Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #457706 > unrolled thread
| Started by | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-07-16 20:12 +0000 |
| Last post | 2018-07-21 16:13 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 177 — 10 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 20:12 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 13:38 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-16 17:06 -0400
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-16 21:25 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-16 17:35 -0400
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-16 21:49 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 22:47 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 17:10 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-17 07:05 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 07:19 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 08:06 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-17 14:35 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 08:40 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-17 09:38 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-17 14:42 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 07:51 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-17 10:03 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 08:37 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-17 10:41 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 08:53 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 16:27 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 09:31 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-17 16:42 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 09:47 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 13:18 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 08:46 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 16:03 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:30 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 09:11 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 10:38 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:08 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 20:30 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 13:44 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 20:12 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 13:35 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-17 11:54 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 10:13 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 13:22 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 06:35 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 10:13 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 10:35 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 10:42 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 12:19 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 14:08 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 14:21 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 14:28 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 14:33 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 07:47 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-18 10:21 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 15:52 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 09:34 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 10:37 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-18 13:44 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 12:02 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 12:04 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:25 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:23 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 12:31 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:43 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 12:47 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:54 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 14:16 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 14:22 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 14:42 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 15:10 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:49 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 20:26 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 13:43 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-19 07:06 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 05:30 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-19 12:36 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-19 07:55 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 06:32 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 12:35 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 06:00 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-19 08:25 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-19 08:27 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:07 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 09:32 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 19:52 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:56 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 14:23 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 14:34 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 15:42 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 13:51 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 14:35 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 10:59 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-17 11:57 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 10:29 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 13:23 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 08:08 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-17 10:17 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Storage Unit <storage.unit@mailinator.com> - 2018-07-21 09:00 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 15:22 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 15:33 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... lol <lol@lol.lol> - 2018-07-21 22:20 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 16:17 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 02:32 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 06:42 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 17:15 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 17:38 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 17:59 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 08:22 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Storage Unit <storage.unit@mailinator.com> - 2018-07-21 08:49 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 12:48 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-21 20:19 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 13:30 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 13:42 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 13:58 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-21 21:02 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 14:31 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-21 22:04 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 16:16 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 14:34 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-21 22:07 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 16:14 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 16:01 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 14:21 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 14:38 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 14:43 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 16:10 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 16:35 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 08:14 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 15:01 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 14:19 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 14:37 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 14:42 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 16:09 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 10:02 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 10:20 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-22 18:16 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-22 11:26 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-22 18:34 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 11:48 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 11:55 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 12:11 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-22 18:35 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-23 07:13 -0500
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 06:25 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-23 12:41 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 12:43 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-23 17:59 -0400
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-23 15:08 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 22:28 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-23 19:25 -0400
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-23 18:20 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 01:28 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-23 18:18 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-22 11:06 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 11:33 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 11:39 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-22 23:03 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 23:29 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-22 23:32 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-22 18:38 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 20:18 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-22 18:36 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 18:55 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-22 18:33 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 19:11 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 11:11 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 11:41 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-23 12:49 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 13:06 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 13:29 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-23 13:31 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 14:38 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-23 18:06 -0400
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-23 15:19 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 15:50 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-23 15:08 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 14:47 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-23 15:08 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 15:34 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 11:14 -0700
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-21 22:09 +0000
Re: San Francisco not only a philosophical shithole... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 16:13 -0700
Page 3 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-17 10:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fr6nmtFl1a1U6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #457929 |
On 7/17/18 10:13 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Tuesday, July 17, 2018 at 10:31:33 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 7/17/18 9:27 AM, RonB wrote: >>> On 2018-07-17, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> SilverSlimer wrote: >>>> >>>>> (snip lies) >>>> >>>> What's wrong, "Slimer"? Wasn't the discussion extreme and dishonest >>>> enough, for you? >>> >>> No, San Francisco literally has human feces on the sidewalks. Ignoring facts >>> is not an argument. >> >> Your issue is blaming liberals for what happens in big cities in a >> conservative country. > > LOL!, So *today* the country is a "conservative country"? Of course it is. Even when Democrats have been in control in recent they have been funded by and beholden to the wealthy interests. <http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-27074746> Of course, right now the Republicans control both houses and the White House. >! And lemme guess, > tomorrow it will also be a "Christian country" again because your 'argument' > will need it, despite the fact you've made statements to the contrary on both. > You're so transparently pathetic ;) Your random insult bot is broken. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-17 10:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e69e3522-ef36-421c-8652-840b4b99a22f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #457937 |
On Tuesday, July 17, 2018 at 11:35:29 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 7/17/18 10:13 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Tuesday, July 17, 2018 at 10:31:33 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 7/17/18 9:27 AM, RonB wrote: > >>> On 2018-07-17, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>>> SilverSlimer wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> (snip lies) > >>>> > >>>> What's wrong, "Slimer"? Wasn't the discussion extreme and dishonest > >>>> enough, for you? > >>> > >>> No, San Francisco literally has human feces on the sidewalks. Ignoring facts > >>> is not an argument. > >> > >> Your issue is blaming liberals for what happens in big cities in a > >> conservative country. > > > > LOL!, So *today* the country is a "conservative country"? > > Of course it is. So your meds really do never wear off... > Even when Democrats have been in control in recent they > have been funded by and beholden to the wealthy interests. Ah, so "wealthy interests" = conservative... interesting. See, this is where you have the labeling problem I told you about, all the "wealthy interests" in places like Hollywood call themselves 'liberals'. You guys really need to talk more.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-17 12:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fr6tq9Fm9qdU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #457939 |
On 7/17/18 10:42 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Tuesday, July 17, 2018 at 11:35:29 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 7/17/18 10:13 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Tuesday, July 17, 2018 at 10:31:33 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>> On 7/17/18 9:27 AM, RonB wrote: >>>>> On 2018-07-17, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> (snip lies) >>>>>> >>>>>> What's wrong, "Slimer"? Wasn't the discussion extreme and dishonest >>>>>> enough, for you? >>>>> >>>>> No, San Francisco literally has human feces on the sidewalks. Ignoring facts >>>>> is not an argument. >>>> >>>> Your issue is blaming liberals for what happens in big cities in a >>>> conservative country. >>> >>> LOL!, So *today* the country is a "conservative country"? >> >> Of course it is. > > So your meds really do never wear off... > >> Even when Democrats have been in control in recent they >> have been funded by and beholden to the wealthy interests. > > Ah, so "wealthy interests" = conservative... interesting. See, this is where > you have the labeling problem I told you about, all the "wealthy interests" > in places like Hollywood call themselves 'liberals'. You guys really need to > talk more. > See: more of your snipping, speaking for me, and using your insult bot. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-17 14:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <07587798-42f0-4feb-9b55-0abf1bc507ae@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #457948 |
On Tuesday, July 17, 2018 at 1:19:40 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 7/17/18 10:42 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Tuesday, July 17, 2018 at 11:35:29 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 7/17/18 10:13 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Tuesday, July 17, 2018 at 10:31:33 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>> On 7/17/18 9:27 AM, RonB wrote: > >>>>> On 2018-07-17, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>>>>> SilverSlimer wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> (snip lies) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> What's wrong, "Slimer"? Wasn't the discussion extreme and dishonest > >>>>>> enough, for you? > >>>>> > >>>>> No, San Francisco literally has human feces on the sidewalks. Ignoring facts > >>>>> is not an argument. > >>>> > >>>> Your issue is blaming liberals for what happens in big cities in a > >>>> conservative country. > >>> > >>> LOL!, So *today* the country is a "conservative country"? > >> > >> Of course it is. > > > > So your meds really do never wear off... > > > >> Even when Democrats have been in control in recent they > >> have been funded by and beholden to the wealthy interests. > > > > Ah, so "wealthy interests" = conservative... interesting. See, this is where > > you have the labeling problem I told you about, all the "wealthy interests" > > in places like Hollywood call themselves 'liberals'. You guys really need to > > talk more. > > > > See: What I don't see is you challenging the argument I just made (again). I repeat: such terms no longer have any useful meaning in a discussion with someone like you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-17 14:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fr74ubFnl4eU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #457959 |
On 7/17/18 2:08 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Tuesday, July 17, 2018 at 1:19:40 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 7/17/18 10:42 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Tuesday, July 17, 2018 at 11:35:29 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>> On 7/17/18 10:13 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>> On Tuesday, July 17, 2018 at 10:31:33 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 7/17/18 9:27 AM, RonB wrote: >>>>>>> On 2018-07-17, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>> SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> (snip lies) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What's wrong, "Slimer"? Wasn't the discussion extreme and dishonest >>>>>>>> enough, for you? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No, San Francisco literally has human feces on the sidewalks. Ignoring facts >>>>>>> is not an argument. >>>>>> >>>>>> Your issue is blaming liberals for what happens in big cities in a >>>>>> conservative country. >>>>> >>>>> LOL!, So *today* the country is a "conservative country"? >>>> >>>> Of course it is. >>> >>> So your meds really do never wear off... >>> >>>> Even when Democrats have been in control in recent they >>>> have been funded by and beholden to the wealthy interests. >>> >>> Ah, so "wealthy interests" = conservative... interesting. See, this is where >>> you have the labeling problem I told you about, all the "wealthy interests" >>> in places like Hollywood call themselves 'liberals'. You guys really need to >>> talk more. >>> >> >> See: > > What I don't see is you challenging the argument I just made (again). > I repeat: such terms no longer have any useful meaning in a discussion > with someone like you. > You made no argument: you tried to speak for me then used your random insult bot to spew nonsense. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-17 14:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2e4a1641-33b0-4b8c-8483-11c5be3c08ee@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #457960 |
On Tuesday, July 17, 2018 at 3:21:19 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 7/17/18 2:08 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Tuesday, July 17, 2018 at 1:19:40 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 7/17/18 10:42 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Tuesday, July 17, 2018 at 11:35:29 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>> On 7/17/18 10:13 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>> On Tuesday, July 17, 2018 at 10:31:33 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>>>> On 7/17/18 9:27 AM, RonB wrote: > >>>>>>> On 2018-07-17, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>>>>>>> SilverSlimer wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> (snip lies) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> What's wrong, "Slimer"? Wasn't the discussion extreme and dishonest > >>>>>>>> enough, for you? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> No, San Francisco literally has human feces on the sidewalks. Ignoring facts > >>>>>>> is not an argument. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Your issue is blaming liberals for what happens in big cities in a > >>>>>> conservative country. > >>>>> > >>>>> LOL!, So *today* the country is a "conservative country"? > >>>> > >>>> Of course it is. > >>> > >>> So your meds really do never wear off... > >>> > >>>> Even when Democrats have been in control in recent they > >>>> have been funded by and beholden to the wealthy interests. > >>> > >>> Ah, so "wealthy interests" = conservative... interesting. See, this is where > >>> you have the labeling problem I told you about, all the "wealthy interests" > >>> in places like Hollywood call themselves 'liberals'. You guys really need to > >>> talk more. > >>> > >> > >> See: > > > > What I don't see is you challenging the argument I just made (again). > > I repeat: such terms no longer have any useful meaning in a discussion > > with someone like you. > > > You made no argument ... other than the fact based one that such terms aren't agreed upon, making it especially pointless to engage with someone like you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-17 14:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fr75lfFnoj9U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #457960 |
On 7/17/18 2:21 PM, Snit wrote: > On 7/17/18 2:08 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >> On Tuesday, July 17, 2018 at 1:19:40 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>> On 7/17/18 10:42 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>> On Tuesday, July 17, 2018 at 11:35:29 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 7/17/18 10:13 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>>> On Tuesday, July 17, 2018 at 10:31:33 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 7/17/18 9:27 AM, RonB wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2018-07-17, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>> SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> (snip lies) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What's wrong, "Slimer"? Wasn't the discussion extreme and >>>>>>>>> dishonest >>>>>>>>> enough, for you? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No, San Francisco literally has human feces on the sidewalks. >>>>>>>> Ignoring facts >>>>>>>> is not an argument. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Your issue is blaming liberals for what happens in big cities in a >>>>>>> conservative country. >>>>>> >>>>>> LOL!, So *today* the country is a "conservative country"? >>>>> >>>>> Of course it is. >>>> >>>> So your meds really do never wear off... >>>> >>>>> Even when Democrats have been in control in recent they >>>>> have been funded by and beholden to the wealthy interests. >>>> >>>> Ah, so "wealthy interests" = conservative... interesting. See, this >>>> is where >>>> you have the labeling problem I told you about, all the "wealthy >>>> interests" >>>> in places like Hollywood call themselves 'liberals'. You guys really >>>> need to >>>> talk more. >>>> >>> >>> See: >> >> What I don't see is you challenging the argument I just made (again). >> I repeat: such terms no longer have any useful meaning in a discussion >> with someone like you. >> > You made no argument: you tried to speak for me then used your random > insult bot to spew nonsense. > And Carroll responded by snipping, playing victim (yeah, I *made* him use his insult bot), and then STILL not making a coherent argument. Carroll argues to argue. And I respond to his trolling for my own amusement. :) -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-18 07:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <75771cb4-5516-43b6-9bec-383063a9c659@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #457965 |
On Tuesday, July 17, 2018 at 3:33:38 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 7/17/18 2:21 PM, Snit wrote: > > On 7/17/18 2:08 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >> On Tuesday, July 17, 2018 at 1:19:40 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>> On 7/17/18 10:42 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>> On Tuesday, July 17, 2018 at 11:35:29 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>>> On 7/17/18 10:13 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>>> On Tuesday, July 17, 2018 at 10:31:33 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>>>>> On 7/17/18 9:27 AM, RonB wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 2018-07-17, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> SilverSlimer wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> (snip lies) > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> What's wrong, "Slimer"? Wasn't the discussion extreme and > >>>>>>>>> dishonest > >>>>>>>>> enough, for you? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> No, San Francisco literally has human feces on the sidewalks. > >>>>>>>> Ignoring facts > >>>>>>>> is not an argument. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Your issue is blaming liberals for what happens in big cities in a > >>>>>>> conservative country. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> LOL!, So *today* the country is a "conservative country"? > >>>>> > >>>>> Of course it is. > >>>> > >>>> So your meds really do never wear off... > >>>> > >>>>> Even when Democrats have been in control in recent they > >>>>> have been funded by and beholden to the wealthy interests. > >>>> > >>>> Ah, so "wealthy interests" = conservative... interesting. See, this > >>>> is where > >>>> you have the labeling problem I told you about, all the "wealthy > >>>> interests" > >>>> in places like Hollywood call themselves 'liberals'. You guys really > >>>> need to > >>>> talk more. > >>>> > >>> > >>> See: > >> > >> What I don't see is you challenging the argument I just made (again). > >> I repeat: such terms no longer have any useful meaning in a discussion > >> with someone like you. > >> > > You made no argument: you tried to speak for me then used your random > > insult bot to spew nonsense. > > > > And Carroll responded by ... pointing out there are cities full of examples of people calling themselves 'liberals' who are obviously nothing more than partisan hypocrites, like you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-18 10:21 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <fhmukd19j490qcogrnn6t8lpk1pfr4i6o4@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #458052 |
Steve Carroll wrote: > people calling themselves 'liberals' Hey, don't be pinning that vile thing onto us. That thing is fscking crazy. -- "So it comes down to (Peter) simply cannot figure out how to watch a YouTube video from Linux. OK." - some thing, lying shamelessly (but no one can quote it lying)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-18 15:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <2nJ3D.315267$go7.314921@fx08.iad> |
| In reply to | #458056 |
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 10:21:55 -0500, chrisv wrote: ( snipped, unread ) -- SilverSlimer Ubuntu 18.04 on MSI GT72 2QD Never apologize Liberalism - One picture, one thousand words: https://kek.gg/i/4xGRhd.jpg Highly recommended reading: - Big Brother: The Orwellian Nightmare Come True (https://kek.gg/u/SrmB) - Questioning Islam: Tough Questions and Honest Answers About the Muslim Religion (https://kek.gg/u/35jND)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-18 09:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fr98fqF3528U9@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #458056 |
On 7/18/18 8:21 AM, chrisv wrote: > Steve Carroll wrote: > >> people calling themselves 'liberals' > > Hey, don't be pinning that vile thing onto us. That thing is fscking > crazy. > Where do you disagree with me and, of course, note that Carroll is attacking me but not others who are liberal... he attacks the PERSON, not the ideas. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-18 10:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6a733301-d925-4e09-aab2-9e7b7d0b7454@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #458056 |
On Wednesday, July 18, 2018 at 9:21:58 AM UTC-6, chrisv wrote: > Steve Carroll wrote: > > > people calling themselves 'liberals' > > Hey, don't be pinning that vile thing onto us. That thing is fscking > crazy. My point to him is the use of such binary terms to create two opposing 'sides' isn't generally very useful for anything other than dividing people. Identity politics have run amok and it's 'the people' that are doing it. The politicians are always gonna play that game, we don't *have* to keep falling for it over and over.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-18 13:44 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <8e2vkdhmqmqb7gdrjeslfnlkoa6cj4ftl2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #458103 |
Steve Carroll wrote: >My point to him is the use of such binary terms to create two opposing >'sides' isn't generally very useful for anything other than dividing people. >Identity politics have run amok and it's 'the people' that are doing it. That's rather ironic, because I see a lot of that exact behavior, from the right-wingers. Propagandists like "Slimer" tell us that "libs" want to "suppress freedom of speech", for an example of one of the *many* egregious *lies* that he has spewed, recently.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-18 12:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2e64dfb2-5aa1-4fe5-9963-ecbd6f98c9f2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #458122 |
On Wednesday, July 18, 2018 at 11:44:33 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote:
> Steve Carroll wrote:
>
> >My point to him is the use of such binary terms to create two opposing
> >'sides' isn't generally very useful for anything other than dividing people.
> >Identity politics have run amok and it's 'the people' that are doing it.
>
> That's rather ironic, because I see a lot of that exact behavior, from
> the right-wingers.
>
> Propagandists like "Slimer" tell us that "libs" want to "suppress
> freedom of speech", for an example of one of the *many* egregious
> *lies* that he has spewed, recently.
Once Klaus Schadenfreude realized how successful Jonas Eklundh Communication is at portraying himself as the 'target' he has figured out this isn't as crazy as it sounded. Just some names Steve Carroll has used
"Evil" John *
"Evil" Snit *
Big Crotch on a Small Fish
Cornelius Munshower
CSMA Moderator
Edward Stanfield
Fretwiz *
Hitman Hero
Measles
Petruzzellis Kids
Sigmond
Slaveen
Smit
Steve C *
Steve Camoll *
Steve Carroll <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> *
Steve Carroll <stevecarroll@xxxxxxxxxxx> *
Steve Carroll <trollkiller@xxxxxx> *
Steve Carroll's Dog *
Steve Carrolll *
Steve Carrroll *
Yevette Owens
Yobo_Obyo
He lies that he uses macOS, while really he never recorded it on the fly and faithfully experienced it. I can tell from the way Jonas Eklundh Communication posted - by being ignorant of basics of the system and the like - he has not once handled a computationally complex challenge before. If he had he would've understood the requirements of dealing with different GUIs!
--
"You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him. He clearly wants the attention"
Steve Carroll, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-18 12:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <040e6ad1-1bb6-4a98-bf69-28e82a3c9738@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #458122 |
On Wednesday, July 18, 2018 at 12:44:33 PM UTC-6, chrisv wrote: > Steve Carroll wrote: > > >My point to him is the use of such binary terms to create two opposing > >'sides' isn't generally very useful for anything other than dividing people. > >Identity politics have run amok and it's 'the people' that are doing it. > > That's rather ironic, because I see a lot of that exact behavior, from > the right-wingers. I see it from both 'sides', and have my entire life... but it's gotten *way* worse in the last decade or so. You probably only see it from one side because you've fallen victim to it more than you realize or are wlling to admit. As a musician who has talked to *tons* of 'the people' on breaks, there are few I've ever talked to who held views that went all in a single direction while, strangely, those same people paint with the broad brush. I'm not just saying this to you, I'm saying it to Slimer, owl, Snit etc. > Propagandists like "Slimer" tell us that "libs" want to "suppress > freedom of speech", for an example of one of the *many* egregious > *lies* that he has spewed, recently. But the problem is... some identifying themselves by that term do, which is the other point I made to Snit (regarding term definitions).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-18 12:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fr9ihnF5g8eU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #458128 |
On 7/18/18 12:04 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Wednesday, July 18, 2018 at 12:44:33 PM UTC-6, chrisv wrote: >> Steve Carroll wrote: >> >>> My point to him is the use of such binary terms to create two opposing >>> 'sides' isn't generally very useful for anything other than dividing people. >>> Identity politics have run amok and it's 'the people' that are doing it. >> >> That's rather ironic, because I see a lot of that exact behavior, from >> the right-wingers. > > I see it from both 'sides', and have my entire life... Yet you offer NO ideas on how to solve problems. I did. > but it's gotten *way* > worse in the last decade or so. You probably only see it from one side > because you've fallen victim to it more than you realize or are wlling to > admit. Things are not that black and white, Carroll. Things are not always one side or the other. You see things in very binary, black and white terms. > As a musician who has talked to *tons* of 'the people' on breaks, > there are few I've ever talked to who held views that went all in a single > direction while, strangely, those same people paint with the broad brush. > I'm not just saying this to you, I'm saying it to Slimer, owl, Snit etc. You mean you think we do what you JUST did? >> Propagandists like "Slimer" tell us that "libs" want to "suppress >> freedom of speech", for an example of one of the *many* egregious >> *lies* that he has spewed, recently. > > But the problem is... some identifying themselves by that term do, > which is the other point I made to Snit (regarding term definitions). Again, Carroll, your claims of my views are NOT my views. I get to speak for me... not you. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-18 12:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fr9ie1F5hfqU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #458122 |
On 7/18/18 11:44 AM, chrisv wrote: > Steve Carroll wrote: > >> My point to him is the use of such binary terms to create two opposing >> 'sides' isn't generally very useful for anything other than dividing people. >> Identity politics have run amok and it's 'the people' that are doing it. > > That's rather ironic, because I see a lot of that exact behavior, from > the right-wingers. And while I sometimes speak in terms of generalities, I am VERY clear they are just that -- generalities. > Propagandists like "Slimer" tell us that "libs" want to "suppress > freedom of speech", for an example of one of the *many* egregious > *lies* that he has spewed, recently. And his comments about Muslims. Carroll does not call Slimer out on that. Ever. Nor will he. Carroll is DEEPLY hypocritical. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-18 12:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fbf55714-f266-433c-955e-ee28cdbe1394@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #458138 |
On Wednesday, July 18, 2018 at 1:23:48 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 7/18/18 11:44 AM, chrisv wrote: > > Steve Carroll wrote: > > > >> My point to him is the use of such binary terms to create two opposing > >> 'sides' isn't generally very useful for anything other than dividing people. > >> Identity politics have run amok and it's 'the people' that are doing it. > > > > That's rather ironic, because I see a lot of that exact behavior, from > > the right-wingers. > > And while I sometimes speak in terms of generalities, The terms 'liberals' and 'conservatives' *are* "generalities", fool. > I am VERY clear they are just that -- generalities. The only thing you're "VERY clear" about is how clueless you are. Notably, you'll whine that was an "attack", the reality is highlighted by asking the obvious: When the very terms you're using are generalities and you can't recognize them as such, why would anyone believe you'd appear to be anything other than clueless?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-18 12:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fr9jigF5kbtU17@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #458148 |
On 7/18/18 12:31 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Wednesday, July 18, 2018 at 1:23:48 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 7/18/18 11:44 AM, chrisv wrote: >>> Steve Carroll wrote: >>> >>>> My point to him is the use of such binary terms to create two opposing >>>> 'sides' isn't generally very useful for anything other than dividing people. >>>> Identity politics have run amok and it's 'the people' that are doing it. >>> >>> That's rather ironic, because I see a lot of that exact behavior, from >>> the right-wingers. >> >> And while I sometimes speak in terms of generalities, > > The terms 'liberals' and 'conservatives' *are* "generalities", Sure... but notice how you feel the need to lash out to note something not in contention. > fool. > >> I am VERY clear they are just that -- generalities. > > The only thing you're "VERY clear" about is how clueless you are. > Notably, you'll whine that was an "attack", the reality is highlighted > by asking the obvious: > > When the very terms you're using are generalities and you can't > recognize them as such, why would anyone believe you'd appear > to be anything other than clueless? > Your random insult bot is crap. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-18 12:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e6272440-39ed-4917-ab3f-f3a92947c18a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #458169 |
On Wednesday, July 18, 2018 at 1:43:15 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 7/18/18 12:31 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Wednesday, July 18, 2018 at 1:23:48 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 7/18/18 11:44 AM, chrisv wrote: > >>> Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> > >>>> My point to him is the use of such binary terms to create two opposing > >>>> 'sides' isn't generally very useful for anything other than dividing people. > >>>> Identity politics have run amok and it's 'the people' that are doing it. > >>> > >>> That's rather ironic, because I see a lot of that exact behavior, from > >>> the right-wingers. > >> > >> And while I sometimes speak in terms of generalities, > > > > The terms 'liberals' and 'conservatives' *are* "generalities", > > Sure... Then why are you still pretending that what you just wrote has any meaning? > but notice how you Notice how you always point back to the "other" person when you don't want to face something? Trust me, "others" notice. > >> I am VERY clear they are just that -- generalities. > > > > The only thing you're "VERY clear" about is how clueless you are. > > Notably, you'll whine that was an "attack", the reality is highlighted > > by asking the obvious: > > > > When the very terms you're using are generalities and you can't > > recognize them as such, why would anyone believe you'd appear > > to be anything other than clueless? > > > > Your random insult bot is crap. You white flag is noted... again.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web