Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #459141 > unrolled thread

I bought a Chromebook!

Started bychrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
First post2018-07-24 07:25 -0500
Last post2018-07-24 19:16 +0000
Articles 20 on this page of 109 — 14 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy


Contents

  I bought a Chromebook! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-24 07:25 -0500
    Re: I bought a Chromebook! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-24 12:26 +0000
      Re: I bought a Chromebook! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-24 07:53 -0500
        Re: I bought a Chromebook! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 06:26 -0700
        Re: I bought a Chromebook! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-24 07:31 -0700
        Re: I bought a Chromebook! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-24 14:58 +0000
          Re: I bought a Chromebook! RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 19:23 +0000
            Re: I bought a Chromebook! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-24 20:08 +0000
              Re: I bought a Chromebook! RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 20:22 +0000
                Re: I bought a Chromebook! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-25 11:53 +0000
                  Re: I bought a Chromebook! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 09:58 -0700
                    Re: I bought a Chromebook! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 10:05 -0700
                    Re: I bought a Chromebook! vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-07-25 18:00 +0000
                      Re: I bought a Chromebook! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 11:10 -0700
                        Re: I bought a Chromebook! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 11:55 -0700
                          Re: I bought a Chromebook! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 12:10 -0700
                        Re: I bought a Chromebook! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 11:57 -0700
                      Re: I bought a Chromebook! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 11:33 -0700
                        Re: I bought a Chromebook! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 12:29 -0700
                          Re: I bought a Chromebook! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 12:45 -0700
                          Re: I bought a Chromebook! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-25 14:49 -0500
                            Re: I bought a Chromebook! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 13:01 -0700
                              Re: I bought a Chromebook! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 14:50 -0600
                                Re: I bought a Chromebook! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-25 21:06 +0000
                                  Re: I bought a Chromebook! GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-25 17:23 -0400
                                    Re: I bought a Chromebook! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-25 21:45 +0000
                                      Re: I bought a Chromebook! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 14:57 -0700
                                        Re: I bought a Chromebook! GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-25 18:18 -0400
                                          Re: I bought a Chromebook! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 22:37 -0700
                                            Re: I bought a Chromebook! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 22:53 -0700
                                          Re: I bought a Chromebook! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-26 14:27 +0000
                                            Re: I bought a Chromebook! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 07:46 -0700
                                            Re: I bought a Chromebook! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-26 09:33 -0700
                                  Re: I bought a Chromebook! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 14:54 -0700
                                Re: I bought a Chromebook! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 14:13 -0700
                                Re: I bought a Chromebook! GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-25 17:21 -0400
                              Re: I bought a Chromebook! Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-25 21:17 +0000
                            Re: I bought a Chromebook! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 13:20 -0700
                              Re: I bought a Chromebook! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 13:27 -0700
                                Re: I bought a Chromebook! Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-25 21:03 +0000
                                  Re: I bought a Chromebook! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 14:51 -0700
                              Re: I bought a Chromebook! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 13:44 -0700
                              Re: I bought a Chromebook! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-25 20:59 +0000
                                Re: I bought a Chromebook! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 14:21 -0700
                                Re: I bought a Chromebook! GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-25 17:25 -0400
                                Re: I bought a Chromebook! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 15:02 -0700
                                Re: I bought a Chromebook! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 17:03 -0600
                                  Re: I bought a Chromebook! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 16:42 -0700
                                  Re: I bought a Chromebook! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-26 14:40 +0000
                                    Re: I bought a Chromebook! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-26 09:37 -0700
                                      Re: I bought a Chromebook! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 10:20 -0700
                                Re: I bought a Chromebook! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-26 06:49 -0500
                                  Re: I bought a Chromebook! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 05:25 -0700
                                  Re: I bought a Chromebook! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 08:17 -0700
                                  Re: I bought a Chromebook! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-26 09:25 -0700
                    Re: I bought a Chromebook! Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-25 21:16 +0000
              Re: I bought a Chromebook! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 13:41 -0700
                Re: I bought a Chromebook! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 14:32 -0700
                  Re: I bought a Chromebook! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 15:06 -0700
                Re: I bought a Chromebook! vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-07-25 00:20 +0000
            Re: I bought a Chromebook! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-26 11:57 -0500
              Re: I bought a Chromebook! RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 20:03 +0000
                Re: I bought a Chromebook! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-26 13:52 -0700
                Re: I bought a Chromebook! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-27 07:17 -0500
                  Re: I bought a Chromebook! fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-07-27 06:05 -0700
                    Re: I bought a Chromebook! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-27 13:23 +0000
                      Re: I bought a Chromebook! fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-07-27 06:57 -0700
                        Re: I bought a Chromebook! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 07:29 -0700
                        Re: I bought a Chromebook! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-27 15:57 +0000
                    Re: I bought a Chromebook! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-27 08:38 -0500
                      Re: I bought a Chromebook! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 06:42 -0700
                      Re: I bought a Chromebook! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 06:58 -0700
                      Re: I bought a Chromebook! fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-07-27 07:08 -0700
                        Re: I bought a Chromebook! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-27 09:33 -0500
                          Re: I bought a Chromebook! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 08:00 -0700
              Re: I bought a Chromebook! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-26 20:43 +0000
                Re: I bought a Chromebook! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-26 13:59 -0700
                Re: I bought a Chromebook! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 14:47 -0700
    Re: I bought a Chromebook! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-24 08:16 -0500
      Re: I bought a Chromebook! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-24 15:00 +0000
        Re: I bought a Chromebook! RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 19:24 +0000
          Re: I bought a Chromebook! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-25 09:34 -0500
            Re: I bought a Chromebook! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 08:01 -0700
              Re: I bought a Chromebook! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 10:37 -0700
        Re: I bought a Chromebook! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-25 09:30 -0500
          Re: I bought a Chromebook! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 07:45 -0700
    Re: I bought a Chromebook! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 06:42 -0700
    $180 is expensive for a piece of garbage. Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 07:42 -0700
      Re: $180 is expensive for a piece of garbage. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-24 15:03 +0000
        Re: $180 is expensive for a piece of garbage. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-24 13:58 -0500
          Re: $180 is expensive for a piece of garbage. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 14:01 -0700
            Re: $180 is expensive for a piece of garbage. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 15:07 -0700
          Re: $180 is expensive for a piece of garbage. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-07-24 17:39 -0400
            Re: $180 is expensive for a piece of garbage. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-25 07:32 -0500
          Re: $180 is expensive for a piece of garbage. Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 05:09 -0700
            Re: $180 is expensive for a piece of garbage. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 05:25 -0700
        Re: $180 is expensive for a piece of garbage. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 19:18 +0000
          Re: $180 is expensive for a piece of garbage. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-24 20:07 +0000
            Re: $180 is expensive for a piece of garbage. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 20:20 +0000
              Re: $180 is expensive for a piece of garbage. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-25 11:44 +0000
          Re: $180 is expensive for a piece of garbage. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 13:45 -0700
    Re: I bought a Chromebook! "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-07-24 15:58 +0000
      Re: I bought a Chromebook! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-24 12:16 -0500
        Re: I bought a Chromebook! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 14:16 -0700
          Re: I bought a Chromebook! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 15:06 -0700
            Re: I bought a Chromebook! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 15:18 -0700
            Re: I bought a Chromebook! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 15:34 -0700
      Re: I bought a Chromebook! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 10:36 -0700
    Re: I bought a Chromebook! RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 19:16 +0000

Page 2 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6  Next page →


#459437

Fromchrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date2018-07-25 14:49 -0500
Message-ID<bekhldp1kft5b9rndsdschcmreh4f45bjg@4ax.com>
In reply to#459427
Steve Carroll wrote:

> and thanks for the display of 'uber-liberal wrongthink'.

Nope.  It displays snittish wrongthink.

I'm sure Slimer refers to the same kind of stuff that he posts in
here.  

Posting something to USENET is not the same as having it in google
drive.

-- 
"But once more for the record - hating low life liars , hypocrites and
MS haters is not the same as hating Linux. I love Linux."  -  low life
liar, hypocrite, and Linux hater "Hadron" Quack

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459442

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-07-25 13:01 -0700
Message-ID<frs39jFbmkoU3@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#459437
On 7/25/18 12:49 PM, chrisv wrote:
> Steve Carroll wrote:
> 
>> and thanks for the display of 'uber-liberal wrongthink'.
> 
> Nope.  It displays snittish wrongthink.
> 
> I'm sure Slimer refers to the same kind of stuff that he posts in
> here.
> 
> Posting something to USENET is not the same as having it in google
> drive.
> 

Slimer said he did not want to store his conservative thoughts on 
Google. I asked him what type of thoughts... now if they are "secret" 
then of course he will not share them here, but if they are not then 
maybe it will get him to share specific thoughts he thinks people 
incorrectly respond poorly to.

Carroll, of course, twisted my comments and tried to speak for me.


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459453

FromSteve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-25 14:50 -0600
Message-ID<pjanqf$nis$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#459442
On 2018-07-25 20:01:55 +0000, Snit said:

> On 7/25/18 12:49 PM, chrisv wrote:
>> Steve Carroll wrote:
>> 
>>> and thanks for the display of 'uber-liberal wrongthink'.
>> 
>> Nope.  It displays snittish wrongthink.
>> 
>> I'm sure Slimer refers to the same kind of stuff that he posts in
>> here.
>> 
>> Posting something to USENET is not the same as having it in google
>> drive.
>> 
> 
> Slimer said he did not want to store his conservative thoughts on Google.

LOL! Talk about spin!

But why would anyone need *you* to speak for him?!

"For the crime of conservative wrongthink. I'll keep my original files 
on my hard disk, methinks." - SilverSlimer

He clearly intimated he should keep a copy of the"original files" lest 
they be judged as the "crime" of "conservative wrongthink" and be 
removed, to which you immediately suggested he was "hiding" things. 
WTF?!

> I asked him what type of thoughts...

More spin, pathetic liar, you made a *blatant* suggested that he was 
"afraid of sharing":

"What specific thoughts are you afraid of sharing?" - Snit

That's a clear suggestion that he's "hiding" his "thoughts" when all he 
talked about was backing up his "original files" on his "hard disk". Do 
you ever *not* lie about or try to spin reality?


> now if they are "secret" then of course he will not share them here, 
> but if they are not then maybe it will get him to share specific 
> thoughts he thinks people incorrectly respond poorly to.

Why would he now do that for *you* when you suggested he was "hiding" 
something in the manner you did, when it made no sense to even put out 
such a bizarre suggestion?

> 
> Carroll, of course, twisted my comments and tried to speak for me.

Then why does reality show Scott rightfully caught your "hiding" BS  
first... that you're trying to pretend never happened. But go right 
ahead... keep trying to strong arm reality.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459469

FromSilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>
Date2018-07-25 21:06 +0000
Message-ID<AD56D.241884$mD.98102@fx31.iad>
In reply to#459453
On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:50:23 -0600, Steve Carroll wrote:

> On 2018-07-25 20:01:55 +0000, Snit said:
> 
>> On 7/25/18 12:49 PM, chrisv wrote:
>>> Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> 
>>>> and thanks for the display of 'uber-liberal wrongthink'.
>>> 
>>> Nope.  It displays snittish wrongthink.
>>> 
>>> I'm sure Slimer refers to the same kind of stuff that he posts in
>>> here.
>>> 
>>> Posting something to USENET is not the same as having it in google
>>> drive.
>>> 
>>> 
>> Slimer said he did not want to store his conservative thoughts on
>> Google.
> 
> LOL! Talk about spin!
> 
> But why would anyone need *you* to speak for him?!
> 
> "For the crime of conservative wrongthink. I'll keep my original files
> on my hard disk, methinks." - SilverSlimer
> 
> He clearly intimated he should keep a copy of the"original files" lest
> they be judged as the "crime" of "conservative wrongthink" and be
> removed, to which you immediately suggested he was "hiding" things.
> WTF?!

If I wrote an article which advocated conservative behaviour, I imagine 
that Google would remove it because it has algorithms against such 
"crime." Alphabet and the companies under it have all been shown to do 
such things many times in the past. 

I'm glad I didn't see Snit Michael Glasser Prescott Computer Guy's spin 
though.

>> I asked him what type of thoughts...
> 
> More spin, pathetic liar, you made a *blatant* suggested that he was
> "afraid of sharing":
> 
> "What specific thoughts are you afraid of sharing?" - Snit
> 
> That's a clear suggestion that he's "hiding" his "thoughts" when all he
> talked about was backing up his "original files" on his "hard disk". Do
> you ever *not* lie about or try to spin reality?
 
I imagine he thinks that I am looking to kill innocent people like his 
peaceful (and imaginary) Muslim friends.

>> now if they are "secret" then of course he will not share them here,
>> but if they are not then maybe it will get him to share specific
>> thoughts he thinks people incorrectly respond poorly to.
> 
> Why would he now do that for *you* when you suggested he was "hiding"
> something in the manner you did, when it made no sense to even put out
> such a bizarre suggestion?

More importantly, why would I bother to waste my time with his 
increasingly retarded posts?

-- 
SilverSlimer
Ubuntu 18.04 on MSI GT72 2QD
Never apologize

Liberalism - One picture, one thousand words: https://kek.gg/i/4xGRhd.jpg

Highly recommended reading: 
- Big Brother: The Orwellian Nightmare Come True
(https://kek.gg/u/SrmB) 
- Questioning Islam: Tough Questions and Honest Answers About the Muslim 
Religion
(https://kek.gg/u/35jND)

"Well, I was wrong, for once." - snitv, being honest, for once. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459485

FromGasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org>
Date2018-07-25 17:23 -0400
Message-ID<frs82mFcrg8U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#459469
On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 21:06:40 GMT, SilverSlimer wrote:

> On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:50:23 -0600, Steve Carroll wrote:
> 
>> On 2018-07-25 20:01:55 +0000, Snit said:
>> 
>>> On 7/25/18 12:49 PM, chrisv wrote:
>>>> Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> and thanks for the display of 'uber-liberal wrongthink'.
>>>> 
>>>> Nope.  It displays snittish wrongthink.
>>>> 
>>>> I'm sure Slimer refers to the same kind of stuff that he posts in
>>>> here.
>>>> 
>>>> Posting something to USENET is not the same as having it in google
>>>> drive.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> Slimer said he did not want to store his conservative thoughts on
>>> Google.
>> 
>> LOL! Talk about spin!
>> 
>> But why would anyone need *you* to speak for him?!
>> 
>> "For the crime of conservative wrongthink. I'll keep my original files
>> on my hard disk, methinks." - SilverSlimer
>> 
>> He clearly intimated he should keep a copy of the"original files" lest
>> they be judged as the "crime" of "conservative wrongthink" and be
>> removed, to which you immediately suggested he was "hiding" things.
>> WTF?!
> 
> If I wrote an article which advocated conservative behaviour, I imagine 
> that Google would remove it because it has algorithms against such 
> "crime." Alphabet and the companies under it have all been shown to do 
> such things many times in the past. 
> 
> I'm glad I didn't see Snit Michael Glasser Prescott Computer Guy's spin 
> though.

He spun himself right into the dirt.

>>> I asked him what type of thoughts...
>> 
>> More spin, pathetic liar, you made a *blatant* suggested that he was
>> "afraid of sharing":
>> 
>> "What specific thoughts are you afraid of sharing?" - Snit
>> 
>> That's a clear suggestion that he's "hiding" his "thoughts" when all he
>> talked about was backing up his "original files" on his "hard disk". Do
>> you ever *not* lie about or try to spin reality?
>  
> I imagine he thinks that I am looking to kill innocent people like his 
> peaceful (and imaginary) Muslim friends.

If snit supports the Muslim agenda, as presented by the Quoran, then he is
an even bigger idiot than I first thought.



>>> now if they are "secret" then of course he will not share them here,
>>> but if they are not then maybe it will get him to share specific
>>> thoughts he thinks people incorrectly respond poorly to.
>> 
>> Why would he now do that for *you* when you suggested he was "hiding"
>> something in the manner you did, when it made no sense to even put out
>> such a bizarre suggestion?
> 
> More importantly, why would I bother to waste my time with his 
> increasingly retarded posts?

He has to be either drunk or high on something.
Snit has gone rogue!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459490

FromSilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>
Date2018-07-25 21:45 +0000
Message-ID<Sb66D.445098$T14.303807@fx44.iad>
In reply to#459485
On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 17:23:32 -0400, GasPipe wrote:

> On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 21:06:40 GMT, SilverSlimer wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:50:23 -0600, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2018-07-25 20:01:55 +0000, Snit said:
>>> 
>>>> On 7/25/18 12:49 PM, chrisv wrote:
>>>>> Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> and thanks for the display of 'uber-liberal wrongthink'.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Nope.  It displays snittish wrongthink.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm sure Slimer refers to the same kind of stuff that he posts in
>>>>> here.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Posting something to USENET is not the same as having it in google
>>>>> drive.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> Slimer said he did not want to store his conservative thoughts on
>>>> Google.
>>> 
>>> LOL! Talk about spin!
>>> 
>>> But why would anyone need *you* to speak for him?!
>>> 
>>> "For the crime of conservative wrongthink. I'll keep my original files
>>> on my hard disk, methinks." - SilverSlimer
>>> 
>>> He clearly intimated he should keep a copy of the"original files" lest
>>> they be judged as the "crime" of "conservative wrongthink" and be
>>> removed, to which you immediately suggested he was "hiding" things.
>>> WTF?!
>> 
>> If I wrote an article which advocated conservative behaviour, I imagine
>> that Google would remove it because it has algorithms against such
>> "crime." Alphabet and the companies under it have all been shown to do
>> such things many times in the past.
>> 
>> I'm glad I didn't see Snit Michael Glasser Prescott Computer Guy's spin
>> though.
> 
> He spun himself right into the dirt.
> 
>>>> I asked him what type of thoughts...
>>> 
>>> More spin, pathetic liar, you made a *blatant* suggested that he was
>>> "afraid of sharing":
>>> 
>>> "What specific thoughts are you afraid of sharing?" - Snit
>>> 
>>> That's a clear suggestion that he's "hiding" his "thoughts" when all
>>> he talked about was backing up his "original files" on his "hard
>>> disk". Do you ever *not* lie about or try to spin reality?
>>  
>> I imagine he thinks that I am looking to kill innocent people like his
>> peaceful (and imaginary) Muslim friends.
> 
> If snit supports the Muslim agenda, as presented by the Quoran, then he
> is an even bigger idiot than I first thought.
> 
> 
> 
>>>> now if they are "secret" then of course he will not share them here,
>>>> but if they are not then maybe it will get him to share specific
>>>> thoughts he thinks people incorrectly respond poorly to.
>>> 
>>> Why would he now do that for *you* when you suggested he was "hiding"
>>> something in the manner you did, when it made no sense to even put out
>>> such a bizarre suggestion?
>> 
>> More importantly, why would I bother to waste my time with his
>> increasingly retarded posts?
> 
> He has to be either drunk or high on something.
> Snit has gone rogue!

Snit Michael Glasser Prescott Computer Guy will be the first to convert 
to Islam the moment the Muslims raise their voice to him. He is a true 
coward, the same kind of leftist twit who supported the Soviet Union 
during the Cold War. He would gladly sell his children if it means that 
he might survive for another day.



-- 
SilverSlimer
Ubuntu 18.04 on MSI GT72 2QD
Never apologize

Liberalism - One picture, one thousand words: https://kek.gg/i/4xGRhd.jpg

Highly recommended reading: 
- Big Brother: The Orwellian Nightmare Come True
(https://kek.gg/u/SrmB) 
- Questioning Islam: Tough Questions and Honest Answers About the Muslim 
Religion
(https://kek.gg/u/35jND)

"Well, I was wrong, for once." - snitv, being honest, for once. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459499

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-07-25 14:57 -0700
Message-ID<frsa27Fd80rU3@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#459490
On 7/25/18 2:45 PM, SilverSlimer wrote:
...
>>>>> now if they are "secret" then of course he will not share them here,
>>>>> but if they are not then maybe it will get him to share specific
>>>>> thoughts he thinks people incorrectly respond poorly to.
>>>>
>>>> Why would he now do that for *you* when you suggested he was "hiding"
>>>> something in the manner you did, when it made no sense to even put out
>>>> such a bizarre suggestion?
>>>
>>> More importantly, why would I bother to waste my time with his
>>> increasingly retarded posts?
>>
>> He has to be either drunk or high on something.
>> Snit has gone rogue!
> 
> Snit Michael Glasser Prescott Computer Guy will be the first to convert
> to Islam the moment the Muslims raise their voice to him.

I would not convert to nor be a member of Christianity nor Islam under 
any circumstances I can imagine. How about you?

Oh.

You claim to already have done that.

> He is a true
> coward, the same kind of leftist twit who supported the Soviet Union
> during the Cold War. He would gladly sell his children if it means that
> he might survive for another day.

Unlike Trump and his supporters I do not generally side with the Soviet 
Union or Russia.


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459508

FromGasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org>
Date2018-07-25 18:18 -0400
Message-ID<frsb9dFdg6vU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#459499
On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:57:27 -0700, Snit wrote:

> On 7/25/18 2:45 PM, SilverSlimer wrote:
> ...
>>>>>> now if they are "secret" then of course he will not share them here,
>>>>>> but if they are not then maybe it will get him to share specific
>>>>>> thoughts he thinks people incorrectly respond poorly to.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why would he now do that for *you* when you suggested he was "hiding"
>>>>> something in the manner you did, when it made no sense to even put out
>>>>> such a bizarre suggestion?
>>>>
>>>> More importantly, why would I bother to waste my time with his
>>>> increasingly retarded posts?
>>>
>>> He has to be either drunk or high on something.
>>> Snit has gone rogue!
>> 
>> Snit Michael Glasser Prescott Computer Guy will be the first to convert
>> to Islam the moment the Muslims raise their voice to him.
> 
> I would not convert to nor be a member of Christianity nor Islam under 
> any circumstances I can imagine. How about you?

When Achmed is hanging you off a 10 story building by your legs and the
rest of the peaceful Muslims are gang raping your wife and daughters, you
will. You'll be the first in line.


>> He is a true
>> coward, the same kind of leftist twit who supported the Soviet Union
>> during the Cold War. He would gladly sell his children if it means that
>> he might survive for another day.
> 
> Unlike Trump and his supporters I do not generally side with the Soviet 
> Union or Russia.

No. You side with the people who knocked down our buildings on 9/11.
You're a piece of shit snit.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459572

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-25 22:37 -0700
Message-ID<a655b734-05c3-493a-9bf9-fc8d2f4ffee7@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#459508
On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 3:18:25 PM UTC-7, GasPipe wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:57:27 -0700, Snit wrote:
> 
> > On 7/25/18 2:45 PM, SilverSlimer wrote:
> > ...
> >>>>>> now if they are "secret" then of course he will not share them here,
> >>>>>> but if they are not then maybe it will get him to share specific
> >>>>>> thoughts he thinks people incorrectly respond poorly to.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Why would he now do that for *you* when you suggested he was "hiding"
> >>>>> something in the manner you did, when it made no sense to even put out
> >>>>> such a bizarre suggestion?
> >>>>
> >>>> More importantly, why would I bother to waste my time with his
> >>>> increasingly retarded posts?
> >>>
> >>> He has to be either drunk or high on something.
> >>> Snit has gone rogue!
> >> 
> >> Snit Michael Glasser Prescott Computer Guy will be the first to convert
> >> to Islam the moment the Muslims raise their voice to him.
> > 
> > I would not convert to nor be a member of Christianity nor Islam under 
> > any circumstances I can imagine. How about you?
> 
> When Achmed is hanging you off a 10 story building by your legs and the
> rest of the peaceful Muslims are gang raping your wife and daughters, you
> will. You'll be the first in line.
> 
> 
> >> He is a true
> >> coward, the same kind of leftist twit who supported the Soviet Union
> >> during the Cold War. He would gladly sell his children if it means that
> >> he might survive for another day.
> > 
> > Unlike Trump and his supporters I do not generally side with the Soviet 
> > Union or Russia.
> 
> No. You side with the people who knocked down our buildings on 9/11.
> You're a piece of shit snit.



I've worked in or with the computer repair field for more than 20 years. I have worked for multinational businesses working with the pharmaceutical industry and the insurance industry. Never, not one single time, were we on any account directed to not install any OS we wanted. We sold Unix, Apple II, HP-UX, among others as well as Windows on our hardware. 

All that he cares about is that John 'The Shill' Gohde gets to deal out his automated call and then hang up and giggle about it. The fact that Snit is an involuntary target on the other end of the phone is what gets him off. 

What Windows looks like can be skinned and not worth obsessing over, especially if it's web based. Given how repeatedly it is clear that John 'The Shill' Gohde's .sig file is some twist of a statement Snit made which had been  a thrashing on John 'The Shill' Gohde for something he did which was senseless/inaccurate/etc... its clearly a daily sign of John 'The Shill' Gohde's lingering distress for having been so frequently pwned: John 'The Shill' Gohde is self-evidently unable of being shown a mirror. It was John 'The Shill' Gohde who was openly asking how better to better his trolling. John 'The Shill' Gohde can take pleasure in the tranquility in the overflowing sewer of my rubbish bin. Of course, the sole thought that matters to John 'The Shill' Gohde is arguing he is "accurate", and if he can't have that he will do whatever it takes to desperately kick truly honest people down, effectively destroying every group he goes to. 



--
E-commerce Simplified!
https://youtu.be/r7wys2JvBD0
http://www.5z8.info/mercenary_w5v9dl_open.exe
https://youtu.be/dNhvVfD4zu4
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459573

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-07-25 22:53 -0700
Message-ID<frt5v6Fio8uU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#459572
On 7/25/18 10:37 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 3:18:25 PM UTC-7, GasPipe wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:57:27 -0700, Snit wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/25/18 2:45 PM, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>> ...
>>>>>>>> now if they are "secret" then of course he will not share them here,
>>>>>>>> but if they are not then maybe it will get him to share specific
>>>>>>>> thoughts he thinks people incorrectly respond poorly to.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why would he now do that for *you* when you suggested he was "hiding"
>>>>>>> something in the manner you did, when it made no sense to even put out
>>>>>>> such a bizarre suggestion?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> More importantly, why would I bother to waste my time with his
>>>>>> increasingly retarded posts?
>>>>>
>>>>> He has to be either drunk or high on something.
>>>>> Snit has gone rogue!
>>>>
>>>> Snit Michael Glasser Prescott Computer Guy will be the first to convert
>>>> to Islam the moment the Muslims raise their voice to him.
>>>
>>> I would not convert to nor be a member of Christianity nor Islam under
>>> any circumstances I can imagine. How about you?
>>
>> When Achmed is hanging you off a 10 story building by your legs and the
>> rest of the peaceful Muslims are gang raping your wife and daughters, you
>> will. You'll be the first in line.
>>
>>
>>>> He is a true
>>>> coward, the same kind of leftist twit who supported the Soviet Union
>>>> during the Cold War. He would gladly sell his children if it means that
>>>> he might survive for another day.
>>>
>>> Unlike Trump and his supporters I do not generally side with the Soviet
>>> Union or Russia.
>>
>> No. You side with the people who knocked down our buildings on 9/11.
>> You're a piece of shit snit.
> 
> 
> 
> I've worked in or with the computer repair field for more than 20 years. I have worked for multinational businesses working with the pharmaceutical industry and the insurance industry. Never, not one single time, were we on any account directed to not install any OS we wanted. We sold Unix, Apple II, HP-UX, among others as well as Windows on our hardware.
> 
> All that he cares about is that John 'The Shill' Gohde gets to deal out his automated call and then hang up and giggle about it. The fact that Snit is an involuntary target on the other end of the phone is what gets him off.
> 
> What Windows looks like can be skinned and not worth obsessing over, especially if it's web based. Given how repeatedly it is clear that John 'The Shill' Gohde's .sig file is some twist of a statement Snit made which had been  a thrashing on John 'The Shill' Gohde for something he did which was senseless/inaccurate/etc... its clearly a daily sign of John 'The Shill' Gohde's lingering distress for having been so frequently pwned: John 'The Shill' Gohde is self-evidently unable of being shown a mirror. It was John 'The Shill' Gohde who was openly asking how better to better his trolling. John 'The Shill' Gohde can take pleasure in the tranquility in the overflowing sewer of my rubbish bin. Of course, the sole thought that matters to John 'The Shill' Gohde is arguing he is "accurate", and if he can't have that he will do whatever it takes to desperately kick truly honest people down, effectively destroying every group he goes to.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> E-commerce Simplified!
> https://youtu.be/r7wys2JvBD0
> http://www.5z8.info/mercenary_w5v9dl_open.exe
> https://youtu.be/dNhvVfD4zu4
> Jonas Eklundh
> 

   Steve Carroll:
     -----
     There is no bot, pathetic liar.
     -----

Bullshit!

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459613

FromSilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>
Date2018-07-26 14:27 +0000
Message-ID<1Tk6D.475531$DS3.138143@fx42.iad>
In reply to#459508
On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 18:18:20 -0400, GasPipe wrote:

> On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:57:27 -0700, Snit wrote:
> 
>> On 7/25/18 2:45 PM, SilverSlimer wrote:
>> ...
>>>>>>> now if they are "secret" then of course he will not share them
>>>>>>> here,
>>>>>>> but if they are not then maybe it will get him to share specific
>>>>>>> thoughts he thinks people incorrectly respond poorly to.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why would he now do that for *you* when you suggested he was
>>>>>> "hiding" something in the manner you did, when it made no sense to
>>>>>> even put out such a bizarre suggestion?
>>>>>
>>>>> More importantly, why would I bother to waste my time with his
>>>>> increasingly retarded posts?
>>>>
>>>> He has to be either drunk or high on something.
>>>> Snit has gone rogue!
>>> 
>>> Snit Michael Glasser Prescott Computer Guy will be the first to
>>> convert to Islam the moment the Muslims raise their voice to him.
>> 
>> I would not convert to nor be a member of Christianity nor Islam under
>> any circumstances I can imagine. How about you?
> 
> When Achmed is hanging you off a 10 story building by your legs and the
> rest of the peaceful Muslims are gang raping your wife and daughters,
> you will. You'll be the first in line.

Just the sight of the Muslims coming to his home will likely be enough 
for Snit Michael Glasser Prescott Computer Guy to surrender and convert. 
I find it idiotic, in particular, how he attaches Christianity to Islam 
in every reply as if Christianity is the inspiration for murder and rape. 
The guy knows as much about the faith as I do about the planet Venus but 
still dares to comment as if he was some sort of authority.

>>> He is a true coward, the same kind of leftist twit who supported the
>>> Soviet Union during the Cold War. He would gladly sell his children if
>>> it means that he might survive for another day.
>> 
>> Unlike Trump and his supporters I do not generally side with the Soviet
>> Union or Russia.
> 
> No. You side with the people who knocked down our buildings on 9/11.
> You're a piece of shit snit.

Interesting projection on his part. Apparently, Trump and his supporters 
side with Russia. Absolutely brilliant...

-- 
SilverSlimer
Ubuntu 18.04 on MSI GT72 2QD

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459618

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-26 07:46 -0700
Message-ID<75bbd031-c5f0-4c20-95f8-f62f944113a2@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#459613
On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 7:27:12 AM UTC-7, SilverSlimer wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 18:18:20 -0400, GasPipe wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:57:27 -0700, Snit wrote:
> > 
> >> On 7/25/18 2:45 PM, SilverSlimer wrote:
> >> ...
> >>>>>>> now if they are "secret" then of course he will not share them
> >>>>>>> here,
> >>>>>>> but if they are not then maybe it will get him to share specific
> >>>>>>> thoughts he thinks people incorrectly respond poorly to.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Why would he now do that for *you* when you suggested he was
> >>>>>> "hiding" something in the manner you did, when it made no sense to
> >>>>>> even put out such a bizarre suggestion?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> More importantly, why would I bother to waste my time with his
> >>>>> increasingly retarded posts?
> >>>>
> >>>> He has to be either drunk or high on something.
> >>>> Snit has gone rogue!
> >>> 
> >>> Snit Michael Glasser Prescott Computer Guy will be the first to
> >>> convert to Islam the moment the Muslims raise their voice to him.
> >> 
> >> I would not convert to nor be a member of Christianity nor Islam under
> >> any circumstances I can imagine. How about you?
> > 
> > When Achmed is hanging you off a 10 story building by your legs and the
> > rest of the peaceful Muslims are gang raping your wife and daughters,
> > you will. You'll be the first in line.
> 
> Just the sight of the Muslims coming to his home will likely be enough 
> for Snit Michael Glasser Prescott Computer Guy to surrender and convert. 
> I find it idiotic, in particular, how he attaches Christianity to Islam 
> in every reply as if Christianity is the inspiration for murder and rape. 
> The guy knows as much about the faith as I do about the planet Venus but 
> still dares to comment as if he was some sort of authority.
> 
> >>> He is a true coward, the same kind of leftist twit who supported the
> >>> Soviet Union during the Cold War. He would gladly sell his children if
> >>> it means that he might survive for another day.
> >> 
> >> Unlike Trump and his supporters I do not generally side with the Soviet
> >> Union or Russia.
> > 
> > No. You side with the people who knocked down our buildings on 9/11.
> > You're a piece of shit snit.
> 
> Interesting projection on his part. Apparently, Trump and his supporters 
> side with Russia. Absolutely brilliant...
> 
> -- 
> SilverSlimer
> Ubuntu 18.04 on MSI GT72 2QD



Jonas Eklundh just wiped his ass with Meat. Meat is the result of the reality that Leninists have been ordered to take over responsibility for schooling young persons. It's not an accident that he is an inane liberal. Too much glue for you, Gluehead. Frankly I do not really care. 

--
Top Six Ways Meat Trolls
https://youtu.be/m37dF5X2S-4
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459634

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-07-26 09:33 -0700
Message-ID<frubf3Fr4bjU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#459613
On 7/26/18 7:27 AM, SilverSlimer wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 18:18:20 -0400, GasPipe wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:57:27 -0700, Snit wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/25/18 2:45 PM, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>> ...
>>>>>>>> now if they are "secret" then of course he will not share them
>>>>>>>> here,
>>>>>>>> but if they are not then maybe it will get him to share specific
>>>>>>>> thoughts he thinks people incorrectly respond poorly to.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why would he now do that for *you* when you suggested he was
>>>>>>> "hiding" something in the manner you did, when it made no sense to
>>>>>>> even put out such a bizarre suggestion?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> More importantly, why would I bother to waste my time with his
>>>>>> increasingly retarded posts?
>>>>>
>>>>> He has to be either drunk or high on something.
>>>>> Snit has gone rogue!
>>>>
>>>> Snit Michael Glasser Prescott Computer Guy will be the first to
>>>> convert to Islam the moment the Muslims raise their voice to him.
>>>
>>> I would not convert to nor be a member of Christianity nor Islam under
>>> any circumstances I can imagine. How about you?
>>
>> When Achmed is hanging you off a 10 story building by your legs and the
>> rest of the peaceful Muslims are gang raping your wife and daughters,
>> you will. You'll be the first in line.
> 
> Just the sight of the Muslims coming to his home will likely be enough
> for Snit Michael Glasser Prescott Computer Guy to surrender and convert.

Already told you: I would NEVER convert to Christianity or Islam, nor 
otherwise be a member of either religion.

Can you say the same? Nope!

> I find it idiotic, in particular, how he attaches Christianity to Islam
> in every reply as if Christianity is the inspiration for murder and rape.

The two religions are comparable... you just want special entitlements 
for Christians.

> The guy knows as much about the faith as I do about the planet Venus but
> still dares to comment as if he was some sort of authority.

You said you read the Qu'ran. Great. Now read the Bible.

>>>> He is a true coward, the same kind of leftist twit who supported the
>>>> Soviet Union during the Cold War. He would gladly sell his children if
>>>> it means that he might survive for another day.
>>>
>>> Unlike Trump and his supporters I do not generally side with the Soviet
>>> Union or Russia.
>>
>> No. You side with the people who knocked down our buildings on 9/11.
>> You're a piece of shit snit.
> 
> Interesting projection on his part. Apparently, Trump and his supporters
> side with Russia. Absolutely brilliant...

Of course Trump repeatedly sides with Putin. And his enablers back it, 
mostly.


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459497

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-07-25 14:54 -0700
Message-ID<frs9tjFd80rU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#459469
On 7/25/18 2:06 PM, SilverSlimer wrote:
...

>> He clearly intimated he should keep a copy of the"original files" lest
>> they be judged as the "crime" of "conservative wrongthink" and be
>> removed, to which you immediately suggested he was "hiding" things.
>> WTF?!
> 
> If I wrote an article which advocated conservative behaviour, I imagine
> that Google would remove it because it has algorithms against such
> "crime."

Curious imagination you have. Ignoring that, though, what do you 
consider "conservative behavior"? I live what most would consider a 
rather conservative life and that is not an issue for me.

...
> I imagine he thinks that I am looking to kill innocent people like his
> peaceful (and imaginary) Muslim friends.

Again, what an odd imagination you have.

>>> now if they are "secret" then of course he will not share them here,
>>> but if they are not then maybe it will get him to share specific
>>> thoughts he thinks people incorrectly respond poorly to.
>>
>> Why would he now do that for *you* when you suggested he was "hiding"
>> something in the manner you did, when it made no sense to even put out
>> such a bizarre suggestion?
> 
> More importantly, why would I bother to waste my time with his
> increasingly retarded posts?

Better than lashing out with the insecurity you are now.



-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459471

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-07-25 14:13 -0700
Message-ID<frs7g5Fcn1nU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#459453
On 7/25/18 1:50 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On 2018-07-25 20:01:55 +0000, Snit said:
> 
>> On 7/25/18 12:49 PM, chrisv wrote:
>>> Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>
>>>> and thanks for the display of 'uber-liberal wrongthink'.
>>>
>>> Nope.  It displays snittish wrongthink.
>>>
>>> I'm sure Slimer refers to the same kind of stuff that he posts in
>>> here.
>>>
>>> Posting something to USENET is not the same as having it in google
>>> drive.
>>>
>>
>> Slimer said he did not want to store his conservative thoughts on Google.
> 
> LOL! Talk about spin!
> 
> But why would anyone need *you* to speak for him?!
> 
> "For the crime of conservative wrongthink. I'll keep my original files 
> on my hard disk, methinks." - SilverSlimer
> 
> He clearly intimated he should keep a copy of the"original files" lest 
> they be judged as the "crime" of "conservative wrongthink" and be 
> removed, to which you immediately suggested he was "hiding" things. WTF?!
> 
>> I asked him what type of thoughts...
> 
> More spin, pathetic liar, you made a *blatant* suggested that he was 
> "afraid of sharing":
> 
> "What specific thoughts are you afraid of sharing?" - Snit
> 
> That's a clear suggestion that he's "hiding" his "thoughts" when all he 
> talked about was backing up his "original files" on his "hard disk". Do 
> you ever *not* lie about or try to spin reality?
> 
> 
>> now if they are "secret" then of course he will not share them here, 
>> but if they are not then maybe it will get him to share specific 
>> thoughts he thinks people incorrectly respond poorly to.
> 
> Why would he now do that for *you* when you suggested he was "hiding" 
> something in the manner you did, when it made no sense to even put out 
> such a bizarre suggestion?
> 
>>
>> Carroll, of course, twisted my comments and tried to speak for me.
> 
> Then why does reality show Scott rightfully caught your "hiding" BS 
> first... that you're trying to pretend never happened. But go right 
> ahead... keep trying to strong arm reality.
> 
> 

As you quote, Slimer talked about fear of sharing his "conservative 
wrongthink" on Google servers, and as you note you agree with me that he 
sees this as being deemed a "crime" (correctly done in quotes, given how 
he almost surely does not see these as crimes).

In other words, you largely agree with me on my reading of what he said.

So, based on that, I was curious what he was afraid of sharing on the 
Google servers... maybe he thinks certain content will get him banned or 
whatever. He never answered... and you went off onto your trolling crap 
over it.

COLA as usual. :)

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459484

FromGasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org>
Date2018-07-25 17:21 -0400
Message-ID<frs7v8FcqqoU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#459453
On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:50:23 -0600, Steve Carroll wrote:

> On 2018-07-25 20:01:55 +0000, Snit said:
> 
>> On 7/25/18 12:49 PM, chrisv wrote:
>>> Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> 
>>>> and thanks for the display of 'uber-liberal wrongthink'.
>>> 
>>> Nope.  It displays snittish wrongthink.
>>> 
>>> I'm sure Slimer refers to the same kind of stuff that he posts in
>>> here.
>>> 
>>> Posting something to USENET is not the same as having it in google
>>> drive.
>>> 
>> 
>> Slimer said he did not want to store his conservative thoughts on Google.
> 
> LOL! Talk about spin!
> 
> But why would anyone need *you* to speak for him?!
> 
> "For the crime of conservative wrongthink. I'll keep my original files 
> on my hard disk, methinks." - SilverSlimer
> 
> He clearly intimated he should keep a copy of the"original files" lest 
> they be judged as the "crime" of "conservative wrongthink" and be 
> removed, to which you immediately suggested he was "hiding" things. 
> WTF?!
> 
>> I asked him what type of thoughts...
> 
> More spin, pathetic liar, you made a *blatant* suggested that he was 
> "afraid of sharing":
> 
> "What specific thoughts are you afraid of sharing?" - Snit
> 
> That's a clear suggestion that he's "hiding" his "thoughts" when all he 
> talked about was backing up his "original files" on his "hard disk". Do 
> you ever *not* lie about or try to spin reality?

Totally bizarre.
Snit has a serious reading comprehension problem.
How the hell did he ever graduate college?
Or is that another one of his lies?



> 
>> now if they are "secret" then of course he will not share them here, 
>> but if they are not then maybe it will get him to share specific 
>> thoughts he thinks people incorrectly respond poorly to.
> 
> Why would he now do that for *you* when you suggested he was "hiding" 
> something in the manner you did, when it made no sense to even put out 
> such a bizarre suggestion?

Bizarre is right.
This is hilarious.

>> 
>> Carroll, of course, twisted my comments and tried to speak for me.
> 
> Then why does reality show Scott rightfully caught your "hiding" BS  
> first... that you're trying to pretend never happened. But go right 
> ahead... keep trying to strong arm reality.

Scott?
I thought it was vallor?
Either way, vallor nailed it.

The one part he left out was that snit will drag up this misinterpretation
2 years from now and present it totally out of context as fact.
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459478

FromKompyler <kompyler@toke.com>
Date2018-07-25 21:17 +0000
Message-ID<pjapdi$l3t$17@dont-email.me>
In reply to#459442
On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 13:01:55 -0700, Snit wrote:

> On 7/25/18 12:49 PM, chrisv wrote:
>> Steve Carroll wrote:
>> 
>>> and thanks for the display of 'uber-liberal wrongthink'.
>> 
>> Nope.  It displays snittish wrongthink.
>> 
>> I'm sure Slimer refers to the same kind of stuff that he posts in here.
>> 
>> Posting something to USENET is not the same as having it in google
>> drive.
>> 
>> 
> Slimer said he did not want to store his conservative thoughts on
> Google. I asked him what type of thoughts... now if they are "secret"
> then of course he will not share them here, but if they are not then
> maybe it will get him to share specific thoughts he thinks people
> incorrectly respond poorly to.

That's not what he said.

> Carroll, of course, twisted my comments and tried to speak for me.

No he didn't. You don't even know what you said.
Drugged up again snit?
Like you try to speak for others?
Sure.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459446

FromSteve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-25 13:20 -0700
Message-ID<6a70ed52-ec8d-4250-8f58-665fef561a59@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#459437
On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 1:49:29 PM UTC-6, chrisv wrote:
> Steve Carroll wrote:
> 
> > and thanks for the display of 'uber-liberal wrongthink'.
> 
> Nope.  It displays snittish wrongthink.

That's a fair point.

He's about as uber-lib as it gets (which is not as far as "ultra",
but that's the problem with these definitions, everyone has their
scale own, me included. To me, Snit is a good example of an 
uber-liberal (though, he tries to pretend otherwise). But... just
because he's as dishonest as the day is long is no reason for
me to be a hypocrite and paint with that broad brush. I hereby
apologize to any uber-liberals who were offended by me linking
them with Snit.

> I'm sure Slimer refers to the same kind of stuff that he posts in
> here.  

Possibly...  he's what I consider to be a far right conservative. For 
reference, "uber" is further than "far" in my mind. If Snit could leave 
his house, I could easily imagine him marching at an antifa rally, I'm 
not convinced SS would march for a political cause.

By the way, you do the same thing with Slimer that I just apologized for ;)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459447

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-07-25 13:27 -0700
Message-ID<frs4q8Fc4fpU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#459446
On 7/25/18 1:20 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 1:49:29 PM UTC-6, chrisv wrote:
>> Steve Carroll wrote:
>>
>>> and thanks for the display of 'uber-liberal wrongthink'.
>>
>> Nope.  It displays snittish wrongthink.
> 
> That's a fair point.
> 
> He's about as uber-lib as it gets (which is not as far as "ultra",
> but that's the problem with these definitions, everyone has their
> scale own, me included. To me, Snit is a good example of an
> uber-liberal (though, he tries to pretend otherwise). But... just
> because he's as dishonest as the day is long is no reason for
> me to be a hypocrite and paint with that broad brush. I hereby
> apologize to any uber-liberals who were offended by me linking
> them with Snit.
> 
>> I'm sure Slimer refers to the same kind of stuff that he posts in
>> here.
> 
> Possibly...  he's what I consider to be a far right conservative. For
> reference, "uber" is further than "far" in my mind. If Snit could leave
> his house, I could easily imagine him marching at an antifa rally, I'm
> not convinced SS would march for a political cause.
> 
> By the way, you do the same thing with Slimer that I just apologized for ;)
> 

What views of mine do you think are "uber-liberal"? And why do you spend 
time imagining me doing things I would be opposed to?

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459466

FromKompyler <kompyler@toke.com>
Date2018-07-25 21:03 +0000
Message-ID<pjaoja$l3t$12@dont-email.me>
In reply to#459447
On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 13:27:51 -0700, Snit wrote:

> On 7/25/18 1:20 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 1:49:29 PM UTC-6, chrisv wrote:
>>> Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>
>>>> and thanks for the display of 'uber-liberal wrongthink'.
>>>
>>> Nope.  It displays snittish wrongthink.
>> 
>> That's a fair point.
>> 
>> He's about as uber-lib as it gets (which is not as far as "ultra",
>> but that's the problem with these definitions, everyone has their scale
>> own, me included. To me, Snit is a good example of an uber-liberal
>> (though, he tries to pretend otherwise). But... just because he's as
>> dishonest as the day is long is no reason for me to be a hypocrite and
>> paint with that broad brush. I hereby apologize to any uber-liberals
>> who were offended by me linking them with Snit.
>> 
>>> I'm sure Slimer refers to the same kind of stuff that he posts in
>>> here.
>> 
>> Possibly...  he's what I consider to be a far right conservative. For
>> reference, "uber" is further than "far" in my mind. If Snit could leave
>> his house, I could easily imagine him marching at an antifa rally, I'm
>> not convinced SS would march for a political cause.
>> 
>> By the way, you do the same thing with Slimer that I just apologized
>> for ;)
>> 
>> 
> What views of mine do you think are "uber-liberal"? And why do you spend
> time imagining me doing things I would be opposed to?

You can't be serious?
Can you?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy


csiph-web