Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #451957 > unrolled thread

Re: Steven Carroll supports police shooting black people

Started by	Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
First post	2018-05-22 11:43 -0700
Last post	2018-05-23 11:58 -0700
Articles	20 on this page of 44 — 9 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

  Re: Steven Carroll supports police shooting black people Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 11:43 -0700
    Re: Steven Carroll supports police shooting black people Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 12:05 -0700
      Re: Steven Carroll supports police shooting black people Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 12:30 -0700
        Re: Steven Carroll supports police shooting black people Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 12:36 -0700
          Re: Steven Carroll supports police shooting black people Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 21:56 -0700
        Re: Steven Carroll supports police shooting black people Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 20:52 -0700
          Re: Steven Carroll supports police shooting black people Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 03:08 -0700
      Re: Steven Carroll supports police shooting black people Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 15:57 -0700
      Re: Steven Carroll supports police shooting black people owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-23 15:11 +0000
        Re: Steven Carroll supports police shooting black people Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 08:42 -0700
          Re: Steven Carroll supports police shooting black people Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 08:55 -0700
            Re: Steven Carroll supports police shooting black people Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 09:16 -0700
            Re: Steven Carroll supports police shooting black people Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 09:26 -0700
              Re: Steven Carroll supports police shooting black people Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 09:32 -0700
                Re: Steven Carroll supports police shooting black people Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 09:37 -0700
                  Re: Steven Carroll supports police shooting black people Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 10:25 -0700
                    Re: Steven Carroll supports police shooting black people Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 12:38 -0700
                    Re: Steven Carroll supports police shooting black people Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 13:55 -0700
              Re: Steven Carroll supports police shooting black people quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> - 2018-05-23 17:37 -0500
                You've seen his tax returns and you know we wants more $$ ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-23 15:48 -0700
                  Re: You've seen his tax returns and you know we wants more $$ ? Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-23 19:22 -0400
                    I desperately need validation from others. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-23 16:31 -0700
                  Re: You've seen his tax returns and you know we wants more $$ ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 18:04 -0700
                    Re: You've seen his tax returns and you know we wants more $$ ? quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> - 2018-05-24 12:49 -0500
                      Re: You've seen his tax returns and you know we wants more $$ ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 11:27 -0700
                      Re: You've seen his tax returns and you know we wants more $$ ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 12:53 -0700
                  Re: You've seen his tax returns and you know we wants more $$ ? quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> - 2018-05-24 12:48 -0500
                    You judge a book by its cover ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-24 11:03 -0700
                      Re: You judge a book by its cover ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 12:23 -0700
                        Re: You judge a book by its cover ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 12:29 -0700
                        Re: You judge a book by its cover ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 13:11 -0700
                          Re: You judge a book by its cover ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 14:15 -0700
                            Re: You judge a book by its cover ? Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 02:17 -0700
                        Re: You judge a book by its cover ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 07:11 -0500
                      Re: You judge a book by its cover ? quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> - 2018-05-24 14:36 -0500
                        Re: You judge a book by its cover ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 13:00 -0700
                    Re: You've seen his tax returns and you know we wants more $$ ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 12:52 -0700
                Re: Steven Carroll supports police shooting black people Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 18:01 -0700
        Re: Steven Carroll supports police shooting black people Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 08:46 -0700
          Re: Steven Carroll supports police shooting black people owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-23 18:27 +0000
            Re: Steven Carroll supports police shooting black people Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 12:21 -0700
              Re: Steven Carroll supports police shooting black people Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 12:42 -0700
            Re: Steven Carroll supports police shooting black people Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 12:40 -0700
          Re: Steven Carroll supports police shooting black people Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 11:58 -0700

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →

#452113 — Re: You've seen his tax returns and you know we wants more $$ ?

From	Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s>
Date	2018-05-23 19:22 -0400
Subject	Re: You've seen his tax returns and you know we wants more $$ ?
Message-ID	<mttbgd1602hhd835hbu3hv9up925hgs1uc@4ax.com>
In reply to	#452111

On Wed, 23 May 2018 15:48:23 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me  @. wrote:

>> Steve Carroll is a babbling idiot.
>> 
>> Couple it with his various personal advertisements where he is looking 
>> for elderly women, his lack of a job and his complete financial failure 
>> and it all spells one word:  L O S E R
>
>You've seen his tax returns and you know we wants more $$ ?
>
>Personally, I don't play the dating game.

Probably because nobody invited you to participate.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452114 — I desperately need validation from others.

From	Jeff-Relf.Me @.
Date	2018-05-23 16:31 -0700
Subject	I desperately need validation from others.
Message-ID	<Jeff-Relf.Me@May.23--4.31pm.Seattle.2018>
In reply to	#452113

> > Personally, I don't play the dating game.
> 
> Probably because nobody invited you to participate.

Yes, you ( Andrzej ) hit the nail on head:

  I desperately need validation from others, and I can't get it.

Or not.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452119 — Re: You've seen his tax returns and you know we wants more $$ ?

From	Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date	2018-05-23 18:04 -0700
Subject	Re: You've seen his tax returns and you know we wants more $$ ?
Message-ID	<fmmhd9Fg07rU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to	#452111

On 5/23/18 3:48 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>> Steve Carroll is a babbling idiot.
>>
>> Couple it with his various personal advertisements where he is looking
>> for elderly women, his lack of a job and his complete financial failure
>> and it all spells one word:  L O S E R
> 
> You've seen his tax returns and you know we wants more $$ ?
> 
> Personally, I don't play the dating game.
> 
Carroll posted links to a dating profile he set up asking for senior 
women. I am sure, by now, he has taken it down. :)

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452156 — Re: You've seen his tax returns and you know we wants more $$ ?

From	quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net>
Date	2018-05-24 12:49 -0500
Subject	Re: You've seen his tax returns and you know we wants more $$ ?
Message-ID	<34GdnftGQYGRZpvGnZ2dnUU7-WkAAAAA@giganews.com>
In reply to	#452119

On Wed, 23 May 2018 18:04:40 -0700, Snit wrote:

> On 5/23/18 3:48 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>> Steve Carroll is a babbling idiot.
>>>
>>> Couple it with his various personal advertisements where he is looking
>>> for elderly women, his lack of a job and his complete financial
>>> failure and it all spells one word:  L O S E R
>> 
>> You've seen his tax returns and you know we wants more $$ ?
>> 
>> Personally, I don't play the dating game.
>> 
> Carroll posted links to a dating profile he set up asking for senior
> women. I am sure, by now, he has taken it down. :)

Yes he did. He was wearing a retarded looking baseball cap in the picture.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452159 — Re: You've seen his tax returns and you know we wants more $$ ?

From	Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date	2018-05-24 11:27 -0700
Subject	Re: You've seen his tax returns and you know we wants more $$ ?
Message-ID	<57380a91-3442-494f-9256-0a1d850d95a9@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#452156

On Thursday, May 24, 2018 at 10:49:07 AM UTC-7, quatloo wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2018 18:04:40 -0700, Snit wrote:
> 
> > On 5/23/18 3:48 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> >>> Steve Carroll is a babbling idiot.
> >>>
> >>> Couple it with his various personal advertisements where he is looking
> >>> for elderly women, his lack of a job and his complete financial
> >>> failure and it all spells one word:  L O S E R
> >> 
> >> You've seen his tax returns and you know we wants more $$ ?
> >> 
> >> Personally, I don't play the dating game.
> >> 
> > Carroll posted links to a dating profile he set up asking for senior
> > women. I am sure, by now, he has taken it down. :)
> 
> Yes he did. He was wearing a retarded looking baseball cap in the picture.

The Underground Marshmallow Person's behavior is really fully unfair. There's zero doubt that as soon as any past 'plonkee' does whatever to hurt the poor coward's feelings that they will be reblocked.Why would you want to cap all programs on Fedora to what can be done on commercial OSs? Steve Carroll's computer has more cores than The Underground Marshmallow Person's. Steve Carroll wins. The Underground Marshmallow Person loses. The Underground Marshmallow Person proved himself to be a charlatan by having the pretense to not engage Steve Carroll by veraciously trumpeting 'goodbye forever!' and then bombarding him anyway by means of another poster. 

Yup. Sadly this is what we have to face. People who obviously have no reason for being here other than to attack Steve Carroll. 

--
This broke the Internet!!
http://www.5z8.info/stalin-will-rise-again_j3h5uj_nakedgrandmas.jpg
https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4xD43Khhkw
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452168 — Re: You've seen his tax returns and you know we wants more $$ ?

From	Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date	2018-05-24 12:53 -0700
Subject	Re: You've seen his tax returns and you know we wants more $$ ?
Message-ID	<fmojhdFuc7oU3@mid.individual.net>
In reply to	#452156

On 5/24/18 10:49 AM, quatloo wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2018 18:04:40 -0700, Snit wrote:
> 
>> On 5/23/18 3:48 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>>> Steve Carroll is a babbling idiot.
>>>>
>>>> Couple it with his various personal advertisements where he is looking
>>>> for elderly women, his lack of a job and his complete financial
>>>> failure and it all spells one word:  L O S E R
>>>
>>> You've seen his tax returns and you know we wants more $$ ?
>>>
>>> Personally, I don't play the dating game.
>>>
>> Carroll posted links to a dating profile he set up asking for senior
>> women. I am sure, by now, he has taken it down. :)
> 
> Yes he did. He was wearing a retarded looking baseball cap in the picture.
> I will not mock him for looks or clothing but why did he post links to 
his dating profile here... other than to play victim?

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452155 — Re: You've seen his tax returns and you know we wants more $$ ?

From	quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net>
Date	2018-05-24 12:48 -0500
Subject	Re: You've seen his tax returns and you know we wants more $$ ?
Message-ID	<34GdnfhGQYF9Z5vGnZ2dnUU7-WmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to	#452111

On Wed, 23 May 2018 15:48:23 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:

>> Steve Carroll is a babbling idiot.
>> 
>> Couple it with his various personal advertisements where he is looking
>> for elderly women, his lack of a job and his complete financial failure
>> and it all spells one word:  L O S E R
> 
> You've seen his tax returns and you know we wants more $$ ?

Of course not. I wouldn't mind seeing Trump's tax returns though. 
When Carroll gets half a bag on he tends to make mistakes with his posts. 
And while he has become careful over the years, he made such an ass of 
himself in CSMA it's rather well known that he is an unemployed, 
divorced, sugar granny seeking loser. It's very sad seeing as he does 
seem to have a decent software background. Now if he only had paying 
clients he wouldn't have to spend his time chasing snit and flooding 
usenet.

> Personally, I don't play the dating game.
That doesn't surprise me.
Neither did the elephant man.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452158 — You judge a book by its cover ?

From	Jeff-Relf.Me @.
Date	2018-05-24 11:03 -0700
Subject	You judge a book by its cover ?
Message-ID	<Jeff-Relf.Me@May.24--11.03am.Seattle.2018>
In reply to	#452155

> > Personally, I don't play the dating game.
> 
> That doesn't surprise me.
> Neither did the elephant man.

You judge a book by its cover ?

How racist/sexist is that ? !

Do you project your racism/sexism onto others, like a good feminist ?

The answer is "yes", and it's too ugly to look at; so "Plonk".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452162 — Re: You judge a book by its cover ?

From	Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
Date	2018-05-24 12:23 -0700
Subject	Re: You judge a book by its cover ?
Message-ID	<5a8903ef-a7d1-4834-8da8-fb9d35615d89@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#452158

On Thursday, May 24, 2018 at 12:03:53 PM UTC-6, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> > > Personally, I don't play the dating game.
> > 
> > That doesn't surprise me.
> > Neither did the elephant man.
> 
> You judge a book by its cover ?
> 
> How racist/sexist is that ? !
> 
> Do you project your racism/sexism onto others, like a good feminist ?
> 
> The answer is "yes", and it's too ugly to look at; so "Plonk".

What's the world coming to when a Snit sock/shill can't get any traction...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452163 — Re: You judge a book by its cover ?

From	Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date	2018-05-24 12:29 -0700
Subject	Re: You judge a book by its cover ?
Message-ID	<f4f74308-d538-4e21-a4f1-1558bbd7a7a2@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#452162

On Thursday, May 24, 2018 at 12:23:56 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Thursday, May 24, 2018 at 12:03:53 PM UTC-6, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> > > > Personally, I don't play the dating game.
> > > 
> > > That doesn't surprise me.
> > > Neither did the elephant man.
> > 
> > You judge a book by its cover ?
> > 
> > How racist/sexist is that ? !
> > 
> > Do you project your racism/sexism onto others, like a good feminist ?
> > 
> > The answer is "yes", and it's too ugly to look at; so "Plonk".
> 
> What's the world coming to when a Snit sock/shill can't get any traction...

BTW, I've already proved that his use of "cult-like" to describe honest people is not honorable, since he's likening them to grazing cows. It was Melzzzzz who flooded DFS's site thousands of times and pretended he did not do it. The one talent Melzzzzz learned well is to attempt to shame DFS into silence and if that doesn't work, troll-splain or completely change the assertion. 

--
Eight things to never feed your cat!
http://www.5z8.info/lemon-party-redux_v1o7pm_nakedgrandmas.jpg
https://youtu.be/TETJEkaUoY4
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452171 — Re: You judge a book by its cover ?

From	Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date	2018-05-24 13:11 -0700
Subject	Re: You judge a book by its cover ?
Message-ID	<fmokkbF47uU2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to	#452162

On 5/24/18 12:23 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Thursday, May 24, 2018 at 12:03:53 PM UTC-6, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>>>> Personally, I don't play the dating game.
>>>
>>> That doesn't surprise me.
>>> Neither did the elephant man.
>>
>> You judge a book by its cover ?
>>
>> How racist/sexist is that ? !
>>
>> Do you project your racism/sexism onto others, like a good feminist ?
>>
>> The answer is "yes", and it's too ugly to look at; so "Plonk".
> 
> What's the world coming to when a Snit sock/shill can't get any traction...
> 
LOL! I noted earlier today that the "Everyone is Snit" gag had only been 
eluded to recently. I was surprised you did not pull out that idiotic 
attack yet.

I must be giving you too much attention for you to be able to hold off 
so long.

You also have not used the "running" one... though I *do* keep giving 
you attention. Once I stop you will not be able to prevent yourself. You 
are THAT predictable (though now that I am calling you out on it so much 
you will try to use other words, or work to twist it in some way to show 
how much of a victim you are... count on it!)

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452174 — Re: You judge a book by its cover ?

From	Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date	2018-05-24 14:15 -0700
Subject	Re: You judge a book by its cover ?
Message-ID	<5b58c594-b96a-4589-8faa-f0cee633e156@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#452171

On Thursday, May 24, 2018 at 1:11:58 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote:
> On 5/24/18 12:23 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> > On Thursday, May 24, 2018 at 12:03:53 PM UTC-6, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> >>>> Personally, I don't play the dating game.
> >>>
> >>> That doesn't surprise me.
> >>> Neither did the elephant man.
> >>
> >> You judge a book by its cover ?
> >>
> >> How racist/sexist is that ? !
> >>
> >> Do you project your racism/sexism onto others, like a good feminist ?
> >>
> >> The answer is "yes", and it's too ugly to look at; so "Plonk".
> > 
> > What's the world coming to when a Snit sock/shill can't get any traction...
> > 
> LOL! I noted earlier today that the "Everyone is Snit" gag had only been 
> eluded to recently. I was surprised you did not pull out that idiotic 
> attack yet.
> 
> I must be giving you too much attention for you to be able to hold off 
> so long.
> 
> You also have not used the "running" one... though I *do* keep giving 
> you attention. Once I stop you will not be able to prevent yourself. You 
> are THAT predictable (though now that I am calling you out on it so much 
> you will try to use other words, or work to twist it in some way to show 
> how much of a victim you are... count on it!)
> 
> -- 
> Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
> cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
> somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
> 
> They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
> 
> <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

I just configured score: -9999 and will never see the flooding. Steve Petruzzellis's nonsense has made a complete ruin of my scripting via GG, so I don't even bother posting to anything with my tablet anymore. Only thing he has achieved with this behavior is that the Steve Petruzzellis plonk has been shown to be the right choice. All that Steve Petruzzellis cares about is that Steve Petruzzellis gets to express his crank call and then hang up and giggle about it. The fact that RonB is an innocent patsy on the other end of the phone is his motivation. 

At one point, he said a usenet denizen was "obsessing" over him, which was shown to be merely replying to his posts. Dropping support for anything Steve Petruzzellis uses is obvious. 

Awhile back I did work on and showed some Visual C++ for the front end which is the only thing you can do when trying to avoid Steve Petruzzellis's dishonest crap while reading with Google Groups. 

--
Eight things to never feed your dog
https://redd.it/6sfkup
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100012978552519
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#453256 — Re: You judge a book by its cover ?

From	Fuck Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date	2018-06-02 02:17 -0700
Subject	Re: You judge a book by its cover ?
Message-ID	<0e35bb74-aa16-4428-aa63-411e75f26ce2@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#452174

On Thursday, May 24, 2018 at 2:15:29 PM UTC-7, Fuck Snit wrote:
> On Thursday, May 24, 2018 at 1:11:58 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote:
> > On 5/24/18 12:23 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> > > On Thursday, May 24, 2018 at 12:03:53 PM UTC-6, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> > >>>> Personally, I don't play the dating game.
> > >>>
> > >>> That doesn't surprise me.
> > >>> Neither did the elephant man.
> > >>
> > >> You judge a book by its cover ?
> > >>
> > >> How racist/sexist is that ? !
> > >>
> > >> Do you project your racism/sexism onto others, like a good feminist ?
> > >>
> > >> The answer is "yes", and it's too ugly to look at; so "Plonk".
> > > 
> > > What's the world coming to when a Snit sock/shill can't get any traction...
> > > 
> > LOL! I noted earlier today that the "Everyone is Snit" gag had only been 
> > eluded to recently. I was surprised you did not pull out that idiotic 
> > attack yet.
> > 
> > I must be giving you too much attention for you to be able to hold off 
> > so long.
> > 
> > You also have not used the "running" one... though I *do* keep giving 
> > you attention. Once I stop you will not be able to prevent yourself. You 
> > are THAT predictable (though now that I am calling you out on it so much 
> > you will try to use other words, or work to twist it in some way to show 
> > how much of a victim you are... count on it!)
> > 
> > -- 
> > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
> > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
> > somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
> > 
> > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
> > 
> > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
> 
> 
> 
> I just configured score: -9999 and will never see the flooding. Steve Petruzzellis's nonsense has made a complete ruin of my scripting via GG, so I don't even bother posting to anything with my tablet anymore. Only thing he has achieved with this behavior is that the Steve Petruzzellis plonk has been shown to be the right choice. All that Steve Petruzzellis cares about is that Steve Petruzzellis gets to express his crank call and then hang up and giggle about it. The fact that RonB is an innocent patsy on the other end of the phone is his motivation. 
> 
> At one point, he said a usenet denizen was "obsessing" over him, which was shown to be merely replying to his posts. Dropping support for anything Steve Petruzzellis uses is obvious. 
> 
> Awhile back I did work on and showed some Visual C++ for the front end which is the only thing you can do when trying to avoid Steve Petruzzellis's dishonest crap while reading with Google Groups. 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Eight things to never feed your dog
> https://redd.it/6sfkup
> https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100012978552519
> Jonas Eklundh



ronB and the other trolls insist asking for a price comparison for a Linux application is wrong. I am working on an idea which will show off how weak Fedora is. 

I have worked in the computer business for 15 years. I have worked for multibillion companies selling to government agencies and green technology industries. Never, not one single time, were we on any account instructed to not load any other OS. We sold AIX, DUnix, Blackberry, etc. in addition to MS OSs. vallor's computer has more memory than ronB's. vallor wins. ronB loses. So take that, ronB. ronB is being controlled by RMS. 

This forum is a leaking porta potty. 



--
Get Rich Slow!!
https://youtu.be/HHT9SJgYsH4
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.os.linux/BVpdH5KOc6s
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452233 — Re: You judge a book by its cover ?

From	chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date	2018-05-25 07:11 -0500
Subject	Re: You judge a book by its cover ?
Message-ID	<94vfgd91p6h1g9brv93dritchl8ivolqsm@4ax.com>
In reply to	#452162

> Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:

>> > > Personally, I don't play the dating game.
>> > 
>> > That doesn't surprise me.
>> > Neither did the elephant man.
>> 
>> You judge a book by its cover ?
>> 
>> How racist/sexist is that ? !

Yeah, it's "racist/sexist" to look at a picture of the elephant man,
and conclude that he was unattractive.

-- 
"If you pick a business to enter that requires some strict cost
controls to show any profit, you are making a stupid decision."  -
Rat

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452164 — Re: You judge a book by its cover ?

From	quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net>
Date	2018-05-24 14:36 -0500
Subject	Re: You judge a book by its cover ?
Message-ID	<EJudnbNUmPKriZrGnZ2dnUU7-VednZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to	#452158

On Thu, 24 May 2018 11:03:53 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:

>> > Personally, I don't play the dating game.
>> 
>> That doesn't surprise me. Neither did the elephant man.
> 
> You judge a book by its cover ?

No.
I prefer to deal in facts.

"He had spent his entire adult life segregated from women, first in the 
workhouse and then as an exhibit. "
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Merrick
 
> How racist/sexist is that ? !

Racist?
Sexist?
How so?

> Do you project your racism/sexism onto others, like a good feminist ?
I do not project anything. I look at the data and form an opinion.
I could probably go on for pages describing how your obtuse posting style 
and bitter, hermit like lifestyle is obvious in your style of posting.
There is no need to however because your reply in this post is more than 
enough confirmation.
 
> The answer is "yes", and it's too ugly to look at; so "Plonk".

You've just dug your own hole and climbed into it. 
Is it as dark as your basement?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452169 — Re: You judge a book by its cover ?

From	Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date	2018-05-24 13:00 -0700
Subject	Re: You judge a book by its cover ?
Message-ID	<1426659f-06dd-44ff-b98d-38309063959a@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#452164

On Thursday, May 24, 2018 at 12:36:29 PM UTC-7, quatloo wrote:
> On Thu, 24 May 2018 11:03:53 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> 
> >> > Personally, I don't play the dating game.
> >> 
> >> That doesn't surprise me. Neither did the elephant man.
> > 
> > You judge a book by its cover ?
> 
> No.
> I prefer to deal in facts.
> 
> "He had spent his entire adult life segregated from women, first in the 
> workhouse and then as an exhibit. "
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Merrick
>  
> > How racist/sexist is that ? !
> 
> Racist?
> Sexist?
> How so?
> 
> > Do you project your racism/sexism onto others, like a good feminist ?
> I do not project anything. I look at the data and form an opinion.
> I could probably go on for pages describing how your obtuse posting style 
> and bitter, hermit like lifestyle is obvious in your style of posting.
> There is no need to however because your reply in this post is more than 
> enough confirmation.
>  
> > The answer is "yes", and it's too ugly to look at; so "Plonk".
> 
> You've just dug your own hole and climbed into it. 
> Is it as dark as your basement?



Lines of text containing words from Flatfish twisted horridly by Desk Rabbit. I have known grade school kids who argue better than you do. I reported Desk Rabbit years ago. As expected, it did diddly-squat to slow the k00k. 

--
Do not click this link!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhOfBmWwCVY
http://www.5z8.info/yourdick_v1o3ww_manhunter
http://www.5z8.info/titstitstitstits_j7t4bl_stalin
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452167 — Re: You've seen his tax returns and you know we wants more $$ ?

From	Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date	2018-05-24 12:52 -0700
Subject	Re: You've seen his tax returns and you know we wants more $$ ?
Message-ID	<fmojfqFuc7oU2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to	#452155

On 5/24/18 10:48 AM, quatloo wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2018 15:48:23 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> 
>>> Steve Carroll is a babbling idiot.
>>>
>>> Couple it with his various personal advertisements where he is looking
>>> for elderly women, his lack of a job and his complete financial failure
>>> and it all spells one word:  L O S E R
>>
>> You've seen his tax returns and you know we wants more $$ ?
> 
> Of course not. I wouldn't mind seeing Trump's tax returns though.
> When Carroll gets half a bag on he tends to make mistakes with his posts.
> And while he has become careful over the years, he made such an ass of
> himself in CSMA it's rather well known that he is an unemployed,
> divorced, sugar granny seeking loser. 

It is only "well known" because of his use of socks to post that 
information as he plays victim.

Then he projects and says I am playing victim to RESPOND to his attacks 
in ways contrary to how people with a victim mentality would.

> It's very sad seeing as he does
> seem to have a decent software background. Now if he only had paying
> clients he wouldn't have to spend his time chasing snit and flooding
> usenet.
> 
>> Personally, I don't play the dating game.
> That doesn't surprise me.
> Neither did the elephant man.
> 


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452118

From	Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date	2018-05-23 18:01 -0700
Message-ID	<fmmh6vFft19U2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to	#452108

On 5/23/18 3:37 PM, quatloo wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2018 09:26:06 -0700, Snit wrote:
> 
>> On 5/23/18 8:55 AM, Snit wrote:
>>> On 5/23/18 8:42 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 9:11:14 AM UTC-6, owl wrote:
>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 5/22/18 11:43 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>>>> Hash: SHA512
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gee, no on saw more forgeries coming. LOL!
>>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>>>> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.28 Comment: GPGTools -
>>>>>>> https://gpgtools.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWJpfjAAoJEC03b6bOr/+drC0P/RZBxcLK8eFZ7QUKjlqJRqfj
>>>>>>> 66udasAYnovhi+C1bpBxXZIm8Xxg2+JDdVoMfw/d+5R8+KpEXpxK+4y9GB8NuBBz
>>>>>>> 98+LuNNIus0cXJ6goCyKZj5FUajHYIhgoEAb+O8F0pYMcqv08R39IddgVEQCasDZ
>>>>>>> 9QPXlQco0QOSD49BArlDa7qgwi17Rs2zkYnw27jEIVEuYlfhqj2T7Mcirwby4JD3
>>>>>>> +1Geq5kCdeCtMG+z6gAdth0akrSMlYLAnixbYolEFm6wtg7DW2BrwVo7NTY8Zuy1
>>>>>>> UjRrn8JAoHrCec82HulrBBEXC/dhti2SIszDnt1GnZSTB33p1plQgklUmmqN8Qvu
>>>>>>> To/TAz07YWAeUHcYSyHzmJuVbL0r9emcQD/AfB8CxAhh+p5F5kc2hfwAOmJ4cGpV
>>>>>>> +kIqUp7N1UXqSOXnFyxYz4HJv9/c0UPNXSY2QDPmaWd7AFrB80BcOw2yVS30jQwo
>>>>>>> QhBtvoj2t/FJi/G7KnIpGYl3ZFy7QxtNL6PnPW5y46EjzDbNEnMbETTxAzI24QGw
>>>>>>> x5xgyhdiyRnpCvyHFd21d09bYOrBHH6qe3NMVTRBPjh1MUaw1E8WhQo916Zvk4jz
>>>>>>> pD23EIt9uk79a2aD+EbC/vZHLPGTqlbI1bmYV5KlzJusIO2i939Cs/AhYcdM8mEQ
>>>>>>> WqdC0S1YIC7GfYk7riFe =F3OP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> One Smart Penny!
>>>>>>> http://bit.ly/2oNYRgv http://tinyurl.com/proof-about-ebot Jonas
>>>>>>> Eklundh Communication
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you going to blame me for forging your PGP credentials as well?
>>>>>
>>>>> Why not?  Copying a signed message in its entirety does not break the
>>>>> signature.
>>>>
>>>> I'm sure he's figured that out already.
>>>
>>> Yes: but I do not think all of your signed messages have an "original"
>>> from your non-flood account.
>>>
>>>> When everyone else is ignoring it, that Snit is the *only* person who
>>>> is *repeatedly* interacting with *his* bot tells one all they need to
>>>> know.
>>>>
>>>> But we're all just *so* stupid here in COLA <eyeroll>.
>>>
>>> I spent YEARS not responding to your posts. Now I am... but in ways you
>>> do not like. This is yet another thing you twist to mean I must be
>>> responsible for your actions.
>>>
>>> Gee, just as with your divorce, you blame me for all wrong in your
>>> life.
>>> What a shock!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Carroll replied with his normal snip snip and his efforts to change the
>> topic FROM the fact he is flooding COLA and other groups TO attacks
>> against me to try to put me on the defensive.
>>
>> So very, very transparent of him. And amusing how pissed off he gets
>> when I respond to my own posts to note it and bypass his snipping games.
>> :)
> 
> Steve Carroll is a babbling idiot. It's obvious to anyone who reads his
> posts. He chose to chase snit all over the Internet over his marriage and
> family. 

Both true and sad. I sincerely feel bad for him and those who care about 
him.

> That alone is enough to prove that Carroll is some kind of a nut.
> Couple it with his various personal advertisements where he is looking
> for elderly women, 

I forgot about those. Worse yet was his need to post about it in COLA... 
using a sock.

> his lack of a job and his complete financial failure
> and it all spells one word:
> 
>    L    O    S  E   R

He has some skills... but has NOTHING to show for them. Not one client. 
Not one website. Nothing but testing, bragging, and flooding Usenet.


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452042

From	Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date	2018-05-23 08:46 -0700
Message-ID	<fmlglpF8pprU2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to	#452038

On 5/23/18 8:11 AM, owl wrote:
> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 5/22/18 11:43 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA512
>>>
>>> Gee, no on saw more forgeries coming. LOL!
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.28
>>> Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
>>>
>>> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWJpfjAAoJEC03b6bOr/+drC0P/RZBxcLK8eFZ7QUKjlqJRqfj
>>> 66udasAYnovhi+C1bpBxXZIm8Xxg2+JDdVoMfw/d+5R8+KpEXpxK+4y9GB8NuBBz
>>> 98+LuNNIus0cXJ6goCyKZj5FUajHYIhgoEAb+O8F0pYMcqv08R39IddgVEQCasDZ
>>> 9QPXlQco0QOSD49BArlDa7qgwi17Rs2zkYnw27jEIVEuYlfhqj2T7Mcirwby4JD3
>>> +1Geq5kCdeCtMG+z6gAdth0akrSMlYLAnixbYolEFm6wtg7DW2BrwVo7NTY8Zuy1
>>> UjRrn8JAoHrCec82HulrBBEXC/dhti2SIszDnt1GnZSTB33p1plQgklUmmqN8Qvu
>>> To/TAz07YWAeUHcYSyHzmJuVbL0r9emcQD/AfB8CxAhh+p5F5kc2hfwAOmJ4cGpV
>>> +kIqUp7N1UXqSOXnFyxYz4HJv9/c0UPNXSY2QDPmaWd7AFrB80BcOw2yVS30jQwo
>>> QhBtvoj2t/FJi/G7KnIpGYl3ZFy7QxtNL6PnPW5y46EjzDbNEnMbETTxAzI24QGw
>>> x5xgyhdiyRnpCvyHFd21d09bYOrBHH6qe3NMVTRBPjh1MUaw1E8WhQo916Zvk4jz
>>> pD23EIt9uk79a2aD+EbC/vZHLPGTqlbI1bmYV5KlzJusIO2i939Cs/AhYcdM8mEQ
>>> WqdC0S1YIC7GfYk7riFe
>>> =F3OP
>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>
>>> --
>>> One Smart Penny!
>>> http://bit.ly/2oNYRgv
>>> http://tinyurl.com/proof-about-ebot
>>> Jonas Eklundh Communication
>>>
>>
>> Are you going to blame me for forging your PGP credentials as well?
> 
> Why not?  Copying a signed message in its entirety does not break
> the signature.

I have seen a number of such posts from his flood account. I did a 
search on some at one point and did not find at least some from his 
standard account. Also, why post stuff like this OTHER than to allow 
himself to play victim?

But either way, contrary to his claims I am not a scripter (well, I 
am... just a crappy one), nor a programmer, nor do I know much about 
DOM, and I sure as hell am not some Hollywood hacker who broke into his 
gmail account in a way that Google and "several federal agencies" could 
not stop.


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#452064

From	owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date	2018-05-23 18:27 +0000
Message-ID	<szb993ga3.ahok3@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to	#452042

Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 5/23/18 8:11 AM, owl wrote:
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 5/22/18 11:43 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA512
>>>>
>>>> Gee, no on saw more forgeries coming. LOL!
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.28
>>>> Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
>>>>
>>>> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWJpfjAAoJEC03b6bOr/+drC0P/RZBxcLK8eFZ7QUKjlqJRqfj
>>>> 66udasAYnovhi+C1bpBxXZIm8Xxg2+JDdVoMfw/d+5R8+KpEXpxK+4y9GB8NuBBz
>>>> 98+LuNNIus0cXJ6goCyKZj5FUajHYIhgoEAb+O8F0pYMcqv08R39IddgVEQCasDZ
>>>> 9QPXlQco0QOSD49BArlDa7qgwi17Rs2zkYnw27jEIVEuYlfhqj2T7Mcirwby4JD3
>>>> +1Geq5kCdeCtMG+z6gAdth0akrSMlYLAnixbYolEFm6wtg7DW2BrwVo7NTY8Zuy1
>>>> UjRrn8JAoHrCec82HulrBBEXC/dhti2SIszDnt1GnZSTB33p1plQgklUmmqN8Qvu
>>>> To/TAz07YWAeUHcYSyHzmJuVbL0r9emcQD/AfB8CxAhh+p5F5kc2hfwAOmJ4cGpV
>>>> +kIqUp7N1UXqSOXnFyxYz4HJv9/c0UPNXSY2QDPmaWd7AFrB80BcOw2yVS30jQwo
>>>> QhBtvoj2t/FJi/G7KnIpGYl3ZFy7QxtNL6PnPW5y46EjzDbNEnMbETTxAzI24QGw
>>>> x5xgyhdiyRnpCvyHFd21d09bYOrBHH6qe3NMVTRBPjh1MUaw1E8WhQo916Zvk4jz
>>>> pD23EIt9uk79a2aD+EbC/vZHLPGTqlbI1bmYV5KlzJusIO2i939Cs/AhYcdM8mEQ
>>>> WqdC0S1YIC7GfYk7riFe
>>>> =F3OP
>>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> One Smart Penny!
>>>> http://bit.ly/2oNYRgv
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/proof-about-ebot
>>>> Jonas Eklundh Communication
>>>>
>>>
>>> Are you going to blame me for forging your PGP credentials as well?
>> 
>> Why not?  Copying a signed message in its entirety does not break
>> the signature.
> 
> I have seen a number of such posts from his flood account. I did a 
> search on some at one point and did not find at least some from his 
> standard account. Also, why post stuff like this OTHER than to allow 
> himself to play victim?
> 

That was a frelwizzen post.  How should I know why you posted it?
 

> But either way, contrary to his claims I am not a scripter (well, I 
> am... just a crappy one), nor a programmer, nor do I know much about 
> DOM,


Scripted posting through GG doesn't require any DOM stuff (although it
is probably easier that way), and you demonstrated ages ago an automated
posting using a web form (google search) with your "Hillary {a,b,c}"
thing.  I've autoposted to GG with bash.  There is no reason to believe
that the flood bot would be beyond your abilities with Applescript.

> and I sure as hell am not some Hollywood hacker who broke into his 
> gmail account in a way that Google and "several federal agencies" could 
> not stop.
> 

What does that strawman have to do with anything?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →

csiph-web

Re: Steven Carroll supports police shooting black people

Contents

#452113 — Re: You've seen his tax returns and you know we wants more $$ ?

#452114 — I desperately need validation from others.

#452119 — Re: You've seen his tax returns and you know we wants more $$ ?

#452156 — Re: You've seen his tax returns and you know we wants more $$ ?

#452159 — Re: You've seen his tax returns and you know we wants more $$ ?

#452168 — Re: You've seen his tax returns and you know we wants more $$ ?

#452155 — Re: You've seen his tax returns and you know we wants more $$ ?

#452158 — You judge a book by its cover ?

#452162 — Re: You judge a book by its cover ?

#452163 — Re: You judge a book by its cover ?

#452171 — Re: You judge a book by its cover ?

#452174 — Re: You judge a book by its cover ?

#453256 — Re: You judge a book by its cover ?

#452233 — Re: You judge a book by its cover ?

#452164 — Re: You judge a book by its cover ?

#452169 — Re: You judge a book by its cover ?

#452167 — Re: You've seen his tax returns and you know we wants more $$ ?

#452118

#452042

#452064