Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #452930 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Simon Singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-31 22:42 +0000 |
| Last post | 2018-06-03 23:23 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 143 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Simon Singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-05-31 22:42 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 17:01 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Simon Singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 01:12 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Simon Singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 01:49 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 21:32 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Simon Singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 14:19 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:35 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Simon Singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 14:49 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 08:04 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 09:16 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 09:35 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Simon Singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 16:24 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 09:53 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 10:06 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit says unsupported claims are lies <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 12:42 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Simon Singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 20:32 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 13:38 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 14:38 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit ignores the 9th amendment <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 14:48 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit says unsupported claims are lies <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 14:01 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-02 04:58 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:03 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 22:32 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 22:48 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 18:05 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 21:26 -0400
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 01:36 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:50 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 22:07 -0400
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 04:05 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 08:18 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 08:58 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 03:07 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 10:14 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:29 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 11:54 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:15 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 12:32 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:37 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 14:27 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 16:34 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 18:13 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 18:19 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 18:36 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:01 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:18 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:12 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 22:38 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:46 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 21:28 -0400
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:50 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 22:04 -0400
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 19:08 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:24 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:12 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 01:50 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 22:50 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 21:32 -0400
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:50 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. "Snit's dysautonomia http://bit.ly/2Jqpplk" <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:10 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:35 -0500
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 07:21 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 09:21 -0500
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Simon Singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 13:48 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 08:03 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 08:35 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:33 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 11:07 -0700
Re: Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2018-06-04 06:51 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 00:02 -0700
Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2018-06-04 14:16 +0000
Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 07:48 -0700
Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 09:20 -0700
Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 09:33 -0700
Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 09:59 -0700
Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 10:10 -0700
Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 10:12 -0700
Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 10:52 -0700
Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 10:35 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 08:42 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 09:54 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:43 -0500
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 07:21 -0700
Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2018-06-14 08:58 +0000
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-14 08:44 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 09:07 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-14 11:59 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 13:07 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-14 13:24 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 14:56 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-14 16:21 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 17:12 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-14 18:03 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 09:30 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-15 11:24 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 09:54 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 10:06 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 10:15 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 10:31 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 10:47 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 11:05 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 11:22 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 11:32 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 12:02 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 12:13 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 12:24 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 12:34 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 13:56 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 14:31 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 16:12 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 17:44 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 20:30 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 21:03 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-16 21:41 +0000
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 14:51 -0700
Re: Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2018-06-04 06:07 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 23:42 -0700
Re: Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2018-06-04 12:53 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 08:41 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 08:46 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 10:00 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 10:06 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 11:58 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 10:10 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 11:56 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 12:01 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 12:22 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:08 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 13:24 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 16:03 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 16:32 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 17:00 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 17:23 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:17 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:17 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 10:00 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 07:45 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 08:00 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 08:16 -0700
Re: Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2018-06-04 06:04 +0000
Re: Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 23:23 -0700
Page 3 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 14:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b7666d26-d7b2-4fd7-a6a7-dfe6bca4fff4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #453720 |
On Sunday, June 3, 2018 at 1:37:37 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 6/3/18 12:32 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Sunday, June 3, 2018 at 1:15:29 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 6/3/18 11:54 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Sunday, June 3, 2018 at 12:29:35 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>> On 6/3/18 10:14 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>> On Sunday, June 3, 2018 at 2:58:09 AM UTC-6, vallor wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>>>> Ever watch TV shows from the 60's? Those people drank like fish. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Carroll and friends stop at nothing with their attacks. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> They hate how I refuse to sink to their level. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> No sinking at all, just contemporary culture. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Ever watch Mad Men? Those guys would get to the office and pour > >>>>>> themselves a drink. Three-martini lunches, a few when they got home. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hell, in the TV show "UFO" from 1970, they had "high-tech" booze > >>>>>> dispensers built into the walls. Was a completely different culture back > >>>>>> then. > >>>>> > >>>>> I grew up in the 60s and 70, preganant women were not depicted > >>>>> as heavy drinkers on TV. They may have done so in RL but usually > >>>>> only if one was an alcoholic. > >>>>> > >>>> Regardless of your view of drinking in the '60s, what you did was > >>>> reprehensible. > >>> > >>> Not at all... I was seeking an explanation for your extremely bizarre > >>> online behavior that virtually everyone you have ever come in contact > >>> with on CSMA and COLA, at the least, has commented on... this was > >>> a potential explanation. > >> > >> See how you move goal posts > > > > ??? My "goal" was to find an explanation for what I just said. > > Your goal is to change the topic from your reprehensible behavior of > harassment: of digging up health information about me from other > sources First of all, there is nothing "reprehensible" about seeking an explanation for *anything*. Secondly, I didn't have to 'dig' at all, you (or maybe eBot) pointed to that crap.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 16:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fnjc8rFpk6sU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #453738 |
On 6/3/18 2:27 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: ... > First of all, there is nothing "reprehensible" about seeking an > explanation for *anything*. Another dishonest twist by you. What is reprehensible is how you: * Furthered your obsessive trolling by doing research on me outside of COLA. * Brought "dirt" from outside of COLA to COLA. While there is nothing to be ashamed of about health conditions, you used mine in your trolling. * You then lied about my family, making up stories about my mother being an alcoholic, for example. When called out on your lies you insisted it is the only thing you could think of -- which speaks poorly of your home life growing up. * You lied about my personal health, a topic that is not even relevant to COLA. * For all of this you played victim and said you were merely trying to understand my posting, which you misrepresented. All of this is grossly reprehensible of you. > Secondly, I didn't have to 'dig' at > all, you (or maybe eBot) pointed to that crap. I did not such thing... and as far as I know ebot never posted to COLA. Your blaming of your ex-girlfriend for your actions is also grossly reprehensible. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 18:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a952db1c-09ee-4e2d-b788-d7e965eba799@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #453771 |
On Sunday, June 3, 2018 at 4:34:54 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 6/3/18 2:27 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > ... > > First of all, there is nothing "reprehensible" about seeking an > > explanation for *anything*. > > Another dishonest twist by you. What is reprehensible is how you: > > * Furthered your obsessive trolling by doing research on me > outside of COLA. > > * Brought "dirt" from outside of COLA to COLA. While there is > nothing to be ashamed of about health conditions, you used > mine in your trolling. > > * You then lied about my family, making up stories about my > mother being an alcoholic, for example. When called out > on your lies you insisted it is the only thing you could > think of -- which speaks poorly of your home life growing > up. > > * You lied about my personal health, a topic that is not even > relevant to COLA. > > * For all of this you played victim and said you were merely > trying to understand my posting, which you misrepresented. > > All of this is grossly reprehensible of you. > > > Secondly, I didn't have to 'dig' at > > all, you (or maybe eBot) pointed to that crap. > > I did not such thing... and as far as I know ebot never posted to COLA. > Your blaming of your ex-girlfriend for your actions is also grossly > reprehensible. > > > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> No no hell no. Prescott Computer Guy never agreed to stop trolling. He lied about his trolling just as you would expect. Prescott Computer Guy claims that he uses Linux, while of course he never timed it on bare metal and honesty tried it. Prescott Computer Guy is just thrilled that Peter Köhlmann is on the other end. Imagine if Prescott Computer Guy walked up to a dog and delivered the punch line. It wouldn't be amusing in any way. His wish is to see Peter Köhlmann chased away by killing of any discussion. And hey, that could or could not... you know what I mean. The entire sham is brimming of goofy inconsistencies and leans heavily on Prescott Computer Guy's 'master's degree' horseplay. Where did you find your scripts? -- Do not click this link!! http://www.5z8.info/michaelangelo-virus_t6v2vq_molotovcocktail https://youtu.be/TETJEkaUoY4 https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.os.linux.advocacy/smzXrBhsWf4 Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 18:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <59fbde63-67be-485d-973a-f92e5c9e9bea@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #453771 |
On Sunday, June 3, 2018 at 5:34:54 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 6/3/18 2:27 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > ... > > First of all, there is nothing "reprehensible" about seeking an > > explanation for *anything*. > > Another dishonest twist by you. Nope. > > Secondly, I didn't have to 'dig' at > > all, you (or maybe eBot) pointed to that crap. > > I did not such thing... You or her. No one had to dig for anything.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 18:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fnjjdkFqo44U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #453771 |
On 6/3/18 4:34 PM, Snit wrote: > On 6/3/18 2:27 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > ... >> First of all, there is nothing "reprehensible" about seeking an >> explanation for *anything*. > > Another dishonest twist by you. What is reprehensible is how you: > > * Furthered your obsessive trolling by doing research on me > outside of COLA. > > * Brought "dirt" from outside of COLA to COLA. While there is > nothing to be ashamed of about health conditions, you used > mine in your trolling. > > * You then lied about my family, making up stories about my > mother being an alcoholic, for example. When called out > on your lies you insisted it is the only thing you could > think of -- which speaks poorly of your home life growing > up. > > * You lied about my personal health, a topic that is not even > relevant to COLA. > > * For all of this you played victim and said you were merely > trying to understand my posting, which you misrepresented. > > All of this is grossly reprehensible of you. > >> Secondly, I didn't have to 'dig' at >> all, you (or maybe eBot) pointed to that crap. > > I did not such thing... and as far as I know ebot never posted to COLA. > Your blaming of your ex-girlfriend for your actions is also grossly > reprehensible. Carroll replied with his normal snip snip crap and then said that if his ex-girlfriend dug this up it does not count as ANYONE digging it up. His dishonesty is endless. To his credit, though, he is no longer denying he ever dated his ex-girlfriend. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 11:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fnionuFm0isU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #453617 |
On 6/3/18 1:58 AM, vallor wrote: ... >> Carroll and friends stop at nothing with their attacks. >> >> They hate how I refuse to sink to their level. > > > No sinking at all, just contemporary culture. > > Ever watch Mad Men? Those guys would get to the office and pour > themselves a drink. Three-martini lunches, a few when they got home. > > Hell, in the TV show "UFO" from 1970, they had "high-tech" booze > dispensers built into the walls. Was a completely different culture back > then. I think you misunderstood... I most certainly did not mean you with the above. I meant Carroll and all the obvious socks who have swarmed to COLA now that I have made it clear I am not playing Carroll's game the way he wishes me to. At some point in my search to better understand my health issues I asked, IN ANOTHER GROUP, about my mother drinking some when she was pregnant. Carroll in his obsession found this and, of course, so did all the socks that come to COLA when Carroll is in tantrum mode. Then they pretend to know what the doctors found, how much my mother drank, and MUCH more that they just make up. The reality: yeah, in the 60s most women drank when they were pregnant and it turned out my health issues were not in any way tied to it (so say the Mayo Clinic doctors). Carroll (and the many socks, which clearly are not tied to him in any way) also have dug up information about my speaking about dysautonomia and then they make up claims about how it impacts ME. They are the ones who stop at nothing with their attacks... Carroll going so far that the police got involved and talked to him about his harassment of people outside of COLA. His emailing people and spreading his lies about me finally got him in trouble. He is going to be even more insane for a while as he deals with his anger over that. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 02:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pevj5e$8me$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #453439 |
On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 18:05:16 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Saturday, June 2, 2018 at 6:47:02 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 22:32:02 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: >> > >> >> On Friday, June 1, 2018 at 11:03:20 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> >>> On 6/1/18 9:58 PM, vallor wrote: >> >>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 20:32:44 +0000, Simon Singh wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> Projection again. >> >>>>> Your logic is faulty snit. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> You made the statement that the police asked Steve Carroll to >> >>>>> stop "harassing you" so the burden of proof rests solely with >> >>>>> you. >> >>>>> You went on to claim the statement was a fact and that even Steve >> >>>>> Carroll admitted this happened. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Those are your statements. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> To date you have not provided any documentation to substantiate >> >>>>> your claims so the only conclusion that can be reached is that >> >>>>> you lied once again and have demonstrated that you are indeed a >> >>>>> dishonest person. >> >>>>> I merely challenged you to provide that proof The burden of proof >> >>>>> is on you to prove >> >>>> >> >>>> This is exactly correct. >> >>> >> >>> It is grossly incorrect. It speaks of "lies" and offers ZERO >> >>> examples of such. >> >> >> >> So you do still beat your wife and kids? We all know this is a >> >> “fact’ so there is no reason to provide “evidence” of it, right >> >> (After all, that is your ‘logic’ here)? >> > >> > Perfect reply! >> > He won't understand why though because he is obviously not too >> > intelligent. >> > >> > >> >>>> And "Snit" knows it. >> >>>> >> >>> If my goal was to convince you it would be my burden of proof. That >> >>> is not my goal though. I do not care if you or he believes it. Why >> >>> would I? >> >>> I know it is true and so does Carroll, who even acknowledged it as >> >>> such. >> >> >> >> I “know” it is “true” that you still beat your wife and kids, so >> >> it’s a “fact”. >> >> That “fact’ doesn’t require any “evidence” simply because I “know” >> >> it. >> >> Anyone, who was blasted on sterno and testors would be happy to have >> >> you on a jury, Snit. LOL! >> > >> > I initially assumed that snit was just the run of the mill troll only >> > with a lot of free time on his hands. After observing him it's become >> > apparent that snit is seriously mentally ill. Just for starters, >> > NPD/BPD are high on the list along with a case of substance abuse >> > where he fogs out and gets repetitive like Rain Man. I suspect he >> > might also suffer from a mild case of mental retardation, possibly >> > due to fetal alcohol syndrome as he exhibits classic signs of that >> > illness as well. >> > >> > There is no question that Snit would be unable to sustain himself in >> > a traditional workplace because his co-workers would not put up with >> > his behavior for long. I suspect his wife and possibly his children, >> > depending upon their age, are well aware that "daddy ain't well". >> > Kids can be cruel. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >>> And if you do not know this you should. :) >> > >> > >> >> What he knows is a *ridiculously* idiotic liar when he sees one... >> >> as do most “others”. >> > >> > >> > >> Wow. A lot of accusations you offer no support for. > > LOL! Think, if you can: Who would he need to "support" it *to* that > isn't already convinced you are what you've shown yourself to be? Snit has to be mentally retarded. There can be no other explanation because nobody could be this ignorant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 20:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fnh4lqFcb78U7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #453497 |
On 6/2/18 7:18 PM, simon singh wrote: > On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 18:05:16 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > >> On Saturday, June 2, 2018 at 6:47:02 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>> simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 22:32:02 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Friday, June 1, 2018 at 11:03:20 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 6/1/18 9:58 PM, vallor wrote: >>>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 20:32:44 +0000, Simon Singh wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Projection again. >>>>>>>> Your logic is faulty snit. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You made the statement that the police asked Steve Carroll to >>>>>>>> stop "harassing you" so the burden of proof rests solely with >>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>> You went on to claim the statement was a fact and that even Steve >>>>>>>> Carroll admitted this happened. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Those are your statements. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> To date you have not provided any documentation to substantiate >>>>>>>> your claims so the only conclusion that can be reached is that >>>>>>>> you lied once again and have demonstrated that you are indeed a >>>>>>>> dishonest person. >>>>>>>> I merely challenged you to provide that proof The burden of proof >>>>>>>> is on you to prove >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is exactly correct. >>>>>> >>>>>> It is grossly incorrect. It speaks of "lies" and offers ZERO >>>>>> examples of such. >>>>> >>>>> So you do still beat your wife and kids? We all know this is a >>>>> “fact’ so there is no reason to provide “evidence” of it, right >>>>> (After all, that is your ‘logic’ here)? >>>> >>>> Perfect reply! >>>> He won't understand why though because he is obviously not too >>>> intelligent. >>>> >>>> >>>>>>> And "Snit" knows it. >>>>>>> >>>>>> If my goal was to convince you it would be my burden of proof. That >>>>>> is not my goal though. I do not care if you or he believes it. Why >>>>>> would I? >>>>>> I know it is true and so does Carroll, who even acknowledged it as >>>>>> such. >>>>> >>>>> I “know” it is “true” that you still beat your wife and kids, so >>>>> it’s a “fact”. >>>>> That “fact’ doesn’t require any “evidence” simply because I “know” >>>>> it. >>>>> Anyone, who was blasted on sterno and testors would be happy to have >>>>> you on a jury, Snit. LOL! >>>> >>>> I initially assumed that snit was just the run of the mill troll only >>>> with a lot of free time on his hands. After observing him it's become >>>> apparent that snit is seriously mentally ill. Just for starters, >>>> NPD/BPD are high on the list along with a case of substance abuse >>>> where he fogs out and gets repetitive like Rain Man. I suspect he >>>> might also suffer from a mild case of mental retardation, possibly >>>> due to fetal alcohol syndrome as he exhibits classic signs of that >>>> illness as well. >>>> >>>> There is no question that Snit would be unable to sustain himself in >>>> a traditional workplace because his co-workers would not put up with >>>> his behavior for long. I suspect his wife and possibly his children, >>>> depending upon their age, are well aware that "daddy ain't well". >>>> Kids can be cruel. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>> And if you do not know this you should. :) >>>> >>>> >>>>> What he knows is a *ridiculously* idiotic liar when he sees one... >>>>> as do most “others”. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Wow. A lot of accusations you offer no support for. >> >> LOL! Think, if you can: Who would he need to "support" it *to* that >> isn't already convinced you are what you've shown yourself to be? > > Snit has to be mentally retarded. There can be no other explanation > because nobody could be this ignorant. > http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1105369 | This article argues that the second amendment was | initially proposed and passed in response to some | antifederalist fears of a standing army. The | thrust of the Amendment was to prevent the | national government from disarming the state | militias. Similarly, the Amendment allowed the | states to arm their own militias if Congress | failed to do so under its Article I, Section 8 | powers. The article notes that Madison and other | Federalists who wrote the Second Amendment were | fully aware of demands for an amendment to protect | an individual's right to own weapons, and that the | framers of the Second Amendment emphatically | rejected this concept. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 22:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pev68h$62p$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #453210 |
On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 22:03:16 -0700, Snit wrote: > On 6/1/18 9:58 PM, vallor wrote: >> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 20:32:44 +0000, Simon Singh wrote: >> >>> Projection again. >>> Your logic is faulty snit. >>> >>> You made the statement that the police asked Steve Carroll to stop >>> "harassing you" so the burden of proof rests solely with you. >>> You went on to claim the statement was a fact and that even Steve >>> Carroll admitted this happened. >>> >>> >>> Those are your statements. >>> >>> To date you have not provided any documentation to substantiate your >>> claims so the only conclusion that can be reached is that you lied >>> once again and have demonstrated that you are indeed a dishonest >>> person. >>> I merely challenged you to provide that proof The burden of proof is >>> on you to prove >> >> This is exactly correct. > > It is grossly incorrect. It speaks of "lies" and offers ZERO examples of > such. You have serious reading comprehension problems snit. The onus, as the OP is on you to provide evidence of your claims. You have not done so. >> And "Snit" knows it. >> > If my goal was to convince you it would be my burden of proof. That is > not my goal though. I do not care if you or he believes it. Why would I? > I know it is true and so does Carroll, who even acknowledged it as such. Nice try. You took the time to post the message and make the claim. Now back it up or retract it. > And if you do not know this you should. :) You need someone to explain logic to you snit because you were asleep that day during the correspondence school class.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 00:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fngs43Fb1d7U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #453380 |
simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 22:03:16 -0700, Snit wrote: > >> On 6/1/18 9:58 PM, vallor wrote: >>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 20:32:44 +0000, Simon Singh wrote: >>> >>>> Projection again. >>>> Your logic is faulty snit. >>>> >>>> You made the statement that the police asked Steve Carroll to stop >>>> "harassing you" so the burden of proof rests solely with you. >>>> You went on to claim the statement was a fact and that even Steve >>>> Carroll admitted this happened. >>>> >>>> >>>> Those are your statements. >>>> >>>> To date you have not provided any documentation to substantiate your >>>> claims so the only conclusion that can be reached is that you lied >>>> once again and have demonstrated that you are indeed a dishonest >>>> person. >>>> I merely challenged you to provide that proof The burden of proof is >>>> on you to prove >>> >>> This is exactly correct. >> >> It is grossly incorrect. It speaks of "lies" and offers ZERO examples of >> such. > > You have serious reading comprehension problems snit. > The onus, as the OP is on you to provide evidence of your claims. > You have not done so. > >>> And "Snit" knows it. >>> >> If my goal was to convince you it would be my burden of proof. That is >> not my goal though. I do not care if you or he believes it. Why would I? >> I know it is true and so does Carroll, who even acknowledged it as such. > > Nice try. > You took the time to post the message and make the claim. Now back it up > or retract it. > >> And if you do not know this you should. :) > > You need someone to explain logic to you snit because you were asleep > that day during the correspondence school class. > You accused me of lying. You provide no evidence. Fair enough.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 21:28 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <aphz5nebq997.1xmban3axttdt$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #453422 |
On 3 Jun 2018 00:46:59 GMT, Snit wrote: > simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 22:03:16 -0700, Snit wrote: >> >>> On 6/1/18 9:58 PM, vallor wrote: >>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 20:32:44 +0000, Simon Singh wrote: >>>> >>>>> Projection again. >>>>> Your logic is faulty snit. >>>>> >>>>> You made the statement that the police asked Steve Carroll to stop >>>>> "harassing you" so the burden of proof rests solely with you. >>>>> You went on to claim the statement was a fact and that even Steve >>>>> Carroll admitted this happened. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Those are your statements. >>>>> >>>>> To date you have not provided any documentation to substantiate your >>>>> claims so the only conclusion that can be reached is that you lied >>>>> once again and have demonstrated that you are indeed a dishonest >>>>> person. >>>>> I merely challenged you to provide that proof The burden of proof is >>>>> on you to prove >>>> >>>> This is exactly correct. >>> >>> It is grossly incorrect. It speaks of "lies" and offers ZERO examples of >>> such. >> >> You have serious reading comprehension problems snit. >> The onus, as the OP is on you to provide evidence of your claims. >> You have not done so. >> >>>> And "Snit" knows it. >>>> >>> If my goal was to convince you it would be my burden of proof. That is >>> not my goal though. I do not care if you or he believes it. Why would I? >>> I know it is true and so does Carroll, who even acknowledged it as such. >> >> Nice try. >> You took the time to post the message and make the claim. Now back it up >> or retract it. >> >>> And if you do not know this you should. :) >> >> You need someone to explain logic to you snit because you were asleep >> that day during the correspondence school class. >> > > You accused me of lying. > > You provide no evidence. You sure have a twisted way of looking at things. Simon is correct, you need to learn how to read simple posts. > Fair enough. You are not fair. You are a troll.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 18:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fngvr1Fbk5tU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #453452 |
On 6/2/18 6:28 PM, Horace wrote: > On 3 Jun 2018 00:46:59 GMT, Snit wrote: > >> simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 22:03:16 -0700, Snit wrote: >>> >>>> On 6/1/18 9:58 PM, vallor wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 20:32:44 +0000, Simon Singh wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Projection again. >>>>>> Your logic is faulty snit. >>>>>> >>>>>> You made the statement that the police asked Steve Carroll to stop >>>>>> "harassing you" so the burden of proof rests solely with you. >>>>>> You went on to claim the statement was a fact and that even Steve >>>>>> Carroll admitted this happened. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Those are your statements. >>>>>> >>>>>> To date you have not provided any documentation to substantiate your >>>>>> claims so the only conclusion that can be reached is that you lied >>>>>> once again and have demonstrated that you are indeed a dishonest >>>>>> person. >>>>>> I merely challenged you to provide that proof The burden of proof is >>>>>> on you to prove >>>>> >>>>> This is exactly correct. >>>> >>>> It is grossly incorrect. It speaks of "lies" and offers ZERO examples of >>>> such. >>> >>> You have serious reading comprehension problems snit. >>> The onus, as the OP is on you to provide evidence of your claims. >>> You have not done so. >>> >>>>> And "Snit" knows it. >>>>> >>>> If my goal was to convince you it would be my burden of proof. That is >>>> not my goal though. I do not care if you or he believes it. Why would I? >>>> I know it is true and so does Carroll, who even acknowledged it as such. >>> >>> Nice try. >>> You took the time to post the message and make the claim. Now back it up >>> or retract it. >>> >>>> And if you do not know this you should. :) >>> >>> You need someone to explain logic to you snit because you were asleep >>> that day during the correspondence school class. >>> >> >> You accused me of lying. >> >> You provide no evidence. > > You sure have a twisted way of looking at things. > Simon is correct, you need to learn how to read simple posts. > > >> Fair enough. > > You are not fair. > You are a troll. Ah, insults and accusations. How creative! -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 22:04 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <h3fyngt1e7uw.mz0ib2cxo07$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #453466 |
On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 18:50:25 -0700, Snit wrote: > On 6/2/18 6:28 PM, Horace wrote: >> On 3 Jun 2018 00:46:59 GMT, Snit wrote: >> >>> simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 22:03:16 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 6/1/18 9:58 PM, vallor wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 20:32:44 +0000, Simon Singh wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Projection again. >>>>>>> Your logic is faulty snit. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You made the statement that the police asked Steve Carroll to stop >>>>>>> "harassing you" so the burden of proof rests solely with you. >>>>>>> You went on to claim the statement was a fact and that even Steve >>>>>>> Carroll admitted this happened. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Those are your statements. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> To date you have not provided any documentation to substantiate your >>>>>>> claims so the only conclusion that can be reached is that you lied >>>>>>> once again and have demonstrated that you are indeed a dishonest >>>>>>> person. >>>>>>> I merely challenged you to provide that proof The burden of proof is >>>>>>> on you to prove >>>>>> >>>>>> This is exactly correct. >>>>> >>>>> It is grossly incorrect. It speaks of "lies" and offers ZERO examples of >>>>> such. >>>> >>>> You have serious reading comprehension problems snit. >>>> The onus, as the OP is on you to provide evidence of your claims. >>>> You have not done so. >>>> >>>>>> And "Snit" knows it. >>>>>> >>>>> If my goal was to convince you it would be my burden of proof. That is >>>>> not my goal though. I do not care if you or he believes it. Why would I? >>>>> I know it is true and so does Carroll, who even acknowledged it as such. >>>> >>>> Nice try. >>>> You took the time to post the message and make the claim. Now back it up >>>> or retract it. >>>> >>>>> And if you do not know this you should. :) >>>> >>>> You need someone to explain logic to you snit because you were asleep >>>> that day during the correspondence school class. >>>> >>> >>> You accused me of lying. >>> >>> You provide no evidence. >> >> You sure have a twisted way of looking at things. >> Simon is correct, you need to learn how to read simple posts. >> >> >>> Fair enough. >> >> You are not fair. >> You are a troll. > > Ah, insults and accusations. How creative! It's a little early in the evening for your Rainman routine isn't it?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 19:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fnh0toFbk5tU19@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #453487 |
On 6/2/18 7:04 PM, Horace wrote: > On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 18:50:25 -0700, Snit wrote: > >> On 6/2/18 6:28 PM, Horace wrote: >>> On 3 Jun 2018 00:46:59 GMT, Snit wrote: >>> >>>> simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 22:03:16 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 6/1/18 9:58 PM, vallor wrote: >>>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 20:32:44 +0000, Simon Singh wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Projection again. >>>>>>>> Your logic is faulty snit. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You made the statement that the police asked Steve Carroll to stop >>>>>>>> "harassing you" so the burden of proof rests solely with you. >>>>>>>> You went on to claim the statement was a fact and that even Steve >>>>>>>> Carroll admitted this happened. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Those are your statements. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> To date you have not provided any documentation to substantiate your >>>>>>>> claims so the only conclusion that can be reached is that you lied >>>>>>>> once again and have demonstrated that you are indeed a dishonest >>>>>>>> person. >>>>>>>> I merely challenged you to provide that proof The burden of proof is >>>>>>>> on you to prove >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is exactly correct. >>>>>> >>>>>> It is grossly incorrect. It speaks of "lies" and offers ZERO examples of >>>>>> such. >>>>> >>>>> You have serious reading comprehension problems snit. >>>>> The onus, as the OP is on you to provide evidence of your claims. >>>>> You have not done so. >>>>> >>>>>>> And "Snit" knows it. >>>>>>> >>>>>> If my goal was to convince you it would be my burden of proof. That is >>>>>> not my goal though. I do not care if you or he believes it. Why would I? >>>>>> I know it is true and so does Carroll, who even acknowledged it as such. >>>>> >>>>> Nice try. >>>>> You took the time to post the message and make the claim. Now back it up >>>>> or retract it. >>>>> >>>>>> And if you do not know this you should. :) >>>>> >>>>> You need someone to explain logic to you snit because you were asleep >>>>> that day during the correspondence school class. >>>>> >>>> >>>> You accused me of lying. >>>> >>>> You provide no evidence. >>> >>> You sure have a twisted way of looking at things. >>> Simon is correct, you need to learn how to read simple posts. >>> >>> >>>> Fair enough. >>> >>> You are not fair. >>> You are a troll. >> >> Ah, insults and accusations. How creative! > > It's a little early in the evening for your Rainman routine isn't it? > Another insult from you... and this one tied to bigotry against autistic people. How classy. Please make your trolling more interesting... if not you will lose my attention, at least for a while. Hint: try to make a point with your posts other than your need to insult others to try to feel better about yourself. Good luck! -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 02:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pevjgd$8me$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #453490 |
On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 19:08:56 -0700, Snit wrote: > On 6/2/18 7:04 PM, Horace wrote: >> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 18:50:25 -0700, Snit wrote: >> >>> On 6/2/18 6:28 PM, Horace wrote: >>>> On 3 Jun 2018 00:46:59 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>> >>>>> simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 22:03:16 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6/1/18 9:58 PM, vallor wrote: >>>>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 20:32:44 +0000, Simon Singh wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Projection again. >>>>>>>>> Your logic is faulty snit. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You made the statement that the police asked Steve Carroll to >>>>>>>>> stop "harassing you" so the burden of proof rests solely with >>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>> You went on to claim the statement was a fact and that even >>>>>>>>> Steve Carroll admitted this happened. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Those are your statements. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> To date you have not provided any documentation to substantiate >>>>>>>>> your claims so the only conclusion that can be reached is that >>>>>>>>> you lied once again and have demonstrated that you are indeed a >>>>>>>>> dishonest person. >>>>>>>>> I merely challenged you to provide that proof The burden of >>>>>>>>> proof is on you to prove >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This is exactly correct. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It is grossly incorrect. It speaks of "lies" and offers ZERO >>>>>>> examples of such. >>>>>> >>>>>> You have serious reading comprehension problems snit. >>>>>> The onus, as the OP is on you to provide evidence of your claims. >>>>>> You have not done so. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> And "Snit" knows it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> If my goal was to convince you it would be my burden of proof. >>>>>>> That is not my goal though. I do not care if you or he believes >>>>>>> it. Why would I? >>>>>>> I know it is true and so does Carroll, who even acknowledged it as >>>>>>> such. >>>>>> >>>>>> Nice try. >>>>>> You took the time to post the message and make the claim. Now back >>>>>> it up or retract it. >>>>>> >>>>>>> And if you do not know this you should. :) >>>>>> >>>>>> You need someone to explain logic to you snit because you were >>>>>> asleep that day during the correspondence school class. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> You accused me of lying. >>>>> >>>>> You provide no evidence. >>>> >>>> You sure have a twisted way of looking at things. >>>> Simon is correct, you need to learn how to read simple posts. >>>> >>>> >>>>> Fair enough. >>>> >>>> You are not fair. >>>> You are a troll. >>> >>> Ah, insults and accusations. How creative! >> >> It's a little early in the evening for your Rainman routine isn't it? >> > Another insult from you... and this one tied to bigotry against autistic > people. How classy. > > Please make your trolling more interesting... if not you will lose my > attention, at least for a while. > > Hint: try to make a point with your posts other than your need to insult > others to try to feel better about yourself. Good luck! Try not making false statements and maybe people might actually listen to you snit. I doubt it, but it's worth a try. In your position autism is something you would aspire to. It's certainly a few levels about mental retardation which is where you sit in the food chain right now. And why not stop trying to move the goal posts from the fact, you like that word snit, FACT that you made a statement you have no proof of and thus you lied. Again, where is your proof that Steve Carroll was asked by the police to stop harassing you on usenet? You had to file a police report and seeing as you seem to save every single post to usenet it should be trivial for you to post. But you won't. Because it never happened. Which proves beyond doubt that you are a liar snit. You are dishonest.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 20:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fnh4lkFcb78U6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #453499 |
On 6/2/18 7:24 PM, simon singh wrote: > On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 19:08:56 -0700, Snit wrote: > >> On 6/2/18 7:04 PM, Horace wrote: >>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 18:50:25 -0700, Snit wrote: >>> >>>> On 6/2/18 6:28 PM, Horace wrote: >>>>> On 3 Jun 2018 00:46:59 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 22:03:16 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 6/1/18 9:58 PM, vallor wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 20:32:44 +0000, Simon Singh wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Projection again. >>>>>>>>>> Your logic is faulty snit. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You made the statement that the police asked Steve Carroll to >>>>>>>>>> stop "harassing you" so the burden of proof rests solely with >>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>> You went on to claim the statement was a fact and that even >>>>>>>>>> Steve Carroll admitted this happened. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Those are your statements. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> To date you have not provided any documentation to substantiate >>>>>>>>>> your claims so the only conclusion that can be reached is that >>>>>>>>>> you lied once again and have demonstrated that you are indeed a >>>>>>>>>> dishonest person. >>>>>>>>>> I merely challenged you to provide that proof The burden of >>>>>>>>>> proof is on you to prove >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This is exactly correct. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It is grossly incorrect. It speaks of "lies" and offers ZERO >>>>>>>> examples of such. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You have serious reading comprehension problems snit. >>>>>>> The onus, as the OP is on you to provide evidence of your claims. >>>>>>> You have not done so. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And "Snit" knows it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If my goal was to convince you it would be my burden of proof. >>>>>>>> That is not my goal though. I do not care if you or he believes >>>>>>>> it. Why would I? >>>>>>>> I know it is true and so does Carroll, who even acknowledged it as >>>>>>>> such. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nice try. >>>>>>> You took the time to post the message and make the claim. Now back >>>>>>> it up or retract it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And if you do not know this you should. :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You need someone to explain logic to you snit because you were >>>>>>> asleep that day during the correspondence school class. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> You accused me of lying. >>>>>> >>>>>> You provide no evidence. >>>>> >>>>> You sure have a twisted way of looking at things. >>>>> Simon is correct, you need to learn how to read simple posts. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Fair enough. >>>>> >>>>> You are not fair. >>>>> You are a troll. >>>> >>>> Ah, insults and accusations. How creative! >>> >>> It's a little early in the evening for your Rainman routine isn't it? >>> >> Another insult from you... and this one tied to bigotry against autistic >> people. How classy. >> >> Please make your trolling more interesting... if not you will lose my >> attention, at least for a while. >> >> Hint: try to make a point with your posts other than your need to insult >> others to try to feel better about yourself. Good luck! > > Try not making false statements and maybe people might actually listen to > you snit. > I doubt it, but it's worth a try. > > In your position autism is something you would aspire to. It's certainly > a few levels about mental retardation which is where you sit in the food > chain right now. > > And why not stop trying to move the goal posts from the fact, you like > that word snit, FACT that you made a statement you have no proof of and > thus you lied. > > Again, where is your proof that Steve Carroll was asked by the police to > stop harassing you on usenet? > You had to file a police report and seeing as you seem to save every > single post to usenet it should be trivial for you to post. > But you won't. > Because it never happened. > > Which proves beyond doubt that you are a liar snit. > You are dishonest. > All those damned unquotable lies! -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 01:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c3b68da5-5811-4578-8b96-8613d030cde0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #453542 |
On Saturday, June 2, 2018 at 8:12:55 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 6/2/18 7:24 PM, simon singh wrote: > > On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 19:08:56 -0700, Snit wrote: > > > >> On 6/2/18 7:04 PM, Horace wrote: > >>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 18:50:25 -0700, Snit wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 6/2/18 6:28 PM, Horace wrote: > >>>>> On 3 Jun 2018 00:46:59 GMT, Snit wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 22:03:16 -0700, Snit wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 6/1/18 9:58 PM, vallor wrote: > >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 20:32:44 +0000, Simon Singh wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Projection again. > >>>>>>>>>> Your logic is faulty snit. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> You made the statement that the police asked Steve Carroll to > >>>>>>>>>> stop "harassing you" so the burden of proof rests solely with > >>>>>>>>>> you. > >>>>>>>>>> You went on to claim the statement was a fact and that even > >>>>>>>>>> Steve Carroll admitted this happened. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Those are your statements. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> To date you have not provided any documentation to substantiate > >>>>>>>>>> your claims so the only conclusion that can be reached is that > >>>>>>>>>> you lied once again and have demonstrated that you are indeed a > >>>>>>>>>> dishonest person. > >>>>>>>>>> I merely challenged you to provide that proof The burden of > >>>>>>>>>> proof is on you to prove > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> This is exactly correct. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> It is grossly incorrect. It speaks of "lies" and offers ZERO > >>>>>>>> examples of such. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> You have serious reading comprehension problems snit. > >>>>>>> The onus, as the OP is on you to provide evidence of your claims. > >>>>>>> You have not done so. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> And "Snit" knows it. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> If my goal was to convince you it would be my burden of proof. > >>>>>>>> That is not my goal though. I do not care if you or he believes > >>>>>>>> it. Why would I? > >>>>>>>> I know it is true and so does Carroll, who even acknowledged it as > >>>>>>>> such. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Nice try. > >>>>>>> You took the time to post the message and make the claim. Now back > >>>>>>> it up or retract it. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> And if you do not know this you should. :) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> You need someone to explain logic to you snit because you were > >>>>>>> asleep that day during the correspondence school class. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> You accused me of lying. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You provide no evidence. > >>>>> > >>>>> You sure have a twisted way of looking at things. > >>>>> Simon is correct, you need to learn how to read simple posts. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> Fair enough. > >>>>> > >>>>> You are not fair. > >>>>> You are a troll. > >>>> > >>>> Ah, insults and accusations. How creative! > >>> > >>> It's a little early in the evening for your Rainman routine isn't it? > >>> > >> Another insult from you... and this one tied to bigotry against autistic > >> people. How classy. > >> > >> Please make your trolling more interesting... if not you will lose my > >> attention, at least for a while. > >> > >> Hint: try to make a point with your posts other than your need to insult > >> others to try to feel better about yourself. Good luck! > > > > Try not making false statements and maybe people might actually listen to > > you snit. > > I doubt it, but it's worth a try. > > > > In your position autism is something you would aspire to. It's certainly > > a few levels about mental retardation which is where you sit in the food > > chain right now. > > > > And why not stop trying to move the goal posts from the fact, you like > > that word snit, FACT that you made a statement you have no proof of and > > thus you lied. > > > > Again, where is your proof that Steve Carroll was asked by the police to > > stop harassing you on usenet? > > You had to file a police report and seeing as you seem to save every > > single post to usenet it should be trivial for you to post. > > But you won't. > > Because it never happened. > > > > Which proves beyond doubt that you are a liar snit. > > You are dishonest. > > > > All those damned unquotable lies! > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> But Doomsdrzej feels the need to please the herd. So be it. Protected code is best done with code morphing. Chris Ahlstrom has a bunch of know-how to share and he wishes to give back to the community. Unfortunately, this is maybe the least appropriate place for doing that because much of the responses are wailing, lying, and other poppycock. Think about it, who knows Python, is a web developer, has hacked Chris Ahlstrom's ID, has poor impulse control and is a huge conniption-fit throwing mama's boy who, when he backs himself into a corner, posts ignorant claptrap even when he's NOT flooding... AND... who struggles to blame everything he is doing on "anyone he can" and has for over a decade? Doomsdrzej is far too idiotic to write a Linux script. The only scripting he's able to do is click, click, drool, drool. -- One Smart Penny!! http://www.5z8.info/how-to-build-a-bomb_h2o1be_peepshow http://www.5z8.info/peepshow_z9s9ht_dogporn http://bit.ly/2oNYRgv Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 22:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pev6vu$62p$7@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #453208 |
On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 04:58:31 +0000, vallor wrote: > On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 20:32:44 +0000, Simon Singh wrote: > >> Projection again. >> Your logic is faulty snit. >> >> You made the statement that the police asked Steve Carroll to stop >> "harassing you" so the burden of proof rests solely with you. >> You went on to claim the statement was a fact and that even Steve >> Carroll admitted this happened. >> >> >> Those are your statements. >> >> To date you have not provided any documentation to substantiate your >> claims so the only conclusion that can be reached is that you lied once >> again and have demonstrated that you are indeed a dishonest person. >> I merely challenged you to provide that proof The burden of proof is on >> you to prove > > This is exactly correct. > > And "Snit" knows it. Thank you. Snit belongs in a treatment program for the mentally ill. Initially I assumed he was just a rather prolific troll but after reading his bizarre replies and twisted logic it's rather obvious that he is not well in the head.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fngs44Fb1d7U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #453386 |
simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 04:58:31 +0000, vallor wrote: > >> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 20:32:44 +0000, Simon Singh wrote: >> >>> Projection again. >>> Your logic is faulty snit. >>> >>> You made the statement that the police asked Steve Carroll to stop >>> "harassing you" so the burden of proof rests solely with you. >>> You went on to claim the statement was a fact and that even Steve >>> Carroll admitted this happened. >>> >>> >>> Those are your statements. >>> >>> To date you have not provided any documentation to substantiate your >>> claims so the only conclusion that can be reached is that you lied once >>> again and have demonstrated that you are indeed a dishonest person. >>> I merely challenged you to provide that proof The burden of proof is on >>> you to prove >> >> This is exactly correct. >> >> And "Snit" knows it. > > Thank you. Snit belongs in a treatment program for the mentally ill. > Initially I assumed he was just a rather prolific troll but after reading > his bizarre replies and twisted logic it's rather obvious that he is not > well in the head. > Gee, I stop responding to Carroll and the socks obsessed with me come out. What a shock!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 21:32 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <1rqknaaxeb0rk$.v686j9gvturd.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #453424 |
On 3 Jun 2018 00:47:00 GMT, Snit wrote: > simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 04:58:31 +0000, vallor wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 20:32:44 +0000, Simon Singh wrote: >>> >>>> Projection again. >>>> Your logic is faulty snit. >>>> >>>> You made the statement that the police asked Steve Carroll to stop >>>> "harassing you" so the burden of proof rests solely with you. >>>> You went on to claim the statement was a fact and that even Steve >>>> Carroll admitted this happened. >>>> >>>> >>>> Those are your statements. >>>> >>>> To date you have not provided any documentation to substantiate your >>>> claims so the only conclusion that can be reached is that you lied once >>>> again and have demonstrated that you are indeed a dishonest person. >>>> I merely challenged you to provide that proof The burden of proof is on >>>> you to prove >>> >>> This is exactly correct. >>> >>> And "Snit" knows it. >> >> Thank you. Snit belongs in a treatment program for the mentally ill. >> Initially I assumed he was just a rather prolific troll but after reading >> his bizarre replies and twisted logic it's rather obvious that he is not >> well in the head. >> > > Gee, I stop responding to Carroll and the socks obsessed with me come out. > > What a shock! You are cornered snit and you know it. This is just another tactic you are attempting to use in order to provide proof of your statements. You're a POS troll snit. Everyone knows it because you provide all the proof they need and you do it every single time you start trolling.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web