Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #457114 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-07-10 19:54 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-07-24 07:28 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 252 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Chris Pratt etc. Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-07-10 19:54 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. SilverSlimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-07-11 09:08 -0400
Re: Chris Pratt etc. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-13 09:58 -0500
Re: Chris Pratt etc. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 16:32 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 09:38 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 10:03 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 11:06 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 11:30 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 12:27 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 13:19 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 21:04 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-13 10:13 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-13 17:44 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 11:12 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-13 12:36 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 12:43 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 13:10 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-13 19:53 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 21:04 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 21:17 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 15:46 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 12:54 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 13:12 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 21:04 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 14:28 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 15:50 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 11:14 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 11:21 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 09:39 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 10:04 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 11:03 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 11:13 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 11:17 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 11:30 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 12:24 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 13:14 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 21:04 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 14:33 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 14:44 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 15:53 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 15:00 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 15:43 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 10:01 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-14 10:13 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 10:47 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-14 11:11 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 11:20 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 11:24 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 11:51 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-14 11:30 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 12:39 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 12:54 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-14 13:19 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-14 13:19 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 13:42 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-14 21:12 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-14 15:10 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-14 22:52 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 16:17 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-14 17:02 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 09:09 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-15 09:24 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 09:26 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-15 10:35 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 11:35 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 09:29 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-15 16:30 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 09:45 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 10:01 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-15 10:44 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 11:51 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-15 13:58 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 14:42 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 17:18 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 14:54 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-15 17:22 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 09:09 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 17:21 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-15 22:56 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-15 17:29 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 06:06 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 15:31 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 10:49 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-14 11:16 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-13 17:38 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-13 12:53 -0500
There is a nice jail cell in chrisv's future Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 11:02 -0700
Re: There is a nice jail cell in chrisv's future owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-13 18:13 +0000
Re: There is a nice jail cell in chrisv's future chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 07:13 -0500
Re: There is a nice jail cell in chrisv's future owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-16 16:08 +0000
Re: There is a nice jail cell in chrisv's future chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 11:34 -0500
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-13 18:04 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 11:09 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 07:00 -0500
Re: Chris Pratt etc. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 08:02 -0500
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 06:48 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 14:53 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 10:12 -0500
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-16 15:19 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 17:52 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-16 15:12 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 08:39 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 17:00 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-16 15:09 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 10:22 -0500
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-16 15:35 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 10:42 -0500
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 08:54 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 16:00 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 09:23 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 17:18 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 18:15 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-16 16:00 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 09:09 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 11:32 -0500
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 10:13 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 11:46 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 17:59 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 13:09 -0500
Re: Chris Pratt etc. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 18:33 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 18:44 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 13:46 -0500
Re: Chris Pratt etc. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 18:51 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 19:04 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 19:06 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 13:58 -0500
Multiple right-wing posts deleted, unread chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 14:16 -0500
Re: Multiple right-wing posts deleted, unread RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 19:24 +0000
Re: Multiple right-wing posts deleted, unread Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 13:42 -0700
Re: Multiple right-wing posts deleted, unread chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 14:30 -0500
Re: Multiple right-wing posts deleted, unread SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 19:49 +0000
Re: Multiple right-wing posts deleted, unread chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 14:52 -0500
Re: Multiple right-wing posts deleted, unread SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 20:04 +0000
Re: Multiple right-wing posts deleted, unread chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 15:07 -0500
Re: Multiple right-wing posts deleted, unread Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 13:20 -0700
Re: Multiple right-wing posts deleted, unread Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 13:36 -0700
Re: Multiple right-wing posts deleted, unread Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 13:39 -0700
Re: Multiple right-wing posts deleted, unread SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 19:47 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-16 19:18 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 13:05 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 19:24 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 13:46 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 18:40 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 17:25 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 12:51 -0500
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 11:15 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 18:29 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 18:49 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-16 18:54 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 19:15 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 12:02 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 19:09 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 14:11 -0500
Re: Chris Pratt etc. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 19:20 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 12:49 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 13:47 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 12:25 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 13:42 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 14:07 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 14:18 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 14:38 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 15:32 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 15:41 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 15:57 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 16:03 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 17:04 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 17:34 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 17:43 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-16 19:30 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 13:40 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 19:46 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-16 18:32 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 18:37 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 18:56 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 19:18 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 13:47 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-16 13:44 -0500
Re: Chris Pratt etc. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 18:50 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 18:01 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 17:55 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 11:10 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 21:10 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 15:47 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 16:17 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 11:13 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-16 06:04 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-16 14:54 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-16 08:38 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-16 15:59 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 09:25 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-16 10:52 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-16 18:51 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-16 14:51 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-16 18:06 -0400
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 15:26 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-16 22:19 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-16 17:47 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-17 01:03 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-16 19:23 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 19:36 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 19:52 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-17 03:56 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 21:26 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 02:37 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 04:11 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 22:44 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 01:20 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-17 02:50 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 03:08 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 04:59 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-17 13:20 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 06:48 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 17:15 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-17 13:45 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 14:39 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-18 01:38 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 19:04 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-18 03:06 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-18 11:26 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 04:45 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-18 15:24 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 15:42 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-19 00:48 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 18:03 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-18 19:29 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-19 12:49 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-19 06:46 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-19 14:51 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 08:07 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-19 09:09 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 09:26 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-19 17:30 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 10:59 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-19 13:39 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 13:52 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-19 20:58 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-19 14:33 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-20 01:22 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 18:33 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 10:10 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 20:07 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 10:56 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-20 10:08 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-20 18:01 +0000
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 11:28 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-20 11:40 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 11:59 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 14:23 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 19:04 -0700
Re: Chris Pratt etc. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 07:04 -0700
Racist Communism Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-07-27 16:51 -0700
We can't change the past or the future. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-07-24 07:28 -0700
Page 1 of 13 [1] 2 3 … 13 Next page →
| From | Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-10 19:54 -0700 |
| Subject | Chris Pratt etc. |
| Message-ID | <856be007-0f42-4bcb-b413-83e55453c613@googlegroups.com> |
Chris Pratt from Jurassic World sheep farm got 1.3 million likes in Instagram in just one day. Ooooh! That is a lot better than Darci Lynne ever did with her stupid shit. Chris Pratt gave a shout out to a Hollywood tour bus, on the street, and somebody actually recognized him. Ooooh! It makes more sense to Moi going to Hollywood than NYC to be seen on the Today Show. Taking a Hollywood Tour bus is pretty desperate, but NOT quite as stupid as wasting your time in NYC waving at family on the Today Show. Season 13 on AGT so far has pretty much tanked. There was one extreme contortionist who looked like some kind of an alien when he walked on all fours. But really, how could you possible entertain anybody for 2-hours with that kind of an act? Today they had a dog who actually sang lamely on AGT. Ooooh! Then there was a male Taylor Swift want a be singer whose act would put anyone to sleep. There were way too many foreign acts this year. Then Trump has nominated a part-time high school basketball coach to the SCOTUS. Ooooh! Boy are the Liberal Progressives freaking out on that one.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-11 09:08 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <Mjn1D.324311$o43.190974@fx33.iad> |
| In reply to | #457114 |
On 2018-07-10 10:54 PM, Simon bar Sinister wrote: > Chris Pratt from Jurassic World sheep farm got 1.3 million likes in Instagram in just one day. Ooooh! That is a lot better than Darci Lynne ever did with her stupid shit. Chris Pratt is the man. Not only is he a good-looking man with lots of charisma and an excellent sense of humour, but he is a proud Christian who is willing to risk the hatred of God-hating liberal Hollywood to send loving words. He earns my kudos and my total respect. -- SilverSlimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-13 09:58 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <22fhkdhg09n78fgn53asv52gf77gk7362c@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #457125 |
SilverSlimer wrote: > (nonsense snipped) More "white christians are the ones being suppressed" nonsense from the propagandist. Christians have never had to fear being open about their faith, in Hollywood or anywhere else, in this country. As usual, the right-wing propaganda is 180 degrees from reality. Let us recall who were "blackballed" in Hollywood, not so many years ago. Left-wingers, with shitty allegations of "communism", that's who. -- "I am quite willing to call a spade a spade in calling GNU/Linux a technological form of Communism." - "Slimer"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-13 16:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <piak7n$mh3$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #457219 |
On 2018-07-13, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > SilverSlimer wrote: > >> (nonsense snipped) > > More "white christians are the ones being suppressed" nonsense from > the propagandist. Christians have never had to fear being open about > their faith, in Hollywood or anywhere else, in this country. > > As usual, the right-wing propaganda is 180 degrees from reality. Let > us recall who were "blackballed" in Hollywood, not so many years ago. > Left-wingers, with shitty allegations of "communism", that's who. There is an attempt by the libtards in this country to "shout down" Christians (and whites) when they express their beliefs on such issues as abortion or homosexual recruitment in the schools (and insane crap like allowing perverts in girl's dressing rooms and bathrooms). But I think it's starting to backfire on them. People are getting fed up with walking on eggshells just for expressing their beliefs. I know I'm fed up with "professional" "offense takers," those who are offended by asinine things like "appropriating" other culture's customs. (Like some girl was attacked by the morons at HuffPuff for wearing a Japanese dress to a prom.) I think allowing men in girl's bathrooms is probably one of the main issues promoted by these morons that allowed Trump to win the presidency. I sincerely doubt that a loud-mouthed lout like Trump would have won if not for such stupidity (I didn't vote for anybody in the last election). The libtards need to grow brains if they want to win elections. Offending and ridiculing the majority of Americans and then expecting them to vote for you, is just pure stupidity. -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-13 09:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fqs2stFl1quU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #457220 |
On 7/13/18 9:32 AM, RonB wrote: > On 2018-07-13, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> SilverSlimer wrote: >> >>> (nonsense snipped) >> >> More "white christians are the ones being suppressed" nonsense from >> the propagandist. Christians have never had to fear being open about >> their faith, in Hollywood or anywhere else, in this country. >> >> As usual, the right-wing propaganda is 180 degrees from reality. Let >> us recall who were "blackballed" in Hollywood, not so many years ago. >> Left-wingers, with shitty allegations of "communism", that's who. > > There is an attempt by the libtards in this country to "shout down" > Christians (and whites) when they express their beliefs on such issues as > abortion or homosexual recruitment in the schools (and insane crap like > allowing perverts in girl's dressing rooms and bathrooms). People stand up against bigotry. This is a good thing. You work to twist it as though it was a bad thing. Oy. > But I think it's > starting to backfire on them. People are getting fed up with walking on > eggshells just for expressing their beliefs. I know I'm fed up with > "professional" "offense takers," those who are offended by asinine things > like "appropriating" other culture's customs. (Like some girl was attacked > by the morons at HuffPuff for wearing a Japanese dress to a prom.) You are deeply offended people stand up for equal rights. Boo hoo for you. Maybe you need to learn to not be so easily offended. > I think allowing men in girl's bathrooms is probably one of the main issues > promoted by these morons that allowed Trump to win the presidency. As far as I know, literally NOBODY is suggesting men should use girl's bathrooms. Nobody. Well, except some on the right who insist THEY get to determine someone is male even if they are not. They want to do genitalia checks on people to help themselves not be uncomfortable. That is insane. > I > sincerely doubt that a loud-mouthed lout like Trump would have won if not > for such stupidity (I didn't vote for anybody in the last election). The > libtards need to grow brains if they want to win elections. Offending and > ridiculing the majority of Americans and then expecting them to vote for > you, is just pure stupidity. You whine about people being offended as you cry about how offended you are. The Dems lost because the DNC was horribly corrupt and Clinton was an absolutely idiotic candidate to run and she ran a miserable campaign. Even then she had about a 70% chance to win. She was Trump's best, of not only, chance and he STILL lost the popular vote and STILL is deeply unpopular in polls. He is more of a joke than Bush II was. Hopefully the DNC learns a lesson from this... though I doubt they will. They, like the GOP, are still paid for and beholden to their wealthy donors. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-13 10:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <498d3c15-fda4-4676-861b-42b15f8caaaa@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #457221 |
On Friday, July 13, 2018 at 10:38:57 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 7/13/18 9:32 AM, RonB wrote: > > On 2018-07-13, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >> SilverSlimer wrote: > >> > >>> (nonsense snipped) > >> > >> More "white christians are the ones being suppressed" nonsense from > >> the propagandist. Christians have never had to fear being open about > >> their faith, in Hollywood or anywhere else, in this country. > >> > >> As usual, the right-wing propaganda is 180 degrees from reality. Let > >> us recall who were "blackballed" in Hollywood, not so many years ago. > >> Left-wingers, with shitty allegations of "communism", that's who. > > > > There is an attempt by the libtards in this country to "shout down" > > Christians (and whites) when they express their beliefs on such issues as > > abortion or homosexual recruitment in the schools (and insane crap like > > allowing perverts in girl's dressing rooms and bathrooms). > > People stand up against bigotry. Not everything is bigotry, as too many on the left would have one believe. Snoflism is a thing now (yes, I just made the term up but it's a thing). > This is a good thing. You work to twist > it as though it was a bad thing. Oy. > > > But I think it's > > starting to backfire on them. People are getting fed up with walking on > > eggshells just for expressing their beliefs. I know I'm fed up with > > "professional" "offense takers," those who are offended by asinine things > > like "appropriating" other culture's customs. (Like some girl was attacked > > by the morons at HuffPuff for wearing a Japanese dress to a prom.) > > You are deeply offended people stand up for equal rights. Not everything is a "right", either. > Hopefully the DNC learns a lesson from this... Too late, the lesson they should've known before dealing with Trump was how far to the left he was going to make their party appear.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-13 11:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fqs810FlvfsU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #457225 |
On 7/13/18 10:03 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Friday, July 13, 2018 at 10:38:57 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 7/13/18 9:32 AM, RonB wrote: >>> On 2018-07-13, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> SilverSlimer wrote: >>>> >>>>> (nonsense snipped) >>>> >>>> More "white christians are the ones being suppressed" nonsense from >>>> the propagandist. Christians have never had to fear being open about >>>> their faith, in Hollywood or anywhere else, in this country. >>>> >>>> As usual, the right-wing propaganda is 180 degrees from reality. Let >>>> us recall who were "blackballed" in Hollywood, not so many years ago. >>>> Left-wingers, with shitty allegations of "communism", that's who. >>> >>> There is an attempt by the libtards in this country to "shout down" >>> Christians (and whites) when they express their beliefs on such issues as >>> abortion or homosexual recruitment in the schools (and insane crap like >>> allowing perverts in girl's dressing rooms and bathrooms). >> >> People stand up against bigotry. > > Not everything is bigotry, as too many on the left would have one believe. > Snoflism is a thing now (yes, I just made the term up but it's a thing). Your implication, of course, is I suggested "everything is bigotry" which is, of course, not true. You are again seeking to put words in my mouth. >> This is a good thing. You work to twist >> it as though it was a bad thing. Oy. >> >>> But I think it's >>> starting to backfire on them. People are getting fed up with walking on >>> eggshells just for expressing their beliefs. I know I'm fed up with >>> "professional" "offense takers," those who are offended by asinine things >>> like "appropriating" other culture's customs. (Like some girl was attacked >>> by the morons at HuffPuff for wearing a Japanese dress to a prom.) >> >> You are deeply offended people stand up for equal rights. > > Not everything is a "right", either. You are suggesting with this, of course, that I am saying otherwise. Which is, again, absurd. Why not respond to what I say and not to what you project onto me? >> Hopefully the DNC learns a lesson from this... > > Too late, the lesson they should've known before dealing with Trump > was how far to the left he was going to make their party appear. The most popular politician in the country is Sanders... the problem the DNC has is they want to appeal to the corporate wing and not the popular wing. They should serve the people as a whole, without giving into the rich. They have taken SOME steps in this direction, such as reducing the power of the idiotic super delegates. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-13 11:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <db650393-981a-43bc-b342-740dd225a512@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #457235 |
On Friday, July 13, 2018 at 12:06:28 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 7/13/18 10:03 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Friday, July 13, 2018 at 10:38:57 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 7/13/18 9:32 AM, RonB wrote: > >>> On 2018-07-13, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>>> SilverSlimer wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> (nonsense snipped) > >>>> > >>>> More "white christians are the ones being suppressed" nonsense from > >>>> the propagandist. Christians have never had to fear being open about > >>>> their faith, in Hollywood or anywhere else, in this country. > >>>> > >>>> As usual, the right-wing propaganda is 180 degrees from reality. Let > >>>> us recall who were "blackballed" in Hollywood, not so many years ago. > >>>> Left-wingers, with shitty allegations of "communism", that's who. > >>> > >>> There is an attempt by the libtards in this country to "shout down" > >>> Christians (and whites) when they express their beliefs on such issues as > >>> abortion or homosexual recruitment in the schools (and insane crap like > >>> allowing perverts in girl's dressing rooms and bathrooms). > >> > >> People stand up against bigotry. > > > > Not everything is bigotry, as too many on the left would have one believe. > > Snoflism is a thing now (yes, I just made the term up but it's a thing). > > Your implication There is no implication, I made a clear statement that I believe to be true. Can I convince you of it? Of course not, but that's beside the point. To my way of looking at things, you can't spit without being labeled a xxx-ist by some loon with an agenda. > >> This is a good thing. You work to twist > >> it as though it was a bad thing. Oy. > >> > >>> But I think it's > >>> starting to backfire on them. People are getting fed up with walking on > >>> eggshells just for expressing their beliefs. I know I'm fed up with > >>> "professional" "offense takers," those who are offended by asinine things > >>> like "appropriating" other culture's customs. (Like some girl was attacked > >>> by the morons at HuffPuff for wearing a Japanese dress to a prom.) > >> > >> You are deeply offended people stand up for equal rights. > > > > Not everything is a "right", either. > > You are suggesting with this I'm not "suggesting" anything, I'm making a factual statement. > > Too late, the lesson they should've known before dealing with Trump > > was how far to the left he was going to make their party appear. > > The most popular politician in the country is Sanders... Even if that media story were true, so what? You saw what reality did to him, it's time to wake up now. > the problem the > DNC has is they want to appeal to the corporate wing and not the popular > wing. They should serve the people as a whole, without giving into the > rich. They have taken SOME steps in this direction, such as reducing the > power of the idiotic super delegates. You're fooling yourself.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-13 12:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fqsco9Fmr83U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #457246 |
On 7/13/18 11:30 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Friday, July 13, 2018 at 12:06:28 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 7/13/18 10:03 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Friday, July 13, 2018 at 10:38:57 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>> On 7/13/18 9:32 AM, RonB wrote: >>>>> On 2018-07-13, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> (nonsense snipped) >>>>>> >>>>>> More "white christians are the ones being suppressed" nonsense from >>>>>> the propagandist. Christians have never had to fear being open about >>>>>> their faith, in Hollywood or anywhere else, in this country. >>>>>> >>>>>> As usual, the right-wing propaganda is 180 degrees from reality. Let >>>>>> us recall who were "blackballed" in Hollywood, not so many years ago. >>>>>> Left-wingers, with shitty allegations of "communism", that's who. >>>>> >>>>> There is an attempt by the libtards in this country to "shout down" >>>>> Christians (and whites) when they express their beliefs on such issues as >>>>> abortion or homosexual recruitment in the schools (and insane crap like >>>>> allowing perverts in girl's dressing rooms and bathrooms). >>>> >>>> People stand up against bigotry. >>> >>> Not everything is bigotry, as too many on the left would have one believe. >>> Snoflism is a thing now (yes, I just made the term up but it's a thing). >> >> Your implication > > There is no implication, I made a clear statement that I believe to be true. > Can I convince you of it? Of course not, but that's beside the point. To my > way of looking at things, you can't spit without being labeled a xxx-ist by > some loon with an agenda. > >>>> This is a good thing. You work to twist >>>> it as though it was a bad thing. Oy. >>>> >>>>> But I think it's >>>>> starting to backfire on them. People are getting fed up with walking on >>>>> eggshells just for expressing their beliefs. I know I'm fed up with >>>>> "professional" "offense takers," those who are offended by asinine things >>>>> like "appropriating" other culture's customs. (Like some girl was attacked >>>>> by the morons at HuffPuff for wearing a Japanese dress to a prom.) >>>> >>>> You are deeply offended people stand up for equal rights. >>> >>> Not everything is a "right", either. >> >> You are suggesting with this > > I'm not "suggesting" anything, I'm making a factual statement. > >>> Too late, the lesson they should've known before dealing with Trump >>> was how far to the left he was going to make their party appear. >> >> The most popular politician in the country is Sanders... > > Even if that media story were true, so what? You saw what reality did > to him, it's time to wake up now. > >> the problem the >> DNC has is they want to appeal to the corporate wing and not the popular >> wing. They should serve the people as a whole, without giving into the >> rich. They have taken SOME steps in this direction, such as reducing the >> power of the idiotic super delegates. > > You're fooling yourself. > You are playing games and then ignoring the fact that Sanders was and, last I checked at least, is the most popular politician on the national scene. To the extent that Trump did get support from those who do not back his open and strong bigotry, it was because he put on a show about caring about the actual people. Of course, as with pretty much all he says, he was lying, but a LOT of people are foolish enough to fall for it (and the competition absolutely sucked and he STILL only won on a statistical fluke). -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-13 13:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ba53d67f-26de-416a-ab78-6ca2e250e50b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #457255 |
On Friday, July 13, 2018 at 1:27:08 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 7/13/18 11:30 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Friday, July 13, 2018 at 12:06:28 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 7/13/18 10:03 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Friday, July 13, 2018 at 10:38:57 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>> On 7/13/18 9:32 AM, RonB wrote: > >>>>> On 2018-07-13, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>>>>> SilverSlimer wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> (nonsense snipped) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> More "white christians are the ones being suppressed" nonsense from > >>>>>> the propagandist. Christians have never had to fear being open about > >>>>>> their faith, in Hollywood or anywhere else, in this country. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> As usual, the right-wing propaganda is 180 degrees from reality. Let > >>>>>> us recall who were "blackballed" in Hollywood, not so many years ago. > >>>>>> Left-wingers, with shitty allegations of "communism", that's who. > >>>>> > >>>>> There is an attempt by the libtards in this country to "shout down" > >>>>> Christians (and whites) when they express their beliefs on such issues as > >>>>> abortion or homosexual recruitment in the schools (and insane crap like > >>>>> allowing perverts in girl's dressing rooms and bathrooms). > >>>> > >>>> People stand up against bigotry. > >>> > >>> Not everything is bigotry, as too many on the left would have one believe. > >>> Snoflism is a thing now (yes, I just made the term up but it's a thing). > >> > >> Your implication > > > > There is no implication, I made a clear statement that I believe to be true. > > Can I convince you of it? Of course not, but that's beside the point. To my > > way of looking at things, you can't spit without being labeled a xxx-ist by > > some loon with an agenda. > > > >>>> This is a good thing. You work to twist > >>>> it as though it was a bad thing. Oy. > >>>> > >>>>> But I think it's > >>>>> starting to backfire on them. People are getting fed up with walking on > >>>>> eggshells just for expressing their beliefs. I know I'm fed up with > >>>>> "professional" "offense takers," those who are offended by asinine things > >>>>> like "appropriating" other culture's customs. (Like some girl was attacked > >>>>> by the morons at HuffPuff for wearing a Japanese dress to a prom.) > >>>> > >>>> You are deeply offended people stand up for equal rights. > >>> > >>> Not everything is a "right", either. > >> > >> You are suggesting with this > > > > I'm not "suggesting" anything, I'm making a factual statement. > > > >>> Too late, the lesson they should've known before dealing with Trump > >>> was how far to the left he was going to make their party appear. > >> > >> The most popular politician in the country is Sanders... > > > > Even if that media story were true, so what? You saw what reality did > > to him, it's time to wake up now. > > > >> the problem the > >> DNC has is they want to appeal to the corporate wing and not the popular > >> wing. They should serve the people as a whole, without giving into the > >> rich. They have taken SOME steps in this direction, such as reducing the > >> power of the idiotic super delegates. > > > > You're fooling yourself. > > > > You are playing games and then ignoring the fact that Sanders was and, > last I checked at least, is the most popular politician on the national > scene. What has this alleged 'popularity' gotten him? That I see, all he's done is help Trump... movements like #WalkAway are the result.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-13 21:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fqsieoFnut2U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #457264 |
Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, July 13, 2018 at 1:27:08 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 7/13/18 11:30 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Friday, July 13, 2018 at 12:06:28 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>> On 7/13/18 10:03 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>> On Friday, July 13, 2018 at 10:38:57 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 7/13/18 9:32 AM, RonB wrote: >>>>>>> On 2018-07-13, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>> SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> (nonsense snipped) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> More "white christians are the ones being suppressed" nonsense from >>>>>>>> the propagandist. Christians have never had to fear being open about >>>>>>>> their faith, in Hollywood or anywhere else, in this country. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As usual, the right-wing propaganda is 180 degrees from reality. Let >>>>>>>> us recall who were "blackballed" in Hollywood, not so many years ago. >>>>>>>> Left-wingers, with shitty allegations of "communism", that's who. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There is an attempt by the libtards in this country to "shout down" >>>>>>> Christians (and whites) when they express their beliefs on such issues as >>>>>>> abortion or homosexual recruitment in the schools (and insane crap like >>>>>>> allowing perverts in girl's dressing rooms and bathrooms). >>>>>> >>>>>> People stand up against bigotry. >>>>> >>>>> Not everything is bigotry, as too many on the left would have one believe. >>>>> Snoflism is a thing now (yes, I just made the term up but it's a thing). >>>> >>>> Your implication >>> >>> There is no implication, I made a clear statement that I believe to be true. >>> Can I convince you of it? Of course not, but that's beside the point. To my >>> way of looking at things, you can't spit without being labeled a xxx-ist by >>> some loon with an agenda. >>> >>>>>> This is a good thing. You work to twist >>>>>> it as though it was a bad thing. Oy. >>>>>> >>>>>>> But I think it's >>>>>>> starting to backfire on them. People are getting fed up with walking on >>>>>>> eggshells just for expressing their beliefs. I know I'm fed up with >>>>>>> "professional" "offense takers," those who are offended by asinine things >>>>>>> like "appropriating" other culture's customs. (Like some girl was attacked >>>>>>> by the morons at HuffPuff for wearing a Japanese dress to a prom.) >>>>>> >>>>>> You are deeply offended people stand up for equal rights. >>>>> >>>>> Not everything is a "right", either. >>>> >>>> You are suggesting with this >>> >>> I'm not "suggesting" anything, I'm making a factual statement. >>> >>>>> Too late, the lesson they should've known before dealing with Trump >>>>> was how far to the left he was going to make their party appear. >>>> >>>> The most popular politician in the country is Sanders... >>> >>> Even if that media story were true, so what? You saw what reality did >>> to him, it's time to wake up now. >>> >>>> the problem the >>>> DNC has is they want to appeal to the corporate wing and not the popular >>>> wing. They should serve the people as a whole, without giving into the >>>> rich. They have taken SOME steps in this direction, such as reducing the >>>> power of the idiotic super delegates. >>> >>> You're fooling yourself. >>> >> >> You are playing games and then ignoring the fact that Sanders was and, >> last I checked at least, is the most popular politician on the national >> scene. > > What has this alleged 'popularity' gotten him? That I see, all he's done is help > Trump... movements like #WalkAway are the result. > Many of the things he backs have gained popularity. But, sure, progress is not easy and you will have those who fear losing their entitlements pushing back. Those of us who want equal rights have both the parties fighting us.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-13 10:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b440343b-cb10-4347-8079-fd1e179b230b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #457220 |
On Friday, July 13, 2018 at 12:32:57 PM UTC-4, RonB wrote: > On 2018-07-13, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > > SilverSlimer wrote: > > > >> (nonsense snipped) > > > > More "white christians are the ones being suppressed" nonsense from > > the propagandist. Christians have never had to fear being open about > > their faith, in Hollywood or anywhere else, in this country. > > > > As usual, the right-wing propaganda is 180 degrees from reality. Let > > us recall who were "blackballed" in Hollywood, not so many years ago. > > Left-wingers, with shitty allegations of "communism", that's who. > > There is an attempt by the libtards in this country to "shout down" > Christians (and whites) when they express their beliefs on such issues as > abortion or homosexual recruitment in the schools (and insane crap like > allowing perverts in girl's dressing rooms and bathrooms). Keyword being "beliefs", because the Constitutional principle of the Separation of Church & State means that *no* religion is allowed to use State Institutions to impose their religious beliefs on others. > But I think it's > starting to backfire on them. People are getting fed up with walking on > eggshells just for expressing their beliefs. The ones its backfiring are have been the white 'Christian' bible-thumpers. Case in point: <https://abcnews.go.com/US/satanists-sue-scottsdale-religious-discrimination/story> <https://newsok.com/article/5561001/devil-worshiper-files-lawsuit-against-putnam-city-schools> > I think allowing men in girl's bathrooms is probably one of the main issues > promoted by these morons that allowed Trump to win the presidency. Perhaps you should first go actually research & let us know just what "allowing men in girls' bathrooms" was actually an accurate news report or not. ...because that's not what the Title IX transgender directive was about. <https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/obama-transgender-bathrooms/> So if that is what you believe, then you've fallen victim to someone's propaganda. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-13 17:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <azx9vc0803g.ah@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #457228 |
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: > On Friday, July 13, 2018 at 12:32:57 PM UTC-4, RonB wrote: >> On 2018-07-13, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> > SilverSlimer wrote: >> > >> >> (nonsense snipped) >> > >> > More "white christians are the ones being suppressed" nonsense from >> > the propagandist. Christians have never had to fear being open about >> > their faith, in Hollywood or anywhere else, in this country. >> > >> > As usual, the right-wing propaganda is 180 degrees from reality. Let >> > us recall who were "blackballed" in Hollywood, not so many years ago. >> > Left-wingers, with shitty allegations of "communism", that's who. >> >> There is an attempt by the libtards in this country to "shout down" >> Christians (and whites) when they express their beliefs on such issues as >> abortion or homosexual recruitment in the schools (and insane crap like >> allowing perverts in girl's dressing rooms and bathrooms). > > Keyword being "beliefs", because the Constitutional principle of the > Separation of Church & State means that *no* religion is allowed to > use State Institutions to impose their religious beliefs on others. > >> But I think it's >> starting to backfire on them. People are getting fed up with walking on >> eggshells just for expressing their beliefs. > > The ones its backfiring are have been the white 'Christian' bible-thumpers. > Case in point: > > <https://abcnews.go.com/US/satanists-sue-scottsdale-religious-discrimination/story> > > <https://newsok.com/article/5561001/devil-worshiper-files-lawsuit-against-putnam-city-schools> > > >> I think allowing men in girl's bathrooms is probably one of the main issues >> promoted by these morons that allowed Trump to win the presidency. > > Perhaps you should first go actually research & let us know just > what "allowing men in girls' bathrooms" was actually an accurate > news report or not. > > ...because that's not what the Title IX transgender directive was about. > > <https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/obama-transgender-bathrooms/> > <quote> RATING: MOSTLY TRUE. WHAT'S FALSE: President Obama did not personally issue the guidance. </quote> > > So if that is what you believe, then you've fallen victim to > someone's propaganda. > <quote> Restrooms and Locker Rooms. A school may provide separate facilities on the basis of sex, but must allow transgender students access to such facilities consistent with their gender identity. </quote> That very quote distinguishes between "sex" and "gender identity." So the assertion of "allowing men in girls' bathrooms" is accurate.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-13 11:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fqs8blFlvfsU6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #457230 |
On 7/13/18 10:44 AM, owl wrote: > -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >> On Friday, July 13, 2018 at 12:32:57 PM UTC-4, RonB wrote: >>> On 2018-07-13, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> SilverSlimer wrote: >>>> >>>>> (nonsense snipped) >>>> >>>> More "white christians are the ones being suppressed" nonsense from >>>> the propagandist. Christians have never had to fear being open about >>>> their faith, in Hollywood or anywhere else, in this country. >>>> >>>> As usual, the right-wing propaganda is 180 degrees from reality. Let >>>> us recall who were "blackballed" in Hollywood, not so many years ago. >>>> Left-wingers, with shitty allegations of "communism", that's who. >>> >>> There is an attempt by the libtards in this country to "shout down" >>> Christians (and whites) when they express their beliefs on such issues as >>> abortion or homosexual recruitment in the schools (and insane crap like >>> allowing perverts in girl's dressing rooms and bathrooms). >> >> Keyword being "beliefs", because the Constitutional principle of the >> Separation of Church & State means that *no* religion is allowed to >> use State Institutions to impose their religious beliefs on others. >> >>> But I think it's >>> starting to backfire on them. People are getting fed up with walking on >>> eggshells just for expressing their beliefs. >> >> The ones its backfiring are have been the white 'Christian' bible-thumpers. >> Case in point: >> >> <https://abcnews.go.com/US/satanists-sue-scottsdale-religious-discrimination/story> >> >> <https://newsok.com/article/5561001/devil-worshiper-files-lawsuit-against-putnam-city-schools> >> >> >>> I think allowing men in girl's bathrooms is probably one of the main issues >>> promoted by these morons that allowed Trump to win the presidency. >> >> Perhaps you should first go actually research & let us know just >> what "allowing men in girls' bathrooms" was actually an accurate >> news report or not. >> >> ...because that's not what the Title IX transgender directive was about. >> >> <https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/obama-transgender-bathrooms/> >> > > <quote> > RATING: MOSTLY TRUE. > WHAT'S FALSE: President Obama did not personally issue the guidance. > </quote> > >> >> So if that is what you believe, then you've fallen victim to >> someone's propaganda. >> > > <quote> > Restrooms and Locker Rooms. A school may provide separate facilities > on the basis of sex, but must allow transgender students access to such > facilities consistent with their gender identity. > </quote> > > That very quote distinguishes between "sex" and "gender identity." > So the assertion of "allowing men in girls' bathrooms" is accurate. > They allow MEN into MEN's rooms and WOMEN into WOMEN's rooms. They base this on a person actual gender and NOT on what the right wants to dictate for them. I cannot imagine wanting to give the government so much power they get to dictate people's gender even in contradiction to what the evidence shows. The right WANTS to be controlled. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-13 12:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <791eabba-c422-4eef-878c-353025080148@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #457230 |
On Friday, July 13, 2018 at 1:44:43 PM UTC-4, owl wrote: > -hh wrote: > > On Friday, July 13, 2018 at 12:32:57 PM UTC-4, RonB wrote: > >> On 2018-07-13, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >> > SilverSlimer wrote: > >> > > >> >> (nonsense snipped) > >> > > >> > More "white christians are the ones being suppressed" nonsense from > >> > the propagandist. Christians have never had to fear being open about > >> > their faith, in Hollywood or anywhere else, in this country. > >> > > >> > As usual, the right-wing propaganda is 180 degrees from reality. Let > >> > us recall who were "blackballed" in Hollywood, not so many years ago. > >> > Left-wingers, with shitty allegations of "communism", that's who. > >> > >> There is an attempt by the libtards in this country to "shout down" > >> Christians (and whites) when they express their beliefs on such issues as > >> abortion or homosexual recruitment in the schools (and insane crap like > >> allowing perverts in girl's dressing rooms and bathrooms). > > > > Keyword being "beliefs", because the Constitutional principle of the > > Separation of Church & State means that *no* religion is allowed to > > use State Institutions to impose their religious beliefs on others. > > > >> But I think it's > >> starting to backfire on them. People are getting fed up with walking on > >> eggshells just for expressing their beliefs. > > > > The ones its backfiring are have been the white 'Christian' bible-thumpers. > > Case in point: > > > > <https://abcnews.go.com/US/satanists-sue-scottsdale-religious-discrimination/story> > > > > <https://newsok.com/article/5561001/devil-worshiper-files-lawsuit-against-putnam-city-schools> > > > > > >> I think allowing men in girl's bathrooms is probably one of the main issues > >> promoted by these morons that allowed Trump to win the presidency. > > > > Perhaps you should first go actually research & let us know just > > what "allowing men in girls' bathrooms" was actually an accurate > > news report or not. > > > > ...because that's not what the Title IX transgender directive was about. > > > > <https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/obama-transgender-bathrooms/> > > > > <quote> > RATING: MOSTLY TRUE. > WHAT'S FALSE: President Obama did not personally issue the guidance. > </quote> > > > > > So if that is what you believe, then you've fallen victim to > > someone's propaganda. > > > > <quote> > Restrooms and Locker Rooms. A school may provide separate facilities > on the basis of sex, but must allow transgender students access to such > facilities consistent with their gender identity. > </quote> > > That very quote distinguishes between "sex" and "gender identity." > So the assertion of "allowing men in girls' bathrooms" is accurate. Sorry, but incorrect. The root of the problem is that most people have never knowingly met a hermaphrodite (let alone worked with one) to realize that there's actually more than just two human genders. Here's a simple primer for ya: <https://www.joshuakennon.com/the-six-common-biological-sexes-in-humans/> -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-13 12:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fqsdnnFn2e4U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #457256 |
On 7/13/18 12:36 PM, -hh wrote: > On Friday, July 13, 2018 at 1:44:43 PM UTC-4, owl wrote: >> -hh wrote: >>> On Friday, July 13, 2018 at 12:32:57 PM UTC-4, RonB wrote: >>>> On 2018-07-13, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> (nonsense snipped) >>>>> >>>>> More "white christians are the ones being suppressed" nonsense from >>>>> the propagandist. Christians have never had to fear being open about >>>>> their faith, in Hollywood or anywhere else, in this country. >>>>> >>>>> As usual, the right-wing propaganda is 180 degrees from reality. Let >>>>> us recall who were "blackballed" in Hollywood, not so many years ago. >>>>> Left-wingers, with shitty allegations of "communism", that's who. >>>> >>>> There is an attempt by the libtards in this country to "shout down" >>>> Christians (and whites) when they express their beliefs on such issues as >>>> abortion or homosexual recruitment in the schools (and insane crap like >>>> allowing perverts in girl's dressing rooms and bathrooms). >>> >>> Keyword being "beliefs", because the Constitutional principle of the >>> Separation of Church & State means that *no* religion is allowed to >>> use State Institutions to impose their religious beliefs on others. >>> >>>> But I think it's >>>> starting to backfire on them. People are getting fed up with walking on >>>> eggshells just for expressing their beliefs. >>> >>> The ones its backfiring are have been the white 'Christian' bible-thumpers. >>> Case in point: >>> >>> <https://abcnews.go.com/US/satanists-sue-scottsdale-religious-discrimination/story> >>> >>> <https://newsok.com/article/5561001/devil-worshiper-files-lawsuit-against-putnam-city-schools> >>> >>> >>>> I think allowing men in girl's bathrooms is probably one of the main issues >>>> promoted by these morons that allowed Trump to win the presidency. >>> >>> Perhaps you should first go actually research & let us know just >>> what "allowing men in girls' bathrooms" was actually an accurate >>> news report or not. >>> >>> ...because that's not what the Title IX transgender directive was about. >>> >>> <https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/obama-transgender-bathrooms/> >>> >> >> <quote> >> RATING: MOSTLY TRUE. >> WHAT'S FALSE: President Obama did not personally issue the guidance. >> </quote> >> >>> >>> So if that is what you believe, then you've fallen victim to >>> someone's propaganda. >>> >> >> <quote> >> Restrooms and Locker Rooms. A school may provide separate facilities >> on the basis of sex, but must allow transgender students access to such >> facilities consistent with their gender identity. >> </quote> >> >> That very quote distinguishes between "sex" and "gender identity." >> So the assertion of "allowing men in girls' bathrooms" is accurate. > > Sorry, but incorrect. > > The root of the problem is that most people have never knowingly > met a hermaphrodite (let alone worked with one) to realize that > there's actually more than just two human genders. > > Here's a simple primer for ya: > > <https://www.joshuakennon.com/the-six-common-biological-sexes-in-humans/> Many cultures around the world have recognized more than two genders. This includes many of the cultures native to the very land of the country being discussed. But *some* Christians do not recognize what others have throughout history and claim if others do not abide by THEIR views this is somehow a harm to them. They want the special entitlement to not be made uncomfortable by others having different (and better supported) views. They want the special entitlement to live in ignorance. Sadly that is a common view on the right. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-13 13:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9a0183ab-a0be-4f40-8825-780d2ecc8c11@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #457258 |
On Friday, July 13, 2018 at 12:43:55 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 7/13/18 12:36 PM, -hh wrote: > > On Friday, July 13, 2018 at 1:44:43 PM UTC-4, owl wrote: > >> -hh wrote: > >>> On Friday, July 13, 2018 at 12:32:57 PM UTC-4, RonB wrote: > >>>> On 2018-07-13, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>>>> SilverSlimer wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> (nonsense snipped) > >>>>> > >>>>> More "white christians are the ones being suppressed" nonsense from > >>>>> the propagandist. Christians have never had to fear being open about > >>>>> their faith, in Hollywood or anywhere else, in this country. > >>>>> > >>>>> As usual, the right-wing propaganda is 180 degrees from reality. Let > >>>>> us recall who were "blackballed" in Hollywood, not so many years ago. > >>>>> Left-wingers, with shitty allegations of "communism", that's who. > >>>> > >>>> There is an attempt by the libtards in this country to "shout down" > >>>> Christians (and whites) when they express their beliefs on such issues as > >>>> abortion or homosexual recruitment in the schools (and insane crap like > >>>> allowing perverts in girl's dressing rooms and bathrooms). > >>> > >>> Keyword being "beliefs", because the Constitutional principle of the > >>> Separation of Church & State means that *no* religion is allowed to > >>> use State Institutions to impose their religious beliefs on others. > >>> > >>>> But I think it's > >>>> starting to backfire on them. People are getting fed up with walking on > >>>> eggshells just for expressing their beliefs. > >>> > >>> The ones its backfiring are have been the white 'Christian' bible-thumpers. > >>> Case in point: > >>> > >>> <https://abcnews.go.com/US/satanists-sue-scottsdale-religious-discrimination/story> > >>> > >>> <https://newsok.com/article/5561001/devil-worshiper-files-lawsuit-against-putnam-city-schools> > >>> > >>> > >>>> I think allowing men in girl's bathrooms is probably one of the main issues > >>>> promoted by these morons that allowed Trump to win the presidency. > >>> > >>> Perhaps you should first go actually research & let us know just > >>> what "allowing men in girls' bathrooms" was actually an accurate > >>> news report or not. > >>> > >>> ...because that's not what the Title IX transgender directive was about. > >>> > >>> <https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/obama-transgender-bathrooms/> > >>> > >> > >> <quote> > >> RATING: MOSTLY TRUE. > >> WHAT'S FALSE: President Obama did not personally issue the guidance. > >> </quote> > >> > >>> > >>> So if that is what you believe, then you've fallen victim to > >>> someone's propaganda. > >>> > >> > >> <quote> > >> Restrooms and Locker Rooms. A school may provide separate facilities > >> on the basis of sex, but must allow transgender students access to such > >> facilities consistent with their gender identity. > >> </quote> > >> > >> That very quote distinguishes between "sex" and "gender identity." > >> So the assertion of "allowing men in girls' bathrooms" is accurate. > > > > Sorry, but incorrect. > > > > The root of the problem is that most people have never knowingly > > met a hermaphrodite (let alone worked with one) to realize that > > there's actually more than just two human genders. > > > > Here's a simple primer for ya: > > > > <https://www.joshuakennon.com/the-six-common-biological-sexes-in-humans/> > > Many cultures around the world have recognized more than two genders. > This includes many of the cultures native to the very land of the > country being discussed. But *some* Christians do not recognize what > others have throughout history and claim if others do not abide by THEIR > views this is somehow a harm to them. > > They want the special entitlement to not be made uncomfortable by others > having different (and better supported) views. They want the special > entitlement to live in ignorance. > > Sadly that is a common view on the right. > > > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> Frankly I do not really mind. Are you being idiotic on purpose? Anyway, it won't matter because the name on a post is irrelevant, it's the content that counts. -- Best CMS Solution of 2017 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhOfBmWwCVY Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-13 19:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sa088zb.3gvaub@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #457256 |
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: > On Friday, July 13, 2018 at 1:44:43 PM UTC-4, owl wrote: >> -hh wrote: >> > On Friday, July 13, 2018 at 12:32:57 PM UTC-4, RonB wrote: >> >> On 2018-07-13, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> >> > SilverSlimer wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> (nonsense snipped) >> >> > >> >> > More "white christians are the ones being suppressed" nonsense from >> >> > the propagandist. Christians have never had to fear being open about >> >> > their faith, in Hollywood or anywhere else, in this country. >> >> > >> >> > As usual, the right-wing propaganda is 180 degrees from reality. Let >> >> > us recall who were "blackballed" in Hollywood, not so many years ago. >> >> > Left-wingers, with shitty allegations of "communism", that's who. >> >> >> >> There is an attempt by the libtards in this country to "shout down" >> >> Christians (and whites) when they express their beliefs on such issues as >> >> abortion or homosexual recruitment in the schools (and insane crap like >> >> allowing perverts in girl's dressing rooms and bathrooms). >> > >> > Keyword being "beliefs", because the Constitutional principle of the >> > Separation of Church & State means that *no* religion is allowed to >> > use State Institutions to impose their religious beliefs on others. >> > >> >> But I think it's >> >> starting to backfire on them. People are getting fed up with walking on >> >> eggshells just for expressing their beliefs. >> > >> > The ones its backfiring are have been the white 'Christian' bible-thumpers. >> > Case in point: >> > >> > <https://abcnews.go.com/US/satanists-sue-scottsdale-religious-discrimination/story> >> > >> > <https://newsok.com/article/5561001/devil-worshiper-files-lawsuit-against-putnam-city-schools> >> > >> > >> >> I think allowing men in girl's bathrooms is probably one of the main issues >> >> promoted by these morons that allowed Trump to win the presidency. >> > >> > Perhaps you should first go actually research & let us know just >> > what "allowing men in girls' bathrooms" was actually an accurate >> > news report or not. >> > >> > ...because that's not what the Title IX transgender directive was about. >> > >> > <https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/obama-transgender-bathrooms/> >> > >> >> <quote> >> RATING: MOSTLY TRUE. >> WHAT'S FALSE: President Obama did not personally issue the guidance. >> </quote> >> >> > >> > So if that is what you believe, then you've fallen victim to >> > someone's propaganda. >> > >> >> <quote> >> Restrooms and Locker Rooms. A school may provide separate facilities >> on the basis of sex, but must allow transgender students access to such >> facilities consistent with their gender identity. >> </quote> >> >> That very quote distinguishes between "sex" and "gender identity." >> So the assertion of "allowing men in girls' bathrooms" is accurate. > > Sorry, but incorrect. > > The root of the problem is that most people have never knowingly > met a hermaphrodite (let alone worked with one) to realize that > there's actually more than just two human genders. > > Here's a simple primer for ya: > > <https://www.joshuakennon.com/the-six-common-biological-sexes-in-humans/> > > This is not about hermaphrodites, but about the mental illness of gender fluidity: the ridiculous idea that you are whatever gender you "choose" to be.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-13 21:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fqsierFnut2U4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #457259 |
owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >> On Friday, July 13, 2018 at 1:44:43 PM UTC-4, owl wrote: >>> -hh wrote: >>>> On Friday, July 13, 2018 at 12:32:57 PM UTC-4, RonB wrote: >>>>> On 2018-07-13, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> (nonsense snipped) >>>>>> >>>>>> More "white christians are the ones being suppressed" nonsense from >>>>>> the propagandist. Christians have never had to fear being open about >>>>>> their faith, in Hollywood or anywhere else, in this country. >>>>>> >>>>>> As usual, the right-wing propaganda is 180 degrees from reality. Let >>>>>> us recall who were "blackballed" in Hollywood, not so many years ago. >>>>>> Left-wingers, with shitty allegations of "communism", that's who. >>>>> >>>>> There is an attempt by the libtards in this country to "shout down" >>>>> Christians (and whites) when they express their beliefs on such issues as >>>>> abortion or homosexual recruitment in the schools (and insane crap like >>>>> allowing perverts in girl's dressing rooms and bathrooms). >>>> >>>> Keyword being "beliefs", because the Constitutional principle of the >>>> Separation of Church & State means that *no* religion is allowed to >>>> use State Institutions to impose their religious beliefs on others. >>>> >>>>> But I think it's >>>>> starting to backfire on them. People are getting fed up with walking on >>>>> eggshells just for expressing their beliefs. >>>> >>>> The ones its backfiring are have been the white 'Christian' bible-thumpers. >>>> Case in point: >>>> >>>> <https://abcnews.go.com/US/satanists-sue-scottsdale-religious-discrimination/story> >>>> >>>> <https://newsok.com/article/5561001/devil-worshiper-files-lawsuit-against-putnam-city-schools> >>>> >>>> >>>>> I think allowing men in girl's bathrooms is probably one of the main issues >>>>> promoted by these morons that allowed Trump to win the presidency. >>>> >>>> Perhaps you should first go actually research & let us know just >>>> what "allowing men in girls' bathrooms" was actually an accurate >>>> news report or not. >>>> >>>> ...because that's not what the Title IX transgender directive was about. >>>> >>>> <https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/obama-transgender-bathrooms/> >>>> >>> >>> <quote> >>> RATING: MOSTLY TRUE. >>> WHAT'S FALSE: President Obama did not personally issue the guidance. >>> </quote> >>> >>>> >>>> So if that is what you believe, then you've fallen victim to >>>> someone's propaganda. >>>> >>> >>> <quote> >>> Restrooms and Locker Rooms. A school may provide separate facilities >>> on the basis of sex, but must allow transgender students access to such >>> facilities consistent with their gender identity. >>> </quote> >>> >>> That very quote distinguishes between "sex" and "gender identity." >>> So the assertion of "allowing men in girls' bathrooms" is accurate. >> >> Sorry, but incorrect. >> >> The root of the problem is that most people have never knowingly >> met a hermaphrodite (let alone worked with one) to realize that >> there's actually more than just two human genders. >> >> Here's a simple primer for ya: >> >> <https://www.joshuakennon.com/the-six-common-biological-sexes-in-humans/> >> >> > > This is not about hermaphrodites, but about the mental illness of > gender fluidity: the ridiculous idea that you are whatever gender > you "choose" to be. > > Who said gender is fluid? And why let the government decide your gender? Who is the expert there, you or Big Brother?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-13 21:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pib4sj$p2j$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #457259 |
On 2018-07-13, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > This is not about hermaphrodites, but about the mental illness of > gender fluidity: the ridiculous idea that you are whatever gender > you "choose" to be. It's insanity. And the asinine bathroom policy (no matter what stupid and misguided reason for implementing it) makes girl's bathrooms and dressing rooms happy hunting grounds for whatever perverts want to pretend they're "transgender." Typical asinine, libtard reasoning. Inconvenience and assault the modesty of 99.5% of the population when a separate bathroom would do the job for the 0.5% who can't figure out if they're men or women. -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 13 [1] 2 3 … 13 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web