Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #328955 > unrolled thread
| Started by | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-27 21:55 +0000 |
| Last post | 2015-10-28 00:18 +0000 |
| Articles | 14 on this page of 194 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-10-27 21:55 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 15:16 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-27 22:16 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 15:32 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-10-27 22:36 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 15:45 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-27 23:21 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-27 20:07 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 00:34 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 17:41 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-28 01:49 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 17:56 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 08:47 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 08:50 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 13:36 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 10:50 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 14:22 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 11:48 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 17:13 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 14:21 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 00:57 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 08:49 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 08:52 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 16:06 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 09:17 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 09:53 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 14:07 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 13:37 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 10:46 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 04:36 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-28 00:48 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 09:01 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 09:04 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 08:44 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 08:47 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-28 11:27 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 02:35 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 20:06 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-29 05:11 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 10:11 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 15:39 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-29 12:11 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 12:28 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-29 12:30 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 09:49 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 11:25 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 09:52 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 17:01 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 13:23 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 12:05 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 11:30 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 20:37 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 17:20 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 21:53 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 01:18 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 01:58 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 02:32 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 05:16 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 09:04 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-30 09:42 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 17:03 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 17:27 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 13:28 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 15:32 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 09:06 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 20:25 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 14:16 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 16:50 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 17:48 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 10:29 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 07:43 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 12:23 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 09:48 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-30 09:48 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 11:28 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 17:08 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 13:19 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 17:30 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 17:47 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 17:52 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 13:55 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 03:53 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-31 06:05 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 08:49 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 16:28 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 09:54 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 17:02 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 11:14 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 13:19 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 10:44 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 18:03 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 11:21 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 20:34 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 16:46 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 08:50 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 10:06 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 15:41 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 11:29 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 16:36 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 09:56 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 13:57 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 20:35 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 03:51 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-30 06:07 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-30 09:32 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-30 14:38 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 09:57 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-30 15:02 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 10:15 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-30 10:08 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 12:33 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 10:04 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 10:18 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 15:32 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 00:59 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 01:18 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 01:33 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 01:41 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 02:07 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 21:57 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-31 10:12 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 10:42 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 21:56 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-31 18:02 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-31 14:35 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-31 22:56 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 12:03 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 23:44 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-31 02:22 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 13:49 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-31 09:05 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-10-31 20:21 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:40 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 23:57 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 09:47 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 16:37 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-29 12:44 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 14:00 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-29 15:10 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 20:41 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 22:25 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 18:45 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 01:22 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 02:12 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 20:36 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 15:34 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 09:59 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 17:20 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 11:15 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 00:59 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 18:16 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 18:44 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 02:01 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 19:06 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 19:11 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 02:29 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 19:48 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 03:01 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 20:05 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 03:11 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 20:21 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 03:27 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 20:36 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 03:46 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 21:16 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 04:23 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 08:34 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 15:55 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 09:07 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 20:11 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 08:56 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 09:03 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 19:50 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 03:23 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 20:40 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 03:50 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 21:15 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 07:07 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 09:02 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 09:05 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 13:40 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 10:57 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 14:06 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 11:21 -0700
The Quran Peaceful? My ass Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-28 14:32 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 08:35 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 16:01 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 21:00 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 18:01 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 17:41 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 17:02 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-27 19:30 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 17:05 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 00:18 +0000
Page 10 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10]
| From | Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-28 13:40 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0r15t$pd0$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #329165 |
On 2015-10-28 12:05 PM, Snit wrote: > On 10/28/15, 6:02 AM, in article n0qgtf$j6r$7@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" > <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > >> On 2015-10-28 3:07 AM, owl wrote: >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 10/27/15, 8:50 PM, in article sgjbnmc83.a@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Imagine if 75 percent of the US populatin identified as Muslim. >>>>> Now there's some "scary" for you... >>>> >>>> Outsiders realize the two religions are not much different. >>>> >>> >>> So would you feel more -- or less -- comfortable if 75 percent of the US >>> population identified as Muslim instead of Christian? >> >> A population which is mostly Muslim tends to implode. >> > America and England, which are majority Christian, tend to invade other > countries. Considering how religion is not part of the government of either country, I don't see how you can consider them Christian. Unlike Muslim countries where Islam is a strong part of the government, Christian nations have separated the faith from the government. -- Charmed Tuna
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-28 10:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D2565A9D.61D18%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #329219 |
On 10/28/15, 10:40 AM, in article n0r15t$pd0$1@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > On 2015-10-28 12:05 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 10/28/15, 6:02 AM, in article n0qgtf$j6r$7@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" >> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >> >>> On 2015-10-28 3:07 AM, owl wrote: >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 10/27/15, 8:50 PM, in article sgjbnmc83.a@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Imagine if 75 percent of the US populatin identified as Muslim. >>>>>> Now there's some "scary" for you... >>>>> >>>>> Outsiders realize the two religions are not much different. >>>>> >>>> >>>> So would you feel more -- or less -- comfortable if 75 percent of the US >>>> population identified as Muslim instead of Christian? >>> >>> A population which is mostly Muslim tends to implode. >>> >> America and England, which are majority Christian, tend to invade other >> countries. > > Considering how religion is not part of the government of either > country, I don't see how you can consider them Christian. I *certainly* see that and have argued STRONGLY that the US, at least, is not a Christian nation. It is not: it is a nation founded on the idea of religious freedom. But we are country where Christians are a very large majority and no modern president has been anything other than a Christian. Our wars are fought in the name of the Christian deity. So in that way it is tied to Christianity, but, sure, it is not the same as having a religious government. > Unlike Muslim countries where Islam is a strong part of the government, > Christian nations have separated the faith from the government. Well, are supposed to. They are still very influential. I think more than religion it is economics and other reasons that lead to violence. In places where we see gross income inequality we see more violence. Applies to many Middle Eastern countries as well as many poor areas of America. The solution is to work to help tie hard work / productivity to financial reward. Right now that is broken in the US and around the world. Also does not help that in the Middle East in the 1940s outsiders came in and defined borders. Most of those outsiders were Christians. Those people have a role in the issue. We also have been funding and arming the not-quite-so-bad guys to take on the bad guys, only to have the group we funded rise up and become the new bad guys. Right now I do not see any good solution, but do back general education and working to help make lives better. If you have people who are fairly comfortable in their lives and do not feel abused they do not lash out with violence (as much, SOME still will). -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-28 14:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <55f1f01a-d476-43a6-99c2-52a42a431c6b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #329231 |
On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 at 11:57:42 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 10/28/15, 10:40 AM, in article n0r15t$pd0$1@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" > <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > > > On 2015-10-28 12:05 PM, Snit wrote: > >> On 10/28/15, 6:02 AM, in article n0qgtf$j6r$7@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" > >> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > >> > >>> On 2015-10-28 3:07 AM, owl wrote: > >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>>>> On 10/27/15, 8:50 PM, in article sgjbnmc83.a@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > >>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> Imagine if 75 percent of the US populatin identified as Muslim. > >>>>>> Now there's some "scary" for you... > >>>>> > >>>>> Outsiders realize the two religions are not much different. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> So would you feel more -- or less -- comfortable if 75 percent of the US > >>>> population identified as Muslim instead of Christian? > >>> > >>> A population which is mostly Muslim tends to implode. > >>> > >> America and England, which are majority Christian, tend to invade other > >> countries. > > > > Considering how religion is not part of the government of either > > country, I don't see how you can consider them Christian. > > I *certainly* see that and have argued STRONGLY that the US, at least, is > not a Christian nation. It is not: it is a nation founded on the idea of > religious freedom. But we are country where Christians are a very large > majority and no modern president has been anything other than a Christian. Which is *very* different from what's going on here, fool: "Countries where Sharia applies in full, covering personal status issues as well as criminal proceedings." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Application_of_sharia_law_by_country You're *supposed* to be providing evidence that Christians and Muslims "are" much the same, remember? So are you going to get to it, or are you going to *keep* babbling, hoping that no one notices you're not getting to it? People are not as stupid as you need them to be.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-28 11:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <06faad41-5938-4a29-be54-9574a0376c71@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #329219 |
On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 at 11:40:19 AM UTC-6, Charmed Tuna wrote: > On 2015-10-28 12:05 PM, Snit wrote: > > On 10/28/15, 6:02 AM, in article n0qgtf$j6r$7@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" > > <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > > > >> On 2015-10-28 3:07 AM, owl wrote: > >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>>> On 10/27/15, 8:50 PM, in article sgjbnmc83.a@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> Imagine if 75 percent of the US populatin identified as Muslim. > >>>>> Now there's some "scary" for you... > >>>> > >>>> Outsiders realize the two religions are not much different. > >>>> > >>> > >>> So would you feel more -- or less -- comfortable if 75 percent of the US > >>> population identified as Muslim instead of Christian? > >> > >> A population which is mostly Muslim tends to implode. > >> > > America and England, which are majority Christian, tend to invade other > > countries. > > Considering how religion is not part of the government of either > country, I don't see how you can consider them Christian. Unlike Muslim > countries where Islam is a strong part of the government, Christian > nations have separated the faith from the government. That's the very thing he is being purposefully obtuse about here... and doing so to push the agenda he falsely claims he doesn't have. He'll pretend that he's 'discussing' things with you but, in reality, he's lying through his teeth and even he knows it. Notice how thin (non-existent) his response to your paragraph here was? "Well, are supposed to. They are still very influential." - Snit He won't talk about that 'influence'... which creates huge divisions with modern Christians. Any fool can see what he tried to do... instead of addressing that which undermines his false claims, he ran away by spewing more of his mealy-mouthed BS.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-28 14:32 -0400 |
| Subject | The Quran Peaceful? My ass |
| Message-ID | <1gcpbmyphur50.1htcspk3e108n$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #329233 |
On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:21:03 -0700 (PDT), Steve Carroll wrote: > On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 at 11:40:19 AM UTC-6, Charmed Tuna wrote: >> On 2015-10-28 12:05 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 10/28/15, 6:02 AM, in article n0qgtf$j6r$7@dont-email.me, "Charmed >>> Tuna" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2015-10-28 3:07 AM, owl wrote: >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 10/27/15, 8:50 PM, in article sgjbnmc83.a@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Imagine if 75 percent of the US populatin identified as Muslim. Now >>>>>>> there's some "scary" for you... >>>>>> >>>>>> Outsiders realize the two religions are not much different. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> So would you feel more -- or less -- comfortable if 75 percent of >>>>> the US population identified as Muslim instead of Christian? >>>> >>>> A population which is mostly Muslim tends to implode. >>>> >>> America and England, which are majority Christian, tend to invade other >>> countries. >> >> Considering how religion is not part of the government of either >> country, I don't see how you can consider them Christian. Unlike Muslim >> countries where Islam is a strong part of the government, Christian >> nations have separated the faith from the government. > > That's the very thing he is being purposefully obtuse about here... and > doing so to push the agenda he falsely claims he doesn't have. He'll > pretend that he's 'discussing' things with you but, in reality, he's > lying through his teeth and even he knows it. Notice how thin > (non-existent) his response to your paragraph here was? > > "Well, are supposed to. They are still very influential." - Snit > > He won't talk about that 'influence'... which creates huge divisions > with modern Christians. Any fool can see what he tried to do... instead > of addressing that which undermines his false claims, he ran away by > spewing more of his mealy-mouthed BS. http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm Here is just a snippet The Quran: Quran (2:191-193) - "And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing... but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone. But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)" (Translation is from the Noble Quran) The verse prior to this (190) refers to "fighting for the cause of Allah those who fight you" leading some to believe that the entire passage refers to a defensive war in which Muslims are defending their homes and families. The historical context of this passage is not defensive warfare, however, since Muhammad and his Muslims had just relocated to Medina and were not under attack by their Meccan adversaries. In fact, the verses urge offensive warfare, in that Muslims are to drive Meccans out of their own city (which they later did). Verse 190 thus means to fight those who offer resistance to Allah's rule (ie. Muslim conquest). The use of the word "persecution" by some Muslim translators is disingenuous (the actual Arabic words for persecution - "idtihad" - and oppression - a variation of "z-l-m" - do not appear in the verse). The word used instead, "fitna", can mean disbelief, or the disorder that results from unbelief or temptation. This is certainly what is meant in this context since the violence is explicitly commissioned "until religion is for Allah" - ie. unbelievers desist in their unbelief. Quran (2:244) - "Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things." Quran (2:216) - "Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not." Not only does this verse establish that violence can be virtuous, but it also contradicts the myth that fighting is intended only in self-defense, since the audience was obviously not under attack at the time. From the Hadith, we know that this verse was narrated at a time that Muhammad was actually trying to motivate his people into raiding merchant caravans for loot. Quran (3:56) - "As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help." Quran (3:151) - "Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority". This speaks directly of polytheists, yet it also includes Christians, since they believe in the Trinity (ie. what Muhammad incorrectly believed to be 'joining companions to Allah'). Quran (4:74) - "Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward." The martyrs of Islam are unlike the early Christians, who were led meekly to the slaughter. These Muslims are killed in battle as they attempt to inflict death and destruction for the cause of Allah. This is the theological basis for today's suicide bombers. Quran (4:76) - "Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah…" Quran (4:89) - "They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks." Quran (4:95) - "Not equal are those of the believers who sit (at home), except those who are disabled (by injury or are blind or lame, etc.), and those who strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with their wealth and their lives. Allah has preferred in grades those who strive hard and fight with their wealth and their lives above those who sit (at home). Unto each, Allah has promised good (Paradise), but Allah has preferred those who strive hard and fight, above those who sit (at home) by a huge reward". -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-28 08:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D256396F.61C82%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #329086 |
On 10/28/15, 12:07 AM, in article srug843.gji@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 10/27/15, 8:50 PM, in article sgjbnmc83.a@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >> >>> Imagine if 75 percent of the US populatin identified as Muslim. >>> Now there's some "scary" for you... >> >> Outsiders realize the two religions are not much different. >> > > So would you feel more -- or less -- comfortable if 75 percent of the US > population identified as Muslim instead of Christian? > I do not back anyone pushing their religion on others. I have no more or less problem with Christians doing it than with Muslims. Remember: those of us outside your two "camps" know you are pretty much the same. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-28 16:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fngmcj83.j@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #329151 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/28/15, 12:07 AM, in article srug843.gji@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 10/27/15, 8:50 PM, in article sgjbnmc83.a@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Imagine if 75 percent of the US populatin identified as Muslim. >>>> Now there's some "scary" for you... >>> >>> Outsiders realize the two religions are not much different. >>> >> >> So would you feel more -- or less -- comfortable if 75 percent of the US >> population identified as Muslim instead of Christian? >> > I do not back anyone pushing their religion on others. I have no more or > less problem with Christians doing it than with Muslims. > > Remember: those of us outside your two "camps" know you are pretty much the > same. > So once again you dodge simple question.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-27 21:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0c49d841-289d-40f8-a9f4-ec0d6d93675b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #329056 |
On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 9:40:45 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 10/27/15, 8:23 PM, in article sef903.au@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > > Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 8:29:55 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: > >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>>> On 10/27/15, 7:01 PM, in article fheuas9.jgiuae3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 7:16:29 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>>>>> On 10/27/15, 5:59 PM, in article sghak30.adfi@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > >>>>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> On 10/27/15, 5:34 PM, in article fhgks83.a0f@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > >>>>>>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> It's also very telling that all the clown had to talk about was a > >>>>>>>>>>>> domain > >>>>>>>>>>>> name, and not his own logical fallacy. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Oh well -- no reason to take the guy seriously. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Because of PC muz butthurt, Jabba's Palace is no more. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2302312/Muslim-victory-figh > >>>>>>>>>>>> t-an > >>>>>>>>>>>> ti- > >>>>>>>>>>>> Is > >>>>>>>>>>>> lamic-lego-Denmark-axes-Jabbas-Palace-toy.html > >>>>>>>>>>>> <quote> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Muslims declare victory in fight over 'anti-Islamic' Lego as > >>>>>>>>>>>> Denmark > >>>>>>>>>>>> promises to axe ???Jabba???s Palace??? toy > >>>>>>>>>>>> </quote> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Is vallor's house in order? > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> One has to wonder if there is anything the Muslims aren't offended > >>>>>>>>>>> by. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> History's crybabies. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Christians and Muslims are much the same. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Both oppose a woman's right to control her body. > >>>>>>>>> Both oppose birth control. > >>>>>>>>> Both oppose drug legalization. > >>>>>>>>> Both oppose equality for gays. > >>>>>>>>> Both oppose pornography. > >>>>>>>>> Both oppose pre-marital sex. > >>>>>>>>> Both oppose prostitution. > >>>>>>>>> Both oppose secularism. > >>>>>>>>> Both support the death penalty. > >>>>>>>>> Both support prayer in school. > >>>>>>>>> Both support pushing their views on others. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Etc. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> They are natural allies. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> One minor difference... > >>>>>>>> Christian: "Convert and be saved." > >>>>>>>> Muslim: "Convert or die." > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> You do not know much about Christianity! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> <http://jdstone.org/cr/files/converttochristianityordie.html> > >>>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forced_conversion#Christianity> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> He's clearly talking about *today*, you dishonest weasel: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> "They are natural allies" > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Your words, present tense. > >>>>> > >>>>> Snit clearly believes that muslims should be held to the standards of the > >>>>> Middle Ages and earlier, since it would be ludicrous to attempt to hold > >>>>> them > >>>>> accountable by modern norms. I wonder which of Snit's personal rainbow > >>>>> coalition would be most likely to slay him for insulting their religion. > >>>>> No, actually I don't wonder. We all know the answer to that question. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> I believe people should be held to high standards. You and Carroll fail. > >>>> Not > >>>> all Muslims are the same. Not all Christians are the same. > >>>> > >>>> Simple facts. > >>>> > >>>> And the fact you are ignorant enough to not know about forced conversions > >>>> to > >>>> Christianity any time since the Middle Ages shows you know NOTHING of > >>>> history. I mean, really, how can you not know about slavery in the US? > >>>> > >>> > >>> Slaves in the US were not forced to convert to Christianity, you moron. > >> > >> Glasser will, undoubtedly, pick out anything and everything that supports his > >> far left-tard BS from this report while totally ignoring facts that undermine > >> it: > >> > >> http://www.pewforum.org/files/2013/04/worlds-muslims-religion-politics-societ > >> y-full-report.pdf > >> > >> I found this poll to be, as Snit likes to say, "interesting": > >> > >> https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/2015/06/23/nationwide-poll-of-us-musl > >> ims-shows-thousands-support-shariah-jihad/ > > > > Good links. Thanks. > > > I referenced this survey, or one similar to it, before. But, sure, it is > quite scary how many Muslims This isn't simply about pushing a religion, you pathetic, pathological liar, it's about pushing it as law and how they're pushing it, *today*. As to how many wish to push that law, there are several hundreds of millions. > Who wants the laws designed to keep ancient goat herders in line to be the > law of the land in modern America? Utter insanity. You were just shown who. (Hint: it wasn't Christians). By the way, why are you talking about "modern" only when it suits you and the rest of the time you're yammering about "history" when it's out of context? Still deluding yourself into believing that people are as stupid as you need them to be?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-27 18:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4ae99049-a809-465b-aa4f-554df1716df2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #329018 |
On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 6:41:09 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 10/27/15, 5:34 PM, in article fhgks83.a0f@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > >>>> It's also very telling that all the clown had to talk about was a domain > >>>> name, and not his own logical fallacy. > >>>> > >>>> Oh well -- no reason to take the guy seriously. > >>>> > >>> > >>> Because of PC muz butthurt, Jabba's Palace is no more. > >>> > >>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2302312/Muslim-victory-fight-anti-Is > >>> lamic-lego-Denmark-axes-Jabbas-Palace-toy.html > >>> <quote> > >>> Muslims declare victory in fight over 'anti-Islamic' Lego as Denmark > >>> promises to axe ???Jabba???s Palace??? toy > >>> </quote> > >>> > >>> Is vallor's house in order? > >> > >> One has to wonder if there is anything the Muslims aren't offended by. > >> > > > > History's crybabies. > > Christians and Muslims are much the same. Tell it to CNN and the UN: http://www.cnn.com/2015/02/06/world/isis-children-torture/ (snip disgustingly pathetic attempt to politicize in a weasel-like manner from a pathologically lying weasel)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-27 17:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D25567C6.61BA6%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #329007 |
On 10/27/15, 5:07 PM, in article n0p3fc$ech$3@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > On 2015-10-27 7:21 PM, owl wrote: >> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >>> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 15:32:19 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> >>>> On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 4:16:15 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: >>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >>>>>> This is a message for the bigots. >>>>>> >>>>>> Naturally, the response will be "if you don't tolerate my bigotry, >>>>>> you are intolerant too!" >>>>>> >>>>>> Which is absurd. There is no moral compunction to tolerate bigotry, >>>>>> just as there is no moral compunction to tolerate extremism. >>>>>> >>>>>> Additionally, stereotyping and bigotry are outside the realm of logic >>>>>> and reason: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/ >>> logic.html#generalization >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> I take it the domain irony escaped you. >>>> >>>> He does have a point. >>> >>> No he doesn't. >>> >>> (I specifically use that faq on that domain for a reason.) >>> >>> It's also very telling that all the clown had to talk about was a domain >>> name, and not his own logical fallacy. >>> >>> Oh well -- no reason to take the guy seriously. >>> >> >> Because of PC muz butthurt, Jabba's Palace is no more. >> >> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2302312/Muslim-victory-fight-anti-Isl >> amic-lego-Denmark-axes-Jabbas-Palace-toy.html >> <quote> >> Muslims declare victory in fight over 'anti-Islamic' Lego as Denmark >> promises to axe ???Jabba???s Palace??? toy >> </quote> >> >> Is vallor's house in order? > > One has to wonder if there is anything the Muslims aren't offended by. > The list is pretty much the same as the ones for Christians. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-27 17:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D2555EA6.61B7E%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #328977 |
On 10/27/15, 3:36 PM, in article 562ffc89$0$5946$b1db1813$19ace300@news.astraweb.com, "vallor" <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: > On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 15:32:19 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > >> On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 4:16:15 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: >>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >>>> This is a message for the bigots. >>>> >>>> Naturally, the response will be "if you don't tolerate my bigotry, >>>> you are intolerant too!" >>>> >>>> Which is absurd. There is no moral compunction to tolerate bigotry, >>>> just as there is no moral compunction to tolerate extremism. >>>> >>>> Additionally, stereotyping and bigotry are outside the realm of logic >>>> and reason: >>>> >>>> http://infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/ > logic.html#generalization >>>> >>>> >>> I take it the domain irony escaped you. >> >> He does have a point. > > No he doesn't. > > (I specifically use that faq on that domain for a reason.) > > It's also very telling that all the clown had to talk about was a domain > name, and not his own logical fallacy. > > Oh well -- no reason to take the guy seriously. Owl has been spewing some of the most extreme ignorance and bigotry I have seen in a while. He is at least presenting himself as being functionally illiterate and incapable of understanding something as simple as an average. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-27 19:30 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0p1al$8c2$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #328955 |
On 10/27/2015 5:55 PM, vallor wrote: > This is a message for the bigots. > > Naturally, the response will be "if you don't tolerate my bigotry, you > are intolerant too!" Yes, you are. > Which is absurd. Which is 100% true. Queers that enjoy sex with dogs don't get to tell me I'm "intolerant" of their perversions. Nor does a fat pile of donut yeast like you get to dictate what's "bigotry" and what's not. > There is no moral compunction to tolerate bigotry, just > as there is no moral compunction to tolerate extremism. Of course there is - up to the point where your safety (physical, financial, material) is endangered. > Additionally, stereotyping and bigotry are outside the realm of logic and > reason: > > http://infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/logic.html#generalization > > Of course, you are free to conduct your discussions without logic and > reason -- just don't expect anyone to take what you say seriously. Signed, Bloaty Doty Linux Bigot Obese Hypocrite
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-27 17:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D2555F43.61B8C%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #328990 |
On 10/27/15, 4:30 PM, in article n0p1al$8c2$1@dont-email.me, "DFS" <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 10/27/2015 5:55 PM, vallor wrote: >> This is a message for the bigots. >> >> Naturally, the response will be "if you don't tolerate my bigotry, you >> are intolerant too!" > > Yes, you are. > > >> Which is absurd. > > Which is 100% true. > > Queers that enjoy sex with dogs don't get to tell me I'm "intolerant" of > their perversions. Why include the "queer" part which refers to homosexuals? Are you implying heterosexual bestiality is fine by you? > Nor does a fat pile of donut yeast like you get to dictate what's > "bigotry" and what's not. He never said he gets to decide: reason and logic do. When you or Owl or anyone spew bigoted nonsense against gays or Muslims it does not matter what others say - it is still bigoted nonsense. >> There is no moral compunction to tolerate bigotry, just >> as there is no moral compunction to tolerate extremism. > > Of course there is - up to the point where your safety (physical, > financial, material) is endangered. You have a right to be an ignorant bigot, sure, but others have a right to call you out on it. >> Additionally, stereotyping and bigotry are outside the realm of logic and >> reason: >> >> http://infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/logic.html#generalization >> >> Of course, you are free to conduct your discussions without logic and >> reason -- just don't expect anyone to take what you say seriously. > > > Signed, > Bloaty Doty > Linux Bigot > Obese Hypocrite On this he is absolutely correct. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-28 00:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <feh380a.apfa@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #329005 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/27/15, 4:30 PM, in article n0p1al$8c2$1@dont-email.me, "DFS" > <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > > >> Nor does a fat pile of donut yeast like you get to dictate what's >> "bigotry" and what's not. > > He never said he gets to decide: reason and logic do. When you or Owl or > anyone spew bigoted nonsense against gays or Muslims it does not matter what > others say - it is still bigoted nonsense. > Snit: "Christians having sex with animals is likely not uncommon"
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 10 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10]
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web