Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #378455 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-10-30 11:24 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-11-01 12:56 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 79 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-30 11:24 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-10-30 06:14 -0700
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-30 09:39 -0400
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-10-30 06:50 -0700
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-10-30 06:54 -0700
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-30 14:12 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-30 10:30 -0400
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-30 14:40 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-30 12:49 -0400
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-30 18:41 +0000
You are not fooling anyone, Mr. Maggot. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-10-30 15:21 -0700
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-30 10:27 -0400
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-30 09:49 -0400
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-10-30 13:49 +0000
Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-10-30 06:57 -0700
Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-30 14:11 +0000
Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-30 15:35 +0100
Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-30 10:38 -0400
Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-30 14:45 +0000
Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-30 12:50 -0400
Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-30 18:42 +0000
Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-30 17:31 -0400
Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-01 10:58 -0700
Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-30 16:11 +0000
Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-30 19:46 +0000
Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-30 16:04 -0400
Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-30 20:52 +0000
Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-30 21:54 +0100
Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-30 22:42 +0100
Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 18:08 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-30 15:33 +0100
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-30 12:47 -0400
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-30 18:38 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-30 10:14 -0400
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-30 14:24 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-30 10:26 -0400
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-31 07:32 -0500
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-31 12:59 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-30 15:26 +0100
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-30 14:31 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-30 16:09 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-30 21:47 +0100
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-30 20:50 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-30 22:06 +0100
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-30 21:09 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-30 18:58 -0400
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-31 00:51 +0100
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-31 00:15 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-31 09:19 -0400
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-31 13:53 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-31 12:29 -0400
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-31 16:52 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-10-31 12:01 -0600
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-31 18:05 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-31 18:12 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-31 15:08 -0400
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-31 19:27 -0400
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-31 23:44 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-10-31 20:25 -0600
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-31 22:43 -0400
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-11-01 17:17 -0600
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-01 19:21 -0400
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-01 16:46 -0700
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-11-01 17:33 -0700
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-02 08:05 -0400
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-10-31 20:24 -0600
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( fr314159@gmail.com - 2016-10-31 06:22 -0700
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-31 13:29 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-10-31 12:02 -0600
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-31 18:10 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-31 19:46 +0100
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-31 18:58 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-31 21:25 +0100
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-11-01 03:49 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-31 13:54 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-10-31 12:02 -0600
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-31 01:10 +0100
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-31 10:50 +0000
Re: kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-11-01 12:56 -0400
Page 1 of 4 [1] 2 3 4 Next page →
| From | Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 11:24 +0000 |
| Subject | kernel 4.8 still bugged ;( |
| Message-ID | <nv4l9g$r0u$1@news.albasani.net> |
I have tried kernel 4.8.5 in orther to switch from trusty 4.7, but alas got BUG softlockup on CPU(s) during rsync. Have to hard reset, switched back to 4.7... -- press any key to continue or any other to quit
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 06:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e1ed7fd7-2d8c-4c33-b0bd-d392e68192dd@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #378455 |
On Sunday, October 30, 2016 at 7:24:34 AM UTC-4, Melzzzzz wrote: > I have tried kernel 4.8.5 in orther to switch from trusty 4.7, but alas got > BUG softlockup on CPU(s) during rsync. Have to hard reset, switched back to > 4.7... Moi firmly believes in letting other Linux Tards fully debug the Kernel, long before he wastes his time installing it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 09:39 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <4OednZK1B4RhaojFnZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #378455 |
On 2016-10-30, Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote: > I have tried kernel 4.8.5 in orther to switch from trusty 4.7, but alas got > BUG softlockup on CPU(s) during rsync. Have to hard reset, switched back to > 4.7... Yes, 4.8 was no good for me either. On one machine it seems to be fine, on another, no good. [marek@m4800 ~]$ uname -r 4.7.10-1-MANJARO -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 06:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <de231d1b-646d-4368-aaf3-d1c880fd8d3b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #378463 |
On Sunday, October 30, 2016 at 10:39:15 PM UTC+9, Marek Novotny wrote: > On 2016-10-30, Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote: > > I have tried kernel 4.8.5 in orther to switch from trusty 4.7, but alas got > > BUG softlockup on CPU(s) during rsync. Have to hard reset, switched back to > > 4.7... > > Yes, 4.8 was no good for me either. On one machine it seems to be fine, > on another, no good. > > [marek@m4800 ~]$ uname -r > 4.7.10-1-MANJARO > > > -- > Marek Novotny > https://github.com/marek-novotny This is the general trend in this World, people becoming dumbier and their products becoming more buggy and low quality...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 06:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <17597c28-2f3a-4e33-95ef-f5b5659ae6ba@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #378474 |
On Sunday, October 30, 2016 at 9:51:01 AM UTC-4, Takuya Saitoh wrote: > On Sunday, October 30, 2016 at 10:39:15 PM UTC+9, Marek Novotny wrote: > > On 2016-10-30, Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote: > > > I have tried kernel 4.8.5 in orther to switch from trusty 4.7, but alas got > > > BUG softlockup on CPU(s) during rsync. Have to hard reset, switched back to > > > 4.7... > > > > Yes, 4.8 was no good for me either. On one machine it seems to be fine, > > on another, no good. > > > > [marek@m4800 ~]$ uname -r > > 4.7.10-1-MANJARO > > > > > > -- > > Marek Novotny > > https://github.com/marek-novotny > > This is the general trend in this World, people becoming dumbier and their products becoming more buggy and low quality... Don't forget that the Japanese are becoming a bunch of pedophile degenerates, Perv.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 14:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e7mde6Fu95mU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #378474 |
On 2016-10-30, Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sunday, October 30, 2016 at 10:39:15 PM UTC+9, Marek Novotny wrote: >> On 2016-10-30, Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote: >> > I have tried kernel 4.8.5 in orther to switch from trusty 4.7, but alas got >> > BUG softlockup on CPU(s) during rsync. Have to hard reset, switched back to >> > 4.7... >> >> Yes, 4.8 was no good for me either. On one machine it seems to be fine, >> on another, no good. >> >> [marek@m4800 ~]$ uname -r >> 4.7.10-1-MANJARO >> >> >> -- >> Marek Novotny >> https://github.com/marek-novotny > > This is the general trend in this World, people becoming dumbier and their products becoming more buggy and low quality... Linux has always been of low quality. People accept it though because Linux is free.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 10:30 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nv504v$jcl$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #378490 |
On 2016-10-30 10:12 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: > On 2016-10-30, Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sunday, October 30, 2016 at 10:39:15 PM UTC+9, Marek Novotny wrote: >>> On 2016-10-30, Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>>> I have tried kernel 4.8.5 in orther to switch from trusty 4.7, but alas got >>>> BUG softlockup on CPU(s) during rsync. Have to hard reset, switched back to >>>> 4.7... >>> >>> Yes, 4.8 was no good for me either. On one machine it seems to be fine, >>> on another, no good. >>> >>> [marek@m4800 ~]$ uname -r >>> 4.7.10-1-MANJARO >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Marek Novotny >>> https://github.com/marek-novotny >> >> This is the general trend in this World, people becoming dumbier and their products becoming more buggy and low quality... > > Linux has always been of low quality. People accept it though because > Linux is free. Or because they are pissed at the NSA or the general country of the United States and believe that using such crap will hurt the country in some way. I was one of those people as well but now realize that whether I use OS X, Linux or Windows, nothing will change in terms of my privacy. Security-wise though, it looks as though Windows, yes Windows, has the advantage over the other two as they don't allow 9 year-old bugs to exist and actually fix their issues over time. -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease Proud libertarian, unapologetic nerd, author, gamer, beast-mode teacher and silver-tongued heel Fingerprint: e58428b2633833a3b0c9bb7e40819166642245b7 Gab.ai: @silverslimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 14:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e7mf2bF5rsU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #378504 |
On 2016-10-30, Silver Slimer <> wrote: > On 2016-10-30 10:12 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: >> On 2016-10-30, Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Sunday, October 30, 2016 at 10:39:15 PM UTC+9, Marek Novotny wrote: >>>> On 2016-10-30, Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>>>> I have tried kernel 4.8.5 in orther to switch from trusty 4.7, but alas got >>>>> BUG softlockup on CPU(s) during rsync. Have to hard reset, switched back to >>>>> 4.7... >>>> >>>> Yes, 4.8 was no good for me either. On one machine it seems to be fine, >>>> on another, no good. >>>> >>>> [marek@m4800 ~]$ uname -r >>>> 4.7.10-1-MANJARO >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Marek Novotny >>>> https://github.com/marek-novotny >>> >>> This is the general trend in this World, people becoming dumbier and their products becoming more buggy and low quality... >> >> Linux has always been of low quality. People accept it though because >> Linux is free. > > Or because they are pissed at the NSA or the general country of the > United States and believe that using such crap will hurt the country in > some way. I was one of those people as well but now realize that whether > I use OS X, Linux or Windows, nothing will change in terms of my > privacy. Security-wise though, it looks as though Windows, yes Windows, > has the advantage over the other two as they don't allow 9 year-old bugs > to exist and actually fix their issues over time. Correct. You almost cannot join a Linux discussion, blog or social media site without running into the socialist corporate hating types. Linux attracts them like flies to honey. I don't understand the reasoning behind self punishment using Linux just to say fuck you to Microsoft. It doesn't make sense.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 12:49 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nv58am$c6f$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #378512 |
On 2016-10-30 10:40 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: > On 2016-10-30, Silver Slimer <> wrote: >> On 2016-10-30 10:12 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: >>> On 2016-10-30, Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Sunday, October 30, 2016 at 10:39:15 PM UTC+9, Marek Novotny wrote: >>>>> On 2016-10-30, Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>>>>> I have tried kernel 4.8.5 in orther to switch from trusty 4.7, but alas got >>>>>> BUG softlockup on CPU(s) during rsync. Have to hard reset, switched back to >>>>>> 4.7... >>>>> >>>>> Yes, 4.8 was no good for me either. On one machine it seems to be fine, >>>>> on another, no good. >>>>> >>>>> [marek@m4800 ~]$ uname -r >>>>> 4.7.10-1-MANJARO >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Marek Novotny >>>>> https://github.com/marek-novotny >>>> >>>> This is the general trend in this World, people becoming dumbier and their products becoming more buggy and low quality... >>> >>> Linux has always been of low quality. People accept it though because >>> Linux is free. >> >> Or because they are pissed at the NSA or the general country of the >> United States and believe that using such crap will hurt the country in >> some way. I was one of those people as well but now realize that whether >> I use OS X, Linux or Windows, nothing will change in terms of my >> privacy. Security-wise though, it looks as though Windows, yes Windows, >> has the advantage over the other two as they don't allow 9 year-old bugs >> to exist and actually fix their issues over time. > > Correct. > You almost cannot join a Linux discussion, blog or social media site > without running into the socialist corporate hating types. Linux > attracts them like flies to honey. > I don't understand the reasoning behind self punishment using Linux just > to say fuck you to Microsoft. > It doesn't make sense. It made sense to me a while ago but after essentially self-whipping myself the way those devout monks used to do by using Linux, I decided to stop being a monk and use Windows. -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease Proud libertarian, unapologetic nerd, author, gamer, beast-mode teacher and silver-tongued heel Fingerprint: e58428b2633833a3b0c9bb7e40819166642245b7 Gab.ai: @silverslimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 18:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e7mt6gF3bdmU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #378533 |
On 2016-10-30, Silver Slimer <> wrote: > On 2016-10-30 10:40 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: >> On 2016-10-30, Silver Slimer <> wrote: >>> On 2016-10-30 10:12 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: >>>> On 2016-10-30, Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Sunday, October 30, 2016 at 10:39:15 PM UTC+9, Marek Novotny wrote: >>>>>> On 2016-10-30, Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>>>>>> I have tried kernel 4.8.5 in orther to switch from trusty 4.7, but alas got >>>>>>> BUG softlockup on CPU(s) during rsync. Have to hard reset, switched back to >>>>>>> 4.7... >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, 4.8 was no good for me either. On one machine it seems to be fine, >>>>>> on another, no good. >>>>>> >>>>>> [marek@m4800 ~]$ uname -r >>>>>> 4.7.10-1-MANJARO >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Marek Novotny >>>>>> https://github.com/marek-novotny >>>>> >>>>> This is the general trend in this World, people becoming dumbier and their products becoming more buggy and low quality... >>>> >>>> Linux has always been of low quality. People accept it though because >>>> Linux is free. >>> >>> Or because they are pissed at the NSA or the general country of the >>> United States and believe that using such crap will hurt the country in >>> some way. I was one of those people as well but now realize that whether >>> I use OS X, Linux or Windows, nothing will change in terms of my >>> privacy. Security-wise though, it looks as though Windows, yes Windows, >>> has the advantage over the other two as they don't allow 9 year-old bugs >>> to exist and actually fix their issues over time. >> >> Correct. >> You almost cannot join a Linux discussion, blog or social media site >> without running into the socialist corporate hating types. Linux >> attracts them like flies to honey. >> I don't understand the reasoning behind self punishment using Linux just >> to say fuck you to Microsoft. >> It doesn't make sense. > > It made sense to me a while ago but after essentially self-whipping > myself the way those devout monks used to do by using Linux, I decided > to stop being a monk and use Windows. Like most others I need to get work done and Windows does a far better job of it than Linux does. Also I don't wish to be associated with the Linux "advocates" who are nothing more than nasty liars.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 15:21 -0700 |
| Subject | You are not fooling anyone, Mr. Maggot. |
| Message-ID | <ebc834ca-1ad7-4cb4-a641-754653c3f5cf@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #378533 |
On Sunday, October 30, 2016 at 12:49:53 PM UTC-4, Silver Slimer wrote: > On 2016-10-30 10:40 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: > > On 2016-10-30, Silver Slimer <> wrote: > >> On 2016-10-30 10:12 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: > >>> On 2016-10-30, Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> On Sunday, October 30, 2016 at 10:39:15 PM UTC+9, Marek Novotny wrote: > >>>>> On 2016-10-30, Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote: > >>>>>> I have tried kernel 4.8.5 in orther to switch from trusty 4.7, but alas got > >>>>>> BUG softlockup on CPU(s) during rsync. Have to hard reset, switched back to > >>>>>> 4.7... > >>>>> > >>>>> Yes, 4.8 was no good for me either. On one machine it seems to be fine, > >>>>> on another, no good. > >>>>> > >>>>> [marek@m4800 ~]$ uname -r > >>>>> 4.7.10-1-MANJARO > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Marek Novotny > >>>>> https://github.com/marek-novotny > >>>> > >>>> This is the general trend in this World, people becoming dumbier and their products becoming more buggy and low quality... > >>> > >>> Linux has always been of low quality. People accept it though because > >>> Linux is free. > >> > >> Or because they are pissed at the NSA or the general country of the > >> United States and believe that using such crap will hurt the country in > >> some way. I was one of those people as well but now realize that whether > >> I use OS X, Linux or Windows, nothing will change in terms of my > >> privacy. Security-wise though, it looks as though Windows, yes Windows, > >> has the advantage over the other two as they don't allow 9 year-old bugs > >> to exist and actually fix their issues over time. > > > > Correct. > > You almost cannot join a Linux discussion, blog or social media site > > without running into the socialist corporate hating types. Linux > > attracts them like flies to honey. > > I don't understand the reasoning behind self punishment using Linux just > > to say fuck you to Microsoft. > > It doesn't make sense. > > It made sense to me a while ago but after essentially self-whipping > myself the way those devout monks used to do by using Linux, I decided > to stop being a monk and use Windows. You are not fooling anyone, Mr. Maggot.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 10:27 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nv4vvq$jcl$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #378474 |
On 2016-10-30 9:50 AM, Takuya Saitoh wrote: > On Sunday, October 30, 2016 at 10:39:15 PM UTC+9, Marek Novotny wrote: >> On 2016-10-30, Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>> I have tried kernel 4.8.5 in orther to switch from trusty 4.7, but alas got >>> BUG softlockup on CPU(s) during rsync. Have to hard reset, switched back to >>> 4.7... >> >> Yes, 4.8 was no good for me either. On one machine it seems to be fine, >> on another, no good. >> >> [marek@m4800 ~]$ uname -r >> 4.7.10-1-MANJARO >> >> >> -- >> Marek Novotny >> https://github.com/marek-novotny > > This is the general trend in this World, people becoming dumbier and their products becoming more buggy and low quality... That only applies to Linux. The same mentality which has allowed Linux to become a thing is now being applied to the general human race and causing the emergence of imbeciles who think they are part of the opposite gender and insisting that the rest of the world use special pronouns to refer to them. -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease Proud libertarian, unapologetic nerd, author, gamer, beast-mode teacher and silver-tongued heel Fingerprint: e58428b2633833a3b0c9bb7e40819166642245b7 Gab.ai: @silverslimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 09:49 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nv4tnu$ber$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #378455 |
On 2016-10-30 7:24 AM, Melzzzzz wrote: > I have tried kernel 4.8.5 in orther to switch from trusty 4.7, but alas got > BUG softlockup on CPU(s) during rsync. Have to hard reset, switched back to > 4.7... More Linux bugs that don't exist! -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease Proud libertarian, unapologetic nerd, author, gamer, beast-mode teacher and silver-tongued heel Fingerprint: e58428b2633833a3b0c9bb7e40819166642245b7 Gab.ai: @silverslimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 13:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nv4tpr02ah7@news3.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #378455 |
On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 11:24:32 +0000, Melzzzzz wrote: > I have tried kernel 4.8.5 in orther to switch from trusty 4.7, but alas got > BUG softlockup on CPU(s) during rsync. Have to hard reset, switched back to > 4.7... > What bug? I don't see this bug on my 4.8 and I use rsync every fucking day. You must have some weird setup that invites problems. You can try to modify /proc/sys/kernel/watchdog_thresh to a large value. -- Linux Advocate # 17,495,314,697 Hail Linux! Hail GNU and the FSF! Hail Stallman! -------------------------------------------------------------- "Do I contradict myself? Very well then, I contradict myself. I am large; I contain multitudes." Walt Whitman
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 06:57 -0700 |
| Subject | Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot |
| Message-ID | <a9870f59-5935-434d-80f8-be321044a5d3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #378472 |
On Sunday, October 30, 2016 at 9:50:04 AM UTC-4, Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks wrote: > On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 11:24:32 +0000, Melzzzzz wrote: > > > I have tried kernel 4.8.5 in orther to switch from trusty 4.7, but alas got > > BUG softlockup on CPU(s) during rsync. Have to hard reset, switched back to > > 4.7... > > > > What bug? I don't see this bug on my 4.8 and I use rsync every > fucking day. > > You must have some weird setup that invites problems. > > You can try to modify /proc/sys/kernel/watchdog_thresh > to a large value. Eewh! So Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot, eh?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 14:11 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot |
| Message-ID | <e7mdcqFu95mU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #378479 |
On 2016-10-30, John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sunday, October 30, 2016 at 9:50:04 AM UTC-4, Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks wrote: >> On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 11:24:32 +0000, Melzzzzz wrote: >> >> > I have tried kernel 4.8.5 in orther to switch from trusty 4.7, but alas got >> > BUG softlockup on CPU(s) during rsync. Have to hard reset, switched back to >> > 4.7... >> > >> >> What bug? I don't see this bug on my 4.8 and I use rsync every >> fucking day. >> >> You must have some weird setup that invites problems. >> >> You can try to modify /proc/sys/kernel/watchdog_thresh >> to a large value. > > > Eewh! So Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot, eh? He demonstrated that he knows next to nothing about Manjaro's octopi and seeing as he runs Manjaro that is not a good sign.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 15:35 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot |
| Message-ID | <20161030153536.1034d874@maxa-pc.cpe.bvcom.net> |
| In reply to | #378489 |
On 30 Oct 2016 14:11:39 GMT Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> wrote: > On 2016-10-30, John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sunday, October 30, 2016 at 9:50:04 AM UTC-4, Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks > > wrote: > >> On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 11:24:32 +0000, Melzzzzz wrote: > >> > >> > I have tried kernel 4.8.5 in orther to switch from trusty 4.7, > >> > but alas got BUG softlockup on CPU(s) during rsync. Have to hard > >> > reset, switched back to 4.7... > >> > > >> > >> What bug? I don't see this bug on my 4.8 and I use rsync every > >> fucking day. > >> > >> You must have some weird setup that invites problems. > >> > >> You can try to modify /proc/sys/kernel/watchdog_thresh > >> to a large value. > > > > > > Eewh! So Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot, eh? > > He demonstrated that he knows next to nothing about Manjaro's octopi > and seeing as he runs Manjaro that is not a good sign. > I use pacman, not octopi for upgrading system, therefore I didn't new they added functionality to resolve conflicts from terminal.... -- press any key to continue or any other to quit
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 10:38 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot |
| Message-ID | <RIidnSU0xIR3mIvFnZ2dnUU7-aVi4p2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #378509 |
On 2016-10-30, Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: > I use pacman, not octopi for upgrading system, therefore I didn't new > they added functionality to resolve conflicts from terminal.... He's just hooking you. He's a loser. You have nothing to gain from him at all. You're his toy. This is how he gets off. Give him a -9999 and move on. -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 14:45 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot |
| Message-ID | <e7mfcpF829U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #378511 |
On 2016-10-30, Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: > On 2016-10-30, Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >> I use pacman, not octopi for upgrading system, therefore I didn't new >> they added functionality to resolve conflicts from terminal.... > > He's just hooking you. He's a loser. You have nothing to gain from him > at all. You're his toy. This is how he gets off. Give him a -9999 and > move on. So how did that work for you Marek? Not too well from your post -9999 replies to me. You're just another Linux fool herd member who knows less about Linux than you believe. You haven't even managed to eradicate snit from COLA, although you think you have. Add it to your long list of failures.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 12:50 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Melzzzzz must be just some kind of a Linux idiot |
| Message-ID | <nv58ce$c6f$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #378513 |
On 2016-10-30 10:45 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: > On 2016-10-30, Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: >> On 2016-10-30, Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>> I use pacman, not octopi for upgrading system, therefore I didn't new >>> they added functionality to resolve conflicts from terminal.... >> >> He's just hooking you. He's a loser. You have nothing to gain from him >> at all. You're his toy. This is how he gets off. Give him a -9999 and >> move on. > > So how did that work for you Marek? > Not too well from your post -9999 replies to me. > You're just another Linux fool herd member who knows less about Linux > than you believe. > You haven't even managed to eradicate snit from COLA, although you think > you have. > Add it to your long list of failures. Snit will _never_ leave. Even if the cockroach were to die tomorrow, he'd find a way to troll the newsgroup as a ghost or a corpse. -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease Proud libertarian, unapologetic nerd, author, gamer, beast-mode teacher and silver-tongued heel Fingerprint: e58428b2633833a3b0c9bb7e40819166642245b7 Gab.ai: @silverslimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 4 [1] 2 3 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web