Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #317512 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-29 14:33 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-08-29 14:29 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 127 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Just click "like" Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 14:33 -0500
Re: Just click "like" vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-08-29 21:12 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-29 14:23 -0700
Re: Just click "like" vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-08-29 23:20 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-29 16:36 -0700
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-08-30 00:37 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-29 17:43 -0700
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-08-30 01:23 +0000
Re: Just click "like" vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-08-30 01:36 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-29 19:58 -0700
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-29 19:53 -0700
Re: Just click "like" vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-08-30 01:18 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-29 19:17 -0700
Re: Just click "like" Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 03:53 -0500
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-30 10:58 -0700
Re: Just click "like" Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 13:44 -0700
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-08-30 21:03 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-30 14:38 -0700
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-08-30 22:00 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-30 15:15 -0700
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-08-30 22:43 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-30 17:33 -0700
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-08-31 03:25 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-30 21:06 -0700
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-08-31 05:11 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-30 22:18 -0700
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-08-31 05:35 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-30 22:37 -0700
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-08-31 05:50 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-30 22:55 -0700
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-08-31 06:18 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-30 23:39 -0700
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-08-31 07:15 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-31 00:20 -0700
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-08-31 12:42 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-31 09:25 -0700
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-08-31 20:55 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-31 14:04 -0700
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-08-31 21:56 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-31 16:45 -0700
Re: Just click "like" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-01 01:51 +0200
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-31 17:07 -0700
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-01 00:34 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-31 17:55 -0700
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-01 01:10 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-31 18:25 -0700
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-01 02:11 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-31 19:21 -0700
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-01 03:10 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-31 20:35 -0700
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-01 04:11 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-31 21:45 -0700
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-01 16:32 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 10:00 -0700
Re: Just click "like" vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-09-01 17:10 +0000
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-01 17:30 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 10:40 -0700
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-01 22:16 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 15:41 -0700
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-01 22:53 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 16:12 -0700
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-01 23:19 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 16:28 -0700
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-01 23:39 +0000
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-01 23:56 +0000
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 00:11 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 17:57 -0700
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 17:42 -0700
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 00:47 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 17:58 -0700
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 01:13 +0000
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 04:17 +0000
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 05:23 +0000
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 04:09 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 21:50 -0700
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 05:16 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 10:38 -0700
Re: Just click "like" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-01 20:46 +0200
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 12:13 -0700
Re: Just click "like" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-01 21:43 +0200
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 13:42 -0700
Re: Just click "like" ronb <ronbNOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 22:01 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 15:07 -0700
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 15:08 -0700
Re: Just click "like" William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-09-01 23:14 +0100
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 15:42 -0700
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-01 22:14 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 15:35 -0700
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-01 22:43 +0000
Re: Just click "like" vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-09-01 22:46 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 16:14 -0700
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-01 23:30 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 17:36 -0700
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 00:49 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 17:59 -0700
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 01:16 +0000
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 04:14 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 21:53 -0700
Just click "like" and Snit Michael Glasser fails Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-02 10:18 +0200
Re: Just click "like" and Snit Michael Glasser fails Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-02 05:07 -0700
Re: Just click "like" and Snit Michael Glasser fails Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-02 14:31 +0200
Just click "like" and Snit Michael Glasser fails completely Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-02 14:41 +0200
Re: Just click "like" and Snit Michael Glasser fails completely Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-02 16:13 +0200
Re: Just click "like" and Snit Michael Glasser fails JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-03 11:37 -0500
Re: Just click "like" vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-09-02 08:08 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-02 05:03 -0700
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 04:21 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 16:09 -0700
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-01 23:15 +0000
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 04:36 +0000
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 05:25 +0000
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-01 00:21 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-31 17:46 -0700
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-01 01:04 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-31 18:17 -0700
Re: Just click "like" Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 21:49 -0500
Re: Just click "like" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-31 07:35 -0500
Re: Just click "like" GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-08-30 15:21 -0600
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-30 14:39 -0700
Re: Just click "like" GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-08-31 13:32 -0600
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-31 12:49 -0700
Re: Just click "like" GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-01 11:38 -0600
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-08-30 00:35 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-29 17:46 -0700
Re: Just click "like" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-08-30 00:56 +0000
Re: Just click "like" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-29 19:16 -0700
Re: Just click "like" John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 14:29 -0700
Page 5 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-01 13:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D20B5BB4.59974%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #318438 |
On 9/1/15, 12:43 PM, in article ms4v1g$kbv$4@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann"
<peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
> Snit wrote:
>
>> On 9/1/15, 11:46 AM, in article ms4rn8$6a0$6@dont-email.me, "Peter
>> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
>>
>>> The imbecile liar Snit Michael Glasser babbled:
>>>
>>>> On 9/1/15, 10:10 AM, in article
>>>> 55e5dc1d$0$64284$c3e8da3$b280bf18@news.astraweb.com, "vallor"
>>>> <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 16:32:50 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/31/15, 9:11 PM, in article se03af.f04ae@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And...??? Are you still playing games where pretend that the desktop
>>>>>>> is as much a part of a browser as the browser's print dialog [1]?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's not "the browser's print dialog." It's the System Print Dialog.
>>>>>
>>>>> You are correct, but he'll never admit that. Time to move on?
>>>>
>>>> He snipped my footnote (but not the reference to it) and ignored the
>>>> actual video where I talk about it: <https://youtu.be/aSNpnYpmKag>.
>>>>
>>>> Keep in mind the discussion has been about workflows in the GUI, *not*
>>>> about what is technically happening in the background. That is not
>>>> relevant to the discussion.
>>>
>>> Because it proves you wrong, you forgot to mention
>>
>> Why not talk about technology
>
> You have yet to talk about tech for the vey first time. You know nothing
> about technology
Oh, so much to learn from you!
Peter Köhlmann <http://goo.gl/CcTIAO>:
-----
The apps with "Quit" do *not* exit, they continue to run
in the background
-----
Actually, even though you repeatedly make amazingly ignorant comments such
as that, I am even open to any evidence you show. To me it is much more
about the content and the technology than the person. If you have a point
and could back it well, as unlikely as that is, I would love to hear it.
>> and not just scream how you think people are
>> wrong in ways you cannot explain.
>
> You think that your snipping of proof is the same as "being unable to
> explain"
See: just lies from you I (and ironic ones as you do not even quote what
video I am speaking of).
>> In my video, by the way, I prove I am
>> right. :)
>
> Your forged and dorctored evidence is of no interest
See: you just lie to avoid speaking of technology.
--
* OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ronb <ronbNOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-01 22:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ms5786$lak$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #318438 |
On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 21:43:24 +0200, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > Your forged and dorctored evidence is of no interest "Snit's" videos are being watched crowds of "tens," probably mostly by his own nyms. -- Zero tolerance for LYING WinDrones & iCultists
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-01 15:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D20B6FCB.599A3%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #318466 |
On 9/1/15, 3:01 PM, in article ms5786$lak$3@dont-email.me, "ronb" <ronbNOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 21:43:24 +0200, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > >> Your forged and dorctored evidence is of no interest > > "Snit's" videos are being watched crowds of "tens," probably mostly by > his own nyms. You mean the videos I use to respond to things in COLA and are made simply for COLA and not viewed by others except in rare caees are only viewed by people in COLA. WOW! Thanks for letting me know. LOL! And then you had to add a variant of the "everyone is Snit" joke. Ha ha. Good grief - try to get out of a grade school mentality. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-01 15:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D20B6FE4.599A4%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #318466 |
On 9/1/15, 3:01 PM, in article ms5786$lak$3@dont-email.me, "ronb" <ronbNOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 21:43:24 +0200, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > >> Your forged and dorctored evidence is of no interest > > "Snit's" videos are being watched crowds of "tens," probably mostly by > his own nyms. You deny watching my videos but know how many views they get. LOL! -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Poaster <wp@dev.null> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-01 23:14 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mjkhbc-2ne.ln1@user-1842.linux.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #318466 |
It was reported that ronb posted: > On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 21:43:24 +0200, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > >> Your forged and dorctored evidence is of no interest > > "Snit's" videos are being watched crowds of "tens," probably mostly by > his own nyms. And perhaps Jeremy from Walmart, & his broadband sharing neighbor. ;-) -- openSUSE 13.2 64-bit KDE 4.14.9 Kernel: Kernel: 4.1.6-3.gd867e86-desktop #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri Aug 28 10:59:34 UTC 2015 (d867e86) x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux This message is virus free, as absolutely NO Micro$oft products were used in its preparation. "If you do want to clean your computer of malware, the first software to delete is Windows." http://www.gnu.org/proprietary/malware-microsoft.en.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-01 15:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D20B77E7.599B8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #318472 |
On 9/1/15, 3:14 PM, in article mjkhbc-2ne.ln1@user-1842.linux.individual.net, "William Poaster" <wp@dev.null> wrote: > It was reported that ronb posted: > >> On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 21:43:24 +0200, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >> >>> Your forged and dorctored evidence is of no interest >> >> "Snit's" videos are being watched crowds of "tens," probably mostly by >> his own nyms. > > And perhaps Jeremy from Walmart, & his broadband sharing neighbor. ;-) Everyone is Snit. Ha ha ha ha! Good grief... will the herd ever get past a grade school mentality? -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-01 22:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <eughd.kzv03@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #318375 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 9/1/15, 10:10 AM, in article > 55e5dc1d$0$64284$c3e8da3$b280bf18@news.astraweb.com, "vallor" > <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: > This is a whacky workflow and, apparently at least, to not clutter his menus > he removed other items we had talked about and used. I didn't remove anything. I showed videos of different machines. All of what you have as "PDF Services" could be nested under *one* menu item on *one* menu. I thought that was clear from the one particular video where I have a single "PDF Services" menu showing sub-menus for "Preview as PDF", "Create PDF", and "Email as PDF." Damn, you are a BLOCKHEAD.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-01 15:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D20B7654.599B4%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #318471 |
On 9/1/15, 3:14 PM, in article eughd.kzv03@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 9/1/15, 10:10 AM, in article >> 55e5dc1d$0$64284$c3e8da3$b280bf18@news.astraweb.com, "vallor" >> <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: > >> This is a whacky workflow and, apparently at least, to not clutter his menus >> he removed other items we had talked about and used. > > I didn't remove anything. I showed videos of different machines. OK, so you added things to different virtual machines. The point stands: you can do any subset of what I show, though sometimes with a sorta whacky workflow where you have to leave the program and click on the desktop, but you end up treating each machine more as a special purpose machine and not one that has each of these features. *And* you showed a pretty cool way to convert files in your file browser to PDF, a topic Peter Köhlmann picked, in a way better than I could show on OS X (again, mine might have had some benefits but overall I think it is fair to say yours was the better solution). > All of what you have as "PDF Services" could be nested under *one* > menu item on *one* menu. Right... you could have it buried in a menu on your desktop, but you cannot have it be tied to the print dialogs or otherwise have it fit a more reasoned workflow. OK. ... Snip your insults where you demonstrate a lack of understanding about my views... prefer to talk about technology. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-01 22:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fancm9a.jf@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #318477 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 9/1/15, 3:14 PM, in article eughd.kzv03@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 9/1/15, 10:10 AM, in article >>> 55e5dc1d$0$64284$c3e8da3$b280bf18@news.astraweb.com, "vallor" >>> <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >> >>> This is a whacky workflow and, apparently at least, to not clutter his menus >>> he removed other items we had talked about and used. >> >> I didn't remove anything. I showed videos of different machines. > OK, so you added things to different virtual machines. The point stands: you > can do any subset of what I show, though sometimes with a sorta whacky > workflow where you have to leave the program and click on the desktop, but > you end up treating each machine more as a special purpose machine and not > one that has each of these features. > *And* you showed a pretty cool way to convert files in your file browser to > PDF, a topic Peter Köhlmann picked, in a way better than I could show on OS > X (again, mine might have had some benefits but overall I think it is fair > to say yours was the better solution). >> All of what you have as "PDF Services" could be nested under *one* >> menu item on *one* menu. > Right... you could have it buried in a menu on your desktop, but you cannot > have it be tied to the print dialogs or otherwise have it fit a more > reasoned workflow. OK. Having things buried somewhere under a "Print" menu, especially things that are completely unrelated to printing, does not equal a "better workflow." You really need to reassess your definition of "streamlined."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-01 22:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <55e62ac3$0$64284$c3e8da3$b280bf18@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #318482 |
On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 22:43:31 +0000, owl wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 9/1/15, 3:14 PM, in article eughd.kzv03@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 9/1/15, 10:10 AM, in article >>>> 55e5dc1d$0$64284$c3e8da3$b280bf18@news.astraweb.com, "vallor" >>>> <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >>> >>>> This is a whacky workflow and, apparently at least, to not clutter >>>> his menus he removed other items we had talked about and used. >>> >>> I didn't remove anything. I showed videos of different machines. > >> OK, so you added things to different virtual machines. The point >> stands: you can do any subset of what I show, though sometimes with a >> sorta whacky workflow where you have to leave the program and click on >> the desktop, but you end up treating each machine more as a special >> purpose machine and not one that has each of these features. > >> *And* you showed a pretty cool way to convert files in your file >> browser to PDF, a topic Peter Köhlmann picked, in a way better than I >> could show on OS X (again, mine might have had some benefits but >> overall I think it is fair to say yours was the better solution). > >>> All of what you have as "PDF Services" could be nested under *one* >>> menu item on *one* menu. > >> Right... you could have it buried in a menu on your desktop, but you >> cannot have it be tied to the print dialogs or otherwise have it fit a >> more reasoned workflow. OK. > > Having things buried somewhere under a "Print" menu, especially things > that are completely unrelated to printing, does not equal a "better > workflow." You really need to reassess your definition of "streamlined." Your arrangement has better system integration, owl. -- -v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-01 16:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D20B7F7E.599D2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #318485 |
On 9/1/15, 3:46 PM, in article 55e62ac3$0$64284$c3e8da3$b280bf18@news.astraweb.com, "vallor" <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >>>> All of what you have as "PDF Services" could be nested under *one* >>>> menu item on *one* menu. >> >>> Right... you could have it buried in a menu on your desktop, but you >>> cannot have it be tied to the print dialogs or otherwise have it fit a >>> more reasoned workflow. OK. >> >> Having things buried somewhere under a "Print" menu, especially things >> that are completely unrelated to printing, does not equal a "better >> workflow." You really need to reassess your definition of "streamlined." > > > Your arrangement has better system integration, owl. His is based on having to go to the file manager or use a system wide hot key to do a task in a browser. His is anything but streamlined... unless you want to count my being able to make an Automator script to do the whole thing, including editing the file, as being "streamlined". Sure, once things are set up I can do it with one menu item, hotkey, or click on my dock... but it is absurd to set things up like that for every task you do. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-01 23:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fa3a.fau@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #318493 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 9/1/15, 3:46 PM, in article > 55e62ac3$0$64284$c3e8da3$b280bf18@news.astraweb.com, "vallor" > <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >>>>> All of what you have as "PDF Services" could be nested under *one* >>>>> menu item on *one* menu. >>> >>>> Right... you could have it buried in a menu on your desktop, but you >>>> cannot have it be tied to the print dialogs or otherwise have it fit a >>>> more reasoned workflow. OK. >>> >>> Having things buried somewhere under a "Print" menu, especially things >>> that are completely unrelated to printing, does not equal a "better >>> workflow." You really need to reassess your definition of "streamlined." >> >> >> Your arrangement has better system integration, owl. > His is based on having to go to the file manager or use a system wide hot > key to do a task in a browser. > His is anything but streamlined... unless you want to count my being able to > make an Automator script to do the whole thing, including editing the file, > as being "streamlined". Sure, once things are set up I can do it with one > menu item, hotkey, or click on my dock... but it is absurd to set things up > like that for every task you do. It's "absurd" because you can't do it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-01 17:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D20B929F.599EE%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #318499 |
On 9/1/15, 4:30 PM, in article fa3a.fau@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 9/1/15, 3:46 PM, in article >> 55e62ac3$0$64284$c3e8da3$b280bf18@news.astraweb.com, "vallor" >> <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: > >>>>>> All of what you have as "PDF Services" could be nested under *one* >>>>>> menu item on *one* menu. >>>> >>>>> Right... you could have it buried in a menu on your desktop, but you >>>>> cannot have it be tied to the print dialogs or otherwise have it fit a >>>>> more reasoned workflow. OK. >>>> >>>> Having things buried somewhere under a "Print" menu, especially things >>>> that are completely unrelated to printing, does not equal a "better >>>> workflow." You really need to reassess your definition of "streamlined." >>> >>> >>> Your arrangement has better system integration, owl. > >> His is based on having to go to the file manager or use a system wide hot >> key to do a task in a browser. > >> His is anything but streamlined... unless you want to count my being able to >> make an Automator script to do the whole thing, including editing the file, >> as being "streamlined". Sure, once things are set up I can do it with one >> menu item, hotkey, or click on my dock... but it is absurd to set things up >> like that for every task you do. > > It's "absurd" because you can't do it. > Why would I not be able to do it? Really what are you talking about? -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-02 00:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <adsfashe9.asj@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #318514 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 9/1/15, 4:30 PM, in article fa3a.fau@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 9/1/15, 3:46 PM, in article >>> 55e62ac3$0$64284$c3e8da3$b280bf18@news.astraweb.com, "vallor" >>> <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >> >>>>>>> All of what you have as "PDF Services" could be nested under *one* >>>>>>> menu item on *one* menu. >>>>> >>>>>> Right... you could have it buried in a menu on your desktop, but you >>>>>> cannot have it be tied to the print dialogs or otherwise have it fit a >>>>>> more reasoned workflow. OK. >>>>> >>>>> Having things buried somewhere under a "Print" menu, especially things >>>>> that are completely unrelated to printing, does not equal a "better >>>>> workflow." You really need to reassess your definition of "streamlined." >>>> >>>> >>>> Your arrangement has better system integration, owl. >> >>> His is based on having to go to the file manager or use a system wide hot >>> key to do a task in a browser. >> >>> His is anything but streamlined... unless you want to count my being able to >>> make an Automator script to do the whole thing, including editing the file, >>> as being "streamlined". Sure, once things are set up I can do it with one >>> menu item, hotkey, or click on my dock... but it is absurd to set things up >>> like that for every task you do. >> >> It's "absurd" because you can't do it. >> > Why would I not be able to do it? Really what are you talking about? Talk is cheap. Do it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-01 17:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D20B9819.599FC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #318519 |
On 9/1/15, 5:49 PM, in article adsfashe9.asj@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 9/1/15, 4:30 PM, in article fa3a.fau@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 9/1/15, 3:46 PM, in article >>>> 55e62ac3$0$64284$c3e8da3$b280bf18@news.astraweb.com, "vallor" >>>> <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>> All of what you have as "PDF Services" could be nested under *one* >>>>>>>> menu item on *one* menu. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Right... you could have it buried in a menu on your desktop, but you >>>>>>> cannot have it be tied to the print dialogs or otherwise have it fit a >>>>>>> more reasoned workflow. OK. >>>>>> >>>>>> Having things buried somewhere under a "Print" menu, especially things >>>>>> that are completely unrelated to printing, does not equal a "better >>>>>> workflow." You really need to reassess your definition of "streamlined." >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Your arrangement has better system integration, owl. >>> >>>> His is based on having to go to the file manager or use a system wide hot >>>> key to do a task in a browser. >>> >>>> His is anything but streamlined... unless you want to count my being able >>>> to >>>> make an Automator script to do the whole thing, including editing the file, >>>> as being "streamlined". Sure, once things are set up I can do it with one >>>> menu item, hotkey, or click on my dock... but it is absurd to set things up >>>> like that for every task you do. >>> >>> It's "absurd" because you can't do it. >>> >> Why would I not be able to do it? Really what are you talking about? > > Talk is cheap. Do it. > Already done... but it is a silly exercise not tied to a real-world problem. My save to recipes IS a real world situation. My mailing of a recipe IS a real world situation. Anyway, I did your "test", now see if you can make a video even close to the one I showed in my challenge. Or even show a STANDARD work flow you would use to save a recipe as a PDF *and* email it. In my video I just use the desktop... so no need for anything special there. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-02 01:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <asdfmvnc903.afei@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #318522 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 9/1/15, 5:49 PM, in article adsfashe9.asj@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 9/1/15, 4:30 PM, in article fa3a.fau@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 9/1/15, 3:46 PM, in article >>>>> 55e62ac3$0$64284$c3e8da3$b280bf18@news.astraweb.com, "vallor" >>>>> <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>> All of what you have as "PDF Services" could be nested under *one* >>>>>>>>> menu item on *one* menu. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Right... you could have it buried in a menu on your desktop, but you >>>>>>>> cannot have it be tied to the print dialogs or otherwise have it fit a >>>>>>>> more reasoned workflow. OK. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Having things buried somewhere under a "Print" menu, especially things >>>>>>> that are completely unrelated to printing, does not equal a "better >>>>>>> workflow." You really need to reassess your definition of "streamlined." >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Your arrangement has better system integration, owl. >>>> >>>>> His is based on having to go to the file manager or use a system wide hot >>>>> key to do a task in a browser. >>>> >>>>> His is anything but streamlined... unless you want to count my being able >>>>> to >>>>> make an Automator script to do the whole thing, including editing the file, >>>>> as being "streamlined". Sure, once things are set up I can do it with one >>>>> menu item, hotkey, or click on my dock... but it is absurd to set things up >>>>> like that for every task you do. >>>> >>>> It's "absurd" because you can't do it. >>>> >>> Why would I not be able to do it? Really what are you talking about? >> >> Talk is cheap. Do it. >> > Already done... but it is a silly exercise not tied to a real-world problem. You failed miserably in your attempt to replicate the workflow in my video. Maybe it's not your fail though. Probably it is just not possible to have such a streamlined workflow with OS X.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-02 04:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fabnd93.dfjo3@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #318530 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 9/1/15, 6:16 PM, in article asdfmvnc903.afei@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> It's "absurd" because you can't do it. >>>>>> >>>>> Why would I not be able to do it? Really what are you talking about? >>>> >>>> Talk is cheap. Do it. >>>> >> >>> Already done... but it is a silly exercise not tied to a real-world problem. >> >> You failed miserably in your attempt to replicate the workflow in my >> video. > One hot key. Saved to a folder of my choice. > Done. > And easy. :) That was not the challenge. The challenge was to duplicate what I did using OS X. Apparently it cannot be done, because you FAILED. LOL seriously, you automate menu drops like in Win 3.1 macro recorder and think that is something special? What if you had a hundred recipes? You going to sit there and watch that crap with the menu dropping down over and over... HOW RETARDED IS THAT OS OF YOURS!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-01 21:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D20BCED6.59A58%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #318543 |
On 9/1/15, 9:14 PM, in article fabnd93.dfjo3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 9/1/15, 6:16 PM, in article asdfmvnc903.afei@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>>>>>> It's "absurd" because you can't do it. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Why would I not be able to do it? Really what are you talking about? >>>>> >>>>> Talk is cheap. Do it. >>>>> >>> >>>> Already done... but it is a silly exercise not tied to a real-world >>>> problem. >>> >>> You failed miserably in your attempt to replicate the workflow in my >>> video. > >> One hot key. Saved to a folder of my choice. > >> Done. > >> And easy. :) > > That was not the challenge. The challenge was to duplicate what I > did using OS X. Apparently it cannot be done, because you FAILED. > LOL seriously, you automate menu drops like in Win 3.1 macro recorder > and think that is something special? What if you had a hundred > recipes? You going to sit there and watch that crap with the menu > dropping down over and over... HOW RETARDED IS THAT OS OF YOURS! > You had TWO recipes and failed. Really... this is silly. But if I wanted to do a bunch of pages I would automate that in a different way... download the pages and then convert to PDF or something. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-02 10:18 +0200 |
| Subject | Just click "like" and Snit Michael Glasser fails |
| Message-ID | <ms6b9h$sfm$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #318549 |
The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: > On 9/1/15, 9:14 PM, in article fabnd93.dfjo3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 9/1/15, 6:16 PM, in article asdfmvnc903.afei@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>>>>>>> It's "absurd" because you can't do it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why would I not be able to do it? Really what are you talking about? >>>>>> >>>>>> Talk is cheap. Do it. >>>>>> >>>> >>>>> Already done... but it is a silly exercise not tied to a real-world >>>>> problem. >>>> >>>> You failed miserably in your attempt to replicate the workflow in my >>>> video. >> >>> One hot key. Saved to a folder of my choice. >> >>> Done. >> >>> And easy. :) >> >> That was not the challenge. The challenge was to duplicate what I >> did using OS X. Apparently it cannot be done, because you FAILED. >> LOL seriously, you automate menu drops like in Win 3.1 macro recorder >> and think that is something special? What if you had a hundred >> recipes? You going to sit there and watch that crap with the menu >> dropping down over and over... HOW RETARDED IS THAT OS OF YOURS! >> > You had TWO recipes and failed. Really... this is silly. That "failing part" needs some explanation How come that you have such a horribly bad eyesight? > But if I wanted to do a bunch of pages I would automate that in a > different way... download the pages and then convert to PDF or something. > Translation: You can't do it and want to hide that fact by doing it *very* different. Whereas when you put one of your lunatic "challenges" it has to be done *exactly* like you do it, otherwise you consider it "failed" Double standards and that...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-02 05:07 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Just click "like" and Snit Michael Glasser fails |
| Message-ID | <D20C347E.59AB6%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #318564 |
On 9/2/15, 1:18 AM, in article ms6b9h$sfm$1@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: > >> On 9/1/15, 9:14 PM, in article fabnd93.dfjo3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 9/1/15, 6:16 PM, in article asdfmvnc903.afei@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>> It's "absurd" because you can't do it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why would I not be able to do it? Really what are you talking about? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Talk is cheap. Do it. >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Already done... but it is a silly exercise not tied to a real-world >>>>>> problem. >>>>> >>>>> You failed miserably in your attempt to replicate the workflow in my >>>>> video. >>> >>>> One hot key. Saved to a folder of my choice. >>> >>>> Done. >>> >>>> And easy. :) >>> >>> That was not the challenge. The challenge was to duplicate what I >>> did using OS X. Apparently it cannot be done, because you FAILED. >>> LOL seriously, you automate menu drops like in Win 3.1 macro recorder >>> and think that is something special? What if you had a hundred >>> recipes? You going to sit there and watch that crap with the menu >>> dropping down over and over... HOW RETARDED IS THAT OS OF YOURS! >>> >> You had TWO recipes and failed. Really... this is silly. > > That "failing part" needs some explanation He did not save the recipes by themselves but the page with tons of other links and the like. ... >> But if I wanted to do a bunch of pages I would automate that in a >> different way... download the pages and then convert to PDF or something. >> > > Translation: You can't do it and want to hide that fact by doing it *very* > different. > Whereas when you put one of your lunatic "challenges" it has to be done > *exactly* like you do it, otherwise you consider it "failed" > > Double standards and that... I made it very clear it did not have to be done in the same way. Your comment is just gibberish. Heck, and the challenge I gave included editing it, saving it, and emailing it. He pretty much showed he had no standard workflow to do that well so he wrote a script... and left out the editing. Oops. Comes down to him showing Linux to be a much less powerful general purpose machine. And even with scripting he had to go to each URL and select it. Rather poor showing in his part. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web