Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #375257 > unrolled thread
| Started by | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-10-06 11:42 -0400 |
| Last post | 2016-10-07 11:10 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 109 — 20 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-06 11:42 -0400
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-10-06 20:00 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-06 19:31 -0400
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-07 00:20 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-06 20:55 -0400
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-07 01:04 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-06 22:11 -0400
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-07 02:19 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-06 23:20 -0400
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-07 03:33 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-07 00:02 -0400
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-07 04:22 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children fr314159@gmail.com - 2016-10-07 08:08 -0700
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-07 10:42 -0500
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-08 03:13 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 03:19 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-08 05:37 -0400
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-10 07:09 -0500
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-10 14:11 +0200
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-10 07:37 -0500
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-10 16:56 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-08 10:26 -0400
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-08 10:48 -0400
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-08 07:58 -0700
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-08 15:04 -0400
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-09 10:24 -0400
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 15:28 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-08 15:41 -0400
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-08 19:57 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-08 17:23 -0400
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-08 10:24 -0400
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-08 10:44 -0600
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-08 17:11 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-08 13:46 -0600
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 20:01 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-08 23:23 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-08 20:43 -0400
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-09 01:15 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-09 01:13 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 02:08 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-09 02:13 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-09 08:15 -0400
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-10 07:27 -0500
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-08 23:22 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-08 22:54 -0600
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-09 15:13 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-09 18:14 +0200
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-09 16:19 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-09 18:25 +0200
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-10 07:21 -0500
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-10 10:50 -0600
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-01 10:09 -0700
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-09 22:29 +0100
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-09 13:38 -0400
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-09 23:58 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-10 07:29 -0500
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-10 13:41 +0100
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-10 12:25 -0500
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-10 13:33 -0400
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-10 10:51 -0600
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-10 12:45 -0500
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-10 16:35 -0600
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-10 18:54 -0400
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-10 21:56 -0600
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-10 22:48 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-11 00:02 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-10 21:58 -0600
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-10 21:58 -0600
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-07 17:56 +0200
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-07 13:25 -0400
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-10-08 00:12 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-08 10:40 -0400
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-10 13:34 -0400
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-07 04:15 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-10-07 16:37 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-07 20:34 +0200
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 11:10 -0700
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-20 11:20 -0400
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-10-21 08:53 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-21 13:19 +0200
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-21 10:45 -0400
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-10-22 01:06 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-22 02:15 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-10-22 02:40 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-22 05:00 +0200
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-10-22 16:34 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-22 23:14 +0200
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-22 18:24 -0400
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-25 23:20 -0400
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-10-26 05:22 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-26 11:26 -0400
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-10-26 20:42 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-27 01:45 +0200
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-10-27 01:21 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-22 09:33 -0400
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-10-22 16:50 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-06 21:25 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-10-07 16:30 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 09:44 -0700
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-10-07 17:20 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-07 15:24 -0400
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-10-07 20:01 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-07 16:50 -0400
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-10-07 21:37 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-07 17:54 -0400
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-10-07 22:11 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-07 13:51 -0400
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-10-07 18:13 +0000
Re: Ping sbd: another programming challenge for your developmentally challenged children Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 11:10 -0700
Page 2 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 Next page →
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-10 16:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ahjgie9g.adf@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #375778 |
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> "owl" wrote: >>>> >>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>> >>>>> "owl" is one of these guys who will have a friendly chit-chat with >>>>> someone, no matter how vile and shitty they are. "Snit", "DFS", you >>>>> name it. I don't get it, either. >>>> >>>> You sure worry a lot about who I talk to for some reason. > > I think you know the reason, "owl". I believe that being a total shit > should be discouraged, and that ignoring them is that only way to do > that. > Present company excepted, people are not one-dimensional. > I realize that some trolling, and some troll feeding, is necessary, > but some of these shitbags have went *way* "over the line". > And you take cola *way* too seriously.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 10:26 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ntavlm$oje$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #375528 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2016-10-07 11:19 PM, Jim Polaski wrote: > On 2016-10-08, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> > wrote: >> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> "Fabian" wrote: >>> >>>> "owl" wrote: >>>>> >>>>> It only spaces down, not up. It's retarded. >>>> >>>> Why are you being so chummy with this contemptible idiot? >>> >>> "owl" is one of these guys who will have a friendly chit-chat >>> with someone, no matter how vile and shitty they are. "Snit", >>> "DFS", you name it. I don't get it, either. >>> >> >> You sure worry a lot about who I talk to for some reason. How >> about you mind your own business. >> > I notice the same thing. Say everything people want to hear and you > get +1,. Disagree and you are the devil and they KF you. Very > strange. And they wonder why I referred to them as Communists in the past. You're free to think and behave however you want with these "advocates" so long as your opinion and behaviour are identical to theirs. Chris Ass Storm, hypochrisv and Wideload Porkster are the worst comrades in here and like I said before, their posts are genuinely worthless so filtering them is not going to cause you to lose sleep. - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease Gab.AI: @silverslimer -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX+QIGAAoJEIwFfgf/rr+u75oH/0D8Kz6uOJl+bcmTXosxy/kn GpV5zf+0+V6ShevEPleMwUn01DxOtJ0iSrOWxaH8eH85K8JdcF7tqaphmqrt9TqH tICwVrNPGfWc16oCC18X4bFkLiEBrZ8fhHIixf7cfXlQtGtBJuQAyq+K687fQ954 TjGqxCUSQluDe1q9W9A3ZvIyyuu40zX+gAzMQtkGLGbZSF5hNmNE3iSD4JfpDrhD 5xllxDP5FOIngecihQBbrRDrAch1zXKRKao3uOeDZdurJiPIrlLUZGD0m3xNkYAZ z1Mdh5GvySMXLdcXeY360quXULAsR55WjQGyAkAMZwlPNR256su64prS5BRWMCg= =+xrp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 10:48 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ntb0v5$s4i$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #375555 |
On 10/8/2016 10:26 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: > Chris Ass Storm, hypochrisv and Wideload Porkster are the worst > comrades in here and like I said before, their posts are genuinely > worthless so filtering them is not going to cause you to lose sleep. It really won't. shitv and Dumb Willie have always been worthless posters, but Ahlstrom used to make decent posts. A long time ago. 'hypochrisv' doesn't exactly roll off the tongue, but I wish I had thought of it! Good one.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 07:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d6c3eb55-f549-4493-9409-b1d729db9f33@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #375562 |
On Saturday, October 8, 2016 at 8:48:22 AM UTC-6, DFS wrote: > On 10/8/2016 10:26 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: > > > > Chris Ass Storm, hypochrisv and Wideload Porkster are the worst > > comrades in here and like I said before, their posts are genuinely > > worthless so filtering them is not going to cause you to lose sleep. > > > It really won't. shitv and Dumb Willie have always been worthless > posters, but Ahlstrom used to make decent posts. A long time ago. > > > 'hypochrisv' doesn't exactly roll off the tongue, but I wish I had > thought of it! Good one. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 It rolls well enough, the 'v' is silent ;) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJX+QmPAAoJELnOYK54exUC29UP/RRy1TXzW/hYnkRGU6dKC719 DBq1m3e8e9C5zpk8RcmJwahd6uTdrXJhFb9lHvGiRvxk86umDuyGiydJkZlXAB2q +rwRkegkt35LSsUcbJNBEn/BgxRro1JaA79SuBCJwXoQYwt1Ll5UsxPa9LvZJ4rF 6lRWLbr87VpNdlnk6uYCMLV7YAv0dOftVoY7qeq43UGjj9BXq3eVT1ede/LYjZkX +far5XW6DhECeuB7z8xV+r6G0l+VCzH3Tb6hrykxizStQlRe99RyF/U7P6iULSDC cEcsf4URZJzxccmv/dNeLeaZEcNRSZ0okhMCUn3OrGli2NvVy07uQNLf9CkXVgH+ 1oiidlyWzRdx1n6iNJI2T6bTe6s8qir1wp/bndJSD+14OT8p+8eKnmy9nPwiBJGJ 0NVdkz30Z59U1Q31f8lWFeC1jbeJlWL81vPPzUAGuLVpjAO3FMWjYPOJaj+ajGB9 pIEWuaVpvU3oW2bmoPCD1yXxxQUs3Oj2YcqosK+ZMXdYkwA2UstsWQhccYP3WO+3 g28M5pJ9hQd1s1eE1jP0i2klCUL2rfQkwrUIFbR9UWdzzbGGZazczzFcarWhy0Aj aubb0dhCVOG67GiTHscXyvoV9AlsPislqeC7xndGKJx1Ae+BEXpBTLBbuprmSC2t SuFBdv3BETJJLLd46ttd =IL6n -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 15:04 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ntbfv8$jm8$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #375562 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2016-10-08 10:48 AM, DFS wrote: > On 10/8/2016 10:26 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: > > >> Chris Ass Storm, hypochrisv and Wideload Porkster are the worst >> comrades in here and like I said before, their posts are >> genuinely worthless so filtering them is not going to cause you >> to lose sleep. > > > It really won't. shitv and Dumb Willie have always been worthless > posters, but Ahlstrom used to make decent posts. A long time ago. When he still pretended to be a man. > 'hypochrisv' doesn't exactly roll off the tongue, but I wish I had > thought of it! Good one. Credit to Steve Carroll for that one. - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease Gab.AI: @silverslimer -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX+UM5AAoJEIwFfgf/rr+uER4H/0PA9HQWfGneeH91jdyhPr3w u7yAzlY5geMM2jWiaLuV0gVkuVyjGBJXqao2NAMhpR2FTtY21u0H7SMqPRPWHpy0 2wuhyvoieclfv3q9+HhGbEh2m77XIldad2QbmhLOhmqfX1Hle2DqvYBfQPKCi+Sn DfvgXEJgmo+acmSuGVpqHs2BJH7sc45b8F3aXFOGQarOxqrSZvKygbntQ/w9dMwN JHw0SmAKx/Yz42n/mgxKKa8fG8keDgi7LJ+Zo9Ov5gNHqmaBBcnwg1cwv4ahtgy9 advZzUraD+5jLsljQgUoPIE+U9aNBCllkL+taEQuFCV5DkmlAz2ewF+rq7I4v+E= =/baa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-09 10:24 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ntdjv9$h2s$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #375593 |
On 10/8/2016 3:04 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 2016-10-08 10:48 AM, DFS wrote: >> On 10/8/2016 10:26 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: >> >> >>> Chris Ass Storm, hypochrisv and Wideload Porkster are the worst >>> comrades in here and like I said before, their posts are >>> genuinely worthless so filtering them is not going to cause you >>> to lose sleep. >> >> >> It really won't. shitv and Dumb Willie have always been worthless >> posters, but Ahlstrom used to make decent posts. A long time ago. > > When he still pretended to be a man. > >> 'hypochrisv' doesn't exactly roll off the tongue, but I wish I had >> thought of it! Good one. > > Credit to Steve Carroll for that one. ah... then to Steve Carroll: Well done. But you may need to change your name back, so we could refer to you as Steve Petruzealous.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 15:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e5shlrF7lurU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #375555 |
On 2016-10-08, Silver Slimer <> wrote: > > On 2016-10-07 11:19 PM, Jim Polaski wrote: >> On 2016-10-08, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> >> wrote: >>> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> "Fabian" wrote: >>>> >>>>> "owl" wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> It only spaces down, not up. It's retarded. >>>>> >>>>> Why are you being so chummy with this contemptible idiot? >>>> >>>> "owl" is one of these guys who will have a friendly chit-chat >>>> with someone, no matter how vile and shitty they are. "Snit", >>>> "DFS", you name it. I don't get it, either. >>>> >>> >>> You sure worry a lot about who I talk to for some reason. How >>> about you mind your own business. >>> >> I notice the same thing. Say everything people want to hear and you >> get +1,. Disagree and you are the devil and they KF you. Very >> strange. > > And they wonder why I referred to them as Communists in the past. > You're free to think and behave however you want with these > "advocates" so long as your opinion and behaviour are identical to > theirs. > > Chris Ass Storm, hypochrisv and Wideload Porkster are the worst > comrades in here and like I said before, their posts are genuinely > worthless so filtering them is not going to cause you to lose sleep. > > > - -- > Silver Slimer > Islam is a disease > Gab.AI: @silverslimer I think it's more of a gang mentality. From a psychological perspective there is safety in a gang as long as you agree with the gang. This is why when one member of the gang makes a ludicrous accusation, the others come running along to pat that person on the back while agreeing with him. This type of "group think" is also comforting to those gang members who are too frightened to speak their own mind in real life. They fear being ostracized from the gang. This is especially prevalent in online blogs because these blogs become the vehicle by which the weak and meek minded person can in effect become the big cheese. Something that they are unable to achieve in real life. That's how it looks to me anyway.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 15:41 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ntbi4b$qbe$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #375576 |
Jim Polaski wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > On 2016-10-08, Silver Slimer <> wrote: >> On 2016-10-07 11:19 PM, Jim Polaski wrote: >>> On 2016-10-08, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> Strange bedfellows.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 19:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hjadgu03qg.ji@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #375602 |
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: > Jim Polaski wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> On 2016-10-08, Silver Slimer <> wrote: >>> On 2016-10-07 11:19 PM, Jim Polaski wrote: >>>> On 2016-10-08, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> > > Strange bedfellows. > Fantastic Linux advocacy, Little Beaver. Do you have a killfile status update for us? We're all on pins and needles awaiting any word from the front.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 17:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ntbo3a$g0s$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #375610 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2016-10-08 3:57 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >> Jim Polaski wrote this copyrighted missive and expects >> royalties: >> >>> On 2016-10-08, Silver Slimer <> wrote: >>>> On 2016-10-07 11:19 PM, Jim Polaski wrote: >>>>> On 2016-10-08, Octavian W. Lagrange >>>>> <olagrang@perch.invalid> >> >> Strange bedfellows. >> > > Fantastic Linux advocacy, Little Beaver. Do you have a killfile > status update for us? We're all on pins and needles awaiting any > word from the front. +1 LOL. Chris Ass Storm is a sad little worm. - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease Gab.AI: @silverslimer -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX+WO7AAoJEIwFfgf/rr+uX5YIAICgWJVp/UFO5S967kwHi4u8 hguBSau/xsSy9cWDcBDqkBgwi9O5pJGFFXWf4KCCN2nfw/1O9cPsH3Q091L74qF9 R5iA+bBarbQtNwEIpWw4AvFU/nq/mae5kL2SOEa+y8QC74X+79DOczb0H54HgrqP k5O4uI+3Ycq1iKJFSWA/x4jq1TXvnYKuE9nv91o0O+UD/e+pLPczTcTxuZoVsAM1 /YItgajkqyuGCgCjzONkZlNt+oz54PLk+Fz4v9axDbkrBG592RfN9uSb/vnohbC/ hjLmPQ6gND/mgBRHe23FNMKWgMQSNgKOY7Z0+9rW69ZdN8F0p58tOD2AaKT/sDo= =nIES -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 10:24 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ntavhl$oje$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #375527 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2016-10-07 11:13 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> "Fabian" wrote: >> >>> "owl" wrote: >>>> >>>> It only spaces down, not up. It's retarded. >>> >>> Why are you being so chummy with this contemptible idiot? >> >> "owl" is one of these guys who will have a friendly chit-chat >> with someone, no matter how vile and shitty they are. "Snit", >> "DFS", you name it. I don't get it, either. >> > > You sure worry a lot about who I talk to for some reason. How > about you mind your own business. hypochrisv would have made an excellent Nazi. He's all for free speech and free association so far as he agrees with what you say and appreciates your friends. The moment he doesn't, you must be silenced at all costs or exiled. That's why we call him hypochrisv. - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease Gab.AI: @silverslimer -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX+QGFAAoJEIwFfgf/rr+ulB4H/ikSJDGceAaMA3d96oivaaoc QgS7VwLQi7LE+z8oIDaqCe9ZLvHF2j6HWJDzLLZzO21iUMbMP5qFXmxZ/qpJnYSl 1nxonHqQEhdLO/vnGT2b5xO/IerH/NLBSOKSleu4LOhlSzcqXlMI0eAPcD4ixywb oVKv/R1/Ya231pNnpMFCSbR2lo3U4tNquTjJWXVY7+UbQL7pRvojAdPujbzDl7Vl FHKCVFDghQdiIkfLcguZgCs2U+UOgd2DSTfDmP9VC5dqKoasZHSKGBoQrXIb+r3f V4nPrvI0Sv5vxzg9b95NY/0s3qZMK7J+lkf+Wercg4Cd0gAPP/kXgbHFKaz6Fks= =91B/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 10:44 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <ntb7ot$ksd$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #375527 |
Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> "Fabian" wrote: >> >>> "owl" wrote: >>>> >>>> It only spaces down, not up. It's retarded. >>> >>> Why are you being so chummy with this contemptible idiot? >> >> "owl" is one of these guys who will have a friendly chit-chat with >> someone, no matter how vile and shitty they are. "Snit", "DFS", you >> name it. I don't get it, either. >> > > You sure worry a lot about who I talk to for some reason. How about > you mind your own business. He's a strange duck, that much is certain. He thinks he is the head cheese here.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 17:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ahjdue003.gau7@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #375586 |
GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: > Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > >> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> "Fabian" wrote: >>> >>>> "owl" wrote: >>>>> >>>>> It only spaces down, not up. It's retarded. >>>> >>>> Why are you being so chummy with this contemptible idiot? >>> >>> "owl" is one of these guys who will have a friendly chit-chat with >>> someone, no matter how vile and shitty they are. "Snit", "DFS", you >>> name it. I don't get it, either. >>> >> >> You sure worry a lot about who I talk to for some reason. How about >> you mind your own business. > > He's a strange duck, that much is certain. He thinks he is the head cheese > here. > Big thrill in life == new killfile entry. It's pathetic.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 13:46 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <ntbiev$s29$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #375588 |
Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: >> Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >> >>> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> "Fabian" wrote: >>>> >>>>> "owl" wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> It only spaces down, not up. It's retarded. >>>>> >>>>> Why are you being so chummy with this contemptible idiot? >>>> >>>> "owl" is one of these guys who will have a friendly chit-chat with >>>> someone, no matter how vile and shitty they are. "Snit", "DFS", you >>>> name it. I don't get it, either. >>>> >>> >>> You sure worry a lot about who I talk to for some reason. How about >>> you mind your own business. >> >> He's a strange duck, that much is certain. He thinks he is the head cheese >> here. >> > > Big thrill in life == new killfile entry. It's pathetic. It just doesn't make any sense to use one. How can they advocate with a killfile?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 20:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e5t1l9Fbqp1U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #375603 |
On 2016-10-08, GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: > Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > >> GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: >>> Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>> >>>> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> "Fabian" wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> "owl" wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It only spaces down, not up. It's retarded. >>>>>> >>>>>> Why are you being so chummy with this contemptible idiot? >>>>> >>>>> "owl" is one of these guys who will have a friendly chit-chat with >>>>> someone, no matter how vile and shitty they are. "Snit", "DFS", you >>>>> name it. I don't get it, either. >>>>> >>>> >>>> You sure worry a lot about who I talk to for some reason. How about >>>> you mind your own business. >>> >>> He's a strange duck, that much is certain. He thinks he is the head cheese >>> here. >>> >> >> Big thrill in life == new killfile entry. It's pathetic. > > It just doesn't make any sense to use one. How can they advocate with a > killfile? Never could understand kill files. It doesn't make sense to me with one exception and that is of course the Prescott Parasite and his socks. He was posting so much crap it was difficult to read the good messages because they would get lost in the noise.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 23:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ntbv5e$6b5$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #375611 |
On Sat, 08 Oct 2016 20:01:45 +0000, Jim Polaski wrote: > Never could understand kill files. It doesn't make sense to me with one > exception and that is of course the Prescott Parasite and his socks. He > was posting so much crap it was difficult to read the good messages > because they would get lost in the noise. So I guess you DO understand killfiles. They filter out the noise. -- Zero tolerance for iCultists and WinDrones
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 20:43 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ntc3rf$k64$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #375645 |
ronb wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > On Sat, 08 Oct 2016 20:01:45 +0000, Jim Polaski wrote: > >> Never could understand kill files. It doesn't make sense to me with one >> exception and that is of course the Prescott Parasite and his socks. He >> was posting so much crap it was difficult to read the good messages >> because they would get lost in the noise. > > So I guess you DO understand killfiles. They filter out the noise. Jim's getting pretty damn noisy. Of course, when the S/N is so small here, thanks to a large N and a not-so-large S, then removing the N leaves precious little to read. There's much better venues for discussing Linux without shit like "Slimer" and bigots like "DFS".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-09 01:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e5tk22FfoakU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #375655 |
On 2016-10-09, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: > ronb wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> On Sat, 08 Oct 2016 20:01:45 +0000, Jim Polaski wrote: >> >>> Never could understand kill files. It doesn't make sense to me with one >>> exception and that is of course the Prescott Parasite and his socks. He >>> was posting so much crap it was difficult to read the good messages >>> because they would get lost in the noise. >> >> So I guess you DO understand killfiles. They filter out the noise. > > Jim's getting pretty damn noisy. > > Of course, when the S/N is so small here, thanks to a large N and a > not-so-large S, then removing the N leaves precious little to read. > > There's much better venues for discussing Linux without shit like > "Slimer" and bigots like "DFS". Seriously, what is your problem Chris? I see the childish way you act and while I don't agree with them, a part of me can see why you are attacked by others. You set yourself up to be ridiculed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-09 01:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e5tjtsFfoakU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #375645 |
On 2016-10-08, ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, 08 Oct 2016 20:01:45 +0000, Jim Polaski wrote: > >> Never could understand kill files. It doesn't make sense to me with one >> exception and that is of course the Prescott Parasite and his socks. He >> was posting so much crap it was difficult to read the good messages >> because they would get lost in the noise. > > So I guess you DO understand killfiles. They filter out the noise. For an idiot like The Prescott Parasite who floods the group with noise that most don't reply to anyway yes they are useful. For the run of the mill idiot though I don't really see the point because the followups will be seen anyway.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-09 02:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ntc8r2$n1o$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #375664 |
On Sun, 09 Oct 2016 01:13:32 +0000, Jim Polaski wrote: > On 2016-10-08, ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sat, 08 Oct 2016 20:01:45 +0000, Jim Polaski wrote: >> >>> Never could understand kill files. It doesn't make sense to me with >>> one exception and that is of course the Prescott Parasite and his >>> socks. He was posting so much crap it was difficult to read the good >>> messages because they would get lost in the noise. >> >> So I guess you DO understand killfiles. They filter out the noise. > > For an idiot like The Prescott Parasite who floods the group with noise > that most don't reply to anyway yes they are useful. > For the run of the mill idiot though I don't really see the point > because the followups will be seen anyway. Who are the "run of the mill" trolls you're talking about? The trolls I killfile are all stuck in their same circular rut saying the same thing over and over again. I've already read their crap several times, why should I read it again? That's what killfile filters are designed for. -- Zero tolerance for iCultists and WinDrones
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web