Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #451234 > unrolled thread
| Started by | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-12 12:38 +0000 |
| Last post | 2018-05-13 05:17 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 527 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-12 12:38 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-12 14:35 +0000
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-13 00:48 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-12 19:02 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-13 04:28 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-12 21:42 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-12 22:52 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-13 16:58 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-13 10:13 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-13 18:22 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-13 11:28 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 13:33 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-13 13:43 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 14:16 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-13 16:48 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 17:59 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 18:33 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-13 19:50 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 20:40 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-13 21:49 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 22:46 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 10:15 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-14 11:15 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 11:27 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-14 18:30 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 13:09 -0700
Does anyone here know of a proud bot owner who'd... Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-14 13:36 -0700
Re: Does anyone here know of a proud bot owner who'd... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 14:13 -0700
Re: Does anyone here know of a proud bot owner who'd... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-14 14:45 -0700
Re: Does anyone here know of a proud bot owner who'd... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-14 14:43 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-14 14:42 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 15:22 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-14 15:41 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 16:54 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-14 17:00 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 19:53 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 20:04 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-14 20:22 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 20:34 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-14 20:37 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 20:50 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-14 20:56 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 23:24 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 21:00 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-14 21:18 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:01 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 11:25 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:58 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 12:15 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 13:10 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 13:47 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 13:59 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 14:08 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 14:30 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 15:48 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 16:17 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 16:26 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 17:38 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 20:14 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 16:18 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 16:43 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 16:50 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 17:22 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 17:26 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 17:36 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 18:05 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 20:55 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-13 20:48 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-13 14:06 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-15 18:41 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:58 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-15 19:31 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 12:08 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-15 19:54 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 13:07 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 13:44 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 13:43 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-15 21:33 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 14:36 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-15 21:53 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 14:56 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-16 00:49 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 17:59 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-16 01:47 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 18:52 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-16 02:05 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 19:09 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 01:10 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 19:11 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 19:07 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 19:06 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-16 23:20 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-16 19:47 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-17 05:45 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 06:02 +0000
Re: Observations Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-17 09:01 -0400
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 07:14 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-17 15:16 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 08:46 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-17 16:26 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 09:42 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 10:21 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 09:57 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 10:26 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 10:33 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 11:08 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 14:07 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 14:14 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 14:45 -0700
Re: Observations chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-17 11:57 -0500
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 10:22 -0700
Re: Observations Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-17 13:44 -0400
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 10:52 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-17 18:33 +0000
Re: Observations chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-17 14:26 -0500
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 14:13 -0700
Re: Observations Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-17 16:43 -0400
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 14:44 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 14:09 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 14:16 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 14:46 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-17 22:29 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 15:40 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 12:53 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 14:36 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 15:30 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 15:42 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-17 23:14 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 17:07 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-18 00:39 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 18:02 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-18 01:17 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 18:30 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 11:57 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-18 12:52 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 14:45 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-18 15:39 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 18:27 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 19:21 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 19:49 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 20:08 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 20:17 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 20:25 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 20:37 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 20:53 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 21:10 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 21:22 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 21:31 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 12:04 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-18 13:03 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 13:12 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-18 13:34 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 13:50 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-18 14:02 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-18 15:37 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 15:47 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-18 15:50 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 17:04 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 17:53 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-18 18:29 -0700
Re: Observations Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-19 01:33 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-18 18:39 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 19:12 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-18 20:13 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 23:03 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 08:16 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-19 08:28 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 08:47 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-19 08:50 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 09:00 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-19 09:03 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 09:25 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-19 09:27 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 09:32 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 17:39 -0700
Re: Observations chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 07:16 -0500
Re: Observations Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-21 09:20 -0400
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 07:23 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 08:41 -0700
Re: Observations chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-22 08:22 -0500
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-21 09:31 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 09:59 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 11:23 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-21 19:28 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 14:39 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 20:21 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 00:31 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 09:09 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 09:47 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 10:04 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 10:17 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 10:29 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 10:42 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 10:38 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 10:58 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 11:05 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 11:36 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 11:44 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 12:32 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 12:36 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 12:44 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 12:48 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 13:20 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 13:31 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 14:36 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 15:04 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 15:23 -0700
Don't expect a good response. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-22 15:12 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 15:53 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 16:46 -0700
innerText Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-22 16:59 -0700
Re: innerText Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 17:39 -0700
Re: innerText Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 18:06 -0700
Re: innerText Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-23 01:18 +0000
Re: innerText Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 18:21 -0700
Re: innerText Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 18:32 -0700
Re: innerText Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 18:32 -0700
Re: innerText Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 18:49 -0700
Re: innerText RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 20:09 +0000
Why ? What's the goal ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-22 18:46 -0700
Re: Why ? What's the goal ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 19:10 -0700
Re: Why ? What's the goal ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 19:30 -0700
Re: Why ? What's the goal ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 19:28 -0700
Re: Why ? What's the goal ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 20:37 -0700
Re: innerText Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 17:46 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 18:05 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 19:13 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 19:31 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 07:45 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 08:43 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 09:12 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 09:24 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 09:49 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 12:34 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 12:56 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 13:34 -0700
Tables Within Tables. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-23 13:56 -0700
Re: Tables Within Tables. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 14:10 -0700
If not a .CSV file, then what ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-23 14:47 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 15:19 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 17:59 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 19:14 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 19:42 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 12:23 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> - 2018-05-24 14:42 -0500
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 13:13 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> - 2018-05-25 09:21 -0500
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 09:13 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 09:22 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> - 2018-05-25 12:08 -0500
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 10:20 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 10:28 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 10:38 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 10:49 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 10:56 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 20:41 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 21:08 -0700
Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-25 11:22 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 11:50 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 11:55 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 12:45 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 14:12 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 14:42 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 15:23 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 15:39 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 16:12 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 18:25 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 18:56 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-26 02:24 +0000
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 19:35 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 19:46 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 19:51 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 19:05 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 15:26 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 16:13 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 18:42 -0700
Michael's PlanetKilling carbon dioxide. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-26 02:27 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 15:32 -0700
"trolling and flooding" your way to freedom, divorce. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-26 02:12 -0700
Re: "trolling and flooding" your way to freedom, divorce. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 02:36 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 12:01 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 11:13 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 09:14 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 09:17 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 09:31 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 09:43 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 09:53 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 10:18 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 09:54 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 20:40 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 10:11 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 20:39 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> - 2018-05-25 12:09 -0500
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 10:16 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 10:24 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 10:43 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 10:50 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 14:15 -0700
Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-26 02:44 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 09:53 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 10:15 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 11:48 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 11:58 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 12:06 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 12:13 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 12:41 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 20:21 +0000
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 14:05 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 14:46 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 16:04 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 16:27 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 16:31 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 16:40 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 16:58 -0700
Tech question for Carroll Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 17:14 -0700
Re: Tech question for Carroll Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 12:27 -0700
Re: Tech question for Carroll Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 12:50 -0700
Re: Tech question for Carroll Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-29 08:52 -0700
Re: Tech question for Carroll Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 09:18 -0700
Re: Tech question for Carroll Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-29 20:41 +0000
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 16:53 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 17:21 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 17:45 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 22:59 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 17:35 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 21:26 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 09:28 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:42 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 10:33 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 11:31 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 10:42 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 11:04 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 11:19 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 11:43 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 11:59 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 12:51 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 12:56 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:06 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 13:12 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:36 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 14:11 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 14:56 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 15:59 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 16:05 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 16:27 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 17:01 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 20:12 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 21:22 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 06:41 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 18:12 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-28 19:06 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 11:48 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 11:55 -0700
Tech question for Carroll Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-29 14:41 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-29 12:12 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:13 -0700
Tech question for Carroll Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-29 14:40 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:36 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 19:28 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 13:02 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:12 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 13:27 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:48 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:37 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 12:18 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 15:56 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 14:23 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 14:48 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 15:30 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 17:43 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 20:03 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 10:21 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 13:09 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 14:00 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 16:51 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 20:17 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 20:53 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 21:30 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 21:47 -0700
The head shrinker. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-24 22:13 -0700
Re: The head shrinker. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 22:18 -0700
Re: The head shrinker. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 22:22 -0700
Re: The head shrinker. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 22:24 -0700
"kinder" is German for "children". Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-24 22:39 -0700
Re: "kinder" is German for "children". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 23:26 -0700
Re: "kinder" is German for "children". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 08:58 -0700
Re: "kinder" is German for "children". quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> - 2018-05-25 09:15 -0500
Re: "kinder" is German for "children". Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 07:35 -0700
Re: "kinder" is German for "children". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 08:55 -0700
Re: "kinder" is German for "children". Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 09:24 -0700
Re: The head shrinker. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 22:19 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 22:04 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 22:10 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 22:16 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 22:22 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 22:25 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 20:19 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 20:25 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 21:06 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 23:26 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 02:35 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 13:16 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 15:30 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 15:44 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 16:32 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 18:53 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 19:28 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 19:42 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 19:57 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 20:01 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 20:10 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 20:13 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 20:37 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 20:44 -0700
Ping Carroll: Why all the trolling? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 19:03 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-23 07:15 -0500
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 07:16 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 07:19 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 07:48 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-23 07:45 -0400
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 04:58 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 12:48 +0000
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 06:17 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 07:19 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 07:35 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 07:53 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 08:17 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 08:52 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 09:22 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 09:34 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 10:01 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 12:36 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 13:28 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 13:39 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 10:09 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 09:38 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 12:37 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 13:01 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 14:52 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 10:37 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 17:13 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-18 17:14 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 10:21 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-19 10:25 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 18:24 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 18:25 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 08:48 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 09:12 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 09:09 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 09:16 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 09:37 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 10:19 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-17 18:55 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 14:12 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-17 22:09 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 15:18 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-17 22:41 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 15:44 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-17 23:08 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 16:19 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-17 23:29 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 17:10 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 12:34 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 14:34 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 15:23 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 15:40 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 16:39 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 18:20 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 19:06 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 19:44 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 20:02 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 20:13 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 20:55 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 21:15 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 22:19 -0700
Re: Observations Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-16 07:38 -0400
Re: Observations chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-16 07:53 -0500
Re: Observations Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-16 09:00 -0400
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-16 07:14 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-16 07:03 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-16 07:16 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 10:45 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-16 11:54 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 12:04 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 12:33 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 12:03 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-16 12:24 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 12:29 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 08:15 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 08:38 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 08:47 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 09:08 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 08:15 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 09:10 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-12 17:20 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 10:34 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-12 17:46 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 11:02 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-13 04:34 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 10:17 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-13 18:26 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 12:49 -0700
Re: Observations "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-13 19:26 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-13 12:34 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 12:48 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 12:51 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 12:52 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 13:39 -0700
Re: Observations "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-13 21:03 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 14:11 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 17:16 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 13:49 -0700
Re: Observations "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-12 19:41 +0000
Re: Observations Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-12 16:06 -0400
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-12 13:23 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-12 20:52 +0000
Re: Observations "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-12 21:12 +0000
Re: Observations Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-05-12 23:52 +0200
Re: Observations Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-12 21:04 -0400
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-12 18:38 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-12 19:03 -0700
Re: Observations chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-14 07:05 -0500
Re: Observations Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-05-14 23:48 +0200
Re: Observations chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-15 09:27 -0500
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 07:43 -0700
Wintroll predictions chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-22 08:06 -0500
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-13 05:17 +0000
Page 22 of 27 — ← Prev page 1 … 20 21 [22] 23 24 … 27 Next page →
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 04:58 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Don't expect a good response. |
| Message-ID | <f9b1077c-5566-460a-afed-a18e389b7b74@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #452021 |
On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 4:45:28 AM UTC-7, Doomsdrzej wrote: > On Tue, 22 May 2018 15:12:26 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: > > >I _love_ to post code here because it really, really helps me; > >however, I know that no one here wants to see it, quite the opposite. > > > >So post away, Steve, but don't expect a good response. > > It's Windows code in most cases so I can't imagine why anyone here in > a Linux advocacy group would want to see it. I thought showing Chris Ahlstrom a taste of his own medicine might help the situation. It did not. Lots of morons are now yapping about the GNU/Linux "CLI" as if something like that seriously is a goal of the community. Turns out Chris Ahlstrom's non-stop flooding comments of Prescott Computer Guy met his own definition of trolling, so he insisted that comment of his was forged by Prescott Computer Guy. If you have 'myFile.doc' open in an application such as emacs and you want to change its name to 'linux.txt' via a proxy icon, Prescott Computer Guy's video might be useful, if only to build a set of script tools. -- Top 15 Ways Chris Ahlstrom Trolls!! https://youtu.be/BUjnZhKk1Bg http://www.5z8.info/nic_cage_naked_y8b5qk_torrentEverything Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 12:48 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Don't expect a good response. |
| Message-ID | <fml68bF6gdpU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #452021 |
Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > On Tue, 22 May 2018 15:12:26 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: > >> I _love_ to post code here because it really, really helps me; >> however, I know that no one here wants to see it, quite the opposite. >> >> So post away, Steve, but don't expect a good response. > > It's Windows code in most cases so I can't imagine why anyone here in > a Linux advocacy group would want to see it. > It is JavaScript he is running on a Mac though it should work on Windows or Linux; apparently tied to his Usenet flooder.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 06:17 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Don't expect a good response. |
| Message-ID | <f65faf5e-8da2-4180-a2c6-11a7a62686b3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #452026 |
On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 5:48:15 AM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > > On Tue, 22 May 2018 15:12:26 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: > > > >> I _love_ to post code here because it really, really helps me; > >> however, I know that no one here wants to see it, quite the opposite. > >> > >> So post away, Steve, but don't expect a good response. > > > > It's Windows code in most cases so I can't imagine why anyone here in > > a Linux advocacy group would want to see it. > > > > It is JavaScript he is running on a Mac though it should work on Windows or > Linux; apparently tied to his Usenet flooder. I just set a filter and never see the flooding. Peter Kohlmann's nonsense has made a total cesspool of COLA via GG, so I don't even try posting to anything with my client anymore. One thing he has done with this nonsense is that the Peter Kohlmann boycott is now done by everyone. Oh goodness, that is just tons of drivel. Are you being idiotic on purpose? Can you get DFS to agree? It was Peter Kohlmann who got busted using dozens of nyms for years, and these are 'people' who come clearly out of the blue immediately into threads where he was getting his ass handed to him... over and over for over a decade. - My Snoring Solution http://www.5z8.info/how-to-build-a-bomb_h2o1be_peepshow http://www.5z8.info/trojan_p4g1zy_how-to-skin-a-gerbil https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 07:19 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Don't expect a good response. |
| Message-ID | <11996aa4-52f6-4987-9f61-a9a5523e5343@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #452026 |
On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 6:48:15 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > > On Tue, 22 May 2018 15:12:26 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: > > > >> I _love_ to post code here because it really, really helps me; > >> however, I know that no one here wants to see it, quite the opposite. > >> > >> So post away, Steve, but don't expect a good response. > > > > It's Windows code in most cases so I can't imagine why anyone here in > > a Linux advocacy group would want to see it. > > > > It is JavaScript he is running on a Mac though it should work on Windows or > Linux; apparently tied to his Usenet flooder. Why don't you explain why I'd need to reference *multiple* tables (which have no ids, only a common class) when you'd only need to reference 1 on GG, which has an id. Oh, that's right, you have to appear clueless on this <eyeyroll>. People are not as stupid as you need them to be.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 07:35 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Don't expect a good response. |
| Message-ID | <ffdc7f23-c8d0-4fd3-862f-597ac85ae3d8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #452033 |
On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 7:19:43 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 6:48:15 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > > > On Tue, 22 May 2018 15:12:26 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: > > > > > >> I _love_ to post code here because it really, really helps me; > > >> however, I know that no one here wants to see it, quite the opposite. > > >> > > >> So post away, Steve, but don't expect a good response. > > > > > > It's Windows code in most cases so I can't imagine why anyone here in > > > a Linux advocacy group would want to see it. > > > > > > > It is JavaScript he is running on a Mac though it should work on Windows or > > Linux; apparently tied to his Usenet flooder. > > Why don't you explain why I'd need to reference *multiple* > tables (which have no ids, only a common class) when you'd > only need to reference 1 on GG, which has an id. Oh, that's > right, you have to appear clueless on this <eyeyroll>. > > People are not as stupid as you need them to be. I'm not going to pretend Troll Killer Snit didn't square me away with scripting and I am indebted to him for his time. Melzzzz has this thread as an example and should learn to at least pretend he is not just making things up from here on. I think we have different views for a good reason. He upsets an entire group of people who are just bystanders, but that's a conceited fool for you. What others care about isn't a factor. By listening to 'lawyers' like that you get phrases like 'religious freedom'. Carried to its (ir)rational progression, the insistence that it's 'partisan' for a hetero dude to not wish to screw a gay man is pushed. -- "You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him. He clearly wants the attention" Steve Carroll, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 07:53 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Don't expect a good response. |
| Message-ID | <fmldjkF84egU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #452033 |
On 5/23/18 7:19 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 6:48:15 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>> On Tue, 22 May 2018 15:12:26 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: >>> >>>> I _love_ to post code here because it really, really helps me; >>>> however, I know that no one here wants to see it, quite the opposite. >>>> >>>> So post away, Steve, but don't expect a good response. >>> >>> It's Windows code in most cases so I can't imagine why anyone here in >>> a Linux advocacy group would want to see it. >>> >> >> It is JavaScript he is running on a Mac though it should work on Windows or >> Linux; apparently tied to his Usenet flooder. > > Why don't you explain why I'd need to reference *multiple* > tables (which have no ids, only a common class) when you'd > only need to reference 1 on GG, which has an id. Oh, that's > right, you have to appear clueless on this <eyeyroll>. I have not looked at the Google Groups code and I *am* largely clueless about this. But, as usual, I am seen as an expert (or at least knowledgeable) about pretty much every tech topic. I COULD NOT do as you are doing. Does not mean I could not learn, but I have NO desire to flood COLA and other Usenet groups. > People are not as stupid as you need them to be. The fact you keep going to the idea of people being stupid is quite telling. YOU think they are stupid enough to think I am a secret programmer and Hollywood hacker who could hack your gmail account in a way Google and "several federal agencies" could not stop. In order for your stories about me to be true I would have to be one of the best hackers in the world, and at least a rather competent programmer. Sandman (who seems to be MIA) *is* a competent programmer, and has shown he has his own Usenet client. The idea you and he have access to YOUR account and can do what you do is, well, hard to NOT believe. :) -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 08:17 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Don't expect a good response. |
| Message-ID | <da7cbd4f-b17c-41fe-a816-51155bfcacb4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #452037 |
On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 8:53:44 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 5/23/18 7:19 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 6:48:15 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > >>> On Tue, 22 May 2018 15:12:26 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: > >>> > >>>> I _love_ to post code here because it really, really helps me; > >>>> however, I know that no one here wants to see it, quite the opposite. > >>>> > >>>> So post away, Steve, but don't expect a good response. > >>> > >>> It's Windows code in most cases so I can't imagine why anyone here in > >>> a Linux advocacy group would want to see it. > >>> > >> > >> It is JavaScript he is running on a Mac though it should work on Windows or > >> Linux; apparently tied to his Usenet flooder. > > > > Why don't you explain why I'd need to reference *multiple* > > tables (which have no ids, only a common class) when you'd > > only need to reference 1 on GG, which has an id. Oh, that's > > right, you have to appear clueless on this <eyeyroll>. > > I have not looked at the Google Groups code and I *am* largely clueless > about this. But, as usual, I am seen as an expert (or at least > knowledgeable) about pretty much every tech topic. > > I COULD NOT do as you are doing. Virtually anyone could do it, I have previously shown how easy it'd be to automate the posts. I wrote that example in a few minutes, it took several more to get the delays dialed in. It's "interesting" how you were once begging people to explain how it could be done, yet, now you're trying to distance yourself. Again, people are not as stupid as you need them to be. > The fact you keep going to the idea of people being stupid is quite > telling. That's the basis for most of what you write. You *obviously* believe you're smarter than "others", if you didn't you wouldn't tell the ridiculous BS you do. > Sandman (who seems to be MIA) *is* a competent programmer, and has shown > he has his own Usenet client. The idea you and he have access to YOUR > account and can do what you do is, well, hard to NOT believe. :) For an over-medicated nitwit wearing a tin foil hat, probably not. For those with working brain cells, it makes no sense for me to do it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 08:52 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Don't expect a good response. |
| Message-ID | <fmlh23F8tjmU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #452039 |
On 5/23/18 8:17 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 8:53:44 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 5/23/18 7:19 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 6:48:15 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>> Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 22 May 2018 15:12:26 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I _love_ to post code here because it really, really helps me; >>>>>> however, I know that no one here wants to see it, quite the opposite. >>>>>> >>>>>> So post away, Steve, but don't expect a good response. >>>>> >>>>> It's Windows code in most cases so I can't imagine why anyone here in >>>>> a Linux advocacy group would want to see it. >>>>> >>>> >>>> It is JavaScript he is running on a Mac though it should work on Windows or >>>> Linux; apparently tied to his Usenet flooder. >>> >>> Why don't you explain why I'd need to reference *multiple* >>> tables (which have no ids, only a common class) when you'd >>> only need to reference 1 on GG, which has an id. Oh, that's >>> right, you have to appear clueless on this <eyeyroll>. >> >> I have not looked at the Google Groups code and I *am* largely clueless >> about this. But, as usual, I am seen as an expert (or at least >> knowledgeable) about pretty much every tech topic. >> >> I COULD NOT do as you are doing. > > Virtually anyone could do it, I have previously shown > how easy it'd be to automate the posts. The fact YOU can do it does not show others can. In fact, other than you and Sandman, I have not seen ANYONE showing evidence of scripting Usenet posts. > I wrote that > example in a few minutes, it took several more to get > the delays dialed in. It's "interesting" how you were > once begging people to explain how it could be done, > yet, now you're trying to distance yourself. Again, > people are not as stupid as you need them to be. I am curious how you do it... though not to the point of wanting you to post the code. How do you get all the phrases that it uses? You spoke of using a "Mad Lib" type algorithm... so you likely have some system to grab sentences from Usenet or elsewhere and then swap out parts of speech... but it seems a lot more coherent than that. So how do you do it? >> The fact you keep going to the idea of people being stupid is quite >> telling. > > That's the basis for most of what you write. You > *obviously* believe you're smarter than "others", > if you didn't you wouldn't tell the ridiculous BS > you do. Do you understand how transparent your "speculations" and attempts to speak for me are? It is just another dodging method by you... it is a FACT you repeatedly focus on people being "stupid"... but then you, as you do with everything, project your own issues onto me. You blame me for YOUR own weaknesses. >> Sandman (who seems to be MIA) *is* a competent programmer, and has shown >> he has his own Usenet client. The idea you and he have access to YOUR >> account and can do what you do is, well, hard to NOT believe. :) > > For an over-medicated nitwit wearing a tin foil hat, > probably not. For those with working brain cells, it > makes no sense for me to do it. See: another dodge from you. It is simply a fact that, contrary to your claims, NOBODY hacked ANY Gmail account of yours in a way that you, Google, and "several federal agencies" could not stop. And it was such an amazingly absurd lie to say that Google decided to keep forged messages public so they could do ANYTHING with them. The lies you have told as you blame me for your actions are absurd and no rational person with even minor tech understanding or even understanding of how investigations work at a minimum level could believe them. That is simply a fact. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 09:22 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Don't expect a good response. |
| Message-ID | <34d41cdb-abad-4f7c-b005-57146862b8ab@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #452043 |
On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 9:52:39 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> I COULD NOT do as you are doing. > > > > Virtually anyone could do it, I have previously shown > > how easy it'd be to automate the posts. > > The fact YOU can do it does not show others can. In fact, other than you > and Sandman, I have not seen ANYONE showing evidence of scripting Usenet > posts. You keep pushing the idea that this is difficult and that you know *nothing* about how to do it. How can a guy who has written a chatbot to run on AOL not have an idea about this? Simple... it's the 'everyone is as stupid as he needs them to be' method. > > I wrote that > > example in a few minutes, it took several more to get > > the delays dialed in. It's "interesting" how you were > > once begging people to explain how it could be done, > > yet, now you're trying to distance yourself. Again, > > people are not as stupid as you need them to be. > > I am curious how you do it... though not to the point of wanting you to > post the code. How do you get all the phrases that it uses? I don't do that but I know how it could be done and anyone who has written a chatbot would know, too. > >> The fact you keep going to the idea of people being stupid is quite > >> telling. > > > > That's the basis for most of what you write. You > > *obviously* believe you're smarter than "others", > > if you didn't you wouldn't tell the ridiculous BS > > you do. > > Do you understand how transparent your "speculations" and attempts to > speak for me are? You speak for you and your message is clear... and it's what I said it is. Contrary to your obvious belief, people aren't as stupid as you need them to be.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 09:34 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Don't expect a good response. |
| Message-ID | <fmljh0F9g09U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #452049 |
On 5/23/18 9:22 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 9:52:39 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>> I COULD NOT do as you are doing. >>> >>> Virtually anyone could do it, I have previously shown >>> how easy it'd be to automate the posts. >> >> The fact YOU can do it does not show others can. In fact, other than you >> and Sandman, I have not seen ANYONE showing evidence of scripting Usenet >> posts. > > You keep pushing the idea that this is difficult and that you know > *nothing* about how to do it. How can a guy who has written a > chatbot to run on AOL not have an idea about this? Simple... > it's the 'everyone is as stupid as he needs them to be' method. What do you think an AIM chat bot has to do with posting via Google Groups? And remember how you have claimed I stole even that code! But the fact you do shows your thinking: once again you are working to one-up me. You know of my AIM bot and you wanted to show you could do more. Guess what: you failed. Sure, you learned JavaScipt and how to work with DOM, but you failed to have your bot show any "understanding" of what it replies to. It just posts stuff at the end of posts. My bot "read" and "understood" what was being said (on a very rudimentary level... really just a lookup table that roughly faked "understanding" and a list of "good" and "bad" people based on words they used, but it was good enough to often convince people for hours it was human). You have shown you can do some things I cannot... but with the actual human-like interaction, as bad as mine was, it was miles ahead of you (mine was a great AIM bot, but it was not anything approaching real AI). >>> I wrote that >>> example in a few minutes, it took several more to get >>> the delays dialed in. It's "interesting" how you were >>> once begging people to explain how it could be done, >>> yet, now you're trying to distance yourself. Again, >>> people are not as stupid as you need them to be. >> >> I am curious how you do it... though not to the point of wanting you to >> post the code. How do you get all the phrases that it uses? > > I don't do that but I know how it could be done and anyone > who has written a chatbot would know, too. My AIM bot worked completely differently... as noted, it read responses, looked for keywords, looked for the person posting and rated them on a "nice" and "mean" scale, and then just had a lookup table of sorts. Your bot came after I open sourced my bot code. Are you using some of that code? I doubt it... it is in AppleScript and is crappy code. And NONE of the phrases I have seen in your bot are from mine (which does not mean there might not be some but it is not common). But all of this is just you blaming me. The elephant in the room is even if I COULD make such a Usenet flooder I could NOT hack ANY gmail account in a way Google and "several federal agencies" could not stop. >>>> The fact you keep going to the idea of people being stupid is quite >>>> telling. >>> >>> That's the basis for most of what you write. You >>> *obviously* believe you're smarter than "others", >>> if you didn't you wouldn't tell the ridiculous BS >>> you do. >> >> Do you understand how transparent your "speculations" and attempts to >> speak for me are? > > You speak for you and your message is clear... and it's what I said it is. > Contrary to your obvious belief, people aren't as stupid as you need > them to be. See: you are back to blaming me AND focusing on your view of stupidity in people as you project it onto me. And dodging. It is what you do. It is one of your tells when you know you have been busted lying. I will never get you to directly admit to your flooding... but such tells, in addition to it already being obvious, give you away. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 10:01 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Don't expect a good response. |
| Message-ID | <dbed3825-0767-44d2-af8f-b23f46221ea9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #452053 |
On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 10:34:44 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 5/23/18 9:22 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 9:52:39 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > > >>>> I COULD NOT do as you are doing. > >>> > >>> Virtually anyone could do it, I have previously shown > >>> how easy it'd be to automate the posts. > >> > >> The fact YOU can do it does not show others can. In fact, other than you > >> and Sandman, I have not seen ANYONE showing evidence of scripting Usenet > >> posts. > > > > You keep pushing the idea that this is difficult and that you know > > *nothing* about how to do it. How can a guy who has written a > > chatbot to run on AOL not have an idea about this? Simple... > > it's the 'everyone is as stupid as he needs them to be' method. > > What do you think an AIM chat bot has to do with posting via Google > Groups? It would give one an understanding about using text strings. > And remember how you have claimed I stole even that code! Which doesn't mean you don't understand how it works. Oops! > But the fact you do shows your thinking: once again you are working to > one-up me. You know of my AIM bot and you wanted to show you could do more. I know you've made a lot of claims, that's it. > Guess what: you failed. You seem to forget that you've only talked about your chatbot, no one in COLA has ever seen it that I'm aware of. I actually post stuff and, when I talk about it, I explain what it does. > My bot "read" and "understood" what was being said The bot you claim you wrote... that no one has ever seen. In any event, you could easily have engaged that code and use it to automate GG posts, as I've proven with the code (and the Selenium example) I put up. > You have shown you can do some things I cannot... but with the actual > human-like interaction, as bad as mine was, it was miles ahead of you All you ever do is claim to have written it, claim what it can do. You have your audience... so let's see it. (snip more BS)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 12:36 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Don't expect a good response. |
| Message-ID | <fmlu5dFbt3cU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #452058 |
On 5/23/18 10:01 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 10:34:44 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 5/23/18 9:22 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 9:52:39 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>> >>>>>> I COULD NOT do as you are doing. >>>>> >>>>> Virtually anyone could do it, I have previously shown >>>>> how easy it'd be to automate the posts. >>>> >>>> The fact YOU can do it does not show others can. In fact, other than you >>>> and Sandman, I have not seen ANYONE showing evidence of scripting Usenet >>>> posts. >>> >>> You keep pushing the idea that this is difficult and that you know >>> *nothing* about how to do it. How can a guy who has written a >>> chatbot to run on AOL not have an idea about this? Simple... >>> it's the 'everyone is as stupid as he needs them to be' method. >> >> What do you think an AIM chat bot has to do with posting via Google >> Groups? > > It would give one an understanding about using text strings. Sure: but that does not explain how you bypass Google filters and post-count standards, nor how you come up with your text. Will you talk about that? I bet not. I bet you obsess over me instead. ... -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 13:28 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Don't expect a good response. |
| Message-ID | <126d9b38-2066-4660-bf8e-a29a1c114d67@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #452069 |
On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 1:36:17 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 5/23/18 10:01 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 10:34:44 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 5/23/18 9:22 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 9:52:39 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>> > >>>>>> I COULD NOT do as you are doing. > >>>>> > >>>>> Virtually anyone could do it, I have previously shown > >>>>> how easy it'd be to automate the posts. > >>>> > >>>> The fact YOU can do it does not show others can. In fact, other than you > >>>> and Sandman, I have not seen ANYONE showing evidence of scripting Usenet > >>>> posts. > >>> > >>> You keep pushing the idea that this is difficult and that you know > >>> *nothing* about how to do it. How can a guy who has written a > >>> chatbot to run on AOL not have an idea about this? Simple... > >>> it's the 'everyone is as stupid as he needs them to be' method. > >> > >> What do you think an AIM chat bot has to do with posting via Google > >> Groups? > > > > It would give one an understanding about using text strings. > > Sure You should consider getting a free Heroku account, then go here... https://socket.io/get-started/chat ... get that running on the account and re-do your chatbot in JS. You can get a free (500MB) mongoDB to hook up to it, too: <https://mlab.com/>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 13:39 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Don't expect a good response. |
| Message-ID | <fmm1soFclp1U8@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #452086 |
On 5/23/18 1:28 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 1:36:17 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 5/23/18 10:01 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 10:34:44 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>> On 5/23/18 9:22 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>> On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 9:52:39 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>> I COULD NOT do as you are doing. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Virtually anyone could do it, I have previously shown >>>>>>> how easy it'd be to automate the posts. >>>>>> >>>>>> The fact YOU can do it does not show others can. In fact, other than you >>>>>> and Sandman, I have not seen ANYONE showing evidence of scripting Usenet >>>>>> posts. >>>>> >>>>> You keep pushing the idea that this is difficult and that you know >>>>> *nothing* about how to do it. How can a guy who has written a >>>>> chatbot to run on AOL not have an idea about this? Simple... >>>>> it's the 'everyone is as stupid as he needs them to be' method. >>>> >>>> What do you think an AIM chat bot has to do with posting via Google >>>> Groups? >>> >>> It would give one an understanding about using text strings. >> >> Sure: but that does not explain how you bypass Google filters and post-count standards, nor how you come up with your text. Will you talk about that? >> I bet not. I bet you obsess over me instead. > > You should This is not about me... though I predicted you would make it so. > consider getting a free Heroku account, then go here... > > https://socket.io/get-started/chat > > .... get that running on the account and re-do your chatbot in JS. This is not about any chatbot but your Google flooding. > You can get a free (500MB) mongoDB to hook up to it, too: > > <https://mlab.com/> -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 10:09 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Don't expect a good response. |
| Message-ID | <5061f825-f21c-4fd0-9581-3c8b303fe68a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #452053 |
On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 9:34:44 AM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 5/23/18 9:22 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 9:52:39 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > > >>>> I COULD NOT do as you are doing. > >>> > >>> Virtually anyone could do it, I have previously shown > >>> how easy it'd be to automate the posts. > >> > >> The fact YOU can do it does not show others can. In fact, other than you > >> and Sandman, I have not seen ANYONE showing evidence of scripting Usenet > >> posts. > > > > You keep pushing the idea that this is difficult and that you know > > *nothing* about how to do it. How can a guy who has written a > > chatbot to run on AOL not have an idea about this? Simple... > > it's the 'everyone is as stupid as he needs them to be' method. > > What do you think an AIM chat bot has to do with posting via Google > Groups? And remember how you have claimed I stole even that code! > > But the fact you do shows your thinking: once again you are working to > one-up me. You know of my AIM bot and you wanted to show you could do more. > > Guess what: you failed. Sure, you learned JavaScipt and how to work with > DOM, but you failed to have your bot show any "understanding" of what it > replies to. It just posts stuff at the end of posts. My bot "read" and > "understood" what was being said (on a very rudimentary level... really > just a lookup table that roughly faked "understanding" and a list of > "good" and "bad" people based on words they used, but it was good enough > to often convince people for hours it was human). > > You have shown you can do some things I cannot... but with the actual > human-like interaction, as bad as mine was, it was miles ahead of you > (mine was a great AIM bot, but it was not anything approaching real AI). > > >>> I wrote that > >>> example in a few minutes, it took several more to get > >>> the delays dialed in. It's "interesting" how you were > >>> once begging people to explain how it could be done, > >>> yet, now you're trying to distance yourself. Again, > >>> people are not as stupid as you need them to be. > >> > >> I am curious how you do it... though not to the point of wanting you to > >> post the code. How do you get all the phrases that it uses? > > > > I don't do that but I know how it could be done and anyone > > who has written a chatbot would know, too. > > My AIM bot worked completely differently... as noted, it read responses, > looked for keywords, looked for the person posting and rated them on a > "nice" and "mean" scale, and then just had a lookup table of sorts. > > Your bot came after I open sourced my bot code. Are you using some of > that code? I doubt it... it is in AppleScript and is crappy code. And > NONE of the phrases I have seen in your bot are from mine (which does > not mean there might not be some but it is not common). > > But all of this is just you blaming me. The elephant in the room is even > if I COULD make such a Usenet flooder I could NOT hack ANY gmail account > in a way Google and "several federal agencies" could not stop. > > >>>> The fact you keep going to the idea of people being stupid is quite > >>>> telling. > >>> > >>> That's the basis for most of what you write. You > >>> *obviously* believe you're smarter than "others", > >>> if you didn't you wouldn't tell the ridiculous BS > >>> you do. > >> > >> Do you understand how transparent your "speculations" and attempts to > >> speak for me are? > > > > You speak for you and your message is clear... and it's what I said it is. > > Contrary to your obvious belief, people aren't as stupid as you need > > them to be. > > See: you are back to blaming me AND focusing on your view of stupidity > in people as you project it onto me. And dodging. > > It is what you do. It is one of your tells when you know you have been > busted lying. > > I will never get you to directly admit to your flooding... but such > tells, in addition to it already being obvious, give you away. > > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> It's an endless saga, and Peter the Cöwardly Liön is simultaneously a master at off-the-cuff trolling remarks, while posting with forgeries of Melzzzzz. Sandman makes things up. Here is a list of names Jonas Eklundh has admitted he attributes to Peter the Cöwardly Liön "Cactus Pete", "Donald", "Donald Miller", "Horace McSwain", "Hymen", "meat", "Mike Weaver", "Modena IV Drid", "Omar Murad Asfour", "Rhino Plastee", "Soapy", "SopwithCamel", "Sunny Day", "Takuya Saitoh", "The Letter Q", "tmelmosfire", "zevon". Most of those are names of his buddy Steven Petruzzellis. Right, Peter the Cöwardly Liön is seeking to sell an HTML reference, which Melzzzzz can get from torrent sites, that is grade school simple. If he wasn't so screwed up he would figure out how dumb he is ;) Who does NOT know that this kind of garbage is Peter the Cöwardly Liön's MO, not the MO of Melzzzzz? It is all just projection... the endless posting, the posting with Melzzzzz's name, the writing of word-twisted nonsense, the outbursts... the puffy red eyes and tendency to show how distressed he is over being kicked from the schoolyard for crapping in it again... Peter the Cöwardly Liön can not help himself. Melzzzzz has much know-how to teach and he could learn to answer questions. Regrettably this is I think the worst venue for doing that because too much of response is howling, word twisting and other BS. -- This Trick Gets Women Hot For You! https://youtu.be/GPPqvw8iEBs http://tinyurl.com/kmqe66h https://youtu.be/dNhvVfD4zu4 Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 09:38 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Don't expect a good response. |
| Message-ID | <9296325b-4294-4e4a-ba79-b3e924fab64f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #452037 |
On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 7:53:44 AM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 5/23/18 7:19 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 6:48:15 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > >>> On Tue, 22 May 2018 15:12:26 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: > >>> > >>>> I _love_ to post code here because it really, really helps me; > >>>> however, I know that no one here wants to see it, quite the opposite. > >>>> > >>>> So post away, Steve, but don't expect a good response. > >>> > >>> It's Windows code in most cases so I can't imagine why anyone here in > >>> a Linux advocacy group would want to see it. > >>> > >> > >> It is JavaScript he is running on a Mac though it should work on Windows or > >> Linux; apparently tied to his Usenet flooder. > > > > Why don't you explain why I'd need to reference *multiple* > > tables (which have no ids, only a common class) when you'd > > only need to reference 1 on GG, which has an id. Oh, that's > > right, you have to appear clueless on this <eyeyroll>. > > I have not looked at the Google Groups code and I *am* largely clueless > about this. But, as usual, I am seen as an expert (or at least > knowledgeable) about pretty much every tech topic. > > I COULD NOT do as you are doing. Does not mean I could not learn, but I > have NO desire to flood COLA and other Usenet groups. > > > People are not as stupid as you need them to be. > > The fact you keep going to the idea of people being stupid is quite > telling. YOU think they are stupid enough to think I am a secret > programmer and Hollywood hacker who could hack your gmail account in a > way Google and "several federal agencies" could not stop. > > In order for your stories about me to be true I would have to be one of > the best hackers in the world, and at least a rather competent programmer. > > Sandman (who seems to be MIA) *is* a competent programmer, and has shown > he has his own Usenet client. The idea you and he have access to YOUR > account and can do what you do is, well, hard to NOT believe. :) > > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> There is no question that all of them are not automated because some of them are direct responses in very specific ways with attempts to mislead on specific issues, not just gibberish. Meaning someone is hand writing many of these. Linux offers the least to the least. I am not annoyed, in fact I'm busting a gut because Snit's trolling is so juvenile. He purposefully didn't speak of all the specifications that he would quickly dismiss... and we all know why. At least he has trolls rushing to his rescue. GNU is based on Linux. Period. Did he think that was clever? -- E-commerce Simplified https://youtu.be/0ZNxaaKD7-c Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 12:37 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Don't expect a good response. |
| Message-ID | <fmlu7kFbt3cU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #452055 |
On 5/23/18 9:38 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 7:53:44 AM UTC-7, Snit wrote: >> On 5/23/18 7:19 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 6:48:15 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>> Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 22 May 2018 15:12:26 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I _love_ to post code here because it really, really helps me; >>>>>> however, I know that no one here wants to see it, quite the opposite.. >>>>>> >>>>>> So post away, Steve, but don't expect a good response. >>>>> >>>>> It's Windows code in most cases so I can't imagine why anyone here in >>>>> a Linux advocacy group would want to see it. >>>>> >>>> >>>> It is JavaScript he is running on a Mac though it should work on Windows or >>>> Linux; apparently tied to his Usenet flooder. >>> >>> Why don't you explain why I'd need to reference *multiple* >>> tables (which have no ids, only a common class) when you'd >>> only need to reference 1 on GG, which has an id. Oh, that's >>> right, you have to appear clueless on this <eyeyroll>. >> >> I have not looked at the Google Groups code and I *am* largely clueless >> about this. But, as usual, I am seen as an expert (or at least >> knowledgeable) about pretty much every tech topic. >> >> I COULD NOT do as you are doing. Does not mean I could not learn, but I >> have NO desire to flood COLA and other Usenet groups. >> >>> People are not as stupid as you need them to be. >> >> The fact you keep going to the idea of people being stupid is quite >> telling. YOU think they are stupid enough to think I am a secret >> programmer and Hollywood hacker who could hack your gmail account in a >> way Google and "several federal agencies" could not stop. >> >> In order for your stories about me to be true I would have to be one of >> the best hackers in the world, and at least a rather competent programmer.. >> >> Sandman (who seems to be MIA) *is* a competent programmer, and has shown >> he has his own Usenet client. The idea you and he have access to YOUR >> account and can do what you do is, well, hard to NOT believe. :) >> >> >> -- >> Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They >> cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel >> somehow superior by attacking the messenger. >> >> They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. >> >> <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> > > > > There is no question that all of them are not automated because some of them are direct responses in very specific ways with attempts to mislead on specific issues, not just gibberish. Meaning someone is hand writing many of these. Linux offers the least to the least. > > I am not annoyed, in fact I'm busting a gut because Snit's trolling is so juvenile. He purposefully didn't speak of all the specifications that he would quickly dismiss... and we all know why. At least he has trolls rushing to his rescue. GNU is based on Linux. Period. > > Did he think that was clever? LOL! I have filters turned off on Thunderbird right now... you almost fooled me into thinking that was actually you and not your bot. I will grant you... while it is clearly randomized, there are many of the posts which are quite good in capturing your "voice". -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 13:01 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Don't expect a good response. |
| Message-ID | <0dfd9505-42bd-41b2-b365-84dc219a6e54@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #452070 |
On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 12:37:28 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 5/23/18 9:38 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 7:53:44 AM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > >> On 5/23/18 7:19 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 6:48:15 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>> Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > >>>>> On Tue, 22 May 2018 15:12:26 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> I _love_ to post code here because it really, really helps me; > >>>>>> however, I know that no one here wants to see it, quite the opposite.. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> So post away, Steve, but don't expect a good response. > >>>>> > >>>>> It's Windows code in most cases so I can't imagine why anyone here in > >>>>> a Linux advocacy group would want to see it. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> It is JavaScript he is running on a Mac though it should work on Windows or > >>>> Linux; apparently tied to his Usenet flooder. > >>> > >>> Why don't you explain why I'd need to reference *multiple* > >>> tables (which have no ids, only a common class) when you'd > >>> only need to reference 1 on GG, which has an id. Oh, that's > >>> right, you have to appear clueless on this <eyeyroll>. > >> > >> I have not looked at the Google Groups code and I *am* largely clueless > >> about this. But, as usual, I am seen as an expert (or at least > >> knowledgeable) about pretty much every tech topic. > >> > >> I COULD NOT do as you are doing. Does not mean I could not learn, but I > >> have NO desire to flood COLA and other Usenet groups. > >> > >>> People are not as stupid as you need them to be. > >> > >> The fact you keep going to the idea of people being stupid is quite > >> telling. YOU think they are stupid enough to think I am a secret > >> programmer and Hollywood hacker who could hack your gmail account in a > >> way Google and "several federal agencies" could not stop. > >> > >> In order for your stories about me to be true I would have to be one of > >> the best hackers in the world, and at least a rather competent programmer.. > >> > >> Sandman (who seems to be MIA) *is* a competent programmer, and has shown > >> he has his own Usenet client. The idea you and he have access to YOUR > >> account and can do what you do is, well, hard to NOT believe. :) > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > >> cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > >> somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > >> > >> They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > >> > >> <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> > > > > > > > > There is no question that all of them are not automated because some of them are direct responses in very specific ways with attempts to mislead on specific issues, not just gibberish. Meaning someone is hand writing many of these. Linux offers the least to the least. > > > > I am not annoyed, in fact I'm busting a gut because Snit's trolling is so juvenile. He purposefully didn't speak of all the specifications that he would quickly dismiss... and we all know why. At least he has trolls rushing to his rescue. GNU is based on Linux. Period. > > > > Did he think that was clever? > > LOL! I have filters turned off on Thunderbird right now... you almost > fooled me into thinking that was actually you and not your bot. > > I will grant you... while it is clearly randomized, there are many of > the posts which are quite good in capturing your "voice". > > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> chrisv and Chris Ahlstrom both lie constantly and shamelessly and continue to do so. So no point in showing any further care or restraint. Do not get too bigheaded, chrisv, sometimes "seemingly intelligent people" are just that. BTW, I've already pointed out that his use of "cult-like" to describe true advocates is mud slinging, since he's likening them to mindless sheep. My unedited statement stands true and correct. I've worked for the PC design industry for more than 35 years. I have had a contract with large companies working with NASA and police forces. Never, not even once, was I under a contractual obligation to not install any version of Linux. We sold Xenix, SCO, HP-UX, among others alongside MS OSs very successfully. You're like a full moon on a cloudless night. We all see you there and thinking you are being clever. And you're so brain-dead you keep repeating it. I am an absolute fanboi of Arch Linux, because that's where all the compelling modernization is happening. -- What Every Entrepreneur Must Know!! http://www.5z8.info/add-worm_z4r9qk_fakelogin https://youtu.be/IhOfBmWwCVY Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-22 14:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f9b0d34f-8467-46f3-bd48-e0009ea6c831@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #451974 |
On Tuesday, May 22, 2018 at 1:31:36 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 5/22/18 12:48 PM, Snit wrote: > > On 5/22/18 12:36 PM, Snit wrote: > >> On 5/22/18 11:44 AM, Snit wrote: > >>> On 5/22/18 11:05 AM, Snit wrote: > >>>> On 5/22/18 10:58 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>> On Tuesday, May 22, 2018 at 11:38:37 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>>>> On 5/22/18 10:17 AM, Snit wrote: > >>>>>>> On 5/22/18 10:04 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>>>>> On Tuesday, May 22, 2018 at 10:47:05 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>>>>>>> On 5/22/18 9:09 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> On Monday, May 21, 2018 at 1:28:36 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, May 21, 2018 at 10:31:26 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/21/18 5:16 AM, chrisv wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Melzzzzz wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some thing wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Easy to do but your wording is absurd. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you reply to script? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> OMG, what a fscking idiot, that thing is. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ah, insults. How creative! > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> But you are an idiot... people have kf'd your puppets/shills. > >>>>>>>>>>>> What you really need is one that keeps switching names, then > >>>>>>>>>>>> they'd have a shot at being almost as annoying as you. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I have no desire to play your flooding / spamming / sock > >>>>>>>>>>> puppet games. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> "Interesting"... you have repeatedly responded to your floodbot > >>>>>>>>>> while falsely > >>>>>>>>>> claiming it's mine, yet, you *also* claim to have "no desire" to > >>>>>>>>>> 'play games'. > >>>>>>>>>> We all know this kind of crap is just part of your usual MO of > >>>>>>>>>> believing that > >>>>>>>>>> everyone is as stupid as you need them to be as you go on > >>>>>>>>>> flooding > >>>>>>>>>> with a > >>>>>>>>>> gmail account that has been tied to you. > >>>>>>>>> Are you still claiming I hacked your account and Google and > >>>>>>>>> "several > >>>>>>>>> federal agencies" could not stop me? LOL! > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> You simply cannot EVER take responsibility for your actions. > >>>>>>>>> You blame > >>>>>>>>> me for EVERYTHING, even your wife leaving you after you cheated > >>>>>>>>> on her. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> As far as your Gmail account being tied to me... only in that > >>>>>>>>> you are so > >>>>>>>>> obsessed you think everything YOU do is tied to me. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Blah... blah... > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> You're just bummed out that readers have kf'd your bot, your > >>>>>>>> puppets > >>>>>>>> and your shills so you're trying to drum up 'business' for them > >>>>>>>> the way > >>>>>>>> you've done for ages. Talk about tech... your bots, socks/shills > >>>>>>>> are way > >>>>>>>> past borings are your lies about what "others" have "said". At > >>>>>>>> least with > >>>>>>>> tech you stand a chance of being interesting for a bit... until > >>>>>>>> you run > >>>>>>>> back to this crap. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> You do not even try to hide it is you (posting code and video to > >>>>>>> prove > >>>>>>> it)... which given how it is YOUR account was never in question > >>>>>>> anyway. > >>>>>>> By the way, did Marek's legal actions against you go anywhere. Seems > >>>>>>> not. Maybe some day they will. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Years ago you warned me about how your stupid debates can get you in > >>>>>>> trouble. You already lost your wife over your Usenet stupidity... > >>>>>>> how > >>>>>>> much more has to happen before you realize your family is right > >>>>>>> about > >>>>>>> the impacts of your addiction? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> Carroll replied with snipping the proof and refusing to answer basic > >>>>>> questions. As is his norm he blamed me for his own actions. > >>>>> > >>>>> LOL! Your delusions aren't "questions". If you weren't so focused on > >>>>> how much of a 'victim' you are, you might learn some "interesting" > >>>>> things. > >>>>> > >>>>> We all know it's most likely to be you but no one can prove it. > >>>>> Worse, for you, there's no one left to convince. Talk tech and > >>>>> you stand a chance of interacting with people, talk delusions > >>>>> and people are going to keep ignoring you like they do Godhe. > >>>>> You like picking nits, you could have made it useful in your life, > >>>>> you could've learned QA testing and maybe even gotten hired: > >>>>> > >>>>> <https://streamable.com/hmx1f> > >>>>> > >>>> As much as you attack and insult me, and pretend to be my > >>>> spokesperson, and contact my wife and coworkers and clients and > >>>> more, I never play the victim as you do when you cry about your wife > >>>> leaving you and then blame me. > >>>> > >>>> You play victim to Marek's threats of legal action. You play victim > >>>> when you say Google and "several federal agencies" could not stop me > >>>> from hacking your gmail account (what an insane delusion you and > >>>> there!). > >>>> > >>> > >>> Carroll replied with snip snip snip. He STILL blames me for all that > >>> is wrong with his life. He has the ultimate victim mentality. > >>> > >>> And when I stop responding to him he will cry I am "running". His > >>> life revolves around me. > >>> > >> Carroll responded but avoided all content and then demanded I do as he > >> wishes. He is, as usual, insane. > >> > > Carroll responded again, crying about how I respond in a way that > > bypasses his snipping and AGAIN demands I do some tech work for him. For > > free. His next game will be to insist if I do not become is clapping > > monkey this means I do not want to "talk tech". He will use the fact I > > RESPOND to his trolling as an attack against me as he plays victim. > > > > His trolling is so very, very predictable. > > > LOL! He responded... doing EXACTLY as predicted. He literally cannot > help himself. > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> From the manner The Holy Ghost complained - by asking for details of the system and more - he has certainly not studied an algorithmically challenging task in his life. Otherwise he'd have understood the requirements including being POSIX compliant! What Melzzzzz does is certainly faster. The Holy Ghost is far too idiotic to write a useful script. The only scripting he's able to do is copying code from usenet groups and claiming it as his own. The Holy Ghost can't get anything else to work, either. -- Do not click this link! https://youtu.be/qwb1Ez0GWMA http://www.5z8.info/facebook-of-sex_w4l4wg_bomb Michael Glasser: Prescott Computer Guy http://prescottcomputerguy.com Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-22 10:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fmj2q8Fmj01U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #451939 |
On 5/22/18 10:04 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Tuesday, May 22, 2018 at 10:47:05 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 5/22/18 9:09 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Monday, May 21, 2018 at 1:28:36 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Monday, May 21, 2018 at 10:31:26 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 5/21/18 5:16 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>>>> Melzzzzz wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> some thing wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Easy to do but your wording is absurd. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why do you reply to script? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> OMG, what a fscking idiot, that thing is. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Ah, insults. How creative! >>>>> >>>>> But you are an idiot... people have kf'd your puppets/shills. >>>>> What you really need is one that keeps switching names, then >>>>> they'd have a shot at being almost as annoying as you. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I have no desire to play your flooding / spamming / sock puppet games. >>> >>> "Interesting"... you have repeatedly responded to your floodbot while falsely >>> claiming it's mine, yet, you *also* claim to have "no desire" to 'play games'. >>> We all know this kind of crap is just part of your usual MO of believing that >>> everyone is as stupid as you need them to be as you go on flooding with a >>> gmail account that has been tied to you. >> Are you still claiming I hacked your account and Google and "several >> federal agencies" could not stop me? LOL! >> >> You simply cannot EVER take responsibility for your actions. You blame >> me for EVERYTHING, even your wife leaving you after you cheated on her. >> >> As far as your Gmail account being tied to me... only in that you are so >> obsessed you think everything YOU do is tied to me. > > Blah... blah... > > You're just bummed out that readers have kf'd your bot, your puppets > and your shills so you're trying to drum up 'business' for them the way > you've done for ages. Talk about tech... your bots, socks/shills are way > past borings are your lies about what "others" have "said". At least with > tech you stand a chance of being interesting for a bit... until you run > back to this crap. You do not even try to hide it is you (posting code and video to prove it)... which given how it is YOUR account was never in question anyway. By the way, did Marek's legal actions against you go anywhere. Seems not. Maybe some day they will. Years ago you warned me about how your stupid debates can get you in trouble. You already lost your wife over your Usenet stupidity... how much more has to happen before you realize your family is right about the impacts of your addiction? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 22 of 27 — ← Prev page 1 … 20 21 [22] 23 24 … 27 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web