Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #453161 > unrolled thread
| Started by | oOze <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-06-01 21:57 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-06-14 09:08 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 763 — 34 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Microsoft to purchase Github oOze <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-01 21:57 -0400
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Snit ignores the 9th amendment <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 18:58 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Fred <Fred.rscmdffjf@l.invalid> - 2018-06-01 19:05 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Sam E <why.should.this@be.email.invalid> - 2018-06-02 10:06 -0500
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 08:34 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 23:42 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Big Al <Big_Al@invalid.com> - 2018-06-01 22:13 -0400
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-06-02 07:28 -0400
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 05:41 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:30 -0500
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github SilverSlimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-08 11:12 -0400
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 08:13 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-06-08 21:56 +0000
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 13:45 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-06-09 23:08 +0000
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 16:20 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-09 23:29 +0000
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:40 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 17:23 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 18:46 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:39 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 17:33 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:38 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 08:22 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 16:02 +0000
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 09:16 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 09:38 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 09:46 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 09:52 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 11:17 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 11:50 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 11:54 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 12:06 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 12:17 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 12:47 -0700
Is Mike on (prescription) drugs, or not ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-10 13:28 -0700
Re: Is Mike on (prescription) drugs, or not ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 13:39 -0700
Re: Is Mike on (prescription) drugs, or not ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 14:01 -0700
Get your story straight, please. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-10 14:16 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 14:24 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-10 17:41 -0400
Re: Get your story straight, please. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 14:53 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 15:42 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 16:00 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-10 19:39 -0400
Re: Get your story straight, please. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 17:22 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 17:27 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 17:32 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 17:39 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-10 20:54 -0400
Re: Get your story straight, please. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-10 18:08 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 18:24 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 18:19 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-10 21:30 -0400
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 19:21 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-10 22:32 -0400
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 19:38 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-10 22:53 -0400
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 19:59 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-10 23:02 -0400
Re: Get your story straight, please. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 03:07 +0000
Re: Get your story straight, please. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 20:13 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 20:24 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 20:41 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 20:45 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 20:18 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 18:03 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 01:10 +0000
Re: Get your story straight, please. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 18:27 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 01:41 +0000
Re: Get your story straight, please. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 19:15 -0700
Random egos, Random games, and Random religions. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-10 23:55 -0700
Re: Random egos, Random games, and Random religions. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-11 10:58 -0700
More lizard than human. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-11 13:45 -0700
Re: More lizard than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-11 13:50 -0700
More bot than human. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-11 14:09 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-11 14:21 -0700
Does not compute. Beep ! Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-11 14:52 -0700
Re: Does not compute. Beep ! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-11 14:53 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 14:53 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-11 15:05 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 15:27 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-11 16:21 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 16:39 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-11 19:43 -0400
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 16:53 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-11 17:21 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 20:02 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-11 20:36 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 20:43 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-11 20:49 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-11 17:20 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 19:42 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-11 20:08 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 21:10 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-11 21:27 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 09:17 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-12 09:33 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 09:50 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 11:12 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-12 11:21 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 11:43 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-12 12:34 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 15:57 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-12 16:43 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 19:07 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-12 19:55 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-13 09:27 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-13 10:45 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-13 11:56 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-13 12:01 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-13 14:31 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-13 14:30 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 09:33 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-14 11:57 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 14:39 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-14 22:10 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 09:59 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-15 11:42 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 13:16 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-15 23:30 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 09:46 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 10:10 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 10:34 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 11:10 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 12:05 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 12:27 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 13:25 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 14:25 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 16:13 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 18:04 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 20:24 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 21:59 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 22:57 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 23:57 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 10:44 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-17 10:53 -0700
Re: More bot than human. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-17 09:56 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-17 10:18 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 11:00 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-17 11:23 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 13:16 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-17 15:41 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 19:56 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-17 20:11 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 21:26 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-17 21:53 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 22:35 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-17 22:49 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 23:11 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-18 05:24 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-18 08:42 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-18 09:32 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-18 10:18 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-18 17:48 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-18 12:02 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-18 12:30 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-18 13:38 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-18 13:54 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Whistle Blower <wbedward@gmail.com> - 2018-06-18 21:24 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-18 14:48 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Whistle Blower <wbedward@gmail.com> - 2018-06-18 21:53 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-18 16:03 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Stumpee McGee <stumpeemcgee49@inoverter.net> - 2018-06-18 19:57 -0400
Is a woman "lying" when she spends thousands on cosmetic surgery ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-18 18:55 -0700
Re: Is a woman "lying" when she spends thousands on cosmetic surgery ? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-06-19 19:22 +0000
Re: Is a woman "lying" when she spends thousands on cosmetic surgery ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 12:31 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-18 14:47 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-18 16:01 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 17:53 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 18:35 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 18:48 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 20:22 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 20:47 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 21:04 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 22:09 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 22:22 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 20:53 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 21:09 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 22:10 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 09:36 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 10:50 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 11:16 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 11:23 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 11:29 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 11:51 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 21:12 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 21:20 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 22:22 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 09:40 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steven Petruzzellis <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 09:41 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 10:52 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 11:16 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 11:28 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 11:32 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 11:54 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 12:23 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 12:32 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 13:04 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 15:17 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 16:59 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 18:00 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 21:02 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 21:21 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 21:35 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 21:43 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 21:55 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-21 09:41 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steven Petruzzellis <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 10:20 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 12:07 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-21 13:50 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steven Petruzzellis <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 14:42 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 18:47 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 12:35 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 13:08 -0700
Re: More bot than human. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-21 02:08 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 19:31 -0700
Re: More bot than human. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-21 02:50 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 20:04 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 20:54 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 21:17 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 13:05 -0600
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-21 13:47 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 15:49 -0600
Re: More bot than human. Steven Petruzzellis <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 14:50 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 14:51 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-21 15:04 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 17:01 -0600
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-21 16:22 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 18:08 -0600
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 17:13 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-21 17:20 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 17:29 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 08:55 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-22 09:38 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 11:44 -0600
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-22 11:29 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 13:45 -0600
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-22 13:07 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 14:29 -0600
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-22 14:20 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 15:01 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-22 15:19 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 15:24 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-22 15:29 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-23 11:05 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 12:37 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-25 12:51 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 12:59 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 11:52 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 15:31 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-25 13:20 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 13:48 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-25 14:31 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 15:00 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-25 15:11 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 15:24 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-25 15:35 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-26 09:53 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-26 13:19 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-26 14:41 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-26 15:28 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-26 16:24 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-26 16:31 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-27 03:08 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 08:52 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-01 09:51 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-01 10:03 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-01 10:19 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-01 23:00 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-02 01:15 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-02 09:21 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 10:10 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 11:07 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 11:35 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 12:24 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 02:09 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 10:01 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-14 10:08 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 10:33 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-14 11:17 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 11:36 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 10:47 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-14 11:10 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 11:22 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-14 11:27 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 11:33 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 12:07 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-14 11:52 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 12:36 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-14 21:00 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 14:29 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-14 15:03 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 09:18 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-15 09:28 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 09:38 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-15 16:43 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-15 10:50 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-15 10:49 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 11:19 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 11:50 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-15 13:54 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 14:10 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 14:54 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-15 17:25 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 17:34 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-15 23:26 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 17:02 -0700
Re: More bot than human. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-16 00:04 +0000
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 00:16 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-15 17:48 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 01:04 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-15 20:58 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 21:43 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 17:50 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-15 17:46 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 00:58 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-15 18:28 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 01:59 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 19:22 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 02:31 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 20:09 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 11:02 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 04:42 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 15:43 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-16 15:45 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 16:03 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 09:13 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-16 16:27 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 09:40 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 17:16 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 17:47 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 17:58 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 18:11 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 18:19 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 18:31 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 19:08 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 19:17 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 22:49 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 10:02 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 10:29 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 10:31 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 10:38 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 11:30 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 12:21 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 13:53 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 09:29 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 15:53 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 16:51 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 17:53 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 00:49 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 19:12 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 20:23 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-17 01:27 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-17 01:47 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 19:18 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 19:27 -0700
Re: More bot than human. GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-16 23:17 -0400
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 22:52 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 22:51 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 23:15 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 19:13 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 18:33 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 17:19 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 17:31 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 09:57 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 17:32 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 11:00 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-16 20:46 +0000
Re: More bot than human. GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-16 17:01 -0400
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 21:39 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-16 22:00 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 15:20 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 22:58 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 17:08 -0700
Re: More bot than human. GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-16 20:20 -0400
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-17 00:30 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-17 00:32 +0000
Re: More bot than human. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 15:57 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 09:00 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 10:10 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 10:34 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 10:54 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 12:18 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 12:48 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 13:46 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 14:07 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 14:34 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 14:55 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 14:32 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 14:45 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 14:53 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 14:58 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 15:10 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 14:47 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 08:15 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 08:40 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 15:52 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:27 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 09:33 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 19:53 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:57 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 08:24 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 10:13 -0700
Re: More bot than human. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-18 11:31 -0500
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 10:56 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 11:17 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 11:26 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:02 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 12:07 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:26 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 13:20 -0700
Re: More bot than human. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-18 13:32 -0500
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 11:47 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:24 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:22 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 12:36 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:47 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 12:49 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:40 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 19:51 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 09:31 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 10:44 -0700
Re: More bot than human. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-18 11:25 -0500
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 10:49 -0700
Re: More bot than human. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-18 13:11 -0500
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 11:16 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:03 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 11:19 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 11:29 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:06 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 12:15 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:26 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 19:36 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:38 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 13:51 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 14:25 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 14:36 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 14:45 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 14:50 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 15:08 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 15:27 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 09:31 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 10:57 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 11:13 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 11:18 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 11:59 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 12:33 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 13:35 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 20:23 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 13:41 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 09:44 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 20:11 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 13:14 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 09:57 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 10:39 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:20 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 12:34 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:44 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 15:11 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 13:53 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 07:37 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 07:42 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 09:30 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 19:48 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:50 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 09:29 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 19:48 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:49 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 12:50 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:55 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 20:40 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 13:56 -0700
Re: More bot than human. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-18 11:33 -0500
Re: More bot than human. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 17:02 +0000
Re: More bot than human. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-19 07:51 -0500
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-19 08:22 -0700
Re: More bot than human. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-19 15:40 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-19 09:32 -0700
Re: More bot than human. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-19 11:41 -0500
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-19 09:57 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 10:28 -0700
Re: More bot than human. GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-19 15:46 -0400
Re: More bot than human. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-19 15:02 -0500
Re: More bot than human. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-19 20:47 +0000
Re: More bot than human. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-20 07:14 -0500
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 19:53 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:57 -0700
Re: More bot than human. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-18 15:03 -0500
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 20:41 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 14:12 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 14:15 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 14:22 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 14:29 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 15:05 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 17:48 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 18:19 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 11:04 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-19 11:40 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 12:13 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-19 12:17 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 12:38 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 16:21 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 16:32 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 18:10 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 12:38 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-19 11:55 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-19 08:28 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 08:55 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 11:10 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-19 11:38 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 11:46 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 12:01 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-19 12:56 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 13:05 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 13:21 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 14:21 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-19 15:26 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 15:58 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-19 16:11 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 12:37 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-19 16:08 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 16:28 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-19 16:14 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 09:55 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 17:19 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 13:04 -0700
Re: More bot than human. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 20:57 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 16:19 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-21 16:06 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 12:44 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 14:04 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 14:36 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 14:41 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 16:01 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 10:29 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-22 11:11 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 11:29 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 13:13 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-22 11:09 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 13:51 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 15:04 -0600
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 14:18 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 10:06 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 12:59 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 14:30 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 12:37 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 16:59 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 12:37 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 12:37 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 16:21 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 12:38 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 12:04 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-19 12:15 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 12:38 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 12:38 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 14:54 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 14:23 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 15:03 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 15:26 -0700
Re: More bot than human. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-18 11:12 -0500
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 10:46 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:21 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 19:31 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:36 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 12:44 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 13:49 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 09:27 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 19:46 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 17:23 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 14:47 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 13:35 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 07:06 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 08:58 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 16:12 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:35 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 09:42 -0700
Re: More bot than human. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-18 11:38 -0500
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:41 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 20:00 +0000
Re: More bot than human. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-18 15:01 -0500
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 20:41 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 13:11 -0700
Re: More bot than human. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-18 11:09 -0500
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 16:12 +0000
Re: More bot than human. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-18 11:59 -0500
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:42 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:48 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 20:10 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 13:14 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:36 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:31 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 17:46 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carrol Busted.... Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-17 01:14 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carrol Busted.... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 19:17 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-17 01:14 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 19:14 -0700
Re: More bot than human. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 15:59 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 09:00 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-17 01:14 +0000
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-17 01:33 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 19:12 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 19:17 -0700
Re: More bot than human. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 15:56 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 09:01 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-17 16:27 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 09:30 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 15:21 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 21:06 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 15:34 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 16:44 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-15 21:04 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 23:02 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 02:23 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 18:05 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-15 22:51 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-15 17:27 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 10:36 -0700
Re: More bot than human. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 03:26 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 03:37 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 20:40 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-14 13:16 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 14:13 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 10:17 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-14 11:18 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-23 10:09 -0600
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-23 09:55 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-23 10:19 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-23 10:26 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steven Petruzzellis <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 20:41 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 13:48 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 14:20 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 20:51 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 21:16 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 21:27 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 21:39 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 21:47 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 21:52 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 02:13 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steven Petruzzellis <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 10:15 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 01:41 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steven Petruzzellis <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 10:10 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 08:01 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 08:06 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 08:21 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 08:27 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 08:33 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 08:44 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 09:15 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 09:28 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 09:56 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 10:12 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 10:56 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 14:01 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 14:14 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 14:13 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 15:03 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 15:28 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 16:39 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 16:47 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 19:03 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 16:49 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 16:50 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 17:18 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 16:45 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 16:56 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 16:59 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 20:30 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 11:28 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 08:49 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 08:30 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 10:46 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-17 10:52 -0700
Re: More bot than human,talk.politics.guns Whistle Blower <wbedward@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 23:24 +0000
Re: More bot than human,talk.politics.guns Stumpee McGee <stumpeemcgee49@inoverter.net> - 2018-06-13 07:32 -0400
Re: More bot than human, Whistle Blower <wbedward@gmail.com> - 2018-06-13 21:14 +0000
How much do you think it's worth ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-11 15:19 -0700
Re: How much do you think it's worth ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 15:26 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 18:23 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-10 21:32 -0400
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 19:22 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-10 22:33 -0400
Re: Get your story straight, please. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 19:02 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 19:34 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-10 22:46 -0400
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 19:51 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 19:49 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 19:54 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-10 22:59 -0400
Re: Get your story straight, please. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-10 20:42 -0400
Re: Get your story straight, please. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-10 20:37 -0400
Re: Get your story straight, please. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 18:29 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-10 21:42 -0400
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 16:55 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-10 20:33 -0400
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 17:39 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-10 20:56 -0400
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 14:55 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-10 18:10 -0400
Re: Get your story straight, please. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 21:28 +0000
Re: Get your story straight, please. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 14:32 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 13:42 -0700
An example of how snit trolls. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 21:03 +0000
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 14:15 -0700
Re: An example of how snit trolls. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 21:26 +0000
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 14:43 -0700
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-10 17:48 -0400
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 14:47 -0700
Re: An example of how snit trolls. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 22:01 +0000
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 15:48 -0700
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 15:29 -0700
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 15:45 -0700
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 16:45 -0700
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 17:29 -0700
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 17:37 -0700
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2018-06-12 17:54 +0000
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-12 11:22 -0700
Re: An example of how snit trolls. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-12 13:22 -0500
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 15:59 -0700
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2018-06-12 23:02 +0000
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 16:10 -0700
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-12 16:46 -0700
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-12 16:45 -0700
Re: An example of how snit trolls. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-13 06:53 -0500
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-12 16:45 -0700
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 09:20 -0700
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 15:35 -0700
Re: An example of how snit trolls. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-10 16:52 -0500
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 15:30 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 16:13 +0000
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 09:39 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-10 11:49 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 11:52 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-10 11:53 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 12:18 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-11 10:56 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 04:11 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 12:28 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Pabst Blue Ribbon <pabst@blue.ribbon> - 2018-06-17 11:02 +0000
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Stumpee McGee <stumpeemcgee49@inoverter.net> - 2018-06-17 08:05 -0400
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-11 06:23 +0000
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 23:33 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 05:02 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 09:00 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-11 11:09 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 11:25 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-11 11:36 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-11 10:57 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:38 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github oOze <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-02 22:28 -0400
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2018-06-02 22:55 -0400
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github oOze <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-03 09:38 -0400
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steven Petruzzellis <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 09:38 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steven Petruzzellis <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 09:39 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2018-06-02 11:42 +0100
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 03:52 -0700
what are all these Linux Developers going to do Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 05:55 -0700
Re: what are all these Linux Developers going to do owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-06-14 13:55 +0000
Re: what are all these Linux Developers going to do chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-14 09:17 -0500
how can Microsoft be the great evil if Linux is all over their site? Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 07:38 -0700
Re: what are all these Linux Developers going to do William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2018-06-14 15:54 +0100
Re: what are all these Linux Developers going to do Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-06-16 06:33 -0400
Re: what are all these Linux Developers going to do Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 09:08 -0700
Page 11 of 39 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 … 39 Next page →
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-20 16:59 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: More bot than human. |
| Message-ID | <34831757-652e-4c9f-8d5e-c7ff4eac786e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #455547 |
On Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 4:17:18 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 6/20/18 1:04 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 1:32:28 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 6/20/18 12:23 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >> ... > >>>>>> Well, OK, at best I am a really, really crappy programmer / scripter. > >>>>>> And while you "show me up" in many ways, your Usenet flood bot > >>>>> > >>>>> I don't have a flood bot, I wouldn't waste my time on silly crap like that. > >>>> > >>>> LOL! > >>> > >>> I wouldn't, it's the sorta thing you'd do, as evidenced by your having > >>> retrofitted someone's bot on AIM, your sock/shill army, etc. > >>> > >>>>>> still > >>>>>> does not do half of what my ancient and unbelievably poorly written AIM > >>>>>> bot did... does not even use current names from the group. I bet you > >>>>>> have the names it does use hard coded in. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Why don't you write a chat bot and we can see how it compares to my > >>>>>> ancient logs. > >>>>> > >>>>> As soon as you prove you wrote that bot I'll consider it ;) > >>>> > >>>> You have shown you are WELL beyond me when it comes to small functions > >>>> and the like -- but I wonder how you do with larger projects. > >>> > >>> Lemme guess... you don't think that knowledge would translate? ;) > >> > >> It is comments like this which lead to the question, actually. > > > > The question as asked by someone who had no clue what he was looking > > at when shown the basic concepts behind doing this dynamically. > > Again, the question is NOT about the code you have shown... Of course not, anyone that understands what I'm doing knows it's a far better system than the code you've plagiarized and call 'yours'. >it is if you > can do NOT just these small bits of code but larger programs. I obviously can... I wrote a basic system in ~30 minutes. BTW, you still haven't proven you wrote this bot, that minor detail still looms. Will you be doing it any time soon as you keep taking credit for 'your' code, that no one has ever seen run? ;) > The fact > that this concept is confusing to you suggests you do not have > experience with full programs, even fairly small ones like this. So why was I able to write ~20 lines that achieves the primary objective while facilitating *far* easier data integration, uses a data structure that minimizes errors, allows for *far* greater productivity (so the user can spend time on the content) and centralizes the code so when a language change occurs I wouldn't have to rewrite every damn thing like you'd have to with this lame AIM bot you plagiarized (while still offering the ability to write custom functions and routing them through 'the brain')? I did that in ~30 minutes 'cuz I was just really lucky; and that was it, that code demonstrates *all* the coding ability I possess, every last bit of it<eyeroll>. Wake me when you realize how ridiculous you sound... maybe that'll be when the meds wear off... > You also speak of not using a line of my code, And I didn't. > as if you would have to in > order to use IDEAS from the code (the reaction scores and the like). What's next? You're gonna claim you invented the concept of a counter, too? You're a riot, Snit. LOL! > Not > at all true. So you have skills I do not but clearly you lack many > skills in this area, too. My hobby level skills encompass the ability to design and implement something you can't even conceive of, which is the point you're missing as you defend your plagiarized pile of pasta. The reality is, for all anyone knows, you *never* got it running because you couldn't figure out what the guy who wrote it did; there's zero proof it ever ran in your hands. And, no, I wouldn't trust your logs as far as I could throw 'em, I've seen you gen up "proof" before. > And it is why you find it hard to believe my code is mine... I don't believe you wrote it for the reasons I stated. You'd have known that the input worked on more than a single keyword; that it wasn't actually respond to entire sentences while analyzing all the context; that you were using their API, which means you would have read the docs... which means you'd know you were making a call, not the other way around, etc. IOW, you flubbed really fundamental stuff... stuff the author would know about even if he'd forgotten the code involved.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-20 18:00 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: More bot than human. |
| Message-ID | <fp0bm1FbepeU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #455553 |
On 6/20/18 4:59 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: ... >>> The question as asked by someone who had no clue what he was looking >>> at when shown the basic concepts behind doing this dynamically. >> >> Again, the question is NOT about the code you have shown... > > Of course not, anyone that understands what I'm doing knows it's a > far better system than the code you've plagiarized and call 'yours'. Nope. You have NO system. You have ideas. It is like a person who writes a well crafted sentence, or even a paragraph, thinking they can write novels. It is clear: * My AIM bot has crappy code, but it worked. And it worked well. * You are jealous of my bot... it is part of the reason you have made your Usenet flood bot and worked on a chat bot. * You have written code FAR better than mine, no doubt, but your flood bot is crappy and your chat bot has never been shown to work at ALL. * Based on your jealousy you are denying I even wrote my AIM bot, as if I would "steal" code that was so crappy. :) Some day you will get your flood bot to be closer to what my AIM bot was, or perhaps even get a chat bot running at all -- until you do, though, and until YOU think you have "bested" me, you will continue to deny my code is mine. For proof of what I say, look at your bragging... doing all you can to change the fact that EVEN THOUGH you are a better coder than I am (and nobody questions that) you have failed to get the quality of output I did with my AIM bot. >> it is if you >> can do NOT just these small bits of code but larger programs. > > I obviously can... I wrote a basic system in ~30 minutes. See: you bragging about what you "can" do but not actually doing it. > BTW, you still haven't proven you wrote this bot, that minor detail still > looms. Will you be doing it any time soon as you keep taking credit for > 'your' code, that no one has ever seen run? ;) See: you trying to put me on the defensive, as if I merely need to find the right magic words to get you to stop lying about me. >> The fact >> that this concept is confusing to you suggests you do not have >> experience with full programs, even fairly small ones like this. > > So why was I able to write ~20 lines that achieves the primary > objective while facilitating *far* easier data integration, uses a data > structure that minimizes errors, allows for *far* greater productivity > (so the user can spend time on the content) and centralizes the code > so when a language change occurs I wouldn't have to rewrite every > damn thing like you'd have to with this lame AIM bot you plagiarized > (while still offering the ability to write custom functions and routing > them through 'the brain')? I did that in ~30 minutes 'cuz I was just > really lucky; and that was it, that code demonstrates *all* the coding > ability I possess, every last bit of it<eyeroll>. > > Wake me when you realize how ridiculous you sound... maybe that'll > be when the meds wear off... See: more bragging from you... but NO actual bot from you EVER that actually works as well as my AIM bot did. >> You also speak of not using a line of my code, > > And I didn't. See how defensive you get. Nobody is suggesting you used a line of my code but you are very, very defensive. It is quite telling! >> as if you would have to in >> order to use IDEAS from the code (the reaction scores and the like). > > What's next? You're gonna claim you invented the concept of a counter, > too? You're a riot, Snit. LOL! See: more attacks from you but NO bot that works nearly as well as my old AIM bot. >> Not >> at all true. So you have skills I do not but clearly you lack many >> skills in this area, too. > > My hobby level skills encompass the ability to design and implement > something you can't even conceive of, which is the point you're missing > as you defend your plagiarized pile of pasta. The reality is, for all anyone > knows, you *never* got it running because you couldn't figure out what > the guy who wrote it did; there's zero proof it ever ran in your hands. > And, no, I wouldn't trust your logs as far as I could throw 'em, I've seen > you gen up "proof" before. Your Usenet flood bot is crappy and you have no chat bot to speak of. You have not implemented a bot better than my AIM bot. Notice how you lie though. It is very telling. >> And it is why you find it hard to believe my code is mine... > > I don't believe you wrote it for the reasons I stated. You'd have > known that the input worked on more than a single keyword; that > it wasn't actually respond to entire sentences while analyzing all the > context; that you were using their API, which means you would have > read the docs... which means you'd know you were making a call, not > the other way around, etc. IOW, you flubbed really fundamental stuff... > stuff the author would know about even if he'd forgotten the code > involved. See: you cannot stop screaming about your jealousy. Wow. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-20 21:02 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: More bot than human. |
| Message-ID | <2a936508-baa2-4d59-b4fc-48637e1a1807@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #455557 |
On Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 7:00:53 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 6/20/18 4:59 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > ... > >>> The question as asked by someone who had no clue what he was looking > >>> at when shown the basic concepts behind doing this dynamically. > >> > >> Again, the question is NOT about the code you have shown... > > > > Of course not, anyone that understands what I'm doing knows it's a > > far better system than the code you've plagiarized and call 'yours'. > > Nope. You have NO system. You have ideas. LOL! My ideas are more organized than your plagiarized pasta. > It is clear: > > * My AIM bot has crappy code, Stop calling it 'yours'. but it worked. And it worked well. Prove it. (snip flood bot BS) > >> it is if you > >> can do NOT just these small bits of code but larger programs. > > > > I obviously can... I wrote a basic system in ~30 minutes. > > See: you bragging about what you "can" do but not actually doing it. It's not bragging, I'm stating a fact. > > > BTW, you still haven't proven you wrote this bot, that minor detail still > > looms. Will you be doing it any time soon as you keep taking credit for > > 'your' code, that no one has ever seen run? ;) > > See: you trying to put me on the defensive, All you have to do is prove it and your off the 'defensive'. (snip rehash) > >> You also speak of not using a line of my code, > > > > And I didn't. > > See how defensive you get. Well, I didn't (snip more flood bot BS and rehash) > >> And it is why you find it hard to believe my code is mine... > > > > I don't believe you wrote it for the reasons I stated. You'd have > > known that the input worked on more than a single keyword; that > > it wasn't actually respond to entire sentences while analyzing all the > > context; that you were using their API, which means you would have > > read the docs... which means you'd know you were making a call, not > > the other way around, etc. IOW, you flubbed really fundamental stuff... > > stuff the author would know about even if he'd forgotten the code > > involved. > > See: you cannot stop screaming about your jealousy. Wow. Screaming? Those are just reasons I believe you're lying, as you so often have with all these little 'stories' you've made up.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-20 21:21 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: More bot than human. |
| Message-ID | <fp0neeFd9s4U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #455557 |
On 6/20/18 6:00 PM, Snit wrote: > On 6/20/18 4:59 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > ... >>>> The question as asked by someone who had no clue what he was looking >>>> at when shown the basic concepts behind doing this dynamically. >>> >>> Again, the question is NOT about the code you have shown... >> >> Of course not, anyone that understands what I'm doing knows it's a >> far better system than the code you've plagiarized and call 'yours'. > > Nope. You have NO system. You have ideas. > > It is like a person who writes a well crafted sentence, or even a > paragraph, thinking they can write novels. > > It is clear: > > * My AIM bot has crappy code, but it worked. And it worked well. > > * You are jealous of my bot... it is part of the reason you have >  made your Usenet flood bot and worked on a chat bot. > > * You have written code FAR better than mine, no doubt, but your >  flood bot is crappy and your chat bot has never been shown to >  work at ALL. > > * Based on your jealousy you are denying I even wrote my AIM bot, >  as if I would "steal" code that was so crappy. :) > > Some day you will get your flood bot to be closer to what my AIM bot > was, or perhaps even get a chat bot running at all -- until you do, > though, and until YOU think you have "bested" me, you will continue to > deny my code is mine. > > For proof of what I say, look at your bragging... doing all you can to > change the fact that EVEN THOUGH you are a better coder than I am (and > nobody questions that) you have failed to get the quality of output I > did with my AIM bot. > >>> it is if you >>> can do NOT just these small bits of code but larger programs. >> >> I obviously can... I wrote a basic system in ~30 minutes. > > See: you bragging about what you "can" do but not actually doing it. > >> BTW, you still haven't proven you wrote this bot, that minor detail still >> looms. Will you be doing it any time soon as you keep taking credit for >> 'your' code, that no one has ever seen run? ;) > > See: you trying to put me on the defensive, as if I merely need to find > the right magic words to get you to stop lying about me. > >>> The fact >>> that this concept is confusing to you suggests you do not have >>> experience with full programs, even fairly small ones like this. >> >> So why was I able to write ~20 lines that achieves the primary >> objective while facilitating *far* easier data integration, uses a data >> structure that minimizes errors, allows for *far* greater productivity >> (so the user can spend time on the content) and centralizes the code >> so when a language change occurs I wouldn't have to rewrite every >> damn thing like you'd have to with this lame AIM bot you plagiarized >> (while still offering the ability to write custom functions and routing >> them through 'the brain')? I did that in ~30 minutes 'cuz I was just >> really lucky; and that was it, that code demonstrates *all* the coding >> ability I possess, every last bit of it<eyeroll>. >> >> Wake me when you realize how ridiculous you sound... maybe that'll >> be when the meds wear off... > > See: more bragging from you... but NO actual bot from you EVER that > actually works as well as my AIM bot did. > >>> You also speak of not using a line of my code, >> >> And I didn't. > > See how defensive you get. Nobody is suggesting you used a line of my > code but you are very, very defensive. It is quite telling! > >>>  as if you would have to in >>> order to use IDEAS from the code (the reaction scores and the like). >> >> What's next? You're gonna claim you invented the concept of a counter, >> too? You're a riot, Snit. LOL! > > See: more attacks from you but NO bot that works nearly as well as my > old AIM bot. > >>> Not >>> at all true. So you have skills I do not but clearly you lack many >>> skills in this area, too. >> >> My hobby level skills encompass the ability to design and implement >> something you can't even conceive of, which is the point you're missing >> as you defend your plagiarized pile of pasta. The reality is, for all >> anyone >> knows, you *never* got it running because you couldn't figure out what >> the guy who wrote it did; there's zero proof it ever ran in your hands. >> And, no, I wouldn't trust your logs as far as I could throw 'em, I've >> seen >> you gen up "proof" before. > > Your Usenet flood bot is crappy and you have no chat bot to speak of. > You have not implemented a bot better than my AIM bot. Notice how you > lie though. It is very telling. > >>> And it is why you find it hard to believe my code is mine... >> >> I don't believe you wrote it for the reasons I stated. You'd have >> known that the input worked on more than a single keyword; that >> it wasn't actually respond to entire sentences while analyzing all the >> context; that you were using their API, which means you would have >> read the docs... which means you'd know you were making a call, not >> the other way around, etc. IOW, you flubbed really fundamental stuff... >> stuff the author would know about even if he'd forgotten the code >> involved. > > See: you cannot stop screaming about your jealousy. Wow. Carroll responded with his normal snip snip and crying over how he cannot believe my bot was actually written by me. His real issue: he KNOWS he cannot write a chat bot NEARLY as good as mine, nor can he fix his crappy Usenet flood bot to work nearly as well (and that is with he and Sandman surely working together). And that is also with me being a CRAPPY coder. I am. There is no doubt about it. I was when I wrote the bot and I STILL am. Yet the AIM flood bot is FAR better than any bot Carroll has been able to write. Sorta amusing how jealous and angry he is getting over it... and how he is even distancing himself from his flood but, at times even denying it is his, but other times speaking of how the content is not computer generated (something only the person running it would know). -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-20 21:35 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: More bot than human. |
| Message-ID | <36378cb5-38f9-4c60-b772-5745028dfb1e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #455574 |
On Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 10:21:38 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > Carroll responded with his normal snip snip and crying over how he > cannot believe my bot was actually written by me. > > His real issue: he KNOWS he cannot write a chat bot NEARLY as good as > mine, Keep telling yourself that, Rainman ;) > Sorta amusing how jealous and angry he is getting over it... a Yeah, I'm seething with rage over plagiarizing pasta <eyeroll>. > is even distancing himself from his flood but, at times even denying it > is his, but other times speaking of how the content is not computer > generated (something only the person runnin... Bull, anyone familiar with our history knows it's not generated in the sense Scott is thinking, and some of them are flat out manually written.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-20 21:43 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: More bot than human. |
| Message-ID | <fp0onbFdiqgU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #455576 |
On 6/20/18 9:35 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 10:21:38 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> Carroll responded with his normal snip snip and crying over how he >> cannot believe my bot was actually written by me. >> >> His real issue: he KNOWS he cannot write a chat bot NEARLY as good as >> mine, > > Keep telling yourself that, Rainman ;) >> Sorta amusing how jealous and angry he is getting over it... a > > Yeah, > > I'm seething with rage over plagiarizing pasta <eyeroll>. > >> is even distancing himself from his flood but, at times even denying it >> is his, but other times speaking of how the content is not computer >> generated (something only the person runnin... > > Bull, anyone familiar with our history knows it's not generated > in the sense Scott is thinking, and some of them are flat out > manually written. So you are manually writing the output... but what parts? Why not share your code? And why not finish your chat bot you claimed was almost complete -- after all, your one function did almost all of what my bot did, right? LOL! It is so very, very predictable how you will lash out as you realize you cannot do what I can. Meanwhile, remember, I openly admit you can do a LOT I cannot with your coding... heck, I could not create a Usenet flood bot, at least not one that goes though Google Groups. I would need a Usenet client with AppleScript support to even try. I commend you for your work and have NO issue admitting you can do things I cannot. See the difference here? [Yes, that is your cue to snip and twist... LOL... so predictable!] -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-20 21:55 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: More bot than human. |
| Message-ID | <88683787-3d40-48b3-91a5-c9c2b2735f7a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #455578 |
On Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 10:43:25 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 6/20/18 9:35 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 10:21:38 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > > >> Carroll responded with his normal snip snip and crying over how he > >> cannot believe my bot was actually written by me. > >> > >> His real issue: he KNOWS he cannot write a chat bot NEARLY as good as > >> mine, > > > > Keep telling yourself that, Rainman ;) > > >> Sorta amusing how jealous and angry he is getting over it... a > > > > Yeah, > > > > I'm seething with rage over plagiarizing pasta <eyeroll>. > > > >> is even distancing himself from his flood but, at times even denying it > >> is his, but other times speaking of how the content is not computer > >> generated (something only the person runnin... > > > > Bull, anyone familiar with our history knows it's not generated > > in the sense Scott is thinking, and some of them are flat out > > manually written. > > So you are manually writing the output... but what parts? > > Why not share your code? Other than you, who *doesn't* know what I'm doing? > And why not finish your chat bot you claimed was almost complete -- > after all, your one function did almost all of what my bot did, right? You seem to have forgotten you've haven't proven this AIM bot is 'yours'. Now *that* is predictable ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-21 09:41 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: More bot than human. |
| Message-ID | <fp22prFlj9bU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #455581 |
On 6/20/18 9:55 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 10:43:25 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 6/20/18 9:35 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 10:21:38 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>> >>>> Carroll responded with his normal snip snip and crying over how he >>>> cannot believe my bot was actually written by me. >>>> >>>> His real issue: he KNOWS he cannot write a chat bot NEARLY as good as >>>> mine, >>> >>> Keep telling yourself that, Rainman ;) >> >>>> Sorta amusing how jealous and angry he is getting over it... a >>> >>> Yeah, >>> >>> I'm seething with rage over plagiarizing pasta <eyeroll>. >>> >>>> is even distancing himself from his flood but, at times even denying it >>>> is his, but other times speaking of how the content is not computer >>>> generated (something only the person runnin... >>> >>> Bull, anyone familiar with our history knows it's not generated >>> in the sense Scott is thinking, and some of them are flat out >>> manually written. >> >> So you are manually writing the output... but what parts? >> >> Why not share your code? > > Other than you, who *doesn't* know what I'm doing? > >> And why not finish your chat bot you claimed was almost complete -- >> after all, your one function did almost all of what my bot did, right? > > You seem to have forgotten you've haven't proven this AIM bot > is 'yours'. Now *that* is predictable ;) Easy to know what you are doing: You are going to go to EVERY side issue you can to avoid simple facts: * Your Usenet flood bot sucks, and you have talked about it needing to have the output hand-written to get it to do even what it does (though you are not clear what you mean here, it is not like my code is NOT hand-written, but your bot just seems to spew random nonsense). * While you CLAIMED you had code that did most of what my AIM chat bot does, you have NO chat bot AT ALL to show for it. * I commend you for your knowledge. I am not jealous or spiteful, and I feel no need to lie about it. You have many areas where your programming skills are far beyond mine (to be fair that is a low bar!) * You deny the AIM chat bot I wrote is my bot saying I could not write what I did, and thus show deep jealousy at your inability to create a similar bot. You also absurdly have attributed your own Usenet flood bot to me (a bot I could not write given how apparently it requires knowing JavaScript and AppleScript would not do)! * At your request I shared my AIM chat bot code with you in the way you wanted me to (GitHub), and even went above and beyond and shared all the log files. * You refuse to share your Usenet flood bot code at all, other than to share a few snippets here and there and some videos of parts of it. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steven Petruzzellis <fretwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-21 10:20 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: More bot than human. |
| Message-ID | <82c13229-fadc-48da-92fb-72df711e7900@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #455608 |
On Thursday, June 21, 2018 at 9:41:34 AM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 6/20/18 9:55 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 10:43:25 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 6/20/18 9:35 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 10:21:38 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>> > >>>> Carroll responded with his normal snip snip and crying over how he > >>>> cannot believe my bot was actually written by me. > >>>> > >>>> His real issue: he KNOWS he cannot write a chat bot NEARLY as good as > >>>> mine, > >>> > >>> Keep telling yourself that, Rainman ;) > >> > >>>> Sorta amusing how jealous and angry he is getting over it... a > >>> > >>> Yeah, > >>> > >>> I'm seething with rage over plagiarizing pasta <eyeroll>. > >>> > >>>> is even distancing himself from his flood but, at times even denying it > >>>> is his, but other times speaking of how the content is not computer > >>>> generated (something only the person runnin... > >>> > >>> Bull, anyone familiar with our history knows it's not generated > >>> in the sense Scott is thinking, and some of them are flat out > >>> manually written. > >> > >> So you are manually writing the output... but what parts? > >> > >> Why not share your code? > > > > Other than you, who *doesn't* know what I'm doing? > > > >> And why not finish your chat bot you claimed was almost complete -- > >> after all, your one function did almost all of what my bot did, right? > > > > You seem to have forgotten you've haven't proven this AIM bot > > is 'yours'. Now *that* is predictable ;) > > Easy to know what you are doing: You are going to go to EVERY side issue > you can to avoid simple facts: > > * Your Usenet flood bot sucks, and you have talked about it needing to > have the output hand-written to get it to do even what it does (though > you are not clear what you mean here, it is not like my code is NOT > hand-written, but your bot just seems to spew random nonsense). > > * While you CLAIMED you had code that did most of what my AIM chat bot > does, you have NO chat bot AT ALL to show for it. > > * I commend you for your knowledge. I am not jealous or spiteful, and I > feel no need to lie about it. You have many areas where your programming > skills are far beyond mine (to be fair that is a low bar!) > > * You deny the AIM chat bot I wrote is my bot saying I could not write > what I did, and thus show deep jealousy at your inability to create a > similar bot. You also absurdly have attributed your own Usenet flood bot > to me (a bot I could not write given how apparently it requires knowing > JavaScript and AppleScript would not do)! > > * At your request I shared my AIM chat bot code with you in the way you > wanted me to (GitHub), and even went above and beyond and shared all the > log files. > > * You refuse to share your Usenet flood bot code at all, other than to > share a few snippets here and there and some videos of parts of it. > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> Sigmond's posts are nothing but an indecipherable prattle. Being an open format as it is, usenet will never go away but it'll never be my cup of tea. You're clueless! Reviewing Linux... forever a novice... If you have 'a.doc' open in an application such as emacs and Sigmond wants to change its name to 'c.doc' via a GUI menu item, Steven Carroll's method might be handy. Steven Carroll can create a virtual machine. Make sure to send him a gold star! You insisting a lie is real does not make it true. - Do not click this link!!! https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.os.linux.advocacy/smzXrBhsWf4 Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-21 12:07 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: More bot than human. |
| Message-ID | <001714f0-82de-4dfd-aad9-ef13ab58b077@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #455608 |
On Thursday, June 21, 2018 at 10:41:34 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 6/20/18 9:55 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 10:43:25 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 6/20/18 9:35 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 10:21:38 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>> > >>>> Carroll responded with his normal snip snip and crying over how he > >>>> cannot believe my bot was actually written by me. > >>>> > >>>> His real issue: he KNOWS he cannot write a chat bot NEARLY as good as > >>>> mine, > >>> > >>> Keep telling yourself that, Rainman ;) > >> > >>>> Sorta amusing how jealous and angry he is getting over it... a > >>> > >>> Yeah, > >>> > >>> I'm seething with rage over plagiarizing pasta <eyeroll>. > >>> > >>>> is even distancing himself from his flood but, at times even denying it > >>>> is his, but other times speaking of how the content is not computer > >>>> generated (something only the person runnin... > >>> > >>> Bull, anyone familiar with our history knows it's not generated > >>> in the sense Scott is thinking, and some of them are flat out > >>> manually written. > >> > >> So you are manually writing the output... but what parts? > >> > >> Why not share your code? > > > > Other than you, who *doesn't* know what I'm doing? > > > >> And why not finish your chat bot you claimed was almost complete -- > >> after all, your one function did almost all of what my bot did, right? > > > > You seem to have forgotten you've haven't proven this AIM bot > > is 'yours'. Now *that* is predictable ;) > > Easy to know what you are doing: It is... and it has a name: reality
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-21 13:50 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: More bot than human. |
| Message-ID | <fp2hd5Fod9iU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #455639 |
On 6/21/18 12:07 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Thursday, June 21, 2018 at 10:41:34 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 6/20/18 9:55 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 10:43:25 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>> On 6/20/18 9:35 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>> On Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 10:21:38 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Carroll responded with his normal snip snip and crying over how he >>>>>> cannot believe my bot was actually written by me. >>>>>> >>>>>> His real issue: he KNOWS he cannot write a chat bot NEARLY as good as >>>>>> mine, >>>>> >>>>> Keep telling yourself that, Rainman ;) >>>> >>>>>> Sorta amusing how jealous and angry he is getting over it... a >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, >>>>> >>>>> I'm seething with rage over plagiarizing pasta <eyeroll>. >>>>> >>>>>> is even distancing himself from his flood but, at times even denying it >>>>>> is his, but other times speaking of how the content is not computer >>>>>> generated (something only the person runnin... >>>>> >>>>> Bull, anyone familiar with our history knows it's not generated >>>>> in the sense Scott is thinking, and some of them are flat out >>>>> manually written. >>>> >>>> So you are manually writing the output... but what parts? >>>> >>>> Why not share your code? >>> >>> Other than you, who *doesn't* know what I'm doing? >>> >>>> And why not finish your chat bot you claimed was almost complete -- >>>> after all, your one function did almost all of what my bot did, right? >>> >>> You seem to have forgotten you've haven't proven this AIM bot >>> is 'yours'. Now *that* is predictable ;) >> >> Easy to know what you are doing: You are going to go to EVERY side issue >> you can to avoid simple facts: >> >> * Your Usenet flood bot sucks, and you have talked about it needing to >> have the output hand-written to get it to do even what it does (though >> you are not clear what you mean here, it is not like my code is NOT >> hand-written, but your bot just seems to spew random nonsense). >> >> * While you CLAIMED you had code that did most of what my AIM chat bot >> does, you have NO chat bot AT ALL to show for it. >> >> * I commend you for your knowledge. I am not jealous or spiteful, and I >> feel no need to lie about it. You have many areas where your programming >> skills are far beyond mine (to be fair that is a low bar!) >> >> * You deny the AIM chat bot I wrote is my bot saying I could not write >> what I did, and thus show deep jealousy at your inability to create a >> similar bot. You also absurdly have attributed your own Usenet flood bot >> to me (a bot I could not write given how apparently it requires knowing >> JavaScript and AppleScript would not do)! >> >> * At your request I shared my AIM chat bot code with you in the way you >> wanted me to (GitHub), and even went above and beyond and shared all the >> log files. >> >> * You refuse to share your Usenet flood bot code at all, other than to >> share a few snippets here and there and some videos of parts of it. > > It is... and it has a name: reality Restore the context you worked to hide, and, sure. But at this point you are just in your circus mode... repeating insults and trying to make excuses for why I, someone who is a CRAPPY coder, was able to make an AIM chat bot that is MUCH better than either your Usenet flood bot OR any chat bot you have made or can make. When your calm down a bit and stop crying over how you cannot "best" me maybe you will find you CAN, esp. with my help. You ARE a far better programmer than I am, no doubt, and with my sharing ideas about my bot maybe someday you can make one that is even better than mine. I would love to see it. It is not as if I would lash out like you are if you manage to do things I cannot... I would (and do) celebrate your success. Best wishes! -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steven Petruzzellis <fretwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-21 14:42 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: More bot than human. |
| Message-ID | <72c32c22-aab5-488c-9f7f-5ab4b1957103@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #455651 |
On Thursday, June 21, 2018 at 1:50:49 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 6/21/18 12:07 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Thursday, June 21, 2018 at 10:41:34 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 6/20/18 9:55 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 10:43:25 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>> On 6/20/18 9:35 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>> On Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 10:21:38 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Carroll responded with his normal snip snip and crying over how he > >>>>>> cannot believe my bot was actually written by me. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> His real issue: he KNOWS he cannot write a chat bot NEARLY as good as > >>>>>> mine, > >>>>> > >>>>> Keep telling yourself that, Rainman ;) > >>>> > >>>>>> Sorta amusing how jealous and angry he is getting over it... a > >>>>> > >>>>> Yeah, > >>>>> > >>>>> I'm seething with rage over plagiarizing pasta <eyeroll>. > >>>>> > >>>>>> is even distancing himself from his flood but, at times even denying it > >>>>>> is his, but other times speaking of how the content is not computer > >>>>>> generated (something only the person runnin... > >>>>> > >>>>> Bull, anyone familiar with our history knows it's not generated > >>>>> in the sense Scott is thinking, and some of them are flat out > >>>>> manually written. > >>>> > >>>> So you are manually writing the output... but what parts? > >>>> > >>>> Why not share your code? > >>> > >>> Other than you, who *doesn't* know what I'm doing? > >>> > >>>> And why not finish your chat bot you claimed was almost complete -- > >>>> after all, your one function did almost all of what my bot did, right? > >>> > >>> You seem to have forgotten you've haven't proven this AIM bot > >>> is 'yours'. Now *that* is predictable ;) > >> > >> Easy to know what you are doing: You are going to go to EVERY side issue > >> you can to avoid simple facts: > >> > >> * Your Usenet flood bot sucks, and you have talked about it needing to > >> have the output hand-written to get it to do even what it does (though > >> you are not clear what you mean here, it is not like my code is NOT > >> hand-written, but your bot just seems to spew random nonsense). > >> > >> * While you CLAIMED you had code that did most of what my AIM chat bot > >> does, you have NO chat bot AT ALL to show for it. > >> > >> * I commend you for your knowledge. I am not jealous or spiteful, and I > >> feel no need to lie about it. You have many areas where your programming > >> skills are far beyond mine (to be fair that is a low bar!) > >> > >> * You deny the AIM chat bot I wrote is my bot saying I could not write > >> what I did, and thus show deep jealousy at your inability to create a > >> similar bot. You also absurdly have attributed your own Usenet flood bot > >> to me (a bot I could not write given how apparently it requires knowing > >> JavaScript and AppleScript would not do)! > >> > >> * At your request I shared my AIM chat bot code with you in the way you > >> wanted me to (GitHub), and even went above and beyond and shared all the > >> log files. > >> > >> * You refuse to share your Usenet flood bot code at all, other than to > >> share a few snippets here and there and some videos of parts of it. > > > > It is... and it has a name: reality > > Restore the context you worked to hide, and, sure. > > But at this point you are just in your circus mode... repeating insults > and trying to make excuses for why I, someone who is a CRAPPY coder, was > able to make an AIM chat bot that is MUCH better than either your Usenet > flood bot OR any chat bot you have made or can make. > > When your calm down a bit and stop crying over how you cannot "best" me > maybe you will find you CAN, esp. with my help. You ARE a far better > programmer than I am, no doubt, and with my sharing ideas about my bot > maybe someday you can make one that is even better than mine. > > I would love to see it... Steven Petruzzellis doesn't have any idea what he is blubbering about. Frankly I do not really care. I think it is already over. I think the person you are responding to is in my KF. What did Steven Petruzzellis have to say about this miraculous, years long string of oddities? Most of the time he would try to push Snit (a real advocate) to believe they're students of his who just happened to have not enough brains to see through his lies. Yeah, right! Steven Petruzzellis claims to be the spreadsheet guru. Let us see him put up a variant minus the shipping/handling procedures.Contrary to Steven Petruzzellis's claim that he has "no experience in making trouble" (a lie as shown by the fact that he slammed Snit (a real advocate)'s site) he was quoted asking IT departments how they would take down a website. -- Puppy Videos https://youtu.be/qwb1Ez0GWMA Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-20 18:47 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: More bot than human. |
| Message-ID | <fp0eeeFbsf3U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #455553 |
On 6/20/18 4:59 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: ... >> You also speak of not using a line of my code, as if you would have to in >> order to use IDEAS from the code (the reaction scores and the like). > > What's next? You're gonna claim you invented the concept of a counter, > too? You're a riot, Snit. LOL! I would love to have you point to a chatroom bot that uses: * Tracking of a set number of people it is focused on * "Reaction" scores to rate "likability" * Use of names OTHER than the person it is responding to * "Humanizing" of user names * Responses changed based on mentioning the bot * Use of typos in some responses * Seconding line correction of typos * Splitting lines of text for some longer responses * Pauses to suggest time to type * Dropping old lines to stay relatively current when it gets behind And perhaps more. Now I have seen chat bots that do SOME of those, such as typos, splitting lines, and pauses, but I know of NO other chat bot that has those features or ones similar to them. So, yes, I *did* make something innovative and, as I have said, better than ANY other bot I ever saw for that type of room. And that is without being a programmer (or, if you prefer, a really crappy programmer). You have the ability to write code that swaps and replaces terms... but your Usenet flood bot is pretty crappy in terms of its responses, and your chat room bot has never run AT ALL as far as you have shown. Amazing how much that bothers you. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-20 12:35 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: More bot than human. |
| Message-ID | <fovok0F82enU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #455531 |
On 6/20/18 12:23 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > You can't prove I have a flood bot any more than you can the AIM bot is 'yours'. > That's a fact. Your flood bot is yours... it uses your account and the idea it was hacked in a way that neither Google nor "several federal agencies" could stop is insane. And we have looked at other evidence in the past, AND you have shown code from it, etc. It is not like there is any question: * Your flood bot is yours * My AIM bot is mine, with code written by me (with some functions from or modified from Apple or wherever I am sure) But let us not get side tracked from your games -- you claim you can write a bot that works as well as mine did. You have MASSIVE advantages in doing so: you have newer tech, better skills, and MY CODE! No reason you should not be able to... and you keep bragging you can. But so far your only bot is the Usenet one which is pretty crappy. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-20 13:08 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: More bot than human. |
| Message-ID | <f891c556-0a90-4b38-92bb-19b0dda4e4b7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #455534 |
On Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 1:35:31 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
> On 6/20/18 12:23 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> > You can't prove I have a flood bot any more than you can the AIM bot is 'yours'.
> > That's a fact.
>
> Your flood bot is yours...
All that's left now is for you to prove it.
Hint: Repeating it over and over isn't' "proof" ;)
> But let us not get side tracked from your games -- you claim you can
> write a bot that works as well as mine did.
What I wrote works way better than the one you're plagiarizing.
> You have MASSIVE advantages in doing so: you have newer tech,
LOL! The ability to dynamically generate existed *long* before that bot.
> better skills, and MY CODE!
I didn't use a line of 'your' code ('cuz you didn't write any of the brain), I used your data.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-21 02:08 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: More bot than human. |
| Message-ID | <fp0fljFbpa5U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #455538 |
On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 13:08:48 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 1:35:31 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
>> On 6/20/18 12:23 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> > You can't prove I have a flood bot any more than you can the AIM bot
is 'yours'.
>> > That's a fact.
>>
>> Your flood bot is yours...
>
> All that's left now is for you to prove it.
>
> Hint: Repeating it over and over isn't' "proof" ;)
He can't prove that, because it isn't true.
Based on your conversations around this subject, it's pretty clear that
such a thing would be beyond your current abilities. Heck, I'd even have
to study the matter for a while to even approach its level of
chattiness. (Assuming it's the same engine doing the auk vote floods,
too.)
>
>> But let us not get side tracked from your games -- you claim you can
>> write a bot that works as well as mine did.
>
> What I wrote works way better than the one you're plagiarizing.
Actually, he probably did write it. It's not necessarily a masterpiece
-- might have lifted the AIM client interface code from someone else, but
does that really matter? I'd have done the same.
Indeed, you were lamenting the fact that Snit didn't use your particular
term "hook" to describe it. But if you look at the code, his input is an
event hook. The fact that he didn't know the term doesn't mean anything.
>
>> You have MASSIVE advantages in doing so: you have newer tech,
>
> LOL! The ability to dynamically generate existed *long* before that bot.
>
>> better skills, and MY CODE!
>
> I didn't use a line of 'your' code ('cuz you didn't write any of the
brain), I used your data.
For extra credit ;) : write a parser that pulls out the data from the
spaghetti code and builds a database of keywords and responses. That
would be tough, because applescript looks to be a really cruddy language
to work with -- and there are probably myriad ways of applying the
keywords to generate the output text.
--
-v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-20 19:31 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: More bot than human. |
| Message-ID | <fp0h0lFcaeqU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #455561 |
On 6/20/18 7:08 PM, vallor wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 13:08:48 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 1:35:31 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
>>> On 6/20/18 12:23 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>> You can't prove I have a flood bot any more than you can the AIM bot
> is 'yours'.
>>>> That's a fact.
>>>
>>> Your flood bot is yours...
>>
>> All that's left now is for you to prove it.
>>
>> Hint: Repeating it over and over isn't' "proof" ;)
>
> He can't prove that, because it isn't true.
> Based on your conversations around this subject, it's pretty clear that
> such a thing would be beyond your current abilities.
Of course I wrote it. That is simply a fact. I cannot get you or Carroll
to not deny it, of course, but that does not matter one whit.
> Heck, I'd even have
> to study the matter for a while to even approach its level of
> chattiness.
Than you for the admission that what I did was pretty impressive in
terms of "chattiness". I am not saying it is the best bot possible, and
surely there are MANY bots that use some form of AI that are MUCH
better, but of the bots I saw on AIM at the time, and the ones I have
seen from others, mine was pretty damned good.
I have no problem with commending Carroll for his coding abilities, nor
about noting I am a crappy coder. No problem at all. And same with you,
I am sure you are a MUCH better coder than I am. Of course, that is a
VERY low bar.
But look at how you two feel the need to insist I did not create what I
did. I have no problem at all commending the two of you. You two look to
tear others down. It is quite telling of our personalities.
And in response you two will pretend it is up to me to find some magic
words to stop you from denying the fact I made the bot. It is not as if
you two have some other source it could even possibly be from -- and you
never will given how there is no other source.
> (Assuming it's the same engine doing the auk vote floods,
> too.)
>
>
>>
>>> But let us not get side tracked from your games -- you claim you can
>>> write a bot that works as well as mine did.
>>
>> What I wrote works way better than the one you're plagiarizing.
>
> Actually, he probably did write it.
Of course I did. As with most programmers I did research and I am sure
you if search line by line you will find some function I used, likely in
a modified form, but it is MY work.
> It's not necessarily a masterpiece
The code is crap... but the functionality was quite impressive.
> -- might have lifted the AIM client interface code from someone else, but
> does that really matter? I'd have done the same.
AIM did have some sample scripts and I am sure I used ideas from their
code, and perhaps even some lines for the I/O. But this is pretty
standard programming practice.
> Indeed, you were lamenting the fact that Snit didn't use your particular
> term "hook" to describe it. But if you look at the code, his input is an
> event hook. The fact that he didn't know the term doesn't mean anything.
Correct.
>>> You have MASSIVE advantages in doing so: you have newer tech,
>>
>> LOL! The ability to dynamically generate existed *long* before that bot.
I used AppleScript and it (or maybe my coding of it) had memory leaks.
You can see where I check for a lack of memory and have the bot quit. It
also struggled to keep up with a fast room, though some of that is from
it pausing to give replies for "typing" time. One thing it did which
helped with this was block users who appeared to be spam bots (there was
no way to remember the list on AIM, which was stupid).
>>> better skills, and MY CODE!
>>
>> I didn't use a line of 'your' code ('cuz you didn't write any of the
> brain), I used your data.
>
> For extra credit ;) : write a parser that pulls out the data from the
> spaghetti code and builds a database of keywords and responses. That
> would be tough, because applescript looks to be a really cruddy language
> to work with -- and there are probably myriad ways of applying the
> keywords to generate the output text.
And the code does not respond to just the single "sentence" (single
post). It kept track of multiple posts and "reaction" scores for people
-- and of other names it was responding to. Those things influence the
responses it gave (at least for some topics). In addition to simple
keyword responses the bot used:
* Blocking of spam bots (and not responding to them)
* Tracking of a set number of people it is focused on
* "Reaction" scores to rate "likability"
* Use of names OTHER than the person it is responding to
* "Humanizing" of user names
* Responses based on mentioning the bot (incl. common name errors)
* Duplicate checking to minimize repetition
* Use of typos in some responses
* Second line posts for correction of typos
* Splitting lines of text for some longer responses
* Pauses to suggest time to type
* Dropping old lines to stay relatively current when it gets behind
Other bots has SOME of those things, but overall, and especially for
someone such as myself who is a crappy coder, I am fairly proud of how
well it worked.
I did try at one time, a few years ago, to get it working on Messages
(at the time iMessages, to think) or Adium, but I had no luck. I think
Carroll is right that if I ever want to revive Turing Device I would
have to port it to JavaScript (which is far outside my abilities
currently) and run it on a very different type of platform.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-21 02:50 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: More bot than human. |
| Message-ID | <fp0i2vFcaneU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #455562 |
On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 19:31:49 -0700, Snit wrote: > On 6/20/18 7:08 PM, vallor wrote: >> On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 13:08:48 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: >> >>> On Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 1:35:31 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>> On 6/20/18 12:23 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>> You can't prove I have a flood bot any more than you can the AIM bot >> is 'yours'. >>>>> That's a fact. >>>> >>>> Your flood bot is yours... >>> >>> All that's left now is for you to prove it. >>> >>> Hint: Repeating it over and over isn't' "proof" ;) >> >> He can't prove that, because it isn't true. > >> Based on your conversations around this subject, it's pretty clear that >> such a thing would be beyond your current abilities. > > Of course I wrote it. I don't know if you're trying to be funny, or your just being stupid. Either way, it's still stupid. I was talking about the floodbot. Obviously. Hilarious that you felt the need to obfuscate the clear meaning of what I wrote -- all the while, complaining that others do that to _you_. Irony: thy name is "Snit". -- -v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-20 20:04 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: More bot than human. |
| Message-ID | <fp0itvFck46U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #455564 |
On 6/20/18 7:50 PM, vallor wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 19:31:49 -0700, Snit wrote:
>
>> On 6/20/18 7:08 PM, vallor wrote:
>>> On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 13:08:48 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 1:35:31 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
>>>>> On 6/20/18 12:23 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>>> You can't prove I have a flood bot any more than you can the AIM bot
>>> is 'yours'.
>>>>>> That's a fact.
>>>>>
>>>>> Your flood bot is yours...
>>>>
>>>> All that's left now is for you to prove it.
>>>>
>>>> Hint: Repeating it over and over isn't' "proof" ;)
>>>
>>> He can't prove that, because it isn't true.
>>
>>> Based on your conversations around this subject, it's pretty clear that
>>> such a thing would be beyond your current abilities.
>>
>> Of course I wrote it.
>
> I don't know if you're trying to be funny, or your just being stupid.
> Either way, it's still stupid.
>
> I was talking about the floodbot. Obviously.
THAT I did not write... but Carroll did, likely with Sandman's help.
Sorry for suggesting otherwise.
> Hilarious that you felt the need to obfuscate the clear meaning of what I
> wrote -- all the while, complaining that others do that to _you_. Irony:
> thy name is "Snit".
Hey, I goofed -- I made a mistake. It happens. And when I do make a
mistake I admit it.
Speaking of errors, I looked at my logs for Turing Device (the AIM bot).
I was wrong about it being in the late '90s... it was mostly in 2003
when I was working on and running the bot.
I have posted the logs on GitHub:
<https://github.com/BrockMcNuggets/AIM-BOT>
They are there under "logChats.zip". Feel free to download and read
examine. Or not. Have it there for anyone who wishes to read to read.
You can see MANY people know Turing Device was a bot, but many did not.
Even when people would note Turing Device was a bot there are many times
people would question if it really was. And many times people talked
about it being "half bot", thinking many of the responses were from a
human.
And there are times it made absurd mistakes... for example, in "Turing
Log Mar5.html" I see "GraFiX DZinR" posted:
anyone in here a whore?
And my bot responded with:
graf, you live in here a whore, don't you?
I would look at the logs and then try to reduce the chance of such
errors, but there, of course, was nothing even close to AI going on...
so there were bound to be errors.
You can also look at the logs and see other bots. The one that likely
comes closest to Turing Device in quality is "b1nary human", but I would
say my bot was considerably better. Used to talk sometimes to the writer
of b1nary human -- and we did occasionally share ideas.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-20 20:54 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: More bot than human. |
| Message-ID | <1b5763d9-9105-4a05-a0f4-c6bd943de9ae@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #455566 |
On Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 9:04:34 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 6/20/18 7:50 PM, vallor wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 19:31:49 -0700, Snit wrote: > > > >> On 6/20/18 7:08 PM, vallor wrote: > >>> On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 13:08:48 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> > >>>> On Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 1:35:31 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>>> On 6/20/18 12:23 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>>> You can't prove I have a flood bot any more than you can the AIM bot > >>> is 'yours'. > >>>>>> That's a fact. > >>>>> > >>>>> Your flood bot is yours... > >>>> > >>>> All that's left now is for you to prove it. > >>>> > >>>> Hint: Repeating it over and over isn't' "proof" ;) > >>> > >>> He can't prove that, because it isn't true. > >> > >>> Based on your conversations around this subject, it's pretty clear that > >>> such a thing would be beyond your current abilities. > >> > >> Of course I wrote it. > > > > I don't know if you're trying to be funny, or your just being stupid. > > Either way, it's still stupid. > > > > I was talking about the floodbot. Obviously. > > THAT I did not write... but Carroll did, likely with Sandman's help. > Sorry for suggesting otherwise. > > > Hilarious that you felt the need to obfuscate the clear meaning of what I > > wrote -- all the while, complaining that others do that to _you_. Irony: > > thy name is "Snit". > > Hey, I goofed -- I made a mistake. It happens. And when I do make a > mistake I admit it. > > Speaking of errors, I looked at my logs for Turing Device (the AIM bot). > I was wrong about it being in the late '90s... it was mostly in 2003 > when I was working on and running the bot. > > I have posted the logs on GitHub: > > <https://github.com/BrockMcNuggets/AIM-BOT> > > They are there under "logChats.zip". Providing the logs aren't just more of your manufactured "proof" with you the most likely scenario) how does a logfile prove you wrote it? Grow a brain, Snit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 11 of 39 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 … 39 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web