Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #451234 > unrolled thread
| Started by | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-12 12:38 +0000 |
| Last post | 2018-05-13 05:17 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 527 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-12 12:38 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-12 14:35 +0000
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-13 00:48 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-12 19:02 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-13 04:28 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-12 21:42 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-12 22:52 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-13 16:58 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-13 10:13 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-13 18:22 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-13 11:28 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 13:33 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-13 13:43 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 14:16 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-13 16:48 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 17:59 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 18:33 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-13 19:50 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 20:40 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-13 21:49 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 22:46 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 10:15 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-14 11:15 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 11:27 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-14 18:30 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 13:09 -0700
Does anyone here know of a proud bot owner who'd... Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-14 13:36 -0700
Re: Does anyone here know of a proud bot owner who'd... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 14:13 -0700
Re: Does anyone here know of a proud bot owner who'd... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-14 14:45 -0700
Re: Does anyone here know of a proud bot owner who'd... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-14 14:43 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-14 14:42 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 15:22 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-14 15:41 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 16:54 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-14 17:00 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 19:53 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 20:04 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-14 20:22 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 20:34 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-14 20:37 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 20:50 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-14 20:56 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 23:24 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 21:00 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-14 21:18 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:01 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 11:25 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:58 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 12:15 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 13:10 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 13:47 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 13:59 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 14:08 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 14:30 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 15:48 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 16:17 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 16:26 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 17:38 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 20:14 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 16:18 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 16:43 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 16:50 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 17:22 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 17:26 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 17:36 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 18:05 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 20:55 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-13 20:48 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-13 14:06 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-15 18:41 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:58 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-15 19:31 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 12:08 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-15 19:54 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 13:07 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 13:44 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 13:43 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-15 21:33 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 14:36 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-15 21:53 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 14:56 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-16 00:49 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 17:59 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-16 01:47 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 18:52 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-16 02:05 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 19:09 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 01:10 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 19:11 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 19:07 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-15 19:06 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-16 23:20 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-16 19:47 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-17 05:45 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 06:02 +0000
Re: Observations Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-17 09:01 -0400
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 07:14 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-17 15:16 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 08:46 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-17 16:26 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 09:42 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 10:21 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 09:57 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 10:26 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 10:33 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 11:08 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 14:07 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 14:14 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 14:45 -0700
Re: Observations chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-17 11:57 -0500
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 10:22 -0700
Re: Observations Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-17 13:44 -0400
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 10:52 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-17 18:33 +0000
Re: Observations chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-17 14:26 -0500
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 14:13 -0700
Re: Observations Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-17 16:43 -0400
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 14:44 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 14:09 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 14:16 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 14:46 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-17 22:29 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 15:40 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 12:53 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 14:36 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 15:30 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 15:42 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-17 23:14 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 17:07 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-18 00:39 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 18:02 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-18 01:17 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 18:30 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 11:57 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-18 12:52 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 14:45 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-18 15:39 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 18:27 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 19:21 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 19:49 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 20:08 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 20:17 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 20:25 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 20:37 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 20:53 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 21:10 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 21:22 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 21:31 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 12:04 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-18 13:03 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 13:12 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-18 13:34 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 13:50 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-18 14:02 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-18 15:37 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 15:47 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-18 15:50 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 17:04 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 17:53 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-18 18:29 -0700
Re: Observations Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-19 01:33 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-18 18:39 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 19:12 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-18 20:13 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 23:03 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 08:16 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-19 08:28 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 08:47 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-19 08:50 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 09:00 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-19 09:03 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 09:25 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-19 09:27 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 09:32 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 17:39 -0700
Re: Observations chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 07:16 -0500
Re: Observations Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-21 09:20 -0400
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 07:23 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 08:41 -0700
Re: Observations chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-22 08:22 -0500
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-21 09:31 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 09:59 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 11:23 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-21 19:28 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 14:39 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 20:21 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 00:31 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 09:09 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 09:47 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 10:04 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 10:17 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 10:29 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 10:42 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 10:38 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 10:58 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 11:05 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 11:36 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 11:44 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 12:32 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 12:36 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 12:44 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 12:48 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 13:20 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 13:31 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 14:36 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 15:04 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 15:23 -0700
Don't expect a good response. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-22 15:12 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 15:53 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 16:46 -0700
innerText Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-22 16:59 -0700
Re: innerText Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 17:39 -0700
Re: innerText Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 18:06 -0700
Re: innerText Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-23 01:18 +0000
Re: innerText Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 18:21 -0700
Re: innerText Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 18:32 -0700
Re: innerText Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 18:32 -0700
Re: innerText Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 18:49 -0700
Re: innerText RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 20:09 +0000
Why ? What's the goal ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-22 18:46 -0700
Re: Why ? What's the goal ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 19:10 -0700
Re: Why ? What's the goal ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 19:30 -0700
Re: Why ? What's the goal ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 19:28 -0700
Re: Why ? What's the goal ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 20:37 -0700
Re: innerText Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 17:46 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 18:05 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 19:13 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 19:31 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 07:45 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 08:43 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 09:12 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 09:24 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 09:49 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 12:34 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 12:56 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 13:34 -0700
Tables Within Tables. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-23 13:56 -0700
Re: Tables Within Tables. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 14:10 -0700
If not a .CSV file, then what ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-23 14:47 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 15:19 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 17:59 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 19:14 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 19:42 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 12:23 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> - 2018-05-24 14:42 -0500
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 13:13 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> - 2018-05-25 09:21 -0500
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 09:13 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 09:22 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> - 2018-05-25 12:08 -0500
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 10:20 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 10:28 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 10:38 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 10:49 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 10:56 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 20:41 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 21:08 -0700
Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-25 11:22 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 11:50 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 11:55 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 12:45 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 14:12 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 14:42 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 15:23 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 15:39 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 16:12 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 18:25 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 18:56 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-26 02:24 +0000
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 19:35 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 19:46 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 19:51 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 19:05 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 15:26 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 16:13 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 18:42 -0700
Michael's PlanetKilling carbon dioxide. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-26 02:27 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 15:32 -0700
"trolling and flooding" your way to freedom, divorce. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-26 02:12 -0700
Re: "trolling and flooding" your way to freedom, divorce. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 02:36 -0700
Re: Apple products are a fashion statement; Linux users are "ugly". Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 12:01 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 11:13 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 09:14 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 09:17 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 09:31 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 09:43 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 09:53 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 10:18 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 09:54 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 20:40 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 10:11 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 20:39 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> - 2018-05-25 12:09 -0500
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 10:16 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 10:24 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 10:43 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 10:50 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 14:15 -0700
Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-26 02:44 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 09:53 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 10:15 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 11:48 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 11:58 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 12:06 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 12:13 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 12:41 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 20:21 +0000
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 14:05 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 14:46 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 16:04 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 16:27 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 16:31 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 16:40 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 16:58 -0700
Tech question for Carroll Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 17:14 -0700
Re: Tech question for Carroll Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 12:27 -0700
Re: Tech question for Carroll Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 12:50 -0700
Re: Tech question for Carroll Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-29 08:52 -0700
Re: Tech question for Carroll Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 09:18 -0700
Re: Tech question for Carroll Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-29 20:41 +0000
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 16:53 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 17:21 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 17:45 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 22:59 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 17:35 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 21:26 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 09:28 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:42 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 10:33 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 11:31 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 10:42 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 11:04 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 11:19 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 11:43 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 11:59 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 12:51 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 12:56 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:06 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 13:12 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:36 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 14:11 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 14:56 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 15:59 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 16:05 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 16:27 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 17:01 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 20:12 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 21:22 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 06:41 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 18:12 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-28 19:06 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 11:48 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 11:55 -0700
Tech question for Carroll Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-29 14:41 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-29 12:12 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:13 -0700
Tech question for Carroll Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-29 14:40 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:36 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 19:28 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 13:02 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:12 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 13:27 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:48 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:37 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 12:18 -0700
Re: Mike is lying to himself because it's _useful_ to do so. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 15:56 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 14:23 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 14:48 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 15:30 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 17:43 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 20:03 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 10:21 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 13:09 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 14:00 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 16:51 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 20:17 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 20:53 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 21:30 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 21:47 -0700
The head shrinker. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-24 22:13 -0700
Re: The head shrinker. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 22:18 -0700
Re: The head shrinker. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 22:22 -0700
Re: The head shrinker. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 22:24 -0700
"kinder" is German for "children". Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-24 22:39 -0700
Re: "kinder" is German for "children". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 23:26 -0700
Re: "kinder" is German for "children". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 08:58 -0700
Re: "kinder" is German for "children". quatloo <quatloo@tribble.net> - 2018-05-25 09:15 -0500
Re: "kinder" is German for "children". Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 07:35 -0700
Re: "kinder" is German for "children". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 08:55 -0700
Re: "kinder" is German for "children". Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 09:24 -0700
Re: The head shrinker. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 22:19 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 22:04 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 22:10 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 22:16 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 22:22 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 22:25 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 20:19 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 20:25 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 21:06 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 23:26 -0700
Re: If not a .CSV file, then what ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 02:35 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 13:16 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 15:30 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 15:44 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 16:32 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 18:53 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 19:28 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 19:42 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 19:57 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 20:01 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 20:10 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 20:13 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 20:37 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 20:44 -0700
Ping Carroll: Why all the trolling? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 19:03 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-23 07:15 -0500
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 07:16 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 07:19 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 07:48 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-23 07:45 -0400
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 04:58 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 12:48 +0000
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 06:17 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 07:19 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 07:35 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 07:53 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 08:17 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 08:52 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 09:22 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 09:34 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 10:01 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 12:36 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 13:28 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 13:39 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 10:09 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 09:38 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-23 12:37 -0700
Re: Don't expect a good response. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 13:01 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 14:52 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-22 10:37 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 17:13 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-18 17:14 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 10:21 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-19 10:25 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 18:24 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 18:25 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 08:48 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 09:12 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 09:09 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 09:16 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 09:37 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 10:19 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-17 18:55 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 14:12 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-17 22:09 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 15:18 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-17 22:41 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 15:44 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-17 23:08 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 16:19 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-17 23:29 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 17:10 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 12:34 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 14:34 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 15:23 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 15:40 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 16:39 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 18:20 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 19:06 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 19:44 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 20:02 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 20:13 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 20:55 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 21:15 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 22:19 -0700
Re: Observations Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-16 07:38 -0400
Re: Observations chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-16 07:53 -0500
Re: Observations Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-16 09:00 -0400
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-16 07:14 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-16 07:03 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-16 07:16 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 10:45 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-16 11:54 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 12:04 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 12:33 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 12:03 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-16 12:24 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 12:29 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 08:15 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 08:38 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 08:47 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-17 09:08 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 08:15 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 09:10 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-12 17:20 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 10:34 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-12 17:46 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 11:02 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-13 04:34 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 10:17 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-13 18:26 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 12:49 -0700
Re: Observations "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-13 19:26 +0000
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-13 12:34 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 12:48 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 12:51 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 12:52 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 13:39 -0700
Re: Observations "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-13 21:03 +0000
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 14:11 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 17:16 -0700
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 13:49 -0700
Re: Observations "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-12 19:41 +0000
Re: Observations Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-12 16:06 -0400
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-12 13:23 -0700
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-12 20:52 +0000
Re: Observations "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-12 21:12 +0000
Re: Observations Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-05-12 23:52 +0200
Re: Observations Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-12 21:04 -0400
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-12 18:38 -0700
Re: Observations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-12 19:03 -0700
Re: Observations chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-14 07:05 -0500
Re: Observations Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-05-14 23:48 +0200
Re: Observations chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-15 09:27 -0500
Re: Observations Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 07:43 -0700
Wintroll predictions chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-22 08:06 -0500
Re: Observations owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-13 05:17 +0000
Page 2 of 27 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 27 Next page →
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-13 22:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3a5e3243-17d8-46b3-a0b7-055c258609a0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #451323 |
On Sunday, May 13, 2018 at 9:49:28 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote:
> On 5/13/18 8:40 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> > On Sunday, May 13, 2018 at 8:50:04 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
> >> On 5/13/18 5:59 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> >> ...
> >>
> >>>>>>>> Makes sense. One of the big benefits of what you are doing is the tie to
> >>>>>>>> a programming language. I *can* use AppleScript (and to some extent
> >>>>>>>> JavaScript) with Numbers but it is, well, pretty crappy. :)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> No, you can't do anything in JS, it's *way* too difficult!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> <https://streamable.com/vqzvj>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> I meant using it with Numbers... not JavaScript in general.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> One of the "big benefits" of what he's doing is he's not locked
> >>>>> into what you're locked into.
> >>>>
> >>>> He or I can use other tools if we want. Neither of us is locked in.
> >>>
> >>> That depends on the task. For creating multiplication tables AS is fine,
> >>> for doing what I was talking about earlier (and below), not so much.
> >>
> >> What I am noting is I am not even "locked in" to Numbers. I also use
> >> Excel and could use sc if I wanted. Years ago I *did* use sc (or
> >> something like it... I think called vc or something like that) on UNIX
> >> and also used the spreadsheet on AppleWorks. Now I use mostly Numbers
> >> and sometimes Excel.
> >
> > I'm talking about 'using' spreadsheets with external programmatic
> > influences, the context that you brought up when you wrote "the tie
> > to a programming language" (this is the context that' I've addressed
> > for the past couple of posts). Unless you've learned languages that
> > enable you to do that, you won't be able to do it so 'locked out' is
> > probably a better term. Why is AppleScript "pretty crappy" for
> > working with Numbers?
>
> It is slow and clunky, at best. Does not help that the person scripting
> it (me) is pretty clueless about it... but even when I have read about
> others who know it much better that is the general consensus.
>
> >>>>> Using Python, JS or whatever... he
> >>>>> can expand the usefulness in a way you can't with just AS. Apple's
> >>>>> answer to this was to open things up with JS.
> >>>>
> >>>> For their scripting, yes, though unless things have changed there are
> >>>> still things AppleScript can do that JavaScript cannot.
> >>>
> >>> Earlier, I was talking about using GoogleSheets as a means of
> >>> performing CRUD operations without a database so a client who
> >>> only knew how to update a GoogleSheet could use it for data on
> >>> their website. I previously showed how you can write to a sheet
> >>> (and it was a lot faster than I though it would be); this one reads
> >>> and filters out records that are not females who are 25 and older
> >>> with certain education levels.
> >>>
> >>> <https://streamable.com/tj6sl>
> >>>
> >>> Forget the filtering, how would you grab any kind of GoogleSheet
> >>> data with AS? I'm sure it can be done... but how would you do it in
> >>> a way that was conducive to putting it into a table on a client's site?
> >>
> >> Don't know.
> >
> > I don't, either... but it'd be interesting to see someone who knows
> > AppleScript well interact with it. Have you ever done any scripting
> > in AS that incorporates any of the Google APIs?
>
> Nope. If Sandman was around he would be able to speak of that MUCH
> better than I can -- don't know if he has done that specifically, but he
> knows AppleScript FAR better than I do, and knows programming in
> general... was going to say far better than I do, but that would imply I
> am a programmer at all. :)
>
>
>
> --
> Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
> cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
> somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
>
> They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
>
> <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
Carroll, 4/10/2015 4:04 PM:
-----
Cute trick... To the guy who hacked my Google account.
-----
No details. Seems to treat it as a joke.
Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:02 PM, <https://goo.gl/51rsmZ>:
-----
Email Hacking Is A Serious Crime
-----
No longer "cute"... now it is a serious crime. OK.
Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:07 PM:
By now he is posting more links to how serious this crime against him is.
Carroll, 4/10/2015 7:25 PM:
-----
I didn't write that.
-----
Now he is denying the posts from his own account. OK, he was "hacked". Someone else posted this. Hard to hack a gmail account given how they use two-step authentication and someone would need access to his phone or the like... but at least POSSIBLE.
Even then, though, if someone tries to guess your password Google alerts you and lets you know what IP address and other info. I know because someone in a Denver internet cafe has tried mine on several occasions.
Google even forces you to change your password when this happens. Very hard to hack these days.
So already Carroll's story is unlikely.
But let us accept it... someone somehow hacked his account bypassing the two step verification. This person did not, however, change his password and Carroll posted within an hour of the "hacker". Before that, unless he is an idiot, he changed his password and the "hacker" was locked out. The "hacker" got one post in.
But Carroll could not leave his story there.
Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:36 PM, <https://goo.gl/NJ2bMH>:
-----
Someone hacked my fretwizzer gmail acct so, for the time being,
don't trust anything from it.
-----
Wait. What? Even after Carroll figured out this "hacker" who was too stupid to change his password had broken into his account and Carroll *surely* must have changed his own password, he is saying the "hacker" might still have access. Might be able to break Google's two-step verification process *again*.
This is *very* unlikely... to the point of being unbelievable.
Even worse for him: he notes which of his accounts he is claiming was hacked - but in the past he has denied even using the other accounts! LOL! He screwed up and made it very clear he has multiple accounts and felt the need to note which one. He made the same mistake in the next quote where he speaks of WHICH of his gmail accounts he is claiming was hacked. Oops! If he only posts with one there would be no need to specify which one!
He has completely screwed up in his game to pretend he posts with only one gmail account. Completely idiotic of him, too!
Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:38 PM, <https://goo.gl/YA7gMO>:
-----
Some mentally deficient child hacked my 'fretwizzer' gmail account
so I may have to kill it. For the time being, don't assume
anything that's coming from it was written by me.
-----
He is still saying that he may have to kill the account instead of just changing the password which anyone with half a brain would have already done (and Google *forces* you to do when someone even tries to hack your account... I know because someone in the Denver area has tried to hack mine multiple times... likely Carroll but I have no proof of this). And he specifies WHICH of his accounts! He is directly admitting he uses more than one account! His claim of being "forged" with his second account is a lie. Proved.
Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:40 PM, <https://goo.gl/j6yCuV>:
-----
Looks like it's still being hacked despite me taking precautions,
I may have to kill the account.
-----
What makes it look like its still being hacked? And what precautions other than changing the two-step verification options does he need? And how would someone bypass this... is he really on the NSA watch list? Seems you would need someone at that level to be doing this. He watches too much TV where they computer hackers spend thirty seconds and bypass all security.
Just nonsense.
Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:05 PM:
-----
Apparently Google is having issues with their accounts to the
point where they're ready to undertake some additional measures.
-----
But, of course, no evidence of this... and what measures? They already alert users if someone else tries to guess your password and use two-step authentication and even force you to make a new password if it seems someone is trying to hack you.
-----
They're now involving several federal agencies in things they
didn't bother with previously in an effort to deal with people who
hack into accounts. They've asked me to leave the account open.
-----
So now Google is letting Carroll know how they are handling these things - and asking him to leave a *hacked* account open... one someone can be using to steal his identity. No. This does not pass the sniff test in any way. Even if they were doing this for some bizarre sting operation, which is in itself far fetched, they would have told Carroll to not make it public information so the hacker would not know.
Just insanity. His own story is so idiotic and full of idiotic claims it simply cannot be true. Carroll uses his secondary Google account - the one he accesses via Tor and is referred to as his Tor account - to have plausible deniability for things he says there. Now he is working to do the same thing with his main account. Maybe Carroll read a report like this: <http://cnnmon.ie/111QeT8> [money.com]. If so he missed the part where they note if you are *really* hacked, which is rare, the hackers change your password and lock you out. Why would they not?
-----
There's some new legislation that will help them deal with this
issue... which probably means more BS for us ;)
-----
Yes, new legislation to make sure Carroll does not have to deal with "hackers" and "forgers" which do not even exist.
The funny part is, this happened shortly after someone in the Denver area, likely Carroll, tried to guess *my* passwords and they did it from an Internet café (Google tells you the IP and that can be used to trace back).
My guess: Carroll is the one who was working to guess my password and figured this new lie of his was a good way to deny his own words even more than he does with his Tor account *and* a way to make it so if I had talked about him trying to hack my account he could say I was just copying his comments. "Proving" I read his posts... which for now I am to see how absurd his lies are. :)
Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:25 PM:
-----
The person who hacked into my Gmail acct. changed the wording on
this post. I've removed the others but Google asked me to leave
one standing for some odd reason.
-----
Here Carroll claims the hacker changed the wording on a post of his from *before* he had even claimed he was hacked. So this hacker not only can *post* for him but edit his old Usenet posts.
I call utter bullshit on this. Out and out lie from Carroll. And then Carroll says Google asked him to not delete these "hacked" posts... this is nonsense. Why would Google want him to leave forged posts in the public and why would Google not just keep their own copy? Even Carroll notes it is for "some odd reason" - yeah, because Carroll is telling stories that make *no* sense at all.
Carroll is lying. Maybe there is some kernel of truth to his stories? Even if so - and frankly it is unlikely he will ever show any evidence to back his claims - the details he is posting are absurd.
Carroll, 4/11/2015 2:10 PM:
-----
And he's so high he thinks people still have to manually enter all
their passwords in whenever they want to use anything that's been
password protected ;)
-----
Nobody had suggested, hinted, implied, or said anything like what Carroll says they did.
Maybe his story will be someone stole his laptop (or mobile device) and he had his passwords saved? If so why not have the device deactivated remotely? Why has he not said anything about this?
My guess: he realizes he screwed up when trying to guess my passwords and is now building a story so he can say his computer was stolen and it was not him. Or, LOL, maybe someone broke into his house and did it.
This unknown hacker knew he was obsessed with me and carried on acting like him. Makes complete sense, eh?
Carroll, 4/12/2015 8:45 AM, <https://goo.gl/KMf4pa>:
-----
The first one, that has since been deleted. My bad for having such
a feeble password on this account.
-----
Now he suggests it was merely from someone guessing his password - which contradicts his above insinuations that it could have been from a saved password on a device he had.
His story changes with the telling.
But as noted, when someone tries to guess your password Google has ways to deal with it. I know - Carroll or someone in his neck of the woods recently tried it with me.
Carroll, 4/12/2015 9:29 AM:
-----
The account in question here is a gmail account. Contrary to
Snit's delusions, I have no idea what a TOR account looks like but
it's a good bet it doesn't bear much of a resemblance to a gmail
account.
-----
Here Carroll plays stupid and pretends that if when he or anyone uses the Tor browser *Carroll* pointed to this somehow changes the way the gmail interface looks. Um, no. Worse it might do is make Google think you are in another country and you would have to set it back to English. But the basic look stays the same.
He is playing stupid and pretending to not know how the Tor browser he pointed to works. Just idiotic of him.
-----
That idiocy aside, I love how Snit has repeatedly, for years,
feigned ignorance about gmail accounts, yet, he keeps disclosing
info that proves he knows about them. Some fools do stuff like
this when they believe people are as stupid as the fool needs them
to be ;)
-----
I do not think Google would allow you to edit your Usenet / groups posts but I do not use it much and do not know for sure. Seems absurd that they would... and others have now said they do not. But given how I do not use Google Groups for posting why would I know the details of their system for certain?
Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:47 PM:
-----
Your obsession with me is insane. Working with Google I now have
proof you and ebot worked together to hack me. Clever. If I press
charges against you I have to also include her so you remain safe
for now.
Do not think this is over.
-----
No evidence of working with Google on this (and all out and out lies). Carroll is making public threats based on lies.
Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:50 PM:
-----
I promised COLA your trolling days were over so you contacted ebot
and worked with her to hack my account. I might not be able to get
your ass handed to you in court over this but wait until your boss
at Yavapai College contacts you.
Maybe you should make that call first. Ask about your comments on
incest.
See if those can not be quoted.
-----
Direct lies and threats by Carroll.
Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:51 PM:
-----
You went too far this time Snit. We have trolled each other for
years but to contact ebot and get her to help you hack my account
was over a line.
-----
A complete and utter lie from Carroll.
Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:52 PM:
-----
The above post is Snit hacking my account.
-----
A complete and utter lie... more false accusations from him.
Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:53 PM:
-----
You edited those posts when you hacked my account. Do not trust
anything from my fretwizzer account now that Snit and ebot have
access to it.
-----
More unsupported claims and attacks by Carroll.
Carroll, 4/16/2015 8:56 PM:
-----
Working with Google I now have proof Snit and ebot hacked the
account. Many of the older posts were edited. You can see evidence
of this by Snit pointing to "old" posts which have been modified to
say I claimed I was his "personal newsgroup rapist", a phrase I
have never used.
-----
No evidence of Carroll working with Google. No evidence of any older posts being edited.
--
E-commerce Simplified!!
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.c/KDQrv8appR8
http://www.5z8.info/freeanimalporn.com-start-download_s9j7do_dogporn
Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-14 10:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <26f19dda-39fe-412b-8e4f-030456f9f176@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #451323 |
On Sunday, May 13, 2018 at 10:49:28 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 5/13/18 8:40 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Sunday, May 13, 2018 at 8:50:04 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 5/13/18 5:59 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >> ... > >> > >>>>>>>> Makes sense. One of the big benefits of what you are doing is the tie to > >>>>>>>> a programming language. I *can* use AppleScript (and to some extent > >>>>>>>> JavaScript) with Numbers but it is, well, pretty crappy. :) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> No, you can't do anything in JS, it's *way* too difficult! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> <https://streamable.com/vqzvj> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> I meant using it with Numbers... not JavaScript in general. > >>>>> > >>>>> One of the "big benefits" of what he's doing is he's not locked > >>>>> into what you're locked into. > >>>> > >>>> He or I can use other tools if we want. Neither of us is locked in. > >>> > >>> That depends on the task. For creating multiplication tables AS is fine, > >>> for doing what I was talking about earlier (and below), not so much. > >> > >> What I am noting is I am not even "locked in" to Numbers. I also use > >> Excel and could use sc if I wanted. Years ago I *did* use sc (or > >> something like it... I think called vc or something like that) on UNIX > >> and also used the spreadsheet on AppleWorks. Now I use mostly Numbers > >> and sometimes Excel. > > > > I'm talking about 'using' spreadsheets with external programmatic > > influences, the context that you brought up when you wrote "the tie > > to a programming language" (this is the context that' I've addressed > > for the past couple of posts). Unless you've learned languages that > > enable you to do that, you won't be able to do it so 'locked out' is > > probably a better term. Why is AppleScript "pretty crappy" for > > working with Numbers? > > It is slow and clunky, at best. Does not help that the person scripting > it (me) is pretty clueless about it... but even when I have read about > others who know it much better that is the general consensus. > > >>>>> Using Python, JS or whatever... he > >>>>> can expand the usefulness in a way you can't with just AS. Apple's > >>>>> answer to this was to open things up with JS. > >>>> > >>>> For their scripting, yes, though unless things have changed there are > >>>> still things AppleScript can do that JavaScript cannot. > >>> > >>> Earlier, I was talking about using GoogleSheets as a means of > >>> performing CRUD operations without a database so a client who > >>> only knew how to update a GoogleSheet could use it for data on > >>> their website. I previously showed how you can write to a sheet > >>> (and it was a lot faster than I though it would be); this one reads > >>> and filters out records that are not females who are 25 and older > >>> with certain education levels. > >>> > >>> <https://streamable.com/tj6sl> > >>> > >>> Forget the filtering, how would you grab any kind of GoogleSheet > >>> data with AS? I'm sure it can be done... but how would you do it in > >>> a way that was conducive to putting it into a table on a client's site? > >> > >> Don't know. > > > > I don't, either... but it'd be interesting to see someone who knows > > AppleScript well interact with it. Have you ever done any scripting > > in AS that incorporates any of the Google APIs? > > Nope. If Sandman was around he would be able to speak of that MUCH > better than I can -- don't know if he has done that specifically, but he > knows AppleScript FAR better than I do, and knows programming in > general... was going to say far better than I do, but that would imply I > am a programmer at all. :) If you actually wrote a chatbot in AS grabbing data from a GoogleSheet would be trivial, even if you stuck to procedural programming (which it seems a lot of people using it tend to do).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-14 11:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <flu22tF2dt2U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #451355 |
On 5/14/18 10:15 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Sunday, May 13, 2018 at 10:49:28 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 5/13/18 8:40 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Sunday, May 13, 2018 at 8:50:04 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>> On 5/13/18 5:59 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>> ... >>>> >>>>>>>>>> Makes sense. One of the big benefits of what you are doing is the tie to >>>>>>>>>> a programming language. I *can* use AppleScript (and to some extent >>>>>>>>>> JavaScript) with Numbers but it is, well, pretty crappy. :) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No, you can't do anything in JS, it's *way* too difficult! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <https://streamable.com/vqzvj> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I meant using it with Numbers... not JavaScript in general. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> One of the "big benefits" of what he's doing is he's not locked >>>>>>> into what you're locked into. >>>>>> >>>>>> He or I can use other tools if we want. Neither of us is locked in. >>>>> >>>>> That depends on the task. For creating multiplication tables AS is fine, >>>>> for doing what I was talking about earlier (and below), not so much. >>>> >>>> What I am noting is I am not even "locked in" to Numbers. I also use >>>> Excel and could use sc if I wanted. Years ago I *did* use sc (or >>>> something like it... I think called vc or something like that) on UNIX >>>> and also used the spreadsheet on AppleWorks. Now I use mostly Numbers >>>> and sometimes Excel. >>> >>> I'm talking about 'using' spreadsheets with external programmatic >>> influences, the context that you brought up when you wrote "the tie >>> to a programming language" (this is the context that' I've addressed >>> for the past couple of posts). Unless you've learned languages that >>> enable you to do that, you won't be able to do it so 'locked out' is >>> probably a better term. Why is AppleScript "pretty crappy" for >>> working with Numbers? >> >> It is slow and clunky, at best. Does not help that the person scripting >> it (me) is pretty clueless about it... but even when I have read about >> others who know it much better that is the general consensus. >> >>>>>>> Using Python, JS or whatever... he >>>>>>> can expand the usefulness in a way you can't with just AS. Apple's >>>>>>> answer to this was to open things up with JS. >>>>>> >>>>>> For their scripting, yes, though unless things have changed there are >>>>>> still things AppleScript can do that JavaScript cannot. >>>>> >>>>> Earlier, I was talking about using GoogleSheets as a means of >>>>> performing CRUD operations without a database so a client who >>>>> only knew how to update a GoogleSheet could use it for data on >>>>> their website. I previously showed how you can write to a sheet >>>>> (and it was a lot faster than I though it would be); this one reads >>>>> and filters out records that are not females who are 25 and older >>>>> with certain education levels. >>>>> >>>>> <https://streamable.com/tj6sl> >>>>> >>>>> Forget the filtering, how would you grab any kind of GoogleSheet >>>>> data with AS? I'm sure it can be done... but how would you do it in >>>>> a way that was conducive to putting it into a table on a client's site? >>>> >>>> Don't know. >>> >>> I don't, either... but it'd be interesting to see someone who knows >>> AppleScript well interact with it. Have you ever done any scripting >>> in AS that incorporates any of the Google APIs? >> >> Nope. If Sandman was around he would be able to speak of that MUCH >> better than I can -- don't know if he has done that specifically, but he >> knows AppleScript FAR better than I do, and knows programming in >> general... was going to say far better than I do, but that would imply I >> am a programmer at all. :) > > If you actually wrote a chatbot in AS grabbing data from a GoogleSheet > would be trivial, even if you stuck to procedural programming (which it > seems a lot of people using it tend to do). > The chatbot I wrote was before GoogleSheets even existed! -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-14 11:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <89a9aab2-465d-42a1-a629-4e8a3539cc13@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #451360 |
On Monday, May 14, 2018 at 12:16:00 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > If you actually wrote a chatbot in AS grabbing data from a GoogleSheet > > would be trivial, even if you stuck to procedural programming (which it > > seems a lot of people using it tend to do). > > > The chatbot I wrote was before GoogleSheets even existed! LOL! OK, I'll bite (but you are getting crazier): What does that have to do with your AppleScripting ability?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-14 18:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <flu2uvF2k66U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #451362 |
Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > On Monday, May 14, 2018 at 12:16:00 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>> If you actually wrote a chatbot in AS grabbing data from a GoogleSheet >>> would be trivial, even if you stuck to procedural programming (which it >>> seems a lot of people using it tend to do). >>> >> The chatbot I wrote was before GoogleSheets even existed! > > LOL! OK, I'll bite (but you are getting crazier): > What does that have to do with your AppleScripting ability? > My AIM chatbot, which you referred to, was written in AppleScript.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-14 13:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bdf39ea6-3505-4a96-b893-117bac508464@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #451365 |
On Monday, May 14, 2018 at 12:30:58 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Monday, May 14, 2018 at 12:16:00 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > > >>> If you actually wrote a chatbot in AS grabbing data from a GoogleSheet > >>> would be trivial, even if you stuck to procedural programming (which it > >>> seems a lot of people using it tend to do). > >>> > >> The chatbot I wrote was before GoogleSheets even existed! > > > > LOL! OK, I'll bite (but you are getting crazier): > > What does that have to do with your AppleScripting ability? > > > > My AIM chatbot, which you referred to, was written in AppleScript. You don't say! Except... you have said, about 2000 times now, which is why I mentioned it. At least Apple gives the option to use the terminal: <https://streamable.com/pmh4d>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-14 13:36 -0700 |
| Subject | Does anyone here know of a proud bot owner who'd... |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@May.14--1.36pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #451371 |
> > My AIM chatBot, which you referred to, was written in AppleScript. > > You don't say! Except... you have said, about 2000 times now, Does anyone here know of a proud bot owner who'd flood this group to make Steve Carroll look bad ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-14 14:13 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Does anyone here know of a proud bot owner who'd... |
| Message-ID | <83c7f305-4d69-47d7-a742-7b1076919d87@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #451372 |
On Monday, May 14, 2018 at 2:36:27 PM UTC-6, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > > > My AIM chatBot, which you referred to, was written in AppleScript. > > > > You don't say! Except... you have said, about 2000 times now, > > Does anyone here know of a proud bot owner who'd > flood this group to make Steve Carroll look bad ? I even know an extremely dishonest and evasive one who once flooded Sandman's site and who is now trying to downplay his AppleScript chops. Whatever he did with that AIM bot, it's highly unlikely it could be retro- fitted for posting via GoogleGroups (though, parts of it may be useful). That said, I already showed most of the difficult steps required to automate a GG post, which Snit claims is "proof" that I'm forging myself, and I don't know squat about AppleScript. What are the odds that Snit, a person who has been using it for decades, can't do it? I'd put 'em at zero.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-14 14:45 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Does anyone here know of a proud bot owner who'd... |
| Message-ID | <flueceF520gU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #451373 |
On 5/14/18 2:13 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Monday, May 14, 2018 at 2:36:27 PM UTC-6, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>>> My AIM chatBot, which you referred to, was written in AppleScript. >>> >>> You don't say! Except... you have said, about 2000 times now, >> >> Does anyone here know of a proud bot owner who'd >> flood this group to make Steve Carroll look bad ? > > I even know an extremely dishonest and evasive one who once flooded > Sandman's site and who is now trying to downplay his AppleScript chops. > Whatever he did with that AIM bot, it's highly unlikely it could be retro- > fitted for posting via GoogleGroups (though, parts of it may be useful). > That said, I already showed most of the difficult steps required to > automate a GG post, which Snit claims is "proof" that I'm forging myself, > and I don't know squat about AppleScript. What are the odds that Snit, a > person who has been using it for decades, can't do it? I'd put 'em at zero. Ah, you are blaming me for your posts, playing victim again. What a shock! It is amazing how often you and other conservatives show off your victim mentality. Heck, you played victim over a college depicting a black man as an example of healthy masculinity. Poor you. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-14 14:43 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Does anyone here know of a proud bot owner who'd... |
| Message-ID | <flue8hF520gU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #451372 |
On 5/14/18 1:36 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>> My AIM chatBot, which you referred to, was written in AppleScript. >> >> You don't say! Except... you have said, about 2000 times now, > > Does anyone here know of a proud bot owner who'd > flood this group to make Steve Carroll look bad ? > It is Carroll playing victim. He claimed someone else took over his account and Google and "several government agencies" could not stop them. Uh huh. Makes complete sense. LOL! -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-14 14:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <flue6uF520gU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #451371 |
On 5/14/18 1:09 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Monday, May 14, 2018 at 12:30:58 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Monday, May 14, 2018 at 12:16:00 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>> >>>>> If you actually wrote a chatbot in AS grabbing data from a GoogleSheet >>>>> would be trivial, even if you stuck to procedural programming (which it >>>>> seems a lot of people using it tend to do). >>>>> >>>> The chatbot I wrote was before GoogleSheets even existed! >>> >>> LOL! OK, I'll bite (but you are getting crazier): >>> What does that have to do with your AppleScripting ability? >>> >> >> My AIM chatbot, which you referred to, was written in AppleScript. > > You don't say! Except... you have said, about 2000 times now, which is > why I mentioned it. You are the one who brought it up... but, of course, you blame me. > At least Apple gives the option to use the terminal: > > <https://streamable.com/pmh4d> > When I wrote my AIM bot it was for OS 9. Things have changed a bit since then. :) -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-14 15:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2625f53c-5870-4691-b2ad-e095d9be42af@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #451377 |
On Monday, May 14, 2018 at 3:42:57 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 5/14/18 1:09 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Monday, May 14, 2018 at 12:30:58 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> On Monday, May 14, 2018 at 12:16:00 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>> > >>>>> If you actually wrote a chatbot in AS grabbing data from a GoogleSheet > >>>>> would be trivial, even if you stuck to procedural programming (which it > >>>>> seems a lot of people using it tend to do). > >>>>> > >>>> The chatbot I wrote was before GoogleSheets even existed! > >>> > >>> LOL! OK, I'll bite (but you are getting crazier): > >>> What does that have to do with your AppleScripting ability? > >>> > >> > >> My AIM chatbot, which you referred to, was written in AppleScript. > > > > You don't say! Except... you have said, about 2000 times now, which is > > why I mentioned it. > > You are the one who brought it up... but, of course, you blame me. > > > At least Apple gives the option to use the terminal: > > > > <https://streamable.com/pmh4d> > > > When I wrote my AIM bot it was for OS 9. Things have changed a bit since > then. :) What does that irrelevant statement have to do with anything? All it does is underscore how long you've been writing AppleScript. The stuff you did with PDF recipes used a modern version of it so it's obvious you've kept up. One of the things that changed was adding JXA, which isn't 'English' enough for you <shrug>... <https://gist.github.com/SteveCarroll/d7543c6859db7f8948ce5f1b7b805dd9/>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-14 15:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fluhlnF5q9oU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #451384 |
On 5/14/18 3:22 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Monday, May 14, 2018 at 3:42:57 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 5/14/18 1:09 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Monday, May 14, 2018 at 12:30:58 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Monday, May 14, 2018 at 12:16:00 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> If you actually wrote a chatbot in AS grabbing data from a GoogleSheet >>>>>>> would be trivial, even if you stuck to procedural programming (which it >>>>>>> seems a lot of people using it tend to do). >>>>>>> >>>>>> The chatbot I wrote was before GoogleSheets even existed! >>>>> >>>>> LOL! OK, I'll bite (but you are getting crazier): >>>>> What does that have to do with your AppleScripting ability? >>>>> >>>> >>>> My AIM chatbot, which you referred to, was written in AppleScript. >>> >>> You don't say! Except... you have said, about 2000 times now, which is >>> why I mentioned it. >> >> You are the one who brought it up... but, of course, you blame me. >> >>> At least Apple gives the option to use the terminal: >>> >>> <https://streamable.com/pmh4d> >>> >> When I wrote my AIM bot it was for OS 9. Things have changed a bit since >> then. :) > > What does that irrelevant statement have to do with anything? I have no idea the relevance of you bringing up my AIM bot, but you bring up LOTS of things about my life and your fantasies of my life out of context. AppleScript was being discussed so it was at least tangentially connected... and you will note I did not insult you over your change of topic. Oddly enough you are now. But, of course, blaming me. So shocking you would do that! LOL! > All it > does is underscore how long you've been writing AppleScript. It was, undoubtedly, the biggest project I ever did and even then the "heart" of it was only perhaps a few dozen lines with then a BUNCH of lines which were largely a poorly done lookup table. > The > stuff you did with PDF recipes used a modern version of it so it's > obvious you've kept up. I fiddle and look things up as I need to. With the recipe script I used all of, what, a dozen or two lines of AppleScript? > One of the things that changed was adding > JXA, which isn't 'English' enough for you <shrug>... > > <https://gist.github.com/SteveCarroll/d7543c6859db7f8948ce5f1b7b805dd9/> My use of technology does not fit your desires and tastes. Man, that sucks! How are you handling it? Do you need to call a family member with your problem here! -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-14 16:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c2e455ff-47f3-413f-a57f-c14e8d43a0d7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #451385 |
On Monday, May 14, 2018 at 4:42:02 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 5/14/18 3:22 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Monday, May 14, 2018 at 3:42:57 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 5/14/18 1:09 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Monday, May 14, 2018 at 12:30:58 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> On Monday, May 14, 2018 at 12:16:00 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>>> If you actually wrote a chatbot in AS grabbing data from a GoogleSheet > >>>>>>> would be trivial, even if you stuck to procedural programming (which it > >>>>>>> seems a lot of people using it tend to do). > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> The chatbot I wrote was before GoogleSheets even existed! > >>>>> > >>>>> LOL! OK, I'll bite (but you are getting crazier): > >>>>> What does that have to do with your AppleScripting ability? > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> My AIM chatbot, which you referred to, was written in AppleScript. > >>> > >>> You don't say! Except... you have said, about 2000 times now, which is > >>> why I mentioned it. > >> > >> You are the one who brought it up... but, of course, you blame me. > >> > >>> At least Apple gives the option to use the terminal: > >>> > >>> <https://streamable.com/pmh4d> > >>> > >> When I wrote my AIM bot it was for OS 9. Things have changed a bit since > >> then. :) > > > > What does that irrelevant statement have to do with anything? > I have no idea the relevance of you bringing up my AIM bot Context got ya down again, Snit? > > All it > > does is underscore how long you've been writing AppleScript. > > It was, undoubtedly, the biggest project I ever did and even then the > "heart" of it was only perhaps a few dozen lines with then a BUNCH of > lines which were largely a poorly done lookup table. > > > The > > stuff you did with PDF recipes used a modern version of it so it's > > obvious you've kept up. > > I fiddle and look things up as I need to. With the recipe script I used > all of, what, a dozen or two lines of AppleScript? By you, maybe. But wasn't your solution done in Automator, calling 3rd party stuff as needed? Would you have been able to do it w/o the 3rd party stuff? > > One of the things that changed was adding > > JXA, which isn't 'English' enough for you <shrug>... > > > > <https://gist.github.com/SteveCarroll/d7543c6859db7f8948ce5f1b7b805dd9/> > > My use of technology does not fit your desires and tastes. True, script trolling is your bag, not mine. > Man, that > sucks! How are you handling it? Do you need to call a family member with > your problem here! LOL! If you actually believe you have the number of anyone who would care how I point how your fracture with reality, go for it ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-14 17:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <flum8iF6mm5U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #451389 |
On 5/14/18 4:54 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: ... >>>> When I wrote my AIM bot it was for OS 9. Things have changed a bit since >>>> then. :) >>> >>> What does that irrelevant statement have to do with anything? >> I have no idea the relevance of you bringing up my AIM bot > > Context got ya down again, Snit? Ah, you are blaming me for bringing up the AIM bot you did. How classy! >>> All it >>> does is underscore how long you've been writing AppleScript. >> >> It was, undoubtedly, the biggest project I ever did and even then the >> "heart" of it was only perhaps a few dozen lines with then a BUNCH of >> lines which were largely a poorly done lookup table. >> >>> The >>> stuff you did with PDF recipes used a modern version of it so it's >>> obvious you've kept up. >> >> I fiddle and look things up as I need to. With the recipe script I used >> all of, what, a dozen or two lines of AppleScript? > > By you, maybe. But wasn't your solution done in Automator, calling > 3rd party stuff as needed? Would you have been able to do it w/o > the 3rd party stuff? Off hand, nope. I did limit myself, at first, to things I already had on my system but later used anything I could easily get for free (legally, of course). I was not going to pay money to do the COLA challenge. :) >>> One of the things that changed was adding >>> JXA, which isn't 'English' enough for you <shrug>... >>> >>> <https://gist.github.com/SteveCarroll/d7543c6859db7f8948ce5f1b7b805dd9/> >> >> My use of technology does not fit your desires and tastes. > > True, script trolling is your bag, not mine. Wow... who would have guessed that you would blame me for your own actions. I mean, geez, just out of the blue like that! LOL! (Yes, that was sarcasm, in case you REALLY need that explained!) >> Man, that >> sucks! How are you handling it? Do you need to call a family member with >> your problem here! > > LOL! If you actually believe you have the number of anyone who would > care how I point how your fracture with reality, go for it ;) A shame YOU do not have their numbers. And again notice how you try to put me on the defensive. There was a time your trolling was much more clever. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-14 19:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6e879f8a-b809-4ae5-a0de-69c1553dfba6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #451390 |
On Monday, May 14, 2018 at 6:00:20 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 5/14/18 4:54 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > ... > >>>> When I wrote my AIM bot it was for OS 9. Things have changed a bit since > >>>> then. :) > >>> > >>> What does that irrelevant statement have to do with anything? > >> I have no idea the relevance of you bringing up my AIM bot > > > > Context got ya down again, Snit? > > Ah, you are blaming me for bringing up the AIM bot you did. How classy! > > >>> All it > >>> does is underscore how long you've been writing AppleScript. > >> > >> It was, undoubtedly, the biggest project I ever did and even then the > >> "heart" of it was only perhaps a few dozen lines with then a BUNCH of > >> lines which were largely a poorly done lookup table. > >> > >>> The > >>> stuff you did with PDF recipes used a modern version of it so it's > >>> obvious you've kept up. > >> > >> I fiddle and look things up as I need to. With the recipe script I used > >> all of, what, a dozen or two lines of AppleScript? > > > > By you, maybe. But wasn't your solution done in Automator, calling > > 3rd party stuff as needed? Would you have been able to do it w/o > > the 3rd party stuff? > > Off hand, nope. I did limit myself, at first, to things I already had on > my system but later used anything I could easily get for free (legally, > of course). I was not going to pay money to do the COLA challenge. :) > > >>> One of the things that changed was adding > >>> JXA, which isn't 'English' enough for you <shrug>... > >>> > >>> <https://gist.github.com/SteveCarroll/d7543c6859db7f8948ce5f1b7b805dd9/> > >> > >> My use of technology does not fit your desires and tastes. > > > > True, script trolling is your bag, not mine. > > Wow... who would have guessed that you would blame me for your own > actions. I mean, geez, just out of the blue like that! LOL! > > (Yes, that was sarcasm, in case you REALLY need that explained!) > > >> Man, that > >> sucks! How are you handling it? Do you need to call a family member with > >> your problem here! > > > > LOL! If you actually believe you have the number of anyone who would > > care how I point how your fracture with reality, go for it ;) > > A shame YOU do not have their numbers. And again notice how you try to > put me on the defensive. > > There was a time your trolling was much more clever. > > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> Blah... blah...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-14 20:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f58e5449-f845-434e-9820-bf24a0b056f0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #451397 |
On Monday, May 14, 2018 at 8:53:57 PM UTC-6, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Monday, May 14, 2018 at 6:00:20 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > On 5/14/18 4:54 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > ... > > >>>> When I wrote my AIM bot it was for OS 9. Things have changed a bit since > > >>>> then. :) > > >>> > > >>> What does that irrelevant statement have to do with anything? > > >> I have no idea the relevance of you bringing up my AIM bot > > > > > > Context got ya down again, Snit? > > > > Ah, you are blaming me for bringing up the AIM bot you did. How classy! > > > > >>> All it > > >>> does is underscore how long you've been writing AppleScript. > > >> > > >> It was, undoubtedly, the biggest project I ever did and even then the > > >> "heart" of it was only perhaps a few dozen lines with then a BUNCH of > > >> lines which were largely a poorly done lookup table. > > >> > > >>> The > > >>> stuff you did with PDF recipes used a modern version of it so it's > > >>> obvious you've kept up. > > >> > > >> I fiddle and look things up as I need to. With the recipe script I used > > >> all of, what, a dozen or two lines of AppleScript? > > > > > > By you, maybe. But wasn't your solution done in Automator, calling > > > 3rd party stuff as needed? Would you have been able to do it w/o > > > the 3rd party stuff? > > > > Off hand, nope. I did limit myself, at first, to things I already had on > > my system but later used anything I could easily get for free (legally, > > of course). I was not going to pay money to do the COLA challenge. :) > > > > >>> One of the things that changed was adding > > >>> JXA, which isn't 'English' enough for you <shrug>... > > >>> > > >>> <https://gist.github.com/SteveCarroll/d7543c6859db7f8948ce5f1b7b805dd9/> > > >> > > >> My use of technology does not fit your desires and tastes. > > > > > > True, script trolling is your bag, not mine. > > > > Wow... who would have guessed that you would blame me for your own > > actions. I mean, geez, just out of the blue like that! LOL! > > > > (Yes, that was sarcasm, in case you REALLY need that explained!) > > > > >> Man, that > > >> sucks! How are you handling it? Do you need to call a family member with > > >> your problem here! > > > > > > LOL! If you actually believe you have the number of anyone who would > > > care how I point how your fracture with reality, go for it ;) > > > > A shame YOU do not have their numbers. And again notice how you try to > > put me on the defensive. > > > > There was a time your trolling was much more clever. > > > > > > -- > > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> > > Blah... blah... The " Blah... blah..." reply above was automated. After dinner I figured out a way to do it with JS, you forging weasel. LOL! Kind of a hack, though, but it works.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-14 20:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <flv23qF8se1U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #451398 |
On 5/14/18 8:04 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Monday, May 14, 2018 at 8:53:57 PM UTC-6, Steve Carroll wrote: ... >> Blah... blah... > > The " Blah... blah..." reply above was automated. After dinner > I figured out a way to do it with JS, you forging weasel. LOL! Kind of a > hack, though, but it works. Gee, you just found out how to automate posts. LOL! The months of you doing so was you showing you do NOT know how to do it. Makes complete sense. Can you list the people stupid enough to believe your lies? Carroll blames me in 3... 2... 1... -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-14 20:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <77217b11-7278-4c79-814b-7b3316cd1fd8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #451400 |
On Monday, May 14, 2018 at 8:22:38 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 5/14/18 8:04 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Monday, May 14, 2018 at 8:53:57 PM UTC-6, Steve Carroll wrote: > ... > >> Blah... blah... > > > > The " Blah... blah..." reply above was automated. After dinner > > I figured out a way to do it with JS, you forging weasel. LOL! Kind of a > > hack, though, but it works. > > Gee, you just found out how to automate posts. LOL! The months of you > doing so was you showing you do NOT know how to do it. Makes complete sense. > > Can you list the people stupid enough to believe your lies? > > > Carroll blames me in 3... 2... 1... > > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> These posts are clearly not automated, they are made by a glue sniffing loser with a sick agenda who has way too much time on his hands (with maybe some scripted pre-processing). Nobody who isn't just using you for criminal ends (isn't a sock/shill) sees you as anything remotely close to honorable. You have few but Jesus to thank for that. I am groupie of C+, because that's where all the thrilling UI updates are happening. -- This broke the Internet! http://www.5z8.info/nic_cage_naked_y8b5qk_torrentEverything Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-14 20:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <flv30oF92knU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #451401 |
On 5/14/18 8:34 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Monday, May 14, 2018 at 8:22:38 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: >> On 5/14/18 8:04 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Monday, May 14, 2018 at 8:53:57 PM UTC-6, Steve Carroll wrote: >> ... >>>> Blah... blah... >>> >>> The " Blah... blah..." reply above was automated. After dinner >>> I figured out a way to do it with JS, you forging weasel. LOL! Kind of a >>> hack, though, but it works. >> >> Gee, you just found out how to automate posts. LOL! The months of you >> doing so was you showing you do NOT know how to do it. Makes complete sense. >> >> Can you list the people stupid enough to believe your lies? >> >> >> Carroll blames me in 3... 2... 1... >> >> >> -- >> Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They >> cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel >> somehow superior by attacking the messenger. >> >> They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. >> >> <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> > > These posts are clearly not automated, So you claim. > they are made by a glue sniffing loser with a sick agenda who has way > too much time on his hands (with maybe some scripted pre-processing). I will take your word for that. LOL! > Nobody who isn't just using you for criminal ends (isn't a sock/shill) > sees you as anything remotely close to honorable. Gee, blaming me for your posts again. What a shock! > You have few but Jesus to thank for that. What? > I am groupie of C+, because that's where all the thrilling UI updates are happening. Of course, Carroll. Of course. > -- > This broke the Internet! > http://www.5z8.info/nic_cage_naked_y8b5qk_torrentEverything > Jonas Eklundh > -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 27 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 27 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web