Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #449313 > unrolled thread

Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway.

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-04-27 15:20 -0700
    Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-27 19:14 -0400
      Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-27 17:29 -0700
        Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-28 13:53 -0400
          Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 13:01 -0700
            Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 00:31 -0700
          Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 16:18 -0400
            Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 13:36 -0700
              Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-28 16:25 -0600
                Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 15:36 -0700
                  Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-28 16:59 -0600
                    Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 16:08 -0700
                      Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-28 17:21 -0600
                        Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 16:40 -0700
                          Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-28 17:46 -0600
              Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-04-29 13:10 +0000
                The obvious eludes him. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-04-29 06:33 -0700
                  Re: The obvious eludes him. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 10:28 -0700
            Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 13:54 -0700
              Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 14:04 -0700
      Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 10:59 -0400
        Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 08:56 -0700
          Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 12:39 -0400
            Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 09:55 -0700
              Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-28 13:05 -0600
                Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 12:58 -0700
                Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 16:21 -0400
                  Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 13:36 -0700
                    Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-28 16:24 -0600
                      Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 19:39 -0400
                      Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-30 07:55 -0500
                        Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-30 09:38 -0400
                        Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-30 08:49 -0600
                        Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 08:04 -0700
                  Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-28 16:24 -0600
                    Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 19:38 -0400
                      Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 16:43 -0700
                      Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-28 17:45 -0600
            Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 13:50 -0700
              Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 13:53 -0700
                Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 14:12 -0700
              Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-04 17:42 -0400
                Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 14:43 -0700
                Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-04 16:54 -0700
                  Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 16:58 -0700
                    Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-04 18:02 -0600
                      Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-04 17:04 -0700
                        Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 17:25 -0700
                          Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-04 17:30 -0700
                            Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 17:37 -0700
                              Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-04 17:41 -0700
                                Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 17:48 -0700
                                  Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-04 17:50 -0700
                                    Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 17:52 -0700
                                      Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-04 18:03 -0700
                                        Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 18:08 -0700
                      Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 17:25 -0700
                        Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 18:22 -0700
                    Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-04 17:03 -0700
                      Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 17:26 -0700
                        Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-04 17:31 -0700
                          Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 17:37 -0700
                            Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-04 17:40 -0700
                              Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-04 20:57 -0400
                                Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-04 18:03 -0700
                                  Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-04 21:17 -0400
                                    Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-04 18:46 -0700
                                      Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 20:44 -0700
                                    My premises are "useful" ( to me ), if not truthy. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-04 18:50 -0700
                                      Re: My premises are "useful" ( to me ), if not truthy. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 02:57 -0700
                  Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 17:02 -0700
                Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 15:16 -0700
                  Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-06 11:01 -0400
                    Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 09:45 -0700
                    Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 14:44 -0700
                  I've been asking Nadegda's friend, "kensi", all kinds of questions. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-06 10:41 -0700
                    Re: I've been asking Nadegda's friend, "kensi", all kinds of questions. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 11:41 -0700
                    Re: I've been asking Nadegda's friend, "kensi", all kinds of questions. Yoda <zUfjeUFm@OFkrUjd.com> - 2018-05-06 22:46 +0000
                      Re: I've been asking Nadegda's friend, "kensi", all kinds of questions. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 16:09 -0700
                      Re: I've been asking Nadegda's friend, "kensi", all kinds of questions. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-07 00:28 +0100
                        Re: I've been asking Nadegda's friend, "kensi", all kinds of questions. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 16:29 -0700
                        Re: I've been asking Nadegda's friend, "kensi", all kinds of questions. g8dgc <g8dgc@noneya.none> - 2018-05-06 20:13 -0400
                          Re: I've been asking Nadegda's friend, "kensi", all kinds of questions. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 19:06 -0700
                          Re: I've been asking Nadegda's friend, "kensi", all kinds of questions. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:03 +0100
                        Re: I've been asking Nadegda's friend, "kensi", all kinds of questions. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-06 17:13 -0700
                          Re: I've been asking Nadegda's friend, "kensi", all kinds of questions. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-06 17:34 -0700
                          Re: I've been asking Nadegda's friend, "kensi", all kinds of questions. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-07 07:46 +0100
                            Re: I've been asking Nadegda's friend, "kensi", all kinds of questions. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-07 00:39 -0700
                              Re: I've been asking Nadegda's friend, "kensi", all kinds of questions. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-07 05:51 -0400
                                Re: I've been asking Nadegda's friend, "kensi", all kinds of questions. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 03:53 -0700
                            Re: I've been asking Nadegda's friend, "kensi", all kinds of questions. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 02:36 -0700
                              Re: I've been asking Nadegda's friend, "kensi", all kinds of questions. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-07 02:49 -0700
                                Re: I've been asking Nadegda's friend, "kensi", all kinds of questions. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 03:07 -0700
                                Re: I've been asking Nadegda's friend, "kensi", all kinds of questions. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-07 10:14 -0700
                      Clueless, you are. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-06 18:05 -0700
                        Re: Clueless, you are. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 18:13 -0700
                        Hammered Yoda <zUfjeUFm@OFkrUjd.com> - 2018-05-07 01:47 +0000
                          Re: Hammered % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 19:02 -0700
                          Re: Hammered Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 20:13 -0700
                            Re: Hammered Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 21:01 -0700
                            Re: Hammered kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-07 05:53 -0400
                        (Soviet) Democrats. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-08 10:53 -0700
    Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 10:50 -0400
      Re: Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 13:46 -0700

Page 3 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6  Next page →

#450447

On Friday, May 4, 2018 at 1:53:45 PM UTC-7, % wrote:
> On 2018-05-04 1:50 PM, Checkmate wrote:
> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> > Checkmate!  In article <v989ed9s1f3chjv7vvio2qthri3aiq8t11@4ax.com>,
> > .m@nsn.s says...
> > 
> > 
> >>
> >> On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 08:56:42 -0700, Snit
> >> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 4/28/18 7:59 AM, a.m wrote:
> >>>> On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 19:14:37 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 4/27/2018 6:20 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> >>>>>> Nadegda wrote:
> >>>>>>>> I'd like to see the RepugliCON party complete the implosion process
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway,
> >>>>>> a blue eyed country that's done little for the darker skinned.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> Rolf, I"m surprised at you living in a lib infestation on the Left coast
> >>>>> and you don't get it?  Look. ALL whites (who aren't progressives) are
> >>>>> racis'. It's as simple as that. In Norway everybody is Progressive so
> >>>>> being white and blond and having ancestors engaged in the slave trade
> >>>>> does not count. Got it?
> >>>>
> >>>> I hope that you're being sarcastic. I'm not progressive at all. If
> >>>> anything, every test shows me as being dead-centre on the political
> >>>> scale.
> >>>
> >>> You are an Alex Jones follower... and denier of basic climate science...
> >>> an extreme right winger.
> >>
> >> Everybody who disagrees with you is far right. Another tactic of the
> >> liberal idiots...
> >>
> >>> Keep in mind the main differences between liberal and conservative world
> >>> views:
> >>>
> >>> * Liberals: support equal rights and environmental protection, with a
> >>> focus on investing in the future and building a stronger tie between
> >>> hard work / productivity and financial reward.
> >>
> >> I wonder how the liberal policy of free welfare for illegal migrants
> >> factors into your idiotic argument.
> >>
> >> < Snip explanation of how great a person is if they subscribe to
> >> liberal ideology but automatically evil if they are conservative. As
> >> we all know, it's impossible to be simultaneously ethical and see even
> >> a SHRED of decency amongst conservatives >
> >>
> >>>> However, I'm also not racist.
> >>>
> >>> Not digging up your old posts but you attack blacks, Muslims,
> >>> non-Christians, etc. Unless your views have changed recently you are an
> >>> extreme bigot. Let us not pretend otherwise.
> >>
> >> Muslims are not a race, liberal idiot.
> >>
> >>>> Nevertheless, I have _zero_ pity
> >>>> for people of colour who believe that they have a disadvantage in life
> >>>> because they aren't part of the "majority."
> >>>
> >>> Simply not being a part of the majority is not why they have a disadvantage.
> >>
> >> Idiot.
> >>
> >>>> In reality, whites are the
> >>>> *minority" everywhere and becoming more so. Despite their much smaller
> >>>> numbers, they do a better job of pooling resources and using them to
> >>>> their full potential than people of colour.
> >>>
> >>> You JUST denied being racist then you push racist crap like that.
> >>
> >> That's a factual statement represented by hundreds of years of
> >> evidence, one of which I presented below. It's not racist to point a
> >> fact out just because it disagrees with the propaganda you're trying
> >> to push, liberal idiot.
> >>
> >>>> It's not racist to think
> >>>> so, especially since hundreds of years of history show that to be the
> >>>> case. The very idea that Europe thrived the way that it did despite
> >>>> the fact that its most valuable resources were taken from them by the
> >>>> Islamic hordes is a testament to that.
> >>>
> >>> And again you show your ignorance and bigotry. And your backing of
> >>> Neo-Nazis / white supremacists views.
> >>
> >> Again, if you disagree with a liberal idiot, you're automatically a
> >> racist, a Neo-Nazi and a white supremacist. After I post this, back to
> >> filtered you go.
> >>
> >>>> Africa's poor climate is not the fault of whites.
> >>>
> >>> WHAT?
> >>
> >> Much of why Africa is a disaster has to do with the fact that the
> >> continent resides between the tropics of Cancer and Capricorn. Guns,
> >> Germs & Steel shows that such a climate makes agriculture difficult
> >> and increases the amount of diseases. Whites didn't create that
> >> climate. Even if you look at the political or social climate, whites
> >> aren't responsible. No white went into the continent and recommended
> >> that they kill each other for thousands of years over gold.
> >>
> >>>> The fact that most
> >>>> of African history involves one tribe fighting another for gold is
> >>>> also not the white's fault. India smelling like a toilet and being
> >>>> overpopulated is not the white's fault. China being overpopulated and
> >>>> filled with misery (despite their being way ahead of everyone
> >>>> technologically for centuries) is not the white's fault. Need I go on?
> >>>
> >>> Please do NOT. Your ignorance is insane.
> >>
> >> Says the guys who relies exclusively on liberal sources and their
> >> propaganda, much of which is shown to be filled with lies, to make an
> >> argument. You'll never change and will remain the moron that you've
> >> shown yourself to be over decades on Usenet. If you weren't white, I'm
> >> sure you'd blame "crackers" for the fact that you live in an excrement
> >> of a house, in an excrement of a town and got married to an excrement
> >> of a woman who dumped excrements of children onto your lap.
> >>
> >> You're a complete joke and it's no surprise that everybody ignores
> >> you.
> > 
> > We have some "progressive" commie libtards in alt.checkmate who could use
> > some of your attention.
> > 
> no we don't we only have the people i let in



Perhaps you use it wrong. Do you not realize the use of VPN? 

Tatiana Spearman Kister and Staci M. Elliot both lie constantly and shamelessly and continue to do so. So no motivation in showing any further civility or judiciousness. Fool! 

Tatiana Spearman Kister shows this is an insomniac troll writing because some of them tap into what Staci M. Elliot said in very specific ways with clear thought behind them. Meaning someone is hand writing many of these. 



--
Live on Kickstarter!!
https://youtu.be/iztSc_msHuo
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#450452

On Fri, 4 May 2018 13:50:32 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
>Checkmate!  In article <v989ed9s1f3chjv7vvio2qthri3aiq8t11@4ax.com>, 
>.m@nsn.s says...
>
>
>> 
>> On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 08:56:42 -0700, Snit
>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> 
>> >On 4/28/18 7:59 AM, a.m wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 19:14:37 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>> >> 
>> >>> On 4/27/2018 6:20 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>> >>>> Nadegda wrote:
>> >>>>>> I'd like to see the RepugliCON party complete the implosion process
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway,
>> >>>> a blue eyed country that's done little for the darker skinned.
>> >>>>
>> >>> Rolf, I"m surprised at you living in a lib infestation on the Left coast
>> >>> and you don't get it?  Look. ALL whites (who aren't progressives) are
>> >>> racis'. It's as simple as that. In Norway everybody is Progressive so
>> >>> being white and blond and having ancestors engaged in the slave trade
>> >>> does not count. Got it?
>> >> 
>> >> I hope that you're being sarcastic. I'm not progressive at all. If
>> >> anything, every test shows me as being dead-centre on the political
>> >> scale.
>> >
>> >You are an Alex Jones follower... and denier of basic climate science... 
>> >an extreme right winger.
>> 
>> Everybody who disagrees with you is far right. Another tactic of the
>> liberal idiots...
>> 
>> >Keep in mind the main differences between liberal and conservative world 
>> >views:
>> >
>> >* Liberals: support equal rights and environmental protection, with a 
>> >focus on investing in the future and building a stronger tie between 
>> >hard work / productivity and financial reward.
>> 
>> I wonder how the liberal policy of free welfare for illegal migrants
>> factors into your idiotic argument.
>> 
>> < Snip explanation of how great a person is if they subscribe to
>> liberal ideology but automatically evil if they are conservative. As
>> we all know, it's impossible to be simultaneously ethical and see even
>> a SHRED of decency amongst conservatives >
>> 
>> >> However, I'm also not racist.
>> >
>> >Not digging up your old posts but you attack blacks, Muslims, 
>> >non-Christians, etc. Unless your views have changed recently you are an 
>> >extreme bigot. Let us not pretend otherwise.
>> 
>> Muslims are not a race, liberal idiot.
>> 
>> >> Nevertheless, I have _zero_ pity
>> >> for people of colour who believe that they have a disadvantage in life
>> >> because they aren't part of the "majority."
>> >
>> >Simply not being a part of the majority is not why they have a disadvantage.
>> 
>> Idiot. 
>> 
>> >> In reality, whites are the
>> >> *minority" everywhere and becoming more so. Despite their much smaller
>> >> numbers, they do a better job of pooling resources and using them to
>> >> their full potential than people of colour.
>> >
>> >You JUST denied being racist then you push racist crap like that.
>> 
>> That's a factual statement represented by hundreds of years of
>> evidence, one of which I presented below. It's not racist to point a
>> fact out just because it disagrees with the propaganda you're trying
>> to push, liberal idiot.
>> 
>> >> It's not racist to think
>> >> so, especially since hundreds of years of history show that to be the
>> >> case. The very idea that Europe thrived the way that it did despite
>> >> the fact that its most valuable resources were taken from them by the
>> >> Islamic hordes is a testament to that.
>> >
>> >And again you show your ignorance and bigotry. And your backing of 
>> >Neo-Nazis / white supremacists views.
>> 
>> Again, if you disagree with a liberal idiot, you're automatically a
>> racist, a Neo-Nazi and a white supremacist. After I post this, back to
>> filtered you go.
>> 
>> >> Africa's poor climate is not the fault of whites.
>> >
>> >WHAT?
>> 
>> Much of why Africa is a disaster has to do with the fact that the
>> continent resides between the tropics of Cancer and Capricorn. Guns,
>> Germs & Steel shows that such a climate makes agriculture difficult
>> and increases the amount of diseases. Whites didn't create that
>> climate. Even if you look at the political or social climate, whites
>> aren't responsible. No white went into the continent and recommended
>> that they kill each other for thousands of years over gold.
>> 
>> >> The fact that most
>> >> of African history involves one tribe fighting another for gold is
>> >> also not the white's fault. India smelling like a toilet and being
>> >> overpopulated is not the white's fault. China being overpopulated and
>> >> filled with misery (despite their being way ahead of everyone
>> >> technologically for centuries) is not the white's fault. Need I go on?
>> >
>> >Please do NOT. Your ignorance is insane.
>> 
>> Says the guys who relies exclusively on liberal sources and their
>> propaganda, much of which is shown to be filled with lies, to make an
>> argument. You'll never change and will remain the moron that you've
>> shown yourself to be over decades on Usenet. If you weren't white, I'm
>> sure you'd blame "crackers" for the fact that you live in an excrement
>> of a house, in an excrement of a town and got married to an excrement
>> of a woman who dumped excrements of children onto your lap.
>> 
>> You're a complete joke and it's no surprise that everybody ignores
>> you.
>
>We have some "progressive" commie libtards in alt.checkmate who could use 
>some of your attention.

I'd go but I dislike liberals too much to want to talk to more of
them. Michael Glasser of Prescott, Arizona already takes a lot of
space.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#450453

On Friday, May 4, 2018 at 2:42:40 PM UTC-7, Doomsdrzej wrote:
> On Fri, 4 May 2018 13:50:32 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> >Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
> >Checkmate!  In article <v989ed9s1f3chjv7vvio2qthri3aiq8t11@4ax.com>, 
> >.m@nsn.s says...
> >
> >
> >> 
> >> On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 08:56:42 -0700, Snit
> >> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> >> 
> >> >On 4/28/18 7:59 AM, a.m wrote:
> >> >> On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 19:14:37 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> >> >> 
> >> >>> On 4/27/2018 6:20 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> >> >>>> Nadegda wrote:
> >> >>>>>> I'd like to see the RepugliCON party complete the implosion process
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Trump writes up contracts, Cuba rapes the rich, and Nadegda praises Norway,
> >> >>>> a blue eyed country that's done little for the darker skinned.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>> Rolf, I"m surprised at you living in a lib infestation on the Left coast
> >> >>> and you don't get it?  Look. ALL whites (who aren't progressives) are
> >> >>> racis'. It's as simple as that. In Norway everybody is Progressive so
> >> >>> being white and blond and having ancestors engaged in the slave trade
> >> >>> does not count. Got it?
> >> >> 
> >> >> I hope that you're being sarcastic. I'm not progressive at all. If
> >> >> anything, every test shows me as being dead-centre on the political
> >> >> scale.
> >> >
> >> >You are an Alex Jones follower... and denier of basic climate science... 
> >> >an extreme right winger.
> >> 
> >> Everybody who disagrees with you is far right. Another tactic of the
> >> liberal idiots...
> >> 
> >> >Keep in mind the main differences between liberal and conservative world 
> >> >views:
> >> >
> >> >* Liberals: support equal rights and environmental protection, with a 
> >> >focus on investing in the future and building a stronger tie between 
> >> >hard work / productivity and financial reward.
> >> 
> >> I wonder how the liberal policy of free welfare for illegal migrants
> >> factors into your idiotic argument.
> >> 
> >> < Snip explanation of how great a person is if they subscribe to
> >> liberal ideology but automatically evil if they are conservative. As
> >> we all know, it's impossible to be simultaneously ethical and see even
> >> a SHRED of decency amongst conservatives >
> >> 
> >> >> However, I'm also not racist.
> >> >
> >> >Not digging up your old posts but you attack blacks, Muslims, 
> >> >non-Christians, etc. Unless your views have changed recently you are an 
> >> >extreme bigot. Let us not pretend otherwise.
> >> 
> >> Muslims are not a race, liberal idiot.
> >> 
> >> >> Nevertheless, I have _zero_ pity
> >> >> for people of colour who believe that they have a disadvantage in life
> >> >> because they aren't part of the "majority."
> >> >
> >> >Simply not being a part of the majority is not why they have a disadvantage.
> >> 
> >> Idiot. 
> >> 
> >> >> In reality, whites are the
> >> >> *minority" everywhere and becoming more so. Despite their much smaller
> >> >> numbers, they do a better job of pooling resources and using them to
> >> >> their full potential than people of colour.
> >> >
> >> >You JUST denied being racist then you push racist crap like that.
> >> 
> >> That's a factual statement represented by hundreds of years of
> >> evidence, one of which I presented below. It's not racist to point a
> >> fact out just because it disagrees with the propaganda you're trying
> >> to push, liberal idiot.
> >> 
> >> >> It's not racist to think
> >> >> so, especially since hundreds of years of history show that to be the
> >> >> case. The very idea that Europe thrived the way that it did despite
> >> >> the fact that its most valuable resources were taken from them by the
> >> >> Islamic hordes is a testament to that.
> >> >
> >> >And again you show your ignorance and bigotry. And your backing of 
> >> >Neo-Nazis / white supremacists views.
> >> 
> >> Again, if you disagree with a liberal idiot, you're automatically a
> >> racist, a Neo-Nazi and a white supremacist. After I post this, back to
> >> filtered you go.
> >> 
> >> >> Africa's poor climate is not the fault of whites.
> >> >
> >> >WHAT?
> >> 
> >> Much of why Africa is a disaster has to do with the fact that the
> >> continent resides between the tropics of Cancer and Capricorn. Guns,
> >> Germs & Steel shows that such a climate makes agriculture difficult
> >> and increases the amount of diseases. Whites didn't create that
> >> climate. Even if you look at the political or social climate, whites
> >> aren't responsible. No white went into the continent and recommended
> >> that they kill each other for thousands of years over gold.
> >> 
> >> >> The fact that most
> >> >> of African history involves one tribe fighting another for gold is
> >> >> also not the white's fault. India smelling like a toilet and being
> >> >> overpopulated is not the white's fault. China being overpopulated and
> >> >> filled with misery (despite their being way ahead of everyone
> >> >> technologically for centuries) is not the white's fault. Need I go on?
> >> >
> >> >Please do NOT. Your ignorance is insane.
> >> 
> >> Says the guys who relies exclusively on liberal sources and their
> >> propaganda, much of which is shown to be filled with lies, to make an
> >> argument. You'll never change and will remain the moron that you've
> >> shown yourself to be over decades on Usenet. If you weren't white, I'm
> >> sure you'd blame "crackers" for the fact that you live in an excrement
> >> of a house, in an excrement of a town and got married to an excrement
> >> of a woman who dumped excrements of children onto your lap.
> >> 
> >> You're a complete joke and it's no surprise that everybody ignores
> >> you.
> >
> >We have some "progressive" commie libtards in alt.checkmate who could use 
> >some of your attention.
> 
> I'd go but I dislike liberals too much to want to talk to more of
> them. Michael Glasser of Prescott, Arizona already takes a lot of
> space.



iOS, runs on the Bash kernel. So yeah, Bash is mobile. Bash is a super computer. Bash is a server. Bash is a desktop. Bash is growing in market share. Thankfully the person you are replying to is in my kill filter. 

Proof Jesus Christ accuses everyone of being Snit http://sandman.net/files/snit_circus.png. 

Don't get too cocky, Jesus Christ, sometimes "seemingly intelligent people" are just that. 

You've proven very little. 

BTW, I've already pointed out that his use of "herd" to describe true advocates is argumentum ad hominem, since he's likening them to beef cattle. I thought showing Jesus Christ a taste of his own medicine might help the situation. It did not. You wishing for something does not make it true. 

--
Get Rich Slow
http://prescottcomputerguy.com/screenflow
https://youtu.be/VxLiH-x0aeY
Jonas Eklundh Communication

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#450460

On 5/4/18 2:42 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
>>> Says the guys who relies exclusively on liberal sources and their
>>> propaganda,

You call reality "liberal"... and then say anyone who uses honest 
sources is using liberal ones so their sources should be discounted. 
Then you point to Breitbart and Alex Jones, two sources which are horrid.

>>> much of which is shown to be filled with lies, to make an
>>> argument. You'll never change and will remain the moron that you've
>>> shown yourself to be over decades on Usenet. If you weren't white, I'm
>>> sure you'd blame "crackers" for the fact that you live in an excrement
>>> of a house, in an excrement of a town and got married to an excrement
>>> of a woman who dumped excrements of children onto your lap.
>>>
>>> You're a complete joke and it's no surprise that everybody ignores
>>> you.
>> We have some "progressive" commie libtards in alt.checkmate who could use
>> some of your attention.
> I'd go but I dislike liberals too much to want to talk to more of
> them. Michael Glasser of Prescott, Arizona already takes a lot of
> space.

You dislike anyone who backs equal rights. You loath the concept because 
it goes against your push for special entitlements for yourself and 
those you see as being similar to you (white, Christian, heterosexual, 
etc.).

This is a key difference between the "right" and "left"... liberals have 
a much stronger tendency to back equal rights, using evidence-based 
policies, and other things which, frankly, simply make sense.


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#450462

On 2018-05-04 4:54 PM, Snit wrote:
> On 5/4/18 2:42 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
>>>> Says the guys who relies exclusively on liberal sources and their
>>>> propaganda,
> 
> You call reality "liberal"... and then say anyone who uses honest 
> sources is using liberal ones so their sources should be discounted. 
> Then you point to Breitbart and Alex Jones, two sources which are horrid.
> 
>>>> much of which is shown to be filled with lies, to make an
>>>> argument. You'll never change and will remain the moron that you've
>>>> shown yourself to be over decades on Usenet. If you weren't white, I'm
>>>> sure you'd blame "crackers" for the fact that you live in an excrement
>>>> of a house, in an excrement of a town and got married to an excrement
>>>> of a woman who dumped excrements of children onto your lap.
>>>>
>>>> You're a complete joke and it's no surprise that everybody ignores
>>>> you.
>>> We have some "progressive" commie libtards in alt.checkmate who could 
>>> use
>>> some of your attention.
>> I'd go but I dislike liberals too much to want to talk to more of
>> them. Michael Glasser of Prescott, Arizona already takes a lot of
>> space.
> 
> You dislike anyone who backs equal rights. You loath the concept because 
> it goes against your push for special entitlements for yourself and 
> those you see as being similar to you (white, Christian, heterosexual, 
> etc.).
> 
> This is a key difference between the "right" and "left"... liberals have 
> a much stronger tendency to back equal rights, using evidence-based 
> policies, and other things which, frankly, simply make sense.
> 
> 
in your opinion

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#450463

On Fri, 4 May 2018 16:58:29 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 2018-05-04 4:54 PM, Snit wrote:
>> On 5/4/18 2:42 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
>>>>> Says the guys who relies exclusively on liberal sources and their
>>>>> propaganda,
>> 
>> You call reality "liberal"... and then say anyone who uses honest 
>> sources is using liberal ones so their sources should be discounted. 
>> Then you point to Breitbart and Alex Jones, two sources which are horrid.
>> 
>>>>> much of which is shown to be filled with lies, to make an
>>>>> argument. You'll never change and will remain the moron that you've
>>>>> shown yourself to be over decades on Usenet. If you weren't white, I'm
>>>>> sure you'd blame "crackers" for the fact that you live in an excrement
>>>>> of a house, in an excrement of a town and got married to an excrement
>>>>> of a woman who dumped excrements of children onto your lap.
>>>>>
>>>>> You're a complete joke and it's no surprise that everybody ignores
>>>>> you.
>>>> We have some "progressive" commie libtards in alt.checkmate who could 
>>>> use
>>>> some of your attention.
>>> I'd go but I dislike liberals too much to want to talk to more of
>>> them. Michael Glasser of Prescott, Arizona already takes a lot of
>>> space.
>> 
>> You dislike anyone who backs equal rights. You loath the concept because 
>> it goes against your push for special entitlements for yourself and 
>> those you see as being similar to you (white, Christian, heterosexual, 
>> etc.).
>> 
>> This is a key difference between the "right" and "left"... liberals have 
>> a much stronger tendency to back equal rights, using evidence-based 
>> policies, and other things which, frankly, simply make sense.
>> 
>> 
>in your opinion


The left doesn't want certain people to have equal rights, they want
special rights.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#450466

On 5/4/18 5:02 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>> You dislike anyone who backs equal rights. You loath the concept because
>>> it goes against your push for special entitlements for yourself and
>>> those you see as being similar to you (white, Christian, heterosexual,
>>> etc.).
>>>
>>> This is a key difference between the "right" and "left"... liberals have
>>> a much stronger tendency to back equal rights, using evidence-based
>>> policies, and other things which, frankly, simply make sense.
>>>
>>>
>> in your opinion
> 
> The left doesn't want certain people to have equal rights, they want
> special rights.

There are some examples where that can be argued, such as with quotas 
(though even there if you understand the broader picture what they say 
makes at least some sense), but I think you would be hard pressed to 
back your claim overall.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#450468

On 2018-05-04 5:04 PM, Snit wrote:
> On 5/4/18 5:02 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>> You dislike anyone who backs equal rights. You loath the concept 
>>>> because
>>>> it goes against your push for special entitlements for yourself and
>>>> those you see as being similar to you (white, Christian, heterosexual,
>>>> etc.).
>>>>
>>>> This is a key difference between the "right" and "left"... liberals 
>>>> have
>>>> a much stronger tendency to back equal rights, using evidence-based
>>>> policies, and other things which, frankly, simply make sense.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> in your opinion
>>
>> The left doesn't want certain people to have equal rights, they want
>> special rights.
> 
> There are some examples where that can be argued, such as with quotas 
> (though even there if you understand the broader picture what they say 
> makes at least some sense), but I think you would be hard pressed to 
> back your claim overall.
> 
is there anything you do that isn't argue

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#450470

On 5/4/18 5:25 PM, % wrote:
>>> The left doesn't want certain people to have equal rights, they want
>>> special rights.
>>
>> There are some examples where that can be argued, such as with quotas 
>> (though even there if you understand the broader picture what they say 
>> makes at least some sense), but I think you would be hard pressed to 
>> back your claim overall.
>>
> is there anything you do that isn't argue

Sure.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#450473

On 2018-05-04 5:30 PM, Snit wrote:
> On 5/4/18 5:25 PM, % wrote:
>>>> The left doesn't want certain people to have equal rights, they want
>>>> special rights.
>>>
>>> There are some examples where that can be argued, such as with quotas 
>>> (though even there if you understand the broader picture what they 
>>> say makes at least some sense), but I think you would be hard pressed 
>>> to back your claim overall.
>>>
>> is there anything you do that isn't argue
> 
> Sure.
> 
you should do that

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#450475

On 5/4/18 5:37 PM, % wrote:
> On 2018-05-04 5:30 PM, Snit wrote:
>> On 5/4/18 5:25 PM, % wrote:
>>>>> The left doesn't want certain people to have equal rights, they want
>>>>> special rights.
>>>>
>>>> There are some examples where that can be argued, such as with 
>>>> quotas (though even there if you understand the broader picture what 
>>>> they say makes at least some sense), but I think you would be hard 
>>>> pressed to back your claim overall.
>>>>
>>> is there anything you do that isn't argue
>>
>> Sure.
>>
> you should do that

Are you trying to argue I do not?

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#450476

On 2018-05-04 5:41 PM, Snit wrote:
> On 5/4/18 5:37 PM, % wrote:
>> On 2018-05-04 5:30 PM, Snit wrote:
>>> On 5/4/18 5:25 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>> The left doesn't want certain people to have equal rights, they want
>>>>>> special rights.
>>>>>
>>>>> There are some examples where that can be argued, such as with 
>>>>> quotas (though even there if you understand the broader picture 
>>>>> what they say makes at least some sense), but I think you would be 
>>>>> hard pressed to back your claim overall.
>>>>>
>>>> is there anything you do that isn't argue
>>>
>>> Sure.
>>>
>> you should do that
> 
> Are you trying to argue I do not?
> 
not yet

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#450477

On 5/4/18 5:48 PM, % wrote:
> On 2018-05-04 5:41 PM, Snit wrote:
>> On 5/4/18 5:37 PM, % wrote:
>>> On 2018-05-04 5:30 PM, Snit wrote:
>>>> On 5/4/18 5:25 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>> The left doesn't want certain people to have equal rights, they want
>>>>>>> special rights.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There are some examples where that can be argued, such as with 
>>>>>> quotas (though even there if you understand the broader picture 
>>>>>> what they say makes at least some sense), but I think you would be 
>>>>>> hard pressed to back your claim overall.
>>>>>>
>>>>> is there anything you do that isn't argue
>>>>
>>>> Sure.
>>>>
>>> you should do that
>>
>> Are you trying to argue I do not?
>>
> not yet

OK.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#450478

On 2018-05-04 5:50 PM, Snit wrote:
> On 5/4/18 5:48 PM, % wrote:
>> On 2018-05-04 5:41 PM, Snit wrote:
>>> On 5/4/18 5:37 PM, % wrote:
>>>> On 2018-05-04 5:30 PM, Snit wrote:
>>>>> On 5/4/18 5:25 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>>> The left doesn't want certain people to have equal rights, they 
>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>> special rights.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There are some examples where that can be argued, such as with 
>>>>>>> quotas (though even there if you understand the broader picture 
>>>>>>> what they say makes at least some sense), but I think you would 
>>>>>>> be hard pressed to back your claim overall.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> is there anything you do that isn't argue
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure.
>>>>>
>>>> you should do that
>>>
>>> Are you trying to argue I do not?
>>>
>> not yet
> 
> OK.
> 
when if you and i ever argue ,
rest assured we won't have to ask if we are

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#450481

On 5/4/18 5:52 PM, % wrote:
> On 2018-05-04 5:50 PM, Snit wrote:
>> On 5/4/18 5:48 PM, % wrote:
>>> On 2018-05-04 5:41 PM, Snit wrote:
>>>> On 5/4/18 5:37 PM, % wrote:
>>>>> On 2018-05-04 5:30 PM, Snit wrote:
>>>>>> On 5/4/18 5:25 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>>>> The left doesn't want certain people to have equal rights, they 
>>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>>> special rights.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There are some examples where that can be argued, such as with 
>>>>>>>> quotas (though even there if you understand the broader picture 
>>>>>>>> what they say makes at least some sense), but I think you would 
>>>>>>>> be hard pressed to back your claim overall.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> is there anything you do that isn't argue
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sure.
>>>>>>
>>>>> you should do that
>>>>
>>>> Are you trying to argue I do not?
>>>>
>>> not yet
>>
>> OK.
>>
> when if you and i ever argue ,
> rest assured we won't have to ask if we are

OK.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#450482

On 2018-05-04 6:03 PM, Snit wrote:
> On 5/4/18 5:52 PM, % wrote:
>> On 2018-05-04 5:50 PM, Snit wrote:
>>> On 5/4/18 5:48 PM, % wrote:
>>>> On 2018-05-04 5:41 PM, Snit wrote:
>>>>> On 5/4/18 5:37 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>> On 2018-05-04 5:30 PM, Snit wrote:
>>>>>>> On 5/4/18 5:25 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> The left doesn't want certain people to have equal rights, 
>>>>>>>>>> they want
>>>>>>>>>> special rights.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There are some examples where that can be argued, such as with 
>>>>>>>>> quotas (though even there if you understand the broader picture 
>>>>>>>>> what they say makes at least some sense), but I think you would 
>>>>>>>>> be hard pressed to back your claim overall.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> is there anything you do that isn't argue
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sure.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> you should do that
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you trying to argue I do not?
>>>>>
>>>> not yet
>>>
>>> OK.
>>>
>> when if you and i ever argue ,
>> rest assured we won't have to ask if we are
> 
> OK.
> 
but a macintosh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#450467

On 2018-05-04 5:02 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> On Fri, 4 May 2018 16:58:29 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 2018-05-04 4:54 PM, Snit wrote:
>>> On 5/4/18 2:42 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
>>>>>> Says the guys who relies exclusively on liberal sources and their
>>>>>> propaganda,
>>>
>>> You call reality "liberal"... and then say anyone who uses honest
>>> sources is using liberal ones so their sources should be discounted.
>>> Then you point to Breitbart and Alex Jones, two sources which are horrid.
>>>
>>>>>> much of which is shown to be filled with lies, to make an
>>>>>> argument. You'll never change and will remain the moron that you've
>>>>>> shown yourself to be over decades on Usenet. If you weren't white, I'm
>>>>>> sure you'd blame "crackers" for the fact that you live in an excrement
>>>>>> of a house, in an excrement of a town and got married to an excrement
>>>>>> of a woman who dumped excrements of children onto your lap.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're a complete joke and it's no surprise that everybody ignores
>>>>>> you.
>>>>> We have some "progressive" commie libtards in alt.checkmate who could
>>>>> use
>>>>> some of your attention.
>>>> I'd go but I dislike liberals too much to want to talk to more of
>>>> them. Michael Glasser of Prescott, Arizona already takes a lot of
>>>> space.
>>>
>>> You dislike anyone who backs equal rights. You loath the concept because
>>> it goes against your push for special entitlements for yourself and
>>> those you see as being similar to you (white, Christian, heterosexual,
>>> etc.).
>>>
>>> This is a key difference between the "right" and "left"... liberals have
>>> a much stronger tendency to back equal rights, using evidence-based
>>> policies, and other things which, frankly, simply make sense.
>>>
>>>
>> in your opinion
> 
> 
> The left doesn't want certain people to have equal rights, they want
> special rights.
> 
everybody wants , the natives here want the pot taxed a different way ,
i'm worried they're going to hold up the process , but my buddy trudeau 
says no matter , weed will be legal by july

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#450484

On Friday, May 4, 2018 at 5:25:02 PM UTC-7, % wrote:
> On 2018-05-04 5:02 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 May 2018 16:58:29 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> On 2018-05-04 4:54 PM, Snit wrote:
> >>> On 5/4/18 2:42 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
> >>>>>> Says the guys who relies exclusively on liberal sources and their
> >>>>>> propaganda,
> >>>
> >>> You call reality "liberal"... and then say anyone who uses honest
> >>> sources is using liberal ones so their sources should be discounted.
> >>> Then you point to Breitbart and Alex Jones, two sources which are horrid.
> >>>
> >>>>>> much of which is shown to be filled with lies, to make an
> >>>>>> argument. You'll never change and will remain the moron that you've
> >>>>>> shown yourself to be over decades on Usenet. If you weren't white, I'm
> >>>>>> sure you'd blame "crackers" for the fact that you live in an excrement
> >>>>>> of a house, in an excrement of a town and got married to an excrement
> >>>>>> of a woman who dumped excrements of children onto your lap.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You're a complete joke and it's no surprise that everybody ignores
> >>>>>> you.
> >>>>> We have some "progressive" commie libtards in alt.checkmate who could
> >>>>> use
> >>>>> some of your attention.
> >>>> I'd go but I dislike liberals too much to want to talk to more of
> >>>> them. Michael Glasser of Prescott, Arizona already takes a lot of
> >>>> space.
> >>>
> >>> You dislike anyone who backs equal rights. You loath the concept because
> >>> it goes against your push for special entitlements for yourself and
> >>> those you see as being similar to you (white, Christian, heterosexual,
> >>> etc.).
> >>>
> >>> This is a key difference between the "right" and "left"... liberals have
> >>> a much stronger tendency to back equal rights, using evidence-based
> >>> policies, and other things which, frankly, simply make sense.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> in your opinion
> > 
> > 
> > The left doesn't want certain people to have equal rights, they want
> > special rights.
> > 
> everybody wants , the natives here want the pot taxed a different way ,
> i'm worried they're going to hold up the process , but my buddy trudeau 
> says no matter , weed will be legal by july



He is clearly trolling, he got called out on it and he's doing the usual nonsense taught in https://goo.gl/k5FDFL as he endeavors to retain what The Holy Ghost already has... but it will not work. From what I've seen it looks like the Bash shell ecosystem is breaking down. 

His wish is to see me chased away by nonstop flooding. And hey, that could happen. 



--
Get Rich Slow
https://youtu.be/48_DdtLGR9s
https://youtu.be/HHT9SJgYsH4
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#450465

On 5/4/18 4:58 PM, % wrote:
> On 2018-05-04 4:54 PM, Snit wrote:
>> On 5/4/18 2:42 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
>>>>> Says the guys who relies exclusively on liberal sources and their
>>>>> propaganda,
>>
>> You call reality "liberal"... and then say anyone who uses honest 
>> sources is using liberal ones so their sources should be discounted. 
>> Then you point to Breitbart and Alex Jones, two sources which are horrid.
>>
>>>>> much of which is shown to be filled with lies, to make an
>>>>> argument. You'll never change and will remain the moron that you've
>>>>> shown yourself to be over decades on Usenet. If you weren't white, I'm
>>>>> sure you'd blame "crackers" for the fact that you live in an excrement
>>>>> of a house, in an excrement of a town and got married to an excrement
>>>>> of a woman who dumped excrements of children onto your lap.
>>>>>
>>>>> You're a complete joke and it's no surprise that everybody ignores
>>>>> you.
>>>> We have some "progressive" commie libtards in alt.checkmate who 
>>>> could use
>>>> some of your attention.
>>> I'd go but I dislike liberals too much to want to talk to more of
>>> them. Michael Glasser of Prescott, Arizona already takes a lot of
>>> space.
>>
>> You dislike anyone who backs equal rights. You loath the concept 
>> because it goes against your push for special entitlements for 
>> yourself and those you see as being similar to you (white, Christian, 
>> heterosexual, etc.).
>>
>> This is a key difference between the "right" and "left"... liberals 
>> have a much stronger tendency to back equal rights, using 
>> evidence-based policies, and other things which, frankly, simply make 
>> sense.
>>
> in your opinion

Sure. And I am happy to look at the evidence. In this case the evidence 
is clear by just looking at recent posts: we have a conservative who is 
against Amazon's denouncement of a group that pushes bigotry and special 
entitlements, and a liberal who backs Amazon doing so. And we have a 
liberal who is backing the use of valid sources (scientific evidence, 
well respected fact checking sites, etc.) and a conservative who backs 
the extremely UNRELIABLE and bigoted Breitbart and Alex Jones sites.

But that is just some data from the two of us... broader data might show 
a different trend. Happy to see what you have.



-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#450469

On 2018-05-04 5:03 PM, Snit wrote:
> On 5/4/18 4:58 PM, % wrote:
>> On 2018-05-04 4:54 PM, Snit wrote:
>>> On 5/4/18 2:42 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
>>>>>> Says the guys who relies exclusively on liberal sources and their
>>>>>> propaganda,
>>>
>>> You call reality "liberal"... and then say anyone who uses honest 
>>> sources is using liberal ones so their sources should be discounted. 
>>> Then you point to Breitbart and Alex Jones, two sources which are 
>>> horrid.
>>>
>>>>>> much of which is shown to be filled with lies, to make an
>>>>>> argument. You'll never change and will remain the moron that you've
>>>>>> shown yourself to be over decades on Usenet. If you weren't white, 
>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>> sure you'd blame "crackers" for the fact that you live in an 
>>>>>> excrement
>>>>>> of a house, in an excrement of a town and got married to an excrement
>>>>>> of a woman who dumped excrements of children onto your lap.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're a complete joke and it's no surprise that everybody ignores
>>>>>> you.
>>>>> We have some "progressive" commie libtards in alt.checkmate who 
>>>>> could use
>>>>> some of your attention.
>>>> I'd go but I dislike liberals too much to want to talk to more of
>>>> them. Michael Glasser of Prescott, Arizona already takes a lot of
>>>> space.
>>>
>>> You dislike anyone who backs equal rights. You loath the concept 
>>> because it goes against your push for special entitlements for 
>>> yourself and those you see as being similar to you (white, Christian, 
>>> heterosexual, etc.).
>>>
>>> This is a key difference between the "right" and "left"... liberals 
>>> have a much stronger tendency to back equal rights, using 
>>> evidence-based policies, and other things which, frankly, simply make 
>>> sense.
>>>
>> in your opinion
> 
> Sure. And I am happy to look at the evidence. In this case the evidence 
> is clear by just looking at recent posts: we have a conservative who is 
> against Amazon's denouncement of a group that pushes bigotry and special 
> entitlements, and a liberal who backs Amazon doing so. And we have a 
> liberal who is backing the use of valid sources (scientific evidence, 
> well respected fact checking sites, etc.) and a conservative who backs 
> the extremely UNRELIABLE and bigoted Breitbart and Alex Jones sites.
> 
> But that is just some data from the two of us... broader data might show 
> a different trend. Happy to see what you have.
> 
> 
> 
i'll be damned , and all i see is friends and a few other people

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web