Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #457706 > unrolled thread
| Started by | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-07-16 20:12 +0000 |
| Last post | 2018-07-21 16:13 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 177 — 10 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 20:12 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 13:38 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-16 17:06 -0400
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-16 21:25 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-16 17:35 -0400
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-16 21:49 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 22:47 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 17:10 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-17 07:05 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 07:19 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 08:06 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-17 14:35 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 08:40 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-17 09:38 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-17 14:42 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 07:51 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-17 10:03 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 08:37 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-17 10:41 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 08:53 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 16:27 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 09:31 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-17 16:42 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 09:47 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 13:18 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 08:46 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 16:03 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:30 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 09:11 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 10:38 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:08 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 20:30 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 13:44 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 20:12 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 13:35 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-17 11:54 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 10:13 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 13:22 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 06:35 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 10:13 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 10:35 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 10:42 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 12:19 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 14:08 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 14:21 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 14:28 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 14:33 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 07:47 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-18 10:21 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 15:52 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 09:34 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 10:37 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-18 13:44 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 12:02 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 12:04 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:25 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:23 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 12:31 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:43 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 12:47 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:54 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 14:16 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 14:22 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 14:42 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 15:10 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:49 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 20:26 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 13:43 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-19 07:06 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 05:30 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-19 12:36 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-19 07:55 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 06:32 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 12:35 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 06:00 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-19 08:25 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-19 08:27 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:07 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 09:32 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 19:52 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:56 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 14:23 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 14:34 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 15:42 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 13:51 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 14:35 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 10:59 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-17 11:57 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 10:29 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 13:23 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 08:08 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-17 10:17 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Storage Unit <storage.unit@mailinator.com> - 2018-07-21 09:00 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 15:22 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 15:33 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... lol <lol@lol.lol> - 2018-07-21 22:20 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 16:17 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 02:32 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 06:42 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 17:15 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 17:38 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 17:59 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 08:22 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Storage Unit <storage.unit@mailinator.com> - 2018-07-21 08:49 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 12:48 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-21 20:19 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 13:30 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 13:42 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 13:58 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-21 21:02 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 14:31 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-21 22:04 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 16:16 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 14:34 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-21 22:07 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 16:14 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 16:01 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 14:21 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 14:38 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 14:43 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 16:10 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 16:35 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 08:14 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 15:01 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 14:19 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 14:37 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 14:42 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 16:09 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 10:02 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 10:20 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-22 18:16 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-22 11:26 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-22 18:34 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 11:48 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 11:55 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 12:11 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-22 18:35 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-23 07:13 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 06:25 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-23 12:41 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 12:43 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-23 17:59 -0400
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-23 15:08 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 22:28 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-23 19:25 -0400
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-23 18:20 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 01:28 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-23 18:18 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-22 11:06 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 11:33 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 11:39 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-22 23:03 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 23:29 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-22 23:32 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-22 18:38 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 20:18 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-22 18:36 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 18:55 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-22 18:33 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 19:11 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 11:11 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 11:41 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-23 12:49 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 13:06 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 13:29 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-23 13:31 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 14:38 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-23 18:06 -0400
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-23 15:19 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 15:50 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-23 15:08 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 14:47 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-23 15:08 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 15:34 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 11:14 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-21 22:09 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 16:13 -0700
Page 6 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-16 17:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9fb34d06-3baa-4c55-8ba3-f5b0bfc52222@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #457758 |
On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 6:15:21 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > Slimer has two ideas on this: Telling "people what others' "ideas" are again? > * Demonize the poor (including using being poor as an insult) Is being unwilling to pay for them a form of 'demonizing' them in your mind?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-16 17:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fr4tb6F8vetU7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #457772 |
On 7/16/18 5:38 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 6:15:21 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> Slimer has two ideas on this: > > Telling "people what others' "ideas" are again? > >> * Demonize the poor (including using being poor as an insult) > > Is being unwilling to pay for them a form of 'demonizing' them in your mind? I am correctly noting his ideas. And noting your lack of ideas. So, what would you suggest? My guess: nothing. You want attention... and you have no clue. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-17 08:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0620ba19-b0b7-4613-867e-95d8855f7377@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #457781 |
On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 5:59:22 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 7/16/18 5:38 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 6:15:21 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > > >> Slimer has two ideas on this: > > > > Telling "people what others' "ideas" are again? > > > >> * Demonize the poor (including using being poor as an insult) > > > > Is being unwilling to pay for them a form of 'demonizing' them in your mind? > > > I am correctly noting his ideas. And noting your lack of ideas. > > So, what would you suggest? My guess: nothing. You want attention... and > you have no clue. > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> LOL! How did Flatfish get SO conceited he concludes everything is about his comments?? Demanding Flatfish to stop trolling, which we should all do, is distinct from showing his fraud. My point was that folk stay here in order to battle kookery. It is not as if honest people don't know what this place is, Steve Petruzzellis included. A sustained, relentless, posting itch, despite nothing to say - basically gunky worm prostitutes, and satisfactorily-waxed fish, hung from the ceiling for his own individual needs. Flatfish must understand that others can go get FileMaker, right, gluey? Add to that, anyone can filter his posts, which renders his trolling impotent, just like Flatfish ;) Just give it up already. You're again trying to act like you know as much as Steve Petruzzellis. You're the village idiot and your many poorly done programs show this. -- Top 15 Ways Flatfish Trolls! https://redd.it/6sfhq6 https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.os.linux.development.apps/G2-ZXYAEyIM http://jeff-relf.me/Cola_Regs.HTM Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Storage Unit <storage.unit@mailinator.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-21 08:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <59qb2f-1cp.ln1@news.neodome.net> |
| In reply to | #457709 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: > strong safety net programs: if someone is out of work or > disabled or a child or otherwise CANNOT work on a temporary or > permanent basis we should provide assistance so they can lead a > reasonably comfortable life. I wonder what do you mean by "reasonably comfortable life". And what if person just don't wan't to work? -- Emacs OS
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-21 12:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frhh18Ftt7oU6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #458716 |
On 7/21/18 6:49 AM, Storage Unit wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: > >> strong safety net programs: if someone is out of work or >> disabled or a child or otherwise CANNOT work on a temporary or >> permanent basis we should provide assistance so they can lead a >> reasonably comfortable life. > > I wonder what do you mean by "reasonably comfortable life". And what if > person just don't wan't to work? Reasonably comfortable is having a decent roof over your head ... for a single person that might be a studio apartment, for a family of four maybe a two bedroom house. Nothing too fancy. Basic utilities should be available, including internet, though there should be caps on how much water and electricity and the like can be used. People should be able to get food -- and depending on the area either be able to use public transportation or have a basic car (or bike or whatever). They should be able to get basic clothing and the like as well as other necessities, and even some entertainment (a smallish TV and maybe enough money to go to a movie or eat out once a month or so). This is for people who WANT to work and cannot (or, well, simply cannot). If someone is not willing to work then that is different. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-21 20:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pj04gi$clp$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #458764 |
On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 12:48:56 -0700, Snit wrote: > On 7/21/18 6:49 AM, Storage Unit wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: >> >>> strong safety net programs: if someone is out of work or disabled or a >>> child or otherwise CANNOT work on a temporary or permanent basis we >>> should provide assistance so they can lead a reasonably comfortable >>> life. >> >> I wonder what do you mean by "reasonably comfortable life". And what if >> person just don't wan't to work? > > Reasonably comfortable is having a decent roof over your head ... for a > single person that might be a studio apartment, for a family of four > maybe a two bedroom house. Nothing too fancy. Basic utilities should be > available, including internet, though there should be caps on how much > water and electricity and the like can be used. People should be able to > get food -- and depending on the area either be able to use public > transportation or have a basic car (or bike or whatever). They should be > able to get basic clothing and the like as well as other necessities, > and even some entertainment (a smallish TV and maybe enough money to go > to a movie or eat out once a month or so). > > This is for people who WANT to work and cannot (or, well, simply > cannot). If someone is not willing to work then that is different. As long as there are veterans who fought or gave their lives to give you the right to sit on your ass all day and do nothing but sponge off the taxpayer, veterans who are homeless, unable to receive proper medical treatment and so forth, people like you, Michael Glasser, deserve zero. You don't even deserve the air you get to breathe for free. I'll bet your family is real proud of you snit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-21 13:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frhjebFrfU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #458772 |
On 7/21/18 1:19 PM, Kompyler wrote: > On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 12:48:56 -0700, Snit wrote: > >> On 7/21/18 6:49 AM, Storage Unit wrote: >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: >>> >>>> strong safety net programs: if someone is out of work or disabled or a >>>> child or otherwise CANNOT work on a temporary or permanent basis we >>>> should provide assistance so they can lead a reasonably comfortable >>>> life. >>> >>> I wonder what do you mean by "reasonably comfortable life". And what if >>> person just don't wan't to work? >> >> Reasonably comfortable is having a decent roof over your head ... for a >> single person that might be a studio apartment, for a family of four >> maybe a two bedroom house. Nothing too fancy. Basic utilities should be >> available, including internet, though there should be caps on how much >> water and electricity and the like can be used. People should be able to >> get food -- and depending on the area either be able to use public >> transportation or have a basic car (or bike or whatever). They should be >> able to get basic clothing and the like as well as other necessities, >> and even some entertainment (a smallish TV and maybe enough money to go >> to a movie or eat out once a month or so). >> >> This is for people who WANT to work and cannot (or, well, simply >> cannot). If someone is not willing to work then that is different. > > As long as there are veterans who fought or gave their lives to give you > the right to sit on your ass all day and do nothing but sponge off the > taxpayer, veterans who are homeless, unable to receive proper medical > treatment and so forth, people like you, Michael Glasser, deserve zero. > You don't even deserve the air you get to breathe for free. > > I'll bet your family is real proud of you snit. > Not sure why you have so much anger but I wish you the best. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-21 13:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a93d3154-4ed2-43a4-bef7-31e29e0fccb3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #458774 |
On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 1:30:07 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 7/21/18 1:19 PM, Kompyler wrote: > > On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 12:48:56 -0700, Snit wrote: > > > >> On 7/21/18 6:49 AM, Storage Unit wrote: > >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: > >>> > >>>> strong safety net programs: if someone is out of work or disabled or a > >>>> child or otherwise CANNOT work on a temporary or permanent basis we > >>>> should provide assistance so they can lead a reasonably comfortable > >>>> life. > >>> > >>> I wonder what do you mean by "reasonably comfortable life". And what if > >>> person just don't wan't to work? > >> > >> Reasonably comfortable is having a decent roof over your head ... for a > >> single person that might be a studio apartment, for a family of four > >> maybe a two bedroom house. Nothing too fancy. Basic utilities should be > >> available, including internet, though there should be caps on how much > >> water and electricity and the like can be used. People should be able to > >> get food -- and depending on the area either be able to use public > >> transportation or have a basic car (or bike or whatever). They should be > >> able to get basic clothing and the like as well as other necessities, > >> and even some entertainment (a smallish TV and maybe enough money to go > >> to a movie or eat out once a month or so). > >> > >> This is for people who WANT to work and cannot (or, well, simply > >> cannot). If someone is not willing to work then that is different. > > > > As long as there are veterans who fought or gave their lives to give you > > the right to sit on your ass all day and do nothing but sponge off the > > taxpayer, veterans who are homeless, unable to receive proper medical > > treatment and so forth, people like you, Michael Glasser, deserve zero. > > You don't even deserve the air you get to breathe for free. > > > > I'll bet your family is real proud of you snit. > > > > Not sure why you have so much anger but I wish you the best. > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> Jeremy insists that he uses macOS, while he never works with it on a real system and honesty experienced it. Jeremy asked to be rated according to objective trolling criteria, which Silver Slimer indulged. Can you get Silver Slimer to agree? - I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened! https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o http://www.5z8.info/dogs-being-eaten_g0w7hf_molotovcocktail Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-21 13:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <084ff6d1-7a11-41e8-a61f-6d5e63787691@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #458774 |
On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 1:30:07 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 7/21/18 1:19 PM, Kompyler wrote: > > On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 12:48:56 -0700, Snit wrote: > > > >> On 7/21/18 6:49 AM, Storage Unit wrote: > >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: > >>> > >>>> strong safety net programs: if someone is out of work or disabled or a > >>>> child or otherwise CANNOT work on a temporary or permanent basis we > >>>> should provide assistance so they can lead a reasonably comfortable > >>>> life. > >>> > >>> I wonder what do you mean by "reasonably comfortable life". And what if > >>> person just don't wan't to work? > >> > >> Reasonably comfortable is having a decent roof over your head ... for a > >> single person that might be a studio apartment, for a family of four > >> maybe a two bedroom house. Nothing too fancy. Basic utilities should be > >> available, including internet, though there should be caps on how much > >> water and electricity and the like can be used. People should be able to > >> get food -- and depending on the area either be able to use public > >> transportation or have a basic car (or bike or whatever). They should be > >> able to get basic clothing and the like as well as other necessities, > >> and even some entertainment (a smallish TV and maybe enough money to go > >> to a movie or eat out once a month or so). > >> > >> This is for people who WANT to work and cannot (or, well, simply > >> cannot). If someone is not willing to work then that is different. > > > > As long as there are veterans who fought or gave their lives to give you > > the right to sit on your ass all day and do nothing but sponge off the > > taxpayer, veterans who are homeless, unable to receive proper medical > > treatment and so forth, people like you, Michael Glasser, deserve zero. > > You don't even deserve the air you get to breathe for free. > > > > I'll bet your family is real proud of you snit. > > > > Not sure why you have so much anger but I wish you the best. > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> Steven Petruzzellis has toned down the hundreds of self obsessed, nonsense threads he used to post but he's the same in the truthfulness department. He simple uses puppets more to generate those attacks. Just idiotic trolling. And I am replying to that trolling. THAT is what the "Steven Petruzzellis circus" is. The bulk of the posters in this group do customizations either as a pastime or as a career, so I think it unlikely more than a few thinks of automation to be "impossible". Was that meant to be your best shot? Promotion is a wonderful thing and consumer herd mentality is even better. I do not grasp that. Darkness is darkness and there are all kinds of people who are of one mind with it. Many are even lawyers.Over and over, the refrain is he wants to "talk tech", but the guy spends most of his time whining about "obsession". - My Snoring Solution http://www.5z8.info/racist-raps_r6r3wf_best-russian-sites-for-bootleg-everything Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-21 21:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pj070l$clp$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #458774 |
On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 13:30:00 -0700, Snit wrote: > On 7/21/18 1:19 PM, Kompyler wrote: >> On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 12:48:56 -0700, Snit wrote: >> >>> On 7/21/18 6:49 AM, Storage Unit wrote: >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: >>>> >>>>> strong safety net programs: if someone is out of work or disabled or >>>>> a child or otherwise CANNOT work on a temporary or permanent basis >>>>> we should provide assistance so they can lead a reasonably >>>>> comfortable life. >>>> >>>> I wonder what do you mean by "reasonably comfortable life". And what >>>> if person just don't wan't to work? >>> >>> Reasonably comfortable is having a decent roof over your head ... for >>> a single person that might be a studio apartment, for a family of four >>> maybe a two bedroom house. Nothing too fancy. Basic utilities should >>> be available, including internet, though there should be caps on how >>> much water and electricity and the like can be used. People should be >>> able to get food -- and depending on the area either be able to use >>> public transportation or have a basic car (or bike or whatever). They >>> should be able to get basic clothing and the like as well as other >>> necessities, and even some entertainment (a smallish TV and maybe >>> enough money to go to a movie or eat out once a month or so). >>> >>> This is for people who WANT to work and cannot (or, well, simply >>> cannot). If someone is not willing to work then that is different. >> >> As long as there are veterans who fought or gave their lives to give >> you the right to sit on your ass all day and do nothing but sponge off >> the taxpayer, veterans who are homeless, unable to receive proper >> medical treatment and so forth, people like you, Michael Glasser, >> deserve zero. You don't even deserve the air you get to breathe for >> free. >> >> I'll bet your family is real proud of you snit. >> >> > Not sure why you have so much anger but I wish you the best. It's not anger, it's disgust. Anger is a waste of energy and usually ends up rewarding the subject of the anger rather than the person who is angry. When I see a parasite like you snit, I am disgusted because you are truly a pathetic excuse for a human being. Someone who gets his jollies flooding a decent newsgroup with gibberish posted via some defective bot really needs to get a life. And yes snit, it's you behind the flood bot. You are the only one who replies to it. There is no logical reason why Mr. Carroll would drag his personal life, family and such into such derogatory posts. And no, snit, he isn't doing it for attention, YOU are doing it for attention. One last item Michael Glasser, you claim the police paid Mr. Carroll a visit due to something he did to you or threatened you with. Well if true, Michael Glasser, the first thing any lawyer or police officer would have told you is to cease all communication with Mr. Carroll or the person harassing you. But you haven't. So it looks like you have been caught in yet another one of those so called "unprovable lies" you seem to be fixated on.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-21 14:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frhn1kFpsjU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #458778 |
On 7/21/18 2:02 PM, Kompyler wrote: > On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 13:30:00 -0700, Snit wrote: > >> On 7/21/18 1:19 PM, Kompyler wrote: >>> On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 12:48:56 -0700, Snit wrote: >>> >>>> On 7/21/18 6:49 AM, Storage Unit wrote: >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: >>>>> >>>>>> strong safety net programs: if someone is out of work or disabled or >>>>>> a child or otherwise CANNOT work on a temporary or permanent basis >>>>>> we should provide assistance so they can lead a reasonably >>>>>> comfortable life. >>>>> >>>>> I wonder what do you mean by "reasonably comfortable life". And what >>>>> if person just don't wan't to work? >>>> >>>> Reasonably comfortable is having a decent roof over your head ... for >>>> a single person that might be a studio apartment, for a family of four >>>> maybe a two bedroom house. Nothing too fancy. Basic utilities should >>>> be available, including internet, though there should be caps on how >>>> much water and electricity and the like can be used. People should be >>>> able to get food -- and depending on the area either be able to use >>>> public transportation or have a basic car (or bike or whatever). They >>>> should be able to get basic clothing and the like as well as other >>>> necessities, and even some entertainment (a smallish TV and maybe >>>> enough money to go to a movie or eat out once a month or so). >>>> >>>> This is for people who WANT to work and cannot (or, well, simply >>>> cannot). If someone is not willing to work then that is different. >>> >>> As long as there are veterans who fought or gave their lives to give >>> you the right to sit on your ass all day and do nothing but sponge off >>> the taxpayer, veterans who are homeless, unable to receive proper >>> medical treatment and so forth, people like you, Michael Glasser, >>> deserve zero. You don't even deserve the air you get to breathe for >>> free. >>> >>> I'll bet your family is real proud of you snit. >>> >>> >> Not sure why you have so much anger but I wish you the best. > > It's not anger, it's disgust. Well, whatever there is about your life to lead you to feel and project your disgust so strongly I sincerely wish you well. > Anger is a waste of energy and usually ends > up rewarding the subject of the anger rather than the person who is angry. > When I see a parasite like you snit, I am disgusted because you are truly > a pathetic excuse for a human being. > > Someone who gets his jollies flooding a decent newsgroup with gibberish > posted via some defective bot really needs to get a life. Sure, but Carroll is trying to "prove" to me that he can make a bot as good as my ancient AIM bot... little does he know how much better my new IRC bot will be. :) And of course he likes to play victim. > And yes snit, > it's you behind the flood bot. I do not control you, nor do I control Carroll, assuming I did not just repeat myself. :) > You are the only one who replies to it. > There is no logical reason why Mr. Carroll would drag his personal life, > family and such into such derogatory posts. And no, snit, he isn't doing > it for attention, YOU are doing it for attention. His need to play victim is emotional, not logical. And who else would even know about the things from his life he has posted about? And who could do as he claims and hack his Google accounts? But you are just trolling... so whatever. :) > One last item Michael Glasser, you claim the police paid Mr. Carroll a > visit due to something he did to you or threatened you with. Carroll is the one who claimed they spoke to him face to face. I did not say that. > Well if > true, Michael Glasser, the first thing any lawyer or police officer would > have told you is to cease all communication with Mr. Carroll or the > person harassing you. As far as I know they merely told him to stop contacting people outside of Usenet. > But you haven't. > So it looks like you have been caught in yet another one of those so > called "unprovable lies" you seem to be fixated on. I can respond or not as I please. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-21 22:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pj0akq$clp$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #458784 |
On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 14:31:31 -0700, Snit wrote: > On 7/21/18 2:02 PM, Kompyler wrote: >> On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 13:30:00 -0700, Snit wrote: >> >>> On 7/21/18 1:19 PM, Kompyler wrote: >>>> On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 12:48:56 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 7/21/18 6:49 AM, Storage Unit wrote: >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: >>>>>> >>>>>>> strong safety net programs: if someone is out of work or disabled >>>>>>> or a child or otherwise CANNOT work on a temporary or permanent >>>>>>> basis we should provide assistance so they can lead a reasonably >>>>>>> comfortable life. >>>>>> >>>>>> I wonder what do you mean by "reasonably comfortable life". And >>>>>> what if person just don't wan't to work? >>>>> >>>>> Reasonably comfortable is having a decent roof over your head ... >>>>> for a single person that might be a studio apartment, for a family >>>>> of four maybe a two bedroom house. Nothing too fancy. Basic >>>>> utilities should be available, including internet, though there >>>>> should be caps on how much water and electricity and the like can be >>>>> used. People should be able to get food -- and depending on the area >>>>> either be able to use public transportation or have a basic car (or >>>>> bike or whatever). They should be able to get basic clothing and the >>>>> like as well as other necessities, and even some entertainment (a >>>>> smallish TV and maybe enough money to go to a movie or eat out once >>>>> a month or so). >>>>> >>>>> This is for people who WANT to work and cannot (or, well, simply >>>>> cannot). If someone is not willing to work then that is different. >>>> >>>> As long as there are veterans who fought or gave their lives to give >>>> you the right to sit on your ass all day and do nothing but sponge >>>> off the taxpayer, veterans who are homeless, unable to receive proper >>>> medical treatment and so forth, people like you, Michael Glasser, >>>> deserve zero. You don't even deserve the air you get to breathe for >>>> free. >>>> >>>> I'll bet your family is real proud of you snit. >>>> >>>> >>> Not sure why you have so much anger but I wish you the best. >> >> It's not anger, it's disgust. > > Well, whatever there is about your life to lead you to feel and project > your disgust so strongly I sincerely wish you well. Reading about you is like reading about some pedophile who just molested a little boy. Disgusting. And you seem to have that effect on just about everyone you come in contact with. It's a good thing you rarely leave your home because if you had to interact in person with people instead of hiding behind a keyboard and your various sock puppets, it wouldn't take long before you aggravated the wrong person and got your head stuffed up your ass. It might actually do you some good. >> Anger is a waste of energy and usually ends up rewarding the subject of >> the anger rather than the person who is angry. >> When I see a parasite like you snit, I am disgusted because you are >> truly a pathetic excuse for a human being. >> >> Someone who gets his jollies flooding a decent newsgroup with gibberish >> posted via some defective bot really needs to get a life. > > Sure, but Carroll is trying to "prove" to me that he can make a bot as > good as my ancient AIM bot... little does he know how much better my new > IRC bot will be. :) I wasn't talking about Mr. Carroll, I was talking about you. See the previous sentence. > And of course he likes to play victim. That's what you do snit. You turn every thread into a pity party for yourself. You are a pathetic "man". >> And yes snit, >> it's you behind the flood bot. > > I do not control you, nor do I control Carroll, assuming I did not just > repeat myself. :) Your reading comprehension sucks. Nobody said you control anyone. In fact it's obvious that you can't even control yourself. You have the reading comprehension skills of a 5th grader, and that's being kind. > >> You are the only one who replies to it. >> There is no logical reason why Mr. Carroll would drag his personal >> life, family and such into such derogatory posts. And no, snit, he >> isn't doing it for attention, YOU are doing it for attention. > > His need to play victim is emotional, not logical. And who else would > even know about the things from his life he has posted about? And who > could do as he claims and hack his Google accounts? You are talking about yourself. I don't know anything about his Google accounts other than the fact that you took it upon yourself to create accounts very similar in name to his fretwizzer account. So why did you do that snit? You crave attention, that's why. > But you are just trolling... so whatever. :) Presenting facts, something foreign to you, is not trolling. Consider it a public service. >> One last item Michael Glasser, you claim the police paid Mr. Carroll a >> visit due to something he did to you or threatened you with. > > Carroll is the one who claimed they spoke to him face to face. I did not > say that. Message ID. >> Well if true, Michael Glasser, the first thing any lawyer or police >> officer would have told you is to cease all communication with Mr. >> Carroll or the person harassing you. > > As far as I know they merely told him to stop contacting people outside > of Usenet. As far as you know? You know nothing snit. You are fishing. >> But you haven't. >> So it looks like you have been caught in yet another one of those so >> called "unprovable lies" you seem to be fixated on. > > I can respond or not as I please. So you admit you are a liar. Good, because the first step in the healing process is to admit there is a problem. And you have a bevy of problems so it's going to be a long haul for you snit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-21 16:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frht6fF201tU6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #458795 |
On 7/21/18 3:04 PM, Kompyler wrote: > On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 14:31:31 -0700, Snit wrote: > >> On 7/21/18 2:02 PM, Kompyler wrote: >>> On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 13:30:00 -0700, Snit wrote: >>> >>>> On 7/21/18 1:19 PM, Kompyler wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 12:48:56 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 7/21/18 6:49 AM, Storage Unit wrote: >>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> strong safety net programs: if someone is out of work or disabled >>>>>>>> or a child or otherwise CANNOT work on a temporary or permanent >>>>>>>> basis we should provide assistance so they can lead a reasonably >>>>>>>> comfortable life. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I wonder what do you mean by "reasonably comfortable life". And >>>>>>> what if person just don't wan't to work? >>>>>> >>>>>> Reasonably comfortable is having a decent roof over your head ... >>>>>> for a single person that might be a studio apartment, for a family >>>>>> of four maybe a two bedroom house. Nothing too fancy. Basic >>>>>> utilities should be available, including internet, though there >>>>>> should be caps on how much water and electricity and the like can be >>>>>> used. People should be able to get food -- and depending on the area >>>>>> either be able to use public transportation or have a basic car (or >>>>>> bike or whatever). They should be able to get basic clothing and the >>>>>> like as well as other necessities, and even some entertainment (a >>>>>> smallish TV and maybe enough money to go to a movie or eat out once >>>>>> a month or so). >>>>>> >>>>>> This is for people who WANT to work and cannot (or, well, simply >>>>>> cannot). If someone is not willing to work then that is different. >>>>> >>>>> As long as there are veterans who fought or gave their lives to give >>>>> you the right to sit on your ass all day and do nothing but sponge >>>>> off the taxpayer, veterans who are homeless, unable to receive proper >>>>> medical treatment and so forth, people like you, Michael Glasser, >>>>> deserve zero. You don't even deserve the air you get to breathe for >>>>> free. >>>>> >>>>> I'll bet your family is real proud of you snit. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Not sure why you have so much anger but I wish you the best. >>> >>> It's not anger, it's disgust. >> >> Well, whatever there is about your life to lead you to feel and project >> your disgust so strongly I sincerely wish you well. > > Reading about you is like reading about some pedophile who just molested > a little boy. > Disgusting. > And you seem to have that effect on just about everyone you come in > contact with. > It's a good thing you rarely leave your home because if you had to > interact in person with people instead of hiding behind a keyboard and > your various sock puppets, it wouldn't take long before you aggravated > the wrong person and got your head stuffed up your ass. > It might actually do you some good. > >>> Anger is a waste of energy and usually ends up rewarding the subject of >>> the anger rather than the person who is angry. >>> When I see a parasite like you snit, I am disgusted because you are >>> truly a pathetic excuse for a human being. >>> >>> Someone who gets his jollies flooding a decent newsgroup with gibberish >>> posted via some defective bot really needs to get a life. >> >> Sure, but Carroll is trying to "prove" to me that he can make a bot as >> good as my ancient AIM bot... little does he know how much better my new >> IRC bot will be. :) > > I wasn't talking about Mr. Carroll, I was talking about you. See the > previous sentence. > >> And of course he likes to play victim. > > That's what you do snit. > You turn every thread into a pity party for yourself. > You are a pathetic "man". > >>> And yes snit, >>> it's you behind the flood bot. >> >> I do not control you, nor do I control Carroll, assuming I did not just >> repeat myself. :) > > Your reading comprehension sucks. Nobody said you control anyone. In fact > it's obvious that you can't even control yourself. > You have the reading comprehension skills of a 5th grader, and that's > being kind. > >> >>> You are the only one who replies to it. >>> There is no logical reason why Mr. Carroll would drag his personal >>> life, family and such into such derogatory posts. And no, snit, he >>> isn't doing it for attention, YOU are doing it for attention. >> >> His need to play victim is emotional, not logical. And who else would >> even know about the things from his life he has posted about? And who >> could do as he claims and hack his Google accounts? > > You are talking about yourself. > I don't know anything about his Google accounts other than the fact that > you took it upon yourself to create accounts very similar in name to his > fretwizzer account. > So why did you do that snit? > You crave attention, that's why. > >> But you are just trolling... so whatever. :) > > Presenting facts, something foreign to you, is not trolling. > Consider it a public service. > >>> One last item Michael Glasser, you claim the police paid Mr. Carroll a >>> visit due to something he did to you or threatened you with. >> >> Carroll is the one who claimed they spoke to him face to face. I did not >> say that. > > Message ID. > >>> Well if true, Michael Glasser, the first thing any lawyer or police >>> officer would have told you is to cease all communication with Mr. >>> Carroll or the person harassing you. >> >> As far as I know they merely told him to stop contacting people outside >> of Usenet. > > As far as you know? > You know nothing snit. > You are fishing. > >>> But you haven't. >>> So it looks like you have been caught in yet another one of those so >>> called "unprovable lies" you seem to be fixated on. >> >> I can respond or not as I please. > > So you admit you are a liar. > Good, because the first step in the healing process is to admit there is > a problem. > And you have a bevy of problems so it's going to be a long haul for you > snit. > > Wow... you lash out a lot and then say you were talking about me being responsible for Carroll's actions. Gee, whose sock are you? LOL! -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-21 14:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c30816fa-5db5-4dbf-a3e0-daaa502978ca@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #458778 |
On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 3:02:15 PM UTC-6, Kompyler wrote: > On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 13:30:00 -0700, Snit wrote: (snip) > >> I'll bet your family is real proud of you snit. > >> > >> > > Not sure why you have so much anger but I wish you the best. > > It's not anger, it's disgust. Anger is a waste of energy and usually ends > up rewarding the subject of the anger rather than the person who is angry. > When I see a parasite like you snit, I am disgusted because you are truly > a pathetic excuse for a human being. > > Someone who gets his jollies flooding a decent newsgroup with gibberish > posted via some defective bot really needs to get a life. And yes snit, > it's you behind the flood bot. You are the only one who replies to it. > There is no logical reason why Mr. Carroll would drag his personal life, > family and such into such derogatory posts. And no, snit, he isn't doing > it for attention, YOU are doing it for attention. He's the likely candidate, obviously, and reasons are equally obvious: 1 - Flood this ng (and others) because they've shunned him. 2 - Use my name to do it so people will stop reading all posts by "Steve Carroll" (I am the one who busts him most often, after all) 3 -Seed search engines with negative BS about me under my name (which is f*cking stupid as hell... but that's Snit) 4 - Create the ability to falsely claim that *I* wrote this/that or *I* have posted this much, etc. > One last item Michael Glasser, you claim the police paid Mr. Carroll a > visit due to something he did to you or threatened you with. Well if > true, Michael Glasser, the first thing any lawyer or police officer would > have told you is to cease all communication with Mr. Carroll or the > person harassing you. Exactly, but it's Snit, so there was never really a reason to believe it (or anything he writes on any topic). He should never be assumed to be telling the truth on anything, ever... and everyone knows it, which pisses him off... but he put it there.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-21 22:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pj0ar3$clp$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #458785 |
On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 14:34:29 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 3:02:15 PM UTC-6, Kompyler wrote: >> On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 13:30:00 -0700, Snit wrote: > > (snip) > >> >> I'll bet your family is real proud of you snit. >> >> >> >> >> > Not sure why you have so much anger but I wish you the best. >> >> It's not anger, it's disgust. Anger is a waste of energy and usually >> ends up rewarding the subject of the anger rather than the person who >> is angry. >> When I see a parasite like you snit, I am disgusted because you are >> truly a pathetic excuse for a human being. >> >> Someone who gets his jollies flooding a decent newsgroup with gibberish >> posted via some defective bot really needs to get a life. And yes snit, >> it's you behind the flood bot. You are the only one who replies to it. >> There is no logical reason why Mr. Carroll would drag his personal >> life, family and such into such derogatory posts. And no, snit, he >> isn't doing it for attention, YOU are doing it for attention. > > He's the likely candidate, obviously, and reasons are equally obvious: > > 1 - Flood this ng (and others) because they've shunned him. > > 2 - Use my name to do it so people will stop reading all posts by "Steve > Carroll" (I am the one who busts him most often, after all) > > 3 -Seed search engines with negative BS about me under my name (which is > f*cking stupid as hell... but that's Snit) > > 4 - Create the ability to falsely claim that *I* wrote this/that or *I* > have posted this much, etc. > >> One last item Michael Glasser, you claim the police paid Mr. Carroll a >> visit due to something he did to you or threatened you with. Well if >> true, Michael Glasser, the first thing any lawyer or police officer >> would have told you is to cease all communication with Mr. Carroll or >> the person harassing you. > > Exactly, but it's Snit, so there was never really a reason to believe it > (or anything he writes on any topic). He should never be assumed to be > telling the truth on anything, ever... and everyone knows it, which > pisses him off... but he put it there. It's astonishing that someone like snit would waste the better part of his life trolling usenet. He obliviously has mental issues so the best it can get is for him to seek professional help for his problem.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-21 16:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frht36F201tU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #458796 |
On 7/21/18 3:07 PM, Kompyler wrote: > On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 14:34:29 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > >> On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 3:02:15 PM UTC-6, Kompyler wrote: >>> On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 13:30:00 -0700, Snit wrote: >> >> (snip) >> >>>>> I'll bet your family is real proud of you snit. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Not sure why you have so much anger but I wish you the best. >>> >>> It's not anger, it's disgust. Anger is a waste of energy and usually >>> ends up rewarding the subject of the anger rather than the person who >>> is angry. >>> When I see a parasite like you snit, I am disgusted because you are >>> truly a pathetic excuse for a human being. >>> >>> Someone who gets his jollies flooding a decent newsgroup with gibberish >>> posted via some defective bot really needs to get a life. And yes snit, >>> it's you behind the flood bot. You are the only one who replies to it. >>> There is no logical reason why Mr. Carroll would drag his personal >>> life, family and such into such derogatory posts. And no, snit, he >>> isn't doing it for attention, YOU are doing it for attention. >> >> He's the likely candidate, obviously, and reasons are equally obvious: >> >> 1 - Flood this ng (and others) because they've shunned him. >> >> 2 - Use my name to do it so people will stop reading all posts by "Steve >> Carroll" (I am the one who busts him most often, after all) >> >> 3 -Seed search engines with negative BS about me under my name (which is >> f*cking stupid as hell... but that's Snit) >> >> 4 - Create the ability to falsely claim that *I* wrote this/that or *I* >> have posted this much, etc. >> >>> One last item Michael Glasser, you claim the police paid Mr. Carroll a >>> visit due to something he did to you or threatened you with. Well if >>> true, Michael Glasser, the first thing any lawyer or police officer >>> would have told you is to cease all communication with Mr. Carroll or >>> the person harassing you. >> >> Exactly, but it's Snit, so there was never really a reason to believe it >> (or anything he writes on any topic). He should never be assumed to be >> telling the truth on anything, ever... and everyone knows it, which >> pisses him off... but he put it there. > > It's astonishing that someone like snit would waste the better part of > his life trolling usenet. > He obliviously has mental issues so the best it can get is for him to > seek professional help for his problem. > You just proved me right about your anger again... and proved Carroll wrong again. Poor guy is not doing well with his trolling today. He used to be MUCH better at it, like when he pulled me into that stupid argument of his where he insisted one cannot be ACTUALLY guilty of breaking a law unless one is adjudicated and found guilty in a court. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-21 16:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frhs9kF1t3dU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #458785 |
On 7/21/18 2:34 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 3:02:15 PM UTC-6, Kompyler wrote: >> On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 13:30:00 -0700, Snit wrote: > > (snip) > >>>> I'll bet your family is real proud of you snit. >>>> >>>> >>> Not sure why you have so much anger but I wish you the best. >> >> It's not anger, it's disgust. Anger is a waste of energy and usually ends >> up rewarding the subject of the anger rather than the person who is angry. >> When I see a parasite like you snit, I am disgusted because you are truly >> a pathetic excuse for a human being. >> >> Someone who gets his jollies flooding a decent newsgroup with gibberish >> posted via some defective bot really needs to get a life. And yes snit, >> it's you behind the flood bot. You are the only one who replies to it. >> There is no logical reason why Mr. Carroll would drag his personal life, >> family and such into such derogatory posts. And no, snit, he isn't doing >> it for attention, YOU are doing it for attention. > > He's the likely candidate, obviously, and reasons are equally obvious: > > 1 - Flood this ng (and others) because they've shunned him. > > 2 - Use my name to do it so people will stop reading all posts by > "Steve Carroll" (I am the one who busts him most often, after all) > > 3 -Seed search engines with negative BS about me under my name > (which is f*cking stupid as hell... but that's Snit) > > 4 - Create the ability to falsely claim that *I* wrote this/that or *I* have > posted this much, etc. > >> One last item Michael Glasser, you claim the police paid Mr. Carroll a >> visit due to something he did to you or threatened you with. Well if >> true, Michael Glasser, the first thing any lawyer or police officer would >> have told you is to cease all communication with Mr. Carroll or the >> person harassing you. > > Exactly, but it's Snit, so there was never really a reason to believe it > (or anything he writes on any topic). He should never be assumed to > be telling the truth on anything, ever... and everyone knows it, which > pisses him off... but he put it there. > Ah, that is right, I hacked your Google accounts in a way that Google and "several federal agencies" cannot stop, and then was able to find out personal details of your life you likely did not post online. Do you realize how stupid your victim-mentality stories are? And how easy your lies are to call out. But, as noted, you lie more in a day than I do in a year. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-21 14:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0d57118c-91c0-4382-933e-85d24a212a2e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #458774 |
On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 2:30:07 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 7/21/18 1:19 PM, Kompyler wrote: > > On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 12:48:56 -0700, Snit wrote: > > > >> On 7/21/18 6:49 AM, Storage Unit wrote: > >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: > >>> > >>>> strong safety net programs: if someone is out of work or disabled or a > >>>> child or otherwise CANNOT work on a temporary or permanent basis we > >>>> should provide assistance so they can lead a reasonably comfortable > >>>> life. > >>> > >>> I wonder what do you mean by "reasonably comfortable life". And what if > >>> person just don't wan't to work? > >> > >> Reasonably comfortable is having a decent roof over your head ... for a > >> single person that might be a studio apartment, for a family of four > >> maybe a two bedroom house. Nothing too fancy. Basic utilities should be > >> available, including internet, though there should be caps on how much > >> water and electricity and the like can be used. People should be able to > >> get food -- and depending on the area either be able to use public > >> transportation or have a basic car (or bike or whatever). They should be > >> able to get basic clothing and the like as well as other necessities, > >> and even some entertainment (a smallish TV and maybe enough money to go > >> to a movie or eat out once a month or so). > >> > >> This is for people who WANT to work and cannot (or, well, simply > >> cannot). If someone is not willing to work then that is different. > > > > As long as there are veterans who fought or gave their lives to give you > > the right to sit on your ass all day and do nothing but sponge off the > > taxpayer, veterans who are homeless, unable to receive proper medical > > treatment and so forth, people like you, Michael Glasser, deserve zero. > > You don't even deserve the air you get to breathe for free. > > > > I'll bet your family is real proud of you snit. > > > > Not sure why you have so much anger but I wish you the best. Telling "others" how they 'feel' again, Snit?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-21 14:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frhnevFpsjU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #458782 |
On 7/21/18 2:21 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 2:30:07 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 7/21/18 1:19 PM, Kompyler wrote: >>> On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 12:48:56 -0700, Snit wrote: >>> >>>> On 7/21/18 6:49 AM, Storage Unit wrote: >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: >>>>> >>>>>> strong safety net programs: if someone is out of work or disabled or a >>>>>> child or otherwise CANNOT work on a temporary or permanent basis we >>>>>> should provide assistance so they can lead a reasonably comfortable >>>>>> life. >>>>> >>>>> I wonder what do you mean by "reasonably comfortable life". And what if >>>>> person just don't wan't to work? >>>> >>>> Reasonably comfortable is having a decent roof over your head ... for a >>>> single person that might be a studio apartment, for a family of four >>>> maybe a two bedroom house. Nothing too fancy. Basic utilities should be >>>> available, including internet, though there should be caps on how much >>>> water and electricity and the like can be used. People should be able to >>>> get food -- and depending on the area either be able to use public >>>> transportation or have a basic car (or bike or whatever). They should be >>>> able to get basic clothing and the like as well as other necessities, >>>> and even some entertainment (a smallish TV and maybe enough money to go >>>> to a movie or eat out once a month or so). >>>> >>>> This is for people who WANT to work and cannot (or, well, simply >>>> cannot). If someone is not willing to work then that is different. >>> >>> As long as there are veterans who fought or gave their lives to give you >>> the right to sit on your ass all day and do nothing but sponge off the >>> taxpayer, veterans who are homeless, unable to receive proper medical >>> treatment and so forth, people like you, Michael Glasser, deserve zero. >>> You don't even deserve the air you get to breathe for free. >>> >>> I'll bet your family is real proud of you snit. >>> >> >> Not sure why you have so much anger but I wish you the best. > > Telling "others" how they 'feel' again, Snit? > Nope... but the fact you cannot understand the emotion behind the lashing out he offers is quite telling of your challenges. Or some of them anyway. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-21 14:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a9c0e99f-3589-4054-acd5-e38b41c598fe@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #458788 |
On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 3:38:43 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 7/21/18 2:21 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 2:30:07 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 7/21/18 1:19 PM, Kompyler wrote: > >>> On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 12:48:56 -0700, Snit wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 7/21/18 6:49 AM, Storage Unit wrote: > >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes: > >>>>> > >>>>>> strong safety net programs: if someone is out of work or disabled or a > >>>>>> child or otherwise CANNOT work on a temporary or permanent basis we > >>>>>> should provide assistance so they can lead a reasonably comfortable > >>>>>> life. > >>>>> > >>>>> I wonder what do you mean by "reasonably comfortable life". And what if > >>>>> person just don't wan't to work? > >>>> > >>>> Reasonably comfortable is having a decent roof over your head ... for a > >>>> single person that might be a studio apartment, for a family of four > >>>> maybe a two bedroom house. Nothing too fancy. Basic utilities should be > >>>> available, including internet, though there should be caps on how much > >>>> water and electricity and the like can be used. People should be able to > >>>> get food -- and depending on the area either be able to use public > >>>> transportation or have a basic car (or bike or whatever). They should be > >>>> able to get basic clothing and the like as well as other necessities, > >>>> and even some entertainment (a smallish TV and maybe enough money to go > >>>> to a movie or eat out once a month or so). > >>>> > >>>> This is for people who WANT to work and cannot (or, well, simply > >>>> cannot). If someone is not willing to work then that is different. > >>> > >>> As long as there are veterans who fought or gave their lives to give you > >>> the right to sit on your ass all day and do nothing but sponge off the > >>> taxpayer, veterans who are homeless, unable to receive proper medical > >>> treatment and so forth, people like you, Michael Glasser, deserve zero. > >>> You don't even deserve the air you get to breathe for free. > >>> > >>> I'll bet your family is real proud of you snit. > >>> > >> > >> Not sure why you have so much anger but I wish you the best. > > > > Telling "others" how they 'feel' again, Snit? > > > > Nope... I see no question mark there, so... yup.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web