Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #453161 > unrolled thread
| Started by | oOze <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-06-01 21:57 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-06-14 09:08 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 763 — 34 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Microsoft to purchase Github oOze <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-01 21:57 -0400
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Snit ignores the 9th amendment <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 18:58 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Fred <Fred.rscmdffjf@l.invalid> - 2018-06-01 19:05 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Sam E <why.should.this@be.email.invalid> - 2018-06-02 10:06 -0500
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 08:34 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 23:42 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Big Al <Big_Al@invalid.com> - 2018-06-01 22:13 -0400
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-06-02 07:28 -0400
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 05:41 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:30 -0500
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github SilverSlimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-08 11:12 -0400
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 08:13 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-06-08 21:56 +0000
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 13:45 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-06-09 23:08 +0000
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 16:20 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-09 23:29 +0000
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:40 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 17:23 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 18:46 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:39 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 17:33 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:38 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 08:22 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 16:02 +0000
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 09:16 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 09:38 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 09:46 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 09:52 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 11:17 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 11:50 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 11:54 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 12:06 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 12:17 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 12:47 -0700
Is Mike on (prescription) drugs, or not ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-10 13:28 -0700
Re: Is Mike on (prescription) drugs, or not ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 13:39 -0700
Re: Is Mike on (prescription) drugs, or not ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 14:01 -0700
Get your story straight, please. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-10 14:16 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 14:24 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-10 17:41 -0400
Re: Get your story straight, please. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 14:53 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 15:42 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 16:00 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-10 19:39 -0400
Re: Get your story straight, please. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 17:22 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 17:27 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 17:32 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 17:39 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-10 20:54 -0400
Re: Get your story straight, please. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-10 18:08 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 18:24 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 18:19 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-10 21:30 -0400
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 19:21 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-10 22:32 -0400
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 19:38 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-10 22:53 -0400
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 19:59 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-10 23:02 -0400
Re: Get your story straight, please. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 03:07 +0000
Re: Get your story straight, please. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 20:13 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 20:24 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 20:41 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 20:45 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 20:18 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 18:03 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 01:10 +0000
Re: Get your story straight, please. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 18:27 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 01:41 +0000
Re: Get your story straight, please. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 19:15 -0700
Random egos, Random games, and Random religions. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-10 23:55 -0700
Re: Random egos, Random games, and Random religions. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-11 10:58 -0700
More lizard than human. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-11 13:45 -0700
Re: More lizard than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-11 13:50 -0700
More bot than human. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-11 14:09 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-11 14:21 -0700
Does not compute. Beep ! Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-11 14:52 -0700
Re: Does not compute. Beep ! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-11 14:53 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 14:53 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-11 15:05 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 15:27 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-11 16:21 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 16:39 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-11 19:43 -0400
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 16:53 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-11 17:21 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 20:02 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-11 20:36 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 20:43 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-11 20:49 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-11 17:20 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 19:42 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-11 20:08 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 21:10 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-11 21:27 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 09:17 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-12 09:33 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 09:50 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 11:12 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-12 11:21 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 11:43 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-12 12:34 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 15:57 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-12 16:43 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 19:07 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-12 19:55 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-13 09:27 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-13 10:45 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-13 11:56 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-13 12:01 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-13 14:31 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-13 14:30 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 09:33 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-14 11:57 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 14:39 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-14 22:10 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 09:59 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-15 11:42 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 13:16 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-15 23:30 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 09:46 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 10:10 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 10:34 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 11:10 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 12:05 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 12:27 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 13:25 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 14:25 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 16:13 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 18:04 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 20:24 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 21:59 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 22:57 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 23:57 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 10:44 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-17 10:53 -0700
Re: More bot than human. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-17 09:56 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-17 10:18 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 11:00 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-17 11:23 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 13:16 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-17 15:41 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 19:56 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-17 20:11 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 21:26 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-17 21:53 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 22:35 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-17 22:49 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 23:11 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-18 05:24 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-18 08:42 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-18 09:32 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-18 10:18 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-18 17:48 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-18 12:02 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-18 12:30 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-18 13:38 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-18 13:54 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Whistle Blower <wbedward@gmail.com> - 2018-06-18 21:24 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-18 14:48 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Whistle Blower <wbedward@gmail.com> - 2018-06-18 21:53 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-18 16:03 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Stumpee McGee <stumpeemcgee49@inoverter.net> - 2018-06-18 19:57 -0400
Is a woman "lying" when she spends thousands on cosmetic surgery ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-18 18:55 -0700
Re: Is a woman "lying" when she spends thousands on cosmetic surgery ? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-06-19 19:22 +0000
Re: Is a woman "lying" when she spends thousands on cosmetic surgery ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 12:31 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-18 14:47 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-18 16:01 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 17:53 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 18:35 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 18:48 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 20:22 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 20:47 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 21:04 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 22:09 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 22:22 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 20:53 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 21:09 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 22:10 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 09:36 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 10:50 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 11:16 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 11:23 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 11:29 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 11:51 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 21:12 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 21:20 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 22:22 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 09:40 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steven Petruzzellis <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 09:41 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 10:52 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 11:16 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 11:28 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 11:32 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 11:54 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 12:23 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 12:32 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 13:04 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 15:17 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 16:59 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 18:00 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 21:02 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 21:21 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 21:35 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 21:43 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 21:55 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-21 09:41 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steven Petruzzellis <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 10:20 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 12:07 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-21 13:50 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steven Petruzzellis <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 14:42 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 18:47 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 12:35 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 13:08 -0700
Re: More bot than human. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-21 02:08 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 19:31 -0700
Re: More bot than human. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-21 02:50 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 20:04 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 20:54 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 21:17 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 13:05 -0600
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-21 13:47 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 15:49 -0600
Re: More bot than human. Steven Petruzzellis <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 14:50 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 14:51 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-21 15:04 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 17:01 -0600
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-21 16:22 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 18:08 -0600
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 17:13 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-21 17:20 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 17:29 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 08:55 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-22 09:38 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 11:44 -0600
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-22 11:29 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 13:45 -0600
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-22 13:07 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 14:29 -0600
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-22 14:20 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 15:01 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-22 15:19 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-22 15:24 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-22 15:29 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-23 11:05 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 12:37 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-25 12:51 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 12:59 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 11:52 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 15:31 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-25 13:20 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 13:48 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-25 14:31 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 15:00 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-25 15:11 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 15:24 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-25 15:35 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-26 09:53 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-26 13:19 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-26 14:41 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-26 15:28 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-26 16:24 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-26 16:31 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-27 03:08 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 08:52 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-01 09:51 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-01 10:03 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-01 10:19 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-01 23:00 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-02 01:15 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-02 09:21 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 10:10 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 11:07 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 11:35 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-13 12:24 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 02:09 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 10:01 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-14 10:08 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 10:33 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-14 11:17 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 11:36 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 10:47 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-14 11:10 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 11:22 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-14 11:27 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 11:33 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 12:07 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-14 11:52 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 12:36 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-14 21:00 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 14:29 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-14 15:03 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 09:18 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-15 09:28 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 09:38 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-15 16:43 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-15 10:50 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-15 10:49 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 11:19 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 11:50 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-15 13:54 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 14:10 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 14:54 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-15 17:25 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 17:34 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-15 23:26 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 17:02 -0700
Re: More bot than human. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-16 00:04 +0000
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 00:16 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-15 17:48 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 01:04 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-15 20:58 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 21:43 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 17:50 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-15 17:46 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 00:58 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-15 18:28 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 01:59 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 19:22 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 02:31 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 20:09 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 11:02 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 04:42 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 15:43 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-16 15:45 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 16:03 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 09:13 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-16 16:27 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 09:40 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 17:16 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 17:47 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 17:58 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 18:11 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 18:19 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 18:31 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 19:08 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 19:17 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 22:49 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 10:02 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 10:29 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 10:31 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 10:38 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 11:30 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 12:21 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 13:53 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 09:29 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 15:53 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 16:51 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 17:53 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 00:49 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 19:12 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 20:23 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-17 01:27 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-17 01:47 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 19:18 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 19:27 -0700
Re: More bot than human. GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-16 23:17 -0400
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 22:52 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 22:51 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 23:15 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 19:13 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 18:33 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 17:19 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 17:31 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 09:57 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 17:32 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 11:00 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-16 20:46 +0000
Re: More bot than human. GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-16 17:01 -0400
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 21:39 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-16 22:00 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 15:20 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 22:58 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 17:08 -0700
Re: More bot than human. GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-16 20:20 -0400
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-17 00:30 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-17 00:32 +0000
Re: More bot than human. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 15:57 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 09:00 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 10:10 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 10:34 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 10:54 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 12:18 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 12:48 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 13:46 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 14:07 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 14:34 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 14:55 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 14:32 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 14:45 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 14:53 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 14:58 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 15:10 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 14:47 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 08:15 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 08:40 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 15:52 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:27 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 09:33 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 19:53 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:57 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 08:24 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 10:13 -0700
Re: More bot than human. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-18 11:31 -0500
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 10:56 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 11:17 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 11:26 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:02 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 12:07 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:26 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 13:20 -0700
Re: More bot than human. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-18 13:32 -0500
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 11:47 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:24 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:22 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 12:36 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:47 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 12:49 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:40 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 19:51 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 09:31 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 10:44 -0700
Re: More bot than human. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-18 11:25 -0500
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 10:49 -0700
Re: More bot than human. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-18 13:11 -0500
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 11:16 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:03 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 11:19 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 11:29 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:06 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 12:15 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:26 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 19:36 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:38 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 13:51 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 14:25 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 14:36 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 14:45 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 14:50 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 15:08 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 15:27 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 09:31 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 10:57 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 11:13 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 11:18 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 11:59 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 12:33 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 13:35 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 20:23 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 13:41 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 09:44 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 20:11 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 13:14 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 09:57 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 10:39 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:20 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 12:34 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:44 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 15:11 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 13:53 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 07:37 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 07:42 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 09:30 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 19:48 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:50 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 09:29 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 19:48 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:49 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 12:50 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:55 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 20:40 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 13:56 -0700
Re: More bot than human. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-18 11:33 -0500
Re: More bot than human. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 17:02 +0000
Re: More bot than human. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-19 07:51 -0500
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-19 08:22 -0700
Re: More bot than human. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-19 15:40 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-19 09:32 -0700
Re: More bot than human. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-19 11:41 -0500
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-19 09:57 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 10:28 -0700
Re: More bot than human. GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-19 15:46 -0400
Re: More bot than human. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-19 15:02 -0500
Re: More bot than human. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-07-19 20:47 +0000
Re: More bot than human. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-20 07:14 -0500
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 19:53 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:57 -0700
Re: More bot than human. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-18 15:03 -0500
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 20:41 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 14:12 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 14:15 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 14:22 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 14:29 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 15:05 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 17:48 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 18:19 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 11:04 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-19 11:40 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 12:13 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-19 12:17 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 12:38 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 16:21 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 16:32 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 18:10 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 12:38 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-19 11:55 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-19 08:28 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 08:55 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 11:10 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-19 11:38 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 11:46 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 12:01 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-19 12:56 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 13:05 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 13:21 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 14:21 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-19 15:26 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 15:58 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-19 16:11 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 12:37 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-19 16:08 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 16:28 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-19 16:14 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 09:55 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 17:19 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 13:04 -0700
Re: More bot than human. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 20:57 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 16:19 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-21 16:06 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 12:44 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 14:04 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 14:36 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 14:41 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 16:01 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 10:29 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-22 11:11 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 11:29 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 13:13 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-22 11:09 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 13:51 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 15:04 -0600
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 14:18 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 10:06 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 12:59 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 14:30 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 12:37 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 16:59 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 12:37 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 12:37 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 16:21 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 12:38 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 12:04 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-19 12:15 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 12:38 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 12:38 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 14:54 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 14:23 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 15:03 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 15:26 -0700
Re: More bot than human. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-18 11:12 -0500
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 10:46 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:21 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 19:31 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:36 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 12:44 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 13:49 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 09:27 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 19:46 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 17:23 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 14:47 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 13:35 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 07:06 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 08:58 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 16:12 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:35 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 09:42 -0700
Re: More bot than human. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-18 11:38 -0500
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:41 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 20:00 +0000
Re: More bot than human. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-18 15:01 -0500
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 20:41 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 13:11 -0700
Re: More bot than human. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-18 11:09 -0500
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 16:12 +0000
Re: More bot than human. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-18 11:59 -0500
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:42 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:48 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-18 20:10 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 13:14 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:36 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-18 12:31 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 17:46 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carrol Busted.... Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-17 01:14 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carrol Busted.... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 19:17 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-17 01:14 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 19:14 -0700
Re: More bot than human. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 15:59 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 09:00 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-17 01:14 +0000
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-17 01:33 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 19:12 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 19:17 -0700
Re: More bot than human. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 15:56 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 09:01 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-17 16:27 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-17 09:30 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 15:21 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-16 21:06 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 15:34 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 16:44 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-15 21:04 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 23:02 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 02:23 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 18:05 -0700
Re: More bot than human. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-15 22:51 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-15 17:27 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 10:36 -0700
Re: More bot than human. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 03:26 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-16 03:37 +0000
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 20:40 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-14 13:16 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 14:13 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 10:17 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-14 11:18 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-23 10:09 -0600
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-23 09:55 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-23 10:19 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-23 10:26 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steven Petruzzellis <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 20:41 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 13:48 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 14:20 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 20:51 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 21:16 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 21:27 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 21:39 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 21:47 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-20 21:52 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 02:13 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steven Petruzzellis <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 10:15 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 01:41 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steven Petruzzellis <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 10:10 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 08:01 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 08:06 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 08:21 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 08:27 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 08:33 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 08:44 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 09:15 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 09:28 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 09:56 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 10:12 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 10:56 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 14:01 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 14:14 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 14:13 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 15:03 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 15:28 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 16:39 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 16:47 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 19:03 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 16:49 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 16:50 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 17:18 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 16:45 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 16:56 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 16:59 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 20:30 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 11:28 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-19 08:49 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 08:30 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 10:46 -0700
Re: More bot than human. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-17 10:52 -0700
Re: More bot than human,talk.politics.guns Whistle Blower <wbedward@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 23:24 +0000
Re: More bot than human,talk.politics.guns Stumpee McGee <stumpeemcgee49@inoverter.net> - 2018-06-13 07:32 -0400
Re: More bot than human, Whistle Blower <wbedward@gmail.com> - 2018-06-13 21:14 +0000
How much do you think it's worth ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-11 15:19 -0700
Re: How much do you think it's worth ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 15:26 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 18:23 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-10 21:32 -0400
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 19:22 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-10 22:33 -0400
Re: Get your story straight, please. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 19:02 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 19:34 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-10 22:46 -0400
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 19:51 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 19:49 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 19:54 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-10 22:59 -0400
Re: Get your story straight, please. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-10 20:42 -0400
Re: Get your story straight, please. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-10 20:37 -0400
Re: Get your story straight, please. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 18:29 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-10 21:42 -0400
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 16:55 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-10 20:33 -0400
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 17:39 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-10 20:56 -0400
Re: Get your story straight, please. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 14:55 -0700
Re: Get your story straight, please. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-10 18:10 -0400
Re: Get your story straight, please. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 21:28 +0000
Re: Get your story straight, please. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 14:32 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 13:42 -0700
An example of how snit trolls. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 21:03 +0000
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 14:15 -0700
Re: An example of how snit trolls. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 21:26 +0000
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 14:43 -0700
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-10 17:48 -0400
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 14:47 -0700
Re: An example of how snit trolls. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 22:01 +0000
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 15:48 -0700
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 15:29 -0700
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 15:45 -0700
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 16:45 -0700
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 17:29 -0700
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 17:37 -0700
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2018-06-12 17:54 +0000
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-12 11:22 -0700
Re: An example of how snit trolls. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-12 13:22 -0500
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 15:59 -0700
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2018-06-12 23:02 +0000
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 16:10 -0700
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-12 16:46 -0700
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-12 16:45 -0700
Re: An example of how snit trolls. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-13 06:53 -0500
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-12 16:45 -0700
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 09:20 -0700
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 15:35 -0700
Re: An example of how snit trolls. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-10 16:52 -0500
Re: An example of how snit trolls. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 15:30 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 16:13 +0000
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 09:39 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-10 11:49 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 11:52 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-10 11:53 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 12:18 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-11 10:56 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 04:11 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 12:28 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Pabst Blue Ribbon <pabst@blue.ribbon> - 2018-06-17 11:02 +0000
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Stumpee McGee <stumpeemcgee49@inoverter.net> - 2018-06-17 08:05 -0400
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-11 06:23 +0000
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 23:33 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 05:02 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 09:00 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-11 11:09 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 11:25 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-11 11:36 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-11 10:57 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:38 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github oOze <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-02 22:28 -0400
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2018-06-02 22:55 -0400
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github oOze <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-06-03 09:38 -0400
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steven Petruzzellis <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 09:38 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Steven Petruzzellis <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 09:39 -0700
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2018-06-02 11:42 +0100
Re: Microsoft to purchase Github Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 03:52 -0700
what are all these Linux Developers going to do Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 05:55 -0700
Re: what are all these Linux Developers going to do owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-06-14 13:55 +0000
Re: what are all these Linux Developers going to do chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-14 09:17 -0500
how can Microsoft be the great evil if Linux is all over their site? Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 07:38 -0700
Re: what are all these Linux Developers going to do William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2018-06-14 15:54 +0100
Re: what are all these Linux Developers going to do Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-06-16 06:33 -0400
Re: what are all these Linux Developers going to do Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 09:08 -0700
Page 34 of 39 — ← Prev page 1 … 32 33 [34] 35 36 … 39 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-19 19:03 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: More bot than human. |
| Message-ID | <fotr08Fr6hnU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #455404 |
On 6/19/18 4:47 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Tuesday, June 19, 2018 at 4:39:04 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: >> On Tuesday, June 19, 2018 at 4:28:38 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>> On 6/19/18 3:03 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>> On Tuesday, June 19, 2018 at 3:13:50 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 6/19/18 10:56 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Hello, earth to Snit! Post the *input* section, like I've asked... you know, how >>>>>> you analyze what's coming in, not what's going out, like below. >>>>> >>>>> We have been talking about processing text once it is already in the >>>>> code... >>>> >>>> Stop the BS... analyzing the input is not the same as processing to prepare for >>>> output; you have to do the former before the latter. >>> >>> I have been very, very patient with you and continue to go FAR out of my >>> way to help you... >> >> Help me do what? I was helping you, asshole. >> >>> Anyway, to please YOU (there is NO other reason for me to post this) I >>> have uploaded the full bot code to github: >>> >>> <https://github.com/BrockMcNuggets/AIM-BOT> >> >> Github... good for you... and I love the Freudian slip: >> >> "The code is a mess -- and even I have difficulty understanding much of it now >> (we written for Mac OS 9 in the 1990s)." >> >> "we written"? The truth will out! >> >> You'll claim it should've been "was" but your hands betrayed you. >> Are you ever honest? Your hands are even when you're not ;) >> >>> Even found a local copy where the text is not mangled as it is >>> elsewhere... so that is a definite plus. >>> >>> Keep in mind this is me going out of my way to do as you wish >> >> Screw that, you're doing this to convince me. Period. >> >>> even as >>> you make up stories about this not being my code, demand I explain YOUR >>> code to you even as you fail to point to your code in the posts where >>> you make such demands, etc. >>> >>> I am giving you MANY chances to be a decent human being. I am being very >>> patient with you. Your response is to play victim. Can you let go of >>> that and focus on tech? Please? >> >> I am focusing on tech. >> >>>> LOL! You don't even know that AIM used hooks! >>> >>> Not even sure what you mean by hooks, but I know what I did was have a >>> script in the AIM script folder and had it run from there, being called >>> from AIM. >> >> LOL! You're killing' me here. Please explain how it's possible for you to have >> written a plugin that used their API without knowing *that* is what you were >> doing? You just *knew* to do it, eh? You didn't have to bother reading their >> documentation? This actually makes sense to you? >> >>> But, sure, you can insult me as we discuss tech. That is what you do. >> >> You're lying and you've been busted. Stop lying and it won't be a problem.. >> >>> Let us see how long it takes you to get back to talking about tech >> >> I have been talking about it. I asked for the input, you stopped talking >> about tech. It's now obvious why. >> >>>> I never messed with that >>>> crap but even I read about it. The way you describe it is to claim: >>>> >>>> "a script that AIM itself called". >>>> >>>> No, fool... you call the hook... if you wrote it, you'd know this. >>>> That right there is enough to prove you're full of crap to me. >>>> >>>> What about the user's response text, what your script would need >>>> to see in order to, you know, actually *do* anything? >>> >>> To do "anything" is rather vague. >> >> To get output which responds from input, obviously. It works on input, Snit. >> >>> But you now have access to the full >>> code on YOUR preferred site, with me going out of my way, even AS you >>> lie about me and spew insults. >>> >>>>>> Why can't you post these to a GIST? No matter, this is not what I'm asking for. >>>>> >>>>> Why the hell should I post my crappy code to some other place when it is >>>>> already posted? >>>> >>>> Because you can't copy AS script out of usenet and have it work, fool.. >>> >>> Does not even work on OS X as far as I know! >> >> Why not? >> >>> But, again, for you and >>> only you -- as a favor to you -- I have uploaded it to github. >>> >>> This is 100% for you, as a favor, even as you lie about me and attack. >> >> F*ck off. No one is buying this 'you did me a favor' crap. Between you and I, >> I did all the favors in this thread. >> >>>> So it's one keyword. >>> >>> Well, one keyword with modifications from other words it found... as >>> described below (and keep in mind this is from memory from a project I >>> worked on in the 1990s... so I am sure I have some details wrong): >>> >>>>> From there it responds to that key word (or set of words) >>>> >>>> With "set of words" meaning: a phrase in between quotes. >>>> Put another way: There's always *1* keyword. >>> >>> Again, see below: >>> >>>>> with the >>>>> "knowledge" of: >>>>> * mentionMe = true or false >>>>> * reaction (I think from -10 to 10 but would have to check) >>>>> * userName (the modified name of the person posting) >>>>> * someOne (a similarly modified name of another person in the queue) >>> >>> So one keyword *WITH* "considering" those factors, at least at times >>> (not all keywords considered all of those). There might have been some >>> other "considerations" but I do not recall and do not see them in a >>> quick scan of the 8000+ lines of code. >> >> Still just responding to keywords, not sentences. >> >> In any event, you should rewrite this thing in JS or some language >> where you can run it... you'd learn a ton. OK, another of your bot posts: > It was Sandman Script Troller who stated that he and his college buddies used to steal candy from toddlers all the time and it was an amusement of his, not even a moral dilemma for them at all. OK, you refer to Sandman... he has been brought up in this thread AND the concept of his using scripts for his trolling. Maybe you are replying to content from the group or even the thread here? Or is it random? I suspect you are working on adding some of the things discussed from my AIM bot (which is fine, I am completely aware that is why you want my old code, and why you are disappointed it is so crappy... harder to steal). > Not only did Michael Glasser Snit's question fail to touch on the "KDE", it has not a thing to do with the desktop. There has been no discussion of KDE, no less any other DE, or even Linux (or the desktop). I, of course, have been in the discussion... so maybe you are grabbing names now and then modifying them somewhat like I have described. > Sandman Script Troller should go lock the medicine chest ;) Hey, at least your bot does not just troll me this way... it is less obsessed than you are. :) > These posts are clearly not automated, they are made by Sandman Script Troller who is a glue sniffing insomniac with an axe to grind who has way too much time on his hands (with maybe some scripted pre-processing). At one point you said something similar to this (about the posts not being automated). In this case you are using some of the insults / name calling you generally focus on me but using them on, I assume, a random name (as I said, maybe one mentioned in the thread). If this is not random and you actually grabbed the name from the content and not the name of a poster that is pretty cool (though Sandman did post recently). > > Enough already. You're again trying to bolster yourself beyond your grade. You're the court jester and your many idiotic scripts show this. > > Sandman Script Troller claims to be the spreadsheet teacher. Let us see him put up a variant but lacking the normalization loops. Mostly random insults... but that sounds like COLA and captures your "tone" reasonably well. It is a bot, though, so of course it will sound a bit funky. > -- > E-commerce Simplified Not sure why you have this in your .sig, but I see your .sig delimiter is not done well. Maybe you are trying to look like a noob? > http://www.5z8.info/how-to-build-a-bomb_h2o1be_peepshow > Jonas Eklundh Communication AB You link to one of MY pages (not really cool, by the way) and then mention Sandman's name. Google seeding? What is the point of this? To throw people off your track and get someone else blamed? I do not think people are as stupid as you need them to be. :) -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-19 16:49 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: More bot than human. |
| Message-ID | <2d70a133-96f7-4f8e-83bb-2ee3fe09416b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #455403 |
On Tuesday, June 19, 2018 at 5:39:04 PM UTC-6, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Tuesday, June 19, 2018 at 4:28:38 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > On 6/19/18 3:03 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > On Tuesday, June 19, 2018 at 3:13:50 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > >> On 6/19/18 10:56 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > > > >>> Hello, earth to Snit! Post the *input* section, like I've asked... you know, how > > >>> you analyze what's coming in, not what's going out, like below. > > >> > > >> We have been talking about processing text once it is already in the > > >> code... > > > > > > Stop the BS... analyzing the input is not the same as processing to prepare for > > > output; you have to do the former before the latter. > > > > I have been very, very patient with you and continue to go FAR out of my > > way to help you... > > Help me do what? I was helping you, asshole. > > > Anyway, to please YOU (there is NO other reason for me to post this) I > > have uploaded the full bot code to github: > > > > <https://github.com/BrockMcNuggets/AIM-BOT> > > Github... good for you... and I love the Freudian slip: > > "The code is a mess -- and even I have difficulty understanding much of it now > (we written for Mac OS 9 in the 1990s)." > > "we written"? The truth will out! LOL! It's no good, Mr. Honesty, I covered that base before I even replied ;) <http://web.archive.org/web/20180619233332/https://github.com/BrockMcNuggets/AIM-BOT/> <https://imgur.com/a/9fkAoR2>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-19 16:50 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: More bot than human. |
| Message-ID | <fotj72Fpu7uU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #455406 |
On 6/19/18 4:49 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 19, 2018 at 5:39:04 PM UTC-6, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> On Tuesday, June 19, 2018 at 4:28:38 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
>>> On 6/19/18 3:03 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday, June 19, 2018 at 3:13:50 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
>>>>> On 6/19/18 10:56 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Hello, earth to Snit! Post the *input* section, like I've asked... you know, how
>>>>>> you analyze what's coming in, not what's going out, like below.
>>>>>
>>>>> We have been talking about processing text once it is already in the
>>>>> code...
>>>>
>>>> Stop the BS... analyzing the input is not the same as processing to prepare for
>>>> output; you have to do the former before the latter.
>>>
>>> I have been very, very patient with you and continue to go FAR out of my
>>> way to help you...
>>
>> Help me do what? I was helping you, asshole.
>>
>>> Anyway, to please YOU (there is NO other reason for me to post this) I
>>> have uploaded the full bot code to github:
>>>
>>> <https://github.com/BrockMcNuggets/AIM-BOT>
>>
>> Github... good for you... and I love the Freudian slip:
>>
>> "The code is a mess -- and even I have difficulty understanding much of it now
>> (we written for Mac OS 9 in the 1990s)."
>>
>> "we written"? The truth will out!
>
> LOL! It's no good, Mr. Honesty, I covered that base before I even replied ;)
>
> <http://web.archive.org/web/20180619233332/https://github.com/BrockMcNuggets/AIM-BOT/>
>
> <https://imgur.com/a/9fkAoR2>
Seems like you just want to troll, but I shall continue to get you back
onto the topics:
1) You have been demanding I explain YOUR code to you, even as you fail
to show your code in the posts where you make such demands. You want me
to go hunt for it, and even then you sometimes only provided video, and
with some of the code blurred out! I also have been very clear much of
your code does go over my head... I am a CRAPPY programmer (if I can be
called one at all!)
2) You have been demanding I explain my poorly written code from the
'90s to you and, you claim, if I fail to do so *to your satisfaction*,
this means you are fully justified to troll me by making up stories
about someone else writing the code. You pretty much are trying to
blackmail me into helping you understand my code (surely so you can
improve your Usenet flood bot). Then you claim you are helping me.
3) In comparing our bots I noted:
* Sandman's Usenet bot breaks content into sentences and replies
with seemingly random insults / accusations after some. It also
counts words and posts numbers for its own internal tracking.
* Your Usenet flood bot responds after the content of a post,
not seeming to look at the content in any way.
* My AIM bot replied to each posted "sentence", pulling keywords
to get reaction scores, mentions of the bot, topics, etc., and
uses these sentences to form replies.
You took comments about that out of context and claimed I was lying to
say my AIM bot did more than look at key words.
4) You begged me to upload my code to GitHub (even though I already
pointed to where it was uploaded elsewhere!). Even with you doing the
above I *still* did this favor for you:
<https://github.com/BrockMcNuggets/AIM-BOT>
5) While denying you had looked at my posted code, you insisted your
"universal" function could do all mine could -- though, as far as I can
tell, it looked only at topics and not the other things I have shown you
my bot did (which is not to say the code you showed does not have many
advantages over my code... it does!)
Now, do you have any actual comments about tech or are you just going to
continue to focus on insults, absurd accusations, twists, and your
standard victim mentality nonsense?
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-19 17:18 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: More bot than human. |
| Message-ID | <276ff039-32fb-4e37-bb5f-bead8f208610@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #455408 |
On Tuesday, June 19, 2018 at 5:51:01 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 6/19/18 4:49 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Tuesday, June 19, 2018 at 5:39:04 PM UTC-6, Steve Carroll wrote: > >> On Tuesday, June 19, 2018 at 4:28:38 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>> On 6/19/18 3:03 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>> On Tuesday, June 19, 2018 at 3:13:50 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>>> On 6/19/18 10:56 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>> Hello, earth to Snit! Post the *input* section, like I've asked... you know, how > >>>>>> you analyze what's coming in, not what's going out, like below. > >>>>> > >>>>> We have been talking about processing text once it is already in the > >>>>> code... > >>>> > >>>> Stop the BS... analyzing the input is not the same as processing to prepare for > >>>> output; you have to do the former before the latter. > >>> > >>> I have been very, very patient with you and continue to go FAR out of my > >>> way to help you... > >> > >> Help me do what? I was helping you, asshole. > >> > >>> Anyway, to please YOU (there is NO other reason for me to post this) I > >>> have uploaded the full bot code to github: > >>> > >>> <https://github.com/BrockMcNuggets/AIM-BOT> > >> > >> Github... good for you... and I love the Freudian slip: > >> > >> "The code is a mess -- and even I have difficulty understanding much of it now > >> (we written for Mac OS 9 in the 1990s)." > >> > >> "we written"? The truth will out! > > > > LOL! It's no good, Mr. Honesty, I covered that base before I even replied ;) > > > > <http://web.archive.org/web/20180619233332/https://github.com/BrockMcNuggets/AIM-BOT/> > > > > <https://imgur.com/a/9fkAoR2> > > Seems like you just want to troll, but I shall continue to get you back > onto the topics: Fine... it was about conversion so my recommendation is don't try to convert all that data. Just grab what's required to make it work on a base level first and start converting it. Have it respond off of 1 keyword to start and pick a topic or two so you have something to display. Once you get the minimum working, the rest of the flat data should just work. Make that your first big milestone.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-19 16:45 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: More bot than human. |
| Message-ID | <fotit8Fpt0vU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #455403 |
On 6/19/18 4:39 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 19, 2018 at 4:28:38 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
>> On 6/19/18 3:03 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, June 19, 2018 at 3:13:50 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
>>>> On 6/19/18 10:56 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Hello, earth to Snit! Post the *input* section, like I've asked... you know, how
>>>>> you analyze what's coming in, not what's going out, like below.
>>>>
>>>> We have been talking about processing text once it is already in the
>>>> code...
>>>
>>> Stop the BS... analyzing the input is not the same as processing to prepare for
>>> output; you have to do the former before the latter.
>>
>> I have been very, very patient with you and continue to go FAR out of my
>> way to help you...
>
> Help me do what? I was helping you, asshole.
>
>> Anyway, to please YOU (there is NO other reason for me to post this) I
>> have uploaded the full bot code to github:
>>
>> <https://github.com/BrockMcNuggets/AIM-BOT>
>
> Github... good for you... and I love the Freudian slip:
>
> "The code is a mess -- and even I have difficulty understanding much of it now
> (we written for Mac OS 9 in the 1990s)."
>
> "we written"? The truth will out!
>
> You'll claim it should've been "was" but your hands betrayed you.
> Are you ever honest? Your hands are even when you're not ;)
>
>> Even found a local copy where the text is not mangled as it is
>> elsewhere... so that is a definite plus.
>>
>> Keep in mind this is me going out of my way to do as you wish
>
> Screw that, you're doing this to convince me. Period.
>
>> even as
>> you make up stories about this not being my code, demand I explain YOUR
>> code to you even as you fail to point to your code in the posts where
>> you make such demands, etc.
>>
>> I am giving you MANY chances to be a decent human being. I am being very
>> patient with you. Your response is to play victim. Can you let go of
>> that and focus on tech? Please?
>
> I am focusing on tech.
>
>>> LOL! You don't even know that AIM used hooks!
>>
>> Not even sure what you mean by hooks, but I know what I did was have a
>> script in the AIM script folder and had it run from there, being called
>> from AIM.
>
> LOL! You're killing' me here. Please explain how it's possible for you to have
> written a plugin that used their API without knowing *that* is what you were
> doing? You just *knew* to do it, eh? You didn't have to bother reading their
> documentation? This actually makes sense to you?
>
>> But, sure, you can insult me as we discuss tech. That is what you do.
>
> You're lying and you've been busted. Stop lying and it won't be a problem.
>
>> Let us see how long it takes you to get back to talking about tech
>
> I have been talking about it. I asked for the input, you stopped talking
> about tech. It's now obvious why.
>
>>> I never messed with that
>>> crap but even I read about it. The way you describe it is to claim:
>>>
>>> "a script that AIM itself called".
>>>
>>> No, fool... you call the hook... if you wrote it, you'd know this.
>>> That right there is enough to prove you're full of crap to me.
>>>
>>> What about the user's response text, what your script would need
>>> to see in order to, you know, actually *do* anything?
>>
>> To do "anything" is rather vague.
>
> To get output which responds from input, obviously. It works on input, Snit.
>
>> But you now have access to the full
>> code on YOUR preferred site, with me going out of my way, even AS you
>> lie about me and spew insults.
>>
>>>>> Why can't you post these to a GIST? No matter, this is not what I'm asking for.
>>>>
>>>> Why the hell should I post my crappy code to some other place when it is
>>>> already posted?
>>>
>>> Because you can't copy AS script out of usenet and have it work, fool.
>>
>> Does not even work on OS X as far as I know!
>
> Why not?
>
>> But, again, for you and
>> only you -- as a favor to you -- I have uploaded it to github.
>>
>> This is 100% for you, as a favor, even as you lie about me and attack.
>
> F*ck off. No one is buying this 'you did me a favor' crap. Between you and I,
> I did all the favors in this thread.
>
>>> So it's one keyword.
>>
>> Well, one keyword with modifications from other words it found... as
>> described below (and keep in mind this is from memory from a project I
>> worked on in the 1990s... so I am sure I have some details wrong):
>>
>>>> From there it responds to that key word (or set of words)
>>>
>>> With "set of words" meaning: a phrase in between quotes.
>>> Put another way: There's always *1* keyword.
>>
>> Again, see below:
>>
>>>> with the
>>>> "knowledge" of:
>>>> * mentionMe = true or false
>>>> * reaction (I think from -10 to 10 but would have to check)
>>>> * userName (the modified name of the person posting)
>>>> * someOne (a similarly modified name of another person in the queue)
>>
>> So one keyword *WITH* "considering" those factors, at least at times
>> (not all keywords considered all of those). There might have been some
>> other "considerations" but I do not recall and do not see them in a
>> quick scan of the 8000+ lines of code.
>
> Still just responding to keywords, not sentences.
>
> In any event, you should rewrite this thing in JS or some language
> where you can run it... you'd learn a ton.
>
Without going line by line in your nonsense:
1) You have been demanding I explain YOUR code to you, even as you fail
to show your code in the posts where you make such demands. You want me
to go hunt for it, and even then you sometimes only provided video, and
with some of the code blurred out! I also have been very clear much of
your code does go over my head... I am a CRAPPY programmer (if I can be
called one at all!)
2) You have been demanding I explain my poorly written code from the
'90s to you and, you claim, if I fail to do so *to your satisfaction*,
this means you are fully justified to troll me by making up stories
about someone else writing the code. You pretty much are trying to
blackmail me into helping you understand my code (surely so you can
improve your Usenet flood bot). Then you claim you are helping me.
3) In comparing our bots I noted:
* Sandman's Usenet bot breaks content into sentences and replies
with seemingly random insults / accusations after some. It also
counts words and posts numbers for its own internal tracking.
* Your Usenet flood bot responds after the content of a post,
not seeming to look at the content in any way.
* My AIM bot replied to each posted "sentence", pulling keywords
to get reaction scores, mentions of the bot, topics, etc., and
uses these sentences to form replies.
You took comments about that out of context and claimed I was lying to
say my AIM bot did more than look at key words.
4) You begged me to upload my code to GitHub (even though I already
pointed to where it was uploaded elsewhere!). Even with you doing the
above I *still* did this favor for you:
<https://github.com/BrockMcNuggets/AIM-BOT>
5) While denying you had looked at my posted code, you insisted your
"universal" function could do all mine could -- though, as far as I can
tell, it looked only at topics and not the other things I have shown you
my bot did (which is not to say the code you showed does not have many
advantages over my code... it does!)
Now, do you have any actual comments about tech or are you just going to
continue to focus on insults, absurd accusations, twists, and your
standard victim mentality nonsense?
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-19 16:56 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: More bot than human. |
| Message-ID | <e4d196db-5da5-46fc-8b67-d9bc926a28d8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #455407 |
On Tuesday, June 19, 2018 at 5:45:47 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > 2) You have been demanding I explain my poorly written code If it's your code you'd know what it took to do the input, at the least. You would know that you were *not* responding to sentences. You'd also know if you were looking at just 1 keyword or combing it with another. Talking about these kinds of things has *nothing* to do with actually explaining how it was done programmatically.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-19 16:59 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: More bot than human. |
| Message-ID | <fotjn1Fq0qkU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #455409 |
On 6/19/18 4:56 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
...
You did your normal snip snip trolling, so posting to give you another
chance. As I said, I am happy to give you multiple chances to actually
stop playing victim and talk about tech.
1) You have been demanding I explain YOUR code to you, even as you fail
to show your code in the posts where you make such demands. You want me
to go hunt for it, and even then you sometimes only provided video, and
with some of the code blurred out! I also have been very clear much of
your code does go over my head... I am a CRAPPY programmer (if I can be
called one at all!)
2) You have been demanding I explain my poorly written code from the
'90s to you and, you claim, if I fail to do so *to your satisfaction*,
this means you are fully justified to troll me by making up stories
about someone else writing the code. You pretty much are trying to
blackmail me into helping you understand my code (surely so you can
improve your Usenet flood bot). Then you claim you are helping me.
3) In comparing our bots I noted:
* Sandman's Usenet bot breaks content into sentences and replies
with seemingly random insults / accusations after some. It also
counts words and posts numbers for its own internal tracking.
* Your Usenet flood bot responds after the content of a post,
not seeming to look at the content in any way.
* My AIM bot replied to each posted "sentence", pulling keywords
to get reaction scores, mentions of the bot, topics, etc., and
uses these sentences to form replies.
You took comments about that out of context and claimed I was lying to
say my AIM bot did more than look at key words.
4) You begged me to upload my code to GitHub (even though I already
pointed to where it was uploaded elsewhere!). Even with you doing the
above I *still* did this favor for you:
<https://github.com/BrockMcNuggets/AIM-BOT>
5) While denying you had looked at my posted code, you insisted your
"universal" function could do all mine could -- though, as far as I can
tell, it looked only at topics and not the other things I have shown you
my bot did (which is not to say the code you showed does not have many
advantages over my code... it does!)
6) Instead of talking about tech, you looked at my GitHub page, found a
typo in the Read Me, and then cried it was somehow dishonest of me to
fix that typo.
Now, do you have any actual comments about tech or are you just going to
continue to focus on insults, absurd accusations, twists, and your
standard victim mentality nonsense?
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-19 20:30 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: More bot than human. |
| Message-ID | <cfef7284-d2b1-4af4-a8de-bd3b63cee709@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #455409 |
On Tuesday, June 19, 2018 at 4:56:41 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Tuesday, June 19, 2018 at 5:45:47 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > > 2) You have been demanding I explain my poorly written code > > If it's your code you'd know what it took to do the input, at the least. > You would know that you were *not* responding to sentences. You'd > also know if you were looking at just 1 keyword or combing it with > another. Talking about these kinds of things has *nothing* to do with > actually explaining how it was done programmatically. Another successful Linux Mint test. That is if you count slow and buggy as a success. Until Jonas Eklundh Communication offers up his 'more streamlined' FOSS tool for evaluation, there is no threat, just wild claims. These degenerates get their jollies out of eliciting angry replies to their flooding, which is the very definition of a troll. No one here has ever read my code, much less found a bug; still, in my auxiliary brain, I'm thinking, "What if the program crashes", a secret I share with you only now. The herd members value the lowest common denominator instead of choice. The guy is as well liked as a tax collector -- and with good cause. I'm not going to play like Takuya Saitoh did not save my bacon with my choice of distro and I appreciate it. Jonas Eklundh Communication has my example to copy and might learn to appear like he knows something about it from now on... of course he screwed up when he first talked ;) Was that meant to be to Takuya Saitoh? - Get Rich Slow http://www.5z8.info/php-start_GPS_tracking-user_j3m3lg_whitepower http://www.5z8.info/backyard-fireworks-disasters_t7w7pu_bombbuilding http://www.5z8.info/nic_cage_naked_y8b5qk_torrentEverything Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-19 11:28 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: More bot than human. |
| Message-ID | <1b4b8e7b-d7ad-4aa1-b59f-a9ca410a1803@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #455363 |
On Tuesday, June 19, 2018 at 10:13:04 AM UTC-7, Snit wrote:
> On 6/19/18 9:56 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> ...
>
> >> You have not shown any understanding that if
> >> you want me to comment on code it would behoove you to actually post a
> >> link to it. I am NOT going to dig back through your non-stop blabbering
> >> at this point to try to find it. Just not gonna happen.
> >
> > I can't link to something you haven't posted
>
> It is not my responsibility to post your code.
>
> As far as mine, here it is:
>
> <http://prescottcomputerguy.com/turing/code>
>
> You claim your code does what that does, even as you claim to not look
> at it. You also insist I should try to explain what you claim is your
> code to you, even as you refuse to post any links to it.
>
> Do you see why your games are so absurd?
>
> > and I'm not going to dig
> > through your site to find one damn function.
>
> I spoke of osText. To find it just click here and do a text search for,
> you guessed it, "osText":
>
> <http://prescottcomputerguy.com/turing/code/TuringText.txt>
>
> Not at all hard. I can post it here but the wrap will be horrid:
> ------
> on osText(someText, useName, reaction)
> set goodList to {"Mac ", "Mac OS X", "OS X"}
> set badList to {"Windows", "Win XP", "Win 98", "Win 95", "Win ME"}
> set neutralList to {"Linux", "FreeBSD", "UNIX", "Mandrake", "Redhat",
> "slackware", "red hat", "dual boot", "*nix", "Mac 8.5", "Mac OS 9", "KDE"}
> set sillyList to {"Etch-A-Sketch", "Speak-N-Spell", "play station", "C
> 64", "Apple IIe", "Apple ][", "abacus", "slide rule"}
> set theList to (every item of goodList) & (every item of badList) &
> (every item of neutralList)
> set hateWords to {"sucks", "sux", "slow", "crap", "hate", "gay",
> "fuck", "shit", "cost too", "expensive", "blow"}
> set rating to 0
> repeat with loop from 1 to count of items in theList
> if someText contains item loop of theList then
> set yourword to item loop of theList
> set rating to 2
> if badList contains yourword then set rating to rating * -1
> if neutralList contains yourword then set rating to 0
> repeat with hateLoop from 1 to count of items in hateWords
> if someText contains item hateLoop of hateWords then
> set rating to rating * -1
> exit repeat
> end if
> end repeat
> if rating = 2 then -- Mac Rocks, Win Sucks
> if badList contains yourword then -- Win Sucks
> set tempText to some item in Â
> {useName & ", you are so right", Â
> yourword & " is not worth even discussing", Â
> "why would anyone use " & yourword, Â
> yourword & " is getting further behind all the time", Â
> yourword & " machines are a piece of crap", Â
> useName & ", I prefer Macs", Â
> "Why do people use " & yourword, Â
> yourword & " is an OS that never innovates", Â
> yourword & " is horrid"}
> else -- Mac Rocks
> set tempText to some item in Â
> {useName & ", you have great taste!", Â
> "I do like my Mac", Â
> "Mac is better for almost everything", Â
> "you can install more programs on a Mac", Â
> "why would anyone get a PC?", Â
> "Windows machines really are kinda sad", Â
> "I feel sorry for people who use Windows", Â
> "what would windows be like if MS did not have Apple to copy?", Â
> useName & ", how long have you been a Mac fan?", Â
> "MS is only about 5 years behind Apple - they are catching up", Â
> "I wonder if .NET will make Windows usable?", Â
> "why do people tolerate Windows when everyone knows it is so bad?", Â
> useName & ", you're one of the few in here with a clue", Â
> yourword & " is getting better all the time", Â
> yourword & " is a piece of art", Â
> yourword & " is the only OS that really innovates", Â
> yourword & " is awesome"}
> end if
> else if rating = -2 then -- Mac sucks, Win Rocks
> if badList contains yourword then -- Win Rocks
> set tempText to some item in Â
> {"you are so wrong", Â
> "people who use " & yourword & " do not know what they are doing", Â
> some item in neutralList & " crushes " & yourword, Â
> useName & ", you would be better served by " & some item in
> neutralList, Â
> some item in neutralList & " is much better " & yourword, Â
> "even " & some item in neutralList & " crushes " & yourword, Â
> "I would rather use a " & some item in sillyList & " than " &
> yourword, Â
> yourword & " is not as good as " & some item in neutralList & ",
> " & some item in neutralList & ", or even a " & some item in sillyList, Â
> yourword & " is blown away by " & some item in neutralList & " or
> even a " & some item in sillyList, Â
> yourword & " is getting further behind all the time", Â
> useName & ", " & yourword & " " & some item in {"sucks", "is
> outdated"}, Â
> yourword & " can't be tinkered with safely", Â
> useName & ", " & some item in goodList & " is much better than "
> & yourword, Â
> useName & ", " & yourword & " crashes way more than " & some item
> in goodList, Â
> useName & ", are there any user friendly " & some item in
> {"spreadsheet", "word processor", "1st person shooter", "image
> converter", "general utility", "database", "browser", "chat client",
> "MP3 player", "HTML editor", "DVD prog", "news client"} & " " & yourword
> & some item in {" progs", " apps"}, Â
> useName & ", what is a good " & some item in {"spreadsheet",
> "word processor", "1st person shooter", "image converter", "general
> utility", "database", "browser", "chat client", "MP3 player", "HTML
> editor", "DVD prog", "news client"} & " for " & yourword, Â
> "is there a good " & some item in {"spreadsheet", "word
> processor", "1st person shooter", "image converter", "general utility",
> "database", "browser", "chat client", "MP3 player", "HTML editor", "DVD
> prog", "news client"} & " for " & yourword & "?", Â
> useName & ", how many " & some item in {"mice", "screens",
> "ethernet cards", "modems", "PCI slots", "sound channels", "files"} & "
> can " & yourword & " handle?", Â
> yourword & " is on slow, overpriced machines", Â
> "The last time I used " & yourword & " it " & some item in {"ate
> my data", "went beep beep beep", "crashed every two seconds", "was way
> too slow"}, Â
> "no such thing as a good version of " & yourword, Â
> yourword & " is a piece of crap", Â
> useName & ": " & yourword & " sucks", Â
> "How long does a " & yourword & " machine last?", Â
> "How much does a " & yourword & " machine cost?", Â
> yourword & " is an OS that never innovates", Â
> yourword & " is horrid"}
> else -- Mac Sucks
> if someText contains "expensive" or someText contains "cost to" then
> set tempText to some item in Â
> {"while expensive, Macs are cheaper than PC's", Â
> "the only cheap PC's are ones put together as a hobby", Â
> "compare any Mac with a comparable Dell... Mac is always cheaper", Â
> "compare the price of a Mac with any major PC vender - Macs are
> inexpensive"}
> else
> set tempText to some item in Â
> {yourword & " is better than " & some item in badList, Â
> useName & ", have you even " & some item in {"touched",
> "smelled", "seen", "owned", "used"} & " a " & yourword, Â
> useName & ", what is wrong with Apple?", Â
> "why don't you like Macs?", Â
> "clearly you know nothing of Apple", Â
> "Apple makes the most advanced OS in the world", Â
> "Mac blows Windows away", Â
> yourword & " is not ruined by " & some item in {"DLL hell", "the
> registry", "stupid virus's and worms"}, Â
> useName & ", you say that out of jelousy", Â
> yourword & "s are a piece of art", Â
> yourword & " is the only OS that really innovates", Â
> yourword & " is awesome"}
> end if
> end if
> else if rating = 0 then -- Linux sucks, Linux Rocks
> if badList contains yourword then -- Linux Sucks
> set tempText to some item in Â
> {yourword & " is better than " & some item in badList, Â
> useName & ", I prefer " & some item in goodList & "?", Â
> yourword & " machines are OK", Â
> yourword & " can be decent", Â
> yourword & " is not half as bad as Windows"}
> else -- Linux Rocks
> set tempText to some item in Â
> {yourword & " is better than " & some item in badList, Â
> useName & ", what are the minimum requirements for " & yourword &
> " progs", Â
> "aren't " & some item in badList & " and " & yourword & "
> essentially the same?", Â
> useName & ", have you even used a Mac?", Â
> useName & ", how is " & yourword & " different from " & some item
> in goodList & "?", Â
> useName & ", how many " & some item in {"", "", "", "",
> "concurrent", "shared", "preemptive", "modern", "maxed"} & Â
> " " & some item in {"mice", "screens", "ethernet cards",
> "modems", "PCI slots", "sound channels", "files", "users", "lines of
> code", Â
> "data entry points", "applications", "web sites"} & " can " &
> yourword & " handle?", Â
> useName & ", how does the " & some item in {"kernel",
> "interface", "networking", "software", "user base", "speed",
> "flexibility"} & Â
> " of " & yourword & " compare to " & some item in goodList & "?", Â
> useName & ", there is less software for " & yourword & " than for
> " & some item in goodList, Â
> useName & ", does " & yourword & " multitask as well as " & some
> item in goodList & "?", Â
> useName & ", I prefer Apple", Â
> yourword & " machines are a not so bad", Â
> yourword & " can be decent", Â
> yourword & " is not as good as Mac, but not bad"}
> end if
> end if
> set genericText to some item in Â
> {useName & ", how do you hook up two computers with different OS's?", Â
> "who made " & yourword, Â
> "they will completely change computers in " & (random number from 5
> to 15) & " years", Â
> "How do they make computers work?", Â
> "Are computers still based on 1's and 0's?", Â
> "what is the best OS for a home user", Â
> "there are a lot of " & yourword & " " & some item in {"exploits",
> "bugs", "virus's", "programmers", "users", "servers"}, Â
> "are there are a lot of " & yourword & " " & some item in
> {"exploits", "bugs", "virus's", "programmers", "users", "servers"} & "?", Â
> "what is a good OS for a small office?", Â
> "how can you dual boot " & yourword & " systems", Â
> "anyone here use " & yourword, Â
> useName & ", all computers are essentially the same", Â
> useName & ", does your " & some item in {"hardware", "experience",
> "software", "file system"} & " effect your OS", Â
> useName & ", have you even used " & yourword, Â
> "who here programs?", Â
> "does anyone use multiple computers?", Â
> "does any OS really do anything the others do not?", Â
> "is it hard to " & some item in {"pirate", "play games", "watch
> movies", "hack", "clone people", "get software"} & " on " & yourword, Â
> "you talking about " & yourword & "?", Â
> "anyone in here good with " & yourword & "?", Â
> "is " & yourword & " going to be around for long?", Â
> "when did " & yourword & " come out?", Â
> "when was " & yourword & " invented?", Â
> "where was " & yourword & " invented?"}
> set someText to some item in {tempText, tempText, genericText}
> return {someText, rating}
> end if
> end repeat
> return {someText, rating}
> end osText
> -----
>
> A lot easier to see on that page. :)
>
> ...
> >> And with proving to you my code is mine... whatever.
> >
> > I asked, you freaked.
>
> A direct lie on your part. There is nothing to "ask" -- I have been very
> clear it is my code. You keep insisting it is not. You keep trolling. As
> I said, though, I cannot stop you from lying.
>
> > Whatever. If it *is* yours you'd have no trouble doing
> > what you did with the other stuff you've posted. Notably, you've *still* not
> > done so and you're *still* stalling, which won't convince anyone. Like I said,
> > you're probably waiting for the author to get back to you.
>
> See: this is you trolling. And keep in mind you are the one:
>
> * Asking me to explain code you are not giving a link to
> * Insisting your code does what code you claim you have not seen does
> * Demanding I explain "your" code
>
> So when you bring up the idea of code not being one of ours it does
> suggest "your" code is not from you.
>
> > Or maybe you
> > don't actually know who that is so you can't because you did what I said,
> > copied it, changed the names of things, etc. If it *is* yours you can talk
> > about it, you *can* and *would* post it when asked to. Instead, the reader
> > is treated to what are obviously red herrings to conceal the fact that it's not
> > yours. Trying to shift the focus to me doesn't help you. This is simple, put
> > up or shut up, those are the only convincing options. You're not talking
> > about the code anymore so you've 'shut up' in that regard, which means
> > even you know you can't 'put up'... so we get the ol' red herring show.
>
> See: more trolling on your part. You really cannot help yourself.
>
>
> --
> Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
> cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
> somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
>
> They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
>
> <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Hi, Snit!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org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=hcV2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
This broke the Internet
http://www.5z8.info/michaelangelo-virus_t6v2vq_molotovcocktail
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLU_evUKollmjeuJy5V5UMotPUs65Q7YM6
Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-19 08:49 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: More bot than human. |
| Message-ID | <fosn08Fklt1U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #455340 |
On 6/19/18 8:27 AM, Snit wrote: ... >>>> Ah, so much trolling by you. >>>> >>>> Your flood bot just plops text into Usenet posts... sometimes as a >>>> "response" and sometimes with new posts. As far as I can tell it >>>> does not even read content, though you have claimed otherwise >>>> (though you show no example). And you now claim to not believe my >>>> code is mine. OH NO! The horror! >>>> >>>> I am happy I gave you yet another chance, and I will gladly give you >>>> more. Your trash is your own, no matter how much you work to dump it >>>> onto me. As long as you stick to not contacting my employer and >>>> family and the like, as the police talked to you about, I will >>>> continue to consider giving you more chances. >>>> >>>> And I sincerely do appreciate your comments when you were not >>>> trolling. My thanks stands. >>>> >>>> Good day. >>> >>> Why didn't you answer that question? Seems to me, if you actually >>> knew, you'd >>> talk about it <shrug>. >> >> You troll me, lying non-stop, and then want me to AGAIN explain what I >> mean by an array of arrays, as you CLAIM to not even look at the code >> I share with you (but then claim your Usenet flood bot can do the same >> thing you say you have not looked at). >> >> Do you not see the absurdity of your request? > > Carroll responded playing victim. Poor, innocent Carroll... all he does > is lie his head off about how my work is not mine, spew insult after > insult, cry about how I do not go into more detail of what I have > discussed with him about an array of arrays, and note as he claims to > not look at code he cannot also say he knows his code will do the same. > > Poor guy... I am not playing his trolling games the way he likes. > > Anyway, I *still* am sincerely appreciative for him showing the code he > claims as his own (though now suggests it might not have been his... > either way I still appreciate it). > > And as long as he does not go back to his harassment me outside of COLA > I very well may give him another chance. Sadly it seems he is still very > bitter and in victim mode about the police talking to him about his > harassment. Carroll responded with more trolling, saying the person who wrote my AIM bot (me) has not contacted, um, me. What? Of course his insinuation is I did not write my own code, which is just just his efforts to put me on the defensive. As he has noted, when he trolls he works to shine the "light" on others and put them on the defensive. He is doing so here. And giving more reason to suspect the code he showed is not his. BUT, and I want to make this clear: his or not I still commend him and thank him for showing it. I still am happy he did so and still consider the conversation we had to be one of the best I have seen him have with ANYONE in a long time (though, to be fair, I have not seen the mass of his posts so maybe he has had others). He showed he CAN have a discussion without complete over trolling, and that is a good sign. Right now, though, Carroll is back to victim mode and is crying for attention... throwing a tantrum. So be it. I am enabling him by replying... that is MY action and I am responsible for that. Will Carroll ever take responsibility for his own actions? I suspect not. He will always blame someone else -- mostly me. At least he has stopped (as far as I know) harassing me outside of Usenet. The police talking to him about it (in a face-to-face conversation if he is to believed) has pushed him to improve his behavior to that extent. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-19 08:30 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: More bot than human. |
| Message-ID | <57e0e738-19f7-4eb0-938e-97e22deeda24@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #455333 |
On Tuesday, June 19, 2018 at 9:06:27 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 6/18/18 4:01 PM, Snit wrote: > > On 6/18/18 2:47 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >> On Monday, June 18, 2018 at 2:54:42 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>> On 6/18/18 1:38 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>> On Monday, June 18, 2018 at 1:30:41 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>>> On 6/18/18 12:02 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>>> On Monday, June 18, 2018 at 11:48:34 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> I do not fully understand your code. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> And, patient as I was with you, you really never bothered to try. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> You do not fully understand my code and even deny looking at it. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You haven't proven it even *is* your code. After talking to you a > >>>>>> little more > >>>>>> in depth, I think what's more likely is, you wrote the content and > >>>>>> someone > >>>>>> else wrote the code and explained it to you so you could add content. > >>>>> > >>>>> Ah, more of your nonsense... it is ripping you apart that my AIM > >>>>> bot is > >>>>> far, far better than your Usenet flooder (in output, not coding). > >>>> > >>>> I'm dead serious, when you pasted up animetext I thought it was > >>>> possible > >>>> that you wrote it; after talking with you I'm less convinced. > >>> > >>> But really what has been shown here are our natures: I am an honest > >>> person > >> > >> LOL! > >> > >>> and did not even consider you might be using someone else's code. > >> > >> To match words and iterate over data structures? Cabinet's wide open > >> again, isn't it? ;) > >> > >>> You, on the other hand, assume my code -- > >> > >> Correction: It is *allegedly* your code. I no longer believe it is > >> and I won't unless I'm convinced otherwise. > >> > >>> that I wrote and have provided > >>> open source to the world -- is not from me > >> > >> Right... like it'd be impossible for you to do that 'cuz, you know, no > >> one > >> has ever attempted it before <eyeroll>. If anyone that I know would ever > >> do that, it'd be you. > >> > >>>>>>> Then you claim your code can do what mine does even as you admit > >>>>>>> you do not > >>>>>>> know what it does (which is absurd) and then you talk about ways > >>>>>>> to get > >>>>>>> extra text into the code which would likely harm the output > >>>>>> > >>>>>> LOL! It would have *way* more to choose from and, like you, I > >>>>>> could still > >>>>>> cull what I didn't like. > >>>>> > >>>>> Are you still claiming to not have looked at the code? > >>>> > >>>> I've only looked at the code you posted to usenet. You know what > >>>> cinched it for me? > >>> > >>> So you are still making claims about code you have not looked at AT ALL. > >>> Or, really, CLAIM to not have looked at. Quite funny. > >> > >> Again: Why would I need to? And why would I deny looking when you've > >> repeatedly suggested I do? This makes sense to you? > >> > >>> And we are not talking about looking at the results and saying you can > >>> infer poor coding or whatever... you are just making things up. > >> > >> I'm not even referring to the quality of those pieces of code, I'm just > >> saying this facilitates custom functions, which should have been clear > >> to you last Wednesday. > >> > >>>> As an exercise, with no coding, try to explain the steps you'd need > >>>> to take to do what I've shown dynamically. Only then can you even > >>>> *begin* to understand the issues involved. I've already given most > >>>> of them to you, all you have to do is explain how they work together > >>>> (or write it out in pseudo code). > >>>> > >>>> And stop pretending that whomever's AIM bot this is it responds > >>>> to sentences when it's targeting keywords... no one buys that bunk. > >>> > >>> See: you assume dishonesty as a reflection on yourself > >> > >> Please, Mr 'Honesty', you tried to suggest that's what you're doing: > >> > >> "Your flood bot does not even respond to sentences... at least Sandman's > >> crappy bot does that." > >> > >> You claimed 'yours' is better than Sandman's, which means you're also > >> claiming that 'yours' responds to sentences, but that's not really what's > >> happening, it's just responding to keywords in sentences. > >> > >>> What's wrong, Snit? Why do you not know what 'your' code does? ;) > >>> > >> Ah, so much trolling by you. > >> > >> Your flood bot just plops text into Usenet posts... sometimes as a "response" and sometimes with new posts. As far as I can tell it does not even read content, though you have claimed otherwise (though you show no example). And you now claim to not believe my code is mine. OH NO! The horror! > >> > >> I am happy I gave you yet another chance, and I will gladly give you more. Your trash is your own, no matter how much you work to dump it onto me. As long as you stick to not contacting my employer and family and the like, as the police talked to you about, I will continue to consider giving you more chances. > >> > >> And I sincerely do appreciate your comments when you were not trolling. My thanks stands. > >> > >> Good day. > > > > Why didn't you answer that question? Seems to me, if you actually knew, you'd > > talk about it <shrug>. > > You troll me, lying non-stop, and then want me to AGAIN explain what I > mean by an array of arrays Regarding that... here's how bad it got with you, and you're not even aware of it, you're completely oblivious to what follows: You talked about using an array/subarray structure... I disagreed with you up to the point where I realized you were doing so *outside* of the structure I had mistakenly assumed you understood; if you recall, I said it wasn't needed, but I was referring to it within the structure you failed to understand. So... it then appeared I backtracked, but I *didn't*, I was merely readjusting the converstion to account for the fact that you totally f*cking clueless about the structure, so I then told you to go with it, an adjustment I was forced to make to prevent the conversation from becoming even *more* convoluted. IOW, you were *so* clueless and you were already heavily confused as you puffed out your chest about 'an array of arrays', that I had to treat you like a child to avoid more BS. (cue up whining and BS)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-17 10:46 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: More bot than human. |
| Message-ID | <305d0de4-e0ba-42dd-990d-08addcd17298@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #455218 |
On Sunday, June 17, 2018 at 3:56:10 AM UTC-6, vallor wrote: > On Sat, 16 Jun 2018 22:57:19 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > I don't suggest a numerically based array/subarray > > structure. To me, having the data live in one like I suggested makes > > more sense as, strictly speaking (and you'll find inaccurate info > > contrary to this), JS doesn't have associated arrays. > > Close enough, though: > > https://www.quirksmode.org/js/associative.html That's why I qualified it with "strictly". I wasn't sure he even knew about this or numerical indexing (seems I was right) so I was just clarifying the terms for him.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-17 10:52 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: More bot than human. |
| Message-ID | <fonlemFlt22U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #455229 |
On 6/17/18 10:46 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Sunday, June 17, 2018 at 3:56:10 AM UTC-6, vallor wrote: >> On Sat, 16 Jun 2018 22:57:19 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: >> >>> I don't suggest a numerically based array/subarray >>> structure. To me, having the data live in one like I suggested makes >>> more sense as, strictly speaking (and you'll find inaccurate info >>> contrary to this), JS doesn't have associated arrays. >> >> Close enough, though: >> >> https://www.quirksmode.org/js/associative.html > > That's why I qualified it with "strictly". I wasn't sure he even knew > about this or numerical indexing (seems I was right) so I was just > clarifying the terms for him. > I am looking more for concepts than specifics in programming. But seems, surprisingly perhaps, we have come to basic agreement. Sincerely happy to have had this discussion with you. Thanks. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Whistle Blower <wbedward@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-12 23:24 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: More bot than human,talk.politics.guns |
| Message-ID | <pfpko0$bh9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #454956 |
On Tue, 12 Jun 2018 12:34:03 -0700, Snit wrote:
> On 6/12/18 11:43 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> On Tuesday, June 12, 2018 at 12:21:06 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Just for that one function it would take some time to do a full
>>> conversion...
>>
>> I just read your post here about 5 minutes ago; since then, I added
>> pretty much the rest of what you'd need relative to these pages and I
>> made a screencast of it working (a good editor is the key). How many
>> functions are there? Or rather, how many pages like this with data,
>> which is all I'm using of yours?
>>
>> function animetext (someText) {
>>
>> const rnd = array => array[Math.floor(Math.random() *
>> array.length)];
>> // the data
>> const theList = ["gasaraki", "evangelion", "monoke", "akira",
>> "bubblegum crisis", "card captor sakura", "chobits", "cowboy
>> bebop", "dragon half", "dragon ball", "dragon ball gt",
>> "escaflowne", "gundam", "gunsmithcats", "hacksign", " lain ",
>> "ninja resurrection", "ninja scroll", "outlaw star", "perfect
>> blue", "robotech", "sailor moon", "techi muyo", "tenchi in tokyo",
>> "tenchi in space", "vampire hunter d", "Bubble Gum Crisis"];
>>
>> const goodTextList = ["I like the amount of *swap1* yourword has,
>> but I prefer the *swap2* in myword","I like yourword, ", " ANIME!,
>> ", " I don't think that there is anything better than yourword, ",
>> " I love yourword, ", " I can't imagine the amount of work
>> yourword must have taken"]
>>
>> const neutralTextList = ["yourword has quality animation, but
>> myword has better drawn figures, ", " myword has better still
>> imagery in their animation, yourword has better animation., ", "
>> the animator's put in large amounts of time in yourword's work.,
>> ", " yourword is not as mature as myword, ", " I don't really like
>> anime, but I have my few favorites, ", " I don't watch as much
>> anime as I used to but I still like myword, ", " subtitled is
>> better than dubbed anime, because dubbing takes it away from it's
>> purest form."]
>>
>> const badTextList = ["I hate yourword, ", " ANIME SUCKS!, ", "I
>> don't think that there is anything worse than yourword, ", " anime
>> is OK for little kids, ", " yourword is all the rage in the
>> prepubescent crowd, ", " I can't stand yourword, ", " I can't
>> imagine the amount of wasted time yourword has taken"];
>>
>> const swap1 = ["action", "violence", "plot twists", "intrigue"];
>>
>> const swap2 = ["dialog", "art", "music", "subtlety"];
>>
>> // process the data
>> const myWord = rnd(theList);
>> const filteredList = theList.filter(item => item !== myWord);
>> const yourWord = rnd(filteredList);
>> const gTRnd = rnd(goodTextList);
>> const nTRnd = rnd(neutralTextList);
>> const bTRnd = rnd(badTextList);
>> const goodText = gTRnd.replace('yourword',
>> yourWord).replace('myword',myWord).replace('*swap1*',
>> rnd(swap1)).replace('*swap2*',rnd(swap2));
>> const neutralText = nTRnd.replace('yourword',
>> yourWord).replace('myword', myWord).replace('*swap1*',
>> rnd(swap1)).replace('*swap2*',rnd(swap2));
>> const badText = bTRnd.replace('yourword',
>> yourWord).replace('myword', myWord).replace('*swap1*',
>> rnd(swap1)).replace('*swap2*',rnd(swap2));
>> console.log('%c goodText:','color: red',goodText);
>> console.log('%c neutralText:','color: red',neutralText);
>> console.log('%c badText:','color: red',badText);
>> }
>> animetext("gasaraki");
>>
>> This deals with the massaged stuff, uses the same idea:
>> <https://streamable.com/2rxtr>
>
> Cool... thanks. Really does much the same though I do like the swapping
> of "yourword" and "myword" as a separate function. That does make a lot
> of sense. Other than that it seems to use pretty much the same
> structure... which would make it easier to convert if I ever decide to.
>
>>> and I have a lot of functions. :)
>>
>> That sit there... never to be used again ;)
>
> They have not been used in years... who knows, maybe some day I will.
> Right now my hobbies have taken me to different places (crafting items
> for my home RPG and other similar things).
You certainly seem to have a copious amount of free time snit. You are
able to sit on usenet all day and night. You have time to fool around
with programming scripts. You have time for hobbies like crafting.
You obviously sit in front of your computer just waiting for a new post
that you can reply to because you somehow manage to reply to some posts
within a minute, give or take a few seconds.
So that means you are sitting there waiting or you are actually using
more than one nym to post. Or maybe both.
Has it ever occurred to you that you might want to find a job instead of
living your life as a parasite living off the backs of the taxpayers of
Yavapai County?
I suppose it hasn't.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stumpee McGee <stumpeemcgee49@inoverter.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-13 07:32 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: More bot than human,talk.politics.guns |
| Message-ID | <h7gqdxjt3dwk$.1wvgbzmnvxq4u.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #454968 |
On Tue, 12 Jun 2018 23:24:49 -0000 (UTC), Whistle Blower wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2018 12:34:03 -0700, Snit wrote:
>
>> On 6/12/18 11:43 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, June 12, 2018 at 12:21:06 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Just for that one function it would take some time to do a full
>>>> conversion...
>>>
>>> I just read your post here about 5 minutes ago; since then, I added
>>> pretty much the rest of what you'd need relative to these pages and I
>>> made a screencast of it working (a good editor is the key). How many
>>> functions are there? Or rather, how many pages like this with data,
>>> which is all I'm using of yours?
>>>
>>> function animetext (someText) {
>>>
>>> const rnd = array => array[Math.floor(Math.random() *
>>> array.length)];
>>> // the data
>>> const theList = ["gasaraki", "evangelion", "monoke", "akira",
>>> "bubblegum crisis", "card captor sakura", "chobits", "cowboy
>>> bebop", "dragon half", "dragon ball", "dragon ball gt",
>>> "escaflowne", "gundam", "gunsmithcats", "hacksign", " lain ",
>>> "ninja resurrection", "ninja scroll", "outlaw star", "perfect
>>> blue", "robotech", "sailor moon", "techi muyo", "tenchi in tokyo",
>>> "tenchi in space", "vampire hunter d", "Bubble Gum Crisis"];
>>>
>>> const goodTextList = ["I like the amount of *swap1* yourword has,
>>> but I prefer the *swap2* in myword","I like yourword, ", " ANIME!,
>>> ", " I don't think that there is anything better than yourword, ",
>>> " I love yourword, ", " I can't imagine the amount of work
>>> yourword must have taken"]
>>>
>>> const neutralTextList = ["yourword has quality animation, but
>>> myword has better drawn figures, ", " myword has better still
>>> imagery in their animation, yourword has better animation., ", "
>>> the animator's put in large amounts of time in yourword's work.,
>>> ", " yourword is not as mature as myword, ", " I don't really like
>>> anime, but I have my few favorites, ", " I don't watch as much
>>> anime as I used to but I still like myword, ", " subtitled is
>>> better than dubbed anime, because dubbing takes it away from it's
>>> purest form."]
>>>
>>> const badTextList = ["I hate yourword, ", " ANIME SUCKS!, ", "I
>>> don't think that there is anything worse than yourword, ", " anime
>>> is OK for little kids, ", " yourword is all the rage in the
>>> prepubescent crowd, ", " I can't stand yourword, ", " I can't
>>> imagine the amount of wasted time yourword has taken"];
>>>
>>> const swap1 = ["action", "violence", "plot twists", "intrigue"];
>>>
>>> const swap2 = ["dialog", "art", "music", "subtlety"];
>>>
>>> // process the data
>>> const myWord = rnd(theList);
>>> const filteredList = theList.filter(item => item !== myWord);
>>> const yourWord = rnd(filteredList);
>>> const gTRnd = rnd(goodTextList);
>>> const nTRnd = rnd(neutralTextList);
>>> const bTRnd = rnd(badTextList);
>>> const goodText = gTRnd.replace('yourword',
>>> yourWord).replace('myword',myWord).replace('*swap1*',
>>> rnd(swap1)).replace('*swap2*',rnd(swap2));
>>> const neutralText = nTRnd.replace('yourword',
>>> yourWord).replace('myword', myWord).replace('*swap1*',
>>> rnd(swap1)).replace('*swap2*',rnd(swap2));
>>> const badText = bTRnd.replace('yourword',
>>> yourWord).replace('myword', myWord).replace('*swap1*',
>>> rnd(swap1)).replace('*swap2*',rnd(swap2));
>>> console.log('%c goodText:','color: red',goodText);
>>> console.log('%c neutralText:','color: red',neutralText);
>>> console.log('%c badText:','color: red',badText);
>>> }
>>> animetext("gasaraki");
>>>
>>> This deals with the massaged stuff, uses the same idea:
>>> <https://streamable.com/2rxtr>
>>
>> Cool... thanks. Really does much the same though I do like the swapping
>> of "yourword" and "myword" as a separate function. That does make a lot
>> of sense. Other than that it seems to use pretty much the same
>> structure... which would make it easier to convert if I ever decide to.
>>
>>>> and I have a lot of functions. :)
>>>
>>> That sit there... never to be used again ;)
>>
>> They have not been used in years... who knows, maybe some day I will.
>> Right now my hobbies have taken me to different places (crafting items
>> for my home RPG and other similar things).
>
> You certainly seem to have a copious amount of free time snit. You are
> able to sit on usenet all day and night. You have time to fool around
> with programming scripts. You have time for hobbies like crafting.
>
> You obviously sit in front of your computer just waiting for a new post
> that you can reply to because you somehow manage to reply to some posts
> within a minute, give or take a few seconds.
> So that means you are sitting there waiting or you are actually using
> more than one nym to post. Or maybe both.
>
> Has it ever occurred to you that you might want to find a job instead of
> living your life as a parasite living off the backs of the taxpayers of
> Yavapai County?
>
> I suppose it hasn't.
Why not just leave snit alone? It's obvious he has some type of mental
affliction and will never change his behavior unless by some miracle modern
medicine discovers a pill to cure whatever it is he suffers from. You've
been chasing him around for years and despite what you might believe have
not been able to change him so why not move on and start living your own
life instead of his? You are as obsessed with snit as he is with himself.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Whistle Blower <wbedward@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-13 21:14 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: More bot than human, |
| Message-ID | <pfs1f6$afg$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #454980 |
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 07:32:03 -0400, Stumpee McGee wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2018 23:24:49 -0000 (UTC), Whistle Blower wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 12 Jun 2018 12:34:03 -0700, Snit wrote:
>>
>>> On 6/12/18 11:43 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday, June 12, 2018 at 12:21:06 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Just for that one function it would take some time to do a full
>>>>> conversion...
>>>>
>>>> I just read your post here about 5 minutes ago; since then, I added
>>>> pretty much the rest of what you'd need relative to these pages and I
>>>> made a screencast of it working (a good editor is the key). How many
>>>> functions are there? Or rather, how many pages like this with data,
>>>> which is all I'm using of yours?
>>>>
>>>> function animetext (someText) {
>>>>
>>>> const rnd = array => array[Math.floor(Math.random() *
>>>> array.length)];
>>>> // the data
>>>> const theList = ["gasaraki", "evangelion", "monoke", "akira",
>>>> "bubblegum crisis", "card captor sakura", "chobits", "cowboy
>>>> bebop", "dragon half", "dragon ball", "dragon ball gt",
>>>> "escaflowne", "gundam", "gunsmithcats", "hacksign", " lain ",
>>>> "ninja resurrection", "ninja scroll", "outlaw star", "perfect
>>>> blue", "robotech", "sailor moon", "techi muyo", "tenchi in
>>>> tokyo",
>>>> "tenchi in space", "vampire hunter d", "Bubble Gum Crisis"];
>>>>
>>>> const goodTextList = ["I like the amount of *swap1* yourword
>>>> has, but I prefer the *swap2* in myword","I like yourword, ", "
>>>> ANIME!,
>>>> ", " I don't think that there is anything better than yourword,
>>>> ",
>>>> " I love yourword, ", " I can't imagine the amount of work
>>>> yourword must have taken"]
>>>>
>>>> const neutralTextList = ["yourword has quality animation, but
>>>> myword has better drawn figures, ", " myword has better still
>>>> imagery in their animation, yourword has better animation., ", "
>>>> the animator's put in large amounts of time in yourword's work.,
>>>> ", " yourword is not as mature as myword, ", " I don't really
>>>> like anime, but I have my few favorites, ", " I don't watch as
>>>> much anime as I used to but I still like myword, ", " subtitled
>>>> is better than dubbed anime, because dubbing takes it away from
>>>> it's purest form."]
>>>>
>>>> const badTextList = ["I hate yourword, ", " ANIME SUCKS!, ", "I
>>>> don't think that there is anything worse than yourword, ", "
>>>> anime is OK for little kids, ", " yourword is all the rage in
>>>> the prepubescent crowd, ", " I can't stand yourword, ", " I
>>>> can't imagine the amount of wasted time yourword has taken"];
>>>>
>>>> const swap1 = ["action", "violence", "plot twists", "intrigue"];
>>>>
>>>> const swap2 = ["dialog", "art", "music", "subtlety"];
>>>>
>>>> // process the data
>>>> const myWord = rnd(theList);
>>>> const filteredList = theList.filter(item => item !== myWord);
>>>> const yourWord = rnd(filteredList);
>>>> const gTRnd = rnd(goodTextList);
>>>> const nTRnd = rnd(neutralTextList);
>>>> const bTRnd = rnd(badTextList);
>>>> const goodText = gTRnd.replace('yourword',
>>>> yourWord).replace('myword',myWord).replace('*swap1*',
>>>> rnd(swap1)).replace('*swap2*',rnd(swap2));
>>>> const neutralText = nTRnd.replace('yourword',
>>>> yourWord).replace('myword', myWord).replace('*swap1*',
>>>> rnd(swap1)).replace('*swap2*',rnd(swap2));
>>>> const badText = bTRnd.replace('yourword',
>>>> yourWord).replace('myword', myWord).replace('*swap1*',
>>>> rnd(swap1)).replace('*swap2*',rnd(swap2));
>>>> console.log('%c goodText:','color: red',goodText);
>>>> console.log('%c neutralText:','color: red',neutralText);
>>>> console.log('%c badText:','color: red',badText);
>>>> }
>>>> animetext("gasaraki");
>>>>
>>>> This deals with the massaged stuff, uses the same idea:
>>>> <https://streamable.com/2rxtr>
>>>
>>> Cool... thanks. Really does much the same though I do like the
>>> swapping of "yourword" and "myword" as a separate function. That does
>>> make a lot of sense. Other than that it seems to use pretty much the
>>> same structure... which would make it easier to convert if I ever
>>> decide to.
>>>
>>>>> and I have a lot of functions. :)
>>>>
>>>> That sit there... never to be used again ;)
>>>
>>> They have not been used in years... who knows, maybe some day I will.
>>> Right now my hobbies have taken me to different places (crafting items
>>> for my home RPG and other similar things).
>>
>> You certainly seem to have a copious amount of free time snit. You are
>> able to sit on usenet all day and night. You have time to fool around
>> with programming scripts. You have time for hobbies like crafting.
>>
>> You obviously sit in front of your computer just waiting for a new post
>> that you can reply to because you somehow manage to reply to some posts
>> within a minute, give or take a few seconds.
>> So that means you are sitting there waiting or you are actually using
>> more than one nym to post. Or maybe both.
>>
>> Has it ever occurred to you that you might want to find a job instead
>> of living your life as a parasite living off the backs of the taxpayers
>> of Yavapai County?
>>
>> I suppose it hasn't.
>
> Why not just leave snit alone? It's obvious he has some type of mental
> affliction and will never change his behavior unless by some miracle
> modern medicine discovers a pill to cure whatever it is he suffers from.
> You've been chasing him around for years and despite what you might
> believe have not been able to change him so why not move on and start
> living your own life instead of his? You are as obsessed with snit as he
> is with himself.
Why are you called you Stumpy?
Is it because you're so small?
Do you know what snit is called?
Faggot.
No further explanation needed. But just in case the slow learners missed
it.
https://goo.gl/images/eZR8AL
Here is one of snit's home made videos
He sounds like a faggot to me.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NvrpuBAMddw
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-11 15:19 -0700 |
| Subject | How much do you think it's worth ? |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jun.11--3.19pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #454880 |
You (Steve) cloned The SnitBot ( streamable.com/xz93n ) ! How much do you think it's worth ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-11 15:26 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: How much do you think it's worth ? |
| Message-ID | <7039c4e7-aea9-4f38-a2ab-5b2f98d99b0f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #454888 |
On Monday, June 11, 2018 at 4:19:17 PM UTC-6, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > You (Steve) cloned The SnitBot ( streamable.com/xz93n ) ! > > How much do you think it's worth ? At least a cup o' Joe!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-10 18:23 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Get your story straight, please. |
| Message-ID | <fo617pFbhcaU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #454773 |
On 6/10/18 6:03 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Sunday, June 10, 2018 at 6:39:20 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 6/10/18 5:32 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Sunday, June 10, 2018 at 6:27:27 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>> On 6/10/18 5:22 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>> ... >>>>>> Snit is using a method called "transference" where he is projecting his own >>>>>> inadequacies and emotional feelings on to other people. >>>>> >>>>> He does it with virtually everyone he comes into contact with >>>>> on usenet, it's only a matter of time. The only 'people' who >>>>> he hasn't done it with are those who have no usenet history >>>>> and they rush right into some thread where he's getting his >>>>> ass handed to him and they give him 'support'. Weird how >>>>> that has happened over and over. >>>> >>>> Amazing how you and your "convenient friend" agree so much! >>> >>> Who *doesn't* agree where your bizarre behavior is concerned? >>> >>> <http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html> >>> >>>>>> It's another common characteristic of a person with BPD. >>>>>> >>>>>> So here is the real question, did you admit to snit that the police paid >>>>>> you a visit and asked you to cease and desist regarding snit? >>>>> >>>>> Of course not. You've seen him 'read', haven't you? >>>> >>>> You did. >>> >>> So point to me 'doing' it. >>> >>> Then you denied. >>> >>> Did the words disappear from the usenet archive? So go get 'em >>> already... but you can't. We both know this. >>> >> >> At this point you are merely working to change the topic to put me on >> the defensive > > The topic is you making unsubstantiated claims for which I am asking you > to support. When someone asks you to support one of your claims that's > 'putting you on the defensive'? You have *that* much of an issue with > adhering to reality? Seriously? > >> , which is stupid, and even worse you are not even speaking >> of any comment of mine. > > Of course I am. Why are now you trying to pretend you haven't made the > statements you've been making about 'the police'? Here are just a few > from this thread... but you've done it all over the newsgroup (and in > other newsgroups): > > "The police talked to you about YOUR harassment." - Snit > > "Ah, another attempt to turn the tables and talk about me... even as you > make up stories about the police talking to you about your harassment." - Snit > > "As the police told you, however, you are not entitled to harass others." - Snit > > "And the police told you that your doing so crossed a line. Thanks, by the > way, for noting they came and talked to you personally." - Snit > > "Never, as the police told you, talk to my friends or family, my co-workers > or clients, my neighbors or ANYONE else in my life outside of Usenet, and > even in Usenet NEVER talk to me nor read my posts again." - Snit > > Are you so overmedicated you don't recall posting those? > You added the fact that the police came to you PERSONALLY and not just on the phone, and before you denied it you admitted to it. It is not like it is in question that those statements of mine are true. Now, care to talk about tech? Why not talk about how your bot picks posts to respond to. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-10 21:32 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Get your story straight, please. |
| Message-ID | <l5ql6694xwil.od6brduwrd4q.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #454777 |
On Sun, 10 Jun 2018 18:23:05 -0700, Snit wrote: > On 6/10/18 6:03 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >> On Sunday, June 10, 2018 at 6:39:20 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>> On 6/10/18 5:32 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>> On Sunday, June 10, 2018 at 6:27:27 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 6/10/18 5:22 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>> ... >>>>>>> Snit is using a method called "transference" where he is projecting his own >>>>>>> inadequacies and emotional feelings on to other people. >>>>>> >>>>>> He does it with virtually everyone he comes into contact with >>>>>> on usenet, it's only a matter of time. The only 'people' who >>>>>> he hasn't done it with are those who have no usenet history >>>>>> and they rush right into some thread where he's getting his >>>>>> ass handed to him and they give him 'support'. Weird how >>>>>> that has happened over and over. >>>>> >>>>> Amazing how you and your "convenient friend" agree so much! >>>> >>>> Who *doesn't* agree where your bizarre behavior is concerned? >>>> >>>> <http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html> >>>> >>>>>>> It's another common characteristic of a person with BPD. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So here is the real question, did you admit to snit that the police paid >>>>>>> you a visit and asked you to cease and desist regarding snit? >>>>>> >>>>>> Of course not. You've seen him 'read', haven't you? >>>>> >>>>> You did. >>>> >>>> So point to me 'doing' it. >>>> >>>> Then you denied. >>>> >>>> Did the words disappear from the usenet archive? So go get 'em >>>> already... but you can't. We both know this. >>>> >>> >>> At this point you are merely working to change the topic to put me on >>> the defensive >> >> The topic is you making unsubstantiated claims for which I am asking you >> to support. When someone asks you to support one of your claims that's >> 'putting you on the defensive'? You have *that* much of an issue with >> adhering to reality? Seriously? >> >>> , which is stupid, and even worse you are not even speaking >>> of any comment of mine. >> >> Of course I am. Why are now you trying to pretend you haven't made the >> statements you've been making about 'the police'? Here are just a few >> from this thread... but you've done it all over the newsgroup (and in >> other newsgroups): >> >> "The police talked to you about YOUR harassment." - Snit >> >> "Ah, another attempt to turn the tables and talk about me... even as you >> make up stories about the police talking to you about your harassment." - Snit >> >> "As the police told you, however, you are not entitled to harass others." - Snit >> >> "And the police told you that your doing so crossed a line. Thanks, by the >> way, for noting they came and talked to you personally." - Snit >> >> "Never, as the police told you, talk to my friends or family, my co-workers >> or clients, my neighbors or ANYONE else in my life outside of Usenet, and >> even in Usenet NEVER talk to me nor read my posts again." - Snit >> >> Are you so overmedicated you don't recall posting those? >> > You added the fact that the police came to you PERSONALLY and not just > on the phone, and before you denied it you admitted to it. > > It is not like it is in question that those statements of mine are true. > > Now, care to talk about tech? Why not talk about how your bot picks > posts to respond to. Where are you reading this snit? Are you so drugged up that you can't comprehend simple sentences? It sure seems that way. Again, msgids where Steve makes these claims. Put up or shut up.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 34 of 39 — ← Prev page 1 … 32 33 [34] 35 36 … 39 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web