Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #376510 > unrolled thread
| Started by | 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-10-16 22:02 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-10-20 09:57 +0100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 250 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-10-16 22:02 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-17 17:16 +0100
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-10-17 18:44 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-17 21:06 +0100
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-10-17 21:39 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-18 09:50 +0100
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-18 12:22 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-18 14:27 +0200
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-18 07:54 -0500
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-18 14:35 +0100
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-18 15:49 +0200
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-18 15:48 +0100
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-18 16:52 +0200
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-18 16:43 +0100
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-18 11:56 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-19 10:29 +0100
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-18 15:05 -0500
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Deplorable Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-19 15:47 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-18 10:57 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-18 22:53 +0100
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Deplorable Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-19 15:55 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-18 19:05 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-18 23:15 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-19 10:27 +0200
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-19 05:38 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-19 09:50 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-19 09:37 -0500
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-19 18:39 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-19 18:37 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-19 09:48 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-19 18:34 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-19 22:04 +0200
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 13:41 -0700
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Deplorable Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-19 16:57 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-20 13:39 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 16:21 -0700
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 17:27 -0700
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 21:28 -0700
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-19 21:00 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-18 16:33 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-18 16:32 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-18 12:48 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-18 12:34 -0500
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-18 13:05 -0500
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-18 20:13 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Deplorable Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-19 15:51 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-19 20:55 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 14:10 -0700
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Deplorable Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-19 17:19 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 14:22 -0700
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Deplorable Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-19 17:28 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-19 18:13 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Deplorable Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-19 18:27 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-19 18:39 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Deplorable Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-19 18:43 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-20 12:14 +0100
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-20 09:33 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-20 09:36 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-20 09:40 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-20 15:09 +0100
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-20 10:23 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-20 14:56 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-20 12:21 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-20 10:24 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-20 09:37 -0500
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-20 10:42 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-20 10:47 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-20 12:17 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-20 10:01 -0500
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-20 11:49 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-20 12:25 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-20 16:26 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-20 11:46 -0500
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-20 16:56 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-20 15:20 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-20 12:14 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-20 16:24 +0100
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-20 14:56 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-20 10:35 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Godzilla <godzilla@lizardboss.invalid> - 2016-10-20 20:43 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-20 14:55 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-20 06:55 -0500
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-20 13:36 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-20 10:06 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-20 14:53 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 08:17 -0700
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-20 12:20 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-20 18:26 +0200
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-20 12:31 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 09:36 -0700
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-20 14:07 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 11:12 -0700
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-20 13:55 -0600
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-20 19:58 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 13:01 -0700
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-20 19:44 -0600
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 19:12 -0700
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-20 16:43 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 11:15 -0700
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-20 20:11 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 09:48 -0700
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 10:28 -0700
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 11:09 -0700
Re: The truth about Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 11:28 -0700
Re: The truth about Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 11:45 -0700
Re: The truth about Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-20 20:20 -0400
Re: The truth about Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 17:53 -0700
Re: The truth about Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-20 23:12 -0400
Re: The truth about Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 20:28 -0700
Re: The truth about Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 22:57 -0700
Re: The truth about Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 07:51 -0700
Re: The truth about Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 08:51 -0700
Re: The truth about Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 09:20 -0700
Re: The truth about Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-21 13:41 +0000
Re: The truth about Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 07:53 -0700
Re: The truth about Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 08:58 -0700
Re: The truth about Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 09:23 -0700
Re: The truth about Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 18:26 -0700
Re: The truth about Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 18:34 -0700
Re: The truth about Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 18:48 -0700
Re: The truth about Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 19:04 -0700
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-20 17:01 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-20 14:12 -0500
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-20 14:35 -0500
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-20 19:37 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 13:00 -0700
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-20 16:54 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 14:21 -0700
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-20 17:27 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-20 21:32 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-20 18:41 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-21 13:36 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-21 12:19 -0600
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-21 20:22 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-20 16:49 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-20 21:16 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-20 23:05 +0100
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-20 19:34 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-20 20:46 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-21 13:31 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-21 12:20 -0600
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-21 20:11 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-21 16:45 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-21 20:54 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-21 23:09 +0100
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-21 19:21 -0600
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-21 19:20 -0600
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 01:25 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-21 13:28 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-21 10:18 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-21 14:40 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 07:56 -0700
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-01 10:30 -0700
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-20 16:59 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-20 09:37 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-20 14:59 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-20 11:13 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-20 15:50 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-20 12:23 -0600
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-20 19:05 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 09:28 -0700
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-20 17:35 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-20 12:18 -0600
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-20 12:22 -0600
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-21 12:17 +0100
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-21 08:33 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-21 12:39 -0600
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-19 23:27 +0100
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Godzilla <godzilla@lizardboss.invalid> - 2016-10-19 22:34 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Deplorable Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-19 18:42 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Godzilla <godzilla@lizardboss.invalid> - 2016-10-19 22:55 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Deplorable Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-19 18:59 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-20 13:37 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-20 10:07 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-20 15:01 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-20 12:22 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-19 18:41 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-19 18:40 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-19 19:49 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-18 19:10 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-18 20:17 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-19 07:04 -0500
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-19 09:52 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-19 15:25 +0100
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-19 16:55 +0200
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-19 16:10 +0100
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-19 17:55 +0200
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-19 17:08 +0100
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-19 18:28 +0200
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-19 13:01 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-19 20:29 +0200
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-19 13:57 -0500
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-19 15:17 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-19 15:12 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-19 23:03 +0100
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Deplorable Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-19 18:26 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-20 13:41 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-20 18:15 +0200
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-20 12:28 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-20 16:57 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-20 14:08 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-21 09:35 +0100
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-21 14:08 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-21 10:21 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-21 14:42 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-21 12:42 -0600
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-21 20:24 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-21 18:27 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-20 21:58 +0200
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-21 09:34 +0100
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-21 10:42 +0200
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-21 07:04 -0500
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-21 13:50 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-21 10:20 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-21 10:25 -0500
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-21 15:35 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-21 12:45 -0600
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-20 23:06 +0100
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-21 09:37 +0100
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-21 13:10 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-21 12:48 -0600
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-21 12:47 -0600
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-19 18:52 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-20 09:54 +0100
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-20 11:19 +0200
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-20 10:55 +0100
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-19 18:43 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-19 13:01 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Deplorable Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-19 16:05 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-19 21:01 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-19 19:33 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-20 13:40 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-20 10:32 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-20 15:19 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-20 12:28 -0600
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-20 19:06 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-19 19:35 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 11:43 -0700
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-18 20:07 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Deplorable Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-19 15:48 -0400
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-19 20:51 +0000
Says the hypocrite and retard known as Turdv. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-18 14:03 -0600
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-18 16:30 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-18 18:37 +0200
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-10-18 21:15 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-19 12:47 +0100
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-19 14:09 +0200
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-19 14:36 +0100
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-19 18:41 +0000
Re: Shipping hardware with Uboot serial debug port and stock Linux kernel improves hardware sales Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-10-20 09:57 +0100
Page 8 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 … 13 Next page →
| From | GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-21 12:20 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nudm9d$ju9$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #377130 |
Jim Polaski wrote: > On 2016-10-21, Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: >> On 2016-10-20, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>> William Poaster wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>> >>>> On 20/10/2016 17:26 in comp.os.linux.advocacy, Peter Köhlmann posted: >>>> >>>>> Silver Slimer wrote: >>>>>> On 2016-10-20 10:53 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: >>>>>>> On 2016-10-20, Silver Slimer <> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2016-10-20 9:36 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: >>>>> >>>>> <lotta crap> >>>>> >>>>> And you wonder why when you defended that lying imbecile even when it was >>>>> very obvious that he lied. Only someone being a lying cretin himmself *or* >>>>> a Snit sock would do so >>>> >>>> Even a Hadron sock. In any case it matter not, he's proved himself to be >>>> a troll & "Polaski " defends him. "Lie down with dogs & you get fleas". >>> >>> "Jim" is undoubtedly a long-time COLA troll. He put a little extra effort >>> into his initial disquise. >> >> Couldn't be more obvious. And that was the best he could do. >> > > Coming from someone who just started posting to COLA 2 months ago /you/ > really seem to know a lot about COLA. And yes, I know you post to other > Linux groups but your regular appearences in COLA started recently. It does seem a bit suspicious. I was having a good raport with him, and all of a sudden he's hearing voices calling people trolls. I guess I'm not in his list anymore. Strange behaviour indeed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-21 20:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e6vb2rFh70cU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #377193 |
On 2016-10-21, GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: > Jim Polaski wrote: > >> On 2016-10-21, Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: >>> On 2016-10-20, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>>> William Poaster wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>>> >>>>> On 20/10/2016 17:26 in comp.os.linux.advocacy, Peter Köhlmann posted: >>>>> >>>>>> Silver Slimer wrote: >>>>>>> On 2016-10-20 10:53 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2016-10-20, Silver Slimer <> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2016-10-20 9:36 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> <lotta crap> >>>>>> >>>>>> And you wonder why when you defended that lying imbecile even when it was >>>>>> very obvious that he lied. Only someone being a lying cretin himmself *or* >>>>>> a Snit sock would do so >>>>> >>>>> Even a Hadron sock. In any case it matter not, he's proved himself to be >>>>> a troll & "Polaski " defends him. "Lie down with dogs & you get fleas". >>>> >>>> "Jim" is undoubtedly a long-time COLA troll. He put a little extra effort >>>> into his initial disquise. >>> >>> Couldn't be more obvious. And that was the best he could do. >>> >> >> Coming from someone who just started posting to COLA 2 months ago /you/ >> really seem to know a lot about COLA. And yes, I know you post to other >> Linux groups but your regular appearences in COLA started recently. > > It does seem a bit suspicious. I was having a good raport with him, and all of > a sudden he's hearing voices calling people trolls. I guess I'm not in his list > anymore. Strange behaviour indeed. > Same here. He's a COLA Cabal sheep member for sure. Too bad as I will give him credit for eradicating snit. Something that nobody else has been able to do.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-21 16:45 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <sIydnejYLJwd45fFnZ2dnUU7-Y-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #377193 |
On 2016-10-21, GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: > Jim Polaski wrote: > >> On 2016-10-21, Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: >>> On 2016-10-20, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>>> William Poaster wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>>> >>>>> On 20/10/2016 17:26 in comp.os.linux.advocacy, Peter Köhlmann posted: >>>>> >>>>>> Silver Slimer wrote: >>>>>>> On 2016-10-20 10:53 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2016-10-20, Silver Slimer <> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2016-10-20 9:36 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> <lotta crap> >>>>>> >>>>>> And you wonder why when you defended that lying imbecile even when it was >>>>>> very obvious that he lied. Only someone being a lying cretin himmself *or* >>>>>> a Snit sock would do so >>>>> >>>>> Even a Hadron sock. In any case it matter not, he's proved himself to be >>>>> a troll & "Polaski " defends him. "Lie down with dogs & you get fleas". >>>> >>>> "Jim" is undoubtedly a long-time COLA troll. He put a little extra effort >>>> into his initial disquise. >>> >>> Couldn't be more obvious. And that was the best he could do. >>> >> >> Coming from someone who just started posting to COLA 2 months ago /you/ >> really seem to know a lot about COLA. And yes, I know you post to other >> Linux groups but your regular appearences in COLA started recently. > > It does seem a bit suspicious. I was having a good raport with him, > and all of a sudden he's hearing voices calling people trolls. I guess > I'm not in his list anymore. Strange behaviour indeed. Is this addressed to me? -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-21 20:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e6vdj8FhoejU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #377215 |
On 2016-10-21, Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: > On 2016-10-21, GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: >> Jim Polaski wrote: >> >>> On 2016-10-21, Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: >>>> On 2016-10-20, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>>>> William Poaster wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>>>> >>>>>> On 20/10/2016 17:26 in comp.os.linux.advocacy, Peter Köhlmann posted: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Silver Slimer wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2016-10-20 10:53 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2016-10-20, Silver Slimer <> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2016-10-20 9:36 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <lotta crap> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And you wonder why when you defended that lying imbecile even when it was >>>>>>> very obvious that he lied. Only someone being a lying cretin himmself *or* >>>>>>> a Snit sock would do so >>>>>> >>>>>> Even a Hadron sock. In any case it matter not, he's proved himself to be >>>>>> a troll & "Polaski " defends him. "Lie down with dogs & you get fleas". >>>>> >>>>> "Jim" is undoubtedly a long-time COLA troll. He put a little extra effort >>>>> into his initial disquise. >>>> >>>> Couldn't be more obvious. And that was the best he could do. >>>> >>> >>> Coming from someone who just started posting to COLA 2 months ago /you/ >>> really seem to know a lot about COLA. And yes, I know you post to other >>> Linux groups but your regular appearences in COLA started recently. >> >> It does seem a bit suspicious. I was having a good raport with him, >> and all of a sudden he's hearing voices calling people trolls. I guess >> I'm not in his list anymore. Strange behaviour indeed. > > Is this addressed to me? > Yes. As if you didn't know.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Poaster <wp@dev.null> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-21 23:09 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <3agqdd-gm1.ln1@debian.machineone.org> |
| In reply to | #377215 |
On 21/10/2016 21:45 in comp.os.linux.advocacy, Marek Novotny posted: > On 2016-10-21, GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: >> Jim Polaski wrote: >> >>> On 2016-10-21, Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: >>>> On 2016-10-20, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>>>> William Poaster wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>>>> >>>>>> On 20/10/2016 17:26 in comp.os.linux.advocacy, Peter Köhlmann posted: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Silver Slimer wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2016-10-20 10:53 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2016-10-20, Silver Slimer <> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2016-10-20 9:36 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <lotta crap> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And you wonder why when you defended that lying imbecile even when it was >>>>>>> very obvious that he lied. Only someone being a lying cretin himmself *or* >>>>>>> a Snit sock would do so >>>>>> >>>>>> Even a Hadron sock. In any case it matter not, he's proved himself to be >>>>>> a troll & "Polaski " defends him. "Lie down with dogs & you get fleas". >>>>> >>>>> "Jim" is undoubtedly a long-time COLA troll. He put a little extra effort >>>>> into his initial disquise. >>>> >>>> Couldn't be more obvious. And that was the best he could do. >>>> >>> >>> Coming from someone who just started posting to COLA 2 months ago /you/ >>> really seem to know a lot about COLA. And yes, I know you post to other >>> Linux groups but your regular appearences in COLA started recently. >> >> It does seem a bit suspicious. I was having a good raport with him, >> and all of a sudden he's hearing voices calling people trolls. I guess >> I'm not in his list anymore. Strange behaviour indeed. > > Is this addressed to me? Trolls trying to divert attention. Typical tactic. -- The severely important command and control functions of the ISS have been running Solaris for some time, probably even from the first launch. Windows was used for things that weren't very important. -- Mark Pentler --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-21 19:21 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nueetf$68u$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #377230 |
William Poaster wrote: > On 21/10/2016 21:45 in comp.os.linux.advocacy, Marek Novotny posted: > >> On 2016-10-21, GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: >>> Jim Polaski wrote: >>> >>>> On 2016-10-21, Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: >>>>> On 2016-10-20, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>>>>> William Poaster wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 20/10/2016 17:26 in comp.os.linux.advocacy, Peter Köhlmann posted: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Silver Slimer wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2016-10-20 10:53 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2016-10-20, Silver Slimer <> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2016-10-20 9:36 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <lotta crap> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And you wonder why when you defended that lying imbecile even when it >>>>>>>> was very obvious that he lied. Only someone being a lying cretin >>>>>>>> himmself *or* a Snit sock would do so >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Even a Hadron sock. In any case it matter not, he's proved himself to be >>>>>>> a troll & "Polaski " defends him. "Lie down with dogs & you get fleas". >>>>>> >>>>>> "Jim" is undoubtedly a long-time COLA troll. He put a little extra >>>>>> effort into his initial disquise. >>>>> >>>>> Couldn't be more obvious. And that was the best he could do. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Coming from someone who just started posting to COLA 2 months ago /you/ >>>> really seem to know a lot about COLA. And yes, I know you post to other >>>> Linux groups but your regular appearences in COLA started recently. >>> >>> It does seem a bit suspicious. I was having a good raport with him, >>> and all of a sudden he's hearing voices calling people trolls. I guess >>> I'm not in his list anymore. Strange behaviour indeed. >> >> Is this addressed to me? > > Trolls trying to divert attention. Typical tactic. > Yawn. Still wearing a tinfoil hat, I see.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-21 19:20 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nueeru$68u$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #377215 |
Marek Novotny wrote: > On 2016-10-21, GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: >> Jim Polaski wrote: >> >>> On 2016-10-21, Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: >>>> On 2016-10-20, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>>>> William Poaster wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>>>> >>>>>> On 20/10/2016 17:26 in comp.os.linux.advocacy, Peter Köhlmann posted: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Silver Slimer wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2016-10-20 10:53 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2016-10-20, Silver Slimer <> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2016-10-20 9:36 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <lotta crap> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And you wonder why when you defended that lying imbecile even when it >>>>>>> was very obvious that he lied. Only someone being a lying cretin >>>>>>> himmself *or* a Snit sock would do so >>>>>> >>>>>> Even a Hadron sock. In any case it matter not, he's proved himself to be >>>>>> a troll & "Polaski " defends him. "Lie down with dogs & you get fleas". >>>>> >>>>> "Jim" is undoubtedly a long-time COLA troll. He put a little extra effort >>>>> into his initial disquise. >>>> >>>> Couldn't be more obvious. And that was the best he could do. >>>> >>> >>> Coming from someone who just started posting to COLA 2 months ago /you/ >>> really seem to know a lot about COLA. And yes, I know you post to other >>> Linux groups but your regular appearences in COLA started recently. >> >> It does seem a bit suspicious. I was having a good raport with him, >> and all of a sudden he's hearing voices calling people trolls. I guess >> I'm not in his list anymore. Strange behaviour indeed. > > Is this addressed to me? > Well, sort of. I noticed no further raport, so I'm only guessing that I'm in your troll filter.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-21 01:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nubqq4$2hf$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #377068 |
On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 19:34:04 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > "Jim" is undoubtedly a long-time COLA troll. He put a little extra > effort into his initial disquise. Yep. -- Zero tolerance for iCultists and WinDrones
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-21 13:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e6ujfvFb6l1U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #377068 |
On 2016-10-20, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: > William Poaster wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> On 20/10/2016 17:26 in comp.os.linux.advocacy, Peter Köhlmann posted: >> >>> Silver Slimer wrote: >>>> On 2016-10-20 10:53 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: >>>>> On 2016-10-20, Silver Slimer <> wrote: >>>>>> On 2016-10-20 9:36 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: >>> >>> <lotta crap> >>> >>> And you wonder why when you defended that lying imbecile even when it was >>> very obvious that he lied. Only someone being a lying cretin himmself *or* a >>> Snit sock would do so >> >> Even a Hadron sock. In any case it matter not, he's proved himself to be >> a troll & "Polaski " defends him. "Lie down with dogs & you get fleas". > > "Jim" is undoubtedly a long-time COLA troll. He put a little extra effort > into his initial disquise. Wrong conclusion. First I'm not a troll. I present the facts and I will bite back when attacked. You discovered that Chris. Second, I used to post in another group many years ago. At least 12 by my guess. Some posts got x posted to COLA so I do remember some names. Ken Downs is one of them. Flyer something or other is another one. Peter I remember. Third, I've read COLA over the years for a laugh so I've seen some of the wars especially with snit, flatish++, Roy Schestowitz, Mark Kent and others. But I wasn't posting then as I was too busy planning my retirement. Fourth, your Cabal seems to be under the impression that someone has to have a long history of COLA posting/reading in order to figure out what your little Cabal is about. Completely incorrect. The COLA Cabal is so transparent that it only takes a week or two of posting here to see how fucked up you people are. And some things never changed. This group is as fucked up now as it was a decade ago. Maybe even worse because back then quality, decent Linux advocates existed. Ken Downs is one of them. The current status of this group is a joke. You call yourselves Linux advocates but you aren't anything close to a Linux advocate. You are just crazy people who want a food fight. Congratulations, you now have one. I'm dead serious Chris. I've never experienced anything like this in any group or blog I have read or participated in. Even Mac users who are the biggest zealots for their Apple products don't even come close to what goes on in COLA. The difference though is that the Apple users tend to stick to the facts, opinions and reasons why they like Apple and think it is the best. They certainly don't attack people, start smear campaigns against posters who disagree with them, unless the person starts attacking them first. Maybe it's true that Apple users are typically higher on the socioeconmic scale than Linux users who have a reputation of being hypocritical, unwashed, basement dwelling dweebs. And it's not just me with this impression. Here is something you can read while waiting for the latest issue of Mad Magazine to arrive: "Are the “Open Source” advocates mentally healthy?" http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Linux/Linux4.html Extra points for listing how many of these traits the COLA Cabal have.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-21 10:18 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nud827$t8s$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #377129 |
On 2016-10-21 9:28 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: > On 2016-10-20, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >> William Poaster wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >>> On 20/10/2016 17:26 in comp.os.linux.advocacy, Peter Köhlmann posted: >>> >>>> Silver Slimer wrote: >>>>> On 2016-10-20 10:53 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: >>>>>> On 2016-10-20, Silver Slimer <> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2016-10-20 9:36 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: >>>> >>>> <lotta crap> >>>> >>>> And you wonder why when you defended that lying imbecile even when it was >>>> very obvious that he lied. Only someone being a lying cretin himmself *or* a >>>> Snit sock would do so >>> >>> Even a Hadron sock. In any case it matter not, he's proved himself to be >>> a troll & "Polaski " defends him. "Lie down with dogs & you get fleas". >> >> "Jim" is undoubtedly a long-time COLA troll. He put a little extra effort >> into his initial disquise. > > Wrong conclusion. > First I'm not a troll. I present the facts and I will bite back when > attacked. You discovered that Chris. > > Second, I used to post in another group many years ago. At least 12 by > my guess. Some posts got x posted to COLA so I do remember some names. > Ken Downs is one of them. Flyer something or other is another one. Peter > I remember. > > Third, I've read COLA over the years for a laugh so I've seen some of > the wars especially with snit, flatish++, Roy Schestowitz, Mark Kent and > others. But I wasn't posting then as I was too busy planning my > retirement. > > Fourth, your Cabal seems to be under the impression that someone has to > have a long history of COLA posting/reading in order to figure out what > your little Cabal is about. > Completely incorrect. > The COLA Cabal is so transparent that it only takes a week or two of > posting here to see how fucked up you people are. > And some things never changed. This group is as fucked up now as it was > a decade ago. Maybe even worse because back then quality, decent Linux > advocates existed. Ken Downs is one of them. The current status of this > group is a joke. You call yourselves Linux advocates but you aren't > anything close to a Linux advocate. You are just crazy people who want a > food fight. Congratulations, you now have one. Like I've said in the past, the "advocates" in this group have done more to damage any interest people might have in Linux than actually advocate the poor man's operating system. > I'm dead serious Chris. > > I've never experienced anything like this in any group or blog I have > read or participated in. Even Mac users who are the biggest zealots for > their Apple products don't even come close to what goes on in COLA. > > The difference though is that the Apple users tend to stick to the > facts, opinions and reasons why they like Apple and think it is the > best. > > They certainly don't attack people, start smear campaigns against > posters who disagree with them, unless the person starts attacking them > first. > > Maybe it's true that Apple users are typically higher on the > socioeconmic scale than Linux users who have a reputation of being > hypocritical, unwashed, basement dwelling dweebs. My lawyer and most of the successful people I've met along the way were Mac users. < snip > -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease Gab.ai: @silverslimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-21 14:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e6unmrFcea8U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #377141 |
On 2016-10-21, Silver Slimer <> wrote: > On 2016-10-21 9:28 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: >> On 2016-10-20, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>> William Poaster wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>> >>>> On 20/10/2016 17:26 in comp.os.linux.advocacy, Peter Köhlmann posted: >>>> >>>>> Silver Slimer wrote: >>>>>> On 2016-10-20 10:53 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: >>>>>>> On 2016-10-20, Silver Slimer <> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2016-10-20 9:36 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: >>>>> >>>>> <lotta crap> >>>>> >>>>> And you wonder why when you defended that lying imbecile even when it was >>>>> very obvious that he lied. Only someone being a lying cretin himmself *or* a >>>>> Snit sock would do so >>>> >>>> Even a Hadron sock. In any case it matter not, he's proved himself to be >>>> a troll & "Polaski " defends him. "Lie down with dogs & you get fleas". >>> >>> "Jim" is undoubtedly a long-time COLA troll. He put a little extra effort >>> into his initial disquise. >> >> Wrong conclusion. >> First I'm not a troll. I present the facts and I will bite back when >> attacked. You discovered that Chris. >> >> Second, I used to post in another group many years ago. At least 12 by >> my guess. Some posts got x posted to COLA so I do remember some names. >> Ken Downs is one of them. Flyer something or other is another one. Peter >> I remember. >> >> Third, I've read COLA over the years for a laugh so I've seen some of >> the wars especially with snit, flatish++, Roy Schestowitz, Mark Kent and >> others. But I wasn't posting then as I was too busy planning my >> retirement. >> >> Fourth, your Cabal seems to be under the impression that someone has to >> have a long history of COLA posting/reading in order to figure out what >> your little Cabal is about. >> Completely incorrect. >> The COLA Cabal is so transparent that it only takes a week or two of >> posting here to see how fucked up you people are. >> And some things never changed. This group is as fucked up now as it was >> a decade ago. Maybe even worse because back then quality, decent Linux >> advocates existed. Ken Downs is one of them. The current status of this >> group is a joke. You call yourselves Linux advocates but you aren't >> anything close to a Linux advocate. You are just crazy people who want a >> food fight. Congratulations, you now have one. > > Like I've said in the past, the "advocates" in this group have done more > to damage any interest people might have in Linux than actually advocate > the poor man's operating system. I've noticed that some of them get chewed to pieces when they try and post in what would be considered a "serious" Linux group. Their games and trickery don't work in groups like that. Neither does their poor Linux skills.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-21 07:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d8d02ccd-33f4-4737-a31e-aaf42798e51f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #377141 |
On Friday, 21 October 2016 07:18:06 UTC-7, Silver Slimer wrote: > > Maybe it's true that Apple users are typically higher on the > > socioeconmic scale than Linux users who have a reputation of being > > hypocritical, unwashed, basement dwelling dweebs. > > My lawyer and most of the successful people I've met along the way were > Mac users. Why would your lawyer and other successful people use slow systems?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-01 10:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D43E1F3D.81889%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #377129 |
On 10/21/16, 6:28 AM, in article e6ujfvFb6l1U2@mid.individual.net, "Jim Polaski" <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> wrote: > On 2016-10-20, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >> William Poaster wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >>> On 20/10/2016 17:26 in comp.os.linux.advocacy, Peter Köhlmann posted: >>> >>>> Silver Slimer wrote: >>>>> On 2016-10-20 10:53 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: >>>>>> On 2016-10-20, Silver Slimer <> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2016-10-20 9:36 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: >>>> >>>> <lotta crap> >>>> >>>> And you wonder why when you defended that lying imbecile even when it was >>>> very obvious that he lied. Only someone being a lying cretin himmself *or* >>>> a >>>> Snit sock would do so >>> >>> Even a Hadron sock. In any case it matter not, he's proved himself to be >>> a troll & "Polaski " defends him. "Lie down with dogs & you get fleas". >> >> "Jim" is undoubtedly a long-time COLA troll. He put a little extra effort >> into his initial disquise. > > Wrong conclusion. > First I'm not a troll. I present the facts and I will bite back when > attacked. You discovered that Chris. > > Second, I used to post in another group many years ago. At least 12 by > my guess. Some posts got x posted to COLA so I do remember some names. > Ken Downs is one of them. Flyer something or other is another one. Peter > I remember. > > Third, I've read COLA over the years for a laugh so I've seen some of > the wars especially with snit, flatish++, Roy Schestowitz, Mark Kent and > others. But I wasn't posting then as I was too busy planning my > retirement. > > Fourth, your Cabal seems to be under the impression that someone has to > have a long history of COLA posting/reading in order to figure out what > your little Cabal is about. > Completely incorrect. > The COLA Cabal is so transparent that it only takes a week or two of > posting here to see how fucked up you people are. Exactly. When people call them out they insist they must be "socks" because how can anyone figure out their completely transparent lies, absurd accusations and paranoia, etc. so quickly. It is insane... they cannot imagine anyone actually has a brain. > And some things never changed. This group is as fucked up now as it was > a decade ago. Maybe even worse because back then quality, decent Linux > advocates existed. Ken Downs is one of them. The current status of this > group is a joke. You call yourselves Linux advocates but you aren't > anything close to a Linux advocate. You are just crazy people who want a > food fight. Congratulations, you now have one. > > I'm dead serious Chris. > > I've never experienced anything like this in any group or blog I have > read or participated in. Even Mac users who are the biggest zealots for > their Apple products don't even come close to what goes on in COLA. There are some Mac users who can be pretty extreme, but, no, I have never seen any group anywhere near as zealous as this one is for Linux. Even in the "Cult of Mac" they openly discuss WEAKNESSES of the Mac and other Apple products. No issue at all with it. In Linux any issue with Linux is deemed a lie... even when there is video proof. > The difference though is that the Apple users tend to stick to the > facts, opinions and reasons why they like Apple and think it is the > best. > > They certainly don't attack people, start smear campaigns against > posters who disagree with them, unless the person starts attacking them > first. Right. > Maybe it's true that Apple users are typically higher on the > socioeconmic scale than Linux users who have a reputation of being > hypocritical, unwashed, basement dwelling dweebs. > > And it's not just me with this impression. Here is something you can > read while waiting for the latest issue of Mad Magazine to arrive: > > "Are the ³Open Source² advocates mentally healthy?" > > http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Linux/Linux4.html > > Extra points for listing how many of these traits the COLA Cabal have. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-20 16:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e6sbfeFpu0rU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #376943 |
On 2016-10-20, Silver Slimer <> wrote: > On 2016-10-20 10:53 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: >> On 2016-10-20, Silver Slimer <> wrote: >>> On 2016-10-20 9:36 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: >>>> On 2016-10-20, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> Marek Novotny wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> slime wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You really need to start realizing that I don't much give a shit what >>>>>>> you think anymore. >>>>> >>>>> Oh, dear. Slime's no longer "Mr Reasonable"? Such a "tragedy". >>>>> >>>>> He gave us a chance, you know. It's our fault. We should just forget >>>>> all of the filthy lies that he's spewed. Not. >>>>> >>>>>> It's your life. You'll never be taken seriously. >>>>> >>>>> Anyone can "act normal" for a while, but only a truly shitty person >>>>> would have done what "Slimer" has done, in here. >>>> >>>> That's because it's 100 percent impossible to be reasonable with you >>>> crazy Linux advocates. The only way is to totally and completely repress >>>> one's own, unique thoughts and completely parrot what you Linux >>>> advocates wish to hear. >>>> And even then, you will bait the person into an argument and when he >>>> defends himself you will proudly, while beating your chest like Tarzan, >>>> proclaim something like: >>>> >>>> "see the troll finally outed himself" at which point the rest of the >>>> COLA Cabal will join the mob frenzy. >>>> >>>> And you need look no further than my postings here in COLA to prove that >>>> point 100 percent true. >>>> >>>> I've reached the same conclusion as Silver Slimer and that conclusion is >>>> that it's impossible to have a reasonable discussion with Linux >>>> advocates in COLA. It's just not. >>>> You have a double standard and will attack anyone who refuses to parrot >>>> your sometimes obtuse ideology. >>>> >>>> It's like GWB said "you are either with us or against us" and in COLA it >>>> has to be 100 percent with us. >>>> >>>> The Cabal double standard is alive and well. For example you will attack >>>> a new poster because they post from Windows rather than listening to the >>>> message. Yet, some in this group post from Windows all the time and you >>>> ignore it because they are 100 pro Linux and wouldn't dare say a bad >>>> thing about Linux. >>>> >>>> I could give 50 more examples but it falls on deaf ears because it's >>>> clear something is wrong with the Linux advocates in COLA. Very wrong. >>> >>> We've all tried to be nice and reasonable, as I was with Marek for >>> instance, only to see the person we were having a nice conversation with >>> drink the Kool-Aid and become the same kind of moron we hoped he would >>> never turn into. >> >> I was completely pleasant, even though I was attacked from my first post >> (you are a snit sock) and remained that way until Chris Ahlstrom >> attacked. >> After seeing the people I was having good conversations with (Poaster, >> Kohlmann, Novotney, ronb and others) pile on the attacks I realized what >> this group is about and how nuts the Linux Cabal members really are. > > That was my experience. I genuinely wanted to talk about Linux, its > faults and strengths with other people when I first came here. It took > about a day or two before I was told that I was Snit. It's impossible so I'm aligning myself with the rest of us who are intelligent enough to think for ourselves. That would be you, DFS etc.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-20 09:37 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <peqdneAR5-gQVZXFnZ2dnUU7-TudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #376856 |
On 2016-10-20, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > Marek Novotny wrote: > >> slime wrote: >>> >>> You really need to start realizing that I don't much give a shit what >>> you think anymore. > > Oh, dear. Slime's no longer "Mr Reasonable"? Such a "tragedy". > > He gave us a chance, you know. It's our fault. We should just forget > all of the filthy lies that he's spewed. Not. > >> It's your life. You'll never be taken seriously. > > Anyone can "act normal" for a while, but only a truly shitty person > would have done what "Slimer" has done, in here. Trolls always show their true nature and it never takes long either. It's like telling a joke. They just can't wait to get to the punchline and often ruin the timing because they are so overly excited to get to the punchline. It's like watching a cat playing with a stupid mouse. The mouse only briefly thinks he's getting away. He never gets away. The cat won't allow it. -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-20 14:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e6s4edFnsenU9@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #376867 |
On 2016-10-20, Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: > On 2016-10-20, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> Marek Novotny wrote: >> >>> slime wrote: >>>> >>>> You really need to start realizing that I don't much give a shit what >>>> you think anymore. >> >> Oh, dear. Slime's no longer "Mr Reasonable"? Such a "tragedy". >> >> He gave us a chance, you know. It's our fault. We should just forget >> all of the filthy lies that he's spewed. Not. >> >>> It's your life. You'll never be taken seriously. >> >> Anyone can "act normal" for a while, but only a truly shitty person >> would have done what "Slimer" has done, in here. > > Trolls always show their true nature and it never takes long either. > It's like telling a joke. They just can't wait to get to the punchline > and often ruin the timing because they are so overly excited to get to > the punchline. It's like watching a cat playing with a stupid mouse. The > mouse only briefly thinks he's getting away. He never gets away. The cat > won't allow it. Only when attacked and provoked, like the Cabal did to me. Sorry, but it's all there in Google and it's common knowledge that this is the way the COLA Cabal operates. Wasn't Greycloud once a Linux advocate? I'm not sure what happened to make him switch sides, but I vaguely remember him being a Linux advocate at one time. It seems the COLA Cabal attacks greycloud these days. So what happened?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-20 11:13 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nuamti$7e9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #376909 |
On 10/20/2016 10:59 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: > Only when attacked and provoked, like the Cabal did to me. > Sorry, but it's all there in Google and it's common knowledge that this > is the way the COLA Cabal operates. > > Wasn't Greycloud once a Linux advocate? > I'm not sure what happened to make him switch sides, but I vaguely > remember him being a Linux advocate at one time. > > It seems the COLA Cabal attacks greycloud these days. > So what happened? The only way you could know that is if you kept close tabs on cola for some years, and 'Jim Polaski' is a brand new nym. Is that you, Flattie? Or is this 'tomas', among a dozen other nyms?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-20 15:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e6s7esFnsenU17@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #376915 |
On 2016-10-20, DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 10/20/2016 10:59 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: > >> Only when attacked and provoked, like the Cabal did to me. >> Sorry, but it's all there in Google and it's common knowledge that this >> is the way the COLA Cabal operates. >> >> Wasn't Greycloud once a Linux advocate? >> I'm not sure what happened to make him switch sides, but I vaguely >> remember him being a Linux advocate at one time. >> >> It seems the COLA Cabal attacks greycloud these days. >> So what happened? > > > The only way you could know that is if you kept close tabs on cola for > some years, and 'Jim Polaski' is a brand new nym. > > Is that you, Flattie? > > Or is this 'tomas', among a dozen other nyms? Nope. I am who I say I am, Jim. I used to post here many years ago under a different nym so I did remember the name greycloud and that he was a Native American and from my memory, I thought he was a Linux advocate. I was an Apple and Windows user back then so I remember well how they would attack us. Recently I was looking for a greycloud post and checked his posting history from Google and noticed it went back a long way so I assumed it was the same person, but I'm not sure.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-20 12:23 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nub222$cqv$8@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #376927 |
Jim Polaski wrote: > On 2016-10-20, DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >> On 10/20/2016 10:59 AM, Jim Polaski wrote: >> >>> Only when attacked and provoked, like the Cabal did to me. >>> Sorry, but it's all there in Google and it's common knowledge that this >>> is the way the COLA Cabal operates. >>> >>> Wasn't Greycloud once a Linux advocate? >>> I'm not sure what happened to make him switch sides, but I vaguely >>> remember him being a Linux advocate at one time. >>> >>> It seems the COLA Cabal attacks greycloud these days. >>> So what happened? >> >> >> The only way you could know that is if you kept close tabs on cola for >> some years, and 'Jim Polaski' is a brand new nym. >> >> Is that you, Flattie? >> >> Or is this 'tomas', among a dozen other nyms? > > Nope. I am who I say I am, Jim. > I used to post here many years ago under a different nym so I did > remember the name greycloud and that he was a Native American and > from my memory, I thought he was a Linux advocate. > I was an Apple and Windows user back then so I remember well how they > would attack us. > > Recently I was looking for a greycloud post and checked his posting > history from Google and noticed it went back a long way so I assumed it > was the same person, but I'm not sure. It is still me. Tahuya!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-20 19:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e6sis6Frlk0U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #376998 |
On 2016-10-20, GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: > > It is still me. > > Tahuya! Cool!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 8 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 … 13 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web