Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #316559 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-24 16:48 -0400 |
| Last post | 2015-08-26 12:50 -0600 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 149 — 32 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-24 16:48 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy deep - 2015-08-24 17:05 -0600
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-24 20:02 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 19:47 -0500
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-08-24 21:21 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Tommy Troll <elkabong99@Itroll.org> - 2015-08-24 21:40 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 01:47 +0000
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Neil <neil@myplaceofwork.com> - 2015-08-25 09:42 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-08-25 10:07 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2015-08-25 10:53 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-08-25 09:31 -0500
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 17:03 +0000
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-08-25 13:12 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-25 17:16 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-08-25 21:54 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-25 19:13 -0700
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-26 09:15 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 21:24 -0500
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 02:29 +0000
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-25 17:05 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-08-30 19:18 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-30 17:39 -0700
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Godzilla <godzilla@lizardboss.invalid> - 2015-08-31 00:40 +0000
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 22:34 -0500
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2015-08-31 02:43 +0200
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2015-08-25 10:48 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Neil <neil@myplaceofwork.com> - 2015-08-25 12:45 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy pjp <pjpoirier_is_located@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-25 14:16 -0300
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2015-08-25 22:35 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-25 17:11 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-08-24 21:19 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 01:47 +0000
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-25 08:06 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy deep - 2015-08-25 21:01 -0600
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-08-25 23:25 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-08-25 22:22 -0600
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-26 06:49 -0500
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-26 10:11 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-26 09:16 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy deep - 2015-08-26 07:56 -0600
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-26 10:13 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-08-26 16:18 +0200
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-26 12:09 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-08-26 12:47 -0600
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy deep - 2015-08-27 09:29 -0600
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-08-27 17:38 +0200
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-26 10:41 -0500
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-26 12:11 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-08-26 12:33 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-08-26 12:48 -0600
Just plonk the guy vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-08-26 16:58 +0000
Re: Just plonk the guy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-26 10:03 -0700
Re: Just plonk the guy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-26 15:02 -0400
Re: Just plonk the guy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-26 12:12 -0700
Nomination for August KOTM vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-08-26 21:26 +0000
Re: Nomination for August KOTM "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 14:38 -0700
Re: Nomination for August KOTM vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-08-26 21:39 +0000
Re: Nomination for August KOTM "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 15:05 -0700
Re: Nomination for August KOTM Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-08-28 20:01 +0000
Re: Nomination for August KOTM "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-28 15:40 -0700
Re: Nomination for August KOTM "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-08-28 19:58 -0500
Re: Nomination for August KOTM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-08-29 01:05 +0000
Re: Nomination for August KOTM Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-08-29 23:17 +0000
Re: Nomination for August KOTM "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 19:24 -0700
Re: Nomination for August KOTM "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-08-28 19:53 -0500
Re: Nomination for August KOTM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-08-29 01:06 +0000
Re: Nomination for August KOTM Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-08-29 23:18 +0000
Re: Nomination for August KOTM buZZard <buzz@none.invalid> - 2015-08-31 15:43 +0000
Re: Nomination for August KOTM buZZard <buzz@none.invalid> - 2015-08-31 15:46 +0000
Re: Nomination for August KOTM Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-26 14:41 -0700
Re: Nomination for August KOTM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-08-26 22:22 +0000
Re: Nomination for August KOTM Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-26 15:38 -0700
Re: Nomination for August KOTM "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-26 15:58 -0700
Re: Nomination for August KOTM Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-26 16:07 -0700
Re: Nomination for August KOTM "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 16:17 -0700
Re: Nomination for August KOTM Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-08-28 20:01 +0000
Re: Nomination for August KOTM "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-26 18:35 -0400
Re: Nomination for August KOTM Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-26 15:40 -0700
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-08-26 19:06 -0400
Re: Nomination for August KOTM chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-27 07:19 -0500
Re: Nomination for August KOTM Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-08-28 19:59 +0000
Re: Just plonk the guy GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-08-26 12:49 -0600
Re: Just plonk the guy vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-08-26 19:03 +0000
Re: Just plonk the guy JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-08-26 14:30 -0500
Re: Just plonk the guy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-26 13:23 -0700
Re: Just plonk the guy GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-08-27 15:38 -0600
Re: Just plonk the guy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-27 07:04 -0500
Re: Just plonk the guy GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-08-27 15:38 -0600
Re: Just plonk the guy GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-08-28 13:13 -0600
Re: Just plonk the guy GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-08-27 15:37 -0600
Re: Just plonk the guy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-26 15:00 -0400
Re: Just plonk the guy vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-08-26 22:16 +0000
Re: Just plonk the guy "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 15:37 -0700
Re: Just plonk the guy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-26 18:56 -0400
Re: Just plonk the guy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-08-27 01:15 +0200
Re: Just plonk the guy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-26 16:27 -0700
Re: Just plonk the guy GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-08-27 15:39 -0600
Re: Just plonk the guy Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-26 16:10 -0700
Re: Just plonk the guy vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-08-27 08:33 +0000
Re: KOTM support material "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@rec.sport.borderline.personality.disorder> - 2015-09-01 06:03 +0000
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-08-31 21:09 -0500
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-09-01 05:51 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-09-01 18:22 +0000
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-01 12:12 +0200
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-01 11:24 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-01 18:48 +0200
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-01 13:36 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-01 21:56 +0200
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-09-01 22:39 +0100
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-01 21:03 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-02 08:51 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-01 12:01 -0600
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-09-01 15:46 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-02 13:19 -0600
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 09:57 -0700
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-01 14:43 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 12:18 -0700
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-01 21:44 +0200
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-01 20:30 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 18:04 -0700
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-01 21:16 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-01 21:21 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 19:12 -0700
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-02 10:01 +0200
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-02 05:11 -0700
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-02 08:57 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-02 10:38 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 14:51 +0000
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 15:22 +0000
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 08:51 -0700
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-09-02 20:02 +0000
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-02 08:24 +0200
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 23:48 -0700
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-02 09:26 +0200
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-02 05:12 -0700
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-02 10:44 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-02 08:01 -0700
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-02 09:17 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-02 07:02 -0700
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-09-02 07:50 +0000
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-09-03 00:56 +0000
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-03 09:10 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-01 20:28 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-08-25 22:18 -0600
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 22:39 -0500
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-08-25 19:11 +0200
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-25 17:13 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 00:07 +0800
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-08-26 12:50 -0600
Page 7 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 Next page →
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-01 21:16 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ms5ii5$t5v$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #318512 |
On 9/1/2015 8:30 PM, A.M wrote: > On 2015-09-01 3:44 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >> How nice and cozy. The imbecile liar Snit Michael Glasser and his prime sock >> cuddling > > Ah, shut the fuck up already. Every single one of your posts is about > "Snit Michael Glasser." You truly are obsessed So is owl, Carroll and cc. It's amazing to watch them be spell-bound for years at a time. > and likely bitter that he > keeps demonstrating how much of a moron you are. NOBODY thinks that you > have intellect of any kind so you're wasting your time defending > yourself because EVERYONE thinks you're a moron. Kohlmann says some stupid things, but I actually think he knows more about Linux than anyone here. Zeke and Bloaty seem very knowledgeable, too. And even though Kohlmann refuses to post code, I think he's probably an excellent C++ (and in the past, assembly) programmer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-01 21:21 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ms5irp$t5v$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #318531 |
On 9/1/2015 9:16 PM, DFS wrote: > On 9/1/2015 8:30 PM, A.M wrote: >> On 2015-09-01 3:44 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > >>> How nice and cozy. The imbecile liar Snit Michael Glasser and his >>> prime sock >>> cuddling >> >> Ah, shut the fuck up already. Every single one of your posts is about >> "Snit Michael Glasser." You truly are obsessed > > So is owl, Carroll and cc. So /are/...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-01 19:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ff217943-97b9-41ba-a19c-9a1dbd1f2318@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #318531 |
On Tuesday, September 1, 2015 at 7:16:35 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote: > On 9/1/2015 8:30 PM, A.M wrote: > > On 2015-09-01 3:44 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > > >> How nice and cozy. The imbecile liar Snit Michael Glasser and his prime sock > >> cuddling > > > > Ah, shut the fuck up already. Every single one of your posts is about > > "Snit Michael Glasser." You truly are obsessed > > So is owl, Carroll and cc. Every single one, liar? FWIW, I'm glad to see some of these guys finally taking the initiative against that jackass. No one should allow that kind of bullying; it's even worse than the kind you do, if you can even call what you do bullying... but Snit is trying to pretend what he's doing isn't. > It's amazing to watch them be spell-bound for years at a time. With "spell-bound" meaning to give Snit what he continually asks for, that he falsely claims doesn't exist. > > and likely bitter that he > > keeps demonstrating how much of a moron you are. NOBODY thinks that you > > have intellect of any kind so you're wasting your time defending > > yourself because EVERYONE thinks you're a moron. > > Kohlmann says some stupid things, but I actually think he knows more > about Linux than anyone here. Zeke and Bloaty seem very knowledgeable, too. No matter, unless something changes Snit's constant BS will drive the few remaining posters out at some point and the ng will suffer the same fate as the others he's killed. There's no question of this, it's just a matter of time and he obviously has plenty to waste (with the taxpayer footing so many of his bills). > And even though Kohlmann refuses to post code, I think he's probably an > excellent C++ (and in the past, assembly) programmer. I guarantee he knows a lot more about programming than Snit ever will, which is why he has respect for developers who work on something as complicated as an operating system. Anyone can see that Snit's head is way up his ass on that topic.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-02 10:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ms6a9l$np8$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #318531 |
Snit wrote: > On 9/1/15, 6:16 PM, in article ms5ii5$t5v$1@dont-email.me, "DFS" > <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > >> On 9/1/2015 8:30 PM, A.M wrote: >>> On 2015-09-01 3:44 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >> >>>> How nice and cozy. The imbecile liar Snit Michael Glasser and his prime >>>> sock cuddling >>> >>> Ah, shut the fuck up already. Every single one of your posts is about >>> "Snit Michael Glasser." You truly are obsessed >> >> So is owl, Carroll and cc. >> >> It's amazing to watch them be spell-bound for years at a time. > > Carroll is the most so... group to group to group for over a decade... > hoping beyond hope to FINALLY catch me in a lie. Weird. Wrong. They are hoping beyond hope to FINALLY catch you speaking the truth >>> and likely bitter that he >>> keeps demonstrating how much of a moron you are. NOBODY thinks that you >>> have intellect of any kind so you're wasting your time defending >>> yourself because EVERYONE thinks you're a moron. >> >> Kohlmann says some stupid things, but I actually think he knows more >> about Linux than anyone here. Zeke and Bloaty seem very knowledgeable, >> too. > > If he does he goes out of his way to hide it. I mean, really, he was wrong > about what the Quit menu item does! You have admitted that you know absolutely nothing about KDE So how come that you can possibly know (and even for translated versions) how "Exit" and "Quit" are used >> And even though Kohlmann refuses to post code, I think he's probably an >> excellent C++ (and in the past, assembly) programmer. > > Very, very unlikely. He cannot do even the most basic things and does not > understand even the basics of computing. > The irony
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-02 05:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D20C359C.59AB8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #318561 |
On 9/2/15, 1:01 AM, in article ms6a9l$np8$1@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann"
<peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
> Snit wrote:
>
>> On 9/1/15, 6:16 PM, in article ms5ii5$t5v$1@dont-email.me, "DFS"
>> <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/1/2015 8:30 PM, A.M wrote:
>>>> On 2015-09-01 3:44 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>>
>>>>> How nice and cozy. The imbecile liar Snit Michael Glasser and his prime
>>>>> sock cuddling
>>>>
>>>> Ah, shut the fuck up already. Every single one of your posts is about
>>>> "Snit Michael Glasser." You truly are obsessed
>>>
>>> So is owl, Carroll and cc.
>>>
>>> It's amazing to watch them be spell-bound for years at a time.
>>
>> Carroll is the most so... group to group to group for over a decade...
>> hoping beyond hope to FINALLY catch me in a lie. Weird.
>
> Wrong. They are hoping beyond hope to FINALLY catch you speaking the truth
Right, because with all my unquotable lies I am evil. Whatever. Same joke
over and over and over.
>>>> and likely bitter that he
>>>> keeps demonstrating how much of a moron you are. NOBODY thinks that you
>>>> have intellect of any kind so you're wasting your time defending
>>>> yourself because EVERYONE thinks you're a moron.
>>>
>>> Kohlmann says some stupid things, but I actually think he knows more
>>> about Linux than anyone here. Zeke and Bloaty seem very knowledgeable,
>>> too.
>>
>> If he does he goes out of his way to hide it. I mean, really, he was wrong
>> about what the Quit menu item does!
>
> You have admitted that you know absolutely nothing about KDE
I do not know much... but clearly more than you, at least in many areas!
> So how come that you can possibly know (and even for translated versions)
> how "Exit" and "Quit" are used
Because I understand GUIs and just to prove you were wrong even used top.
Peter Köhlmann <http://goo.gl/CcTIAO>:
-----
The apps with "Quit" do *not* exit, they continue to run
in the background
-----
Had you known how to use "top" you would know you were wrong:
<http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/top.mov>
So how did you end up making such an absurd mistake?
>>> And even though Kohlmann refuses to post code, I think he's probably an
>>> excellent C++ (and in the past, assembly) programmer.
>>
>> Very, very unlikely. He cannot do even the most basic things and does not
>> understand even the basics of computing.
>
> The irony
Oh come on... you have shown you cannot even view a YouTube video in way
which you find "readable", you think one cannot block comments on their own
YouTube videos because FireFox extensions have been blocked (WTF?!?! You
clearly were clueless about local and online data), you said that a mere
count of lines of current code can tell you how many lines of older and
smaller code is still in the original, etc.
And those are just recent examples. You are just unbelievably ignorant... it
is why you fear speaking of technology - you get it wrong far, far more
often than you get it right, but even worse you refuse to admit when you are
wrong.
--
* OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-02 08:57 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ms6rju$ovv$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #318531 |
On 2015-09-01 9:16 PM, DFS wrote: > On 9/1/2015 8:30 PM, A.M wrote: >> On 2015-09-01 3:44 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > >>> How nice and cozy. The imbecile liar Snit Michael Glasser and his >>> prime sock >>> cuddling >> >> Ah, shut the fuck up already. Every single one of your posts is about >> "Snit Michael Glasser." You truly are obsessed > > So is owl, Carroll and cc. > > It's amazing to watch them be spell-bound for years at a time. I would appreciate Snit just not responding to them though. There are always hundreds of Snit posts repeating the same garbage to these people and they never seem to just get it. When faced with such idiocy, I just give up after a while. I don't care if they think I'm "running" or whatever. I'll give them that if I don't have to talk to them anymore. >> and likely bitter that he >> keeps demonstrating how much of a moron you are. NOBODY thinks that you >> have intellect of any kind so you're wasting your time defending >> yourself because EVERYONE thinks you're a moron. > > Kohlmann says some stupid things, but I actually think he knows more > about Linux than anyone here. Zeke and Bloaty seem very knowledgeable, > too. I agree with Roseanne vallor probably knows a lot, but I've also learned since then that he purposely deconstructs reality and creates a new truth. When he did that to me, I lost all respect for him. He can be knowledgeable about Linux all that he wants but I have no interest in communicating with him any further. > And even though Kohlmann refuses to post code, I think he's probably an > excellent C++ (and in the past, assembly) programmer. I honestly doubt it. No one has avoided proving anything more than he has and if his programming is as erroneous as the statements he makes, I can't imagine any of his programs working all too well. I see him as only slightly more intelligent than William Poaster and Chris Ahlstrom, the resident stooges.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-02 10:38 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ms71i0$g74$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #318586 |
On 2015-09-02 9:00 AM, Snit wrote: > On 9/2/15, 5:57 AM, in article ms6rju$ovv$1@dont-email.me, "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> > wrote: > >> On 2015-09-01 9:16 PM, DFS wrote: >>> On 9/1/2015 8:30 PM, A.M wrote: >>>> On 2015-09-01 3:44 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>> >>>>> How nice and cozy. The imbecile liar Snit Michael Glasser and his >>>>> prime sock >>>>> cuddling >>>> >>>> Ah, shut the fuck up already. Every single one of your posts is about >>>> "Snit Michael Glasser." You truly are obsessed >>> >>> So is owl, Carroll and cc. >>> >>> It's amazing to watch them be spell-bound for years at a time. >> >> I would appreciate Snit just not responding to them though. There are >> always hundreds of Snit posts repeating the same garbage to these people >> and they never seem to just get it. When faced with such idiocy, I just >> give up after a while. I don't care if they think I'm "running" or >> whatever. I'll give them that if I don't have to talk to them anymore. > > I finally did that with Carroll. Probably should with cc. Owl at least > sometimes tries - actually ends up with the best Linux advocacy I have seen > in years in here. > > When he gets to the point where he cannot make Linux look good, though, he > goes into whacko mode. > >>>> and likely bitter that he >>>> keeps demonstrating how much of a moron you are. NOBODY thinks that you >>>> have intellect of any kind so you're wasting your time defending >>>> yourself because EVERYONE thinks you're a moron. >>> >>> Kohlmann says some stupid things, but I actually think he knows more >>> about Linux than anyone here. Zeke and Bloaty seem very knowledgeable, >>> too. >> >> I agree with Roseanne vallor probably knows a lot, but I've also learned >> since then that he purposely deconstructs reality and creates a new >> truth. When he did that to me, I lost all respect for him. He can be >> knowledgeable about Linux all that he wants but I have no interest in >> communicating with him any further. > > Vallor can be knowledgeable... but his use of logic is weak. > >>> And even though Kohlmann refuses to post code, I think he's probably an >>> excellent C++ (and in the past, assembly) programmer. >> >> I honestly doubt it. No one has avoided proving anything more than he >> has and if his programming is as erroneous as the statements he makes, I >> can't imagine any of his programs working all too well. I see him as >> only slightly more intelligent than William Poaster and Chris Ahlstrom, >> the resident stooges. > > Peter fears speaking of technology based on how ignorant even he knows he > is, and tries to hide it behind insults and grade school jokes. The fact that he constantly insults a person looking for evidence or asking for technical knowledge, to me, is proof that the guy doesn't know shit and probably finds the task of wiping his geriatric German ass challenging as well. That's probably why when every one of his family members got his recommendation that they should use Linux, they all decided to buy Macs instead.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-02 14:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fdsadn93.a3@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #318586 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 9/2/15, 5:57 AM, in article ms6rju$ovv$1@dont-email.me, "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> > wrote: >> On 2015-09-01 9:16 PM, DFS wrote: >>> On 9/1/2015 8:30 PM, A.M wrote: >>>> On 2015-09-01 3:44 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>> >>>>> How nice and cozy. The imbecile liar Snit Michael Glasser and his >>>>> prime sock >>>>> cuddling >>>> >>>> Ah, shut the fuck up already. Every single one of your posts is about >>>> "Snit Michael Glasser." You truly are obsessed >>> >>> So is owl, Carroll and cc. >>> >>> It's amazing to watch them be spell-bound for years at a time. >> >> I would appreciate Snit just not responding to them though. There are >> always hundreds of Snit posts repeating the same garbage to these people >> and they never seem to just get it. When faced with such idiocy, I just >> give up after a while. I don't care if they think I'm "running" or >> whatever. I'll give them that if I don't have to talk to them anymore. > I would prefer to talk about technology and workflows and the like - hence > my recent "challenge" I posted. > I suspect none of the "advocates" will even show their efforts... Owl, who > had the best chance, already admitted some of the stuff I showed is outside > his skillset at the very least. LOL!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-02 15:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fafa3w0.8a@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #318604 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 9/2/15, 7:51 AM, in article fdsadn93.a3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 9/2/15, 5:57 AM, in article ms6rju$ovv$1@dont-email.me, "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> >>> wrote: >> >>>> On 2015-09-01 9:16 PM, DFS wrote: >>>>> On 9/1/2015 8:30 PM, A.M wrote: >>>>>> On 2015-09-01 3:44 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> How nice and cozy. The imbecile liar Snit Michael Glasser and his >>>>>>> prime sock >>>>>>> cuddling >>>>>> >>>>>> Ah, shut the fuck up already. Every single one of your posts is about >>>>>> "Snit Michael Glasser." You truly are obsessed >>>>> >>>>> So is owl, Carroll and cc. >>>>> >>>>> It's amazing to watch them be spell-bound for years at a time. >>>> >>>> I would appreciate Snit just not responding to them though. There are >>>> always hundreds of Snit posts repeating the same garbage to these people >>>> and they never seem to just get it. When faced with such idiocy, I just >>>> give up after a while. I don't care if they think I'm "running" or >>>> whatever. I'll give them that if I don't have to talk to them anymore. >> >>> I would prefer to talk about technology and workflows and the like - hence >>> my recent "challenge" I posted. >> >>> I suspect none of the "advocates" will even show their efforts... Owl, who >>> had the best chance, already admitted some of the stuff I showed is outside >>> his skillset at the very least. >> >> LOL! >> > You spoke of the video stuff as being outside your skill set... and with the > other tasks you had to write custom scripts to try to make your system do > what mine does by default. Yes, video production is outside my skill set. But video production was not the task.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-02 08:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <845cf554-fd13-46bb-8ee8-f8a2dc27e6a7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #318614 |
On Wednesday, September 2, 2015 at 9:22:53 AM UTC-6, owl wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > > On 9/2/15, 7:51 AM, in article fdsadn93.a3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>> On 9/2/15, 5:57 AM, in article ms6rju$ovv$1@dont-email.me, "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> > >>> wrote: > >> > >>>> On 2015-09-01 9:16 PM, DFS wrote: > >>>>> On 9/1/2015 8:30 PM, A.M wrote: > >>>>>> On 2015-09-01 3:44 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>>> How nice and cozy. The imbecile liar Snit Michael Glasser and his > >>>>>>> prime sock > >>>>>>> cuddling > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Ah, shut the fuck up already. Every single one of your posts is about > >>>>>> "Snit Michael Glasser." You truly are obsessed > >>>>> > >>>>> So is owl, Carroll and cc. > >>>>> > >>>>> It's amazing to watch them be spell-bound for years at a time. > >>>> > >>>> I would appreciate Snit just not responding to them though. There are > >>>> always hundreds of Snit posts repeating the same garbage to these people > >>>> and they never seem to just get it. When faced with such idiocy, I just > >>>> give up after a while. I don't care if they think I'm "running" or > >>>> whatever. I'll give them that if I don't have to talk to them anymore. > >> > >>> I would prefer to talk about technology and workflows and the like - hence > >>> my recent "challenge" I posted. > >> > >>> I suspect none of the "advocates" will even show their efforts... Owl, who > >>> had the best chance, already admitted some of the stuff I showed is outside > >>> his skillset at the very least. > >> > >> LOL! > >> > > You spoke of the video stuff as being outside your skill set... and with the > > other tasks you had to write custom scripts to try to make your system do > > what mine does by default. > > Yes, video production is outside my skill set. But video production was > not the task. It certainly is if you believe that Snit's screencast efforts should be categorized under the heading of "video production". I've already proven that Snit doesn't know squat about video, he knows how to use screencast apps to an extent but he doesn't know what's going on with the video aspect.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-02 20:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <55e755f1$0$58680$c3e8da3$88b277c5@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #318586 |
On Wed, 02 Sep 2015 08:57:15 -0400, A.M wrote:
> On 2015-09-01 9:16 PM, DFS wrote:
>> On 9/1/2015 8:30 PM, A.M wrote:
>>> and likely bitter that he keeps demonstrating how much of a moron you
>>> are. NOBODY thinks that you have intellect of any kind so you're
>>> wasting your time defending yourself because EVERYONE thinks you're a
>>> moron.
I x-posted this to auk because you've got twinkletoes trying to speak for
"EVERYONE" (and lying his ass off).
But it gets better:
>>
>> Kohlmann says some stupid things, but I actually think he knows more
>> about Linux than anyone here. Zeke and Bloaty seem very knowledgeable,
>> too.
>
> I agree with Roseanne vallor probably knows a lot, but I've also learned
> since then that he purposely deconstructs reality and creates a new
> truth. When he did that to me, I lost all respect for him. He can be
> knowledgeable about Linux all that he wants but I have no interest in
> communicating with him any further.
Translation: He can dish it out, but throw any shade his way, and he
crumbles like a rice crispy treat.
"Brave Sir Slimer, he bravely run away!"
I may, indeed, be his new "Usenet Lord and Master". Lul.
>> And even though Kohlmann refuses to post code, I think he's probably an
>> excellent C++ (and in the past, assembly) programmer.
>
> I honestly doubt it. No one has avoided proving anything more than he
> has and if his programming is as erroneous as the statements he makes,
[ Note to reader: Peter Kohlmann is right almost all the time, but the
trolls consistently try to say otherwise -- as this one does here. ]
--
-v
"Apple OS X: Where security doesn't matter at all."
-Snit Michael Glasser [Paraphrased]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-02 08:24 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ms64jg$44t$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #318512 |
A.M wrote: > On 2015-09-01 3:44 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >> The imbecile liar Snit Michael Glasser babbled: >> >>> On 9/1/15, 11:43 AM, in article ms4rhf$71j$2@dont-email.me, "A.M" >>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2015-09-01 12:57 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 9/1/15, 3:12 AM, in article ms3tj5$7ei$1@dont-email.me, "Peter >>>>> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>> Jesus fucking christ, get a life you idjit. It was fucking satire. >>>>>>>> Jeez, humor just isn't any fun when you have to explain the joke to >>>>>>>> the stupid people in the room. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Says a Linux advocate, part of the gang who considers me calling >>>>>>> Linux "a beer brewed by pre-teens in an old, soiled toilet" to be a >>>>>>> lie and not a joke. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Maybe because it is a lie, Snit >>>>>> >>>>>> your "jokes" amuse no one. Even your fellow troll swine are ashamed >>>>>> at such a display of utter stupidity >>>>> >>>>> I do not necessarily like his jokes, but they are a LOT better than >>>>> the ones you and your herd tell: >>>> >>>> Liar, you love them. >>> >>> Well, OK. Please tell more. >>> >>> >> >> How nice and cozy. The imbecile liar Snit Michael Glasser and his prime >> sock cuddling > Ah, shut the fuck up already. Every single one of your posts is about "Snit Michael Glasser." You do nothing but defending that dishonest swine
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-01 23:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D20BE9C6.59A86%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #318557 |
On 9/1/15, 11:24 PM, in article ms64jg$44t$2@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > A.M wrote: > >> On 2015-09-01 3:44 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>> The imbecile liar Snit Michael Glasser babbled: >>> >>>> On 9/1/15, 11:43 AM, in article ms4rhf$71j$2@dont-email.me, "A.M" >>>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2015-09-01 12:57 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 9/1/15, 3:12 AM, in article ms3tj5$7ei$1@dont-email.me, "Peter >>>>>> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Jesus fucking christ, get a life you idjit. It was fucking satire. >>>>>>>>> Jeez, humor just isn't any fun when you have to explain the joke to >>>>>>>>> the stupid people in the room. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Says a Linux advocate, part of the gang who considers me calling >>>>>>>> Linux "a beer brewed by pre-teens in an old, soiled toilet" to be a >>>>>>>> lie and not a joke. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Maybe because it is a lie, Snit >>>>>>> >>>>>>> your "jokes" amuse no one. Even your fellow troll swine are ashamed >>>>>>> at such a display of utter stupidity >>>>>> >>>>>> I do not necessarily like his jokes, but they are a LOT better than >>>>>> the ones you and your herd tell: >>>>> >>>>> Liar, you love them. >>>> >>>> Well, OK. Please tell more. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> How nice and cozy. The imbecile liar Snit Michael Glasser and his prime >>> sock cuddling >> > Ah, shut the fuck up already. Every single one of your posts is about "Snit > Michael Glasser." > > You do nothing but defending that dishonest swine With all my evil unquotable lies! -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-02 09:26 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ms686s$gpb$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #318558 |
The imbecile liar Snit Michael Glasser babbled: > On 9/1/15, 11:24 PM, in article ms64jg$44t$2@dont-email.me, "Peter > Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > >> A.M wrote: >> >>> On 2015-09-01 3:44 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>>> The imbecile liar Snit Michael Glasser babbled: >>>> >>>>> On 9/1/15, 11:43 AM, in article ms4rhf$71j$2@dont-email.me, "A.M" >>>>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2015-09-01 12:57 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 9/1/15, 3:12 AM, in article ms3tj5$7ei$1@dont-email.me, "Peter >>>>>>> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Jesus fucking christ, get a life you idjit. It was fucking >>>>>>>>>> satire. Jeez, humor just isn't any fun when you have to explain >>>>>>>>>> the joke to the stupid people in the room. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Says a Linux advocate, part of the gang who considers me calling >>>>>>>>> Linux "a beer brewed by pre-teens in an old, soiled toilet" to be >>>>>>>>> a lie and not a joke. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Maybe because it is a lie, Snit >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> your "jokes" amuse no one. Even your fellow troll swine are ashamed >>>>>>>> at such a display of utter stupidity >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I do not necessarily like his jokes, but they are a LOT better than >>>>>>> the ones you and your herd tell: >>>>>> >>>>>> Liar, you love them. >>>>> >>>>> Well, OK. Please tell more. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> How nice and cozy. The imbecile liar Snit Michael Glasser and his prime >>>> sock cuddling >>> >> Ah, shut the fuck up already. Every single one of your posts is about >> "Snit Michael Glasser." >> >> You do nothing but defending that dishonest swine > > With all my evil unquotable lies! > All your lies are quoteable and have been quoted hundreds of times. just because your take the easy cop out to ignore the quotes and then pretend that they do not exist does not make them disappear
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-02 05:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D20C35D4.59AB9%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #318559 |
On 9/2/15, 12:26 AM, in article ms686s$gpb$1@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>> Ah, shut the fuck up already. Every single one of your posts is about >>> "Snit Michael Glasser." >>> >>> You do nothing but defending that dishonest swine >> >> With all my evil unquotable lies! >> > > All your lies are quoteable and have been quoted hundreds of times. In unquotable ways. Ha ha. Same joke... but now you have turned it into a meta-joke. Really pathetic. All because you fear speaking of technology. > just because your take the easy cop out to ignore the quotes and then > pretend that they do not exist does not make them disappear Yeah, look at all the ones I snipped here. Oh. You have none. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-02 10:44 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ms71sb$g74$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #318559 |
On 2015-09-02 3:26 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > The imbecile liar Snit Michael Glasser babbled: > >> On 9/1/15, 11:24 PM, in article ms64jg$44t$2@dont-email.me, "Peter >> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >> >>> A.M wrote: >>> >>>> On 2015-09-01 3:44 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>>>> The imbecile liar Snit Michael Glasser babbled: >>>>> >>>>>> On 9/1/15, 11:43 AM, in article ms4rhf$71j$2@dont-email.me, "A.M" >>>>>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2015-09-01 12:57 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> On 9/1/15, 3:12 AM, in article ms3tj5$7ei$1@dont-email.me, "Peter >>>>>>>> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Jesus fucking christ, get a life you idjit. It was fucking >>>>>>>>>>> satire. Jeez, humor just isn't any fun when you have to explain >>>>>>>>>>> the joke to the stupid people in the room. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Says a Linux advocate, part of the gang who considers me calling >>>>>>>>>> Linux "a beer brewed by pre-teens in an old, soiled toilet" to be >>>>>>>>>> a lie and not a joke. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Maybe because it is a lie, Snit >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> your "jokes" amuse no one. Even your fellow troll swine are ashamed >>>>>>>>> at such a display of utter stupidity >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I do not necessarily like his jokes, but they are a LOT better than >>>>>>>> the ones you and your herd tell: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Liar, you love them. >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, OK. Please tell more. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> How nice and cozy. The imbecile liar Snit Michael Glasser and his prime >>>>> sock cuddling >>>> >>> Ah, shut the fuck up already. Every single one of your posts is about >>> "Snit Michael Glasser." >>> >>> You do nothing but defending that dishonest swine >> >> With all my evil unquotable lies! >> > > All your lies are quoteable and have been quoted hundreds of times. ROFL. Yeah, and I'm sure that *you* were the one who quoted them, Peter the Klöwn. As of yet, you haven't proven anything at all, much less a quote showing that Snit was wrong. Meanwhile, he has demonstrated how much of an imbecile you are countless times and continues to do it. The way I see it, you're a dead horse than Snit keeps kicking. The only difference is that you're too much of a moron to realize that you've died. > just because your take the easy cop out to ignore the quotes and then > pretend that they do not exist does not make them disappear By all means, show us how he did that just _once_ .
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-02 08:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D20C5D5D.59B24%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #318602 |
On 9/2/15, 7:44 AM, in article ms71sb$g74$6@dont-email.me, "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>> You do nothing but defending that dishonest swine >>> >>> With all my evil unquotable lies! >>> >> >> All your lies are quoteable and have been quoted hundreds of times. > > ROFL. Yeah, and I'm sure that *you* were the one who quoted them, Peter > the Klöwn. As of yet, you haven't proven anything at all, much less a > quote showing that Snit was wrong. Meanwhile, he has demonstrated how > much of an imbecile you are countless times and continues to do it. The > way I see it, you're a dead horse than Snit keeps kicking. The only > difference is that you're too much of a moron to realize that you've died. > >> just because your take the easy cop out to ignore the quotes and then >> pretend that they do not exist does not make them disappear > > By all means, show us how he did that just _once_ . This should be fun. :) -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-02 09:17 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ms6sqa$s6v$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #318558 |
On 2015-09-02 2:48 AM, Snit wrote: > On 9/1/15, 11:24 PM, in article ms64jg$44t$2@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann" > <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > >> A.M wrote: >> >>> On 2015-09-01 3:44 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>>> The imbecile liar Snit Michael Glasser babbled: >>>> >>>>> On 9/1/15, 11:43 AM, in article ms4rhf$71j$2@dont-email.me, "A.M" >>>>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2015-09-01 12:57 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 9/1/15, 3:12 AM, in article ms3tj5$7ei$1@dont-email.me, "Peter >>>>>>> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Jesus fucking christ, get a life you idjit. It was fucking satire. >>>>>>>>>> Jeez, humor just isn't any fun when you have to explain the joke to >>>>>>>>>> the stupid people in the room. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Says a Linux advocate, part of the gang who considers me calling >>>>>>>>> Linux "a beer brewed by pre-teens in an old, soiled toilet" to be a >>>>>>>>> lie and not a joke. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Maybe because it is a lie, Snit >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> your "jokes" amuse no one. Even your fellow troll swine are ashamed >>>>>>>> at such a display of utter stupidity >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I do not necessarily like his jokes, but they are a LOT better than >>>>>>> the ones you and your herd tell: >>>>>> >>>>>> Liar, you love them. >>>>> >>>>> Well, OK. Please tell more. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> How nice and cozy. The imbecile liar Snit Michael Glasser and his prime >>>> sock cuddling >>> >> Ah, shut the fuck up already. Every single one of your posts is about "Snit >> Michael Glasser." >> >> You do nothing but defending that dishonest swine > > With all my evil unquotable lies! To Peter the Klöwn: Why *wouldn't* I defend Snit? He might be unusually annoying as an individual but he isn't a flat-out liar like you and the advocates are and when he makes claims, he actually backs them up. You, on the other hand, do nothing but demonstrate high levels of stupidity through ridiculous comments which are backed by no evidence whatsoever.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-02 07:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D20C4F8C.59AFD%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #318591 |
On 9/2/15, 6:17 AM, in article ms6sqa$s6v$4@dont-email.me, "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>> How nice and cozy. The imbecile liar Snit Michael Glasser and his prime >>>>> sock cuddling >>>> >>> Ah, shut the fuck up already. Every single one of your posts is about "Snit >>> Michael Glasser." >>> >>> You do nothing but defending that dishonest swine >> >> With all my evil unquotable lies! > > To Peter the Klöwn: Why *wouldn't* I defend Snit? He might be unusually > annoying as an individual but he isn't a flat-out liar like you and the > advocates are and when he makes claims, he actually backs them up. You, > on the other hand, do nothing but demonstrate high levels of stupidity > through ridiculous comments which are backed by no evidence whatsoever. Peter attacks me because he knows he cannot back his claims. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-02 07:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <55e6aa4c$0$29382$c3e8da3$e074e489@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #318512 |
On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 20:30:08 -0400, A.M wrote: > On 2015-09-01 3:44 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >> The imbecile liar Snit Michael Glasser babbled: >> >>> On 9/1/15, 11:43 AM, in article ms4rhf$71j$2@dont-email.me, "A.M" >>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2015-09-01 12:57 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 9/1/15, 3:12 AM, in article ms3tj5$7ei$1@dont-email.me, "Peter >>>>> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>> Jesus fucking christ, get a life you idjit. It was fucking >>>>>>>> satire. >>>>>>>> Jeez, humor just isn't any fun when you have to explain the joke >>>>>>>> to the stupid people in the room. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Says a Linux advocate, part of the gang who considers me calling >>>>>>> Linux "a beer brewed by pre-teens in an old, soiled toilet" to be >>>>>>> a lie and not a joke. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Maybe because it is a lie, Snit >>>>>> >>>>>> your "jokes" amuse no one. Even your fellow troll swine are ashamed >>>>>> at such a display of utter stupidity >>>>> >>>>> I do not necessarily like his jokes, but they are a LOT better than >>>>> the ones you and your herd tell: >>>> >>>> Liar, you love them. >>> >>> Well, OK. Please tell more. >>> >>> >>> >> How nice and cozy. The imbecile liar Snit Michael Glasser and his prime >> sock cuddling > > Ah, shut the fuck up already. Every single one of your posts is about > "Snit Michael Glasser." You truly are obsessed and likely bitter that he > keeps demonstrating how much of a moron you are. NOBODY thinks that you > have intellect of any kind so you're wasting your time defending > yourself because EVERYONE thinks you're a moron. Don't look now, but my nominee has taken it upon himself to pretend to speak for the whole group twice in as many days. As above. tinw, and all that. I've heard a rumor that he has also admitted to being a narcissist, if that wasn't already obvious. (I know he's a lost cause for KOTM this round, but maybe next month.) -- -v Two Russian friends happen to meet in Red Square. One of them says, "By the way, did you hear that Romanov died?" "No," replied the other, "I didn't even know he'd been arrested!"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web