Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #366369 > unrolled thread

future Democrat voters

Started by"Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid>
First post2016-08-23 17:51 +0000
Last post2016-08-25 14:00 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 113 — 6 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy


Contents

  future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 17:51 +0000
    Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:18 -0700
      Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 18:32 +0000
        Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:43 -0700
          Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 19:13 +0000
            Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 12:29 -0700
              Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 19:53 +0000
                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 13:07 -0700
                  Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 20:33 +0000
                    Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 13:41 -0700
                      Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 21:01 +0000
                        Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 14:14 -0700
                          Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 22:01 +0000
                            Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:12 -0700
                              Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 22:43 +0000
                                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:50 -0700
                                  Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 23:26 +0000
                                    Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 16:57 -0700
                                      Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 01:41 +0000
                                        Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 18:56 -0700
                                          Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 03:16 +0000
                                            Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 20:23 -0700
                                              Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 03:40 +0000
                                                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 20:46 -0700
                                                  Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 04:10 +0000
                                                    Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 21:29 -0700
                                                      Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 04:44 +0000
                                                        Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 07:56 -0700
                                                          Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 15:45 +0000
                                                            Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 08:49 -0700
                                                              Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 16:00 +0000
                                                                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 09:15 -0700
                                                                  Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 16:42 +0000
                                                                    Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 09:50 -0700
                                                                      Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 17:58 +0000
                                                                        Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:12 -0700
                                                                          Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 18:54 +0000
                                                                            Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 12:06 -0700
                                                                              Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 19:25 +0000
                                                                                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 12:41 -0700
                                                                                  Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 19:55 +0000
                                                                                    Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:13 -0700
                                                                                      Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:29 +0000
                                                                                        Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:34 -0700
                                                                                          Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:50 +0000
                                                                                            Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:55 -0700
                                                                                              Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:59 +0000
                                                                                                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:02 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 21:09 +0000
                                                                                                    Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:14 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 21:27 +0000
                                                                                                        Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:32 -0700
                                                                                                          Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 21:47 +0000
                                                                                                            Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:56 -0700
                                                                                                              Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 23:51 +0000
                                                                                                                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 18:00 -0700
                                                                                                                  Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 01:28 +0000
                                                                                                                    Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 18:32 -0700
                                                                                                                An example Owl asked for 5 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:31 -0700
                                                                                                                  Re: An example Owl asked for 5 "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:38 +0000
                                                                                                                    Re: An example Owl asked for 5 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:59 -0700
                                                                                                            Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 15:04 -0700
                                                                                                              Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 00:00 +0000
                                                                                                                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 18:03 -0700
                                                                                                                  Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 01:28 +0000
                                                                                                                    Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 18:33 -0700
                                                                                                                      Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 01:52 +0000
                                                                                                                        Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 19:01 -0700
                                                                                                                          Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 02:49 +0000
                                                                                                                            Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:06 -0700
                                                                                                                              Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 03:27 +0000
                                                                                                                                Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 21:24 -0700
                                                                                                                        Re: future Democrat voters GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 21:21 -0600
                                                                                                                          Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 03:51 +0000
                                                                                                                            Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 21:27 -0700
                                                                                                                          Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 21:23 -0700
                                                                                                                          Re: future Democrat voters Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-25 07:04 -0400
                                                                                                                  Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 01:56 +0000
                                                                                                                    Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 19:03 -0700
                                                                                                                      Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 03:00 +0000
                                                                                                                        Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:19 -0700
                                                                                                                          Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 03:32 +0000
                                                                                                                            Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 21:25 -0700
                                                                                                                An example Owl asked for 6 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:31 -0700
                                                                                                                  Re: An example Owl asked for 6 "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:39 +0000
                                                                                                                    Re: An example Owl asked for 6 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:58 -0700
                                                                                                            An example Owl asked for 4 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:31 -0700
                                                                An example Owl asked for 3 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:30 -0700
                                                        An example Owl asked for 2 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:30 -0700
                                                    An example Owl asked for Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:29 -0700
                                                      Re: An example Owl asked for "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:33 +0000
                                                        Re: An example Owl asked for Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:40 -0700
                                                          Re: An example Owl asked for "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:45 +0000
                                                            Re: An example Owl asked for Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:58 -0700
                                                              Re: An example Owl asked for "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 21:07 +0000
                                                                Re: An example Owl asked for Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:09 -0700
                                    Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:30 -0400
                                      Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:38 -0700
                                Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:28 -0400
                                  Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:33 -0700
                                    Re: future Democrat voters Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 09:44 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:19 -0400
                  Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:32 -0700
            Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:16 -0400
              Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:31 -0700
                Re: future Democrat voters Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 09:42 -0700
                  Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 13:05 -0400
                    Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 10:17 -0700
                      Re: future Democrat voters Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 11:06 -0700
                        Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:51 -0400
                          Re: future Democrat voters Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 12:56 -0700
                            Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 16:54 -0400
                              Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:00 -0700

Page 3 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6  Next page →


#366540

From"Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid>
Date2016-08-24 19:55 +0000
Message-ID<fhjavuda0e.ae@perch.invalid>
In reply to#366533
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 8/24/16, 12:25 PM, in article fhjavd9.kaie@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 8/24/16, 11:54 AM, in article fg3ufa883r7.hfyy@perch.invalid, "Octavian
>>> W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>> 
>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>> But giving privileges based on color or sex is exactly what you
>>>>>>>>>> support.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I said no such thing. You made that up to try to back out of your
>>>>>>>>> repulsive position that somehow (though you cannot say how) EQUALITY is
>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>> form of racism against YOU.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> You define EQUALITY as Government-sanctioned SPECIAL TREATMENT based on
>>>>>>>> RACE.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> When? Quote? You have none.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Do you not support Affirmative Action?
>>>>>> 
>>>>> You ask NOW! After all this time? I think we can say this is a direct
>>>>> admission that you flat out made things up about my view.
>>>> 
>>>> What the fuck are you on?
>>> 
>>> I am not going down the rabbit hole with you as you move goal posts and
>>> change topics repeatedly. I am staying focused.
>>> 
>>> You claimed EQUALITY was a form of racism against you. Equality. Not
>>> affirmative action but EQUALITY.
>> 
>> Then you should be able to provide a quote of me doing so.
>> Knock yourself out, Lyin Ted.
> 
> How about the quotes where I first noted what you did and you have been
> trying to do ANYTHING to stop that from being the focus, including spewing
> absurd insults and accusations against me.
> 

No, how about a quote of me saying what you said I said, Lyin Ted.
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#366546

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2016-08-24 13:13 -0700
Message-ID<D3E34DE0.79FA3%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#366540
On 8/24/16, 12:55 PM, in article fhjavuda0e.ae@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:

>>>> I am not going down the rabbit hole with you as you move goal posts and
>>>> change topics repeatedly. I am staying focused.
>>>> 
>>>> You claimed EQUALITY was a form of racism against you. Equality. Not
>>>> affirmative action but EQUALITY.
>>> 
>>> Then you should be able to provide a quote of me doing so.
>>> Knock yourself out, Lyin Ted.
>> 
>> How about the quotes where I first noted what you did and you have been
>> trying to do ANYTHING to stop that from being the focus, including spewing
>> absurd insults and accusations against me.
>> 
> 
> No, how about a quote of me saying what you said I said, Lyin Ted.
>  

You mean the one you snipped, including the message ID.

LOL!

You then whine when people post the same content you run from.

Face it, in a discussion about EQUALITY you deemed it racist against you.
Now you are crying that I called you out on it. Boo hoo for you.

Oh, and you keep making accusations against me... just to try to put me on
the defensive. 


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#366551

From"Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid>
Date2016-08-24 20:29 +0000
Message-ID<fhjvads.kiv93@perch.invalid>
In reply to#366546
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 8/24/16, 12:55 PM, in article fhjavuda0e.ae@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
> 
>>>>> I am not going down the rabbit hole with you as you move goal posts and
>>>>> change topics repeatedly. I am staying focused.
>>>>> 
>>>>> You claimed EQUALITY was a form of racism against you. Equality. Not
>>>>> affirmative action but EQUALITY.
>>>> 
>>>> Then you should be able to provide a quote of me doing so.
>>>> Knock yourself out, Lyin Ted.
>>> 
>>> How about the quotes where I first noted what you did and you have been
>>> trying to do ANYTHING to stop that from being the focus, including spewing
>>> absurd insults and accusations against me.
>>> 
>> 
>> No, how about a quote of me saying what you said I said, Lyin Ted.
>>  
> 
> You mean the one you snipped, including the message ID.
> 

I snipped it because it was not a quote of me saying what
you said I said, Lyin Ted.

You said this: 

  <quote>
    You claimed EQUALITY was a form of racism against you. Equality. Not
    affirmative action but EQUALITY.
  </quote>

I asked for a quote of me saying that, and you provided this:

  <quote>
  Owl <hjad11u03.ako9@perch.invalid>:
    -----
    Your self-loathing, anti-white racism comes flying out at
    every opportunity, doesn't it.
    -----
  </quote>

Try again, and this time try not to FAIL, dumbass.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#366553

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2016-08-24 13:34 -0700
Message-ID<D3E352DB.79FB3%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#366551
On 8/24/16, 1:29 PM, in article fhjvads.kiv93@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:

> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 8/24/16, 12:55 PM, in article fhjavuda0e.ae@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>>>>>> I am not going down the rabbit hole with you as you move goal posts and
>>>>>> change topics repeatedly. I am staying focused.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> You claimed EQUALITY was a form of racism against you. Equality. Not
>>>>>> affirmative action but EQUALITY.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Then you should be able to provide a quote of me doing so.
>>>>> Knock yourself out, Lyin Ted.
>>>> 
>>>> How about the quotes where I first noted what you did and you have been
>>>> trying to do ANYTHING to stop that from being the focus, including spewing
>>>> absurd insults and accusations against me.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> No, how about a quote of me saying what you said I said, Lyin Ted.
>>>  
>> 
>> You mean the one you snipped, including the message ID.
> 
> I snipped it because it was not a quote of me saying what
> you said I said, Lyin Ted.
> 
> You said this: 
> 
>   <quote>
>     You claimed EQUALITY was a form of racism against you. Equality. Not
>     affirmative action but EQUALITY.
>   </quote>
> 
> I asked for a quote of me saying that, and you provided this:
> 
>   <quote>
>   Owl <hjad11u03.ako9@perch.invalid>:
>     -----
>     Your self-loathing, anti-white racism comes flying out at
>     every opportunity, doesn't it.
>     -----
>   </quote>
> 
> Try again, and this time try not to FAIL, dumbass.


THAT quote from you is in response to me speaking of equality. Of equality
you said it shows "anti-white racism."

Your words. There is NO way equality is the same as anti-white racism. None.
That is just a sign you think you being white should afford you privileges
others do not have.

In the same post, by the way, I pointed to another example of you doing the
same thing. You then posted many times with insults and accusations and
changes of topics.


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#366557

From"Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid>
Date2016-08-24 20:50 +0000
Message-ID<afhjvad.djig83@perch.invalid>
In reply to#366553
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 8/24/16, 1:29 PM, in article fhjvads.kiv93@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 8/24/16, 12:55 PM, in article fhjavuda0e.ae@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>>>> I am not going down the rabbit hole with you as you move goal posts and
>>>>>>> change topics repeatedly. I am staying focused.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> You claimed EQUALITY was a form of racism against you. Equality. Not
>>>>>>> affirmative action but EQUALITY.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Then you should be able to provide a quote of me doing so.
>>>>>> Knock yourself out, Lyin Ted.
>>>>> 
>>>>> How about the quotes where I first noted what you did and you have been
>>>>> trying to do ANYTHING to stop that from being the focus, including spewing
>>>>> absurd insults and accusations against me.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> No, how about a quote of me saying what you said I said, Lyin Ted.
>>>>  
>>> 
>>> You mean the one you snipped, including the message ID.
>> 
>> I snipped it because it was not a quote of me saying what
>> you said I said, Lyin Ted.
>> 
>> You said this: 
>> 
>>   <quote>
>>     You claimed EQUALITY was a form of racism against you. Equality. Not
>>     affirmative action but EQUALITY.
>>   </quote>
>> 
>> I asked for a quote of me saying that, and you provided this:
>> 
>>   <quote>
>>   Owl <hjad11u03.ako9@perch.invalid>:
>>     -----
>>     Your self-loathing, anti-white racism comes flying out at
>>     every opportunity, doesn't it.
>>     -----
>>   </quote>
>> 
>> Try again, and this time try not to FAIL, dumbass.
> 
> 
> THAT quote from you is in response to me speaking of equality.

It was in direct response to you saying, "Boo hoo for you."
IOW, Boo hoo whitey, you gots to pay.  Check your privilege.

I suppose it's possible that casual racists like you are
simply unaware of the offensiveness of your speech, but
you should know that I was very hurt by both your tone and
your assumption that because I am white I am automatically
part of the privileged class, AKA the WEALTHY.

> Of equality
> you said it shows "anti-white racism."
> 

So I never said what you said I said.  You lied.  Got it.


> Your words. There is NO way equality is the same as anti-white racism. None.
> That is just a sign you think you being white should afford you privileges
> others do not have.

That's a nice strawman you've got there.  You should take him
on tour.

> 
> In the same post, by the way, I pointed to another example of you doing the
> same thing. You then posted many times with insults and accusations and
> changes of topics.
> 

This is what I said in the very last line of that post:

    "I fight for equality.  You fight to maintain institutional racism
     against whites."

 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#366559

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2016-08-24 13:55 -0700
Message-ID<D3E357B9.79FBE%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#366557
On 8/24/16, 1:50 PM, in article afhjvad.djig83@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:

...
>>>   <quote>
>>>     You claimed EQUALITY was a form of racism against you. Equality. Not
>>>     affirmative action but EQUALITY.
>>>   </quote>
>>> 
>>> I asked for a quote of me saying that, and you provided this:
>>> 
>>>   <quote>
>>>   Owl <hjad11u03.ako9@perch.invalid>:
>>>     -----
>>>     Your self-loathing, anti-white racism comes flying out at
>>>     every opportunity, doesn't it.
>>>     -----
>>>   </quote>
>>> 
>>> Try again, and this time try not to FAIL, dumbass.
>> 
>> 
>> THAT quote from you is in response to me speaking of equality.
> 
> It was in direct response to you saying, "Boo hoo for you."
> IOW, Boo hoo whitey, you gots to pay.  Check your privilege.

Boo hoo for you feeling like you are not getting what you think you are
entitled to.

But notice how you have gone BACK to claiming I am a "racist" for backing
equality:

> I suppose it's possible that casual racists

And BOOM! No need to dig though old quotes when you just repeated your claim
that a desire for EQUALITY makes one "racist" - against you.

You keep saying this then when it is pointed out how absurd it is you
challenge me to point out you saying this. Well, there, you JUST said it
again. 

My call for EQUALITY makes me, to you, a "racist." Utterly absurd... and
shows your sense of entitlement and privilege.

> like you are simply unaware of the offensiveness of your speech, but you
> should know that I was very hurt by both your tone and your assumption that
> because I am white I am automatically part of the privileged class, AKA the
> WEALTHY.

I did not say you were wealthy, nor deny or say anyone else was or was not.

Below you just babble and spew more insults. Not biting.

>> Of equality
>> you said it shows "anti-white racism."
> 
> So I never said what you said I said.  You lied.  Got it.
> 
> 
>> Your words. There is NO way equality is the same as anti-white racism. None.
>> That is just a sign you think you being white should afford you privileges
>> others do not have.
> 
> That's a nice strawman you've got there.  You should take him
> on tour.
> 
>> 
>> In the same post, by the way, I pointed to another example of you doing the
>> same thing. You then posted many times with insults and accusations and
>> changes of topics.
>> 
> 
> This is what I said in the very last line of that post:
> 
>     "I fight for equality.  You fight to maintain institutional racism
>      against whites."

Another lie you told about me. Sad how you feel the need.



-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#366561

From"Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid>
Date2016-08-24 20:59 +0000
Message-ID<fhjvadas.kvd83@perch.invalid>
In reply to#366559
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 8/24/16, 1:50 PM, in article afhjvad.djig83@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
> 
> ...
>>>>   <quote>
>>>>     You claimed EQUALITY was a form of racism against you. Equality. Not
>>>>     affirmative action but EQUALITY.
>>>>   </quote>
>>>> 
>>>> I asked for a quote of me saying that, and you provided this:
>>>> 
>>>>   <quote>
>>>>   Owl <hjad11u03.ako9@perch.invalid>:
>>>>     -----
>>>>     Your self-loathing, anti-white racism comes flying out at
>>>>     every opportunity, doesn't it.
>>>>     -----
>>>>   </quote>
>>>> 
>>>> Try again, and this time try not to FAIL, dumbass.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> THAT quote from you is in response to me speaking of equality.
>> 
>> It was in direct response to you saying, "Boo hoo for you."
>> IOW, Boo hoo whitey, you gots to pay.  Check your privilege.
> 
> Boo hoo for you feeling like you are not getting what you think you are
> entitled to.
> 

Would you say that to a black man?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#366562

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2016-08-24 14:02 -0700
Message-ID<D3E35959.79FC3%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#366561
On 8/24/16, 1:59 PM, in article fhjvadas.kvd83@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:

> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 8/24/16, 1:50 PM, in article afhjvad.djig83@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>> ...
>>>>>   <quote>
>>>>>     You claimed EQUALITY was a form of racism against you. Equality. Not
>>>>>     affirmative action but EQUALITY.
>>>>>   </quote>
>>>>> 
>>>>> I asked for a quote of me saying that, and you provided this:
>>>>> 
>>>>>   <quote>
>>>>>   Owl <hjad11u03.ako9@perch.invalid>:
>>>>>     -----
>>>>>     Your self-loathing, anti-white racism comes flying out at
>>>>>     every opportunity, doesn't it.
>>>>>     -----
>>>>>   </quote>
>>>>> 
>>>>> Try again, and this time try not to FAIL, dumbass.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> THAT quote from you is in response to me speaking of equality.
>>> 
>>> It was in direct response to you saying, "Boo hoo for you."
>>> IOW, Boo hoo whitey, you gots to pay.  Check your privilege.
>> 
>> Boo hoo for you feeling like you are not getting what you think you are
>> entitled to.
> 
> Would you say that to a black man?

Irrelevant... but clearly you THINK I would not... meaning you feel entitled
to not being called out on your sense of entitlement and privilege.

-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#366565

From"Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid>
Date2016-08-24 21:09 +0000
Message-ID<sahjva.e883@perch.invalid>
In reply to#366562
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 8/24/16, 1:59 PM, in article fhjvadas.kvd83@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 8/24/16, 1:50 PM, in article afhjvad.djig83@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>> 
>>> ...
>>>>>>   <quote>
>>>>>>     You claimed EQUALITY was a form of racism against you. Equality. Not
>>>>>>     affirmative action but EQUALITY.
>>>>>>   </quote>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I asked for a quote of me saying that, and you provided this:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>   <quote>
>>>>>>   Owl <hjad11u03.ako9@perch.invalid>:
>>>>>>     -----
>>>>>>     Your self-loathing, anti-white racism comes flying out at
>>>>>>     every opportunity, doesn't it.
>>>>>>     -----
>>>>>>   </quote>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Try again, and this time try not to FAIL, dumbass.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> THAT quote from you is in response to me speaking of equality.
>>>> 
>>>> It was in direct response to you saying, "Boo hoo for you."
>>>> IOW, Boo hoo whitey, you gots to pay.  Check your privilege.
>>> 
>>> Boo hoo for you feeling like you are not getting what you think you are
>>> entitled to.
>> 
>> Would you say that to a black man?
> 
> Irrelevant... but clearly you THINK I would not... meaning you feel entitled
> to not being called out on your sense of entitlement and privilege.
>

It's absolutely relevant.  Would you say that to a black man?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#366566

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2016-08-24 14:14 -0700
Message-ID<D3E35C34.79FCA%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#366565
On 8/24/16, 2:09 PM, in article sahjva.e883@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:

> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 8/24/16, 1:59 PM, in article fhjvadas.kvd83@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>> On 8/24/16, 1:50 PM, in article afhjvad.djig83@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> ...
>>>>>>>   <quote>
>>>>>>>     You claimed EQUALITY was a form of racism against you. Equality. Not
>>>>>>>     affirmative action but EQUALITY.
>>>>>>>   </quote>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I asked for a quote of me saying that, and you provided this:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   <quote>
>>>>>>>   Owl <hjad11u03.ako9@perch.invalid>:
>>>>>>>     -----
>>>>>>>     Your self-loathing, anti-white racism comes flying out at
>>>>>>>     every opportunity, doesn't it.
>>>>>>>     -----
>>>>>>>   </quote>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Try again, and this time try not to FAIL, dumbass.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> THAT quote from you is in response to me speaking of equality.
>>>>> 
>>>>> It was in direct response to you saying, "Boo hoo for you."
>>>>> IOW, Boo hoo whitey, you gots to pay.  Check your privilege.
>>>> 
>>>> Boo hoo for you feeling like you are not getting what you think you are
>>>> entitled to.
>>> 
>>> Would you say that to a black man?
>> 
>> Irrelevant... but clearly you THINK I would not... meaning you feel entitled
>> to not being called out on your sense of entitlement and privilege.
> 
> It's absolutely relevant.  Would you say that to a black man?

See above. You keep showing off your sense of entitlement and privilege.

THAT is the issue here.


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#366569

From"Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid>
Date2016-08-24 21:27 +0000
Message-ID<ahjuv9ad3.ajvu@perch.invalid>
In reply to#366566
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 8/24/16, 2:09 PM, in article sahjva.e883@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 8/24/16, 1:59 PM, in article fhjvadas.kvd83@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 8/24/16, 1:50 PM, in article afhjvad.djig83@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>   <quote>
>>>>>>>>     You claimed EQUALITY was a form of racism against you. Equality. Not
>>>>>>>>     affirmative action but EQUALITY.
>>>>>>>>   </quote>
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I asked for a quote of me saying that, and you provided this:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>   <quote>
>>>>>>>>   Owl <hjad11u03.ako9@perch.invalid>:
>>>>>>>>     -----
>>>>>>>>     Your self-loathing, anti-white racism comes flying out at
>>>>>>>>     every opportunity, doesn't it.
>>>>>>>>     -----
>>>>>>>>   </quote>
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Try again, and this time try not to FAIL, dumbass.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> THAT quote from you is in response to me speaking of equality.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> It was in direct response to you saying, "Boo hoo for you."
>>>>>> IOW, Boo hoo whitey, you gots to pay.  Check your privilege.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Boo hoo for you feeling like you are not getting what you think you are
>>>>> entitled to.
>>>> 
>>>> Would you say that to a black man?
>>> 
>>> Irrelevant... but clearly you THINK I would not... meaning you feel entitled
>>> to not being called out on your sense of entitlement and privilege.
>> 
>> It's absolutely relevant.  Would you say that to a black man?
> 
> See above. You keep showing off your sense of entitlement and privilege.
> 
> THAT is the issue here.
> 

So you refuse to answer a simple question (because it shows how RACIST 
you are) and instead spew yet more RACIST HATE SPEECH.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#366570

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2016-08-24 14:32 -0700
Message-ID<D3E3608D.79FD4%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#366569
On 8/24/16, 2:27 PM, in article ahjuv9ad3.ajvu@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:

>>>>>>>> THAT quote from you is in response to me speaking of equality.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> It was in direct response to you saying, "Boo hoo for you."
>>>>>>> IOW, Boo hoo whitey, you gots to pay.  Check your privilege.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Boo hoo for you feeling like you are not getting what you think you are
>>>>>> entitled to.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Would you say that to a black man?
>>>> 
>>>> Irrelevant... but clearly you THINK I would not... meaning you feel
>>>> entitled
>>>> to not being called out on your sense of entitlement and privilege.
>>> 
>>> It's absolutely relevant.  Would you say that to a black man?
>> 
>> See above. You keep showing off your sense of entitlement and privilege.
>> 
>> THAT is the issue here.
>> 
> 
> So you refuse to answer a simple question

Because it is not relevant... but, hey, just to shove your nonsense in your
face even more, ANYONE who says that simply supporting equality shows you
are racist against them is being absurd and showing a sense of entitlement
and privilege.

There may be disagreements on how to achieve equality based on historic and
current conditions, but you just went with EQUALITY itself being somehow
"racist" against you. This absolutely shows you having a sense of
entitlement and privilege. No doubt. And you keep doing it.

Meanwhile you just lash out with insults you cannot even begin to back.

> (because it shows how RACIST you are) and instead spew yet more RACIST HATE
> SPEECH.



-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#366571

From"Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid>
Date2016-08-24 21:47 +0000
Message-ID<ahjfvu03a.38@perch.invalid>
In reply to#366570
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 8/24/16, 2:27 PM, in article ahjuv9ad3.ajvu@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
> 
>>>>>>>>> THAT quote from you is in response to me speaking of equality.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> It was in direct response to you saying, "Boo hoo for you."
>>>>>>>> IOW, Boo hoo whitey, you gots to pay.  Check your privilege.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Boo hoo for you feeling like you are not getting what you think you are
>>>>>>> entitled to.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Would you say that to a black man?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Irrelevant... but clearly you THINK I would not... meaning you feel
>>>>> entitled
>>>>> to not being called out on your sense of entitlement and privilege.
>>>> 
>>>> It's absolutely relevant.  Would you say that to a black man?
>>> 
>>> See above. You keep showing off your sense of entitlement and privilege.
>>> 
>>> THAT is the issue here.
>>> 
>> 
>> So you refuse to answer a simple question
> 
> Because it is not relevant...

Just answer the question, RACIST.
You said this to me:

  "Boo hoo for you feeling like you are not getting what you think you are
  entitled to."

Once again, would you say that to a black man?

Since you are likely to dodge yet again, I'll answer for you.  Of course
you would NEVER say that to a BLACK man.  But you feel COMFORTABLE saying
it to a WHITE man.  That's because ANTI-WHITE RACISM is ACCEPTABLE to you.
And its acceptance at large is being pushed by the RACIST KKK DEMOCRAT
PARTY agenda of maintaining INSTITUTIONAL RACISM in America.

Your HATRED is SICKENING.  You disgusting BIGOT!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#366572

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2016-08-24 14:56 -0700
Message-ID<D3E3660E.79FE4%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#366571
On 8/24/16, 2:47 PM, in article ahjfvu03a.38@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:

> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 8/24/16, 2:27 PM, in article ahjuv9ad3.ajvu@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>>>>>>>>>> THAT quote from you is in response to me speaking of equality.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> It was in direct response to you saying, "Boo hoo for you."
>>>>>>>>> IOW, Boo hoo whitey, you gots to pay.  Check your privilege.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Boo hoo for you feeling like you are not getting what you think you are
>>>>>>>> entitled to.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Would you say that to a black man?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Irrelevant... but clearly you THINK I would not... meaning you feel
>>>>>> entitled
>>>>>> to not being called out on your sense of entitlement and privilege.
>>>>> 
>>>>> It's absolutely relevant.  Would you say that to a black man?
>>>> 
>>>> See above. You keep showing off your sense of entitlement and privilege.
>>>> 
>>>> THAT is the issue here.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> So you refuse to answer a simple question
>> 
>> Because it is not relevant...
> 
> Just answer the question, RACIST.

I did answer... and instead of responding in a reasonable way you repeatedly
call me a racist. The fact you are lashing out like this is a sure sign of
you feeling angry and insecure.

Keep in mind it is YOU, not I, who repeatedly insists EQUALITY is unfair to
YOU... showing your sense of entitlement and privilege.

> You said this to me:
> 
>   "Boo hoo for you feeling like you are not getting what you think you are
>   entitled to."

Yeah, because equality is not good enough for you... you want more. You feel
entitled to more. 

> Once again, would you say that to a black man?

Already answered... even though it is not even slightly relevant.

Below you make up stories about me... lying to try to put me on the
defensive because even you, when facing a mirror, are ashamed of yourself.

I am happy to have been able to hold up that mirror for you to look into.

> Since you are likely to dodge yet again, I'll answer for you.  Of course
> you would NEVER say that to a BLACK man.  But you feel COMFORTABLE saying
> it to a WHITE man.  That's because ANTI-WHITE RACISM is ACCEPTABLE to you.
> And its acceptance at large is being pushed by the RACIST KKK DEMOCRAT
> PARTY agenda of maintaining INSTITUTIONAL RACISM in America.
> 
> Your HATRED is SICKENING.  You disgusting BIGOT!
> 



-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#366577

From"Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid>
Date2016-08-24 23:51 +0000
Message-ID<hjufu30.aaeru3@perch.invalid>
In reply to#366572
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 8/24/16, 2:47 PM, in article ahjfvu03a.38@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 8/24/16, 2:27 PM, in article ahjuv9ad3.ajvu@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> THAT quote from you is in response to me speaking of equality.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> It was in direct response to you saying, "Boo hoo for you."
>>>>>>>>>> IOW, Boo hoo whitey, you gots to pay.  Check your privilege.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Boo hoo for you feeling like you are not getting what you think you are
>>>>>>>>> entitled to.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Would you say that to a black man?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Irrelevant... but clearly you THINK I would not... meaning you feel
>>>>>>> entitled
>>>>>>> to not being called out on your sense of entitlement and privilege.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> It's absolutely relevant.  Would you say that to a black man?
>>>>> 
>>>>> See above. You keep showing off your sense of entitlement and privilege.
>>>>> 
>>>>> THAT is the issue here.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> So you refuse to answer a simple question
>>> 
>>> Because it is not relevant...
>> 
>> Just answer the question, RACIST.
> 
> I did answer...

You did NOT.  "Irrelevent" is not an answer.  It is a dodge.
Chickenshit RACIST LIAR.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#366580

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2016-08-24 18:00 -0700
Message-ID<D3E3913F.7A00C%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#366577
On 8/24/16, 4:51 PM, in article hjufu30.aaeru3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:

>>>>> So you refuse to answer a simple question
>>>> 
>>>> Because it is not relevant...
>>> 
>>> Just answer the question, RACIST.
>> 
>> I did answer...
> 
> You did NOT.  "Irrelevent" is not an answer.  It is a dodge.
> Chickenshit RACIST LIAR.

You snip, deny what I posted, and then call me names.... all because you are
ashamed of your own sense of entitlement and privilege. The response you
keep running from:
    -----
    Because it is not relevant... but, hey, just to shove your
    nonsense in your face even more, ANYONE who says that simply
    supporting equality shows you are racist against them is being
    absurd and showing a sense of entitlement and privilege.

    There may be disagreements on how to achieve equality based on
    historic and current conditions, but you just went with EQUALITY
    itself being somehow "racist" against you. This absolutely shows
    you having a sense of entitlement and privilege. No doubt. And you
    keep doing it.

    Meanwhile you just lash out with insults you cannot even begin to
    back.
    -----

Keep in mind I do NOT have the same sense of entitlement and privilege and
privilege you do, and would not sink to the level of name calling and
insults you have been doing.

-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#366584

From"Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid>
Date2016-08-25 01:28 +0000
Message-ID<fhguzc9023.ae@perch.invalid>
In reply to#366580
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 8/24/16, 4:51 PM, in article hjufu30.aaeru3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
> 
>>>>>> So you refuse to answer a simple question
>>>>> 
>>>>> Because it is not relevant...
>>>> 
>>>> Just answer the question, RACIST.
>>> 
>>> I did answer...
>> 
>> You did NOT.  "Irrelevent" is not an answer.  It is a dodge.
>> Chickenshit RACIST LIAR.
> 
> You snip, deny what I posted, and then call me names.... all because you are
> ashamed of your own sense of entitlement and privilege. The response you
> keep running from:
>     -----
>     Because it is not relevant... but, hey, just to shove your
>     nonsense in your face even more, ANYONE who says that simply
>     supporting equality shows you are racist against them is being
>     absurd and showing a sense of entitlement and privilege.
> 
>     There may be disagreements on how to achieve equality based on
>     historic and current conditions, but you just went with EQUALITY
>     itself being somehow "racist" against you. This absolutely shows
>     you having a sense of entitlement and privilege. No doubt. And you
>     keep doing it.
> 
>     Meanwhile you just lash out with insults you cannot even begin to
>     back.
>     -----
> 
> Keep in mind I do NOT have the same sense of entitlement and privilege and
> privilege you do, and would not sink to the level of name calling and
> insults you have been doing.
> 

So is that a "Yes" or a "No"?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#366585

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2016-08-24 18:32 -0700
Message-ID<D3E398AC.7A01B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#366584
On 8/24/16, 6:28 PM, in article fhguzc9023.ae@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:

> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 8/24/16, 4:51 PM, in article hjufu30.aaeru3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>>>>>>> So you refuse to answer a simple question
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Because it is not relevant...
>>>>> 
>>>>> Just answer the question, RACIST.
>>>> 
>>>> I did answer...
>>> 
>>> You did NOT.  "Irrelevent" is not an answer.  It is a dodge.
>>> Chickenshit RACIST LIAR.
>> 
>> You snip, deny what I posted, and then call me names.... all because you are
>> ashamed of your own sense of entitlement and privilege. The response you
>> keep running from:
>>     -----
>>     Because it is not relevant... but, hey, just to shove your
>>     nonsense in your face even more, ANYONE who says that simply
>>     supporting equality shows you are racist against them is being
>>     absurd and showing a sense of entitlement and privilege.
>> 
>>     There may be disagreements on how to achieve equality based on
>>     historic and current conditions, but you just went with EQUALITY
>>     itself being somehow "racist" against you. This absolutely shows
>>     you having a sense of entitlement and privilege. No doubt. And you
>>     keep doing it.
>> 
>>     Meanwhile you just lash out with insults you cannot even begin to
>>     back.
>>     -----
>> 
>> Keep in mind I do NOT have the same sense of entitlement and privilege and
>> privilege you do, and would not sink to the level of name calling and
>> insults you have been doing.
> 
> So is that a "Yes" or a "No"?

That is a "learn to read" and a "you are not entitled to push false
dichotomies."



-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#366822 — An example Owl asked for 5

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2016-08-25 13:31 -0700
SubjectAn example Owl asked for 5
Message-ID<D3E4A3B1.7A22A%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#366577
On 8/24/16, 4:51 PM, in article hjufu30.aaeru3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:

>>>>> So you refuse to answer a simple question
>>>> 
>>>> Because it is not relevant...
>>> 
>>> Just answer the question, RACIST.
>> 
>> I did answer...
> 
> You did NOT.  "Irrelevent" is not an answer.  It is a dodge.
> Chickenshit RACIST LIAR.

You snip, deny what I posted, and then call me names.... all because you are
ashamed of your own sense of entitlement and privilege. The response you
keep running from:
    -----
    Because it is not relevant... but, hey, just to shove your
    nonsense in your face even more, ANYONE who says that simply
    supporting equality shows you are racist against them is being
    absurd and showing a sense of entitlement and privilege.

    There may be disagreements on how to achieve equality based on
    historic and current conditions, but you just went with EQUALITY
    itself being somehow "racist" against you. This absolutely shows
    you having a sense of entitlement and privilege. No doubt. And you
    keep doing it.

    Meanwhile you just lash out with insults you cannot even begin to
    back.
    -----

Keep in mind I do NOT have the same sense of entitlement and privilege and
privilege you do, and would not sink to the level of name calling and
insults you have been doing.

-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#366829 — Re: An example Owl asked for 5

From"Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid>
Date2016-08-25 20:38 +0000
SubjectRe: An example Owl asked for 5
Message-ID<hghvui39a3.jg@perch.invalid>
In reply to#366822
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 8/24/16, 4:51 PM, in article hjufu30.aaeru3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
> 
>>>>>> So you refuse to answer a simple question
>>>>> 
>>>>> Because it is not relevant...
>>>> 
>>>> Just answer the question, RACIST.
>>> 
>>> I did answer...
>> 
>> You did NOT.  "Irrelevent" is not an answer.  It is a dodge.
>> Chickenshit RACIST LIAR.
> 
> You snip, deny what I posted, and then call me names.... all because you are
> ashamed of your own sense of entitlement and privilege. The response you
> keep running from:
>     -----
>     Orpnhfr vg vf abg eryrinag... ohg, url, whfg gb fubir lbhe
>     abafrafr va lbhe snpr rira zber, NALBAR jub fnlf gung fvzcyl
>     fhccbegvat rdhnyvgl fubjf lbh ner enpvfg ntnvafg gurz vf orvat
>     nofheq naq fubjvat n frafr bs ragvgyrzrag naq cevivyrtr.
> 
>     Gurer znl or qvfnterrzragf ba ubj gb npuvrir rdhnyvgl onfrq ba
>     uvfgbevp naq pheerag pbaqvgvbaf, ohg lbh whfg jrag jvgu RDHNYVGL
>     vgfrys orvat fbzrubj "enpvfg" ntnvafg lbh. Guvf nofbyhgryl fubjf
>     lbh univat n frafr bs ragvgyrzrag naq cevivyrtr. Ab qbhog. Naq lbh
>     xrrc qbvat vg.
> 
>     Zrnajuvyr lbh whfg ynfu bhg jvgu vafhygf lbh pnaabg rira ortva gb
>     onpx.
>     -----
> 

Whatever that was, it doesn't look like a Yes or No.

> Keep in mind I do NOT have the same sense of entitlement and privilege and
> privilege you do,

What "sense of entitlement and privilege" do I have?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 3 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy


csiph-web