Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #286466 > unrolled thread

yep, it's an iGay

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  yep, it's an iGay owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 17:07 +0000
    Re: yep, it's an iGay DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 13:10 -0400
      Re: yep, it's an iGay Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 12:17 -0700
        Re: yep, it's an iGay Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 12:24 -0700
          Re: yep, it's an iGay DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 22:23 -0400
            Re: yep, it's an iGay Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 19:47 -0700
              Re: yep, it's an iGay -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-03-30 09:28 -0700
                Re: yep, it's an iGay "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-30 12:41 -0400
                  Re: yep, it's an iGay -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-03-30 11:41 -0700
                Re: yep, it's an iGay Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 10:15 -0700
                  Re: yep, it's an iGay -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-03-30 11:35 -0700
                    Re: yep, it's an iGay "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-30 15:39 -0400
                    Re: yep, it's an iGay Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 12:43 -0700
                      Re: yep, it's an iGay -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-03-30 17:18 -0700
                        Re: yep, it's an iGay Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 17:35 -0700
                          Re: yep, it's an iGay -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-03-30 19:11 -0700
                            Re: yep, it's an iGay Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 20:13 -0700
                              Re: yep, it's an iGay -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-03-31 03:47 -0700
                                Re: yep, it's an iGay Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 08:39 -0700
                                  Re: yep, it's an iGay -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-03-31 09:22 -0700
                                    Re: yep, it's an iGay Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 10:10 -0700
                                      Re: yep, it's an iGay -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-02 03:18 -0700
                                        Re: yep, it's an iGay Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 08:10 -0700
        Re: yep, it's an iGay Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 13:56 -0700
      Re: yep, it's an iGay Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 13:57 -0700
    Re: yep, it's an iGay Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-03-30 09:33 +0100
    Re: yep, it's an iGay Marti van Lin <ml2mst@nospam.indvalid> - 2015-03-31 01:39 +0200
      Re: yep, it's an iGay owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-31 00:09 +0000
        Re: yep, it's an iGay DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 09:42 -0400
        Re: yep, it's an iGay Marti van Lin <ml2mst@nospam.indvalid> - 2015-04-01 01:51 +0200
          Re: yep, it's an iGay owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-01 00:14 +0000
          Re: yep, it's an iGay Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2015-04-01 11:50 +0000
            Re: yep, it's an iGay DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 08:31 -0400
              Re: yep, it's an iGay -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-01 06:09 -0700
            Re: yep, it's an iGay Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-01 17:14 +0200
              Re: yep, it's an iGay GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 12:18 -0600
              Re: yep, it's an iGay owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-01 18:59 +0000
                Re: yep, it's an iGay "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-01 15:05 -0400
                  Re: yep, it's an iGay owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-01 20:49 +0000
                    Re: yep, it's an iGay Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-01 22:58 +0200
                      Re: yep, it's an iGay owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-01 21:57 +0000
                        Re: yep, it's an iGay Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-02 00:15 +0200
                          Re: yep, it's an iGay owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-01 23:10 +0000
                            Re: yep, it's an iGay Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-02 01:40 +0200
                              Re: yep, it's an iGay owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-02 00:07 +0000
                                Re: yep, it's an iGay Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 20:56 -0400
                                  Re: yep, it's an iGay GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 17:15 -0600
                                    Re: yep, it's an iGay Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 01:23 +0200
                                      Re: yep, it's an iGay GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 19:08 -0600
                                    Re: yep, it's an iGay Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 21:55 -0400
                                      Re: yep, it's an iGay GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:46 -0600
                                        Re: yep, it's an iGay Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-03 15:52 -0400
                                          Re: yep, it's an iGay GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-04 16:32 -0600
                                            Re: yep, it's an iGay Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-05 01:09 +0200
                                              Re: yep, it's an iGay GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-05 12:38 -0600
                                            Re: yep, it's an iGay Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-05 11:29 -0400
                                              Re: yep, it's an iGay GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-05 12:33 -0600
                                        Re: yep, it's an iGay -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-04 18:06 -0700
                                          Re: yep, it's an iGay GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-05 12:31 -0600
                          Re: yep, it's an iGay DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 23:15 -0400
                            Re: yep, it's an iGay Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 23:48 -0400
            Re: yep, it's an iGay GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 12:18 -0600
      Re: yep, it's an iGay Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-30 20:19 -0400
        Re: yep, it's an iGay jeremywalmartprescottaz@gmail.com - 2015-03-30 17:42 -0700
    Re: yep, it's an iGay awoolmeyer@gmail.com - 2015-03-31 08:47 -0700

Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4  Next page →

#287211

On Tuesday, March 31, 2015 at 10:22:39 AM UTC-6, -hh wrote:
> Steve Carroll wrote:
> > -hh wrote:
> > > 
> > > Its an okay shot - can't really see all that much of the
> > > critter because they're just peeking out of their hidey-hold. 
> > 
> > While the background colors aren't as vivid as some of the 
> > others in your gallery (due to the use of the light's focus
> > - say, compared to IMG_0792), that's actually the thing I like
> > about it.
> 
> Understood/agreed;that highlighting is what I like about it too.
> 
> 
> > > Biologically...rare variant..."fingerprint" pattern:
> > > 
> > > <http://www.huntzinger.com/photo/2013/brac/fingerprintFT-2669.jpg>
> > > ...
> > 
> > I really like that shot.
> 
> It turned out pretty well, considering how I was "standing on 
> my head" in 3D space to get the required composition angle.
> 
>  
> > > Similarly, they don't care much for sunlight...
> > > 
> > > <http://www.huntzinger.com/photo/2013/brac/flamingoT-herd_3064-RAW.jpg>
> > 
> > Sorta looks like a breakfast cereal turning bad.
> 
> Yes, because the purple sea fan they all were on had detatched
> and was dying.
>  
>  
> > Dude, your gallery is killer... these stuck out for me:
> > 
> > IMG_0792, IMG_1799, IMG_1009, IMG_9983, IMG_9813
> > 
> > Before I got to the end I was thinking... 'I wonder if
> > he ever does video'... and then I saw the them (they were
> > *really* slow to load, though). Sound propagates pretty
> > well through water but the video camera still needs
> > decent capability. What vid-cam are you using for that?
> 
> Most were taken with a housed Canon 7D, which is a dSLR 
> with (somewhat limitations) 1080p video capability.

That's actually decent audio.

> The exception to the above is IMG_1009, which used a 
> compact JVC HD videocam ... I forget the exact model; its 
> also 1080p and was sold just before the HERO cams came out.
> As can be seen from the image quality, it doesn't take great
> stills, but that eel is the only only one of that particular 
> species I'd ever seen, and it was tucked into a tiny little 
> crevice which I couldn't use the 7D (with WA lens) onto.  
> 
> Fortunately, the diving had been good enough that I had
> previously decided to lug along both of my UW cameras on 
> dives, so as to have both a WA and a Macro setup, even
> though there was the compromise in image quality (as seen)
> on whichever focal length the JVC happened to be set up for 
> for that particular dive.
> 
> Even though I've not used the JVC for much, it has paid
> for itself well enough .. for eample, if you found the 
> Tahiti video, that was all done on the JVC.

I've heard they make some nice equipment in the compact arena (like a lot of their stuff). Their little Quadproof looks cool but I guess it isn't going very deep.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#287376

Steve Carroll wrote:
> -hh wrote:
> > Steve Carroll wrote:
> > > 
> > > Before I got to the end I was thinking... 'I wonder if
> > > he ever does video'... and then I saw the them (they were
> > > *really* slow to load, though). Sound propagates pretty
> > > well through water but the video camera still needs
> > > decent capability. What vid-cam are you using for that?
> > 
> > Most were taken with a housed Canon 7D, which is a dSLR 
> > with (somewhat limitations) 1080p video capability.
> 
> That's actually decent audio.

It does pick up quite a bit, including various undesired noises
from the housing system (squeaks & clunks from moving strobe
arms, etc).  And of course, since its also inside that housing, 
the UW stuff doesn't have wind noise (whereas topside stuff 
does - contrast with the Brac stills montage).   

Overall, my biggest complaint with the 7D for video is that
it lacks dynamic real time autofocus - once you set up for a
shot, that's it, so you had better hope that the lens & focal
length gives you adequate DOF to make the video appear ok.
But then again, I wasn't originally buying it for video but for
stills ... had I wanted a "video first" system, I probably could 
have saved a few $K five years ago ... although not anymore
today, because the temptation now would be to 'future proof'
with a 4K system.


> > The exception to the above is IMG_1009, which used a 
> > compact JVC HD videocam ... I forget the exact model; its 
> > also 1080p and was sold just before the HERO cams came out.
> > As can be seen from the image quality, it doesn't take great
> > stills, but that eel is the only only one of that particular 
> > species I'd ever seen, and it was tucked into a tiny little 
> > crevice which I couldn't use the 7D (with WA lens) onto.  
> > 
> > Fortunately, the diving had been good enough that I had
> > previously decided to lug along both of my UW cameras on 
> > dives, so as to have both a WA and a Macro setup, even
> > though there was the compromise in image quality (as seen)
> > on whichever focal length the JVC happened to be set up for 
> > for that particular dive.
> > 
> > Even though I've not used the JVC for much, it has paid
> > for itself well enough .. for eample, if you found the 
> > Tahiti video, that was all done on the JVC.
> 
> I've heard they make some nice equipment in the compact arena
> (like a lot of their stuff). Their little Quadproof looks cool but I
> guess it isn't going very deep.

Happened to look at the JVC this morning ... its a "Picsio" GC-FM1:

< http://support.jvc.com/consumer/product.jsp?archive=true&pathId=58&modelId=MODL028582>

Which went into an Ikelite housing and accompanied with an Ikelite 
W-20 Wide Angle Conversion Lens at times, both of which can be seen here:

<http://www.backscatter.com/sku/ike-5651.11.lasso>

IIRC, a bit under $1K all told.  Some (all?) of that period's GoPro's lacked
any LCD display to see what you're filming, whereas this not-quite-as-little 
JVC does have a 2" screen on back...makes for a big difference in composing.  


-hh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#287426

On Thursday, April 2, 2015 at 4:18:41 AM UTC-6, -hh wrote:
> Steve Carroll wrote:
> > -hh wrote:
> > > Steve Carroll wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Before I got to the end I was thinking... 'I wonder if
> > > > he ever does video'... and then I saw the them (they were
> > > > *really* slow to load, though). Sound propagates pretty
> > > > well through water but the video camera still needs
> > > > decent capability. What vid-cam are you using for that?
> > > 
> > > Most were taken with a housed Canon 7D, which is a dSLR 
> > > with (somewhat limitations) 1080p video capability.
> > 
> > That's actually decent audio.
> 
> It does pick up quite a bit, including various undesired noises
> from the housing system (squeaks & clunks from moving strobe
> arms, etc).  And of course, since its also inside that housing, 
> the UW stuff doesn't have wind noise (whereas topside stuff 
> does - contrast with the Brac stills montage).   
> 
> Overall, my biggest complaint with the 7D for video is that
> it lacks dynamic real time autofocus - once you set up for a
> shot, that's it, so you had better hope that the lens & focal
> length gives you adequate DOF to make the video appear ok.
> But then again, I wasn't originally buying it for video but for
> stills ... had I wanted a "video first" system, I probably could 
> have saved a few $K five years ago ... although not anymore
> today, because the temptation now would be to 'future proof'
> with a 4K system.
> 
> 
> > > The exception to the above is IMG_1009, which used a 
> > > compact JVC HD videocam ... I forget the exact model; its 
> > > also 1080p and was sold just before the HERO cams came out.
> > > As can be seen from the image quality, it doesn't take great
> > > stills, but that eel is the only only one of that particular 
> > > species I'd ever seen, and it was tucked into a tiny little 
> > > crevice which I couldn't use the 7D (with WA lens) onto.  
> > > 
> > > Fortunately, the diving had been good enough that I had
> > > previously decided to lug along both of my UW cameras on 
> > > dives, so as to have both a WA and a Macro setup, even
> > > though there was the compromise in image quality (as seen)
> > > on whichever focal length the JVC happened to be set up for 
> > > for that particular dive.
> > > 
> > > Even though I've not used the JVC for much, it has paid
> > > for itself well enough .. for eample, if you found the 
> > > Tahiti video, that was all done on the JVC.
> > 
> > I've heard they make some nice equipment in the compact arena
> > (like a lot of their stuff). Their little Quadproof looks cool but I
> > guess it isn't going very deep.
> 
> Happened to look at the JVC this morning ... its a "Picsio" GC-FM1:
> 
> < http://support.jvc.com/consumer/product.jsp?archive=true&pathId=58&modelId=MODL028582>
> 
> Which went into an Ikelite housing and accompanied with an Ikelite 
> W-20 Wide Angle Conversion Lens at times, both of which can be seen here:
> 
> <http://www.backscatter.com/sku/ike-5651.11.lasso>
> 
> IIRC, a bit under $1K all told.  Some (all?) of that period's GoPro's lacked
> any LCD display to see what you're filming, whereas this not-quite-as-little 
> JVC does have a 2" screen on back...makes for a big difference in composing.  

My youngest has a GoPro Hero 3 (I think it's a Black?), no LDC but it's amazing how much can be crammed into these little things!  In FCP X we can get decently sharp slo-mo segments when he shoots at high frame rates.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#286489

On Saturday, March 28, 2015 at 1:17:19 PM UTC-6, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Saturday, March 28, 2015 at 11:10:26 AM UTC-6, DFS wrote:
> > On 3/28/2015 1:07 PM, owl wrote:
> > > https://9to5mac.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/tim-cook-apple-watch.jpg?w=704&h=528
> > 
> > 
> > The Apple pimp-slap is strong on owl...
> 
> Hehe ;)
> 
> The only watches I ever purchased (doesn't include watches given to me as a child) are in this pic - warning: it's 3264 × 2448. The two on the left were purchased solely for backpacking. I found I can't really wear a watch for some reason, just bugs the hell outta me. I used to be a goldsmith long ago and was one of the very few I knew that never wore jewelry (aside from a wedding ring).

Link
<http://home.comcast.net/~fretwizz/watch-collection.png>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#286490

On Saturday, March 28, 2015 at 11:10:26 AM UTC-6, DFS wrote:
> On 3/28/2015 1:07 PM, owl wrote:
> > https://9to5mac.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/tim-cook-apple-watch.jpg?w=704&h=528
> 
> 
> The Apple pimp-slap is strong on owl...

Hehe ;) 

The only watches I ever purchased (doesn't include watches given to me as a child) are in this pic. The two on the left were purchased solely for backpacking. I found I can't really wear a watch for some reason, just bugs the hell outta me. I used to be a goldsmith long ago and was one of the very few I knew that never wore jewelry (aside from a wedding ring). 

<http://home.comcast.net/~fretwizz/watch-collection.png>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#286702

On 28/03/2015 17:07, owl wrote:
> https://9to5mac.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/tim-cook-apple-watch.jpg?w=704&h=528
>

I can think of several girls who would love that. I guess the Linux 
geeks don't interact with women in IT much to have noticed that ;-)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#286852

Op 28-03-15 om 18:07 schreef owl:
> https://9to5mac.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/tim-cook-apple-watch.jpg?w=704&h=528
>
What's your problem?

It's obviously designed for women.

The market is crowded with pink laptops, blingbling cellphone/tablet 
covers etc. targeted at girls and women.

-- 
|_|0|_| Marti T. van Lin (alias ML2MST)
|_|_|0| Computer enthusiast and Amateur Musician
|0|0|0| http://osg33x.blogspot.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#286867

Marti van Lin <ml2mst@nospam.indvalid> wrote:
> Op 28-03-15 om 18:07 schreef owl:
>> https://9to5mac.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/tim-cook-apple-watch.jpg?w=704&h=528
>>
> What's your problem?

> It's obviously designed for women.

Apple watch is only for women?
Why is badass Tim Cook wearing one?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#286961

On 3/30/2015 8:09 PM, owl wrote:
> Marti van Lin <ml2mst@nospam.indvalid> wrote:
>> Op 28-03-15 om 18:07 schreef owl:
>>> https://9to5mac.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/tim-cook-apple-watch.jpg?w=704&h=528
>>>
>> What's your problem?
>
>> It's obviously designed for women.
>
> Apple watch is only for women?
> Why is badass Tim Cook wearing one?


His bank account is badass, that's for sure.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#287078

Op 31-03-15 om 02:09 schreef owl:

> Marti van Lin <ml2mst@nospam.indvalid> wrote:
>> Op 28-03-15 om 18:07 schreef owl:
>>> https://9to5mac.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/tim-cook-apple-watch.jpg?w=704&h=528
>>>
>> What's your problem?
>
>> It's obviously designed for women.
>
> Apple watch is only for women?

No, only the pink one is designed for women, me thinks.

> Why is badass Tim Cook wearing one?

What are you trying to imply by "badass" and are you implying Tim Cook 
wears a pink Apple Watch?


-- 
|_|0|_| Marti T. van Lin (alias ML2MST)
|_|_|0| Computer enthusiast and Amateur Musician
|0|0|0| http://osg33x.blogspot.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#287089

Marti van Lin <ml2mst@nospam.indvalid> wrote:
> Op 31-03-15 om 02:09 schreef owl:

>> Marti van Lin <ml2mst@nospam.indvalid> wrote:
>>> Op 28-03-15 om 18:07 schreef owl:
>>>> https://9to5mac.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/tim-cook-apple-watch.jpg?w=704&h=528
>>>>
>>> What's your problem?
>>
>>> It's obviously designed for women.
>>
>> Apple watch is only for women?

> No, only the pink one is designed for women, me thinks.

Why dost thou think that?  Mustangs don't have to be pink.

>> Why is badass Tim Cook wearing one?

> What are you trying to imply by "badass" and are you implying Tim Cook 
> wears a pink Apple Watch?

There's no need to "imply" anything about badass Tim Cook, and
where did I imply that Tim Cook is wearing a *pink* Apple Watch?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#287117

Marti van Lin wrote:

> What are you trying to imply by "badass" and are you implying Tim Cook
> wears a pink Apple Watch?

Bowel, like most Wintrolls here, is homophobic.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#287124

On 4/1/2015 7:50 AM, Tattoo Vampire wrote:
> Marti van Lin wrote:
>
>> What are you trying to imply by "badass" and are you implying Tim Cook
>> wears a pink Apple Watch?
>
> Bowel, like most Wintrolls here, is homophobic.


Tattoo, like most "advocates" here, is broke.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#287134

DFS wrote:
> On 4/1/2015 7:50 AM, Tattoo Vampire wrote:
> > Marti van Lin wrote:
> >
> >> What are you trying to imply by "badass" and are you implying Tim Cook
> >> wears a pink Apple Watch?
> >
> > Bowel, like most Wintrolls here, is homophobic.
> 
> 
> Tattoo, like most "advocates" here, is broke.

Blame it on all of those gays who are stealing all of the 'good' jobs.


-hh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#287178

Tattoo Vampire wrote:

> Marti van Lin wrote:
> 
>> What are you trying to imply by "badass" and are you implying Tim Cook
>> wears a pink Apple Watch?
> 
> Bowel, like most Wintrolls here, is homophobic.

He is also a nazi. A really disgusting racist. Even worse than flatfish and 
DFS, i that is possible at all. Stupid rednecks with lots of vacuum between 
their ears

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#287243

Peter Köhlmann wrote:

> Tattoo Vampire wrote:
> 
>> Marti van Lin wrote:
>> 
>>> What are you trying to imply by "badass" and are you implying Tim Cook
>>> wears a pink Apple Watch?
>> 
>> Bowel, like most Wintrolls here, is homophobic.
> 
> He is also a nazi. A really disgusting racist. Even worse than flatfish
> and DFS, i that is possible at all. Stupid rednecks with lots of vacuum
> between their ears

And you are just plain fucked up in the head.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#287257

Peter K??hlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
> Tattoo Vampire wrote:

>> Marti van Lin wrote:
>> 
>>> What are you trying to imply by "badass" and are you implying Tim Cook
>>> wears a pink Apple Watch?
>> 
>> Bowel, like most Wintrolls here, is homophobic.

> He is also a nazi. A really disgusting racist. Even worse than flatfish and 
> DFS, i that is possible at all. Stupid rednecks with lots of vacuum between 
> their ears

Did your family keep any souvenirs from 1096?

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/08/Gottfried_von_Bouillon_%28Hofkirche_Innsbruck%29_2006_0931C.jpg/170px-Gottfried_von_Bouillon_%28Hofkirche_Innsbruck%29_2006_0931C.jpg

Maybe from the nearby slave labor camp in 1945?

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/11/22/article-1230025-07508CC6000005DC-7_470x423_popup.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/11/22/article-1230025-075087A2000005DC-954_470x423_popup.jpg

You Mainz bastards have a lot to account for. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#287259

"owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote in message 
news:bvhfytr84.kjhor@rooftop.invalid...
> Peter K??hlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
>> Tattoo Vampire wrote:
>
>>> Marti van Lin wrote:
>>>
>>>> What are you trying to imply by "badass" and are you implying Tim Cook
>>>> wears a pink Apple Watch?
>>>
>>> Bowel, like most Wintrolls here, is homophobic.
>
>> He is also a nazi. A really disgusting racist. Even worse than flatfish 
>> and
>> DFS, i that is possible at all. Stupid rednecks with lots of vacuum 
>> between
>> their ears
>
> Did your family keep any souvenirs from 1096?
>
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/08/Gottfried_von_Bouillon_%28Hofkirche_Innsbruck%29_2006_0931C.jpg/170px-Gottfried_von_Bouillon_%28Hofkirche_Innsbruck%29_2006_0931C.jpg
>
> Maybe from the nearby slave labor camp in 1945?
>
> http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/11/22/article-1230025-07508CC6000005DC-7_470x423_popup.jpg
>
> http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/11/22/article-1230025-075087A2000005DC-954_470x423_popup.jpg
>
> You Mainz bastards have a lot to account for.
>

This is a pretty sick and twisted subject but I remember a short while back 
a bunch of posts about lampshades, soap, etc. Then I saw this on the 
DailyMail website less than one month ago:

<quote>
Bar of soap 'made from the fat of Jewish Holocaust victims' is removed from 
eBay after Dutch owner put it up for sale
6 March 2015

    * The listing sought ?199 for the bar of soap reportedly made from 'fat'
    * It was claimed victims of the Westerbork concentration camp in Holland
    * The Nazis are believed to have experimented with the soap during the 
war
    * SS leader Heinrich Himmler is reported to have stopped the experiments

</quote>

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2982639/Bar-soap-fat-Jewish-Holocaust-victims-removed-eBay-Dutch-owner-sale.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#287271

Ezekiel <zeke@nosuchemail.com> wrote:

> "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote in message 
> news:bvhfytr84.kjhor@rooftop.invalid...
>> Peter K??hlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
>>> Tattoo Vampire wrote:
>>
>>>> Marti van Lin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> What are you trying to imply by "badass" and are you implying Tim Cook
>>>>> wears a pink Apple Watch?
>>>>
>>>> Bowel, like most Wintrolls here, is homophobic.
>>
>>> He is also a nazi. A really disgusting racist. Even worse than flatfish 
>>> and
>>> DFS, i that is possible at all. Stupid rednecks with lots of vacuum 
>>> between
>>> their ears
>>
>> Did your family keep any souvenirs from 1096?
>>
>> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/08/Gottfried_von_Bouillon_%28Hofkirche_Innsbruck%29_2006_0931C.jpg/170px-Gottfried_von_Bouillon_%28Hofkirche_Innsbruck%29_2006_0931C.jpg
>>
>> Maybe from the nearby slave labor camp in 1945?
>>
>> http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/11/22/article-1230025-07508CC6000005DC-7_470x423_popup.jpg
>>
>> http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/11/22/article-1230025-075087A2000005DC-954_470x423_popup.jpg
>>
>> You Mainz bastards have a lot to account for.
>>

> This is a pretty sick and twisted subject but I remember a short while back 
> a bunch of posts about lampshades, soap, etc. Then I saw this on the 
> DailyMail website less than one month ago:

> <quote>
> Bar of soap 'made from the fat of Jewish Holocaust victims' is removed from 
> eBay after Dutch owner put it up for sale
> 6 March 2015

>     * The listing sought ?199 for the bar of soap reportedly made from 'fat'
>     * It was claimed victims of the Westerbork concentration camp in Holland
>     * The Nazis are believed to have experimented with the soap during the 
> war
>     * SS leader Heinrich Himmler is reported to have stopped the experiments

> </quote>

> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2982639/Bar-soap-fat-Jewish-Holocaust-victims-removed-eBay-Dutch-owner-sale.html

The soap thing has been fairly well debunked, but what jumped out at me
when first hearing the story was the idea that nazis would want to wash
with soap made from melted jews.  It just kind of goes against the grain. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#287275

owl wrote:

> Ezekiel <zeke@nosuchemail.com> wrote:
> 
>> "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:bvhfytr84.kjhor@rooftop.invalid...
>>> Peter K??hlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
>>>> Tattoo Vampire wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Marti van Lin wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> What are you trying to imply by "badass" and are you implying Tim
>>>>>> Cook wears a pink Apple Watch?
>>>>>
>>>>> Bowel, like most Wintrolls here, is homophobic.
>>>
>>>> He is also a nazi. A really disgusting racist. Even worse than flatfish
>>>> and
>>>> DFS, i that is possible at all. Stupid rednecks with lots of vacuum
>>>> between
>>>> their ears
>>>
>>> Did your family keep any souvenirs from 1096?
>>>
>>> 
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/08/Gottfried_von_Bouillon_%28Hofkirche_Innsbruck%29_2006_0931C.jpg/170px-Gottfried_von_Bouillon_%28Hofkirche_Innsbruck%29_2006_0931C.jpg
>>>
>>> Maybe from the nearby slave labor camp in 1945?
>>>
>>> 
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/11/22/article-1230025-07508CC6000005DC-7_470x423_popup.jpg
>>>
>>> 
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/11/22/article-1230025-075087A2000005DC-954_470x423_popup.jpg
>>>
>>> You Mainz bastards have a lot to account for.
>>>
> 
>> This is a pretty sick and twisted subject but I remember a short while
>> back a bunch of posts about lampshades, soap, etc. Then I saw this on the
>> DailyMail website less than one month ago:
> 
>> <quote>
>> Bar of soap 'made from the fat of Jewish Holocaust victims' is removed
>> from eBay after Dutch owner put it up for sale
>> 6 March 2015
> 
>>     * The listing sought ?199 for the bar of soap reportedly made from
>>     'fat' * It was claimed victims of the Westerbork concentration camp
>>     in Holland * The Nazis are believed to have experimented with the
>>     soap during the
>> war
>>     * SS leader Heinrich Himmler is reported to have stopped the
>>     experiments
> 
>> </quote>
> 
>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2982639/Bar-soap-fat-Jewish-Holocaust-victims-removed-eBay-Dutch-owner-sale.html
> 
> The soap thing has been fairly well debunked, but what jumped out at me
> when first hearing the story was the idea that nazis would want to wash
> with soap made from melted jews.  It just kind of goes against the grain.

Who said anything about them using it themselves?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web