Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #450022 > unrolled thread
| Started by | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-02 06:54 -0500 |
| Last post | 2018-05-05 19:10 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 328 — 16 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-02 06:54 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-05-02 16:42 +0200
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-02 09:28 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-02 11:08 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-02 08:16 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-02 11:50 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-02 17:17 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-02 15:08 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-02 22:43 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-02 19:28 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-02 17:31 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-03 19:21 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-03 17:05 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-03 21:42 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-03 19:02 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-04 08:03 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-04 03:18 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-03 20:27 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-04 03:55 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-03 20:57 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-04 04:13 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-03 21:19 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-04 09:19 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-04 14:28 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-04 09:05 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-03 21:33 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-03 18:47 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-04 03:21 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-04 08:04 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-04 16:05 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-04 09:07 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-04 16:20 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-04 09:33 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 22:00 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-02 17:11 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-03 01:03 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-02 18:15 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-03 01:24 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-02 18:33 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-03 01:45 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-02 18:54 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-03 07:13 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-03 10:54 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-03 11:40 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-03 10:30 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-03 09:08 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-03 08:22 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-03 10:53 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-03 19:22 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-03 21:33 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-03 19:01 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-04 03:23 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-03 20:28 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-04 04:00 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-03 21:02 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-04 09:06 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-04 08:05 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-03 10:36 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-04 03:25 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-03 20:29 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-04 04:02 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-03 21:07 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-04 04:21 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-03 21:25 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-04 09:06 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-04 05:49 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-04 09:37 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-04 14:28 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-04 10:32 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-04 08:35 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-04 15:57 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-04 09:06 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 10:29 -0600
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-04 10:03 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 10:00 -0600
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-05 10:27 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 11:14 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 11:18 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-05 11:53 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 13:37 -0600
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-05 13:03 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 13:20 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-05 13:36 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 14:44 -0600
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-05 13:54 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-05 17:22 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 09:06 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 09:52 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 10:32 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 10:39 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 12:00 -0600
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 11:12 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 11:19 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 12:40 -0600
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 12:11 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 13:43 -0600
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 12:55 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 14:20 -0600
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 14:03 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 14:37 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 14:50 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 14:51 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-06 22:24 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 15:33 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-06 22:37 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 15:45 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-06 22:52 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-05-06 22:59 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 16:02 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-05-06 23:04 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 16:06 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-05-06 23:20 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 16:23 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-05-06 23:38 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 21:17 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 16:01 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 08:45 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 15:38 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 12:11 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 11:25 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-05 13:43 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-05 07:07 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-05 15:29 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-05 10:19 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-05 19:47 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-05 13:06 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-05 21:16 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-05 15:54 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-05 23:24 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-05 17:30 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-06 12:42 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-06 11:18 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 09:47 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 09:14 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 09:56 -0700
What's useful to Michael Glasser is very, -very- different... Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-06 10:27 -0700
Re: What's useful to Michael Glasser is very, -very- different... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 10:43 -0700
Re: What's useful to Michael Glasser is very, -very- different... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 10:54 -0700
Re: What's useful to Michael Glasser is very, -very- different... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 12:12 -0600
Re: What's useful to Michael Glasser is very, -very- different... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 11:22 -0700
Re: What's useful to Michael Glasser is very, -very- different... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 12:41 -0600
Re: What's useful to Michael Glasser is very, -very- different... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 12:12 -0700
Re: What's useful to Michael Glasser is very, -very- different... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 11:23 -0700
Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-06 11:39 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 11:57 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 13:16 -0600
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 12:20 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 14:01 -0600
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 14:26 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 09:28 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-07 10:06 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 10:16 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-07 10:25 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 10:30 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-07 10:37 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 10:48 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-07 10:54 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 11:08 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-07 11:19 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 12:07 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-07 12:37 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 13:08 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-07 13:44 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 08:25 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 11:27 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-07 11:37 -0700
BrownEyed "Cuba, North Korea and Nepal" appear to be your ideal. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-06 13:15 -0700
Re: BrownEyed "Cuba, North Korea and Nepal" appear to be your ideal. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 13:18 -0700
Re: BrownEyed "Cuba, North Korea and Nepal" appear to be your ideal. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 13:32 -0700
Re: BrownEyed "Cuba, North Korea and Nepal" appear to be your ideal. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 14:35 -0700
Re: BrownEyed "Cuba, North Korea and Nepal" appear to be your ideal. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 14:41 -0700
Re: BrownEyed "Cuba, North Korea and Nepal" appear to be your ideal. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 14:49 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 12:58 -0600
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 12:15 -0700
"CrackHead" is a pejorative -- it might be natural. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-06 13:34 -0700
Re: "CrackHead" is a pejorative -- it might be natural. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 14:37 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 09:41 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-06 11:11 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 09:46 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-06 11:00 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 09:45 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-06 10:52 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 09:44 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 10:35 -0600
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-05 10:41 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 11:47 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-05 19:17 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 13:08 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-05 13:16 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 14:42 -0600
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-05 13:46 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 14:49 -0600
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-05 13:56 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 09:09 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 09:55 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 10:40 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 10:49 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 11:01 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 11:25 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 07:09 -0700
MainStream Media worships BlueEyed Norway. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-05 09:04 -0700
Re: MainStream Media worships BlueEyed Norway. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-05 12:36 -0400
Re: MainStream Media worships BlueEyed Norway. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-05 10:42 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-07 07:25 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-07 10:15 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 10:40 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-07 17:23 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-07 10:29 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-07 15:20 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-07 12:40 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 12:45 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 03:01 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-04 17:40 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-05-07 04:14 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 04:24 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-07 09:48 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 08:50 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-07 10:18 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-07 17:36 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-07 10:44 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 07:02 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-08 15:58 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 09:09 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 09:19 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 10:13 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 09:13 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 09:26 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-08 16:57 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 10:01 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-08 13:50 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 11:07 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 12:37 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-08 14:28 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 13:39 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-08 17:14 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 14:45 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 12:55 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 12:22 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 12:59 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 13:40 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 13:58 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 19:05 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 19:53 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 07:04 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-09 08:00 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 08:24 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-09 08:29 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 08:56 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-09 09:44 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 10:23 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-09 10:27 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 11:12 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 11:41 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 12:16 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-09 13:51 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 14:03 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-09 14:11 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 14:47 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-09 16:30 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 17:14 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 17:37 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-09 18:20 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 19:55 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-09 20:01 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 20:38 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-09 20:39 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-10 08:10 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-10 09:21 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-10 09:28 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-10 09:33 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-10 09:45 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-10 10:09 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-10 10:20 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-10 10:54 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 20:50 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 20:02 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 17:29 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 10:25 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:16 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 07:40 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-09 08:20 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 09:14 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 11:47 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 09:49 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-08 17:18 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 10:19 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 12:29 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 12:59 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 02:05 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 12:41 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-08 17:49 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 11:01 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 13:07 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 11:17 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-08 18:20 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 11:23 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 13:28 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-08 18:43 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-08 17:10 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 14:14 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-08 14:34 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 12:56 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-08 14:31 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 13:42 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-08 18:55 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-08 17:20 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 14:47 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-08 17:16 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 14:45 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-08 14:28 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 11:01 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-08 15:33 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 08:00 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 07:33 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 09:24 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 09:44 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-04 14:28 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-04 08:09 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-04 14:28 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-03 17:27 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-03 07:12 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-03 11:46 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-02 16:37 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-03 19:31 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-03 19:58 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-04 03:27 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-04 05:49 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-05 19:10 -0500
Page 14 of 17 — ← Prev page 1 … 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 Next page →
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 17:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f87f4ccd-0dfd-4016-9cf6-c61c114b343e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #450982 |
On Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 5:30:20 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 5/9/18 2:47 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 3:11:38 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 5/9/18 2:03 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 2:51:21 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>> On 5/9/18 11:41 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>> On Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 11:27:05 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>>>> On 5/9/18 10:23 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>>>> On Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 10:44:13 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 5/9/18 8:56 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 9:29:22 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> On 5/9/18 8:24 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> Based on your standard of someone is more honest if they cannot be > >>>>>>>>>>>> quoted lying as easily as someone else > >>>>>>>>>>> ???! > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Who said they "cannot"? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> You are the one claiming that when you look at how easy it is to quote > >>>>>>>>>> someone lying this indicates how honest they ACTUALLY are. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Learn to read. I'm the one claiming that they are engaging in bias. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I'm pointing out what Politifact is*doing* > >>>>>>>>>>> which is cherry picking. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Nope. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> They clearly are. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> In a way you cannot show? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> In a way I can't show to you. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> Ah, back to your blaming of me for your own failure. > >>>>> > >>>>> LOL! > >>>>> > >>>>> *They* are the ones making the claims about people's statements. > >>>> > >>>> Right. They are rating STATEMENTS. > >>> > >>> And THEN they pop those ratings together into pages based on... > >>> NOTHING... as they peddle propaganda. The Ostermeier study > >>> in 2011 and the Farnsworth study in 2016 shed's light on their BS. > >> > >> Would love to see those studies. > > > > My take: That anyone can look at those pages and need to see > > a study to realize what they're doing (with the messages they're > > obviously trying to send) doesn't bode well for this country. > > > > Pages like that are the reason studies have been conducted. > > None of this is surprising given that the Tampa Bay Times is a > > well known liberal rag. The Poynter Institute, which now has full > > ownership (gleefully reported by democraticunderground.com) > > is funded by George Soros. I wonder how many media pies > > Clinton donor Soros has his fingers in now... > > > Ah, so a claim of guilt by association but no link to any such studies. To me the stuff was self evident without knowing who was behind it, you disagree. I figure if you were that interested about the evidence behind what you're arguing you'd do the research yourself.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 18:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <flhl2jF9mtgU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #450993 |
On 5/9/18 5:37 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: ... >>> Pages like that are the reason studies have been conducted. >>> None of this is surprising given that the Tampa Bay Times is a >>> well known liberal rag. The Poynter Institute, which now has full >>> ownership (gleefully reported by democraticunderground.com) >>> is funded by George Soros. I wonder how many media pies >>> Clinton donor Soros has his fingers in now... >>> >> Ah, so a claim of guilt by association but no link to any >> such studies. And no actual ratings you can point to >> where you show they are biased. > > To me the stuff was self evident without knowing who was behind it, Ah, the old "self evident" excuse to avoid the fact you have no support, along with your signature dishonest snipping. > you disagree. I figure if you were that interested about the evidence > behind what you're arguing you'd do the research yourself. LOL! You cannot back your claims so you work to turn things around and say *I* should be supporting the opposite. Too damned funny to see you at your "finest"! -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 19:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7952fba4-fb1a-4153-8db6-a375a7426bff@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #450994 |
On Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 7:20:22 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 5/9/18 5:37 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > ... > >>> Pages like that are the reason studies have been conducted. > >>> None of this is surprising given that the Tampa Bay Times is a > >>> well known liberal rag. The Poynter Institute, which now has full > >>> ownership (gleefully reported by democraticunderground.com) > >>> is funded by George Soros. I wonder how many media pies > >>> Clinton donor Soros has his fingers in now... > >>> > >> Ah, so a claim of guilt by association but no link to any > >> such studies. And no actual ratings you can point to > >> where you show they are biased. > > > To me the stuff was self evident without knowing who was behind it, > > Ah, the old "self evident" excuse to avoid the fact you have no support, > along with your signature dishonest snipping. > > > you disagree. I figure if you were that interested about the evidence > > behind what you're arguing you'd do the research yourself. > > LOL! You cannot back your claims so you work to turn things around and > say *I* should be supporting the opposite. You’ve missed it, you’re arguing that PolitiFACT *is* factual with no evidence other than they use the word “FACT” in their name ;) A fact is something you are required to show evidence for, it’s not merely a statement someone *labels* a “fact”.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 20:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <flhr0gFaqi3U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #450997 |
On 5/9/18 7:55 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 7:20:22 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 5/9/18 5:37 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >> ... >>>>> Pages like that are the reason studies have been conducted. >>>>> None of this is surprising given that the Tampa Bay Times is a >>>>> well known liberal rag. The Poynter Institute, which now has full >>>>> ownership (gleefully reported by democraticunderground.com) >>>>> is funded by George Soros. I wonder how many media pies >>>>> Clinton donor Soros has his fingers in now... >>>>> >>>> Ah, so a claim of guilt by association but no link to any >>>> such studies. And no actual ratings you can point to >>>> where you show they are biased. > >>> To me the stuff was self evident without knowing who was behind it, >> >> Ah, the old "self evident" excuse to avoid the fact you have no support, >> along with your signature dishonest snipping. >> >>> you disagree. I figure if you were that interested about the evidence >>> behind what you're arguing you'd do the research yourself. >> >> LOL! You cannot back your claims so you work to turn things around and >> say *I* should be supporting the opposite. > > You’ve missed it, you’re arguing that PolitiFACT *is* factual with no > evidence other than they use the word “FACT” in their name ;) > > A fact is something you are required to show evidence for, it’s not merely a > statement someone *labels* a “fact”. > > > Still not a single example of a rating from them which you think is biased, nor a sign of bias in selecting, nor a quote or even link to studies you claimed backed your view. You have NOTHING to back your view so you want to turn the burden of proof around. Good try. Not biting... other than to note that Politifact DOES show their sources, etc. If you think they are not showing their evidence then point to the rating you mean and speak of the evidence they get wrong or miss. But, and this is 100% predictable, you will not. You will instead blame me, work to turn around the burden of proof, snip content you cannot handle, directly lie, project your personal problems onto me, etc. Does it not bother you how amazingly predictable your trolling is. Hey, you have not whined about my degree as an out to you actually showing thought all day. Now fits the pattern of when you often do. See if you can stop yourself. :) -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 20:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <700876f6-0841-4748-9610-1e8ac8014a8c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #450999 |
On Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 9:01:39 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 5/9/18 7:55 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 7:20:22 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 5/9/18 5:37 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >> ... > >>>>> Pages like that are the reason studies have been conducted. > >>>>> None of this is surprising given that the Tampa Bay Times is a > >>>>> well known liberal rag. The Poynter Institute, which now has full > >>>>> ownership (gleefully reported by democraticunderground.com) > >>>>> is funded by George Soros. I wonder how many media pies > >>>>> Clinton donor Soros has his fingers in now... > >>>>> > >>>> Ah, so a claim of guilt by association but no link to any > >>>> such studies. And no actual ratings you can point to > >>>> where you show they are biased. > > >>> To me the stuff was self evident without knowing who was behind it, > >> > >> Ah, the old "self evident" excuse to avoid the fact you have no support, > >> along with your signature dishonest snipping. > >> > >>> you disagree. I figure if you were that interested about the evidence > >>> behind what you're arguing you'd do the research yourself. > >> > >> LOL! You cannot back your claims so you work to turn things around and > >> say *I* should be supporting the opposite. > > > > You’ve missed it, you’re arguing that PolitiFACT *is* factual with no > > evidence other than they use the word “FACT” in their name ;) > > > > A fact is something you are required to show evidence for, it’s not merely a > > statement someone *labels* a “fact”. > > > > > > Still not a single example of a rating from them which you think is > biased, They are rating and then giving percentages of “truth”, in order to do that they need to know exactly what the truth is (half-truths need not apply) on *eveything*. How do you propose to show that every single assessment of *theirs*is accurate and truthful? No one can do this, which is why only idiots fall for this stuff.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 20:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <flht80Fb7cvU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #451001 |
On 5/9/18 8:38 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: ... > They are rating and then giving percentages of “truth”, in order to do that they > need to know exactly what the truth is (half-truths need not apply) on *eveything*. > How do you propose to show that every single assessment of *theirs*is accurate > and truthful? No one can do this, which is why only idiots fall for this stuff. > Still not a single example of a rating from them which you think is biased, nor a sign of bias in selecting, nor a quote or even link to studies you claimed backed your view. You have NOTHING to back your view so you want to turn the burden of proof around. Good try. Not biting... other than to note that Politifact DOES show their sources, etc. If you think they are not showing their evidence then point to the rating you mean and speak of the evidence they get wrong or miss. But, and this is 100% predictable, you will not. You will instead blame me, work to turn around the burden of proof, snip content you cannot handle, directly lie, project your personal problems onto me, etc. Does it not bother you how amazingly predictable your trolling is. Hey, you have not whined about my degree as an out to you actually showing thought all day. Now fits the pattern of when you often do. See if you can stop yourself. :) -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 08:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <43ff3b11-ad1c-4c5a-a918-0ba2e3dc9e09@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #451002 |
On Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 9:39:46 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 5/9/18 8:38 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > ... > > They are rating and then giving percentages of “truth”, in order to do that they > > need to know exactly what the truth is (half-truths need not apply) on *eveything*. > > How do you propose to show that every single assessment of *theirs*is accurate > > and truthful? No one can do this, which is why only idiots fall for this stuff. > > > Still not a single example of a rating from them which you think is > biased, In your opinion... which isn't worth much... as I will once again show. I'll even take your ridiculously blatant partisanship out of it for a sec ( I know that's an impossible task). In your opinion, when they showed Bernie's"statements" as registering at 15% truthfulness and HRC's at 24%, you don't believe they cherry picked the data to create such a display on a page which headlined with: "The Final Five -- on the Truth-O-Meter" Do you *really* believe that what Politifact labeled as "All False statements involving Hillary Clinton" actually *were* "ALL the false statements made by HRC during the campaign? (or is the headline on that page "Pants on Fire" level BS?) In order to go along with what you've been peddling you'd have to, at the least, believe both of those things they've pushed. That's why I say you have zero credibility on discussing Politifact. My money says you can't even spot the issue with them labeling this "False": <http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/apr/02/donald-trump/trump-usps-postal-service-amazon-losing-fortune/> And I'd double the bet that you can't you spot the false statement Politifact is making as they perform their (ahem) 'rating' here.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 09:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <flj9s5FkujbU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #451027 |
On 5/10/18 8:10 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 9:39:46 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 5/9/18 8:38 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >> ... >>> They are rating and then giving percentages of “truth”, in order to do that they >>> need to know exactly what the truth is (half-truths need not apply) on *eveything*. >>> How do you propose to show that every single assessment of *theirs*is accurate >>> and truthful? No one can do this, which is why only idiots fall for this stuff. >>> >> Still not a single example of a rating from them which you think is >> biased, > > In your opinion... which isn't worth much... as I will once again show. I'll > even take your ridiculously blatant partisanship out of it for a sec ( I > know that's an impossible task). > > In your opinion, when they showed Bernie's"statements" as registering at > 15% truthfulness and HRC's at 24%, you don't believe they cherry picked > the data to create such a display on a page which headlined with: > "The Final Five -- on the Truth-O-Meter" > > Do you *really* believe that what Politifact labeled as "All False > statements involving Hillary Clinton" actually *were* "ALL the false > statements made by HRC during the campaign? > > (or is the headline on that page "Pants on Fire" level BS?) > > In order to go along with what you've been peddling you'd have to, > at the least, believe both of those things they've pushed. That's why > I say you have zero credibility on discussing Politifact. My money says > you can't even spot the issue with them labeling this "False": > > <http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/apr/02/donald-trump/trump-usps-postal-service-amazon-losing-fortune/> > > And I'd double the bet that you can't you spot the false statement > Politifact is making as they perform their (ahem) 'rating' here. > > > It is simply a fact that you have not, until now, presented a link to a rating you claim is biased, and even now when you do you ask ME to fulfill your burden of proof and see if I can find some way it is biased. No thanks... not here to help you, I am here to see if you will eventually back your claims (and to watch you squirm and try to turn things around over and over). Also will note you twist their page where you say they present all relevant ratings in one place with the idea they are presenting ratings on all comments made by someone, whether they rated them or not. They never suggest, and even directly counter, the idea that they rate ALL comments made by anyone. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 09:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8dcb0885-6939-4fc5-bbf3-f1493969c071@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #451041 |
On Thursday, May 10, 2018 at 10:21:29 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 5/10/18 8:10 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 9:39:46 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 5/9/18 8:38 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >> ... > >>> They are rating and then giving percentages of “truth”, in order to do that they > >>> need to know exactly what the truth is (half-truths need not apply) on *eveything*. > >>> How do you propose to show that every single assessment of *theirs*is accurate > >>> and truthful? No one can do this, which is why only idiots fall for this stuff. > >>> > >> Still not a single example of a rating from them which you think is > >> biased, > > > > In your opinion... which isn't worth much... as I will once again show. I'll > > even take your ridiculously blatant partisanship out of it for a sec ( I > > know that's an impossible task). > > > > In your opinion, when they showed Bernie's"statements" as registering at > > 15% truthfulness and HRC's at 24%, you don't believe they cherry picked > > the data to create such a display on a page which headlined with: > > "The Final Five -- on the Truth-O-Meter" > > > > Do you *really* believe that what Politifact labeled as "All False > > statements involving Hillary Clinton" actually *were* "ALL the false > > statements made by HRC during the campaign? > > > > (or is the headline on that page "Pants on Fire" level BS?) > > > > In order to go along with what you've been peddling you'd have to, > > at the least, believe both of those things they've pushed. That's why > > I say you have zero credibility on discussing Politifact. My money says > > you can't even spot the issue with them labeling this "False": > > > > <http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/apr/02/donald-trump/trump-usps-postal-service-amazon-losing-fortune/> > > > > And I'd double the bet that you can't you spot the false statement > > Politifact is making as they perform their (ahem) 'rating' here. > > > > > > > It is simply a fact <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9TNmfrbTnes&t=7s>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 09:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fljairFkujbU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #451045 |
On 5/10/18 9:28 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Thursday, May 10, 2018 at 10:21:29 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 5/10/18 8:10 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 9:39:46 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>> On 5/9/18 8:38 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>> ... >>>>> They are rating and then giving percentages of “truth”, in order to do that they >>>>> need to know exactly what the truth is (half-truths need not apply) on *eveything*. >>>>> How do you propose to show that every single assessment of *theirs*is accurate >>>>> and truthful? No one can do this, which is why only idiots fall for this stuff. >>>>> >>>> Still not a single example of a rating from them which you think is >>>> biased, >>> >>> In your opinion... which isn't worth much... as I will once again show. I'll >>> even take your ridiculously blatant partisanship out of it for a sec ( I >>> know that's an impossible task). >>> >>> In your opinion, when they showed Bernie's"statements" as registering at >>> 15% truthfulness and HRC's at 24%, you don't believe they cherry picked >>> the data to create such a display on a page which headlined with: >>> "The Final Five -- on the Truth-O-Meter" >>> >>> Do you *really* believe that what Politifact labeled as "All False >>> statements involving Hillary Clinton" actually *were* "ALL the false >>> statements made by HRC during the campaign? >>> >>> (or is the headline on that page "Pants on Fire" level BS?) >>> >>> In order to go along with what you've been peddling you'd have to, >>> at the least, believe both of those things they've pushed. That's why >>> I say you have zero credibility on discussing Politifact. My money says >>> you can't even spot the issue with them labeling this "False": >>> >>> <http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/apr/02/donald-trump/trump-usps-postal-service-amazon-losing-fortune/> >>> >>> And I'd double the bet that you can't you spot the false statement >>> Politifact is making as they perform their (ahem) 'rating' here. >>> >>> >>> >> It is simply a fact > > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9TNmfrbTnes&t=7s> > You still have not provided a link to a rating AND your reasoning as to why you think it is biased, and you still pretend they are rating ALL comments made by people, which is directly contrary to what they note they are doing. You have provided, of course, multiple easily quoted lies as you do this, and you have repeatedly worked to turn things around and either put me on the defensive or push your burden of proof onto me. Simple, easy examples of you acting in dishonest ad otherwise immoral ways. Interesting to watch. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 09:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3c2704b1-f665-4960-8961-f4ab0972d7a5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #451048 |
On Thursday, May 10, 2018 at 10:33:34 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 5/10/18 9:28 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Thursday, May 10, 2018 at 10:21:29 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 5/10/18 8:10 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 9:39:46 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>> On 5/9/18 8:38 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>> ... > >>>>> They are rating and then giving percentages of “truth”, in order to do that they > >>>>> need to know exactly what the truth is (half-truths need not apply) on *eveything*. > >>>>> How do you propose to show that every single assessment of *theirs*is accurate > >>>>> and truthful? No one can do this, which is why only idiots fall for this stuff. > >>>>> > >>>> Still not a single example of a rating from them which you think is > >>>> biased, > >>> > >>> In your opinion... which isn't worth much... as I will once again show. I'll > >>> even take your ridiculously blatant partisanship out of it for a sec ( I > >>> know that's an impossible task). > >>> > >>> In your opinion, when they showed Bernie's"statements" as registering at > >>> 15% truthfulness and HRC's at 24%, you don't believe they cherry picked > >>> the data to create such a display on a page which headlined with: > >>> "The Final Five -- on the Truth-O-Meter" > >>> > >>> Do you *really* believe that what Politifact labeled as "All False > >>> statements involving Hillary Clinton" actually *were* "ALL the false > >>> statements made by HRC during the campaign? > >>> > >>> (or is the headline on that page "Pants on Fire" level BS?) > >>> > >>> In order to go along with what you've been peddling you'd have to, > >>> at the least, believe both of those things they've pushed. That's why > >>> I say you have zero credibility on discussing Politifact. My money says > >>> you can't even spot the issue with them labeling this "False": > >>> > >>> <http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/apr/02/donald-trump/trump-usps-postal-service-amazon-losing-fortune/> > >>> > >>> And I'd double the bet that you can't you spot the false statement > >>> Politifact is making as they perform their (ahem) 'rating' here. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> It is simply a fact > > > > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9TNmfrbTnes&t=7s> > > > You still have ... proven you "wrong"? Sure... but who *hasn't*? "They never suggest, and even directly counter, the idea that they rate ALL comments made by anyone." - Snit <https://imgur.com/a/vkqvOG1> For you, the light never will go off that they are picking and choosing, despite the fact that they clearly are. Anyone can make anything look however they want when they are selective with the data... news at 11. LOL!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 10:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fljcluFlj6qU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #451053 |
On 5/10/18 9:28 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Thursday, May 10, 2018 at 10:21:29 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 5/10/18 8:10 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 9:39:46 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>> On 5/9/18 8:38 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>> ... >>>>> They are rating and then giving percentages of “truth”, in order to do that they >>>>> need to know exactly what the truth is (half-truths need not apply) on *eveything*. >>>>> How do you propose to show that every single assessment of *theirs*is accurate >>>>> and truthful? No one can do this, which is why only idiots fall for this stuff. >>>>> >>>> Still not a single example of a rating from them which you think is >>>> biased, >>> >>> In your opinion... which isn't worth much... as I will once again show. I'll >>> even take your ridiculously blatant partisanship out of it for a sec ( I >>> know that's an impossible task). >>> >>> In your opinion, when they showed Bernie's"statements" as registering at >>> 15% truthfulness and HRC's at 24%, you don't believe they cherry picked >>> the data to create such a display on a page which headlined with: >>> "The Final Five -- on the Truth-O-Meter" >>> >>> Do you *really* believe that what Politifact labeled as "All False >>> statements involving Hillary Clinton" actually *were* "ALL the false >>> statements made by HRC during the campaign? >>> >>> (or is the headline on that page "Pants on Fire" level BS?) >>> >>> In order to go along with what you've been peddling you'd have to, >>> at the least, believe both of those things they've pushed. That's why >>> I say you have zero credibility on discussing Politifact. My money says >>> you can't even spot the issue with them labeling this "False": >>> >>> <http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/apr/02/donald-trump/trump-usps-postal-service-amazon-losing-fortune/> >>> >>> And I'd double the bet that you can't you spot the false statement >>> Politifact is making as they perform their (ahem) 'rating' here. >>> >>> >>> >> It is simply a fact > > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9TNmfrbTnes&t=7s> > You still have not provided a link to a rating AND your reasoning as to why you think it is biased, and you still pretend they are rating ALL comments made by people, which is directly contrary to what they note they are doing. You have provided, of course, multiple easily quoted lies as you do this, and you have repeatedly worked to turn things around and either put me on the defensive or push your burden of proof onto me. Simple, easy examples of you acting in dishonest ad otherwise immoral ways. Interesting to watch. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 10:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e0750e93-9bb9-4aee-9923-96cc9f7f9a96@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #451061 |
On Thursday, May 10, 2018 at 11:09:22 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 5/10/18 9:28 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Thursday, May 10, 2018 at 10:21:29 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 5/10/18 8:10 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 9:39:46 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>> On 5/9/18 8:38 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>> ... > >>>>> They are rating and then giving percentages of “truth”, in order > to do that they > >>>>> need to know exactly what the truth is (half-truths need not > apply) on *eveything*. > >>>>> How do you propose to show that every single assessment of > *theirs*is accurate > >>>>> and truthful? No one can do this, which is why only idiots fall > for this stuff. > >>>>> > >>>> Still not a single example of a rating from them which you think is > >>>> biased, > >>> > >>> In your opinion... which isn't worth much... as I will once again > show. I'll > >>> even take your ridiculously blatant partisanship out of it for a > sec ( I > >>> know that's an impossible task). > >>> > >>> In your opinion, when they showed Bernie's"statements" as > registering at > >>> 15% truthfulness and HRC's at 24%, you don't believe they cherry picked > >>> the data to create such a display on a page which headlined with: > >>> "The Final Five -- on the Truth-O-Meter" > >>> > >>> Do you *really* believe that what Politifact labeled as "All False > >>> statements involving Hillary Clinton" actually *were* "ALL the false > >>> statements made by HRC during the campaign? > >>> > >>> (or is the headline on that page "Pants on Fire" level BS?) > >>> > >>> In order to go along with what you've been peddling you'd have to, > >>> at the least, believe both of those things they've pushed. That's why > >>> I say you have zero credibility on discussing Politifact. My money says > >>> you can't even spot the issue with them labeling this "False": > >>> > >>> > <http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/apr/02/donald-trump/trump-usps-postal-service-amazon-losing-fortune/> > >>> > >>> And I'd double the bet that you can't you spot the false statement > >>> Politifact is making as they perform their (ahem) 'rating' here. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> It is simply a fact > > > > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9TNmfrbTnes&t=7s> > > > You ... didn't look closely at the dates on the page that claimed to show "All False statements involving Hillary Clinton"? True, but I have now. The ones they list are for her 2008 and 2016 election campaigns, making the suggestion even sillier. Of course, at some point, the drugs will wear off and you may (but probably not) realize that selectively including statements is *how* you can make anything look any way you want it to look.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 10:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fljfasFm74vU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #451064 |
On 5/10/18 10:20 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Thursday, May 10, 2018 at 11:09:22 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 5/10/18 9:28 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >> > On Thursday, May 10, 2018 at 10:21:29 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> >> On 5/10/18 8:10 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >> >>> On Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 9:39:46 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> >>>> On 5/9/18 8:38 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >> >>>> ... >> >>>>> They are rating and then giving percentages of “truth”, in order >> to do that they >> >>>>> need to know exactly what the truth is (half-truths need not >> apply) on *eveything*. >> >>>>> How do you propose to show that every single assessment of >> *theirs*is accurate >> >>>>> and truthful? No one can do this, which is why only idiots fall >> for this stuff. >> >>>>> >> >>>> Still not a single example of a rating from them which you think is >> >>>> biased, >> >>> >> >>> In your opinion... which isn't worth much... as I will once again >> show. I'll >> >>> even take your ridiculously blatant partisanship out of it for a >> sec ( I >> >>> know that's an impossible task). >> >>> >> >>> In your opinion, when they showed Bernie's"statements" as >> registering at >> >>> 15% truthfulness and HRC's at 24%, you don't believe they cherry picked >> >>> the data to create such a display on a page which headlined with: >> >>> "The Final Five -- on the Truth-O-Meter" >> >>> >> >>> Do you *really* believe that what Politifact labeled as "All False >> >>> statements involving Hillary Clinton" actually *were* "ALL the false >> >>> statements made by HRC during the campaign? >> >>> >> >>> (or is the headline on that page "Pants on Fire" level BS?) >> >>> >> >>> In order to go along with what you've been peddling you'd have to, >> >>> at the least, believe both of those things they've pushed. That's why >> >>> I say you have zero credibility on discussing Politifact. My money says >> >>> you can't even spot the issue with them labeling this "False": >> >>> >> >>> >> <http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/apr/02/donald-trump/trump-usps-postal-service-amazon-losing-fortune/> >> >>> >> >>> And I'd double the bet that you can't you spot the false statement >> >>> Politifact is making as they perform their (ahem) 'rating' here. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> It is simply a fact >> > >> > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9TNmfrbTnes&t=7s> >> > >> You > > .... didn't look closely at the dates on the page that claimed to show > "All False statements involving Hillary Clinton"? True, but I have now. > > The ones they list are for her 2008 and 2016 election campaigns, > making the suggestion even sillier. Of course, at some point, the > drugs will wear off and you may (but probably not) realize that > selectively including statements is *how* you can make anything > look any way you want it to look. > -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 20:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <95b43d8c-57b0-4e46-b989-b4e0f5f077e9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #451001 |
On Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 8:38:29 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 9:01:39 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > On 5/9/18 7:55 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > On Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 7:20:22 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > >> On 5/9/18 5:37 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > >> ... > > >>>>> Pages like that are the reason studies have been conducted. > > >>>>> None of this is surprising given that the Tampa Bay Times is a > > >>>>> well known liberal rag. The Poynter Institute, which now has full > > >>>>> ownership (gleefully reported by democraticunderground.com) > > >>>>> is funded by George Soros. I wonder how many media pies > > >>>>> Clinton donor Soros has his fingers in now... > > >>>>> > > >>>> Ah, so a claim of guilt by association but no link to any > > >>>> such studies. And no actual ratings you can point to > > >>>> where you show they are biased. > > > >>> To me the stuff was self evident without knowing who was behind it, > > >> > > >> Ah, the old "self evident" excuse to avoid the fact you have no support, > > >> along with your signature dishonest snipping. > > >> > > >>> you dis... Are people still debating this? So, yeah, I buy into my own fancy, fully knowing flatfish+++ has been fooled, because it makes me reconsider my code, improving it. Pull up a record check on flatfish+++ and you will learn that he was in a penitentiary more than once. I do not know what for. The investigation sites fail to go into that extent of specificity and legal reports apparently have to be subpoenaed. You are as dumb as a shoe. I will squash beetles with my brain. -- Live on Kickstarter https://youtu.be/VxLiH-x0aeY http://www.5z8.info/open.exe_f2s2ea_nazi http://www.5z8.info/stalin-will-rise-again_j3h5uj_nakedgrandmas.jpg Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 20:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e3679ef3-aae0-4051-abb2-1f30e78acb19@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #450997 |
On Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 7:55:48 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 7:20:22 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > On 5/9/18 5:37 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > ... > > >>> Pages like that are the reason studies have been conducted. > > >>> None of this is surprising given that the Tampa Bay Times is a > > >>> well known liberal rag. The Poynter Institute, which now has full > > >>> ownership (gleefully reported by democraticunderground.com) > > >>> is funded by George Soros. I wonder how many media pies > > >>> Clinton donor Soros has his fingers in now... > > >>> > > >> Ah, so a claim of guilt by association but no link to any > > >> such studies. And no actual ratings you can point to > > >> where you show they are biased. > > > > To me the stuff was self evident without knowing who was behind it, > > > > Ah, the old "self evident" excuse to avoid the fact you have no support, > > along with your signature dishonest snipping. > > > > > you disagree. I figure if you were that interested about the evidence > > > behind what you're arguing you'd do the research yoursel... No one here has ever read my program, much less found a bug; still, in my auxiliary brain, I'm thinking, "I have dark thoughts in the middle of the night". Real discussion will leave once the trolls overpopulate. That, and there will repeatedly be a mentally unstable element or more in an unmoderated usenet group (hello Bill 'The Flooder' Cunningham). The current crap aside, we've all seen who often gets enraged when he does not get a catch on his hook. If you have 'file.doc' open in a user space program such as gedit and Bill 'The Flooder' Cunningham wants to change its name to 'windows.txt' via a hot key, Doc O'Leary's method might be wise. With no reason at all, as is usual for Bill 'The Flooder' Cunningham. Trinity is likely my second favorite DE and the only one I recommend to computer morons. Primary interface is Cinnamon, though. A modern look is all you want after the initial learning curve. BTW, I've already pointed out that his use of "herd" to describe true advocates is libel, since he's likening them to mindless automatons. Already moved on from that. You are too slow! You do realize that the massive floods ending up in multiple groups started out as a joke about hacking Google. -- Top 15 Ways Bill 'The Flooder' Cunningham Trolls!! http://www.5z8.info/nic_cage_naked_y8b5qk_torrentEverything https://youtu.be/UkAyrfOZaXc Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 17:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5f980465-266f-4088-8a10-afbbd47cd384@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #450970 |
On Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 2:11:38 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 5/9/18 2:03 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 2:51:21 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 5/9/18 11:41 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 11:27:05 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>> On 5/9/18 10:23 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>> On Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 10:44:13 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>>>> On 5/9/18 8:56 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>>>> On Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 9:29:22 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 5/9/18 8:24 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> Based on your standard of someone is more honest if they cannot be > >>>>>>>>>> quoted lying as easily as someone else > >>>>>>>>> ???! > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Who said they "cannot"? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> You are the one claiming that when you look at how easy it is to quote > >>>>>>>> someone lying this indicates how honest they ACTUALLY are. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Learn to read. I'm the one claiming that they are engaging in bias. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I'm pointing out what Politifact is*doing* > >>>>>>>>> which is cherry picking. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Nope. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> They clearly are. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> In a way you cannot show? > >>>>> > >>>>> In a way I can't show to you. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> Ah, back to your blaming of me for your own failure. > >>> > >>> LOL! > >>> > >>> *They* are the ones making the claims about people's statements. > >> > >> Right. They are rating STATEMENTS. > > > > And THEN they pop those ratings together into pages based on... > > NOTHING... as they peddle propaganda. The Ostermeier study > > in 2011 and the Farnsworth study in 2016 shed's light on their BS. > > Would love to see those studies. Have links? Quotes? > > >> You say they are being biased about > >> it but do not show any statement where they show bias, and then twist > >> things to say they are rating PEOPLE and not just statements. > >> > >>> I'm merely challenging it. > >> > >> Oh. OK. Which statement? If you think they rated one poorly then point > >> to it. > >> > >>> Here's the better question: > >> > >>> Instead of merely taking them at their word, because they report what > >>> you like to see, can you show that people's statements actually *are* > >>> how they've categorize them in every case? > >>> > >>> And the answer... Everyone is Barry 'The Moron' Margolin -- the oldest gag in the book. I thought showing him some kindness might help the situation. It did not. He'd have to be suffering from a form of insanity to be unsure of if he "once had" developed System76 with JF Mezei. Sound like anyone in here? When someone can not remember his past claims and makes use of bogus, self-image saving idiocy later, it's extremely obvious what his ploy is. It's trivial to pick by focusing on hardly any special cases unrepresentative from what's the norm. What is more honest from an honest advocates way of thinking are the non-exceptional circumstances. I have known grade school kids who argue better than Barry 'The Moron' Margolin does. A sucking vacuum of ideas, magnified by the reciprocal of a mere moment in a cosmological time scale, demonstrating the vast nothingness of the main character's so-called thought process. Are you being transparent on purpose? -- Eight things to never feed your dog https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/RSikBcWxBLo Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 10:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <be95b40f-3adb-4d90-8de3-fee9046ee8b5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #450948 |
On Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 8:29:22 AM UTC-7, Snit wrote:
> On 5/9/18 8:24 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> >> Based on your standard of someone is more honest if they cannot be
> >> quoted lying as easily as someone else
> > ???!
> >
> > Who said they "cannot"?
>
> You are the one claiming that when you look at how easy it is to quote
> someone lying this indicates how honest they ACTUALLY are.
>
> Any by that standard -- YOUR standard -- I am far more honest than you
> are. The conclusion in this case is, of course, true, but it is fun to
> note that by YOUR logic you just showed I am more honest than you are.
>
> > I'm pointing out what Politifact is*doing*
> > which is cherry picking.
>
> Nope. To show this you would have to show what comments they are NOT
> rating and give reasoning to show they would if they did not have this
> claimed bias.
>
> You have shown no bias on their part.
>
> > They*could*, if they wanted to, show how
> > many more lies HRC told than Sanders, they're clearly choosing
> > not to.
>
> You have not shown that they could. I will chalk this up to you failing
> to understand basic logic, th...
But Steve Carroll feels the need to attack the cult-like herd of convenient friends. So be it. Just some names Carroll has used
"Evil" John *
"Evil" Snit *
Big Crotch on a Small Fish
Cornelius Munshower
CSMA Moderator
Edward Stanfield
Fretwiz *
Hitman Hero
Measles
Petruzzellis Kids
Sigmond
Slaveen
Smit
Steve C *
Steve Camoll *
Steve Carroll <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> *
Steve Carroll <stevecarroll@xxxxxxxxxxx> *
Steve Carroll <trollkiller@xxxxxx> *
Steve Carroll's Dog *
Steve Carrolll *
Steve Carrroll *
Yevette Owens
Yobo_Obyo
Hell, just recently Steve Carroll was declaring himself the only "true Linux advocate", and claiming that "advocates" (in irony-quotes to try to paint them as the bad guys) are actively working against the success of desktop Linux.
By the way, spending time learning is never a waste. Asserting you know all and working to persuade Takuya Saitoh that it is true, as Steve Carroll tries to do? That is a waste ;)
--
I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened!!
http://www.5z8.info/lemon-party-redux_v1o7pm_nakedgrandmas.jpg
http://www.5z8.info/yourdick_v1o3ww_manhunter
http://www.5z8.info/php-start_GPS_tracking-user_f8h9lv_-OPEN-WEBCAM---START-RECORD--
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 07:16 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <tio5fd9k26jd36nftop7ojtqbk4ksm6uho@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #450865 |
Steve Carroll wrote: > chrisv wrote: >> >> Simply growing-up surrounded >> by ignorance, poverty and crime, is a huge disadvantage. Obviously. > >That's true for any group of any color, though. I think the larger >problem for the black community is they've lost the concept of >family (more so than other groups). Having grown up in the 60s >in N.Y., I recall a time when the black sense of family was every >bit as strong as the white family. Certainly there are cultural issues that are holding them back, as a group. When scholastic success is looked-down upon as "acting white", that's a problem. When someone does well, despite their disadvantages, it deserves as much consideration as their SAT score. It's just plain *easier* for the rich/white kids to get "the numbers". >The social programs have given >black men an out, they can father children but don't need to raise >them. You can never truly help anyone by making them dependent >on anything and any reparations need to go in the direction of >removing dependencies. The white man has done the same thing to entire countries. Ruined them with our "charity". >> According to the right-wing propgandist, it's whites and Christians >> that are the oppressed groups in the US. > >He may just be saying that to get the expected rise. I don't believe >one could argue that those groups aren't being demonized but, to >my mind, the oppression blacks feel is more tied to their financial >prospects so it's not much of a comparison. Anyone who would fall for the propagandist's bullshit obviously has no idea what it is to be "oppressed". -- "PS: if you post your public keys here, *I* can also read the messages if I want. ANYONE can. You might want to look into PGP and how it works. :)" - some thing, putting its ignorance on display
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 07:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <62c92fd3-bd1b-4243-909f-dc5430c6ca73@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #450927 |
On Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 6:16:52 AM UTC-6, chrisv wrote: > Steve Carroll wrote: > > > chrisv wrote: > >> > >> Simply growing-up surrounded > >> by ignorance, poverty and crime, is a huge disadvantage. Obviously. > > > >That's true for any group of any color, though. I think the larger > >problem for the black community is they've lost the concept of > >family (more so than other groups). Having grown up in the 60s > >in N.Y., I recall a time when the black sense of family was every > >bit as strong as the white family. > > Certainly there are cultural issues that are holding them back, as a > group. When scholastic success is looked-down upon as "acting white", > that's a problem. And that's another huge issue I completely forgot about. > When someone does well, despite their disadvantages, it deserves as > much consideration as their SAT score. It's just plain *easier* for > the rich/white kids to get "the numbers". I'd probably take the word "rich" out of it because it sorta dilutes the point but... yeah. > >The social programs have given > >black men an out, they can father children but don't need to raise > >them. You can never truly help anyone by making them dependent > >on anything and any reparations need to go in the direction of > >removing dependencies. > > The white man has done the same thing to entire countries. Ruined > them with our "charity". > > >> According to the right-wing propgandist, it's whites and Christians > >> that are the oppressed groups in the US. > > > >He may just be saying that to get the expected rise. I don't believe > >one could argue that those groups aren't being demonized but, to > >my mind, the oppression blacks feel is more tied to their financial > >prospects so it's not much of a comparison. > > Anyone who would fall for the propagandist's bullshit obviously has no > idea what it is to be "oppressed". Context is always the key. There will always be discrimination, and it'll go in both directions. But how can anyone argue that whites are as financially oppressed as the black community? They can't: <https://www.kff.org/other/state-indicator/poverty-rate-by-raceethnicity/?currentTimeframe=0&sortModel=%7B%22colId%22:%22Location%22,%22sort%22:%22asc%22%7D> We can argue the causes... how much more, or less, does what happened in the past affect today and we probably never will come up with anything resembling a solution. Or we can do what you mentioned elsewhere in a different context but still applies here (in my opinion): "What's important is what living people are thinking and doing." That's not to say we should completely forget the past, just that you won't change as much going forward if you keep using the past as the reason for not moving forward. No one is immune to that reality. On something like affirmation action, while I disagree with the idea in principle, I understand why it was done. There are no easy answers. Should cops in a predominantly black, low income, high crime area engage in profiling? Again, while I disagree, I understand the reason for doing so in what is tantamount to a war zone. > -- > "PS: if you post your public keys here, *I* can also read the messages > if I want. ANYONE can. You might want to look into PGP and how it > works. :)" - some thing, putting its ignorance on display Great quote by the 'IT Master' ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 14 of 17 — ← Prev page 1 … 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web