Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #458413 > unrolled thread
| Started by | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-07-19 18:14 +0000 |
| Last post | 2018-07-20 13:14 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 260 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 18:14 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 11:30 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-19 14:38 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 13:37 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 23:55 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 17:14 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 18:17 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-19 17:18 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 17:45 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 21:42 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 20:23 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Storage Unit <storage.unit@mailinator.com> - 2018-07-21 07:40 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-21 16:30 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 17:21 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-21 18:27 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 12:24 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 19:45 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-21 20:01 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 20:44 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 14:14 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 03:03 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 12:42 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 12:43 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 13:27 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 17:20 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 12:42 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 12:53 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-20 07:04 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 05:29 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 14:53 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-20 10:07 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 15:19 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-20 10:30 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 15:36 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-20 10:47 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 16:08 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 20:50 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-21 15:58 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 09:16 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 12:44 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 16:06 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-07-22 13:17 -0400
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-23 07:38 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 05:54 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 16:46 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-23 12:08 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 22:26 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-23 16:29 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 11:12 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 11:37 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 11:49 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 12:29 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 12:48 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 12:58 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 13:06 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 13:13 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 13:40 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 13:49 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 15:38 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 15:52 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 15:59 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 16:06 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 16:49 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 16:57 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 17:03 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 17:06 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 17:12 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 17:30 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-25 21:02 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 15:17 -0600
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 14:19 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-25 22:34 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 17:08 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-25 18:34 -0400
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 16:05 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-25 17:43 -0400
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 19:30 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 01:45 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-25 21:03 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-25 21:01 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 15:03 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 15:06 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-24 14:44 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 16:32 -0600
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-25 05:25 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 05:41 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 06:58 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 10:36 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 11:49 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 13:00 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 13:05 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 15:07 -0600
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 14:16 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 15:19 -0600
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 14:55 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-25 14:50 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 15:02 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-25 18:15 -0400
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 22:58 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 16:40 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-25 19:48 -0400
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 16:57 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-25 20:18 -0400
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 17:39 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 21:18 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 22:55 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-26 06:37 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-26 14:37 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-26 09:35 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-26 12:06 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 20:07 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-26 13:26 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 13:45 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-27 06:50 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-27 13:07 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 06:26 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-27 06:37 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-27 13:43 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-27 07:09 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-27 16:12 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 09:19 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-27 11:09 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 11:23 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-27 18:34 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-27 13:08 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 14:52 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 16:51 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-27 19:08 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 19:11 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 19:26 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 20:44 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 22:33 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-28 08:33 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-28 09:03 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-28 08:58 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-28 08:49 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-28 08:55 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 11:39 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-27 12:15 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-27 12:00 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-27 11:42 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 07:13 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-27 12:06 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 10:11 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-27 12:13 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-27 11:23 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-27 11:06 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 19:16 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-27 12:18 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-27 14:35 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 19:39 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-27 14:50 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-07-26 15:04 -0400
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 12:27 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 16:23 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 16:45 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 16:54 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 17:01 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 17:15 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 17:18 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 17:32 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 21:15 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 10:41 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-25 20:19 -0400
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 17:41 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-25 20:57 -0400
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 21:19 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-26 10:16 -0400
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 21:18 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 21:49 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 22:54 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 23:24 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 10:47 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 17:23 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-26 14:24 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-26 09:30 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 09:48 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 11:24 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-26 20:39 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 14:00 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 15:27 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 15:51 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 15:55 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 16:21 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 16:26 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 16:39 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 16:48 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 16:59 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 17:02 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 17:17 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-25 20:22 -0400
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-25 20:21 -0400
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 17:22 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-25 20:27 -0400
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 17:20 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-23 18:17 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 00:57 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-23 23:00 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 16:54 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-23 18:19 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 20:32 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 19:26 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 12:42 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 12:46 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-24 20:09 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-07-24 09:36 -0400
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 07:13 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-24 15:01 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-24 14:56 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 13:00 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 13:09 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 15:25 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-20 10:31 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 15:39 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 09:07 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 16:06 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 20:53 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-20 11:10 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-20 11:12 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 16:42 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 12:15 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 11:12 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 20:56 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-21 16:00 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 17:22 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 16:42 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-07-22 13:17 -0400
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 10:51 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 00:42 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 18:24 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-07-20 07:46 -0400
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 13:11 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 15:06 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 15:35 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-20 20:42 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 21:18 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 13:10 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 06:15 -0700
chrisv is an Arse! Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 05:44 -0700
chrisv is a naive socialist SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 15:03 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 12:54 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 15:01 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 15:13 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 15:22 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 15:55 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 13:13 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-20 10:29 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 15:34 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-20 10:36 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 15:41 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-20 10:48 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 16:08 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 20:52 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 16:07 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 20:54 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 16:04 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 13:09 -0700
Re: More than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-20 10:17 -0500
Re: More than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 15:49 +0000
Re: More than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 13:14 -0700
Page 3 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 13 Next page →
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-20 16:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <JLn4D.447920$br4.427845@fx34.iad> |
| In reply to | #458544 |
On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 10:30:06 -0500, chrisv wrote: > RonB wrote: > >> (snipped, unread) As predicted. -- SilverSlimer Ubuntu 18.04 on MSI GT72 2QD Never apologize Liberalism - One picture, one thousand words: https://kek.gg/i/4xGRhd.jpg Highly recommended reading: - Big Brother: The Orwellian Nightmare Come True (https://kek.gg/u/SrmB) - Questioning Islam: Tough Questions and Honest Answers About the Muslim Religion (https://kek.gg/u/35jND)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-22 13:17 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pj2fan$orn$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #458534 |
RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > It's pure, undiluted bullshit from top to bottom. I dub thee "Unreachable Ron". -- "...The name of the song is called 'Haddocks' Eyes'!" "Oh, that's the name of the song, is it?" Alice said, trying to feel interested. "No, you don't understand," the Knight said, looking a little vexed. "That's what the name is called. The name really is, 'The Aged Aged Man.'" "Then I ought to have said "That's what the song is called'?" Alice corrected herself. "No, you oughtn't: that's quite another thing! The song is called 'Ways and Means': but that's only what it is called you know!" "Well, what is the song then?" said Alice, who was by this time completely bewildered. "I was coming to that," the Knight said. "The song really is "A-sitting on a Gate": and the tune's my own invention." -- Lewis Carroll, "Through the Looking Glass"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-23 07:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <amibldlv24g06bdhdp68lb34imn9uvc5u4@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #458896 |
Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > RonB wrote: >> >> It's pure, undiluted bullshit from top to bottom. > > I dub thee "Unreachable Ron". It's the right-wing "full court press" in action. It's sort of interesting. Not sure what kind of a moron is fooled by it... -- "The simple fact is that you and the other Zelots don't like having your false statemetns and illogical views questioned I can only think that you must fear the wrath of the almighty Stallman if you were to have an independant thought." - Tom Shillton
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-23 05:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2b9a6e08-3993-435e-8763-62ab59e54bb8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #458991 |
On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 5:38:28 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote: > Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > > > RonB wrote: > >> > >> It's pure, undiluted bullshit from top to bottom. > > > > I dub thee "Unreachable Ron". > > It's the right-wing "full court press" in action. It's sort of > interesting. Not sure what kind of a moron is fooled by it... > > -- > "The simple fact is that you and the other Zelots don't like having > your false statemetns and illogical views questioned I can only think > that you must fear the wrath of the almighty Stallman if you were to > have an independant thought." - Tom Shillton I will not ask Sandman how any part of Steve Carroll's body tastes no matter how habitually Sandman kisses it. How is failing existing brain matter tied to a random neuron generator in any way going to lead to valuable group writing? Now why the requirement to open a ticket via Ubuntu in a desktop system? Of course, he didn't initially list this as part of his inevitably always growing 'test' <eyeroll>. -- Best CMS Solution of 2017!! https://youtu.be/iztSc_msHuo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZNxaaKD7-c Michael Glasser: Prescott Computer Guy http://prescottcomputerguy.com Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-23 16:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pj50q1$ll6$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #458991 |
On 2018-07-23, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > >> RonB wrote: >>> >>> It's pure, undiluted bullshit from top to bottom. >> >> I dub thee "Unreachable Ron". > > It's the right-wing "full court press" in action. It's sort of > interesting. Not sure what kind of a moron is fooled by it... You're projecting again, chrisv. You're the one who supports libtards no matter how vile. And the one gullible enough to take the "Intelligence" community's word at face value after all the times they've lied to us. -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-23 12:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <502cldh8bk8n7jtmptegeujt3p7mdfflt4@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #459012 |
RonB wrote: >You're projecting again, chrisv. You're the one who supports libtards no >matter how vile. And the one gullible enough to take the "Intelligence" >community's word at face value after all the times they've lied to us. Not one single true sentence to be found. How ironic. For example, (repeating myself) I find the suppression of freedom of speach, from the antifa, to be very disturbing and disgusting. I very aware of lying bastards in all directions, but there appears to be far too much to the "Russia" issue to be "pure, undiluted bullshit from top to bottom." I mean, you can't get any less compromising than calling something "pure, undiluted bullshit from top to bottom." The full court press. -- 'Good job their Snit. I bet Owl wished he'd never been sent on this "advocacy" skirmish by his master Roy now ;)' - "Hadron"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-23 22:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pj5kn2$oi4$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #459016 |
On 2018-07-23, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > RonB wrote: > >>You're projecting again, chrisv. You're the one who supports libtards no >>matter how vile. And the one gullible enough to take the "Intelligence" >>community's word at face value after all the times they've lied to us. > > Not one single true sentence to be found. How ironic. > > For example, (repeating myself) I find the suppression of freedom of > speach, from the antifa, to be very disturbing and disgusting. > > I very aware of lying bastards in all directions, but there appears to > be far too much to the "Russia" issue to be "pure, undiluted bullshit > from top to bottom." > > I mean, you can't get any less compromising than calling something > "pure, undiluted bullshit from top to bottom." The full court press. Okay. I'm really tired of arguing politics. There are total morons at both sides of the poltiical spectrum ... however ... I think the Russian collusion bullshit is just that, total and complete bullshit. I think its just a continuation of Zbigniew Brzezinski's (and cohorts) plan to isolate and (eventually) destroy Russia. They thought they had obtained their goal when the Soviet Union fell and the Wall Street Bankster's began raping the country by divvying up its natural resources. Which makes Putin's rise to power and his throwing out of these slimeballs even more galling to them. Just when the Deep State thought they had Russia in their claws, Putin twisted it free. That's why they hate him so much. Two weaknesses in the "Deep State" is what will always keep them from obtaining their ultimate goal (world domination). Lack of timing and lack of proportion. They push too fast and they push too far. (Take for example the pushing of perverts in girl's bathrooms and dressing rooms that – I think – was the "bridge too far" for Clinton and her cohorts.) At any rate, the "Intelligence" (so-called) community doesn't have any facts to back up their electoral interference bogus claims. I know this because I know it's bullshit and I've seen how these liars operate in the past. Their goal is to get gullible Americans to make emotional decisions, not decisions based on facts and reasoning. -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-23 16:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <63f3804f-0e80-4c61-9719-9b8f508af1c0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459061 |
RonB wrote: > On 2018-07-23, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> RonB wrote: >>>You're projecting again, chrisv. You're the one who supports libtards no >>>matter how vile. And the one gullible enough to take the "Intelligence" >>>community's word at face value after all the times they've lied to us. >> >> Not one single true sentence to be found. How ironic. Classical Ad Hominem. >> For example, (repeating myself) I find the suppression of freedom of >> speach, from the antifa, to be very disturbing and disgusting. >> >> I very aware of lying bastards in all directions, but there appears to >> be far too much to the "Russia" issue to be "pure, undiluted bullshit >> from top to bottom." The interference is already a lock, as are donations to the NRA. The elephant in the room is collusion.. and even this is probably going to be shades of gray where it may very well have been done, but fails to cross the legal thresholds. >> I mean, you can't get any less compromising than calling something >> "pure, undiluted bullshit from top to bottom." The full court press. > > Okay. I'm really tired of arguing politics. There are total morons at both > sides of the poltiical spectrum ... however ... > > I think the Russian collusion bullshit is just that, total and complete > bullshit. The investigation is still very, very early. Take a look at how long it took for Watergate to finally crack. And how Nixon was screaming “witch hunt” until the day he resigned. And given how long the Republicans pursued Benghazi with zero inditements and zero guilty pleas, we easily have another year to go...and more will be invariably found. > I think its just a continuation of Zbigniew Brzezinski's (and cohorts) plan > to isolate and (eventually) destroy Russia. They thought they had > obtained their goal when the Soviet Union fell and the Wall Street > Bankster's began raping the country by divvying up its natural resources. Brzezinski was long out of office when the Cold War finally ended. His shift in strategies may have been to credit for the schedule, but credit is also due to others as well, from both political parties. > Which makes Putin's rise to power and his throwing out of these slimeballs > even more galling to them. Just when the Deep State thought they had Russia > in their claws, Putin twisted it free. That's why they hate him so much. One doesn’t need to be part of the fictional Deep State to understand the kleptocracy and not be in favor of it. > Two weaknesses in the "Deep State" is what will always keep them from > obtaining their ultimate goal (world domination). Lack of timing and lack of > proportion. Three weaknesses: what is claimed doesn’t exist. > They push too fast and they push too far. Heaven forbid that we take 150 years...indeed, six generations... to finally start to work in earnest to reduce inequalities within their citizens! Yes, it’s been taking generations. > (Take for example the pushing of perverts in girl's bathrooms and dressing > rooms that – I think – was the "bridge too far" for Clinton and her cohorts.) Particularly since that was a twisted claim. Ironic since it seems that the political party with the most predatory perverts are the ones who did the twisting. > At any rate, the "Intelligence" (so-called) community doesn't have any facts > to back up their electoral interference bogus claims. I know this because I know > it's bullshit and I've seen how these liars operate in the past. Oh, so you’ve had a Security clearance and have worked with them professionally to know this? Just when was this, Ron? And in just what capacity? Did you *ever* have access into, say, materials that were controlled because of collection methods? Now try to wrap your brain around how that trade is being transformed by Big Data. Take for example, take a data set of cellular phone tower signal vectors and of city surveillance cameras ... you can now put a face on those cellphone numbers and track them both physically as well as through their contacts. Run the recordings backwards in time after an attack and figure it all out...that’s how law enforcement has been cracking major cases for over a decade now, grandpa. > Their goal is to get gullible Americans to make emotional decisions, not > decisions based on facts and reasoning. Nope, you’ve got them conflated with used car salesmen & politicians. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-24 11:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ffc14c7e-b1d1-416d-ab59-861b54819d8e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459075 |
On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 5:29:28 PM UTC-6, -hh wrote: > The investigation is still very, very early. Which is why no one should be alleging unquestionable guilt. We now live in an atmosphere where search warrants and indictments equal guilt (Glasser must be loving the hell outta it). That there is currently no publicly available evidence doesn't mean anyone is innocent, but it also means that the people involved are still presumed to be so. One would never know that by listening to the 'Snit' on the street, who is constantly force fed crap by the media. > Oh, so you’ve had a Security clearance and have worked with them professionally > to know this? This cuts both ways. > > Their goal is to get gullible Americans to make emotional decisions, not > > decisions based on facts and reasoning. > > Nope There is no question he has a valid point there as the presumption of innocence has left the building for anyone involved in the Trump campaign. >, you’ve got them conflated with used car salesmen & politicians. Looks to be the other way around and you can easily spot anyone doing it because there is no presumption of innocence in their arguments. Worse, many of them will argue *against* the presumption of innocence. Just because Trump is a narcissitic liar doesn't mean he isn't innocent of the claims (not charges, *claims*) made against him. It's like we're reliving the McCarthy era.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-24 11:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frp9uiFmqppU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #459201 |
On 7/24/18 11:12 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 5:29:28 PM UTC-6, -hh wrote: > >> The investigation is still very, very early. > > Which is why no one should be alleging unquestionable guilt. We now live > in an atmosphere where search warrants and indictments equal guilt (Glasser > must be loving the hell outta it). That there is currently no publicly available > evidence doesn't mean anyone is innocent, but it also means that the people > involved are still presumed to be so. One would never know that by listening > to the 'Snit' on the street, who is constantly force fed crap by the media. You mean like the crap you spew non-stop... like how none of "your" posts are from a bot and how it is somehow fine for you to make up stories about my having used government money to get my degrees, or how it would be bad if I *had* taken out a loan from the government to do so. You obsess over me and lie about me non-stop. >> Oh, so you’ve had a Security clearance and have worked with them professionally >> to know this? > > This cuts both ways. > >>> Their goal is to get gullible Americans to make emotional decisions, not >>> decisions based on facts and reasoning. >> >> Nope > > There is no question he has a valid point there as the presumption of innocence > has left the building for anyone involved in the Trump campaign. > >> , you’ve got them conflated with used car salesmen & politicians. > > Looks to be the other way around and you can easily spot anyone doing it because > there is no presumption of innocence in their arguments. Worse, many of them will > argue *against* the presumption of innocence. Just because Trump is a narcissitic > liar doesn't mean he isn't innocent of the claims (not charges, *claims*) made > against him. It's like we're reliving the McCarthy era. We should have a presumption of innocence in our adjudication process, but that does not mean OUTSIDE of the adjudication process we cannot look at evidence and conclude someone is ACTUALLY guilty of a crime. In fact, this is generally what happens in a court case, the prosecutors are saying the person is ACTUALLY guilty. This confused the hell out of you years ago and continues to do so now. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-24 11:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <260495c2-7ba5-4c51-bb1d-da44b9a943fc@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459207 |
On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 12:37:09 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 7/24/18 11:12 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 5:29:28 PM UTC-6, -hh wrote: > > > >> The investigation is still very, very early. > > > > Which is why no one should be alleging unquestionable guilt. We now live > > in an atmosphere where search warrants and indictments equal guilt (Glasser > > must be loving the hell outta it). That there is currently no publicly available > > evidence doesn't mean anyone is innocent, but it also means that the people > > involved are still presumed to be so. One would never know that by listening > > to the 'Snit' on the street, who is constantly force fed crap by the media. > > You mean like the crap you spew non-stop... Said Snit to himself in the mirror. <https://medium.com/@jancovorstermyafibheart/10-ectopic-heartbeat-vagus-nerve-palpitations-tips-for-you-b8b2acd4dbbe> You've talked bout bloating, fainting, ghost pains, etc, the above is most likely your 'issue', Mr. Hypochondria. Doctors can't wait for fools like you to show up, and you like it because you get long term disability, thus enabling you to take food right off the table of people who actually need gov't assistance. > > Looks to be the other way around and you can easily spot anyone doing it because > > there is no presumption of innocence in their arguments. Worse, many of them will > > argue *against* the presumption of innocence. Just because Trump is a narcissitic > > liar doesn't mean he isn't innocent of the claims (not charges, *claims*) made > > against him. It's like we're reliving the McCarthy era. > > We should have a presumption of innocence in our adjudication process Right... and we should taint jury pools with our media prior to that process, this makes all the sense in the world <eyeroll>. > but that does not mean OUTSIDE of the adjudication process we cannot > look at evidence and conclude someone is ACTUALLY guilty of a crime. Concluding it is different than stating it as if it were a fact; when that 'fact' gets reported nightly, for stupid, partisan sheep like you, it becomes real because people still believe that media (a thing they should no longer do).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-24 12:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frpd1dFnhp2U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #459213 |
On 7/24/18 11:49 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 12:37:09 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 7/24/18 11:12 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 5:29:28 PM UTC-6, -hh wrote: >>> >>>> The investigation is still very, very early. >>> >>> Which is why no one should be alleging unquestionable guilt. We now live >>> in an atmosphere where search warrants and indictments equal guilt (Glasser >>> must be loving the hell outta it). That there is currently no publicly available >>> evidence doesn't mean anyone is innocent, but it also means that the people >>> involved are still presumed to be so. One would never know that by listening >>> to the 'Snit' on the street, who is constantly force fed crap by the media. >> >> You mean like the crap you spew non-stop... > > Said Snit to himself in the mirror. > > <https://medium.com/@jancovorstermyafibheart/10-ectopic-heartbeat-vagus-nerve-palpitations-tips-for-you-b8b2acd4dbbe> > > You've talked bout bloating, fainting, ghost pains, etc, the above is most likely your > 'issue', Mr. Hypochondria. Doctors can't wait for fools like you to show up, and you > like it because you get long term disability, thus enabling you to take food right off > the table of people who actually need gov't assistance. Ah, you claim I am the one who does as you JUST did... pretending to know more about my health than I and my doctors do. What is worse, though, is you obsess over me. It is insane of you. >>> Looks to be the other way around and you can easily spot anyone doing it because >>> there is no presumption of innocence in their arguments. Worse, many of them will >>> argue *against* the presumption of innocence. Just because Trump is a narcissitic >>> liar doesn't mean he isn't innocent of the claims (not charges, *claims*) made >>> against him. It's like we're reliving the McCarthy era. >> >> We should have a presumption of innocence in our adjudication process > > Right... and we should taint jury pools with our media prior to that process, > this makes all the sense in the world <eyeroll>. I note we should have the presumption of innocence and you respond with THAT. LOL! Yeah, you are completely losing it. >> but that does not mean OUTSIDE of the adjudication process we cannot >> look at evidence and conclude someone is ACTUALLY guilty of a crime. > > Concluding it is different than stating it as if it were a fact; when that 'fact' > gets reported nightly, for stupid, partisan sheep like you, it becomes real > because people still believe that media (a thing they should no longer do). It is a fact you are guilty of harassment -- from what you say the police even talked to you face-to-face about it. Nothing wrong with noting that fact, even though it is unlikely to ever be adjudicated. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-24 12:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <75b6f844-74e8-4703-ae55-1826c8fea7d3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459224 |
On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 1:29:52 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 7/24/18 11:49 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 12:37:09 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 7/24/18 11:12 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 5:29:28 PM UTC-6, -hh wrote: > >>> > >>>> The investigation is still very, very early. > >>> > >>> Which is why no one should be alleging unquestionable guilt. We now live > >>> in an atmosphere where search warrants and indictments equal guilt (Glasser > >>> must be loving the hell outta it). That there is currently no publicly available > >>> evidence doesn't mean anyone is innocent, but it also means that the people > >>> involved are still presumed to be so. One would never know that by listening > >>> to the 'Snit' on the street, who is constantly force fed crap by the media. > >> > >> You mean like the crap you spew non-stop... > > > > Said Snit to himself in the mirror. > > > > <https://medium.com/@jancovorstermyafibheart/10-ectopic-heartbeat-vagus-nerve-palpitations-tips-for-you-b8b2acd4dbbe> > > > > You've talked bout bloating, fainting, ghost pains, etc, the above is most likely your > > 'issue', Mr. Hypochondria. Doctors can't wait for fools like you to show up, and you > > like it because you get long term disability, thus enabling you to take food right off > > the table of people who actually need gov't assistance. > > Ah, you claim I am the one who does as you JUST did... pretending to > know more about my health than I and my doctors do. I'm not pretending anything, I'm noting, based on statistical fact, that is "most likely" your issue. <C43B8CEC.B5EF8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> For the stuff you've *claimed* you were diagnosed with, Pepcid wouldn't do squat to relieve the symptoms. You're a classic hypochondriac, some Dr. probably saw you coming from a mile away. > >>> Looks to be the other way around and you can easily spot anyone doing it because > >>> there is no presumption of innocence in their arguments. Worse, many of them will > >>> argue *against* the presumption of innocence. Just because Trump is a narcissitic > >>> liar doesn't mean he isn't innocent of the claims (not charges, *claims*) made > >>> against him. It's like we're reliving the McCarthy era. > >> > >> We should have a presumption of innocence in our adjudication process > > > > Right... and we should taint jury pools with our media prior to that process, > > this makes all the sense in the world <eyeroll>. > > I note we should have the presumption of innocence You 'noted' more than that... "We should have a presumption of innocence in our adjudication process, but that does not mean OUTSIDE of the adjudication process we cannot look at evidence and conclude someone is ACTUALLY guilty of a crime. In fact, this is generally what happens in a court case, the prosecutors are saying the person is ACTUALLY guilty." - Snit Saying (alleging) someone *is* guilty and ACTUALLY proving it are two different things; it's the prosecutor's job to do both. For anyone other than a prosecutor to claim, as a fact, that someone *is* guilty without having the benefit of the judge to determine if the evidence in question was even legally obtained (as well as seeing that the evidentiary chain was maintained) and to check its veracity, is absurd. Were this not so, there'd be no need for a process. You then 'noted': "This confused the hell out of you years ago and continues to do so now." - Snit But only you are confused by this reality, thinking people know there are occasions where juries have been sequestered due to the wrecklessness of the media, especially problematic in high profile cases. The only question here is: Why are you still pretending to know anything about this topic when you keep making it crystal clear that you don't? Just because someone *can* do something (like falsely pronounce guilt) doesn't mean they *should* do it; now that the media is as irresponsible as they are the matter has become virtually unmanageable. (snip more delusions and unsubstantiated allegations)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-24 12:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1ca5e4e0-2571-4435-a126-025feb304075@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459232 |
On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 12:48:15 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 1:29:52 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > On 7/24/18 11:49 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 12:37:09 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > >> On 7/24/18 11:12 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > >>> On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 5:29:28 PM UTC-6, -hh wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> The investigation is still very, very early. > > >>> > > >>> Which is why no one should be alleging unquestionable guilt. We now live > > >>> in an atmosphere where search warrants and indictments equal guilt (Glasser > > >>> must be loving the hell outta it). That there is currently no publicly available > > >>> evidence doesn't mean anyone is innocent, but it also means that the people > > >>> involved are still presumed to be so. One would never know that by listening > > >>> to the 'Snit' on the street, who is constantly force fed crap by the media. > > >> > > >> You mean like the crap you spew non-stop... > > > > > > Said Snit to himself in the mirror. > > > > > > <https://medium.com/@jancovorstermyafibheart/10-ectopic-heartbeat-vagus-nerve-palpitations-tips-for-you-b8b2acd4dbbe> > > > > > > You've talked bout bloating, fainting, ghost pains, etc, the above is most likely your > > > 'issue', Mr. Hypochondria. Doctors can't wait for fools like you to show up, and you > > > like it because you get long term disability, thus enabling you to take food right off > > > the table of people who actually need gov't assistance. > > > > Ah, you claim I am the one who does as you JUST did... pretending to > > know more about my health than I and my doctors do. > > I'm not pretending anything, I'm noting, based on statistical fact, that is > "most likely" your issue. > > <C43B8CEC.B5EF8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > > For the stuff you've *claimed* you were diagnosed with, Pepcid wouldn't > do squat to relieve the symptoms. You're a classic hypochondriac, some > Dr. probably saw you coming from a mile away. > > > >>> Looks to be the other way around and you can easily spot anyone doing it because > > >>> there is no presumption of innocence in their arguments. Worse, many of them will > > >>> argue *against* the presumption of innocence. Just because Trump is a narcissitic > > >>> liar doesn't mean he isn't innocent of the claims (not charges, *claims*) made > > >>> against him. It's like we're reliving the McCarthy era. > > >> > > >> We should have a presumption of innocence in our adjudication process > > > > > > Right... and we should taint jury pools with our media prior to that process, > > > this makes all the sense in the world <eyeroll>. > > > > I note we should have the presumption of innocence > > You 'noted' more than that... > > "We should have a presumption of innocence in our adjudication process, > but that does not mean OUTSIDE of the adjudication process we cannot > look at evidence and conclude someone is ACTUALLY guilty of a crime. In > fact, this is generally what happens in a court case, the prosecutors > are saying the person is ACTUALLY guilty." - Snit > > Saying (alleging) someone *is* guilty and ACTUALLY proving it are two > different things; it's the prosecutor's job to do both. For anyone other > than a prosecutor to claim, as a fact, that someone *is* guilty without > having the benefit of the judge to determine if the evidence in question > was even legally obtained (as well as seeing that the evidentiary chain > was maintained) and to check its veracity, is absurd. Were this not so, > there'd be no need for a process. > > You then 'noted': > > "This confused the hell out of you years ago and continues to do so now." - Snit > > But only you are confused by this reality, thinking people know there are > occasions where juries have been sequestered due to the wrecklessness > of the media, especially problematic in high profile cases. > > The only question here is: Why are you still pretending to know anything > about this topic when you keep making it crystal clear that you don't? > Just because someone *can* do something (like falsely pronounce guilt) > doesn't mean they *should* do it; now that the media is as irresponsible > as they are the matter has become virtually unmanageable. > > (snip more delusions and unsubstantiated allegations) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In article <328ae2c8-12e1-4830-b455-53187a4bc309@googlegroups.com>, Steve Carroll wrote: > > Sandman: > > <http://usenet.sandman.net/misc/snit_flood> It doesn't show what > > interval the script is run at, but how he has used it, at least in > > the beginning. I stopped logging it this way back in may :) > > From what I've personally looked at, it looks like it's all over the > map. Yes, with obvious scripted sessions. Not saying some of it isn't manual. > > Sandman: > > Maybe I'll update it :) > > What would it take to do that? For "later" to occur! <http://usenet.sandman.net/misc/postingtimes/Snit/Flooding> That's a running tally of Snit's non-sock posts and his flooding during the last month. It'll update automatically and always show the last two months. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJZyKjaAAoJECFEwfBaA+jR4QEIAIWE3GfOGnnxynLfUhRnWv+l OkvAvQ8GofGI1JjIOn7NnlyfGRV/JPiIzJmzoCrdV6uY9E9qaYOXScF4M5Vas4bv 2WqBlNIh7se9g6Zkj330L12RkuZckS5l0nJ++OTbmztOzLtAlrWKHADTiJ9u8JnR BCjcAhMrjQ0Jwut34hJr57pzj7p88oYCPP46IcrEMbWnd03n43BGUVLGr9i9pYU+ 7F6867hOzaFJ4DdRE52zv15yIYVUIHx7HFNNtV7ZfPRBRQQuyA403S8PM1RC/nQ/ RKau+ma21bzltpxlqTO+XAXMMLLZiGXy8hbv4Ib/tPlc5cKI3P6UDZ4exbbCmnE= =1Dqa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - What Every Entrepreneur Must Know https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100012978552519 Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-24 13:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frpf6mFo1k2U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #459232 |
On 7/24/18 12:48 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 1:29:52 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 7/24/18 11:49 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 12:37:09 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>> On 7/24/18 11:12 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>> On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 5:29:28 PM UTC-6, -hh wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The investigation is still very, very early. >>>>> >>>>> Which is why no one should be alleging unquestionable guilt. We now live >>>>> in an atmosphere where search warrants and indictments equal guilt (Glasser >>>>> must be loving the hell outta it). That there is currently no publicly available >>>>> evidence doesn't mean anyone is innocent, but it also means that the people >>>>> involved are still presumed to be so. One would never know that by listening >>>>> to the 'Snit' on the street, who is constantly force fed crap by the media. >>>> >>>> You mean like the crap you spew non-stop... >>> >>> Said Snit to himself in the mirror. >>> >>> <https://medium.com/@jancovorstermyafibheart/10-ectopic-heartbeat-vagus-nerve-palpitations-tips-for-you-b8b2acd4dbbe> >>> >>> You've talked bout bloating, fainting, ghost pains, etc, the above is most likely your >>> 'issue', Mr. Hypochondria. Doctors can't wait for fools like you to show up, and you >>> like it because you get long term disability, thus enabling you to take food right off >>> the table of people who actually need gov't assistance. >> >> Ah, you claim I am the one who does as you JUST did... pretending to >> know more about my health than I and my doctors do. > > I'm not pretending anything, I'm noting, based on statistical fact, that is > "most likely" your issue. Ah, your defense is you do not understand basic logic and statistics and how to apply them to specific cases -- esp. cases you know very little about. But even with such deep ignorance as your "defense", why make up stories about me using government money to get my degrees? More wild ass guessing on your part in an effort to get me to talk more about my education and finances? > <C43B8CEC.B5EF8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > > For the stuff you've *claimed* you were diagnosed with, Pepcid wouldn't > do squat to relieve the symptoms. You're a classic hypochondriac, some > Dr. probably saw you coming from a mile away. See: there you go again... making crap up about me. You do this pretty much non-stop. I sincerely think you are not able to help yourself... it is a compulsion on your part. >>>>> Looks to be the other way around and you can easily spot anyone doing it because >>>>> there is no presumption of innocence in their arguments. Worse, many of them will >>>>> argue *against* the presumption of innocence. Just because Trump is a narcissitic >>>>> liar doesn't mean he isn't innocent of the claims (not charges, *claims*) made >>>>> against him. It's like we're reliving the McCarthy era. >>>> >>>> We should have a presumption of innocence in our adjudication process >>> >>> Right... and we should taint jury pools with our media prior to that process, >>> this makes all the sense in the world <eyeroll>. >> >> I note we should have the presumption of innocence > > You 'noted' more than that... The exact sentence you responded to: "We should have a presumption of innocence in our adjudication process" > "We should have a presumption of innocence in our adjudication process, > but that does not mean OUTSIDE of the adjudication process we cannot > look at evidence and conclude someone is ACTUALLY guilty of a crime. In > fact, this is generally what happens in a court case, the prosecutors > are saying the person is ACTUALLY guilty." - Snit > > Saying (alleging) someone *is* guilty and ACTUALLY proving it are two > different things; it's the prosecutor's job to do both. For anyone other > than a prosecutor to claim, as a fact, that someone *is* guilty without > having the benefit of the judge to determine if the evidence in question > was even legally obtained (as well as seeing that the evidentiary chain > was maintained) and to check its veracity, is absurd. Were this not so, > there'd be no need for a process. Are you suggesting you referenced what you were snipping? > You then 'noted': > > "This confused the hell out of you years ago and continues to do so now." - Snit Yes... and it did and it clearly still does. You confuse the ideas of being ACTUALLY guilty of breaking the law with being FOUND GUILTY beyond a reasonable doubt during an adjudication process (knowing you, you will keep going on about your confusion, blaming me, and that will be repeated... when I speak of "ACTUALLY GUILTY" just assume the "beyond a reasonable doubt" part) > But only you are confused by this reality, thinking people know there are > occasions where juries have been sequestered due to the wrecklessness > of the media, especially problematic in high profile cases. Ah, you are making up claims about my views on the media and its influence so you can avoid speaking of how you have confused being ACTUALLY guilty and FOUND GUILTY... and have done so for years. You do work to put me on the defensive when you know you are wrong. Fair enough. Remember the example I used and you ran from: ----- It is a fact you are guilty of harassment -- from what you say the police even talked to you face-to-face about it. Nothing wrong with noting that fact, even though it is unlikely to ever be adjudicated. ----- You will ALWAYS run from this example... because it is such a good example of how wrong you are. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-24 13:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7d6210cd-3180-4973-9d8f-09f24d37a270@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459240 |
On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 1:06:50 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 7/24/18 12:48 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 1:29:52 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 7/24/18 11:49 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 12:37:09 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>> On 7/24/18 11:12 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>> On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 5:29:28 PM UTC-6, -hh wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> The investigation is still very, very early. > >>>>> > >>>>> Which is why no one should be alleging unquestionable guilt. We now live > >>>>> in an atmosphere where search warrants and indictments equal guilt (Glasser > >>>>> must be loving the hell outta it). That there is currently no publicly available > >>>>> evidence doesn't mean anyone is innocent, but it also means that the people > >>>>> involved are still presumed to be so. One would never know that by listening > >>>>> to the 'Snit' on the street, who is constantly force fed crap by the media. > >>>> > >>>> You mean like the crap you spew non-stop... > >>> > >>> Said Snit to himself in the mirror. > >>> > >>> <https://medium.com/@jancovorstermyafibheart/10-ectopic-heartbeat-vagus-nerve-palpitations-tips-for-you-b8b2acd4dbbe> > >>> > >>> You've talked bout bloating, fainting, ghost pains, etc, the above is most likely your > >>> 'issue', Mr. Hypochondria. Doctors can't wait for fools like you to show up, and you > >>> like it because you get long term disability, thus enabling you to take food right off > >>> the table of people who actually need gov't assistance. > >> > >> Ah, you claim I am the one who does as you JUST did... pretending to > >> know more about my health than I and my doctors do. > > > > I'm not pretending anything, I'm noting, based on statistical fact, that is > > "most likely" your issue. > > Ah, your defense is you do not understand basic logic and statistics and > how to apply them to specific cases -- esp. cases you know very little > about. > > But even with such deep ignorance as your "defense", why make up stories > about me using government money to get my degrees? More wild ass > guessing on your part in an effort to get me to talk more about my > education and finances? > > > <C43B8CEC.B5EF8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > > > > For the stuff you've *claimed* you were diagnosed with, Pepcid wouldn't > > do squat to relieve the symptoms. You're a classic hypochondriac, some > > Dr. probably saw you coming from a mile away. > > See: there you go again... making crap up about me. You do this pretty > much non-stop. I sincerely think you are not able to help yourself... it > is a compulsion on your part. > > >>>>> Looks to be the other way around and you can easily spot anyone doing it because > >>>>> there is no presumption of innocence in their arguments. Worse, many of them will > >>>>> argue *against* the presumption of innocence. Just because Trump is a narcissitic > >>>>> liar doesn't mean he isn't innocent of the claims (not charges, *claims*) made > >>>>> against him. It's like we're reliving the McCarthy era. > >>>> > >>>> We should have a presumption of innocence in our adjudication process > >>> > >>> Right... and we should taint jury pools with our media prior to that process, > >>> this makes all the sense in the world <eyeroll>. > >> > >> I note we should have the presumption of innocence > > > > You 'noted' more than that... > > The exact sentence you responded to: > > "We should have a presumption of innocence in our adjudication process" > > > "We should have a presumption of innocence in our adjudication process, > > but that does not mean OUTSIDE of the adjudication process we cannot > > look at evidence and conclude someone is ACTUALLY guilty of a crime. In > > fact, this is generally what happens in a court case, the prosecutors > > are saying the person is ACTUALLY guilty." - Snit > > > > Saying (alleging) someone *is* guilty and ACTUALLY proving it are two > > different things; it's the prosecutor's job to do both. For anyone other > > than a prosecutor to claim, as a fact, that someone *is* guilty without > > having the benefit of the judge to determine if the evidence in question > > was even legally obtained (as well as seeing that the evidentiary chain > > was maintained) and to check its veracity, is absurd. Were this not so, > > there'd be no need for a process. > > Are you suggesting you referenced what you were snipping? > > > You then 'noted': > > > > "This confused the hell out of you years ago and continues to do so now." - Snit > > Yes... and it did and it clearly still does. You confuse the ideas of > being ACTUALLY guilty of breaking the law with being FOUND GUILTY beyond > a reasonable doubt during an adjudication process (knowing you, you will > keep going on about your confusion, blaming me, and that will be > repeated... when I speak of "ACTUALLY GUILTY" just assume the "beyond a > reasonable doubt" part) > > > But only you are confused by this reality, thinking people know there are > > occasions where juries have been sequestered due to the wrecklessness > > of the media, especially problematic in high profile cases. > > Ah, you are making up claims about my views on the media and its > influence so you can avoid speaking of how you have confused being > ACTUALLY guilty and FOUND GUILTY... and have done so for years. You do > work to put me on the defensive when you know you are wrong. Fair enough. > > Remember the example I used and you ran from: > ----- > It is a fact you are guilty of harassment -- from what you say the > police even talked to you face-to-face about it. Nothing wrong with > noting that fact, even though it is unlikely to ever be adjudicated. > ----- > > You will ALWAYS run from this example... because it is such a good > example of how wrong you are. > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> At times, fiction is more valuable than truth. You refuse to take responsibility for your own comments. Actions that are easily found in a search. I have known fish who argue better than you do. Flooder Steve Carroll is again seen declaring "NOT THERE" when it comes to text on a site where information is there multiple times... but Flooder Steve Carroll is just too halfwitted or lost to understand any advice he reads... or he doesn't recognize it *as* info when he does see it. Oh goodness, that is just tons of tripe. Only what Flooder Steve Carroll wants matters to Flooder Steve Carroll. There is nothing Klaus Schadenfreude can do to change that. It's a trolling addiction and it is what it is. -- Do not click this link! Michael Glasser: Prescott Computer Guy http://prescottcomputerguy.com https://youtu.be/E3m_i-x92D0 https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.os.linux.advocacy/tzMH39QmAmU Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-24 13:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7a65552a-c0f0-4ccd-b897-445bb669bdff@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459240 |
On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 2:06:50 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > Ah, your defense Why would I need a "defense" to suggest what I believe is "most likely", especially given that it's a statistically sound suggestion? > > <C43B8CEC.B5EF8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > > > > For the stuff you've *claimed* you were diagnosed with, Pepcid wouldn't > > do squat to relieve the symptoms. You're a classic hypochondriac, some > > Dr. probably saw you coming from a mile away. > > See: there you go again... making crap up about me. I'm just saying what I believe is "most likely" to have happened. Besides, you may be (and probably are) lying about your diagnosis. (cue up you faulting "others" for not believing you... again). > Are you suggesting I'm not suggesting anything, I'm flatly stating that you are clueless on this topic. The idea that you believe one can, OUTSIDE of a courtroom, scrutinize the evidence devoid of the necessary methods that our legal system prescribes to ensure a fair trial is something only an idiot would push. Who *doesn't* know this? You, for one. > > You then 'noted': > > > > "This confused the hell out of you years ago and continues to do so now." - Snit > > Yes... and it did and it clearly still does. To *you*, but not to people who understand why we must have a process that should not be tainted by the media who now sit at the ready to do just that for political gain (on both sides). > > But only you are confused by this reality, thinking people know there are > > occasions where juries have been sequestered due to the wrecklessness > > of the media, especially problematic in high profile cases. > > Ah, you are making up claims about my views on the media You made your 'views' clear... if you're OUTSIDE the courtroom, which necessarily includes the media, you can state that someone *is* guilty. Of course, this upends the idea that the media should, in theory, only reports "facts"... but you have no use for those, so you're fine with it. This is how f*cked up your thinking is, you're just too far gone to see.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-24 13:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frphnoFok0vU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #459255 |
On 7/24/18 1:40 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 2:06:50 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> Ah, your defense > > Why would I need a "defense" to suggest what I believe is "most likely", > especially given that it's a statistically sound suggestion? > >>> <C43B8CEC.B5EF8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> >>> For the stuff you've *claimed* you were diagnosed with, Pepcid wouldn't >>> do squat to relieve the symptoms. You're a classic hypochondriac, some >>> Dr. probably saw you coming from a mile away. >> >> See: there you go again... making crap up about me. > > I'm just saying what I believe is "most likely" to have happened. > Besides, you may be (and probably are) lying about your diagnosis. > (cue up you faulting "others" for not believing you... again). > >> Are you suggesting > > I'm not suggesting anything, I'm flatly stating that you are clueless on > this topic. The idea that you believe one can, OUTSIDE of a courtroom, > scrutinize the evidence devoid of the necessary methods that our legal > system prescribes to ensure a fair trial is something only an idiot would > push. Who *doesn't* know this? You, for one. > >>> You then 'noted': >>> >>> "This confused the hell out of you years ago and continues to do so now." - Snit >> >> Yes... and it did and it clearly still does. > > To *you*, but not to people who understand why we must have a process > that should not be tainted by the media who now sit at the ready to do just > that for political gain (on both sides). > >>> But only you are confused by this reality, thinking people know there are >>> occasions where juries have been sequestered due to the wrecklessness >>> of the media, especially problematic in high profile cases. >> >> Ah, you are making up claims about my views on the media > > You made your 'views' clear... if you're OUTSIDE the courtroom, which > necessarily includes the media, you can state that someone *is* guilty. > Of course, this upends the idea that the media should, in theory, only > reports "facts"... but you have no use for those, so you're fine with it. > This is how f*cked up your thinking is, you're just too far gone to see. See: you are obsessed and delusional enough where you think you can look something up on WebMD or whatever and then figure out things better than I and my doctors, even though you have FAR less knowledge. And worse than that, you WANT to, and you WANT to attack me for it. That is insane of you. It is what started you on the path into having the police come talk to you about your harassment. Then you go into your nonsense attacks about your delusions of my views, but snip my actual comments! No wonder even you have figured out you cannot back your claims, esp. when you speak to me... you just make things up. Remember, you are ACTUALLY guilty of harassment... and there is nothing wrong with saying that even if you are never adjudicated for it. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-24 15:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0c5ff025-d325-4b62-a030-3ddc4d1d88a3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459259 |
On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 2:50:04 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 7/24/18 1:40 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 2:06:50 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > > >> Ah, your defense > > > > Why would I need a "defense" to suggest what I believe is "most likely", > > especially given that it's a statistically sound suggestion? > > > >>> <C43B8CEC.B5EF8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > >>> > >>> For the stuff you've *claimed* you were diagnosed with, Pepcid wouldn't > >>> do squat to relieve the symptoms. You're a classic hypochondriac, some > >>> Dr. probably saw you coming from a mile away. > >> > >> See: there you go again... making crap up about me. > > > > I'm just saying what I believe is "most likely" to have happened. > > Besides, you may be (and probably are) lying about your diagnosis. > > (cue up you faulting "others" for not believing you... again). > > > >> Are you suggesting > > > > I'm not suggesting anything, I'm flatly stating that you are clueless on > > this topic. The idea that you believe one can, OUTSIDE of a courtroom, > > scrutinize the evidence devoid of the necessary methods that our legal > > system prescribes to ensure a fair trial is something only an idiot would > > push. Who *doesn't* know this? You, for one. > > > >>> You then 'noted': > >>> > >>> "This confused the hell out of you years ago and continues to do so now." - Snit > >> > >> Yes... and it did and it clearly still does. > > > > To *you*, but not to people who understand why we must have a process > > that should not be tainted by the media who now sit at the ready to do just > > that for political gain (on both sides). > > > >>> But only you are confused by this reality, thinking people know there are > >>> occasions where juries have been sequestered due to the wrecklessness > >>> of the media, especially problematic in high profile cases. > >> > >> Ah, you are making up claims about my views on the media > > > > You made your 'views' clear... if you're OUTSIDE the courtroom, which > > necessarily includes the media, you can state that someone *is* guilty. > > Of course, this upends the idea that the media should, in theory, only > > reports "facts"... but you have no use for those, so you're fine with it. > > This is how f*cked up your thinking is, you're just too far gone to see. > > > See: you are ... presenting an argument you refuse to look at the evidence of? Yes... again; it's what you do. You should stick to talking tech... if you can find anyone to talk about it with... for the 2 minutes stretches you're not blatantly dishonest.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-24 15:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frpou3Fq5imU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #459277 |
On 7/24/18 3:38 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >> >> See: you are obsessed and delusional enough where you think you can look something up on WebMD or whatever and then figure out things better than I and my doctors, even though you have FAR less knowledge. And worse than that, you WANT to, and you WANT to attack me for it. That is insane of you. It is what started you on the path into having the police come talk to you about your harassment. >> >> Then you go into your nonsense attacks about your delusions of my views, but snip my actual comments! No wonder even you have figured out you cannot back your claims, esp. when you speak to me... you just make things up. Remember, you are ACTUALLY guilty of harassment... and there is nothing wrong with saying that even if you are never adjudicated for it. Nothing below suggests even you think there is anything rational about your compulsion to look things up on WebMD and the like and pretend to know more about my health than my doctors and I do. Nothing you say below suggests you have learned much from having the police speak to you about your harassment (though, I admit, as far as I know you have stopped going outside of COLA to contact / harass people in my life). > .... presenting an argument you refuse to look at the evidence of? Yes... again; > it's what you do. You should stick to talking tech... if you can find anyone to > talk about it with... for the 2 minutes stretches you're not blatantly dishonest. Ah, tech. Cool. Let us talk about it. The offer, perhaps unwisely, is still open to have you interact with my bot and learn a bit about it. I am happy to have it running on IRC for you. Let me know when and I will do so. Or we can talk about your bots... your insult bot or your flood bot. Or we can talk about other tech we both share an interest in. Or if those things do not interest you that is fine, too. Just stop lying about my life. If you can. Deal? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 13 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web