Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #341469 > unrolled thread
| Started by | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-01-23 15:40 -0500 |
| Last post | 2016-01-27 20:46 -0500 |
| Articles | 18 on this page of 98 — 20 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-23 15:40 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-23 16:23 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-23 21:37 +0000
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-23 16:49 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-23 22:35 +0000
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-23 20:56 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-23 20:25 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-01-24 01:47 +0000
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-01-24 03:30 +0100
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-24 10:17 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-01-24 10:56 -0700
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 17:14 -0800
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-01-27 02:21 +0100
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 21:57 -0800
Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-27 05:49 -0500
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-27 07:25 -0600
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-27 20:35 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 22:26 -0800
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-28 05:43 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-28 07:38 -0600
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-01-28 09:26 -0600
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-29 12:47 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-29 18:18 +0000
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-29 18:38 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-29 23:52 +0000
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-30 11:55 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 23:52 -0800
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-28 20:27 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-02-09 22:02 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-01-28 09:16 -0600
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-01-28 10:46 -0500
Re: Anti-Linux trolls: still spectacularly bad fuckwits William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-01-28 23:08 +0000
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-01-27 13:26 -0700
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Penny Tration <fedora_the_explora@asia.com> - 2016-01-28 02:13 +0000
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-01-28 09:10 -0600
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-01-28 10:40 -0500
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-28 09:49 -0600
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-03-22 12:13 -0700
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Penny Tration <fedora_the_explora@asia.com> - 2016-01-28 17:25 +0000
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-01-28 13:28 -0600
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-28 14:22 -0600
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad "1 eyed chicken" <chicken@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 22:31 +0100
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-01-28 23:07 +0000
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-28 20:23 -0500
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-29 06:46 -0600
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-29 13:16 -0500
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-28 20:21 -0500
Linux Liars On Patrol. Penny Tration <fedora_the_explora@asia.com> - 2016-01-29 20:07 +0000
Re: Linux Liars On Patrol. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-01-29 16:55 -0600
Re: Linux Liars On Patrol. Penny Tration <fedora_the_explora@asia.com> - 2016-01-29 23:13 +0000
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-01-28 12:31 -0700
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-01-28 14:49 -0500
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-01-28 21:09 +0100
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-28 14:17 -0600
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-03-22 12:13 -0700
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-01-28 20:01 -0500
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-01-29 03:07 +0100
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-29 12:22 +0000
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-01-29 08:35 -0500
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-29 13:05 -0500
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-01-29 19:27 +0100
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-29 20:28 -0500
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 02:35 +0000
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad mike antipasto <pizzadude@mycomputerrox.org> - 2016-01-29 21:42 -0500
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-30 03:08 +0000
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-01-30 05:50 +0100
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-30 00:13 -0500
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-01-30 06:18 +0100
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-30 00:19 -0500
Troll -- nasty, thick-headed know-nothings ranting about Linux Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-30 08:12 -0500
Re: Troll -- nasty, thick-headed know-nothings ranting about Linux chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-01 07:52 -0600
Advantage: Linux chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-01 10:35 -0600
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-01 07:24 -0600
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-30 00:07 -0500
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-29 18:52 +0000
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-01-30 08:54 -0500
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-28 20:31 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-28 20:44 -0500
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-01-29 03:02 +0100
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-29 07:46 -0600
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-28 21:07 -0500
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-29 07:00 -0600
Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-02-09 22:02 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-01-27 07:47 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-01-27 13:25 -0700
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad kubuntuking@gmail.com - 2016-01-27 08:18 -0800
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-01-27 13:06 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-26 16:03 +0000
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-26 19:52 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-27 00:56 +0000
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-27 20:49 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-01-27 13:28 -0700
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-01-24 10:53 -0700
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad kubuntuking@gmail.com - 2016-01-27 08:15 -0800
Troll craphead: still spectacularly bad (and incompetent) Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-27 12:48 -0500
Re: Troll craphead: still spectacularly bad (and incompetent) and proud of it! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-27 12:35 -0600
Re: Troll craphead: still spectacularly bad (and incompetent) and proud of it! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-27 20:37 -0500
Re: Linux crapware: still spectacularly bad DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-27 20:46 -0500
Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-28 21:07 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad |
| Message-ID | <n8ehbs$7sf$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #342026 |
On 1/28/2016 8:31 PM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > What a farrago! Creepy, if you were a prissy Brit instead of a prissy American you'd use the word 'ghastly' every day.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-29 07:00 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad |
| Message-ID | <pvnmab19a2u9n0n0fueaji594t7pr8t8uh@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #342026 |
Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >> Like Windows 8-10? > >You mean any Windows, don't you? Like how Microsoft products like Office >keep their "modern" look even when you change the desktop to the "Classic" >theme? How Windows changes its look and feel almost from version to >version? How keystrokes, menu entries, "charms", and hot spots come and go, >apparently at the whim of either a marketer or some grunt programmer? Why don't they just design it the best way, and then leave it alone? Don't me there is no best way that everyone can agree on! >And have you ever seen the user-interface and 10-pounds-of-bologna in a >2-pound sack that is Visual Studio? What a farrago! "Minor annoyances at most", according to "Hadron". "When it comes to real work analysis, no one cares", he said. Yet the mewling hypocrite constantly attacked GNU/Linux for being inconsistent, even joining forces with the thing to advocate a single "best UI". -- "No one cares about ribbons etc when it comes to real work and data analysis. Most of your gripes are minor annoyances at most." - Hadron "inconsistency is OK when Microsoft does it" Quark
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-09 22:02 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Troll lies: still spectacularly bad |
| Message-ID | <n9e937$td7$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #342026 |
On 1/28/2016 8:31 PM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > Windows Microsoft Office > Windows > Visual Studio "Marti, we don't care about Microsoft and its products here." Chris "Little Beaver" Ahlstrom, Oct 2013
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-27 07:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n8ae3k$js5$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #341836 |
On 2016-01-26 8:21 PM, Melzzzzz wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 17:14:01 -0800 (PST) > Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sunday, January 24, 2016 at 11:30:04 AM UTC+9, Melzzzzz wrote: >>> On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 20:25:41 -0500 >>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 1/23/2016 4:37 PM, owl wrote: >>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>> I'm now using a new SSD and new nVidia GTX card >>>>>> >>>>>> installed Win7 with no issues whatsoever >>>>>> >>>>>> live-booted Fedora 23 - ran OK from live CD >>>>>> did hard drive install, which said successful >>>>>> rebooted >>>>>> logged in >>>>>> started loading for a few seconds then total system lock >>>>>> >>>>>> hard-boot, retry, same thing >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You fucked something up. Try again or get somebody who knows >>>>> what they're doing to help you. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> With Fedora I used separate root (15GB), home (20GB), and swap >>>> (5GB) partitions. The install went cleanly and said it was >>>> successful. What could I have screwed up? >>>> >>>> My subsequent Manjaro install using the same partitions went fine. >>>> It boots normally. On that one, the LiveCD boot has a 'use >>>> non-free drivers' option, which it probably installs for you. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Aha, fedora probably loads nouveau which doesnt work for maxwell >>> cards. >> >> Don't use new hardware for Linux, takes time till the unpaid >> hobbyists figure out and reverse engineer the Windoze drivers and >> even more time till the Linux Distro retailers steal it from them... >> Sadly, the hardware manufactures are in bed with M$ only... > > That is why I'll switch to AMD as they are open sourcing their > GPU hardware... That's great, except that AMD will probably not even exist in a few years anymore. Their stock is close to becoming a penny stock and they don't seem to be developing anything that is exciting the masses anymore. I am still rooting for them but I'm not too confident. -- Slimer EFF & OpenMedia member / IFAW, Conservative Party of Canada, Mozilla & PETA supporter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-27 13:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <n8b8vf$tgp$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #341836 |
On 01/26/16 18:21, Melzzzzz wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 17:14:01 -0800 (PST) > Takuya Saitoh<taka0038@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sunday, January 24, 2016 at 11:30:04 AM UTC+9, Melzzzzz wrote: >>> On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 20:25:41 -0500 >>> DFS<nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 1/23/2016 4:37 PM, owl wrote: >>>>> DFS<nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>> I'm now using a new SSD and new nVidia GTX card >>>>>> >>>>>> installed Win7 with no issues whatsoever >>>>>> >>>>>> live-booted Fedora 23 - ran OK from live CD >>>>>> did hard drive install, which said successful >>>>>> rebooted >>>>>> logged in >>>>>> started loading for a few seconds then total system lock >>>>>> >>>>>> hard-boot, retry, same thing >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You fucked something up. Try again or get somebody who knows >>>>> what they're doing to help you. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> With Fedora I used separate root (15GB), home (20GB), and swap >>>> (5GB) partitions. The install went cleanly and said it was >>>> successful. What could I have screwed up? >>>> >>>> My subsequent Manjaro install using the same partitions went fine. >>>> It boots normally. On that one, the LiveCD boot has a 'use >>>> non-free drivers' option, which it probably installs for you. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Aha, fedora probably loads nouveau which doesnt work for maxwell >>> cards. >> >> Don't use new hardware for Linux, takes time till the unpaid >> hobbyists figure out and reverse engineer the Windoze drivers and >> even more time till the Linux Distro retailers steal it from them... >> Sadly, the hardware manufactures are in bed with M$ only... > > That is why I'll switch to AMD as they are open sourcing their > GPU hardware... > I downloaded their latest AMD APIs SDK. Seems pretty decent for windows. I believe they are also supporting linux now.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kubuntuking@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-27 08:18 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5757f399-2421-4d84-8c5c-4601eb4f44f4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #341833 |
On Wednesday, January 27, 2016 at 2:14:05 AM UTC+1, Takuya Saitoh wrote: > On Sunday, January 24, 2016 at 11:30:04 AM UTC+9, Melzzzzz wrote: > > On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 20:25:41 -0500 > > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > > > > > On 1/23/2016 4:37 PM, owl wrote: > > > > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > > > >> I'm now using a new SSD and new nVidia GTX card > > > >> > > > >> installed Win7 with no issues whatsoever > > > >> > > > >> live-booted Fedora 23 - ran OK from live CD > > > >> did hard drive install, which said successful > > > >> rebooted > > > >> logged in > > > >> started loading for a few seconds then total system lock > > > >> > > > >> hard-boot, retry, same thing > > > >> > > > > > > > > You fucked something up. Try again or get somebody who knows > > > > what they're doing to help you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With Fedora I used separate root (15GB), home (20GB), and swap (5GB) > > > partitions. The install went cleanly and said it was successful. > > > What could I have screwed up? > > > > > > My subsequent Manjaro install using the same partitions went fine. > > > It boots normally. On that one, the LiveCD boot has a 'use non-free > > > drivers' option, which it probably installs for you. > > > > > > > > > > Aha, fedora probably loads nouveau which doesnt work for maxwell cards. > > Don't use new hardware for Linux, takes time till the unpaid hobbyists figure out and reverse engineer the Windoze drivers and even more time till the Linux Distro retailers steal it from them... LOLZERS! They must give to the rocking cummunity! threadz 50x faster than MSmalware need the power of OPEN SORES! Creepee is a linux developer - maybe he can backport closed source CRAPZ to kubuntu?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-27 13:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n8b0q4$li3$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #341890 |
<kubuntuking@gmail.com> wrote in message news:5757f399-2421-4d84-8c5c-4601eb4f44f4@googlegroups.com... > On Wednesday, January 27, 2016 at 2:14:05 AM UTC+1, Takuya Saitoh wrote: > > LOLZERS! They must give to the rocking cummunity! > threadz 50x faster than MSmalware need the power of > OPEN SORES! Creepee is a linux developer - maybe > he can backport closed source CRAPZ to kubuntu? <giggle> Oh kubuntu king, you're such a genius! -- Yep, Windows bitrot is there, no matter how hard you fight it. Many of the young people I know (my nephews and their friends) basically get around it by reinstalling Windows about every month. wRonG - The idiot gene runs strong in his family where people reinstall Windows every month. Message-ID: <l7e8ft$lav$2@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-26 16:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhdjjcoaef.j@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #341496 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 1/23/2016 4:37 PM, owl wrote: >> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>> I'm now using a new SSD and new nVidia GTX card >>> >>> installed Win7 with no issues whatsoever >>> >>> live-booted Fedora 23 - ran OK from live CD >>> did hard drive install, which said successful >>> rebooted >>> logged in >>> started loading for a few seconds then total system lock >>> >>> hard-boot, retry, same thing >>> >> >> You fucked something up. Try again or get somebody who knows >> what they're doing to help you. > > > > > With Fedora I used separate root (15GB), home (20GB), and swap (5GB) > partitions. The install went cleanly and said it was successful. What > could I have screwed up? > Who knows what you did. > My subsequent Manjaro install using the same partitions went fine. It > boots normally. Wait, isn't Manjaro also "linux crapware"? > On that one, the LiveCD boot has a 'use non-free > drivers' option, which it probably installs for you. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-26 19:52 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n89475$58b$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #341756 |
On 1/26/2016 11:03 AM, owl wrote: > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >> On 1/23/2016 4:37 PM, owl wrote: >>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>> I'm now using a new SSD and new nVidia GTX card >>>> >>>> installed Win7 with no issues whatsoever >>>> >>>> live-booted Fedora 23 - ran OK from live CD >>>> did hard drive install, which said successful >>>> rebooted >>>> logged in >>>> started loading for a few seconds then total system lock >>>> >>>> hard-boot, retry, same thing >>>> >>> >>> You fucked something up. Try again or get somebody who knows >>> what they're doing to help you. >> >> >> >> >> With Fedora I used separate root (15GB), home (20GB), and swap (5GB) >> partitions. The install went cleanly and said it was successful. What >> could I have screwed up? >> > > Who knows what you did. I did a "successful" Fedora 23 install. They didn't make any promises about it booting up... my bad. >> My subsequent Manjaro install using the same partitions went fine. It >> boots normally. > > > Wait, isn't Manjaro also "linux crapware"? Yes. It's spectacularly ugly on first install (15.12 w/ xfce), but at least it boots. Last time I ran it hibernate wouldn't work at all. >> On that one, the LiveCD boot has a 'use non-free >> drivers' option, which it probably installs for you. I'm sensing a clue.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-27 00:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fdaj93raf.ki@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #341820 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 1/26/2016 11:03 AM, owl wrote: >> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>> On 1/23/2016 4:37 PM, owl wrote: >>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>> I'm now using a new SSD and new nVidia GTX card >>>>> >>>>> installed Win7 with no issues whatsoever >>>>> >>>>> live-booted Fedora 23 - ran OK from live CD >>>>> did hard drive install, which said successful >>>>> rebooted >>>>> logged in >>>>> started loading for a few seconds then total system lock >>>>> >>>>> hard-boot, retry, same thing >>>>> >>>> >>>> You fucked something up. Try again or get somebody who knows >>>> what they're doing to help you. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> With Fedora I used separate root (15GB), home (20GB), and swap (5GB) >>> partitions. The install went cleanly and said it was successful. What >>> could I have screwed up? >>> >> >> Who knows what you did. > > > I did a "successful" Fedora 23 install. They didn't make any promises > about it booting up... my bad. > > You said you logged in. That means it booted. > > >>> My subsequent Manjaro install using the same partitions went fine. It >>> boots normally. >> >> >> Wait, isn't Manjaro also "linux crapware"? > > Yes. It's spectacularly ugly on first install (15.12 w/ xfce), but at > least it boots. Fedora booted. > Last time I ran it hibernate wouldn't work at all. > > > >>> On that one, the LiveCD boot has a 'use non-free >>> drivers' option, which it probably installs for you. > > I'm sensing a clue. > Maybe you'll find one then.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-27 20:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n8bruo$4t4$9@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #341826 |
On 1/26/2016 7:56 PM, owl wrote: > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >> On 1/26/2016 11:03 AM, owl wrote: >>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>> On 1/23/2016 4:37 PM, owl wrote: >>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>> I'm now using a new SSD and new nVidia GTX card >>>>>> >>>>>> installed Win7 with no issues whatsoever >>>>>> >>>>>> live-booted Fedora 23 - ran OK from live CD >>>>>> did hard drive install, which said successful >>>>>> rebooted >>>>>> logged in >>>>>> started loading for a few seconds then total system lock >>>>>> >>>>>> hard-boot, retry, same thing >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You fucked something up. Try again or get somebody who knows >>>>> what they're doing to help you. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> With Fedora I used separate root (15GB), home (20GB), and swap (5GB) >>>> partitions. The install went cleanly and said it was successful. What >>>> could I have screwed up? >>>> >>> >>> Who knows what you did. >> >> >> I did a "successful" Fedora 23 install. They didn't make any promises >> about it booting up... my bad. >> >> > > You said you logged in. That means it booted. > >> >> >>>> My subsequent Manjaro install using the same partitions went fine. It >>>> boots normally. >>> >>> >>> Wait, isn't Manjaro also "linux crapware"? >> >> Yes. It's spectacularly ugly on first install (15.12 w/ xfce), but at >> least it boots. > > > Fedora booted. > >> Last time I ran it hibernate wouldn't work at all. >> >> >> >>>> On that one, the LiveCD boot has a 'use non-free >>>> drivers' option, which it probably installs for you. >> >> I'm sensing a clue. >> > > Maybe you'll find one then. creep
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-27 13:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <n8b94f$tgp$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #341820 |
On 01/26/16 17:52, DFS wrote: > On 1/26/2016 11:03 AM, owl wrote: >> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>> On 1/23/2016 4:37 PM, owl wrote: >>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>> I'm now using a new SSD and new nVidia GTX card >>>>> >>>>> installed Win7 with no issues whatsoever >>>>> >>>>> live-booted Fedora 23 - ran OK from live CD >>>>> did hard drive install, which said successful >>>>> rebooted >>>>> logged in >>>>> started loading for a few seconds then total system lock >>>>> >>>>> hard-boot, retry, same thing >>>>> >>>> >>>> You fucked something up. Try again or get somebody who knows >>>> what they're doing to help you. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> With Fedora I used separate root (15GB), home (20GB), and swap (5GB) >>> partitions. The install went cleanly and said it was successful. What >>> could I have screwed up? >>> >> >> Who knows what you did. > > > I did a "successful" Fedora 23 install. They didn't make any promises > about it booting up... my bad. > > LOL!!! That's happened to me before with an earlier Fedora linux distro. Wouldn't boot up at all... just sat there like Dumb Willie. > > >>> My subsequent Manjaro install using the same partitions went fine. It >>> boots normally. >> >> >> Wait, isn't Manjaro also "linux crapware"? > > Yes. It's spectacularly ugly on first install (15.12 w/ xfce), but at > least it boots. Last time I ran it hibernate wouldn't work at all. > > > >>> On that one, the LiveCD boot has a 'use non-free >>> drivers' option, which it probably installs for you. > > I'm sensing a clue. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-24 10:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <n832tp$a7b$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #341469 |
On 01/23/16 13:40, DFS wrote: > I'm now using a new SSD and new nVidia GTX card > > installed Win7 with no issues whatsoever > > live-booted Fedora 23 - ran OK from live CD > did hard drive install, which said successful > rebooted > logged in > started loading for a few seconds then total system lock > > hard-boot, retry, same thing > > > MS is doomed. > Linux won/is winning/will win. LOL!!! That's the linux hobbyware for you, developed by narcissistic hobbyists.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kubuntuking@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-27 08:15 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <b1e08e56-ba0b-4b69-a789-644f4dfadfbb@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #341469 |
On Saturday, January 23, 2016 at 9:40:23 PM UTC+1, DFS wrote: > I'm now using a new SSD and new nVidia GTX card > > installed Win7 with no issues whatsoever > > live-booted Fedora 23 - ran OK from live CD > did hard drive install, which said successful > rebooted > logged in > started loading for a few seconds then total system lock > > hard-boot, retry, same thing > hard boots or Hadron imbecile? Ask Creepee who runs LeeNax at work for his pee pee purchases! Kubuntu giveZ you rocking more more Linux POWER threadz!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-27 12:48 -0500 |
| Subject | Troll craphead: still spectacularly bad (and incompetent) |
| Message-ID | <n8avtb$g3k$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #341889 |
kubuntuking@gmail.com wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > On Saturday, January 23, 2016 at 9:40:23 PM UTC+1, DFS wrote: >> >> <"I am incompetent"> > > <"I am an imbecile"> -- You will outgrow your usefulness.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-27 12:35 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Troll craphead: still spectacularly bad (and incompetent) and proud of it! |
| Message-ID | <6c3iab1rjdeq654eiaulcgql8af0f00p5a@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #341901 |
Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >kubuntuking@gmail.com wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> On Saturday, January 23, 2016 at 9:40:23 PM UTC+1, DFS wrote: >>> >>> <"I am incompetent"> >> >> <"I am an imbecile"> -- 'What should be noted is (Redhat's) contributions are small considering how much money they make freeloading off the "community" that did nearly all the development.' - DumFSck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-27 20:37 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Troll craphead: still spectacularly bad (and incompetent) and proud of it! |
| Message-ID | <n8br81$33e$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #341904 |
On 1/27/2016 1:35 PM, shitv wrote: > 'What should be noted is (Redhat's) contributions are small > considering how much money they make freeloading off the "community" > that did nearly all the development.' - DumFSck Not only do they hugely freeload, the top 5 Red Hat "executives" take home millions each year.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-27 20:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n8broo$4t4$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #341901 |
On 1/27/2016 12:48 PM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >> On Saturday, January 23, 2016 at 9:40:23 PM UTC+1, DFS wrote: >>> >>> <"I am incompetent"> Don't take it so hard, Creepy. It's not like I ragged on your favorite bit of hobbyware: Fluxbox. Give us a screenshot of your desktop. We need a laugh.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web