Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #374055 > unrolled thread
| Started by | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-10-01 17:51 -0400 |
| Last post | 2016-10-02 15:46 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 169 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-01 17:51 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-01 18:00 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 15:13 -0700
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-01 18:21 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 15:32 -0700
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 15:39 -0700
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-02 09:20 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-02 13:05 -0700
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-02 15:37 -0700
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 15:42 -0700
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 15:38 -0700
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-01 18:26 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 15:38 -0700
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-02 09:17 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-02 10:34 -0600
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-02 17:35 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-02 18:31 -0600
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-03 09:26 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-03 09:34 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-03 12:57 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-03 13:04 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-03 13:55 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-03 19:25 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-03 20:30 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 17:50 -0700
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 07:39 -0700
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-03 09:05 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-03 09:45 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 07:38 -0700
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-02 15:46 -0700
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 15:30 -0700
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-01 18:50 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-01 23:00 +0000
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 16:05 -0700
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-01 17:16 -0600
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-02 09:30 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-02 12:35 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-02 19:00 +0000
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-10-02 17:06 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-03 00:43 +0000
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 02:59 +0000
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-02 19:28 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-03 00:55 +0000
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-02 14:14 -0600
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 16:01 -0700
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-02 09:29 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-02 14:32 +0000
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-02 12:06 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-02 13:35 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-02 13:32 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-02 19:01 +0000
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-02 19:23 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-03 00:47 +0000
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-03 05:27 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-03 12:38 +0000
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-03 08:55 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-04 07:30 -0500
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-04 12:41 +0000
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-03 09:35 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 07:28 -0700
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-02 18:43 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-02 15:47 -0700
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-02 19:11 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-02 16:31 -0700
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-03 09:21 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-03 13:47 +0000
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-03 22:41 +0100
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-03 22:20 +0000
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-03 18:45 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-03 22:52 +0000
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-10-03 19:56 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-04 02:14 +0200
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-03 20:34 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-04 02:45 +0200
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-03 19:20 -0600
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-04 03:26 +0200
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-04 13:29 +0100
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-04 07:52 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-04 14:06 +0200
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-04 08:17 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-04 14:30 +0200
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-04 08:46 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-04 09:41 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-04 15:51 +0200
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-04 16:37 +0100
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-04 11:50 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-04 21:16 +0200
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-04 16:37 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-04 22:46 +0200
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-04 17:06 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-04 23:17 +0200
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-04 17:40 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-04 23:52 +0200
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-04 18:41 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-04 10:24 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-04 11:48 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-04 12:29 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-04 13:19 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-04 16:29 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-04 18:24 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-04 18:47 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-04 12:10 -0600
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-04 14:50 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-04 14:02 -0600
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-04 14:26 +0200
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-04 08:43 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-04 13:33 +0100
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-10-04 22:45 +0000
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-04 19:06 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-03 23:07 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-04 13:27 +0100
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-04 14:44 +0200
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-04 14:53 +0200
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-04 10:16 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-04 16:26 +0200
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-04 16:34 +0100
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-04 10:34 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-04 16:51 +0200
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-04 12:12 -0600
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-04 16:33 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-03 20:33 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-04 20:12 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-05 09:21 +0100
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-03 23:51 +0100
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-03 23:10 +0000
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-03 20:21 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-04 07:40 -0500
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-03 09:55 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-03 16:28 +0200
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-03 13:00 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-03 19:28 +0200
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-03 14:12 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-03 20:59 +0200
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-03 15:05 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-03 15:09 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-03 15:28 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-03 15:46 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-03 15:55 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-03 19:23 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-03 23:36 +0000
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-03 21:10 +0000
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-03 17:20 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-03 17:32 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-03 21:42 +0200
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-03 15:55 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-03 22:32 +0200
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-03 17:02 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-03 17:04 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-03 22:54 +0100
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-03 22:51 +0100
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-01 10:01 -0700
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 07:30 -0700
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-04 10:41 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-04 12:06 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-04 13:11 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-04 16:21 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-04 19:19 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-04 19:31 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-02 19:19 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-02 19:20 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-03 09:38 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-03 13:49 +0000
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-03 11:14 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-03 15:41 +0000
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-03 11:43 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-03 12:57 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-03 13:04 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-03 14:07 -0400
Re: OT: GreyCloud and Slimer and Octavian: I don't get it. Help me understand. tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-02 15:46 -0700
Page 2 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-03 13:04 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nsu323$lmt$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #374459 |
On 10/3/2016 12:57 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 2016-10-03 9:34 AM, DFS wrote: >> On 10/3/2016 9:26 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: >> >> >>> That money not only prevents Hillary from saying bad things about >>> the Saudis, but incites her to defend Muslims in general no >>> matter how criminal they are and to seriously consider Sharia law >>> as a solution for America's ills. She is a reproachable human >>> being and I hope she dies before November comes. >> >> Hitting the bottle early today, I see. > > You're starting to expose yourself as a true moron, DFS. It took me a while, whereas you exposed yourself immediately. And you've been reinforcing it a LOT lately: "Clinton defends murderous Muslims, and is being paid to seriously consider Sharia law in America" Is that your stance?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-03 13:55 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nsu630$35a$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #374466 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2016-10-03 1:04 PM, DFS wrote: > On 10/3/2016 12:57 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 >> >> On 2016-10-03 9:34 AM, DFS wrote: >>> On 10/3/2016 9:26 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: >>> >>> >>>> That money not only prevents Hillary from saying bad things >>>> about the Saudis, but incites her to defend Muslims in >>>> general no matter how criminal they are and to seriously >>>> consider Sharia law as a solution for America's ills. She is >>>> a reproachable human being and I hope she dies before >>>> November comes. >>> >>> Hitting the bottle early today, I see. >> >> You're starting to expose yourself as a true moron, DFS. > > > It took me a while, whereas you exposed yourself immediately. > > And you've been reinforcing it a LOT lately: > > "Clinton defends murderous Muslims, and is being paid to seriously > consider Sharia law in America" > > Is that your stance? Follow the money, idiot. You'll notice that a great number of Sharia-compliant countries are among her most generous donors. We can only imagine why but tell yourself that Hillary wants to increase the number of these murderous savages America allows by 500%. - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX8putAAoJEIwFfgf/rr+uQDIH/0YXV3+fRlH+Nh0XKGkYWodD mUxgS4p441vXwbZho3jTbTaC1/zcQwExXMzIqdCQJsF2mkRU0ZbZ9y56K7DimdV5 WCSkXL7PsDhMkrbEbrReo1Ak1O0NXKpJklCtEb1isx3Kgd3md2EMWqcDnaQRee6W vQfTnkaom8KGMbH3owYK2+jODsuc+qm10B5qJrSAKLhvzZxftt1XSicrS+ZAIjit 9mioltCHD2I+UpQJaG6bOiPWqkourdqrrsNTybDW4h9QyrlU1HX/5w1KNG0CoTPt f4nxfe0mRH9xfRD5F4kPoXNFQI+1IkC5VegNGrltn4I9KG8Ajt6+xzCI2E6lu3s= =EkdN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-03 19:25 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nsupc5$8vn$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #374475 |
On 10/3/2016 1:55 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 2016-10-03 1:04 PM, DFS wrote: >> On 10/3/2016 12:57 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 >>> >>> On 2016-10-03 9:34 AM, DFS wrote: >>>> On 10/3/2016 9:26 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> That money not only prevents Hillary from saying bad things >>>>> about the Saudis, but incites her to defend Muslims in >>>>> general no matter how criminal they are and to seriously >>>>> consider Sharia law as a solution for America's ills. She is >>>>> a reproachable human being and I hope she dies before >>>>> November comes. >>>> >>>> Hitting the bottle early today, I see. >>> >>> You're starting to expose yourself as a true moron, DFS. >> >> >> It took me a while, whereas you exposed yourself immediately. >> >> And you've been reinforcing it a LOT lately: >> >> "Clinton defends murderous Muslims, and is being paid to seriously >> consider Sharia law in America" >> >> Is that your stance? > > Follow the money, idiot. > > You'll notice that a great number of Sharia-compliant countries are > among her most generous donors. We can only imagine why Thanks for admitting your imagination is the basis of your anti-Clinton hatred, and pro-Trump stupidity. > but tell > yourself that Hillary wants to increase the number of these murderous > savages America allows by 500%. No doubt they can be dangerous. I'd like to kick most of them out, to be safe. And keep them out. But the fact is many American Muslims like and support America a lot more than you do. So you won't mind if we keep you out, too... right?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-03 20:30 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nsut5t$il5$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #374607 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2016-10-03 7:25 PM, DFS wrote: > On 10/3/2016 1:55 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 >> >> On 2016-10-03 1:04 PM, DFS wrote: >>> On 10/3/2016 12:57 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 >>>> >>>> On 2016-10-03 9:34 AM, DFS wrote: >>>>> On 10/3/2016 9:26 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> That money not only prevents Hillary from saying bad >>>>>> things about the Saudis, but incites her to defend >>>>>> Muslims in general no matter how criminal they are and to >>>>>> seriously consider Sharia law as a solution for America's >>>>>> ills. She is a reproachable human being and I hope she >>>>>> dies before November comes. >>>>> >>>>> Hitting the bottle early today, I see. >>>> >>>> You're starting to expose yourself as a true moron, DFS. >>> >>> >>> It took me a while, whereas you exposed yourself immediately. >>> >>> And you've been reinforcing it a LOT lately: >>> >>> "Clinton defends murderous Muslims, and is being paid to >>> seriously consider Sharia law in America" >>> >>> Is that your stance? >> >> Follow the money, idiot. >> >> You'll notice that a great number of Sharia-compliant countries >> are among her most generous donors. We can only imagine why > > > Thanks for admitting your imagination is the basis of your > anti-Clinton hatred, and pro-Trump stupidity. You're denying this is the case? Once again, follow the money. Meh, you're too lazy to do because you're an asshole so here, I'm doing it for you. <http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/06/14/hillary-clinton-took - -millions-anti-lbgt-countries-gays-jailed-put-death/> >> but tell yourself that Hillary wants to increase the number of >> these murderous savages America allows by 500%. > > No doubt they can be dangerous. I'd like to kick most of them out, > to be safe. And keep them out. > > But the fact is many American Muslims like and support America a > lot more than you do. So you won't mind if we keep you out, too... > right? As you say that, I am reminded of how one of my eighth grade students today, whose parents came here in the 1990s in pursuit of peace from Algeria, told me his teammates that "if he had the power of the American president, he'd kill every last Jew." That's how appreciative they are of their host country. You're on the same level as Peter the Klöwn. - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX8vgKAAoJEIwFfgf/rr+uJUwH/jYWgXXDIz0s02Vshp1jD54E mQjEfhN7Y2u9aWBIJK6tGZtfH8wDuDTLaffOn6IG70BLarvriBaE9EBwgFhWdWkk IrPIAal55n+ES2cFJZTBQP+Y80XgTuNF3uDtaOGGBzZbHOgS62lYAwu5+orYKuH+ NOZkYen6iHxT8ZDkGOHWq6Y+imb3aSJtgFpMo4JKmgWOmvuulzI3exylkEyYel37 PVUoUSRB1/nmhU5S3CeSrhPX27fMfeZL9UFFEu3+IEkADN0D2K4v/3mODADlYv9a 1EliZE6d+hEMAW5NClsv/3gjd/he/x+1dAl4SRMEJWYfbWZNOXJ78GouYcYYpeU= =TCgh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-03 17:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1b7487ce-30f9-4363-b0b7-be946127c1b8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #374624 |
On Monday, 3 October 2016 17:30:04 UTC-7, Silver Slimer wrote: > As you say that, I am reminded of how one of my eighth grade students > today, whose parents came here in the 1990s in pursuit of peace from > Algeria, told me his teammates that "if he had the power of the > American president, he'd kill every last Jew." > > That's how appreciative they are of their host country. > > You're on the same level as Peter the Klöwn. > > - -- > Silver Slimer > Islam is a disease You are a Nazi, just against Muslims and not Jews.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-03 07:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <48a5414e-8efa-46c3-ab19-12c9ce5e27b1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #374395 |
On Monday, 3 October 2016 06:26:15 UTC-7, Silver Slimer wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 2016-10-02 8:31 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > > On 10/02/2016 03:35 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: > >> On 2016-10-02 12:34 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > >>> On 10/02/2016 07:17 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: > >>>> On 2016-10-01 06:26 PM, DFS wrote: > >>>>> On 10/1/2016 6:00 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: > >>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 2016-10-01 05:51 PM, DFS wrote: > >>>>>>> http://www.cnn.com/search/?text=clinton+lied > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Why does the "Clinton News Network" run such articles? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Find me one CNN article which questions FBI head Comey's > >>>>>> decision not to prosecute Clinton after he admitted > >>>>>> that she was guilty of a series of wrongdoings. > > > > > >>>>> You slimed away from answering the question. Why? > > > >>>> I didn't slime away from anything. The reality is that CNN > >>>> will _mention_ such things in passing only because they know > >>>> that they can't conceal them. After all, they still have to > >>>> give people the _impression_ that they're objective and if an > >>>> e-mail scandal was mentioned on Fox News and perhaps NBC > >>>> News, they don't have much of a choice but to acknowledge it. > >>>> However, their position is always the same: treat it as no > >>>> big deal if it somehow involves the Democratic candidate. > >>>> Meanwhile, if Donald Trump so much as yelled at a guy who is > >>>> 1/32rd coloured 35 years ago, they'll make it their headline > >>>> for days at a time. > > > >>>> I'm sure you noticed such behaviour from them but chose to > >>>> disregard it. > > > >>> DFS is still asleep. > > > >> Definitely. It's sad to see because I actually like the guy. > > > >>> It is amazing that he doesn't really pay that much attention > >>> to the news and finally realize that he's been lied to. He > >>> trusts everything that MSM puts out. He won't trust > >>> alternative media. Just like the dumb-ass snit, it has either > >>> got click bait on a news website and can't be trusted or it > >>> isn't from MSM, which he thinks can be trusted. Problem is, as > >>> Shawn Hannity pointed out, journalism has died a long time > >>> ago. > > > >> He's right. The kind of guys people used to watch on 60 Minutes > >> and elsewhere reporting the news and interpreting it as > >> OBJECTIVE members of society is gone. Now, it's just a bunch of > >> pretty faces dictating what they want you to know on television. > >> I doubt that any of them ever did any real journalism in their > >> lives. > > > >>> A journalists duties is to report and analyze an event to the > >>> public as the truth. Unfortunately, MSM has been bought off by > >>> not only our government but also other governments as well. > >>> Since when has Saudi Arabia was ever mentioned in a bad light > >>> by the MSM? Never. One reporter that quit CNN said that they > >>> were paid off by the Saudis to never put them in a bad light. > > > >> I still remember how, a few years ago, the Western world's > >> leaders mourned the death of the Saudi king Hussein as if there > >> was some terrible loss involved. The guy is dead and frankly > >> should have been put there by the American government a long time > >> ago. The fact that they ended up worshipping a guy who believes > >> in a system where gays can be thrown off of roofs without > >> incident and women are treated as slaves rather than equal > >> members of society says a lot about what the Western governments > >> have turned into. > > > > And Hillary took the money for her campaign from the Saudis. She > > could care less about the public. > > That money not only prevents Hillary from saying bad things about the > Saudis, but incites her to defend Muslims in general no matter how > criminal they are and to seriously consider Sharia law as a solution > for America's ills. She is a reproachable human being and I hope she > dies before November comes. > > - -- > Silver Slimer > Islam is a disease > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2 > > iQEbBAEBCAAGBQJX8lx0AAoJEIwFfgf/rr+uB9MH9iEh3/ADMLkhWa6pYxKy1m05 > nzBYa88HmVzV/6ChRYOoZUHqnV5c3E8Cio6THMK8ehZ239UeTGKBuVJY5b9JrbKI > 9TAQsYW+88zEhXtTOySCCBvqwqyTOQsNVId9pfHt7H1SaQ3NVTvTJibtPrrteNTg > 3vFZR+Ey1U+o274Z7Hrac//BBdBdL1D6pWuSzGIhyNi3UbbkNkBA02e1EpaQe7My > 0GdV2+stpGduW7bDLE31StU8i4rcvrC6JxAt2zvtNQ2REPcAMUOLO27dMAHl/8ij > CBvpDZHxHfoS5U2AuwOT7lcOuRTZBljbBZUXJtX4ebFB0HJO6VtfmOS0F5Wnag== > =XKjb > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Why do you lie so often? She has never said she supports Sharia law. You are simply an idiot and a bigot.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-03 09:05 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nstl3e$21i$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #374124 |
On 10/2/2016 9:17 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 2016-10-01 06:26 PM, DFS wrote: >> On 10/1/2016 6:00 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 >>> >>> On 2016-10-01 05:51 PM, DFS wrote: >>>> http://www.cnn.com/search/?text=clinton+lied >>>> >>>> >>>> Why does the "Clinton News Network" run such articles? >>> >>> Find me one CNN article which questions FBI head Comey's decision >>> not to prosecute Clinton after he admitted that she was guilty of >>> a series of wrongdoings. These are sort of what you want. Perhaps not exactly. * CNN publicizes poll which says most people want her charged http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/11/politics/hillary-clinton-fbi-charges-poll/ * CNN calls out FBI and Clinton for email scandal http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/opinions/clinton-emails-fbi-decision-sexton/ * CNN publicizes Clinton lies http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/01/politics/washington-post-clinton-four-pinnochios-comey-emails/ * CNN publicizes Republican questioning of Comey http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/07/politics/james-comey-hillary-clinton-email-hearing/ Now why would the "Clinton News Network" run ANY of those opinion pieces or articles that put Clinton in a very bad light? Fact is, Clinton's email server scandal has been beaten to death on CNN. >> You slimed away from answering the question. Why? > > I didn't slime away from anything. The reality is that CNN will > _mention_ such things in passing only because they know that they > can't conceal them. After all, they still have to give people the > _impression_ that they're objective They don't HAVE to do anything. It must be the 'GreyCloud banking cabal' that's making them cover Trump. > and if an e-mail scandal was > mentioned on Fox News and perhaps NBC News, they don't have much of a > choice but to acknowledge it. Why not? > However, their position is always the > same: treat it as no big deal if it somehow involves the Democratic > candidate. Meanwhile, if Donald Trump so much as yelled at a guy who > is 1/32rd coloured 35 years ago, they'll make it their headline for > days at a time. > > I'm sure you noticed such behaviour from them but chose to disregard it. CNN covers Trump and his buffoonish behavior a lot more than Clinton. So? He's more entertaining and candid. He delivers more drama, more news, and he gets more viewers. But he's a trainwreck - his serial lies and flip-flopping and hypocrisy and bullying should be covered, dissected and shown repeatedly. The failure to release his tax returns, that one act alone, should've disqualified him. The FEC disclosure document isn't enough; I think the candidates should be required to release their federal tax returns so we can see if they're lying about taxes paid, donations, or their claimed business success. Lately, his public "Miss Piggy" abuse of the Venezuelan beauty is and was beyond the pale. And he'll probably bring up Bill Clinton's infidelities in the next debate - if he does, I hope they blast him for his own adulterous behavior. He's a sick SOB. Not nearly fit to be President of the most important and powerful country on Earth.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-03 09:45 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nstndt$aip$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #374388 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2016-10-03 9:05 AM, DFS wrote: > On 10/2/2016 9:17 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 >> >> On 2016-10-01 06:26 PM, DFS wrote: >>> On 10/1/2016 6:00 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 >>>> >>>> On 2016-10-01 05:51 PM, DFS wrote: >>>>> http://www.cnn.com/search/?text=clinton+lied >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Why does the "Clinton News Network" run such articles? >>>> >>>> Find me one CNN article which questions FBI head Comey's >>>> decision not to prosecute Clinton after he admitted that she >>>> was guilty of a series of wrongdoings. > > > These are sort of what you want. Perhaps not exactly. > > * CNN publicizes poll which says most people want her charged > http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/11/politics/hillary-clinton-fbi-charges-pol l/ They're > talking about other people there, not themselves. CNN itself agrees with not charging her. > * CNN calls out FBI and Clinton for email scandal > http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/opinions/clinton-emails-fbi-decision-sex ton/ > > > > * CNN publicizes Clinton lies > http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/01/politics/washington-post-clinton-four-pi nnochios-comey-emails/ > > > > > * CNN publicizes Republican questioning of Comey > http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/07/politics/james-comey-hillary-clinton-ema il-hearing/ > > > > > Now why would the "Clinton News Network" run ANY of those opinion > pieces or articles that put Clinton in a very bad light? > > > Fact is, Clinton's email server scandal has been beaten to death on > CNN. Once again, the videos themselves don't take a position against Hillary, they simply shows _others_ attacking Clinton. They're free to defend her immediately thereafter by discrediting the guest. >>> You slimed away from answering the question. Why? >> >> I didn't slime away from anything. The reality is that CNN will >> _mention_ such things in passing only because they know that >> they can't conceal them. After all, they still have to give >> people the _impression_ that they're objective > > They don't HAVE to do anything. It must be the 'GreyCloud banking > cabal' that's making them cover Trump. They cover Trump only when they believe that they can use some of what they covered against him. The other week, they covered his Obama birther "controversy" live with the expectation that he would say something which would make him look bad. Knowing this, his campaign had the event start with tons of people praising him. Once that was done, Trump basically said "Obama was born in America, period." and they were left with nothing to attack him with. They _still_ attacked him though. >> and if an e-mail scandal was mentioned on Fox News and perhaps >> NBC News, they don't have much of a choice but to acknowledge >> it. > > Why not? Because if they didn't, people would wonder why the network wasn't covering something as immense that had been covered by everyone else. It would be too obvious that they're not objective at all. >> However, their position is always the same: treat it as no big >> deal if it somehow involves the Democratic candidate. Meanwhile, >> if Donald Trump so much as yelled at a guy who is 1/32rd coloured >> 35 years ago, they'll make it their headline for days at a time. >> >> I'm sure you noticed such behaviour from them but chose to >> disregard it. > > CNN covers Trump and his buffoonish behavior a lot more than > Clinton. So? He's more entertaining and candid. He delivers more > drama, more news, and he gets more viewers. But he's a trainwreck > - his serial lies and flip-flopping and hypocrisy and bullying > should be covered, dissected and shown repeatedly. > > The failure to release his tax returns, that one act alone, > should've disqualified him. The FEC disclosure document isn't > enough; I think the candidates should be required to release their > federal tax returns so we can see if they're lying about taxes > paid, donations, or their claimed business success. If they're being audited and especially after the lawyer suggested not to release them, I'm with Trump in resisting the temptation. Besides, they put Romney against the wall to release his tax returns as well and even though he had nothing to hide and his records were essentially spotless, they still found something meaningless and drove it to the ground for the next week on mainstream media. It's a baiting maneuver and Trump is right to not do a thing. > Lately, his public "Miss Piggy" abuse of the Venezuelan beauty is > and was beyond the pale. Except all videos from that era show him _defending_ the spickerdoodle and she discredited herself when claiming that his comments caused her to have an eating disorder when she, back in the day, admitted to having one before even competing for Miss Universe. She was bought off and it's painfully obvious to everyone but you. > And he'll probably bring up Bill Clinton's infidelities in the > next debate - if he does, I hope they blast him for his own > adulterous behavior. Yeah, marrying women and divorcing them is so unusual nowadays. What a monster! Bill Clinton raping a bunch of women he never dated or married isn't worse at all. You can't possibly be this asleep. > He's a sick SOB. So are you and somehow I found a way to get along with you. - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX8mEJAAoJEIwFfgf/rr+uzaoH/2eGWuTZSTnjqDdnd9Aq0nfr P+I+t3cM2aUppHSUT4nrWpRuq6E0uLSixFyO1iwEv4sD9ozVi+K00nh6KPSwRoMC YUxF95F7ldLvKoIyx2AkS96cbw9VP9jm7UmZOQlV6lCVEWQJ/vM10qTk85O74x3g Vy/0kFLp944BStxEdrozhjtjEM/6yRwoP8NRrAybjsq2G5Pex0hmsGn0AnVlb7pK D+8U7eu8jlmL6fCQ20S74Kwynqd0MIjqcei+2NiZFaEHR8T4sc+yyIgXhIzT958f TjR/K+HUfkMkk/+bT2vBhSPjRAGrdAfoGX3zFTcq4/MTlizr4VqYfgAVqYbFX80= =LRav -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-03 07:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f7a8dc6b-2aa6-4b7a-8d15-22b577ac350c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #374403 |
On Monday, 3 October 2016 06:45:49 UTC-7, Silver Slimer wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 2016-10-03 9:05 AM, DFS wrote: > > On 10/2/2016 9:17 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 > >> > >> On 2016-10-01 06:26 PM, DFS wrote: > >>> On 10/1/2016 6:00 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: > >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 > >>>> > >>>> On 2016-10-01 05:51 PM, DFS wrote: > >>>>> http://www.cnn.com/search/?text=clinton+lied > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Why does the "Clinton News Network" run such articles? > >>>> > >>>> Find me one CNN article which questions FBI head Comey's > >>>> decision not to prosecute Clinton after he admitted that she > >>>> was guilty of a series of wrongdoings. > > > > > > These are sort of what you want. Perhaps not exactly. > > > > * CNN publicizes poll which says most people want her charged > > http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/11/politics/hillary-clinton-fbi-charges-pol > l/ > > They're > > > talking about other people there, not themselves. CNN itself > agrees with not charging her. > > > * CNN calls out FBI and Clinton for email scandal > > http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/opinions/clinton-emails-fbi-decision-sex > ton/ > > > > > > > > * CNN publicizes Clinton lies > > http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/01/politics/washington-post-clinton-four-pi > nnochios-comey-emails/ > > > > > > > > > > * CNN publicizes Republican questioning of Comey > > http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/07/politics/james-comey-hillary-clinton-ema > il-hearing/ > > > > > > > > > > Now why would the "Clinton News Network" run ANY of those opinion > > pieces or articles that put Clinton in a very bad light? > > > > > > Fact is, Clinton's email server scandal has been beaten to death on > > CNN. > > Once again, the videos themselves don't take a position against > Hillary, they simply shows _others_ attacking Clinton. They're free to > defend her immediately thereafter by discrediting the guest. > > >>> You slimed away from answering the question. Why? > >> > >> I didn't slime away from anything. The reality is that CNN will > >> _mention_ such things in passing only because they know that > >> they can't conceal them. After all, they still have to give > >> people the _impression_ that they're objective > > > > They don't HAVE to do anything. It must be the 'GreyCloud banking > > cabal' that's making them cover Trump. > > They cover Trump only when they believe that they can use some of what > they covered against him. The other week, they covered his Obama > birther "controversy" live with the expectation that he would say > something which would make him look bad. Knowing this, his campaign > had the event start with tons of people praising him. Once that was > done, Trump basically said "Obama was born in America, period." and > they were left with nothing to attack him with. They _still_ attacked > him though. > > >> and if an e-mail scandal was mentioned on Fox News and perhaps > >> NBC News, they don't have much of a choice but to acknowledge > >> it. > > > > Why not? > > Because if they didn't, people would wonder why the network wasn't > covering something as immense that had been covered by everyone else. > It would be too obvious that they're not objective at all. > > >> However, their position is always the same: treat it as no big > >> deal if it somehow involves the Democratic candidate. Meanwhile, > >> if Donald Trump so much as yelled at a guy who is 1/32rd coloured > >> 35 years ago, they'll make it their headline for days at a time. > >> > >> I'm sure you noticed such behaviour from them but chose to > >> disregard it. > > > > CNN covers Trump and his buffoonish behavior a lot more than > > Clinton. So? He's more entertaining and candid. He delivers more > > drama, more news, and he gets more viewers. But he's a trainwreck > > - his serial lies and flip-flopping and hypocrisy and bullying > > should be covered, dissected and shown repeatedly. > > > > The failure to release his tax returns, that one act alone, > > should've disqualified him. The FEC disclosure document isn't > > enough; I think the candidates should be required to release their > > federal tax returns so we can see if they're lying about taxes > > paid, donations, or their claimed business success. > > If they're being audited and especially after the lawyer suggested not > to release them, I'm with Trump in resisting the temptation. Besides, > they put Romney against the wall to release his tax returns as well > and even though he had nothing to hide and his records were > essentially spotless, they still found something meaningless and drove > it to the ground for the next week on mainstream media. It's a baiting > maneuver and Trump is right to not do a thing. > > > Lately, his public "Miss Piggy" abuse of the Venezuelan beauty is > > and was beyond the pale. > > Except all videos from that era show him _defending_ the spickerdoodle > and she discredited herself when claiming that his comments caused her > to have an eating disorder when she, back in the day, admitted to > having one before even competing for Miss Universe. She was bought off > and it's painfully obvious to everyone but you. > > > And he'll probably bring up Bill Clinton's infidelities in the > > next debate - if he does, I hope they blast him for his own > > adulterous behavior. > > Yeah, marrying women and divorcing them is so unusual nowadays. What a > monster! Bill Clinton raping a bunch of women he never dated or > married isn't worse at all. You can't possibly be this asleep. > > > He's a sick SOB. > > So are you and somehow I found a way to get along with you. > > - -- > Silver Slimer > Islam is a disease > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2 > > iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX8mEJAAoJEIwFfgf/rr+uzaoH/2eGWuTZSTnjqDdnd9Aq0nfr > P+I+t3cM2aUppHSUT4nrWpRuq6E0uLSixFyO1iwEv4sD9ozVi+K00nh6KPSwRoMC > YUxF95F7ldLvKoIyx2AkS96cbw9VP9jm7UmZOQlV6lCVEWQJ/vM10qTk85O74x3g > Vy/0kFLp944BStxEdrozhjtjEM/6yRwoP8NRrAybjsq2G5Pex0hmsGn0AnVlb7pK > D+8U7eu8jlmL6fCQ20S74Kwynqd0MIjqcei+2NiZFaEHR8T4sc+yyIgXhIzT958f > TjR/K+HUfkMkk/+bT2vBhSPjRAGrdAfoGX3zFTcq4/MTlizr4VqYfgAVqYbFX80= > =LRav > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- I do not care how great Trump's dick tastes to you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-02 15:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c799dbe7-1e27-4118-9dbf-9d672cbd5687@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #374058 |
On Saturday, 1 October 2016 15:00:04 UTC-7, Silver Slimer wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 2016-10-01 05:51 PM, DFS wrote: > > http://www.cnn.com/search/?text=clinton+lied > > > > > > Why does the "Clinton News Network" run such articles? > > Find me one CNN article which questions FBI head Comey's decision not > to prosecute Clinton after he admitted that she was guilty of a series > of wrongdoings. > > - -- > Silver Slimer > Islam is a disease > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2 > > iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX8DHiAAoJEIwFfgf/rr+uhkwH/iG68QIkyRTppafmIKA1iX78 > c9cgzRStcWj2Jo9ufoI1si4GFqP2K2tRWN/K93ESM69hLbk7CVV/eMH9u0PV5s1o > doEjGJTUOOvRyftQZwUMVpHnIzU8AY24YoxmphJW822xhVwqs3rfbLgxzaQLlt05 > HNlmvruEwW5nwk00Cj23HaSVcNFzFZ4ePtvJNpmqyySHD36e/o/8UUwz4CltRWQm > oT9S7Jpw3lmiiqsICsmsEL7hFl0RlHH/3mbFtqpGAQOXk9Q8GIOpsQT5zvjDr5WL > g6ptBaSrllJC0CB9n/O7/HdcR5tqblT+3gu9koUepIfnIgfypuCfEo34hjfzrxY= > =B8mu > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Why would they be required to question it?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-01 15:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <70895a5b-70cb-4ec1-8a28-4d00ac5f36ac@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #374055 |
On Saturday, October 1, 2016 at 3:51:35 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote: > http://www.cnn.com/search/?text=clinton+lied > > > Why does the "Clinton News Network" run such articles? LOL! You've been hanging out with Feeb too long ;) How many articles are there showing CNN accusing Clinton of lying? I dunno... maybe you're getting a different feed than I am but I see numerous articles where CNN is reporting on Republicans accusing her of lying. If that's the case, then that in itself is pretty damning because we know there were plenty of people on both sides of the isle that believe she lied about plenty of things.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-01 18:50 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nspej7$6n2$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #374066 |
On 10/1/2016 6:30 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Saturday, October 1, 2016 at 3:51:35 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote: >> http://www.cnn.com/search/?text=clinton+lied >> >> >> Why does the "Clinton News Network" run such articles? > > LOL! You've been hanging out with Feeb too long ;) huh? > How many articles are there showing CNN accusing Clinton of lying? Irrelevant. The fact that they run any articles (or Ads by Google such as 'Clinton Lied People Died') at all calling her honesty into question proves the Triumvirate of Trump Twits (GC, Slimer, owl) is just babbling the usual paranoid idiocy about "the mainstream media" and "CNN is a propaganda site". That reminds me: Clinton's "vast right-wing conspiracy" was stupid as hell, too. > I dunno... maybe you're getting a different feed than I am but I see > numerous articles where CNN is reporting on Republicans accusing her > of lying. If that's the case, then that in itself is pretty damning > because we know there were plenty of people on both sides of the isle > that believe she lied about plenty of things.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-01 23:00 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhjaga.fjppli@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #374075 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 10/1/2016 6:30 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >> On Saturday, October 1, 2016 at 3:51:35 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote: >>> http://www.cnn.com/search/?text=clinton+lied >>> >>> >>> Why does the "Clinton News Network" run such articles? >> >> LOL! You've been hanging out with Feeb too long ;) > > huh? > > > >> How many articles are there showing CNN accusing Clinton of lying? > > > Irrelevant. > > The fact that they run any articles (or Ads by Google such as 'Clinton > Lied People Died') at all calling her honesty into question proves the > Triumvirate of Trump Twits (GC, Slimer, owl) is just babbling the usual > paranoid idiocy about "the mainstream media" and "CNN is a propaganda site". > You're voting for brain-fried pothead Gary Johnson. 'nuff said.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-01 16:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7c3f99bd-5de8-4496-9938-b0d427c76adc@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #374076 |
On Saturday, October 1, 2016 at 5:00:07 PM UTC-6, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > > On 10/1/2016 6:30 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >> On Saturday, October 1, 2016 at 3:51:35 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote: > >>> http://www.cnn.com/search/?text=clinton+lied > >>> > >>> > >>> Why does the "Clinton News Network" run such articles? > >> > >> LOL! You've been hanging out with Feeb too long ;) > > > > huh? > > > > > > > >> How many articles are there showing CNN accusing Clinton of lying? > > > > > > Irrelevant. > > > > The fact that they run any articles (or Ads by Google such as 'Clinton > > Lied People Died') at all calling her honesty into question proves the > > Triumvirate of Trump Twits (GC, Slimer, owl) is just babbling the usual > > paranoid idiocy about "the mainstream media" and "CNN is a propaganda site". > > > > You're voting for brain-fried pothead Gary Johnson. 'nuff said. LOL! No he isn't.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-01 17:16 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nspg47$a09$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #374076 |
On 10/01/2016 05:00 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >> On 10/1/2016 6:30 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Saturday, October 1, 2016 at 3:51:35 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote: >>>> http://www.cnn.com/search/?text=clinton+lied >>>> >>>> >>>> Why does the "Clinton News Network" run such articles? >>> >>> LOL! You've been hanging out with Feeb too long ;) >> >> huh? >> >> >> >>> How many articles are there showing CNN accusing Clinton of lying? >> >> >> Irrelevant. >> >> The fact that they run any articles (or Ads by Google such as 'Clinton >> Lied People Died') at all calling her honesty into question proves the >> Triumvirate of Trump Twits (GC, Slimer, owl) is just babbling the usual >> paranoid idiocy about "the mainstream media" and "CNN is a propaganda site". >> > > You're voting for brain-fried pothead Gary Johnson. 'nuff said. > > Send him this new political party formed by Anthony Wiener: https://www.google.com/search?q=Weiner-Holder+party&espv=2&biw=1920&bih=944&tbm=isch&imgil=RcRa8WsrXlUrSM%253A%253BrpADugDNYZjNfM%253Bhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fweiner.politifake.org%25252Ftags%25252Fweiner&source=iu&pf=m&fir=RcRa8WsrXlUrSM%253A%252CrpADugDNYZjNfM%252C_&usg=__dLJNW5XcgYphPrnMiUYJ_Xs13LM%3D&dpr=1&ved=0ahUKEwjDnuz-3brPAhVQ42MKHWMJCq4QyjcIKg&ei=XEPwV8OAItDGjwPjkqjwCg#imgrc=RcRa8WsrXlUrSM%3A
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-02 09:30 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nsr25c$bqb$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #374076 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2016-10-01 07:00 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >> On 10/1/2016 6:30 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Saturday, October 1, 2016 at 3:51:35 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote: >>>> http://www.cnn.com/search/?text=clinton+lied >>>> >>>> >>>> Why does the "Clinton News Network" run such articles? >>> >>> LOL! You've been hanging out with Feeb too long ;) >> >> huh? >> >> >> >>> How many articles are there showing CNN accusing Clinton of >>> lying? >> >> >> Irrelevant. >> >> The fact that they run any articles (or Ads by Google such as >> 'Clinton Lied People Died') at all calling her honesty into >> question proves the Triumvirate of Trump Twits (GC, Slimer, owl) >> is just babbling the usual paranoid idiocy about "the mainstream >> media" and "CNN is a propaganda site". >> > > You're voting for brain-fried pothead Gary Johnson. 'nuff said. Fortunately for Gary Johnson, he has a decent platform especially as it relates to Snowden (pardon him) and open-source. Unfortunately for Gary Johnson, he is unable to make the link between his platform and what he says in interviews. At best, he is a hypocrite. - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX8Qv5AAoJEIwFfgf/rr+ujMkH/3LnuJLMIBheMjti+Phv/Xef BsSgpqhf1nI6RbspANcSwLqSJrp/vVu2kQpvjPTUu8pv/Hbdfxc2GmEXhi18FF9P e+Q6ef0x8RJ4UpBdsQxhMqmrDmDosEfMlytrKzi96p97srkpoFwP77w5SRZ1CQn/ CFWLYgu2RmdruJP74okljyGKpyvod1IzZ6YKVGAL6wSoDRgKiqMfkGCdxNQSuwsF IXwWf71CiLzlroHSlMwcfUlsKSEYtHZeiYtGJYQE+1tRjiKUk4MtrnrxiJDFyGjZ AGwns1AJ0OsELdplEjS8Xufwa3pvnZnZDEZQbbDTvUrcfvCOmUtF/hs+lxLSKE8= =Jayt -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-02 12:35 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nsrd11$e5n$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #374076 |
On 10/1/2016 7:00 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >> On 10/1/2016 6:30 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Saturday, October 1, 2016 at 3:51:35 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote: >>>> http://www.cnn.com/search/?text=clinton+lied >>>> >>>> >>>> Why does the "Clinton News Network" run such articles? >>> >>> LOL! You've been hanging out with Feeb too long ;) >> >> huh? >> >> >> >>> How many articles are there showing CNN accusing Clinton of lying? >> >> >> Irrelevant. >> >> The fact that they run any articles (or Ads by Google such as 'Clinton >> Lied People Died') at all calling her honesty into question proves the >> Triumvirate of Trump Twits (GC, Slimer, owl) is just babbling the usual >> paranoid idiocy about "the mainstream media" and "CNN is a propaganda site". >> > > You're voting for brain-fried pothead Gary Johnson. 'nuff said. I had seriously considered it, but Nov 8 I'll write in 'No Confidence'. I seriously think Trump doesn't actually want the job - he acts more deranged, more bullying, more childish, more dishonest and yet no more prepared by the day. And most of his supporters just forget about the idiocy, or say it doesn't really matter. Or worse, believe it doesn't really matter. It's amazing that he's just behind Clinton in the polls.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-02 19:00 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e5d3prFhl63U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #374196 |
On 2016-10-02, DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 10/1/2016 7:00 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>> On 10/1/2016 6:30 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>> On Saturday, October 1, 2016 at 3:51:35 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote: >>>>> http://www.cnn.com/search/?text=clinton+lied >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Why does the "Clinton News Network" run such articles? >>>> >>>> LOL! You've been hanging out with Feeb too long ;) >>> >>> huh? >>> >>> >>> >>>> How many articles are there showing CNN accusing Clinton of lying? >>> >>> >>> Irrelevant. >>> >>> The fact that they run any articles (or Ads by Google such as 'Clinton >>> Lied People Died') at all calling her honesty into question proves the >>> Triumvirate of Trump Twits (GC, Slimer, owl) is just babbling the usual >>> paranoid idiocy about "the mainstream media" and "CNN is a propaganda site". >>> >> >> You're voting for brain-fried pothead Gary Johnson. 'nuff said. > > > I had seriously considered it, but Nov 8 I'll write in 'No Confidence'. > > I seriously think Trump doesn't actually want the job - he acts more > deranged, more bullying, more childish, more dishonest and yet no more > prepared by the day. And most of his supporters just forget about the > idiocy, or say it doesn't really matter. Or worse, believe it doesn't > really matter. > > It's amazing that he's just behind Clinton in the polls. If you want to know how the corrupt Clinton machine operates read this book: Armageddon- By Dick Morris http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/30299031-armageddon
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-02 17:06 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <hqeqk6ces5dd$.dlg@tattoovampire.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #374236 |
Jim Polaski wrote: > Dick Morris 'Nuff said. He's a total POS.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-03 00:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e5dnueFmf1iU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #374271 |
On 2016-10-02, Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> wrote: > Jim Polaski wrote: > >> Dick Morris > > 'Nuff said. He's a total POS. Of course he is. He played a major part in building the Clinton empire and he is exactly the kind of people the Clinton's surround themselves with so he knows how they operate. Of course there is also the former secret service agent's book on the Clintons. That one is even better. https://www.amazon.com/Crisis-Character-Discloses-Firsthand-Experience/dp/1455568872 And of course there are books about Trump as well. The difference is Hillary and Bill were elected officials and Trump is a businessman. Our elected offcials are supposed to represent the public and raise the bar for integrity, honesty and so forth. All the Clintons have managed to do, and do very well is line their own pockets and lie their way into the hearts of the American public. I can understand why people would not want to vote for Trump. He is a loose cannon. No question about it. However, how can anyone lower their integrity enough to vote for Hillary? Most politicians are liars, but Hillary and Bill take that to an entirely new level.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web