Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #376020 > unrolled thread

Does Linux cause resistance to cancer?

Started byTakuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com>
First post2016-10-11 18:17 -0700
Last post2016-10-13 14:37 +0300
Articles 20 on this page of 150 — 20 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 18:17 -0700
    Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-11 18:33 -0700
      Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 20:22 -0700
      Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-12 08:17 -0400
        Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-12 10:05 -0400
          Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-12 11:52 -0400
            Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-12 12:02 -0400
              Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-12 12:15 -0400
                Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-12 12:24 -0400
                  Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-12 11:38 -0500
                  Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-12 12:39 -0400
                    Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-12 18:44 +0200
                      Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 10:02 -0700
                        Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 10:05 -0700
                        Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-12 19:23 +0200
                          Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-12 13:47 -0400
                            Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 11:13 -0700
                              Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-12 20:22 +0200
                              Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-12 14:26 -0400
                                Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-12 20:31 +0200
                                  Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-12 15:30 -0400
                                  Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-12 19:41 +0000
                                    Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-12 14:42 -0600
                                      Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-12 20:57 +0000
                                        Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-12 21:50 -0600
                                          Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-13 20:25 +0000
                                            Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-13 15:08 -0600
                                  Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 12:59 -0700
                      Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-12 13:43 -0400
                        Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-12 23:11 +0100
                          Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-13 00:19 +0200
                            Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-12 23:35 +0100
                              Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-12 21:06 -0400
                                Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 18:18 -0700
                                  Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Pickles <picklesdill9@mail.com> - 2016-10-14 00:36 +0000
                                    Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-14 07:01 -0500
                                Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-13 09:09 +0100
                                  Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-13 10:02 -0400
                            Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-01 10:10 -0700
                          Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-12 18:32 -0400
                            Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-12 23:39 +0100
                              Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Godzilla <godzilla@lizardboss.invalid> - 2016-10-12 22:46 +0000
                      Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-12 14:54 -0400
                      Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-12 20:11 -0400
                    Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-12 13:41 -0400
                      Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-12 12:57 -0500
                      Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 11:09 -0700
                      Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-12 15:26 -0400
                      Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 20:30 +0000
                        Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-12 20:17 -0400
                          Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-12 21:10 -0400
                    Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-12 18:06 +0000
                      Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-12 15:07 -0400
                        Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-12 19:17 +0000
                          Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-12 15:40 -0400
                        Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-12 15:39 -0400
                          Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-12 15:52 -0400
                      Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-12 15:31 -0400
                        Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-12 15:51 -0400
                          Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-12 16:13 -0400
                          Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-12 23:15 +0100
                Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-12 17:58 +0000
                  Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 11:13 -0700
                    Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 11:16 -0700
                  Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-12 15:27 -0400
                    Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-13 12:26 +0000
    Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 20:32 -0700
      Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 07:18 -0700
    Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-12 08:17 -0400
      Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-12 10:03 -0400
        Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-12 09:19 -0500
        Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-12 16:30 +0200
          Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-12 10:39 -0400
          Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-12 15:51 +0100
            Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-12 17:26 +0200
          Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-12 17:20 +0200
            Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-12 10:47 -0500
          Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-12 11:56 -0400
            Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-12 12:04 -0400
              Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-12 11:14 -0500
              Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-12 12:16 -0400
                Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-12 12:25 -0400
                  Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-12 14:50 -0400
                    Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-12 15:34 -0400
                      Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-12 15:42 -0400
                        Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-12 16:02 -0400
                          Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-12 16:27 -0400
                            Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-12 17:09 -0400
                              Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-12 17:44 -0400
                                Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-12 23:47 +0200
                                  Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-12 23:22 +0100
                                  Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-13 07:03 -0500
                                Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-12 18:29 -0400
                                  Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-13 01:28 +0000
                                    Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-12 21:42 -0400
                                    Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-13 06:56 -0500
                                      Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 03:36 +0000
                                        Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 09:57 -0700
                              Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-13 00:42 +0000
                                Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-12 21:35 -0400
                                  Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-13 01:42 +0000
                                    Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 19:14 -0700
                        Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-13 12:34 +0000
                      Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-12 15:07 -0500
          Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Alexander Suvorov <axr.suvorov@yandex.ru> - 2016-10-13 14:42 +0300
            Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 03:33 +0000
        Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-12 11:52 -0400
          Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-12 12:01 -0400
            Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-12 18:08 +0200
              Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-12 12:15 -0400
            Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-12 12:14 -0400
              Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-12 12:23 -0400
                Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-12 12:38 -0400
                  Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-12 18:49 +0200
                    Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-12 15:07 -0400
                      Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-12 15:39 -0400
                        Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-12 15:45 -0400
                          Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-12 16:04 -0400
                      Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Godzilla <godzilla@lizardboss.invalid> - 2016-10-12 20:23 +0000
                        Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-12 16:36 -0400
                  Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-12 13:36 -0400
                    Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-12 15:25 -0400
                      Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-12 15:46 -0400
                        Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-12 16:08 -0400
                          Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-12 16:20 -0400
                            Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-12 16:35 -0400
                              Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-12 16:53 -0400
                                Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-12 17:41 -0400
                                  Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-12 18:24 -0400
                                    Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-12 18:30 -0400
                                    Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-12 23:32 +0100
                            Two more "Slimer" feedings deleted, unread chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-12 16:01 -0500
                              Re: Two more "Slimer" feedings deleted, unread Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-12 20:35 -0400
                                Re: Two more "Slimer" feedings deleted, unread Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-13 12:20 +0000
            Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 10:02 -0700
              Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-12 19:20 +0200
                Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-12 13:50 -0400
                Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-12 15:12 -0400
                Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 17:58 -0700
                  Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-13 09:34 +0200
              Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-12 15:10 -0400
      Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Alexander Suvorov <axr.suvorov@yandex.ru> - 2016-10-13 14:35 +0300
        Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 03:31 +0000
    Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? fr314159@gmail.com - 2016-10-12 06:46 -0700
      Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-12 08:54 -0500
        Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-12 20:07 -0400
          Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-13 12:45 +0000
          Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-13 08:24 -0500
            Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-13 13:31 +0000
        Re: Does Linux cause resistance to cancer? Alexander Suvorov <axr.suvorov@yandex.ru> - 2016-10-13 14:37 +0300

Page 4 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8  Next page →

#376209

FromWilliam Poaster <wp@dev.null>
Date2016-10-12 23:15 +0100
Message-ID<h9p2dd-t32.ln1@debian.machineone.org>
In reply to#376161
On 12/10/2016 20:51 in comp.os.linux.advocacy, Marek Novotny posted:

> On 2016-10-12, Silver Slimer <> wrote:
>>
>> On 2016-10-12 2:06 PM, Jim Polaski wrote:
>>> On 2016-10-12, Silver Slimer <> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On 2016-10-12 12:24 PM, Marek Novotny wrote:
>>>>> On 2016-10-12, Silver Slimer <> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 2016-10-12 12:02 PM, Marek Novotny wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2016-10-12, Silver Slimer <> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 2016-10-12 10:05 AM, Marek Novotny wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2016-10-12, Silver Slimer <> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On 2016-10-11 9:33 PM, Me Sham wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 at 8:17:39 PM UTC-5, 
>>>>>>>>>>> Takuya Saitoh wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Force some cancer patients to use Linux
>>>>>>>>>>>> _everyday_
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> No. They're in enough pain as it is.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> ROFL.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> [X] Asshole
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I've given up on trying to make you happy, Marek.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> That was you trying?? Wow... What happens when you don't
>>>>>>> try?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> You're expecting me to change who I am to please the lying
>>>>>> losers in here. I won't do that, not even if it makes you
>>>>>> smile.
>>>>> 
>>>>> You said you're not a troll. So I'm only asking you not to
>>>>> troll. Should be easy.
>>>> 
>>>> Your definition of trolling includes anyone who doesn't speak 
>>>> positively about Linux CONSTANTLY. You can't expect that from a 
>>>> normal, functional human being.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease Gab.AI: @silverslimer
>>> 
>>> If /some/ of the cabal members behave in real life like they behave
>>> in this group then they are far from normal, functional human
>>> beings.
>>> 
>>> I used to frequent a Linux blog and every now and then the topic of
>>>  Linux advocacy and specifically comp.os.linux.advocacy would come
>>> up. Some of the discussions were hilarious because specific posters
>>> in COLA were mentioned and usually ripped apart. Some people,
>>> usually a new blogger, actually believedthat COLA is a satirical
>>> group because it would be impossible to find so many ignorant
>>> people all in one place. There were a couple of old timers on that
>>> blog who used to post here in COLA and they seemed to have an
>>> endless supply of stories to tell. I wonder how the "COLA Cabal"
>>> feels knowing that other Linux users are laughing at them?
>>
>> No person here is more ignorant than Peter the Klöwn. He's the kind of
>> guy who would tell you that a car's engine consists of two hamsters
>> running in a wheel even if it were common knowledge that it's a lot
>> more complicated than that. Even if you were to prove him wrong, he'd
>> still claim you did no such thing. Just about everyone else except for
>> Saturday-morning wrestling jobbers Chris Ass Storm, Wideload Porkster
>> and hypochrisv is smarter than he is.
>
> [X] Asshole
> [X] Troll
> [X] liar

+100

-- 

What IS remarkable, is that a well developed ape has come
to realise that he lives on a planet, circling a sun, in a 
planetary system, within a galaxy, within a universe.
- Professor Michio Kaku - Theoretical Physicist -

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376123

FromJim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org>
Date2016-10-12 17:58 +0000
Message-ID<e67bt8FpttpU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#376097
On 2016-10-12, Silver Slimer <> wrote:
>
> On 2016-10-12 12:02 PM, Marek Novotny wrote:
>> On 2016-10-12, Silver Slimer <> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 2016-10-12 10:05 AM, Marek Novotny wrote:
>>>> On 2016-10-12, Silver Slimer <> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 2016-10-11 9:33 PM, Me Sham wrote:
>>>>>> On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 at 8:17:39 PM UTC-5, Takuya 
>>>>>> Saitoh wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Force some cancer patients to use Linux _everyday_
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> No. They're in enough pain as it is.
>>>>> 
>>>>> ROFL.
>>>> 
>>>> [X] Asshole
>>> 
>>> I've given up on trying to make you happy, Marek.
>> 
>> That was you trying?? Wow... What happens when you don't try?
>
> You're expecting me to change who I am to please the lying losers in
> here. I won't do that, not even if it makes you smile.
>
> - -- 
> Silver Slimer
> Islam is a disease
> Gab.AI: @silverslimer

You have to please the cabal here or else you will be deemed a troll, a 
sock, a rabble-rouser or some other usually vulgar term.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376127

Fromtmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com>
Date2016-10-12 11:13 -0700
Message-ID<ccb79ca3-4294-4d37-83f9-cedc3ebf47c5@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#376123
On Wednesday, 12 October 2016 10:58:02 UTC-7, Jim Polaski  wrote:
> On 2016-10-12, Silver Slimer <> wrote:
> >
> > On 2016-10-12 12:02 PM, Marek Novotny wrote:
> >> On 2016-10-12, Silver Slimer <> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> On 2016-10-12 10:05 AM, Marek Novotny wrote:
> >>>> On 2016-10-12, Silver Slimer <> wrote:
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> On 2016-10-11 9:33 PM, Me Sham wrote:
> >>>>>> On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 at 8:17:39 PM UTC-5, Takuya 
> >>>>>> Saitoh wrote:
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> Force some cancer patients to use Linux _everyday_
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> No. They're in enough pain as it is.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> ROFL.
> >>>> 
> >>>> [X] Asshole
> >>> 
> >>> I've given up on trying to make you happy, Marek.
> >> 
> >> That was you trying?? Wow... What happens when you don't try?
> >
> > You're expecting me to change who I am to please the lying losers in
> > here. I won't do that, not even if it makes you smile.
> >
> > - -- 
> > Silver Slimer
> > Islam is a disease
> > Gab.AI: @silverslimer
> 
> You have to please the cabal here or else you will be deemed a troll, a 
> sock, a rabble-rouser or some other usually vulgar term.

If you know that then why do you join them?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376129

FromSteve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
Date2016-10-12 11:16 -0700
Message-ID<f192fa9d-8237-46da-affd-c95ad89ec4b9@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#376127
On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 at 12:13:18 PM UTC-6, tmelmosfire wrote:
> On Wednesday, 12 October 2016 10:58:02 UTC-7, Jim Polaski  wrote:
> > On 2016-10-12, Silver Slimer <> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2016-10-12 12:02 PM, Marek Novotny wrote:
> > >> On 2016-10-12, Silver Slimer <> wrote:
> > >>> 
> > >>> On 2016-10-12 10:05 AM, Marek Novotny wrote:
> > >>>> On 2016-10-12, Silver Slimer <> wrote:
> > >>>>> 
> > >>>>> On 2016-10-11 9:33 PM, Me Sham wrote:
> > >>>>>> On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 at 8:17:39 PM UTC-5, Takuya 
> > >>>>>> Saitoh wrote:
> > >>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>> Force some cancer patients to use Linux _everyday_
> > >>>>>> 
> > >>>>>> No. They're in enough pain as it is.
> > >>>>> 
> > >>>>> ROFL.
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> [X] Asshole
> > >>> 
> > >>> I've given up on trying to make you happy, Marek.
> > >> 
> > >> That was you trying?? Wow... What happens when you don't try?
> > >
> > > You're expecting me to change who I am to please the lying losers in
> > > here. I won't do that, not even if it makes you smile.
> > >
> > > - -- 
> > > Silver Slimer
> > > Islam is a disease
> > > Gab.AI: @silverslimer
> > 
> > You have to please the cabal here or else you will be deemed a troll, a 
> > sock, a rabble-rouser or some other usually vulgar term.
> 
> If you know that then why do you join them?

LOL! That he agrees with everyone about *you* doesn't mean he's 'joined' anything. Face it, setting you aside is just common sense, Snit ;)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376146

FromSilver Slimer <.m@nsn.s>
Date2016-10-12 15:27 -0400
Message-ID<ntm2qq$2vf$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#376123
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 2016-10-12 1:58 PM, Jim Polaski wrote:
> On 2016-10-12, Silver Slimer <> wrote:
>> 
>> On 2016-10-12 12:02 PM, Marek Novotny wrote:
>>> On 2016-10-12, Silver Slimer <> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On 2016-10-12 10:05 AM, Marek Novotny wrote:
>>>>> On 2016-10-12, Silver Slimer <> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 2016-10-11 9:33 PM, Me Sham wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 at 8:17:39 PM UTC-5,
>>>>>>> Takuya Saitoh wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Force some cancer patients to use Linux _everyday_
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> No. They're in enough pain as it is.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ROFL.
>>>>> 
>>>>> [X] Asshole
>>>> 
>>>> I've given up on trying to make you happy, Marek.
>>> 
>>> That was you trying?? Wow... What happens when you don't try?
>> 
>> You're expecting me to change who I am to please the lying losers
>> in here. I won't do that, not even if it makes you smile.
>> 
>> - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease Gab.AI: @silverslimer
> 
> You have to please the cabal here or else you will be deemed a
> troll, a sock, a rabble-rouser or some other usually vulgar term.

I'm glad you noticed and that's one of the reasons I appreciate your
presence.
- -- 
Silver Slimer
Islam is a disease
Gab.AI: @silverslimer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX/o6sAAoJEIwFfgf/rr+u0y4H/0rAKRtU3C04h+xFQ2IixmXJ
BPzgR52RH8epz8uXIOzOzXsaJ8I0x0bTjV4j9w77v8rYLnRb/b+4KGPSoxsZuvyA
t8GSGTLkLKvJk1FajsXog6663VdYDpE0459h0CnNJTLhzBHBcxcq5q3toR2gfPU8
xfECAATUwv0OK99t7LDCTYYm7AwV8xW+FOlZc9yuDlupPLN5VHZanrAaib3SikH3
awaV3adH/FEOLAMpkp4w24pSNto3d/zH6v89wCbvQWjoY2lfoctpSoGQuck5IW5X
ZHD7TbswEFnn8bhTkh0j9KlU0nmeUaTVUBju8eiFposaEqxmq2eMwEgLd3Jz7ZI=
=c3Mv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376265

FromJim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org>
Date2016-10-13 12:26 +0000
Message-ID<e69csfFa1qrU2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#376146
On 2016-10-12, Silver Slimer <> wrote:
>
> On 2016-10-12 1:58 PM, Jim Polaski wrote:
>> On 2016-10-12, Silver Slimer <> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 2016-10-12 12:02 PM, Marek Novotny wrote:
>>>> On 2016-10-12, Silver Slimer <> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 2016-10-12 10:05 AM, Marek Novotny wrote:
>>>>>> On 2016-10-12, Silver Slimer <> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 2016-10-11 9:33 PM, Me Sham wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 at 8:17:39 PM UTC-5,
>>>>>>>> Takuya Saitoh wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Force some cancer patients to use Linux _everyday_
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> No. They're in enough pain as it is.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ROFL.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> [X] Asshole
>>>>> 
>>>>> I've given up on trying to make you happy, Marek.
>>>> 
>>>> That was you trying?? Wow... What happens when you don't try?
>>> 
>>> You're expecting me to change who I am to please the lying losers
>>> in here. I won't do that, not even if it makes you smile.
>>> 
>>> - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease Gab.AI: @silverslimer
>> 
>> You have to please the cabal here or else you will be deemed a
>> troll, a sock, a rabble-rouser or some other usually vulgar term.
>
> I'm glad you noticed and that's one of the reasons I appreciate your
> presence.
> - -- 
> Silver Slimer
> Islam is a disease
> Gab.AI: @silverslimer

Apparently COLA is some kind of sick Cabal more interested in discussing 
trolls than Linux. I suppose spending all day at a job where they are 
using Windows software frustrates them so by the time they get home, put 
on their Linux hat and attempt to advocate Linux they are pretty well 
worn out and a wee bit high strung.
Hypocrites and liars, the non-pathological kind of liars, have a similar 
problem with frustration due to their lack of integrity and honesty.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376027

FromTakuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com>
Date2016-10-11 20:32 -0700
Message-ID<6439abcd-b970-4c44-a1bb-30b698b1d553@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#376020
On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 at 10:17:39 AM UTC+9, Takuya Saitoh wrote:
> Android doesn't count as Linux here but otherwise look at the serious Linux users, any cancer victims among them??  Look at their bodies, why are not they dropping dead from cancer like flies?  Instead, the slim and healthier look Apple and Windoze users are suffering from the disease...  Is it just a coincidence or causality?????  Perhaps a "mental disease" which forces its carriers to use Linux is responsible for this cancer immunity.  Perhaps it's the Asperger syndrome....
> 
> Experiment:  Force some cancer patients to use Linux _everyday_, how many of them will become cancer free?
> 
> Taka

Serious Linux use requires doping, Appil and M$shit do not...

https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/cam/patient/cannabis-pdq

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9cUC8tjoB_0

That makes a hell of difference!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376389

FromTakuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com>
Date2016-10-14 07:18 -0700
Message-ID<30b87dd6-ab97-4fca-b674-d1196e488343@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#376027
On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 at 12:32:37 PM UTC+9, Takuya Saitoh wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 at 10:17:39 AM UTC+9, Takuya Saitoh wrote:
> > Android doesn't count as Linux here but otherwise look at the serious Linux users, any cancer victims among them??  Look at their bodies, why are not they dropping dead from cancer like flies?  Instead, the slim and healthier look Apple and Windoze users are suffering from the disease...  Is it just a coincidence or causality?????  Perhaps a "mental disease" which forces its carriers to use Linux is responsible for this cancer immunity.  Perhaps it's the Asperger syndrome....
> > 
> > Experiment:  Force some cancer patients to use Linux _everyday_, how many of them will become cancer free?
> > 
> > Taka
> 
> Serious Linux use requires doping, Appil and M$shit do not...
> 
> https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/cam/patient/cannabis-pdq
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9cUC8tjoB_0
> 
> That makes a hell of difference!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbNVe57vKEk

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376055

FromSilver Slimer <.m@nsn.s>
Date2016-10-12 08:17 -0400
Message-ID<ntl9jk$2ai$4@dont-email.me>
In reply to#376020
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 2016-10-11 9:17 PM, Takuya Saitoh wrote:
> Android doesn't count as Linux here

Not unless it is succeeding. Any good news about Android is a credit
to Linux; any bad news means that it's no longer Linux. You have to
follow the train of thought of these "advocates."

< snip >

- -- 
Silver Slimer
Islam is a disease
Gab.AI: @silverslimer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX/inFAAoJEIwFfgf/rr+uut4H/11OJeSLdzFlh5FYBYzGtTW4
G1W9HByIhmhNfK/eMn1u7HaWgWE8ym5TV+VQynxr1NFYjZOZeJPc5HMHARRBG8rm
kufe9t+FSc/d+3ZJnqeDSH5y6MYJk1rNVE0CYVtryLk/VniMIVMNUdvJUwJaS3a7
d6pVWHrSRsHvEMJfjFtP9FU9mBvkQNrgIZ0NX8labUaKtj0MtjjS3CPflQa4seaQ
Si/WU62w/SA/1igOeCvC1fVCfDH/M9QKSJA/lkAKM/7CnxdjLF3W4DwLZZIdrOCT
8v8Lvx/74snq6Q2ATUjsv3kKrJP/CjtdlCPrj7jFkQ1/LBnutUav5kFVD5nvArU=
=6Tj8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376065

FromMarek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com>
Date2016-10-12 10:03 -0400
Message-ID<-P-dnel0PNFW32PKnZ2dnUU7-WudnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#376055
On 2016-10-12, Silver Slimer <> wrote:
>
> On 2016-10-11 9:17 PM, Takuya Saitoh wrote:
>> Android doesn't count as Linux here
>
> Not unless it is succeeding. Any good news about Android is a credit
> to Linux; any bad news means that it's no longer Linux. You have to
> follow the train of thought of these "advocates."

Android uses a Linux kernel. Does that count as Linux being on mobile?
Yes. Can you blame the Linux kernel for what Google added on top of it?
No. It's that simple. 

-- 
Marek Novotny
https://github.com/marek-novotny

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376071

Fromchrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date2016-10-12 09:19 -0500
Message-ID<h9hsvbh75f06keg85n335kkeaum5t7o9fn@4ax.com>
In reply to#376065
> slime wrote:
>>
>> Not unless it is succeeding. Any good news about Android is a credit
>> to Linux; any bad news means that it's no longer Linux. 

Yawn.  Slime repeating the same old *lies* again...

>> You have to follow the train of thought of these "advocates."

I'm sure that it would be difficult for a lying sack of shit, like
you, "Slimer", to comprehend the thought process of a decent, honest
person...

-- 
"When it's a negative article the Linux loons disassociate Android
from Linux."  -  "Flatfish", lying shamelessly

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376073

FromMelzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com>
Date2016-10-12 16:30 +0200
Message-ID<20161012163043.3122d5a4@maxa-pc.cpe.bvcom.net>
In reply to#376065
On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:03:54 -0400
Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:

> On 2016-10-12, Silver Slimer <> wrote:
> >
> > On 2016-10-11 9:17 PM, Takuya Saitoh wrote:  
> >> Android doesn't count as Linux here  
> >
> > Not unless it is succeeding. Any good news about Android is a credit
> > to Linux; any bad news means that it's no longer Linux. You have to
> > follow the train of thought of these "advocates."  
> 
> Android uses a Linux kernel. Does that count as Linux being on mobile?
> Yes. Can you blame the Linux kernel for what Google added on top of
> it? No. It's that simple. 
> 

Android is not GNU/Linux.

-- 
press any key to continue or any other to quit

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376074

FromMarek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com>
Date2016-10-12 10:39 -0400
Message-ID<J7qdnaCC0cST1mPKnZ2dnUU7-L2dnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#376073
On 2016-10-12, Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:03:54 -0400
> Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2016-10-12, Silver Slimer <> wrote:
>> >
>> > On 2016-10-11 9:17 PM, Takuya Saitoh wrote:  
>> >> Android doesn't count as Linux here  
>> >
>> > Not unless it is succeeding. Any good news about Android is a credit
>> > to Linux; any bad news means that it's no longer Linux. You have to
>> > follow the train of thought of these "advocates."  
>> 
>> Android uses a Linux kernel. Does that count as Linux being on mobile?
>> Yes. Can you blame the Linux kernel for what Google added on top of
>> it? No. It's that simple. 
>
> Android is not GNU/Linux.

Even easier. 

-- 
Marek Novotny
https://github.com/marek-novotny

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376075

FromWilliam Poaster <wp@dev.null>
Date2016-10-12 15:51 +0100
Message-ID<h8v1dd-cd3.ln1@debian.machineone.org>
In reply to#376073
On 12/10/2016 15:30 in comp.os.linux.advocacy, Melzzzzz posted:

> On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:03:54 -0400
> Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2016-10-12, Silver Slimer <> wrote:
>> >
>> > On 2016-10-11 9:17 PM, Takuya Saitoh wrote:  
>> >> Android doesn't count as Linux here  
>> >
>> > Not unless it is succeeding. Any good news about Android is a credit
>> > to Linux; any bad news means that it's no longer Linux. You have to
>> > follow the train of thought of these "advocates."  
>> 
>> Android uses a Linux kernel. Does that count as Linux being on mobile?
>> Yes. Can you blame the Linux kernel for what Google added on top of
>> it? No. It's that simple. 
>> 
>
> Android is not GNU/Linux.

Google’s Android developers can modify the Linux kernel to fit their
needs, but Android isn't the type of Linux system used on desktops etc.
You can’t run Android apps on Linux distros, conversely you can’t run
GNU/Linux programs on Android.

-- 

What IS remarkable, is that a well developed ape has come
to realise that he lives on a planet, circling a sun, in a 
planetary system, within a galaxy, within a universe.
- Professor Michio Kaku - Theoretical Physicist -

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376078

FromPeter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de>
Date2016-10-12 17:26 +0200
Message-ID<ntlkn0$cn0$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#376075
William Poaster wrote:

> On 12/10/2016 15:30 in comp.os.linux.advocacy, Melzzzzz posted:
> 
>> On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:03:54 -0400
>> Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2016-10-12, Silver Slimer <> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > On 2016-10-11 9:17 PM, Takuya Saitoh wrote:
>>> >> Android doesn't count as Linux here
>>> >
>>> > Not unless it is succeeding. Any good news about Android is a credit
>>> > to Linux; any bad news means that it's no longer Linux. You have to
>>> > follow the train of thought of these "advocates."
>>> 
>>> Android uses a Linux kernel. Does that count as Linux being on mobile?
>>> Yes. Can you blame the Linux kernel for what Google added on top of
>>> it? No. It's that simple.
>>> 
>>
>> Android is not GNU/Linux.
> 
> Google’s Android developers can modify the Linux kernel to fit their
> needs, 

The android kernel and the "standard" linux kernel are already merged for 
quite some time

> but Android isn't the type of Linux system used on desktops etc.
> You can’t run Android apps on Linux distros, conversely you can’t run
> GNU/Linux programs on Android.
> 
That's not really true. There exist "virtual" android devices on which you 
can run normal android apps. You get one like that when you install "Android 
Studio" (for developing Android apps). You can set those virtual devices to 
any type of real device you want, or "invent" your own device. 
Android Studio runs on windows, OSX and naturally on linux
If you just want a virtual Android device, those exist too

The other way around is more simple. You *can* run GNU apps on Android. You 
can even download a complete set of linux CLI programs and install them on 
your device

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376077

FromPeter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de>
Date2016-10-12 17:20 +0200
Message-ID<ntlkbd$9lp$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#376073
Melzzzzz wrote:

> On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:03:54 -0400
> Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 2016-10-12, Silver Slimer <> wrote:
>> >
>> > On 2016-10-11 9:17 PM, Takuya Saitoh wrote:
>> >> Android doesn't count as Linux here
>> >
>> > Not unless it is succeeding. Any good news about Android is a credit
>> > to Linux; any bad news means that it's no longer Linux. You have to
>> > follow the train of thought of these "advocates."
>> 
>> Android uses a Linux kernel. Does that count as Linux being on mobile?
>> Yes. Can you blame the Linux kernel for what Google added on top of
>> it? No. It's that simple.
>> 
> 
> Android is not GNU/Linux.
> 

Android is linux. That's enough. GNU is just an additional twist
Also, you can install the set of GNU tools on an android device if you want 
to

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376081

Fromchrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date2016-10-12 10:47 -0500
Message-ID<bplsvbtifdp2p8df0m78anqu3v3ik7iqdb@4ax.com>
In reply to#376077
Peter Köhlmann wrote:

> Melzzzzz wrote:
>>
>> Marek Novotny wrote:
>> 
>>> slime wrote:
>>>>
>>>> the kook and bigot Takuya Saitoh wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Android doesn't count as Linux here
>>>>
>>>> (snip slime lies)
>>> 
>>> Android uses a Linux kernel. Does that count as Linux being on mobile?
>>> Yes. Can you blame the Linux kernel for what Google added on top of
>>> it? No. It's that simple.
>> 
>> Android is not GNU/Linux.
>
>Android is linux. That's enough. GNU is just an additional twist

Yep, and the kook and bigot "Takuya Saitoh" is not a Linux advocate.

-- 
"I can't stand liars who always just happen to be Linux users. "  -
"Slimer"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376087

FromSilver Slimer <.m@nsn.s>
Date2016-10-12 11:56 -0400
Message-ID<ntlmfa$ii7$5@dont-email.me>
In reply to#376073
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 2016-10-12 10:30 AM, Melzzzzz wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:03:54 -0400 Marek Novotny
> <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 2016-10-12, Silver Slimer <> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 2016-10-11 9:17 PM, Takuya Saitoh wrote:
>>>> Android doesn't count as Linux here
>>> 
>>> Not unless it is succeeding. Any good news about Android is a
>>> credit to Linux; any bad news means that it's no longer Linux.
>>> You have to follow the train of thought of these "advocates."
>>> 
>> 
>> Android uses a Linux kernel. Does that count as Linux being on
>> mobile? Yes. Can you blame the Linux kernel for what Google added
>> on top of it? No. It's that simple.
>> 
> 
> Android is not GNU/Linux.

And if any good news about it comes out, it's GNU/Linux. You
"advocates" can't figure yourselves out.

- -- 
Silver Slimer
Islam is a disease
Gab.AI: @silverslimer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX/l08AAoJEIwFfgf/rr+uvTcH/Azd6QZolwMN+l9uIImlmepC
8OuoMEMyf3J7oRazLC0uTSBHSqt63QLY1nlSoBCYzFeYtd9VlSX9cru2aXFscFIX
fP68Iqi5eHVLbhNyV2YNXLyn4TJuZm1RNzRgSqoUbDNgBGwtTTSrTGybhbFwWYUC
lR1DvphRmjx2T3iQToG5Is2ykGACau+rT7OQMjxDlgo59OaVxcJejt1uxra7AjzI
cr9RrcL/Jg8tNWxAtWYLn5N13XMwUGso/TvBGjAyMl65nlNk8X9PkTDtC8wEDL8E
LKPFBgqkTze14ap/iF5pNEKhj2y13N3DsOMTlZCDKTH7i7AW/7b0kl0gEb04Wko=
=tO+m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376092

FromMarek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com>
Date2016-10-12 12:04 -0400
Message-ID<Ub2dnbUylKe8wmPKnZ2dnUU7-KWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#376087
On 2016-10-12, Silver Slimer <> wrote:
>
> On 2016-10-12 10:30 AM, Melzzzzz wrote:
>> On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:03:54 -0400 Marek Novotny
>> <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2016-10-12, Silver Slimer <> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On 2016-10-11 9:17 PM, Takuya Saitoh wrote:
>>>>> Android doesn't count as Linux here
>>>> 
>>>> Not unless it is succeeding. Any good news about Android is a
>>>> credit to Linux; any bad news means that it's no longer Linux.
>>>> You have to follow the train of thought of these "advocates."
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Android uses a Linux kernel. Does that count as Linux being on
>>> mobile? Yes. Can you blame the Linux kernel for what Google added
>>> on top of it? No. It's that simple.
>>> 
>> 
>> Android is not GNU/Linux.
>
> And if any good news about it comes out, it's GNU/Linux. You
> "advocates" can't figure yourselves out.

Show one person making the claim that Android is "GNU/Linux".

-- 
Marek Novotny
https://github.com/marek-novotny

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#376096

Fromchrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date2016-10-12 11:14 -0500
Message-ID<a8osvbt4qpm33bs3cd6g1d6lmovtau0u56@4ax.com>
In reply to#376092
Marek Novotny wrote:

> slime wrote:
>>
>> Melzzzzz wrote:
>>> 
>>> Android is not GNU/Linux.
>>
>> And if any good news about it comes out, it's GNU/Linux. 

Another "Slimer" bald-face lie.  Documented.

>> You "advocates" can't figure yourselves out.
>
> Show one person making the claim that Android is "GNU/Linux".

"Slimer" can't stop lying.

-- 
"if any good news about it comes out, it's GNU/Linux."  -  "Slimer",
lying shamelessly

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 4 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web