Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #452930 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Simon Singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-31 22:42 +0000 |
| Last post | 2018-06-03 23:23 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 143 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Simon Singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-05-31 22:42 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 17:01 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Simon Singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 01:12 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Simon Singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 01:49 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 21:32 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Simon Singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 14:19 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:35 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Simon Singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 14:49 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 08:04 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 09:16 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 09:35 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Simon Singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 16:24 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 09:53 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 10:06 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit says unsupported claims are lies <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 12:42 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Simon Singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 20:32 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 13:38 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 14:38 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit ignores the 9th amendment <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 14:48 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit says unsupported claims are lies <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 14:01 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-02 04:58 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:03 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 22:32 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 22:48 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 18:05 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 21:26 -0400
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 01:36 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:50 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 22:07 -0400
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 04:05 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 08:18 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 08:58 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 03:07 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 10:14 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:29 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 11:54 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:15 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 12:32 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:37 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 14:27 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 16:34 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 18:13 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 18:19 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 18:36 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:01 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:18 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:12 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 22:38 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:46 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 21:28 -0400
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:50 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 22:04 -0400
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 19:08 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:24 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:12 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 01:50 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 22:50 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 21:32 -0400
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:50 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. "Snit's dysautonomia http://bit.ly/2Jqpplk" <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:10 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:35 -0500
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 07:21 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 09:21 -0500
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Simon Singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 13:48 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 08:03 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 08:35 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:33 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 11:07 -0700
Re: Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2018-06-04 06:51 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 00:02 -0700
Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2018-06-04 14:16 +0000
Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 07:48 -0700
Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 09:20 -0700
Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 09:33 -0700
Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 09:59 -0700
Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 10:10 -0700
Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 10:12 -0700
Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 10:52 -0700
Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 10:35 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 08:42 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 09:54 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:43 -0500
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 07:21 -0700
Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2018-06-14 08:58 +0000
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-14 08:44 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 09:07 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-14 11:59 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 13:07 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-14 13:24 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 14:56 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-14 16:21 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 17:12 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-14 18:03 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 09:30 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-15 11:24 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 09:54 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 10:06 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 10:15 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 10:31 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 10:47 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 11:05 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 11:22 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 11:32 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 12:02 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 12:13 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 12:24 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 12:34 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 13:56 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 14:31 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 16:12 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 17:44 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 20:30 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 21:03 -0700
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-16 21:41 +0000
Re: Snit digest 449 / 2018-06-14 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-16 14:51 -0700
Re: Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2018-06-04 06:07 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 23:42 -0700
Re: Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2018-06-04 12:53 +0000
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 08:41 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 08:46 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 10:00 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 10:06 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 11:58 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 10:10 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 11:56 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 12:01 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 12:22 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:08 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 13:24 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 16:03 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 16:32 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 17:00 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 17:23 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:17 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:17 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 10:00 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 07:45 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 08:00 -0700
Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Snit calls the cops when he steps on his dick <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 08:16 -0700
Re: Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2018-06-04 06:04 +0000
Re: Re: Snit: Please explain Steve Carrol and the police. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 23:23 -0700
Page 4 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 18:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fngvrrFbk5tU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #453457 |
On 6/2/18 6:32 PM, Horace wrote: > On 3 Jun 2018 00:47:00 GMT, Snit wrote: > >> simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 04:58:31 +0000, vallor wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 20:32:44 +0000, Simon Singh wrote: >>>> >>>>> Projection again. >>>>> Your logic is faulty snit. >>>>> >>>>> You made the statement that the police asked Steve Carroll to stop >>>>> "harassing you" so the burden of proof rests solely with you. >>>>> You went on to claim the statement was a fact and that even Steve >>>>> Carroll admitted this happened. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Those are your statements. >>>>> >>>>> To date you have not provided any documentation to substantiate your >>>>> claims so the only conclusion that can be reached is that you lied once >>>>> again and have demonstrated that you are indeed a dishonest person. >>>>> I merely challenged you to provide that proof The burden of proof is on >>>>> you to prove >>>> >>>> This is exactly correct. >>>> >>>> And "Snit" knows it. >>> >>> Thank you. Snit belongs in a treatment program for the mentally ill. >>> Initially I assumed he was just a rather prolific troll but after reading >>> his bizarre replies and twisted logic it's rather obvious that he is not >>> well in the head. >>> >> >> Gee, I stop responding to Carroll and the socks obsessed with me come out. >> >> What a shock! > > You are cornered snit and you know it. This is just another tactic you are > attempting to use in order to provide proof of your statements. > > You're a POS troll snit. > Everyone knows it because you provide all the proof they need and you do it > every single time you start trolling. > Ah, insults and accusations. How creative! -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Snit's dysautonomia http://bit.ly/2Jqpplk" <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 19:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <41228ec9-61d2-4c00-874e-7ff3e3060132@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #453386 |
On Saturday, June 2, 2018 at 3:50:40 PM UTC-7, simon singh wrote: > On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 04:58:31 +0000, vallor wrote: > > > On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 20:32:44 +0000, Simon Singh wrote: > > > >> Projection again. > >> Your logic is faulty snit. > >> > >> You made the statement that the police asked Steve Carroll to stop > >> "harassing you" so the burden of proof rests solely with you. > >> You went on to claim the statement was a fact and that even Steve > >> Carroll admitted this happened. > >> > >> > >> Those are your statements. > >> > >> To date you have not provided any documentation to substantiate your > >> claims so the only conclusion that can be reached is that you lied once > >> again and have demonstrated that you are indeed a dishonest person. > >> I merely challenged you to provide that proof The burden of proof is on > >> you to prove > > > > This is exactly correct. > > > > And "Snit" knows it. > > Thank you. Snit belongs in a treatment program for the mentally ill. > Initially I assumed he was just a rather prolific troll but after reading > his bizarre replies and twisted logic it's rather obvious that he is not > well in the head. Advertising is a wonderful thing and consumer ignorance is even better. The content clearly is a bunch of vallor-like crap. Only glue sniffing would lead to that. A persistent, relentless, posting itch, while suffering from an empty mind - fundamentally slippery worm prostitutes, and well-lubricated sheep, immobilized with chains for his own individual requirements. Ending support for 16 bit apps is needed for progress. Too much glue for you, gluehead. GNU/Linux's update system failed over and over again. Linux offers the least of everything to the average user. -- Get Rich Slow!! https://goo.gl/Fho5Nq https://youtu.be/Z5wo5aE7MUk Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-08 07:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <votkhdljthhgkki69rmt0peip018kevmsd@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #453208 |
vallor wrote: > have demonstrated that you are indeed a dishonest person. *chuckle* Most serial liars are, man! -- "They post with false FB accounts (which quickly get cancelled, and then Sandman alters images saying he just happened to have it)" - some thing, lying shamelessly (but no one can quote it lying). For the truth, see http://usenet.sandman.net/pages/wifedenial
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-08 07:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fnvhmrF4mibU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #454404 |
On 6/8/18 5:35 AM, chrisv wrote:
> vallor wrote:
>
>> have demonstrated that you are indeed a dishonest person.
>
> *chuckle* Most serial liars are, man!
>
Ah, you mean like this guy:
chrisv:
-----
That thing won't even acknowledge that virtual desktops are a very
nice feature. It claims that they require "too much configuration".
You see, they require that you decide how to organize things on the
desktops.
In other words, in order to enjoy the benefit of a tool, you must
actually use the tool.
Sheesh.
-----
What an absurd lie you told!
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-08 09:21 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <io3lhdlkp0835glqsu1qnc4cemgf6obq9d@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #454404 |
> "Simon Singh", not vallor, wrote: >> >> have demonstrated that you are indeed a dishonest person. Attribution corrected. -- "Steve Carroll admitted [to having-been contacted by the police over his harassment.]" - some thing, lying shamelessly (but no one can quote it lying)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Simon Singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 13:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <peu77g$8oh$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #453061 |
On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 09:53:17 -0700, Snit wrote: > On 6/1/18 9:24 AM, Simon Singh wrote: >> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 08:04:20 -0700, Snit wrote: >> >>> On 6/1/18 7:49 AM, Simon Singh wrote: >>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 07:35:13 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 6/1/18 7:19 AM, Simon Singh wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 01:49:55 +0000, Simon Singh wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 01:12:51 +0000, Simon Singh wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 May 2018 17:01:35 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 5/31/18 3:42 PM, Simon Singh wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Snit, you have claimed that the police advised Steve Carroll >>>>>>>>>> not to bother you. Do you have any proof of this potentially >>>>>>>>>> libelous statement? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> There is nothing wrong with my noting how Carroll was contacted >>>>>>>>> by the police over his harassment, nor anything wrong with >>>>>>>>> noting they spoke to him about what lines he has crossed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nobody said there is anything wrong with it. Please try and use a >>>>>>>> little basic reading comprehension skills, the question is do you >>>>>>>> have any proof of your claims. >>>>>>>> So do you? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cat got your tongue snit? >>>>>> >>>>>> Since snit apparently has no proof that Steve Carroll was contacted >>>>>> by the police the only conclusion that can be made is that snit has >>>>>> been caught in yet another one of his lies. >>>>>> >>>>>> Why are you such a dishonest person snit? >>>>>> >>>>> It is merely a fact Carroll was contacted by the police over his >>>>> harassment, a fact even Carroll has admitted to. >>>> >>>> Then it should be trivial for you to prove this. >>> >>> Not really, but also not really of any importance. Your belief or lack >>> of belief is of no real concern. As I said, it is merely a fact that >>> Carroll was contacted by the police for his harassment. This is >>> something even Carroll has noted. You can accept, reject, or have no >>> opinion about it -- does not make one whit of difference. >> >> It's always about the other person isn't it snit? >> You project far too much. >> Facts are indisputable and since you offer no evidence that your claim >> ever happening, it is not a fact. It is a statement and without >> evidence a false statement. >> >> >>> What is interesting is how many non-regular posters will now be >>> jumping in to insist it is not true. LOL! >> >> Which has no bearing on the validity of your statement. >> I see your bot has inserted itself in the thread in order to confuse >> people who might read the thread. >> >>> No wonder Carroll focuses on "socks" and "shills" so much... that is >>> his life! By all means, explain your connection to this whole idiotic >>> sega of his! >> >> Irrelevant. What Steve Carroll does or doesn't do has nothing to do >> with your statement that Steve was contacted by the police and asked to >> stop "harassing" you. >> A statement that you are at this point unable to back up. >> >> >>>>> You can believe. You can fail to believe it. You can simply not >>>>> care. >>>>> It is of no consequence. >>>> >>>> What I believe is not pertinent to this discussion which concerns you >>>> making a statement for which you have no evidence to substantiate. So >>>> you can either provide some form of documentation to prove your >>>> statement, continue your dishonesty or retract the statement and >>>> apologize to Steve Carroll. The choice is yours. >>> >>> You assume your belief or lack of it is of some value, and you assume >>> that a lack of proof is a form of disproof (a logical error Carroll >>> has made in the past). Interesting. >> >> Projection again. >> My beliefs having nothing to do with your statement regarding Steve >> Carroll and the police. I dispute your statement due to lack of >> evidence. >> The only thing that is indisputable snit is that you are a liar and a >> dishonest person. That is indisputable. >> >> >>> Prediction: you will continue to push the logical fallacy that a lack >>> of proof is a form of disproof, AND you will continue to insist you >>> are owed ANYTHING by me, AND You will continue to pretend your view is >>> at all relevant here, as if your denial could change the fact that >>> Carroll was, of course, contacted by the police over his harassment. >> >> Projection again. >> This is very simple snit. You made a statement that you are unable to >> prove. That is known by most people as a lie. >> Something you do profusely. >> >>> All 100% predictable. >> >> Indeed you are. >> You think people are as ignorant as you need them to be. What never >> seems to occur to you is that your own lack of intelligence impedes you >> from a cognitive thought process which becomes your downfall. >> >> It happens in every single thread you inject yourself into. >> >> And yes, it is 100% predictable and unlike your false statement about >> Steve Carroll it is easily substantiated, indisputable and thus a fact. >> > You claim I have made false statement about Carroll being contacted by > the police for his harassment. You offer no support for this. And, in > fact, your claim is unsupportable because it is incorrect. It is not up to me to prove your statements are false. It is up to you as the OP to prove that your statements are true. In this particular example, you made a serious statement that Steve Carroll was contacted by the police and asked to refrain from harassing you on usenet. That was your statement. To date you have offered no proof that this ever happened so the only conclusion that can be reached is that you made a false statement which most people would call a lie. If you can prove your statement with evidence other than your own word which is worth less than zero, please do. If not, be a man and retract it. > Fair enough.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 08:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d9bc4383-e3d5-489d-8b3a-1a0f95a9eaf4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #453285 |
On Saturday, June 2, 2018 at 6:48:34 AM UTC-7, Simon Singh wrote: > On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 09:53:17 -0700, Snit wrote: > > > On 6/1/18 9:24 AM, Simon Singh wrote: > >> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 08:04:20 -0700, Snit wrote: > >> > >>> On 6/1/18 7:49 AM, Simon Singh wrote: > >>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 07:35:13 -0700, Snit wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On 6/1/18 7:19 AM, Simon Singh wrote: > >>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 01:49:55 +0000, Simon Singh wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 01:12:51 +0000, Simon Singh wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 May 2018 17:01:35 -0700, Snit wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On 5/31/18 3:42 PM, Simon Singh wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> Snit, you have claimed that the police advised Steve Carroll > >>>>>>>>>> not to bother you. Do you have any proof of this potentially > >>>>>>>>>> libelous statement? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> There is nothing wrong with my noting how Carroll was contacted > >>>>>>>>> by the police over his harassment, nor anything wrong with > >>>>>>>>> noting they spoke to him about what lines he has crossed. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Nobody said there is anything wrong with it. Please try and use a > >>>>>>>> little basic reading comprehension skills, the question is do you > >>>>>>>> have any proof of your claims. > >>>>>>>> So do you? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Cat got your tongue snit? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Since snit apparently has no proof that Steve Carroll was contacted > >>>>>> by the police the only conclusion that can be made is that snit has > >>>>>> been caught in yet another one of his lies. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Why are you such a dishonest person snit? > >>>>>> > >>>>> It is merely a fact Carroll was contacted by the police over his > >>>>> harassment, a fact even Carroll has admitted to. > >>>> > >>>> Then it should be trivial for you to prove this. > >>> > >>> Not really, but also not really of any importance. Your belief or lack > >>> of belief is of no real concern. As I said, it is merely a fact that > >>> Carroll was contacted by the police for his harassment. This is > >>> something even Carroll has noted. You can accept, reject, or have no > >>> opinion about it -- does not make one whit of difference. > >> > >> It's always about the other person isn't it snit? > >> You project far too much. > >> Facts are indisputable and since you offer no evidence that your claim > >> ever happening, it is not a fact. It is a statement and without > >> evidence a false statement. > >> > >> > >>> What is interesting is how many non-regular posters will now be > >>> jumping in to insist it is not true. LOL! > >> > >> Which has no bearing on the validity of your statement. > >> I see your bot has inserted itself in the thread in order to confuse > >> people who might read the thread. > >> > >>> No wonder Carroll focuses on "socks" and "shills" so much... that is > >>> his life! By all means, explain your connection to this whole idiotic > >>> sega of his! > >> > >> Irrelevant. What Steve Carroll does or doesn't do has nothing to do > >> with your statement that Steve was contacted by the police and asked to > >> stop "harassing" you. > >> A statement that you are at this point unable to back up. > >> > >> > >>>>> You can believe. You can fail to believe it. You can simply not > >>>>> care. > >>>>> It is of no consequence. > >>>> > >>>> What I believe is not pertinent to this discussion which concerns you > >>>> making a statement for which you have no evidence to substantiate. So > >>>> you can either provide some form of documentation to prove your > >>>> statement, continue your dishonesty or retract the statement and > >>>> apologize to Steve Carroll. The choice is yours. > >>> > >>> You assume your belief or lack of it is of some value, and you assume > >>> that a lack of proof is a form of disproof (a logical error Carroll > >>> has made in the past). Interesting. > >> > >> Projection again. > >> My beliefs having nothing to do with your statement regarding Steve > >> Carroll and the police. I dispute your statement due to lack of > >> evidence. > >> The only thing that is indisputable snit is that you are a liar and a > >> dishonest person. That is indisputable. > >> > >> > >>> Prediction: you will continue to push the logical fallacy that a lack > >>> of proof is a form of disproof, AND you will continue to insist you > >>> are owed ANYTHING by me, AND You will continue to pretend your view is > >>> at all relevant here, as if your denial could change the fact that > >>> Carroll was, of course, contacted by the police over his harassment. > >> > >> Projection again. > >> This is very simple snit. You made a statement that you are unable to > >> prove. That is known by most people as a lie. > >> Something you do profusely. > >> > >>> All 100% predictable. > >> > >> Indeed you are. > >> You think people are as ignorant as you need them to be. What never > >> seems to occur to you is that your own lack of intelligence impedes you > >> from a cognitive thought process which becomes your downfall. > >> > >> It happens in every single thread you inject yourself into. > >> > >> And yes, it is 100% predictable and unlike your false statement about > >> Steve Carroll it is easily substantiated, indisputable and thus a fact. > >> > > You claim I have made false statement about Carroll being contacted by > > the police for his harassment. You offer no support for this. And, in > > fact, your claim is unsupportable because it is incorrect. > > It is not up to me to prove your statements are false. It is up to you as > the OP to prove that your statements are true. > In this particular example, you made a serious statement that Steve > Carroll was contacted by the police and asked to refrain from harassing > you on usenet. > That was your statement. > To date you have offered no proof that this ever happened so the only > conclusion that can be reached is that you made a false statement which > most people would call a lie. > > If you can prove your statement with evidence other than your own word > which is worth less than zero, please do. > If not, be a man and retract it. > > > > Fair enough. Are you being idiotic on purpose? I am an absolute advocate of Ubuntu, because that's where all the compelling UI updates are happening. I thought showing him I know where he lives might help the situation. It did not. No no hell no. John Gohde never agreed to stop flooding. He lied about his trolling just as you would expect. Enjoy the tranquility in the teeming septic tank of my KF. Don't look now, but I think John Gohde has a serious woody for Steve Carroll. It was John Gohde who forged me (and Steve Carroll) and admitted it. -- What Every Entrepreneur Must Know http://www.5z8.info/lemon-party-redux_v1o7pm_nakedgrandmas.jpg Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 08:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4be7fe17-79b1-4ffa-a303-ae26dcff1913@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #453285 |
On Saturday, June 2, 2018 at 7:48:34 AM UTC-6, Simon Singh wrote: > > You claim I have made false statement about Carroll being contacted by > > the police for his harassment. You offer no support for this. And, in > > fact, your claim is unsupportable because it is incorrect. > > It is not up to me to prove your statements are false. It is up to you as > the OP to prove that your statements are true. > In this particular example, you made a serious statement that Steve > Carroll was contacted by the police and asked to refrain from harassing > you on usenet. > That was your statement. > To date you have offered no proof that this ever happened so the only > conclusion that can be reached is that you made a false statement which > most people would call a lie. > > If you can prove your statement with evidence other than your own word > which is worth less than zero, please do. > If not, be a man and retract it. Being that he has never produced a single shred of evidence that I ever harassed his family, friends, clients, etc., a thing he cannot possibly do because it’s BS, how would it be possible for him to produce evidence that he convinced the police I did so to the point they’d take the action he’s alleging they took?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 10:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fng2mmF6ev8U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #453285 |
On 6/2/18 6:48 AM, Simon Singh wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 09:53:17 -0700, Snit wrote:
>
>> On 6/1/18 9:24 AM, Simon Singh wrote:
>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 08:04:20 -0700, Snit wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 6/1/18 7:49 AM, Simon Singh wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 07:35:13 -0700, Snit wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 6/1/18 7:19 AM, Simon Singh wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 01:49:55 +0000, Simon Singh wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 01:12:51 +0000, Simon Singh wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 May 2018 17:01:35 -0700, Snit wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 5/31/18 3:42 PM, Simon Singh wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Snit, you have claimed that the police advised Steve Carroll
>>>>>>>>>>> not to bother you. Do you have any proof of this potentially
>>>>>>>>>>> libelous statement?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There is nothing wrong with my noting how Carroll was contacted
>>>>>>>>>> by the police over his harassment, nor anything wrong with
>>>>>>>>>> noting they spoke to him about what lines he has crossed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nobody said there is anything wrong with it. Please try and use a
>>>>>>>>> little basic reading comprehension skills, the question is do you
>>>>>>>>> have any proof of your claims.
>>>>>>>>> So do you?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cat got your tongue snit?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Since snit apparently has no proof that Steve Carroll was contacted
>>>>>>> by the police the only conclusion that can be made is that snit has
>>>>>>> been caught in yet another one of his lies.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why are you such a dishonest person snit?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is merely a fact Carroll was contacted by the police over his
>>>>>> harassment, a fact even Carroll has admitted to.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then it should be trivial for you to prove this.
>>>>
>>>> Not really, but also not really of any importance. Your belief or lack
>>>> of belief is of no real concern. As I said, it is merely a fact that
>>>> Carroll was contacted by the police for his harassment. This is
>>>> something even Carroll has noted. You can accept, reject, or have no
>>>> opinion about it -- does not make one whit of difference.
>>>
>>> It's always about the other person isn't it snit?
>>> You project far too much.
>>> Facts are indisputable and since you offer no evidence that your claim
>>> ever happening, it is not a fact. It is a statement and without
>>> evidence a false statement.
>>>
>>>
>>>> What is interesting is how many non-regular posters will now be
>>>> jumping in to insist it is not true. LOL!
>>>
>>> Which has no bearing on the validity of your statement.
>>> I see your bot has inserted itself in the thread in order to confuse
>>> people who might read the thread.
>>>
>>>> No wonder Carroll focuses on "socks" and "shills" so much... that is
>>>> his life! By all means, explain your connection to this whole idiotic
>>>> sega of his!
>>>
>>> Irrelevant. What Steve Carroll does or doesn't do has nothing to do
>>> with your statement that Steve was contacted by the police and asked to
>>> stop "harassing" you.
>>> A statement that you are at this point unable to back up.
>>>
>>>
>>>>>> You can believe. You can fail to believe it. You can simply not
>>>>>> care.
>>>>>> It is of no consequence.
>>>>>
>>>>> What I believe is not pertinent to this discussion which concerns you
>>>>> making a statement for which you have no evidence to substantiate. So
>>>>> you can either provide some form of documentation to prove your
>>>>> statement, continue your dishonesty or retract the statement and
>>>>> apologize to Steve Carroll. The choice is yours.
>>>>
>>>> You assume your belief or lack of it is of some value, and you assume
>>>> that a lack of proof is a form of disproof (a logical error Carroll
>>>> has made in the past). Interesting.
>>>
>>> Projection again.
>>> My beliefs having nothing to do with your statement regarding Steve
>>> Carroll and the police. I dispute your statement due to lack of
>>> evidence.
>>> The only thing that is indisputable snit is that you are a liar and a
>>> dishonest person. That is indisputable.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Prediction: you will continue to push the logical fallacy that a lack
>>>> of proof is a form of disproof, AND you will continue to insist you
>>>> are owed ANYTHING by me, AND You will continue to pretend your view is
>>>> at all relevant here, as if your denial could change the fact that
>>>> Carroll was, of course, contacted by the police over his harassment.
>>>
>>> Projection again.
>>> This is very simple snit. You made a statement that you are unable to
>>> prove. That is known by most people as a lie.
>>> Something you do profusely.
>>>
>>>> All 100% predictable.
>>>
>>> Indeed you are.
>>> You think people are as ignorant as you need them to be. What never
>>> seems to occur to you is that your own lack of intelligence impedes you
>>> from a cognitive thought process which becomes your downfall.
>>>
>>> It happens in every single thread you inject yourself into.
>>>
>>> And yes, it is 100% predictable and unlike your false statement about
>>> Steve Carroll it is easily substantiated, indisputable and thus a fact.
>>>
>> You claim I have made false statement about Carroll being contacted by
>> the police for his harassment. You offer no support for this. And, in
>> fact, your claim is unsupportable because it is incorrect.
>
> It is not up to me to prove your statements are false. It is up to you as
> the OP to prove that your statements are true.
> In this particular example, you made a serious statement that Steve
> Carroll was contacted by the police and asked to refrain from harassing
> you on usenet.
> That was your statement.
> To date you have offered no proof that this ever happened so the only
> conclusion that can be reached is that you made a false statement which
> most people would call a lie.
This logical fallacy of yours is the closest you have come to backing
your multiple accusations.
As such it is reasonable to assume your accusations comes merely from
your inability to understand basic logic.
Fair enough.
That does not mean, of course, that you cannot offer more, later.
Meanwhile with my statement of simple fact, you can accept or reject it
as you please, or simply hold no opinion. I am OK with that and own you
nothing. If you care, which it is hard to understand why you would, you
need only look at Carroll's own admission:
Snit:
-----
Are you denying that the police contacted you over your harassment?
-----
Carroll:
-----
They did!
-----
But even if Carroll had not admitted it, so what? Does not impact you in
ANY way and is not relevant to your life.
> If you can prove your statement with evidence other than your own word
> which is worth less than zero, please do.
> If not, be a man and retract it.
Based on your own reasoning here if you cannot offer support for your
claim -- currently based on nothing but your own logical fallacy -- you
deem YOURSELF "worth less than zero". I do not agree with this
assessment of you, but I shall not try to talk you out of it.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 11:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9b015059-c90b-46af-9041-5ef54eca5e14@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #453312 |
On Saturday, June 2, 2018 at 11:33:13 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: (snip juvenile crap) > > It is not up to me to prove your statements are false. It is up to you as > > the OP to prove that your statements are true. > > In this particular example, you made a serious statement that Steve > > Carroll was contacted by the police and asked to refrain from harassing > > you on usenet. > > That was your statement. > > To date you have offered no proof that this ever happened so the only > > conclusion that can be reached is that you made a false statement which > > most people would call a lie. > > This logical fallacy of yours is Is this just trolling or are you really as mentally impaired as you seem? You've stated that you suffer from dysautonomia: "I am Michael. I suffer with dysautonomia..." <https://thefaceofmentalillness.wordpress.com/2014/01/12/the-face-of-mental-illness-1122014/> The term "brain fog" has been used to describe what happens to people who suffer dysautonomia and the other symptoms you've described on usenet clearly point to POTS, which indicates "a loss of brain functioning in areas such as thinking, remembering, concentrating, and reasoning to a level that interferes with daily activities". Definitely not good for trying to hold a reasonable conversation. This brief summary explains some of your issues: <http://www.dysautonomiainternational.org/blog/wordpress/cognitive-dysfunction-and-brain-fog-in-pots/> Is there some other medication that you should be looking in to? Serious questions: When people converse with you should they just go along with your unreasonable positions? Should people just ignore you altogether? How would you recommend people deal with you? I ask because it's got to be tiring for you to be faced with realities you clearly don't want to deal with... and it's not like your posts come with a warning label (though, that's not a bad idea).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sandman <mr@sandman.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 06:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sandman-dd4fdc21f8528fa4d04d105d4e6f27bd@individual.net> |
| In reply to | #453312 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In article <fng2mmF6ev8U1@mid.individual.net>, Snit wrote: > Meanwhile with my statement of simple fact, you can accept or reject > it as you please, or simply hold no opinion. I am OK with that and > own you nothing. If you care, which it is hard to understand why you > would, you need only look at Carroll's own admission: > Snit: Are you denying that the police contacted you over your > harassment? > Steve Carroll: They did! Curious how almost all "quotes" from Snit never contain any Message-ID's... Steve Carroll Re: Tech question for Carroll 05/31/2018 <ceb1f8da-e4ad-44e9-a631-f1fc37057e12@googlegroups.com> "Were these "police" wearing 'special' uniforms and did they offer you a nice cool drink? ;)" Snit Re: Tech question for Carroll 05/31/2018 <fnau9gF74o0U2@mid.individual.net> "Are you denying that the police contacted you over your harassment?" Steve Carroll Re: Tech question for Carroll 05/31/2018 <782ad182-b975-4be4-a1c0-49cb57ea2855@googlegroups.com> "They did! Didn't they? And it appears to still be working ;)" [X] Misinterpretation (http://tinyurl.com/jpbvlu2) [X] Obfuscation (http://tinyurl.com/hhg8ezh) [X] Quote editing (http://tinyurl.com/ydcf75g3) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJbFOGPAAoJECFEwfBaA+jRydgH/3kkJqiKfUM4ajq8jTRrULrc DMaS1WOki8AveX2cTRg2U/NTVJJL3WN89ZOvuIXhBr6GxtDGarL42yl8o4wYoZ5h QFoxKC2kYCpV/q3MIX5AxZXS53pLM0Xp8RZu7XaMpfSQGCOqHAp92nZ2xAfa0OlB +lNZENPVIhjxgyup4hnSFGC/9cEi9SV3cuRG0HZtUK//xf1RuJWoy5huSclaiPYo A+W25BBChLZsC4A4igiry6m94dWCFvLKiuD0UajZO9R4PGrlMxDDiIoTpKkW61e1 3xY9zqUfC3gfcaJFfwSDAodcSJWFN2kfGa4T9je/6ykDlpq7FDBsf2ugH4mtzoE= =Vu4C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Sandman
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 00:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fnk6fqFtu7bU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #453827 |
On 6/3/18 11:51 PM, Sandman wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> In article <fng2mmF6ev8U1@mid.individual.net>, Snit wrote:
>
>> Meanwhile with my statement of simple fact, you can accept or reject
>> it as you please, or simply hold no opinion. I am OK with that and
>> own you nothing. If you care, which it is hard to understand why you
>> would, you need only look at Carroll's own admission:
>
>> Snit: Are you denying that the police contacted you over your
>> harassment?
>
>> Steve Carroll: They did!
>
> Curious how almost all "quotes" from Snit never contain any Message-ID's...
>
> Steve Carroll
> Re: Tech question for Carroll
> 05/31/2018 <ceb1f8da-e4ad-44e9-a631-f1fc37057e12@googlegroups.com>
>
> "Were these "police" wearing 'special' uniforms and did they
> offer you a nice cool drink? ;)"
>
> Snit
> Re: Tech question for Carroll
> 05/31/2018 <fnau9gF74o0U2@mid.individual.net>
>
> "Are you denying that the police contacted you over your
> harassment?"
>
> Steve Carroll
> Re: Tech question for Carroll
> 05/31/2018 <782ad182-b975-4be4-a1c0-49cb57ea2855@googlegroups.com>
>
> "They did! Didn't they? And it appears to still be working ;)"
>
> [X] Misinterpretation (http://tinyurl.com/jpbvlu2)
> [X] Obfuscation (http://tinyurl.com/hhg8ezh)
> [X] Quote editing (http://tinyurl.com/ydcf75g3)
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJbFOGPAAoJECFEwfBaA+jRydgH/3kkJqiKfUM4ajq8jTRrULrc
> DMaS1WOki8AveX2cTRg2U/NTVJJL3WN89ZOvuIXhBr6GxtDGarL42yl8o4wYoZ5h
> QFoxKC2kYCpV/q3MIX5AxZXS53pLM0Xp8RZu7XaMpfSQGCOqHAp92nZ2xAfa0OlB
> +lNZENPVIhjxgyup4hnSFGC/9cEi9SV3cuRG0HZtUK//xf1RuJWoy5huSclaiPYo
> A+W25BBChLZsC4A4igiry6m94dWCFvLKiuD0UajZO9R4PGrlMxDDiIoTpKkW61e1
> 3xY9zqUfC3gfcaJFfwSDAodcSJWFN2kfGa4T9je/6ykDlpq7FDBsf2ugH4mtzoE=
> =Vu4C
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
Invalid styling code shown on his site <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>:
<div style="padding: 3px; align: center;">
Same errors noted at the time (proving not from WBM changes):
Message-ID: <C0A30BB5.502C7%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>
-----
Line: 373
Property align doesn't exist : center
Line: 412
Property align doesn't exist : center
Line: 431
Property align doesn't exist : center
-----
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sandman <mr@sandman.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 14:16 +0000 |
| Subject | Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 |
| Message-ID | <sandman-0d0618f37d0fa000239c752ec809737e@individual.net> |
| In reply to | #453829 |
In article <fnk6fqFtu7bU1@mid.individual.net>, Snit wrote: > [2745] Invalid styling code shown on his site <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o > [2745] >:. [X] Dig up arguments from the past (http://tinyurl.com/ybcd8czt) [X] Diversion (http://tinyurl.com/zmwrfn2) [X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/gtdd77m) Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): ------------------------------------------------------------------------- troll /404 | lying /592 | incest /2 sex / | honorable /9 | honest /102 run /22 | css /46 | tilde / proof /31 | -- Sandman
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 07:48 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 |
| Message-ID | <237dc211-4875-4144-8c5e-0bce2505b95a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #453855 |
On Monday, June 4, 2018 at 7:16:49 AM UTC-7, Sandman wrote: > In article <fnk6fqFtu7bU1@mid.individual.net>, Snit wrote: > > > [2745] Invalid styling code shown on his site <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o > > [2745] >:. > > [X] Dig up arguments from the past (http://tinyurl.com/ybcd8czt) > [X] Diversion (http://tinyurl.com/zmwrfn2) > [X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/gtdd77m) > > Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > troll /404 | lying /592 | incest /2 > sex / | honorable /9 | honest /102 > run /22 | css /46 | tilde / > proof /31 | > > -- > Sandman I think the person you are replying to is in my KF. What is the Earth coming to when a Doomsdrzej aka Sliver Slimer shill fails to get any responses? Just look at your junk and look at mine, there is nothing for me to learn from an idiot like Doomsdrzej aka Sliver Slimer. But hey, let him keep making a dunce of himself. I am sure one of his stooges will come to the rescue. VPN's update system failed over and over again. The one skill Doomsdrzej aka Sliver Slimer learned well is to attempt to humiliate Steve Carroll into silence and if that does not work, troll-splain or completely change the goalpost. -- What Every Entrepreneur Must Know http://www.5z8.info/michaelangelo-virus_t6v2vq_molotovcocktail Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 09:20 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 |
| Message-ID | <173d75a6-80d5-4ad8-8f54-7042fea1a522@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #453855 |
On Monday, June 4, 2018 at 8:16:49 AM UTC-6, Sandman wrote: > In article <fnk6fqFtu7bU1@mid.individual.net>, Snit wrote: > > > [2745] Invalid styling code shown on his site <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o > > [2745] >:. > > [X] Dig up arguments from the past (http://tinyurl.com/ybcd8czt) > [X] Diversion (http://tinyurl.com/zmwrfn2) > [X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/gtdd77m) > > Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > troll /404 | lying /592 | incest /2 > sex / | honorable /9 | honest /102 > run /22 | css /46 | tilde / > proof /31 | > > -- > Sandman "This section is far from finished" <http://usenet.sandman.net/pages/Forgingpostsandmaterial> We know who the poster boy could be ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 09:33 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 |
| Message-ID | <7c977e2a-c445-462e-8752-c511d2e3a2f4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #454021 |
On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 9:20:18 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Monday, June 4, 2018 at 8:16:49 AM UTC-6, Sandman wrote: > > In article <fnk6fqFtu7bU1@mid.individual.net>, Snit wrote: > > > > > [2745] Invalid styling code shown on his site <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o > > > [2745] >:. > > > > [X] Dig up arguments from the past (http://tinyurl.com/ybcd8czt) > > [X] Diversion (http://tinyurl.com/zmwrfn2) > > [X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/gtdd77m) > > > > Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > troll /404 | lying /592 | incest /2 > > sex / | honorable /9 | honest /102 > > run /22 | css /46 | tilde / > > proof /31 | > > > > -- > > Sandman > > "This section is far from finished" > <http://usenet.sandman.net/pages/Forgingpostsandmaterial> > > We know who the poster boy could be ;) Anyway, it will never matter because the name on a post does not matter, it's the content that counts. When I was new here, I wanted to be reasonable and unbiased. I gave Jesus more than an intelligent person could be expected to. How is GIMP on Linux doing anything above the lowest common denominator? max headroom shreds Jesus in every way possible. I think the point is far from just to get innocent posters to listen to him. The point is likely to piss me off for flooding outside groups he knows I frequent. Jesus and the other trolls insist searching for a price comparison for a Linux application is attacking. -- Puppy Videos!! https://youtu.be/HHT9SJgYsH4 https://youtu.be/HMx0RyzbPgQ Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 09:59 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 |
| Message-ID | <fnntroFbpqgU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #454021 |
On 6/5/18 9:20 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Monday, June 4, 2018 at 8:16:49 AM UTC-6, Sandman wrote: >> In article <fnk6fqFtu7bU1@mid.individual.net>, Snit wrote: >> >>> [2745] Invalid styling code shown on his site <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o >>> [2745] >:. >> >> [X] Dig up arguments from the past (http://tinyurl.com/ybcd8czt) >> [X] Diversion (http://tinyurl.com/zmwrfn2) >> [X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/gtdd77m) >> >> Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> troll /404 | lying /592 | incest /2 >> sex / | honorable /9 | honest /102 >> run /22 | css /46 | tilde / >> proof /31 | >> >> -- >> Sandman > > "This section is far from finished" > <http://usenet.sandman.net/pages/Forgingpostsandmaterial> > > We know who the poster boy could be ;) > If Sandman is honest he would fill that with content from you. He will not. Even though you though him under the bus with your admission about the CSS on his site being faulty EXACTLY as I said all those years ago, a claim he has been trolling me over ever since, he will blame me. Heck, Sandman blames me for your posts. Repeatedly. And blames me for the automated flooding you and he do. It is insane. Was just talking to someone about you... it was a discussion about health issues and how people online respond. I noted how MOST people online respond with compassion and understanding, many even speak of their own health issues and those of loved ones. You, on the other hand, directly lie about my health issues to troll me. Your psychopathic lies serve as a warning for others. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 10:10 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 |
| Message-ID | <a244ad32-28f3-484e-a738-7615db7771c1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #454027 |
On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 10:59:39 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 6/5/18 9:20 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Monday, June 4, 2018 at 8:16:49 AM UTC-6, Sandman wrote: > >> In article <fnk6fqFtu7bU1@mid.individual.net>, Snit wrote: > >> > >>> [2745] Invalid styling code shown on his site <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o > >>> [2745] >:. > >> > >> [X] Dig up arguments from the past (http://tinyurl.com/ybcd8czt) > >> [X] Diversion (http://tinyurl.com/zmwrfn2) > >> [X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/gtdd77m) > >> > >> Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> troll /404 | lying /592 | incest /2 > >> sex / | honorable /9 | honest /102 > >> run /22 | css /46 | tilde / > >> proof /31 | > >> > >> -- > >> Sandman > > > > "This section is far from finished" > > <http://usenet.sandman.net/pages/Forgingpostsandmaterial> > > > > We know who the poster boy could be ;) > > > > If Sandman is honest Why are *you* worried about the honesty of "others"? (snip dishonesty)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 10:12 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 |
| Message-ID | <fnnukiFbpqgU7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #454030 |
On 6/5/18 10:10 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 10:59:39 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 6/5/18 9:20 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Monday, June 4, 2018 at 8:16:49 AM UTC-6, Sandman wrote: >>>> In article <fnk6fqFtu7bU1@mid.individual.net>, Snit wrote: >>>> >>>>> [2745] Invalid styling code shown on his site <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o >>>>> [2745] >:. >>>> >>>> [X] Dig up arguments from the past (http://tinyurl.com/ybcd8czt) >>>> [X] Diversion (http://tinyurl.com/zmwrfn2) >>>> [X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/gtdd77m) >>>> >>>> Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> troll /404 | lying /592 | incest /2 >>>> sex / | honorable /9 | honest /102 >>>> run /22 | css /46 | tilde / >>>> proof /31 | >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sandman >>> >>> "This section is far from finished" >>> <http://usenet.sandman.net/pages/Forgingpostsandmaterial> >>> >>> We know who the poster boy could be ;) >>> >> >> If Sandman is honest > > Why are *you* worried about the honesty of "others"? > > (snip dishonesty) > What makes you think I worry about you and he lying? I *did* worry about the impacts of your harassment of my family, friends, co-workers, clients and more -- and I am very happy the police finally got involved. But worry about the lies you two tell on here? Nope. I would prefer, of course, if you would be honest, but you will not be. You each lie more in a day than I do in a year (at least on days you post!). It is just who you are. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 10:52 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit digest 448 / 2018-06-04 |
| Message-ID | <37f4f261-f1d7-45d5-961a-1e3e116df6b6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #454031 |
On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 11:12:53 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 6/5/18 10:10 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 10:59:39 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 6/5/18 9:20 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Monday, June 4, 2018 at 8:16:49 AM UTC-6, Sandman wrote: > >>>> In article <fnk6fqFtu7bU1@mid.individual.net>, Snit wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> [2745] Invalid styling code shown on his site <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o > >>>>> [2745] >:. > >>>> > >>>> [X] Dig up arguments from the past (http://tinyurl.com/ybcd8czt) > >>>> [X] Diversion (http://tinyurl.com/zmwrfn2) > >>>> [X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/gtdd77m) > >>>> > >>>> Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): > >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> troll /404 | lying /592 | incest /2 > >>>> sex / | honorable /9 | honest /102 > >>>> run /22 | css /46 | tilde / > >>>> proof /31 | > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Sandman > >>> > >>> "This section is far from finished" > >>> <http://usenet.sandman.net/pages/Forgingpostsandmaterial> > >>> > >>> We know who the poster boy could be ;) > >>> > >> > >> If Sandman is honest > > > > Why are *you* worried about the honesty of "others"? > > > > (snip dishonesty) > > > What makes you think I worry about you and he lying? Your years of paranoid, delusional rants as you lie about "others", obviously.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web