Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #366298 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-22 20:04 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-08-25 08:38 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 382 — 16 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 20:04 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 13:35 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 20:47 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 13:51 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 21:07 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 14:16 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 21:32 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 14:38 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 22:04 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 15:22 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 23:00 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 16:13 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 16:00 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 09:11 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 16:22 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 09:37 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 16:54 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 10:14 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 17:21 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 10:29 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 17:43 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:03 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 09:51 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 14:17 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 09:05 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 11:51 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:01 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 18:27 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:46 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 21:17 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 10:07 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:41 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 20:06 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 00:13 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 20:33 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 01:24 +0000
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:14 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:26 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:10 -0400
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-26 09:07 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 13:37 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-26 09:56 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 10:42 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:23 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:29 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 10:41 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:23 -0700
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 09:17 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:08 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:17 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:32 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 09:24 -0700
Re: Another day chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-26 11:27 -0500
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:36 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:45 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 13:52 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 13:43 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 17:18 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 14:39 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 18:42 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 17:24 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 00:09 +0000
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 17:33 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:29 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 12:08 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 18:26 -0600
Re: Another day ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-27 04:21 +0000
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 21:46 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 05:15 +0000
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 05:42 +0000
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 00:07 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:30 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 12:09 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 18:27 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 19:06 -0700
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 09:20 +0200
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 10:04 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 01:06 -0700
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 10:23 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 01:39 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 01:09 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 01:27 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-27 15:10 -0400
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 21:58 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 13:17 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 18:28 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 19:15 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 09:38 -0400
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 22:22 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 13:37 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-27 19:10 -0400
Re: Another day ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 03:20 +0000
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 09:35 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-28 09:16 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 10:03 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-27 15:02 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:19 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 15:34 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 19:03 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:28 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:27 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 12:06 -0700
Re: Another day -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-27 15:30 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 18:20 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 18:24 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 19:01 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 19:42 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 07:39 -0700
Re: Another day William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-08-28 16:22 +0100
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 09:50 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 15:29 -0400
Re: Another day ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 20:16 +0000
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 17:40 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 15:14 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 18:19 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 16:18 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 19:40 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 16:42 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 19:44 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 16:56 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 19:59 -0400
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 18:16 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-28 09:08 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-28 09:17 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-29 09:06 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 09:42 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 08:12 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 11:50 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 10:00 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 19:22 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 16:57 -0700
Re: Another day Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-29 18:39 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 15:43 -0700
Re: Another day ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 23:12 +0000
Re: Another day ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 23:15 +0000
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 17:09 -0700
Re: Another day Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-29 20:52 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 18:13 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-29 19:34 -0400
Re: Another day Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-30 01:49 +0200
Re: Another day Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-30 01:46 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 17:21 -0700
Re: Another day Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-30 02:26 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 17:33 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-30 09:16 -0400
Re: Another day Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-30 15:26 +0200
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-28 12:38 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 17:16 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 14:23 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:20 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 15:35 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 18:38 -0400
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 01:50 +0200
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 20:13 -0400
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 09:19 +0200
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:35 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 12:15 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-29 11:02 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 08:08 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-27 15:10 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:21 -0600
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 09:36 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 16:43 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:00 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 17:08 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:16 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 17:32 +0000
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 10:39 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 18:04 +0000
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:39 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 10:53 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 14:26 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 12:23 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 18:06 +0000
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 19:11 +0000
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:22 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:11 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 17:29 +0000
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 18:12 +0000
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 19:19 +0000
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 10:33 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 21:20 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 21:27 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 14:04 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:07 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 18:00 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:18 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 23:40 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:26 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:37 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:42 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 11:49 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 14:08 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 21:18 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:47 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 12:00 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:13 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 15:57 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:16 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 22:31 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:44 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 23:00 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 16:07 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:25 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 21:40 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:22 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 21:39 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 11:59 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:41 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 21:14 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:50 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:39 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 12:07 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:44 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:17 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-23 20:07 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 01:02 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 09:59 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 14:25 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 10:58 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 15:16 +0000
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:16 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 21:34 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:09 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-23 20:08 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 01:10 +0000
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:28 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 10:12 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 09:03 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:20 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:41 -0700
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 12:29 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:55 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:11 -0700
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 13:20 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:33 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:45 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:50 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:02 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:54 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:10 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:19 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:32 -0400
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 10:54 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 11:08 -0400
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 12:03 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 12:47 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:19 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 11:59 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:16 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 15:59 -0600
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 22:13 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:18 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:29 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:14 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:33 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 07:56 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:23 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:43 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:53 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:10 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:22 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:26 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:36 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:46 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 20:58 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:14 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:18 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-23 20:47 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 01:24 +0000
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:48 -0600
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 05:06 +0000
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:27 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 10:24 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 14:34 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 10:58 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 15:14 +0000
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:30 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 10:00 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 08:58 -0700
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 09:24 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:31 -0600
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 12:16 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:51 -0600
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 13:17 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 20:56 -0600
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 20:33 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:16 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:30 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:49 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:48 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:09 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 20:55 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:13 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:15 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:44 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:22 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:48 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 07:57 -0400
Re: Another day -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-26 06:41 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:35 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 13:51 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:17 -0600
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 13:03 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:36 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 16:09 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 09:27 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:33 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:44 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 13:44 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 17:14 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:10 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 13:48 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:16 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:24 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:28 -0600
Re: Another day Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-25 07:10 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:46 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 09:58 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 14:28 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 08:54 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:47 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:08 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 20:45 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:03 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:00 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:12 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:09 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:37 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:50 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:07 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 19:23 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:25 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 10:44 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:47 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 11:58 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:04 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:05 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:37 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 23:38 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:39 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:26 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 13:42 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:47 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:53 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:04 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 19:20 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:24 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:36 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 23:37 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 07:53 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 11:56 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 11:04 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 11:53 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 19:16 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 23:22 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 19:24 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 23:37 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:26 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 02:51 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 22:54 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 19:59 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 03:01 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 21:19 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 19:56 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 03:00 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 20:31 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 22:29 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 02:50 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 19:57 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 03:04 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 20:31 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:22 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 07:58 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:26 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:44 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:43 -0600
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 19:15 +0000
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 10:19 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 11:51 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:42 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 08:38 -0400
Page 9 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 … 20 Next page →
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 16:21 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <npqfe5$n40$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #367127 |
Snit wrote: > On 8/26/16, 12:52 PM, in article npq6l7$l40$5@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" > <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > >> Silver Slimer wrote: >> >>> On 2016-08-26 1:36 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>> chrisv wrote: >>>> >>>>> Marek Novotny wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2016-08-26, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> *thead plonk* >>>> >>>> Fuck off, moron. >>> >>> I find it sad that chrisv appears to see himself as some sort of moral >>> authority here and also appears to believe that his approval is >>> necessary. I've been here a long enough time and have yet to see a >>> single informative post from the guy. >>> >> He even still uses windows XP to post with... yet he says that he is >> moral and honest and doesn't use Linux and probably doesn't even know how >> to install linux. >> > He claims to be Linux 100%... thus the herd accepts him. > > Actually, I've never seen any of his/her posts that says this. His/her version of that newsreader is for XP only. -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 09:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6f33611e-385a-442d-9f84-def4becaa186@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #367045 |
On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 10:24:08 AM UTC-6, Marek Novotny wrote: > On 2016-08-26, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > > // snip > > > You accused me of backing pedophilia but ... > > Dude, what kind of sick shit are you into now? One never knows... "I do not see any *logical* reason to disallow incest" - Snit
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 16:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhjgai0ba.a3@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #367051 |
Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 10:24:08 AM UTC-6, Marek Novotny wrote: >> On 2016-08-26, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >> // snip >> >> > You accused me of backing pedophilia but ... >> >> Dude, what kind of sick shit are you into now? > > One never knows... > > "I do not see any *logical* reason to disallow incest" - Snit > He also advocates for the right of adult men to shower with little girls. The guy is just sick.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 10:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E5C3C3.7A3EE%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #367052 |
On 8/26/16, 9:43 AM, in article fhjgai0ba.a3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 10:24:08 AM UTC-6, Marek Novotny wrote: >>> On 2016-08-26, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> >>> // snip >>> >>>> You accused me of backing pedophilia but ... >>> >>> Dude, what kind of sick shit are you into now? >> >> One never knows... >> >> "I do not see any *logical* reason to disallow incest" - Snit >> > > He also advocates for the right of adult men to shower with little girls. > The guy is just sick. > We now have you on two issues where even you know you cannot defend your nonsense: your claim equality is somehow unfair to you... which shows your sense of entitlement and privilege. You have back pedaled from this saying your false accusations against me were based on something other that my merely noting I back equality, but not even you can say what. Even you know your claim on that is poppycock. You also whine when I note how repulsive I find your Big Brother bathroom licenses and penis checks. YOU are the one who made it clear you want such things. And why? No other reason than to feel better about yourself by putting others down. And when pressed you folded on this issue, too. Comes down to even you know your positions are completely unsupportable. Your fear mongering and sense of entitlement and privileged cannot be supported by logic. Your positions are emotion and ego driven. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 17:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhjajaf.jigi@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #367055 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/26/16, 9:43 AM, in article fhjgai0ba.a3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 10:24:08 AM UTC-6, Marek Novotny wrote: >>>> On 2016-08-26, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> // snip >>>> >>>>> You accused me of backing pedophilia but ... >>>> >>>> Dude, what kind of sick shit are you into now? >>> >>> One never knows... >>> >>> "I do not see any *logical* reason to disallow incest" - Snit >>> >> >> He also advocates for the right of adult men to shower with little girls. >> The guy is just sick. >> > We now have you on So no denial of the above. Just an attempt at distraction. Why do you want the right to shower with little girls?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 10:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E5C76A.7A401%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #367062 |
On 8/26/16, 10:08 AM, in article fhjajaf.jigi@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/26/16, 9:43 AM, in article fhjgai0ba.a3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 10:24:08 AM UTC-6, Marek Novotny wrote: >>>>> On 2016-08-26, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> // snip >>>>> >>>>>> You accused me of backing pedophilia but ... >>>>> >>>>> Dude, what kind of sick shit are you into now? >>>> >>>> One never knows... >>>> >>>> "I do not see any *logical* reason to disallow incest" - Snit >>>> >>> >>> He also advocates for the right of adult men to shower with little girls. >>> The guy is just sick. >>> >> We now have you on > > So no denial of the above. Just an attempt at distraction. > Why do you want the right to shower with little girls? > We now have you on two issues where even you know you cannot defend your nonsense: your claim equality is somehow unfair to you... which shows your sense of entitlement and privilege. You have back pedaled from this saying your false accusations against me were based on something other that my merely noting I back equality, but not even you can say what. Even you know your claim on that is poppycock. You also whine when I note how repulsive I find your Big Brother bathroom licenses and penis checks. YOU are the one who made it clear you want such things. And why? No other reason than to feel better about yourself by putting others down. And when pressed you folded on this issue, too. Comes down to even you know your positions are completely unsupportable. Your fear mongering and sense of entitlement and privileged cannot be supported by logic. Your positions are emotion and ego driven. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 17:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <afhjvu0a.3@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #367068 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/26/16, 10:08 AM, in article fhjajaf.jigi@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/26/16, 9:43 AM, in article fhjgai0ba.a3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 10:24:08 AM UTC-6, Marek Novotny wrote: >>>>>> On 2016-08-26, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> // snip >>>>>> >>>>>>> You accused me of backing pedophilia but ... >>>>>> >>>>>> Dude, what kind of sick shit are you into now? >>>>> >>>>> One never knows... >>>>> >>>>> "I do not see any *logical* reason to disallow incest" - Snit >>>>> >>>> >>>> He also advocates for the right of adult men to shower with little girls. >>>> The guy is just sick. >>>> >>> We now have you on >> >> So no denial of the above. Just an attempt at distraction. >> Why do you want the right to shower with little girls? >> > > We now have you on two issues where even you know you cannot defend your > nonsense: your claim equality is somehow unfair to you... which shows your > sense of entitlement and privilege. You have back pedaled from this saying > your false accusations against me were based on something other that my > merely noting I back equality, but not even you can say what. Even you know > your claim on that is poppycock. > > You also whine when I note how repulsive I find your Big Brother bathroom > licenses and penis checks. YOU are the one who made it clear you want such > things. And why? No other reason than to feel better about yourself by > putting others down. And when pressed you folded on this issue, too. > > Comes down to even you know your positions are completely unsupportable. > Your fear mongering and sense of entitlement and privileged cannot be > supported by logic. Your positions are emotion and ego driven. > That's your answer? I see a lot of blah blah blah, but I don't see any explanation for your advocacy of the right of adult men to shower with little girls.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 10:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b00f6b3e-afa2-4982-bb15-d664775fb44a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #367079 |
On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 11:32:28 AM UTC-6, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > > On 8/26/16, 10:08 AM, in article fhjajaf.jigi@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > > > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>> On 8/26/16, 9:43 AM, in article fhjgai0ba.a3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > >>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 10:24:08 AM UTC-6, Marek Novotny wrote: > >>>>>> On 2016-08-26, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> // snip > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> You accused me of backing pedophilia but ... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Dude, what kind of sick shit are you into now? > >>>>> > >>>>> One never knows... > >>>>> > >>>>> "I do not see any *logical* reason to disallow incest" - Snit > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> He also advocates for the right of adult men to shower with little girls. > >>>> The guy is just sick. > >>>> > >>> We now have you on > >> > >> So no denial of the above. Just an attempt at distraction. > >> Why do you want the right to shower with little girls? > >> > > > > We now have you on two issues where even you know you cannot defend your > > nonsense: your claim equality is somehow unfair to you... which shows your > > sense of entitlement and privilege. You have back pedaled from this saying > > your false accusations against me were based on something other that my > > merely noting I back equality, but not even you can say what. Even you know > > your claim on that is poppycock. > > > > You also whine when I note how repulsive I find your Big Brother bathroom > > licenses and penis checks. YOU are the one who made it clear you want such > > things. And why? No other reason than to feel better about yourself by > > putting others down. And when pressed you folded on this issue, too. > > > > Comes down to even you know your positions are completely unsupportable. > > Your fear mongering and sense of entitlement and privileged cannot be > > supported by logic. Your positions are emotion and ego driven. > > > > That's your answer? I see a lot of blah blah blah, but I don't see > any explanation for your advocacy of the right of adult men to shower > with little girls. Nude? There is no such "right" in a public place, nor will there ever be in the U.S, for obvious reasons. You're wasting your time with this anyway... when Snit tried to defend his position on incest he pivoted to limiting the definition, his point of reference was 80 year old couples. If he touches this question this is the kind of thing you can expect from him.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 18:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hjagu37.ak3r@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #367084 |
Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 11:32:28 AM UTC-6, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> > On 8/26/16, 10:08 AM, in article fhjajaf.jigi@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> > >> >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> On 8/26/16, 9:43 AM, in article fhjgai0ba.a3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> >>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>>> On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 10:24:08 AM UTC-6, Marek Novotny wrote: >> >>>>>> On 2016-08-26, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> // snip >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> You accused me of backing pedophilia but ... >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Dude, what kind of sick shit are you into now? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> One never knows... >> >>>>> >> >>>>> "I do not see any *logical* reason to disallow incest" - Snit >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> He also advocates for the right of adult men to shower with little girls. >> >>>> The guy is just sick. >> >>>> >> >>> We now have you on >> >> >> >> So no denial of the above. Just an attempt at distraction. >> >> Why do you want the right to shower with little girls? >> >> >> > >> > We now have you on two issues where even you know you cannot defend your >> > nonsense: your claim equality is somehow unfair to you... which shows your >> > sense of entitlement and privilege. You have back pedaled from this saying >> > your false accusations against me were based on something other that my >> > merely noting I back equality, but not even you can say what. Even you know >> > your claim on that is poppycock. >> > >> > You also whine when I note how repulsive I find your Big Brother bathroom >> > licenses and penis checks. YOU are the one who made it clear you want such >> > things. And why? No other reason than to feel better about yourself by >> > putting others down. And when pressed you folded on this issue, too. >> > >> > Comes down to even you know your positions are completely unsupportable. >> > Your fear mongering and sense of entitlement and privileged cannot be >> > supported by logic. Your positions are emotion and ego driven. >> > >> >> That's your answer? I see a lot of blah blah blah, but I don't see >> any explanation for your advocacy of the right of adult men to shower >> with little girls. > > Nude? There is no such "right" in a public place, nor will there ever be in the U.S, for obvious reasons. Slippery slope. But Snit defends it. http://thehill.com/regulation/pending-regs/291522-transgender-rules-for-homeless-shelters-spark-firestorm http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/08/16/obamas-adims-federal-transgender-rules-homeless-shelters-cause-outrage/ <quote> Wildmon also worried that the rules would be too easily abused and would likely put women seeking a safe place to sleep in danger of being harassed — or worse — by sexual predators. ... For example, the transgender ideological demand means that single-sex bathrooms and locker rooms must opened up to people of the opposite sex, regardless of age, and without any verification of created “gender identity.” </quote> > You're wasting your time with this anyway... when Snit tried to defend his position on incest he pivoted to limiting the definition, his point of reference was 80 year old couples. If he touches this question this is the kind of thing you can expect from him.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 13:39 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nppus3$qfb$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #367079 |
On 2016-08-26 1:32 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/26/16, 10:08 AM, in article fhjajaf.jigi@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 8/26/16, 9:43 AM, in article fhjgai0ba.a3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 10:24:08 AM UTC-6, Marek Novotny wrote: >>>>>>> On 2016-08-26, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> // snip >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You accused me of backing pedophilia but ... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dude, what kind of sick shit are you into now? >>>>>> >>>>>> One never knows... >>>>>> >>>>>> "I do not see any *logical* reason to disallow incest" - Snit >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> He also advocates for the right of adult men to shower with little girls. >>>>> The guy is just sick. >>>>> >>>> We now have you on >>> >>> So no denial of the above. Just an attempt at distraction. >>> Why do you want the right to shower with little girls? >>> >> >> We now have you on two issues where even you know you cannot defend your >> nonsense: your claim equality is somehow unfair to you... which shows your >> sense of entitlement and privilege. You have back pedaled from this saying >> your false accusations against me were based on something other that my >> merely noting I back equality, but not even you can say what. Even you know >> your claim on that is poppycock. >> >> You also whine when I note how repulsive I find your Big Brother bathroom >> licenses and penis checks. YOU are the one who made it clear you want such >> things. And why? No other reason than to feel better about yourself by >> putting others down. And when pressed you folded on this issue, too. >> >> Comes down to even you know your positions are completely unsupportable. >> Your fear mongering and sense of entitlement and privileged cannot be >> supported by logic. Your positions are emotion and ego driven. >> > > That's your answer? I see a lot of blah blah blah, but I don't see > any explanation for your advocacy of the right of adult men to shower > with little girls. I think what's saddest in his response is the fact that he's echoing the concerns of feminists and the Black Lives Matter terrorists. He truly has no mind of his own and might as well be considered to be little more than a Liberal Feminazi script. -- Silver Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 10:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <beefff78-558e-4c86-8c99-e3577b233b94@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #367085 |
On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 11:39:17 AM UTC-6, Silver Slimer wrote: > On 2016-08-26 1:32 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 8/26/16, 10:08 AM, in article fhjajaf.jigi@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> > >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>>> On 8/26/16, 9:43 AM, in article fhjgai0ba.a3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > >>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 10:24:08 AM UTC-6, Marek Novotny wrote: > >>>>>>> On 2016-08-26, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> // snip > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> You accused me of backing pedophilia but ... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Dude, what kind of sick shit are you into now? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> One never knows... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> "I do not see any *logical* reason to disallow incest" - Snit > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> He also advocates for the right of adult men to shower with little girls. > >>>>> The guy is just sick. > >>>>> > >>>> We now have you on > >>> > >>> So no denial of the above. Just an attempt at distraction. > >>> Why do you want the right to shower with little girls? > >>> > >> > >> We now have you on two issues where even you know you cannot defend your > >> nonsense: your claim equality is somehow unfair to you... which shows your > >> sense of entitlement and privilege. You have back pedaled from this saying > >> your false accusations against me were based on something other that my > >> merely noting I back equality, but not even you can say what. Even you know > >> your claim on that is poppycock. > >> > >> You also whine when I note how repulsive I find your Big Brother bathroom > >> licenses and penis checks. YOU are the one who made it clear you want such > >> things. And why? No other reason than to feel better about yourself by > >> putting others down. And when pressed you folded on this issue, too. > >> > >> Comes down to even you know your positions are completely unsupportable. > >> Your fear mongering and sense of entitlement and privileged cannot be > >> supported by logic. Your positions are emotion and ego driven. > >> > > > > That's your answer? I see a lot of blah blah blah, but I don't see > > any explanation for your advocacy of the right of adult men to shower > > with little girls. > > I think what's saddest in his response is the fact that he's echoing the > concerns of feminists and the Black Lives Matter terrorists. He truly > has no mind of his own and might as well be considered to be little more > than a Liberal Feminazi script. He's even done it with things that make no sense to do it with (for him, an Apple advocating, IT Master). For example, when Apple came out with the MacBook Air, he wrote the following: "Apple is pushing how green this is - but it is clearly disposable... when the battery dies you can pretty much just throw it away." <https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!original/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/feSyFVVDV50/0BJSoL4jYhMJ> I pointed out to the 'IT Master' that, no, Apple didn't make an $1800 disposable computer and razzed him a bit over it. He finally admitted that he was merely parroting an article he'd read (but he didn't read the comments to it, which would have given him the clue). My prediction is he'll falsely claim I made this all up (like he usually does) but I've even pointed to the post of his where he admitted he got the 'info' from, more than once. He simply doesn't know how to be honest, even when there is direct evidence he's full of it. That's what pathological liars do, it's who they are.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 14:26 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <npq1l3$4pd$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #367098 |
On 2016-08-26 1:53 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 11:39:17 AM UTC-6, Silver Slimer wrote: >> On 2016-08-26 1:32 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 8/26/16, 10:08 AM, in article fhjajaf.jigi@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 8/26/16, 9:43 AM, in article fhjgai0ba.a3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 10:24:08 AM UTC-6, Marek Novotny wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2016-08-26, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> // snip >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You accused me of backing pedophilia but ... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Dude, what kind of sick shit are you into now? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> One never knows... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "I do not see any *logical* reason to disallow incest" - Snit >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> He also advocates for the right of adult men to shower with little girls. >>>>>>> The guy is just sick. >>>>>>> >>>>>> We now have you on >>>>> >>>>> So no denial of the above. Just an attempt at distraction. >>>>> Why do you want the right to shower with little girls? >>>>> >>>> >>>> We now have you on two issues where even you know you cannot defend your >>>> nonsense: your claim equality is somehow unfair to you... which shows your >>>> sense of entitlement and privilege. You have back pedaled from this saying >>>> your false accusations against me were based on something other that my >>>> merely noting I back equality, but not even you can say what. Even you know >>>> your claim on that is poppycock. >>>> >>>> You also whine when I note how repulsive I find your Big Brother bathroom >>>> licenses and penis checks. YOU are the one who made it clear you want such >>>> things. And why? No other reason than to feel better about yourself by >>>> putting others down. And when pressed you folded on this issue, too. >>>> >>>> Comes down to even you know your positions are completely unsupportable. >>>> Your fear mongering and sense of entitlement and privileged cannot be >>>> supported by logic. Your positions are emotion and ego driven. >>>> >>> >>> That's your answer? I see a lot of blah blah blah, but I don't see >>> any explanation for your advocacy of the right of adult men to shower >>> with little girls. >> >> I think what's saddest in his response is the fact that he's echoing the >> concerns of feminists and the Black Lives Matter terrorists. He truly >> has no mind of his own and might as well be considered to be little more >> than a Liberal Feminazi script. > > He's even done it with things that make no sense to do it with (for him, an Apple advocating, IT Master). For example, when Apple came out with the MacBook Air, he wrote the following: > > "Apple is pushing how green this is - but it is clearly disposable... when the battery dies you can pretty much just throw it away." > > <https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!original/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/feSyFVVDV50/0BJSoL4jYhMJ> > > I pointed out to the 'IT Master' that, no, Apple didn't make an $1800 disposable computer and razzed him a bit over it. He finally admitted that he was merely parroting an article he'd read (but he didn't read the comments to it, which would have given him the clue). My prediction is he'll falsely claim I made this all up (like he usually does) but I've even pointed to the post of his where he admitted he got the 'info' from, more than once. He simply doesn't know how to be honest, even when there is direct evidence he's full of it. That's what pathological liars do, it's who they are. It's just a matter of time before he runs for office in Prescott, Arizona. It seems that endless lying is a pre-requisite to run as a Democrat. -- Silver Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 12:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fbe9bde1-8055-4917-be59-e124cbc90089@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #367109 |
On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 12:26:45 PM UTC-6, Silver Slimer wrote: > On 2016-08-26 1:53 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 11:39:17 AM UTC-6, Silver Slimer wrote: > >> On 2016-08-26 1:32 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>>> On 8/26/16, 10:08 AM, in article fhjajaf.jigi@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > >>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>>>>> On 8/26/16, 9:43 AM, in article fhjgai0ba.a3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > >>>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>> On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 10:24:08 AM UTC-6, Marek Novotny wrote: > >>>>>>>>> On 2016-08-26, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> // snip > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> You accused me of backing pedophilia but ... > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Dude, what kind of sick shit are you into now? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> One never knows... > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> "I do not see any *logical* reason to disallow incest" - Snit > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> He also advocates for the right of adult men to shower with little girls. > >>>>>>> The guy is just sick. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> We now have you on > >>>>> > >>>>> So no denial of the above. Just an attempt at distraction. > >>>>> Why do you want the right to shower with little girls? > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> We now have you on two issues where even you know you cannot defend your > >>>> nonsense: your claim equality is somehow unfair to you... which shows your > >>>> sense of entitlement and privilege. You have back pedaled from this saying > >>>> your false accusations against me were based on something other that my > >>>> merely noting I back equality, but not even you can say what. Even you know > >>>> your claim on that is poppycock. > >>>> > >>>> You also whine when I note how repulsive I find your Big Brother bathroom > >>>> licenses and penis checks. YOU are the one who made it clear you want such > >>>> things. And why? No other reason than to feel better about yourself by > >>>> putting others down. And when pressed you folded on this issue, too. > >>>> > >>>> Comes down to even you know your positions are completely unsupportable. > >>>> Your fear mongering and sense of entitlement and privileged cannot be > >>>> supported by logic. Your positions are emotion and ego driven. > >>>> > >>> > >>> That's your answer? I see a lot of blah blah blah, but I don't see > >>> any explanation for your advocacy of the right of adult men to shower > >>> with little girls. > >> > >> I think what's saddest in his response is the fact that he's echoing the > >> concerns of feminists and the Black Lives Matter terrorists. He truly > >> has no mind of his own and might as well be considered to be little more > >> than a Liberal Feminazi script. > > > > He's even done it with things that make no sense to do it with (for him, an Apple advocating, IT Master). For example, when Apple came out with the MacBook Air, he wrote the following: > > > > "Apple is pushing how green this is - but it is clearly disposable... when the battery dies you can pretty much just throw it away." > > > > <https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!original/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/feSyFVVDV50/0BJSoL4jYhMJ> > > > > I pointed out to the 'IT Master' that, no, Apple didn't make an $1800 disposable computer and razzed him a bit over it. He finally admitted that he was merely parroting an article he'd read (but he didn't read the comments to it, which would have given him the clue). My prediction is he'll falsely claim I made this all up (like he usually does) but I've even pointed to the post of his where he admitted he got the 'info' from, more than once. He simply doesn't know how to be honest, even when there is direct evidence he's full of it. That's what pathological liars do, it's who they are. > > It's just a matter of time before he runs for office in Prescott, > Arizona. It seems that endless lying is a pre-requisite to run as a > Democrat. Even Prescott has its standards. I can just picture him at a state dinner: <http://sj.blacksteel.com/fetters-sj/FLSJ6.m.jpg>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 18:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hjajg03.afji@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #367079 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/26/16, 10:32 AM, in article afhjvu0a.3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/26/16, 10:08 AM, in article fhjajaf.jigi@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 8/26/16, 9:43 AM, in article fhjgai0ba.a3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 10:24:08 AM UTC-6, Marek Novotny wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2016-08-26, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> // snip >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You accused me of backing pedophilia but ... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dude, what kind of sick shit are you into now? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> One never knows... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "I do not see any *logical* reason to disallow incest" - Snit >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> He also advocates for the right of adult men to shower with little girls. >>>>>> The guy is just sick. >>>>>> >>>>> We now have you on >>>> >>>> So no denial of the above. Just an attempt at distraction. >>>> Why do you want the right to shower with little girls? >>>> >>> >>> We now have you on two issues where even you know you cannot defend your >>> nonsense: your claim equality is somehow unfair to you... which shows your >>> sense of entitlement and privilege. You have back pedaled from this saying >>> your false accusations against me were based on something other that my >>> merely noting I back equality, but not even you can say what. Even you know >>> your claim on that is poppycock. >>> >>> You also whine when I note how repulsive I find your Big Brother bathroom >>> licenses and penis checks. YOU are the one who made it clear you want such >>> things. And why? No other reason than to feel better about yourself by >>> putting others down. And when pressed you folded on this issue, too. >>> >>> Comes down to even you know your positions are completely unsupportable. >>> Your fear mongering and sense of entitlement and privileged cannot be >>> supported by logic. Your positions are emotion and ego driven. >>> >> >> That's your answer? I see a lot of blah blah blah, but I don't see >> any explanation for your advocacy of the right of adult men to shower >> with little girls. >> > > I gave no such advocacy. You ARE making that up. In other words, you are > lying. > So now disagree with the LGBT agenda and the Obama homeless shelter changes that allow for any man to pose as a woman and share sleeping/ bathroom/shower facilities with women and children?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 19:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhjbadfieaf0.afj@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #367104 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/26/16, 11:06 AM, in article hjajg03.afji@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >>>>> Comes down to even you know your positions are completely unsupportable. >>>>> Your fear mongering and sense of entitlement and privileged cannot be >>>>> supported by logic. Your positions are emotion and ego driven. >>>>> >>>> >>>> That's your answer? I see a lot of blah blah blah, but I don't see >>>> any explanation for your advocacy of the right of adult men to shower >>>> with little girls. >>>> >>> >>> I gave no such advocacy. You ARE making that up. In other words, you are >>> lying. >>> >> >> So now disagree with the LGBT agenda and the Obama homeless shelter >> changes that allow for any man to pose as a woman and share sleeping/ >> bathroom/shower facilities with women and children? > > Support? Oh, you have none. > Already posted. Google transgender homeless shelter rule changes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 13:22 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <npptsd$mug$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #367052 |
On 2016-08-26 12:43 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 10:24:08 AM UTC-6, Marek Novotny wrote: >>> On 2016-08-26, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> >>> // snip >>> >>>> You accused me of backing pedophilia but ... >>> >>> Dude, what kind of sick shit are you into now? >> >> One never knows... >> >> "I do not see any *logical* reason to disallow incest" - Snit >> > > He also advocates for the right of adult men to shower with little girls. > The guy is just sick. +1. I'm sure he's already visited his local Target's gender-neutral restroom. -- Silver Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 10:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E5C66A.7A3FE%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #367045 |
On 8/26/16, 9:24 AM, in article -sednQmXyra88F3KnZ2dnUU7-bGdnZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny" <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: > On 2016-08-26, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > > // snip > >> You accused me of backing pedophilia but ... > > Dude, what kind of sick shit are you into now? I am into what honesty and integrity... but you and your herd are offended by that! So are many of the others who troll COLA. It is interesting how much those of you who troll are willing to lie about me because you cannot find actual significant flaws with my views. Not that I have no flaws... I do... but I openly admit to them and refuse to sink to your level. Funny how it drives you crazy. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 17:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ahfjdaof.a4@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #367066 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/26/16, 9:24 AM, in article > -sednQmXyra88F3KnZ2dnUU7-bGdnZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny" > <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: > >> On 2016-08-26, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >> // snip >> >>> You accused me of backing pedophilia but ... >> >> Dude, what kind of sick shit are you into now? > > I am into what honesty and integrity... but you and your herd are offended > by that! So are many of the others who troll COLA. > > It is interesting how much those of you who troll are willing to lie about > me because you cannot find actual significant flaws with my views. Do you find no flaw with you idea that adult men should have the right to shower with little girls? > Not that > I have no flaws... I do... but I openly admit to them and refuse to sink to > your level. > You refuse even to address the reasons for your advocacy for the right of adult men to shower with little girls. No denial. No justification. Just attempts at distraction.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 18:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hjgavada.dji@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #367077 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/26/16, 10:29 AM, in article ahfjdaof.a4@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/26/16, 9:24 AM, in article >>> -sednQmXyra88F3KnZ2dnUU7-bGdnZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny" >>> <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2016-08-26, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> // snip >>>> >>>>> You accused me of backing pedophilia but ... >>>> >>>> Dude, what kind of sick shit are you into now? >>> >>> I am into what honesty and integrity... but you and your herd are offended >>> by that! So are many of the others who troll COLA. >>> >>> It is interesting how much those of you who troll are willing to lie about >>> me because you cannot find actual significant flaws with my views. >> >> Do you find no flaw with you idea that adult men should have the right >> to shower with little girls? > > No penis check is needed for that. It won't be allowed. The man who has already gained entry by pretending to be a woman will have access to the shower area. Nothing requires him to "display his parts" when he goes in. Are you OK with this? No "penis check" at the homeless shelter?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 19:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhvnmdkfi9.jfu7@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #367105 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/26/16, 11:12 AM, in article hjgavada.dji@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/26/16, 10:29 AM, in article ahfjdaof.a4@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 8/26/16, 9:24 AM, in article >>>>> -sednQmXyra88F3KnZ2dnUU7-bGdnZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny" >>>>> <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2016-08-26, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> // snip >>>>>> >>>>>>> You accused me of backing pedophilia but ... >>>>>> >>>>>> Dude, what kind of sick shit are you into now? >>>>> >>>>> I am into what honesty and integrity... but you and your herd are offended >>>>> by that! So are many of the others who troll COLA. >>>>> >>>>> It is interesting how much those of you who troll are willing to lie about >>>>> me because you cannot find actual significant flaws with my views. >>>> >>>> Do you find no flaw with you idea that adult men should have the right >>>> to shower with little girls? >>> >>> No penis check is needed for that. >> >> It won't be allowed. > > You have already said people should be waiting outside of bathrooms to make > guesses as to people's genitalia so they can call the police and get ID > checks and, if needed, penis checks. > They won't be allowed to do that at the homeless shelters. The right "gender identity" will get you in. > Are you saying this will not be allowed? If not why not? > That's right. They won't be allowed. As to why, LGBT agenda whining. >> The man who has already gained entry by pretending >> to be a woman > > Evidence of pretending? > What do you mean? He says "I'm a woman" or "I identify as a woman" and he's in. >> will have access to the shower area. Nothing requires >> him to "display his parts" when he goes in. > > So this person was not undressed as they showered? > Nothing says you have to take off clothes in the shower. >> Are you OK with this? >> No "penis check" at the homeless shelter? > > You are moving goal posts from your Big Bother penis checks for bathrooms to > showers. > Showers are part of this whole LGBT agenda. http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/05/10/oregon-schools-let-students-use-whichever-locker-room-sports-team-matches-their-gender <quote> Oregon public schools will be required to let students use whichever bathroom and locker room they feel matches their gender identity, according to new state guidelines. </quote> http://time.com/4324687/even-in-liberal-communities-transgender-bathroom-laws-worry-parents/ <quote> Several times a week, the pool is reserved for the Swim Team program, which, the Center says, “provides swim team training and competition for youths 6 – 18 years.” According to one mother of a swim team member, Ellen Vandevort, her daughter was just leaving the locker room in late April when a person who was bald, with heavy stubble and a towel at waist level, stepped out of the shower. Her daughter and the younger girls on the team, says Vandevort, grew alarmed and reported it to the swim coach who suggested that the girls change in the family shower room. </quote> > Which shows you know your past comments are unsupportable. > https://www.google.com/#q=transgender+homeless+shelter+rule+changes
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 9 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 … 20 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web