Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #449199 > unrolled thread
| Started by | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-04-26 11:49 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-04-27 18:29 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 139 — 16 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Possibly good? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-26 11:49 -0700
Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 12:28 -0700
Re: Possibly good? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-26 22:24 +0000
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-26 15:38 -0700
Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 21:47 -0700
Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 15:51 -0700
Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-27 00:39 -0700
Re: Possibly good? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-26 23:32 +0000
Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-27 03:45 -0700
Re: Possibly good? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-27 11:03 -0500
Re: Possibly good? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-27 22:03 +0000
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-27 17:28 -0700
Re: Possibly good? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 11:01 -0400
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 08:52 -0700
Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 16:01 +0000
Re: Possibly good? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 12:43 -0400
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 09:56 -0700
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 09:48 -0700
Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 19:08 +0000
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 13:00 -0700
Re: Possibly good? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 16:23 -0400
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 13:36 -0700
Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 20:59 +0000
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 14:11 -0700
Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 22:33 +0000
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 15:35 -0700
Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 22:56 +0000
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 16:06 -0700
Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 23:21 +0000
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 16:42 -0700
Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 14:27 +0000
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 10:26 -0700
Re: Possibly good? Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-29 19:27 -0400
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 16:54 -0700
Re: Possibly good? Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 19:41 -0400
Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 20:56 +0000
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 14:07 -0700
Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 22:06 +0000
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 15:30 -0700
Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 22:43 +0000
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 16:07 -0700
Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 23:17 +0000
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 16:42 -0700
Re: Possibly good? Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-04-29 00:58 +0000
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 18:22 -0700
Re: Possibly good? Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-04-29 01:37 +0000
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 18:44 -0700
Re: Possibly good? Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-04-29 01:53 +0000
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 19:06 -0700
Re: Possibly good? Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-04-29 02:16 +0000
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 19:30 -0700
Re: Possibly good? Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-04-29 02:44 +0000
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 19:46 -0700
Re: Possibly good? Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-04-29 02:54 +0000
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 20:00 -0700
Re: Possibly good? Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-04-29 03:03 +0000
Our planet is greener now, vs. 100 years ago. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-29 04:44 -0700
Re: Our planet is greener now, vs. 100 years ago. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 05:13 -0700
Re: Our planet is greener now, vs. 100 years ago. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-29 19:21 -0400
Re: Our planet is greener now, vs. 100 years ago. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 16:54 -0700
Re: Possibly good? Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 17:11 -0400
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 14:18 -0700
Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-04-29 09:42 -0400
Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 14:21 +0000
Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 07:34 -0700
Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-04-29 10:43 -0400
Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 15:28 +0000
Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-04-29 13:13 -0400
Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 17:37 +0000
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 10:44 -0700
Re: Possibly good? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-30 08:15 -0500
Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-30 06:36 -0700
Re: Possibly good? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-29 15:29 +0000
Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 15:43 +0000
Re: Possibly good? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-29 16:05 +0000
Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 16:44 +0000
Re: Possibly good? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-29 17:40 +0000
Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 17:58 +0000
Re: Possibly good? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-29 19:24 +0000
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 12:43 -0700
Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 20:26 +0000
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 13:46 -0700
Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 20:24 +0000
Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 14:05 -0700
Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 09:23 -0700
Re: Possibly good? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 12:27 -0400
Re: Possibly good? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-04-28 17:24 +0000
Re: Possibly good? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 13:44 -0400
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 10:54 -0700
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 10:56 -0700
Re: Possibly good? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-04-28 21:01 +0200
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 12:59 -0700
Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 20:51 +0000
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 13:57 -0700
Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 21:04 +0000
Re: Possibly good? Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 17:13 -0400
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 14:17 -0700
Re: Possibly good? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 03:37 +0000
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 20:41 -0700
Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 01:21 -0700
Re: Possibly good? Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 17:09 -0400
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 14:12 -0700
Re: Possibly good? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 03:36 +0000
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 20:40 -0700
Re: Possibly good? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-05-01 09:26 +0200
Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-28 23:13 -0700
Re: Possibly good? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-30 08:19 -0500
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 08:04 -0700
Re: Possibly good? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 03:38 +0000
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 20:42 -0700
Re: Possibly good? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-05-01 09:24 +0200
Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-01 05:34 -0400
Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 02:53 -0700
Re: Possibly good? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 03:34 +0000
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 20:39 -0700
Re: Possibly good? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-05-01 09:20 +0200
Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-01 05:37 -0400
Re: Possibly good? Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-01 11:11 -0400
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 15:17 +0000
Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-01 19:47 -0400
Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-04-29 09:40 -0400
Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 07:03 -0700
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 10:26 -0700
Re: Possibly good? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-30 08:03 -0500
Re: Possibly good? William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2018-04-30 14:14 +0100
Re: Possibly good? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 03:44 +0000
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 04:43 +0000
Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-01 05:28 +0000
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 05:36 +0000
Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-01 06:09 +0000
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 07:12 -0700
Re: Possibly good? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-01 14:52 +0000
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 14:56 +0000
Re: Possibly good? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-01 15:01 +0000
Re: Possibly good? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-01 07:01 -0500
Re: Possibly good? Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-01 11:21 -0400
Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 08:31 -0700
Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-01 19:41 -0400
Re: Possibly good? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-27 18:29 -0700
Page 3 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-28 16:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fkkd5tFom7jU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #449429 |
On 4/28/18 3:43 PM, owl wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 4/28/18 3:06 PM, owl wrote: >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 4/28/18 1:56 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>> I would love to see Antarctica uncovered in my lifetime, and I couldn't >>>>>>> care less about Florida. Let that shit sink. >>>> >>>>>> Yes owl, make sure you go to_ANY_ scientific site that states a >>>>>> position but makes sure that it states whatever position the Prescott >>>>>> cockroach agrees with otherwise go to any_OTHER_ scientific site and >>>>>> do the same. If you can't find one that agrees with Michael Glasser, >>>>>> make sure that you ask him to send you his pre-approved list of_ANY_ >>>>>> scientific site. >>>> >>>>> What does snit know about science? He thinks psychology is a science. >>>>> You know, that field of "study" that changes its determinations based >>>>> on political pressure. >>>> >>>> I clearly know more about climate science and psychology than you do. >>>> You clearly know more than I do about computer science, or at least >>>> programming. >>>> >>>> No shame in either of those. >>>> >>> >>> So you know a lot about some junk science fields. >> >> And here you prove me right. Thanks! >> > > Prove you right about what? That you know a lot > about some junk science fields? Well, if you accept > a mere statement as proof, then that says a lot about > your "scientific" mind, so I guess in a roundabout way > it does prove that you are a junk science expert. > > >>> What about Bigfoot and UFOs? >> >> What about them? >> > > How is climate change going to affect Bigfoot's > habitat? Will he be happy or sad to see more > plant life spring up over the next few decades? > > How is climate change going to affect UFOs? > Will they need to add more solar shielding > to protect themselves from that crazy Sun? > > See: your lack of understanding of basic science, and your twisting of what I have said about science, proves me right. I sincerely think you cannot help it. As I said, if you REALLY want to know about climate science go to ANY scientific site on the topic. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-28 23:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <b9z08ga3.vhuo34@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #449435 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/28/18 3:43 PM, owl wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 4/28/18 3:06 PM, owl wrote: >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 4/28/18 1:56 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>> I would love to see Antarctica uncovered in my lifetime, and I couldn't >>>>>>>> care less about Florida. Let that shit sink. >>>>> >>>>>>> Yes owl, make sure you go to_ANY_ scientific site that states a >>>>>>> position but makes sure that it states whatever position the Prescott >>>>>>> cockroach agrees with otherwise go to any_OTHER_ scientific site and >>>>>>> do the same. If you can't find one that agrees with Michael Glasser, >>>>>>> make sure that you ask him to send you his pre-approved list of_ANY_ >>>>>>> scientific site. >>>>> >>>>>> What does snit know about science? He thinks psychology is a science. >>>>>> You know, that field of "study" that changes its determinations based >>>>>> on political pressure. >>>>> >>>>> I clearly know more about climate science and psychology than you do. >>>>> You clearly know more than I do about computer science, or at least >>>>> programming. >>>>> >>>>> No shame in either of those. >>>>> >>>> >>>> So you know a lot about some junk science fields. >>> >>> And here you prove me right. Thanks! >>> >> >> Prove you right about what? That you know a lot >> about some junk science fields? Well, if you accept >> a mere statement as proof, then that says a lot about >> your "scientific" mind, so I guess in a roundabout way >> it does prove that you are a junk science expert. >> >> >>>> What about Bigfoot and UFOs? >>> >>> What about them? >>> >> >> How is climate change going to affect Bigfoot's >> habitat? Will he be happy or sad to see more >> plant life spring up over the next few decades? >> >> How is climate change going to affect UFOs? >> Will they need to add more solar shielding >> to protect themselves from that crazy Sun? >> >> > See: your lack of understanding of basic science, and your twisting of > what I have said about science, proves me right. > > I sincerely think you cannot help it. > > As I said, if you REALLY want to know about climate science go to ANY > scientific site on the topic. > I've been to plenty, and the all say it's a bunch of crap, unfortunately. I wish it weren't, because I want the Antarctic ice to melt so we can explore.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-28 16:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fkkf7lFp263U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #449438 |
On 4/28/18 4:17 PM, owl wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 4/28/18 3:43 PM, owl wrote: >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 4/28/18 3:06 PM, owl wrote: >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 4/28/18 1:56 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>>> I would love to see Antarctica uncovered in my lifetime, and I couldn't >>>>>>>>> care less about Florida. Let that shit sink. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes owl, make sure you go to_ANY_ scientific site that states a >>>>>>>> position but makes sure that it states whatever position the Prescott >>>>>>>> cockroach agrees with otherwise go to any_OTHER_ scientific site and >>>>>>>> do the same. If you can't find one that agrees with Michael Glasser, >>>>>>>> make sure that you ask him to send you his pre-approved list of_ANY_ >>>>>>>> scientific site. >>>>>> >>>>>>> What does snit know about science? He thinks psychology is a science. >>>>>>> You know, that field of "study" that changes its determinations based >>>>>>> on political pressure. >>>>>> >>>>>> I clearly know more about climate science and psychology than you do. >>>>>> You clearly know more than I do about computer science, or at least >>>>>> programming. >>>>>> >>>>>> No shame in either of those. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> So you know a lot about some junk science fields. >>>> >>>> And here you prove me right. Thanks! >>>> >>> >>> Prove you right about what? That you know a lot >>> about some junk science fields? Well, if you accept >>> a mere statement as proof, then that says a lot about >>> your "scientific" mind, so I guess in a roundabout way >>> it does prove that you are a junk science expert. >>> >>> >>>>> What about Bigfoot and UFOs? >>>> >>>> What about them? >>>> >>> >>> How is climate change going to affect Bigfoot's >>> habitat? Will he be happy or sad to see more >>> plant life spring up over the next few decades? >>> >>> How is climate change going to affect UFOs? >>> Will they need to add more solar shielding >>> to protect themselves from that crazy Sun? >>> >>> >> See: your lack of understanding of basic science, and your twisting of >> what I have said about science, proves me right. >> >> I sincerely think you cannot help it. >> >> As I said, if you REALLY want to know about climate science go to ANY >> scientific site on the topic. >> > > I've been to plenty, and the all say it's a bunch of crap, unfortunately. > I wish it weren't, because I want the Antarctic ice to melt so we can > explore. > OK, you think the science is "a bunch of crap" and you deny it. I accept the evidence. We shall not agree. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-29 00:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pc35bm$o2m$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #449446 |
On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 16:42:45 -0700, Snit, thunk thusly: > On 4/28/18 4:17 PM, owl wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 4/28/18 3:43 PM, owl wrote: >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 4/28/18 3:06 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 4/28/18 1:56 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>> I would love to see Antarctica uncovered in my lifetime, and I couldn't >>>>>>>>>> care less about Florida. Let that shit sink. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yes owl, make sure you go to_ANY_ scientific site that states a >>>>>>>>> position but makes sure that it states whatever position the Prescott >>>>>>>>> cockroach agrees with otherwise go to any_OTHER_ scientific site and >>>>>>>>> do the same. If you can't find one that agrees with Michael Glasser, >>>>>>>>> make sure that you ask him to send you his pre-approved list of_ANY_ >>>>>>>>> scientific site. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What does snit know about science? He thinks psychology is a science. >>>>>>>> You know, that field of "study" that changes its determinations based >>>>>>>> on political pressure. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I clearly know more about climate science and psychology than you do. >>>>>>> You clearly know more than I do about computer science, or at least >>>>>>> programming. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No shame in either of those. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> So you know a lot about some junk science fields. >>>>> >>>>> And here you prove me right. Thanks! >>>>> >>>> >>>> Prove you right about what? That you know a lot >>>> about some junk science fields? Well, if you accept >>>> a mere statement as proof, then that says a lot about >>>> your "scientific" mind, so I guess in a roundabout way >>>> it does prove that you are a junk science expert. >>>> >>>> >>>>>> What about Bigfoot and UFOs? >>>>> >>>>> What about them? >>>>> >>>> >>>> How is climate change going to affect Bigfoot's >>>> habitat? Will he be happy or sad to see more >>>> plant life spring up over the next few decades? >>>> >>>> How is climate change going to affect UFOs? >>>> Will they need to add more solar shielding >>>> to protect themselves from that crazy Sun? >>>> >>>> >>> See: your lack of understanding of basic science, and your twisting of >>> what I have said about science, proves me right. >>> >>> I sincerely think you cannot help it. >>> >>> As I said, if you REALLY want to know about climate science go to ANY >>> scientific site on the topic. >>> >> >> I've been to plenty, and the all say it's a bunch of crap, unfortunately. >> I wish it weren't, because I want the Antarctic ice to melt so we can >> explore. >> > OK, you think the science is "a bunch of crap" and you deny it. I accept > the evidence. We shall not agree. > It was Global Warming, then Climate Change. Next it will be called As The World Turns, I Need A Profession. Seems obvious that storms get worse as populations explode in storm prone areas. The oceans will *seem* to rise as wetlands are filled to accomodate more people. If we really want to reduce CO2, we should start deploying some nukes. Where do you live? Exact coordinates improve accuracy :) -- Brick Mortar
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-28 18:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fkkl2gFq6hlU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #449452 |
On 4/28/18 5:58 PM, Brick wrote: ... >> OK, you think the science is "a bunch of crap" and you deny it. I accept >> the evidence. We shall not agree. > > It was Global Warming, then Climate Change. You can call it either... I do not care. > Next it will be called As The World Turns, I Need A Profession. > Seems obvious that storms get worse as populations explode in storm prone areas. Why would that makes storms worse and not just make then cause more harm to populations? > The oceans will *seem* to rise as wetlands are filled to accomodate more people. So you deny they are really rising. OK, you do not know the science. > If we really want to reduce CO2, we should start deploying some nukes. > Where do you live? > Exact coordinates improve accuracy :) Move topics as you wish. This one is dead anyway. As I said, go to a relevant science site if you really want to learn. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-29 01:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pc37l8$1k1$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #449453 |
On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 18:22:24 -0700, Snit, thunk thusly: > On 4/28/18 5:58 PM, Brick wrote: > ... >>> OK, you think the science is "a bunch of crap" and you deny it. I accept >>> the evidence. We shall not agree. >> >> It was Global Warming, then Climate Change. > > You can call it either... I do not care. > >> Next it will be called As The World Turns, I Need A Profession. >> Seems obvious that storms get worse as populations explode in storm prone areas. > > Why would that makes storms worse and not just make then cause more harm > to populations? Now you're thinking. >> The oceans will *seem* to rise as wetlands are filled to accomodate more people. > > So you deny they are really rising. OK, you do not know the science. I know they're not rising... execpt near poor islands that want money. >> If we really want to reduce CO2, we should start deploying some nukes. >> Where do you live? >> Exact coordinates improve accuracy :) > > Move topics as you wish. This one is dead anyway. As I said, go to a > relevant science site if you really want to learn. Not really interested in what science zombies had implanted in their heads. -- Brick Mortar
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-28 18:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fkkmchFqe8fU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #449454 |
On 4/28/18 6:37 PM, Brick wrote: > On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 18:22:24 -0700, Snit, thunk thusly: >> On 4/28/18 5:58 PM, Brick wrote: >> ... >>>> OK, you think the science is "a bunch of crap" and you deny it. I accept >>>> the evidence. We shall not agree. >>> >>> It was Global Warming, then Climate Change. >> >> You can call it either... I do not care. >> >>> Next it will be called As The World Turns, I Need A Profession. >>> Seems obvious that storms get worse as populations explode in storm prone areas. >> >> Why would that makes storms worse and not just make then cause more harm >> to populations? > > Now you're thinking. You seem to think storms are not actually getting worse, contrary to the evidence. Why? >>> The oceans will *seem* to rise as wetlands are filled to accomodate more people. >> >> So you deny they are really rising. OK, you do not know the science. > > I know they're not rising... execpt near poor islands that want money. OK, you think you know something contrary to the evidence. Again, this is why I suggest you look at scientific sites to educate yourself. >>> If we really want to reduce CO2, we should start deploying some nukes. >>> Where do you live? >>> Exact coordinates improve accuracy :) >> >> Move topics as you wish. This one is dead anyway. As I said, go to a >> relevant science site if you really want to learn. > > Not really interested in what science zombies had implanted in their heads. If you are not interested in science that is fine, but I think it is unwise of you to pretend to "know" things which are contrary to the evidence. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-29 01:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pc38j3$1k1$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #449455 |
On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 18:44:49 -0700, Snit, thunk thusly: > On 4/28/18 6:37 PM, Brick wrote: >> On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 18:22:24 -0700, Snit, thunk thusly: >>> On 4/28/18 5:58 PM, Brick wrote: >>> ... >>>>> OK, you think the science is "a bunch of crap" and you deny it. I accept >>>>> the evidence. We shall not agree. >>>> >>>> It was Global Warming, then Climate Change. >>> >>> You can call it either... I do not care. >>> >>>> Next it will be called As The World Turns, I Need A Profession. >>>> Seems obvious that storms get worse as populations explode in storm prone areas. >>> >>> Why would that makes storms worse and not just make then cause more harm >>> to populations? >> >> Now you're thinking. > > You seem to think storms are not actually getting worse, contrary to the > evidence. Why? Are we having more tornados, or more dopplar indicated tornados. Are hurricanes worse, or are we just sending more planes out to measure higher wind speeds compared to 1880? > >>>> The oceans will *seem* to rise as wetlands are filled to accomodate more people. >>> >>> So you deny they are really rising. OK, you do not know the science. Oh, I've seen bullshit before, calling it science is new to me. >> I know they're not rising... execpt near poor islands that want money. > > OK, you think you know something contrary to the evidence. Again, this > is why I suggest you look at scientific sites to educate yourself. Educated means indoctrinated now? No thanks. >>>> If we really want to reduce CO2, we should start deploying some nukes. >>>> Where do you live? >>>> Exact coordinates improve accuracy :) >>> >>> Move topics as you wish. This one is dead anyway. As I said, go to a >>> relevant science site if you really want to learn. >> >> Not really interested in what science zombies had implanted in their heads. > > If you are not interested in science that is fine, but I think it is > unwise of you to pretend to "know" things which are contrary to the > evidence. No zombies here. -- Brick Mortar
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-28 19:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fkknl6Fqml1U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #449456 |
On 4/28/18 6:53 PM, Brick wrote: > On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 18:44:49 -0700, Snit, thunk thusly: >> On 4/28/18 6:37 PM, Brick wrote: >>> On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 18:22:24 -0700, Snit, thunk thusly: >>>> On 4/28/18 5:58 PM, Brick wrote: >>>> ... >>>>>> OK, you think the science is "a bunch of crap" and you deny it. I accept >>>>>> the evidence. We shall not agree. >>>>> >>>>> It was Global Warming, then Climate Change. >>>> >>>> You can call it either... I do not care. >>>> >>>>> Next it will be called As The World Turns, I Need A Profession. >>>>> Seems obvious that storms get worse as populations explode in storm prone areas. >>>> >>>> Why would that makes storms worse and not just make then cause more harm >>>> to populations? >>> >>> Now you're thinking. >> >> You seem to think storms are not actually getting worse, contrary to the >> evidence. Why? > > Are we having more tornados, or more dopplar indicated tornados. > Are hurricanes worse, or are we just sending more planes out to measure higher wind > speeds compared to 1880? Again, I suggest you go to multiple scientific websites to get a better understanding of this, but here is a good start: <https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/RisingCost/rising_cost5.php> >>>>> The oceans will *seem* to rise as wetlands are filled to accomodate more people. >>>> >>>> So you deny they are really rising. OK, you do not know the science. > > Oh, I've seen bullshit before, calling it science is new to me. Again: if you want to know the science, go to the website of the scientific organizations. Look at their references. >>> I know they're not rising... execpt near poor islands that want money. >> >> OK, you think you know something contrary to the evidence. Again, this >> is why I suggest you look at scientific sites to educate yourself. > > Educated means indoctrinated now? > No thanks. If you think learning about the evidence and the science is "indoctrination" that is your issue. >>>>> If we really want to reduce CO2, we should start deploying some nukes. >>>>> Where do you live? >>>>> Exact coordinates improve accuracy :) >>>> >>>> Move topics as you wish. This one is dead anyway. As I said, go to a >>>> relevant science site if you really want to learn. >>> >>> Not really interested in what science zombies had implanted in their heads. >> >> If you are not interested in science that is fine, but I think it is >> unwise of you to pretend to "know" things which are contrary to the >> evidence. > > No zombies here. This is not the Walking Dead. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-29 02:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pc39tv$1k1$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #449457 |
On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 19:06:29 -0700, Snit, thunk thusly: > On 4/28/18 6:53 PM, Brick wrote: >> On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 18:44:49 -0700, Snit, thunk thusly: >>> On 4/28/18 6:37 PM, Brick wrote: >>>> On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 18:22:24 -0700, Snit, thunk thusly: >>>>> On 4/28/18 5:58 PM, Brick wrote: >>>>> ... >>>>>>> OK, you think the science is "a bunch of crap" and you deny it. I accept >>>>>>> the evidence. We shall not agree. >>>>>> >>>>>> It was Global Warming, then Climate Change. >>>>> >>>>> You can call it either... I do not care. >>>>> >>>>>> Next it will be called As The World Turns, I Need A Profession. >>>>>> Seems obvious that storms get worse as populations explode in storm prone areas. >>>>> >>>>> Why would that makes storms worse and not just make then cause more harm >>>>> to populations? >>>> >>>> Now you're thinking. >>> >>> You seem to think storms are not actually getting worse, contrary to the >>> evidence. Why? >> >> Are we having more tornados, or more dopplar indicated tornados. >> Are hurricanes worse, or are we just sending more planes out to measure higher wind >> speeds compared to 1880? > > Again, I suggest you go to multiple scientific websites to get a better > understanding of this, but here is a good start: > ><https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/RisingCost/rising_cost5.php> Rising costs? Is there something there about beach homes, which were little more than shacks when I was a kid, have been replaced by McBeach Mansions owned by douchbags that need the poor to subsidize their insurance? Useless info. > >>>>>> The oceans will *seem* to rise as wetlands are filled to accomodate more people. >>>>> >>>>> So you deny they are really rising. OK, you do not know the science. >> >> Oh, I've seen bullshit before, calling it science is new to me. > > Again: if you want to know the science, go to the website of the > scientific organizations. Look at their references. Puh Shaw !! >>>> I know they're not rising... execpt near poor islands that want money. >>> >>> OK, you think you know something contrary to the evidence. Again, this >>> is why I suggest you look at scientific sites to educate yourself. >> >> Educated means indoctrinated now? >> No thanks. > > If you think learning about the evidence and the science is > "indoctrination" that is your issue. I think learning requires more than reading, followed by full acceptance. >>>>>> If we really want to reduce CO2, we should start deploying some nukes. >>>>>> Where do you live? >>>>>> Exact coordinates improve accuracy :) >>>>> >>>>> Move topics as you wish. This one is dead anyway. As I said, go to a >>>>> relevant science site if you really want to learn. >>>> >>>> Not really interested in what science zombies had implanted in their heads. >>> >>> If you are not interested in science that is fine, but I think it is >>> unwise of you to pretend to "know" things which are contrary to the >>> evidence. >> >> No zombies here. > > This is not the Walking Dead. It's in your head. -- Brick Mortar
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-28 19:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fkkp2oFqv78U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #449458 |
On 4/28/18 7:16 PM, Brick wrote: > On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 19:06:29 -0700, Snit, thunk thusly: >> On 4/28/18 6:53 PM, Brick wrote: >>> On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 18:44:49 -0700, Snit, thunk thusly: >>>> On 4/28/18 6:37 PM, Brick wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 18:22:24 -0700, Snit, thunk thusly: >>>>>> On 4/28/18 5:58 PM, Brick wrote: >>>>>> ... >>>>>>>> OK, you think the science is "a bunch of crap" and you deny it. I accept >>>>>>>> the evidence. We shall not agree. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It was Global Warming, then Climate Change. >>>>>> >>>>>> You can call it either... I do not care. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Next it will be called As The World Turns, I Need A Profession. >>>>>>> Seems obvious that storms get worse as populations explode in storm prone areas. >>>>>> >>>>>> Why would that makes storms worse and not just make then cause more harm >>>>>> to populations? >>>>> >>>>> Now you're thinking. >>>> >>>> You seem to think storms are not actually getting worse, contrary to the >>>> evidence. Why? >>> >>> Are we having more tornados, or more dopplar indicated tornados. >>> Are hurricanes worse, or are we just sending more planes out to measure higher wind >>> speeds compared to 1880? >> >> Again, I suggest you go to multiple scientific websites to get a better >> understanding of this, but here is a good start: >> >> <https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/RisingCost/rising_cost5.php> > > Rising costs? > Is there something there about beach homes, which were little more than shacks when I > was a kid, have been replaced by McBeach Mansions owned by douchbags that need the > poor to subsidize their insurance? > > Useless info. I agree that information is not even slightly relevant or useful in understanding ocean level rising, though of course it will be impacted by it. It also ties into our socializing of the costs of the rich. >>>>>>> The oceans will *seem* to rise as wetlands are filled to accomodate more people. >>>>>> >>>>>> So you deny they are really rising. OK, you do not know the science. >>> >>> Oh, I've seen bullshit before, calling it science is new to me. >> >> Again: if you want to know the science, go to the website of the >> scientific organizations. Look at their references. > > Puh Shaw !! Already established you have disdain for evidence, reason, logic, etc., at least in this area. Not sure what your goal in moving forward is. >>>>> I know they're not rising... execpt near poor islands that want money. >>>> >>>> OK, you think you know something contrary to the evidence. Again, this >>>> is why I suggest you look at scientific sites to educate yourself. >>> >>> Educated means indoctrinated now? >>> No thanks. >> >> If you think learning about the evidence and the science is >> "indoctrination" that is your issue. > > I think learning requires more than reading, followed by full acceptance. Do you believe in plate tectonics? How about the force of gravity being inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source of that mass? Germ theory? I am all for doing more than reading... but when you look at ALL the knowledge an educated person needs you cannot double check all of it, and if you did you could not be sure you did not have biases (not that you ever can, but without peer review and the like there is a higher chance). >>>>>>> If we really want to reduce CO2, we should start deploying some nukes. >>>>>>> Where do you live? >>>>>>> Exact coordinates improve accuracy :) >>>>>> >>>>>> Move topics as you wish. This one is dead anyway. As I said, go to a >>>>>> relevant science site if you really want to learn. >>>>> >>>>> Not really interested in what science zombies had implanted in their heads. >>>> >>>> If you are not interested in science that is fine, but I think it is >>>> unwise of you to pretend to "know" things which are contrary to the >>>> evidence. >>> >>> No zombies here. >> >> This is not the Walking Dead. > > It's in your head. There is a lot of scientific knowledge and understanding of the data in my head. Sure. Still, you would be better served going to scientific sites instead of just speaking to me and then pushing ignorance. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-29 02:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pc3bim$1k1$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #449459 |
On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 19:30:46 -0700, Snit, thunk thusly: > On 4/28/18 7:16 PM, Brick wrote: SNIP >> >> It's in your head. > > There is a lot of scientific knowledge and understanding of the data in > my head. Sure. Still, you would be better served going to scientific > sites instead of just speaking to me and then pushing ignorance. You will see this is a trend, nothing more. This warming won't last long, though I'm not sure why intelligent people are concerned about ice from the last Ice Age melting. Maybe they prefer an ice age, where all the crops die. Crop failures are good for the economy, to zombies. -- Brick Mortar
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-28 19:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fkkq00Fr4euU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #449460 |
On 4/28/18 7:44 PM, Brick wrote: > On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 19:30:46 -0700, Snit, thunk thusly: >> On 4/28/18 7:16 PM, Brick wrote: > > SNIP > >>> >>> It's in your head. >> >> There is a lot of scientific knowledge and understanding of the data in >> my head. Sure. Still, you would be better served going to scientific >> sites instead of just speaking to me and then pushing ignorance. > > You will see this is a trend, nothing more. > This warming won't last long, though I'm not sure why intelligent people > are concerned about ice from the last Ice Age melting. > > Maybe they prefer an ice age, where all the crops die. > Crop failures are good for the economy, to zombies. > Why not try to learn some about the science? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-29 02:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pc3c5s$1k1$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #449461 |
On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 19:46:24 -0700, Snit, thunk thusly: > On 4/28/18 7:44 PM, Brick wrote: >> On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 19:30:46 -0700, Snit, thunk thusly: >>> On 4/28/18 7:16 PM, Brick wrote: >> >> SNIP >> >>>> >>>> It's in your head. >>> >>> There is a lot of scientific knowledge and understanding of the data in >>> my head. Sure. Still, you would be better served going to scientific >>> sites instead of just speaking to me and then pushing ignorance. >> >> You will see this is a trend, nothing more. >> This warming won't last long, though I'm not sure why intelligent people >> are concerned about ice from the last Ice Age melting. >> >> Maybe they prefer an ice age, where all the crops die. >> Crop failures are good for the economy, to zombies. >> > Why not try to learn some about the science? > Well, as a matter of fact, I know all about the science of FEMA money. Taxpayers nation-wide now pay for local beaches, drainage repairs. Thanks. When it cools off, we'll get you to pay for salting the roads. Your fucking cars are changing the climate to get colder. Wahhh, Wahhh, where's our money. -- Brick Mortar
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-28 20:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fkkqpgFr993U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #449462 |
On 4/28/18 7:54 PM, Brick wrote: > On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 19:46:24 -0700, Snit, thunk thusly: >> On 4/28/18 7:44 PM, Brick wrote: >>> On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 19:30:46 -0700, Snit, thunk thusly: >>>> On 4/28/18 7:16 PM, Brick wrote: >>> >>> SNIP >>> >>>>> >>>>> It's in your head. >>>> >>>> There is a lot of scientific knowledge and understanding of the data in >>>> my head. Sure. Still, you would be better served going to scientific >>>> sites instead of just speaking to me and then pushing ignorance. >>> >>> You will see this is a trend, nothing more. >>> This warming won't last long, though I'm not sure why intelligent people >>> are concerned about ice from the last Ice Age melting. >>> >>> Maybe they prefer an ice age, where all the crops die. >>> Crop failures are good for the economy, to zombies. >>> >> Why not try to learn some about the science? >> > > Well, as a matter of fact, I know all about the science of FEMA money. > Taxpayers nation-wide now pay for local beaches, drainage repairs. > Thanks. > When it cools off, we'll get you to pay for salting the roads. > Your fucking cars are changing the climate to get colder. > Wahhh, Wahhh, where's our money. You change topics a lot. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-29 03:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pc3cm5$1k1$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #449463 |
On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 20:00:00 -0700, Snit, thunk thusly: > On 4/28/18 7:54 PM, Brick wrote: >> On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 19:46:24 -0700, Snit, thunk thusly: >>> On 4/28/18 7:44 PM, Brick wrote: >>>> On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 19:30:46 -0700, Snit, thunk thusly: >>>>> On 4/28/18 7:16 PM, Brick wrote: >>>> >>>> SNIP >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It's in your head. >>>>> >>>>> There is a lot of scientific knowledge and understanding of the data in >>>>> my head. Sure. Still, you would be better served going to scientific >>>>> sites instead of just speaking to me and then pushing ignorance. >>>> >>>> You will see this is a trend, nothing more. >>>> This warming won't last long, though I'm not sure why intelligent people >>>> are concerned about ice from the last Ice Age melting. >>>> >>>> Maybe they prefer an ice age, where all the crops die. >>>> Crop failures are good for the economy, to zombies. >>>> >>> Why not try to learn some about the science? >>> >> >> Well, as a matter of fact, I know all about the science of FEMA money. >> Taxpayers nation-wide now pay for local beaches, drainage repairs. >> Thanks. >> When it cools off, we'll get you to pay for salting the roads. >> Your fucking cars are changing the climate to get colder. >> Wahhh, Wahhh, where's our money. > > You change topics a lot. > > The climate changes alot. Manipulating revenue stays the same. I haven't changed a topic, I focused it with reality lenses. -- Brick Mortar
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-29 04:44 -0700 |
| Subject | Our planet is greener now, vs. 100 years ago. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.29--4.44am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #449464 |
Our climate is changing ? Everything changes. Our planet is greener now, vs. 100 years ago, because it's warmer, with more carbon dioxide.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-29 05:13 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Our planet is greener now, vs. 100 years ago. |
| Message-ID | <cfe03063-9f0b-4371-b4b7-339e2f455d15@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #449479 |
On Sunday, April 29, 2018 at 4:44:57 AM UTC-7, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > Our climate is changing ? Everything changes. > > Our planet is greener now, vs. 100 years ago, > because it's warmer, with more carbon dioxide. So what's Bill 'The Shill' Cunningham's method for the flooding nonsense? FileMaker? That is the only tool he knows, and it is a joke. He must be abusing it to produce these stupid "group-killer" garbage posts. Here is my theory, Bill 'The Shill' Cunningham took the chatbot that he hacked and blamed MuahMan for... he's feeding it data from the program, grabbing "special" paragraphs, then altering those using Pseudo-Context Free Grammar and then he actively posts them because his insomnia enables him to do that close to ceaselessly. Why does Bill 'The Shill' Cunningham focus on MuahMan's self-esteem issues so much? I will intoxicate Bill 'The Shill' Cunningham with my mind. -- Eight things to never feed your dog! Michael Glasser: Prescott Computer Guy http://prescottcomputerguy.com https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AglvCo3dJ38&feature=youtu.be http://www.5z8.info/hackwebcam_e9z2tw_friendster-of-sex Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-29 19:21 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Our planet is greener now, vs. 100 years ago. |
| Message-ID | <lpkcedthi7pv24urcqc8ni5khj2s245ooo@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #449479 |
On Sun, 29 Apr 2018 04:44:57 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: >Our climate is changing ? Everything changes. > >Our planet is greener now, vs. 100 years ago, >because it's warmer, with more carbon dioxide. And you know it's true because shoeless Jeff Relf, who takes a dump in a bucket, is the authority on science.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-29 16:54 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Our planet is greener now, vs. 100 years ago. |
| Message-ID | <fkn49oFca94U6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #449574 |
On 4/29/18 4:21 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote: > On Sun, 29 Apr 2018 04:44:57 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: > >> Our climate is changing ? Everything changes. >> >> Our planet is greener now, vs. 100 years ago, >> because it's warmer, with more carbon dioxide. > > And you know it's true because shoeless Jeff Relf, who takes a dump in > a bucket, is the authority on science. > My .sig is right again! -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web