Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #158130 > unrolled thread

Bathsalt Owl should show soon sniffing bathsalt. It was punked by 7, and it doesn't have the man package to unpunk itself. It will run around most of the day avoiding 7.

Started byBig Steel <"The One77KKK"@One77KKK.net>
First post2013-01-15 05:42 -0500
Last post2013-01-16 00:53 +0000
Articles 4 — 4 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy


Contents

  Bathsalt Owl should show soon sniffing bathsalt. It was punked by 7, and it doesn't have the man package to unpunk itself.  It will run around most of the day avoiding 7. Big Steel <"The One77KKK"@One77KKK.net> - 2013-01-15 05:42 -0500
    Re: Bathsalt Owl should show soon sniffing bathsalt. It was punked by 7, and it doesn't have the man package to unpunk itself.  It will run around most of the day avoiding 7. RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2013-01-15 10:52 -0800
      Re: Bathsalt Owl should show soon sniffing bathsalt. It was punked by 7, and it doesn't have the man package to unpunk itself.  It will run around most of the day avoiding 7. Big Steel <"The OneOOOOwee"@OneOOOOweee.net> - 2013-01-15 14:38 -0500
      Re: Bathsalt Owl should show soon sniffing bathsalt. It was punked by 7, and it doesn't have the man package to unpunk itself.  It will run around most of the day avoiding 7. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-01-16 00:53 +0000

#158130 — Bathsalt Owl should show soon sniffing bathsalt. It was punked by 7, and it doesn't have the man package to unpunk itself. It will run around most of the day avoiding 7.

FromBig Steel <"The One77KKK"@One77KKK.net>
Date2013-01-15 05:42 -0500
SubjectBathsalt Owl should show soon sniffing bathsalt. It was punked by 7, and it doesn't have the man package to unpunk itself. It will run around most of the day avoiding 7.
Message-ID<cZudnVVCJPgZr2jNnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@earthlink.com>


[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#158194

FromRayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com>
Date2013-01-15 10:52 -0800
Message-ID<916e6773-7a09-4afc-aabb-f01754dee3c7@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#158130
On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 12:42:10 PM UTC+2, Big Steel wrote:
> 

LOL.  I don't know who's the bigger fool, (f)owl or 7.  They both are about tied in tomfoolery, and both are Linux users which figures.

RL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#158204

FromBig Steel <"The OneOOOOwee"@OneOOOOweee.net>
Date2013-01-15 14:38 -0500
Message-ID<k9GdnVZdB7m_LWjNnZ2dnUVZ_uOdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
In reply to#158194
On 1/15/2013 1:52 PM, RayLopez99 wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 12:42:10 PM UTC+2, Big Steel wrote:
>>
>
> LOL.  I don't know who's the bigger fool, (f)owl or 7.  They both are about tied in tomfoolery, and both are Linux users which figures.
>
> RL

7 punked him so bad that Bathsalt Owl launched and attacked England over 
it. :)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#158249

Fromowl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date2013-01-16 00:53 +0000
Message-ID<ery830a.ser@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to#158194
RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 12:42:10 PM UTC+2, Big Steel wrote:
> > 

> LOL.  I don't know who's the bigger fool, (f)owl or 7.  They both are about tied in tomfoolery, and both are Linux users which figures.

I see both of you fags are begging for my attention again.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy


csiph-web