Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #322087 > unrolled thread
| Started by | scooz <scooz@myemailisspamfree.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-22 12:27 -0400 |
| Last post | 2015-10-04 11:46 +0000 |
| Articles | 14 on this page of 294 — 26 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode scooz <scooz@myemailisspamfree.net> - 2015-09-22 12:27 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-22 12:35 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Edward Milano <milano58_remove_no_spam@post.com> - 2015-09-22 16:47 +0000
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 09:54 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-22 12:57 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 10:04 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 09:51 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 09:49 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 14:47 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 12:09 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 15:18 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode scooz <scooz@myemailisspamfree.net> - 2015-09-22 18:23 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 15:30 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode scooz <scooz@myemailisspamfree.net> - 2015-09-22 18:46 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 16:01 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 18:48 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 16:00 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 16:30 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 23:47 +0000
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 16:59 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-23 02:12 +0200
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 17:36 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 09:50 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 09:13 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-23 19:41 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2015-09-24 00:12 +0000
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-23 20:17 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-23 22:11 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-24 07:22 -0500
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-09-24 14:12 +0100
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-24 09:26 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-24 15:58 -0600
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 23:04 -0500
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-11 21:09 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-22 20:48 -0500
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 00:43 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 22:03 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 01:41 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 22:45 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 02:04 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 23:08 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-23 06:04 +0000
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-22 23:09 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-23 05:56 +0000
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 09:40 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-23 10:11 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 09:54 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 13:07 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 10:40 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 09:12 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-23 16:26 +0000
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 09:36 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-09-23 21:12 +0000
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode scooz <scooz@myemailisspamfree.net> - 2015-09-23 17:16 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 14:23 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode John Doe <always.look@message.header> - 2015-10-04 12:02 +0000
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-23 10:03 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 10:21 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-23 11:49 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 12:04 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 09:40 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-23 13:14 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 13:21 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 10:42 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 13:57 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 11:24 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-23 14:28 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 11:33 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2015-09-24 01:20 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-24 09:45 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-24 09:06 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-24 10:13 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 10:39 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-23 14:29 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 11:34 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 09:23 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-23 09:14 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2015-09-24 00:12 +0000
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode scooz <scooz@myemailisspamfree.net> - 2015-09-23 20:14 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-04 00:41 -0500
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-03 22:49 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-04 10:18 +0200
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-04 11:53 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 08:58 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-04 12:00 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 09:03 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-04 09:45 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-04 11:50 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-04 18:32 +0200
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-04 12:49 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-04 18:51 +0200
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-04 10:04 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-04 16:56 -0500
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-04 10:02 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-05 00:19 +0200
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Lloyd Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2015-10-04 17:25 -0500
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-05 00:30 +0200
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Lloyd Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2015-10-04 17:40 -0500
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-05 00:46 +0200
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Lloyd Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2015-10-04 17:47 -0500
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-04 16:18 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode nom de plume <nomdeplume@stickybit.guru> - 2015-10-04 20:08 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-04 20:42 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode nom de plume <nomdeplume@stickybit.guru> - 2015-10-04 21:13 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-05 09:57 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode nom de plume <nomdeplume@stickybit.guru> - 2015-10-05 12:22 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-05 12:43 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-05 10:00 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 13:39 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-05 10:01 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-10-05 23:13 +0100
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-05 17:22 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-05 20:57 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode nom de plume <nomdeplume@stickybit.guru> - 2015-10-05 22:01 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-10-06 08:27 +0100
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode nom de plume <nomdeplume@stickybit.guru> - 2015-10-06 11:44 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Onion Knight <onionknight@linuxmail.org> - 2015-10-06 18:46 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-05 16:27 -0500
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-06 15:24 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-06 18:52 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 23:32 +0000
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-06 16:49 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-04 19:03 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode nom de plume <nomdeplume@stickybit.guru> - 2015-10-04 22:23 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-04 19:04 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode nom de plume <nomdeplume@stickybit.guru> - 2015-10-04 22:24 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-10-05 12:54 +0100
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode nom de plume <nomdeplume@stickybit.guru> - 2015-10-05 12:03 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-05 12:34 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-05 11:16 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode nom de plume <nomdeplume@stickybit.guru> - 2015-10-04 19:42 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-10-05 12:52 +0100
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-04 19:05 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-04 18:43 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-04 20:19 -0600
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-04 18:40 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode nom de plume <nomdeplume@stickybit.guru> - 2015-10-04 19:01 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-04 19:41 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode nom de plume <nomdeplume@stickybit.guru> - 2015-10-04 20:12 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-04 20:44 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode nom de plume <nomdeplume@stickybit.guru> - 2015-10-04 21:16 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-04 18:59 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode nom de plume <nomdeplume@stickybit.guru> - 2015-10-04 22:18 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 12:28 +0000
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 12:35 +0000
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode nom de plume <nomdeplume@stickybit.guru> - 2015-10-05 12:13 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-05 09:59 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-05 16:04 +0200
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-05 10:14 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-05 16:54 +0200
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-05 09:16 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-05 12:37 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-05 09:51 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-05 13:29 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Onion Knight <onionknight@linuxmail.org> - 2015-10-05 15:26 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-05 16:35 -0500
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 23:07 -0500
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-05 15:29 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Onion Knight <onionknight@linuxmail.org> - 2015-10-05 15:48 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-05 17:52 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-05 17:51 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 22:16 +0000
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-07 14:50 -0600
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-07 17:41 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-08 23:38 -0600
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-09 10:59 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-05 12:24 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode nom de plume <nomdeplume@stickybit.guru> - 2015-10-05 12:35 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-05 13:14 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Onion Knight <onionknight@linuxmail.org> - 2015-10-05 15:27 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-05 17:50 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-05 16:34 -0500
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-06 18:50 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-07 06:57 -0500
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 22:58 -0500
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-11 21:08 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-05 09:16 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 22:50 -0500
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-11 21:06 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode nom de plume <nomdeplume@stickybit.guru> - 2015-10-05 12:25 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 09:54 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-05 13:09 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode nom de plume <nomdeplume@stickybit.guru> - 2015-10-05 21:57 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-06 08:31 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode nom de plume <nomdeplume@stickybit.guru> - 2015-10-06 12:01 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-06 09:27 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-06 13:28 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-06 10:40 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-06 14:49 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-06 12:05 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-06 12:57 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-06 10:18 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-06 13:38 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-06 11:28 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode nom de plume <nomdeplume@stickybit.guru> - 2015-10-06 13:22 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-07 14:52 -0600
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 23:35 +0000
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-06 16:48 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-07 00:00 +0000
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-06 17:11 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-07 12:24 -0500
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Onion Knight <onionknight@linuxmail.org> - 2015-10-07 13:32 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-07 10:40 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-07 13:32 -0500
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-07 19:14 +0000
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Onion Knight <onionknight@linuxmail.org> - 2015-10-07 16:27 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-07 17:35 +0000
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-07 10:42 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Onion Knight <onionknight@linuxmail.org> - 2015-10-07 16:26 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-08 13:42 -0500
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 20:08 +0000
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Onion Knight <onionknight@linuxmail.org> - 2015-10-08 17:05 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-09 10:00 -0500
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-09 15:15 +0000
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-10-09 11:49 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Onion Knight <onionknight@linuxmail.org> - 2015-10-09 12:05 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Onion Knight <onionknight@linuxmail.org> - 2015-10-09 12:04 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-09 13:19 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-09 16:39 -0500
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-10-09 23:09 +0100
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-09 15:39 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-09 19:34 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-09 20:23 -0600
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-10 07:21 -0500
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "Eagle" <bird@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-10 15:49 +0200
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-10 10:06 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 17:40 +0000
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-10 14:12 -0600
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-10-10 22:39 +0100
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-13 09:04 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-13 09:07 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 23:11 -0500
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-12 00:54 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-12 01:12 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-10 20:05 -0500
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-10 18:14 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-12 10:14 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-12 09:03 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-09 22:27 +0000
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-09 15:42 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-09 14:17 -0600
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-07 10:39 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-07 14:46 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-07 12:16 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-07 17:32 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-07 15:19 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-07 18:46 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-07 16:01 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-07 19:56 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-07 17:05 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-08 09:32 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-10-05 23:17 +0100
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 22:24 +0000
Just another Fairy Tale by dumb willie. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-07 14:54 -0600
Re: Just another Fairy Tale by dumb willie. Onion Knight <onionknight@linuxmail.org> - 2015-10-07 16:59 -0400
Re: Just another Fairy Tale by dumb willie. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-07 21:05 +0000
Re: Just another Fairy Tale by dumb willie. Onion Knight <onionknight@linuxmail.org> - 2015-10-08 08:38 -0400
Re: Just another Fairy Tale by dumb willie. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-08 13:37 -0500
Re: Just another Fairy Tale by Onion Knight & Lord Pah-sons. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-10-08 22:49 +0100
Is Geoff Fitton who goes by the nym William Poaster Really A Hospital Janitor? Onion Knight <onionknight@linuxmail.org> - 2015-10-08 18:23 -0400
Re: Is Geoff Fitton who goes by the nym William Poaster Really A Hospital Janitor? JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-09 10:02 -0500
Re: Is Geoff Fitton who goes by the nym William Poaster Really A Hospital Janitor? Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-09 15:13 +0000
Re: Is Geoff Fitton who goes by the nym William Poaster Really A Hospital Janitor? "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-09 12:56 -0400
Re: Is Geoff Fitton who goes by the nym William Poaster Really A Hospital Janitor? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-09 18:58 +0200
Re: Is Geoff Fitton who goes by the nym William Poaster Really A Hospital Janitor? JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-09 16:50 -0500
Re: Is Geoff Fitton who goes by the nym William Poaster Really A Hospital Janitor? Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-09 22:22 +0000
Re: Is Geoff Fitton who goes by the nym William Poaster Really A Hospital Janitor? GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-09 20:26 -0600
Re: Is Geoff Fitton who goes by the nym William Poaster Really A Hospital Janitor? Onion Knight <onionknight@linuxmail.org> - 2015-10-09 18:53 -0400
Re: Is Geoff Fitton who goes by the nym William Poaster Really A Hospital Janitor? ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-09 23:31 +0000
Re: Is Geoff Fitton who goes by the nym William Poaster Really A Hospital Janitor? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-09 16:43 -0700
Re: Is Geoff Fitton who goes by the nym William Poaster Really A Hospital Janitor? ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-09 23:29 +0000
Re: Is Geoff Fitton who goes by the nym William Poaster Really A Hospital Janitor? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-09 16:43 -0700
Re: Is Geoff Fitton who goes by the nym William Poaster Really A Hospital Janitor? Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-09 17:50 +0000
Re: Is Geoff Fitton who goes by the nym William Poaster Really A Hospital Janitor? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-09 10:16 -0500
Re: Is Geoff Fitton who goes by the nym William Poaster Really A Hospital Janitor? Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-09 15:22 +0000
Re: Is Geoff Fitton who goes by the nym William Poaster Really A Hospital Janitor? Onion Knight <onionknight@linuxmail.org> - 2015-10-09 12:00 -0400
Re: Is Geoff Fitton who goes by the nym William Poaster Really A Hospital Janitor? JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-09 16:12 -0500
Re: Is Geoff Fitton who goes by the nym William Poaster Really A Hospital Janitor? Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-09 21:35 +0000
Re: Is Geoff Fitton who goes by the nym William Poaster Really A Hospital Janitor? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-12 08:48 -0500
Re: Is Geoff Fitton who goes by the nym William Poaster Really A Hospital Janitor? Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-12 14:02 +0000
Re: Is Geoff Fitton who goes by the nym William Poaster Really A Hospital Janitor? "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-10-12 10:08 -0400
Re: Is Geoff Fitton who goes by the nym William Poaster Really A Hospital Janitor? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-09 09:55 -0700
Re: Just another Fairy Tale by dumb willie. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-08 23:41 -0600
Re: Just another Fairy Tale by dumb willie. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-09 12:13 +0000
Re: Just another Fairy Tale by dumb willie. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-08 23:40 -0600
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-04 22:58 +0000
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-04 19:25 -0400
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-04 16:13 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-04 20:18 -0600
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-27 09:48 -0500
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 14:50 +0000
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-27 09:50 -0700
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode John Doe <always.look@message.header> - 2015-10-04 12:15 +0000
Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode John Doe <always.look@message.header> - 2015-10-04 11:46 +0000
Page 15 of 15 — ← Prev page 1 … 13 14 [15]
| From | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-12 10:08 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Is Geoff Fitton who goes by the nym William Poaster Really A Hospital Janitor? |
| Message-ID | <mvgeo3$jt8$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #326335 |
"Lloyd Parsons" <lloydp211@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:d81sqqFuap7U4@mid.individual.net...
> On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 08:48:27 -0500, chrisv wrote:
>
>>
>> Can you read? How could you get it so wrong? Don't you know that
>> you're stupid? Don't you know that I know far more about economics than
>> you do?
>>
> No evidence of that has ever come from you. You have this la-la view of
> how and why business does what it does and what it takes to get a product
> to market successfully.
>
>> You seem to live in a fantasy world, "Lloyd". One where people who have
>> you plonked read all of your posts. One where you don't regularly get
>> your ignorant ass handed to you in the debates.
>>
> The only fantasy world is the 'business' acumen you try to spew.
The only thing funnier than his "business" acumen is his technical
(in)competence.
This reminds me of a Relf classic.
"Testing is how you know
if the code works or not,
not compile-time warnings."
- Jeff Relf
Heh. One doesn't need to be a pro, to know how stupid that is...
(ignorance from turdv)
<d6plp958n3o545aqg62banloa9sip3ds6n@4ax.com>
>Problem with Chromebooks in the enterprise - when IBM, HP, eBay,
>Citi Bank, etc writes an email, internal document or spreadsheet
>they don't want Google to see each and every word they write?
Didn't think you had the brains that God gave a cockroach, fsckwit.
How about encrypting things that they don't want others to see?
turdv "thinks" that encryption will magically provide privacy on the docs
and spreadsheets you edit, calculate and spell-check online. Google can
spell-check your document but if it's encrypted they won't be able to read
what they're spell-checking.
--
"I have a BSEE.... Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining
stability" is not one of them. Just the opposite, in fact."
The turdv idiot and his pretend BSEE degree.
"To make systems stable, we use Negative Feedback"
MIT - http://web.mit.edu/jamwno/Public/UAT/Jim_Feedback.ppt
"Since it's hard to make the op-amp gain stable over all operating
conditions *negative feedback* is used to **stabilize** the op-amp"
MIT - http://www.mit.edu/~godoy/6098/study/review_all.pdf
"Negative feedback is a central concept in the design of linear amplifiers.
It enables them to be designed with predictable, precise and **stable**
performance."
Oxford University -
http://www-teaching.physics.ox.ac.uk/practical_course/ELManCh14.pdf
"Black used negative feedback, which reduces the gain but makes the
amplifier insensitive to variations in tube characteristics. This invention
made it possible to build *stable* amplifiers with linear
characteristics..."
Princeton University - http://press.princeton.edu/chapters/s9493.pdf
<quote>
(Caltech)
Negative Feedback
A major breakthrough was invention of the feedback amplifier in 1927 by
Harold S. Black. Black used negative feedback which reduces the gain but
makes the amplifier very insensitive to variations in tube characteristics.
This invention made it possible to build **stable amplifiers** with linear
characteristics.
Positive Feedback
In a system with positive feedback, the increase in some variable or signal
leads to a situation in which that quantify is further through its dynamics.
This has a **destabilizing** effect and is usually accompanied by a
saturation that limits the growth of the quantity.
</quote>
http://www.cds.caltech.edu/~murray/books/AM05/pdf/am06-complete_16Sep06.pdf
<quote>
If we introduce positive, or regenerative, feedback into an amplifier
circuit, it has the tendency of creating and sustaining oscillations.
Negative feedback, on the other hand, has a "dampening" effect on an
amplifier. While positive feedback drives an amplifier circuit toward a
point of instability (oscillations), negative feedback drives it the
opposite direction: toward a point of stability.
</quote>
http://openbookproject.net/electricCircuits/Semi/SEMI_4.html#xtocid209015
<quote>
OSCILLATORS
We have already talked about FEEDBACK in terms of NEGATIVE FEEDBACK to
stabilize a circuit. We will now cover a new term called POSITIVE FEEDBACK -
it changes the performance of circuit completely. It makes the circuit
OSCILLATE. Negative feedback "kills" a circuits performance - positive
feedback makes it oscillate.
</quote>
http://www.talkingelectronics.com/projects/TheTransistorAmplifier/TheTransistorAmplifier-P1.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-09 09:55 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Is Geoff Fitton who goes by the nym William Poaster Really A Hospital Janitor? |
| Message-ID | <5aad38f9-7c55-4852-a520-10f4cc606fad@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #325785 |
On Friday, October 9, 2015 at 9:22:16 AM UTC-6, Lloyd Parsons wrote: > On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 10:16:50 -0500, chrisv wrote: > > > JEDIDIAH wrote: > > > >> That's the problem with products that need to be "compatible" with > >> other > >>products. The industry is littered with the corpses of "better". It > >>doesn't mean they had mass market success or even managed to stick > >>around. > > > > Yeah, these markets are rife with special circumstances, software > > compatibility being the most important, that lead to the market shares > > having nothing at all to do with what is the best product, or what > > product is the best value. > > > > Is desktop Windows really so much better than Mac and Linux? Hell no. > > > > Is Windows mobile really so much worse than Android and iOS? Hell no. > > > > Is Android really so much better than iOS? Hell no. > > You make good points Chris. But you are hung up on the tech, and the > tech doesn't matter as much as it used to in this marketplace. This group obviously needs a name change, I vote for: comp.os.linux.financials ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-08 23:41 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Just another Fairy Tale by dumb willie. |
| Message-ID | <SbqdnUwsAcs4zorLnZ2dnUU7-UOdnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #325442 |
On 10/07/15 15:05, Lloyd Parsons wrote: > On Wed, 07 Oct 2015 16:59:58 -0400, Onion Knight wrote: > >> On Wed, 07 Oct 2015 14:54:42 -0600, GreyCloud wrote: >> >>> On 10/05/15 16:17, William Poaster wrote: >>>> It was reported that nom de plume posted: >>>> >>>>> On 2015-10-05, A.M<> wrote: >>>>>> On 2015-10-04 9:16 PM, nom de plume wrote: >>>>>>> On 2015-10-05, A.M<> wrote: >>>>>>>> In a world where alternatives to Windows are EASILY obtained, the >>>>>>>> fact that 90% of the world chooses to use Windows indicates that >>>>>>>> the majority of users consider it to be the best operating system >>>>>>>> on the market or at the very least, the friendliest. The fact that >>>>>>>> you are insinuating that Windows is the equivalent of 2+3=4 is >>>>>>>> disgusting as there is no reason to believe that the choice of >>>>>>>> Windows is illogical or incorrect. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So according to you, 90% of the world chooses to use Windows and >>>>>>> that indicates that users consider it to be the best OS. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'll have to disagree with you there. I think quite a lot of those >>>>>>> users use Windows out of sheer momentum. And to be clear what I >>>>>>> mean by that is that they used Windows before, so they just use it >>>>>>> again. I believe that they are mostly not even aware of Linux at >>>>>>> all. Do you agree or disagree with my assessment? >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd agree that most of them are not aware of Linux's existence. >>>>>> However, >>>>>> most of them are also disgusted by Linux once the operating system >>>>>> is installed on their hardware. Every person I've "converted" >>>>>> quickly ran back to me to ask why certain things don't work. I >>>>>> always explained to them how differently it works and brought up >>>>>> alternatives, but it doesn't take long for them to wish for Windows >>>>>> to be re-installed. >>>>> >>>>> Ah, so according to you, you actively try to switch users to Linux, >>>>> but fail because they hate it. Sorry, but that dog doesn't hunt. I'd >>>>> explain why but you're a smart guy, right? You can figure it out? ;) >>>> >>>> I've had just the opposite reaction. >>>> Every person I've "converted" to GNU/Linux quickly ran back to me to >>>> ask how the hell could they get *rid* of the M$ Windoze abomination, >>>> especially Fista, Tiles 8& 8.1 etc. >> >> These Linux zealots must be living on another planet. >> People rarely stay with desktop Linux for very long after trying it. >> Most people in fact can't wait to rid Linux from their system. >> >> And in his post he claims every person he converted, ran back to him to >> ask how they could get rid of Windows. >> >> If he already converted them, why do they still need to get rid of >> Windows? >> >> This Linux loser sure isn't the brightest bulb in the box now is he? > > What is interesting to me is that Linux actually is pretty good as long > as you can find the applications to do whatever task you need doing. In > my case Ubuntu on the Chromebook is doing a good job for me. I've got > Moneydance and pan running on it and I could use Libre Office if I wanted > to. > > But if I want a very good photo editing app, there really isn't one. And > there is no unified ecosystem in the Linux world. Well, except for > Google. > > I've got a nephew that loves Linux and uses it most of the time, but even > he has to kick up his Windows box for many things because there is no app > for whatever he needed to do. > Or the possibility that the app is there on the net somewhere but gave the app a really stupid name. Take the name Gimp for example. -- When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the bottom, and have a longer blanket."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-09 12:13 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Just another Fairy Tale by dumb willie. |
| Message-ID | <d7ppc2Fsn6rU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #325724 |
On Thu, 08 Oct 2015 23:41:52 -0600, GreyCloud wrote: > On 10/07/15 15:05, Lloyd Parsons wrote: >> On Wed, 07 Oct 2015 16:59:58 -0400, Onion Knight wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 07 Oct 2015 14:54:42 -0600, GreyCloud wrote: >>> >>>> On 10/05/15 16:17, William Poaster wrote: >>>>> It was reported that nom de plume posted: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2015-10-05, A.M<> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2015-10-04 9:16 PM, nom de plume wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2015-10-05, A.M<> wrote: >>>>>>>>> In a world where alternatives to Windows are EASILY obtained, >>>>>>>>> the fact that 90% of the world chooses to use Windows indicates >>>>>>>>> that the majority of users consider it to be the best operating >>>>>>>>> system on the market or at the very least, the friendliest. The >>>>>>>>> fact that you are insinuating that Windows is the equivalent of >>>>>>>>> 2+3=4 is disgusting as there is no reason to believe that the >>>>>>>>> choice of Windows is illogical or incorrect. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So according to you, 90% of the world chooses to use Windows and >>>>>>>> that indicates that users consider it to be the best OS. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'll have to disagree with you there. I think quite a lot of >>>>>>>> those users use Windows out of sheer momentum. And to be clear >>>>>>>> what I mean by that is that they used Windows before, so they >>>>>>>> just use it again. I believe that they are mostly not even aware >>>>>>>> of Linux at all. Do you agree or disagree with my assessment? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'd agree that most of them are not aware of Linux's existence. >>>>>>> However, >>>>>>> most of them are also disgusted by Linux once the operating system >>>>>>> is installed on their hardware. Every person I've "converted" >>>>>>> quickly ran back to me to ask why certain things don't work. I >>>>>>> always explained to them how differently it works and brought up >>>>>>> alternatives, but it doesn't take long for them to wish for >>>>>>> Windows to be re-installed. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ah, so according to you, you actively try to switch users to Linux, >>>>>> but fail because they hate it. Sorry, but that dog doesn't hunt. >>>>>> I'd explain why but you're a smart guy, right? You can figure it >>>>>> out? ;) >>>>> >>>>> I've had just the opposite reaction. >>>>> Every person I've "converted" to GNU/Linux quickly ran back to me to >>>>> ask how the hell could they get *rid* of the M$ Windoze abomination, >>>>> especially Fista, Tiles 8& 8.1 etc. >>> >>> These Linux zealots must be living on another planet. >>> People rarely stay with desktop Linux for very long after trying it. >>> Most people in fact can't wait to rid Linux from their system. >>> >>> And in his post he claims every person he converted, ran back to him >>> to ask how they could get rid of Windows. >>> >>> If he already converted them, why do they still need to get rid of >>> Windows? >>> >>> This Linux loser sure isn't the brightest bulb in the box now is he? >> >> What is interesting to me is that Linux actually is pretty good as long >> as you can find the applications to do whatever task you need doing. >> In my case Ubuntu on the Chromebook is doing a good job for me. I've >> got Moneydance and pan running on it and I could use Libre Office if I >> wanted to. >> >> But if I want a very good photo editing app, there really isn't one. >> And there is no unified ecosystem in the Linux world. Well, except for >> Google. >> >> I've got a nephew that loves Linux and uses it most of the time, but >> even he has to kick up his Windows box for many things because there is >> no app for whatever he needed to do. >> > Or the possibility that the app is there on the net somewhere but gave > the app a really stupid name. Take the name Gimp for example. That would only be an issue in finding one the first time I would think. -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-08 23:40 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Just another Fairy Tale by dumb willie. |
| Message-ID | <SbqdnU0sAcvEzorLnZ2dnUU7-UOdnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #325438 |
On 10/07/15 14:59, Onion Knight wrote: > On Wed, 07 Oct 2015 14:54:42 -0600, GreyCloud wrote: > >> On 10/05/15 16:17, William Poaster wrote: >>> It was reported that nom de plume posted: >>> >>>> On 2015-10-05, A.M<> wrote: >>>>> On 2015-10-04 9:16 PM, nom de plume wrote: >>>>>> On 2015-10-05, A.M<> wrote: >>>>>>> In a world where alternatives to Windows are EASILY obtained, the fact >>>>>>> that 90% of the world chooses to use Windows indicates that the majority >>>>>>> of users consider it to be the best operating system on the market or at >>>>>>> the very least, the friendliest. The fact that you are insinuating that >>>>>>> Windows is the equivalent of 2+3=4 is disgusting as there is no reason >>>>>>> to believe that the choice of Windows is illogical or incorrect. >>>>>> >>>>>> So according to you, 90% of the world chooses to use Windows and that >>>>>> indicates that users consider it to be the best OS. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'll have to disagree with you there. I think quite a lot of those users >>>>>> use Windows out of sheer momentum. And to be clear what I mean by that >>>>>> is that they used Windows before, so they just use it again. I believe >>>>>> that they are mostly not even aware of Linux at all. Do you agree or >>>>>> disagree with my assessment? >>>>> >>>>> I'd agree that most of them are not aware of Linux's existence. However, >>>>> most of them are also disgusted by Linux once the operating system is >>>>> installed on their hardware. Every person I've "converted" quickly ran >>>>> back to me to ask why certain things don't work. I always explained to >>>>> them how differently it works and brought up alternatives, but it >>>>> doesn't take long for them to wish for Windows to be re-installed. >>>> >>>> Ah, so according to you, you actively try to switch users to Linux, but >>>> fail because they hate it. Sorry, but that dog doesn't hunt. I'd explain >>>> why but you're a smart guy, right? You can figure it out? ;) >>> >>> I've had just the opposite reaction. >>> Every person I've "converted" to GNU/Linux quickly ran back to me to ask >>> how the hell could they get *rid* of the M$ Windoze abomination, especially >>> Fista, Tiles 8& 8.1 etc. > > These Linux zealots must be living on another planet. That's the toilet cleanser they're using in their jobs that causes that. > People rarely stay with desktop Linux for very long after trying it. > Most people in fact can't wait to rid Linux from their system. > > And in his post he claims every person he converted, ran back to him to ask > how they could get rid of Windows. > > If he already converted them, why do they still need to get rid of Windows? > > This Linux loser sure isn't the brightest bulb in the box now is he? -- When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the bottom, and have a longer blanket."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-04 22:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <feso93.a0@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #324212 |
In comp.os.linux.advocacy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > A.M wrote: > >> On 2015-10-04 12:32 PM, Idiot wrote: >>> A.M wrote: >>> >>>> On 2015-10-04 1:41 AM, Nobody wrote: >>>>> On 9/22/2015 11:43 PM, Joel wrote: >>>>>> Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 9/22/2015 2:18 PM, Joel wrote: >>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For them to be that obsessed with finding me doing wrong and still >>>>>>>>> fail that >>>>>>>>> badly suggests I am amazingly accurate and honest. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That sums it up. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, Snit! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Without even pointing out the irony of someone, with your nonexistent >>>>>> nym, accusing someone using his real name and email address of being a >>>>>> puppet, I'll just say that if you ever want to say what you ignorantly >>>>>> wrote above to my face, bring it the fuck on, retard. You think just >>>>>> because I'm into computers that I'm a fairy nerd like your bitch ass? >>>>>> Your sheltered existence is very evident. >>>>>> >>>>>> You see, fuckface, I'm not like Snit - I will call you out on the >>>>>> little pussyboy you are. He's a gentleman, unlike you shit-eating >>>>>> fools who attack him. >>>>> >>>>> Hi Micheal Glasser, aka Snit, aka Drew P. Bawls. >>>> >>>> For the Windows users here who are unaware of who Nobody is: he is a >>>> Linux loser >>> >>> Thats rich coming from one of the most dishonest and rabid racist swine >>> posting in COLA. A windows luser, naturally >> >> It's spelled "That's," Idiot. It's spelled "loser," Idiot. > > No. Windows "users" are "lusers". Always have been, are now, and will > forever be. http://i.imgur.com/hDZViWT.png
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-04 19:25 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <muscdn$dgu$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #324251 |
On 10/4/2015 6:58 PM, owl wrote: > In comp.os.linux.advocacy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >> No. Windows "users" are "lusers". Always have been, are now, and will >> forever be. > > http://i.imgur.com/hDZViWT.png 'lusrmgr'?!?!?! ha! self-nuke by MS of all Windows users :(
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-04 16:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D23700B3.5EAC6%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #324212 |
On 10/4/15, 3:19 PM, in article mus8ha$1f6$2@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > A.M wrote: > >> On 2015-10-04 12:32 PM, Idiot wrote: >>> A.M wrote: >>> >>>> On 2015-10-04 1:41 AM, Nobody wrote: >>>>> On 9/22/2015 11:43 PM, Joel wrote: >>>>>> Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 9/22/2015 2:18 PM, Joel wrote: >>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For them to be that obsessed with finding me doing wrong and still >>>>>>>>> fail that >>>>>>>>> badly suggests I am amazingly accurate and honest. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That sums it up. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, Snit! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Without even pointing out the irony of someone, with your nonexistent >>>>>> nym, accusing someone using his real name and email address of being a >>>>>> puppet, I'll just say that if you ever want to say what you ignorantly >>>>>> wrote above to my face, bring it the fuck on, retard. You think just >>>>>> because I'm into computers that I'm a fairy nerd like your bitch ass? >>>>>> Your sheltered existence is very evident. >>>>>> >>>>>> You see, fuckface, I'm not like Snit - I will call you out on the >>>>>> little pussyboy you are. He's a gentleman, unlike you shit-eating >>>>>> fools who attack him. >>>>> >>>>> Hi Micheal Glasser, aka Snit, aka Drew P. Bawls. >>>> >>>> For the Windows users here who are unaware of who Nobody is: he is a >>>> Linux loser >>> >>> Thats rich coming from one of the most dishonest and rabid racist swine >>> posting in COLA. A windows luser, naturally >> >> It's spelled "That's," Idiot. It's spelled "loser," Idiot. > > No. Windows "users" are "lusers". Always have been, are now, and will > forever be. > You need to be incredibly stupid to rely on windows as OS for everyday usage > >> To this day, >> Idiot, I have yet to have you quote even _one_ of my lies. >> > > Poor imbecile liar Snit Michael Glasser. Lies quoted hundreds of times, and > all the time you needed to snip the quotes. How much futile work! Everyone is Snit. Ha hahaahahahahahahahahaha Snit tells unquotable lies. hahahahahahahahahaha Really, Peter, grow up. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-04 20:18 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nNqdnbjqVJx3QIzLnZ2dnUU7-IWdnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #324212 |
On 10/04/15 16:19, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > A.M wrote: > >> On 2015-10-04 12:32 PM, Idiot wrote: >>> A.M wrote: >>> >>>> On 2015-10-04 1:41 AM, Nobody wrote: >>>>> On 9/22/2015 11:43 PM, Joel wrote: >>>>>> Nobody<nobody@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 9/22/2015 2:18 PM, Joel wrote: >>>>>>>> Snit<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For them to be that obsessed with finding me doing wrong and still >>>>>>>>> fail that >>>>>>>>> badly suggests I am amazingly accurate and honest. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That sums it up. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, Snit! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Without even pointing out the irony of someone, with your nonexistent >>>>>> nym, accusing someone using his real name and email address of being a >>>>>> puppet, I'll just say that if you ever want to say what you ignorantly >>>>>> wrote above to my face, bring it the fuck on, retard. You think just >>>>>> because I'm into computers that I'm a fairy nerd like your bitch ass? >>>>>> Your sheltered existence is very evident. >>>>>> >>>>>> You see, fuckface, I'm not like Snit - I will call you out on the >>>>>> little pussyboy you are. He's a gentleman, unlike you shit-eating >>>>>> fools who attack him. >>>>> >>>>> Hi Micheal Glasser, aka Snit, aka Drew P. Bawls. >>>> >>>> For the Windows users here who are unaware of who Nobody is: he is a >>>> Linux loser >>> >>> Thats rich coming from one of the most dishonest and rabid racist swine >>> posting in COLA. A windows luser, naturally >> >> It's spelled "That's," Idiot. It's spelled "loser," Idiot. > > No. Windows "users" are "lusers". Always have been, are now, and will > forever be. > You need to be incredibly stupid to rely on windows as OS for everyday usage > >> To this day, >> Idiot, I have yet to have you quote even _one_ of my lies. >> > > Poor imbecile liar Snit Michael Glasser. Lies quoted hundreds of times, and > all the time you needed to snip the quotes. How much futile work! You'd have to be a vegetable to use linux for everyday usage and work. LOL!!! -- When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the bottom, and have a longer blanket."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-27 09:48 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mu8vkn$fam$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #322123 |
On 09/22/2015 01:47 PM, Joel wrote: > scooz <scooz@myemailisspamfree.net> wrote: > >>> For those that are unaware, Snit's detractors try to gang up on him, >>> and get others to beLIEve that he's just a troll. This "scooz" >>> character is the real troll. >> >> Hello snit! >> >> You haven't used the Joel Crump sock puppet in a long time. > > > You're only proving me right by throwing out that tired accusation. > You have no real basis to attack Snit, so you accuse others of being > his puppets, and you lie about his posts. Pathetic. You may as well have posted that under your "Snit" nym. It's that obvious. One more for the kill file... I've got twin "Lloyds" in there so far...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-27 14:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d6qe2jFqt3U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #323170 |
On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 09:48:55 -0500, Nobody wrote: > On 09/22/2015 01:47 PM, Joel wrote: >> scooz <scooz@myemailisspamfree.net> wrote: >> >>>> For those that are unaware, Snit's detractors try to gang up on him, >>>> and get others to beLIEve that he's just a troll. This "scooz" >>>> character is the real troll. >>> >>> Hello snit! >>> >>> You haven't used the Joel Crump sock puppet in a long time. >> >> >> You're only proving me right by throwing out that tired accusation. You >> have no real basis to attack Snit, so you accuse others of being his >> puppets, and you lie about his posts. Pathetic. > > You may as well have posted that under your "Snit" nym. It's that > obvious. > > One more for the kill file... I've got twin "Lloyds" in there so far... Bullshit! You don't killfile no matter how much you bleat about doing so. You love the attention, all trolls do. -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-27 09:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D22D6C52.5DFD5%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #323172 |
On 9/27/15, 7:50 AM, in article d6qe2jFqt3U1@mid.individual.net, "Lloyd Parsons" <lloydp211@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 09:48:55 -0500, Nobody wrote: > >> On 09/22/2015 01:47 PM, Joel wrote: >>> scooz <scooz@myemailisspamfree.net> wrote: >>> >>>>> For those that are unaware, Snit's detractors try to gang up on him, >>>>> and get others to beLIEve that he's just a troll. This "scooz" >>>>> character is the real troll. >>>> >>>> Hello snit! >>>> >>>> You haven't used the Joel Crump sock puppet in a long time. >>> >>> >>> You're only proving me right by throwing out that tired accusation. You >>> have no real basis to attack Snit, so you accuse others of being his >>> puppets, and you lie about his posts. Pathetic. >> >> You may as well have posted that under your "Snit" nym. It's that >> obvious. >> >> One more for the kill file... I've got twin "Lloyds" in there so far... > > Bullshit! You don't killfile no matter how much you bleat about doing > so. You love the attention, all trolls do. > > > Ah, so THAT is why you troll me with false accusations. Thanks for the admission. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Doe <always.look@message.header> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-04 12:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mur58k$8ub$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #323182 |
You should drop the unusually long anti-Microsoft spammy signature. -- Snit <usenet gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in news:D22D6C52.5DFD5%usenet gallopinginsanity.com: > Path: eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!news.informatik.hu-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail > From: Snit <usenet gallopinginsanity.com> > Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-10,comp.os.linux.advocacy > Subject: Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode > Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 09:50:10 -0700 > Lines: 46 > Message-ID: <D22D6C52.5DFD5%usenet gallopinginsanity.com> > References: <D225D9EC.5CA0D%usenet gallopinginsanity.com> <v53lcnmu15y3$.jktk9e6w9zar.dlg 40tude.net> <jav20bpqrrmg01ti7h4cbj45utpll46k6o 4ax.com> <1pgub8cktbut6.asgsajduu3j9$.dlg 40tude.net> <vd830b5b6f4vn75oa21hjh8btju4v5cmb3 4ax.com> <mu8vkn$fam$1 news.albasani.net> <d6qe2jFqt3U1 mid.individual.net> > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > X-Trace: individual.net XnmbQjukiNHeJhYTgf69SgtnO6llZj0p+njLKdxO4IWNjXxiF9 > Cancel-Lock: sha1:gwlhNEPTbZH+izPWAMpUDHzCndc= > User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.36.0.130206 > Thread-Topic: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode > Thread-Index: AdD5RJI4rXwZh2/JpEiopHscllPUFA== > Xref: mx02.eternal-september.org alt.comp.os.windows-10:9245 comp.os.linux.advocacy:551261 > > On 9/27/15, 7:50 AM, in article d6qe2jFqt3U1 mid.individual.net, "Lloyd > Parsons" <lloydp211 gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 09:48:55 -0500, Nobody wrote: >> >>> On 09/22/2015 01:47 PM, Joel wrote: >>>> scooz <scooz myemailisspamfree.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> For those that are unaware, Snit's detractors try to gang up on him, >>>>>> and get others to beLIEve that he's just a troll. This "scooz" >>>>>> character is the real troll. >>>>> >>>>> Hello snit! >>>>> >>>>> You haven't used the Joel Crump sock puppet in a long time. >>>> >>>> >>>> You're only proving me right by throwing out that tired accusation. You >>>> have no real basis to attack Snit, so you accuse others of being his >>>> puppets, and you lie about his posts. Pathetic. >>> >>> You may as well have posted that under your "Snit" nym. It's that >>> obvious. >>> >>> One more for the kill file... I've got twin "Lloyds" in there so far... >> >> Bullshit! You don't killfile no matter how much you bleat about doing >> so. You love the attention, all trolls do. >> >> >> > Ah, so THAT is why you troll me with false accusations. Thanks for the > admission. > > > -- > * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> > * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> > * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> > * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> > * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> > * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> > * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> > * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> > * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c> > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Doe <always.look@message.header> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-04 11:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mur3i7$8ub$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #322087 |
He's right, idiot. There is absolutely nothing off-topic or trollish about posting bugs. You are the troll. -- scooz <scooz myemailisspamfree.net> wrote in news:1pgub8cktbut6.asgsajduu3j9$.dlg 40tude.net: > Path: eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail > From: scooz <scooz myemailisspamfree.net> > Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-10,comp.os.linux.advocacy > Subject: Re: Three clicks for Task View in Tablet Mode > Followup-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy > Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 12:27:57 -0400 > Organization: A noiseless patient Spider > Lines: 28 > Sender: scooz <> > Message-ID: <1pgub8cktbut6.asgsajduu3j9$.dlg 40tude.net> > References: <D225D9EC.5CA0D%usenet gallopinginsanity.com> <v53lcnmu15y3$.jktk9e6w9zar.dlg 40tude.net> <jav20bpqrrmg01ti7h4cbj45utpll46k6o 4ax.com> > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="db055f5bcb95b9cebde83f9040dd4470"; logging-data="8040"; mail-complaints-to="abuse eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+QqSuoo4cFSKAkt++77j4s9BwubsBxqRs=" > User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.84 > Cancel-Lock: sha1:hBJNK2tp6j9aAd5HjTw91Y1Hrfo= > Xref: mx02.eternal-september.org alt.comp.os.windows-10:9015 comp.os.linux.advocacy:550126 > > On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 12:16:21 -0400, Joel wrote: > >> scooz <scooz myemailisspamfree.net> wrote: >> >>>Take your trolling back to comp.os.linux.advocacy where it belongs, >>>snit Michael Glasser "The Prescott Computer Guy". >>> >>>For those that are unaware, snit is a professional troll. >>>Do not engage in any discussion with this troll because he will >>>quickly ruin your group. >> >> >> For those that are unaware, Snit's detractors try to gang up on him, >> and get others to beLIEve that he's just a troll. This "scooz" >> character is the real troll. > >> -- >>Joel Crump > > Hello snit! > > You haven't used the Joel Crump sock puppet in a long time. > > http://www.programdoc.com/711_30907_1.htm > > Here is more about snit Michael Glasser, the professional troll: > > http://usenet.sandman.net/texter/list.php?categories[]=Digests >
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 15 of 15 — ← Prev page 1 … 13 14 [15]
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web