Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #454215 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-06-06 12:25 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-06-06 14:52 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 220 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
We assert useful premises, disregarding the truth. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-06 12:25 -0700
Re: We assert useful premises, disregarding the truth. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-06 16:35 -0400
Re: We assert useful premises, disregarding the truth. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 17:52 -0700
Re: We assert useful premises, disregarding the truth. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-06 18:14 -0700
Re: We assert useful premises, disregarding the truth. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 19:39 -0700
No truth, Nothing to aspire to ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-06 18:21 -0700
Re: No truth, Nothing to aspire to ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-06 18:37 -0700
Re: No truth, Nothing to aspire to ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 18:51 -0700
Re: No truth, Nothing to aspire to ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-06 19:09 -0700
Re: No truth, Nothing to aspire to ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 19:19 -0700
Re: No truth, Nothing to aspire to ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-06 19:24 -0700
Re: No truth, Nothing to aspire to ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 19:30 -0700
Re: No truth, Nothing to aspire to ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-06 19:45 -0700
Re: No truth, Nothing to aspire to ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 20:02 -0700
Re: No truth, Nothing to aspire to ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-06 20:14 -0700
Re: No truth, Nothing to aspire to ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 20:31 -0700
Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-06 20:46 -0700
Re: Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 20:49 -0700
Re: Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-06 22:11 -0600
Re: Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 21:22 -0700
Re: Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 11:32 -0700
Fabulous Fabian might be behind it ( the bot ). Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-07 12:45 -0700
Re: Fabulous Fabian might be behind it ( the bot ). Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 14:30 -0700
My kids give zero fucks. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-07 15:38 -0700
Re: Fabulous Fabian might be behind it ( the bot ). Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 16:51 -0700
Re: Fabulous Fabian might be behind it ( the bot ). Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 17:21 -0700
Re: Fabulous Fabian might be behind it ( the bot ). Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 17:36 -0700
Re: Fabulous Fabian might be behind it ( the bot ). Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 18:07 -0700
Re: Fabulous Fabian might be behind it ( the bot ). Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 18:20 -0700
Re: Re: Fabulous Fabian might be behind it ( the bot ). Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2018-06-08 16:53 +0000
Re: Re: Fabulous Fabian might be behind it ( the bot ). Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2018-06-08 16:49 +0000
Re: Fabulous Fabian might be behind it ( the bot ). Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 16:40 -0700
Re: Re: Fabulous Fabian might be behind it ( the bot ). Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2018-06-08 16:54 +0000
Re: Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 16:24 -0700
Re: Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 17:07 -0700
Re: Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 17:24 -0700
Re: Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 17:44 -0700
Re: Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 17:55 -0700
Re: Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 18:19 -0700
Re: Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 18:23 -0700
Re: Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 18:52 -0700
Re: Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 19:48 -0700
Re: Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 20:25 -0700
Re: Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 20:32 -0700
Re: Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 20:52 -0700
Re: Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 21:16 -0700
Re: Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 21:56 -0700
I don't need WordPress. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-07 22:33 -0700
Re: I don't need WordPress. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 06:41 +0000
Re: I don't need WordPress. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 09:18 -0700
Social Security Disability (SSDI). Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-08 09:33 -0700
Re: Social Security Disability (SSDI). Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 09:39 -0700
Re: Social Security Disability (SSDI). Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 12:11 -0700
Re: Social Security Disability (SSDI). Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 13:17 -0700
Re: Social Security Disability (SSDI). Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 13:42 -0700
Re: Social Security Disability (SSDI). Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 13:49 -0700
Re: Social Security Disability (SSDI). Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 13:55 -0700
Shouting "Walk!" to a paraplegic, every day, for decades. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-08 14:10 -0700
Re: Shouting "Walk!" to a paraplegic, every day, for decades. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 14:15 -0700
Re: Shouting "Walk!" to a paraplegic, every day, for decades. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 15:51 -0700
Re: Shouting "Walk!" to a paraplegic, every day, for decades. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 17:37 -0700
Re: Shouting "Walk!" to a paraplegic, every day, for decades. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 17:45 -0700
Re: Shouting "Walk!" to a paraplegic, every day, for decades. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 18:00 -0700
Re: Shouting "Walk!" to a paraplegic, every day, for decades. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 19:55 -0700
Re: Shouting "Walk!" to a paraplegic, every day, for decades. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 09:22 -0700
Re: Social Security Disability (SSDI). Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 12:06 -0700
Re: Social Security Disability (SSDI). Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 01:11 -0700
Re: I don't need WordPress. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 12:02 -0700
Re: Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 23:58 -0700
Re: Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 09:08 -0700
Re: Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 12:01 -0700
Re: Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 12:58 -0700
Re: Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 13:32 -0700
Re: Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 13:47 -0700
Re: Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 13:53 -0700
Re: Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 14:03 -0700
Re: Re: Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2018-06-08 16:50 +0000
Are you looking in the mirror again ? ! Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-07 18:29 -0700
Re: Are you looking in the mirror again ? ! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 18:36 -0700
Re: Are you looking in the mirror again ? ! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 18:56 -0700
Re: Are you looking in the mirror again ? ! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 19:49 -0700
Re: Are you looking in the mirror again ? ! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 20:30 -0700
Re: Are you looking in the mirror again ? ! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 20:43 -0700
Re: Are you looking in the mirror again ? ! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 20:55 -0700
Re: Are you looking in the mirror again ? ! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 21:19 -0700
Re: Are you looking in the mirror again ? ! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 21:37 -0700
Re: Are you looking in the mirror again ? ! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 21:58 -0700
"SeniorPeopleMeet.COM" wouldn't be the worst choice. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-07 23:17 -0700
Re: "SeniorPeopleMeet.COM" wouldn't be the worst choice. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 06:41 +0000
If Michael Glasser were human, and not a lizard. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-07 23:48 -0700
Re: If Michael Glasser were human, and not a lizard. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 00:00 -0700
I wish Michael Glasser were just evil, and not hopelessly insane. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-08 00:24 -0700
Re: I wish Michael Glasser were just evil, and not hopelessly insane. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 00:26 -0700
Re: I wish Michael Glasser were just evil, and not hopelessly insane. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 01:00 -0700
Re: "SeniorPeopleMeet.COM" wouldn't be the worst choice. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 00:07 -0700
Re: "SeniorPeopleMeet.COM" wouldn't be the worst choice. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 00:13 -0700
Re: "SeniorPeopleMeet.COM" wouldn't be the worst choice. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 09:36 -0700
Snit writes his own FanFic ? Proof ? Cite ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-08 09:53 -0700
Re: Snit writes his own FanFic ? Proof ? Cite ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 09:58 -0700
Re: Snit writes his own FanFic ? Proof ? Cite ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 12:30 -0700
Re: Snit writes his own FanFic ? Proof ? Cite ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 13:07 -0700
Re: Snit writes his own FanFic ? Proof ? Cite ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 13:34 -0700
Re: Snit writes his own FanFic ? Proof ? Cite ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 12:13 -0700
Re: Snit writes his own FanFic ? Proof ? Cite ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 13:05 -0700
Re: Snit writes his own FanFic ? Proof ? Cite ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 13:32 -0700
Thank God for SSDI. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-08 13:44 -0700
Re: Thank God for SSDI. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 13:47 -0700
Re: Thank God for SSDI. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 13:54 -0700
Re: Thank God for SSDI. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 13:51 -0700
Thank God for SSDI. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-08 14:00 -0700
Re: Thank God for SSDI. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 14:12 -0700
Kids aren't my bag. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-08 14:32 -0700
Re: Thank God for SSDI. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 15:52 -0700
Re: Thank God for SSDI. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 14:32 -0700
Re: "SeniorPeopleMeet.COM" wouldn't be the worst choice. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 12:11 -0700
Re: Are you looking in the mirror again ? ! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 06:41 +0000
Re: Are you looking in the mirror again ? ! Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 23:59 -0700
Re: Are you looking in the mirror again ? ! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 00:03 -0700
Re: Re: Are you looking in the mirror again ? ! Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2018-06-08 16:47 +0000
Re: Re: Are you looking in the mirror again ? ! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 09:51 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Are you looking in the mirror again ? ! Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2018-06-08 17:06 +0000
Re: Are you looking in the mirror again ? ! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 09:48 -0700
Re: Are you looking in the mirror again ? ! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 12:13 -0700
Re: Are you looking in the mirror again ? ! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 13:21 -0700
Re: Are you looking in the mirror again ? ! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 13:48 -0700
Re: Are you looking in the mirror again ? ! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 13:51 -0700
Re: Are you looking in the mirror again ? ! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 14:32 -0700
Re: Are you looking in the mirror again ? ! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 14:48 -0700
Re: Are you looking in the mirror again ? ! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 15:53 -0700
Re: Are you looking in the mirror again ? ! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 16:54 -0700
Re: Are you looking in the mirror again ? ! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 16:59 -0700
Re: Are you looking in the mirror again ? ! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 17:05 -0700
Re: Are you looking in the mirror again ? ! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 17:27 -0700
Re: Are you looking in the mirror again ? ! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 17:39 -0700
Re: Are you looking in the mirror again ? ! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 17:47 -0700
Re: Are you looking in the mirror again ? ! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 18:04 -0700
Re: Are you looking in the mirror again ? ! vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-09 04:12 +0000
Re: Are you looking in the mirror again ? ! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 21:31 -0700
Re: Are you looking in the mirror again ? ! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 13:40 -0700
Re: Re: Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2018-06-08 16:55 +0000
Re: Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-06 21:23 -0700
Re: Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 21:24 -0700
Don't teach JavaScript without a proper goal in mind. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-06 20:00 -0700
Re: Don't teach JavaScript without a proper goal in mind. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-06 20:03 -0700
Re: No truth, Nothing to aspire to ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 19:31 -0700
Re: No truth, Nothing to aspire to ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 19:32 -0700
Re: No truth, Nothing to aspire to ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-06 22:47 -0400
NO TRUTH. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-06 20:28 -0700
Re: NO TRUTH. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-07 05:32 -0400
Harp playing, androgynous angels in the clouds ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-07 11:18 -0700
Re: Harp playing, androgynous angels in the clouds ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-07 16:42 -0400
Ben Jacoby takes _pride_ in his randomness, I don't. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-07 14:15 -0700
Re: Ben Jacoby takes _pride_ in his randomness, I don't. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 02:20 -0400
Worshiping Ignorance. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-07 23:36 -0700
Re: Worshiping Ignorance. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 11:42 -0400
" I can choose to do the opposite of what I prefer " -- Ben Jacoby. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-08 10:17 -0700
Re: Worshiping Ignorance. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-09 01:58 +0000
Re: Worshiping Ignorance. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 19:55 -0700
Re: Worshiping Ignorance. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-09 21:37 +0000
EINSTEIN's category, far from the Pope. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-09 14:51 -0700
Re: EINSTEIN's category, far from the Pope. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-06-09 22:01 +0000
To a retard, _everything_ is "random". Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-09 15:11 -0700
Re: EINSTEIN's category, far from the Pope. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 15:13 -0700
Re: EINSTEIN's category, far from the Pope. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 15:54 -0700
Re: EINSTEIN's category, far from the Pope. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-09 22:54 +0000
People are forever MisQuoting Einstein; I correct them. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-09 16:40 -0700
Re: People are forever MisQuoting Einstein; I correct them. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-10 00:15 +0000
Putting words in Einstein's mouth. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-09 17:42 -0700
Re: Putting words in Einstein's mouth. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-10 00:59 +0000
God Doesn't Play Dice, he's not an idiot; nor is he a "he". Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-09 18:28 -0700
Re: God Doesn't Play Dice, he's not an idiot; nor is he a "he". vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-10 01:42 +0000
Mark Twain was a determinist. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-09 20:16 -0700
Re: Mark Twain was a determinist. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-10 12:48 -0400
Quantum Mechanics is statistical, not complete. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-10 10:51 -0700
Re: Quantum Mechanics is statistical, not complete. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 11:10 -0700
Re: Quantum Mechanics is statistical, not complete. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-11 11:02 -0400
Quantum Mechanics is statistical, not complete. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-11 09:20 -0700
Re: Quantum Mechanics is statistical, not complete. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-11 17:09 -0400
Bell's theorem is just another "I don't know". Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-11 14:32 -0700
Re: Bell's theorem is just another "I don't know". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-11 14:33 -0700
No one can "prove" ThermoDynamics and/or General Relativity, 100.00000000%. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-11 15:00 -0700
Re: No one can "prove" ThermoDynamics and/or General Relativity, 100.00000000%. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-11 15:01 -0700
We assert _useful_ premises ( and ThermoDynamics is _Very_ useful ). Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-11 15:27 -0700
Re: Bell's theorem is just another "I don't know". benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-11 19:57 -0400
Re: Bell's theorem is just another "I don't know". vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-12 17:11 +0000
SuperDeterminism was useful to Einstein, and to me. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-12 12:03 -0700
Enjoy your silly hat. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-13 14:46 -0700
Sex toys/dolls. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-15 00:44 -0700
Re: God Doesn't Play Dice, he's not an idiot; nor is he a "he". benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-09 22:59 -0400
Re: God Doesn't Play Dice, he's not an idiot; nor is he a "he". vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-10 03:51 +0000
Re: God Doesn't Play Dice, he's not an idiot; nor is he a "he". benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-10 12:50 -0400
Mark Twain, Einstein and Stephen Hawking are revered by nerds Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-10 11:01 -0700
Re: Mark Twain, Einstein and Stephen Hawking are revered by nerds benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-11 11:06 -0400
Asleep, living in a dream. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-11 10:04 -0700
Re: Asleep, living in a dream. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-11 14:22 -0500
Re: Asleep, living in a dream. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-11 17:21 -0400
Your house is built on sand. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-11 14:43 -0700
Re: God Doesn't Play Dice, he's not an idiot; nor is he a "he". Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 04:21 -0700
Re: Putting words in Einstein's mouth. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 18:30 -0700
Re: Putting words in Einstein's mouth. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:40 -0700
Re: Putting words in Einstein's mouth. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-11 07:02 -0500
Re: Putting words in Einstein's mouth. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 05:17 -0700
Quantum Mechanics is _not_ complete. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-11 09:41 -0700
Re: Quantum Mechanics is _not_ complete. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-11 17:17 -0400
"statistics is [sic] real" -- Ben Jacoby. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-11 14:39 -0700
Re: "statistics is [sic] real" -- Ben Jacoby. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-11 14:53 -0700
When I hear the word "Quantum", I replace it with the word "BullShit". Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-11 15:09 -0700
Re: When I hear the word "Quantum", I replace it with the word "BullShit". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-11 15:25 -0700
Re: "statistics is [sic] real" -- Ben Jacoby. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-11 20:00 -0400
" I can't know " -- Bell's Theorem. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-11 19:29 -0700
Re: EINSTEIN's category, far from the Pope. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-09 22:28 -0400
Re: Worshiping Ignorance. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 14:53 -0700
If the truth is your enemy... Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-09 00:14 -0700
Re: Worshiping Ignorance. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-06-09 06:52 -0400
Re: Worshiping Ignorance. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 05:26 -0700
Re: Harp playing, androgynous angels in the clouds ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 23:27 -0700
Re: We assert useful premises, disregarding the truth. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-06 14:21 -0700
Re: We assert useful premises, disregarding the truth. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-06 21:22 +0000
I feel rich, very rich. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-06 14:39 -0700
Re: We assert useful premises, disregarding the truth. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-06 14:52 -0700
Page 3 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 11 Next page →
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-07 18:52 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. |
| Message-ID | <22fecedb-34b6-4fb5-915e-cb77c4e2c115@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #454340 |
On Thursday, June 7, 2018 at 7:23:23 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 6/7/18 6:19 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Thursday, June 7, 2018 at 6:55:48 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 6/7/18 5:44 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > > > >>> So you got nothin' and the taxpayers were robbed. Makes one > >>> wonder why you brought this topic up when you knew you'd > >>> look like an idiotic hypocrite for doing so. > >> > >> See: THIS. > >> > >> That type of shit? > > > > You opened your fat mouth and made false claims about what I > > "have to show" for my knowledge. What do you think you should > > have expected as a response? > > If you have more to show then show it. That would be cool. Sure, I'll just post 'em up and... grow a brain, Snit. > >>>>> "You can usually tell a WordPress site (or other template based system) > >>>>> with a glance just by looking at it... no need to go to the code." > >>>>> > >>>>> Funny stuff ;) > >>>> > >>>> You often can. > >>> > >>> You said without looking at the code... to that, I say: Bull if the > >>> default attributions have been removed. > >> > >> You can disagree... but I am letting you know it is not hard in MANY > >> cases. Could be WordPress or some other template maker... but it often > >> not hard to tell. > > > > If you're actually serious... and I doubt it, you're letting me know > > that you know less about template based CMS than I previously > > suspected. > > Sigh. See... just mindless attacks. What attack? I'm entitled to "suspect" whatever the hell I want. If you don't like that don't read it. It's my opinion that you're very clueless on this topic and I can support that opinion with logic and reason, which I do below. > >>>> The template-look is pretty obvious on most. > >>> > >>> Talk about these "pretty obvious" giveaways. > >> > >> The menu systems and the like. The look and feel -- but really never > >> thought of the details. Happy to look at this if you wish. > > > > Like I said, unless someone is in the room with you, it's an easy claim > > to make on the 'net because there is no way to tell when you've blown > > it. You've apparently forgotten the time that I tweaked that WP site so > > all vestiges of WP were removed (I even changed folder names). > > Themes can be made to look *any* way you want. You also seem to > > forget that I made the WP demo of your site, which proves that point. > > As I said, there are exceptions. But *GENERALLY* you can tell. But point > to some where you think it would be harder. Anyone with a basic level of competence can make any WP site look like anything they want. What I'm saying is, because of that fact, you're premise is wrong. You're acting like WP denotes how a site will look, it doesn't *at all*. (that was the key, Snit!) The theme is responsible for that and the vast majority of them are not written by Automattic. You still haven't mentioned a concrete, telltale sign. There's a reason for that, you can't, not one that doesn't exist on most any other site. Go install AMPPS and get WP running locally, then go to Wordpress.org and see what it takes to create a basic theme from scratch, only then will you begin to understand. If it's too much work or you're 'not interested'... fine, but you're talkin' outta your ass here. You might as well be arguing that all sites look alike (and this argument has been made by some). > >> That would be MUCH better than the current nonsense. > >> > >>>> Sometimes I > >>>> make that guess and it is another system, but most of the time I can tell.. > >>> > >>> It's a great claim to make unless someone is in the room with you to > >>> watch you blow it. On the 'net, no one can disprove you. I know better. > >> > >> So you make claims knowing nobody can disprove you. > > > > LOL! That'd be *you* making claims about template based sites > > and what CMS they stem from. You have a serious identity issue, > > don't you ;) > > THIS TYPE OF MINDLESS INSULTS. Why don't you try reading for comprehension?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-07 19:48 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. |
| Message-ID | <fnu94dFp19uU8@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #454343 |
On 6/7/18 6:52 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Thursday, June 7, 2018 at 7:23:23 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 6/7/18 6:19 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Thursday, June 7, 2018 at 6:55:48 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>> On 6/7/18 5:44 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> >>> >>>>> So you got nothin' and the taxpayers were robbed. Makes one >>>>> wonder why you brought this topic up when you knew you'd >>>>> look like an idiotic hypocrite for doing so. >>>> >>>> See: THIS. >>>> >>>> That type of shit? >>> >>> You opened your fat mouth and made false claims about what I >>> "have to show" for my knowledge. What do you think you should >>> have expected as a response? >> >> If you have more to show then show it. That would be cool. > > Sure, I'll just post 'em up and... grow a brain, Snit. So, as I said, you have nothing to show. Fair enough. But why have you been twisting this comment of mine to suggest that I was saying learning was bad or whatever? You now agree you have NOTHING to show. I do and did (my silly political site). >>>>>>> "You can usually tell a WordPress site (or other template based system) >>>>>>> with a glance just by looking at it... no need to go to the code." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Funny stuff ;) >>>>>> >>>>>> You often can. >>>>> >>>>> You said without looking at the code... to that, I say: Bull if the >>>>> default attributions have been removed. >>>> >>>> You can disagree... but I am letting you know it is not hard in MANY >>>> cases. Could be WordPress or some other template maker... but it often >>>> not hard to tell. >>> >>> If you're actually serious... and I doubt it, you're letting me know >>> that you know less about template based CMS than I previously >>> suspected. >> >> Sigh. See... just mindless attacks. > > What attack? I'm entitled to "suspect" whatever the hell I want. If you don't like > that don't read it. It's my opinion that you're very clueless on this topic and I > can support that opinion with logic and reason, which I do below. I was talking tech: one can generally (though not always) tell if a site is a WordPress or similar type site from the template "look". You then responded by belittling me. It is silly. It is so habitual with you that you cannot stop. The sensible thing for you to do would be to point to examples and then we can see and look at them. >>>> That would be MUCH better than the current nonsense. >>>> >>>>>> Sometimes I >>>>>> make that guess and it is another system, but most of the time I can tell.. >>>>> >>>>> It's a great claim to make unless someone is in the room with you to >>>>> watch you blow it. On the 'net, no one can disprove you. I know better. >>>> >>>> So you make claims knowing nobody can disprove you. >>> >>> LOL! That'd be *you* making claims about template based sites >>> and what CMS they stem from. You have a serious identity issue, >>> don't you ;) >> >> THIS TYPE OF MINDLESS INSULTS. > > Why don't you try reading for comprehension? See: I note your poor behavior and you work to put me on the defensive with more insults. You sincerely cannot stop. Remember, I am giving you yet ANOTHER chance. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-07 20:25 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. |
| Message-ID | <8f471220-8a07-40e6-bde3-0e5484113f0d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #454346 |
On Thursday, June 7, 2018 at 8:48:48 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 6/7/18 6:52 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > Sure, I'll just post 'em up and... grow a brain, Snit. > > So, as I said, you have nothing to show. I have nothing to show you other than the stuff I've shown, which you have repeatedly claimed is "NOTHING" (even the theme I fixed for you for free). Notably, to you, stuff like this is "NOTHING"... <https://streamable.com/ftug3> ... which is an absurd position to take. But all it means is that *you* dont' see any value in it. A person with a simple site, who is stuck in spreadsheet land when it comes to managing things (and that's lot of people) will see the value, instantly. One needn't know anything about the web to see the value in something like this. > Fair enough. But why have you > been twisting this comment of mine to suggest that I was saying learning > was bad or whatever? Twisting? Even if I never showed a single thing, knowledge would be good for its own sake. > You now agree you have NOTHING to show ... other than the examples I've shown. If you don't believe it's obvious I can create pretty much any kind of look and a fair amount of functionality based on what I have already shown, then it's obvious you don't understand what you've looked at. > I was talking tech: one can generally (though not always) tell if a site > is a WordPress or similar type site from the template "look". So point to these telltale signs already.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-07 20:32 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. |
| Message-ID | <fnublhFsakoU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #454348 |
On 6/7/18 8:25 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Thursday, June 7, 2018 at 8:48:48 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 6/7/18 6:52 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> Sure, I'll just post 'em up and... grow a brain, Snit. >> >> So, as I said, you have nothing to show. > > I have nothing to show you other than the stuff I've shown, which you > have repeatedly claimed is "NOTHING" (even the theme I fixed for you > for free). Notably, to you, stuff like this is "NOTHING"... > > <https://streamable.com/ftug3> > > ... which is an absurd position to take. But all it means is that *you* > dont' see any value in it. A person with a simple site, who is stuck in > spreadsheet land when it comes to managing things (and that's lot > of people) will see the value, instantly. One needn't know anything > about the web to see the value in something like this. You have some demos... but no website or anything else other than your flood bot. You even speak of not showing anything else! >> Fair enough. But why have you >> been twisting this comment of mine to suggest that I was saying learning >> was bad or whatever? > > Twisting? Even if I never showed a single thing, knowledge would be > good for its own sake. Twisting... sigh. Yes, you have knowledge and that is cool and good in its own right (even though before you said that you did not know ANYONE who thought so, sigh), you have no site or program or anything which brings in income or helps anyone OTHER than your flood bot. For crying out loud, do you REALLY need a thousand disclaimers for EVERY sentence or you will play games? STOP. JUST. STOP. >> You now agree you have NOTHING to show > > ... other than the examples I've shown. If you don't believe it's > obvious I can create pretty much any kind of look and a fair amount > of functionality based on what I have already shown, then it's obvious > you don't understand what you've looked at. > >> I was talking tech: one can generally (though not always) tell if a site >> is a WordPress or similar type site from the template "look". > > So point to these telltale signs already. Take a look at these: <https://www.creativebloq.com/web-design/examples-wordpress-11121165> Most of those look like WordPress type template sites. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-07 20:52 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. |
| Message-ID | <f6bcae02-6874-415e-b8ea-4df8091b2e17@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #454350 |
On Thursday, June 7, 2018 at 9:32:04 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 6/7/18 8:25 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Thursday, June 7, 2018 at 8:48:48 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 6/7/18 6:52 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > >>> Sure, I'll just post 'em up and... grow a brain, Snit. > >> > >> So, as I said, you have nothing to show. > > > > I have nothing to show you other than the stuff I've shown, which you > > have repeatedly claimed is "NOTHING" (even the theme I fixed for you > > for free). Notably, to you, stuff like this is "NOTHING"... > > > > <https://streamable.com/ftug3> > > > > ... which is an absurd position to take. But all it means is that *you* > > dont' see any value in it. A person with a simple site, who is stuck in > > spreadsheet land when it comes to managing things (and that's lot > > of people) will see the value, instantly. One needn't know anything > > about the web to see the value in something like this. > > You have some demos... And you've claimed they are "NOTHING". Here's the part you're missing: You, not seeing any value in any of them, says more about you than it does me or the demos. Anyone stuck in spreadsheet land would agree. > >> Fair enough. But why have you > >> been twisting this comment of mine to suggest that I was saying learning > >> was bad or whatever? > > > > Twisting? Even if I never showed a single thing, knowledge would be > > good for its own sake. > > Twisting... sigh. Yes, you have knowledge and that is cool And you're also saying it's worthless to me... make up your mind already. > >> You now agree you have NOTHING to show > > > > ... other than the examples I've shown. If you don't believe it's > > obvious I can create pretty much any kind of look and a fair amount > > of functionality based on what I have already shown, then it's obvious > > you don't understand what you've looked at. > > > >> I was talking tech: one can generally (though not always) tell if a site > >> is a WordPress or similar type site from the template "look". > > > > So point to these telltale signs already. > > Take a look at these: > > <https://www.creativebloq.com/web-design/examples-wordpress-11121165> > > Most of those look like WordPress type template sites. Based on 'looking' at what? Again, there's a reason you can't say. The reason you, in your mind, so often believe you correctly 'guess' that a site is a WP site is based on the fact that almost 1 in 3 sites are nowadays. So while you're busy 'guessing' you can't actually explain the things behind your 'guess', because there aren't any. The odds are in WP's favor and you fail to understand that. If you could say, you would... but you can't, so you don't. You'll write 50 more posts and you won't be able to point to a single thing. The fact is, CSS is what makes a site 'look' like it does, WP has nothing to do with it. Need proof? Remove the style sheet(s).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-07 21:16 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. |
| Message-ID | <fnue8lFsng3U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #454352 |
On 6/7/18 8:52 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: ... >> You have some demos... but no website or anything else other than your flood bot. You even speak of not showing anything else! > > And you've claimed they are "NOTHING". Other than what I said they were. And you are STILL just playing games. For crying out loud, are you seriously unable to stop. No site. No program that helps you or your family. Nothing to show but learning (which is of course important but done to "best" me) and your flood bot. > Here's the part you're missing: > You, not seeing any value in any of them, The value of your flood bot is to annoy people and play victim. > says more about you than it > does me or the demos. Anyone stuck in spreadsheet land would agree. YOUR. GAMES. ARE. STUPID. >>>> Fair enough. But why have you >>>> been twisting this comment of mine to suggest that I was saying learning >>>> was bad or whatever? >>> >>> Twisting? Even if I never showed a single thing, knowledge would be >>> good for its own sake. >> >> Twisting... sigh. Yes, you have knowledge and that is cool > > And you're also saying it's worthless to me... make up your mind already. You are the one who said that you know NOBODY who thought knowledge was of value... now you twist that to mean me. STOP. PLAYING. GAMES. >>>> You now agree you have NOTHING to show >>> >>> ... other than the examples I've shown. If you don't believe it's >>> obvious I can create pretty much any kind of look and a fair amount >>> of functionality based on what I have already shown, then it's obvious >>> you don't understand what you've looked at. >>> >>>> I was talking tech: one can generally (though not always) tell if a site >>>> is a WordPress or similar type site from the template "look". >>> >>> So point to these telltale signs already. >> >> Take a look at these: >> >> <https://www.creativebloq.com/web-design/examples-wordpress-11121165> >> >> Most of those look like WordPress type template sites. > > Based on 'looking' at what? Those sites. They scream template... most likely WordPress. > Again, there's a reason you can't say. The reason you, in your mind, > so often believe you correctly 'guess' that a site is a WP site is based > on the fact that almost 1 in 3 sites are nowadays. That has zero to do with their look. Literally nothing. > So while you're busy > 'guessing' you can't actually explain the things behind your 'guess', > because there aren't any. The odds are in WP's favor and you fail to > understand that. If you could say, you would... but you can't, so you > don't. You'll write 50 more posts and you won't be able to point to a > single thing. The fact is, CSS is what makes a site 'look' like it does, > WP has nothing to do with it. Need proof? Remove the style sheet(s). The fact you cannot see it is quite telling. The menu structure and a big image on top. VERY common on WordPress and other such templates. They are "generic". Here, instead of going into detail, this site does so fairly well: <https://www.primedesignsolutions.com/?p=1274> Key point I was talking about: ----- Your site may look like everyone else’s. Skilled designers can minimize this problem with creative use of graphics and customization within the template, but the most popular themes have been downloaded thousands of times. ----- And I will add that many templates look much alike. There are certainly some nits to pick there... but it is a decent start for you. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-07 21:56 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Arrogance is the bane of every ( brain dead ) feminist. |
| Message-ID | <608cf722-e8ba-4847-89e0-d13a7781c9d1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #454354 |
On Thursday, June 7, 2018 at 10:16:24 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: (snip BS) > >>>> I was talking tech: one can generally (though not always) tell if a site > >>>> is a WordPress or similar type site from the template "look". > >>> > >>> So point to these telltale signs already. > >> > >> Take a look at these: > >> > >> <https://www.creativebloq.com/web-design/examples-wordpress-11121165> > >> > >> Most of those look like WordPress type template sites. > > > > Based on 'looking' at what? > > Those sites. They scream template... most likely WordPress. Do you even know what a "template" is and why it's *not* a catch-all term that can bail you out here? Wordpress is *not* the CSS which makes a given WP site look the way it does. And it's only "most likely WordPress" because of how many sites are built using it now. > > Again, there's a reason you can't say. The reason you, in your mind, > > so often believe you correctly 'guess' that a site is a WP site is based > > on the fact that almost 1 in 3 sites are nowadays. > > That has zero to do with their look. AGAIN: WordPress has zero to do with their look. > > So while you're busy > > 'guessing' you can't actually explain the things behind your 'guess', > > because there aren't any. The odds are in WP's favor and you fail to > > understand that. If you could say, you would... but you can't, so you > > don't. You'll write 50 more posts and you won't be able to point to a > > single thing. The fact is, CSS is what makes a site 'look' like it does, > > WP has nothing to do with it. Need proof? Remove the style sheet(s). > > The fact you cannot see it is quite telling. So fire one up and remove the styling... tell me you can spot that it's a WP site. Hint: this logic proves what I'm saying is true. > The menu structure and a big image on top. What about the "menu structure"? Be specific. And a "big image on top"? Only templates sites have those, they're not 'in fashion' in the last few years? > VERY common on WordPress and other such templates. > They are "generic". They are *also* on virtually every kind of 'modern' site there is. > Here, instead of going into detail, this site does so fairly well: > > <https://www.primedesignsolutions.com/?p=1274> Same things... there is nothing there that isn't on virtually any kind of modern site... on *every* kind of modern site. > Key point I was talking about: > ----- > Your site may look like everyone else’s. Skilled designers can minimize > this problem with creative use of graphics and customization within the > template, but the most popular themes have been downloaded thousands of > times. > ----- That's marketing crap... you'd *still* be guessing what it was and you'd have a 1 in 3 shot that it's WP. Remove the styling, 'mystery' solved! > And I will add that many templates look much alike. Many sites, templates or not, have a hero image and similar menus. There are only so many things you can do and still have the thing work well from a UI perspective. > There are certainly some nits to pick there... but it is a decent start > for you. I suggest you get AMPPS and educate yourself. There are essentially single click installers in AMMPS and you can have a local site up in no time... no fussing with a stack (that the MacOS will keep crapping on with every update unless you do certain things), just a simple install and off you go. It's not just WP, either, you can install all kinds of stuff, Moodle, real estate software, whatever, it's literally a dev playground: <https://streamable.com/t68x7>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-07 22:33 -0700 |
| Subject | I don't need WordPress. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jun.7--10.33pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #454357 |
I don't need WordPress. Nor does Mike. You (Steve) are preaching to yourself.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-08 06:41 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: I don't need WordPress. |
| Message-ID | <fnump4Fu72oU7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #454362 |
<Jeff-Relf.Me @.> wrote: > I don't need WordPress. > > Nor does Mike. > > You (Steve) are preaching to yourself. > WordPress is a fine tool — but it has pros and cons like anything else.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-08 09:18 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: I don't need WordPress. |
| Message-ID | <dd7ea87c-43c2-4009-be1d-1beab763d126@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #454362 |
On Thursday, June 7, 2018 at 11:33:37 PM UTC-6, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > I don't need WordPress. > > Nor does Mike. I disagree, if anyone ever needed anything, Snit needs WP. > You (Steve) are preaching to yourself. Possibly, but someone who has had the website building portion of his business dry up because the web outpaced him, would benefit from using WP to keep that service relevant in the modern web era.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-08 09:33 -0700 |
| Subject | Social Security Disability (SSDI). |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jun.8--9.33am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #454424 |
> if anyone ever needed anything, Snit needs WordPress. > the website building portion of his business dried up > because the web outpaced him Mike doesn't need WordPress nor anything like that. Most likely, he gets Social Security Disability (SSDI).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-08 09:39 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Social Security Disability (SSDI). |
| Message-ID | <fff3dafa-cbb9-4c27-a725-7276a2ddae01@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #454425 |
On Friday, June 8, 2018 at 10:33:56 AM UTC-6, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > > if anyone ever needed anything, Snit needs WordPress. > > the website building portion of his business dried up > > because the web outpaced him > > Mike doesn't need WordPress nor anything like that. > > Most likely, he gets Social Security Disability (SSDI). I agree but he has 3 kids so his SSDI probably needs supplementing (unless his wife is working 24 hours a day).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-08 12:11 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Social Security Disability (SSDI). |
| Message-ID | <fo02nvF80giU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #454427 |
On 6/8/18 9:39 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Friday, June 8, 2018 at 10:33:56 AM UTC-6, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>> if anyone ever needed anything, Snit needs WordPress. >>> the website building portion of his business dried up >>> because the web outpaced him >> >> Mike doesn't need WordPress nor anything like that. >> >> Most likely, he gets Social Security Disability (SSDI). > > I agree but he has 3 kids so his SSDI probably needs supplementing > (unless his wife is working 24 hours a day). > You say you agree with his disagreement with you. Oy. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-08 13:17 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Social Security Disability (SSDI). |
| Message-ID | <00d0d8a6-79cc-4d3f-8985-bd7844408e35@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #454456 |
On Friday, June 8, 2018 at 1:12:02 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
> On 6/8/18 9:39 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> > On Friday, June 8, 2018 at 10:33:56 AM UTC-6, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> >>> if anyone ever needed anything, Snit needs WordPress.
> >>> the website building portion of his business dried up
> >>> because the web outpaced him
> >>
> >> Mike doesn't need WordPress nor anything like that.
> >>
> >> Most likely, he gets Social Security Disability (SSDI).
> >
> > I agree but he has 3 kids so his SSDI probably needs supplementing
> > (unless his wife is working 24 hours a day).
> >
> You say you agree with his disagreement with you.
LOL!
I agreed with his suggestion about what is "Most likely", that you get SSDI,
which is why I wrote my agreement under that statement and not the first
one, the topic of which I already made clear my position in a previous post
("if anyone ever needed anything, Snit needs WordPress."). It's called
'context', if you ever begin to learn to comprehend what you read this
'context' stuff will become important ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-08 13:42 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Social Security Disability (SSDI). |
| Message-ID | <fo0829Fp19uU28@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #454467 |
On 6/8/18 1:17 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Friday, June 8, 2018 at 1:12:02 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
>> On 6/8/18 9:39 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> On Friday, June 8, 2018 at 10:33:56 AM UTC-6, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>>>>> if anyone ever needed anything, Snit needs WordPress.
>>>>> the website building portion of his business dried up
>>>>> because the web outpaced him
>>>>
>>>> Mike doesn't need WordPress nor anything like that.
>>>>
>>>> Most likely, he gets Social Security Disability (SSDI).
>>>
>>> I agree but he has 3 kids so his SSDI probably needs supplementing
>>> (unless his wife is working 24 hours a day).
>>>
>> You say you agree with his disagreement with you.
>
> LOL!
>
> I agreed with his suggestion about what is "Most likely", that you get SSDI,
> which is why I wrote my agreement under that statement and not the first
> one, the topic of which I already made clear my position in a previous post
> ("if anyone ever needed anything, Snit needs WordPress."). It's called
> 'context', if you ever begin to learn to comprehend what you read this
> 'context' stuff will become important ;)
>
You agreed with his disagreement. Twist all you want.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-08 13:49 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Social Security Disability (SSDI). |
| Message-ID | <12afc9fd-e704-4b38-9c1c-00e9ad65de27@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #454472 |
On Friday, June 8, 2018 at 2:42:52 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
> On 6/8/18 1:17 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> > On Friday, June 8, 2018 at 1:12:02 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
> >> On 6/8/18 9:39 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> >>> On Friday, June 8, 2018 at 10:33:56 AM UTC-6, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> >>>>> if anyone ever needed anything, Snit needs WordPress.
> >>>>> the website building portion of his business dried up
> >>>>> because the web outpaced him
> >>>>
> >>>> Mike doesn't need WordPress nor anything like that.
> >>>>
> >>>> Most likely, he gets Social Security Disability (SSDI).
> >>>
> >>> I agree but he has 3 kids so his SSDI probably needs supplementing
> >>> (unless his wife is working 24 hours a day).
> >>>
> >> You say you agree with his disagreement with you.
> >
> > LOL!
> >
> > I agreed with his suggestion about what is "Most likely", that you get SSDI,
> > which is why I wrote my agreement under that statement and not the first
> > one, the topic of which I already made clear my position in a previous post
> > ("if anyone ever needed anything, Snit needs WordPress."). It's called
> > 'context', if you ever begin to learn to comprehend what you read this
> > 'context' stuff will become important ;)
> >
> You agreed with his disagreement.
Correction: *you* read it that way, if you can call whatever it is you
do, 'reading' ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-08 13:55 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Social Security Disability (SSDI). |
| Message-ID | <fo08pfFp19uU30@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #454477 |
On 6/8/18 1:49 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Friday, June 8, 2018 at 2:42:52 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
>> On 6/8/18 1:17 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> On Friday, June 8, 2018 at 1:12:02 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
>>>> On 6/8/18 9:39 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>> On Friday, June 8, 2018 at 10:33:56 AM UTC-6, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>>>>>>> if anyone ever needed anything, Snit needs WordPress.
>>>>>>> the website building portion of his business dried up
>>>>>>> because the web outpaced him
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mike doesn't need WordPress nor anything like that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Most likely, he gets Social Security Disability (SSDI).
>>>>>
>>>>> I agree but he has 3 kids so his SSDI probably needs supplementing
>>>>> (unless his wife is working 24 hours a day).
>>>>>
>>>> You say you agree with his disagreement with you.
>>>
>>> LOL!
>>>
>>> I agreed with his suggestion about what is "Most likely", that you get SSDI,
>>> which is why I wrote my agreement under that statement and not the first
>>> one, the topic of which I already made clear my position in a previous post
>>> ("if anyone ever needed anything, Snit needs WordPress."). It's called
>>> 'context', if you ever begin to learn to comprehend what you read this
>>> 'context' stuff will become important ;)
>>>
>> You agreed with his disagreement.
>
> Correction: *you* read it that way, if you can call whatever it is you
> do, 'reading' ;)
>
Ah, insults. How clever. About time to ignore you and respond just to
your bot... it is actually more coherent than you are. Seriously, it
often is.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-08 14:10 -0700 |
| Subject | Shouting "Walk!" to a paraplegic, every day, for decades. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jun.8--2.10pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #454467 |
Last 15 years, Steve has been telling Mike: > if you ever begin to learn to comprehend what you read, > this 'context' stuff will become important ;) He (Mike) can't do it. Basically, you've been shouting "Walk!" to a paraplegic, every day, for decades.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-08 14:15 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Shouting "Walk!" to a paraplegic, every day, for decades. |
| Message-ID | <01e4fac3-cb4f-417e-b4ac-742595a84f2f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #454485 |
On Friday, June 8, 2018 at 3:10:42 PM UTC-6, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > Last 15 years, Steve has been telling Mike: > > if you ever begin to learn to comprehend what you read, > > this 'context' stuff will become important ;) > > He (Mike) can't do it. Basically, you've been > shouting "Walk!" to a paraplegic, every day, for decades. LOL! The 'Catholic' in me really believes he will walk one day ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-08 15:51 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Shouting "Walk!" to a paraplegic, every day, for decades. |
| Message-ID | <fo0fitFa2fpU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #454485 |
On 6/8/18 2:10 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > Last 15 years, Steve has been telling Mike: >> if you ever begin to learn to comprehend what you read, >> this 'context' stuff will become important ;) > > He (Mike) can't do it. Basically, you've been > shouting "Walk!" to a paraplegic, every day, for decades. > Amma ladda goochin, mumoo maluchin. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web