Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #449636 > unrolled thread

The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes

Started byfr314159@gmail.com
First post2018-04-30 07:21 -0700
Last post2018-05-01 19:54 -0400
Articles 4 on this page of 44 — 9 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-04-30 07:21 -0700
    Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-30 08:16 -0700
    Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-30 11:21 -0400
    Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-30 10:28 -0500
      Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-30 11:57 -0400
        Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-30 11:06 -0500
          Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-30 13:00 -0400
      Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-30 09:43 -0700
      Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-30 10:23 -0700
        Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-30 12:56 -0500
          Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-30 11:25 -0700
            Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-30 11:49 -0700
        Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-04-30 11:37 -0700
          Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-30 12:08 -0700
      Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-01 13:02 +0000
        Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-01 08:26 -0500
          Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-01 13:49 +0000
            Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-01 14:04 +0000
            Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-01 09:05 -0500
              Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-01 11:25 -0400
              Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-01 15:41 +0000
                Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-01 12:13 -0500
                  Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-01 20:42 +0000
              Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-01 19:51 -0400
                Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 17:42 -0700
                Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 17:43 -0700
                  Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-02 02:33 +0000
                    Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 20:29 -0700
            Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-05-02 09:33 +0200
              Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-02 01:07 -0700
              Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-02 08:03 -0400
        Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 08:03 -0600
          Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-01 15:24 +0000
            Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 08:35 -0700
              Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-01 16:01 +0000
                Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 09:15 -0700
                  Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-05-01 16:39 +0000
                Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 09:56 -0700
                  Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 10:02 -0700
                    Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 15:59 -0700
                      Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 18:04 -0700
            Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-05-01 19:02 +0200
        Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-05-01 19:01 +0200
          Re: The Vinyl Debate Continues -- Assholes Will Be Assholes Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-01 19:54 -0400

Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]

#449972

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-05-01 18:04 -0700
Message-ID<fksh56Fii01U6@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#449946
On 5/1/18 3:59 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 1, 2018 at 11:03:02 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
>> On 5/1/18 9:56 AM, Steven Petruzzellis wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, May 1, 2018 at 9:02:16 AM UTC-7, F. Russell wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 01 May 2018 08:35:29 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    I was right,
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That's NOT an explanation.
>>>>
>>>> Where is your explanation?  Where is it?
>>>>
>>>> You CANNOT provide one.  You are INCAPABLE of doing do.
>>>>
>>>> So get the fuck outa here.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Total garbage by an ignorant, tall-tale telling, scheming, collaborating donkey who couldn't tell the truth even if he swore on his mother's grave.
>>>
>>> What it looks like is the least of your problems and is no big deal, especially if it's better than the competition.
>>>
>>> You do realize that the massive floods ending up in multiple groups started out in COLA, right?
>>
>> I did see where at one point you (Carroll) said that these post were not
>> automated. What do you claim now about your flooding?
> 
> Sticking with the ol' hard-sell routine, eh... any takers yet? ;)
> 
>> Oh, and you do realize your bragging about how you can work with web
>> pages in ways others in COLA cannot,
> 
> Which "others" cannot?  What "ways"?
> 
> (snip crap)
> 
>> proves these posts are from you.
> 
> Do you realize that what I showed was *also* done in the
> AppleScript editor? Now let's see... who else uses that
> kind of tech?
> 
> Hmmm... 'telmosfire "meat" Glasser' comes to mind.
> 
> People are not as stupid as you need them to be, they never were.

So you blame me even for your posts. EVERYTHING in your life is, in your 
twisted mind, MY fault.

YOUR actions are YOUR responsibility, not mine. Take personal 
responsibility for your life.


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#449902

FromPeter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de>
Date2018-05-01 19:02 +0200
Message-ID<pca6iq$993$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#449879
F. Russell wrote:

> On Tue, 01 May 2018 08:03:02 -0600, Steve Carroll wrote:
> 
>> 
>> [snip smug smirk of dummy asshole]
>>
> 
> Everything I say is incontrovertibly incorrect -- as usual.
> 

See. I repaired that typo of yours

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#449901

FromPeter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de>
Date2018-05-01 19:01 +0200
Message-ID<pca6hl$993$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#449845
F. Russell wrote:

> On Mon, 30 Apr 2018 10:28:11 -0500, chrisv wrote:
> 
>> 
>> I would also suppose that the limits of CD's dynamic range, while
>> massive, could be perceived, under laboratory conditions.
>> 
> 
> Actually, we perceive well beyond that range on a daily basis.
> 
> The standard CD (16-bit) encompasses 96dB of dynamic range.
> 
> If we consider the sound of normal breathing to be 0dB,
> a chain saw or jack hammer would be about 110dB which already
> exceeds that range.
> 
> Dynamic range is just a RANGE between the loudest and softest
> sounds (expressed usually as a ratio of intensities or signal
> voltages).  A musical performance is intended to express IDEAS
> and a dynamic range greater than 96dB should NEVER be necessary.
>
Idiot. As usual you talk about things you know absolutely nothing about.
A performance of a symphonic orchestra will easily go beyond that limit

> However, only classical music utilizes dynamic range. 

Again, idiot. There is lots of music around which has a very high dynamic 
range

> That
> puerile junk idiom known as "popular" music only has a SINGLE
> level near the top of the range.  

A claim which only shows that you don't know your ass from a hole in the 
ground, Snit 2.0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#449962

FromChris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us>
Date2018-05-01 19:54 -0400
Message-ID<pcavmk$7al$8@dont-email.me>
In reply to#449901
Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> F. Russell wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 30 Apr 2018 10:28:11 -0500, chrisv wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> I would also suppose that the limits of CD's dynamic range, while
>>> massive, could be perceived, under laboratory conditions.
>>> 
>> 
>> Actually, we perceive well beyond that range on a daily basis.
>> 
>> The standard CD (16-bit) encompasses 96dB of dynamic range.
>> 
>> If we consider the sound of normal breathing to be 0dB,
>> a chain saw or jack hammer would be about 110dB which already
>> exceeds that range.
>> 
>> Dynamic range is just a RANGE between the loudest and softest
>> sounds (expressed usually as a ratio of intensities or signal
>> voltages).  A musical performance is intended to express IDEAS
>> and a dynamic range greater than 96dB should NEVER be necessary.
>>
> Idiot. As usual you talk about things you know absolutely nothing about.
> A performance of a symphonic orchestra will easily go beyond that limit
>
>> However, only classical music utilizes dynamic range. 
>
> Again, idiot. There is lots of music around which has a very high dynamic 
> range

Anecdote:  I was listening to a classical tune ("Romeo and Juliet" as I
recall) on a vinyl recording, and the compression of the dynamic range of
the wildest parts of that recording were obvious.  Mushy!

>> That
>> puerile junk idiom known as "popular" music only has a SINGLE
>> level near the top of the range.  
>
> A claim which only shows that you don't know your ass from a hole in the 
> ground, Snit 2.0

You sure he isn't a "Snit" beta?

-- 
One of the most striking differences between a cat and a lie is that a cat has
only nine lives.
		-- Mark Twain, "Pudd'nhead Wilson's Calendar"

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web