Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #354536 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sandman <mr@sandman.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-05-10 18:22 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-05-16 09:54 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 109 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-10 18:22 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-10 13:35 -0500
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-10 17:53 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-10 17:53 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-11 15:51 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-11 17:26 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 10:40 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 12:16 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-11 22:57 +0200
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 18:02 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 19:12 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-12 13:27 +0200
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-12 08:48 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 06:21 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-12 08:42 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 09:29 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-05-12 21:47 -0300
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-12 23:14 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-05-13 08:52 -0300
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-13 09:12 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-13 15:38 +0200
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-13 09:50 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-13 18:06 +0200
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 09:15 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-13 18:26 +0200
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 09:37 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-05-13 09:39 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Alan Bundis <birdwatcheralanbundis@mymail.net> - 2016-05-13 17:34 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 10:39 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 10:57 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-13 18:38 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-13 14:44 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 11:56 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-13 20:07 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 09:04 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-14 21:35 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-13 19:20 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 14:29 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-13 23:37 +0200
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 15:24 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-13 21:39 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-13 23:19 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-13 21:09 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-13 21:13 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 14:23 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <PeteM@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 11:23 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-14 15:59 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-14 16:28 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 09:30 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 13:07 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <PeteM@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 12:55 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-14 17:22 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 15:11 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-14 20:52 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 18:14 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-15 00:29 +0200
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 19:43 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-14 23:20 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 19:36 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-14 23:57 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 20:18 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-15 00:29 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 21:00 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-15 01:13 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 09:54 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-15 14:41 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 09:47 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-15 08:21 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 09:59 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Alan Bundis <birdwatcheralanbundis@mymail.net> - 2016-05-13 17:37 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-25 17:23 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 15:39 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-25 20:23 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 08:21 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-14 22:00 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 10:24 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-15 14:30 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-15 18:48 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-15 15:03 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-15 12:16 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-15 19:32 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-16 15:13 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-16 19:22 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-16 16:01 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-16 21:27 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 12:06 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-13 14:08 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-13 16:31 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 19:46 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-05-14 08:47 -0300
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-15 13:04 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-05-18 09:01 -0300
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-16 07:41 -0500
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-05-18 09:03 -0300
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-13 10:28 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-13 13:44 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-16 07:36 -0500
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-12 08:37 -0700
Snit digest 236 / 2016-05-12 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-12 16:06 +0000
Re: Snit digest 236 / 2016-05-12 tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 09:32 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-12 08:36 -0700
Snit digest 235 / 2016-05-12 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-12 16:02 +0000
Re: Snit digest 235 / 2016-05-12 tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 09:32 -0700
Re: Snit digest 235 / 2016-05-12 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 09:37 -0700
Re: Snit digest 235 / 2016-05-12 tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 18:28 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-18 11:29 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 18:12 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-05-16 13:57 +0100
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-16 09:54 -0700
Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 Next page →
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-15 19:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ghjvlc.4v@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #355552 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 5/15/2016 2:48 PM, owl wrote: >> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>> On 5/15/2016 1:24 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>> On Saturday, May 14, 2016 at 8:00:48 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote: >>>>> On 5/13/2016 12:15 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>>> On Friday, May 13, 2016 at 10:06:55 AM UTC-6, Peter Köhlmann >>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> Yes. It does the trick, it is *short* and I don't have to write >>>>>>> it myself. Why rewrite something which already exists? It is >>>>>>> not my fault that your beloved VB isn't up to snuff >>>>>> >>>>>> You;re right, obviously... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Quit lying... >>>> >>>> Oh, f*ck... you're really gonna yank that outta content this way, >>>> Snit? >>> >>> ? All context was included. >>> >>> >>> >>>>> he failed. He used somebody else's code. >>>> >>>> Whatever you say, Acid Rainman ;) >>> >>> Did I stutter? "He failed. He used somebody else's code." >>> >> >> Dude, you're using nntplib in your stats thingie instead of >> rolling your own. > > > SLAP! > > Kohlmann made fun of what I admitted was a simple gcd algorithm, and > when I said 'write it yourself' the cheater came back with a call to a > built-in function. > anon@lowtide:~$ cat gcd.py #!/usr/bin/python import sys import fractions int1 = int(sys.argv[1]) int2 = int(sys.argv[2]) print fractions.gcd(int1, int2) anon@lowtide:~$ ./gcd.py 252 105 21 anon@lowtide:~$ I win.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-16 15:13 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nhd5te$ece$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #355556 |
On 5/15/2016 3:32 PM, owl wrote: > anon@lowtide:~$ cat gcd.py > #!/usr/bin/python > import sys > import fractions > int1 = int(sys.argv[1]) > int2 = int(sys.argv[2]) > print fractions.gcd(int1, int2) > anon@lowtide:~$ ./gcd.py 252 105 > 21 > anon@lowtide:~$ > > I win. Very good, Beaver. You made calls to 4 builtin functions: import, int, print, gcd. Let's enhance the efficiency with a 1-liner: import sys,fractions;print fractions.gcd(int(sys.argv[1]),int(sys.argv[2])) "Densecodemakessensecode"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-16 19:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ghvcmi9f.a3r@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #355645 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
> On 5/15/2016 3:32 PM, owl wrote:
>
>> anon@lowtide:~$ cat gcd.py
>> #!/usr/bin/python
>> import sys
>> import fractions
>> int1 = int(sys.argv[1])
>> int2 = int(sys.argv[2])
>> print fractions.gcd(int1, int2)
>> anon@lowtide:~$ ./gcd.py 252 105
>> 21
>> anon@lowtide:~$
>>
>> I win.
>
>
> Very good, Beaver. You made calls to 4 builtin functions: import, int,
> print, gcd.
>
> Let's enhance the efficiency with a 1-liner:
>
> import sys,fractions;print fractions.gcd(int(sys.argv[1]),int(sys.argv[2]))
>
>
> "Densecodemakessensecode"
>
I'd just do it in bash myself.
anon@lowtide:~$ cat gcd.sh
#!/bin/bash
./gcd.py ${1} ${2}
anon@lowtide:~$
anon@lowtide:~$ ./gcd.sh 252 105
21
anon@lowtide:~$
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-16 16:01 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nhd8p0$pv3$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #355649 |
On 5/16/2016 3:22 PM, owl wrote:
> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>> On 5/15/2016 3:32 PM, owl wrote:
>>
>>> anon@lowtide:~$ cat gcd.py
>>> #!/usr/bin/python
>>> import sys
>>> import fractions
>>> int1 = int(sys.argv[1])
>>> int2 = int(sys.argv[2])
>>> print fractions.gcd(int1, int2)
>>> anon@lowtide:~$ ./gcd.py 252 105
>>> 21
>>> anon@lowtide:~$
>>>
>>> I win.
>>
>>
>> Very good, Beaver. You made calls to 4 builtin functions: import, int,
>> print, gcd.
>>
>> Let's enhance the efficiency with a 1-liner:
>>
>> import sys,fractions;print fractions.gcd(int(sys.argv[1]),int(sys.argv[2]))
>>
>>
>> "Densecodemakessensecode"
>>
>
> I'd just do it in bash myself.
> anon@lowtide:~$ cat gcd.sh
> #!/bin/bash
> ./gcd.py ${1} ${2}
> anon@lowtide:~$
>
> anon@lowtide:~$ ./gcd.sh 252 105
> 21
> anon@lowtide:~$
Can you nest gcd.sh inside another script, then that inside another,
inside another... etc.
cat gcd.py
#!/usr/bin/python
import sys,fractions;print "python gcd = " + str(
fractions.gcd(int(sys.argv[1]),int(sys.argv[2])))
cat gcd.sh
#!/bin/bash
./gcd.py ${1} ${2}
cat gcd2.sh
#!/bin/bash
./gcd.sh ${1} ${2}
cat gcd3.sh
#!/bin/bash
./gcd2.sh ${1} ${2}
cat gcd4.sh
#!/bin/bash
./gcd3.sh ${1} ${2}
anon@lowtide:~$ ./gcd4.sh 252 105
python gcd = 21
?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-16 21:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ghjcvmnb93.a@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #355651 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
> On 5/16/2016 3:22 PM, owl wrote:
>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>> On 5/15/2016 3:32 PM, owl wrote:
>>>
>>>> anon@lowtide:~$ cat gcd.py
>>>> #!/usr/bin/python
>>>> import sys
>>>> import fractions
>>>> int1 = int(sys.argv[1])
>>>> int2 = int(sys.argv[2])
>>>> print fractions.gcd(int1, int2)
>>>> anon@lowtide:~$ ./gcd.py 252 105
>>>> 21
>>>> anon@lowtide:~$
>>>>
>>>> I win.
>>>
>>>
>>> Very good, Beaver. You made calls to 4 builtin functions: import, int,
>>> print, gcd.
>>>
>>> Let's enhance the efficiency with a 1-liner:
>>>
>>> import sys,fractions;print fractions.gcd(int(sys.argv[1]),int(sys.argv[2]))
>>>
>>>
>>> "Densecodemakessensecode"
>>>
>>
>> I'd just do it in bash myself.
>> anon@lowtide:~$ cat gcd.sh
>> #!/bin/bash
>> ./gcd.py ${1} ${2}
>> anon@lowtide:~$
>>
>> anon@lowtide:~$ ./gcd.sh 252 105
>> 21
>> anon@lowtide:~$
>
>
> Can you nest gcd.sh inside another script, then that inside another,
> inside another... etc.
>
> cat gcd.py
> #!/usr/bin/python
> import sys,fractions;print "python gcd = " + str(
> fractions.gcd(int(sys.argv[1]),int(sys.argv[2])))
>
> cat gcd.sh
> #!/bin/bash
> ./gcd.py ${1} ${2}
>
> cat gcd2.sh
> #!/bin/bash
> ./gcd.sh ${1} ${2}
>
> cat gcd3.sh
> #!/bin/bash
> ./gcd2.sh ${1} ${2}
>
> cat gcd4.sh
> #!/bin/bash
> ./gcd3.sh ${1} ${2}
>
> anon@lowtide:~$ ./gcd4.sh 252 105
> python gcd = 21
>
> ?
>
yes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-15 12:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f88f2b5d-4be9-46c7-9010-b14219359413@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #355539 |
On Sunday, May 15, 2016 at 12:30:25 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote: > On 5/15/2016 1:24 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Saturday, May 14, 2016 at 8:00:48 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote: > >> On 5/13/2016 12:15 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Friday, May 13, 2016 at 10:06:55 AM UTC-6, Peter Köhlmann > >>> wrote: > >> > >>>> Yes. It does the trick, it is *short* and I don't have to write > >>>> it myself. Why rewrite something which already exists? It is > >>>> not my fault that your beloved VB isn't up to snuff > >>> > >>> You;re right, obviously... > >> > >> > >> Quit lying... > > > > Oh, f*ck... you're really gonna yank that outta content this way, > > Snit? > > ? All context was included. "You;re right, obviously... but you can't tell me you've never done stuff like this. DFS should start playing with mongodb and javascript, I think he'd like it." <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/yCxFgtKF4w8/aWT4z-8tBQAJ> What I'm saying is that PK is right to ask "Why rewrite something which already exists?" and I'm saying so as I *simultaneously* point out that he "can't tell me" he has "never done stuff like this" (writing it from scratch). This is buy one scenario your poor reading comprehension didn't allow for as you claimed I was "lying". If you need any other reading lessons just lemme know, Snit ;) > >>> DFS should start playing with mongodb and javascript, I think > >>> he'd like it. > >> > >> > >> MongoDB seems to be doing well. Started in 2007, they have nearly > >> 20 offices around the world. One here in Atlanta, right near where > >> I used to work. > >> > >> https://www.mongodb.com/office-locations > >> > >> > >> "MongoDB stores data records as BSON documents. BSON is a binary > >> representation of JSON documents... > >> > >> "Specification Version 1.0 BSON is a binary format in which zero or > >> more key/value pairs are stored as a single entity. We call this > >> entity a document." > >> > >> > >> yuck. > > > > Maybe... but there's gold in them thar hills. > > gold is nice. > > > > >> Rows and columns ftw... > > > > For some of the win, yeah... but a lot off things have changed while > > you were asleep, Rump(elstiltskin). > > Sure they have... tell us again: Why, so you can sleep through it again? > * "Which [Windows] users? Not to ones that are doing the majority of > their computer using mobile devices, you know the vast majority of > users." > > * "The [Windows corporate and consumer] apps that are being *totally* > eclipsed by mobile app that, you know... run on Linux?" > > * "Being that you can do the most common tasks, previously only done > on the desktop, on a tablet or smart phone, the average user > probably uses one of his mobile apps at a ratio of 10 to 1 with > one of his desktop apps (if it's even that close)." > > * "As to the 10x number [referenced above], it's likely *way* low..." Yeah... it's probably more like 20 to 1. > * "The majority [of users]... people who are using WAY more apps on > mobile devices than they are running *anything* by MS." > > > You slunk away last time. Now look at who is lying. > >> How are you using MongoDB and JavaScript in real life? > > > > Right now only in MEAN stack apps > > "With MongoDB, we can store our documents in a JSON-like format, write > JSON queries on our ExpressJS and NodeJS based server, and seamlessly > pass JSON documents to our AngularJS frontend." > > http://blog.mongodb.org/post/49262866911/the-mean-stack-mongodb-expressjs-angularjs-and > > Is this what you're doing? Making actual money doing it? No, I'm generally paid in Federal Reserve Notes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-13 14:08 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nh5515$nkl$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #355080 |
On 5/13/2016 12:06 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
> DFS wrote:
>
>> On 5/13/2016 9:38 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>> DFS wrote:
>>
>>>> It's a simple algorithm.
>>>
>>> Yes. Since it is basically the same as the ones in C entry level classes
>>>
>>>> So you should be able to show us your version
>>>> in a different language. Write it yourself - from scratch - like I did.
>>>> No code recursion.
>>>
>>> int GCD(int number1, int number2)
>>> {
>>> cout << std::__gcd(number1,number2);
>>>
>>> return 0
>>> }
>>>
>>>> Or slink away 'cause you're another mouthy Linux idiot.
>>>
>>> Beats you grade school routine by some
>>
>>
>> Moron. Cheater. Lazy. All 3.
>>
>> All you did was call an existing gcd function.
>
> Yes. It does the trick, it is *short* and I don't have to write it myself.
I said 'write it yourself - from scratch'. Why can't you read?
> Why rewrite something which already exists? It is not my fault that your
> beloved VB isn't up to snuff
More Kohlmann idiocy.
What I showed was python - gcd is part of the standard library for years.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-13 16:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhjdoa03.a3@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #355035 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
> On 5/13/2016 9:38 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>> DFS wrote:
>
>>> It's a simple algorithm.
>>
>> Yes. Since it is basically the same as the ones in C entry level classes
>>
>>> So you should be able to show us your version
>>> in a different language. Write it yourself - from scratch - like I did.
>>> No code recursion.
>>
>> int GCD(int number1, int number2)
>> {
>> cout << std::__gcd(number1,number2);
>>
>> return 0
>> }
>>
>>> Or slink away 'cause you're another mouthy Linux idiot.
>>
>> Beats you grade school routine by some
>
>
> Moron. Cheater. Lazy. All 3.
>
> All you did was call an existing gcd function.
>
>
There's already a gcd() in the python stdlib also.
https://hg.python.org/cpython/file/2.7/Lib/fractions.py
<quote>
def gcd(a, b):
"""Calculate the Greatest Common Divisor of a and b.
Unless b==0, the result will have the same sign as b (so that when
b is divided by it, the result comes out positive).
"""
while b:
a, b = b, a%b
return a
</quote>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-14 19:46 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nh8d6d$367$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #355031 |
"PeterKöhlmann" wrote in message news:nh4l6m$p6l$1@dont-email.me...
DFS wrote:
> On 5/13/2016 7:52 AM, sbd wrote:
>
>>>> Why do you support internet criminals DFFFFS? are you one of
>>>> them? Have you heard term, birds of the same feather fuck
>>>> together. Isn't that why you jump to their defense.
>>>
>>>
>>> What are you blabbing about now, boy?
>
>
> You couldn't even remember what you were blabbing about, boy.
>
>
>
>
>> Looks like you are still playing with high school level of coding. It
>> doesn't even come close to entry level university programming. Come
>> on, grow up!
>
>
> It's a simple algorithm.
>Yes. Since it is basically the same as the ones in C entry level classes
> So you should be able to show us your version
> in a different language. Write it yourself - from scratch - like I did.
> No code recursion.
>int GCD(int number1, int number2)
>{
>cout << std::__gcd(number1,number2);
>return 0
}
> Or slink away 'cause you're another mouthy Linux idiot.
>Beats you grade school routine by some
So Pecker, were you born a Nazi Asshole, or did you cultivate it?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-14 08:47 -0300 |
| Message-ID | <nh732r$993$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #355029 |
On 05/13/2016 10:12 AM, DFS wrote: > On 5/13/2016 7:52 AM, sbd wrote: > >>>> Why do you support internet criminals DFFFFS? are you one of >>>> them? Have you heard term, birds of the same feather fuck >>>> together. Isn't that why you jump to their defense. >>> >>> >>> What are you blabbing about now, boy? > > > You couldn't even remember what you were blabbing about, boy. > > > > >> Looks like you are still playing with high school level of coding. It >> doesn't even come close to entry level university programming. Come >> on, grow up! > > > It's a simple algorithm. So you should be able to show us your version > in a different language. Write it yourself - from scratch - like I did. > No code recursion. > > Or slink away 'cause you're another mouthy Linux idiot. > I can write it in Pascal, Delphi, C, C++, Java, Python. I could even do it in a language I have never written anything, with half hour of going over the basics. What is more important is, how efficient is the code, are there any memory issues, how many times is the routine called, what is the overhead in CPU usage, what would be the drag on the main program if any. These are the type issues that would be of interest to me. I am not interested in getting into a childish code show-and-tell! > >>> You could find all the other losers like you that live in your city! >> >> >> Did anyone tell you, you argue like a child? A child playing in a >> man's world!Just jerking off in public, a real loser. That is >> DFFFFS for you! the extra F's are defined in a previous post. > > > > Here's the kind of kiddie shit you post often: > > "But tell me DFFFFS, every time -hh calls you with his pants down, do > you run over pronto to give him lip service, you must love it." > I do get into shameful rants at times, don't I? Unfortunately, to kill rats, you have to get into the sewer! > > Are you 14? > no, 15
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-15 13:04 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nhaa00$s48$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #355254 |
On 5/14/2016 7:47 AM, sbd wrote: > On 05/13/2016 10:12 AM, DFS wrote: >> On 5/13/2016 7:52 AM, sbd wrote: >> >>>>> Why do you support internet criminals DFFFFS? are you one of >>>>> them? Have you heard term, birds of the same feather fuck >>>>> together. Isn't that why you jump to their defense. >>>> >>>> >>>> What are you blabbing about now, boy? >> >> >> You couldn't even remember what you were blabbing about, boy. Which 'internet criminals' do I support, moron? >>> Looks like you are still playing with high school level of coding. It >>> doesn't even come close to entry level university programming. Come >>> on, grow up! >> >> >> It's a simple algorithm. So you should be able to show us your version >> in a different language. Write it yourself - from scratch - like I did. >> No code recursion. >> >> Or slink away 'cause you're another mouthy Linux idiot. >> > > I can write it in Pascal, Delphi, C, C++, Java, Python. And yet you didn't... > I could even do it in a language I have never written anything, with > half hour of going over the basics. Talk's cheap. Do it in Go. Go. ... Stop. Time is up, and you couldn't even get your thumb out of your mouth. > What is more important is, how efficient is the code, > are there any memory issues, how many times is the routine called, what > is the overhead in CPU usage, what would be the drag on the main program > if any. These are the type issues that would be of interest to me. The main thing that interests you is if Daddy will ever ask for his money back. > I am not interested in getting into a childish code show-and-tell! As if you could anyway. >>>> You could find all the other losers like you that live in your city! >>> >>> >>> Did anyone tell you, you argue like a child? A child playing in a >>> man's world!Just jerking off in public, a real loser. That is >>> DFFFFS for you! the extra F's are defined in a previous post. >> >> >> >> Here's the kind of kiddie shit you post often: >> >> "But tell me DFFFFS, every time -hh calls you with his pants down, do >> you run over pronto to give him lip service, you must love it." >> > > I do get into shameful rants at times, don't I? That tween homo stuff is what comes into your mind first. Every time. > Unfortunately, to kill rats, you have to get into the sewer! cola /is/ a sewer - mainly because of feces like savedbydaddy (you) and shitv. >> Are you 14? >> > > no, 15 You give yourself too much credit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-18 09:01 -0300 |
| Message-ID | <nhhlcm$b5s$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #355508 |
On 05/15/2016 02:04 PM, DFS wrote: > On 5/14/2016 7:47 AM, sbd wrote: >> On 05/13/2016 10:12 AM, DFS wrote: >>> On 5/13/2016 7:52 AM, sbd wrote: >>> >>>>>> Why do you support internet criminals DFFFFS? are you one of >>>>>> them? Have you heard term, birds of the same feather fuck >>>>>> together. Isn't that why you jump to their defense. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> What are you blabbing about now, boy? >>> >>> >>> You couldn't even remember what you were blabbing about, boy. > > > Which 'internet criminals' do I support, moron? > > > >>>> Looks like you are still playing with high school level of coding. It >>>> doesn't even come close to entry level university programming. Come >>>> on, grow up! >>> >>> >>> It's a simple algorithm. So you should be able to show us your version >>> in a different language. Write it yourself - from scratch - like I did. >>> No code recursion. >>> >>> Or slink away 'cause you're another mouthy Linux idiot. >>> >> >> I can write it in Pascal, Delphi, C, C++, Java, Python. > > And yet you didn't... > > > >> I could even do it in a language I have never written anything, with > > half hour of going over the basics. > > Talk's cheap. > > Do it in Go. Go. > ... > > Stop. Time is up, and you couldn't even get your thumb out of your mouth. > > > >> What is more important is, how efficient is the code, >> are there any memory issues, how many times is the routine called, what >> is the overhead in CPU usage, what would be the drag on the main program >> if any. These are the type issues that would be of interest to me. > > The main thing that interests you is if Daddy will ever ask for his > money back. > > > > >> I am not interested in getting into a childish code show-and-tell! > > As if you could anyway. > I don't jump simply because you demand something. You are irrelevant! > > >>>>> You could find all the other losers like you that live in your city! >>>> >>>> >>>> Did anyone tell you, you argue like a child? A child playing in a >>>> man's world!Just jerking off in public, a real loser. That is >>>> DFFFFS for you! the extra F's are defined in a previous post. >>> >>> >>> >>> Here's the kind of kiddie shit you post often: >>> >>> "But tell me DFFFFS, every time -hh calls you with his pants down, do >>> you run over pronto to give him lip service, you must love it." >>> >> >> I do get into shameful rants at times, don't I? > > > That tween homo stuff is what comes into your mind first. Every time. > What do you expect when you act like a man-child bitch. A while back when I was pounding the shit out of -hh, he yelps for your help which was not a manly thing to do and you come running in with your shit, not manly. The opposite of not manly is fruitish! I think you would agree! > > >> Unfortunately, to kill rats, you have to get into the sewer! > > cola /is/ a sewer - mainly because of feces like savedbydaddy (you) and > shitv. > > > >>> Are you 14? >>> >> >> no, 15 > > You give yourself too much credit. > > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-16 07:41 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <8qfjjblqvajoutcsdblk67kerh7u39q85a@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #355254 |
sbd wrote: >> Here's the kind of kiddie shit you post often: >> >> "But tell me DFFFFS, every time -hh calls you with his pants down, do >> you run over pronto to give him lip service, you must love it." Hehe. -highhorse just wants to "ass" him some questions. >I do get into shameful rants at times, don't I? Unfortunately, to kill >rats, you have to get into the sewer! There's no need, though, as they are self-nuking. -- "Go to www.newegg.com and build a new computer:" - DumFSck, providing "evidence" that there can be "too much choice" in a free market.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-18 09:03 -0300 |
| Message-ID | <nhhlgn$b5s$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #355603 |
On 05/16/2016 09:41 AM, chrisv wrote: > sbd wrote: > >>> Here's the kind of kiddie shit you post often: >>> >>> "But tell me DFFFFS, every time -hh calls you with his pants down, do >>> you run over pronto to give him lip service, you must love it." > > Hehe. -highhorse just wants to "ass" him some questions. > good one! >> I do get into shameful rants at times, don't I? Unfortunately, to kill >> rats, you have to get into the sewer! > > There's no need, though, as they are self-nuking. > I agree, give them rope they will hang themselves.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-13 10:28 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nh4o4q$4n4$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #355022 |
On 5/13/2016 7:52 AM, sbd wrote:
> Looks like you are still playing with high school level of coding. It
> doesn't even come close to entry level university programming. Come on,
> grow up!
It doesn't have to be complex to be useful.
---------------------------------------------------
import sys
def getScores(scores):
i, total = 0,0
while 1:
score = input('Enter sdb score: ')
if score > 60:
print "Typo! sbd is a fucking idiot."
else:
total += score
i += 1
if i == scores:
print "Avg of %s scores is %s" % (i, total/i)
break
nbr = int(sys.argv[1])
getScores(nbr)
---------------------------------------------------
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-13 13:44 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nh53jn$icp$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #355022 |
On 5/13/2016 7:52 AM, sbd wrote:
> Gives us some more of your VB DB stuff, at least it is entertaining!
This one will teach you how to scrape data off a website and write the
data to screen, file and database.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
#webscraper.py
from lxml import html
import os, requests, sqlite3
#get HTML from web
enthought = "https://www.enthought.com/products/canopy/package-index/"
page = requests.get(enthought)
tree = html.fromstring(page.content)
#populate list objects
p1 = tree.xpath('//a[@target="_blank"]/text()')
p2 = tree.xpath('//td[@valign="middle"]/text()')
#data cleanup
for i in range(4): p1.pop(0)
p2 = [t.replace("\r\n", "") for t in p2]
p2 = filter(None, (t.strip() for t in p2))
#confirm lists have same number of items
lenData = [len(p1),len(p2)]
if len(set(lenData)) != 1:
print "Data parsing issue. The lists have different counts."
print "The program will exit."
exit(0)
#make sure package name/version is unique
dupes = []
pcheck = set()
def punique(pck):
if pck not in pcheck:
u = True
pcheck.add(pck)
else:
#print " * dupe name: " + pck
dupes.append(pck)
u = False
return u
#combine lists
p = []
for i in xrange(0,len(p1),2):
if punique(p1[i]+'-'+p2[i]):
p.insert(i,(p1[i],p2[i],p1[i+1],p2[i+1]))
#alternative
#t = iter(zip(p1, p2))
#p = [a + b for a, b in zip(t, t)]
#create database and table
dbName = "enthought.sqlite"
os.remove(dbName)
conn = sqlite3.connect(dbName)
db = conn.cursor()
sSQL = " CREATE TABLE If Not Exists PACKAGES " \
" (PackageName,Version,License,Description, " \
" PRIMARY KEY (PackageName,Version)); "
db.execute(sSQL)
sSQL = " CREATE VIEW If not Exists V_LICENSE AS " \
" SELECT LICENSE, COUNT(LICENSE) AS PACKAGES " \
" FROM PACKAGES " \
" GROUP BY LICENSE;"
db.execute(sSQL)
#print to screen, write to .csv file, save to db
csvfile = "EnThought_Packages.csv"
with open(csvfile, "w") as f:
f.write("PackageName,Version,License,Description\n")
for package,version,license,desc in p:
print "%s,%s,%s,%s" % (package,version,license,desc)
f.write("%s,%s,%s,%s\n" % (package,version,license,desc.replace(",","")))
db.execute("INSERT INTO PACKAGES VALUES (?,?,?,?)",
(package,version,license,desc))
conn.commit()
db.close()
conn.close()
print
if len(dupes) > 0:
print str(len(dupes)) + " duplicate packages: " + str(dupes)
print "Finished:" + str(len(p1)/2) + " items processed"
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-16 07:36 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ucfjjbpb3t2ntln7u0n5o1tec98lorubv9@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #355022 |
sbd wrote: >Did anyone tell you, you argue like a child? A child playing in a man's >world! Just jerking off in public, a real loser. That is DFFFFS for you! You think? He can look at a situation where 2%of the population has an order of magnitude more choice than the 98% has, and claim that it shows that choice is not important to those 2%. Dumfsck is a shameless jackass and liar, best ignored, unless you like tormenting retards. -- 'A more equal distribution of usage would prove "choice" is valued the way you cola idiots bleat about it' - DumFSck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-12 08:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D359F13F.72B58%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #354815 |
On 5/12/16, 4:27 AM, in article nh1p3l$q7$1@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>> Yopu have lied about that often enough. >> >> Can you provide a best of his lies list? > > You mean the *hundreds* of times they were provided, by dozens of different > people? And *all* of them ignored and snipped. and then by you dishonest > swine declared as "unquoteable" and nonexistent > >> Do not forget the message IDs and links like Snit provides for you! > > See above. The absolute proof that you are a lying imbecile has been > provided hundreds, if not thousands of times. > > Everyone has seen them, again and again and again > > Your cretinous "telmosfire" sock is one of the results of that. You let him > fill the group with inane drivel, hundreds of times the same idiotic > bullshit. You do that *every* time when cornered and you can't actually > answer without lying even more Of note: Peter did not show a single lie of mine. Not one. He insists they exist but are all somehow unquotable. Weird. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sandman <mr@sandman.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-12 16:06 +0000 |
| Subject | Snit digest 236 / 2016-05-12 |
| Message-ID | <sandman-b7585e6a3cdf75241cb2051e9d37cd00@individual.net> |
| In reply to | #354858 |
In article <D359F13F.72B58%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote: > [1692] Of note: Peter did not show a single lie (269) of mine. Not one. > [1693] He insists they exist but are all somehow unquotable. Here are some quotes of some of your lies: Snit 12/17/2015 12:43:38 AM <D297453A.672BC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> "I use a Usenet provider that does not post my IP, but I do not use any such anonymizer service for Usenet." Snit 12/15/2015 09:05:33 PM <D295C09D.67140%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> "The comment is not from anyone in my family..." Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): ------------------------------------------------------------------------- troll 0 114 | lying/lie 1 269 | incest 0 2 sex 0 0 | honorable 0 7 | honest 0 45 run 0 13 | css 0 17 | tilde 0 0 -- Sandman
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-12 09:32 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Snit digest 236 / 2016-05-12 |
| Message-ID | <3bb8cc1e-b0ce-4a98-9fbd-1a7d12cb0ed6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #354869 |
Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll is attacking Snit with horrid personal attacks. What about Steven's life? Is it any better?
Best site Steven Petruzzellis has been able to show he made for money
http://www.oldneighborhoodrestaurant.net
Made by the Go Daddy Website builder and is utter crap. After people made comments about how crappy it is he denied he pointed to it and even denied he is the one who made it. He is the contact person http://www.reservationdiary.eu/eng/reservation/d76d1156-e9f7-43c1-b77b-b07189857820
http://shrinktheweb.snapito.io/v2/webshot/spu-ea68c8-ogi2-3cwn3bmfojjlb56e?size=800x0&screen=1024x768&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.reservationdiary.eu%2Feng%2Freservation%2Fd76d1156-e9f7-43c1-b77b-b07189857820
He likely went to the Go Daddy Website Builder after he failed to get WordPress installed.
https://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic/13879
His other sites are gone
http://devsite.eu.pn (copy right infringement)
http://demsites.atwebpages.com/pokemon/ (breaking terms of service)
Why?
X10 Hosting booted Steven Petruzzellis for inappropriate activity
Comcast booted Steven Petruzzellis for inappropriate activity
FreeHostingEU booted Steven Petruzzellis for copyright infringement
AwardSpace (atwebpages.com) booted Steven Petruzzellis for breaking terms of service
His wife booted Steven Petruzzellis to the curb for cheating on her
Even Steven Petruzzellis says
I've been booted off by past providers before because people
complain about me and all my bullshit. I don't want to lose my ISP
*again* but I still need my army of sock puppets so I continually
search usenet for whatever servers I haven't yet been booted
from.
Is there any service Steven has used but not been booted from?
This is why Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll attacks Snit.
Steven Petruzzellis was is divorced because his wife caught him screwing another woman.
Snit is married and by all appearances happily so.
He never complains about his wife in COLA.
Steven Petruzzellis is living on charity of Karen Emmerich in a single bedroom at 11072 W 67th Way, Arvada, CO 80004. For proof call and ask 303-423-3363
Snit does not live in a mansion or even a high end home but has a house and a yard.
Steven Petruzzellis has two kids but no respect. He repeatedly called Ryan his "little screwup" and refers to his son Steve as a "dick" and worse. He mocks his possible future daughter-in-law as someone who takes too many selfies and is focused only on herself
https://www.facebook.com/adriana.ayaquica
Snit has two kids (or more) and never speaks poorly of them in public.
No reason to think they are not a happy family.
Steven Petruzzellis claims to be a stay at home dad who pays thousands of dollars for day care. Steven has no job and no purpose in life. Steven has given up and now seeks a mother-figure to date. His biggest accomplishment on his resume is providing the customer with "Freaky Fast" and delicious sandwiches at Jimmy Johns Gourmet Subs http://jresume.com/spetruzz
Snit has his own business doing technical work and also teaches.
Snit offers a true contribution to society.
Teachers are truly under appreciated.
Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll is a nearly 60 year old guy who is single, broke and has no skills. He blames Snit for his loss of his wife and girlfriend. Steven is jealous of what Snit has and in a narcissistic rage repeatedly works to take it away from him. For over 10 years he has failed at even this. Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll is an utter failure in life.
Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll is a reprehensible piece of shit
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web