Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #452930 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Simon Singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-31 22:42 +0000 |
| Last post | 2018-06-03 23:23 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 143 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Simon Singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-05-31 22:42 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 17:01 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Simon Singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 01:12 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Simon Singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 01:49 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 21:32 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Simon Singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 14:19 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:35 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Simon Singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 14:49 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 08:04 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 09:16 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 09:35 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Simon Singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 16:24 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 09:53 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 10:06 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit says unsupported claims are lies <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 12:42 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Simon Singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 20:32 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 13:38 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 14:38 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit ignores the 9th amendment <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 14:48 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit says unsupported claims are lies <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 14:01 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-02 04:58 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:03 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 22:32 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 22:48 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 18:05 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 21:26 -0400
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 01:36 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:50 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 22:07 -0400
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 04:05 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 08:18 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 08:58 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 03:07 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 10:14 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:29 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 11:54 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:15 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 12:32 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:37 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 14:27 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 16:34 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 18:13 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 18:19 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 18:36 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:01 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:18 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:12 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 22:38 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:46 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 21:28 -0400
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:50 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 22:04 -0400
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 19:08 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:24 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:12 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 01:50 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 22:50 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 21:32 -0400
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:50 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. "Snit's dysautonomia http://bit.ly/2Jqpplk" <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:10 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:35 -0500
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 07:21 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 09:21 -0500
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Simon Singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 13:48 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 08:03 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 08:35 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:33 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 11:07 -0700
Re: Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2018-06-04 06:51 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 00:02 -0700
Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2018-06-04 14:16 +0000
Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 07:48 -0700
Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 09:20 -0700
Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 09:33 -0700
Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 09:59 -0700
Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 10:10 -0700
Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 10:12 -0700
Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 10:52 -0700
Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 10:35 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 08:42 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 09:54 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:43 -0500
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 07:21 -0700
Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2018-06-14 08:58 +0000
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-14 08:44 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 09:07 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-14 11:59 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 13:07 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-14 13:24 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 14:56 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-14 16:21 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 17:12 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-14 18:03 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 09:30 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-15 11:24 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 09:54 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 10:06 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 10:15 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 10:31 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 10:47 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 11:05 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 11:22 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 11:32 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 12:02 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 12:13 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 12:24 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 12:34 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 13:56 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 14:31 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 16:12 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 17:44 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 20:30 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 21:03 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-16 21:41 +0000
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 14:51 -0700
Re: Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2018-06-04 06:07 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 23:42 -0700
Re: Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2018-06-04 12:53 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 08:41 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 08:46 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 10:00 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 10:06 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 11:58 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 10:10 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 11:56 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 12:01 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 12:22 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:08 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 13:24 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 16:03 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 16:32 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 17:00 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 17:23 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:17 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:17 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 10:00 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 07:45 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 08:00 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 08:16 -0700
Re: Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2018-06-04 06:04 +0000
Re: Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 23:23 -0700
Page 5 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 10:35 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 |
| Message-ID | <f73aab39-2823-496b-a16d-248dcfe2fdf8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #454030 |
On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 10:10:29 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 10:59:39 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > On 6/5/18 9:20 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > On Monday, June 4, 2018 at 8:16:49 AM UTC-6, Sandman wrote: > > >> In article <fnk6fqFtu7bU1@mid.individual.net>, Snit wrote: > > >> > > >>> [2745] Invalid styling code shown on his site <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o > > >>> [2745] >:. > > >> > > >> [X] Dig up arguments from the past (http://tinyurl.com/ybcd8czt) > > >> [X] Diversion (http://tinyurl.com/zmwrfn2) > > >> [X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/gtdd77m) > > >> > > >> Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> troll /404 | lying /592 | incest /2 > > >> sex / | honorable /9 | honest /102 > > >> run /22 | css /46 | tilde / > > >> proof /31 | > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Sandman > > > > > > "This section is far from finished" > > > <http://usenet.sandman.net/pages/Forgingpostsandmaterial> > > > > > > We know who the poster boy could be ;) > > > > > > > If Sandman is honest > > Why are *you* worried about the honesty of "others"? > > (snip dishonesty) You do realize that the massive floods ending up in multiple groups started out in COLA, right? By the way, taking effort possibly getting informed isn't wasted time. Believing you know more than everyone else and working to convince others that it is true? *That* is a waste. In fact Jesus Christ's lies became more vile. So as might be expected I regret writing software for Jesus Christ. While I am sure his shills liked it, being nice to him made things worse. Jesus Christ is a nitwit - most people have plonked his socks. What he really wants is a bot that keeps switching names, then the posts would have a chance at being nearly as bothersome as he is. Really, what lie? That is the problem with millennials and American pupils don't have a clue, people from older generations (~50 yo) SHOULD know better than to fall for liberalism. -- Do not click this link! http://jeff-relf.me/Cola_Regs.HTM https://youtu.be/HHT9SJgYsH4 Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 08:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fnl4viF577rU6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #453829 |
On 6/4/18 12:02 AM, Snit wrote: > On 6/3/18 11:51 PM, Sandman wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> In article <fng2mmF6ev8U1@mid.individual.net>, Snit wrote: >> >>> Meanwhile with my statement of simple fact, you can accept or reject >>> it as you please, or simply hold no opinion. I am OK with that and >>> own you nothing. If you care, which it is hard to understand why you >>> would, you need only look at Carroll's own admission: >> >>> Snit: Are you denying that the police contacted you over your >>> harassment? >> >>> Steve Carroll: They did! >> >> Curious how almost all "quotes" from Snit never contain any >> Message-ID's... >> >> Steve Carroll >> Re: Tech question for Carroll >> 05/31/2018 <ceb1f8da-e4ad-44e9-a631-f1fc37057e12@googlegroups.com> >> >> "Were these "police" wearing 'special' uniforms and did they >> offer you a nice cool drink? ;)" >> >> Snit >> Re: Tech question for Carroll >> 05/31/2018 <fnau9gF74o0U2@mid.individual.net> >> >> "Are you denying that the police contacted you over your >> harassment?" >> >> Steve Carroll >> Re: Tech question for Carroll >> 05/31/2018 <782ad182-b975-4be4-a1c0-49cb57ea2855@googlegroups.com> >> >> "They did! Didn't they? And it appears to still be working ;)" >> >> [X] Misinterpretation (http://tinyurl.com/jpbvlu2) >> [X] Obfuscation (http://tinyurl.com/hhg8ezh) >> [X] Quote editing (http://tinyurl.com/ydcf75g3) >> >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) >> >> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJbFOGPAAoJECFEwfBaA+jRydgH/3kkJqiKfUM4ajq8jTRrULrc >> DMaS1WOki8AveX2cTRg2U/NTVJJL3WN89ZOvuIXhBr6GxtDGarL42yl8o4wYoZ5h >> QFoxKC2kYCpV/q3MIX5AxZXS53pLM0Xp8RZu7XaMpfSQGCOqHAp92nZ2xAfa0OlB >> +lNZENPVIhjxgyup4hnSFGC/9cEi9SV3cuRG0HZtUK//xf1RuJWoy5huSclaiPYo >> A+W25BBChLZsC4A4igiry6m94dWCFvLKiuD0UajZO9R4PGrlMxDDiIoTpKkW61e1 >> 3xY9zqUfC3gfcaJFfwSDAodcSJWFN2kfGa4T9je/6ykDlpq7FDBsf2ugH4mtzoE= >> =Vu4C >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> > > Invalid styling code shown on his site <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>: > > <div style="padding: 3px; align: center;"> > > Same errors noted at the time (proving not from WBM changes): > > Message-ID: <C0A30BB5.502C7%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> > ----- > Line: 373 > Property align doesn't exist : center > Line: 412 > Property align doesn't exist : center > Line: 431 > Property align doesn't exist : center > ----- > > > And in response Sandman showed Carroll's automated posting is FAR better than is Sandman's. They seem to be in a spat right now... I wonder if it is over this issue. Are they competing and unable to decide whom has "won"? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 09:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ba4a1146-94cb-4a01-babe-20ced7abe3a3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #453863 |
On Monday, June 4, 2018 at 8:42:46 AM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 6/4/18 12:02 AM, Snit wrote: > > On 6/3/18 11:51 PM, Sandman wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >> Hash: SHA1 > >> > >> In article <fng2mmF6ev8U1@mid.individual.net>, Snit wrote: > >> > >>> Meanwhile with my statement of simple fact, you can accept or reject > >>> it as you please, or simply hold no opinion. I am OK with that and > >>> own you nothing. If you care, which it is hard to understand why you > >>> would, you need only look at Carroll's own admission: > >> > >>> Snit: Are you denying that the police contacted you over your > >>> harassment? > >> > >>> Steve Carroll: They did! > >> > >> Curious how almost all "quotes" from Snit never contain any > >> Message-ID's... > >> > >> Steve Carroll > >> Re: Tech question for Carroll > >> 05/31/2018 <ceb1f8da-e4ad-44e9-a631-f1fc37057e12@googlegroups.com> > >> > >> "Were these "police" wearing 'special' uniforms and did they > >> offer you a nice cool drink? ;)" > >> > >> Snit > >> Re: Tech question for Carroll > >> 05/31/2018 <fnau9gF74o0U2@mid.individual.net> > >> > >> "Are you denying that the police contacted you over your > >> harassment?" > >> > >> Steve Carroll > >> Re: Tech question for Carroll > >> 05/31/2018 <782ad182-b975-4be4-a1c0-49cb57ea2855@googlegroups.com> > >> > >> "They did! Didn't they? And it appears to still be working ;)" > >> > >> [X] Misinterpretation (http://tinyurl.com/jpbvlu2) > >> [X] Obfuscation (http://tinyurl.com/hhg8ezh) > >> [X] Quote editing (http://tinyurl.com/ydcf75g3) > >> > >> > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) > >> > >> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJbFOGPAAoJECFEwfBaA+jRydgH/3kkJqiKfUM4ajq8jTRrULrc > >> DMaS1WOki8AveX2cTRg2U/NTVJJL3WN89ZOvuIXhBr6GxtDGarL42yl8o4wYoZ5h > >> QFoxKC2kYCpV/q3MIX5AxZXS53pLM0Xp8RZu7XaMpfSQGCOqHAp92nZ2xAfa0OlB > >> +lNZENPVIhjxgyup4hnSFGC/9cEi9SV3cuRG0HZtUK//xf1RuJWoy5huSclaiPYo > >> A+W25BBChLZsC4A4igiry6m94dWCFvLKiuD0UajZO9R4PGrlMxDDiIoTpKkW61e1 > >> 3xY9zqUfC3gfcaJFfwSDAodcSJWFN2kfGa4T9je/6ykDlpq7FDBsf2ugH4mtzoE= > >> =Vu4C > >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >> > > > > Invalid styling code shown on his site <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>: > > > > <div style="padding: 3px; align: center;"> > > > > Same errors noted at the time (proving not from WBM changes): > > > > Message-ID: <C0A30BB5.502C7%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> > > ----- > > Line: 373 > > Property align doesn't exist : center > > Line: 412 > > Property align doesn't exist : center > > Line: 431 > > Property align doesn't exist : center > > ----- > > > > > > > And in response Sandman showed Carroll's automated posting is FAR better > than is Sandman's. They seem to be in a spat right now... I wonder if it > is over this issue. Are they competing and unable to decide whom has "won"? > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> What did DFS have to say about this long list of "convenient friends" who popped up at just the right moment? Most of the time he would try to lead the advocates to trust they're "honest and honorable" posters who just happened to have great timing. Yeah, right! Prescott Computer Guy can create a virtual machine. Makes DFS cry because he can not. Why do you keep repeating yourself? -- Do not click this link! http://www.5z8.info/creditscore_g7f8du_launchexe http://www.5z8.info/nic_cage_naked_y8b5qk_torrentEverything https://youtu.be/Z5wo5aE7MUk Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-08 07:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <e4ukhd5ag7ekui0c97setvikavd9m0k181@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #453827 |
Sandman wrote: > some thing wrote: >> >> Meanwhile with my statement of simple fact, you can accept or reject >> it as you please, or simply hold no opinion. I am OK with that and >> own you nothing. If you care, which it is hard to understand why you >> would, you need only look at Carroll's own admission: > >> Snit: Are you denying that the police contacted you over your >> harassment? > >> Steve Carroll: They did! LOL Nice "proof", liar. >Curious how almost all "quotes" from Snit never contain any Message-ID's... > > Steve Carroll > Re: Tech question for Carroll > 05/31/2018 <ceb1f8da-e4ad-44e9-a631-f1fc37057e12@googlegroups.com> > > "Were these "police" wearing 'special' uniforms and did they > offer you a nice cool drink? ;)" > > Snit > Re: Tech question for Carroll > 05/31/2018 <fnau9gF74o0U2@mid.individual.net> > > "Are you denying that the police contacted you over your > harassment?" > > Steve Carroll > Re: Tech question for Carroll > 05/31/2018 <782ad182-b975-4be4-a1c0-49cb57ea2855@googlegroups.com> > > "They did! Didn't they? And it appears to still be working ;)" > >[X] Misinterpretation (http://tinyurl.com/jpbvlu2) >[X] Obfuscation (http://tinyurl.com/hhg8ezh) >[X] Quote editing (http://tinyurl.com/ydcf75g3) What a "surprise", eh? -- '(Sandman) also considers "proof" to be "meaningless"... which is quite telling.' - some thing, lying shamelessly (but no one can quote it lying)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-08 07:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fnvhnsF4mibU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #454405 |
On 6/8/18 5:43 AM, chrisv wrote:
> Sandman wrote:
>
>> some thing wrote:
>>>
>>> Meanwhile with my statement of simple fact, you can accept or reject
>>> it as you please, or simply hold no opinion. I am OK with that and
>>> own you nothing. If you care, which it is hard to understand why you
>>> would, you need only look at Carroll's own admission:
>>
>>> Snit: Are you denying that the police contacted you over your
>>> harassment?
>>
>>> Steve Carroll: They did!
>
> LOL Nice "proof", liar.
>
>> Curious how almost all "quotes" from Snit never contain any Message-ID's...
>>
>> Steve Carroll
>> Re: Tech question for Carroll
>> 05/31/2018 <ceb1f8da-e4ad-44e9-a631-f1fc37057e12@googlegroups.com>
>>
>> "Were these "police" wearing 'special' uniforms and did they
>> offer you a nice cool drink? ;)"
>>
>> Snit
>> Re: Tech question for Carroll
>> 05/31/2018 <fnau9gF74o0U2@mid.individual.net>
>>
>> "Are you denying that the police contacted you over your
>> harassment?"
>>
>> Steve Carroll
>> Re: Tech question for Carroll
>> 05/31/2018 <782ad182-b975-4be4-a1c0-49cb57ea2855@googlegroups.com>
>>
>> "They did! Didn't they? And it appears to still be working ;)"
>>
>> [X] Misinterpretation (http://tinyurl.com/jpbvlu2)
>> [X] Obfuscation (http://tinyurl.com/hhg8ezh)
>> [X] Quote editing (http://tinyurl.com/ydcf75g3)
>
> What a "surprise", eh?
>
All my damned unquotable lies. Unlike yours which are easy to quote:
chrisv:
-----
That thing won't even acknowledge that virtual desktops are a very
nice feature. It claims that they require "too much configuration".
You see, they require that you decide how to organize things on the
desktops.
In other words, in order to enjoy the benefit of a tool, you must
actually use the tool.
Sheesh.
-----
What an absurd lie you told!
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sandman <mr@sandman.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-14 08:58 +0000 |
| Subject | Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 |
| Message-ID | <sandman-e6bc3195bce17bb5b5fc31d1f8234a32@individual.net> |
| In reply to | #454411 |
In article <fnvhnsF4mibU2@mid.individual.net>, Snit wrote: > [2749] All my damned unquotable lies. [X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/gtdd77m) Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): ------------------------------------------------------------------------- troll /404 | lying 2/594 | incest /2 sex / | honorable /9 | honest /102 run /22 | css /46 | tilde / proof /31 | -- Sandman
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-14 08:44 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 |
| Message-ID | <fofgq5F5iclU8@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #455040 |
On 6/14/18 1:58 AM, Sandman wrote: > In article <fnvhnsF4mibU2@mid.individual.net>, Snit wrote: > >> [2749] All my damned unquotable lies. > > [X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/gtdd77m) > > Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > troll /404 | lying 2/594 | incest /2 > sex / | honorable /9 | honest /102 > run /22 | css /46 | tilde / > proof /31 | > My AIM bot was MUCH better than this. Come on, you are a programmer... why can't you do better than I did? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-14 09:07 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 |
| Message-ID | <aab91a14-c760-438f-977c-73b4ab7b839c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #455062 |
On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 9:44:09 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 6/14/18 1:58 AM, Sandman wrote: > > In article <fnvhnsF4mibU2@mid.individual.net>, Snit wrote: > > > >> [2749] All my damned unquotable lies. > > > > [X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/gtdd77m) > > > > Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > troll /404 | lying 2/594 | incest /2 > > sex / | honorable /9 | honest /102 > > run /22 | css /46 | tilde / > > proof /31 | > > > > My AIM bot was MUCH better than this. Come on, you are a programmer... > why can't you do better than I did? If you tried to recreate the Php based stuff he's shown you'd find it's far more complicated than your bot (not even considering that, at the least, it uses Php, MySQL, Javascript, HTML and CSS).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-14 11:59 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 |
| Message-ID | <fofs7tF7t26U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #455063 |
On 6/14/18 9:07 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 9:44:09 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 6/14/18 1:58 AM, Sandman wrote: >>> In article <fnvhnsF4mibU2@mid.individual.net>, Snit wrote: >>> >>>> [2749] All my damned unquotable lies. >>> >>> [X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/gtdd77m) >>> >>> Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> troll /404 | lying 2/594 | incest /2 >>> sex / | honorable /9 | honest /102 >>> run /22 | css /46 | tilde / >>> proof /31 | >>> >> >> My AIM bot was MUCH better than this. Come on, you are a programmer... >> why can't you do better than I did? > > If you tried to recreate the Php based stuff he's shown you'd find it's far > more complicated than your bot (not even considering that, at the least, it > uses Php, MySQL, Javascript, HTML and CSS). > I mean with results. If the code is harder AND he cannot get it to response better than this that is a shame. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-14 13:07 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 |
| Message-ID | <a29bbeaa-8bfa-4642-9e37-c2b667d88422@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #455074 |
On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 12:59:12 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 6/14/18 9:07 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 9:44:09 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 6/14/18 1:58 AM, Sandman wrote: > >>> In article <fnvhnsF4mibU2@mid.individual.net>, Snit wrote: > >>> > >>>> [2749] All my damned unquotable lies. > >>> > >>> [X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/gtdd77m) > >>> > >>> Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> troll /404 | lying 2/594 | incest /2 > >>> sex / | honorable /9 | honest /102 > >>> run /22 | css /46 | tilde / > >>> proof /31 | > >>> > >> > >> My AIM bot was MUCH better than this. Come on, you are a programmer... > >> why can't you do better than I did? > > > > If you tried to recreate the Php based stuff he's shown you'd find it's far > > more complicated than your bot (not even considering that, at the least, it > > uses Php, MySQL, Javascript, HTML and CSS). > > > I mean with results. Which means you're talking about term definitions that have nothing to do with how more or less complicated the programming is than yours > If the code is harder You know that it is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-14 13:24 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 |
| Message-ID | <fog177F8s86U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #455078 |
On 6/14/18 1:07 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 12:59:12 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 6/14/18 9:07 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 9:44:09 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>> On 6/14/18 1:58 AM, Sandman wrote: >>>>> In article <fnvhnsF4mibU2@mid.individual.net>, Snit wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> [2749] All my damned unquotable lies. >>>>> >>>>> [X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/gtdd77m) >>>>> >>>>> Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> troll /404 | lying 2/594 | incest /2 >>>>> sex / | honorable /9 | honest /102 >>>>> run /22 | css /46 | tilde / >>>>> proof /31 | >>>>> >>>> >>>> My AIM bot was MUCH better than this. Come on, you are a programmer... >>>> why can't you do better than I did? >>> >>> If you tried to recreate the Php based stuff he's shown you'd find it's far >>> more complicated than your bot (not even considering that, at the least, it >>> uses Php, MySQL, Javascript, HTML and CSS). >>> >> I mean with results. > > Which means you're talking about term definitions that have nothing to > do with how more or less complicated the programming is than yours > >> If the code is harder > > You know that it is. What I am noting is there is NO DOUBT he is a better coder than I am... but look at the results of his auto-posting... pretty crappy. I mean, really, plopping numbers in front of lines, posting arbitrary accusations, and then a table to track his own bot actions. So what? If he could get -- or has -- his bot reading lines and then he could get it to response to keywords as mine does. THAT might be sorta cool, esp. for a cesspool like COLA. Still, would be good for him to use a separate account (and let people know) so it would be easily blocked. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-14 14:56 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 |
| Message-ID | <52b9410d-bb97-4493-abb8-f2d46ca2ca32@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #455080 |
On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 2:24:10 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 6/14/18 1:07 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 12:59:12 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 6/14/18 9:07 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 9:44:09 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>> On 6/14/18 1:58 AM, Sandman wrote: > >>>>> In article <fnvhnsF4mibU2@mid.individual.net>, Snit wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> [2749] All my damned unquotable lies. > >>>>> > >>>>> [X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/gtdd77m) > >>>>> > >>>>> Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): > >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>> troll /404 | lying 2/594 | incest /2 > >>>>> sex / | honorable /9 | honest /102 > >>>>> run /22 | css /46 | tilde / > >>>>> proof /31 | > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> My AIM bot was MUCH better than this. Come on, you are a programmer... > >>>> why can't you do better than I did? > >>> > >>> If you tried to recreate the Php based stuff he's shown you'd find it's far > >>> more complicated than your bot (not even considering that, at the least, it > >>> uses Php, MySQL, Javascript, HTML and CSS). > >>> > >> I mean with results. > > > > Which means you're talking about term definitions that have nothing to > > do with how more or less complicated the programming is than yours > > > >> If the code is harder > > > > You know that it is. > > What I am noting is there is NO DOUBT he is a better coder than I am... Then it made no sense for you to attack him based on his abilities as "a programmer". > but look at the results of his auto-posting... pretty crappy. In your opinion, as based on your definitions of the terms used, which have nothing to do with the programming concepts behind it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-14 16:21 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 |
| Message-ID | <fogbkjFamtuU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #455082 |
On 6/14/18 2:56 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 2:24:10 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 6/14/18 1:07 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 12:59:12 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>> On 6/14/18 9:07 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>> On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 9:44:09 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 6/14/18 1:58 AM, Sandman wrote: >>>>>>> In article <fnvhnsF4mibU2@mid.individual.net>, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [2749] All my damned unquotable lies. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/gtdd77m) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> troll /404 | lying 2/594 | incest /2 >>>>>>> sex / | honorable /9 | honest /102 >>>>>>> run /22 | css /46 | tilde / >>>>>>> proof /31 | >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> My AIM bot was MUCH better than this. Come on, you are a programmer... >>>>>> why can't you do better than I did? >>>>> >>>>> If you tried to recreate the Php based stuff he's shown you'd find it's far >>>>> more complicated than your bot (not even considering that, at the least, it >>>>> uses Php, MySQL, Javascript, HTML and CSS). >>>>> >>>> I mean with results. >>> >>> Which means you're talking about term definitions that have nothing to >>> do with how more or less complicated the programming is than yours >>> >>>> If the code is harder >>> >>> You know that it is. >> >> What I am noting is there is NO DOUBT he is a better coder than I am... > > Then it made no sense for you to attack him based on his abilities as > "a programmer". I am noting his output for his bot is horrid... and the fact he is a programmer suggests it should be better. If he was NOT a programmer then it would be more understandable. >> but look at the results of his auto-posting... pretty crappy. > > In your opinion, as based on your definitions of the terms used, which > have nothing to do with the programming concepts behind it. Again: the idea is since he is a programmer and is knowledgeable about this type of stuff I am surprised he has not been able to improve it. Not putting his programming skills down at all. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-14 17:12 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 |
| Message-ID | <1b36138f-a6cd-4265-ab0e-6b3218ca0b76@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #455084 |
On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 5:21:59 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 6/14/18 2:56 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 2:24:10 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 6/14/18 1:07 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 12:59:12 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>> On 6/14/18 9:07 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>> On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 9:44:09 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>>>> On 6/14/18 1:58 AM, Sandman wrote: > >>>>>>> In article <fnvhnsF4mibU2@mid.individual.net>, Snit wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> [2749] All my damned unquotable lies. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> [X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/gtdd77m) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): > >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>> troll /404 | lying 2/594 | incest /2 > >>>>>>> sex / | honorable /9 | honest /102 > >>>>>>> run /22 | css /46 | tilde / > >>>>>>> proof /31 | > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> My AIM bot was MUCH better than this. Come on, you are a programmer... > >>>>>> why can't you do better than I did? > >>>>> > >>>>> If you tried to recreate the Php based stuff he's shown you'd find it's far > >>>>> more complicated than your bot (not even considering that, at the least, it > >>>>> uses Php, MySQL, Javascript, HTML and CSS). > >>>>> > >>>> I mean with results. > >>> > >>> Which means you're talking about term definitions that have nothing to > >>> do with how more or less complicated the programming is than yours > >>> > >>>> If the code is harder > >>> > >>> You know that it is. > >> > >> What I am noting is there is NO DOUBT he is a better coder than I am... > > > > Then it made no sense for you to attack him based on his abilities as > > "a programmer". > > I am noting his output for his bot is horrid... and the fact he is a > programmer suggests it should be better. If he was NOT a programmer then > it would be more understandable. > > >> but look at the results of his auto-posting... pretty crappy. > > > > In your opinion, as based on your definitions of the terms used, which > > have nothing to do with the programming concepts behind it. > > Again: the idea is since he is a programmer and is knowledgeable about > this type of stuff I am surprised he has not been able to improve it. > Not putting his programming skills down at all. That's how I read it: "Come on, you are a programmer... why can't you do better than I did?" If a guy wrote a chatroom program that changed foul language prior to outputting, should a user complain about the programmer's ability because he doesn't like the fact word meanings are no longer there, despite the fact that the output is exactly what the programmer had intended? That the censorship was accomplished with programming has nothing to do with the quality of it; but that's what you're arguing based on your opinion that the output is "horrid", due solely to word meanings not being what you'd like to see. You're conflating things.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-14 18:03 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 |
| Message-ID | <foghiuFbmnhU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #455086 |
On 6/14/18 5:12 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 5:21:59 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 6/14/18 2:56 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 2:24:10 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>> On 6/14/18 1:07 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>> On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 12:59:12 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 6/14/18 9:07 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>>>> On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 9:44:09 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> On 6/14/18 1:58 AM, Sandman wrote: >>>>>>>>> In article <fnvhnsF4mibU2@mid.individual.net>, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [2749] All my damned unquotable lies. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/gtdd77m) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): >>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>> troll /404 | lying 2/594 | incest /2 >>>>>>>>> sex / | honorable /9 | honest /102 >>>>>>>>> run /22 | css /46 | tilde / >>>>>>>>> proof /31 | >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> My AIM bot was MUCH better than this. Come on, you are a programmer... >>>>>>>> why can't you do better than I did? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you tried to recreate the Php based stuff he's shown you'd find it's far >>>>>>> more complicated than your bot (not even considering that, at the least, it >>>>>>> uses Php, MySQL, Javascript, HTML and CSS). >>>>>>> >>>>>> I mean with results. >>>>> >>>>> Which means you're talking about term definitions that have nothing to >>>>> do with how more or less complicated the programming is than yours >>>>> >>>>>> If the code is harder >>>>> >>>>> You know that it is. >>>> >>>> What I am noting is there is NO DOUBT he is a better coder than I am... >>> >>> Then it made no sense for you to attack him based on his abilities as >>> "a programmer". >> >> I am noting his output for his bot is horrid... and the fact he is a >> programmer suggests it should be better. If he was NOT a programmer then >> it would be more understandable. >> >>>> but look at the results of his auto-posting... pretty crappy. >>> >>> In your opinion, as based on your definitions of the terms used, which >>> have nothing to do with the programming concepts behind it. >> >> Again: the idea is since he is a programmer and is knowledgeable about >> this type of stuff I am surprised he has not been able to improve it. >> Not putting his programming skills down at all. > > That's how I read it: > "Come on, you are a programmer... why can't you do better than I did?" > > If a guy wrote a chatroom program that changed foul language prior > to outputting, should a user complain about the programmer's ability > because he doesn't like the fact word meanings are no longer there, > despite the fact that the output is exactly what the programmer had > intended? That the censorship was accomplished with programming > has nothing to do with the quality of it; but that's what you're arguing > based on your opinion that the output is "horrid", due solely to word > meanings not being what you'd like to see. You're conflating things. > Do you understand what I meant now? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-15 09:30 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 |
| Message-ID | <ac6946e8-f3f4-4dd9-96b5-4a5144fd6a46@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #455087 |
On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 7:03:29 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 6/14/18 5:12 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 5:21:59 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 6/14/18 2:56 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 2:24:10 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>> On 6/14/18 1:07 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>> On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 12:59:12 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>>>> On 6/14/18 9:07 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>>>> On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 9:44:09 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 6/14/18 1:58 AM, Sandman wrote: > >>>>>>>>> In article <fnvhnsF4mibU2@mid.individual.net>, Snit wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [2749] All my damned unquotable lies. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> [X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/gtdd77m) > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): > >>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>>>> troll /404 | lying 2/594 | incest /2 > >>>>>>>>> sex / | honorable /9 | honest /102 > >>>>>>>>> run /22 | css /46 | tilde / > >>>>>>>>> proof /31 | > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> My AIM bot was MUCH better than this. Come on, you are a programmer... > >>>>>>>> why can't you do better than I did? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> If you tried to recreate the Php based stuff he's shown you'd find it's far > >>>>>>> more complicated than your bot (not even considering that, at the least, it > >>>>>>> uses Php, MySQL, Javascript, HTML and CSS). > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> I mean with results. > >>>>> > >>>>> Which means you're talking about term definitions that have nothing to > >>>>> do with how more or less complicated the programming is than yours > >>>>> > >>>>>> If the code is harder > >>>>> > >>>>> You know that it is. > >>>> > >>>> What I am noting is there is NO DOUBT he is a better coder than I am... > >>> > >>> Then it made no sense for you to attack him based on his abilities as > >>> "a programmer". > >> > >> I am noting his output for his bot is horrid... and the fact he is a > >> programmer suggests it should be better. If he was NOT a programmer then > >> it would be more understandable. > >> > >>>> but look at the results of his auto-posting... pretty crappy. > >>> > >>> In your opinion, as based on your definitions of the terms used, which > >>> have nothing to do with the programming concepts behind it. > >> > >> Again: the idea is since he is a programmer and is knowledgeable about > >> this type of stuff I am surprised he has not been able to improve it. > >> Not putting his programming skills down at all. > > > > That's how I read it: > > "Come on, you are a programmer... why can't you do better than I did?" > > > > If a guy wrote a chatroom program that changed foul language prior > > to outputting, should a user complain about the programmer's ability > > because he doesn't like the fact word meanings are no longer there, > > despite the fact that the output is exactly what the programmer had > > intended? That the censorship was accomplished with programming > > has nothing to do with the quality of it; but that's what you're arguing > > based on your opinion that the output is "horrid", due solely to word > > meanings not being what you'd like to see. You're conflating things. > > > Do you understand what I meant now? I think i's clear what I understood.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-15 11:24 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 |
| Message-ID | <foieilFmnflU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #455105 |
On 6/15/18 9:30 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 7:03:29 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 6/14/18 5:12 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 5:21:59 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>> On 6/14/18 2:56 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>> On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 2:24:10 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 6/14/18 1:07 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>>>> On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 12:59:12 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> On 6/14/18 9:07 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 9:44:09 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 6/14/18 1:58 AM, Sandman wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> In article <fnvhnsF4mibU2@mid.individual.net>, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> [2749] All my damned unquotable lies. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> [X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/gtdd77m) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): >>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>> troll /404 | lying 2/594 | incest /2 >>>>>>>>>>> sex / | honorable /9 | honest /102 >>>>>>>>>>> run /22 | css /46 | tilde / >>>>>>>>>>> proof /31 | >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> My AIM bot was MUCH better than this. Come on, you are a programmer... >>>>>>>>>> why can't you do better than I did? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If you tried to recreate the Php based stuff he's shown you'd find it's far >>>>>>>>> more complicated than your bot (not even considering that, at the least, it >>>>>>>>> uses Php, MySQL, Javascript, HTML and CSS). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I mean with results. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Which means you're talking about term definitions that have nothing to >>>>>>> do with how more or less complicated the programming is than yours >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If the code is harder >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You know that it is. >>>>>> >>>>>> What I am noting is there is NO DOUBT he is a better coder than I am... >>>>> >>>>> Then it made no sense for you to attack him based on his abilities as >>>>> "a programmer". >>>> >>>> I am noting his output for his bot is horrid... and the fact he is a >>>> programmer suggests it should be better. If he was NOT a programmer then >>>> it would be more understandable. >>>> >>>>>> but look at the results of his auto-posting... pretty crappy. >>>>> >>>>> In your opinion, as based on your definitions of the terms used, which >>>>> have nothing to do with the programming concepts behind it. >>>> >>>> Again: the idea is since he is a programmer and is knowledgeable about >>>> this type of stuff I am surprised he has not been able to improve it. >>>> Not putting his programming skills down at all. >>> >>> That's how I read it: >>> "Come on, you are a programmer... why can't you do better than I did?" >>> >>> If a guy wrote a chatroom program that changed foul language prior >>> to outputting, should a user complain about the programmer's ability >>> because he doesn't like the fact word meanings are no longer there, >>> despite the fact that the output is exactly what the programmer had >>> intended? That the censorship was accomplished with programming >>> has nothing to do with the quality of it; but that's what you're arguing >>> based on your opinion that the output is "horrid", due solely to word >>> meanings not being what you'd like to see. You're conflating things. >>> >> Do you understand what I meant now? > > I think i's clear what I understood. > LOL! Your games are amusing as long as you do not take them too far. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-16 09:54 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 |
| Message-ID | <9f817244-f8f5-46f8-8a14-481aba1ac64c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #455114 |
On Friday, June 15, 2018 at 12:24:25 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 6/15/18 9:30 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 7:03:29 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 6/14/18 5:12 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 5:21:59 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>> On 6/14/18 2:56 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>> On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 2:24:10 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>>>> On 6/14/18 1:07 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>>>> On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 12:59:12 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 6/14/18 9:07 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>>>>>> On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 9:44:09 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> On 6/14/18 1:58 AM, Sandman wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> In article <fnvhnsF4mibU2@mid.individual.net>, Snit wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [2749] All my damned unquotable lies. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> [X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/gtdd77m) > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): > >>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>>>>>> troll /404 | lying 2/594 | incest /2 > >>>>>>>>>>> sex / | honorable /9 | honest /102 > >>>>>>>>>>> run /22 | css /46 | tilde / > >>>>>>>>>>> proof /31 | > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> My AIM bot was MUCH better than this. Come on, you are a programmer... > >>>>>>>>>> why can't you do better than I did? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> If you tried to recreate the Php based stuff he's shown you'd find it's far > >>>>>>>>> more complicated than your bot (not even considering that, at the least, it > >>>>>>>>> uses Php, MySQL, Javascript, HTML and CSS). > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I mean with results. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Which means you're talking about term definitions that have nothing to > >>>>>>> do with how more or less complicated the programming is than yours > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> If the code is harder > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> You know that it is. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> What I am noting is there is NO DOUBT he is a better coder than I am... > >>>>> > >>>>> Then it made no sense for you to attack him based on his abilities as > >>>>> "a programmer". > >>>> > >>>> I am noting his output for his bot is horrid... and the fact he is a > >>>> programmer suggests it should be better. If he was NOT a programmer then > >>>> it would be more understandable. > >>>> > >>>>>> but look at the results of his auto-posting... pretty crappy. > >>>>> > >>>>> In your opinion, as based on your definitions of the terms used, which > >>>>> have nothing to do with the programming concepts behind it. > >>>> > >>>> Again: the idea is since he is a programmer and is knowledgeable about > >>>> this type of stuff I am surprised he has not been able to improve it. > >>>> Not putting his programming skills down at all. > >>> > >>> That's how I read it: > >>> "Come on, you are a programmer... why can't you do better than I did?" > >>> > >>> If a guy wrote a chatroom program that changed foul language prior > >>> to outputting, should a user complain about the programmer's ability > >>> because he doesn't like the fact word meanings are no longer there, > >>> despite the fact that the output is exactly what the programmer had > >>> intended? That the censorship was accomplished with programming > >>> has nothing to do with the quality of it; but that's what you're arguing > >>> based on your opinion that the output is "horrid", due solely to word > >>> meanings not being what you'd like to see. You're conflating things. > >>> > >> Do you understand what I meant now? > > > > I think i's clear what I understood. > > > LOL! > > Your games are amusing as long as you do not take them too far. What part wasn't clear? You have an *opinion* on his output. That doesn't automatically call into question his programming ability, which is what you've done. If there's a "game" here, you're the one playing it as you pretend that your *opinion* of his output carries any weight. the irony of your game is it's based on an *opinion* on you hold.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-16 10:06 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 |
| Message-ID | <fokud3Fu30eU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #455164 |
On 6/16/18 9:54 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Friday, June 15, 2018 at 12:24:25 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 6/15/18 9:30 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 7:03:29 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>> On 6/14/18 5:12 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>> On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 5:21:59 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 6/14/18 2:56 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>>>> On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 2:24:10 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> On 6/14/18 1:07 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 12:59:12 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 6/14/18 9:07 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 9:44:09 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/14/18 1:58 AM, Sandman wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <fnvhnsF4mibU2@mid.individual.net>, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2749] All my damned unquotable lies. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/gtdd77m) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): >>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>>> troll /404 | lying 2/594 | incest /2 >>>>>>>>>>>>> sex / | honorable /9 | honest /102 >>>>>>>>>>>>> run /22 | css /46 | tilde / >>>>>>>>>>>>> proof /31 | >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> My AIM bot was MUCH better than this. Come on, you are a programmer... >>>>>>>>>>>> why can't you do better than I did? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> If you tried to recreate the Php based stuff he's shown you'd find it's far >>>>>>>>>>> more complicated than your bot (not even considering that, at the least, it >>>>>>>>>>> uses Php, MySQL, Javascript, HTML and CSS). >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I mean with results. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Which means you're talking about term definitions that have nothing to >>>>>>>>> do with how more or less complicated the programming is than yours >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If the code is harder >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You know that it is. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What I am noting is there is NO DOUBT he is a better coder than I am... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Then it made no sense for you to attack him based on his abilities as >>>>>>> "a programmer". >>>>>> >>>>>> I am noting his output for his bot is horrid... and the fact he is a >>>>>> programmer suggests it should be better. If he was NOT a programmer then >>>>>> it would be more understandable. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> but look at the results of his auto-posting... pretty crappy. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In your opinion, as based on your definitions of the terms used, which >>>>>>> have nothing to do with the programming concepts behind it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Again: the idea is since he is a programmer and is knowledgeable about >>>>>> this type of stuff I am surprised he has not been able to improve it. >>>>>> Not putting his programming skills down at all. >>>>> >>>>> That's how I read it: >>>>> "Come on, you are a programmer... why can't you do better than I did?" >>>>> >>>>> If a guy wrote a chatroom program that changed foul language prior >>>>> to outputting, should a user complain about the programmer's ability >>>>> because he doesn't like the fact word meanings are no longer there, >>>>> despite the fact that the output is exactly what the programmer had >>>>> intended? That the censorship was accomplished with programming >>>>> has nothing to do with the quality of it; but that's what you're arguing >>>>> based on your opinion that the output is "horrid", due solely to word >>>>> meanings not being what you'd like to see. You're conflating things. >>>>> >>>> Do you understand what I meant now? >>> >>> I think i's clear what I understood. >>> >> LOL! >> >> Your games are amusing as long as you do not take them too far. > > What part wasn't clear? You have an *opinion* on his output. That doesn't > automatically call into question his programming ability Hence why I never pulled into question his programming ability. > , which is what you've > done. Again: your games are amusing up to a point. You are reaching that point. :) Seriously, you were just acting in a very reasonable way in another thread... I commend you for that and thank you -- and thank you -- for that and your assistance. Try not to slide into your games of defining what OTHERS meant. You misunderstood what I said. I explained. You are still insisting your view of what I meant must be right. It is absurd. > If there's a "game" here, you're the one playing it as you pretend that > your *opinion* of his output carries any weight. the irony of your game is it's > based on an *opinion* on you hold. I think it is safe to say his bot sucks. Even yours is better. Of course, his goal is not to have it sound reasonable... it is just to spew arbitrary insults. So in that it is working as he intends. Whatever. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-16 10:15 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 |
| Message-ID | <1543fc36-9137-47d7-99be-d833670ca1e2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #455165 |
On Saturday, June 16, 2018 at 11:06:46 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 6/16/18 9:54 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Friday, June 15, 2018 at 12:24:25 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 6/15/18 9:30 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 7:03:29 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>> On 6/14/18 5:12 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>> On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 5:21:59 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>>>> On 6/14/18 2:56 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>>>> On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 2:24:10 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 6/14/18 1:07 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>>>>>> On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 12:59:12 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> On 6/14/18 9:07 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 9:44:09 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/14/18 1:58 AM, Sandman wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <fnvhnsF4mibU2@mid.individual.net>, Snit wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2749] All my damned unquotable lies. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/gtdd77m) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>>>>>>>> troll /404 | lying 2/594 | incest /2 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> sex / | honorable /9 | honest /102 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> run /22 | css /46 | tilde / > >>>>>>>>>>>>> proof /31 | > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> My AIM bot was MUCH better than this. Come on, you are a programmer... > >>>>>>>>>>>> why can't you do better than I did? > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> If you tried to recreate the Php based stuff he's shown you'd find it's far > >>>>>>>>>>> more complicated than your bot (not even considering that, at the least, it > >>>>>>>>>>> uses Php, MySQL, Javascript, HTML and CSS). > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I mean with results. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Which means you're talking about term definitions that have nothing to > >>>>>>>>> do with how more or less complicated the programming is than yours > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> If the code is harder > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> You know that it is. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> What I am noting is there is NO DOUBT he is a better coder than I am... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Then it made no sense for you to attack him based on his abilities as > >>>>>>> "a programmer". > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I am noting his output for his bot is horrid... and the fact he is a > >>>>>> programmer suggests it should be better. If he was NOT a programmer then > >>>>>> it would be more understandable. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>> but look at the results of his auto-posting... pretty crappy. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> In your opinion, as based on your definitions of the terms used, which > >>>>>>> have nothing to do with the programming concepts behind it. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Again: the idea is since he is a programmer and is knowledgeable about > >>>>>> this type of stuff I am surprised he has not been able to improve it. > >>>>>> Not putting his programming skills down at all. > >>>>> > >>>>> That's how I read it: > >>>>> "Come on, you are a programmer... why can't you do better than I did?" > >>>>> > >>>>> If a guy wrote a chatroom program that changed foul language prior > >>>>> to outputting, should a user complain about the programmer's ability > >>>>> because he doesn't like the fact word meanings are no longer there, > >>>>> despite the fact that the output is exactly what the programmer had > >>>>> intended? That the censorship was accomplished with programming > >>>>> has nothing to do with the quality of it; but that's what you're arguing > >>>>> based on your opinion that the output is "horrid", due solely to word > >>>>> meanings not being what you'd like to see. You're conflating things. > >>>>> > >>>> Do you understand what I meant now? > >>> > >>> I think i's clear what I understood. > >>> > >> LOL! > >> > >> Your games are amusing as long as you do not take them too far. > > > > What part wasn't clear? You have an *opinion* on his output. That doesn't > > automatically call into question his programming ability > > Hence why I never pulled into question his programming ability. Of course you did: "Come on, you are a programmer... why can't you do better than I did?" - Snit It's a "game" to claim otherwise > Try not to slide into your games of defining what OTHERS meant. Try not to slide into your games of defining reality based on only your own *opinion*. > You misunderstood what I said. I quoted what you said, more than once, and I stated how I read it. You *opine* otherwise... "others" will *opine* based on how they read it. That's how this all works. You can't change people's opinions by stating the same thing over and over. > > If there's a "game" here, you're the one playing it as you pretend that > > your *opinion* of his output carries any weight. the irony of your game is it's > > based on an *opinion* on you hold. > > I think it is safe to say his bot sucks. Even yours is better. > > Of course, his goal is not to have it sound reasonable... Again, that is your *opinion*, which, again, has nothing to do with the programming behind it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web