Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #451200 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-11 16:05 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-05-29 21:02 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 152 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-11 16:05 -0400
More white oppression (which doesn't exist) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-05-11 14:16 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-11 14:44 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-12 10:23 -0400
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 07:28 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-05-12 10:37 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-12 14:17 -0400
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-05-12 15:24 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-15 08:51 -0500
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 07:11 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-05-15 20:39 +0200
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 11:42 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:53 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-15 14:56 -0400
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 12:14 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-05-16 18:08 +0200
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-16 09:30 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-16 09:35 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 10:31 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 10:42 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-16 11:49 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 12:30 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-16 16:19 -0400
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-16 16:01 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-05-15 12:47 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 13:34 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 13:57 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-17 08:00 -0500
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 06:59 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-05-17 13:19 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-18 09:23 -0500
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2018-05-18 15:36 +0100
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-05-18 08:45 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-18 11:27 -0500
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-05-18 09:39 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-18 09:51 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 09:47 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-18 09:49 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 03:44 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-18 09:36 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-17 07:10 -0500
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-17 09:09 -0400
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-17 08:41 -0500
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 07:00 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 06:56 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 02:59 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 20:25 +0000
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 13:38 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-23 17:55 -0400
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 20:22 +0000
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 13:37 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-05-23 18:40 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 06:27 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-24 17:41 -0400
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-05-24 17:43 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 20:18 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 21:01 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 21:32 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 21:52 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 22:06 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 21:08 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-25 08:00 -0400
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-05-25 05:41 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-25 09:14 -0400
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> - 2018-05-25 09:14 -0500
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 09:18 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 10:26 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-25 16:45 -0400
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 14:13 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 09:30 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 10:48 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 10:59 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 11:11 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 11:25 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 11:45 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 13:23 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 14:16 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 07:51 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 09:14 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 14:34 -0500
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-05-25 12:45 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 14:48 -0500
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 09:14 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 07:01 -0500
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-05-25 06:22 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 08:50 -0500
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-05-25 07:21 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 09:27 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-25 16:42 -0400
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 14:05 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 20:04 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 09:28 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-25 16:41 -0400
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 14:25 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-05-25 15:42 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 15:46 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-26 11:48 -0400
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 09:01 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-05-26 09:06 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-26 12:11 -0400
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 09:17 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-05-26 19:21 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 09:07 -0400
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 06:34 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 09:16 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:22 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:03 -0500
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-29 08:05 -0400
Andrzej Matuch averaged 6.8 Posts/Day, 216 last 30 days. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-29 06:23 -0700
Re: Andrzej Matuch averaged 6.8 Posts/Day, 216 last 30 days. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 06:25 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-29 07:56 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 08:47 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-29 17:35 -0400
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 05:22 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 13:26 -0500
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 11:30 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-05-25 12:28 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 14:35 -0500
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 14:42 -0500
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-05-25 12:48 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 14:48 -0500
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-05-25 12:39 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 14:17 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 14:26 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-11 14:40 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-12 13:00 +0000
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 06:09 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 08:31 -0700
More right-wing crybaby illogic (which does exist) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-14 07:25 -0500
Re: More right-wing crybaby illogic (which does exist) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 05:33 -0700
Re: More right-wing crybaby illogic (which does exist) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 19:28 -0700
Re: More right-wing crybaby illogic (which does exist) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-14 08:20 -0500
Re: More right-wing crybaby illogic (which does exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-14 08:25 -0700
Re: More right-wing crybaby illogic (which does exist) RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 20:19 +0000
Re: More right-wing crybaby illogic (which does exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 13:37 -0700
Re: More right-wing crybaby illogic (which does exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-14 08:26 -0700
Re: More right-wing crybaby illogic (which does exist) RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 20:13 +0000
Re: More right-wing crybaby illogic (which does exist) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 13:36 -0700
Re: More right-wing crybaby illogic (which does exist) quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> - 2018-05-23 17:42 -0500
Re: More right-wing crybaby illogic (which does exist) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 19:00 -0700
Re: More right-wing crybaby illogic (which does exist) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 02:50 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 23:45 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 01:52 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 08:54 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 22:41 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 03:48 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 14:31 -0700
Tech question for Carroll Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-29 14:40 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 17:07 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 18:26 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 18:57 -0700
Re: More white oppression (which doesn't exist) Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 21:02 -0700
Page 3 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-17 07:10 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <8irqfdpb07k7mmef57a65tgcggehriirij@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #451430 |
Peter Köhlmann wrote: > chrisv wrote: >> >> -hh wrote: >> >>> The Snowflake protesth too much.... >> >> Hey, -highhorse, who, here, claimed that LibreOffice/OpenOffice is >> "100% compatible" with MS-Office? > >Well, it isn't 100%. But pretty close. >And it works way better to export OO-files to MS-format than the other way >around (import OO-files from MSO) >Not to talk about the *much* better capabilities of OO or LO for Macro-works >compared to MSO. MSO is just plain shite when it comes to Macros in >Documents > >> Who, here, claimed that GIMP is "equal to" Photoshop? > >For the majority of users it is better than PhotoShop, as it does not have >that steep learning curve to be mastered >It is naturally not "equal" to it. Of course, it's trolling 101, to take our quite-reasonable statements and twist them into something they are not. Trolling assholes, like -highhorse, need to *lie* to attack their superiors. -- 'What about all of the claims of how OpenOffice can seamlessly open up Word and Excel documents often better than MS Office. I suppose that was just another "advocate" lie.' - trolling fsckwit "Ezekiel"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-17 09:09 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nnvqfd5oivf9gvqal8v0hhgscqr1rtpsng@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #451563 |
On Thu, 17 May 2018 07:10:34 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >Peter Köhlmann wrote: > >> chrisv wrote: >>> >>> -hh wrote: >>> >>>> The Snowflake protesth too much.... >>> >>> Hey, -highhorse, who, here, claimed that LibreOffice/OpenOffice is >>> "100% compatible" with MS-Office? >> >>Well, it isn't 100%. But pretty close. >>And it works way better to export OO-files to MS-format than the other way >>around (import OO-files from MSO) >>Not to talk about the *much* better capabilities of OO or LO for Macro-works >>compared to MSO. MSO is just plain shite when it comes to Macros in >>Documents >> >>> Who, here, claimed that GIMP is "equal to" Photoshop? >> >>For the majority of users it is better than PhotoShop, as it does not have >>that steep learning curve to be mastered >>It is naturally not "equal" to it. > >Of course, it's trolling 101, to take our quite-reasonable statements >and twist them into something they are not. Trolling assholes, like >-highhorse, need to *lie* to attack their superiors. Are you suggesting that hh has to lie to everyone on Earth?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-17 08:41 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ac1rfdp93p9i4l1mg19mafse032j98ai09@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #451569 |
Doomsdrzej wrote: > chrisv wrote: >> >> Trolling assholes, like -highhorse, need to *lie* to attack their superiors. > > Are you suggesting that hh has to lie to everyone on Earth? No. Only to about 90% of them, and that's only if he's going to attack them. -- "(TomB) even claimed that when I noted how desktop Linux was becoming more efficient, productive, and better at error reduction this was somehow against the open source philosophy." - some thing, lying shamelessly (but no one can quote it lying)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-17 07:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fm5g7cFlv2mU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #451570 |
On 5/17/18 6:41 AM, chrisv wrote:
> Doomsdrzej wrote:
>
>> chrisv wrote:
>>>
>>> Trolling assholes, like -highhorse, need to *lie* to attack their superiors.
>>
>> Are you suggesting that hh has to lie to everyone on Earth?
>
> No. Only to about 90% of them, and that's only if he's going to
> attack them.
>
You keep attacking him for your claim he did as you do:
chrisv:
-----
That thing won't even acknowledge that virtual desktops are a very
nice feature. It claims that they require "too much configuration".
You see, they require that you decide how to organize things on the
desktops.
In other words, in order to enjoy the benefit of a tool, you must
actually use the tool.
Sheesh.
-----
Why not apply the same standard to yourself?
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-17 06:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fm5g0uFlv2mU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #451563 |
On 5/17/18 5:10 AM, chrisv wrote: ... >> For the majority of users it is better than PhotoShop, as it does not have >> that steep learning curve to be mastered >> It is naturally not "equal" to it. > > Of course, it's trolling 101, to take our quite-reasonable statements > and twist them into something they are not. Trolling assholes, like > -highhorse, need to *lie* to attack their superiors. Ah, so you were just following your "trolling 1o1" class when you said this the other day: chrisv: ----- That thing won't even acknowledge that virtual desktops are a very nice feature. It claims that they require "too much configuration". You see, they require that you decide how to organize things on the desktops. In other words, in order to enjoy the benefit of a tool, you must actually use the tool. Sheesh. ----- Thank you for your admission! -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-18 02:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2d49c0da-b7d4-4793-9870-fa6206cd2cfd@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #451563 |
On Thursday, May 17, 2018 at 5:10:37 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote: > Peter Köhlmann wrote: > > > chrisv wrote: > >> > >> -hh wrote: > >> > >>> The Snowflake protesth too much.... > >> > >> Hey, -highhorse, who, here, claimed that LibreOffice/OpenOffice is > >> "100% compatible" with MS-Office? > > > >Well, it isn't 100%. But pretty close. > >And it works way better to export OO-files to MS-format than the other way > >around (import OO-files from MSO) > >Not to talk about the *much* better capabilities of OO or LO for Macro-works > >compared to MSO. MSO is just plain shite when it comes to Macros in > >Documents > > > >> Who, here, claimed that GIMP is "equal to" Photoshop? > > > >For the majority of users it is better than PhotoShop, as it does not have > >that steep learning curve to be mastered > >It is naturally not "equal" to it. > > Of course, it's trolling 101, to take our quite-reasonable statements > and twist them into something they are not. Trolling assholes, like > -highhorse, need to *lie* to attack their superiors. > > -- > 'What about all of the claims of how OpenOffice can seamlessly open up > Word and Excel documents often better than MS Office. I suppose that > was just another "advocate" lie.' - trolling fsckwit "Ezekiel" Yup. It seems this is what we have to defeat. People who have no reason for being here other than to upset me. And in retaliation you have nothing but a crack to start more flooding. Can ASCII characters be concatenated into a string with a logical connection to the "real" world; that is the question posed recently by those astonished at the fire-hose of nonsense from assorted google-posters and basement-dwelling ultra-cranks. Frankly I do not really have any hope. BTW, I've already discussed that his use of "herd" to describe COLA denizens is name calling, since he's likening them to barnyard animals. It was owl who stated that he and his hired winos used to lie to strangers all the time and it was fun, not even to feel guilty about. But when the data were collected, it turns out with absolute proof, owl was far more "narcissistic" than anybody else. -- What Every Entrepreneur Must Know! http://www.5z8.info/add-worm_z4r9qk_fakelogin http://www.5z8.info/how-to-build-a-bomb_h2o1be_peepshow https://youtu.be/48_DdtLGR9s Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 20:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pe4io0$gl4$8@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #451430 |
On 2018-05-15, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > chrisv wrote: > >> -hh wrote: >> >>>The Snowflake protesth too much.... >> >> Hey, -highhorse, who, here, claimed that LibreOffice/OpenOffice is >> "100% compatible" with MS-Office? > > Well, it isn't 100%. But pretty close. > And it works way better to export OO-files to MS-format than the other way > around (import OO-files from MSO) I hardly ever use a word processor now anyhow. Almost all my writing is done in a text editor (usually Jstar – JOE, which I'm using now). But when I do need to read a Microsoft Office document (rarely) it just pops into Libre Office automatically. Non-problem solved. -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 13:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fmm1qkFclp1U7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #452085 |
On 5/23/18 1:25 PM, RonB wrote: > On 2018-05-15, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >> chrisv wrote: >> >>> -hh wrote: >>> >>>> The Snowflake protesth too much.... >>> >>> Hey, -highhorse, who, here, claimed that LibreOffice/OpenOffice is >>> "100% compatible" with MS-Office? >> >> Well, it isn't 100%. But pretty close. >> And it works way better to export OO-files to MS-format than the other way >> around (import OO-files from MSO) > > I hardly ever use a word processor now anyhow. Almost all my writing is done > in a text editor (usually Jstar – JOE, which I'm using now). But when I do > need to read a Microsoft Office document (rarely) it just pops into Libre > Office automatically. > > Non-problem solved. > For your needs, which you describe as quite minimal, Linux works at least well enough. Sure. Nobody is telling you to change. Non-problem solved. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 17:55 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <giobgd50t15v1e9urj8ur2vdvf48lol3jv@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #452085 |
On Wed, 23 May 2018 20:25:36 -0000 (UTC), RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >On 2018-05-15, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >> chrisv wrote: >> >>> -hh wrote: >>> >>>>The Snowflake protesth too much.... >>> >>> Hey, -highhorse, who, here, claimed that LibreOffice/OpenOffice is >>> "100% compatible" with MS-Office? >> >> Well, it isn't 100%. But pretty close. >> And it works way better to export OO-files to MS-format than the other way >> around (import OO-files from MSO) > >I hardly ever use a word processor now anyhow. Almost all my writing is done >in a text editor (usually Jstar – JOE, which I'm using now). But when I do >need to read a Microsoft Office document (rarely) it just pops into Libre >Office automatically. > >Non-problem solved. I just loaded Ubuntu 18.04 from a USB key not 30 minutes ago to see how it changed from the previous edition. While not much seems to have been improved or modified, I could not help but notice how quickly my Word documents loaded in LibreOffice, even when loading from a USB key. What puzzled me though is how my video files, encoded in h.265, refused to load in the bundled Videos application. I figured it was a codec issue but the ones encoded in h.264 were recognized as media needing nothing more than a codec. Instead, the h.265 ones said something about "text files." Does the operating system not support the codec for some reason (despite the fact that they were ripped using Handbrake)?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 20:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pe4ih8$gl4$7@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #451419 |
On 2018-05-15, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > -hh wrote: > >>The Snowflake protesth too much.... > > Hey, -highhorse, who, here, claimed that LibreOffice/OpenOffice is > "100% compatible" with MS-Office? > > Who, here, claimed that GIMP is "equal to" Photoshop? > > No verbose bullshit, just give a name and an exact quote, or, better > yet, a message ID. > > If you think that you can beat us with your lies, you are fooling > yourself, -highhorse. What I've always said about Photoshop is that 99% of the people don't need it. It's basically a professional (niche) tool. And I've said if you're one of the few who do need (or want) it, get a Mac or Windows machine to run it on. Of course "-highorse" would lie about this, that's what he (and his fellow cranks) do. -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 13:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fmm1orFclp1U6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #452084 |
On 5/23/18 1:22 PM, RonB wrote: > On 2018-05-15, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> -hh wrote: >> >>> The Snowflake protesth too much.... >> >> Hey, -highhorse, who, here, claimed that LibreOffice/OpenOffice is >> "100% compatible" with MS-Office? >> >> Who, here, claimed that GIMP is "equal to" Photoshop? >> >> No verbose bullshit, just give a name and an exact quote, or, better >> yet, a message ID. >> >> If you think that you can beat us with your lies, you are fooling >> yourself, -highhorse. > > What I've always said about Photoshop is that 99% of the people don't need > it. Sure: 99% of people have no need for computers. Through most of human history they did not even exist! > It's basically a professional (niche) tool. And I've said if you're one > of the few who do need (or want) it, get a Mac or Windows machine to run it > on. Of course "-highorse" would lie about this, that's what he (and his > fellow cranks) do. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 18:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <122581a1-f87e-423c-a84c-b368b246f88c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #452084 |
On 5/23/18 1:22 PM, RonB wrote: > On 2018-05-15, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> -hh wrote: >> >>> The Snowflake protesth too much.... >> >> Hey, -highhorse, who, here, claimed that LibreOffice/OpenOffice is >> "100% compatible" with MS-Office? >> >> Who, here, claimed that GIMP is "equal to" Photoshop? >> >> No verbose bullshit, just give a name and an exact quote, or, better >> yet, a message ID. >> >> If you think that you can beat us with your lies, you are fooling >> yourself, -highhorse. > > What I've always said about Photoshop is that 99% of the people don't need > it. Said that ever on COLA? Cite, please. > It's basically a professional (niche) tool. And I've said if you're one > of the few who do need (or want) it, get a Mac or Windows machine to run it > on. Of course "-highorse" would lie about this, that's what he (and his > fellow cranks) do. Unsubstantiated Ad Hominem claim. Cite, please. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-24 06:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7a05f995-e06b-497a-b617-317dc76bbb59@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #452121 |
On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 6:40:12 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote: > On 5/23/18 1:22 PM, RonB wrote: > > On 2018-05-15, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >> -hh wrote: > >> > >>> The Snowflake protesth too much.... > >> > >> Hey, -highhorse, who, here, claimed that LibreOffice/OpenOffice is > >> "100% compatible" with MS-Office? > >> > >> Who, here, claimed that GIMP is "equal to" Photoshop? > >> > >> No verbose bullshit, just give a name and an exact quote, or, better > >> yet, a message ID. > >> > >> If you think that you can beat us with your lies, you are fooling > >> yourself, -highhorse. > > > > What I've always said about Photoshop is that 99% of the people don't need > > it. > > Said that ever on COLA? Cite, please. > > > It's basically a professional (niche) tool. And I've said if you're one > > of the few who do need (or want) it, get a Mac or Windows machine to run it > > on. Of course "-highorse" would lie about this, that's what he (and his > > fellow cranks) do. > > Unsubstantiated Ad Hominem claim. Cite, please. > > -hh What were you thinking? Oh goodness, that is just tons of nonsense. You're clueless! Sandman fabricates stories. Here is a list of names Jonas Eklundh has admitted he attributes to Melzzzzz "Cactus Pete", "Donald", "Donald Miller", "Horace McSwain", "Hymen", "meat", "Mike Weaver", "Modena IV Drid", "Omar Murad Asfour", "Rhino Plastee", "Soapy", "SopwithCamel", "Sunny Day", "Takuya Saitoh", "The Letter Q", "tmelmosfire", "zevon". Most of those are names of his buddy Steven Petruzzellis. -- Live on Kickstarter https://youtu.be/r7wys2JvBD0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4xD43Khhkw Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-24 17:41 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pacegd5t6c787nfe03dn5iaaia069citdl@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #452121 |
On Wed, 23 May 2018 18:40:09 -0700 (PDT), -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >On 5/23/18 1:22 PM, RonB wrote: >> On 2018-05-15, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> -hh wrote: >>> >>>> The Snowflake protesth too much.... >>> >>> Hey, -highhorse, who, here, claimed that LibreOffice/OpenOffice is >>> "100% compatible" with MS-Office? >>> >>> Who, here, claimed that GIMP is "equal to" Photoshop? >>> >>> No verbose bullshit, just give a name and an exact quote, or, better >>> yet, a message ID. >>> >>> If you think that you can beat us with your lies, you are fooling >>> yourself, -highhorse. >> >> What I've always said about Photoshop is that 99% of the people don't need >> it. > >Said that ever on COLA? Cite, please. I corroborate his statement. I recall him saying it. >> It's basically a professional (niche) tool. And I've said if you're one >> of the few who do need (or want) it, get a Mac or Windows machine to run it >> on. Of course "-highorse" would lie about this, that's what he (and his >> fellow cranks) do. > >Unsubstantiated Ad Hominem claim. Cite, please. His statement is accurate. Two against one, homie.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-24 17:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <438eaf0f-d23c-4dc3-8b1b-2a137282da53@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #452176 |
On Thursday, May 24, 2018 at 5:41:39 PM UTC-4, Doomsdrzej wrote: > On Wed, 23 May 2018 18:40:09 -0700 (PDT), -hh wrote: > > >On 5/23/18 1:22 PM, RonB wrote: > >> On 2018-05-15, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>> -hh wrote: > >>> > >>>> The Snowflake protesth too much.... > >>> > >>> Hey, -highhorse, who, here, claimed that LibreOffice/OpenOffice is > >>> "100% compatible" with MS-Office? > >>> > >>> Who, here, claimed that GIMP is "equal to" Photoshop? > >>> > >>> No verbose bullshit, just give a name and an exact quote, or, better > >>> yet, a message ID. > >>> > >>> If you think that you can beat us with your lies, you are fooling > >>> yourself, -highhorse. > >> > >> What I've always said about Photoshop is that 99% of the people don't need > >> it. > > > >Said that ever on COLA? Cite, please. > > I corroborate his statement. I recall him saying it. LOL, now you've made an unsubstantiated claim. Once again, Cite, Please. > >> It's basically a professional (niche) tool. And I've said if you're one > >> of the few who do need (or want) it, get a Mac or Windows machine to run it > >> on. Of course "-highorse" would lie about this, that's what he (and his > >> fellow cranks) do. > > > >Unsubstantiated Ad Hominem claim. Cite, please. > > His statement is accurate. Two against one, homie. Incorrect. All you've done is volunteer yourself as also being responsible to provide the relevant citation. Google Groups URL link in your next reply, or a full retraction, else you forfeit all credibility. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-24 20:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fmpdk9F57deU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #452184 |
On 5/24/18 5:43 PM, -hh wrote: > On Thursday, May 24, 2018 at 5:41:39 PM UTC-4, Doomsdrzej wrote: >> On Wed, 23 May 2018 18:40:09 -0700 (PDT), -hh wrote: >> >>> On 5/23/18 1:22 PM, RonB wrote: >>>> On 2018-05-15, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> -hh wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The Snowflake protesth too much.... >>>>> >>>>> Hey, -highhorse, who, here, claimed that LibreOffice/OpenOffice is >>>>> "100% compatible" with MS-Office? >>>>> >>>>> Who, here, claimed that GIMP is "equal to" Photoshop? >>>>> >>>>> No verbose bullshit, just give a name and an exact quote, or, better >>>>> yet, a message ID. >>>>> >>>>> If you think that you can beat us with your lies, you are fooling >>>>> yourself, -highhorse. >>>> >>>> What I've always said about Photoshop is that 99% of the people don't need >>>> it. >>> >>> Said that ever on COLA? Cite, please. >> >> I corroborate his statement. I recall him saying it. > > LOL, now you've made an unsubstantiated claim. Once again, Cite, Please. > >>>> It's basically a professional (niche) tool. And I've said if you're one >>>> of the few who do need (or want) it, get a Mac or Windows machine to run it >>>> on. Of course "-highorse" would lie about this, that's what he (and his >>>> fellow cranks) do. >>> >>> Unsubstantiated Ad Hominem claim. Cite, please. >> >> His statement is accurate. Two against one, homie. > > Incorrect. All you've done is volunteer yourself as also being responsible > to provide the relevant citation. Google Groups URL link in your next reply, > or a full retraction, else you forfeit all credibility. > > > -hh > It is like Carroll claiming he does not have to show I do what he accuses because others "witnessed" it but cannot quote it. Utterly insane of him. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-24 21:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <739926c0-e648-4b46-bcf6-b832fc869a65@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #452187 |
On Thursday, May 24, 2018 at 9:18:36 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 5/24/18 5:43 PM, -hh wrote: > > On Thursday, May 24, 2018 at 5:41:39 PM UTC-4, Doomsdrzej wrote: > >> On Wed, 23 May 2018 18:40:09 -0700 (PDT), -hh wrote: > >> > >>> On 5/23/18 1:22 PM, RonB wrote: > >>>> On 2018-05-15, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>>>> -hh wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> The Snowflake protesth too much.... > >>>>> > >>>>> Hey, -highhorse, who, here, claimed that LibreOffice/OpenOffice is > >>>>> "100% compatible" with MS-Office? > >>>>> > >>>>> Who, here, claimed that GIMP is "equal to" Photoshop? > >>>>> > >>>>> No verbose bullshit, just give a name and an exact quote, or, better > >>>>> yet, a message ID. > >>>>> > >>>>> If you think that you can beat us with your lies, you are fooling > >>>>> yourself, -highhorse. > >>>> > >>>> What I've always said about Photoshop is that 99% of the people don't need > >>>> it. > >>> > >>> Said that ever on COLA? Cite, please. > >> > >> I corroborate his statement. I recall him saying it. > > > > LOL, now you've made an unsubstantiated claim. Once again, Cite, Please. > > > >>>> It's basically a professional (niche) tool. And I've said if you're one > >>>> of the few who do need (or want) it, get a Mac or Windows machine to run it > >>>> on. Of course "-highorse" would lie about this, that's what he (and his > >>>> fellow cranks) do. > >>> > >>> Unsubstantiated Ad Hominem claim. Cite, please. > >> > >> His statement is accurate. Two against one, homie. > > > > Incorrect. All you've done is volunteer yourself as also being responsible > > to provide the relevant citation. Google Groups URL link in your next reply, > > or a full retraction, else you forfeit all credibility. > > > > > > -hh > > > > It is like Carroll claiming he does not have to show I do what he > accuses because others "witnessed" it but cannot quote it. > > Utterly insane of him. What's really insane here, ironically so, is that you,-hh and I were all involved in a thread that had -hh and Photoshop in the title one month ago :) (and ...yes, the answer to this puzzle can be found in it)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-24 21:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fmphu1F61hdU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #452194 |
On 5/24/18 9:01 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Thursday, May 24, 2018 at 9:18:36 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 5/24/18 5:43 PM, -hh wrote: >>> On Thursday, May 24, 2018 at 5:41:39 PM UTC-4, Doomsdrzej wrote: >>>> On Wed, 23 May 2018 18:40:09 -0700 (PDT), -hh wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 5/23/18 1:22 PM, RonB wrote: >>>>>> On 2018-05-15, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> -hh wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The Snowflake protesth too much.... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hey, -highhorse, who, here, claimed that LibreOffice/OpenOffice is >>>>>>> "100% compatible" with MS-Office? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Who, here, claimed that GIMP is "equal to" Photoshop? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No verbose bullshit, just give a name and an exact quote, or, better >>>>>>> yet, a message ID. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you think that you can beat us with your lies, you are fooling >>>>>>> yourself, -highhorse. >>>>>> >>>>>> What I've always said about Photoshop is that 99% of the people don't need >>>>>> it. >>>>> >>>>> Said that ever on COLA? Cite, please. >>>> >>>> I corroborate his statement. I recall him saying it. >>> >>> LOL, now you've made an unsubstantiated claim. Once again, Cite, Please. >>> >>>>>> It's basically a professional (niche) tool. And I've said if you're one >>>>>> of the few who do need (or want) it, get a Mac or Windows machine to run it >>>>>> on. Of course "-highorse" would lie about this, that's what he (and his >>>>>> fellow cranks) do. >>>>> >>>>> Unsubstantiated Ad Hominem claim. Cite, please. >>>> >>>> His statement is accurate. Two against one, homie. >>> >>> Incorrect. All you've done is volunteer yourself as also being responsible >>> to provide the relevant citation. Google Groups URL link in your next reply, >>> or a full retraction, else you forfeit all credibility. >>> >>> >>> -hh >>> >> >> It is like Carroll claiming he does not have to show I do what he >> accuses because others "witnessed" it but cannot quote it. >> >> Utterly insane of him. > > What's really insane here, ironically so, is that you,-hh and I > were all involved in a thread that had -hh and Photoshop in the > title one month ago :) > > (and ...yes, the answer to this puzzle can be found in it) > In other words you are pretending to have found a quote but instead of sharing it you want to just troll. LOL! But let us assume you are right... you found that very quickly. Meanwhile you have spent over a decade trying to find "lies" by me but it is trivial to show more lies from you in a day than you can find from me in a year. Good job shooting yourself in the foot. Again. :) -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-24 21:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <26e7ef44-53d2-4fd0-b62d-071e94a49869@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #452198 |
On Thursday, May 24, 2018 at 10:32:04 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 5/24/18 9:01 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Thursday, May 24, 2018 at 9:18:36 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 5/24/18 5:43 PM, -hh wrote: > >>> On Thursday, May 24, 2018 at 5:41:39 PM UTC-4, Doomsdrzej wrote: > >>>> On Wed, 23 May 2018 18:40:09 -0700 (PDT), -hh wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On 5/23/18 1:22 PM, RonB wrote: > >>>>>> On 2018-05-15, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>>>>>> -hh wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> The Snowflake protesth too much.... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hey, -highhorse, who, here, claimed that LibreOffice/OpenOffice is > >>>>>>> "100% compatible" with MS-Office? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Who, here, claimed that GIMP is "equal to" Photoshop? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> No verbose bullshit, just give a name and an exact quote, or, better > >>>>>>> yet, a message ID. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> If you think that you can beat us with your lies, you are fooling > >>>>>>> yourself, -highhorse. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> What I've always said about Photoshop is that 99% of the people don't need > >>>>>> it. > >>>>> > >>>>> Said that ever on COLA? Cite, please. > >>>> > >>>> I corroborate his statement. I recall him saying it. > >>> > >>> LOL, now you've made an unsubstantiated claim. Once again, Cite, Please. > >>> > >>>>>> It's basically a professional (niche) tool. And I've said if you're one > >>>>>> of the few who do need (or want) it, get a Mac or Windows machine to run it > >>>>>> on. Of course "-highorse" would lie about this, that's what he (and his > >>>>>> fellow cranks) do. > >>>>> > >>>>> Unsubstantiated Ad Hominem claim. Cite, please. > >>>> > >>>> His statement is accurate. Two against one, homie. > >>> > >>> Incorrect. All you've done is volunteer yourself as also being responsible > >>> to provide the relevant citation. Google Groups URL link in your next reply, > >>> or a full retraction, else you forfeit all credibility. > >>> > >>> > >>> -hh > >>> > >> > >> It is like Carroll claiming he does not have to show I do what he > >> accuses because others "witnessed" it but cannot quote it. > >> > >> Utterly insane of him. > > > > What's really insane here, ironically so, is that you,-hh and I > > were all involved in a thread that had -hh and Photoshop in the > > title one month ago :) > > > > (and ...yes, the answer to this puzzle can be found in it) > > > In other words you are pretending to have found a quote In other words, you're always on the "wrong" side of the argument ;) I didn't find anything, I actually remember the thread because you were calling RonB silly in it when you were the one being silly. > But let us assume you are right... LOL! Like you haven't already looked. People are not as stupid as you need them to be. Learn it, live it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-24 22:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fmpjueF6eo8U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #452198 |
On 5/24/18 9:32 PM, Snit wrote: ... >>> It is like Carroll claiming he does not have to show I do what he >>> accuses because others "witnessed" it but cannot quote it. >>> >>> Utterly insane of him. >> >> What's really insane here, ironically so, is that you,-hh and I >> were all involved in a thread that had -hh and Photoshop in the >> title one month ago :) >> >> (and ...yes, the answer to this puzzle can be found in it) >> > In other words you are pretending to have found a quote but instead of > sharing it you want to just troll. LOL! > > But let us assume you are right... you found that very quickly. > Meanwhile you have spent over a decade trying to find "lies" by me but > it is trivial to show more lies from you in a day than you can find from > me in a year. > > Good job shooting yourself in the foot. Again. :) > More snip snip from Carroll... he knows he has NO real point. And he knows I am right about him lying more in a day than I do in a year. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web