Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #286560 > unrolled thread
| Started by | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-03-29 13:24 +0000 |
| Last post | 2015-03-29 15:50 -0600 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 413 — 25 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 13:24 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-29 15:41 +0200
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 13:59 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-29 16:00 +0200
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 14:09 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-29 16:10 +0200
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 14:19 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-29 16:16 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-29 10:20 -0400
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 14:35 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-29 11:09 -0400
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 14:59 +0000
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-29 16:04 -0600
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-29 10:18 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-29 16:23 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-29 12:38 -0400
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 17:02 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-29 13:08 -0400
Re: fucking firefox John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-03-29 10:12 -0700
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-29 13:53 -0400
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 03:48 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-29 10:04 -0400
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-29 10:15 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-29 10:20 -0400
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-29 10:30 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-29 11:07 -0400
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-29 21:04 -0400
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 01:21 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 13:01 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 12:54 -0400
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 14:39 +0000
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 14:37 +0000
Re: fucking firefox John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-03-29 07:30 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-03-30 11:21 +0100
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-29 14:39 +0000
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 15:06 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-29 17:09 +0200
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 15:17 +0000
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 04:16 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 13:31 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-30 19:47 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 14:01 -0400
Re: fucking firefox chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-30 13:35 -0500
Re: fucking firefox chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-30 13:57 -0500
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-30 20:00 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 20:56 -0400
Re: fucking firefox William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-30 22:22 +0100
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-30 19:59 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-30 20:02 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 08:53 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-31 05:53 -0400
Re: fucking firefox William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-31 10:59 +0100
The Apache Software Foundation Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-31 06:11 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 13:07 -0600
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 22:32 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 21:28 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 12:17 -0600
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 08:40 -0400
Re: fucking firefox vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 08:12 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-01 17:24 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-01 12:10 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-01 18:37 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 10:15 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-01 19:51 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 11:20 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 14:22 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 11:27 -0700
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 16:49 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-02 01:01 +0200
Re: fucking wintrolls ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 23:01 +0000
Re: fucking lintrolls GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:46 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-01 19:51 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:45 -0600
Re: fucking firefox cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-04-02 05:00 -0700
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:44 -0600
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 19:06 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 13:12 +0200
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:39 -0600
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 12:17 -0600
Re: fucking firefox cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-04-01 11:27 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 11:30 -0700
Re: fucking firefox cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-04-01 11:35 -0700
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-01 14:47 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 12:01 -0700
Re: fucking firefox cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-04-01 12:14 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 13:02 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-01 22:57 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-01 23:46 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-02 00:02 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-02 00:08 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-02 00:23 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 15:43 -0700
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:41 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-04 09:36 -0700
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-01 20:11 -0400
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-01 20:30 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 18:30 -0700
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:39 -0600
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 21:02 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 23:47 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-02 06:09 +0200
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-02 08:58 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 09:23 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 08:12 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2015-04-04 02:17 +0000
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-03 09:38 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-01 19:57 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-01 19:56 -0400
Re: fucking firefox JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-02 13:35 -0500
Re: fucking wintrolls ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 22:17 +0000
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 16:46 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 14:58 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-02 00:13 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 15:20 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-01 21:31 +0200
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-01 15:38 -0400
Ezekiel doesn't care, obviously. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-02 08:20 -0700
Re: Ezekiel doesn't care, obviously. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-02 12:01 -0400
Your Usenet skills reflect your email skills. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-02 09:55 -0700
Re: Your Usenet skills reflect your email skills. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 13:37 -0400
Re: Your Usenet skills reflect your email skills. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-02 14:20 -0400
Re: Your Usenet skills reflect your email skills. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 11:34 -0700
If you don't need more, than fine. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-02 19:25 -0700
Re: If you don't need more, than fine. Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-02 23:50 -0400
Re: If you don't need more, than fine. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 13:10 +0200
Re: If you don't need more, than fine. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-03 12:58 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-01 19:53 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 12:17 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-01 19:49 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-02 01:53 +0200
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 12:36 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 12:16 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 08:59 -0400
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 09:25 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 09:54 -0400
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 00:04 +0000
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:29 -0600
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 20:49 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 21:56 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-03-31 10:50 +0100
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 12:11 +0200
Re: fucking firefox chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-31 07:07 -0500
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 14:42 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-03-31 13:45 +0100
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 08:55 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 17:13 +0200
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-31 11:35 -0400
Re: fucking firefox vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 08:09 -0700
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-01 11:59 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 12:15 -0600
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-01 15:26 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 16:42 -0600
Re: fucking firefox vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 15:01 -0700
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 16:43 -0600
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-01 19:54 -0400
If wealth and/or IQ made you happy... Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-02 06:16 -0700
Re: If wealth and/or IQ made you happy... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 13:47 -0500
Re: If wealth and/or IQ made you happy... jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-04-02 20:14 +0000
Re: If wealth and/or IQ made you happy... benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 17:57 -0400
Re: If wealth and/or IQ made you happy... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-02 18:21 -0400
Re: If wealth and/or IQ made you happy... vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-02 16:48 -0700
Re: If wealth and/or IQ made you happy... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-02 22:14 -0400
Define "Good things". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-02 19:29 -0700
Re: Define "Good things". Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 22:15 -0500
Re: Define "Good things". Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-02 23:49 -0400
The House of Saud. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-02 07:55 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-01 12:07 -0400
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-01 18:40 +0000
Re: fucking firefox vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 14:52 -0700
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 16:40 -0600
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 11:56 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 20:31 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 12:03 -0700
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 16:43 -0600
Re: fucking firefox vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 07:38 -0700
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 14:42 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-01 17:13 +0200
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 12:14 -0600
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 12:13 -0600
Re: fucking firefox vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 13:49 -0700
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 16:39 -0600
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 04:15 +0000
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 04:33 +0000
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 04:35 +0000
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 04:50 +0000
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:28 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-30 06:00 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:28 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2015-03-30 23:26 +0000
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-30 08:05 -0400
Hooting owl Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-30 05:56 -0400
Re: Hooting owl William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-30 11:01 +0100
Re: Hooting owl Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 08:58 -0700
Re: Hooting owl Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 09:43 -0700
Re: Hooting owl GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:26 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 13:28 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:25 -0600
fucking owl Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-29 12:27 -0400
Re: fucking owl Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-29 12:32 -0400
Re: fucking owl GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-29 16:00 -0600
Fucking bowel Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2015-03-29 18:41 +0000
Re: fucking owl owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 18:54 +0000
Re: fucking owl GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-29 15:58 -0600
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-29 09:45 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-29 15:54 +0200
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 14:06 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-29 10:00 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-29 15:55 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-29 09:55 -0400
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-29 14:38 +0000
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 14:43 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-29 16:42 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-29 15:55 -0600
Re: fucking firefox taka0038@gmail.com - 2015-04-01 09:23 -0700
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-29 14:41 +0000
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 14:55 +0000
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 04:25 +0000
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 04:29 +0000
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:24 -0600
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 04:44 +0000
Re: fucking firefox William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-30 09:05 +0100
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 09:55 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 09:40 -0700
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:23 -0600
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:22 -0600
Re: fucking firefox William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-29 16:19 +0100
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 15:41 +0000
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-29 15:54 -0600
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 04:09 +0000
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 04:23 +0000
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 04:32 +0000
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 04:40 +0000
Re: fucking firefox William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-30 09:06 +0100
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 10:06 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:21 -0600
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 20:45 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:20 -0600
Re: fucking firefox William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-30 09:02 +0100
Irritable bowel chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-30 07:09 -0500
Re: Irritable bowel DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 10:40 -0400
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 10:40 -0400
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-30 11:25 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:18 -0600
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:16 -0600
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-29 15:53 -0600
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 03:47 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-30 08:23 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-03-30 16:06 +0100
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:15 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 09:43 -0700
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 16:57 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 12:13 -0700
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 19:24 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 12:35 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-29 12:44 -0700
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 19:54 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 13:06 -0700
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 20:29 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 13:59 -0700
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 00:55 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 18:15 -0700
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 01:38 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 18:54 -0700
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 02:25 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 22:53 -0700
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 03:12 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 22:56 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 13:06 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-30 19:46 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 14:00 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-30 20:15 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 11:42 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-30 20:54 +0200
Re: fucking firefox JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-03-30 14:03 -0500
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 12:12 -0700
Re: fucking firefox chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-30 14:22 -0500
Re: fucking firefox vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-03-30 15:37 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-30 19:50 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 21:51 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-30 19:49 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-30 20:01 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 08:50 +0200
"What's a Sea drive?" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-31 05:57 -0400
Re: "What's a Sea drive?" DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 08:40 -0400
Re: "What's a Sea drive?" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-31 09:14 -0500
Re: "What's a Sea drive?" DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 13:22 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 08:57 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 17:11 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 11:40 -0400
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 11:47 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 13:29 -0400
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 22:29 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-31 18:39 -0400
Re: fucking firefox JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-02 13:31 -0500
Re: fucking firefox chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-02 14:19 -0500
Re: fucking firefox JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-02 15:42 -0500
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 21:19 +0000
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-02 23:41 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-02 19:37 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-02 12:49 -0700
Re: fucking firefox William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-02 22:56 +0100
C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-02 19:40 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-03 09:40 +0100
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-03 06:04 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 13:07 +0200
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-03 12:16 +0100
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-03 07:11 -0500
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:35 -0600
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:35 -0600
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-03 07:57 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 15:21 +0200
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-03 09:42 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 16:03 +0200
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-03 10:16 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-03 10:16 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:35 -0600
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-03 10:20 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:34 -0600
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-03 22:29 +0100
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-04 09:33 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-03 09:49 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-03 09:10 -0500
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:31 -0600
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-03 11:00 -0500
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-03 12:24 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-03 12:36 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:30 -0600
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:30 -0600
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:29 -0600
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-03 15:01 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-04 16:25 -0600
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:28 -0600
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-03 22:29 +0100
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:28 -0600
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-03 13:01 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:27 -0600
Re: fucking firefox vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-02 16:55 -0700
Re: fucking firefox vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-02 17:21 -0700
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-02 22:06 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 13:02 +0200
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-03 07:53 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 15:19 +0200
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-03 09:36 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:27 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-03 09:51 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:26 -0600
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:25 -0600
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 19:03 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-02 19:35 -0400
Re: fucking firefox chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-03 06:49 -0500
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-03 09:00 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:22 -0600
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-03 14:55 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-04 16:24 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-03 09:39 -0400
Re: fucking firefox JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-03 11:03 -0500
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-31 17:40 -0700
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 08:45 -0400
Re: fucking firefox JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-03-31 09:33 -0500
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 11:11 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 17:19 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 11:42 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-31 13:18 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 11:43 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 20:30 +0200
Re: fucking firefox William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-31 22:36 +0100
Re: fucking firefox Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-31 23:51 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-01 00:18 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-31 19:52 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 21:27 -0400
Re: fucking firefox vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 08:23 -0700
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 12:10 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 14:30 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 16:30 -0600
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 16:41 -0600
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 22:49 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-31 19:54 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 21:35 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 16:40 -0600
Re: fucking firefox William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-31 22:33 +0100
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 22:39 +0000
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 12:04 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 13:34 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-31 10:50 -0700
Re: fucking firefox chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-31 08:33 -0500
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 12:15 -0700
Re: fucking firefox vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-03-30 15:31 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 16:23 -0700
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 23:36 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 17:44 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 15:26 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-30 22:06 +0200
Re: fucking firefox JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-03-30 15:19 -0500
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 23:02 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 08:49 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 08:52 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 11:39 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 12:16 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-30 19:46 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 08:47 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 08:50 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 17:07 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 11:37 -0400
Re: fucking firefox vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 09:03 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 12:56 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-01 19:50 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 14:21 -0400
Re: fucking firefox William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-01 22:45 +0100
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 21:01 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-01 20:00 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 12:54 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 10:08 -0700
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-29 15:50 -0600
Page 3 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 21 Next page →
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 19:47 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mfc26d$5gk$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286766 |
Slimer wrote: > On 2015-03-30 12:16 AM, ronb wrote: >> On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 17:09:28 +0200, Melzzzzz wrote: >> >>> I can run firefox from home dir no problem, but I prefer using package >>> manager ... Manjaro rulleeeeez!!! >> >> Who wouldn't prefer the package manager? -- it's just one of the ways >> Linux is superior to WinCrap. > > The problem with the package manager is that the versions of its > software are often MUCH older than what is available in the wild. That is very rarely the case. And not for a long time > For > instance, you'll hear that LibreOffice 4.5 is available with amazing new > features but your repository only called 4.1, with no possibility of > upgrading until the distribution's head decides to allow it. To you, > that's superior, to me is another waiting period that I wish I could > avoid but can't due to Linux's complete inferiority. > Pray tell, when will you learn the very first things about linux?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 14:01 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mfc2vt$9ki$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286771 |
On 2015-03-30 1:47 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > Slimer wrote: > >> On 2015-03-30 12:16 AM, ronb wrote: >>> On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 17:09:28 +0200, Melzzzzz wrote: >>> >>>> I can run firefox from home dir no problem, but I prefer using package >>>> manager ... Manjaro rulleeeeez!!! >>> >>> Who wouldn't prefer the package manager? -- it's just one of the ways >>> Linux is superior to WinCrap. >> >> The problem with the package manager is that the versions of its >> software are often MUCH older than what is available in the wild. > > That is very rarely the case. And not for a long time I agree that it's not for a long time, but I recall being stuck with old versions for weeks on distributions which weren't rolling. >> For >> instance, you'll hear that LibreOffice 4.5 is available with amazing new >> features but your repository only called 4.1, with no possibility of >> upgrading until the distribution's head decides to allow it. To you, >> that's superior, to me is another waiting period that I wish I could >> avoid but can't due to Linux's complete inferiority. >> > > Pray tell, when will you learn the very first things about linux? Once you start posting messages which don't contain an overwhelming amount of lies, I suppose. -- Slimer OpenMedia, GreenPeace Supporter & SPCA Paw Partner Encrypt.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 13:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <bn5jhap3u6csfvj85rot05o652uev1mhe7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #286771 |
> Slime wrote: >> >> For >> instance, you'll hear that LibreOffice 4.5 is available with amazing new >> features LOL Slime needs his word processor to be SOTA, and just *can't* wait until the disto's repository "catches up". What a douche bag. -- "Redhat does not warranty IN CAPITAL LETTERS that their product is suitable for any purpose or application." - trolling fsckwit "Ezekiel"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 13:57 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <4j6jhati963lv0glrqrd8e8snouf50lgu6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #286788 |
chrisv wrote: >> Slime wrote: >>> >>> For >>> instance, you'll hear that LibreOffice 4.5 is available with amazing new >>> features > >LOL Slime needs his word processor to be SOTA, and just *can't* wait >until the disto's repository "catches up". > >What a douche bag. Before the douche bag accuses me of "lying", of course, it might be some other part of LO, not the word processor, that needs to be SOTA. Still, he's a funny douche bag. Here's a classic from Slime's alter-ego "Hadron". -- Advocate: The fact is, whether you like it or not, Linux is free. "Hadron" responds: So is dog shit on the pavement.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 20:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mfco23$q1o$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286788 |
chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> Slime wrote: >>> >>> For >>> instance, you'll hear that LibreOffice 4.5 is available with amazing new >>> features > > LOL Slime needs his word processor to be SOTA, and just *can't* wait > until the disto's repository "catches up". > > What a douche bag. The "prerelease" of LibreOffice is 4.4.2. The current verson is 4.4.1. > -- > "Redhat does not warranty IN CAPITAL LETTERS that their product is > suitable for any purpose or application." - trolling fsckwit > "Ezekiel" Yep: -- The two most common things in the Universe are hydrogen and stupidity. -- Harlan Ellison
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 20:56 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mfcrat$72u$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286788 |
On 2015-03-30 2:35 PM, chrisv wrote: >> Slime wrote: >>> >>> For >>> instance, you'll hear that LibreOffice 4.5 is available with amazing new >>> features > > LOL Slime needs his word processor to be SOTA, and just *can't* wait > until the disto's repository "catches up". > > What a douche bag. Idiot, these updates usually come with bugfixes for - get this - bugs. You want the latest version to make sure that the open-source toiletware doesn't suddenly lose your data or that the feature you've been dying to have finally appears. I know that you Linux losers will forever live in the 1990s, but some of us enjoy being able to do exceptional things with our software. -- Slimer OpenMedia, GreenPeace Supporter & SPCA Paw Partner Encrypt.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Poaster <wp@dev.null> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 22:22 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <kdroub-3k3.ln1@user-1842.linux.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #286771 |
It was reported that Peter Köhlmann posted:
> Slimer wrote:
>
>> On 2015-03-30 12:16 AM, ronb wrote:
>>> On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 17:09:28 +0200, Melzzzzz wrote:
>>>
>>>> I can run firefox from home dir no problem, but I prefer using package
>>>> manager ... Manjaro rulleeeeez!!!
>>>
>>> Who wouldn't prefer the package manager? -- it's just one of the ways
>>> Linux is superior to WinCrap.
>>
>> The problem with the package manager is that the versions of its
>> software are often MUCH older than what is available in the wild.
>
> That is very rarely the case. And not for a long time
>
>> For
>> instance, you'll hear that LibreOffice 4.5 is available with amazing new
>> features but your repository only called 4.1, with no possibility of
>> upgrading until the distribution's head decides to allow it. To you,
>> that's superior, to me is another waiting period that I wish I could
>> avoid but can't due to Linux's complete inferiority.
>>
>
> Pray tell, when will you learn the very first things about linux?
WTF is that buffoon babbling about?
LibreOffice website:
LibreOffice 4.4.1 for Linux x64
My distro's repository:
libreoffice-base-4.4.1.2-5.1.x86_64.rpm 29-Mar-2015
libreoffice-calc-4.4.1.2-5.1.x86_64.rpm 29-Mar-2015
libreoffice-draw-4.4.1.2-5.1.x86_64.rpm 29-Mar-2015
libreoffice-impress-4.4.1.2-5.1.x86_64.rpm 29-Mar-2015
libreoffice-kde4-4.4.1.2-5.1.x86_64.rpm 29-Mar-2015
libreoffice-math-4.4.1.2-5.1.x86_64.rpm 29-Mar-2015
libreoffice-writer-4.4.1.2-5.1.x86_64.rpm 29-Mar-2015
--
openSUSE 13.2 64-bit
KDE 4.14.6
Kernel: 3.19.1-2.1.desktop x86_64 GNU/Linux 2015-3-10
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 19:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mfcnvb$q1o$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286771 |
Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > Slimer wrote: > >> On 2015-03-30 12:16 AM, ronb wrote: >>> On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 17:09:28 +0200, Melzzzzz wrote: >>> >>>> I can run firefox from home dir no problem, but I prefer using package >>>> manager ... Manjaro rulleeeeez!!! >>> >>> Who wouldn't prefer the package manager? -- it's just one of the ways >>> Linux is superior to WinCrap. >> >> The problem with the package manager is that the versions of its >> software are often MUCH older than what is available in the wild. > > That is very rarely the case. And not for a long time > >> For >> instance, you'll hear that LibreOffice 4.5 is available with amazing new >> features but your repository only called 4.1, with no possibility of >> upgrading until the distribution's head decides to allow it. To you, >> that's superior, to me is another waiting period that I wish I could >> avoid but can't due to Linux's complete inferiority. > > Pray tell, when will you learn the very first things about linux? Hell, installing LibreOffice 4.latest is pretty easy. https://www.libreoffice.org/download/libreoffice-fresh/ On CentOS, it is an unpack and a wilcard install via yum. Pretty similar on Debian. My Debian Sid comes with 4.3, but 4.4 was an easy wildcard install. Y'know, "sLIEmore" sounds like "Hadron", but without all the Linux knowledge. :-D Relive that sad packer's thrashing in the sig. "cissy" LOL -- Also notice he NOW mentions apt-get and not APT. *I* was ALWAYS referring to apt-get v aptitude. And I *was right*. I dont know how many more times I can categorically state that I provided the links explaining why. 100% case close. Why does he not comment on Homer being 100% INCORRECT? "Telling lies" even? TomB is a word weasel. You're wasting your time. Time and time again he gets things wrong, partly as an understandable component of the learning process, but will never admit I was correct. apt-get v aptitude compiling as root configure v ./configure leaving root terminals open root ssh access and the corker where is said he count NOT get a Windowless PC or words to that affect. Hell, you have even quoted him. He has become such a whining cissy that I truly wonder if he might be an Ahlstrom nym at this stage. There are probably oodles more examples (almost certainly UI issues). I bear him no ill will. I just wish he would stop running with out rabid herd and denying when he was plain wrong. -- "Hadron" <iev9uq$tpo$3@news.eternal-september.org>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 20:02 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <3gfauncz63mi.1dn800bazb85n.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #286857 |
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 19:59:21 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> Slimer wrote: >> >>> On 2015-03-30 12:16 AM, ronb wrote: >>>> On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 17:09:28 +0200, Melzzzzz wrote: >>>> >>>>> I can run firefox from home dir no problem, but I prefer using package >>>>> manager ... Manjaro rulleeeeez!!! >>>> >>>> Who wouldn't prefer the package manager? -- it's just one of the ways >>>> Linux is superior to WinCrap. >>> >>> The problem with the package manager is that the versions of its >>> software are often MUCH older than what is available in the wild. >> >> That is very rarely the case. And not for a long time >> >>> For >>> instance, you'll hear that LibreOffice 4.5 is available with amazing new >>> features but your repository only called 4.1, with no possibility of >>> upgrading until the distribution's head decides to allow it. To you, >>> that's superior, to me is another waiting period that I wish I could >>> avoid but can't due to Linux's complete inferiority. >> >> Pray tell, when will you learn the very first things about linux? > > Hell, installing LibreOffice 4.latest is pretty easy. Of course it is. Now try collaborating with people using the industry standard MSOffice and see what happens.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-31 08:53 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mfdg7h$nd3$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286861 |
Tomas wrote: > On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 19:59:21 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > >> Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >>> Slimer wrote: >>> >>>> On 2015-03-30 12:16 AM, ronb wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 17:09:28 +0200, Melzzzzz wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I can run firefox from home dir no problem, but I prefer using >>>>>> package manager ... Manjaro rulleeeeez!!! >>>>> >>>>> Who wouldn't prefer the package manager? -- it's just one of the ways >>>>> Linux is superior to WinCrap. >>>> >>>> The problem with the package manager is that the versions of its >>>> software are often MUCH older than what is available in the wild. >>> >>> That is very rarely the case. And not for a long time >>> >>>> For >>>> instance, you'll hear that LibreOffice 4.5 is available with amazing >>>> new features but your repository only called 4.1, with no possibility >>>> of upgrading until the distribution's head decides to allow it. To you, >>>> that's superior, to me is another waiting period that I wish I could >>>> avoid but can't due to Linux's complete inferiority. >>> >>> Pray tell, when will you learn the very first things about linux? >> >> Hell, installing LibreOffice 4.latest is pretty easy. > > Of course it is. > Now try collaborating with people using the industry standard > MSOffice and see what happens. Well, it works. What did you expect?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-31 05:53 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mfdqpe$oq0$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286924 |
Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > Tomas wrote: > >> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 19:59:21 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>> >>> Hell, installing LibreOffice 4.latest is pretty easy. >> >> Of course it is. >> Now try collaborating with people using the industry standard >> MSOffice and see what happens. > > Well, it works. What did you expect? Why would I bother to "collaborate" with people using MS Office? We'd use the free LibreOffice. LibreOffice 4.4 has significantly improved MS Office "compatibility", anyway. It's quite good enough to create the few DOCX and XLSX files we Linux users at work need to provide to the Microsoft Morlocks. Almost time for Microsoft to "innovate" yet another "Office" format, ain't it? -- My God, I'm depressed! Here I am, a computer with a mind a thousand times as powerful as yours, doing nothing but cranking out fortunes and sending mail about softball games. And I've got this pain right through my ALU. I've asked for it to be replaced, but nobody ever listens. I think it would be better for us both if you were to just log out again.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Poaster <wp@dev.null> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-31 10:59 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <eo7qub-i24.ln1@user-1842.linux.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #286927 |
It was reported that Chris Ahlstrom posted: > Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> Tomas wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 19:59:21 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>>> >>>> Hell, installing LibreOffice 4.latest is pretty easy. >>> >>> Of course it is. >>> Now try collaborating with people using the industry standard >>> MSOffice and see what happens. >> >> Well, it works. What did you expect? > > Why would I bother to "collaborate" with people using MS Office? We'd > use the free LibreOffice. > > LibreOffice 4.4 has significantly improved MS Office "compatibility", anyway. > It's quite good enough to create the few DOCX and XLSX files we Linux users > at work need to provide to the Microsoft Morlocks. > > Almost time for Microsoft to "innovate" yet another "Office" format, ain't > it? And who says the industry standard is MSOffice? These companies, governments & universities don't: https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Major_OpenOffice.org_Deployments -- openSUSE 13.2 64-bit KDE 4.14.6 Kernel: 3.19.1-2.1.desktop x86_64 GNU/Linux 2015-3-10
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-31 06:11 -0400 |
| Subject | The Apache Software Foundation |
| Message-ID | <mfdrqh$oq0$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286930 |
William Poaster wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > It was reported that Chris Ahlstrom posted: > >> Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >>> Tomas wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 19:59:21 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hell, installing LibreOffice 4.latest is pretty easy. >>>> >>>> Of course it is. >>>> Now try collaborating with people using the industry standard >>>> MSOffice and see what happens. >>> >>> Well, it works. What did you expect? >> >> Why would I bother to "collaborate" with people using MS Office? We'd >> use the free LibreOffice. >> >> LibreOffice 4.4 has significantly improved MS Office "compatibility", anyway. >> It's quite good enough to create the few DOCX and XLSX files we Linux users >> at work need to provide to the Microsoft Morlocks. >> >> Almost time for Microsoft to "innovate" yet another "Office" format, ain't >> it? > > And who says the industry standard is MSOffice? > These companies, governments & universities don't: > > https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Major_OpenOffice.org_Deployments With your distro and the software at this site, you could pretty much do anything you need to do with computers: http://www.apache.org/ The Apache Software Foundation provides support for the Apache community of open-source software projects, which provide software products for the public good. The ASF is made up of more than 150 top level projects which cover a wide range of technologies. Chances are if you are looking for a rewarding experience in Open Source, you are going to find it here. -- <aph> manoj is going nuts on the bug fixing crusade! woo woo! <Knghtbrd> manoj went nuts long time ago. but the bug fixing is cool =>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-31 13:07 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <Jv6dnU3qiNj3bYfInZ2dnUU7-fednZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #286930 |
William Poaster wrote: > It was reported that Chris Ahlstrom posted: > >> Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >>> Tomas wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 19:59:21 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hell, installing LibreOffice 4.latest is pretty easy. >>>> >>>> Of course it is. >>>> Now try collaborating with people using the industry standard >>>> MSOffice and see what happens. >>> >>> Well, it works. What did you expect? >> >> Why would I bother to "collaborate" with people using MS Office? We'd >> use the free LibreOffice. >> >> LibreOffice 4.4 has significantly improved MS Office "compatibility", >> anyway. It's quite good enough to create the few DOCX and XLSX files we >> Linux users at work need to provide to the Microsoft Morlocks. >> >> Almost time for Microsoft to "innovate" yet another "Office" format, >> ain't it? > > And who says the industry standard is MSOffice? Industry set that standard a long time ago, numbnuts. > These companies, governments & universities don't: > https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Major_OpenOffice.org_Deployments > Taxpayer funded. Openoffice is for communists.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-31 22:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mff79i$k7s$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286930 |
On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:59:10 +0100, William Poaster wrote: > And who says the industry standard is MSOffice? > These companies, governments & universities don't: > https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Major_OpenOffice.org_Deployments MicroCrap Office has NEVER been a standard for me. Even when I used Windows I didn't use Office. -- To WinDrones and iCultists obsessed with Linux. Get a life.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-31 21:28 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mffhih$9if$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #287065 |
On 2015-03-31 6:32 PM, ronb wrote: > On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:59:10 +0100, William Poaster wrote: > >> And who says the industry standard is MSOffice? >> These companies, governments & universities don't: >> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Major_OpenOffice.org_Deployments > > MicroCrap Office has NEVER been a standard for me. Even when I used > Windows I didn't use Office. Couldn't afford it on your minimum wage job, eh? -- Slimer OpenMedia, GreenPeace Supporter & SPCA Paw Partner Encrypt.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-01 12:17 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <DOidndbyWOLTq4HInZ2dnUU7-V2dnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #287065 |
ronb wrote: > On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:59:10 +0100, William Poaster wrote: > >> And who says the industry standard is MSOffice? >> These companies, governments & universities don't: >> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Major_OpenOffice.org_Deployments > > MicroCrap Office has NEVER been a standard for me. Even when I used > Windows I didn't use Office. > That's because you are a false snob... and a pure luser.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-31 08:40 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mfe4ja$s9l$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286927 |
On 3/31/2015 5:53 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> Tomas wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 19:59:21 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>>> >>>> Hell, installing LibreOffice 4.latest is pretty easy. >>> >>> Of course it is. >>> Now try collaborating with people using the industry standard >>> MSOffice and see what happens. >> >> Well, it works. What did you expect? > > Why would I bother to "collaborate" with people using MS Office? We'd > use the free LibreOffice. > > LibreOffice 4.4 has significantly improved MS Office "compatibility", anyway. > It's quite good enough to create the few DOCX and XLSX files we Linux users > at work need to provide to the Microsoft Morlocks. > > Almost time for Microsoft to "innovate" yet another "Office" format, ain't > it? "Marti, we don't care about Microsoft and its products here." Chris "Little Beaver" Ahlstrom, Oct 2013
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-01 08:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <551c0ac4$0$44764$c3e8da3$dd9697d2@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #286943 |
On 03/31/2015 05:40 AM, DFS wrote: > On 3/31/2015 5:53 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >> Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >>> Tomas wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 19:59:21 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hell, installing LibreOffice 4.latest is pretty easy. >>>> >>>> Of course it is. >>>> Now try collaborating with people using the industry standard >>>> MSOffice and see what happens. >>> >>> Well, it works. What did you expect? >> >> Why would I bother to "collaborate" with people using MS Office? We'd >> use the free LibreOffice. >> >> LibreOffice 4.4 has significantly improved MS Office "compatibility", >> anyway. >> It's quite good enough to create the few DOCX and XLSX files we Linux >> users >> at work need to provide to the Microsoft Morlocks. >> >> Almost time for Microsoft to "innovate" yet another "Office" format, >> ain't >> it? > > > "Marti, we don't care about Microsoft and its products here." > Chris "Little Beaver" Ahlstrom, Oct 2013 This gets stupider every time you post it. -- -v Postmen never die, they just lose their zip.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-01 17:24 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mfh2hi$9pr$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #287174 |
vallor wrote: > On 03/31/2015 05:40 AM, DFS wrote: >> On 3/31/2015 5:53 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>> Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>> >>>> Tomas wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 19:59:21 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hell, installing LibreOffice 4.latest is pretty easy. >>>>> >>>>> Of course it is. >>>>> Now try collaborating with people using the industry standard >>>>> MSOffice and see what happens. >>>> >>>> Well, it works. What did you expect? >>> >>> Why would I bother to "collaborate" with people using MS Office? We'd >>> use the free LibreOffice. >>> >>> LibreOffice 4.4 has significantly improved MS Office "compatibility", >>> anyway. >>> It's quite good enough to create the few DOCX and XLSX files we Linux >>> users >>> at work need to provide to the Microsoft Morlocks. >>> >>> Almost time for Microsoft to "innovate" yet another "Office" format, >>> ain't >>> it? >> >> >> "Marti, we don't care about Microsoft and its products here." >> Chris "Little Beaver" Ahlstrom, Oct 2013 > > This gets stupider every time you post it. > Well, what do you expect? Its from DFS
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 21 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web