Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #375517 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-10-07 22:00 -0400 |
| Last post | 2016-10-08 09:52 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 43 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Trump's next rally Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-10-07 22:00 -0400
Re: Trump's next rally "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-08 02:06 +0000
Re: Trump's next rally Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 19:10 -0700
Re: Trump's next rally DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-08 10:40 -0400
Re: Trump's next rally Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-10-08 11:28 -0400
Re: Trump's next rally "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-08 17:05 +0000
Re: Trump's next rally GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-08 13:47 -0600
Re: Trump's next rally "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-08 19:54 +0000
Re: Trump's next rally Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-08 15:12 -0400
Re: Trump's next rally ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-08 23:30 +0000
Re: Trump's next rally Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-08 14:30 -0400
Re: Trump's next rally Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 18:49 +0000
Re: Trump's next rally Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-08 15:15 -0400
Re: Trump's next rally Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 19:54 +0000
Re: Trump's next rally Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-08 17:22 -0400
Re: Trump's next rally Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 21:33 +0000
Re: Trump's next rally Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-08 18:04 -0400
Re: Trump's next rally Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 22:30 +0000
Re: Trump's next rally Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-08 20:45 -0400
Re: Trump's next rally chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-10 07:52 -0500
Re: Trump's next rally ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-08 23:31 +0000
Re: Trump's next rally Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-08 20:46 -0400
Re: Trump's next rally ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 00:57 +0000
Re: Trump's next rally robert.wolfe@wildcat.uuhec.net (Robert Wolfe) - 2016-10-09 02:37 +0000
Re: Trump's next rally GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-08 23:00 -0600
Re: Trump's next rally Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-09 08:20 -0400
Re: Trump's next rally "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.invalid> - 2016-10-09 13:39 +0000
Re: Trump's next rally Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-09 15:14 +0000
Re: Trump's next rally chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-10 07:51 -0500
Re: Trump's next rally GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-08 13:49 -0600
Re: Trump's next rally Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-08 17:17 -0400
Re: Trump's next rally "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-08 21:31 +0000
Re: Trump's next rally ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-08 23:32 +0000
Re: Trump's next rally Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-09 01:23 +0000
Re: Trump's next rally GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-08 23:05 -0600
Re: Trump's next rally "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.invalid> - 2016-10-09 13:37 +0000
Re: Trump's next rally Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-09 10:06 -0400
Re: Trump's next rally Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 02:13 +0000
Re: Trump's next rally Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-10-07 22:29 -0400
Re: Trump's next rally Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 02:36 +0000
Re: Trump's next rally "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-08 02:43 +0000
Re: Trump's next rally Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-08 05:42 -0400
Re: Trump's next rally DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-08 09:52 -0400
Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →
| From | Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-07 22:00 -0400 |
| Subject | Trump's next rally |
| Message-ID | <5m858ckqzc4x$.dlg@tattoovampire.eternal-september.org> |
"And YOU get grabbed by the pussy! And YOU get grabbed by the pussy, oh wait, you're too fat. Move over...that bitch behind you gets grabbed by the pussy!"
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 02:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hjadfoe03.g88@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #375517 |
Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> wrote: > "And YOU get grabbed by the pussy! And YOU get grabbed by the pussy, oh > wait, you're too fat. Move over...that bitch behind you gets grabbed by the > pussy!" Alpha male talks shit with the guys. News at eleven.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-07 19:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <cdc80c9d-623e-431e-96c2-bcc31a09496e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #375518 |
On Friday, October 7, 2016 at 7:07:01 PM UTC-7, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> wrote: > > "And YOU get grabbed by the pussy! And YOU get grabbed by the pussy, oh > > wait, you're too fat. Move over...that bitch behind you gets grabbed by the > > pussy!" > > Alpha male talks shit with the guys. News at eleven. The Snits of the world are going to make a big deal out of this October surprise of a "new" video from 2005.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 10:40 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ntb0fr$s4i$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #375518 |
On 10/7/2016 10:06 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> wrote: >> "And YOU get grabbed by the pussy! And YOU get grabbed by the pussy, oh >> wait, you're too fat. Move over...that bitch behind you gets grabbed by the >> pussy!" > > Alpha male talks shit with the guys. News at eleven. Yeah. My wife was kind of incredulous. I told her he was trying to impress the young guys, and most of us speak like that at one time or another. Of course, we were 16 years old at the time... It doesn't bother me. But I'm surprised he apologized - he usually doesn't. He sucks for a lot of reasons, but this isn't one. Are their videos of Clinton out there cursing? http://selwynduke.typepad.com/selwyndukecom/hillary-clintons-vulgar-m.html http://www.dcclothesline.com/2013/08/25/the-filthy-mouth-of-hillary-clinton/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 11:28 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <bvsdvlxuy1g$.dlg@tattoovampire.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #375559 |
DFS wrote: > Yeah. My wife was kind of incredulous. I told her he was trying to > impress the young guys, and most of us speak like that at one time or > another. Of course, we were 16 years old at the time... > > It doesn't bother me. But I'm surprised he apologized - he usually doesn't. > > He sucks for a lot of reasons, but this isn't one. It's more evidence of how he feels about women in general. This is the guy who wants to be the leader of the free world and he's an obvious misogynist, among other things.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 17:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hjasdfu03r.f7u@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #375575 |
Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> wrote: > DFS wrote: > >> Yeah. My wife was kind of incredulous. I told her he was trying to >> impress the young guys, and most of us speak like that at one time or >> another. Of course, we were 16 years old at the time... >> >> It doesn't bother me. But I'm surprised he apologized - he usually doesn't. >> >> He sucks for a lot of reasons, but this isn't one. > > It's more evidence of how he feels about women in general. This is the guy > who wants to be the leader of the free world and he's an obvious misogynist, > among other things. Yeah, better to elect the woman who laughingly defended a child rapist and tried to destroy the credibility of the women who were abused by her perverted husband. And no mention of girlfriend Huma's insanely gross husband, Carlos Danger.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 13:47 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <ntbige$s29$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #375587 |
Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> wrote: >> DFS wrote: >> >>> Yeah. My wife was kind of incredulous. I told her he was trying to >>> impress the young guys, and most of us speak like that at one time or >>> another. Of course, we were 16 years old at the time... >>> >>> It doesn't bother me. But I'm surprised he apologized - he usually doesn't. >>> >>> He sucks for a lot of reasons, but this isn't one. >> >> It's more evidence of how he feels about women in general. This is the guy >> who wants to be the leader of the free world and he's an obvious misogynist, >> among other things. > > Yeah, better to elect the woman who laughingly defended a child rapist > and tried to destroy the credibility of the women who were abused by > her perverted husband. And no mention of girlfriend Huma's insanely > gross husband, Carlos Danger. I thought Huma was married to Anthony Wiener?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 19:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <shjgoe03.ghauoe4@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #375604 |
GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: > Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > >> Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> wrote: >>> DFS wrote: >>> >>>> Yeah. My wife was kind of incredulous. I told her he was trying to >>>> impress the young guys, and most of us speak like that at one time or >>>> another. Of course, we were 16 years old at the time... >>>> >>>> It doesn't bother me. But I'm surprised he apologized - he usually doesn't. >>>> >>>> He sucks for a lot of reasons, but this isn't one. >>> >>> It's more evidence of how he feels about women in general. This is the guy >>> who wants to be the leader of the free world and he's an obvious misogynist, >>> among other things. >> >> Yeah, better to elect the woman who laughingly defended a child rapist >> and tried to destroy the credibility of the women who were abused by >> her perverted husband. And no mention of girlfriend Huma's insanely >> gross husband, Carlos Danger. > > I thought Huma was married to Anthony Wiener? > So did she. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Weiner <quote> A second scandal began on July 23, 2013, several months after Weiner returned to politics in the New York City mayoral race.[62] Explicit photos were sent by him under the alias "Carlos Danger" to a 22-year-old woman with whom Weiner had contact as late as April 2013, more than a year after he had left Congress.[62] The 22-year-old woman was later revealed as Sydney Leathers, an Indiana native who first came into contact with him by expressing her disapproval of his extramarital behaviors.[63] </quote>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 15:12 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ntbgdq$lb4$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #375575 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2016-10-08 11:28 AM, Tattoo Vampire wrote: > DFS wrote: > >> Yeah. My wife was kind of incredulous. I told her he was trying >> to impress the young guys, and most of us speak like that at one >> time or another. Of course, we were 16 years old at the time... >> >> It doesn't bother me. But I'm surprised he apologized - he >> usually doesn't. >> >> He sucks for a lot of reasons, but this isn't one. > > It's more evidence of how he feels about women in general. This is > the guy who wants to be the leader of the free world and he's an > obvious misogynist, among other things. Not one man who's ever gotten laid talked any differently about women in the locker room or with his buddies. Between that and finding out that Hillary Clinton has no intention of helping the middle class, that she's stolen money earmarked for Haiti and allowed rapists (like her husband) to go free after rape, I'd still gladly choose Trump. - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease Gab.AI: @silverslimer -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX+UULAAoJEIwFfgf/rr+uq8UH/j1t8puLs+qk32At6r8gXRPL fkDQHaffqF0onxKd/2mhCPaGzVX1sBX6W0aHq27mPETrsb6DI83j/2HAOopZUfK2 w/7CwTPsXqGwfE5ajiB5e1qx0lcmxhld5d0NTf5/b8rsff5J/U/LkR5qS3rv8S6R sk2rkgD248dbhxdbVVAhmHcG/FP0XJx+H3vMWQeKWpts02MtUq1oWKGdjcIrq0I/ PxYe9FAncgsqSeXybMJ8Rj0pgukllJdhRNer+QyraprIjohLh+2LmUDGAlwWW0E2 xEkKW1xKrmLNTZF0BdT0vHUvBHaUiguXMnjImONenClK0uLsVGGy5VUznRtQ54s= =tLWf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 23:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ntbvhr$6b5$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #375575 |
On Sat, 08 Oct 2016 11:28:01 -0400, Tattoo Vampire wrote: > DFS wrote: > >> Yeah. My wife was kind of incredulous. I told her he was trying to >> impress the young guys, and most of us speak like that at one time or >> another. Of course, we were 16 years old at the time... >> >> It doesn't bother me. But I'm surprised he apologized - he usually >> doesn't. >> >> He sucks for a lot of reasons, but this isn't one. > > It's more evidence of how he feels about women in general. This is the > guy who wants to be the leader of the free world and he's an obvious > misogynist, > among other things. I thought Hillary like misogynists, she's stayed married to one for a long, long time. -- Zero tolerance for iCultists and WinDrones
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 14:30 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ntbdv2$cv3$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #375559 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2016-10-08 10:40 AM, DFS wrote: > On 10/7/2016 10:06 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >> Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> wrote: >>> "And YOU get grabbed by the pussy! And YOU get grabbed by the >>> pussy, oh wait, you're too fat. Move over...that bitch behind >>> you gets grabbed by the pussy!" >> >> Alpha male talks shit with the guys. News at eleven. > > > Yeah. My wife was kind of incredulous. I told her he was trying > to impress the young guys, and most of us speak like that at one > time or another. Of course, we were 16 years old at the time... > > It doesn't bother me. But I'm surprised he apologized - he > usually doesn't. > > He sucks for a lot of reasons, but this isn't one. I saw it as a problem when I _read_ what he wrote but after _hearing_ what Trump said, you realize that he's just joking. The problem I DO have is the fact that he would see women in that manner in general. However, this is the political situation in the United States for the time being: - - Donald Trump: A vote for a sexist who is very disrespectful of women in private but who loves his country and wants to help the economy. - - Hillary Clinton: An absolute monster who sees everyone as a number and who simply wants to use power to enrich herself regardless of the cost to the people. - - Gary Johnson: A miserable moron who says that he is a Libertarian despite the fact that his position is in line with the Democrats. - - Jill Stein: A woman of principle who is ready and willing to sacrifice jobs and economic strength to benefit the environment. You guys are screwed and I think that I am done with this election. I'll just follow Canadian politics from now on. - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease Gab.AI: @silverslimer -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX+TsyAAoJEIwFfgf/rr+uO1MH+wW1z+EKg0kIYcqJCkrslnIK 1AbTw7nIuLV75OetAyUB+ZKZDT7QQT0OFHnNcAY9bc1+HzcUZeilzc4sjFrLYbER M4JhJdaHyhDZhjp/e6zWrVWTixlEtej6Yg7XZUJ6xjzhA6XcIJptLXzo44lvkoBp i4qCuY+JOwqkRIvBxwm9XAe9ROKxKbRAWB1DozvrJ+CqGqG0m8MVa6NsG7YSE80H 838KeaBuKXrbvhlH32EwVShyyEP7HgZ1gOtGXy83ipIsfiHB1icwFM2hnEhpTiLw u6+dxIBiUAnVznHPyZWwE1RwL49KoCeTNVkFhMg4yQYY9+Q1THUHlDT5LYh8ZOI= =psa1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 18:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e5stdsFanduU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #375589 |
On 2016-10-08, Silver Slimer <> wrote: > > On 2016-10-08 10:40 AM, DFS wrote: >> >> Yeah. My wife was kind of incredulous. I told her he was trying >> to impress the young guys, and most of us speak like that at one >> time or another. Of course, we were 16 years old at the time... >> >> It doesn't bother me. But I'm surprised he apologized - he >> usually doesn't. >> >> He sucks for a lot of reasons, but this isn't one. > > I saw it as a problem when I _read_ what he wrote but after _hearing_ > what Trump said, you realize that he's just joking. The problem I DO > have is the fact that he would see women in that manner in general. > However, this is the political situation in the United States for the > time being: > > - - Donald Trump: A vote for a sexist who is very disrespectful of women > in private but who loves his country and wants to help the economy. > - - Hillary Clinton: An absolute monster who sees everyone as a number > and who simply wants to use power to enrich herself regardless of the > cost to the people. > - - Gary Johnson: A miserable moron who says that he is a Libertarian > despite the fact that his position is in line with the Democrats. > - - Jill Stein: A woman of principle who is ready and willing to > sacrifice jobs and economic strength to benefit the environment. > > You guys are screwed and I think that I am done with this election. > I'll just follow Canadian politics from now on. > > - -- > Silver Slimer > Islam is a disease > Gab.AI: @silverslimer We are screwed that's for sure. The problem with Trump is that he probably isn't doing or saying anything that past presidents weren't saying or doing. Look at John F. Kennedy for example. The difference is Trump keeps gettng caught! We are in serious trouble here. It's like choosing whether you want to get shot, hung or electrocuted. No matter which method is chosen the end result is the same. You are dead.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 15:15 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ntbgka$lb4$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #375590 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2016-10-08 2:49 PM, Jim Polaski wrote: > On 2016-10-08, Silver Slimer <> wrote: >> >> On 2016-10-08 10:40 AM, DFS wrote: >>> >>> Yeah. My wife was kind of incredulous. I told her he was >>> trying to impress the young guys, and most of us speak like >>> that at one time or another. Of course, we were 16 years old >>> at the time... >>> >>> It doesn't bother me. But I'm surprised he apologized - he >>> usually doesn't. >>> >>> He sucks for a lot of reasons, but this isn't one. >> >> I saw it as a problem when I _read_ what he wrote but after >> _hearing_ what Trump said, you realize that he's just joking. The >> problem I DO have is the fact that he would see women in that >> manner in general. However, this is the political situation in >> the United States for the time being: >> >> - - Donald Trump: A vote for a sexist who is very disrespectful >> of women in private but who loves his country and wants to help >> the economy. - - Hillary Clinton: An absolute monster who sees >> everyone as a number and who simply wants to use power to enrich >> herself regardless of the cost to the people. - - Gary Johnson: A >> miserable moron who says that he is a Libertarian despite the >> fact that his position is in line with the Democrats. - - Jill >> Stein: A woman of principle who is ready and willing to sacrifice >> jobs and economic strength to benefit the environment. >> >> You guys are screwed and I think that I am done with this >> election. I'll just follow Canadian politics from now on. >> >> - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease Gab.AI: @silverslimer > > We are screwed that's for sure. The problem with Trump is that he > probably isn't doing or saying anything that past presidents > weren't saying or doing. Look at John F. Kennedy for example. The > difference is Trump keeps gettng caught! > > We are in serious trouble here. It's like choosing whether you want > to get shot, hung or electrocuted. No matter which method is chosen > the end result is the same. You are dead. Meanwhile, the last election here in Canada was more or less the only one in which a lack of class was demonstrated. Generally, these things are cordial affairs and the worst any candidate will throw at his opponents is an insinuation that he might have stolen funds or something. Boy do I hope our country's elections never become like the American one. I am seriously beginning to just tune out. - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease Gab.AI: @silverslimer -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX+UXbAAoJEIwFfgf/rr+ubAgH/RJ6ZG4fW1YxXgmUg56Ur/aX irwFhbTzjOHI0FXlYkXxbrhfdBjRz/z+KZXAYRGyQZ6u3gTad1CHVHRXBn57GuOm C85whcANLaHHn08fwqwhFGdh1oN3HQpUxqgnSZOrDlbLIdvp4R2/jmT4gDKPL/9i oioN495mpdj4qSkeXnpJSkLWqZDVM7DFhxc409kbIq6ouqN+KBRL8eDdA/58A/pR ANqx0U6AlIzuULWF4fOJzh24577F318GeJvzq5ND/ygmOMzgQ9oQiGTiy256pWci qGjN5vNqTOcuFPIBDfzg2W9AFFwbr+74K+F8z2OVIbgrDZ9NhLGw06Ykgv66IUo= =KuMe -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 19:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e5t17gFbctpU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #375596 |
On 2016-10-08, Silver Slimer <> wrote: > > On 2016-10-08 2:49 PM, Jim Polaski wrote: >> On 2016-10-08, Silver Slimer <> wrote: >>> >>> On 2016-10-08 10:40 AM, DFS wrote: >>>> >>>> Yeah. My wife was kind of incredulous. I told her he was >>>> trying to impress the young guys, and most of us speak like >>>> that at one time or another. Of course, we were 16 years old >>>> at the time... >>>> >>>> It doesn't bother me. But I'm surprised he apologized - he >>>> usually doesn't. >>>> >>>> He sucks for a lot of reasons, but this isn't one. >>> >>> I saw it as a problem when I _read_ what he wrote but after >>> _hearing_ what Trump said, you realize that he's just joking. The >>> problem I DO have is the fact that he would see women in that >>> manner in general. However, this is the political situation in >>> the United States for the time being: >>> >>> - - Donald Trump: A vote for a sexist who is very disrespectful >>> of women in private but who loves his country and wants to help >>> the economy. - - Hillary Clinton: An absolute monster who sees >>> everyone as a number and who simply wants to use power to enrich >>> herself regardless of the cost to the people. - - Gary Johnson: A >>> miserable moron who says that he is a Libertarian despite the >>> fact that his position is in line with the Democrats. - - Jill >>> Stein: A woman of principle who is ready and willing to sacrifice >>> jobs and economic strength to benefit the environment. >>> >>> You guys are screwed and I think that I am done with this >>> election. I'll just follow Canadian politics from now on. >>> >>> - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease Gab.AI: @silverslimer >> >> We are screwed that's for sure. The problem with Trump is that he >> probably isn't doing or saying anything that past presidents >> weren't saying or doing. Look at John F. Kennedy for example. The >> difference is Trump keeps gettng caught! >> >> We are in serious trouble here. It's like choosing whether you want >> to get shot, hung or electrocuted. No matter which method is chosen >> the end result is the same. You are dead. > > Meanwhile, the last election here in Canada was more or less the only > one in which a lack of class was demonstrated. Generally, these things > are cordial affairs and the worst any candidate will throw at his > opponents is an insinuation that he might have stolen funds or > something. Boy do I hope our country's elections never become like the > American one. I am seriously beginning to just tune out. > > - -- > Silver Slimer > Islam is a disease > Gab.AI: @silverslimer If I recall correctly Trudeau enlisted the same team of advisors that Obama used to get elected. I remeber reading that somewhere but I could be wrong.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 17:22 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ntbo1j$g0s$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #375608 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2016-10-08 3:54 PM, Jim Polaski wrote: > On 2016-10-08, Silver Slimer <> wrote: >> >> On 2016-10-08 2:49 PM, Jim Polaski wrote: >>> On 2016-10-08, Silver Slimer <> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 2016-10-08 10:40 AM, DFS wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Yeah. My wife was kind of incredulous. I told her he was >>>>> trying to impress the young guys, and most of us speak >>>>> like that at one time or another. Of course, we were 16 >>>>> years old at the time... >>>>> >>>>> It doesn't bother me. But I'm surprised he apologized - he >>>>> usually doesn't. >>>>> >>>>> He sucks for a lot of reasons, but this isn't one. >>>> >>>> I saw it as a problem when I _read_ what he wrote but after >>>> _hearing_ what Trump said, you realize that he's just joking. >>>> The problem I DO have is the fact that he would see women in >>>> that manner in general. However, this is the political >>>> situation in the United States for the time being: >>>> >>>> - - Donald Trump: A vote for a sexist who is very >>>> disrespectful of women in private but who loves his country >>>> and wants to help the economy. - - Hillary Clinton: An >>>> absolute monster who sees everyone as a number and who simply >>>> wants to use power to enrich herself regardless of the cost >>>> to the people. - - Gary Johnson: A miserable moron who says >>>> that he is a Libertarian despite the fact that his position >>>> is in line with the Democrats. - - Jill Stein: A woman of >>>> principle who is ready and willing to sacrifice jobs and >>>> economic strength to benefit the environment. >>>> >>>> You guys are screwed and I think that I am done with this >>>> election. I'll just follow Canadian politics from now on. >>>> >>>> - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease Gab.AI: @silverslimer >>> >>> We are screwed that's for sure. The problem with Trump is that >>> he probably isn't doing or saying anything that past >>> presidents weren't saying or doing. Look at John F. Kennedy for >>> example. The difference is Trump keeps gettng caught! >>> >>> We are in serious trouble here. It's like choosing whether you >>> want to get shot, hung or electrocuted. No matter which method >>> is chosen the end result is the same. You are dead. >> >> Meanwhile, the last election here in Canada was more or less the >> only one in which a lack of class was demonstrated. Generally, >> these things are cordial affairs and the worst any candidate will >> throw at his opponents is an insinuation that he might have >> stolen funds or something. Boy do I hope our country's elections >> never become like the American one. I am seriously beginning to >> just tune out. >> >> - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease Gab.AI: @silverslimer > > If I recall correctly Trudeau enlisted the same team of advisors > that Obama used to get elected. I remeber reading that somewhere > but I could be wrong. I heard the same thing which would explain why the commercials and the approach in general was very similar to what we were exposed to right before Obama was elected. It made Trudeau look like a bright star in an otherwise dark night sky even though there was truly no reason to elect the twat. Not only was he terrible in debates (interrupted incessantly like Tim Kaine), but he had no experience whatsoever and had never really done any kind of work other than being a substitute drama teacher and the eventual deputy for an area of Montreal (a job he rarely attended). He was a disaster but because he had his dad's name (which should have been a BAD thing since his dad created Canada's worst debt ever), a pretty face and nice hair, he was elected on the "hope" platform like Obama was. We had a $1.7 billion surplus when he was elected and in mere months he squandered that and turned it in a $30 billion deficit. He claims that it'll be paid off in five years but the reality is that the conservatives will be elected, THEY will pay it off and then the liberals will again take credit for it and claim that the conservatives were the ones who spent all of that money in the first place. Liberals are swine. - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease Gab.AI: @silverslimer -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX+WOEAAoJEIwFfgf/rr+uf6AH/13HIrVUdgWmvMmWb44Ff0/p 8NtyxA/YcOeXuVIAnpcDVHkf5A1uGqU1lHLyQL8Yliv7q5gIA6+dgCJHU4WuyANm I6TmzvD79H5EdIHMGFmue2/sqGEmsAlJ/HNPWID1ODKYnO2lasydzsl3n53sJppm 0evpBU570zp3dulwCs8Je34B4gJy+rCDkR4OqU6ngwF+of2mp05x1o38pSHOxiaJ zwZ8mH4HXOUodSVmVT75pd1JmZEhxetP31qJEsgQkfXjzZiXAJi3OMJ+PH3YF9op frTipgSDmGLsk6a1JYCarIYrAG9wOSRtAm4tNSyAg75duHd0Jodu47rX1tgdjRs= =gsTO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 21:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e5t70uFd1h4U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #375622 |
On 2016-10-08, Silver Slimer <> wrote: > > On 2016-10-08 3:54 PM, Jim Polaski wrote: >> On 2016-10-08, Silver Slimer <> wrote: >> >> If I recall correctly Trudeau enlisted the same team of advisors >> that Obama used to get elected. I remeber reading that somewhere >> but I could be wrong. > > I heard the same thing which would explain why the commercials and the > approach in general was very similar to what we were exposed to right > before Obama was elected. It made Trudeau look like a bright star in > an otherwise dark night sky even though there was truly no reason to > elect the twat. Not only was he terrible in debates (interrupted > incessantly like Tim Kaine), but he had no experience whatsoever and > had never really done any kind of work other than being a substitute > drama teacher and the eventual deputy for an area of Montreal (a job > he rarely attended). He was a disaster but because he had his dad's > name (which should have been a BAD thing since his dad created > Canada's worst debt ever), a pretty face and nice hair, he was elected > on the "hope" platform like Obama was. We had a $1.7 billion surplus > when he was elected and in mere months he squandered that and turned > it in a $30 billion deficit. He claims that it'll be paid off in five > years but the reality is that the conservatives will be elected, THEY > will pay it off and then the liberals will again take credit for it > and claim that the conservatives were the ones who spent all of that > money in the first place. > > Liberals are swine. > - -- > Silver Slimer > Islam is a disease > Gab.AI: @silverslimer I voted for Obama in 2008 because I really believed that he wanted to change things and McCain is just a political hack with stale ideas that are part of the problem not the solution. In 2012 I held my nose and voted for Romney because Obama was clearly inept and weak and I couldn't stomach another 4 years of Obama. This year I'm voting for Trump because liberalism is destroying this country and if Hillary wins we are surely doomed. Trump is far from perfect but his faults are no where near as dangerous and corrupt as Hillary's are. The Clintons are crooks. The latest Wikileaks emails from yesterday are very serious stuff and the press is barely covering it choosing instead to cover some locker room talk by Trump.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 18:04 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ntbqh0$rce$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #375628 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2016-10-08 5:33 PM, Jim Polaski wrote: > On 2016-10-08, Silver Slimer <> wrote: >> >> On 2016-10-08 3:54 PM, Jim Polaski wrote: >>> On 2016-10-08, Silver Slimer <> wrote: > >>> >>> If I recall correctly Trudeau enlisted the same team of >>> advisors that Obama used to get elected. I remeber reading that >>> somewhere but I could be wrong. >> >> I heard the same thing which would explain why the commercials >> and the approach in general was very similar to what we were >> exposed to right before Obama was elected. It made Trudeau look >> like a bright star in an otherwise dark night sky even though >> there was truly no reason to elect the twat. Not only was he >> terrible in debates (interrupted incessantly like Tim Kaine), but >> he had no experience whatsoever and had never really done any >> kind of work other than being a substitute drama teacher and the >> eventual deputy for an area of Montreal (a job he rarely >> attended). He was a disaster but because he had his dad's name >> (which should have been a BAD thing since his dad created >> Canada's worst debt ever), a pretty face and nice hair, he was >> elected on the "hope" platform like Obama was. We had a $1.7 >> billion surplus when he was elected and in mere months he >> squandered that and turned it in a $30 billion deficit. He claims >> that it'll be paid off in five years but the reality is that the >> conservatives will be elected, THEY will pay it off and then the >> liberals will again take credit for it and claim that the >> conservatives were the ones who spent all of that money in the >> first place. >> >> Liberals are swine. - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease Gab.AI: >> @silverslimer > > I voted for Obama in 2008 because I really believed that he wanted > to change things and McCain is just a political hack with stale > ideas that are part of the problem not the solution. In 2012 I held > my nose and voted for Romney because Obama was clearly inept and > weak and I couldn't stomach another 4 years of Obama. > > This year I'm voting for Trump because liberalism is destroying > this country and if Hillary wins we are surely doomed. Trump is far > from perfect but his faults are no where near as dangerous and > corrupt as Hillary's are. The Clintons are crooks. The latest > Wikileaks emails from yesterday are very serious stuff and the > press is barely covering it choosing instead to cover some locker > room talk by Trump. I have to wonder who is actually listening or watching these network news shows anymore. I understand that they get ratings, but I'm sure that most of the people watching them have noticed that they lack objectivity and cover the news in a very biased way. Are people watching simply because there is nothing else or are they actually believing them? For my part, I decided that the best way to fight the biased news is to rely on a number of carefully-selected RSS feeds for information and donating to the only truthful and right-wing news agency in Canada with a monthly donation. I'd cancel cable, but I doubt that these people get any money from my subscription anyway. - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease Gab.AI: @silverslimer -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX+W1xAAoJEIwFfgf/rr+uptwH/A9vL3pN4nlfNIt5yysA/Dbh 1zhpvm0C9INu0oDWedzB4oKq88wshQgxbLhZiEHWCrjJdVdsBra1+MkfNEg4zcWX X9l7+r0oIyVyFKO9v8tJ2QYS+3kB0Yj023c1K7g7ale8onCl+r545XLpxj09Syuo a+g6gwCxMSllZnp07dpPIGAZtE5is/tLr5kp/XqaysSUIj6wlUFY7pZg6m56Lkf7 rTPwualpo70AHFfMUDHIGqmOBcvw4UxxemP+Uo3FramCfxKPfalef5MJm061ALTV ZTyw13LxcxgVZiLre1mnxJupGzhoPDfpHwXSirOf8CPrjZGAFLzDpT6Bx4LHRkQ= =sslM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 22:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e5tabeFdonmU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #375636 |
On 2016-10-08, Silver Slimer <> wrote: > > > I have to wonder who is actually listening or watching these network > news shows anymore. I understand that they get ratings, but I'm sure > that most of the people watching them have noticed that they lack > objectivity and cover the news in a very biased way. Are people > watching simply because there is nothing else or are they actually > believing them? They must be or advertisers wouldn't be buying time on them. My cable company has the MSNBC, CNN and FOXNews right next to each on the dial so it's easy to flip between them. I find it interesting how each one spins the news to fit their particular agenda. The MSM in the USA is heavily biased towards the left. The right wingers do control AM talk radio pretty much though with Limbaugh, Hannity and so forth. Personally, I'm sick of it all. Sunday's debate is going to be one hell of a pissing contest though. > For my part, I decided that the best way to fight the biased news is > to rely on a number of carefully-selected RSS feeds for information > and donating to the only truthful and right-wing news agency in Canada > with a monthly donation. I'd cancel cable, but I doubt that these > people get any money from my subscription anyway. > > - -- > Silver Slimer > Islam is a disease > Gab.AI: @silverslimer I think I've become cynical in my old age because I don't believe anything I see on TV or read on the Internet. Everything is spun in some direction or another.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 20:45 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ntc3v5$k64$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #375637 |
Jim Polaski wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > On 2016-10-08, Silver Slimer <> wrote: >> >> I have to wonder who is actually listening or watching these network >> news shows anymore. I understand that they get ratings, but I'm sure >> that most of the people watching them have noticed that they lack >> objectivity and cover the news in a very biased way. Are people >> watching simply because there is nothing else or are they actually >> believing them? > > They must be or advertisers wouldn't be buying time on them. My cable > company has the MSNBC, CNN and FOXNews right next to each on the dial so > it's easy to flip between them. I find it interesting how each one spins > the news to fit their particular agenda. The MSM in the USA is heavily > biased towards the left. The right wingers do control AM talk radio > pretty much though with Limbaugh, Hannity and so forth. > Personally, I'm sick of it all. > Sunday's debate is going to be one hell of a pissing contest though. > >> For my part, I decided that the best way to fight the biased news is >> to rely on a number of carefully-selected RSS feeds for information >> and donating to the only truthful and right-wing news agency in Canada >> with a monthly donation. I'd cancel cable, but I doubt that these >> people get any money from my subscription anyway. > > I think I've become cynical in my old age because I don't believe > anything I see on TV or read on the Internet. Everything is spun in some > direction or another. Right you are, O Spinner and Paddlefoot.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-10 07:52 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <8m3nvbd1i91le5cugtqgujp5u447fo303m@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #375657 |
> Jim Polaski wrote: >> >> I think I've become cynical in my old age because I don't believe >> anything I see on TV or read on the Internet. Everything is spun in some >> direction or another. Oh, you're so "smart", "Jim". I *never* would have figured that out! -- "GNU/Linux is only slighter better than being infected with the uncurable ebola virus." - "Slimer"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web