Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #451888 > unrolled thread
| Started by | quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-21 17:36 -0500 |
| Last post | 2018-05-26 08:45 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 43 — 6 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> - 2018-05-21 17:36 -0500
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 15:56 -0700
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 17:45 -0700
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 18:01 -0700
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 20:56 +0000
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> - 2018-05-23 17:39 -0500
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-23 19:22 -0400
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 18:05 -0700
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 21:52 -0700
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> - 2018-05-24 12:39 -0500
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 10:55 -0700
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 12:50 -0700
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-24 17:44 -0400
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 14:50 -0700
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> - 2018-05-25 09:13 -0500
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 08:22 -0700
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 09:22 -0700
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-25 22:11 +0000
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 15:31 -0700
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-25 22:36 +0000
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 15:45 -0700
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-25 22:51 +0000
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 15:53 -0700
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-25 23:29 +0000
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 18:44 -0700
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-26 02:02 +0000
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 19:08 -0700
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-26 02:22 +0000
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 19:33 -0700
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-26 12:02 -0400
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 09:15 -0700
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-26 11:56 -0400
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 09:03 -0700
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 19:16 -0700
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 20:02 -0700
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-26 11:51 -0400
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 09:02 -0700
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-26 11:43 -0400
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 08:46 -0700
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 15:39 -0700
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 20:03 -0700
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-26 11:37 -0400
Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 08:45 -0700
Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-25 15:45 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 |
| Message-ID | <fmrhvkF9k83U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #452375 |
On 5/25/18 3:36 PM, owl wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 5/25/18 3:11 PM, owl wrote: >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 5/25/18 7:13 AM, quatloo wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 24 May 2018 17:44:34 -0400, Doomsdrzej wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, 24 May 2018 12:39:20 -0500, quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2018 19:22:14 -0400, Doomsdrzej wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2018 17:39:55 -0500, quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2018 20:56:18 +0000, RonB wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Bye "quatloo." Nice not knowing you. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Likewise. You seem to be yet another right wing, racist, conspiracy >>>>>>>>> theory moron. >>>>>>>>> Obviously a Trumpee. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> He's already the best president the United States has ever had. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You can't be serious. >>>>>>> Trump is a buffoon with the vocabulary of an 8th grader, maybe. >>>>>>> He is one hell of a salesman though. >>>>>> >>>>>> He's accomplished more in one year than the Smiling Black Man >>>>>> accomplished in 8. Hell, see what he got done in just 200 days >>>>>> <http://start.att.net/news/read/category/news/article/business_insider- >>>>> heres_how_many_laws_trump_signed_in_his_first_200- >>>>> newscred2#.WYnMaPhYRgk.twitter> >>>>> >>>>> So you are comparing Trump to Obama who might just be the worst president >>>>> in modern history. >>>>> Aiming a little low there aren't you? >>>> >>>> Obama is generally rated in the first or second quartile. Not only is >>>> Trump generally rated in the fourth quartile, he is generally rated at >>>> the very bottom... number 44 of 44. >>>> >>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_rankings_of_presidents_of_the_United_States#Notable_scholar_surveys> >>>> OR <https://goo.gl/Jmh9Fh> >>>> >>>> The aggregate rankings of the two: >>>> >>>> Obama: 11 (first quartile) >>>> Trump: 44 (very last place) >>>> >>>> To be fair, there is only one ranking for Trump... >>> >>> >>> And that one ranking is from APSA. >>> https://www.nas.org/articles/why_im_leaving_the_political_science_association >>> >>>> and presidents tend >>>> to go up a little once their term or terms are done. Maybe Buchanan will >>>> get put back on the bottom. :) >>>> >>> >>> Trump is already the greatest president in American history, and he's still >>> got seven more years to go. >> >> Ah, the is the greatest... but ranked dead last. >> >> Makes complete sense. LOL! >> > > Ranked dead last by a single libtard organization. The people who > matter, such as me, rank him number one of all time. > > > Nope. Look at his polling numbers. <https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/> -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-25 22:51 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 |
| Message-ID | <szb908038ga.ahog34@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #452380 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 5/25/18 3:36 PM, owl wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 5/25/18 3:11 PM, owl wrote: >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 5/25/18 7:13 AM, quatloo wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 24 May 2018 17:44:34 -0400, Doomsdrzej wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, 24 May 2018 12:39:20 -0500, quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2018 19:22:14 -0400, Doomsdrzej wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2018 17:39:55 -0500, quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2018 20:56:18 +0000, RonB wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Bye "quatloo." Nice not knowing you. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Likewise. You seem to be yet another right wing, racist, conspiracy >>>>>>>>>> theory moron. >>>>>>>>>> Obviously a Trumpee. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> He's already the best president the United States has ever had. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You can't be serious. >>>>>>>> Trump is a buffoon with the vocabulary of an 8th grader, maybe. >>>>>>>> He is one hell of a salesman though. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> He's accomplished more in one year than the Smiling Black Man >>>>>>> accomplished in 8. Hell, see what he got done in just 200 days >>>>>>> <http://start.att.net/news/read/category/news/article/business_insider- >>>>>> heres_how_many_laws_trump_signed_in_his_first_200- >>>>>> newscred2#.WYnMaPhYRgk.twitter> >>>>>> >>>>>> So you are comparing Trump to Obama who might just be the worst president >>>>>> in modern history. >>>>>> Aiming a little low there aren't you? >>>>> >>>>> Obama is generally rated in the first or second quartile. Not only is >>>>> Trump generally rated in the fourth quartile, he is generally rated at >>>>> the very bottom... number 44 of 44. >>>>> >>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_rankings_of_presidents_of_the_United_States#Notable_scholar_surveys> >>>>> OR <https://goo.gl/Jmh9Fh> >>>>> >>>>> The aggregate rankings of the two: >>>>> >>>>> Obama: 11 (first quartile) >>>>> Trump: 44 (very last place) >>>>> >>>>> To be fair, there is only one ranking for Trump... >>>> >>>> >>>> And that one ranking is from APSA. >>>> https://www.nas.org/articles/why_im_leaving_the_political_science_association >>>> >>>>> and presidents tend >>>>> to go up a little once their term or terms are done. Maybe Buchanan will >>>>> get put back on the bottom. :) >>>>> >>>> >>>> Trump is already the greatest president in American history, and he's still >>>> got seven more years to go. >>> >>> Ah, the is the greatest... but ranked dead last. >>> >>> Makes complete sense. LOL! >>> >> >> Ranked dead last by a single libtard organization. The people who >> matter, such as me, rank him number one of all time. >> >> >> > Nope. Look at his polling numbers. > > <https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/> > Polls are great. Except, uhh... November 2016.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-25 15:53 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 |
| Message-ID | <fmriflF9mp1U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #452382 |
On 5/25/18 3:51 PM, owl wrote: >>>> Ah, the is the greatest... but ranked dead last. >>>> >>>> Makes complete sense. LOL! >>>> >>> Ranked dead last by a single libtard organization. The people who >>> matter, such as me, rank him number one of all time. >>> >>> >>> >> Nope. Look at his polling numbers. >> >> <https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/> >> > Polls are great. Except, uhh... November 2016. > Where do you get Nov. 2016 from? You disagree... OK: show contrary evidence. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-25 23:29 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 |
| Message-ID | <szb3a.gho3@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #452383 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 5/25/18 3:51 PM, owl wrote: >>>>> Ah, the is the greatest... but ranked dead last. >>>>> >>>>> Makes complete sense. LOL! >>>>> >>>> Ranked dead last by a single libtard organization. The people who >>>> matter, such as me, rank him number one of all time. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Nope. Look at his polling numbers. >>> >>> <https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/> >>> >> Polls are great. Except, uhh... November 2016. >> > > Where do you get Nov. 2016 from? > > You disagree... OK: show contrary evidence. > Nov 2016, when Trump won the election despite practically every preceding poll saying Hillary would win by a landslide.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-25 18:44 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 |
| Message-ID | <fmrsgcFb9maU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #452386 |
On 5/25/18 4:29 PM, owl wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 5/25/18 3:51 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>> Ah, the is the greatest... but ranked dead last. >>>>>> >>>>>> Makes complete sense. LOL! >>>>>> >>>>> Ranked dead last by a single libtard organization. The people who >>>>> matter, such as me, rank him number one of all time. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Nope. Look at his polling numbers. >>>> >>>> <https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/> >>>> >>> Polls are great. Except, uhh... November 2016. >>> >> >> Where do you get Nov. 2016 from? >> >> You disagree... OK: show contrary evidence. > > Nov 2016, when Trump won the election despite practically every > preceding poll saying Hillary would win by a landslide. So in a discussion about his polling AS president you talk about an election from BEFORE he was president... and even in that he lost the popular vote to an absolutely horrible candidate who ran a miserable campaign. Bottom line: he has horrid polling numbers and is rated in the bottom quartile... really as the VERY bottom of the list (though that may very well change with future polls, and Buchanan might get put back at the bottom). -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-26 02:02 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 |
| Message-ID | <axz8cv0837a.bvh9@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #452394 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 5/25/18 4:29 PM, owl wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 5/25/18 3:51 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>> Ah, the is the greatest... but ranked dead last. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Makes complete sense. LOL! >>>>>>> >>>>>> Ranked dead last by a single libtard organization. The people who >>>>>> matter, such as me, rank him number one of all time. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Nope. Look at his polling numbers. >>>>> >>>>> <https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/> >>>>> >>>> Polls are great. Except, uhh... November 2016. >>>> >>> >>> Where do you get Nov. 2016 from? >>> >>> You disagree... OK: show contrary evidence. >> >> Nov 2016, when Trump won the election despite practically every >> preceding poll saying Hillary would win by a landslide. > > So in a discussion about his polling AS president you talk about an > election from BEFORE he was president... and even in that he lost the > popular vote to an absolutely horrible candidate who ran a miserable > campaign. > The fact that polls -- even a huge number of them simultaneously -- can be so far off the mark speaks volumes to anyone outside the brainwashed left. Political polling as an industry is almost as worthless to human enlightenment as the field of psychology. > Bottom line: he has horrid polling numbers and is rated in the bottom > quartile... really as the VERY bottom of the list (though that may very > well change with future polls, and Buchanan might get put back at the > bottom). > You dumbass. How many times does it have to be shown to you that that "consensus" consisted of *one* leftist organization's rating? You may has well have asked Jimmy Kimmel.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-25 19:08 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 |
| Message-ID | <fmrtsjFbfiqU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #452397 |
On 5/25/18 7:02 PM, owl wrote:
> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 5/25/18 4:29 PM, owl wrote:
>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>> On 5/25/18 3:51 PM, owl wrote:
>>>>>>>> Ah, the is the greatest... but ranked dead last.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Makes complete sense. LOL!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ranked dead last by a single libtard organization. The people who
>>>>>>> matter, such as me, rank him number one of all time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nope. Look at his polling numbers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Polls are great. Except, uhh... November 2016.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Where do you get Nov. 2016 from?
>>>>
>>>> You disagree... OK: show contrary evidence.
>>>
>>> Nov 2016, when Trump won the election despite practically every
>>> preceding poll saying Hillary would win by a landslide.
>>
>> So in a discussion about his polling AS president you talk about an
>> election from BEFORE he was president... and even in that he lost the
>> popular vote to an absolutely horrible candidate who ran a miserable
>> campaign.
>>
>
> The fact that polls -- even a huge number of them simultaneously --
> can be so far off the mark speaks volumes to anyone outside the
> brainwashed left. Political polling as an industry is almost
> as worthless to human enlightenment as the field of psychology.
Ah, you deny the evidence. OK.
>> Bottom line: he has horrid polling numbers and is rated in the bottom
>> quartile... really as the VERY bottom of the list (though that may very
>> well change with future polls, and Buchanan might get put back at the
>> bottom).
>
> You dumbass. How many times does it have to be shown to you that
> that "consensus" consisted of *one* leftist organization's rating?
> You may has well have asked Jimmy Kimmel.
Ah, insults and whining about the evidence.
Fact 1: Trump lost the popular election to a horrible candidate who
ran a miserable campaign.
Fact 2: Trump is rated by experts in the fourth quartile. Compare
this to Obama who is rated in the first or second.
Fact 3: Trump has HORRIBLE polling numbers. He is a deeply unpopular
president.
Fact 4: Regardless of the above, he IS the president. Not that this
is in question by anyone here but I want to make it clear. :)
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-26 02:22 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 |
| Message-ID | <szb00300ga.gho3@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #452400 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 5/25/18 7:02 PM, owl wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 5/25/18 4:29 PM, owl wrote: >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 5/25/18 3:51 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>>> Ah, the is the greatest... but ranked dead last. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Makes complete sense. LOL! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ranked dead last by a single libtard organization. The people who >>>>>>>> matter, such as me, rank him number one of all time. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nope. Look at his polling numbers. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Polls are great. Except, uhh... November 2016. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Where do you get Nov. 2016 from? >>>>> >>>>> You disagree... OK: show contrary evidence. >>>> >>>> Nov 2016, when Trump won the election despite practically every >>>> preceding poll saying Hillary would win by a landslide. >>> >>> So in a discussion about his polling AS president you talk about an >>> election from BEFORE he was president... and even in that he lost the >>> popular vote to an absolutely horrible candidate who ran a miserable >>> campaign. >>> >> >> The fact that polls -- even a huge number of them simultaneously -- >> can be so far off the mark speaks volumes to anyone outside the >> brainwashed left. Political polling as an industry is almost >> as worthless to human enlightenment as the field of psychology. > > Ah, you deny the evidence. OK. > >>> Bottom line: he has horrid polling numbers and is rated in the bottom >>> quartile... really as the VERY bottom of the list (though that may very >>> well change with future polls, and Buchanan might get put back at the >>> bottom). >> >> You dumbass. How many times does it have to be shown to you that >> that "consensus" consisted of *one* leftist organization's rating? >> You may has well have asked Jimmy Kimmel. > > Ah, insults and whining about the evidence. > Ah, denial of the facts. > > Fact 1: Trump lost the popular election to a horrible candidate who > ran a miserable campaign. > A popular election containing 3 million illegal alien voters in California, the shithole that unfortunately seems to be increasingly safer from North Korean nuclear attack. (Yes, even Trump makes the occasional mistake). > Fact 2: Trump is rated by experts in the fourth quartile. Compare > this to Obama who is rated in the first or second. > By *one* leftist organization, the APSA. > Fact 3: Trump has HORRIBLE polling numbers. He is a deeply unpopular > president. > He is an extremely popular president among those who voted for him. > Fact 4: Regardless of the above, he IS the president. Not that this > is in question by anyone here but I want to make it clear. :) > Fact 5: He will be re-elected in 2020, and (thank God) will be able to stack the Supreme Court with sensible people who respect the Constitution.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-25 19:33 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 |
| Message-ID | <fmrvciFbotbU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #452402 |
On 5/25/18 7:22 PM, owl wrote: ... > Ah, denial of the facts. > >> >> Fact 1: Trump lost the popular election to a horrible candidate who >> ran a miserable campaign. > > A popular election containing 3 million illegal alien voters in > California, the shithole that unfortunately seems to be increasingly > safer from North Korean nuclear attack. (Yes, even Trump makes the > occasional mistake). Ah, the lie that non-citizens voted in droves: <http://www.politifact.com/florida/statements/2017/jun/22/ainsley-earhardt/following-trump-voter-fraud-allegations-claim-57-m/> <https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hillary-clinton-800000-votes-non-citizens/> <https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/illegal-immigrants-2008-election/> <https://www.factcheck.org/2017/08/25-million-clinton-votes-werent-fake/> >> Fact 2: Trump is rated by experts in the fourth quartile. Compare >> this to Obama who is rated in the first or second. > > By *one* leftist organization, the APSA. By the one and only poll of expert we know... which you deem leftist. >> Fact 3: Trump has HORRIBLE polling numbers. He is a deeply unpopular >> president. > > He is an extremely popular president among those who voted for him. Ah... moving of goal posts. And even then what makes you think that? <http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-trump-election-voters-20171108-story.html> >> Fact 4: Regardless of the above, he IS the president. Not that this >> is in question by anyone here but I want to make it clear. :) > > Fact 5: He will be re-elected in 2020, and (thank God) will be able > to stack the Supreme Court with sensible people who respect the > Constitution. He is unlikely to be re-elected in 2020 (though the Dems ARE working to be as stupid as they were in 2016, so maybe). And, yes, his SCOTUS pick has at least in some cases upheld the Constitution: <https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/trump-supreme-court-pick-sides-liberals-immigration-ruling-against-administration-n866681> -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-26 12:02 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 |
| Message-ID | <cu0jgd16jkube3o96ukahn9up8ga4f1l6q@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #452402 |
On Sat, 26 May 2018 02:22:49 +0000 (UTC), owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: < snip > >> Fact 1: Trump lost the popular election to a horrible candidate who >> ran a miserable campaign. >> > >A popular election containing 3 million illegal alien voters in >California, the shithole that unfortunately seems to be increasingly >safer from North Korean nuclear attack. (Yes, even Trump makes the >occasional mistake). +1. Like I said in the previous post, there is tons of evidence showing that illegals were allowed and encouraged to vote but since Michael Glasser, Prescott Radioactive Cockroach never looks at anything other than the filtered mainstream media, he's unaware of it all. > >> Fact 2: Trump is rated by experts in the fourth quartile. Compare >> this to Obama who is rated in the first or second. > >By *one* leftist organization, the APSA. Why would anyone care what "experts" think about a politician anyway? The only people that matter are the ones who will actually feel the consequences of the President's competence: the people. >> Fact 3: Trump has HORRIBLE polling numbers. He is a deeply unpopular >> president. >> > >He is an extremely popular president among those who voted for him. Actually, he's becoming more popular even with people who didn't. Independents are moving away from the Democrats and approaching the right and his approval ratings at this point in his presidency are higher than the Dancing Monkey's were. >> Fact 4: Regardless of the above, he IS the president. Not that this >> is in question by anyone here but I want to make it clear. :) > >Fact 5: He will be re-elected in 2020, and (thank God) will be able >to stack the Supreme Court with sensible people who respect the >Constitution. The media Michael Glasser, Street Corner Prostitute from Prescott, Arizona relies on believes that there is a blue wave about to kick the man out of office at the midterms despite the fact that Republicans are leading in the polls. That should give you an idea of how accurate they are and how much reality has an effect on them.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-26 09:15 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 |
| Message-ID | <fmtfghFkb5hU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #452479 |
On 5/26/18 9:02 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote: > On Sat, 26 May 2018 02:22:49 +0000 (UTC), owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> > wrote: > > < snip > > >>> Fact 1: Trump lost the popular election to a horrible candidate who >>> ran a miserable campaign. >>> >> >> A popular election containing 3 million illegal alien voters in >> California, the shithole that unfortunately seems to be increasingly >> safer from North Korean nuclear attack. (Yes, even Trump makes the >> occasional mistake). > > +1. Like I said in the previous post, there is tons of evidence > showing that illegals were allowed and encouraged to vote but since > Michael Glasser, Prescott Radioactive Cockroach never looks at > anything other than the filtered mainstream media, he's unaware of it > all. Another great example of you making insane claims with NO support... and then lashing out at those of us who actually look for evidence. Fair enough. >>> Fact 2: Trump is rated by experts in the fourth quartile. Compare >>> this to Obama who is rated in the first or second. >> >> By *one* leftist organization, the APSA. > > Why would anyone care what "experts" think about a politician anyway? > The only people that matter are the ones who will actually feel the > consequences of the President's competence: the people. Face it: if Trump rated high you would be all over it. But, sure... what the people think is very important... and the people rate him poorly, too: <https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings> >>> Fact 3: Trump has HORRIBLE polling numbers. He is a deeply unpopular >>> president. >>> >> >> He is an extremely popular president among those who voted for him. > > Actually, he's becoming more popular even with people who didn't. > Independents are moving away from the Democrats and approaching the > right and his approval ratings at this point in his presidency are > higher than the Dancing Monkey's were. In what areas? Overall people want to reduce income redistribution to the rich, they want a living wage, they want health care for all, they want to reduce the risk of gun harm, etc. >>> Fact 4: Regardless of the above, he IS the president. Not that this >>> is in question by anyone here but I want to make it clear. :) >> >> Fact 5: He will be re-elected in 2020, and (thank God) will be able >> to stack the Supreme Court with sensible people who respect the >> Constitution. > > The media Michael Glasser, Street Corner Prostitute from Prescott, > Arizona relies on believes that there is a blue wave about to kick the > man out of office at the midterms despite the fact that Republicans > are leading in the polls. That should give you an idea of how accurate > they are and how much reality has an effect on them. Ah, like Carroll, you lash out with insults as you pretend to be my spokesperson. Amazing how often you and he do that. I can speak for myself just fine... and do so likely more than I should. :) -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-26 11:56 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 |
| Message-ID | <lq0jgd5l3b0kvmt1aboucqgam2g2h86n7q@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #452397 |
On Sat, 26 May 2018 02:02:12 +0000 (UTC), owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 5/25/18 4:29 PM, owl wrote: >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 5/25/18 3:51 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>> Ah, the is the greatest... but ranked dead last. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Makes complete sense. LOL! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ranked dead last by a single libtard organization. The people who >>>>>>> matter, such as me, rank him number one of all time. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Nope. Look at his polling numbers. >>>>>> >>>>>> <https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/> >>>>>> >>>>> Polls are great. Except, uhh... November 2016. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Where do you get Nov. 2016 from? >>>> >>>> You disagree... OK: show contrary evidence. >>> >>> Nov 2016, when Trump won the election despite practically every >>> preceding poll saying Hillary would win by a landslide. >> >> So in a discussion about his polling AS president you talk about an >> election from BEFORE he was president... and even in that he lost the >> popular vote to an absolutely horrible candidate who ran a miserable >> campaign. >> > >The fact that polls -- even a huge number of them simultaneously -- >can be so far off the mark speaks volumes to anyone outside the >brainwashed left. Political polling as an industry is almost >as worthless to human enlightenment as the field of psychology. Michael Glasser, Prescott Sewer Rat also disregards the fact that the popular vote was tainted by the fact that illegals, in huge numbers, were allowed to vote in liberal states such as California. Tons of evidence of this exists but since it hasn't been mentioned in liberal rags, it never happened.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-26 09:03 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 |
| Message-ID | <fmteqhFk5r3U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #452476 |
On 5/26/18 8:56 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote: > On Sat, 26 May 2018 02:02:12 +0000 (UTC), owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> > wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 5/25/18 4:29 PM, owl wrote: >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 5/25/18 3:51 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>>> Ah, the is the greatest... but ranked dead last. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Makes complete sense. LOL! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ranked dead last by a single libtard organization. The people who >>>>>>>> matter, such as me, rank him number one of all time. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nope. Look at his polling numbers. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Polls are great. Except, uhh... November 2016. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Where do you get Nov. 2016 from? >>>>> >>>>> You disagree... OK: show contrary evidence. >>>> >>>> Nov 2016, when Trump won the election despite practically every >>>> preceding poll saying Hillary would win by a landslide. >>> >>> So in a discussion about his polling AS president you talk about an >>> election from BEFORE he was president... and even in that he lost the >>> popular vote to an absolutely horrible candidate who ran a miserable >>> campaign. >>> >> >> The fact that polls -- even a huge number of them simultaneously -- >> can be so far off the mark speaks volumes to anyone outside the >> brainwashed left. Political polling as an industry is almost >> as worthless to human enlightenment as the field of psychology. > > Michael Glasser, Prescott Sewer Rat also disregards the fact that the > popular vote was tainted by the fact that illegals, in huge numbers, > were allowed to vote in liberal states such as California. Sure: I disregard unsupported idiocy... and you back it. No argument here. > Tons of evidence of this exists but since it hasn't been mentioned in > liberal rags, it never happened. As noted: you accept idiotic claims with NO support. None. There is no reliable or meaningful support of the claim. Thanks for the great example of your lack of critical thinking skills. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-25 19:16 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 |
| Message-ID | <7f71892e-e4dd-40ff-a3b0-0e8b3334cb7b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #452383 |
On Friday, May 25, 2018 at 3:53:44 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 5/25/18 3:51 PM, owl wrote: > >>>> Ah, the is the greatest... but ranked dead last. > >>>> > >>>> Makes complete sense. LOL! > >>>> > >>> Ranked dead last by a single libtard organization. The people who > >>> matter, such as me, rank him number one of all time. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> Nope. Look at his polling numbers. > >> > >> <https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/> > >> > > Polls are great. Except, uhh... November 2016. > > > > Where do you get Nov. 2016 from? > > You disagree... OK: show contrary evidence. > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> For crying out loud, just recently The Holy Ghost was declaring himself the only "true Linux advocate", and claiming that "advocates" (in mockery-quotes, because he is afraid of them) are insisting desktop Linux is perfect as is. But when the charts were produced, it turns out with absolute proof, The Holy Ghost was far more "neurotic" than anybody else. So he changed his story to "mentioning" him. -- My Snoring Solution Michael Glasser: Prescott Computer Guy http://prescottcomputerguy.com Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-25 20:02 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 |
| Message-ID | <fms12tFc0ikU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #452401 |
On 5/25/18 7:16 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Friday, May 25, 2018 at 3:53:44 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: >> On 5/25/18 3:51 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>> Ah, the is the greatest... but ranked dead last. >>>>>> >>>>>> Makes complete sense. LOL! >>>>>> >>>>> Ranked dead last by a single libtard organization. The people who >>>>> matter, such as me, rank him number one of all time. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Nope. Look at his polling numbers. >>>> >>>> <https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/> >>>> >>> Polls are great. Except, uhh... November 2016. >>> >> >> Where do you get Nov. 2016 from? >> >> You disagree... OK: show contrary evidence. >> >> -- >> Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They >> cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel >> somehow superior by attacking the messenger. >> >> They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. >> >> <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> > > > > For crying out loud, just recently The Holy Ghost was declaring himself the only "true Linux advocate", and claiming that "advocates" (in mockery-quotes, because he is afraid of them) are insisting desktop Linux is perfect as is. > > But when the charts were produced, it turns out with absolute proof, The Holy Ghost was far more "neurotic" than anybody else. So he changed his story to "mentioning" him. > > > > -- > My Snoring Solution > Michael Glasser: Prescott Computer Guy > http://prescottcomputerguy.com > Jonas Eklundh Communication AB > 2 -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-26 11:51 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 |
| Message-ID | <oi0jgd5nu1uahjnanm9k8cp1g2c99gvot1@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #452382 |
On Fri, 25 May 2018 22:51:38 +0000 (UTC), owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 5/25/18 3:36 PM, owl wrote: >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 5/25/18 3:11 PM, owl wrote: >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 5/25/18 7:13 AM, quatloo wrote: >>>>>>> On Thu, 24 May 2018 17:44:34 -0400, Doomsdrzej wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, 24 May 2018 12:39:20 -0500, quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2018 19:22:14 -0400, Doomsdrzej wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2018 17:39:55 -0500, quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2018 20:56:18 +0000, RonB wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Bye "quatloo." Nice not knowing you. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Likewise. You seem to be yet another right wing, racist, conspiracy >>>>>>>>>>> theory moron. >>>>>>>>>>> Obviously a Trumpee. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> He's already the best president the United States has ever had. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You can't be serious. >>>>>>>>> Trump is a buffoon with the vocabulary of an 8th grader, maybe. >>>>>>>>> He is one hell of a salesman though. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> He's accomplished more in one year than the Smiling Black Man >>>>>>>> accomplished in 8. Hell, see what he got done in just 200 days >>>>>>>> <http://start.att.net/news/read/category/news/article/business_insider- >>>>>>> heres_how_many_laws_trump_signed_in_his_first_200- >>>>>>> newscred2#.WYnMaPhYRgk.twitter> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So you are comparing Trump to Obama who might just be the worst president >>>>>>> in modern history. >>>>>>> Aiming a little low there aren't you? >>>>>> >>>>>> Obama is generally rated in the first or second quartile. Not only is >>>>>> Trump generally rated in the fourth quartile, he is generally rated at >>>>>> the very bottom... number 44 of 44. >>>>>> >>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_rankings_of_presidents_of_the_United_States#Notable_scholar_surveys> >>>>>> OR <https://goo.gl/Jmh9Fh> >>>>>> >>>>>> The aggregate rankings of the two: >>>>>> >>>>>> Obama: 11 (first quartile) >>>>>> Trump: 44 (very last place) >>>>>> >>>>>> To be fair, there is only one ranking for Trump... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> And that one ranking is from APSA. >>>>> https://www.nas.org/articles/why_im_leaving_the_political_science_association >>>>> >>>>>> and presidents tend >>>>>> to go up a little once their term or terms are done. Maybe Buchanan will >>>>>> get put back on the bottom. :) >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Trump is already the greatest president in American history, and he's still >>>>> got seven more years to go. >>>> >>>> Ah, the is the greatest... but ranked dead last. >>>> >>>> Makes complete sense. LOL! >>>> >>> >>> Ranked dead last by a single libtard organization. The people who >>> matter, such as me, rank him number one of all time. >>> >>> >>> >> Nope. Look at his polling numbers. >> >> <https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/> >> > >Polls are great. Except, uhh... November 2016. Most of those polls gave HilLIARy a 95+% chance of winning. I wonder if they apologized.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-26 09:02 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 |
| Message-ID | <fmtenvFk5r3U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #452475 |
On 5/26/18 8:51 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote: >>> Nope. Look at his polling numbers. >>> >>> <https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/> >>> >> Polls are great. Except, uhh... November 2016. > Most of those polls gave HilLIARy a 95+% chance of winning. > > I wonder if they apologized. She had about a 70% chance of winning... Trump a 30%. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-26 11:43 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 |
| Message-ID | <720jgdhm0eb98phg477n9ubpik5c9ldmtv@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #452375 |
On Fri, 25 May 2018 22:36:59 +0000 (UTC), owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 5/25/18 3:11 PM, owl wrote: >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 5/25/18 7:13 AM, quatloo wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 24 May 2018 17:44:34 -0400, Doomsdrzej wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, 24 May 2018 12:39:20 -0500, quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2018 19:22:14 -0400, Doomsdrzej wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2018 17:39:55 -0500, quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2018 20:56:18 +0000, RonB wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Bye "quatloo." Nice not knowing you. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Likewise. You seem to be yet another right wing, racist, conspiracy >>>>>>>>> theory moron. >>>>>>>>> Obviously a Trumpee. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> He's already the best president the United States has ever had. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You can't be serious. >>>>>>> Trump is a buffoon with the vocabulary of an 8th grader, maybe. >>>>>>> He is one hell of a salesman though. >>>>>> >>>>>> He's accomplished more in one year than the Smiling Black Man >>>>>> accomplished in 8. Hell, see what he got done in just 200 days >>>>>> <http://start.att.net/news/read/category/news/article/business_insider- >>>>> heres_how_many_laws_trump_signed_in_his_first_200- >>>>> newscred2#.WYnMaPhYRgk.twitter> >>>>> >>>>> So you are comparing Trump to Obama who might just be the worst president >>>>> in modern history. >>>>> Aiming a little low there aren't you? >>>> >>>> Obama is generally rated in the first or second quartile. Not only is >>>> Trump generally rated in the fourth quartile, he is generally rated at >>>> the very bottom... number 44 of 44. >>>> >>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_rankings_of_presidents_of_the_United_States#Notable_scholar_surveys> >>>> OR <https://goo.gl/Jmh9Fh> >>>> >>>> The aggregate rankings of the two: >>>> >>>> Obama: 11 (first quartile) >>>> Trump: 44 (very last place) >>>> >>>> To be fair, there is only one ranking for Trump... >>> >>> >>> And that one ranking is from APSA. >>> https://www.nas.org/articles/why_im_leaving_the_political_science_association >>> >>>> and presidents tend >>>> to go up a little once their term or terms are done. Maybe Buchanan will >>>> get put back on the bottom. :) >>>> >>> >>> Trump is already the greatest president in American history, and he's still >>> got seven more years to go. >> >> Ah, the is the greatest... but ranked dead last. >> >> Makes complete sense. LOL! >> > >Ranked dead last by a single libtard organization. The people who >matter, such as me, rank him number one of all time. The funny part is that objective organizations have Trump's approval rating at this time in his presidency at a higher number than the Smiling/Dancing Black Man but none of that matters to Michael Glasser, Prescott Computer Guy. If facts disagree with his assumptions, he will dig and dig through the web to find someone who agrees with him, even if it ends up being the KKK or Black Lives Matter.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-26 08:46 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 |
| Message-ID | <fmtdqiFjvnhU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #452468 |
On 5/26/18 8:43 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote: > On Fri, 25 May 2018 22:36:59 +0000 (UTC), owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> > wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 5/25/18 3:11 PM, owl wrote: >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 5/25/18 7:13 AM, quatloo wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 24 May 2018 17:44:34 -0400, Doomsdrzej wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, 24 May 2018 12:39:20 -0500, quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2018 19:22:14 -0400, Doomsdrzej wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2018 17:39:55 -0500, quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2018 20:56:18 +0000, RonB wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Bye "quatloo." Nice not knowing you. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Likewise. You seem to be yet another right wing, racist, conspiracy >>>>>>>>>> theory moron. >>>>>>>>>> Obviously a Trumpee. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> He's already the best president the United States has ever had. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You can't be serious. >>>>>>>> Trump is a buffoon with the vocabulary of an 8th grader, maybe. >>>>>>>> He is one hell of a salesman though. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> He's accomplished more in one year than the Smiling Black Man >>>>>>> accomplished in 8. Hell, see what he got done in just 200 days >>>>>>> <http://start.att.net/news/read/category/news/article/business_insider- >>>>>> heres_how_many_laws_trump_signed_in_his_first_200- >>>>>> newscred2#.WYnMaPhYRgk.twitter> >>>>>> >>>>>> So you are comparing Trump to Obama who might just be the worst president >>>>>> in modern history. >>>>>> Aiming a little low there aren't you? >>>>> >>>>> Obama is generally rated in the first or second quartile. Not only is >>>>> Trump generally rated in the fourth quartile, he is generally rated at >>>>> the very bottom... number 44 of 44. >>>>> >>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_rankings_of_presidents_of_the_United_States#Notable_scholar_surveys> >>>>> OR <https://goo.gl/Jmh9Fh> >>>>> >>>>> The aggregate rankings of the two: >>>>> >>>>> Obama: 11 (first quartile) >>>>> Trump: 44 (very last place) >>>>> >>>>> To be fair, there is only one ranking for Trump... >>>> >>>> >>>> And that one ranking is from APSA. >>>> https://www.nas.org/articles/why_im_leaving_the_political_science_association >>>> >>>>> and presidents tend >>>>> to go up a little once their term or terms are done. Maybe Buchanan will >>>>> get put back on the bottom. :) >>>>> >>>> >>>> Trump is already the greatest president in American history, and he's still >>>> got seven more years to go. >>> >>> Ah, the is the greatest... but ranked dead last. >>> >>> Makes complete sense. LOL! >>> >> >> Ranked dead last by a single libtard organization. The people who >> matter, such as me, rank him number one of all time. > > The funny part is that objective organizations have Trump's approval > rating at this time in his presidency at a higher number than the > Smiling/Dancing Black Man but none of that matters to Michael Glasser, > Prescott Computer Guy. If facts disagree with his assumptions, he will > dig and dig through the web to find someone who agrees with him, even > if it ends up being the KKK or Black Lives Matter. > Seriously, what? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-25 15:39 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit: 273 Carroll: 0 |
| Message-ID | <49091087-eee5-4e52-849d-eff4b6babdbe@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #452372 |
On Friday, May 25, 2018 at 3:31:31 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 5/25/18 3:11 PM, owl wrote: > > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 5/25/18 7:13 AM, quatloo wrote: > >>> On Thu, 24 May 2018 17:44:34 -0400, Doomsdrzej wrote: > >>> > >>>> On Thu, 24 May 2018 12:39:20 -0500, quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2018 19:22:14 -0400, Doomsdrzej wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2018 17:39:55 -0500, quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Wed, 23 May 2018 20:56:18 +0000, RonB wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Bye "quatloo." Nice not knowing you. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Likewise. You seem to be yet another right wing, racist, conspiracy > >>>>>>> theory moron. > >>>>>>> Obviously a Trumpee. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> He's already the best president the United States has ever had. > >>>>> > >>>>> You can't be serious. > >>>>> Trump is a buffoon with the vocabulary of an 8th grader, maybe. > >>>>> He is one hell of a salesman though. > >>>> > >>>> He's accomplished more in one year than the Smiling Black Man > >>>> accomplished in 8. Hell, see what he got done in just 200 days > >>>> <http://start.att.net/news/read/category/news/article/business_insider- > >>> heres_how_many_laws_trump_signed_in_his_first_200- > >>> newscred2#.WYnMaPhYRgk.twitter> > >>> > >>> So you are comparing Trump to Obama who might just be the worst president > >>> in modern history. > >>> Aiming a little low there aren't you? > >> > >> Obama is generally rated in the first or second quartile. Not only is > >> Trump generally rated in the fourth quartile, he is generally rated at > >> the very bottom... number 44 of 44. > >> > >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_rankings_of_presidents_of_the_United_States#Notable_scholar_surveys> > >> OR <https://goo.gl/Jmh9Fh> > >> > >> The aggregate rankings of the two: > >> > >> Obama: 11 (first quartile) > >> Trump: 44 (very last place) > >> > >> To be fair, there is only one ranking for Trump... > > > > > > And that one ranking is from APSA. > > https://www.nas.org/articles/why_im_leaving_the_political_science_association > > > >> and presidents tend > >> to go up a little once their term or terms are done. Maybe Buchanan will > >> get put back on the bottom. :) > >> > > > > Trump is already the greatest president in American history, and he's still > > got seven more years to go. > > Ah, the is the greatest... but ranked dead last. > > Makes complete sense. LOL! > > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> BTW, I've already proved that his use of "herd" to describe true advocates is argumentum ad hominem, since he's likening them to hungry goats. How is LibreOffice on Linux doing anything above the lowest common denominator? Can emoji be concatenated into a string with a logical connection to the "real" world; that is the question posed recently by those astonished at the endless babbling of "advocates" and neck beard freaks. It was Sandman who forged me (and vallor) and bragged about it. Time to blame the Russians! If Sandman calls getting his ass kicked hard like an idiot for over a decade by numerous people (and completely destroying his reputation and any reason for advocates to give credence to anything he has to say - until the cows come home) good 'trolling', then whatever... he is a magnificent troll. I can not go along with that meaning, I use another term. I call Sandman a total lummox. Nobody gets it, I barely understand it. -- Best CMS Solution of 2017! https://youtu.be/VxLiH-x0aeY https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.os.linux.advocacy/smzXrBhsWf4 https://youtu.be/lF8yk7ul4Mw Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web