Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #452860 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-31 05:22 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-06-04 23:17 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 703 — 30 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Slaughtering concert goers. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-31 05:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Snit's family hates him" <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-31 05:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 12:06 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 10:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 15:49 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-31 20:12 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 17:20 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit took things out of COLA and called the cops <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-31 13:19 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 16:37 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 19:57 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 17:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 21:38 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 21:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 02:42 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:22 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 17:36 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:07 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:47 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:15 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 09:18 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 08:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 09:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 22:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 23:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 00:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 01:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 11:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 11:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 14:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:58 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-05-31 19:49 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-05-31 17:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 21:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 02:39 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 03:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:13 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 03:21 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 05:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 08:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 08:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 11:59 -0700
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Slaughtering concert goers. ❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 14:07 -0500
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 18:50 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:00 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:29 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 23:47 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 00:18 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 09:14 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 11:48 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 14:28 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 20:14 -0400
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 00:18 +0000
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 00:18 +0000
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 21:20 -0400
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 19:03 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:26 +0000
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 19:45 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:54 +0000
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-02 08:15 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit says unsupported claims are lies <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 12:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 12:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit says unsupported claims are lies <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 12:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 17:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 17:37 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 18:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 18:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:11 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:34 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:48 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 04:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 04:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:12 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 22:41 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 00:47 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:31 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 23:41 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:39 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 18:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:14 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 20:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:19 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 21:26 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 19:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:15 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:36 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:32 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 21:48 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:34 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit wants to repeal the 2A <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 10:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:32 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:26 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 18:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-01 08:08 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 21:35 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 19:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:53 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 21:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:51 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 22:35 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 21:10 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 01:39 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 22:04 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 19:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:30 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 22:01 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 19:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:28 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:27 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:38 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:53 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 20:28 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:37 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Snit's dysautonomia http://bit.ly/2Jqpplk" <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 20:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:19 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:18 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-02 04:54 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-02 05:06 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:54 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 22:33 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 03:41 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:11 -0700
The Supreme Court got it wrong. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-02 06:51 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 07:47 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 08:23 -0700
The Second Amendment doesn't address recreational guns. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-02 08:45 -0700
Re: The Second Amendment doesn't address recreational guns. Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 09:05 -0700
Re: The Second Amendment doesn't address recreational guns. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 09:17 -0700
Re: The Second Amendment doesn't address recreational guns. Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 09:36 -0700
Re: The Second Amendment doesn't address recreational guns. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:42 -0700
Re: The Second Amendment doesn't address recreational guns. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 11:08 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 08:50 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:59 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:43 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:25 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 13:28 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 19:45 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:08 -0600
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 22:32 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-03 23:24 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 01:12 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:15 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:31 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:37 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 10:48 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 11:00 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 13:27 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 13:32 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 16:58 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 21:38 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:49 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 03:49 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:45 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Snit's dysautonomia http://bit.ly/2Jqpplk" <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 22:17 -0700
Permission to breath ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-02 19:10 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:13 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:07 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 20:10 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:53 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? "Snit's dysautonomia http://bit.ly/2Jqpplk" <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 21:30 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 23:33 -0400
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:42 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-03 07:57 -0400
Re: Permission to breath ? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 06:31 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:08 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? "Snit's dysautonomia http://bit.ly/2Jqpplk" <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 20:58 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:07 -0700
Clarity. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-03 08:52 -0700
Re: Clarity. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 09:54 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Snit's dysautonomia http://bit.ly/2Jqpplk" <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 13:33 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 03:46 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:53 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 22:59 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 23:19 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-03 09:10 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 00:31 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:31 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:12 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:26 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:37 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:10 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:54 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 22:19 -0500
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 20:58 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-07 00:24 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 05:43 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 10:15 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 10:59 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-08 07:17 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 00:21 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-09 16:07 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 09:30 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-10 01:32 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 18:34 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:50 -0700
"Natural Rights" aren't always wonderful. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-09 19:02 -0700
Re: "Natural Rights" aren't always wonderful. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 19:14 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 19:17 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:49 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 10:06 -0700
Depressed Losers, slaughtering consert goers, is "natural" ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-09 12:21 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 03:52 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 02:18 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 01:41 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:25 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 07:45 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:38 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:43 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:16 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 09:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 10:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:53 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700
Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-02 06:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 10:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 13:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 13:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 16:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 18:25 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 19:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 21:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-03 07:59 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 04:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 11:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 12:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 12:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 12:44 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 13:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 13:17 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 13:21 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 16:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 16:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 17:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 18:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 18:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 19:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 03:44 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 08:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-04 17:37 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 15:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 04:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 16:41 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 16:48 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 17:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 17:17 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:21 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 18:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 18:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 03:45 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 08:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 12:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:04 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 12:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 00:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 01:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:31 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:04 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:21 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 20:37 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:30 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 17:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:02 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:02 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 17:59 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 15:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:24 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 16:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:44 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:42 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-04 17:27 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 15:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-04 23:47 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:51 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:11 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 07:19 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 08:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 09:37 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:51 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 13:18 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 14:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 16:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 16:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 17:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 22:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-06 04:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 18:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 18:48 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 07:48 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 15:27 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 16:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-06 17:58 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 19:41 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 08:55 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 15:32 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 16:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 15:34 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-06 19:03 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 17:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 17:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 20:45 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:15 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:41 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:24 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:17 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:08 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:23 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:01 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:32 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-08 05:15 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 06:41 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:49 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 07:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 21:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 21:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 21:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 22:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:07 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:31 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 21:45 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit ignores the 9th amendment <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 19:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 21:25 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 02:37 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 21:51 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-01 08:00 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 06:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 06:58 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 21:28 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 19:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:27 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 21:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:44 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:19 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 22:32 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:23 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 20:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 22:09 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 21:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 22:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 13:44 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:19 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 23:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 13:57 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 00:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-04 02:48 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 00:58 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 22:19 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 20:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:26 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:45 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 14:00 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 22:45 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:39 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:11 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 23:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 07:48 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 05:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 06:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 15:20 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 14:55 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 20:34 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-05 22:57 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-07 15:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 16:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-07 20:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 06:41 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-08 08:29 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 08:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 22:25 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:16 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 05:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-08 08:30 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 00:34 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 14:07 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 13:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 17:07 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 16:18 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 16:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 17:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 20:58 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:15 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 22:13 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 20:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:41 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:11 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-05 02:29 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 03:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 07:50 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 07:41 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-05 10:38 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 10:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 12:55 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 11:23 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 07:58 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 08:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 11:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-06-05 14:58 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 12:17 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 13:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 14:45 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 14:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 14:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:47 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:04 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:49 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:45 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 17:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 22:42 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:46 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:45 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:36 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 22:55 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 21:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 21:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 22:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 22:44 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-09 02:13 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 23:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 06:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 07:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 15:16 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 08:28 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 15:50 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 09:23 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 09:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 10:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 10:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 10:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 20:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 21:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-10 14:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 14:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 14:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 15:25 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 17:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 17:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 12:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-06-09 13:42 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 14:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 14:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-06-09 16:24 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 15:34 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-06-09 17:31 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-09 23:47 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-10 00:21 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 21:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 04:59 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 22:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 05:52 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-06-10 06:07 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 00:59 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 08:36 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 08:28 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 16:04 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 09:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 09:37 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 09:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 11:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 11:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-10 05:26 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 05:52 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 23:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 08:36 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 11:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 12:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 12:34 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 15:23 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 15:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 11:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 11:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-06-10 01:39 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 08:36 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 01:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-06-10 15:46 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 15:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 17:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:36 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 18:59 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 15:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:37 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:36 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-09 12:22 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 09:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 10:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 10:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-09 13:22 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-09 13:31 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 10:35 -0700
Truth Avoidance. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-09 12:11 -0700
Re: Truth Avoidance. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 14:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-09 12:20 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 09:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-09 21:12 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 14:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-09 18:41 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 15:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:36 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 16:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 16:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 17:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 17:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 23:55 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 08:36 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 11:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 00:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 12:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 16:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 16:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 16:59 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 17:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 18:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-06 04:17 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-06 19:03 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-07 05:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-07 22:05 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:05 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:49 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:45 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 17:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:23 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 17:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-07 15:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 16:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:18 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 08:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 11:55 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 23:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:07 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 17:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 17:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 17:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 17:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 22:45 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-06 04:18 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-06 09:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 16:59 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:17 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 18:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 22:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 20:36 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 09:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 06:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 13:29 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 11:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit wants to repeal the 2A <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 11:23 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 17:20 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit says unsupported claims are lies <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 14:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 14:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 23:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 11:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 11:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 14:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 20:37 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 17:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 18:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 19:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Snit's dysautonomia http://bit.ly/2Jqpplk" <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:41 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:12 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 22:32 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 15:59 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 15:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:24 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:14 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 20:28 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 20:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:58 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:17 -0500
Page 31 of 36 — ← Prev page 1 … 29 30 [31] 32 33 … 36 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-09 09:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fo2dn0Fl6msU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #454548 |
On 6/9/18 9:20 AM, benj wrote: > On 6/9/2018 9:22 AM, max headroom wrote: >> In news:fo19ubFehauU1@mid.individual.net, >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >> >>> On 6/8/18 11:13 PM, Scout wrote: >>>> "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in message >>>> news:pffpgb$5bm$3@dont-email.me... >>>>> In news:fo15klFcgkoU3@mid.individual.net, >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>> On 6/8/18 10:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> All of it... because you can't. >> >>>>>>>> Pick your favorite part. Or where you think you make the best >>>>>>>> point. It gets tiring rehashing the same long list of things. >> >>>>>>> My favorite part was when Scout blew your "new interpretation in >>>>>>> 2008" lie out of the water! >> >>>>>> The Heller case is pretty easy to reference, and is the first time >>>>>> the new interpretation was offered by the SCOTUS.... >> >>>>> Yeah, that's the one! >> >>>> Have you noticed how the responses have little to actually do with >>>> what is actually being replied to other than referencing a few >>>> specific keywords. >> >>>> But have fun with that programmed merry-go-round. >> >>>> I smacked down it's lies for the lurkers, if any, and moved on. >> >>> At this point there is no real discussion. I was asked to back the >>> following points. I did. There was no real counter ... >> >> That you would acknowledge, much less try to refute. >> >> You are correct, though, that there is no discussion. You have posted >> your claims, supported by >> various opinion cites, and that is that. Rinse and repeat. >> >> Does that really work in sci.physics or comp.os.linux.advocacy? >> >> > No, but it happily disrupts all on-topic discussions. I repeatedly push things back onto topic. If you do not like it that is on you. * The meaning / usage of "bear arms" (pretty much exclusively for "war, soldiering or organized, armed action"). * Their were laws restricting firearms at the start of the country which were never, as far as I can find, challenged on second amendment grounds. This makes it a hard sale to say they were against the second amendment. * Most (though not all) relevant scholars have supported the states rights view. * We should not allow the NRA, a group that benefits from mass shootings and terrorism, to largely control our gun laws. * We clearly do have, have had, and should have, limits on arms... what one could call "infringements". * We should do more research on gun deaths and injuries, as we do with vehicles, pools, food, and pretty much everything else that is tied to death and injuries. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-09 21:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fo2u63FnimtU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #454541 |
On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 06:22:56 -0700, max headroom wrote: > In news:fo19ubFehauU1@mid.individual.net, > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > >> On 6/8/18 11:13 PM, Scout wrote: >>> "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in message >>> news:pffpgb$5bm$3@dont-email.me... >>>> In news:fo15klFcgkoU3@mid.individual.net, Snit >>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>> On 6/8/18 10:02 PM, max headroom wrote: > >>>>>>>> All of it... because you can't. > >>>>>>> Pick your favorite part. Or where you think you make the best >>>>>>> point. It gets tiring rehashing the same long list of things. > >>>>>> My favorite part was when Scout blew your "new interpretation in >>>>>> 2008" lie out of the water! > >>>>> The Heller case is pretty easy to reference, and is the first time >>>>> the new interpretation was offered by the SCOTUS.... > >>>> Yeah, that's the one! > >>> Have you noticed how the responses have little to actually do with >>> what is actually being replied to other than referencing a few >>> specific keywords. > >>> But have fun with that programmed merry-go-round. > >>> I smacked down it's lies for the lurkers, if any, and moved on. > >> At this point there is no real discussion. I was asked to back the >> following points. I did. There was no real counter ... > > That you would acknowledge, much less try to refute. > > You are correct, though, that there is no discussion. You have posted > your claims, supported by various opinion cites, and that is that. Rinse > and repeat. > > Does that really work in sci.physics or comp.os.linux.advocacy? I don't think anybody takes "Snit" seriously at this point. And yes, you've got him reduced to ad nauseum fallacies, so you've definitely prevailed in the discussion. -- -v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-09 14:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fo2v9uFognlU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #454573 |
On 6/9/18 2:12 PM, vallor wrote: > On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 06:22:56 -0700, max headroom wrote: > >> In news:fo19ubFehauU1@mid.individual.net, >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >> >>> On 6/8/18 11:13 PM, Scout wrote: >>>> "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in message >>>> news:pffpgb$5bm$3@dont-email.me... >>>>> In news:fo15klFcgkoU3@mid.individual.net, Snit >>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>> On 6/8/18 10:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> All of it... because you can't. >> >>>>>>>> Pick your favorite part. Or where you think you make the best >>>>>>>> point. It gets tiring rehashing the same long list of things. >> >>>>>>> My favorite part was when Scout blew your "new interpretation in >>>>>>> 2008" lie out of the water! >> >>>>>> The Heller case is pretty easy to reference, and is the first time >>>>>> the new interpretation was offered by the SCOTUS.... >> >>>>> Yeah, that's the one! >> >>>> Have you noticed how the responses have little to actually do with >>>> what is actually being replied to other than referencing a few >>>> specific keywords. >> >>>> But have fun with that programmed merry-go-round. >> >>>> I smacked down it's lies for the lurkers, if any, and moved on. >> >>> At this point there is no real discussion. I was asked to back the >>> following points. I did. There was no real counter ... >> >> That you would acknowledge, much less try to refute. >> >> You are correct, though, that there is no discussion. You have posted >> your claims, supported by various opinion cites, and that is that. Rinse >> and repeat. >> >> Does that really work in sci.physics or comp.os.linux.advocacy? > > I don't think anybody takes "Snit" seriously at this point. > > And yes, you've got him reduced to ad nauseum fallacies, so you've > definitely prevailed in the discussion. You say that a lot but offer no support. Oh. I get it. Irony! Good one! -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-09 18:41 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <37skgxpqlch4$.1jkdj6l5yooy6$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #454573 |
On 9 Jun 2018 21:12:35 GMT, vallor wrote: > On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 06:22:56 -0700, max headroom wrote: > >> In news:fo19ubFehauU1@mid.individual.net, >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >> >>> On 6/8/18 11:13 PM, Scout wrote: >>>> "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in message >>>> news:pffpgb$5bm$3@dont-email.me... >>>>> In news:fo15klFcgkoU3@mid.individual.net, Snit >>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>> On 6/8/18 10:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> All of it... because you can't. >> >>>>>>>> Pick your favorite part. Or where you think you make the best >>>>>>>> point. It gets tiring rehashing the same long list of things. >> >>>>>>> My favorite part was when Scout blew your "new interpretation in >>>>>>> 2008" lie out of the water! >> >>>>>> The Heller case is pretty easy to reference, and is the first time >>>>>> the new interpretation was offered by the SCOTUS.... >> >>>>> Yeah, that's the one! >> >>>> Have you noticed how the responses have little to actually do with >>>> what is actually being replied to other than referencing a few >>>> specific keywords. >> >>>> But have fun with that programmed merry-go-round. >> >>>> I smacked down it's lies for the lurkers, if any, and moved on. >> >>> At this point there is no real discussion. I was asked to back the >>> following points. I did. There was no real counter ... >> >> That you would acknowledge, much less try to refute. >> >> You are correct, though, that there is no discussion. You have posted >> your claims, supported by various opinion cites, and that is that. Rinse >> and repeat. >> >> Does that really work in sci.physics or comp.os.linux.advocacy? > > I don't think anybody takes "Snit" seriously at this point. > > And yes, you've got him reduced to ad nauseum fallacies, so you've > definitely prevailed in the discussion. At this point Michael Glasser aka snit has become a laughing stock.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-09 15:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bbeasl.vc8.19.21@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #454591 |
On 2018-06-09 3:41 PM, Horace wrote: > On 9 Jun 2018 21:12:35 GMT, vallor wrote: > >> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 06:22:56 -0700, max headroom wrote: >> >>> In news:fo19ubFehauU1@mid.individual.net, >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>> >>>> On 6/8/18 11:13 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>> "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:pffpgb$5bm$3@dont-email.me... >>>>>> In news:fo15klFcgkoU3@mid.individual.net, Snit >>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>> On 6/8/18 10:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>> All of it... because you can't. >>> >>>>>>>>> Pick your favorite part. Or where you think you make the best >>>>>>>>> point. It gets tiring rehashing the same long list of things. >>> >>>>>>>> My favorite part was when Scout blew your "new interpretation in >>>>>>>> 2008" lie out of the water! >>> >>>>>>> The Heller case is pretty easy to reference, and is the first time >>>>>>> the new interpretation was offered by the SCOTUS.... >>> >>>>>> Yeah, that's the one! >>> >>>>> Have you noticed how the responses have little to actually do with >>>>> what is actually being replied to other than referencing a few >>>>> specific keywords. >>> >>>>> But have fun with that programmed merry-go-round. >>> >>>>> I smacked down it's lies for the lurkers, if any, and moved on. >>> >>>> At this point there is no real discussion. I was asked to back the >>>> following points. I did. There was no real counter ... >>> >>> That you would acknowledge, much less try to refute. >>> >>> You are correct, though, that there is no discussion. You have posted >>> your claims, supported by various opinion cites, and that is that. Rinse >>> and repeat. >>> >>> Does that really work in sci.physics or comp.os.linux.advocacy? >> >> I don't think anybody takes "Snit" seriously at this point. >> >> And yes, you've got him reduced to ad nauseum fallacies, so you've >> definitely prevailed in the discussion. > > At this point Michael Glasser aka snit has become a laughing stock. > well isn't that cool i just found out i'm that too
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-09 16:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fo36k7Fpoq2U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #454592 |
On 6/9/18 3:46 PM, % wrote: > On 2018-06-09 3:41 PM, Horace wrote: >> On 9 Jun 2018 21:12:35 GMT, vallor wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 06:22:56 -0700, max headroom wrote: >>> >>>> In news:fo19ubFehauU1@mid.individual.net, >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>> >>>>> On 6/8/18 11:13 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>> "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:pffpgb$5bm$3@dont-email.me... >>>>>>> In news:fo15klFcgkoU3@mid.individual.net, Snit >>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 10:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> All of it... because you can't. >>>> >>>>>>>>>> Pick your favorite part. Or where you think you make the best >>>>>>>>>> point. It gets tiring rehashing the same long list of things. >>>> >>>>>>>>> My favorite part was when Scout blew your "new interpretation in >>>>>>>>> 2008" lie out of the water! >>>> >>>>>>>> The Heller case is pretty easy to reference, and is the first time >>>>>>>> the new interpretation was offered by the SCOTUS.... >>>> >>>>>>> Yeah, that's the one! >>>> >>>>>> Have you noticed how the responses have little to actually do with >>>>>> what is actually being replied to other than referencing a few >>>>>> specific keywords. >>>> >>>>>> But have fun with that programmed merry-go-round. >>>> >>>>>> I smacked down it's lies for the lurkers, if any, and moved on. >>>> >>>>> At this point there is no real discussion. I was asked to back the >>>>> following points. I did. There was no real counter ... >>>> >>>> That you would acknowledge, much less try to refute. >>>> >>>> You are correct, though, that there is no discussion. You have posted >>>> your claims, supported by various opinion cites, and that is that. >>>> Rinse >>>> and repeat. >>>> >>>> Does that really work in sci.physics or comp.os.linux.advocacy? >>> >>> I don't think anybody takes "Snit" seriously at this point. >>> >>> And yes, you've got him reduced to ad nauseum fallacies, so you've >>> definitely prevailed in the discussion. >> >> At this point Michael Glasser aka snit has become a laughing stock. >> > well isn't that cool i just found out i'm that too LOL! -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-09 16:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bbee60.vc8.19.52@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #454602 |
On 2018-06-09 4:36 PM, Snit wrote: > On 6/9/18 3:46 PM, % wrote: >> On 2018-06-09 3:41 PM, Horace wrote: >>> On 9 Jun 2018 21:12:35 GMT, vallor wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 06:22:56 -0700, max headroom wrote: >>>> >>>>> In news:fo19ubFehauU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>> >>>>>> On 6/8/18 11:13 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>> "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:pffpgb$5bm$3@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>> In news:fo15klFcgkoU3@mid.individual.net, Snit >>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 10:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> All of it... because you can't. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Pick your favorite part. Or where you think you make the best >>>>>>>>>>> point. It gets tiring rehashing the same long list of things. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> My favorite part was when Scout blew your "new interpretation in >>>>>>>>>> 2008" lie out of the water! >>>>> >>>>>>>>> The Heller case is pretty easy to reference, and is the first time >>>>>>>>> the new interpretation was offered by the SCOTUS.... >>>>> >>>>>>>> Yeah, that's the one! >>>>> >>>>>>> Have you noticed how the responses have little to actually do with >>>>>>> what is actually being replied to other than referencing a few >>>>>>> specific keywords. >>>>> >>>>>>> But have fun with that programmed merry-go-round. >>>>> >>>>>>> I smacked down it's lies for the lurkers, if any, and moved on. >>>>> >>>>>> At this point there is no real discussion. I was asked to back the >>>>>> following points. I did. There was no real counter ... >>>>> >>>>> That you would acknowledge, much less try to refute. >>>>> >>>>> You are correct, though, that there is no discussion. You have posted >>>>> your claims, supported by various opinion cites, and that is that. >>>>> Rinse >>>>> and repeat. >>>>> >>>>> Does that really work in sci.physics or comp.os.linux.advocacy? >>>> >>>> I don't think anybody takes "Snit" seriously at this point. >>>> >>>> And yes, you've got him reduced to ad nauseum fallacies, so you've >>>> definitely prevailed in the discussion. >>> >>> At this point Michael Glasser aka snit has become a laughing stock. >>> >> well isn't that cool i just found out i'm that too > > LOL! > we could start an elusive club
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-09 16:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fo371sFpoq2U8@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #454609 |
On 6/9/18 4:42 PM, % wrote: > On 2018-06-09 4:36 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 6/9/18 3:46 PM, % wrote: >>> On 2018-06-09 3:41 PM, Horace wrote: >>>> On 9 Jun 2018 21:12:35 GMT, vallor wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 06:22:56 -0700, max headroom wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In news:fo19ubFehauU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6/8/18 11:13 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>> "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:pffpgb$5bm$3@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>> In news:fo15klFcgkoU3@mid.individual.net, Snit >>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 10:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> All of it... because you can't. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Pick your favorite part. Or where you think you make the best >>>>>>>>>>>> point. It gets tiring rehashing the same long list of things. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> My favorite part was when Scout blew your "new interpretation in >>>>>>>>>>> 2008" lie out of the water! >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The Heller case is pretty easy to reference, and is the first >>>>>>>>>> time >>>>>>>>>> the new interpretation was offered by the SCOTUS.... >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yeah, that's the one! >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Have you noticed how the responses have little to actually do with >>>>>>>> what is actually being replied to other than referencing a few >>>>>>>> specific keywords. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> But have fun with that programmed merry-go-round. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> I smacked down it's lies for the lurkers, if any, and moved on. >>>>>> >>>>>>> At this point there is no real discussion. I was asked to back the >>>>>>> following points. I did. There was no real counter ... >>>>>> >>>>>> That you would acknowledge, much less try to refute. >>>>>> >>>>>> You are correct, though, that there is no discussion. You have posted >>>>>> your claims, supported by various opinion cites, and that is that. >>>>>> Rinse >>>>>> and repeat. >>>>>> >>>>>> Does that really work in sci.physics or comp.os.linux.advocacy? >>>>> >>>>> I don't think anybody takes "Snit" seriously at this point. >>>>> >>>>> And yes, you've got him reduced to ad nauseum fallacies, so you've >>>>> definitely prevailed in the discussion. >>>> >>>> At this point Michael Glasser aka snit has become a laughing stock. >>>> >>> well isn't that cool i just found out i'm that too >> >> LOL! >> > we could start an elusive club I am already in the chicken stock club. It is a soup-er group! -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-09 16:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bbeelq.ebs.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #454610 |
On 2018-06-09 4:43 PM, Snit wrote: > On 6/9/18 4:42 PM, % wrote: >> On 2018-06-09 4:36 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 6/9/18 3:46 PM, % wrote: >>>> On 2018-06-09 3:41 PM, Horace wrote: >>>>> On 9 Jun 2018 21:12:35 GMT, vallor wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 06:22:56 -0700, max headroom wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> In news:fo19ubFehauU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 11:13 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>> "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:pffpgb$5bm$3@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>> In news:fo15klFcgkoU3@mid.individual.net, Snit >>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 10:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> All of it... because you can't. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Pick your favorite part. Or where you think you make the best >>>>>>>>>>>>> point. It gets tiring rehashing the same long list of things. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> My favorite part was when Scout blew your "new >>>>>>>>>>>> interpretation in >>>>>>>>>>>> 2008" lie out of the water! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The Heller case is pretty easy to reference, and is the first >>>>>>>>>>> time >>>>>>>>>>> the new interpretation was offered by the SCOTUS.... >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Yeah, that's the one! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Have you noticed how the responses have little to actually do with >>>>>>>>> what is actually being replied to other than referencing a few >>>>>>>>> specific keywords. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But have fun with that programmed merry-go-round. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I smacked down it's lies for the lurkers, if any, and moved on. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> At this point there is no real discussion. I was asked to back the >>>>>>>> following points. I did. There was no real counter ... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That you would acknowledge, much less try to refute. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You are correct, though, that there is no discussion. You have >>>>>>> posted >>>>>>> your claims, supported by various opinion cites, and that is >>>>>>> that. Rinse >>>>>>> and repeat. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Does that really work in sci.physics or comp.os.linux.advocacy? >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't think anybody takes "Snit" seriously at this point. >>>>>> >>>>>> And yes, you've got him reduced to ad nauseum fallacies, so you've >>>>>> definitely prevailed in the discussion. >>>>> >>>>> At this point Michael Glasser aka snit has become a laughing stock. >>>>> >>>> well isn't that cool i just found out i'm that too >>> >>> LOL! >>> >> we could start an elusive club > > I am already in the chicken stock club. It is a soup-er group! > > i'm a member of the the compulsive rhymers club , okey-dokey.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-09 17:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fo38g1Fq1qfU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #454612 |
On 6/9/18 4:50 PM, % wrote: > On 2018-06-09 4:43 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 6/9/18 4:42 PM, % wrote: >>> On 2018-06-09 4:36 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 6/9/18 3:46 PM, % wrote: >>>>> On 2018-06-09 3:41 PM, Horace wrote: >>>>>> On 9 Jun 2018 21:12:35 GMT, vallor wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 06:22:56 -0700, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In news:fo19ubFehauU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 11:13 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>> "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:pffpgb$5bm$3@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>> In news:fo15klFcgkoU3@mid.individual.net, Snit >>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 10:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All of it... because you can't. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pick your favorite part. Or where you think you make the best >>>>>>>>>>>>>> point. It gets tiring rehashing the same long list of things. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> My favorite part was when Scout blew your "new >>>>>>>>>>>>> interpretation in >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2008" lie out of the water! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The Heller case is pretty easy to reference, and is the >>>>>>>>>>>> first time >>>>>>>>>>>> the new interpretation was offered by the SCOTUS.... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, that's the one! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Have you noticed how the responses have little to actually do >>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>> what is actually being replied to other than referencing a few >>>>>>>>>> specific keywords. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> But have fun with that programmed merry-go-round. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I smacked down it's lies for the lurkers, if any, and moved on. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> At this point there is no real discussion. I was asked to back the >>>>>>>>> following points. I did. There was no real counter ... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That you would acknowledge, much less try to refute. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You are correct, though, that there is no discussion. You have >>>>>>>> posted >>>>>>>> your claims, supported by various opinion cites, and that is >>>>>>>> that. Rinse >>>>>>>> and repeat. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Does that really work in sci.physics or comp.os.linux.advocacy? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't think anybody takes "Snit" seriously at this point. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And yes, you've got him reduced to ad nauseum fallacies, so you've >>>>>>> definitely prevailed in the discussion. >>>>>> >>>>>> At this point Michael Glasser aka snit has become a laughing stock. >>>>>> >>>>> well isn't that cool i just found out i'm that too >>>> >>>> LOL! >>>> >>> we could start an elusive club >> >> I am already in the chicken stock club. It is a soup-er group! >> >> > i'm a member of the the compulsive rhymers club , okey-dokey. Ah, you are a poet and are not even aware of the fact. Something like that. :) -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-09 17:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bbefsp.mhr.19.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #454614 |
On 2018-06-09 5:08 PM, Snit wrote: > On 6/9/18 4:50 PM, % wrote: >> On 2018-06-09 4:43 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 6/9/18 4:42 PM, % wrote: >>>> On 2018-06-09 4:36 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 6/9/18 3:46 PM, % wrote: >>>>>> On 2018-06-09 3:41 PM, Horace wrote: >>>>>>> On 9 Jun 2018 21:12:35 GMT, vallor wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 06:22:56 -0700, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In news:fo19ubFehauU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 11:13 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:pffpgb$5bm$3@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>>> In news:fo15klFcgkoU3@mid.individual.net, Snit >>>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 10:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All of it... because you can't. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pick your favorite part. Or where you think you make the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> best >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point. It gets tiring rehashing the same long list of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> My favorite part was when Scout blew your "new >>>>>>>>>>>>>> interpretation in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2008" lie out of the water! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The Heller case is pretty easy to reference, and is the >>>>>>>>>>>>> first time >>>>>>>>>>>>> the new interpretation was offered by the SCOTUS.... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, that's the one! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Have you noticed how the responses have little to actually do >>>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>>> what is actually being replied to other than referencing a few >>>>>>>>>>> specific keywords. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> But have fun with that programmed merry-go-round. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I smacked down it's lies for the lurkers, if any, and moved on. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> At this point there is no real discussion. I was asked to back >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> following points. I did. There was no real counter ... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That you would acknowledge, much less try to refute. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You are correct, though, that there is no discussion. You have >>>>>>>>> posted >>>>>>>>> your claims, supported by various opinion cites, and that is >>>>>>>>> that. Rinse >>>>>>>>> and repeat. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Does that really work in sci.physics or comp.os.linux.advocacy? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't think anybody takes "Snit" seriously at this point. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And yes, you've got him reduced to ad nauseum fallacies, so you've >>>>>>>> definitely prevailed in the discussion. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> At this point Michael Glasser aka snit has become a laughing >>>>>>> stock. >>>>>>> >>>>>> well isn't that cool i just found out i'm that too >>>>> >>>>> LOL! >>>>> >>>> we could start an elusive club >>> >>> I am already in the chicken stock club. It is a soup-er group! >>> >>> >> i'm a member of the the compulsive rhymers club , okey-dokey. > > Ah, you are a poet and are not even aware of the fact. > > Something like that. :) > this isn't going to go anywhere
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-09 20:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fo3kf6FrvfqU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #454615 |
On 6/9/18 5:11 PM, % wrote: > On 2018-06-09 5:08 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 6/9/18 4:50 PM, % wrote: >>> On 2018-06-09 4:43 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 6/9/18 4:42 PM, % wrote: >>>>> On 2018-06-09 4:36 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 6/9/18 3:46 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>> On 2018-06-09 3:41 PM, Horace wrote: >>>>>>>> On 9 Jun 2018 21:12:35 GMT, vallor wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 06:22:56 -0700, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In news:fo19ubFehauU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 11:13 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:pffpgb$5bm$3@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>>>> In news:fo15klFcgkoU3@mid.individual.net, Snit >>>>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 10:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All of it... because you can't. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pick your favorite part. Or where you think you make the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> best >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point. It gets tiring rehashing the same long list of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My favorite part was when Scout blew your "new >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interpretation in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2008" lie out of the water! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Heller case is pretty easy to reference, and is the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> first time >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the new interpretation was offered by the SCOTUS.... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, that's the one! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Have you noticed how the responses have little to actually >>>>>>>>>>>> do with >>>>>>>>>>>> what is actually being replied to other than referencing a few >>>>>>>>>>>> specific keywords. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> But have fun with that programmed merry-go-round. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I smacked down it's lies for the lurkers, if any, and moved on. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> At this point there is no real discussion. I was asked to >>>>>>>>>>> back the >>>>>>>>>>> following points. I did. There was no real counter ... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That you would acknowledge, much less try to refute. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You are correct, though, that there is no discussion. You have >>>>>>>>>> posted >>>>>>>>>> your claims, supported by various opinion cites, and that is >>>>>>>>>> that. Rinse >>>>>>>>>> and repeat. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Does that really work in sci.physics or comp.os.linux.advocacy? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I don't think anybody takes "Snit" seriously at this point. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And yes, you've got him reduced to ad nauseum fallacies, so you've >>>>>>>>> definitely prevailed in the discussion. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> At this point Michael Glasser aka snit has become a laughing >>>>>>>> stock. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> well isn't that cool i just found out i'm that too >>>>>> >>>>>> LOL! >>>>>> >>>>> we could start an elusive club >>>> >>>> I am already in the chicken stock club. It is a soup-er group! >>>> >>>> >>> i'm a member of the the compulsive rhymers club , okey-dokey. >> >> Ah, you are a poet and are not even aware of the fact. >> >> Something like that. :) >> > this isn't going to go anywhere It should just go. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-09 23:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.35866b206d9cb723993d05@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #454615 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <bbefsp.mhr.19.3@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... > > On 2018-06-09 5:08 PM, Snit wrote: > > On 6/9/18 4:50 PM, % wrote: > >> On 2018-06-09 4:43 PM, Snit wrote: > >>> On 6/9/18 4:42 PM, % wrote: > >>>> On 2018-06-09 4:36 PM, Snit wrote: > >>>>> On 6/9/18 3:46 PM, % wrote: > >>>>>> On 2018-06-09 3:41 PM, Horace wrote: > >>>>>>> On 9 Jun 2018 21:12:35 GMT, vallor wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 06:22:56 -0700, max headroom wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> In news:fo19ubFehauU1@mid.individual.net, > >>>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 11:13 PM, Scout wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in message > >>>>>>>>>>> news:pffpgb$5bm$3@dont-email.me... > >>>>>>>>>>>> In news:fo15klFcgkoU3@mid.individual.net, Snit > >>>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 10:02 PM, max headroom wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All of it... because you can't. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pick your favorite part. Or where you think you make the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> best > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point. It gets tiring rehashing the same long list of > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> My favorite part was when Scout blew your "new > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> interpretation in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2008" lie out of the water! > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The Heller case is pretty easy to reference, and is the > >>>>>>>>>>>>> first time > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the new interpretation was offered by the SCOTUS.... > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, that's the one! > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Have you noticed how the responses have little to actually do > >>>>>>>>>>> with > >>>>>>>>>>> what is actually being replied to other than referencing a few > >>>>>>>>>>> specific keywords. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> But have fun with that programmed merry-go-round. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I smacked down it's lies for the lurkers, if any, and moved on. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> At this point there is no real discussion. I was asked to back > >>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>> following points. I did. There was no real counter ... > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> That you would acknowledge, much less try to refute. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> You are correct, though, that there is no discussion. You have > >>>>>>>>> posted > >>>>>>>>> your claims, supported by various opinion cites, and that is > >>>>>>>>> that. Rinse > >>>>>>>>> and repeat. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Does that really work in sci.physics or comp.os.linux.advocacy? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I don't think anybody takes "Snit" seriously at this point. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> And yes, you've got him reduced to ad nauseum fallacies, so you've > >>>>>>>> definitely prevailed in the discussion. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> At this point Michael Glasser aka snit has become a laughing > >>>>>>> stock. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> well isn't that cool i just found out i'm that too > >>>>> > >>>>> LOL! > >>>>> > >>>> we could start an elusive club > >>> > >>> I am already in the chicken stock club. It is a soup-er group! > >>> > >>> > >> i'm a member of the the compulsive rhymers club , okey-dokey. > > > > Ah, you are a poet and are not even aware of the fact. > > > > Something like that. :) > > > this isn't going to go anywhere Even YOU figured that out. I guess that confirms it real good. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-10 08:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fo4683FhreU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #454659 |
Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <bbefsp.mhr.19.3@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com > says... > > >> >> On 2018-06-09 5:08 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 6/9/18 4:50 PM, % wrote: >>>> On 2018-06-09 4:43 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 6/9/18 4:42 PM, % wrote: >>>>>> On 2018-06-09 4:36 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 6/9/18 3:46 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2018-06-09 3:41 PM, Horace wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 9 Jun 2018 21:12:35 GMT, vallor wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 06:22:56 -0700, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> In news:fo19ubFehauU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 11:13 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:pffpgb$5bm$3@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In news:fo15klFcgkoU3@mid.individual.net, Snit >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 10:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All of it... because you can't. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pick your favorite part. Or where you think you make the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> best >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point. It gets tiring rehashing the same long list of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My favorite part was when Scout blew your "new >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interpretation in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2008" lie out of the water! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Heller case is pretty easy to reference, and is the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first time >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the new interpretation was offered by the SCOTUS.... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, that's the one! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you noticed how the responses have little to actually do >>>>>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>>>>> what is actually being replied to other than referencing a few >>>>>>>>>>>>> specific keywords. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> But have fun with that programmed merry-go-round. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I smacked down it's lies for the lurkers, if any, and moved on. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> At this point there is no real discussion. I was asked to back >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> following points. I did. There was no real counter ... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> That you would acknowledge, much less try to refute. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You are correct, though, that there is no discussion. You have >>>>>>>>>>> posted >>>>>>>>>>> your claims, supported by various opinion cites, and that is >>>>>>>>>>> that. Rinse >>>>>>>>>>> and repeat. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Does that really work in sci.physics or comp.os.linux.advocacy? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I don't think anybody takes "Snit" seriously at this point. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And yes, you've got him reduced to ad nauseum fallacies, so you've >>>>>>>>>> definitely prevailed in the discussion. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> At this point Michael Glasser aka snit has become a laughing >>>>>>>>> stock. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> well isn't that cool i just found out i'm that too >>>>>>> >>>>>>> LOL! >>>>>>> >>>>>> we could start an elusive club >>>>> >>>>> I am already in the chicken stock club. It is a soup-er group! >>>>> >>>>> >>>> i'm a member of the the compulsive rhymers club , okey-dokey. >>> >>> Ah, you are a poet and are not even aware of the fact. >>> >>> Something like that. :) >>> >> this isn't going to go anywhere > > Even YOU figured that out. I guess that confirms it real good. > Well.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-10 11:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bbghkn.9qe.19.9@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #454659 |
On 2018-06-09 11:55 PM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <bbefsp.mhr.19.3@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com > says... > > >> >> On 2018-06-09 5:08 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 6/9/18 4:50 PM, % wrote: >>>> On 2018-06-09 4:43 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 6/9/18 4:42 PM, % wrote: >>>>>> On 2018-06-09 4:36 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 6/9/18 3:46 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2018-06-09 3:41 PM, Horace wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 9 Jun 2018 21:12:35 GMT, vallor wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 06:22:56 -0700, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> In news:fo19ubFehauU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 11:13 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:pffpgb$5bm$3@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In news:fo15klFcgkoU3@mid.individual.net, Snit >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 10:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All of it... because you can't. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pick your favorite part. Or where you think you make the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> best >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point. It gets tiring rehashing the same long list of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My favorite part was when Scout blew your "new >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interpretation in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2008" lie out of the water! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Heller case is pretty easy to reference, and is the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first time >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the new interpretation was offered by the SCOTUS.... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, that's the one! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you noticed how the responses have little to actually do >>>>>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>>>>> what is actually being replied to other than referencing a few >>>>>>>>>>>>> specific keywords. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> But have fun with that programmed merry-go-round. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I smacked down it's lies for the lurkers, if any, and moved on. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> At this point there is no real discussion. I was asked to back >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> following points. I did. There was no real counter ... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> That you would acknowledge, much less try to refute. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You are correct, though, that there is no discussion. You have >>>>>>>>>>> posted >>>>>>>>>>> your claims, supported by various opinion cites, and that is >>>>>>>>>>> that. Rinse >>>>>>>>>>> and repeat. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Does that really work in sci.physics or comp.os.linux.advocacy? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I don't think anybody takes "Snit" seriously at this point. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And yes, you've got him reduced to ad nauseum fallacies, so you've >>>>>>>>>> definitely prevailed in the discussion. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> At this point Michael Glasser aka snit has become a laughing >>>>>>>>> stock. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> well isn't that cool i just found out i'm that too >>>>>>> >>>>>>> LOL! >>>>>>> >>>>>> we could start an elusive club >>>>> >>>>> I am already in the chicken stock club. It is a soup-er group! >>>>> >>>>> >>>> i'm a member of the the compulsive rhymers club , okey-dokey. >>> >>> Ah, you are a poet and are not even aware of the fact. >>> >>> Something like that. :) >>> >> this isn't going to go anywhere > > Even YOU figured that out. I guess that confirms it real good. > no problem it wasn't my post
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-10 00:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3586700ed686fbac993d09@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #454592 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <bbeasl.vc8.19.21@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... > > On 2018-06-09 3:41 PM, Horace wrote: > > On 9 Jun 2018 21:12:35 GMT, vallor wrote: > > > >> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 06:22:56 -0700, max headroom wrote: > >> > >>> In news:fo19ubFehauU1@mid.individual.net, > >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > >>> > >>>> On 6/8/18 11:13 PM, Scout wrote: > >>>>> "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in message > >>>>> news:pffpgb$5bm$3@dont-email.me... > >>>>>> In news:fo15klFcgkoU3@mid.individual.net, Snit > >>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > >>>>>>> On 6/8/18 10:02 PM, max headroom wrote: > >>> > >>>>>>>>>> All of it... because you can't. > >>> > >>>>>>>>> Pick your favorite part. Or where you think you make the best > >>>>>>>>> point. It gets tiring rehashing the same long list of things. > >>> > >>>>>>>> My favorite part was when Scout blew your "new interpretation in > >>>>>>>> 2008" lie out of the water! > >>> > >>>>>>> The Heller case is pretty easy to reference, and is the first time > >>>>>>> the new interpretation was offered by the SCOTUS.... > >>> > >>>>>> Yeah, that's the one! > >>> > >>>>> Have you noticed how the responses have little to actually do with > >>>>> what is actually being replied to other than referencing a few > >>>>> specific keywords. > >>> > >>>>> But have fun with that programmed merry-go-round. > >>> > >>>>> I smacked down it's lies for the lurkers, if any, and moved on. > >>> > >>>> At this point there is no real discussion. I was asked to back the > >>>> following points. I did. There was no real counter ... > >>> > >>> That you would acknowledge, much less try to refute. > >>> > >>> You are correct, though, that there is no discussion. You have posted > >>> your claims, supported by various opinion cites, and that is that. Rinse > >>> and repeat. > >>> > >>> Does that really work in sci.physics or comp.os.linux.advocacy? > >> > >> I don't think anybody takes "Snit" seriously at this point. > >> > >> And yes, you've got him reduced to ad nauseum fallacies, so you've > >> definitely prevailed in the discussion. > > > > At this point Michael Glasser aka snit has become a laughing stock. > > > well isn't that cool i just found out i'm that too I wasn't sure how to break it to you. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-10 12:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bbgi7h.9qe.19.15@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #454661 |
On 2018-06-10 12:16 AM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <bbeasl.vc8.19.21@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com > says... > > >> >> On 2018-06-09 3:41 PM, Horace wrote: >>> On 9 Jun 2018 21:12:35 GMT, vallor wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 06:22:56 -0700, max headroom wrote: >>>> >>>>> In news:fo19ubFehauU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>> >>>>>> On 6/8/18 11:13 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>> "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:pffpgb$5bm$3@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>> In news:fo15klFcgkoU3@mid.individual.net, Snit >>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 10:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> All of it... because you can't. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Pick your favorite part. Or where you think you make the best >>>>>>>>>>> point. It gets tiring rehashing the same long list of things. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> My favorite part was when Scout blew your "new interpretation in >>>>>>>>>> 2008" lie out of the water! >>>>> >>>>>>>>> The Heller case is pretty easy to reference, and is the first time >>>>>>>>> the new interpretation was offered by the SCOTUS.... >>>>> >>>>>>>> Yeah, that's the one! >>>>> >>>>>>> Have you noticed how the responses have little to actually do with >>>>>>> what is actually being replied to other than referencing a few >>>>>>> specific keywords. >>>>> >>>>>>> But have fun with that programmed merry-go-round. >>>>> >>>>>>> I smacked down it's lies for the lurkers, if any, and moved on. >>>>> >>>>>> At this point there is no real discussion. I was asked to back the >>>>>> following points. I did. There was no real counter ... >>>>> >>>>> That you would acknowledge, much less try to refute. >>>>> >>>>> You are correct, though, that there is no discussion. You have posted >>>>> your claims, supported by various opinion cites, and that is that. Rinse >>>>> and repeat. >>>>> >>>>> Does that really work in sci.physics or comp.os.linux.advocacy? >>>> >>>> I don't think anybody takes "Snit" seriously at this point. >>>> >>>> And yes, you've got him reduced to ad nauseum fallacies, so you've >>>> definitely prevailed in the discussion. >>> >>> At this point Michael Glasser aka snit has become a laughing stock. >>> >> well isn't that cool i just found out i'm that too > > I wasn't sure how to break it to you. > it would be a lie if you said it anyway
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 16:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <pf76s1$75a$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #454053 |
In news:bb3m5g.j3i.17.1@news.alt.net, % <persent@gmail.com> typed: > On 2018-06-05 2:45 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 6/5/18 1:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>> In news:fno5uhFbpqgU8@mid.individual.net, >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>> On 6/5/18 11:56 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 08:11:42 -0700, Snit >>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> Even now the NRA is saying schools should have gun-carrying >>>>>> teachers! >>>>> Here's the liberal alternative: >>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/pennsylvania-school-district-gives-teachers-small-baseball-bats-last-resort-n864986 >>>>> That's how dumb the leftists are. >>>> What a stupid idea... but much, much better than putting GUNS in >>>> class rooms. THAT idea is FAR worse. >>> If a crazed gunman bursts into the room in which you are trapped, >>> would you rather have a baseball >>> bat or a gun? >> I would rather NOT have more guns in the classroom given how it will >> surely lead to more kids being shot. You can twist that to say you >> want a gun if someone else has one, but when your "solution" is >> likely to lead to more harm than good it is not a good solution. > no one needs a gun unless they are going to kill something Sometimes things need killing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 16:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bb3sns.84b.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #454089 |
On 2018-06-05 4:20 PM, max headroom wrote: > In news:bb3m5g.j3i.17.1@news.alt.net, > % <persent@gmail.com> typed: > >> On 2018-06-05 2:45 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 6/5/18 1:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>> In news:fno5uhFbpqgU8@mid.individual.net, >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>> On 6/5/18 11:56 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 08:11:42 -0700, Snit >>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> Even now the NRA is saying schools should have gun-carrying >>>>>>> teachers! > >>>>>> Here's the liberal alternative: > >>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/pennsylvania-school-district-gives-teachers-small-baseball-bats-last-resort-n864986 > >>>>>> That's how dumb the leftists are. > >>>>> What a stupid idea... but much, much better than putting GUNS in >>>>> class rooms. THAT idea is FAR worse. > >>>> If a crazed gunman bursts into the room in which you are trapped, >>>> would you rather have a baseball >>>> bat or a gun? > >>> I would rather NOT have more guns in the classroom given how it will >>> surely lead to more kids being shot. You can twist that to say you >>> want a gun if someone else has one, but when your "solution" is >>> likely to lead to more harm than good it is not a good solution. > >> no one needs a gun unless they are going to kill something > > Sometimes things need killing. > > name one
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 16:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <pf7944$koj$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #454091 |
In news:bb3sns.84b.17.1@news.alt.net, % <persent@gmail.com> typed: > On 2018-06-05 4:20 PM, max headroom wrote: >> In news:bb3m5g.j3i.17.1@news.alt.net, >> % <persent@gmail.com> typed: >>> On 2018-06-05 2:45 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 6/5/18 1:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>> In news:fno5uhFbpqgU8@mid.individual.net, >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>> On 6/5/18 11:56 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 08:11:42 -0700, Snit >>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> Even now the NRA is saying schools should have gun-carrying >>>>>>>> teachers! >>>>>>> Here's the liberal alternative: >>>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/pennsylvania-school-district-gives-teachers-small-baseball-bats-last-resort-n864986 >>>>>>> That's how dumb the leftists are. >>>>>> What a stupid idea... but much, much better than putting GUNS in >>>>>> class rooms. THAT idea is FAR worse. >>>>> If a crazed gunman bursts into the room in which you are trapped, >>>>> would you rather have a baseball >>>>> bat or a gun? >>>> I would rather NOT have more guns in the classroom given how it >>>> will surely lead to more kids being shot. You can twist that to >>>> say you want a gun if someone else has one, but when your >>>> "solution" is likely to lead to more harm than good it is not a >>>> good solution. >>> no one needs a gun unless they are going to kill something >> Sometimes things need killing. > name one Antifa.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 31 of 36 — ← Prev page 1 … 29 30 [31] 32 33 … 36 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web