Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #452930 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Simon Singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-31 22:42 +0000 |
| Last post | 2018-06-03 23:23 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 143 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Simon Singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-05-31 22:42 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 17:01 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Simon Singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 01:12 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Simon Singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 01:49 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 21:32 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Simon Singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 14:19 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:35 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Simon Singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 14:49 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 08:04 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 09:16 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 09:35 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Simon Singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 16:24 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 09:53 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 10:06 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit says unsupported claims are lies <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 12:42 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Simon Singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 20:32 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 13:38 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 14:38 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit ignores the 9th amendment <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 14:48 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit says unsupported claims are lies <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 14:01 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-02 04:58 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:03 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 22:32 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 22:48 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 18:05 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 21:26 -0400
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 01:36 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:50 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 22:07 -0400
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 04:05 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 08:18 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 08:58 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 03:07 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 10:14 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:29 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 11:54 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:15 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 12:32 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:37 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 14:27 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 16:34 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 18:13 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 18:19 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 18:36 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:01 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:18 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:12 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 22:38 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:46 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 21:28 -0400
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:50 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 22:04 -0400
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 19:08 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:24 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:12 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 01:50 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 22:50 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 21:32 -0400
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:50 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. "Snit's dysautonomia http://bit.ly/2Jqpplk" <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:10 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:35 -0500
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 07:21 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 09:21 -0500
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Simon Singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 13:48 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 08:03 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 08:35 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:33 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 11:07 -0700
Re: Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2018-06-04 06:51 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 00:02 -0700
Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2018-06-04 14:16 +0000
Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 07:48 -0700
Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 09:20 -0700
Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 09:33 -0700
Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 09:59 -0700
Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 10:10 -0700
Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 10:12 -0700
Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 10:52 -0700
Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 10:35 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 08:42 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 09:54 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:43 -0500
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 07:21 -0700
Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2018-06-14 08:58 +0000
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-14 08:44 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 09:07 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-14 11:59 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 13:07 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-14 13:24 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 14:56 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-14 16:21 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 17:12 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-14 18:03 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 09:30 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-15 11:24 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 09:54 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 10:06 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 10:15 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 10:31 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 10:47 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 11:05 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 11:22 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 11:32 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 12:02 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 12:13 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 12:24 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 12:34 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 13:56 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 14:31 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 16:12 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 17:44 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 20:30 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 21:03 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-16 21:41 +0000
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 14:51 -0700
Re: Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2018-06-04 06:07 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 23:42 -0700
Re: Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2018-06-04 12:53 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 08:41 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 08:46 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 10:00 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 10:06 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 11:58 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 10:10 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 11:56 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 12:01 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 12:22 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:08 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 13:24 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 16:03 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 16:32 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 17:00 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 17:23 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:17 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:17 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 10:00 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 07:45 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 08:00 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 08:16 -0700
Re: Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2018-06-04 06:04 +0000
Re: Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 23:23 -0700
Page 7 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 08:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fnl4toF577rU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #453826 |
On 6/3/18 11:42 PM, Snit wrote: > On 6/3/18 11:07 PM, Sandman wrote: >>>>> Snit: >>>>> It is merely a fact Carroll was contacted by the police over his >>>>> harassment, a fact even Carroll has admitted to. >>>> simon singh: >>>> Then it should be trivial for you to prove this. >>> Not really, but also not really of any importance. Your belief or >>> lack of belief is of no real concern. As I said, it is merely a fact >>> that Carroll was contacted by the police for his harassment. >> No, it's merely a claim that he was. A claim from you. A 100% >> unsubstantiated >> claim from you. I.e. hot air. > > What an odd twist from you. > > Anyway, did you see where Carroll tossed you under he bus again? He > FINALLY admitted the page of yours with the faulty CSS was, in deed, > code that would not validate. He also claimed you admitted to this before. > > Invalid styling code shown on sandman.net <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>: > > <div style="padding: 3px; align: center;"> > > Same errors noted at the time (proving not from WBM changes): > > Message-ID: <C0A30BB5.502C7%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> > ----- > Line: 373 > Property align doesn't exist : center > Line: 412 > Property align doesn't exist : center > Line: 431 > Property align doesn't exist : center > ----- > > And now Carroll has admitted I was right all along. > > Curious what you say about it? > Sandman snipped... as to be expected. He does not care if he twists things, and he cries about how Carroll threw him under the bus. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 08:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <aefa65db-4827-477d-a006-28ef08b819a0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #453826 |
On Monday, June 4, 2018 at 12:42:07 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 6/3/18 11:07 PM, Sandman wrote: > >>>> Snit: > >>>> It is merely a fact Carroll was contacted by the police over his > >>>> harassment, a fact even Carroll has admitted to. > >>> simon singh: > >>> Then it should be trivial for you to prove this. > >> Not really, but also not really of any importance. Your belief or > >> lack of belief is of no real concern. As I said, it is merely a fact > >> that Carroll was contacted by the police for his harassment. > > No, it's merely a claim that he was. A claim from you. A 100% unsubstantiated > > claim from you. I.e. hot air. > > What an odd twist from you. > > Anyway, did you see where Carroll tossed you under he bus again? He > FINALLY admitted the page of yours with the faulty CSS was, in deed, > code that would not validate. Over-medicated again, Snit? Both he and I had a conversation on this trivial oversight ~14 years ago, the only notable thing about it is how you still act like you won the lotto because of it. Meanwhile, there sits your ‘business’ site, looking like it does and has for all that time. If there’s a bus in this scenario it’s one that drove over that slab of flesh you call your head. > He also claimed you admitted to this before. He did so right away... he’s not you... running from every known bit of reality as you jump from one whining liefest to the next. > And now Carroll has admitted I was right all along. I also “admitted” that you’ve done a ton of lying about all kinds of things, it’s “interesting” how you leave that out. > Curious what you say about it? Like anyone with a working brain, he’d probably point out how I ‘m only right or honest in your diseased mind when it fits some trolling BS of yours. This doesn’t pass the laugh test because you’ve already impugned me as *your* witness (based on what you’ve said about me for over a decade). Sober up.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 10:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fnl9i0F63hiU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #453864 |
On 6/4/18 8:46 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Monday, June 4, 2018 at 12:42:07 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 6/3/18 11:07 PM, Sandman wrote: >>>>>> Snit: >>>>>> It is merely a fact Carroll was contacted by the police over his >>>>>> harassment, a fact even Carroll has admitted to. >>>>> simon singh: >>>>> Then it should be trivial for you to prove this. >>>> Not really, but also not really of any importance. Your belief or >>>> lack of belief is of no real concern. As I said, it is merely a fact >>>> that Carroll was contacted by the police for his harassment. >>> No, it's merely a claim that he was. A claim from you. A 100% unsubstantiated >>> claim from you. I.e. hot air. >> >> What an odd twist from you. >> >> Anyway, did you see where Carroll tossed you under he bus again? He >> FINALLY admitted the page of yours with the faulty CSS was, in deed, >> code that would not validate. > > Over-medicated again, Snit? Both he and I had a conversation > on this trivial oversight ~14 years ago, the only notable thing > about it is how you still act like you won the lotto because of it. > Meanwhile, there sits your ‘business’ site, looking like it does > and has for all that time. If there’s a bus in this scenario it’s one > that drove over that slab of flesh you call your head. > >> He also claimed you admitted to this before. > > He did so right away... he’s not you... running from every known > bit of reality as you jump from one whining liefest to the next. > >> And now Carroll has admitted I was right all along. > > I also “admitted” that you’ve done a ton of lying about all > kinds of things, it’s “interesting” how you leave that out. > >> Curious what you say about it? > > Like anyone with a working brain, he’d probably point > out how I ‘m only right or honest in your diseased mind > when it fits some trolling BS of yours. This doesn’t pass > the laugh test because you’ve already impugned me as > *your* witness (based on what you’ve said about me for > over a decade). Sober up. > Sandman denied it for years... and as far as I know STILL has never admitted his CSS failed to validate. Heck, he has been trolling me for over a decade over his anger over my noting it. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 10:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <aeb34108-91a6-406f-bf2b-e3344d8fe64f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #453871 |
On Monday, June 4, 2018 at 11:00:52 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 6/4/18 8:46 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Monday, June 4, 2018 at 12:42:07 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 6/3/18 11:07 PM, Sandman wrote: > >>>>>> Snit: > >>>>>> It is merely a fact Carroll was contacted by the police over his > >>>>>> harassment, a fact even Carroll has admitted to. > >>>>> simon singh: > >>>>> Then it should be trivial for you to prove this. > >>>> Not really, but also not really of any importance. Your belief or > >>>> lack of belief is of no real concern. As I said, it is merely a fact > >>>> that Carroll was contacted by the police for his harassment. > >>> No, it's merely a claim that he was. A claim from you. A 100% unsubstantiated > >>> claim from you. I.e. hot air. > >> > >> What an odd twist from you. > >> > >> Anyway, did you see where Carroll tossed you under he bus again? He > >> FINALLY admitted the page of yours with the faulty CSS was, in deed, > >> code that would not validate. > > > > Over-medicated again, Snit? Both he and I had a conversation > > on this trivial oversight ~14 years ago, the only notable thing > > about it is how you still act like you won the lotto because of it. > > Meanwhile, there sits your ‘business’ site, looking like it does > > and has for all that time. If there’s a bus in this scenario it’s one > > that drove over that slab of flesh you call your head. > > > >> He also claimed you admitted to this before. > > > > He did so right away... he’s not you... running from every known > > bit of reality as you jump from one whining liefest to the next. > > > >> And now Carroll has admitted I was right all along. > > > > I also “admitted” that you’ve done a ton of lying about all > > kinds of things, it’s “interesting” how you leave that out. > > > >> Curious what you say about it? > > > > Like anyone with a working brain, he’d probably point > > out how I ‘m only right or honest in your diseased mind > > when it fits some trolling BS of yours. This doesn’t pass > > the laugh test because you’ve already impugned me as > > *your* witness (based on what you’ve said about me for > > over a decade). Sober up. > > > Sandman denied it for years... Why are *you* talking about what "others" have denied for years?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 11:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7e02cd8b-42c9-4c72-b2cf-86ba5b94cc37@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #453874 |
On Monday, June 4, 2018 at 10:06:11 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Monday, June 4, 2018 at 11:00:52 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > On 6/4/18 8:46 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > On Monday, June 4, 2018 at 12:42:07 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > >> On 6/3/18 11:07 PM, Sandman wrote: > > >>>>>> Snit: > > >>>>>> It is merely a fact Carroll was contacted by the police over his > > >>>>>> harassment, a fact even Carroll has admitted to. > > >>>>> simon singh: > > >>>>> Then it should be trivial for you to prove this. > > >>>> Not really, but also not really of any importance. Your belief or > > >>>> lack of belief is of no real concern. As I said, it is merely a fact > > >>>> that Carroll was contacted by the police for his harassment. > > >>> No, it's merely a claim that he was. A claim from you. A 100% unsubstantiated > > >>> claim from you. I.e. hot air. > > >> > > >> What an odd twist from you. > > >> > > >> Anyway, did you see where Carroll tossed you under he bus again? He > > >> FINALLY admitted the page of yours with the faulty CSS was, in deed, > > >> code that would not validate. > > > > > > Over-medicated again, Snit? Both he and I had a conversation > > > on this trivial oversight ~14 years ago, the only notable thing > > > about it is how you still act like you won the lotto because of it. > > > Meanwhile, there sits your ‘business’ site, looking like it does > > > and has for all that time. If there’s a bus in this scenario it’s one > > > that drove over that slab of flesh you call your head. > > > > > >> He also claimed you admitted to this before. > > > > > > He did so right away... he’s not you... running from every known > > > bit of reality as you jump from one whining liefest to the next. > > > > > >> And now Carroll has admitted I was right all along. > > > > > > I also “admitted” that you’ve done a ton of lying about all > > > kinds of things, it’s “interesting” how you leave that out. > > > > > >> Curious what you say about it? > > > > > > Like anyone with a working brain, he’d probably point > > > out how I ‘m only right or honest in your diseased mind > > > when it fits some trolling BS of yours. This doesn’t pass > > > the laugh test because you’ve already impugned me as > > > *your* witness (based on what you’ve said about me for > > > over a decade). Sober up. > > > > > Sandman denied it for years... > > Why are *you* talking about what "others" have denied for years? Just hogwash from him. But Satan has left objectivity behind and is simply holding me guilty for the acts of himself. The one talent Satan learned fully is to try to humiliate Prescott Computer Guy into false confession and if that does not work, drown him out with flooding or subtly change the target. I persist in being unpersuaded that these posts are unequivocally not from Prescott Computer Guy, clearly they are from Satan. - My Snoring Solution http://www.5z8.info/trojan_p4g1zy_how-to-skin-a-gerbil http://www.5z8.info/killallimmigrants_t8w8io_asian-brides http://www.5z8.info/dogs-being-eaten_g0w7hf_molotovcocktail Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 10:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fnla49F66nqU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #453871 |
On 6/4/18 10:00 AM, Snit wrote: > On 6/4/18 8:46 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >> On Monday, June 4, 2018 at 12:42:07 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>> On 6/3/18 11:07 PM, Sandman wrote: >>>>>>> Snit: >>>>>>> It is merely a fact Carroll was contacted by the police over his >>>>>>> harassment, a fact even Carroll has admitted to. >>>>>> simon singh: >>>>>> Then it should be trivial for you to prove this. >>>>> Not really, but also not really of any importance. Your belief or >>>>> lack of belief is of no real concern. As I said, it is merely a fact >>>>> that Carroll was contacted by the police for his harassment. >>>> No, it's merely a claim that he was. A claim from you. A 100% >>>> unsubstantiated >>>> claim from you. I.e. hot air. >>> >>> What an odd twist from you. >>> >>> Anyway, did you see where Carroll tossed you under he bus again? He >>> FINALLY admitted the page of yours with the faulty CSS was, in deed, >>> code that would not validate. >> >> Over-medicated again, Snit? Both he and I had a conversation >> on this trivial oversight ~14 years ago, the only notable thing >> about it is how you still act like you won the lotto because of it. >> Meanwhile, there sits your ‘business’ site, looking like it does >> and has for all that time. If there’s a bus in this scenario it’s one >> that drove over that slab of flesh you call your head. >> >>> He also claimed you admitted to this before. >> >> He did so right away... he’s not you... running from every known >> bit of reality as you jump from one whining liefest to the next. >> >>> And now Carroll has admitted I was right all along. >> >> I also “admitted” that you’ve done a ton of lying about all >> kinds of things, it’s “interesting” how you leave that out. >>> Curious what you say about it? >> >> Like anyone with a working brain, he’d probably point >> out how I ‘m only right or honest in your diseased mind >> when it fits some trolling BS of yours. This doesn’t pass >> the laugh test because you’ve already impugned me as >> *your* witness (based on what you’ve said about me for >> over a decade). Sober up. >> > Sandman denied it for years... and as far as I know STILL has never > admitted his CSS failed to validate. Heck, he has been trolling me for > over a decade over his anger over my noting it. > Carroll responded with whining that I actually point out his lies, and Sandman's... even though before he whined I did not point out his EVERY lie. LOL! Carroll is having one of his public break downs. Again. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 11:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1a09c9a9-1708-495d-8a0d-7d0e914073ed@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #453877 |
On Monday, June 4, 2018 at 11:10:36 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
> On 6/4/18 10:00 AM, Snit wrote:
> > On 6/4/18 8:46 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> >> On Monday, June 4, 2018 at 12:42:07 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
> >>> On 6/3/18 11:07 PM, Sandman wrote:
> >>>>>>> Snit:
> >>>>>>> It is merely a fact Carroll was contacted by the police over his
> >>>>>>> harassment, a fact even Carroll has admitted to.
> >>>>>> simon singh:
> >>>>>> Then it should be trivial for you to prove this.
> >>>>> Not really, but also not really of any importance. Your belief or
> >>>>> lack of belief is of no real concern. As I said, it is merely a fact
> >>>>> that Carroll was contacted by the police for his harassment.
> >>>> No, it's merely a claim that he was. A claim from you. A 100%
> >>>> unsubstantiated
> >>>> claim from you. I.e. hot air.
> >>>
> >>> What an odd twist from you.
> >>>
> >>> Anyway, did you see where Carroll tossed you under he bus again? He
> >>> FINALLY admitted the page of yours with the faulty CSS was, in deed,
> >>> code that would not validate.
> >>
> >> Over-medicated again, Snit? Both he and I had a conversation
> >> on this trivial oversight ~14 years ago, the only notable thing
> >> about it is how you still act like you won the lotto because of it.
> >> Meanwhile, there sits your ‘business’ site, looking like it does
> >> and has for all that time. If there’s a bus in this scenario it’s one
> >> that drove over that slab of flesh you call your head.
> >>
> >>> He also claimed you admitted to this before.
> >>
> >> He did so right away... he’s not you... running from every known
> >> bit of reality as you jump from one whining liefest to the next.
> >>
> >>> And now Carroll has admitted I was right all along.
> >>
> >> I also “admitted” that you’ve done a ton of lying about all
> >> kinds of things, it’s “interesting” how you leave that out.
> >>> Curious what you say about it?
> >>
> >> Like anyone with a working brain, he’d probably point
> >> out how I ‘m only right or honest in your diseased mind
> >> when it fits some trolling BS of yours. This doesn’t pass
> >> the laugh test because you’ve already impugned me as
> >> *your* witness (based on what you’ve said about me for
> >> over a decade). Sober up.
> >>
> > Sandman denied it for years... and as far as I know STILL has never
> > admitted his CSS failed to validate. Heck, he has been trolling me for
> > over a decade over his anger over my noting it.
> >
> Carroll responded with
... reality? Yes. By the way, why are *you* talking about CSS issues?
What's this... and what are this issues with it?
@charset "UTF-8";
html {
font-size: 62.5%;
height: 100%;
}
body {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
color: #000;
line-height: 1.15em;
overflow-y: scroll;
font-size: 1.4em;
height: 100%;
background: #EFEFE6 url(../images/bg/header-shadow.png) no-repeat left top;
}
body, td, th {
font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
color: #1D3A70;
}
.container {
width: 809px;
margin: 0;
padding: 0px;
display: block;
background: url(../images/bg/bg.png);
min-height: 100%;
/* Added to show a student how this could be centered
position: relative; -- not really needed, but similar to what we do in class
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
*/
}
header {
width: 809px;
float: left;
margin: 0px;
padding: 0px;
display: block;
}
header img {
height: 142px;
width: 787px;
background: url(../images/bg/comp_guy_anim.gif) no-repeat;
}
nav {
float: left;
width: 180px;
padding: 0px 0px 10px;
margin: 0px;
display: block;
}
article {
width: 600px;
float: left;
padding-top: 0px;
padding-right: 4px;
padding-bottom: 10px;
padding-left: 0px;
display: block;
}
ul, dl {
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
ol {
margin: 0px 0px 0px 15px;
padding: 0px;
}
li {
line-height: 1.5em;
}
img {
border: none;
}
a:link {
color: #42413C;
text-decoration: underline;
}
a:visited {
color: #6E6C64;
text-decoration: underline;
}
a:hover, a:active, a:focus {
text-decoration: none;
}
article ul, article ol {
padding: 0 15px 5px 40px;
}
article h1 {
letter-spacing: 1px;
text-align: center;
font-size: 1.15em;
font-family: Cantarell, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
font-weight: bold;
padding-top: 0px;
padding-right: 0px;
padding-bottom: 9px;
padding-left: 0px;
margin-top: 0px;
margin-right: 30px;
margin-bottom: 0px;
margin-left: 0px;
line-height: 1em;
}
article h2 {
font-size: 1.1em;
border-left: 7px solid #C7D1BB;
letter-spacing: 2px;
font-variant: small-caps;
background: #E2EAD9;
border-top: 1px solid #C7D1BB;
border-right: 1px solid #333333;
border-bottom: 1px solid #333333;
margin-top: 0px;
margin-right: 20px;
margin-bottom: 7px;
margin-left: 20px;
padding-top: 3px;
padding-right: 0px;
padding-bottom: 3px;
padding-left: 7px;
font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
font-weight: bold;
line-height: 1.1em;
}
article h2 a {
color: #1D3A70;
text-decoration: none;
}
article p {
font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
line-height: 1.5em;
margin-bottom: 10px;
margin-left: 30px;
margin-right: 30px;
margin-top: 0px;
padding: 0px;
text-align: left;
text-indent: 0px;
}
.center {
text-align: center;
margin-right: auto;
margin-left: auto;
}
article img {
text-align: justify;
padding: 0px;
text-indent: 0px;
margin-top: 0px;
margin-right: 15px;
margin-bottom: 0px;
margin-left: 0px;
}
article table td {
margin: 0px;
padding: 0px;
text-indent: 0px;
}
article table.border {
border: 4px solid #C7D1BB;
text-align: center;
margin: 0px;
padding: 0px;
}
article table.left {
text-align: justify;
margin: 0px;
padding: 0px;
line-height: 1.6em;
letter-spacing: 1px;
text-indent: 0px;
}
article img.left {
padding: 1px;
border: 2px solid #BEC8B3;
background: #666666;
text-indent: 0px;
float: left;
margin-top: 0px;
margin-right: 15px;
margin-bottom: 5px;
margin-left: 0px;
}
article img.left_no_border {
padding: 0px;
text-indent: 0px;
border-style: none;
float: left;
margin-top: 0px;
margin-right: 15px;
margin-bottom: 5px;
margin-left: 0px;
}
article img.right {
padding: 0px 0px 0px 1px;
border: 2px solid #BEC8B3;
text-indent: 0px;
background: #666666;
float: right;
margin: 0px 0px 15px;
}
a #Form:hover {
border: 2px solid #00F;
background-color: #C7D1BB;
}
article img.right_no_border {
padding: 0px;
text-indent: 0px;
border-style: none;
float: right;
margin-top: 0px;
margin-right: 0px;
margin-bottom: 5px;
margin-left: 10px;
}
article img.no_border {
margin: 0px;
text-indent: 0px;
border-style: none;
padding: 0px;
}
article p strong {
font-weight: normal;
}
table.contact {
padding-top: 0px;
padding-right: 40px;
padding-bottom: 10px;
padding-left: 20px;
border-collapse : collapse;
margin-top: 0px;
margin-right: auto;
margin-bottom: 0px;
margin-left: auto;
width: 80%;
}
table.contact td {
padding-top: 0px;
padding-right: 3px;
padding-bottom: 0px;
padding-left: 3px;
vertical-align: top;
}
table.inset {
padding-top: 0px;
padding-right: 300px;
padding-bottom: 10px;
padding-left: 20px;
border-collapse : collapse;
margin-top: 0px;
margin-right: 20px;
margin-bottom: 0px;
margin-left: 30px;
line-height: 1.5em;
}
table.inset p {
margin-right: 0px;
margin-left: 0px;
padding-right: 0px;
padding-left: 0px;
}
table.inset td {
font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
vertical-align: top;
margin: 10px;
border-bottom-width: 5px;
border-bottom-style: solid;
border-bottom-color: #FFF;
padding: 0px;
border-top-width: 5px;
border-top-style: solid;
border-top-color: #FFF;
}
table.inset img.left_no_border {
margin: 0px;
padding-top: 3px;
padding-right: 10px;
padding-bottom: 0px;
padding-left: 5px;
}
table.lined_up {
margin-left: 25px;
padding: 0px;
margin-top: 0px;
margin-right: 0px;
margin-bottom: 10px;
}
table.portfolio {
padding: 0px;
border-width: 0px;
border-style: none;
margin-top: 0px;
margin-right: auto;
margin-bottom: 20px;
margin-left: auto;
border-collapse : collapse;
}
table.portfolio a, table.portfolio a:link, table.portfolio a:visited, table.portfolio a:hover, table.portfolio a:active {
text-decoration: none;
font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
font-size: .9em;
line-height: 1.1em;
}
table.portfolio a:hover {
text-decoration: underline;
}
table.portfolio img {
padding: 1px;
border: 2px solid #BEC8B3;
background: #666666;
text-align: center;
vertical-align: bottom;
margin: 8px 8px 2px;
}
table.portfolio img:hover {
border-color: #0000FF;
}
table.portfolio img.no_border {
padding: 0px;
border: 0px none #FFFFFF;
background: #FFFFFF;
text-align: center;
vertical-align: bottom;
margin: 0px;
}
table.portfolio td {
padding: 0px;
text-align: center;
vertical-align: top;
margin: 0px;
}
table.testimonial {
width: 535px;
margin-top: 0px;
margin-right: auto;
margin-bottom: 25px;
margin-left: auto;
padding-top: 0px;
padding-right: 0px;
padding-bottom: 0px;
padding-left: 0px;
border-collapse : collapse;
font-size: 0.9em;
}
table.testimonial td {
margin: 0px;
padding: 0px;
}
table.testimonial img {
margin: 0px;
padding: 0px;
}
table.testimonial td.top {
background-image: url(../images/testimonials/TestimonialTop.gif);
background-repeat: no-repeat;
height: 20px;
line-height: 1em;
}
table.testimonial td.middle {
background-image: url(../images/testimonials/TestimonialMiddle.gif);
background-repeat: repeat-y;
}
table.testimonial td.middle p {
padding-top: 5px;
padding-right: 20px;
padding-bottom: 0px;
padding-left: 20px;
text-indent: 20px;
text-align: left;
margin: 0px;
}
table.testimonial td.bottom {
background-image: url(../images/testimonials/TestimonialBottom.gif);
background-repeat: no-repeat;
height: 100px;
background-position: bottom;
}
table.testimonial td.bottom p {
text-align: right;
color: #000;
font-style: italic;
margin: 0px;
padding-top: 0px;
padding-right: 25px;
padding-bottom: 25px;
padding-left: 50px;
}
table.testimonial td.bottom img {
border-top-style: none;
border-right-style: none;
border-bottom-style: none;
border-left-style: none;
text-align: left;
padding-top: 0px;
padding-right: 0px;
padding-bottom: 0px;
padding-left: 100px;
margin-top: 0px;
margin-right: 100px;
margin-bottom: 0px;
margin-left: 0px;
}
tr.no_pad, tr.no_pad td, tr.no_pad td img {
margin: 0px;
padding: 0px;
border-top-style: none;
border-right-style: none;
border-bottom-style: none;
border-left-style: none;
}
td.nowrap {
white-space: nowrap;
}
td.right_just, table.inset td.right_just {
text-align: right;
padding-right: 10px;
}
nav a {
color: #000000;
font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
margin-left: 30px;
margin-right: 15px;
text-decoration: none;
-webkit-transition: all 0.2s ease-in;
-moz-transition: all 0.2s ease-in;
display: block;
padding: 5px;
text-decoration: none;
border-top: 1px solid #FFFFFF;
border-right: 1px solid #999999;
border-bottom: 1px solid #999999;
border-left: 1px solid #FFFFFF;
background: #CED9C2;
text-decoration: none;
margin-top: 0px;
margin-bottom: 3px;
line-height: 1.2em;
}
nav a:link {
color: #000000;
text-decoration: none;
}
nav a:visited {
color: #660033;
text-decoration: none;
}
nav a:hover, nav a:focus {
color: #000;
border-right: 3px solid #333333;
background-color: #D5E1C9;
text-decoration: none;
}
nav a:active {
color: #000000;
border-right: 3px solid #333333;
background-color: #D7E3CB;
text-decoration: none;
}
nav a.current {
border-top: 1px solid #999999;
border-right: 1px solid #FFFFFF;
border-bottom: 1px solid #FFFFFF;
border-left: 1px solid #949494;
background: #BEC8B3;
text-decoration: none;
}
nav a.current:visited {
color: #000000;
text-decoration: none;
}
nav a.current:hover, nav a.current:focus {
color: #000000;
background: #BEC8B3;
border-right: 4px solid #666666;
text-decoration: none;
}
nav a.current:active {
color: #000000;
background: #B4C6DE;
border-right: 3px solid #333333;
}
nav a.no_bottom_pad {
padding-bottom: 0px;
text-decoration: none;
}
footer {
position: relative;
clear: both;
padding: 30px 0px 0px;
color: #000000;
text-align: center;
text-indent: 0px;
display: block;
margin: 0px 0px 0px 170px;
}
footer p {
font-size: .9em;
margin: 0px;
padding: 0px;
}
footer p strong {
font-weight: normal;
}
footer a {
color: #000000;
text-decoration: none;
}
footer a:hover {
color: #000000;
text-decoration: underline;
}
.small {
font-size: 0.75em;
color: #666666;
}
footer p.small {
font-size: 0.75em;
color: #666666;
line-height: 1.1em;
margin: 25px 120px 0px 110px;
border-bottom: none;
padding: 0px 0px 15px;
border-top-style: none;
border-right-style: none;
border-left-style: none;
}
.noPrint {
display: block;
margin: 0px;
padding: 0px;
border-top-style: none;
border-right-style: none;
border-bottom-style: none;
border-left-style: none;
}
.printOnly {
display: none;
border-top-style: none;
border-right-style: none;
border-bottom-style: none;
border-left-style: none;
}
.hidden {
display: none;
}
td.ad {
color: #999;
text-align: center;
font-size: 90%;
}
td.ad img:hover {
background-color: #00F;
}
.speedtest {
overflow: hidden;
height: 400px;
width: 500px;
}
.speedtest iframe {
padding: 0px;
margin-top: -120px;
margin-right: 0px;
margin-bottom: 0px;
margin-left: 0px;
height: 400px;
width: 500px;
}
ul.button-link {
margin: 0px 0px 1px 21px;
padding: 0px;
display: block;
clear: both;
float: none;
width: 100%;
height: 36px;
}
ul.button-link li {
float: left;
list-style: none;
height: 23px;
font-family: sans-serif;
font-weight: bold;
margin: 0 auto;
padding: 0;
}
ul.button-link li a {
background-image: url(../images/bg/button-grad-other.gif);
background-repeat: repeat-x;
border-right-color: #B2B2B2;
border-right-style: solid;
border-left-color: #B2B2B2;
border-left-style: solid;
font-variant: small-caps;
line-height: 1.5em;
background-color: #D8DFD1;
margin: 0px 6px 9px 0px;
padding: 4px 8px 0px;
color: #000;
height: 23px;
float: left;
}
ul.button-link li.current a {
background: #DFE7D6 url(../images/bg/button-grad.gif) repeat-x;
}
ul.button-link a, ul.button-link a:link, ul.button-link a:visited, ul.button-link a:hover, ul.button-link a:active {
color: #000;
text-decoration: none;
}
ul.button-link li:hover a {
background: #DEE5D5 url(../images/bg/button-grad-hover.gif) repeat-x;
}
table.faq {
background: #EFEFEF;
margin-right: auto;
margin-left: auto;
text-align: center;
padding: 0px 0px 5px;
margin-bottom: 10px;
border-radius: 10px;
}
table.faq td {
font-size: 0.75em;
color: #666666;
text-align: center;
margin: 0px auto;
padding: 0px;
}
table.faq img {
margin: 10px 10px 0px;
padding: 0px;
}
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 12:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fnlgkgF7iu6U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #453871 |
On 6/4/18 10:00 AM, Snit wrote:
> On 6/4/18 8:46 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> On Monday, June 4, 2018 at 12:42:07 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
>>> On 6/3/18 11:07 PM, Sandman wrote:
>>>>>>> Snit:
>>>>>>> It is merely a fact Carroll was contacted by the police over his
>>>>>>> harassment, a fact even Carroll has admitted to.
>>>>>> simon singh:
>>>>>> Then it should be trivial for you to prove this.
>>>>> Not really, but also not really of any importance. Your belief or
>>>>> lack of belief is of no real concern. As I said, it is merely a fact
>>>>> that Carroll was contacted by the police for his harassment.
>>>> No, it's merely a claim that he was. A claim from you. A 100%
>>>> unsubstantiated
>>>> claim from you. I.e. hot air.
>>>
>>> What an odd twist from you.
>>>
>>> Anyway, did you see where Carroll tossed you under he bus again? He
>>> FINALLY admitted the page of yours with the faulty CSS was, in deed,
>>> code that would not validate.
>>
>> Over-medicated again, Snit? Both he and I had a conversation
>> on this trivial oversight ~14 years ago, the only notable thing
>> about it is how you still act like you won the lotto because of it.
>> Meanwhile, there sits your ‘business’ site, looking like it does
>> and has for all that time. If there’s a bus in this scenario it’s one
>> that drove over that slab of flesh you call your head.
>>
>>> He also claimed you admitted to this before.
>>
>> He did so right away... he’s not you... running from every known
>> bit of reality as you jump from one whining liefest to the next.
>>
>>> And now Carroll has admitted I was right all along.
>>
>> I also “admitted” that you’ve done a ton of lying about all
>> kinds of things, it’s “interesting” how you leave that out.
>>> Curious what you say about it?
>>
>> Like anyone with a working brain, he’d probably point
>> out how I ‘m only right or honest in your diseased mind
>> when it fits some trolling BS of yours. This doesn’t pass
>> the laugh test because you’ve already impugned me as
>> *your* witness (based on what you’ve said about me for
>> over a decade). Sober up.
>>
> Sandman denied it for years... and as far as I know STILL has never
> admitted his CSS failed to validate. Heck, he has been trolling me for
> over a decade over his anger over my noting it.
>
Carroll responded by changing the topic to the ONLY thing he ever thinks
about... me and things related to me. He now wants me to help him
understand my CSS.
Oy.
No thanks, Carroll... not interested in helping you copy my site again.
But why not focus on the topic here: how you tossed Sandman under the
bus again:
Invalid styling code shown on sandman.net
<https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>:
<div style="padding: 3px; align: center;">
Same errors noted at the time (proving not from WBM changes):
Message-ID: <C0A30BB5.502C7%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>
-----
Line: 373
Property align doesn't exist : center
Line: 412
Property align doesn't exist : center
Line: 431
Property align doesn't exist : center
-----
And now Carroll has admitted I was right all along.
Poor Sandman... all he could do was respond with his flood bot. LOL!
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 12:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f08f1e72-b9d2-4da2-a053-1190031df354@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #453900 |
On Monday, June 4, 2018 at 1:01:40 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > Carroll responded by changing the topic to the ONLY thing he ever thinks > about... me and things related to me. You were talking about the tech topic of CSS... as I am. So what are you whining about? > But why not focus on the topic here: how you tossed Sandman under the > bus again: "Interesting" that's the "topic" given that you alleged the following: "I do not focus on personalities - I focus on the content of your posts" - Snit > Invalid styling code shown on sandman.net > <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>: > > <div style="padding: 3px; align: center;"> > > Same errors noted at the time (proving not from WBM changes): So are we talking about tech or people? Why is tech the "topic" when it's someone else's efforts but it's not the "topic" when they're *your* efforts? How does that work, Mr. Hypocrite? Do you really believe that "others" can't see through your grade school level BS?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 13:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fnlkhpF8csoU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #453900 |
On 6/4/18 12:01 PM, Snit wrote: > On 6/4/18 10:00 AM, Snit wrote: >> On 6/4/18 8:46 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Monday, June 4, 2018 at 12:42:07 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>> On 6/3/18 11:07 PM, Sandman wrote: >>>>>>>> Snit: >>>>>>>> It is merely a fact Carroll was contacted by the police over his >>>>>>>> harassment, a fact even Carroll has admitted to. >>>>>>> simon singh: >>>>>>> Then it should be trivial for you to prove this. >>>>>> Not really, but also not really of any importance. Your belief or >>>>>> lack of belief is of no real concern. As I said, it is merely a fact >>>>>> that Carroll was contacted by the police for his harassment. >>>>> No, it's merely a claim that he was. A claim from you. A 100% >>>>> unsubstantiated >>>>> claim from you. I.e. hot air. >>>> >>>> What an odd twist from you. >>>> >>>> Anyway, did you see where Carroll tossed you under he bus again? He >>>> FINALLY admitted the page of yours with the faulty CSS was, in deed, >>>> code that would not validate. >>> >>> Over-medicated again, Snit? Both he and I had a conversation >>> on this trivial oversight ~14 years ago, the only notable thing >>> about it is how you still act like you won the lotto because of it. >>> Meanwhile, there sits your ‘business’ site, looking like it does >>> and has for all that time. If there’s a bus in this scenario it’s one >>> that drove over that slab of flesh you call your head. >>> >>>> He also claimed you admitted to this before. >>> >>> He did so right away... he’s not you... running from every known >>> bit of reality as you jump from one whining liefest to the next. >>> >>>> And now Carroll has admitted I was right all along. >>> >>> I also “admitted” that you’ve done a ton of lying about all >>> kinds of things, it’s “interesting” how you leave that out. >>>> Curious what you say about it? >>> >>> Like anyone with a working brain, he’d probably point >>> out how I ‘m only right or honest in your diseased mind >>> when it fits some trolling BS of yours. This doesn’t pass >>> the laugh test because you’ve already impugned me as >>> *your* witness (based on what you’ve said about me for >>> over a decade). Sober up. >>> >> Sandman denied it for years... and as far as I know STILL has never >> admitted his CSS failed to validate. Heck, he has been trolling me for >> over a decade over his anger over my noting it. >> > Carroll responded by changing the topic to the ONLY thing he ever thinks > about... me and things related to me. He now wants me to help him > understand my CSS. > > Oy. > > No thanks, Carroll... not interested in helping you copy my site again. > > But why not focus on the topic here: how you tossed Sandman under the > bus again: > > Invalid styling code shown on sandman.net > <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>: > > <div style="padding: 3px; align: center;"> > > Same errors noted at the time (proving not from WBM changes): > > Message-ID: <C0A30BB5.502C7%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> > ----- > Line: 373 > Property align doesn't exist : center > Line: 412 > Property align doesn't exist : center > Line: 431 > Property align doesn't exist : center > ----- > > And now Carroll has admitted I was right all along. > > Poor Sandman... all he could do was respond with his flood bot. LOL! > > Carroll responded whining that I am focusing on how he and Sandman have been lying about tech for years... after all, unlike them I mostly focus on people... but now I am pointing out a lie they have been telling and trolling me over for more than a decade. Poor babies! -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 13:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0e87fc91-1a3e-4de0-8dcd-00ca2aa07950@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #453909 |
On Monday, June 4, 2018 at 2:08:28 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > Carroll responded ... by pointing out your blatant hypocrisy? Yes. Swinging back to tech, this is what you should be teaching your 'students': <http://devsite-test.eu5.net/css-grid-demo/>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 16:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fnluqpFa43hU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #453909 |
On 6/4/18 1:08 PM, Snit wrote: > On 6/4/18 12:01 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 6/4/18 10:00 AM, Snit wrote: >>> On 6/4/18 8:46 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>> On Monday, June 4, 2018 at 12:42:07 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 6/3/18 11:07 PM, Sandman wrote: >>>>>>>>> Snit: >>>>>>>>> It is merely a fact Carroll was contacted by the police over his >>>>>>>>> harassment, a fact even Carroll has admitted to. >>>>>>>> simon singh: >>>>>>>> Then it should be trivial for you to prove this. >>>>>>> Not really, but also not really of any importance. Your belief or >>>>>>> lack of belief is of no real concern. As I said, it is merely a fact >>>>>>> that Carroll was contacted by the police for his harassment. >>>>>> No, it's merely a claim that he was. A claim from you. A 100% >>>>>> unsubstantiated >>>>>> claim from you. I.e. hot air. >>>>> >>>>> What an odd twist from you. >>>>> >>>>> Anyway, did you see where Carroll tossed you under he bus again? He >>>>> FINALLY admitted the page of yours with the faulty CSS was, in deed, >>>>> code that would not validate. >>>> >>>> Over-medicated again, Snit? Both he and I had a conversation >>>> on this trivial oversight ~14 years ago, the only notable thing >>>> about it is how you still act like you won the lotto because of it. >>>> Meanwhile, there sits your ‘business’ site, looking like it does >>>> and has for all that time. If there’s a bus in this scenario it’s one >>>> that drove over that slab of flesh you call your head. >>>> >>>>> He also claimed you admitted to this before. >>>> >>>> He did so right away... he’s not you... running from every known >>>> bit of reality as you jump from one whining liefest to the next. >>>> >>>>> And now Carroll has admitted I was right all along. >>>> >>>> I also “admitted” that you’ve done a ton of lying about all >>>> kinds of things, it’s “interesting” how you leave that out. >>>>> Curious what you say about it? >>>> >>>> Like anyone with a working brain, he’d probably point >>>> out how I ‘m only right or honest in your diseased mind >>>> when it fits some trolling BS of yours. This doesn’t pass >>>> the laugh test because you’ve already impugned me as >>>> *your* witness (based on what you’ve said about me for >>>> over a decade). Sober up. >>>> >>> Sandman denied it for years... and as far as I know STILL has never >>> admitted his CSS failed to validate. Heck, he has been trolling me >>> for over a decade over his anger over my noting it. >>> >> Carroll responded by changing the topic to the ONLY thing he ever >> thinks about... me and things related to me. He now wants me to help >> him understand my CSS. >> >> Oy. >> >> No thanks, Carroll... not interested in helping you copy my site again. >> >> But why not focus on the topic here: how you tossed Sandman under the >> bus again: >> >> Invalid styling code shown on sandman.net >> <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>: >> >> <div style="padding: 3px; align: center;"> >> >> Same errors noted at the time (proving not from WBM changes): >> >> Message-ID: <C0A30BB5.502C7%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> >> ----- >> Line: 373 >> Property align doesn't exist : center >> Line: 412 >> Property align doesn't exist : center >> Line: 431 >> Property align doesn't exist : center >> ----- >> >> And now Carroll has admitted I was right all along. >> >> Poor Sandman... all he could do was respond with his flood bot. LOL! >> >> > Carroll responded whining that I am focusing on how he and Sandman have > been lying about tech for years... after all, unlike them I mostly focus > on people... but now I am pointing out a lie they have been telling and > trolling me over for more than a decade. > > Poor babies! > More snip snip by Carroll as he cries it is wrong for me to point out his lies even AS he is flooding COLA, obsessing over me, and lying his ass off. Poor, poor baby! But with all that, Carroll, thank you for admitting to how Sandman has been lying about his CSS for over a decade AND for admitting to so many of the sock names you use. That was appreciated. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 16:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <aa71f7a2-f6e5-4ee7-b164-67c3a6b406be@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #453933 |
On Monday, June 4, 2018 at 5:03:55 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > More Already covered... I anticipated you were gonna whine that enough wasn't being done for you for free so I did do more, that lightbox example is done using only CSS.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 17:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fnm25lFa43hU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #453900 |
On 6/4/18 12:01 PM, Snit wrote: > On 6/4/18 10:00 AM, Snit wrote: >> On 6/4/18 8:46 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Monday, June 4, 2018 at 12:42:07 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>> On 6/3/18 11:07 PM, Sandman wrote: >>>>>>>> Snit: >>>>>>>> It is merely a fact Carroll was contacted by the police over his >>>>>>>> harassment, a fact even Carroll has admitted to. >>>>>>> simon singh: >>>>>>> Then it should be trivial for you to prove this. >>>>>> Not really, but also not really of any importance. Your belief or >>>>>> lack of belief is of no real concern. As I said, it is merely a fact >>>>>> that Carroll was contacted by the police for his harassment. >>>>> No, it's merely a claim that he was. A claim from you. A 100% >>>>> unsubstantiated >>>>> claim from you. I.e. hot air. >>>> >>>> What an odd twist from you. >>>> >>>> Anyway, did you see where Carroll tossed you under he bus again? He >>>> FINALLY admitted the page of yours with the faulty CSS was, in deed, >>>> code that would not validate. >>> >>> Over-medicated again, Snit? Both he and I had a conversation >>> on this trivial oversight ~14 years ago, the only notable thing >>> about it is how you still act like you won the lotto because of it. >>> Meanwhile, there sits your ‘business’ site, looking like it does >>> and has for all that time. If there’s a bus in this scenario it’s one >>> that drove over that slab of flesh you call your head. >>> >>>> He also claimed you admitted to this before. >>> >>> He did so right away... he’s not you... running from every known >>> bit of reality as you jump from one whining liefest to the next. >>> >>>> And now Carroll has admitted I was right all along. >>> >>> I also “admitted” that you’ve done a ton of lying about all >>> kinds of things, it’s “interesting” how you leave that out. >>>> Curious what you say about it? >>> >>> Like anyone with a working brain, he’d probably point >>> out how I ‘m only right or honest in your diseased mind >>> when it fits some trolling BS of yours. This doesn’t pass >>> the laugh test because you’ve already impugned me as >>> *your* witness (based on what you’ve said about me for >>> over a decade). Sober up. >>> >> Sandman denied it for years... and as far as I know STILL has never >> admitted his CSS failed to validate. Heck, he has been trolling me for >> over a decade over his anger over my noting it. >> > Carroll responded by changing the topic to the ONLY thing he ever thinks > about... me and things related to me. He now wants me to help him > understand my CSS. > > Oy. > > No thanks, Carroll... not interested in helping you copy my site again. > > But why not focus on the topic here: how you tossed Sandman under the > bus again: > > Invalid styling code shown on sandman.net > <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>: > > <div style="padding: 3px; align: center;"> > > Same errors noted at the time (proving not from WBM changes): > > Message-ID: <C0A30BB5.502C7%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> > ----- > Line: 373 > Property align doesn't exist : center > Line: 412 > Property align doesn't exist : center > Line: 431 > Property align doesn't exist : center > ----- > > And now Carroll has admitted I was right all along. > > Poor Sandman... all he could do was respond with his flood bot. LOL! > > Carroll responded whining that I am focusing on how he and Sandman have been lying about tech for years... after all, unlike them I mostly focus on people... but now I am pointing out a lie they have been telling and trolling me over for more than a decade. Poor babies! --- Carroll did this over and over and over. He will even respond to this message doing the same thing. Oh well. At least he admitted Sandman's site had faulty CSS just as I have been saying and they have been denyng for over a decade, AND he admitted to his use of ALL the sock names I had noted he used. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 17:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2eb608d7-0ffe-4916-9b18-45c2dac39bfc@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #453938 |
On Monday, June 4, 2018 at 6:00:57 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > Carroll did this over and over and over Well, no one could ever argue that I haven't 'donated' a lot to your 'education', that's for sure. Anyway, isn't it amazing how little CSS one needs to get a mobile savvy layout like the one you're using? C'mon, admit it... this is better than handing you cash. If you were nicer to Sandman he might just teach you about databases ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 16:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fnok05FbpqgU14@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #453900 |
On 6/4/18 12:01 PM, Snit wrote: > On 6/4/18 10:00 AM, Snit wrote: >> On 6/4/18 8:46 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Monday, June 4, 2018 at 12:42:07 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>> On 6/3/18 11:07 PM, Sandman wrote: >>>>>>>> Snit: >>>>>>>> It is merely a fact Carroll was contacted by the police over his >>>>>>>> harassment, a fact even Carroll has admitted to. >>>>>>> simon singh: >>>>>>> Then it should be trivial for you to prove this. >>>>>> Not really, but also not really of any importance. Your belief or >>>>>> lack of belief is of no real concern. As I said, it is merely a fact >>>>>> that Carroll was contacted by the police for his harassment. >>>>> No, it's merely a claim that he was. A claim from you. A 100% >>>>> unsubstantiated >>>>> claim from you. I.e. hot air. >>>> >>>> What an odd twist from you. >>>> >>>> Anyway, did you see where Carroll tossed you under he bus again? He >>>> FINALLY admitted the page of yours with the faulty CSS was, in deed, >>>> code that would not validate. >>> >>> Over-medicated again, Snit? Both he and I had a conversation >>> on this trivial oversight ~14 years ago, the only notable thing >>> about it is how you still act like you won the lotto because of it. >>> Meanwhile, there sits your ‘business’ site, looking like it does >>> and has for all that time. If there’s a bus in this scenario it’s one >>> that drove over that slab of flesh you call your head. >>> >>>> He also claimed you admitted to this before. >>> >>> He did so right away... he’s not you... running from every known >>> bit of reality as you jump from one whining liefest to the next. >>> >>>> And now Carroll has admitted I was right all along. >>> >>> I also “admitted” that you’ve done a ton of lying about all >>> kinds of things, it’s “interesting” how you leave that out. >>>> Curious what you say about it? >>> >>> Like anyone with a working brain, he’d probably point >>> out how I ‘m only right or honest in your diseased mind >>> when it fits some trolling BS of yours. This doesn’t pass >>> the laugh test because you’ve already impugned me as >>> *your* witness (based on what you’ve said about me for >>> over a decade). Sober up. >>> >> Sandman denied it for years... and as far as I know STILL has never >> admitted his CSS failed to validate. Heck, he has been trolling me for >> over a decade over his anger over my noting it. >> > Carroll responded by changing the topic to the ONLY thing he ever thinks > about... me and things related to me. He now wants me to help him > understand my CSS. > > Oy. > > No thanks, Carroll... not interested in helping you copy my site again. > > But why not focus on the topic here: how you tossed Sandman under the > bus again: > > Invalid styling code shown on sandman.net > <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>: > > <div style="padding: 3px; align: center;"> > > Same errors noted at the time (proving not from WBM changes): > > Message-ID: <C0A30BB5.502C7%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> > ----- > Line: 373 > Property align doesn't exist : center > Line: 412 > Property align doesn't exist : center > Line: 431 > Property align doesn't exist : center > ----- > > And now Carroll has admitted I was right all along. > > Poor Sandman... all he could do was respond with his flood bot. LOL! > > Carroll responded whining that I am focusing on how he and Sandman have been lying about tech for years... after all, unlike them I mostly focus on people... but now I am pointing out a lie they have been telling and trolling me over for more than a decade. Poor babies! -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 16:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fnok0mFprokU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #453871 |
On 6/4/18 10:00 AM, Snit wrote:
> On 6/4/18 8:46 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> On Monday, June 4, 2018 at 12:42:07 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
>>> On 6/3/18 11:07 PM, Sandman wrote:
>>>>>>> Snit:
>>>>>>> It is merely a fact Carroll was contacted by the police over his
>>>>>>> harassment, a fact even Carroll has admitted to.
>>>>>> simon singh:
>>>>>> Then it should be trivial for you to prove this.
>>>>> Not really, but also not really of any importance. Your belief or
>>>>> lack of belief is of no real concern. As I said, it is merely a fact
>>>>> that Carroll was contacted by the police for his harassment.
>>>> No, it's merely a claim that he was. A claim from you. A 100%
>>>> unsubstantiated
>>>> claim from you. I.e. hot air.
>>>
>>> What an odd twist from you.
>>>
>>> Anyway, did you see where Carroll tossed you under he bus again? He
>>> FINALLY admitted the page of yours with the faulty CSS was, in deed,
>>> code that would not validate.
>>
>> Over-medicated again, Snit? Both he and I had a conversation
>> on this trivial oversight ~14 years ago, the only notable thing
>> about it is how you still act like you won the lotto because of it.
>> Meanwhile, there sits your ‘business’ site, looking like it does
>> and has for all that time. If there’s a bus in this scenario it’s one
>> that drove over that slab of flesh you call your head.
>>
>>> He also claimed you admitted to this before.
>>
>> He did so right away... he’s not you... running from every known
>> bit of reality as you jump from one whining liefest to the next.
>>
>>> And now Carroll has admitted I was right all along.
>>
>> I also “admitted” that you’ve done a ton of lying about all
>> kinds of things, it’s “interesting” how you leave that out.
>>> Curious what you say about it?
>>
>> Like anyone with a working brain, he’d probably point
>> out how I ‘m only right or honest in your diseased mind
>> when it fits some trolling BS of yours. This doesn’t pass
>> the laugh test because you’ve already impugned me as
>> *your* witness (based on what you’ve said about me for
>> over a decade). Sober up.
>>
> Sandman denied it for years... and as far as I know STILL has never
> admitted his CSS failed to validate. Heck, he has been trolling me for
> over a decade over his anger over my noting it.
>
Carroll responded by changing the topic to the ONLY thing he ever thinks
about... me and things related to me. He now wants me to help him
understand my CSS.
Oy.
No thanks, Carroll... not interested in helping you copy my site again.
But why not focus on the topic here: how you tossed Sandman under the
bus again:
Invalid styling code shown on sandman.net
<https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>:
<div style="padding: 3px; align: center;">
Same errors noted at the time (proving not from WBM changes):
Message-ID: <C0A30BB5.502C7%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>
-----
Line: 373
Property align doesn't exist : center
Line: 412
Property align doesn't exist : center
Line: 431
Property align doesn't exist : center
-----
And now Carroll has admitted I was right all along.
Poor Sandman... all he could do was respond with his flood bot. LOL!
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 10:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fnl9glF63hiU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #453826 |
On 6/3/18 11:42 PM, Snit wrote: > On 6/3/18 11:07 PM, Sandman wrote: >>>>> Snit: >>>>> It is merely a fact Carroll was contacted by the police over his >>>>> harassment, a fact even Carroll has admitted to. >>>> simon singh: >>>> Then it should be trivial for you to prove this. >>> Not really, but also not really of any importance. Your belief or >>> lack of belief is of no real concern. As I said, it is merely a fact >>> that Carroll was contacted by the police for his harassment. >> No, it's merely a claim that he was. A claim from you. A 100% >> unsubstantiated >> claim from you. I.e. hot air. > > What an odd twist from you. > > Anyway, did you see where Carroll tossed you under he bus again? He > FINALLY admitted the page of yours with the faulty CSS was, in deed, > code that would not validate. He also claimed you admitted to this before. > > Invalid styling code shown on sandman.net <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>: > > <div style="padding: 3px; align: center;"> > > Same errors noted at the time (proving not from WBM changes): > > Message-ID: <C0A30BB5.502C7%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> > ----- > Line: 373 > Property align doesn't exist : center > Line: 412 > Property align doesn't exist : center > Line: 431 > Property align doesn't exist : center > ----- > > And now Carroll has admitted I was right all along. > > Curious what you say about it? > Carroll jumped in trying to change the topic to a site of mine he copied and then asked me to edit FOR HIM to he could have something more to his liking to copy more from. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-01 07:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <89d62a4f-b4cc-455f-bd83-8266bb497c02@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #453020 |
On Friday, June 1, 2018 at 7:19:59 AM UTC-7, Simon Singh wrote: > On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 01:49:55 +0000, Simon Singh wrote: > > > On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 01:12:51 +0000, Simon Singh wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 31 May 2018 17:01:35 -0700, Snit wrote: > >> > >>> On 5/31/18 3:42 PM, Simon Singh wrote: > >>>> Snit, you have claimed that the police advised Steve Carroll not to > >>>> bother you. Do you have any proof of this potentially libelous > >>>> statement? > >>>> > >>> There is nothing wrong with my noting how Carroll was contacted by the > >>> police over his harassment, nor anything wrong with noting they spoke > >>> to him about what lines he has crossed. > >> > >> Nobody said there is anything wrong with it. Please try and use a > >> little basic reading comprehension skills, the question is do you have > >> any proof of your claims. > >> So do you? > > > > Cat got your tongue snit? > > Since snit apparently has no proof that Steve Carroll was contacted by > the police the only conclusion that can be made is that snit has been > caught in yet another one of his lies. > > Why are you such a dishonest person snit? Ending support for macOS is obvious. Gee, imagine Satan trying to pin his codswallop on Melzzzzz and me, no one has ever seen that before. It was Satan who got busted using lots of accounts like a moron, and these are 'people' who come out of the blue directly into threads where he was being ripped apart... continuously for over a decade. Satan is far too unintelligent to write a quality script. The only scripting he's able to do is simple stuff I did years ago. Just look at what Satan has posted and look at mine, there is nothing for Melzzzzz to learn from an idiot like Satan. But hey, let him keep making a fool of himself. He can make another sock to pat himself on the back. To my way of thinking, taking time perhaps educating yourself is never wasted time. Declaring you know more than everyone else and taking it on yourself to 'prove' people that it's true? That is a waste ;) Learning Linux... forever a tenderfoot... - Top Six Ways Satan Trolls https://youtu.be/dNhvVfD4zu4 http://www.5z8.info/titstitstitstits_j7t4bl_stalin http://www.5z8.info/stalin-will-rise-again_j3h5uj_nakedgrandmas.jpg Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-01 08:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1f15b6be-87eb-4235-ac7a-bbb7c5c14de0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #452963 |
On Thursday, May 31, 2018 at 6:49:56 PM UTC-7, Simon Singh wrote: > On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 01:12:51 +0000, Simon Singh wrote: > > > On Thu, 31 May 2018 17:01:35 -0700, Snit wrote: > > > >> On 5/31/18 3:42 PM, Simon Singh wrote: > >>> Snit, you have claimed that the police advised Steve Carroll not to > >>> bother you. Do you have any proof of this potentially libelous > >>> statement? > >>> > >> There is nothing wrong with my noting how Carroll was contacted by the > >> police over his harassment, nor anything wrong with noting they spoke > >> to him about what lines he has crossed. > > > > Nobody said there is anything wrong with it. Please try and use a little > > basic reading comprehension skills, the question is do you have any > > proof of your claims. > > So do you? > > Cat got your tongue snit? A shadow of justification, projected wisely, at the wrong time. Thus, my timely statement stands literal and correct. Meat only thinks about Steve Carroll, Steve Carroll, Steve Carroll! What Mac looks like matters little and not tied to its functionality, especially if it's hackable. This is merely a hobby of mine. Who doesn't know that this kind of bunk is Meat's approach, not the approach of Steve Carroll? It is all just projection... the trolling, the posting with Steve Carroll's name, the writing of drivel, the anger... the diaper rash and tendency to show how embarrassed he is over being booted from the playground for shitting in it again ;) What is Meat's system for the flooding crap? Access? That is the only tool he knows, and it is a joke. He must be using it to produce these goofy "group-killer" threads. Best guess, Meat took Steve Carroll's code that he reverse engineered and try to sell online... he's feeding it Steve Carroll's posts, grabbing offensive paragraphs, then mangling those using the Baum–Welch method and then he actively posts them because his insomnia enables him to do that practically ceaselessly. -- Curious how these posts are made? https://youtu.be/0ZNxaaKD7-c
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web