Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #378455 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-10-30 11:24 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-11-01 12:56 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 79 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-30 11:24 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-10-30 06:14 -0700
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-30 09:39 -0400
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-10-30 06:50 -0700
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-10-30 06:54 -0700
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-30 14:12 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-30 10:30 -0400
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-30 14:40 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-30 12:49 -0400
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-30 18:41 +0000
You are not fooling anyone, Mr. Maggot. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-10-30 15:21 -0700
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-30 10:27 -0400
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-30 09:49 -0400
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-10-30 13:49 +0000
Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-10-30 06:57 -0700
Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-30 14:11 +0000
Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-30 15:35 +0100
Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-30 10:38 -0400
Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-30 14:45 +0000
Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-30 12:50 -0400
Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-30 18:42 +0000
Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-30 17:31 -0400
Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-01 10:58 -0700
Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-30 16:11 +0000
Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-30 19:46 +0000
Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-30 16:04 -0400
Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-30 20:52 +0000
Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-30 21:54 +0100
Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-30 22:42 +0100
Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 18:08 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-30 15:33 +0100
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-30 12:47 -0400
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-30 18:38 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-30 10:14 -0400
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-30 14:24 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-30 10:26 -0400
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-31 07:32 -0500
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-31 12:59 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-30 15:26 +0100
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-30 14:31 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-30 16:09 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-30 21:47 +0100
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-30 20:50 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-30 22:06 +0100
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-30 21:09 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-30 18:58 -0400
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-31 00:51 +0100
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-31 00:15 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-31 09:19 -0400
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-31 13:53 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-31 12:29 -0400
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-31 16:52 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-10-31 12:01 -0600
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-31 18:05 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-31 18:12 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-31 15:08 -0400
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-31 19:27 -0400
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-31 23:44 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-10-31 20:25 -0600
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-31 22:43 -0400
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-11-01 17:17 -0600
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-01 19:21 -0400
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-01 16:46 -0700
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-11-01 17:33 -0700
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-02 08:05 -0400
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-10-31 20:24 -0600
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( fr314159@gmail.com - 2016-10-31 06:22 -0700
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-31 13:29 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-10-31 12:02 -0600
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-31 18:10 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-31 19:46 +0100
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-31 18:58 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-31 21:25 +0100
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-11-01 03:49 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-31 13:54 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-10-31 12:02 -0600
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-31 01:10 +0100
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-31 10:50 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-11-01 12:56 -0400
Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 Next page →
| From | Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 18:42 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot |
| Message-ID | <e7mt92F3bdmU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #378534 |
On 2016-10-30, Silver Slimer <> wrote: > On 2016-10-30 10:45 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: >> On 2016-10-30, Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: >>> On 2016-10-30, Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>>> I use pacman, not octopi for upgrading system, therefore I didn't new >>>> they added functionality to resolve conflicts from terminal.... >>> >>> He's just hooking you. He's a loser. You have nothing to gain from him >>> at all. You're his toy. This is how he gets off. Give him a -9999 and >>> move on. >> >> So how did that work for you Marek? >> Not too well from your post -9999 replies to me. >> You're just another Linux fool herd member who knows less about Linux >> than you believe. >> You haven't even managed to eradicate snit from COLA, although you think >> you have. >> Add it to your long list of failures. > > Snit will _never_ leave. Even if the cockroach were to die tomorrow, > he'd find a way to troll the newsgroup as a ghost or a corpse. If North Korea drops a nuke on the USA the only life that will survive will be the cockroaches and snit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 17:31 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot |
| Message-ID | <nv5oq5$2fr$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #378543 |
On 2016-10-30 2:42 PM, Jim Polaski wrote: > On 2016-10-30, Silver Slimer <> wrote: >> On 2016-10-30 10:45 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: >>> On 2016-10-30, Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: >>>> On 2016-10-30, Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>>>> I use pacman, not octopi for upgrading system, therefore I didn't new >>>>> they added functionality to resolve conflicts from terminal.... >>>> >>>> He's just hooking you. He's a loser. You have nothing to gain from him >>>> at all. You're his toy. This is how he gets off. Give him a -9999 and >>>> move on. >>> >>> So how did that work for you Marek? >>> Not too well from your post -9999 replies to me. >>> You're just another Linux fool herd member who knows less about Linux >>> than you believe. >>> You haven't even managed to eradicate snit from COLA, although you think >>> you have. >>> Add it to your long list of failures. >> >> Snit will _never_ leave. Even if the cockroach were to die tomorrow, >> he'd find a way to troll the newsgroup as a ghost or a corpse. > > If North Korea drops a nuke on the USA the only life that will survive > will be the cockroaches and snit. I'd be hard pressed to believe that North Korea didn't just nuke itself in attempting to nuke the United States. Nothing about that country strikes me as competent. -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease Proud libertarian, unapologetic nerd, author, gamer, beast-mode teacher and silver-tongued heel Fingerprint: e58428b2633833a3b0c9bb7e40819166642245b7 Gab.ai: @silverslimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-01 10:58 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot |
| Message-ID | <D43E25EE.818AB%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #378534 |
On 10/30/16, 9:50 AM, in article nv58ce$c6f$4@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > On 2016-10-30 10:45 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: >> On 2016-10-30, Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: >>> On 2016-10-30, Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>>> I use pacman, not octopi for upgrading system, therefore I didn't new >>>> they added functionality to resolve conflicts from terminal.... >>> >>> He's just hooking you. He's a loser. You have nothing to gain from him >>> at all. You're his toy. This is how he gets off. Give him a -9999 and >>> move on. >> >> So how did that work for you Marek? >> Not too well from your post -9999 replies to me. >> You're just another Linux fool herd member who knows less about Linux >> than you believe. >> You haven't even managed to eradicate snit from COLA, although you think >> you have. >> Add it to your long list of failures. > > Snit will _never_ leave. Even if the cockroach were to die tomorrow, > he'd find a way to troll the newsgroup as a ghost or a corpse. Even after I had been gone almost a month Slimer could not stop obsessing over me. Amazing. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Poaster <wp@dev.null> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 16:11 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot |
| Message-ID | <amihed-5f8.ln1@debian.machineone.org> |
| In reply to | #378511 |
On 30/10/2016 14:38 in comp.os.linux.advocacy, Marek Novotny posted: > On 2016-10-30, Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >> I use pacman, not octopi for upgrading system, therefore I didn't new >> they added functionality to resolve conflicts from terminal.... > > He's just hooking you. He's a loser. You have nothing to gain from him > at all. You're his toy. This is how he gets off. Give him a -9999 and > move on. Goad, Polaksi & Mutherfucker, the Three Stooges. -- What IS remarkable, is that a well developed ape has come to realise that he lives on a planet, circling a sun, in a planetary system, within a galaxy, within a universe. - Professor Michio Kaku - Theoretical Physicist -
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 19:46 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot |
| Message-ID | <nv5ina$j29$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #378511 |
On 2016-10-30, Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: > On 2016-10-30, Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >> I use pacman, not octopi for upgrading system, therefore I didn't new >> they added functionality to resolve conflicts from terminal.... > > He's just hooking you. He's a loser. You have nothing to gain from him > at all. You're his toy. This is how he gets off. Give him a -9999 and > move on. > Heh, I never used automatic filtering in my life ;) I would only use them on spam bots, but I can't see that many on usenet. -- press any key to continue or any other to quit
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 16:04 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot |
| Message-ID | <0_GdneVqpcr1z4vFnZ2dnUU7-W2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #378548 |
On 2016-10-30, Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote: > On 2016-10-30, Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: >> On 2016-10-30, Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>> I use pacman, not octopi for upgrading system, therefore I didn't new >>> they added functionality to resolve conflicts from terminal.... >> >> He's just hooking you. He's a loser. You have nothing to gain from him >> at all. You're his toy. This is how he gets off. Give him a -9999 and >> move on. >> > Heh, I never used automatic filtering in my life ;) > I would only use them on spam bots, but I can't see that many on usenet. It's up to you. I'm merely making an observation. -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 20:52 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot |
| Message-ID | <nv5mir$q1k$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #378549 |
On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 16:04:56 -0400, Marek Novotny wrote: > On 2016-10-30, Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote: >> On 2016-10-30, Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: >>> On 2016-10-30, Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>>> I use pacman, not octopi for upgrading system, therefore I didn't new >>>> they added functionality to resolve conflicts from terminal.... >>> >>> He's just hooking you. He's a loser. You have nothing to gain from him >>> at all. You're his toy. This is how he gets off. Give him a -9999 and >>> move on. >>> >> Heh, I never used automatic filtering in my life ;) >> I would only use them on spam bots, but I can't see that many on >> usenet. > > It's up to you. I'm merely making an observation. What's the practical difference between a spam bot and "Snit" or "Slime?" But, as Marek says, to each their own. -- Zero tolerance for iCultists and WinDrones
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 21:54 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot |
| Message-ID | <20161030215446.73cbdaed@maxa-pc.cpe.bvcom.net> |
| In reply to | #378554 |
On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 20:52:44 -0000 (UTC) ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 16:04:56 -0400, Marek Novotny wrote: > > > On 2016-10-30, Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote: > >> On 2016-10-30, Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: > >>> On 2016-10-30, Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: > >>>> I use pacman, not octopi for upgrading system, therefore I > >>>> didn't new they added functionality to resolve conflicts from > >>>> terminal.... > >>> > >>> He's just hooking you. He's a loser. You have nothing to gain > >>> from him at all. You're his toy. This is how he gets off. Give > >>> him a -9999 and move on. > >>> > >> Heh, I never used automatic filtering in my life ;) > >> I would only use them on spam bots, but I can't see that many on > >> usenet. > > > > It's up to you. I'm merely making an observation. > > What's the practical difference between a spam bot and "Snit" or > "Slime?" Spam bot doesn't read and reply. > > But, as Marek says, to each their own. > -- press any key to continue or any other to quit
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 22:42 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot |
| Message-ID | <nv5pf5$4km$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #378555 |
Melzzzzz wrote: > On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 20:52:44 -0000 (UTC) > ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 16:04:56 -0400, Marek Novotny wrote: >> >> > On 2016-10-30, Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote: >> >> On 2016-10-30, Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2016-10-30, Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >> >>>> I use pacman, not octopi for upgrading system, therefore I >> >>>> didn't new they added functionality to resolve conflicts from >> >>>> terminal.... >> >>> >> >>> He's just hooking you. He's a loser. You have nothing to gain >> >>> from him at all. You're his toy. This is how he gets off. Give >> >>> him a -9999 and move on. >> >>> >> >> Heh, I never used automatic filtering in my life ;) >> >> I would only use them on spam bots, but I can't see that many on >> >> usenet. >> > >> > It's up to you. I'm merely making an observation. >> >> What's the practical difference between a spam bot and "Snit" or >> "Slime?" > > Spam bot doesn't read and reply. > Neither do the trolls
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-31 18:08 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot |
| Message-ID | <nv81b4$m6k$10@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #378562 |
On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 22:42:22 +0100, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > Melzzzzz wrote: > >> On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 20:52:44 -0000 (UTC) >> ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 16:04:56 -0400, Marek Novotny wrote: >>> >>> > On 2016-10-30, Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>> >> On 2016-10-30, Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 2016-10-30, Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I use pacman, not octopi for upgrading system, therefore I didn't >>> >>>> new they added functionality to resolve conflicts from >>> >>>> terminal.... >>> >>> >>> >>> He's just hooking you. He's a loser. You have nothing to gain from >>> >>> him at all. You're his toy. This is how he gets off. Give him a >>> >>> -9999 and move on. >>> >>> >>> >> Heh, I never used automatic filtering in my life ;) >>> >> I would only use them on spam bots, but I can't see that many on >>> >> usenet. >>> > >>> > It's up to you. I'm merely making an observation. >>> >>> What's the practical difference between a spam bot and "Snit" or >>> "Slime?" >> >> Spam bot doesn't read and reply. >> >> > Neither do the trolls Exactly. -- Zero tolerance for iCultists and WinDrones
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 15:33 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <20161030153335.6eb2c14a@maxa-pc.cpe.bvcom.net> |
| In reply to | #378472 |
On 30 Oct 2016 13:49:47 GMT Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> wrote: > On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 11:24:32 +0000, Melzzzzz wrote: > > > I have tried kernel 4.8.5 in orther to switch from trusty 4.7, but > > alas got BUG softlockup on CPU(s) during rsync. Have to hard reset, > > switched back to 4.7... > > > > What bug? I don't see this bug on my 4.8 and I use rsync every > fucking day. > > You must have some weird setup that invites problems. > > You can try to modify /proc/sys/kernel/watchdog_thresh > to a large value. > Look I know kernel bug when I see one. kswapd goes hayway, and couldn't kill rsync process which got stuck. dmesg was full of BUG messages (CPU stuck) and I have 32GB of RAM.... Since I have no such problems with 4.7 I conclude it is a kernel rather hardware thing... -- press any key to continue or any other to quit
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 12:47 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nv585j$c6f$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #378507 |
On 2016-10-30 10:33 AM, Melzzzzz wrote: > On 30 Oct 2016 13:49:47 GMT > Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> wrote: > >> On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 11:24:32 +0000, Melzzzzz wrote: >> >>> I have tried kernel 4.8.5 in orther to switch from trusty 4.7, but >>> alas got BUG softlockup on CPU(s) during rsync. Have to hard reset, >>> switched back to 4.7... >>> >> >> What bug? I don't see this bug on my 4.8 and I use rsync every >> fucking day. >> >> You must have some weird setup that invites problems. >> >> You can try to modify /proc/sys/kernel/watchdog_thresh >> to a large value. >> > > Look I know kernel bug when I see one. And you admit that they exist unlike the other Linux advocates. It's the reason why I insist on still reading your posts even though I've filtered all of the others. > kswapd goes hayway, and couldn't > kill rsync process which got stuck. dmesg was full of BUG messages (CPU > stuck) and I have 32GB of RAM.... > Since I have no such problems with 4.7 I conclude it is a kernel rather > hardware thing... Your hardware is unlikely to ever be faulty. If things don't work, it's almost always going to be Linux's fault. -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease Proud libertarian, unapologetic nerd, author, gamer, beast-mode teacher and silver-tongued heel Fingerprint: e58428b2633833a3b0c9bb7e40819166642245b7 Gab.ai: @silverslimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 18:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e7mt1qF3bdmU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #378531 |
On 2016-10-30, Silver Slimer <> wrote: > On 2016-10-30 10:33 AM, Melzzzzz wrote: >> On 30 Oct 2016 13:49:47 GMT >> Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 11:24:32 +0000, Melzzzzz wrote: >>> >>>> I have tried kernel 4.8.5 in orther to switch from trusty 4.7, but >>>> alas got BUG softlockup on CPU(s) during rsync. Have to hard reset, >>>> switched back to 4.7... >>>> >>> >>> What bug? I don't see this bug on my 4.8 and I use rsync every >>> fucking day. >>> >>> You must have some weird setup that invites problems. >>> >>> You can try to modify /proc/sys/kernel/watchdog_thresh >>> to a large value. >>> >> >> Look I know kernel bug when I see one. > > And you admit that they exist unlike the other Linux advocates. It's the > reason why I insist on still reading your posts even though I've > filtered all of the others. Melzzzzz is one of the better Linux advocates. >> kswapd goes hayway, and couldn't >> kill rsync process which got stuck. dmesg was full of BUG messages (CPU >> stuck) and I have 32GB of RAM.... >> Since I have no such problems with 4.7 I conclude it is a kernel rather >> hardware thing... > > Your hardware is unlikely to ever be faulty. If things don't work, it's > almost always going to be Linux's fault. Yep. If Linux is involved, it's 98 percent a Linux problem and 2 percent a faulty hardware problem.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 10:14 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nv4vej$hoe$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #378455 |
Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > I have tried kernel 4.8.5 in orther to switch from trusty 4.7, but alas got > BUG softlockup on CPU(s) during rsync. Have to hard reset, switched back to > 4.7... What!!!? "Skippy Fandango" claims we *never ever* discuss Linux problems and call those who report them trolls! Do you think "Skippy" could be talking out his ass!?!?!? -- You have no real enemies.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 14:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e7me52Fuec9U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #378492 |
On 2016-10-30, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: > Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> I have tried kernel 4.8.5 in orther to switch from trusty 4.7, but alas got >> BUG softlockup on CPU(s) during rsync. Have to hard reset, switched back to >> 4.7... > > What!!!? "Skippy Fandango" claims we *never ever* discuss Linux problems > and call those who report them trolls! > > Do you think "Skippy" could be talking out his ass!?!?!? Have you graduated from wiping dicks to wiping asses now? Or is that something you read in Mad Magazine?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 10:26 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <RIidnSs0xIRkn4vFnZ2dnUU7-aWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #378492 |
On 2016-10-30, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: > Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> I have tried kernel 4.8.5 in orther to switch from trusty 4.7, but alas got >> BUG softlockup on CPU(s) during rsync. Have to hard reset, switched back to >> 4.7... > > What!!!? "Skippy Fandango" claims we *never ever* discuss Linux problems > and call those who report them trolls! > > Do you think "Skippy" could be talking out his ass!?!?!? Just goes to show how full of shit they are. I have said the entire time I've used Linux that we indeed discuss bugs. We have very public bug trackers and the entire Linux kernel is developed out in the open. It's just another classic case of trolls being retarded idiots that just make shit up. -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-31 07:32 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <18ee1cphlg2lcts6s140v1nuc0ko7ck7fu@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #378498 |
Marek Novotny wrote: > Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >> >> Melzzzzz wrote: >>> >>> I have tried kernel 4.8.5 in orther to switch from trusty 4.7, but alas got >>> BUG softlockup on CPU(s) during rsync. Have to hard reset, switched back to >>> 4.7... >> >> What!!!? "Skippy Fandango" claims we *never ever* discuss Linux problems >> and call those who report them trolls! >> >> Do you think "Skippy" could be talking out his ass!?!?!? > >Just goes to show how full of shit they are. I have said the entire time >I've used Linux that we indeed discuss bugs. We have very public bug >trackers and the entire Linux kernel is developed out in the open. It's >just another classic case of trolls being retarded idiots that just make >shit up. I don't think that's there's ever been a troll in here who has not spewed the "you can't say one bad thing about Linux without getting attacked" *lie*. -- "If we're even mildly critical of GNU/Linux, we're liars and trolls." - "Slimer", lying shamelessly
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-31 12:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e7oth2FhokaU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #378609 |
On 2016-10-31, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > Marek Novotny wrote: > >> Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>> >>> Melzzzzz wrote: >>>> >>>> I have tried kernel 4.8.5 in orther to switch from trusty 4.7, but alas got >>>> BUG softlockup on CPU(s) during rsync. Have to hard reset, switched back to >>>> 4.7... >>> >>> What!!!? "Skippy Fandango" claims we *never ever* discuss Linux problems >>> and call those who report them trolls! >>> >>> Do you think "Skippy" could be talking out his ass!?!?!? >> >>Just goes to show how full of shit they are. I have said the entire time >>I've used Linux that we indeed discuss bugs. We have very public bug >>trackers and the entire Linux kernel is developed out in the open. It's >>just another classic case of trolls being retarded idiots that just make >>shit up. > > I don't think that's there's ever been a troll in here who has not > spewed the "you can't say one bad thing about Linux without getting > attacked" *lie*. That's because it is 100 percent true. Disagree with the Linux Cabal, even on a minor issue and you will be attacked. I was completely 100 percent civil and courteous up until your Cabal member Chris Ahlstrom attacked me because I didn't snip some of Silver Slimer's attacks on his wife. That was the turning point for me because despite being a Linux user, unlike you, "Mr Forte Agent" chrisv, I realized that what Silver Slimer, DFS, Greycloud, Steve Carroll, Deplorable Owl and others were saying about the losers in this COLA group as well as Linux was and is true. Couple that with the lies I see from the Linux COLA Cabal, and being a Linux user I can easily tell when you losers are omitting facts about Linux failing, I decided to give you, the Linux COLA Cabal exactly what you expect. You want another anti-Linux, or more accurately another anti-Linux "advocate" poster, well you got one. And in spades. I'll take Silver Slimer or DFS any day of the week over scum like you and the rest of your paranoid, lying, creepy Linux COLA Cabal. Oh, and if you need help installing Linux so you can actually use the operating system you love so dearly, I'm willing to help you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 15:26 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <20161030152621.767e58d4@maxa-pc.cpe.bvcom.net> |
| In reply to | #378492 |
On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 10:14:00 -0400 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: > Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > > > I have tried kernel 4.8.5 in orther to switch from trusty 4.7, but > > alas got BUG softlockup on CPU(s) during rsync. Have to hard reset, > > switched back to 4.7... > > What!!!? "Skippy Fandango" claims we *never ever* discuss Linux > problems and call those who report them trolls! > > Do you think "Skippy" could be talking out his ass!?!?!? > Skippy, spindrift, Jim ... same guy... -- press any key to continue or any other to quit
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 14:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e7mehsF2qjU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #378499 |
On 2016-10-30, Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: > On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 10:14:00 -0400 > Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: > >> Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >> > I have tried kernel 4.8.5 in orther to switch from trusty 4.7, but >> > alas got BUG softlockup on CPU(s) during rsync. Have to hard reset, >> > switched back to 4.7... >> >> What!!!? "Skippy Fandango" claims we *never ever* discuss Linux >> problems and call those who report them trolls! >> >> Do you think "Skippy" could be talking out his ass!?!?!? >> > > Skippy, spindrift, Jim ... same guy... Please leave me out of your conspiracy theories. You are wrong, as usual. At least for me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web