Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #457706 > unrolled thread
| Started by | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-07-16 20:12 +0000 |
| Last post | 2018-07-21 16:13 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 177 — 10 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 20:12 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 13:38 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-16 17:06 -0400
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-16 21:25 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-16 17:35 -0400
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-16 21:49 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 22:47 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 17:10 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-17 07:05 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 07:19 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 08:06 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-17 14:35 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 08:40 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-17 09:38 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-17 14:42 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 07:51 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-17 10:03 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 08:37 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-17 10:41 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 08:53 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 16:27 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 09:31 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-17 16:42 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 09:47 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 13:18 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 08:46 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 16:03 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:30 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 09:11 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 10:38 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:08 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 20:30 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 13:44 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 20:12 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 13:35 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-17 11:54 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 10:13 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 13:22 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 06:35 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 10:13 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 10:35 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 10:42 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 12:19 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 14:08 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 14:21 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 14:28 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 14:33 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 07:47 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-18 10:21 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 15:52 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 09:34 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 10:37 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-18 13:44 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 12:02 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 12:04 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:25 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:23 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 12:31 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:43 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 12:47 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:54 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 14:16 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 14:22 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 14:42 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 15:10 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:49 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 20:26 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 13:43 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-19 07:06 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 05:30 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-19 12:36 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-19 07:55 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 06:32 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 12:35 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 06:00 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-19 08:25 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-19 08:27 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:07 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 09:32 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 19:52 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:56 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 14:23 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 14:34 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 15:42 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 13:51 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 14:35 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 10:59 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-17 11:57 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 10:29 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 13:23 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 08:08 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-17 10:17 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Storage Unit <storage.unit@mailinator.com> - 2018-07-21 09:00 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 15:22 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 15:33 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... lol <lol@lol.lol> - 2018-07-21 22:20 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 16:17 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 02:32 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 06:42 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 17:15 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 17:38 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 17:59 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 08:22 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Storage Unit <storage.unit@mailinator.com> - 2018-07-21 08:49 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 12:48 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-21 20:19 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 13:30 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 13:42 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 13:58 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-21 21:02 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 14:31 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-21 22:04 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 16:16 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 14:34 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-21 22:07 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 16:14 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 16:01 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 14:21 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 14:38 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 14:43 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 16:10 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 16:35 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 08:14 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 15:01 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 14:19 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 14:37 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 14:42 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 16:09 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 10:02 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 10:20 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-22 18:16 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-22 11:26 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-22 18:34 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 11:48 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 11:55 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 12:11 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-22 18:35 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-23 07:13 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 06:25 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-23 12:41 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 12:43 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-23 17:59 -0400
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-23 15:08 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 22:28 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-23 19:25 -0400
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-23 18:20 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 01:28 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-23 18:18 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-22 11:06 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 11:33 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 11:39 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-22 23:03 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 23:29 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-22 23:32 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-22 18:38 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 20:18 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-22 18:36 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 18:55 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-22 18:33 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 19:11 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 11:11 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 11:41 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-23 12:49 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 13:06 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 13:29 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-23 13:31 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 14:38 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-23 18:06 -0400
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-23 15:19 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 15:50 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-23 15:08 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 14:47 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-23 15:08 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 15:34 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 11:14 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-21 22:09 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 16:13 -0700
Page 7 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-21 16:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frhsqlF201tU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #458791 |
On 7/21/18 2:43 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 3:38:43 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 7/21/18 2:21 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 2:30:07 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>> On 7/21/18 1:19 PM, Kompyler wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 12:48:56 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 7/21/18 6:49 AM, Storage Unit wrote: >>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> strong safety net programs: if someone is out of work or disabled or a >>>>>>>> child or otherwise CANNOT work on a temporary or permanent basis we >>>>>>>> should provide assistance so they can lead a reasonably comfortable >>>>>>>> life. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I wonder what do you mean by "reasonably comfortable life". And what if >>>>>>> person just don't wan't to work? >>>>>> >>>>>> Reasonably comfortable is having a decent roof over your head ... for a >>>>>> single person that might be a studio apartment, for a family of four >>>>>> maybe a two bedroom house. Nothing too fancy. Basic utilities should be >>>>>> available, including internet, though there should be caps on how much >>>>>> water and electricity and the like can be used. People should be able to >>>>>> get food -- and depending on the area either be able to use public >>>>>> transportation or have a basic car (or bike or whatever). They should be >>>>>> able to get basic clothing and the like as well as other necessities, >>>>>> and even some entertainment (a smallish TV and maybe enough money to go >>>>>> to a movie or eat out once a month or so). >>>>>> >>>>>> This is for people who WANT to work and cannot (or, well, simply >>>>>> cannot). If someone is not willing to work then that is different. >>>>> >>>>> As long as there are veterans who fought or gave their lives to give you >>>>> the right to sit on your ass all day and do nothing but sponge off the >>>>> taxpayer, veterans who are homeless, unable to receive proper medical >>>>> treatment and so forth, people like you, Michael Glasser, deserve zero. >>>>> You don't even deserve the air you get to breathe for free. >>>>> >>>>> I'll bet your family is real proud of you snit. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Not sure why you have so much anger but I wish you the best. >>> >>> Telling "others" how they 'feel' again, Snit? >> >> Nope... but the fact you cannot understand the emotion behind the lashing out he offers is quite telling of your challenges. Or some of them anyway. > > I see no question mark there, so... yup. Your insult bot completely screwed up there. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-21 16:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <34f15895-eb87-463d-b812-dfacf3096da6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #458813 |
On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 4:10:16 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 7/21/18 2:43 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 3:38:43 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 7/21/18 2:21 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 2:30:07 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>> On 7/21/18 1:19 PM, Kompyler wrote: > >>>>> On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 12:48:56 -0700, Snit wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On 7/21/18 6:49 AM, Storage Unit wrote: > >>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> strong safety net programs: if someone is out of work or disabled or a > >>>>>>>> child or otherwise CANNOT work on a temporary or permanent basis we > >>>>>>>> should provide assistance so they can lead a reasonably comfortable > >>>>>>>> life. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I wonder what do you mean by "reasonably comfortable life". And what if > >>>>>>> person just don't wan't to work? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Reasonably comfortable is having a decent roof over your head ... for a > >>>>>> single person that might be a studio apartment, for a family of four > >>>>>> maybe a two bedroom house. Nothing too fancy. Basic utilities should be > >>>>>> available, including internet, though there should be caps on how much > >>>>>> water and electricity and the like can be used. People should be able to > >>>>>> get food -- and depending on the area either be able to use public > >>>>>> transportation or have a basic car (or bike or whatever). They should be > >>>>>> able to get basic clothing and the like as well as other necessities, > >>>>>> and even some entertainment (a smallish TV and maybe enough money to go > >>>>>> to a movie or eat out once a month or so). > >>>>>> > >>>>>> This is for people who WANT to work and cannot (or, well, simply > >>>>>> cannot). If someone is not willing to work then that is different. > >>>>> > >>>>> As long as there are veterans who fought or gave their lives to give you > >>>>> the right to sit on your ass all day and do nothing but sponge off the > >>>>> taxpayer, veterans who are homeless, unable to receive proper medical > >>>>> treatment and so forth, people like you, Michael Glasser, deserve zero. > >>>>> You don't even deserve the air you get to breathe for free. > >>>>> > >>>>> I'll bet your family is real proud of you snit. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Not sure why you have so much anger but I wish you the best. > >>> > >>> Telling "others" how they 'feel' again, Snit? > >> > >> Nope... but the fact you cannot understand the emotion behind the lashing out he offers is quite telling of your challenges. Or some of them anyway. > > > > I see no question mark there, so... yup. > > Your insult bot completely screwed up there. > > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> Don't get too egotistical, Flooder Steve Carroll, sometimes "your unquotable lies" are just that. Flooder Steve Carroll can't get anything else to work, either. You can say I am Flooder Steve Carroll for all I care. Until Flooder Steve Carroll offers up his 'gold standard' Mac workflow for assessment, there is no challenge, just crazed assertions. On and on. You're again trying to push your ego when you have no skill. You're the dull knife in the drawer and your many stupid programs show this. I think Flooder Steve Carroll does not even know what is wrong with Unity. Right now there are too many "more choice is always better" freetards and not enough people with a clue enough to help the people with old computers. It was Flooder Steve Carroll who got caught using dozens of accounts over and over, and these are 'people' who come clearly out of the blue immediately into threads where he was being proved wrong... continuously for years. -- Curious how these posts are made? Email: usenet@gallopinginsanity.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-22 08:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9fb6a53b-e621-4b97-bc6a-010d43ec713e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #458820 |
On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 4:35:55 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 4:10:16 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > > On 7/21/18 2:43 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 3:38:43 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > >> On 7/21/18 2:21 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > >>> On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 2:30:07 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > >>>> On 7/21/18 1:19 PM, Kompyler wrote: > > >>>>> On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 12:48:56 -0700, Snit wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> On 7/21/18 6:49 AM, Storage Unit wrote: > > >>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> strong safety net programs: if someone is out of work or disabled or a > > >>>>>>>> child or otherwise CANNOT work on a temporary or permanent basis we > > >>>>>>>> should provide assistance so they can lead a reasonably comfortable > > >>>>>>>> life. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> I wonder what do you mean by "reasonably comfortable life". And what if > > >>>>>>> person just don't wan't to work? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Reasonably comfortable is having a decent roof over your head ... for a > > >>>>>> single person that might be a studio apartment, for a family of four > > >>>>>> maybe a two bedroom house. Nothing too fancy. Basic utilities should be > > >>>>>> available, including internet, though there should be caps on how much > > >>>>>> water and electricity and the like can be used. People should be able to > > >>>>>> get food -- and depending on the area either be able to use public > > >>>>>> transportation or have a basic car (or bike or whatever). They should be > > >>>>>> able to get basic clothing and the like as well as other necessities, > > >>>>>> and even some entertainment (a smallish TV and maybe enough money to go > > >>>>>> to a movie or eat out once a month or so). > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> This is for people who WANT to work and cannot (or, well, simply > > >>>>>> cannot). If someone is not willing to work then that is different. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> As long as there are veterans who fought or gave their lives to give you > > >>>>> the right to sit on your ass all day and do nothing but sponge off the > > >>>>> taxpayer, veterans who are homeless, unable to receive proper medical > > >>>>> treatment and so forth, people like you, Michael Glasser, deserve zero. > > >>>>> You don't even deserve the air you get to breathe for free. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I'll bet your family is real proud of you snit. > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> Not sure why you have so much anger but I wish you the best. > > >>> > > >>> Telling "others" how they 'feel' again, Snit? > > >> > > >> Nope... but the fact you cannot understand the emotion behind the lashing out he offers is quite telling of your challenges. Or some of them anyway. > > > > > > I see no question mark there, so... yup. > > > > Your insult bot completely screwed up there. > > > > > > -- > > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> > > > > Don't get too egotistical, Flooder Steve Carroll, sometimes "your unquotable lies" are just that. > > Flooder Steve Carroll can't get anything else to work, either. You can say I am Flooder Steve Carroll for all I care. > > Until Flooder Steve Carroll offers up his 'gold standard' Mac workflow for assessment, there is no challenge, just crazed assertions. > > On and on. You're again trying to push your ego when you have no skill. You're the dull knife in the drawer and your many stupid programs show this. > > I think Flooder Steve Carroll does not even know what is wrong with Unity. > > Right now there are too many "more choice is always better" freetards and not enough people with a clue enough to help the people with old computers. It was Flooder Steve Carroll who got caught using dozens of accounts over and over, and these are 'people' who come clearly out of the blue immediately into threads where he was being proved wrong... continuously for years. > > -- > Curious how these posts are made? Email: usenet@gallopinginsanity.com Did he think that was clever? Advertising is a wonderful thing and consumer stupidity is even better. I don't understand that. Denseness is denseness and there are "advocates" who are of one mind with it. Several are even programmers. -- Eight things to never feed your cat! http://tinyurl.com/kmqe66h http://www.5z8.info/open.exe_f2s2ea_nazi Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-21 15:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3f1ae512-8a61-4cc0-916d-a932b58690f2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #458782 |
On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 2:21:11 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 2:30:07 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > On 7/21/18 1:19 PM, Kompyler wrote: > > > On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 12:48:56 -0700, Snit wrote: > > > > > >> On 7/21/18 6:49 AM, Storage Unit wrote: > > >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: > > >>> > > >>>> strong safety net programs: if someone is out of work or disabled or a > > >>>> child or otherwise CANNOT work on a temporary or permanent basis we > > >>>> should provide assistance so they can lead a reasonably comfortable > > >>>> life. > > >>> > > >>> I wonder what do you mean by "reasonably comfortable life". And what if > > >>> person just don't wan't to work? > > >> > > >> Reasonably comfortable is having a decent roof over your head ... for a > > >> single person that might be a studio apartment, for a family of four > > >> maybe a two bedroom house. Nothing too fancy. Basic utilities should be > > >> available, including internet, though there should be caps on how much > > >> water and electricity and the like can be used. People should be able to > > >> get food -- and depending on the area either be able to use public > > >> transportation or have a basic car (or bike or whatever). They should be > > >> able to get basic clothing and the like as well as other necessities, > > >> and even some entertainment (a smallish TV and maybe enough money to go > > >> to a movie or eat out once a month or so). > > >> > > >> This is for people who WANT to work and cannot (or, well, simply > > >> cannot). If someone is not willing to work then that is different. > > > > > > As long as there are veterans who fought or gave their lives to give you > > > the right to sit on your ass all day and do nothing but sponge off the > > > taxpayer, veterans who are homeless, unable to receive proper medical > > > treatment and so forth, people like you, Michael Glasser, deserve zero. > > > You don't even deserve the air you get to breathe for free. > > > > > > I'll bet your family is real proud of you snit. > > > > > > > Not sure why you have so much anger but I wish you the best. > > Telling "others" how they 'feel' again, Snit? Klaus Schadenfreude can create a virtual machine. Of course that is not possible on anything but Linux! One guy reported him years ago. As expected, it did naught to thwart the dolt. That lame duck update system failed over and over again. Do you have a Network+ certification? <giggle> If Steve Carroll calls having his ass handed to him like an idiot day in and day out by numerous people effective 'trolling', then yeah... he is a fine troll. I can not agree with that definition, I use another term. I call him a complete dumb-ass. I am well aware the stuff I link to from Reddit is total tenderfoot level. That said, it is good enough. - Do not click this link! https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/6sfkup/what_desktop_tasks_does_linux_handle_better_than/= Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-21 14:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7a2c15bb-01da-4063-8c46-2a3b286be14a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #458772 |
On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 2:19:32 PM UTC-6, Kompyler wrote: > On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 12:48:56 -0700, Snit wrote: > > > On 7/21/18 6:49 AM, Storage Unit wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: > >> > >>> strong safety net programs: if someone is out of work or disabled or a > >>> child or otherwise CANNOT work on a temporary or permanent basis we > >>> should provide assistance so they can lead a reasonably comfortable > >>> life. > >> > >> I wonder what do you mean by "reasonably comfortable life". And what if > >> person just don't wan't to work? > > > > Reasonably comfortable is having a decent roof over your head ... for a > > single person that might be a studio apartment, for a family of four > > maybe a two bedroom house. Nothing too fancy. Basic utilities should be > > available, including internet, though there should be caps on how much > > water and electricity and the like can be used. People should be able to > > get food -- and depending on the area either be able to use public > > transportation or have a basic car (or bike or whatever). They should be > > able to get basic clothing and the like as well as other necessities, > > and even some entertainment (a smallish TV and maybe enough money to go > > to a movie or eat out once a month or so). > > > > This is for people who WANT to work and cannot (or, well, simply > > cannot). If someone is not willing to work then that is different. > > As long as there are veterans who fought or gave their lives to give you > the right to sit on your ass all day and do nothing but sponge off the > taxpayer, If that's all he did that'd be one thing... but then he has the gall to go online and spout the BS that he does. Worse, the taxpayer didn't get *any* kind of ROI. He won't even update his knowledge on the field he's worked in, that offers the most lucrative potential by far. Doing web work is a perfect job to do out of one's home while still making decent $$ but he's too 'busy' <eyeroll> to contribute.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-21 14:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frhncoFpsjU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #458781 |
On 7/21/18 2:19 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 2:19:32 PM UTC-6, Kompyler wrote: >> On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 12:48:56 -0700, Snit wrote: >> >>> On 7/21/18 6:49 AM, Storage Unit wrote: >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: >>>> >>>>> strong safety net programs: if someone is out of work or disabled or a >>>>> child or otherwise CANNOT work on a temporary or permanent basis we >>>>> should provide assistance so they can lead a reasonably comfortable >>>>> life. >>>> >>>> I wonder what do you mean by "reasonably comfortable life". And what if >>>> person just don't wan't to work? >>> >>> Reasonably comfortable is having a decent roof over your head ... for a >>> single person that might be a studio apartment, for a family of four >>> maybe a two bedroom house. Nothing too fancy. Basic utilities should be >>> available, including internet, though there should be caps on how much >>> water and electricity and the like can be used. People should be able to >>> get food -- and depending on the area either be able to use public >>> transportation or have a basic car (or bike or whatever). They should be >>> able to get basic clothing and the like as well as other necessities, >>> and even some entertainment (a smallish TV and maybe enough money to go >>> to a movie or eat out once a month or so). >>> >>> This is for people who WANT to work and cannot (or, well, simply >>> cannot). If someone is not willing to work then that is different. >> >> As long as there are veterans who fought or gave their lives to give you >> the right to sit on your ass all day and do nothing but sponge off the >> taxpayer, > > If that's all he did that'd be one thing... but then he has the gall to go > online and spout the BS that he does. Worse, the taxpayer didn't get > *any* kind of ROI. He won't even update his knowledge on the field > he's worked in, that offers the most lucrative potential by far. Doing > web work is a perfect job to do out of one's home while still making > decent $$ but he's too 'busy' <eyeroll> to contribute. > You are the one who talked about having difficulty putting food on the table... and you are also making up stories about my life. You do that a lot. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-21 14:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <931d4dcb-f3af-41d9-873c-89681d723701@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #458787 |
On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 3:37:32 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 7/21/18 2:19 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 2:19:32 PM UTC-6, Kompyler wrote: > >> On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 12:48:56 -0700, Snit wrote: > >> > >>> On 7/21/18 6:49 AM, Storage Unit wrote: > >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: > >>>> > >>>>> strong safety net programs: if someone is out of work or disabled or a > >>>>> child or otherwise CANNOT work on a temporary or permanent basis we > >>>>> should provide assistance so they can lead a reasonably comfortable > >>>>> life. > >>>> > >>>> I wonder what do you mean by "reasonably comfortable life". And what if > >>>> person just don't wan't to work? > >>> > >>> Reasonably comfortable is having a decent roof over your head ... for a > >>> single person that might be a studio apartment, for a family of four > >>> maybe a two bedroom house. Nothing too fancy. Basic utilities should be > >>> available, including internet, though there should be caps on how much > >>> water and electricity and the like can be used. People should be able to > >>> get food -- and depending on the area either be able to use public > >>> transportation or have a basic car (or bike or whatever). They should be > >>> able to get basic clothing and the like as well as other necessities, > >>> and even some entertainment (a smallish TV and maybe enough money to go > >>> to a movie or eat out once a month or so). > >>> > >>> This is for people who WANT to work and cannot (or, well, simply > >>> cannot). If someone is not willing to work then that is different. > >> > >> As long as there are veterans who fought or gave their lives to give you > >> the right to sit on your ass all day and do nothing but sponge off the > >> taxpayer, > > > > If that's all he did that'd be one thing... but then he has the gall to go > > online and spout the BS that he does. Worse, the taxpayer didn't get > > *any* kind of ROI. He won't even update his knowledge on the field > > he's worked in, that offers the most lucrative potential by far. Doing > > web work is a perfect job to do out of one's home while still making > > decent $$ but he's too 'busy' <eyeroll> to contribute. > > > > You are the one who talked about having difficulty putting food on the > table... For whom did I 'talk' about it? Quote it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-21 16:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frhsp3F201tU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #458790 |
On 7/21/18 2:42 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 3:37:32 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 7/21/18 2:19 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 2:19:32 PM UTC-6, Kompyler wrote: >>>> On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 12:48:56 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 7/21/18 6:49 AM, Storage Unit wrote: >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: >>>>>> >>>>>>> strong safety net programs: if someone is out of work or disabled or a >>>>>>> child or otherwise CANNOT work on a temporary or permanent basis we >>>>>>> should provide assistance so they can lead a reasonably comfortable >>>>>>> life. >>>>>> >>>>>> I wonder what do you mean by "reasonably comfortable life". And what if >>>>>> person just don't wan't to work? >>>>> >>>>> Reasonably comfortable is having a decent roof over your head ... for a >>>>> single person that might be a studio apartment, for a family of four >>>>> maybe a two bedroom house. Nothing too fancy. Basic utilities should be >>>>> available, including internet, though there should be caps on how much >>>>> water and electricity and the like can be used. People should be able to >>>>> get food -- and depending on the area either be able to use public >>>>> transportation or have a basic car (or bike or whatever). They should be >>>>> able to get basic clothing and the like as well as other necessities, >>>>> and even some entertainment (a smallish TV and maybe enough money to go >>>>> to a movie or eat out once a month or so). >>>>> >>>>> This is for people who WANT to work and cannot (or, well, simply >>>>> cannot). If someone is not willing to work then that is different. >>>> >>>> As long as there are veterans who fought or gave their lives to give you >>>> the right to sit on your ass all day and do nothing but sponge off the >>>> taxpayer, >>> >>> If that's all he did that'd be one thing... but then he has the gall to go >>> online and spout the BS that he does. Worse, the taxpayer didn't get >>> *any* kind of ROI. He won't even update his knowledge on the field >>> he's worked in, that offers the most lucrative potential by far. Doing >>> web work is a perfect job to do out of one's home while still making >>> decent $$ but he's too 'busy' <eyeroll> to contribute. >>> >> >> You are the one who talked about having difficulty putting food on the table... and you are also making up stories about my life. You do that a lot. > > For whom did I 'talk' about it? We each speak only for ourselves, though you often project onto me. So you were speaking of yourself. > Quote it. Do you even deny you were talking about having difficulty putting food on the table? I doubt it. But if you directly deny it I will actually look. Will be fun to shove another of your lies in your face. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-22 10:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <53f3c99c-d0ff-4058-90ce-9d9ae28d3da3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #458812 |
On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 5:09:26 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 7/21/18 2:42 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 3:37:32 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 7/21/18 2:19 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 2:19:32 PM UTC-6, Kompyler wrote: > >>>> On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 12:48:56 -0700, Snit wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On 7/21/18 6:49 AM, Storage Unit wrote: > >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> strong safety net programs: if someone is out of work or disabled or a > >>>>>>> child or otherwise CANNOT work on a temporary or permanent basis we > >>>>>>> should provide assistance so they can lead a reasonably comfortable > >>>>>>> life. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I wonder what do you mean by "reasonably comfortable life". And what if > >>>>>> person just don't wan't to work? > >>>>> > >>>>> Reasonably comfortable is having a decent roof over your head ... for a > >>>>> single person that might be a studio apartment, for a family of four > >>>>> maybe a two bedroom house. Nothing too fancy. Basic utilities should be > >>>>> available, including internet, though there should be caps on how much > >>>>> water and electricity and the like can be used. People should be able to > >>>>> get food -- and depending on the area either be able to use public > >>>>> transportation or have a basic car (or bike or whatever). They should be > >>>>> able to get basic clothing and the like as well as other necessities, > >>>>> and even some entertainment (a smallish TV and maybe enough money to go > >>>>> to a movie or eat out once a month or so). > >>>>> > >>>>> This is for people who WANT to work and cannot (or, well, simply > >>>>> cannot). If someone is not willing to work then that is different. > >>>> > >>>> As long as there are veterans who fought or gave their lives to give you > >>>> the right to sit on your ass all day and do nothing but sponge off the > >>>> taxpayer, > >>> > >>> If that's all he did that'd be one thing... but then he has the gall to go > >>> online and spout the BS that he does. Worse, the taxpayer didn't get > >>> *any* kind of ROI. He won't even update his knowledge on the field > >>> he's worked in, that offers the most lucrative potential by far. Doing > >>> web work is a perfect job to do out of one's home while still making > >>> decent $$ but he's too 'busy' <eyeroll> to contribute. > >>> > >> > >> You are the one who talked about having difficulty putting food on the table... and you are also making up stories about my life. You do that a lot. > > > > For whom did I 'talk' about it? > > We each speak only for ourselves And, as expected, no "proof" from the lying hypocrite who has repeatedly claimed he always support his BS. Gee, you don't think the fact that you've written hundreds of thousands of posts filled with BS might have something to do with your total lack of credibility, do you?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-22 10:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4bad8a15-0cc1-460a-991b-7c7e21411de6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #458887 |
On Sunday, July 22, 2018 at 10:02:53 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 5:09:26 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > On 7/21/18 2:42 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 3:37:32 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > >> On 7/21/18 2:19 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > >>> On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 2:19:32 PM UTC-6, Kompyler wrote: > > >>>> On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 12:48:56 -0700, Snit wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> On 7/21/18 6:49 AM, Storage Unit wrote: > > >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> strong safety net programs: if someone is out of work or disabled or a > > >>>>>>> child or otherwise CANNOT work on a temporary or permanent basis we > > >>>>>>> should provide assistance so they can lead a reasonably comfortable > > >>>>>>> life. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I wonder what do you mean by "reasonably comfortable life". And what if > > >>>>>> person just don't wan't to work? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Reasonably comfortable is having a decent roof over your head ... for a > > >>>>> single person that might be a studio apartment, for a family of four > > >>>>> maybe a two bedroom house. Nothing too fancy. Basic utilities should be > > >>>>> available, including internet, though there should be caps on how much > > >>>>> water and electricity and the like can be used. People should be able to > > >>>>> get food -- and depending on the area either be able to use public > > >>>>> transportation or have a basic car (or bike or whatever). They should be > > >>>>> able to get basic clothing and the like as well as other necessities, > > >>>>> and even some entertainment (a smallish TV and maybe enough money to go > > >>>>> to a movie or eat out once a month or so). > > >>>>> > > >>>>> This is for people who WANT to work and cannot (or, well, simply > > >>>>> cannot). If someone is not willing to work then that is different. > > >>>> > > >>>> As long as there are veterans who fought or gave their lives to give you > > >>>> the right to sit on your ass all day and do nothing but sponge off the > > >>>> taxpayer, > > >>> > > >>> If that's all he did that'd be one thing... but then he has the gall to go > > >>> online and spout the BS that he does. Worse, the taxpayer didn't get > > >>> *any* kind of ROI. He won't even update his knowledge on the field > > >>> he's worked in, that offers the most lucrative potential by far. Doing > > >>> web work is a perfect job to do out of one's home while still making > > >>> decent $$ but he's too 'busy' <eyeroll> to contribute. > > >>> > > >> > > >> You are the one who talked about having difficulty putting food on the table... and you are also making up stories about my life. You do that a lot. > > > > > > For whom did I 'talk' about it? > > > > We each speak only for ourselves > > And, as expected, no "proof" from the lying hypocrite who has repeatedly > claimed he always support his BS. Gee, you don't think the fact that you've > written hundreds of thousands of posts filled with BS might have something > to do with your total lack of credibility, do you? Can ASCII characters be concatenated into a string with a logical connection to the "real" world; that is the question posed recently by those astonished at the non-stop flood of gibberish from trolls and basement-dwelling ultra-cranks. Oh goodness, that is just tons of rubbish. Just give it up already. You're again trying to push your ego when you have no skill. You're the dim bulb and your many incoherent tasks show this. I sometimes kill Klaus Schadenfreude with my brain. So what is Klaus Schadenfreude's poison for the flooding crap? Access? That is the only database he knows, and it is a joke. He must be abusing it to produce these stupid "spam" garbage posts. Lemme guess, Klaus Schadenfreude took the chatbot that he hacked and blamed Takuya Saitoh for... he's feeding it Google Groups data, grabbing hand-picked paragraphs, then editing those using Markova chains and then he manually posts them because his obsessiveness enables him to do that nonstop. -- "You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him. He clearly wants the attention" Steve Carroll, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-22 18:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pS35D.462187$yc1.381444@fx40.iad> |
| In reply to | #458887 |
On Sun, 22 Jul 2018 10:02:50 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 5:09:26 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 7/21/18 2:42 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >> > On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 3:37:32 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> >> On 7/21/18 2:19 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >> >>> On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 2:19:32 PM UTC-6, Kompyler wrote: >> >>>> On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 12:48:56 -0700, Snit wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> On 7/21/18 6:49 AM, Storage Unit wrote: >> >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> strong safety net programs: if someone is out of work or >> >>>>>>> disabled or a child or otherwise CANNOT work on a temporary or >> >>>>>>> permanent basis we should provide assistance so they can lead a >> >>>>>>> reasonably comfortable life. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> I wonder what do you mean by "reasonably comfortable life". And >> >>>>>> what if person just don't wan't to work? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Reasonably comfortable is having a decent roof over your head ... >> >>>>> for a single person that might be a studio apartment, for a >> >>>>> family of four maybe a two bedroom house. Nothing too fancy. >> >>>>> Basic utilities should be available, including internet, though >> >>>>> there should be caps on how much water and electricity and the >> >>>>> like can be used. People should be able to get food -- and >> >>>>> depending on the area either be able to use public transportation >> >>>>> or have a basic car (or bike or whatever). They should be able to >> >>>>> get basic clothing and the like as well as other necessities, and >> >>>>> even some entertainment (a smallish TV and maybe enough money to >> >>>>> go to a movie or eat out once a month or so). >> >>>>> >> >>>>> This is for people who WANT to work and cannot (or, well, simply >> >>>>> cannot). If someone is not willing to work then that is >> >>>>> different. >> >>>> >> >>>> As long as there are veterans who fought or gave their lives to >> >>>> give you the right to sit on your ass all day and do nothing but >> >>>> sponge off the taxpayer, >> >>> >> >>> If that's all he did that'd be one thing... but then he has the >> >>> gall to go online and spout the BS that he does. Worse, the >> >>> taxpayer didn't get *any* kind of ROI. He won't even update his >> >>> knowledge on the field he's worked in, that offers the most >> >>> lucrative potential by far. Doing web work is a perfect job to do >> >>> out of one's home while still making decent $$ but he's too 'busy' >> >>> <eyeroll> to contribute. >> >>> >> >>> >> >> You are the one who talked about having difficulty putting food on >> >> the table... and you are also making up stories about my life. You >> >> do that a lot. >> > >> > For whom did I 'talk' about it? >> >> We each speak only for ourselves > > And, as expected, no "proof" from the lying hypocrite who has repeatedly > claimed he always support his BS. Gee, you don't think the fact that > you've written hundreds of thousands of posts filled with BS might have > something to do with your total lack of credibility, do you? +1 -- SilverSlimer Ubuntu 18.04 on MSI GT72 2QD Never apologize Liberalism - One picture, one thousand words: https://kek.gg/i/4xGRhd.jpg Highly recommended reading: - Big Brother: The Orwellian Nightmare Come True (https://kek.gg/u/SrmB) - Questioning Islam: Tough Questions and Honest Answers About the Muslim Religion (https://kek.gg/u/35jND)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-22 11:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frk0iaFggp2U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #458904 |
On 7/22/18 11:16 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: > On Sun, 22 Jul 2018 10:02:50 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > >> On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 5:09:26 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>> On 7/21/18 2:42 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>> On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 3:37:32 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 7/21/18 2:19 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>>> On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 2:19:32 PM UTC-6, Kompyler wrote: >>>>>>> On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 12:48:56 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 7/21/18 6:49 AM, Storage Unit wrote: >>>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> strong safety net programs: if someone is out of work or >>>>>>>>>> disabled or a child or otherwise CANNOT work on a temporary or >>>>>>>>>> permanent basis we should provide assistance so they can lead a >>>>>>>>>> reasonably comfortable life. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I wonder what do you mean by "reasonably comfortable life". And >>>>>>>>> what if person just don't wan't to work? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Reasonably comfortable is having a decent roof over your head ... >>>>>>>> for a single person that might be a studio apartment, for a >>>>>>>> family of four maybe a two bedroom house. Nothing too fancy. >>>>>>>> Basic utilities should be available, including internet, though >>>>>>>> there should be caps on how much water and electricity and the >>>>>>>> like can be used. People should be able to get food -- and >>>>>>>> depending on the area either be able to use public transportation >>>>>>>> or have a basic car (or bike or whatever). They should be able to >>>>>>>> get basic clothing and the like as well as other necessities, and >>>>>>>> even some entertainment (a smallish TV and maybe enough money to >>>>>>>> go to a movie or eat out once a month or so). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This is for people who WANT to work and cannot (or, well, simply >>>>>>>> cannot). If someone is not willing to work then that is >>>>>>>> different. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As long as there are veterans who fought or gave their lives to >>>>>>> give you the right to sit on your ass all day and do nothing but >>>>>>> sponge off the taxpayer, >>>>>> >>>>>> If that's all he did that'd be one thing... but then he has the >>>>>> gall to go online and spout the BS that he does. Worse, the >>>>>> taxpayer didn't get *any* kind of ROI. He won't even update his >>>>>> knowledge on the field he's worked in, that offers the most >>>>>> lucrative potential by far. Doing web work is a perfect job to do >>>>>> out of one's home while still making decent $$ but he's too 'busy' >>>>>> <eyeroll> to contribute. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> You are the one who talked about having difficulty putting food on >>>>> the table... and you are also making up stories about my life. You >>>>> do that a lot. >>>> >>>> For whom did I 'talk' about it? >>> >>> We each speak only for ourselves >> >> And, as expected, no "proof" from the lying hypocrite who has repeatedly >> claimed he always support his BS. Gee, you don't think the fact that >> you've written hundreds of thousands of posts filled with BS might have >> something to do with your total lack of credibility, do you? > > +1 > > > Carroll plays these games... he makes non-stop accusations he refuses to back up, even when I note he is full of shit or I have no clue what the hell is he is talking about. This was true when he spoke of my putting someone down for being black (what?) and then brought up names I do not even know... I even did a quick search of COLA and do not see them as ever having posted, but Google Groups sucks so maybe I missed it. He did that also when he accused me of attacking people for using Linux, even though I am VERY clear people should use whatever they want. Then he demands "proof" for something that is not an accusation and is not something I am putting him down for. Yes, he spoke of having difficulty putting food on the table... that is simply a fact. I do not know if he really is or not, but he spoke of it. Even if he is having such challenges it is NOT a reason to put him down. Be he spoke of that AS he was making up stories about me having the government pay for my degrees and other fantasies he has about my personal life and personal finances. He simply makes things up and then attacks me for it. He lies. Non-stop. Oh, and he spoke of my post count (why?) and claimed it was high (and used that as an attacks) as he denied his own post count and then tried to attribute his OWN posts to ME. He is completely over the top insane with his trolling. Again. Likely because of how pissed he is about the police coming to speak to him about his harassment. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-22 18:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pj2inv$ce7$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #458904 |
On Sun, 22 Jul 2018 18:16:53 +0000, SilverSlimer wrote: > On Sun, 22 Jul 2018 10:02:50 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > >> On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 5:09:26 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>> On 7/21/18 2:42 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> > On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 3:37:32 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>> >> On 7/21/18 2:19 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> >>> On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 2:19:32 PM UTC-6, Kompyler wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 12:48:56 -0700, Snit wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>>> On 7/21/18 6:49 AM, Storage Unit wrote: >>> >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> strong safety net programs: if someone is out of work or >>> >>>>>>> disabled or a child or otherwise CANNOT work on a temporary or >>> >>>>>>> permanent basis we should provide assistance so they can lead >>> >>>>>>> a reasonably comfortable life. >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> I wonder what do you mean by "reasonably comfortable life". And >>> >>>>>> what if person just don't wan't to work? >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Reasonably comfortable is having a decent roof over your head >>> >>>>> ... >>> >>>>> for a single person that might be a studio apartment, for a >>> >>>>> family of four maybe a two bedroom house. Nothing too fancy. >>> >>>>> Basic utilities should be available, including internet, though >>> >>>>> there should be caps on how much water and electricity and the >>> >>>>> like can be used. People should be able to get food -- and >>> >>>>> depending on the area either be able to use public >>> >>>>> transportation or have a basic car (or bike or whatever). They >>> >>>>> should be able to get basic clothing and the like as well as >>> >>>>> other necessities, and even some entertainment (a smallish TV >>> >>>>> and maybe enough money to go to a movie or eat out once a month >>> >>>>> or so). >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> This is for people who WANT to work and cannot (or, well, simply >>> >>>>> cannot). If someone is not willing to work then that is >>> >>>>> different. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> As long as there are veterans who fought or gave their lives to >>> >>>> give you the right to sit on your ass all day and do nothing but >>> >>>> sponge off the taxpayer, >>> >>> >>> >>> If that's all he did that'd be one thing... but then he has the >>> >>> gall to go online and spout the BS that he does. Worse, the >>> >>> taxpayer didn't get *any* kind of ROI. He won't even update his >>> >>> knowledge on the field he's worked in, that offers the most >>> >>> lucrative potential by far. Doing web work is a perfect job to do >>> >>> out of one's home while still making decent $$ but he's too 'busy' >>> >>> <eyeroll> to contribute. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> You are the one who talked about having difficulty putting food on >>> >> the table... and you are also making up stories about my life. You >>> >> do that a lot. >>> > >>> > For whom did I 'talk' about it? >>> >>> We each speak only for ourselves >> >> And, as expected, no "proof" from the lying hypocrite who has >> repeatedly claimed he always support his BS. Gee, you don't think the >> fact that you've written hundreds of thousands of posts filled with BS >> might have something to do with your total lack of credibility, do you? > > +1 Snit is essentially a combination of a compulsive and pathological liar . He is the very definition of a sociopath. Couple that with his utter lack of reading comprehension skills and you have Michael Glasser, a person who is trapped in his own misery. Feeling sorry for a pathetic person like Michael Glasser is a waste of time because his narcissistic tendencies will kick in and he will assume he is superior to those offering him help or guidance.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-22 11:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bf6bd419-30b2-43fc-81a3-05c982831ed0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #458909 |
On Sunday, July 22, 2018 at 12:34:41 PM UTC-6, Kompyler wrote: > Snit is essentially a combination of a compulsive and pathological liar . > He is the very definition of a sociopath. > Couple that with his utter lack of reading comprehension skills and you > have Michael Glasser, a person who is trapped in his own misery. > Feeling sorry for a pathetic person like Michael Glasser is a waste of > time because his narcissistic tendencies will kick in and he will assume > he is superior to those offering him help or guidance. Unfortunately, when the gov't ended programs and facilities for people like him a few decades ago, this meant that the 'Snits' of the world were left to be dealt with by their families. Imagine what his family has to go through on a daily basis, what with his trying to strong arm reality into some delusion he's having. At least the state finally got him off the road.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-22 11:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <43f45ef3-d1f0-4c45-b15a-b58dde669da3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #458913 |
On Sunday, July 22, 2018 at 11:48:28 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Sunday, July 22, 2018 at 12:34:41 PM UTC-6, Kompyler wrote: > > > Snit is essentially a combination of a compulsive and pathological liar . > > He is the very definition of a sociopath. > > Couple that with his utter lack of reading comprehension skills and you > > have Michael Glasser, a person who is trapped in his own misery. > > Feeling sorry for a pathetic person like Michael Glasser is a waste of > > time because his narcissistic tendencies will kick in and he will assume > > he is superior to those offering him help or guidance. > > Unfortunately, when the gov't ended programs and facilities for people like > him a few decades ago, this meant that the 'Snits' of the world were left to > be dealt with by their families. Imagine what his family has to go through on > a daily basis, what with his trying to strong arm reality into some delusion > he's having. At least the state finally got him off the road. Troll Master Steve Carroll does not know if there is a encumbered FOSS program to handle such tasks. All that matters is that Troll Master Steve Carroll gets to dish out his poorly written flyer and then hang up and giggle about it. The fact that Sandman is an involuntary target on the other end of the phone is the game. The entire farce is brimming of laughable inconsistencies and is based heavily on Troll Master Steve Carroll's 'user database' gag. Now Sandman on the other end of the game doesn't matter. All that matters is Troll Master Steve Carroll gets to deliver the payload. So how to win? Don't pay attention the post. Honest discussion isn't part of ploy and never was. Sandman bamboozled Troll Master Steve Carroll a bit, big f*cking deal. Why be a sniveling asshole about it? -- Get Rich Slow https://youtu.be/HHT9SJgYsH4 Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-22 12:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <52d0df63-4a40-4d41-aeda-7eb8c614bd05@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #458913 |
On Sunday, July 22, 2018 at 11:48:28 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Sunday, July 22, 2018 at 12:34:41 PM UTC-6, Kompyler wrote: > > > Snit is essentially a combination of a compulsive and pathological liar . > > He is the very definition of a sociopath. > > Couple that with his utter lack of reading comprehension skills and you > > have Michael Glasser, a person who is trapped in his own misery. > > Feeling sorry for a pathetic person like Michael Glasser is a waste of > > time because his narcissistic tendencies will kick in and he will assume > > he is superior to those offering him help or guidance. > > Unfortunately, when the gov't ended programs and facilities for people like > him a few decades ago, this meant that the 'Snits' of the world were left to > be dealt with by their families. Imagine what his family has to go through on > a daily basis, what with his trying to strong arm reality into some delusion > he's having. At least the state finally got him off the road. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 One thing that I have never seen spoofed is the Google acct. number so perhaps you can use it as a filtering criteria, too. Here's mine: posting-account=qzPusQoAAADVdKNEKE-jqIVbecHp7oZ7 My gmail posts go back to 2009 (that I've seen, crackhead's forgeries using gmail only go back to 2012). Notice the posting acct. number on this response matches this post from 2009: <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/C9FwjiytRoA/ftc2GG7-37AJ> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJX5+9UAAoJELnOYK54exUCqOMP/AiBMj7DVoep+aTZfsYEwg7h tTwqKInwpmHwUjkZYu2m+kBBuXOZR47OwKWZpUCfnloN4pfL2cgTqmAHeDilVI+L 9sUw15rPd95n/5BDXezZnxzoL6n/8/GzHYmFqUJoKScaOxab4Odf97PDqVfEqiml G86egbR85z7deWiUNcl8Bq1zLtP17eSGy0sUmPMMDrbw/7lbGQ4ayA/ZqjfzXadx qmf3+WYUEvquDgXN4b6x9Ig+EzlIME0Ylp3I6COEFJ69Ozu3ZjwWDp1RWI0Eq4XP vV2I1GFq19AO02hAvJ/qZcWAHgYwhhlFmVWzoqbA1dSnDsCjLr0+xGaAUVcLuwjd qNdLSd1wrunCfUuotc6kUGyvj2Vy3zA5oWmLpHA4utjOrm5RlSyTaJHESOV08CAS X0YO+7LjGBxZ87U//Jfo0vB5u+ij91l7Zdsphf+eSNWvJ+DoUtimlvcP5o4Te1D9 rKNmZ1QUMkl/Kjl9x70Q58XH8etkp9d2NHE1vVth5c9vsfAaNkJVHn7TIC79h4NE Kny8Zp0r+QCsKnqs+NYd9GPyhvGsGmoBzEneAOgs7l509EoCOB3+Lfam3D7OmdvD 97FL/nbKbmDE8n9H8gs1sAua3Yfwz8S7IpHN19GTh9GNCKU8F+orXTSzAPUaKNyp mMihyxG5fd2CFFGEQV8a =sC4v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Get Rich Slow! https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.sys.mac.system/6m_7Z7rQ6Hg http://www.5z8.info/titstitstitstits_j7t4bl_stalin https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLU_evUKollmjeuJy5V5UMotPUs65Q7YM6 Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-22 18:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frkpmgFloqpU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #458913 |
On 7/22/18 11:48 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Sunday, July 22, 2018 at 12:34:41 PM UTC-6, Kompyler wrote: > >> Snit is essentially a combination of a compulsive and pathological liar . >> He is the very definition of a sociopath. >> Couple that with his utter lack of reading comprehension skills and you >> have Michael Glasser, a person who is trapped in his own misery. >> Feeling sorry for a pathetic person like Michael Glasser is a waste of >> time because his narcissistic tendencies will kick in and he will assume >> he is superior to those offering him help or guidance. > > Unfortunately, when the gov't ended programs and facilities for people like > him a few decades ago, this meant that the 'Snits' of the world were left to > be dealt with by their families. Imagine what his family has to go through on > a daily basis, what with his trying to strong arm reality into some delusion > he's having. At least the state finally got him off the road. > See: this is you just lying about me and my family. You cried repeatedly how I merely noted the fact you spoke of difficulties putting food on the table, but you have no issue with you spewing such crap about my life. Your hypocrisy knows no limit. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-23 07:13 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <gahbldllhgll1r0qnvqhhq51g53up777dp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #458909 |
Kompyler wrote: >Snit is essentially a combination of a compulsive and pathological liar . >He is the very definition of a sociopath. >Couple that with his utter lack of reading comprehension skills and you >have Michael Glasser, a person who is trapped in his own misery. >Feeling sorry for a pathetic person like Michael Glasser is a waste of >time because his narcissistic tendencies will kick in and he will assume >he is superior to those offering him help or guidance. How many *thousand* times has the above sentiment, give or take, been posted? Maybe it will have the desired effect, this time, eh? -- "But to say [Linux] should not be used for what it was designed for, as [TomB] did, shows pretty deep ignorance of the whole purpose of Linux." - some thing, lying shamelessly (but no one can quote it lying)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-23 06:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a750d104-c5dd-4b68-99aa-b6f0f0e3b2e2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #458987 |
On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 5:13:51 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote: > Kompyler wrote: > > >Snit is essentially a combination of a compulsive and pathological liar . > >He is the very definition of a sociopath. > >Couple that with his utter lack of reading comprehension skills and you > >have Michael Glasser, a person who is trapped in his own misery. > >Feeling sorry for a pathetic person like Michael Glasser is a waste of > >time because his narcissistic tendencies will kick in and he will assume > >he is superior to those offering him help or guidance. > > How many *thousand* times has the above sentiment, give or take, been > posted? > > Maybe it will have the desired effect, this time, eh? > > -- > "But to say [Linux] should not be used for what it was designed for, > as [TomB] did, shows pretty deep ignorance of the whole purpose of > Linux." - some thing, lying shamelessly (but no one can quote it > lying) Bravo, Klaus Schadenfreude, you are now living rent-free inside Steven Carroll's beady little brain. Ha! What is Steven Carroll's poison for the flooding crap? mySQL? That is the only tool he knows, or admits to. He must be programming it to write these absurd "attack" garbage posts. Lemme hypothesis, Steven Carroll took a PGP program that he reverse engineered and blamed Klaus Schadenfreude for... he's feeding it data from the program, grabbing offensive paragraphs, then editing those using the Viterbi algorithm and then he directly posts them because his lack of work enables him to do that almost constantly. Steven Carroll doesn't have any concept of what he is babbling about. Why the added task to edit the DOM via ODBC connectivity in an embedded system? Of course, Steven Carroll didn't list this as part of his unsurprisingly always growing 'test' <shrug>. Who are you even blubbering to? If Steven Carroll calls having his lies quoted left and right by Klaus Schadenfreude and me (and completely trashing his reputation and any reason for people to give credence to anything he has to say - forever) good 'trolling', then sure... he is a fine troll. I can not personally subscribe to that view, I use another term. I call him an out-and-out lamer. <giggle> Now Klaus Schadenfreude on the other end of the phone doesn't matter. All that matters is Steven Carroll gets to deliver his flood. So how to respond? Don't answer the nonsense. Reason isn't part of contrivance and never has been. -- My Snoring Solution!! http://www.5z8.info/peepshow_z9s9ht_dogporn Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-23 12:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frmpadF5bquU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #458987 |
On 7/23/18 5:13 AM, chrisv wrote: > Kompyler wrote: > >> Snit is essentially a combination of a compulsive and pathological liar . >> He is the very definition of a sociopath. >> Couple that with his utter lack of reading comprehension skills and you >> have Michael Glasser, a person who is trapped in his own misery. >> Feeling sorry for a pathetic person like Michael Glasser is a waste of >> time because his narcissistic tendencies will kick in and he will assume >> he is superior to those offering him help or guidance. > > How many *thousand* times has the above sentiment, give or take, been > posted? > > Maybe it will have the desired effect, this time, eh? > The desired effect is to get attention. It often works. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web