Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #459090 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-07-23 17:47 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-07-24 04:21 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 60 — 10 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
I'm 58, not 15. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-07-23 17:47 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 18:11 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 22:52 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-24 01:39 +0000
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 18:58 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 22:05 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 00:41 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-24 06:56 -0500
Re: I'm 58, not 15. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-24 12:16 +0000
Re: I'm 58, not 15. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-24 07:26 -0500
Re: I'm 58, not 15. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-24 12:27 +0000
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 09:04 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 09:49 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 05:39 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 09:04 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 09:10 -0400
Re: I'm 58, not 15. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-24 14:59 +0000
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 09:06 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 11:26 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 11:40 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 12:32 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 12:54 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 13:08 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 13:21 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 13:40 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 13:49 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 14:10 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 15:37 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 15:48 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 15:57 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 16:05 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 16:18 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 16:47 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 16:52 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 16:58 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-25 20:59 +0000
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 14:21 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-25 17:50 -0400
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 17:01 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 11:03 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 11:25 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 12:10 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 12:27 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-25 20:46 +0000
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 11:55 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 12:11 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 12:31 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 12:46 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-25 20:52 +0000
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 14:15 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 17:08 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 16:21 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 16:05 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 14:48 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 15:06 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 09:05 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 05:54 -0700
Re: I'm 58, not 15. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 09:02 -0700
Yep! Jeff is Dead at age 58. Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 03:54 -0700
Re: Yep! Jeff is Dead at age 58. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 04:21 -0700
Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-24 12:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frpd5pFnhp2U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #459212 |
On 7/24/18 11:58 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 12:41:02 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 7/24/18 9:06 AM, Snit wrote: >>> On 7/24/18 7:59 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>> On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 09:10:42 -0400, benj wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 7/24/2018 8:16 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 06:56:25 -0500, chrisv wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Once a month, maybe; I'm 58, not 15. Annoyingly, my dick still gets >>>>>>>>> hard at night. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You are one weird fsck, Relf. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> snitv >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Only in the up-is-down, lies-are-truth world of a right-wing >>>>>>> propagandist, is my behavior in any way comparable to that thing's. >>>>>> >>>>>> I thought I had you in my killfile, Snit Michael Glasser Prescott >>>>>> Computer Guy. >>>>>> >>>>>> Since when do you use chrisv@nospam.invalid as an e-mail address? >>>>>> >>>>> It so predictable that libs always accuse everyone else of doing what >>>>> they do like say their upside down world of GOPers being the racists and >>>>> Democrats being the abolitionists, and the constant lies and propaganda >>>>> of the hard-left. Snit is a typical case. He pretends to be sensible and >>>>> reasonable and willing to debate, but really he's always trying to set >>>>> up anyone who disagrees with his propaganda for blast from his dogma. >>>>> Basically a liar pretending to be honest like any crook. He is not a >>>>> "good guy". >>>>> >>>>> My advice is #walkaway. A killfile will do. >>>> >>>> I actually find it to be a shame that socialists and centrists such as >>>> myself can't find common ground and just agree to disagree. I actually >>>> like snitv, but I hate arguing politics with the guy because I'm "wrong" >>>> on everything and he's "right" on everything and vice versa. >>>> >>>> I'm a debater and I love to talk politics but have to say that I'm >>>> growing increasingly weary of these confrontations. >>>> >>>> >>> You clearly LOATH to talk politics. You cannot back your views and when >>> that is pointed out you freak out. >>> >> Carroll whined that he does not think anyone can back anything... > > to *you*. You were posting to me. Sure. And you blamed me for your failure to be able to back anything. Sure. But I am not the one ACTUALLY at fault. I am neither ACTUALLY guilty nor have I been adjudicated guilty of preventing you from being able to back your points. >> he even puts "backs" in quotes > > .... to *you* because the concept only works in one direction for *you*. > Who *hasn't* seen this? More of your vague meta-debate crap. Bottom line: YOU know YOU cannot back your views. And you blame me. It is what you do... you play victim non-stop. >> Of course, he blames his failure on me... somehow in his mind his lack >> of understanding the very concept of evidence is my fault. > > You're projecting,,, again. I obviously understand it, you're the one with a > problem about evidence... and I'll prove it again, below... > >> I would ask him for evidence of this but Carroll snipped the rest of the sentence. He KNOWS he has no evidence. Fair enough. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-24 12:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <896e00fa-2200-46d8-a488-246c49a1ff8a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459227 |
On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 1:32:12 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> Carroll whined that he does not think anyone can back anything... > > > > to *you*. > > You were posting to me. Sure. Very good, Snit! And now make the leap to the context of "back anything"... c'mon, you can do it! > But I am not the one ACTUALLY at fault. So who is at fault for you denying all the facts you've denied? > I am neither ACTUALLY guilty nor > have I been adjudicated guilty of preventing you from being able to back > your points. Were it just me we wouldn't be having this discussing. The evidence that shows people believe you are what you've shown yourself to be is way past overwhelming... and even that is only a small part of the evidence. This isn't a crime, so the only jury will be usenet... and it has weighed in on you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-24 13:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frpf9cFo1k2U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #459233 |
On 7/24/18 12:54 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 1:32:12 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>> Carroll whined that he does not think anyone can back anything... >>> >>> to *you*. >> >> You were posting to me. Sure. > > Very good, Snit! And now make the leap to the context of "back anything"... > c'mon, you can do it! > >> But I am not the one ACTUALLY at fault. > > So who is at fault for you denying all the facts you've denied? > >> I am neither ACTUALLY guilty nor >> have I been adjudicated guilty of preventing you from being able to back >> your points. > > Were it just me we wouldn't be having this discussing. The evidence > that shows people believe you are what you've shown yourself to be > is way past overwhelming... and even that is only a small part of the > evidence. This isn't a crime, so the only jury will be usenet... and it > has weighed in on you. > Ah, you have gone into meta-debate land and your absurd accusation nonsense in an effort to put me on the defensive to try to obfuscate the fact that even you know you cannot back your views. Your trolling is not very clever. But, hey, I do give you attention for it. At some point I will stop for a while just to see you cry about how I am running. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-24 13:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <78422ceb-268d-44ad-ae29-348b8449221b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459242 |
On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 2:08:16 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 7/24/18 12:54 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 1:32:12 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > > >>>> Carroll whined that he does not think anyone can back anything... > >>> > >>> to *you*. > >> > >> You were posting to me. Sure. > > > > Very good, Snit! And now make the leap to the context of "back anything"... > > c'mon, you can do it! > > > >> But I am not the one ACTUALLY at fault. > > > > So who is at fault for you denying all the facts you've denied? > > > >> I am neither ACTUALLY guilty nor > >> have I been adjudicated guilty of preventing you from being able to back > >> your points. > > > > Were it just me we wouldn't be having this discussing. The evidence > > that shows people believe you are what you've shown yourself to be > > is way past overwhelming... and even that is only a small part of the > > evidence. This isn't a crime, so the only jury will be usenet... and it > > has weighed in on you. > > > > Ah, you have gone into meta-debate land Red herrings won't help you. I'm still talking about the fact that no one can "back" anything to you when you've decided you disagree with it, especially so when the topic is politics. > and your absurd accusation > nonsense in an effort to put me on the defensive to try to obfuscate the > fact that even you know you cannot back your views. One of my views, that people universally believe you're a liar, troll or worse, is 'backed' by 'The Snit List' and you deny it, to the point where you've actually claimed the people complaining in it are my sock puppets. You also refuse to recognize the fact that such absurdities have cost you in the way of credibility... even *as* people (the few who are left) regularly ignored you in discussions where logic and reason will be required... if they are not just shunning altogether.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-24 13:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frph6kFoga8U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #459250 |
On 7/24/18 1:21 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 2:08:16 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 7/24/18 12:54 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 1:32:12 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>> >>>>>> Carroll whined that he does not think anyone can back anything... >>>>> >>>>> to *you*. >>>> >>>> You were posting to me. Sure. >>> >>> Very good, Snit! And now make the leap to the context of "back anything"... >>> c'mon, you can do it! >>> >>>> But I am not the one ACTUALLY at fault. >>> >>> So who is at fault for you denying all the facts you've denied? >>> >>>> I am neither ACTUALLY guilty nor >>>> have I been adjudicated guilty of preventing you from being able to back >>>> your points. >>> >>> Were it just me we wouldn't be having this discussing. The evidence >>> that shows people believe you are what you've shown yourself to be >>> is way past overwhelming... and even that is only a small part of the >>> evidence. This isn't a crime, so the only jury will be usenet... and it >>> has weighed in on you. >>> >> >> Ah, you have gone into meta-debate land > > Red herrings won't help you. I'm still talking about the fact that no one > can "back" anything to you when you've decided you disagree with it, > especially so when the topic is politics. > >> and your absurd accusation >> nonsense in an effort to put me on the defensive to try to obfuscate the >> fact that even you know you cannot back your views. > > One of my views, that people universally believe you're a liar, troll or > worse, is 'backed' by 'The Snit List' and you deny it, to the point where > you've actually claimed the people complaining in it are my sock puppets. > > You also refuse to recognize the fact that such absurdities have cost you > in the way of credibility... even *as* people (the few who are left) regularly > ignored you in discussions where logic and reason will be required... if they > are not just shunning altogether. > I tend to do research and I stick to evidence. If you show evidence I am wrong I am open to it. You do not even understand the concept of evidence, as you showed when you tried to insist your obsession with my health issues made you understand things better than my doctors and I do because you looked at some stats. You generally fail to back your views. You blame me for it. All of this is your meta-debate crap, though. Notice you are not even trying to point out a comment of mine you think is wrong. You are so far gone and NEED so much for me to be wrong about SOMETHING you just run to this type of crap. And you become obsessed. It is this type of obsession which lead you to harass people outside of COLA... which lead to you having the police come speak to you about your actions. Learn from your mistakes. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-24 13:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <51a60d21-ea45-476a-9087-679198834ec2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459254 |
On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 2:40:56 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > I tend to do research and I stick to evidence. You tend to ignore anything that refutes whatever illogical stance you've taken... like 'The Snit List'. Your list proves what I said, your response is to either ignore it, pretend I wrote it or something equally silly. Everyone has seen you do this... repeatedly... which is why your credibility is zero. > If you show evidence I am wrong I am open to it. That happens about as much as a lightening strike, most of the time this is false. > You do not even understand the concept of evidence So 'The Snit List' isn't evidence that people believe you're a liar troll or worse? > Notice you are not even trying to point out a comment of mine you think > is wrong. I do it all the time, as do "others", to your repeated denials We've all seen this time after time... too many to count.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-24 14:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frpiv3FosnmU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #459258 |
On 7/24/18 1:49 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 2:40:56 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> I tend to do research and I stick to evidence. > > You tend to ignore anything that refutes whatever illogical stance you've > taken... like 'The Snit List'. Your list proves what I said, your response is > to either ignore it, pretend I wrote it or something equally silly. Everyone > has seen you do this... repeatedly... which is why your credibility is zero. > >> If you show evidence I am wrong I am open to it. > > That happens about as much as a lightening strike, most of the time this is false. > >> You do not even understand the concept of evidence > > So 'The Snit List' isn't evidence that people believe you're a liar troll or worse? > >> Notice you are not even trying to point out a comment of mine you think >> is wrong. > > I do it all the time, as do "others", to your repeated denials We've all seen this > time after time... too many to count. > Ah, more accusations as you avoid any actual topic other than your obsession with me. Look at it this way, right now I am speaking of your obsession with me and YOU are providing the proof. The logic is solid and irrefutable... you show no signs of being able to stop yourself from making up claims about my health, about my schooling, about my business, about my family, and more. You show no sign of being able to stop yourself from snipping content you do not like, such as the police speaking to you about your harassment. Using simple logic my points are very strongly supported: you are filled with irrational hatred and a deep obsession. This is from what you are posting NOW in COLA... no need to do ANY guessing on your personal life, no need to dig back through years of posts. Now. You are proving me right NOW. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-24 15:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ffc9e8c7-5a57-40cf-9345-56f6f5b719b7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459261 |
On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 3:11:03 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 7/24/18 1:49 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 2:40:56 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > > >> I tend to do research and I stick to evidence. > > > > You tend to ignore anything that refutes whatever illogical stance you've > > taken... like 'The Snit List'. Your list proves what I said, your response is > > to either ignore it, pretend I wrote it or something equally silly. Everyone > > has seen you do this... repeatedly... which is why your credibility is zero. > > > >> If you show evidence I am wrong I am open to it. > > > > That happens about as much as a lightening strike, most of the time this is false. > > > >> You do not even understand the concept of evidence > > > > So 'The Snit List' isn't evidence that people believe you're a liar troll or worse? > > > >> Notice you are not even trying to point out a comment of mine you think > >> is wrong. > > > > I do it all the time, as do "others", to your repeated denials We've all seen this > > time after time... too many to count. > > > > Ah, more accusations as you avoid any actual topic So... to you, when you alleged "I tend to do research and I stick to evidence" and I refuted your allegation, my having done so automatically renders the topic *not* an "actual topic"? LOL! After how many meds?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-24 15:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frpom6Fq4efU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #459276 |
On 7/24/18 3:37 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 3:11:03 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 7/24/18 1:49 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 2:40:56 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>> >>>> I tend to do research and I stick to evidence. >>> >>> You tend to ignore anything that refutes whatever illogical stance you've >>> taken... like 'The Snit List'. Your list proves what I said, your response is >>> to either ignore it, pretend I wrote it or something equally silly. Everyone >>> has seen you do this... repeatedly... which is why your credibility is zero. >>> >>>> If you show evidence I am wrong I am open to it. >>> >>> That happens about as much as a lightening strike, most of the time this is false. >>> >>>> You do not even understand the concept of evidence >>> >>> So 'The Snit List' isn't evidence that people believe you're a liar troll or worse? >>> >>>> Notice you are not even trying to point out a comment of mine you think >>>> is wrong. >>> >>> I do it all the time, as do "others", to your repeated denials We've all seen this >>> time after time... too many to count. >>> >> Ah, more accusations as you avoid any actual topic other than your obsession with me. >> >> Look at it this way, right now I am speaking of your obsession with me and YOU are providing the proof. The logic is solid and irrefutable... you show no signs of being able to stop yourself from making up claims about my health, about my schooling, about my business, about my family, and more. You show no sign of being able to stop yourself from snipping content you do not like, such as the police speaking to you about your harassment. >> >> Using simple logic my points are very strongly supported: you are filled with irrational hatred and a deep obsession. This is from what you are posting NOW in COLA... no need to do ANY guessing on your personal life, no need to dig back through years of posts. Now. You are proving me right NOW. > > So... to you, when you alleged "I tend to do research and I stick to evidence" I do... on pretty much any topic. But my doing so is not the topic. *I* am not the topic. Well, I am to you. To you I, or your fantasies of me, are ALWAYS the topic. This is more proof of the obsession I have noted you have. See: evidence. YOU are providing the evidence for what I have noted about you. But who cares? Why not talk about something other than me and your obsession with me. There is more to life that that! > and I refuted your allegation, my having done so automatically renders the > topic *not* an "actual topic"? > > LOL! After how many meds? > -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-24 15:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bc7f93cc-06ff-48d4-b07e-2f43912074a2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459278 |
On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 4:48:40 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > So... to you, when you alleged "I tend to do research and I stick to evidence" > > I do... on pretty much any topic Were that true, how do you explain what you're running from (your list)? >. But my doing so is not the topic. That's what I replied to.... so it is the topic we were talking about (and it followed the previous statements on that topic, as well). How you can be conversing in a topic and then abruptly claim it's not the topic is exactly the point I'm making about why you have no credibility. > > and I refuted your allegation, my having done so automatically renders the > > topic *not* an "actual topic"? > > > > LOL! After how many meds? So it's just blatant dishonesty on your part, meds had nothing to do with it?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-24 16:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frpplhFqampU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #459282 |
On 7/24/18 3:57 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 4:48:40 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>> So... to you, when you alleged "I tend to do research and I stick to evidence" >> >> I do... on pretty much any topic > > Were that true, how do you explain what you're running from (your list)? Do you mean your list of failed attempts to quote me as you accuse? If so I have spoken of YOUR list many times... you just like bringing it up over and over and over and over and over because it is the best you have, even if a failure, to actually back what you WANT to be true about me. But, again, you are back to talking about me and your delusions of me. Heck, you even call your list MINE, as though it has ANYTHING to do with me. It does not, other than that the guy who has stalked me and harassed me and those around me since 2004 is responsible for it. >> . But my doing so is not the topic. > > That's what I replied to.... so it is the topic we were talking about (and it followed > the previous statements on that topic, as well). How you can be conversing in a > topic and then abruptly claim it's not the topic is exactly the point I'm making > about why you have no credibility. One of your many challenges is thinking EVERY conversation is about me and your delusions about me. Why not talk about tech instead? Or politics? Or ANYTHING other than your victim mentality crap where you obsess over me and pretend all that is wrong in your life is somehow my fault? >>> and I refuted your allegation, my having done so automatically renders the >>> topic *not* an "actual topic"? >>> >>> LOL! After how many meds? > > So it's just blatant dishonesty on your part, meds had nothing to do with it? See: this is you again fantasizing about my life. Now you want to know what medications I take and more about my health. You are truly sick. Notice how neither I nor anyone else ever asks you about your health issues (though your obvious compulsions and insecurity and obsessions are hard to miss... but YOU bring them to COLA). -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-24 16:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1a00b3e5-4d1d-43cb-bcc3-4c147a6e7e8f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459285 |
On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 5:05:25 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 7/24/18 3:57 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 4:48:40 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > > >>> So... to you, when you alleged "I tend to do research and I stick to evidence" > >> > >> I do... on pretty much any topic > > > > Were that true, how do you explain what you're running from (your list)? > > Do you mean your list of failed attempts to quote me This is exactly what I'm talking about and it's *the* reason you have zero credibility on usenet. Not only do you run from your list, you even push the dishonest argument that it's my list when the facts show I had nothing to do with it. Ebot started it (bless her heart) because you kept on denying everything. She figured it'd be funny to watch you deny what virtually everyone you come into contact with was saying about you and *why* they might be saying it. Later,High Plains Thumper provided the ordering, attributions, etc. and Mark Bilk hosts it. I played no part in it at all. I realize you have a vested interest in pushing the lie that I did... but the facts just don't support your lie. > Why not talk about tech instead? Or politics? As you can't even make it past being honest about yourself or "others", why would *anyone* do that, on *any* topic?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-24 16:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frps51Fqq9nU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #459291 |
On 7/24/18 4:18 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 5:05:25 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 7/24/18 3:57 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 4:48:40 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>> >>>>> So... to you, when you alleged "I tend to do research and I stick to evidence" >>>> >>>> I do... on pretty much any topic >>> >>> Were that true, how do you explain what you're running from (your list)? >> >> Do you mean your list of failed attempts to quote me > > This is exactly what I'm talking about and it's *the* reason you have > zero credibility on usenet. Not only do you run from your list, you even > push the dishonest argument that it's my list when the facts show I had > nothing to do with it. Ebot started it (bless her heart) because you kept > on denying everything. She figured it'd be funny to watch you deny what > virtually everyone you come into contact with was saying about you and > *why* they might be saying it. Later,High Plains Thumper provided the > ordering, attributions, etc. and Mark Bilk hosts it. I played no part in it at > all. I realize you have a vested interest in pushing the lie that I did... but > the facts just don't support your lie. Your opinion of me, as delusional as it is, means nothing to me. >> Why not talk about tech instead? Or politics? > > As you can't even make it past being honest about yourself or "others", > why would *anyone* do that, on *any* topic? So you do not want to talk to me. Fine. Never post to me or about me again. But you literally CANNOT stop yourself. You are obsessed. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-24 16:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f50d01c1-8b37-464e-b066-9223c81d6286@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459299 |
On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 5:47:48 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 7/24/18 4:18 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 5:05:25 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 7/24/18 3:57 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 4:48:40 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>> > >>>>> So... to you, when you alleged "I tend to do research and I stick to evidence" > >>>> > >>>> I do... on pretty much any topic > >>> > >>> Were that true, how do you explain what you're running from (your list)? > >> > >> Do you mean your list of failed attempts to quote me > > > > This is exactly what I'm talking about and it's *the* reason you have > > zero credibility on usenet. Not only do you run from your list, you even > > push the dishonest argument that it's my list when the facts show I had > > nothing to do with it. Ebot started it (bless her heart) because you kept > > on denying everything. She figured it'd be funny to watch you deny what > > virtually everyone you come into contact with was saying about you and > > *why* they might be saying it. Later,High Plains Thumper provided the > > ordering, attributions, etc. and Mark Bilk hosts it. I played no part in it at > > all. I realize you have a vested interest in pushing the lie that I did... but > > the facts just don't support your lie. > > Your opinion of me, as delusional as it is, means nothing to me. I wasn't giving an opinion, I was stating facts... which is why you're pretending I was doing otherwise. Who *hasn't* seen you pull this? > >> Why not talk about tech instead? Or politics? > > > > As you can't even make it past being honest about yourself or "others", > > why would *anyone* do that, on *any* topic? > > So you do not want to talk to me. I'm doing so, in the manner I choose.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-24 16:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frpspeFqth8U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #459305 |
On 7/24/18 4:52 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 5:47:48 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 7/24/18 4:18 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 5:05:25 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>> On 7/24/18 3:57 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 4:48:40 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> So... to you, when you alleged "I tend to do research and I stick to evidence" >>>>>> >>>>>> I do... on pretty much any topic >>>>> >>>>> Were that true, how do you explain what you're running from (your list)? >>>> >>>> Do you mean your list of failed attempts to quote me >>> >>> This is exactly what I'm talking about and it's *the* reason you have >>> zero credibility on usenet. Not only do you run from your list, you even >>> push the dishonest argument that it's my list when the facts show I had >>> nothing to do with it. Ebot started it (bless her heart) because you kept >>> on denying everything. She figured it'd be funny to watch you deny what >>> virtually everyone you come into contact with was saying about you and >>> *why* they might be saying it. Later,High Plains Thumper provided the >>> ordering, attributions, etc. and Mark Bilk hosts it. I played no part in it at >>> all. I realize you have a vested interest in pushing the lie that I did... but >>> the facts just don't support your lie. >> >> Your opinion of me, as delusional as it is, means nothing to me. > > I wasn't giving an opinion, I was stating facts... which is why you're > pretending I was doing otherwise. Who *hasn't* seen you pull this? > >>>> Why not talk about tech instead? Or politics? >>> >>> As you can't even make it past being honest about yourself or "others", >>> why would *anyone* do that, on *any* topic? >> >> So you do not want to talk to me. > > I'm doing so, in the manner I choose. > Your delusional opinion of me STILL is of absolutely no interest, other than a sign of how completely over the top your obsession and delusional states are. What are you going to do when I stop responded to you again? I bet you cannot go 48 hours without begging for attention and crying I am "running away" from your delusions. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-25 20:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pjaoc3$l3t$8@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #459308 |
On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 16:58:38 -0700, Snit wrote: > On 7/24/18 4:52 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 5:47:48 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>> On 7/24/18 4:18 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 5:05:25 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 7/24/18 3:57 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 4:48:40 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> So... to you, when you alleged "I tend to do research and I stick >>>>>>>> to evidence" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I do... on pretty much any topic >>>>>> >>>>>> Were that true, how do you explain what you're running from (your >>>>>> list)? >>>>> >>>>> Do you mean your list of failed attempts to quote me >>>> >>>> This is exactly what I'm talking about and it's *the* reason you have >>>> zero credibility on usenet. Not only do you run from your list, you >>>> even push the dishonest argument that it's my list when the facts >>>> show I had nothing to do with it. Ebot started it (bless her heart) >>>> because you kept on denying everything. She figured it'd be funny to >>>> watch you deny what virtually everyone you come into contact with was >>>> saying about you and *why* they might be saying it. Later,High Plains >>>> Thumper provided the ordering, attributions, etc. and Mark Bilk hosts >>>> it. I played no part in it at all. I realize you have a vested >>>> interest in pushing the lie that I did... but the facts just don't >>>> support your lie. >>> >>> Your opinion of me, as delusional as it is, means nothing to me. >> >> I wasn't giving an opinion, I was stating facts... which is why you're >> pretending I was doing otherwise. Who *hasn't* seen you pull this? >> >>>>> Why not talk about tech instead? Or politics? >>>> >>>> As you can't even make it past being honest about yourself or >>>> "others", >>>> why would *anyone* do that, on *any* topic? >>> >>> So you do not want to talk to me. >> >> I'm doing so, in the manner I choose. >> >> > Your delusional opinion of me STILL is of absolutely no interest, other > than a sign of how completely over the top your obsession and delusional > states are. > > What are you going to do when I stop responded to you again? I bet you > cannot go 48 hours without begging for attention and crying I am > "running away" from your delusions. Says the person, that's you snit, who claims to have filed a police report for harassment yet still responds to every single message in COLA and other places.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-25 14:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frs7v2Fcn1nU6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #459461 |
On 7/25/18 1:59 PM, Kompyler wrote: ... >> Your delusional opinion of me STILL is of absolutely no interest, other >> than a sign of how completely over the top your obsession and delusional >> states are. >> >> What are you going to do when I stop responded to you again? I bet you >> cannot go 48 hours without begging for attention and crying I am >> "running away" from your delusions. > > Says the person, that's you snit, who claims to have filed a police > report for harassment yet still responds to every single message in COLA > and other places. Please quote me saying what you just attributed to me. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-25 17:50 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <frs9l1Fd6f3U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #459483 |
On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:21:38 -0700, Snit wrote: > On 7/25/18 1:59 PM, Kompyler wrote: > ... >>> Your delusional opinion of me STILL is of absolutely no interest, other >>> than a sign of how completely over the top your obsession and delusional >>> states are. >>> >>> What are you going to do when I stop responded to you again? I bet you >>> cannot go 48 hours without begging for attention and crying I am >>> "running away" from your delusions. >> >> Says the person, that's you snit, who claims to have filed a police >> report for harassment yet still responds to every single message in COLA >> and other places. > > Please quote me saying what you just attributed to me. Once again you completely miss the point. So the police were called to visit Steve Carroll and ask him to stop harassing you but you didn't file the report? Ok, so your wife, psychiatrist or kids filed it. Bottom line, you are the only person who can approve of such report being filed because you are directly involved. You are the only person in this group making the claim so are you saying it wasn't you? You can't believe people are that ignorant. So stop the spin and either produce evidence that the police visited Carroll and asked him to leave you alone or stop posting potentially libelous statements.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-24 17:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frpsuiFqth8U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #459305 |
On 7/24/18 4:52 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >> So you do not want to talk to me. >> > I'm doing so, in the manner I choose. No, you are not. You are doing so as your compulsion forces you to. You literally CANNOT stop trolling at this point. You are completely and totally obsessed with it, and are addicted to the attention I am giving you. Your utter LACK of control is completely obvious. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-25 11:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3ee5b286-20b4-4f79-995b-c5baf2c3e313@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459309 |
On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 6:01:26 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 7/24/18 4:52 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >> So you do not want to talk to me. > >> > > I'm doing so, in the manner I choose. > > No, you are not. What must you be mixing that'd find you telling me what I've chosen?! I probably don't wanna know...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web