Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #366357 > unrolled thread
| Started by | tinus61 <tinus61@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-23 18:25 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-08-23 20:18 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 169 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever tinus61 <tinus61@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-23 18:25 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-23 12:22 -0500
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-23 10:45 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-08-23 20:02 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-23 17:54 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-24 06:43 -0500
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-24 06:26 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 10:58 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-24 13:08 -0500
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 20:56 +0000
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:02 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-24 23:21 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:26 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 21:25 -0600
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-25 09:37 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-25 07:22 -0500
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 12:03 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 14:14 -0600
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 16:57 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:01 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 14:21 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 18:14 -0600
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:18 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-26 09:05 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 13:44 +0000
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:17 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 09:15 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 09:20 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 07:53 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 10:55 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:18 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 09:14 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 09:21 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:06 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:16 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:16 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 15:08 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 15:36 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 18:57 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 07:55 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 08:31 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 09:21 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 09:30 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 09:58 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:15 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 10:46 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 11:03 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 11:35 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 11:54 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 12:18 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 12:22 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 13:48 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 14:15 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 00:20 +0000
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 18:08 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 01:24 +0000
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 18:42 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 19:09 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-27 04:39 +0000
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 21:49 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 22:04 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 02:21 +0000
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 03:12 +0000
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 20:46 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 21:48 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 04:27 +0000
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 21:53 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 22:01 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 22:23 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 05:03 +0000
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 05:35 +0000
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 23:03 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 00:05 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 09:23 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 01:13 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 02:05 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-27 08:12 -0500
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 07:15 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 09:24 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 12:16 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 10:52 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 18:02 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-27 08:03 -0500
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-27 04:35 +0000
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-27 15:05 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-27 13:00 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 19:25 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:02 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 18:13 -0600
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 14:14 -0600
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-25 23:38 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:40 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-25 23:45 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:46 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-25 23:50 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:54 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-25 18:39 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:41 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-25 19:05 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 19:09 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-08-26 13:28 +0100
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:18 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 18:17 -0600
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-25 07:12 -0500
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 10:49 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:20 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-25 18:28 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 12:50 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 10:04 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 10:01 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-25 19:39 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 10:45 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-25 14:52 -0500
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 12:57 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-25 23:34 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:39 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-25 23:43 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:45 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-25 23:46 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:48 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 10:02 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 10:35 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:44 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-25 00:11 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 17:58 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 21:41 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-25 14:53 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-25 07:28 -0500
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-25 14:57 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-25 08:12 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 11:23 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-25 09:34 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 13:01 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-25 19:15 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:34 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-25 20:41 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:53 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-25 23:33 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:36 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 17:50 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:57 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 18:10 -0600
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-25 21:20 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 15:56 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 19:28 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:04 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 18:08 -0600
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 10:24 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 19:25 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:01 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:51 -0600
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 14:19 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:31 -0600
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 19:00 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 18:26 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-27 14:58 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 12:27 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 09:24 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 08:33 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 11:59 -0400
Who the Hell is Marek? John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 11:09 -0700
Re: Who the Hell is Marek? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 15:16 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 10:52 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:21 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-08-24 18:11 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 10:36 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 09:49 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-08-23 19:13 +0000
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-23 20:18 -0400
Page 4 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 22:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0pednShyT_fTglzKnZ2dnUU7-V-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #367194 |
On 2016-08-27, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/26/16, 9:39 PM, in article npr5i8$680$1@dont-email.me, "ronb" ><ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 19:09:34 -0700, Marek Novotny wrote: >> >>> On 2016-08-27, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> And that is ripping you to pieces. >>> >>> Whole lot of wishful thinking, loser. >> >> "Snit" is aggressively delusional. > > Why do you herd hump so much? Why do you fuck goats up the ass? You it makes them scream like hell. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlYlNF30bVg -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-27 02:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hjfuaeoa.38@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #367177 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/26/16, 6:24 PM, in article hajgbau3.a3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: >>> >>> Did you see that video that shows how he made it?? >>> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X468EdllTg0 >>> >> >> Yeah. Mouse clicks. LOL. >> > Hey, you tried some time ago to do better. You did not. > > Marek has not been able to produce ANYTHING. > > He is still struggling. > > Keep in mind I did it on the clock... he would already have gone over any > reasonable price limit. He has failed... but I still want to see what he can > do given all the time he wants. > You're not seriously claiming that somebody paid you to do that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-27 03:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <afhjdue03.a11@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #367186 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/26/16, 7:21 PM, in article hjfuaeoa.38@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/26/16, 6:24 PM, in article hajgbau3.a3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: >> >>>>> >>>>> Did you see that video that shows how he made it?? >>>>> >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X468EdllTg0 >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yeah. Mouse clicks. LOL. >>>> >>> Hey, you tried some time ago to do better. You did not. >>> >>> Marek has not been able to produce ANYTHING. >>> >>> He is still struggling. >>> >>> Keep in mind I did it on the clock... he would already have gone over any >>> reasonable price limit. He has failed... but I still want to see what he can >>> do given all the time he wants. >> >> You're not seriously claiming that somebody paid you to do that. > > I was clear from the start: this started as a job someone wanted me to do... > make a simple image. Cool. Then they saw it, were happy, and wanted more -- > hence the reason I have the task starting with the spreadsheet. Are you now > acting like this is a surprise to you? > How much did they pay you?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 20:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <sL6dnR3ad5CxkFzKnZ2dnUU7-cGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #367187 |
On 2016-08-27, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/26/16, 8:12 PM, in article afhjdue03.a11@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/26/16, 7:21 PM, in article hjfuaeoa.38@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 8/26/16, 6:24 PM, in article hajgbau3.a3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Did you see that video that shows how he made it?? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X468EdllTg0 >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Yeah. Mouse clicks. LOL. >>>>>> >>>>> Hey, you tried some time ago to do better. You did not. >>>>> >>>>> Marek has not been able to produce ANYTHING. >>>>> >>>>> He is still struggling. >>>>> >>>>> Keep in mind I did it on the clock... he would already have gone over any >>>>> reasonable price limit. He has failed... but I still want to see what he >>>>> can >>>>> do given all the time he wants. >>>> >>>> You're not seriously claiming that somebody paid you to do that. >>> >>> I was clear from the start: this started as a job someone wanted me to do... >>> make a simple image. Cool. Then they saw it, were happy, and wanted more -- >>> hence the reason I have the task starting with the spreadsheet. Are you now >>> acting like this is a surprise to you? >> >> How much did they pay you? > > I did that and other work... but the time for that, I believe, was 1 hour. > Maybe 2 with some back and forth on different colors and verbiage... as > Marek correctly noted, it is not as if this was a big task... but it is more > than he can do. > > Heck, even your efforts were not as well done, though if you want to show > better I am open to it. He's not the one running around challenging everyone; you are. I could just as easily challenge you with shell script I wrote and ask you to do the same better and watch you crash and burn like the chump you are. We're not exactly using Linux to make stupid videos, ya know... -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 21:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0pednSxyT_cXhlzKnZ2dnUU7-V-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #367188 |
On 2016-08-27, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/26/16, 8:46 PM, in article > sL6dnR3ad5CxkFzKnZ2dnUU7-cGdnZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny" ><marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: // snip >> He's not the one running around challenging everyone; you are. > > Yet you claimed Peter "challenged" me when he asked for an OS X GUI for a > task... and you "challenged" me when you talked about scripts. Are you now > saying you two were not doing as you said? Just giving you a taste of your own bullshit. // snip -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-27 04:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhavaoa.fji@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #367187 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/26/16, 8:12 PM, in article afhjdue03.a11@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/26/16, 7:21 PM, in article hjfuaeoa.38@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 8/26/16, 6:24 PM, in article hajgbau3.a3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Did you see that video that shows how he made it?? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X468EdllTg0 >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Yeah. Mouse clicks. LOL. >>>>>> >>>>> Hey, you tried some time ago to do better. You did not. >>>>> >>>>> Marek has not been able to produce ANYTHING. >>>>> >>>>> He is still struggling. >>>>> >>>>> Keep in mind I did it on the clock... he would already have gone over any >>>>> reasonable price limit. He has failed... but I still want to see what he >>>>> can >>>>> do given all the time he wants. >>>> >>>> You're not seriously claiming that somebody paid you to do that. >>> >>> I was clear from the start: this started as a job someone wanted me to do... >>> make a simple image. Cool. Then they saw it, were happy, and wanted more -- >>> hence the reason I have the task starting with the spreadsheet. Are you now >>> acting like this is a surprise to you? >> >> How much did they pay you? > > I did that and other work... but the time for that, I believe, was 1 hour. How much *money* did they pay you? > Maybe 2 with some back and forth on different colors and verbiage... as > Marek correctly noted, it is not as if this was a big task... but it is more > than he can do. > > Heck, even your efforts were not as well done, though if you want to show > better I am open to it. > My efforts were far superior to yours. This is one example that I can find. https://vid.me/fDkN
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 21:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0pednS5yT_d4gVzKnZ2dnUU7-V-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #367192 |
On 2016-08-27, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: // snip >> Heck, even your efforts were not as well done, though if you want to show >> better I am open to it. > > My efforts were far superior to yours. > This is one example that I can find. > https://vid.me/fDkN Nice -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 22:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0pednSlyT_cLg1zKnZ2dnUU7-V-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #367192 |
On 2016-08-27, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/26/16, 9:27 PM, in article fhavaoa.fji@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: // snip > Yeah, like I am going to share that with you. I mean, really... WTF? I even > hesitated to share the time given how it is NONE of your business what I do > with my professional life, but I did speak of the task and I did not see any > real harm. But now you want to know how much money I made... maybe to see if > you finally CAN figure out how to do this how much you might make? Jesus, chill out, loser. You're the one who blabbed it is for a client, supposedly. You already posted the time and your hourly rate is already noted on your lamer than donkey balls web site. HAHAHHAHAHA // snip >> My efforts were far superior to yours. >> This is one example that I can find. >> https://vid.me/fDkN > > Does not fit the requirements at all... nor really do anything interesting. > But you sure were proud of it! Columns coming and going and changing sizes > and getting re-labeled with no rhyme or reason. I mean, sure, I see where it > screws up and has the size change when you lose columns... but what a mess. technically speaking it kicks yours in the ass. All you did was script a mouse click and record the screen. -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 22:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <sfudnfR9MdQivlzKnZ2dnUU7-T_NnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #367199 |
On 2016-08-27, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: // snip > Same with you... IF you ever figure out how to do it I am happy to show your > work off and let people see how great Linux handles the task. It can handle > it... right? Do you think anyone gives a crap about your endorsement? -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-27 05:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhjavi30.9uaf@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #367192 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/26/16, 9:27 PM, in article fhavaoa.fji@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >>>>> I was clear from the start: this started as a job someone wanted me to >>>>> do... >>>>> make a simple image. Cool. Then they saw it, were happy, and wanted more -- >>>>> hence the reason I have the task starting with the spreadsheet. Are you now >>>>> acting like this is a surprise to you? >>>> >>>> How much did they pay you? >>> >>> I did that and other work... but the time for that, I believe, was 1 hour. >> >> How much *money* did they pay you? > > Yeah, like I am going to share that with you. I mean, really... WTF? I even > hesitated to share the time given how it is NONE of your business what I do > with my professional life, but I did speak of the task and I did not see any > real harm. But now you want to know how much money I made... maybe to see if > you finally CAN figure out how to do this how much you might make? > > Sorry... this is a one-off type task. Not something to be repeated. The type > thing which you do not do by rote (which are the type tasks ronb speaks of > -- funny how you and your herd never call him out on his lies about me... > just weird. LOL!) > Just curious how much something like that is worth to somebody. >>> Maybe 2 with some back and forth on different colors and verbiage... as >>> Marek correctly noted, it is not as if this was a big task... but it is more >>> than he can do. >>> >>> Heck, even your efforts were not as well done, though if you want to show >>> better I am open to it. >> >> My efforts were far superior to yours. >> This is one example that I can find. >> https://vid.me/fDkN > > Does not fit the requirements at all... nor really do anything interesting. > But you sure were proud of it! Columns coming and going and changing sizes > and getting re-labeled with no rhyme or reason. I mean, sure, I see where it > screws up and has the size change when you lose columns... but what a mess. > > By the way, when I was trying to create a similar effect with ScreenFlow I > ran into a bug... the "linear" actions were not fully linear. They came out > with an update that fixed that. The update also fixed the problems I was > having with animated gifs! > > The task lead to me reporting two bugs to the ScreenFlow developers, both of > which have been fixed. > > I sincerely wish open source software handles bugs as well. > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ah5gAkna3jI
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-27 05:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fjavu3.88@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #367200 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/26/16, 10:03 PM, in article fhjavi30.9uaf@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> >> Just curious how much something like that is worth to somebody. > > Depends on the market you are in. I told you the time... you can make a > decent guess from there. > Nobody would pay for that around here, but I guess in some places folks have more money than sense.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 23:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <K7WdneOUwOKCsFzKnZ2dnUU7-fHNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #367204 |
On 2016-08-27, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/26/16, 10:35 PM, in article fjavu3.88@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/26/16, 10:03 PM, in article fhjavi30.9uaf@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Just curious how much something like that is worth to somebody. >>> >>> Depends on the market you are in. I told you the time... you can make a >>> decent guess from there. >>> >> >> Nobody would pay for that around here, but I guess in some places folks >> have more money than sense. > > Ah, yes, you live in a land where nobody pays people to help them make ads. > LOL! > > Comes down to you were not able to make something that worked as well... > though you are still FAR ahead of Marek who cannot figure out where to even > begin. As I already said, I would have used After Effects for something like that. Anything which can use a keyframe over time should do fine. It's just a question of how much time you want to waste making it pretty. Personally, I don't buy that it is for a client at all. If it is then you got lucky because you don't actually know how to do these things. Recording the whole screen and you happened to have an app that looks appealing so you don't have to actually do any real work. What luck. What owl did was pull from skill. Big difference. // snip -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-27 00:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <neOdnapXaPJWplzKnZ2dnUU7-eHNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #367206 |
On 2016-08-27, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/26/16, 11:03 PM, in article > K7WdneOUwOKCsFzKnZ2dnUU7-fHNnZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny" ><marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: > >> On 2016-08-27, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/26/16, 10:35 PM, in article fjavu3.88@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 8/26/16, 10:03 PM, in article fhjavi30.9uaf@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Just curious how much something like that is worth to somebody. >>>>> >>>>> Depends on the market you are in. I told you the time... you can make a >>>>> decent guess from there. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Nobody would pay for that around here, but I guess in some places folks >>>> have more money than sense. >>> >>> Ah, yes, you live in a land where nobody pays people to help them make ads. >>> LOL! >>> >>> Comes down to you were not able to make something that worked as well... >>> though you are still FAR ahead of Marek who cannot figure out where to even >>> begin. >> >> As I already said, I would have used After Effects for something like >> that. > > You "would have"... LOL! Comes down to you cannot do it... but even when you > dream of how you MIGHT, you think in terms of non-Linux software. LOL. So this is the simple After Effects key framing I spoke of. Running on my Dell which really does run Windows and really does use the Adobe suite as I mentioned so many times. https://www.dropbox.com/s/nv2vkhw03kp59gx/Comp1.mp4?dl=0 https://www.dropbox.com/s/gocnmfxikeqrav2/comp-1.png?dl=0 > Can I tell you how unbelievably funny this is! To do a task you admit is > easy... perhaps even trivial... you have to leave Linux behind and run to > another OS. After Effects is an app I used a long long time ago. I mentioned that already. And I still use Adobe apps even now, also already mentioned. I'm sure Blender would do just fine, but I'm not at all familiar with Blender. And as I also said, I didn't get into Linux to make videos. But whole movies have been made with Blender. Obviously it can be done. > Why? Is Linux not capable enough for you to be able to handle even easy > tasks? Really... you are digging your grave deeper and deeper! Ah, Snit caught lying... That was easier than I thought. Linux has software which can handle such things, but by all means, please keep denying it and make yourself an even bigger fool than you already are. >> Anything which can use a keyframe over time should do fine. It's >> just a question of how much time you want to waste making it pretty. > > Well, you have spent HOURS trolling me... but you CANNOT do this task. Not > will not.. CANNOT. So my dropbox link above is After Effects, both a screen shot of the keyframe and a video from After Effects doing the simple keyframe over time I spoke of. LOL. So much for cannot theory. // snip -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-27 09:23 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <nprf5v$uc6$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #367187 |
Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/26/16, 7:21 PM, in article hjfuaeoa.38@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 8/26/16, 6:24 PM, in article hajgbau3.a3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Did you see that video that shows how he made it?? >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X468EdllTg0 >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Yeah. Mouse clicks. LOL. >>>>> >>>> Hey, you tried some time ago to do better. You did not. >>>> >>>> Marek has not been able to produce ANYTHING. >>>> >>>> He is still struggling. >>>> >>>> Keep in mind I did it on the clock... he would already have gone over >>>> any reasonable price limit. He has failed... but I still want to see >>>> what he can do given all the time he wants. >>> >>> You're not seriously claiming that somebody paid you to do that. >> >> I was clear from the start: this started as a job someone wanted me to >> do... make a simple image. Cool. Then they saw it, were happy, and wanted >> more -- hence the reason I have the task starting with the spreadsheet. >> Are you now acting like this is a surprise to you? >> > > How much did they pay you? No matter what amount: It was still a rip-off And naturally the lying imbecile is doing his usual job again. He lies
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-27 01:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ovqdnQY-HLst1lzKnZ2dnUU7-SednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #367212 |
On 2016-08-27, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > See Marek... here is an example of one of the herd begging for my attention. > They cannot help it. They lie to get responses. Who are you trying to kid, me or you?? Cause I'm thinking you're kidding yourself... You ain't kidding me, loser. -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-27 02:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <rJidnRMoi4BrylzKnZ2dnUU7-SPNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #367216 |
On 2016-08-27, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/27/16, 1:13 AM, in article > ovqdnQY-HLst1lzKnZ2dnUU7-SednZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny" ><marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: > >> On 2016-08-27, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> See Marek... here is an example of one of the herd begging for my attention. >>> They cannot help it. They lie to get responses. >> >> Who are you trying to kid, me or you?? Cause I'm thinking you're kidding >> yourself... You ain't kidding me, loser. > > I am noting a specific example of something you denied. > > Anyway: you tried my task and bombed. Bad. Maybe you will try again? > > I looked at your effort and took that as a task from you. Maybe you meant it > that way? Maybe not. > > But here is my replicating what you did... but with a better Y-axis (one > that makes sense): <https://youtu.be/OSygJ0NaO_4> > > Then had some fun and messed with it: <https://youtu.be/Fv0_LF90CDw>. > > Just had the two bars with their shadows spin in different ways. By the way, > I first posted it to my "real" channel by mistake - so old links to it are > dead. Sorry about that. > > Really, though, your effort was less than what even I expected of you. Can > you do better? Keep in mind I looked at what you did and replicated the > results (roughly) and it was truly trivial. Did it as I was watching a show > on my second monitor. I used to use the whole creative suite and Apple's pro apps up until about 2004 I'd say. Now I just use illustrator and photoshop mostly for two purposes. Illustrator to create templates. Photoshop to check in the art others create using the template. I don't really do this stuff anymore. I used to do pretty good work in this area but I lost my desire a long time ago. As I said long before this thread I don't even want Adobe's apps. I didn't get into Linux to do these stupid things you're prancing on about. Now that doesn't mean I forgot how shit got done all together. I still know enough to know what you showed and how you did it was luck. What I showed in terms of keyframes is right on. That's how someone would actually create something. They'd just spend more time on it and make it look better. But the point of what I showed was that I would have used After Effects. I made something once that looked like Apple's Motion app logo and I made it spin like a gyroscope. I used to be able to make water look like water. So what you're showing is chump bullshit. I think we both know it and you're just kidding yourself. I very much doubt there is a client. Most likely it's just you screwing around in your spare time, which is all of your time, and coming up with crap you think looks visually nice and then parading it around here to see if someone will attempt to do it on Linux better. But most likely everyone here got into Linux for other reasons. And again, I think you know this. Now the stuff we do see you doing, like your web pages, come on be honest, they're shit. You can't seriously tell me you're skills are on par with today's web design. The method you used for your little creation, it's not exactly one that demonstrates any real skill. You didn't draw the spread sheet. You didn't draw the bars. In my simple example, I made everything. The color changing, the crappy bar, etc. I'm not using Excel as a back drop because it might look nice. I could have... That way you couldn't complain about the look of the numbers. I didn't because the point was to show you that keyframing is the method I would have used had I been asked to do what you were showing off. See you're not the one responsible for the whole look. What if the client rejected the look of Apple's Numbers app? What if they wanted something entirely different looking? See I think you're a choker. Owl did the work. I did the work. You captured the whole screen of an existing app and let Apple script a mouse click for you. Dude, no matter how you slice it what you did is lame. Yes, I'll give you the prop it looks nice. But you didn't create that look. So you can't take credit for that. And that's really the bottom line. You didn't work for it. You got lucky that the client liked what you were "able" to put together with no real skills. That's nothing to be proud of Snit. Now, you go on lying to yourself if you like. I'm not so far out of the creative scene to not recognize bullshit when I see it. When we ask you do real work, like a script, which you first said you could do. I never challenged you to write a script until you first said you could. You choked. When Peter challenged you for NFS, you choked again. Time and time again you show you don't really know jack shit. I have yet to see anything from you at all that demonstrates a real skill. -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-27 08:12 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <3343sbh5nuu7krtvergdraalv7fs44tkqm@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #367216 |
Marek Novotny wrote: > some thing wrote: >> >> They lie to get responses. > >Who are you trying to kid, me or you?? Cause I'm thinking you're kidding >yourself... You ain't kidding me, loser. The above is another of the thing's favorite things to do - take what we say about it and say it about us. I wrote yesterday that it *lied* to get a response, so it pulls this lame IKYABWAI. -- "Without that vendor lock-in you'll just get a mediochre system that isn't very stable." - some stupid POS that calls itself "GreyCloud"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-27 07:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <37CdnY_tlOYBPVzKnZ2dnUU7-IudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #367224 |
On 2016-08-27, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > Marek Novotny wrote: > >> some thing wrote: >>> >>> They lie to get responses. >> >>Who are you trying to kid, me or you?? Cause I'm thinking you're kidding >>yourself... You ain't kidding me, loser. > > The above is another of the thing's favorite things to do - take what > we say about it and say it about us. I wrote yesterday that it *lied* > to get a response, so it pulls this lame IKYABWAI. He's knows he's worthless. He can lie to himself all day long for all I care. But he knows he doesn't have any skill. He's never shown any skill at all. Just another Mac wannabe. -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-27 09:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <EJmdnaHiVtIzI1zKnZ2dnUU7-RfNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #367231 |
On 2016-08-27, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/27/16, 7:15 AM, in article > 37CdnY_tlOYBPVzKnZ2dnUU7-IudnZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny" ><marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: > >> On 2016-08-27, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> Marek Novotny wrote: >>> >>>> some thing wrote: >>>>> >>>>> They lie to get responses. >>>> >>>> Who are you trying to kid, me or you?? Cause I'm thinking you're kidding >>>> yourself... You ain't kidding me, loser. >>> >>> The above is another of the thing's favorite things to do - take what >>> we say about it and say it about us. I wrote yesterday that it *lied* >>> to get a response, so it pulls this lame IKYABWAI. >> >> He's knows he's worthless. He can lie to himself all day long for all I >> care. But he knows he doesn't have any skill. He's never shown any skill >> at all. Just another Mac wannabe. > > See: for you this forum is all about YOU and ego... showing of your > "skill"... for me it is about tasks: what can we do. Nope, it's a usenet group not a forum. And no, it's not about me or my ego. If that were true I'd be posting about everything I do and waiting for kudos to roll in. Not surprisingly though that's what you're doing. You're the one who posts really retarded crap and begs for everyone else to do the same. I guess that's a classic example of your projection tendencies. > Even with a task YOU and I both agree is easy you failed. Your best efforts > lead you to leaving Linux behind, which is in itself quite telling, and then > you showed you could not do anything but an amazingly piss-poor job. My objective was to show keyframing in After Effects as a method for doing what you did and I accomplished that task in spades. You can clearly see what I am saying is correct. Your being in denial won't help your situation. So much for your clueless accusation that I cannot even begin to do what I said, which is yet another self-nuke on your part. > You then declared yourself some sort of grand winner at... what? Using a > program that takes more skill? What? That is just you pushing your own ego.. > you simply cannot get tasks done! What do *you* actually do Michael? Anyone can take a screen shot of someone else's designed software. Did you make the bars? No. The background? No. The entire look and feel is straight up Apple's. All you did was record the screen... You don't own that creative process. Even you have to know what I am saying is correct. Keep lying to yourself Snit, maybe you'll believe it, eh? -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 12:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5226c416-22d9-44a1-a96f-6e319260eff2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #367093 |
On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 12:17:52 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 8/26/16, 10:46 AM, in article > 35ydnYdE5PgQHV3KnZ2dnUU7-IHNnZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny" > <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: > > >> Comes down to I showed a task you could not do... and you are insecure about > >> it. OK. > >> > >>> When you hear how he made that spreadsheet effect, you'll see what I mean. > >>> Talk about an idiot. > >> > >> Again: I pointed to a task you could not do and you became insecure... and > >> above you show you assume I should feel the same. > >> > >> I do not. > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X468EdllTg0 > > > > That's the video showing how Snit made the Numbers animated GIF. > > Correct. > > > So Snit, why not explain in detail how this is done in this video? > > I went into quite some detail in the past. It started with someone wanting > an image created in a spreadsheet. The scope of the task grew when he wanted > it to be animated. So the challenge was to get the pre-existing chart, > created with a spreadsheet, to become an animated GIF (or video). > > If you have other questions I am happy to answer. Why not address the rest of the 'criteria' that this 'client' hand for this ever-growing 'project'? LOL!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web