Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #450022 > unrolled thread
| Started by | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-02 06:54 -0500 |
| Last post | 2018-05-05 19:10 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 328 — 16 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-02 06:54 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-05-02 16:42 +0200
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-02 09:28 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-02 11:08 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-02 08:16 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-02 11:50 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-02 17:17 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-02 15:08 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-02 22:43 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-02 19:28 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-02 17:31 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-03 19:21 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-03 17:05 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-03 21:42 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-03 19:02 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-04 08:03 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-04 03:18 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-03 20:27 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-04 03:55 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-03 20:57 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-04 04:13 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-03 21:19 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-04 09:19 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-04 14:28 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-04 09:05 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-03 21:33 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-03 18:47 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-04 03:21 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-04 08:04 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-04 16:05 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-04 09:07 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-04 16:20 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-04 09:33 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 22:00 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-02 17:11 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-03 01:03 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-02 18:15 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-03 01:24 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-02 18:33 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-03 01:45 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-02 18:54 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-03 07:13 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-03 10:54 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-03 11:40 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-03 10:30 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-03 09:08 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-03 08:22 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-03 10:53 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-03 19:22 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-03 21:33 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-03 19:01 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-04 03:23 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-03 20:28 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-04 04:00 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-03 21:02 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-04 09:06 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-04 08:05 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-03 10:36 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-04 03:25 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-03 20:29 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-04 04:02 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-03 21:07 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-04 04:21 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-03 21:25 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-04 09:06 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-04 05:49 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-04 09:37 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-04 14:28 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-04 10:32 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-04 08:35 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-04 15:57 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-04 09:06 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 10:29 -0600
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-04 10:03 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 10:00 -0600
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-05 10:27 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 11:14 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 11:18 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-05 11:53 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 13:37 -0600
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-05 13:03 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 13:20 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-05 13:36 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 14:44 -0600
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-05 13:54 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-05 17:22 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 09:06 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 09:52 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 10:32 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 10:39 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 12:00 -0600
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 11:12 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 11:19 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 12:40 -0600
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 12:11 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 13:43 -0600
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 12:55 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 14:20 -0600
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 14:03 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 14:37 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 14:50 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 14:51 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-06 22:24 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 15:33 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-06 22:37 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 15:45 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-06 22:52 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-05-06 22:59 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 16:02 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-05-06 23:04 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 16:06 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-05-06 23:20 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 16:23 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-05-06 23:38 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 21:17 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 16:01 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 08:45 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 15:38 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 12:11 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 11:25 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-05 13:43 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-05 07:07 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-05 15:29 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-05 10:19 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-05 19:47 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-05 13:06 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-05 21:16 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-05 15:54 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-05 23:24 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-05 17:30 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-06 12:42 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-06 11:18 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 09:47 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 09:14 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 09:56 -0700
What's useful to Michael Glasser is very, -very- different... Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-06 10:27 -0700
Re: What's useful to Michael Glasser is very, -very- different... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 10:43 -0700
Re: What's useful to Michael Glasser is very, -very- different... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 10:54 -0700
Re: What's useful to Michael Glasser is very, -very- different... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 12:12 -0600
Re: What's useful to Michael Glasser is very, -very- different... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 11:22 -0700
Re: What's useful to Michael Glasser is very, -very- different... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 12:41 -0600
Re: What's useful to Michael Glasser is very, -very- different... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 12:12 -0700
Re: What's useful to Michael Glasser is very, -very- different... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 11:23 -0700
Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-06 11:39 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 11:57 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 13:16 -0600
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 12:20 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 14:01 -0600
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 14:26 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 09:28 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-07 10:06 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 10:16 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-07 10:25 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 10:30 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-07 10:37 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 10:48 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-07 10:54 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 11:08 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-07 11:19 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 12:07 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-07 12:37 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 13:08 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-07 13:44 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 08:25 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 11:27 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-07 11:37 -0700
BrownEyed "Cuba, North Korea and Nepal" appear to be your ideal. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-06 13:15 -0700
Re: BrownEyed "Cuba, North Korea and Nepal" appear to be your ideal. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 13:18 -0700
Re: BrownEyed "Cuba, North Korea and Nepal" appear to be your ideal. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 13:32 -0700
Re: BrownEyed "Cuba, North Korea and Nepal" appear to be your ideal. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 14:35 -0700
Re: BrownEyed "Cuba, North Korea and Nepal" appear to be your ideal. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 14:41 -0700
Re: BrownEyed "Cuba, North Korea and Nepal" appear to be your ideal. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 14:49 -0700
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 12:58 -0600
Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 12:15 -0700
"CrackHead" is a pejorative -- it might be natural. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-06 13:34 -0700
Re: "CrackHead" is a pejorative -- it might be natural. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 14:37 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 09:41 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-06 11:11 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 09:46 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-06 11:00 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 09:45 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-06 10:52 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 09:44 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 10:35 -0600
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-05 10:41 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 11:47 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-05 19:17 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 13:08 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-05 13:16 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 14:42 -0600
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-05 13:46 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 14:49 -0600
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-05 13:56 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 09:09 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 09:55 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 10:40 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 10:49 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 11:01 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 11:25 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 07:09 -0700
MainStream Media worships BlueEyed Norway. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-05 09:04 -0700
Re: MainStream Media worships BlueEyed Norway. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-05 12:36 -0400
Re: MainStream Media worships BlueEyed Norway. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-05 10:42 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-07 07:25 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-07 10:15 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 10:40 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-07 17:23 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-07 10:29 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-07 15:20 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-07 12:40 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 12:45 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 03:01 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-04 17:40 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-05-07 04:14 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 04:24 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-07 09:48 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 08:50 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-07 10:18 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-07 17:36 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-07 10:44 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 07:02 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-08 15:58 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 09:09 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 09:19 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 10:13 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 09:13 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 09:26 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-08 16:57 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 10:01 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-08 13:50 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 11:07 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 12:37 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-08 14:28 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 13:39 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-08 17:14 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 14:45 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 12:55 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 12:22 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 12:59 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 13:40 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 13:58 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 19:05 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 19:53 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 07:04 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-09 08:00 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 08:24 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-09 08:29 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 08:56 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-09 09:44 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 10:23 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-09 10:27 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 11:12 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 11:41 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 12:16 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-09 13:51 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 14:03 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-09 14:11 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 14:47 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-09 16:30 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 17:14 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 17:37 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-09 18:20 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 19:55 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-09 20:01 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 20:38 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-09 20:39 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-10 08:10 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-10 09:21 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-10 09:28 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-10 09:33 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-10 09:45 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-10 10:09 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-10 10:20 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-10 10:54 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 20:50 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 20:02 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 17:29 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 10:25 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:16 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 07:40 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-09 08:20 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 09:14 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 11:47 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 09:49 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-08 17:18 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 10:19 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 12:29 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 12:59 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 02:05 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 12:41 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-08 17:49 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 11:01 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 13:07 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 11:17 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-08 18:20 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 11:23 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 13:28 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-08 18:43 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-08 17:10 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 14:14 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-08 14:34 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 12:56 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-08 14:31 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 13:42 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-08 18:55 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-08 17:20 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 14:47 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-08 17:16 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 14:45 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-08 14:28 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 11:01 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-08 15:33 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 08:00 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 07:33 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-08 09:24 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 09:44 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-04 14:28 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-04 08:09 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-04 14:28 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-03 17:27 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-03 07:12 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-03 11:46 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-02 16:37 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-03 19:31 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-03 19:58 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-04 03:27 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-04 05:49 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-05 19:10 -0500
Page 9 of 17 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 … 17 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-07 12:37 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? |
| Message-ID | <flbo7sF32aU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #450755 |
On 5/7/18 12:07 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
...
>> You went back to your games where you demand I quote back to you what
>> you have said...
>
> Why *shouldn't* I ask you to quote something of mine you've *claimed*
> I've written? Well, OK... you, being you... we all know why I shouldn't...
> but you get the idea ;)
>
> I suggest you either get better at telling lies or go back to talkin' tech.
>
Gee, do I want to go to ANOTHER side issue meta-debate of yours where
you twist my noting you want me to quote your comments back to you to
suggesting I lied about your comments (an insinuated lie of yours) and
to where you pretend, again dishonestly, that I did not quote your
comments and show the context you pretend does not exist. Well, I guess
I must want to because I just did! But I would prefer if you would grow
up and actually respond to the content where I DO quote you, in context,
and prove you said what you said!
On 5/6/18 9:09 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Saturday, May 5, 2018 at 2:56:41 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
>> On 5/5/18 1:49 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> On 2018-05-05 20:46:59 +0000, Snit said:
>>>
>>>> On 5/5/18 1:42 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>> On 2018-05-05 20:16:53 +0000, Snit said:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/5/18 1:08 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>> You are backing racial quotas of a sort...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm pointing out how they undoubtedly *must* be forced to look
>>>>>>>>> at things in a way that you and I will never have to if they
>>>>>>>>> want to live through the day.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> They no more have to judge people by the color of their skin
>>>>>>>> than colleges and employers have to with affirmative action.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No one has to do anything... but prudence suggests that it would
>>>>>>> be in their interest to do so if they want to live when policing
>>>>>>> in the high crime areas.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> One black person is not responsible for the actions of another.
>>>>>> You are trying to justify police shooting someone based on the
>>>>>> color of their skin.
>>>>>>
>>>>> LOL! Where do you believe I 'justified' that?
>>>>>
>>>> Sigh. OK, you are back to your game playing nonsense... you JUST
>>>> said how they have to target blacks differently
>>>>
>>> I used the wrod "target"?! Where?
>>>
>> My level of interest in your word games: zero.
>>
> The games were all yours, Mr. Pathological Liar.
You went back to your games where you demand I quote back to you what
you have said... and then denying you said it because I spoke of what I
disagree with in your views but did not use your exact words.
Even worse you do this AS you lie about what I have said, in this case
claiming I "equated policing in high crime areas with job/college
issues". You made that up in response to my noting I do not back
grouping people by color in either situation, which does not in any way
imply the two situations are equal.
But back to your support of judging people by the color of their skin,
and you being OK with this in situations where black people are shot!
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0141854
——
The results provide evidence of a significant bias in the killing of
unarmed black Americans relative to unarmed white Americans, in that the
probability of being {black, unarmed, and shot by police} is about 3.49
times the probability of being {white, unarmed, and shot by police} on
average. Furthermore, the results of multi-level modeling show that
there exists significant heterogeneity across counties in the extent of
racial bias in police shootings, with some counties showing relative
risk ratios of 20 to 1 or more. Finally, analysis of police shooting
data as a function of county-level predictors suggests that racial bias
in police shootings is most likely to emerge in police departments in
larger metropolitan counties with low median incomes and a sizable
portion of black residents, especially when there is high financial
inequality in that county. There is no relationship between county-level
racial bias in police shootings and crime rates (even race-specific
crime rates), meaning that the racial bias observed in police shootings
in this data set is not explainable as a response to local-level crime
rates.
——
Steve Carroll
-----
What does that last statement tell you? In such areas, given
that stats show a police officer is 18.9 times more likely
to be killed by a black male (who, at 6% commit 42% of
police officer deaths), you wouldn't think it prudent for
them to exhibit a "bias" if they want to come home from work
that night? It's a war zone, the things we'd all like to
believe should be done can't be done, there'd be no one left
alive to do them.
-----
I'm pointing out how they undoubtedly *must* be forced to
look at things in a way that you and I will never have to if
they want to live through the day.
-----
> They no more have to judge people by the color of
> their skin than colleges and employers have to
> with affirmative action.
No one has to do anything... but prudence suggests
that it would be in their interest to do so if they
want to live when policing in the high crime areas.
-----
> You are STILL backing judging people by the color
> of their skin
I'm just recognizing that police officers in these
high crime areas don't have the luxury not to.
-----
That is you, Carroll, noting your support for targeting people based on
the color of their skin in determining who to shoot. You can cry and
whine and lie when faced with your own words, as you did during your
tantrum over a black person being shown as an example of healthy
masculinity, but you still are responsible for your words.
You have always shown racist tendencies but you used to be better at
hiding them... you used to want to be the KKK member who never had his
hood lifted. Now, perhaps based on Trump's open bigotry and how he has
made it more acceptable in this nation to be a bigot, you have a harder
time keeping your hood on. Or maybe you just do not care to.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-07 13:08 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? |
| Message-ID | <a1fc410d-6ee9-4d30-9c41-a48a6fdb6fdd@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #450759 |
On Monday, May 7, 2018 at 1:37:37 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 5/7/18 12:07 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > ... > >> You went back to your games where you demand I quote back to you what > >> you have said... > > > > Why *shouldn't* I ask you to quote something of mine you've *claimed* > > I've written? Well, OK... you, being you... we all know why I shouldn't... > > but you get the idea ;) > > > > I suggest you either get better at telling lies or go back to talkin' tech. > > > Gee, do I want to go to ANOTHER side issue ??? The name of this thread is Talkin' tech, the ng is about tech. How do you figure all the off topic BS posts you put up are *not* side issues... but tech topics are?! C'mon, you can do it... just switch to some troll about PDFs, menu items being labeled "wrong", etc. Anyone can see that the way you're going you're going to be ignored again... which might happen anyway... but wouldn't you rather be ignored based on a disagreement about tech than based on you having... well... whatever it is you're having? See? I didn' even toss in a description of it (and believe me, it wasn't easy ;) I'm sure all involved, yourself included, would welcome this change (who knows, chrisv might even promote you above the rank of "thing").
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-07 13:44 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? |
| Message-ID | <flbs4oF112aU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #450763 |
On 5/6/18 9:09 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Saturday, May 5, 2018 at 2:56:41 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
>> On 5/5/18 1:49 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> On 2018-05-05 20:46:59 +0000, Snit said:
>>>
>>>> On 5/5/18 1:42 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>> On 2018-05-05 20:16:53 +0000, Snit said:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/5/18 1:08 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>> You are backing racial quotas of a sort...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm pointing out how they undoubtedly *must* be forced to look
>>>>>>>>> at things in a way that you and I will never have to if they
>>>>>>>>> want to live through the day.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> They no more have to judge people by the color of their skin
>>>>>>>> than colleges and employers have to with affirmative action.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No one has to do anything... but prudence suggests that it would
>>>>>>> be in their interest to do so if they want to live when policing
>>>>>>> in the high crime areas.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> One black person is not responsible for the actions of another.
>>>>>> You are trying to justify police shooting someone based on the
>>>>>> color of their skin.
>>>>>>
>>>>> LOL! Where do you believe I 'justified' that?
>>>>>
>>>> Sigh. OK, you are back to your game playing nonsense... you JUST
>>>> said how they have to target blacks differently
>>>>
>>> I used the wrod "target"?! Where?
>>>
>> My level of interest in your word games: zero.
>>
> The games were all yours, Mr. Pathological Liar.
You went back to your games where you demand I quote back to you what
you have said... and then denying you said it because I spoke of what I
disagree with in your views but did not use your exact words.
Even worse you do this AS you lie about what I have said, in this case
claiming I "equated policing in high crime areas with job/college
issues". You made that up in response to my noting I do not back
grouping people by color in either situation, which does not in any way
imply the two situations are equal.
But back to your support of judging people by the color of their skin,
and you being OK with this in situations where black people are shot!
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0141854
——
The results provide evidence of a significant bias in the killing of
unarmed black Americans relative to unarmed white Americans, in that the
probability of being {black, unarmed, and shot by police} is about 3.49
times the probability of being {white, unarmed, and shot by police} on
average. Furthermore, the results of multi-level modeling show that
there exists significant heterogeneity across counties in the extent of
racial bias in police shootings, with some counties showing relative
risk ratios of 20 to 1 or more. Finally, analysis of police shooting
data as a function of county-level predictors suggests that racial bias
in police shootings is most likely to emerge in police departments in
larger metropolitan counties with low median incomes and a sizable
portion of black residents, especially when there is high financial
inequality in that county. There is no relationship between county-level
racial bias in police shootings and crime rates (even race-specific
crime rates), meaning that the racial bias observed in police shootings
in this data set is not explainable as a response to local-level crime
rates.
——
Steve Carroll
-----
What does that last statement tell you? In such areas, given
that stats show a police officer is 18.9 times more likely
to be killed by a black male (who, at 6% commit 42% of
police officer deaths), you wouldn't think it prudent for
them to exhibit a "bias" if they want to come home from work
that night? It's a war zone, the things we'd all like to
believe should be done can't be done, there'd be no one left
alive to do them.
-----
I'm pointing out how they undoubtedly *must* be forced to
look at things in a way that you and I will never have to if
they want to live through the day.
-----
> They no more have to judge people by the color of
> their skin than colleges and employers have to
> with affirmative action.
No one has to do anything... but prudence suggests
that it would be in their interest to do so if they
want to live when policing in the high crime areas.
-----
> You are STILL backing judging people by the color
> of their skin
I'm just recognizing that police officers in these
high crime areas don't have the luxury not to.
-----
That is you, Carroll, noting your support for targeting people based on
the color of their skin in determining who to shoot. You can cry and
whine and lie when faced with your own words, as you did during your
tantrum over a black person being shown as an example of healthy
masculinity, but you still are responsible for your words.
You have always shown racist tendencies but you used to be better at
hiding them... you used to want to be the KKK member who never had his
hood lifted. Now, perhaps based on Trump's open bigotry and how he has
made it more acceptable in this nation to be a bigot, you have a harder
time keeping your hood on. Or maybe you just do not care to.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 08:25 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? |
| Message-ID | <33c77daf-d391-41fa-be6a-12ca70e9d29b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #450766 |
On Monday, May 7, 2018 at 2:44:12 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > You > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> You: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9TNmfrbTnes>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-07 11:27 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? |
| Message-ID | <b6ead872-73de-40a8-bf70-5d9c3949fc30@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #450749 |
On Monday, May 7, 2018 at 10:54:37 AM UTC-7, Snit wrote:
> On 5/7/18 10:48 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> > On Monday, May 7, 2018 at 11:37:22 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
> >> On 5/7/18 10:25 AM, Snit wrote:
> >>> On 5/7/18 10:16 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> >>>
> >>> You snipped key context and then pretended it did not exist. Not biting..
> >>> But I will, AGAIN, post the full commentary.
> >>>
> >>> At some point I will stop doing even this. Then you will claim victory
> >>> and insist I am running... even though with your dishonest snipping,
> >>> word play, blaming me for all that is wrong in your life and all the
> >>> mistakes you make, etc. YOU are the one running from accepting
> >>> responsibility for your own words and actions.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 5/6/18 9:09 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> >>> > On Saturday, May 5, 2018 at 2:56:41 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
> >>> >> On 5/5/18 1:49 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> >>> >>> On 2018-05-05 20:46:59 +0000, Snit said:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>> On 5/5/18 1:42 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> >>> >>>>> On 2018-05-05 20:16:53 +0000, Snit said:
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>>> On 5/5/18 1:08 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> >>> >>>>>> ...
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> You are backing racial quotas of a sort...
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>> I'm pointing out how they undoubtedly *must* be forced to look
> >>> >>>>>>>>> at things in a way that you and I will never have to if they
> >>> >>>>>>>>> want to live through the day.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>> They no more have to judge people by the color of their skin
> >>> >>>>>>>> than colleges and employers have to with affirmative action.
> >>> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>> No one has to do anything... but prudence suggests that it would
> >>> >>>>>>> be in their interest to do so if they want to live when policing
> >>> >>>>>>> in the high crime areas.
> >>> >>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>> One black person is not responsible for the actions of another.
> >>> >>>>>> You are trying to justify police shooting someone based on the
> >>> >>>>>> color of their skin.
> >>> >>>>>>
> >>> >>>>> LOL! Where do you believe I 'justified' that?
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>> Sigh. OK, you are back to your game playing nonsense... you JUST
> >>> >>>> said how they have to target blacks differently
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>> I used the wrod "target"?! Where?
> >>> >>>
> >>> >> My level of interest in your word games: zero.
> >>> >>
> >>> > The games were all yours, Mr. Pathological Liar.
> >>>
> >>> You went back to your games where you demand I quote back to you what
> >>> you have said... and then denying you said it because I spoke of what I
> >>> disagree with in your views but did not use your exact words.
> >>>
> >>> Even worse you do this AS you lie about what I have said, in this case
> >>> claiming I "equated policing in high crime areas with job/college
> >>> issues". You made that up in response to my noting I do not back
> >>> grouping people by color in either situation, which does not in any way
> >>> imply the two situations are equal.
> >>>
> >>> But back to your support of judging people by the color of their skin,
> >>> and you being OK with this in situations where black people are shot!
> >>>
> >>> http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0141854
> >>> ——
> >>> The results provide evidence of a significant bias in the killing of
> >>> unarmed black Americans relative to unarmed white Americans, in that the
> >>> probability of being {black, unarmed, and shot by police} is about 3.49
> >>> times the probability of being {white, unarmed, and shot by police} on
> >>> average. Furthermore, the results of multi-level modeling show that
> >>> there exists significant heterogeneity across counties in the extent of
> >>> racial bias in police shootings, with some counties showing relative
> >>> risk ratios of 20 to 1 or more. Finally, analysis of police shooting
> >>> data as a function of county-level predictors suggests that racial bias
> >>> in police shootings is most likely to emerge in police departments in
> >>> larger metropolitan counties with low median incomes and a sizable
> >>> portion of black residents, especially when there is high financial
> >>> inequality in that county. There is no relationship between county-level
> >>> racial bias in police shootings and crime rates (even race-specific...
It was David Brown who flooded benj's site hundreds of thousands of times and pretended he did not do it. A shadow of justification, projected quickly, at the wrong time.
For crying out loud, man... even you have filtered that fool. Given what he is nobody should condemn me for working to be rid of his type of BS. Out-and-out hogwash by an ignorant, fabricating, slippery, colluding peabrain who would not tell the truth no matter what his socks/shills say. Hell, just recently David Brown was declaring himself the only "true Linux advocate", and claiming that "advocates" (in scare-quotes, who he also refers to as "the herd") are trying to make Linux become like the Mac.
--
I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened!
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.os.linux/BVpdH5KOc6s
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.c/KDQrv8appR8
http://prescottcomputerguy.com
Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-07 11:37 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? |
| Message-ID | <flbkn6Ftrs8U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #450753 |
On 5/7/18 11:27 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Monday, May 7, 2018 at 10:54:37 AM UTC-7, Snit wrote:
>> On 5/7/18 10:48 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> On Monday, May 7, 2018 at 11:37:22 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
>>>> On 5/7/18 10:25 AM, Snit wrote:
>>>>> On 5/7/18 10:16 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> You snipped key context and then pretended it did not exist. Not biting..
>>>>> But I will, AGAIN, post the full commentary.
>>>>>
>>>>> At some point I will stop doing even this. Then you will claim victory
>>>>> and insist I am running... even though with your dishonest snipping,
>>>>> word play, blaming me for all that is wrong in your life and all the
>>>>> mistakes you make, etc. YOU are the one running from accepting
>>>>> responsibility for your own words and actions.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/6/18 9:09 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>> > On Saturday, May 5, 2018 at 2:56:41 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
>>>>> >> On 5/5/18 1:49 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>> >>> On 2018-05-05 20:46:59 +0000, Snit said:
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>> On 5/5/18 1:42 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>> >>>>> On 2018-05-05 20:16:53 +0000, Snit said:
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>> On 5/5/18 1:08 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>> ...
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You are backing racial quotas of a sort...
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm pointing out how they undoubtedly *must* be forced to look
>>>>> >>>>>>>>> at things in a way that you and I will never have to if they
>>>>> >>>>>>>>> want to live through the day.
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>> They no more have to judge people by the color of their skin
>>>>> >>>>>>>> than colleges and employers have to with affirmative action.
>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>> No one has to do anything... but prudence suggests that it would
>>>>> >>>>>>> be in their interest to do so if they want to live when policing
>>>>> >>>>>>> in the high crime areas.
>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>> One black person is not responsible for the actions of another.
>>>>> >>>>>> You are trying to justify police shooting someone based on the
>>>>> >>>>>> color of their skin.
>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>> LOL! Where do you believe I 'justified' that?
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>> Sigh. OK, you are back to your game playing nonsense... you JUST
>>>>> >>>> said how they have to target blacks differently
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>> I used the wrod "target"?! Where?
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >> My level of interest in your word games: zero.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> > The games were all yours, Mr. Pathological Liar.
>>>>>
>>>>> You went back to your games where you demand I quote back to you what
>>>>> you have said... and then denying you said it because I spoke of what I
>>>>> disagree with in your views but did not use your exact words.
>>>>>
>>>>> Even worse you do this AS you lie about what I have said, in this case
>>>>> claiming I "equated policing in high crime areas with job/college
>>>>> issues". You made that up in response to my noting I do not back
>>>>> grouping people by color in either situation, which does not in any way
>>>>> imply the two situations are equal.
>>>>>
>>>>> But back to your support of judging people by the color of their skin,
>>>>> and you being OK with this in situations where black people are shot!
>>>>>
>>>>> http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0141854
>>>>> ——
>>>>> The results provide evidence of a significant bias in the killing of
>>>>> unarmed black Americans relative to unarmed white Americans, in that the
>>>>> probability of being {black, unarmed, and shot by police} is about 3.49
>>>>> times the probability of being {white, unarmed, and shot by police} on
>>>>> average. Furthermore, the results of multi-level modeling show that
>>>>> there exists significant heterogeneity across counties in the extent of
>>>>> racial bias in police shootings, with some counties showing relative
>>>>> risk ratios of 20 to 1 or more. Finally, analysis of police shooting
>>>>> data as a function of county-level predictors suggests that racial bias
>>>>> in police shootings is most likely to emerge in police departments in
>>>>> larger metropolitan counties with low median incomes and a sizable
>>>>> portion of black residents, especially when there is high financial
>>>>> inequality in that county. There is no relationship between county-level
>>>>> racial bias in police shootings and crime rates (even race-specific....
>
>
>
> It was David Brown who flooded benj's site hundreds of thousands of times and pretended he did not do it. A shadow of justification, projected quickly, at the wrong time.
>
> For crying out loud, man... even you have filtered that fool. Given what he is nobody should condemn me for working to be rid of his type of BS. Out-and-out hogwash by an ignorant, fabricating, slippery, colluding peabrain who would not tell the truth no matter what his socks/shills say. Hell, just recently David Brown was declaring himself the only "true Linux advocate", and claiming that "advocates" (in scare-quotes, who he also refers to as "the herd") are trying to make Linux become like the Mac.
Makes more sense than what you say with your "common" account... at
least this time you did not claim that starting one thread prevents
people from posting in others. LOL!
Your bot is being more reasonable than you "real" responses!
> --
> I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened!
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.os.linux/BVpdH5KOc6s
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.c/KDQrv8appR8
> http://prescottcomputerguy.com
Please leave my site out of your flooding.
> Jonas Eklundh
>
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-06 13:15 -0700 |
| Subject | BrownEyed "Cuba, North Korea and Nepal" appear to be your ideal. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@May.6--1.15pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #450637 |
Michael Glasser replied ( to me ): > > An 80 year old Japanese lady, who only speaks Japanese, > > isn't the same as a young, horny black male, who only speaks Arabic. > > I say treat people like individuals... > I reject [ affirmative action ]. We've only probabilities -- what's most likely to happen -- given our long and storied past. Is this good ? Hell -NO- ! it's the LeastBad option. > > > * You showed deep ignorance about the weaknesses of using a single test > > > to judge the qualifications of an individual. > > The additional measure suggested by the source Carroll quoted was > "grades" ( and he even quoted that part of the text ). Achievement is exponential, not linear. A CryptoCurrency would be better than tests and grades, I think. > I take some vitamins and do occasionally take a Tylenol or the like > (though even that is rare). I avoid caffeine (though I do like chocolate > I do not drink sodas or coffee, other than say Trader Joe's samples) Nice, I thought you were taking prescription drugs. No caffeine for me... except a bit of chocolate, on rare occasions. > > Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? > > They have benefits but I would not want the world to be like them. > > > What about Cuba, North Korea and communist Nepal ? > > Nope. > > > Are you aware of their existance ? > > Yes, but not of their relevance here. BrownEyed "Cuba, North Korea and Nepal" appear to be your ideal; yet you only "know" BlueEyed Norway... why is that ? ! > > > * When you backed yourself into a corner you reacted with anger > > > -- name calling, insults, lies, and more. > > > > Again, I don't recall this. > > You can read his posts. Of course I can, as I have, every day, for years.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-06 13:18 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: BrownEyed "Cuba, North Korea and Nepal" appear to be your ideal. |
| Message-ID | <b8kdf5.nqp.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #450648 |
On 2018-05-06 1:15 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > Michael Glasser replied ( to me ): >>> An 80 year old Japanese lady, who only speaks Japanese, >>> isn't the same as a young, horny black male, who only speaks Arabic. >> >> I say treat people like individuals... >> I reject [ affirmative action ]. > > We've only probabilities -- what's most likely to happen -- > given our long and storied past. > Is this good ? Hell -NO- ! it's the LeastBad option. > >>>> * You showed deep ignorance about the weaknesses of using a single test >>>> to judge the qualifications of an individual. >> >> The additional measure suggested by the source Carroll quoted was >> "grades" ( and he even quoted that part of the text ). > > Achievement is exponential, not linear. > A CryptoCurrency would be better than tests and grades, I think. > >> I take some vitamins and do occasionally take a Tylenol or the like >> (though even that is rare). I avoid caffeine (though I do like chocolate >> I do not drink sodas or coffee, other than say Trader Joe's samples) > > Nice, I thought you were taking prescription drugs. > No caffeine for me... except a bit of chocolate, on rare occasions. > >>> Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? >> >> They have benefits but I would not want the world to be like them. >> >>> What about Cuba, North Korea and communist Nepal ? >> >> Nope. >> >>> Are you aware of their existance ? >> >> Yes, but not of their relevance here. > > BrownEyed "Cuba, North Korea and Nepal" appear to be your ideal; > yet you only "know" BlueEyed Norway... why is that ? ! > >>>> * When you backed yourself into a corner you reacted with anger >>>> -- name calling, insults, lies, and more. >>> >>> Again, I don't recall this. >> >> You can read his posts. > > Of course I can, as I have, every day, for years. > did you like them
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-06 13:32 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: BrownEyed "Cuba, North Korea and Nepal" appear to be your ideal. |
| Message-ID | <a2b0e5a0-2a14-4240-99cc-d9095178a482@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #450650 |
On Sunday, May 6, 2018 at 1:18:13 PM UTC-7, % wrote: > On 2018-05-06 1:15 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > > Michael Glasser replied ( to me ): > >>> An 80 year old Japanese lady, who only speaks Japanese, > >>> isn't the same as a young, horny black male, who only speaks Arabic. > >> > >> I say treat people like individuals... > >> I reject [ affirmative action ]. > > > > We've only probabilities -- what's most likely to happen -- > > given our long and storied past. > > Is this good ? Hell -NO- ! it's the LeastBad option. > > > >>>> * You showed deep ignorance about the weaknesses of using a single test > >>>> to judge the qualifications of an individual. > >> > >> The additional measure suggested by the source Carroll quoted was > >> "grades" ( and he even quoted that part of the text ). > > > > Achievement is exponential, not linear. > > A CryptoCurrency would be better than tests and grades, I think. > > > >> I take some vitamins and do occasionally take a Tylenol or the like > >> (though even that is rare). I avoid caffeine (though I do like chocolate > >> I do not drink sodas or coffee, other than say Trader Joe's samples) > > > > Nice, I thought you were taking prescription drugs. > > No caffeine for me... except a bit of chocolate, on rare occasions. > > > >>> Is BlueEyed Norway your... This is something the mainstream media never covers. You purchased it and took it for a test drive and your "intuitions" lead you to that conclusion, proving what? You're clueless! Good grief, just recently he was declaring himself the only "true Linux advocate", and claiming that "advocates" (in mockery-quotes just to annoy people) are focusing on Windows more than on Linux. You're four seconds away from being in everyone's kill filter. Steve Carroll's posts are quite thoroughly false. There is no dispute that as soon as any released 'plonked person' does whatever to frighten the feeble milksop's feelings that they'll be put right back in the kill filter. - Puppy Videos http://www.5z8.info/peepshow_z9s9ht_dogporn http://www.5z8.info/hackwebcam_e9z2tw_friendster-of-sex Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-06 14:35 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: BrownEyed "Cuba, North Korea and Nepal" appear to be your ideal. |
| Message-ID | <fl9aojFe6bvU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #450648 |
On 5/6/18 1:15 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: ... >> I take some vitamins and do occasionally take a Tylenol or the like >> (though even that is rare). I avoid caffeine (though I do like chocolate >> I do not drink sodas or coffee, other than say Trader Joe's samples) > > Nice, I thought you were taking prescription drugs. I have in the past but in general. nope. ... >>>> * When you backed yourself into a corner you reacted with anger >>>> -- name calling, insults, lies, and more. >>> >>> Again, I don't recall this. >> >> You can read his posts. > > Of course I can, as I have, every day, for years. Seems he thinks you are me. :) -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-06 14:41 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: BrownEyed "Cuba, North Korea and Nepal" appear to be your ideal. |
| Message-ID | <b8kibe.b3i.17.7@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #450657 |
On 2018-05-06 2:35 PM, Snit wrote: > On 5/6/18 1:15 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > ... >>> I take some vitamins and do occasionally take a Tylenol or the like >>> (though even that is rare). I avoid caffeine (though I do like chocolate >>> I do not drink sodas or coffee, other than say Trader Joe's samples) >> >> Nice, I thought you were taking prescription drugs. > > I have in the past but in general. nope. > > ... >>>>> * When you backed yourself into a corner you reacted with anger >>>>> -- name calling, insults, lies, and more. >>>> >>>> Again, I don't recall this. >>> >>> You can read his posts. >> >> Of course I can, as I have, every day, for years. > > Seems he thinks you are me. :) > > tylenol does that
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-06 14:49 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: BrownEyed "Cuba, North Korea and Nepal" appear to be your ideal. |
| Message-ID | <fl9bjbFeb0vU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #450660 |
On 5/6/18 2:41 PM, % wrote: > On 2018-05-06 2:35 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 5/6/18 1:15 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >> ... >>>> I take some vitamins and do occasionally take a Tylenol or the like >>>> (though even that is rare). I avoid caffeine (though I do like >>>> chocolate >>>> I do not drink sodas or coffee, other than say Trader Joe's samples) >>> >>> Nice, I thought you were taking prescription drugs. >> >> I have in the past but in general. nope. >> >> ... >>>>>> * When you backed yourself into a corner you reacted with anger >>>>>> -- name calling, insults, lies, and more. >>>>> >>>>> Again, I don't recall this. >>>> >>>> You can read his posts. >>> >>> Of course I can, as I have, every day, for years. >> >> Seems he thinks you are me. :) >> >> > tylenol does that :) -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-06 12:58 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? |
| Message-ID | <pcnj9k$9i4$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #450633 |
On 2018-05-06 18:39:14 +0000, Jeff-Relf.Me @. said: >> >> * You [SteveCarroll] whined about a black man being shown as >> an example of healthy masculinity. > > I missed that. > >> * You lied about me equating things I did not, >> and otherwise lied about and twisted what I said. > > I missed that too. Trust me, you didn't miss anything. > >> * In the context of police shootings, you said it made sense >> to you for them to have a bias against blacks. > > Yes, to stay alive, so fewer cops die. My statement wasn't in "the context of shootings", it was in the context of common sense. Crackhead equated college/job related issues to policing high crime areas. Snit: "You back such judging when it goes against someone with dark skin but not when it benefits them." Me: "I back common sense, a trait that enables me to differentiate between wildly varied contexts so I don't arrive at a broad based 'solution' to problems that aren't remotely similar. Equating policing in high crime areas with college/job related issues is so far past ludicrous I can't come up with a word to describe it... even 'totally clueless' isn't strong enough." <dc661906-943e-45a6-9420-48d11b6b9741@googlegroups.com> He got pissed I called out his idiocy so he did what he does best. > An 80 year old Japanese lady, who only speaks Japanese, > isn't the same as a young, horny black male, who only speaks Arabic. > >> * You showed deep ignorance about the weaknesses of using a single test >> to judge the qualifications of an individual. > > That's the solution to this problem ? ! > You don't have one. > >> * You projected your reading comprehension and drug addiction issues onto me. > > Likely, you take legal drugs. > > Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? > > What about Cuba, North Korea and communist Nepal ? > Are you aware of their existance ? > >> * When you backed yourself into a corner you reacted with anger >> -- name calling, insults, lies, and more. > > Again, I don't recall this. > >> I was contacted by your family because of their concerns about you >> -- they are tired of your obsession with me. > > How would any of us know if this is true or not ? ! > We can't. Of course we can, Mr. Psych Degree is the one making the claim ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-06 12:15 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Is BlueEyed Norway your "more equal, low-carbon" ideal ? |
| Message-ID | <fl92hsFcb1gU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #450638 |
On 5/6/18 11:58 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> * In the context of police shootings, you said it made sense
>>> to you for them to have a bias against blacks.
>>
>> Yes, to stay alive, so fewer cops die.
>
> My statement wasn't in "the context of shootings", it was in the context
> of common sense.
It was in context to this research:
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0141854
——
The results provide evidence of a significant bias in the killing of
unarmed black Americans relative to unarmed white Americans, in that the
probability of being {black, unarmed, and shot by police} is about 3.49
times the probability of being {white, unarmed, and shot by police} on
average. Furthermore, the results of multi-level modeling show that
there exists significant heterogeneity across counties in the extent of
racial bias in police shootings, with some counties showing relative
risk ratios of 20 to 1 or more. Finally, analysis of police shooting
data as a function of county-level predictors suggests that racial bias
in police shootings is most likely to emerge in police departments in
larger metropolitan counties with low median incomes and a sizable
portion of black residents, especially when there is high financial
inequality in that county. There is no relationship between county-level
racial bias in police shootings and crime rates (even race-specific
crime rates), meaning that the racial bias observed in police shootings
in this data set is not explainable as a response to local-level crime
rates.
——
You even specifically called out the "last statement" where they speak
of a "racial bias" against blacks that is NOT explained by "local-level
crime rates".
You backed this bias... the specific bias against people based solely on
their skin color.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-06 13:34 -0700 |
| Subject | "CrackHead" is a pejorative -- it might be natural. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@May.6--1.34pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #450638 |
> Crackhead equated college/job related issues to policing high crime areas. You could say the writes too much, and rejects comments too much -- like a speed freak; but "CrackHead" is a pejorative -- it might be natural.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-06 14:37 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: "CrackHead" is a pejorative -- it might be natural. |
| Message-ID | <fl9atbFe6bvU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #450653 |
On 5/6/18 1:34 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >> Crackhead equated college/job related issues to policing high crime areas. > > You could say the writes too much, > and rejects comments too much -- like a speed freak; > but "CrackHead" is a pejorative -- it might be natural. > Carroll projects his own drug issues onto me. He has for years. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-06 09:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fl8pi5Faab4U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #450586 |
On 5/6/18 5:42 AM, owl wrote: > In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 5/5/18 4:24 PM, owl wrote: >>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 5/5/18 2:16 PM, owl wrote: >>>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 5/5/18 12:47 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 5/5/18 8:29 AM, owl wrote: >>> >>>>> one of the comments to that article: >>>>> <quote> >>>>> Casey Noble >>>>> actually, I was told by Child Protective Services DIRECTLY that any form of hitting your child is illegal AT LEAST in the state of Indiana >>>>> </quote> >>>> >>>> What law? >>> >>> Who knows, but the guy in the case above was convicted of assault. >> >> So you do not know the law or what actions happened but you know the >> results are wrong? That IS a question... but seems to be the case. >> Please clarify. > > You cannot read, yet you home-school your kids. The law was "assault." > The man was convicted of "assault" for spanking his own child. > The "actions that happened" were that he had to appeal to the state > Supreme Court in order to get the conviction overturned. > > >>>>> Another from the land of libtards: >>>>> <quote> >>>>> Massachusetts lawmakers say a proposed measure that would ban parents from >>>>> spanking their children, even in their own homes, is a way to protect >>>>> kids from abuse. But many parents believe it's an example of government >>>>> run amok. >>>> >>>> What law? >>> >>> Apparently the one Nurse Libtard moved forward to a vote. >> >> So you have no idea. Um, OK. >> > > As stated multiple times, the "law" is the bill that was before > the state house for a vote. > > >>>>> In all 50 states, parents are legally allowed to spank their children. But >>>>> in 29 states it's illegal for a teacher to practice corporal punishment, >>>>> including spanking. >>>> >>>> OK. A teacher cannot touch my kids. Sure. >>> >>> Teachers have to put up with your brats six hours a day. They should >>> be allowed to administer the discipline that is not available in the >>> typical libtard home. >> >> Nope. NOBODY has a right to strike my child without my permission. Nobody! >> > > Who says? You? That is the case today (thanks, libtards), but for > decades schools were allowed to spank kids. In my junior high, the > principal had a big wooden paddle that all the kids were afraid of. > And as a result we didn't have any savages rampaging in the classrooms > like we do today. > > >>>>> A Massachusetts nurse is hoping to change that and make the state the >>>>> first in the nation to ban corporal punishment at home. >>>> >>>> A nurse. One. Um, OK. >>> >>> She got the bill moved to a vote. >> >> Would love to see the bill. >> > > So look it up. > > >>>>> "I think it's ironic that domestic violence applies to everyone except the most vulnerable — children," said Kathleen Wolf, who wrote the bill. >>>>> >>>>> Massachusetts lawmakers will consider the bill today. >>>>> </quote> >>>>> >>>>> That was from 2007. Don't know how it came out. But it's easy to see >>>>> that the agenda is there. Keep America sane. Vote conservative. >>>> >>>> The agenda of a nurse? One person? >>> >>> Do you doubt she is a liberal? 2007 was a little early for the stupid >>> pink hats, but I'll bet she's got one now. >> >> I doubt she is more than one person. > > > Let's hope so. > > >> What, really, is your complaint >> here... one person did something (maybe, though you cannot show it) > > > What do you mean by "show it"? Is the article describing it not enough? > > >> that >> you disagree with. >> >> So what? >> > > So, thanks libtards. > > Ah, you know nothing of the laws being talked about or proposed, no links for anyone to even look at, you want OTHERS to help you find these bills or whatever, but you KNOW you are outraged at people. You have a lot of fear and anger but little knowledge. Fair enough. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-06 11:11 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <h76ueddc3rnbjf5u14hc4d8epml3rappfg@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #450562 |
On Sat, 5 May 2018 23:24:59 +0000 (UTC), owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> OK. A teacher cannot touch my kids. Sure. >> > >Teachers have to put up with your brats six hours a day. They should >be allowed to administer the discipline that is not available in the >typical libtard home. I know of a case in my previous school board where two teachers were essentially being kicked and smacked by the children and, despite controlling themselves for as long as they could, eventually ended up putting their hands on the students. One simply grabbed the kid and told him to stop and the other, if I remember correctly, might have shoved the kid out of her way. The result: the kid goes home to mommy, arrogantly tells her what the teachers did carefully omitting what led to the teacher's response and both teachers were arrested. You can imagine whether they will get to hold onto their jobs. In fact, when I left the public system a few months ago and decided to move into private one, my old school scrambled to find someone to replace me and they ended up with a woman who had retired as a teacher. I could control these groups while I was there and I guess the woman tried as well but something happened and she got arrested as well. Apparently, one of the many "wonderful" kids who had never tasted the back of their parents' hands decided to injure themselves across the neck leaving a mark. Obviously, though the woman most likely never touched them, they went straight to the principal and blamed her. To say the least, I left at the most perfect time since they most likely would have tried something like that with me as well. Considering how tall, muscular and intimidating I look, I wouldn't have had a chance with the cops or a judge. Meanwhile, the kids I have in the private system laugh about how they get spanked if ever they do something their parents don't approve of and they are the nicest, hardest-working, most respectful bunch of adolescents I have ever come across. < snip Michael Glasser idiocy >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-06 09:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fl8pqkFacibU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #450595 |
On 5/6/18 8:11 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote: > On Sat, 5 May 2018 23:24:59 +0000 (UTC), owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> > wrote: > >>> OK. A teacher cannot touch my kids. Sure. >>> >> >> Teachers have to put up with your brats six hours a day. They should >> be allowed to administer the discipline that is not available in the >> typical libtard home. > > I know of a case in my previous school board where two teachers were > essentially being kicked and smacked by the children and, despite > controlling themselves for as long as they could, eventually ended up > putting their hands on the students. One simply grabbed the kid and > told him to stop and the other, if I remember correctly, might have > shoved the kid out of her way. The result: the kid goes home to mommy, > arrogantly tells her what the teachers did carefully omitting what led > to the teacher's response and both teachers were arrested. You can > imagine whether they will get to hold onto their jobs. > > In fact, when I left the public system a few months ago and decided to > move into private one, my old school scrambled to find someone to > replace me and they ended up with a woman who had retired as a > teacher. I could control these groups while I was there and I guess > the woman tried as well but something happened and she got arrested as > well. Apparently, one of the many "wonderful" kids who had never > tasted the back of their parents' hands decided to injure themselves > across the neck leaving a mark. Obviously, though the woman most > likely never touched them, they went straight to the principal and > blamed her. To say the least, I left at the most perfect time since > they most likely would have tried something like that with me as well. > Considering how tall, muscular and intimidating I look, I wouldn't > have had a chance with the cops or a judge. > > Meanwhile, the kids I have in the private system laugh about how they > get spanked if ever they do something their parents don't approve of > and they are the nicest, hardest-working, most respectful bunch of > adolescents I have ever come across. > > < snip Michael Glasser idiocy > > You snip my comments because you know you cannot refute them. So be it. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-06 11:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <cn5ued1s1r0uq1jpnaa4pkilsq4bubsqoa@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #450557 |
On Sat, 5 May 2018 21:16:41 +0000 (UTC), owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 5/5/18 12:47 PM, owl wrote: >>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 5/5/18 8:29 AM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>> Here is info on black Americans... do you not understand the situation >>>>>>>> there? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Here is info on black Americans... do you not understand the situation >>>>>>> there? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQP2XeEMlXM >>>>>>> >>>>>> What point do you think you are making? That a single hand-picked >>>>>> example of a black person is representative of... what? >>>>>> >>>>> A single, hand-picked example of what I see almost every >>>>> time I go to a store. They get no parental supervision, >>>>> so it's no surprise when they grow up to be criminals. >>>> >>>> They who? >>> >>> Reading comprehension again... >> >> So you cannot say what "they" you even mean. The people in the video? >> People with dark skin? People with kids? >> > >You snipped the part of my answer that clarified for those with >reading comprehension. > > >> ...>> It is not likely to be true but even if it is, spanking is not the >> only >>>> way to discipline children. >>> >>> A brat who is acting out like that in public needs his butt >>> set on fire so he suffers not just the minor pain of a spanking, >>> but also the public humiliation of being put in his place. >> >> Are you aware of what the research says of best methods to discipline? >> > >What kind of moron would need to look to research to know if spanking >is effective? > > >>> But why don't you answer the question? Do you think it's liberals or >>> conservatives who have pushed for enacting laws against giving good >>> old-fashioned behind-the-woodshed discipline to unruly brats? >> >> What laws do you even mean? Laws against child abuse? I think I have >> seen some that I believe go to far but do not know what laws you even mean. >> > >So, this guy got convicted of assault for spanking his own kid, >and it has to go to the state Supreme Court before he gets cleared. > >https://www.parentmap.com/article/legal-united-states-spanking-kids ><quote> >The court’s verbiage for the case, which centered around a father who >had been convicted of assault for publicly spanking his young toddler >daughter, was carefully worded, asserting that... ></quote> > >one of the comments to that article: ><quote> >Casey Noble >actually, I was told by Child Protective Services DIRECTLY that any form of hitting your child is illegal AT LEAST in the state of Indiana ></quote> > > >Another from the land of libtards: ><quote> >Massachusetts lawmakers say a proposed measure that would ban parents from >spanking their children, even in their own homes, is a way to protect >kids from abuse. But many parents believe it's an example of government >run amok. > >In all 50 states, parents are legally allowed to spank their children. But >in 29 states it's illegal for a teacher to practice corporal punishment, >including spanking. > >A Massachusetts nurse is hoping to change that and make the state the >first in the nation to ban corporal punishment at home. > >"I think it's ironic that domestic violence applies to everyone except the most vulnerable — children," said Kathleen Wolf, who wrote the bill. > >Massachusetts lawmakers will consider the bill today. ></quote> > >That was from 2007. Don't know how it came out. But it's easy to see >that the agenda is there. Keep America sane. Vote conservative. Nanny states, the likes of which Michael Glasser of Prescott, Arizona is hoping the all of the United States will soon get to enjoy. All we need to know about spanking is that when it's _unwarranted_ and endless, it can be considered damaging and will likely lead the child to become an adult with low self-esteem. However, if it is warranted and dished out as a last resort when a child truly doesn't understand the rules, it leads to improved behaviour. Unfortunately, academics believe that children can be reasoned with and while that is true to a certain degree, sometimes they don't understand unless some aggression is displayed or delivered. It also doesn't lead to a broken relationship with the person dishing out the punishment as the children eventually grow to understand why they were punished and even respect the person who hurt them. In fact, they tend to respect the person's authority even long after it is clear that the punisher no longer holds any kind of size or strength advantage over his supposed victim. All of this is common sense. Of course, none of it appears in testimonies made by experts - most of which have never had children and those who do tend to neglect them - in the books and the result is that the legal system tries to enforce new theories on behaviour rather than millennia-old practises which have been proven efficient.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 9 of 17 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 … 17 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web