Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #330596 > unrolled thread
| Started by | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-03 06:26 +0000 |
| Last post | 2015-11-03 15:55 -0500 |
| Articles | 8 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Should we give wimmens the vote? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 06:26 +0000
Re: Should we give wimmens the vote? Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 09:04 -0500
Re: Should we give wimmens the vote? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 18:02 +0000
Re: Should we give wimmens the vote? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 19:34 +0000
Re: Should we give wimmens the vote? Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 13:54 -0500
Re: Should we give wimmens the vote? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 10:59 -0800
Re: Should we give wimmens the vote? Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 14:43 -0500
Re: Should we give wimmens the vote? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 15:55 -0500
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 06:26 +0000 |
| Subject | Should we give wimmens the vote? |
| Message-ID | <sdfhu03.aoaf@rooftop.invalid> |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKosd0xJadE
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 09:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n1aeon$m3e$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #330596 |
On 2015-11-03 1:26 AM, owl wrote: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKosd0xJadE He repeatedly demonstrates how ignorant and idiotic the masses in America are. These people get their "news" from the same sources that Snit does, it should therefore not be surprising how ignorant they are of what Sharia law even is and how destructive it might be to females. But they're right, Sharia law isn't bad because Snit's Muslim friends are friendly. -- Charmed Tuna
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 18:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fashcn03a.p@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #330640 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 11/3/15, 7:04 AM, in article n1aeon$m3e$1@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" > <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > >> On 2015-11-03 1:26 AM, owl wrote: >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKosd0xJadE >> >> He repeatedly demonstrates how ignorant and idiotic the masses in >> America are. These people get their "news" from the same sources that >> Snit does, it should therefore not be surprising how ignorant they are >> of what Sharia law even is and how destructive it might be to females. >> >> But they're right, Sharia law isn't bad because Snit's Muslim friends >> are friendly. > > You assume you know what sources I get my news from. Silly. > > And you also assume Biblical law is somehow better than Sharia law... even > though you have been shown direct passages from the Bible that demonstrate > it is not true. > So you're good with Hillary's Sharia law plan also?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 19:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhsbvd83.a@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #330689 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 11/3/15, 11:02 AM, in article fashcn03a.p@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 11/3/15, 7:04 AM, in article n1aeon$m3e$1@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" >>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2015-11-03 1:26 AM, owl wrote: >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKosd0xJadE >>>> >>>> He repeatedly demonstrates how ignorant and idiotic the masses in >>>> America are. These people get their "news" from the same sources that >>>> Snit does, it should therefore not be surprising how ignorant they are >>>> of what Sharia law even is and how destructive it might be to females. >>>> >>>> But they're right, Sharia law isn't bad because Snit's Muslim friends >>>> are friendly. >>> >>> You assume you know what sources I get my news from. Silly. >>> >>> And you also assume Biblical law is somehow better than Sharia law... even >>> though you have been shown direct passages from the Bible that demonstrate >>> it is not true. >>> >> So you're good with Hillary's Sharia law plan also? >> > > No clue what you mean. Why not point to her site where she lays it out. > She's your candidate. You do the research. I'm not voting for her regardless of her Sharia stance.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 13:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n1avoe$tod$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #330640 |
On 2015-11-03 12:45 PM, Snit wrote: > On 11/3/15, 7:04 AM, in article n1aeon$m3e$1@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" > <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > >> On 2015-11-03 1:26 AM, owl wrote: >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKosd0xJadE >> >> He repeatedly demonstrates how ignorant and idiotic the masses in >> America are. These people get their "news" from the same sources that >> Snit does, it should therefore not be surprising how ignorant they are >> of what Sharia law even is and how destructive it might be to females. >> >> But they're right, Sharia law isn't bad because Snit's Muslim friends >> are friendly. > > You assume you know what sources I get my news from. Silly. > > And you also assume Biblical law is somehow better than Sharia law... even > though you have been shown direct passages from the Bible that demonstrate > it is not true. *Yawn* -- Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 10:59 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <d060a25a-309a-4a94-a481-519adb7ae80f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #330701 |
On Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 11:54:14 AM UTC-7, Slimer wrote: > On 2015-11-03 12:45 PM, Snit wrote: > > On 11/3/15, 7:04 AM, in article n1aeon$m3e$1@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" > > <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > > > >> On 2015-11-03 1:26 AM, owl wrote: > >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKosd0xJadE > >> > >> He repeatedly demonstrates how ignorant and idiotic the masses in > >> America are. These people get their "news" from the same sources that > >> Snit does, it should therefore not be surprising how ignorant they are > >> of what Sharia law even is and how destructive it might be to females. > >> > >> But they're right, Sharia law isn't bad because Snit's Muslim friends > >> are friendly. > > > > You assume you know what sources I get my news from. Silly. > > > > And you also assume Biblical law is somehow better than Sharia law... even > > though you have been shown direct passages from the Bible that demonstrate > > it is not true. > > *Yawn* Agreed. Had he read the article I cited recently he might have come up with a new angle, maybe even one that made sense and actually supported his statements.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 14:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n1b2l5$a0u$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #330704 |
On 2015-11-03 1:59 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 11:54:14 AM UTC-7, Slimer wrote: >> On 2015-11-03 12:45 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 11/3/15, 7:04 AM, in article n1aeon$m3e$1@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" >>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2015-11-03 1:26 AM, owl wrote: >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKosd0xJadE >>>> >>>> He repeatedly demonstrates how ignorant and idiotic the masses in >>>> America are. These people get their "news" from the same sources that >>>> Snit does, it should therefore not be surprising how ignorant they are >>>> of what Sharia law even is and how destructive it might be to females. >>>> >>>> But they're right, Sharia law isn't bad because Snit's Muslim friends >>>> are friendly. >>> >>> You assume you know what sources I get my news from. Silly. >>> >>> And you also assume Biblical law is somehow better than Sharia law... even >>> though you have been shown direct passages from the Bible that demonstrate >>> it is not true. >> >> *Yawn* > > Agreed. Had he read the article I cited recently he might have come up with a new angle, maybe even one that made sense and actually supported his statements. I yawned because I honestly think that the topic interests absolutely no one but Snit. I can't imagine anyone gets pleasure coming here and expecting to talk about Linux only to see that drivel day and night. I am starting to sympathize with the advotwats. -- Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 15:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <10t3yt8ooo7g.1gt729b236l0a$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #330720 |
On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 14:43:41 -0500, Slimer wrote: > On 2015-11-03 1:59 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >> On Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 11:54:14 AM UTC-7, Slimer wrote: >>> On 2015-11-03 12:45 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 11/3/15, 7:04 AM, in article n1aeon$m3e$1@dont-email.me, "Charmed Tuna" >>>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2015-11-03 1:26 AM, owl wrote: >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKosd0xJadE >>>>> >>>>> He repeatedly demonstrates how ignorant and idiotic the masses in >>>>> America are. These people get their "news" from the same sources that >>>>> Snit does, it should therefore not be surprising how ignorant they are >>>>> of what Sharia law even is and how destructive it might be to females. >>>>> >>>>> But they're right, Sharia law isn't bad because Snit's Muslim friends >>>>> are friendly. >>>> >>>> You assume you know what sources I get my news from. Silly. >>>> >>>> And you also assume Biblical law is somehow better than Sharia law... even >>>> though you have been shown direct passages from the Bible that demonstrate >>>> it is not true. >>> >>> *Yawn* >> >> Agreed. Had he read the article I cited recently he might have come up with a new angle, maybe even one that made sense and actually supported his statements. > > I yawned because I honestly think that the topic interests absolutely no > one but Snit. I can't imagine anyone gets pleasure coming here and > expecting to talk about Linux only to see that drivel day and night. I > am starting to sympathize with the advotwats. Like I said, snit to turn a discussion about boiling water into a circus. He motive is to disrupt, not to discuss technology. -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web