Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #328955 > unrolled thread
| Started by | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-27 21:55 +0000 |
| Last post | 2015-10-28 00:18 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 194 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-10-27 21:55 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 15:16 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-27 22:16 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 15:32 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-10-27 22:36 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 15:45 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-27 23:21 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-27 20:07 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 00:34 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 17:41 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-28 01:49 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 17:56 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 08:47 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 08:50 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 13:36 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 10:50 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 14:22 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 11:48 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 17:13 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 14:21 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 00:57 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 08:49 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 08:52 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 16:06 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 09:17 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 09:53 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 14:07 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 13:37 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 10:46 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 04:36 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-28 00:48 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 09:01 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 09:04 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 08:44 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 08:47 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-28 11:27 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 02:35 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 20:06 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-29 05:11 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 10:11 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 15:39 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-29 12:11 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 12:28 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-29 12:30 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 09:49 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 11:25 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 09:52 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 17:01 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 13:23 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 12:05 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 11:30 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 20:37 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 17:20 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 21:53 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 01:18 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 01:58 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 02:32 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 05:16 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 09:04 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-30 09:42 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 17:03 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 17:27 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 13:28 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 15:32 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 09:06 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 20:25 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 14:16 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 16:50 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 17:48 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 10:29 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 07:43 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 12:23 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 09:48 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-30 09:48 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 11:28 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 17:08 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 13:19 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 17:30 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 17:47 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 17:52 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 13:55 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 03:53 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-31 06:05 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 08:49 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 16:28 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 09:54 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 17:02 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 11:14 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 13:19 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 10:44 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 18:03 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 11:21 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 20:34 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 16:46 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 08:50 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 10:06 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 15:41 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 11:29 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 16:36 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 09:56 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 13:57 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 20:35 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 03:51 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-30 06:07 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-30 09:32 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-30 14:38 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 09:57 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-30 15:02 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 10:15 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-30 10:08 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 12:33 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-30 10:04 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 10:18 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 15:32 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 00:59 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 01:18 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 01:33 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 01:41 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 02:07 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 21:57 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-31 10:12 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 10:42 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-30 21:56 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-31 18:02 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-31 14:35 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-31 22:56 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 12:03 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 23:44 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-31 02:22 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 13:49 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-31 09:05 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-10-31 20:21 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:40 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 23:57 +0100
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 09:47 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 16:37 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-29 12:44 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-29 14:00 -0500
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-29 15:10 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 20:41 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 22:25 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 18:45 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 01:22 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-30 02:12 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-29 20:36 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-30 15:34 -0600
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 09:59 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-29 17:20 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 11:15 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 00:59 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 18:16 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 18:44 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 02:01 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 19:06 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 19:11 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 02:29 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 19:48 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 03:01 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 20:05 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 03:11 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 20:21 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 03:27 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 20:36 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 03:46 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 21:16 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 04:23 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 08:34 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 15:55 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 09:07 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 20:11 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 08:56 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 09:03 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 19:50 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 03:23 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 20:40 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 03:50 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 21:15 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 07:07 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 09:02 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 09:05 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-28 13:40 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 10:57 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 14:06 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 11:21 -0700
The Quran Peaceful? My ass Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-28 14:32 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-28 08:35 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 16:01 +0000
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 21:00 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 18:01 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 17:41 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 17:02 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-27 19:30 -0400
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 17:05 -0700
Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-28 00:18 +0000
Page 9 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-27 20:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D2558D43.61BEC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #329050 |
On 10/27/15, 8:11 PM, in article fshge8q.bmjc@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 10/27/15, 8:01 PM, in article fhgjxmc3.kfa0@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 10/27/15, 7:29 PM, in article shgur8w.jgi@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> Snit clearly believes that muslims should be held to the standards of >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> Middle Ages and earlier, since it would be ludicrous to attempt to hold >>>>>>> them >>>>>>> accountable by modern norms. I wonder which of Snit's personal rainbow >>>>>>> coalition would be most likely to slay him for insulting their religion. >>>>>>> No, actually I don't wonder. We all know the answer to that question. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> I believe people should be held to high standards. You and Carroll fail. >>>>>> Not >>>>>> all Muslims are the same. Not all Christians are the same. >>>>>> >>>>>> Simple facts. >>>>>> >>>>>> And the fact you are ignorant enough to not know about forced conversions >>>>>> to >>>>>> Christianity any time since the Middle Ages shows you know NOTHING of >>>>>> history. I mean, really, how can you not know about slavery in the US? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Slaves in the US were not forced to convert to Christianity, you moron. >>>> >>>> <http://atlantablackstar.com/?p=236342> >>>> <https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081218095851AAXCAKl> >>>> >>>> Really, TRY to learn a little about history. >>>> >>> >>> How about you try reading the links you posted. Neither of them says >>> anything >>> about slaves in the US being forced to convert to Christianity. >> >> Keep in mind you are functionally illiterate. >> > Surely you should be able to quote some reputable historian who agrees with > your claim that slaves in the US were forced to convert to Christianity. > No? That's what I thought. WTF? You made a claim then a conclusion then a proclamation. LEARN a bit about history and your religion and your own bigotry. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-28 03:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhsncj83.a9r@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #329052 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/27/15, 8:11 PM, in article fshge8q.bmjc@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 10/27/15, 8:01 PM, in article fhgjxmc3.kfa0@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 10/27/15, 7:29 PM, in article shgur8w.jgi@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>> Snit clearly believes that muslims should be held to the standards of >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> Middle Ages and earlier, since it would be ludicrous to attempt to hold >>>>>>>> them >>>>>>>> accountable by modern norms. I wonder which of Snit's personal rainbow >>>>>>>> coalition would be most likely to slay him for insulting their religion. >>>>>>>> No, actually I don't wonder. We all know the answer to that question. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> I believe people should be held to high standards. You and Carroll fail. >>>>>>> Not >>>>>>> all Muslims are the same. Not all Christians are the same. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Simple facts. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And the fact you are ignorant enough to not know about forced conversions >>>>>>> to >>>>>>> Christianity any time since the Middle Ages shows you know NOTHING of >>>>>>> history. I mean, really, how can you not know about slavery in the US? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Slaves in the US were not forced to convert to Christianity, you moron. >>>>> >>>>> <http://atlantablackstar.com/?p=236342> >>>>> <https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081218095851AAXCAKl> >>>>> >>>>> Really, TRY to learn a little about history. >>>>> >>>> >>>> How about you try reading the links you posted. Neither of them says >>>> anything >>>> about slaves in the US being forced to convert to Christianity. >>> >>> Keep in mind you are functionally illiterate. >>> >> Surely you should be able to quote some reputable historian who agrees with >> your claim that slaves in the US were forced to convert to Christianity. >> No? That's what I thought. > > WTF? You made a claim then a conclusion then a proclamation. > > LEARN a bit about history and your religion and your own bigotry. > You made the claim of "slavery in the US" being representative of a time of "forced conversions" to Christianity. Prove your claim or retract it. Snit: "And the fact you are ignorant enough to not know about forced conversions to Christianity any time since the Middle Ages shows you know NOTHING of history. I mean, really, how can you not know about slavery in the US?" I call bullshit, so put up or shut up.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-27 20:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D25590E5.61BF3%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #329054 |
On 10/27/15, 8:27 PM, in article fhsncj83.a9r@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> Keep in mind you are functionally illiterate. >>>> >>> Surely you should be able to quote some reputable historian who agrees with >>> your claim that slaves in the US were forced to convert to Christianity. >>> No? That's what I thought. >> >> WTF? You made a claim then a conclusion then a proclamation. >> >> LEARN a bit about history and your religion and your own bigotry. > > You made the claim of "slavery in the US" being representative of a time > of "forced conversions" to Christianity. Prove your claim or retract it. I already provided links which you proved to be too illiterate to understand. Then you made a bizarre claim / conclusion / proclamation. The idea that slaves were ripped from their own cultures and forced into the US culture in a way that made them HAVE to submit is so amazingly basic to the idea of US history that you ignorance of it is just mind boggling. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-28 03:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fna.a0a3f@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #329055 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/27/15, 8:27 PM, in article fhsncj83.a9r@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>>>> Keep in mind you are functionally illiterate. >>>>> >>>> Surely you should be able to quote some reputable historian who agrees with >>>> your claim that slaves in the US were forced to convert to Christianity. >>>> No? That's what I thought. >>> >>> WTF? You made a claim then a conclusion then a proclamation. >>> >>> LEARN a bit about history and your religion and your own bigotry. >> >> You made the claim of "slavery in the US" being representative of a time >> of "forced conversions" to Christianity. Prove your claim or retract it. > > I already provided links LOL! A link to "ask yahoo", where some fool says, "Yes. Go watch Roots!" How about a link to some actual *history*. > which you proved to be too illiterate to > understand. Then you made a bizarre claim / conclusion / proclamation. > > The idea that slaves were ripped from their own cultures and forced into the > US culture in a way that made them HAVE to submit is so amazingly basic to > the idea of US history that you ignorance of it is just mind boggling. > You are an idiot. Slaves in the US were never forced into Christianity. Period.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-27 21:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D2559A1F.61BFE%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #329058 |
On 10/27/15, 8:46 PM, in article fna.a0a3f@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: ... > Slaves in the US were never forced into Christianity. Support? Remember, you already showed you could not understand information you were shown. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-28 04:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fsncmfg83.a@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #329063 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/27/15, 8:46 PM, in article fna.a0a3f@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > ... > >> Slaves in the US were never forced into Christianity. > > Support? Remember, you already showed you could not understand information > you were shown. > If your school asked you to teach a class on the forced conversion of Christianity among US slaves, what text would you use? I'll be happy to get ahold of a copy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-28 08:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D2563910.61C80%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #329064 |
On 10/27/15, 9:23 PM, in article fsncmfg83.a@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 10/27/15, 8:46 PM, in article fna.a0a3f@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >> ... >> >>> Slaves in the US were never forced into Christianity. >> >> Support? Remember, you already showed you could not understand information >> you were shown. >> > > If your school asked you to teach a class on the forced conversion of > Christianity among US slaves, what text would you use? I'll be happy > to get ahold of a copy. > > What school are you even talking about? Really, TRY To focus. Try to understand how the slaves had EVERYTHING taken from them and, yes, Christians backed this (not all, but you are just noting what some Muslims do and attributing it to all, so you should do the same with Christians). The slaves had their families, the cultures, and even their languages taken from them. Then you blame the ancestors of the slaves for them not having the benefits of these things. But that is a different issue. Remember, you were already shown links you demonstrated your inability to understand. We can also look at the native Americans who Christians forced to convert or die. Here, a link on that which you will not understand. <http://www.nebraskastudies.org/0400/stories/0401_0129.html> And then you can turn on any evangelical Christian show and see where people are being told they HAVE to convert or face a fate WORSE than death... eternal damnation. Utter lies to try to force people to convert. It is reprehensible. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-28 15:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fes9t.jgkmv8@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #329149 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/27/15, 9:23 PM, in article fsncmfg83.a@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 10/27/15, 8:46 PM, in article fna.a0a3f@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> ... >>> >>>> Slaves in the US were never forced into Christianity. >>> >>> Support? Remember, you already showed you could not understand information >>> you were shown. >>> >> >> If your school asked you to teach a class on the forced conversion of >> Christianity among US slaves, what text would you use? I'll be happy >> to get ahold of a copy. >> >> > What school are you even talking about? Uhh... the school where you supposedly teach comes to mind. > Really, TRY To focus. Try to > understand how the slaves had EVERYTHING taken from them and, yes, > Christians backed this (not all, but you are just noting what some Muslims > do and attributing it to all, so you should do the same with Christians). > The slaves had their families, the cultures, and even their languages taken > from them. > What are you babbling about? Try to stay focused. > Then you blame the ancestors of the slaves for them not having the benefits > of these things. But that is a different issue. > Huh? The "ancestors or the slaves"? What are you talking about now? > Remember, you were already shown links you demonstrated your inability to > understand. We can also look at the native Americans who Christians forced > to convert or die. Here, a link on that which you will not understand. > > <http://www.nebraskastudies.org/0400/stories/0401_0129.html> > LOL. So now you abandon your claim that US slaves were forced to convert to Christianity on pain of death, and switch to an equally bogus claim that Native Americans were forced to convert or die. I know it must be a painful to hear this, but finding truth in history requires more than just your gut feelings. > And then you can turn on any evangelical Christian show and see where people > are being told they HAVE to convert or face a fate WORSE than death... > eternal damnation. Utter lies to try to force people to convert. It is > reprehensible. > So now Christian "fire and brimstone" sermons are the equivalent of the muslim "convert or die" at the point of a sword. You are well and truly lost.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-28 09:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D25640E2.61CA6%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #329160 |
On 10/28/15, 8:55 AM, in article fes9t.jgkmv8@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 10/27/15, 9:23 PM, in article fsncmfg83.a@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 10/27/15, 8:46 PM, in article fna.a0a3f@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>> ... >>>> >>>>> Slaves in the US were never forced into Christianity. >>>> >>>> Support? Remember, you already showed you could not understand information >>>> you were shown. >>>> >>> >>> If your school asked you to teach a class on the forced conversion of >>> Christianity among US slaves, what text would you use? I'll be happy >>> to get ahold of a copy. >>> >>> >> What school are you even talking about? > > Uhh... the school where you supposedly teach comes to mind. I teach at multiple schools and teach computer classes. Really, WTF are you talking about? You are completely unable to stay focused on ANYTHING in any conversation except when you actually made a few videos of Linux. >> Really, TRY To focus. Try to understand how the slaves had EVERYTHING taken >> from them and, yes, Christians backed this (not all, but you are just noting >> what some Muslims do and attributing it to all, so you should do the same >> with Christians). The slaves had their families, the cultures, and even their >> languages taken from them. > > What are you babbling about? And given how you openly admit you cannot even understand what you read there is no value in talking to you. ... -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-27 20:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bef721a1-2320-41ce-9093-903a71ccb216@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #329043 |
On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 8:48:28 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 10/27/15, 7:29 PM, in article shgur8w.jgi@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > >>> Snit clearly believes that muslims should be held to the standards of the > >>> Middle Ages and earlier, since it would be ludicrous to attempt to hold them > >>> accountable by modern norms. I wonder which of Snit's personal rainbow > >>> coalition would be most likely to slay him for insulting their religion. > >>> No, actually I don't wonder. We all know the answer to that question. > >>> > >>> > >> I believe people should be held to high standards. You and Carroll fail. Not > >> all Muslims are the same. Not all Christians are the same. > >> > >> Simple facts. > >> > >> And the fact you are ignorant enough to not know about forced conversions to > >> Christianity any time since the Middle Ages shows you know NOTHING of > >> history. I mean, really, how can you not know about slavery in the US? > >> > > > > Slaves in the US were not forced to convert to Christianity, you moron. > > <http://atlantablackstar.com/?p=236342> > <https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081218095851AAXCAKl> > > Really, TRY to learn a little about history. The things being spoken of aren't about history, you idiotic, pathological liar... this is about today. Today, a clueless, over-medicated pathological liar wrote: "Christians and Muslims are much the same." - Snit
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-28 08:56 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0qgi7$j6r$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #329051 |
On 2015-10-27 11:11 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 8:48:28 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 10/27/15, 7:29 PM, in article shgur8w.jgi@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>>>> Snit clearly believes that muslims should be held to the standards of the >>>>> Middle Ages and earlier, since it would be ludicrous to attempt to hold them >>>>> accountable by modern norms. I wonder which of Snit's personal rainbow >>>>> coalition would be most likely to slay him for insulting their religion. >>>>> No, actually I don't wonder. We all know the answer to that question. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I believe people should be held to high standards. You and Carroll fail. Not >>>> all Muslims are the same. Not all Christians are the same. >>>> >>>> Simple facts. >>>> >>>> And the fact you are ignorant enough to not know about forced conversions to >>>> Christianity any time since the Middle Ages shows you know NOTHING of >>>> history. I mean, really, how can you not know about slavery in the US? >>>> >>> >>> Slaves in the US were not forced to convert to Christianity, you moron. >> >> <http://atlantablackstar.com/?p=236342> >> <https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081218095851AAXCAKl> >> >> Really, TRY to learn a little about history. > > The things being spoken of aren't about history, you idiotic, pathological liar... this is about today. > > Today, a clueless, over-medicated pathological liar wrote: > > "Christians and Muslims are much the same." - Snit I actually once said that last part to a priest in my 20s. He couldn't wait to rip into me and list the ridiculously-high amount of differences. In reality, there's very little in common between the Christians and the Muslims and Islam is indeed the most immoral and repulsive religion on Earth. -- Charmed Tuna
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-28 09:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D2563FF2.61CA2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #329110 |
On 10/28/15, 5:56 AM, in article n0qgi7$j6r$4@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: ... >>> <http://atlantablackstar.com/?p=236342> >>> <https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081218095851AAXCAKl> >>> >>> Really, TRY to learn a little about history. >> >> The things being spoken of aren't about history, you idiotic, pathological >> liar... this is about today. >> >> Today, a clueless, over-medicated pathological liar wrote: >> >> "Christians and Muslims are much the same." - Snit > > I actually once said that last part to a priest in my 20s. He couldn't > wait to rip into me and list the ridiculously-high amount of > differences. In reality, there's very little in common between the > Christians and the Muslims and Islam is indeed the most immoral and > repulsive religion on Earth. > Of course a Christian priest is not likely to back such a statement. But look up Hutaree and then replace the word "Christian" with "Muslim" in what you find. Can you see any real difference between the extremists of each group? Here is one link on them: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hutaree>. Or how many know of Robert Doggart? He, a Christian who had even run for political office, planned to kill an entire village of people merely because they were Muslims: <http://goo.gl/zf2p2f>. Elsewhere we find he never was put in prison! He is clearly a terrorist but a Christian one so the news pretty much ignored this! We can also find that over 50% of Americans have bigoted views toward Islam, even though only 10% have ever even been in a Mosque and les than 25% have any friends who are Muslim: <https://today.yougov.com/news/2015/03/09/poll-results-islam/>. The reality, though, is in the US you are FAR more likely to be a victim of Christian extremists than Muslim ones (largely based on numbers, there are a lot more Christians in general - not suggesting Christian are generally worse). -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-27 19:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <617cc04a-bf98-489d-b858-1ce5cbd53e9c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #329039 |
On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 8:29:55 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > > On 10/27/15, 7:01 PM, in article fheuas9.jgiuae3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > > >> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 7:16:29 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>> On 10/27/15, 5:59 PM, in article sghak30.adfi@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>>>>> On 10/27/15, 5:34 PM, in article fhgks83.a0f@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > >>>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> It's also very telling that all the clown had to talk about was a > >>>>>>>>>> domain > >>>>>>>>>> name, and not his own logical fallacy. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Oh well -- no reason to take the guy seriously. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Because of PC muz butthurt, Jabba's Palace is no more. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2302312/Muslim-victory-fight-an > >>>>>>>>> ti- > >>>>>>>>> Is > >>>>>>>>> lamic-lego-Denmark-axes-Jabbas-Palace-toy.html > >>>>>>>>> <quote> > >>>>>>>>> Muslims declare victory in fight over 'anti-Islamic' Lego as Denmark > >>>>>>>>> promises to axe ???Jabba???s Palace??? toy > >>>>>>>>> </quote> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Is vallor's house in order? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> One has to wonder if there is anything the Muslims aren't offended by. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> History's crybabies. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Christians and Muslims are much the same. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Both oppose a woman's right to control her body. > >>>>>> Both oppose birth control. > >>>>>> Both oppose drug legalization. > >>>>>> Both oppose equality for gays. > >>>>>> Both oppose pornography. > >>>>>> Both oppose pre-marital sex. > >>>>>> Both oppose prostitution. > >>>>>> Both oppose secularism. > >>>>>> Both support the death penalty. > >>>>>> Both support prayer in school. > >>>>>> Both support pushing their views on others. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Etc. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> They are natural allies. > >>>>> > >>>>> One minor difference... > >>>>> Christian: "Convert and be saved." > >>>>> Muslim: "Convert or die." > >>>> > >>>> You do not know much about Christianity! > >>>> > >>>> <http://jdstone.org/cr/files/converttochristianityordie.html> > >>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forced_conversion#Christianity> > >>> > >>> He's clearly talking about *today*, you dishonest weasel: > >>> > >>> "They are natural allies" > >>> > >>> Your words, present tense. > >> > >> Snit clearly believes that muslims should be held to the standards of the > >> Middle Ages and earlier, since it would be ludicrous to attempt to hold them > >> accountable by modern norms. I wonder which of Snit's personal rainbow > >> coalition would be most likely to slay him for insulting their religion. > >> No, actually I don't wonder. We all know the answer to that question. > >> > >> > > I believe people should be held to high standards. You and Carroll fail. Not > > all Muslims are the same. Not all Christians are the same. > > > > Simple facts. > > > > And the fact you are ignorant enough to not know about forced conversions to > > Christianity any time since the Middle Ages shows you know NOTHING of > > history. I mean, really, how can you not know about slavery in the US? > > > > Slaves in the US were not forced to convert to Christianity, you moron. Glasser will, undoubtedly, pick out anything and everything that supports his far left-tard BS from this report while totally ignoring facts that undermine it: http://www.pewforum.org/files/2013/04/worlds-muslims-religion-politics-society-full-report.pdf I found this poll to be, as Snit likes to say, "interesting": https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/2015/06/23/nationwide-poll-of-us-muslims-shows-thousands-support-shariah-jihad/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-28 03:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sef903.au@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #329044 |
Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 8:29:55 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> > On 10/27/15, 7:01 PM, in article fheuas9.jgiuae3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> > >> >> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 7:16:29 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> >>>> On 10/27/15, 5:59 PM, in article sghak30.adfi@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>>>>> On 10/27/15, 5:34 PM, in article fhgks83.a0f@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> >>>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> It's also very telling that all the clown had to talk about was a >> >>>>>>>>>> domain >> >>>>>>>>>> name, and not his own logical fallacy. >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Oh well -- no reason to take the guy seriously. >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Because of PC muz butthurt, Jabba's Palace is no more. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2302312/Muslim-victory-fight-an >> >>>>>>>>> ti- >> >>>>>>>>> Is >> >>>>>>>>> lamic-lego-Denmark-axes-Jabbas-Palace-toy.html >> >>>>>>>>> <quote> >> >>>>>>>>> Muslims declare victory in fight over 'anti-Islamic' Lego as Denmark >> >>>>>>>>> promises to axe ???Jabba???s Palace??? toy >> >>>>>>>>> </quote> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Is vallor's house in order? >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> One has to wonder if there is anything the Muslims aren't offended by. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> History's crybabies. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Christians and Muslims are much the same. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Both oppose a woman's right to control her body. >> >>>>>> Both oppose birth control. >> >>>>>> Both oppose drug legalization. >> >>>>>> Both oppose equality for gays. >> >>>>>> Both oppose pornography. >> >>>>>> Both oppose pre-marital sex. >> >>>>>> Both oppose prostitution. >> >>>>>> Both oppose secularism. >> >>>>>> Both support the death penalty. >> >>>>>> Both support prayer in school. >> >>>>>> Both support pushing their views on others. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Etc. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> They are natural allies. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> One minor difference... >> >>>>> Christian: "Convert and be saved." >> >>>>> Muslim: "Convert or die." >> >>>> >> >>>> You do not know much about Christianity! >> >>>> >> >>>> <http://jdstone.org/cr/files/converttochristianityordie.html> >> >>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forced_conversion#Christianity> >> >>> >> >>> He's clearly talking about *today*, you dishonest weasel: >> >>> >> >>> "They are natural allies" >> >>> >> >>> Your words, present tense. >> >> >> >> Snit clearly believes that muslims should be held to the standards of the >> >> Middle Ages and earlier, since it would be ludicrous to attempt to hold them >> >> accountable by modern norms. I wonder which of Snit's personal rainbow >> >> coalition would be most likely to slay him for insulting their religion. >> >> No, actually I don't wonder. We all know the answer to that question. >> >> >> >> >> > I believe people should be held to high standards. You and Carroll fail. Not >> > all Muslims are the same. Not all Christians are the same. >> > >> > Simple facts. >> > >> > And the fact you are ignorant enough to not know about forced conversions to >> > Christianity any time since the Middle Ages shows you know NOTHING of >> > history. I mean, really, how can you not know about slavery in the US? >> > >> >> Slaves in the US were not forced to convert to Christianity, you moron. > > Glasser will, undoubtedly, pick out anything and everything that supports his far left-tard BS from this report while totally ignoring facts that undermine it: > > http://www.pewforum.org/files/2013/04/worlds-muslims-religion-politics-society-full-report.pdf > > I found this poll to be, as Snit likes to say, "interesting": > > https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/2015/06/23/nationwide-poll-of-us-muslims-shows-thousands-support-shariah-jihad/ Good links. Thanks.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-27 20:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D25591C4.61BF4%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #329053 |
On 10/27/15, 8:23 PM, in article sef903.au@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 8:29:55 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 10/27/15, 7:01 PM, in article fheuas9.jgiuae3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 7:16:29 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 10/27/15, 5:59 PM, in article sghak30.adfi@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 10/27/15, 5:34 PM, in article fhgks83.a0f@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>>>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It's also very telling that all the clown had to talk about was a >>>>>>>>>>>> domain >>>>>>>>>>>> name, and not his own logical fallacy. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Oh well -- no reason to take the guy seriously. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Because of PC muz butthurt, Jabba's Palace is no more. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2302312/Muslim-victory-figh >>>>>>>>>>>> t-an >>>>>>>>>>>> ti- >>>>>>>>>>>> Is >>>>>>>>>>>> lamic-lego-Denmark-axes-Jabbas-Palace-toy.html >>>>>>>>>>>> <quote> >>>>>>>>>>>> Muslims declare victory in fight over 'anti-Islamic' Lego as >>>>>>>>>>>> Denmark >>>>>>>>>>>> promises to axe ???Jabba???s Palace??? toy >>>>>>>>>>>> </quote> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Is vallor's house in order? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> One has to wonder if there is anything the Muslims aren't offended >>>>>>>>>>> by. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> History's crybabies. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Christians and Muslims are much the same. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Both oppose a woman's right to control her body. >>>>>>>>> Both oppose birth control. >>>>>>>>> Both oppose drug legalization. >>>>>>>>> Both oppose equality for gays. >>>>>>>>> Both oppose pornography. >>>>>>>>> Both oppose pre-marital sex. >>>>>>>>> Both oppose prostitution. >>>>>>>>> Both oppose secularism. >>>>>>>>> Both support the death penalty. >>>>>>>>> Both support prayer in school. >>>>>>>>> Both support pushing their views on others. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Etc. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> They are natural allies. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> One minor difference... >>>>>>>> Christian: "Convert and be saved." >>>>>>>> Muslim: "Convert or die." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You do not know much about Christianity! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <http://jdstone.org/cr/files/converttochristianityordie.html> >>>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forced_conversion#Christianity> >>>>>> >>>>>> He's clearly talking about *today*, you dishonest weasel: >>>>>> >>>>>> "They are natural allies" >>>>>> >>>>>> Your words, present tense. >>>>> >>>>> Snit clearly believes that muslims should be held to the standards of the >>>>> Middle Ages and earlier, since it would be ludicrous to attempt to hold >>>>> them >>>>> accountable by modern norms. I wonder which of Snit's personal rainbow >>>>> coalition would be most likely to slay him for insulting their religion. >>>>> No, actually I don't wonder. We all know the answer to that question. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I believe people should be held to high standards. You and Carroll fail. >>>> Not >>>> all Muslims are the same. Not all Christians are the same. >>>> >>>> Simple facts. >>>> >>>> And the fact you are ignorant enough to not know about forced conversions >>>> to >>>> Christianity any time since the Middle Ages shows you know NOTHING of >>>> history. I mean, really, how can you not know about slavery in the US? >>>> >>> >>> Slaves in the US were not forced to convert to Christianity, you moron. >> >> Glasser will, undoubtedly, pick out anything and everything that supports his >> far left-tard BS from this report while totally ignoring facts that undermine >> it: >> >> http://www.pewforum.org/files/2013/04/worlds-muslims-religion-politics-societ >> y-full-report.pdf >> >> I found this poll to be, as Snit likes to say, "interesting": >> >> https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/2015/06/23/nationwide-poll-of-us-musl >> ims-shows-thousands-support-shariah-jihad/ > > Good links. Thanks. > I referenced this survey, or one similar to it, before. But, sure, it is quite scary how many Muslims AND Christians want to push their religion onto others. Both have holy books with HORRIBLE lessons and EVIL morality. Does not mean most Christians and Muslims live by such evil, but some in each group want to have their books pushed into law. It is absurd. Who wants the laws designed to keep ancient goat herders in line to be the law of the land in modern America? Utter insanity. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-28 03:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sgjbnmc83.a@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #329056 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/27/15, 8:23 PM, in article sef903.au@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 8:29:55 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 10/27/15, 7:01 PM, in article fheuas9.jgiuae3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 7:16:29 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> On 10/27/15, 5:59 PM, in article sghak30.adfi@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 10/27/15, 5:34 PM, in article fhgks83.a0f@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>>>>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It's also very telling that all the clown had to talk about was a >>>>>>>>>>>>> domain >>>>>>>>>>>>> name, and not his own logical fallacy. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh well -- no reason to take the guy seriously. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Because of PC muz butthurt, Jabba's Palace is no more. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2302312/Muslim-victory-figh >>>>>>>>>>>>> t-an >>>>>>>>>>>>> ti- >>>>>>>>>>>>> Is >>>>>>>>>>>>> lamic-lego-Denmark-axes-Jabbas-Palace-toy.html >>>>>>>>>>>>> <quote> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Muslims declare victory in fight over 'anti-Islamic' Lego as >>>>>>>>>>>>> Denmark >>>>>>>>>>>>> promises to axe ???Jabba???s Palace??? toy >>>>>>>>>>>>> </quote> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Is vallor's house in order? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> One has to wonder if there is anything the Muslims aren't offended >>>>>>>>>>>> by. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> History's crybabies. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Christians and Muslims are much the same. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Both oppose a woman's right to control her body. >>>>>>>>>> Both oppose birth control. >>>>>>>>>> Both oppose drug legalization. >>>>>>>>>> Both oppose equality for gays. >>>>>>>>>> Both oppose pornography. >>>>>>>>>> Both oppose pre-marital sex. >>>>>>>>>> Both oppose prostitution. >>>>>>>>>> Both oppose secularism. >>>>>>>>>> Both support the death penalty. >>>>>>>>>> Both support prayer in school. >>>>>>>>>> Both support pushing their views on others. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Etc. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> They are natural allies. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> One minor difference... >>>>>>>>> Christian: "Convert and be saved." >>>>>>>>> Muslim: "Convert or die." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You do not know much about Christianity! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <http://jdstone.org/cr/files/converttochristianityordie.html> >>>>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forced_conversion#Christianity> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> He's clearly talking about *today*, you dishonest weasel: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "They are natural allies" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Your words, present tense. >>>>>> >>>>>> Snit clearly believes that muslims should be held to the standards of the >>>>>> Middle Ages and earlier, since it would be ludicrous to attempt to hold >>>>>> them >>>>>> accountable by modern norms. I wonder which of Snit's personal rainbow >>>>>> coalition would be most likely to slay him for insulting their religion. >>>>>> No, actually I don't wonder. We all know the answer to that question. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> I believe people should be held to high standards. You and Carroll fail. >>>>> Not >>>>> all Muslims are the same. Not all Christians are the same. >>>>> >>>>> Simple facts. >>>>> >>>>> And the fact you are ignorant enough to not know about forced conversions >>>>> to >>>>> Christianity any time since the Middle Ages shows you know NOTHING of >>>>> history. I mean, really, how can you not know about slavery in the US? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Slaves in the US were not forced to convert to Christianity, you moron. >>> >>> Glasser will, undoubtedly, pick out anything and everything that supports his >>> far left-tard BS from this report while totally ignoring facts that undermine >>> it: >>> >>> http://www.pewforum.org/files/2013/04/worlds-muslims-religion-politics-societ >>> y-full-report.pdf >>> >>> I found this poll to be, as Snit likes to say, "interesting": >>> >>> https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/2015/06/23/nationwide-poll-of-us-musl >>> ims-shows-thousands-support-shariah-jihad/ >> >> Good links. Thanks. >> > I referenced this survey, or one similar to it, before. But, sure, it is > quite scary how many Muslims AND Christians want to push their religion onto > others. Both have holy books with HORRIBLE lessons and EVIL morality. > > Does not mean most Christians and Muslims live by such evil, but some in > each group want to have their books pushed into law. It is absurd. > > Who wants the laws designed to keep ancient goat herders in line to be the > law of the land in modern America? Utter insanity. > Well, with about 75 percent of the US population identifying as Christian, and given the sorry state of morality compared to Christian beliefs, I don't think that there is much "push" going on to get laws more in line with the Bible. Imagine if 75 percent of the US populatin identified as Muslim. Now there's some "scary" for you...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-27 21:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D25599E7.61BFC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #329059 |
On 10/27/15, 8:50 PM, in article sgjbnmc83.a@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> I referenced this survey, or one similar to it, before. But, sure, it is >> quite scary how many Muslims AND Christians want to push their religion onto >> others. Both have holy books with HORRIBLE lessons and EVIL morality. >> >> Does not mean most Christians and Muslims live by such evil, but some in >> each group want to have their books pushed into law. It is absurd. >> >> Who wants the laws designed to keep ancient goat herders in line to be the >> law of the land in modern America? Utter insanity. >> > > Well, with about 75 percent of the US population identifying as Christian, > and given the sorry state of morality compared to Christian beliefs, What do you mean by "Christian beliefs"? The way most Christians see Christianity today or the evil lessons of the Bible? > I don't think that there is much "push" going on to get laws more in line with > the Bible. What you think is not relevant. > Imagine if 75 percent of the US populatin identified as Muslim. > Now there's some "scary" for you... Outsiders realize the two religions are not much different. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-28 07:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <srug843.gji@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #329062 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/27/15, 8:50 PM, in article sgjbnmc83.a@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > >> Imagine if 75 percent of the US populatin identified as Muslim. >> Now there's some "scary" for you... > > Outsiders realize the two religions are not much different. > So would you feel more -- or less -- comfortable if 75 percent of the US population identified as Muslim instead of Christian?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-28 09:02 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0qgtf$j6r$7@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #329086 |
On 2015-10-28 3:07 AM, owl wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 10/27/15, 8:50 PM, in article sgjbnmc83.a@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >> >>> Imagine if 75 percent of the US populatin identified as Muslim. >>> Now there's some "scary" for you... >> >> Outsiders realize the two religions are not much different. >> > > So would you feel more -- or less -- comfortable if 75 percent of the US > population identified as Muslim instead of Christian? A population which is mostly Muslim tends to implode. -- Charmed Tuna
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-28 09:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D2564050.61CA4%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #329113 |
On 10/28/15, 6:02 AM, in article n0qgtf$j6r$7@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > On 2015-10-28 3:07 AM, owl wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 10/27/15, 8:50 PM, in article sgjbnmc83.a@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Imagine if 75 percent of the US populatin identified as Muslim. >>>> Now there's some "scary" for you... >>> >>> Outsiders realize the two religions are not much different. >>> >> >> So would you feel more -- or less -- comfortable if 75 percent of the US >> population identified as Muslim instead of Christian? > > A population which is mostly Muslim tends to implode. > America and England, which are majority Christian, tend to invade other countries. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 9 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web