Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #350884 > unrolled thread
| Started by | 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-19 21:54 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-04-26 19:54 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 443 — 25 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-04-19 21:54 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-19 15:02 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-19 22:13 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye brexit insanity <aslsfijasslkjfhwe22jads@oasdfasfs.org> - 2016-04-19 22:22 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-19 15:44 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-19 17:47 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-04-20 21:51 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-20 15:06 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-20 15:27 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-21 12:13 -0500
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-21 20:13 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-21 12:02 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-21 13:15 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-21 13:52 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-21 15:03 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 00:04 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-22 10:13 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 01:25 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-22 14:22 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-22 07:35 -0500
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 09:27 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-22 23:21 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 14:38 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-23 00:03 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 15:10 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-23 00:23 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 15:33 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-23 01:00 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 16:13 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-23 02:07 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 17:15 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-23 02:34 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 17:37 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-23 02:56 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 18:06 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-23 03:29 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 18:32 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-23 03:46 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 18:49 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-23 03:55 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 19:08 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-23 12:32 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-23 12:34 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-23 08:08 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-23 09:23 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-23 09:22 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-23 09:41 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-23 09:53 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-23 09:33 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-23 10:01 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-23 10:24 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-23 11:13 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-23 11:34 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-23 12:20 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-24 10:52 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye "Popkin" <Popkin@telus.net> - 2016-04-24 16:01 -0400
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-24 13:36 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-24 16:36 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-24 23:28 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 12:05 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-25 12:10 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 12:12 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-25 12:18 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 12:35 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-25 12:58 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 13:10 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-25 13:17 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 13:20 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 14:24 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 14:31 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-24 23:28 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-24 17:37 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-23 20:00 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-23 23:38 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-24 15:58 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-24 10:33 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-24 18:52 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-24 12:00 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-24 19:31 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-24 12:37 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-24 21:12 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 12:48 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-25 22:14 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 15:43 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-25 23:07 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 16:15 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-26 02:13 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 19:38 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-26 02:46 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 19:50 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 19:49 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-26 02:57 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 19:59 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-26 03:35 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 20:46 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-26 03:58 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 21:03 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-26 04:13 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 21:22 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-26 04:41 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 21:50 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-26 05:09 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 22:13 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-26 05:39 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 22:41 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-26 05:58 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 22:59 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-26 06:06 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-26 08:52 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-26 09:35 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-26 09:38 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-26 09:48 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-26 09:54 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-26 09:56 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-26 10:04 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-26 16:57 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-26 10:13 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-27 05:38 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-27 00:37 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-27 05:29 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-27 00:36 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-27 14:18 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-04-27 20:06 -0600
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-28 04:15 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-04-28 15:32 -0600
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-26 06:25 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 21:28 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-26 06:37 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 21:49 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-26 06:58 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 22:12 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-04-24 15:11 -0600
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 12:52 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-25 13:35 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-25 13:43 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-25 18:16 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-04-25 15:20 -0600
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 14:58 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-04-26 15:48 -0600
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 15:45 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-23 00:59 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 16:13 -0700
Plonk Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-22 19:57 -0400
Re: Plonk "Popkin" <Popkin@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 20:15 -0400
Re: Plonk Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-22 21:02 -0400
Keep talking Chris Ahlstrom Richard King <kingsley651@webby.org> - 2016-04-22 21:19 -0400
Re: Plonk "Popkin" <Popkin@telus.net> - 2016-04-24 17:46 -0400
Re: Plonk Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-24 23:30 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye "Popkin" <Popkin@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 19:32 -0400
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 09:26 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye "Popkin" <Popkin@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 19:30 -0400
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 16:32 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-27 04:55 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-27 00:35 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-27 04:01 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 05:24 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-22 06:06 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 07:04 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-22 08:04 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 08:30 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-22 09:56 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 10:28 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-22 12:44 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 13:44 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-22 14:19 -0700
Re: Marek Novotn is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 13:07 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Richard King <kingsley651@webby.org> - 2016-04-22 16:38 -0400
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 14:36 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Richard King <kingsley651@webby.org> - 2016-04-22 18:07 -0400
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 15:20 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-22 19:48 -0400
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Richard King <kingsley651@webby.org> - 2016-04-22 20:44 -0400
"Richand King", yet another nym of a long-time troll Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-22 21:00 -0400
Ask Chris Ahlstrom about.... Richard King <kingsley651@webby.org> - 2016-04-22 21:22 -0400
Re: "Richand King", yet another nym of a long-time troll chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-25 07:48 -0500
Re: "Richand King", yet another nym of a long-time troll William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-25 14:07 +0100
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 19:04 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-22 22:53 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 23:24 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-23 13:35 +0100
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-23 08:04 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-25 07:33 -0500
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-25 10:14 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-25 10:50 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-25 10:53 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-26 12:01 -0400
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-23 08:10 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-23 13:31 +0100
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-25 07:29 -0500
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-25 09:28 -0400
Marek Novotny appreciates the beauty of certain 1990's tech Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-22 19:45 -0400
Chris Ahlstrom Makes an ASS of himself again Richard King <kingsley651@webby.org> - 2016-04-22 21:11 -0400
Re: Marek Novotny appreciates the beauty of certain 1990's tech William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-23 13:30 +0100
Re: Marek Novotn is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-22 19:42 -0400
Chris Ahlstrom... Asshole of the year. Just ask Jayne Ahlstrom, his wife. Richard King <kingsley651@webby.org> - 2016-04-22 21:07 -0400
Re: Marek Novotn is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 18:29 -0700
Re: Marek Novotn is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-23 03:32 +0200
Re: Marek Novotn is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 19:40 -0700
Re: Marek Novotn is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-23 05:15 +0200
Re: Marek Novotn is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 20:31 -0700
Re: Marek Novotn is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-23 07:28 -0400
Re: Marek Novotn is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-23 13:43 +0200
Re: Marek Novotn is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-23 06:56 -0700
Re: Marek Novotn is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-23 14:27 -0400
Re: Marek Novotn is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-23 11:46 -0700
Re: Marek Novotn is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-24 17:49 -0700
Re: Marek Novotn is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-24 18:35 -0700
Re: Marek Novotn is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-23 14:26 -0400
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 09:42 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 10:26 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 12:45 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 14:08 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 14:24 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 14:54 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 15:10 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 15:16 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 16:01 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 16:18 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye "Popkin" <Popkin@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 19:59 -0400
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 17:04 -0700
A Big Appil beam in his eye Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-22 19:55 -0400
Re: A Big Appil beam in his eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 17:03 -0700
Re: A Big Appil beam in his eye Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-22 21:01 -0400
Re: A Big Appil beam in his eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 18:07 -0700
Chris Ahlstrom's Obsession With People He Claims to Have Filtered. Richard King <kingsley651@webby.org> - 2016-04-22 21:18 -0400
Re: A Big Appil beam in his eye JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-04-22 20:52 -0500
Re: A Big Appil beam in his eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 19:08 -0700
Re: A Big Appil beam in his eye "Popkin" <Popkin@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 20:11 -0400
Re: A Big Appil beam in his eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 17:15 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 12:54 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 14:10 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 14:24 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye "Popkin" <Popkin@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 20:02 -0400
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 17:03 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 13:10 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 14:25 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 14:26 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 14:46 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 15:03 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 15:14 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 15:17 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-21 22:16 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-04-21 20:23 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-21 12:53 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-04-21 23:07 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-21 19:44 -0400
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-21 23:58 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-22 10:10 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 01:24 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-04-22 10:58 +0100
The Appil of my eye Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-22 05:40 -0400
Re: The Appil of my eye Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-04-22 11:02 +0100
Re: The Appil of my eye Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-04-22 11:44 +0100
Re: The Appil of my eye frederick <fakeemail@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 00:31 +0100
Re: The Appil of my eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 09:25 -0700
Re: The Appil of my eye Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-22 15:09 -0400
Re: The Appil of my eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 12:31 -0700
Re: The Appil of my eye Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-22 22:57 +0200
Re: The Appil of my eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 13:58 -0700
Re: The Appil of my eye Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-22 19:53 -0400
Re: The Appil of my eye Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-04-25 11:11 +0100
Re: The Appil of my eye chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-25 07:18 -0500
Re: The Appil of my eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 19:40 -0700
Re: The Appil of my eye Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-22 19:52 -0400
Re: The Appil of my eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 17:02 -0700
Re: The Appil of my eye Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-22 21:03 -0400
Chris Ahlstrom a Pansy... Richard King <kingsley651@webby.org> - 2016-04-22 21:15 -0400
Re: The Appil of my eye JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-04-22 20:55 -0500
Re: The Appil of my eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 19:39 -0700
Re: The Appil of my eye "Popkin" <Popkin@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 19:34 -0400
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-22 02:51 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-04-23 10:04 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-23 06:46 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-23 09:26 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-23 09:50 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-19 19:40 -0400
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-04-20 21:10 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-21 12:07 -0400
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-04-20 16:42 +0100
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye "Popkin" <Popkin@telus.net> - 2016-04-21 12:16 -0400
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye frederick <fakeemail@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 21:42 +0100
A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye "Drummer"<drummer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 05:17 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-26 06:02 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-26 07:01 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-26 07:20 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-26 07:28 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-26 07:56 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-26 08:02 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-26 08:16 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-26 08:46 -0700
His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-26 20:41 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-26 14:21 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-26 14:24 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-26 18:27 -0400
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-26 15:37 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-26 18:55 -0400
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-26 16:48 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-26 16:55 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-26 17:09 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-26 20:36 -0400
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-27 10:11 +0100
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-27 00:07 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-26 17:11 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-27 00:18 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-26 17:29 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-27 00:38 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-26 17:47 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-27 01:03 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-26 18:10 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-27 01:26 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-26 18:37 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-27 02:48 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-27 06:25 -0400
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-27 07:49 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-27 14:54 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-27 08:11 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 07:59 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-27 16:33 +0100
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-27 08:52 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-27 17:35 +0100
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-27 15:57 -0400
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-27 13:10 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-27 10:07 -0500
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 10:19 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-27 20:59 +0200
Thing Digest chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-27 14:33 -0500
Re: Thing Digest vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-27 20:18 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-28 00:05 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-28 00:14 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-28 00:23 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-28 00:42 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-28 00:51 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-27 20:32 -0400
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-28 00:59 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 02:40 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-27 10:18 +0100
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-27 14:00 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-27 07:57 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-27 16:37 +0100
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-27 09:03 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-27 13:07 -0400
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-27 17:45 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-27 16:23 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 10:24 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 10:30 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-27 11:18 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 12:26 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 12:46 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-27 20:15 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 13:33 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-27 21:31 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 14:35 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 14:54 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 14:42 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-27 23:51 +0200
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 15:00 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-27 21:53 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 14:59 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 15:35 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-27 20:34 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 13:48 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-27 23:29 +0200
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 14:36 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-27 23:48 +0200
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 15:01 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 15:49 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-27 23:12 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 17:27 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-27 23:12 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-27 23:18 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 17:25 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-28 00:53 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 18:06 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-28 01:33 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 18:50 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-28 02:03 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 19:26 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-28 05:23 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 23:44 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-28 07:14 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-28 00:42 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-28 08:26 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-28 10:11 +0100
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-28 06:48 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-28 06:46 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-28 23:48 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-28 17:00 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-28 06:34 -0500
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-28 20:49 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-28 13:51 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 17:29 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-28 00:54 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 18:04 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-28 01:13 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 18:26 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-28 01:32 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 18:45 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-28 02:12 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 19:26 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 18:46 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-28 02:11 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 19:29 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-28 02:58 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 20:03 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-28 03:19 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 20:35 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 10:47 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 18:46 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-28 02:04 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 19:30 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-28 03:00 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 20:08 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-28 03:29 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 20:41 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 09:09 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 19:28 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-27 13:43 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-28 10:12 -0400
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-28 07:24 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 10:31 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 13:54 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-27 14:10 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-27 23:21 +0200
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-27 14:30 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-28 09:54 -0400
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 11:21 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-27 11:48 -0400
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-27 09:10 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-28 09:53 -0400
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-04-27 20:11 -0600
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-27 02:11 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-27 02:48 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-27 10:17 +0100
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-27 07:21 -0500
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-27 11:48 -0400
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-26 20:37 -0400
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-27 00:45 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-27 10:49 -0400
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-26 20:01 -0400
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-27 02:19 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-27 07:26 -0500
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-27 09:48 -0500
A Big anti-Linux K00k Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-26 19:54 -0400
Page 19 of 23 — ← Prev page 1 … 17 18 [19] 20 21 … 23 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 13:48 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <D34673A4.71213%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #352246 |
On 4/27/16, 1:34 PM, in article fhgvmncj893a.fki8@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >> On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 12:46:40 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: >> >>> He already said one: >>> >>> "your constant crap about productivity." >> >> You know, "Snit" may be using the creationist "argument from incredulity" > > Snit is an Atheist who nevertheless believes that Man is not part of > Nature. What Man is supposed to be a part of in his diseased mind > anybody's guess. The definition of natural is "not made or caused by humankind." Really... your attack is just an idiotic word play. But, hey, it is the best you have... and even on that is not even about Linux or computer technology. If that is the best you have you must realize how right I generally am. Thanks! -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 23:29 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <nfraop$njk$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #352251 |
The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser snotted: > On 4/27/16, 1:34 PM, in article fhgvmncj893a.fki8@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >>> On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 12:46:40 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> >>>> He already said one: >>>> >>>> "your constant crap about productivity." >>> >>> You know, "Snit" may be using the creationist "argument from >>> incredulity" >> >> Snit is an Atheist who nevertheless believes that Man is not part of >> Nature. What Man is supposed to be a part of in his diseased mind >> anybody's guess. > > The definition of natural is "not made or caused by humankind." Nope. That is just *one* definition existing in nature and not made or caused by people : coming from nature not having any extra substances or chemicals added : not containing anything artificial usual or expected having a specified character by nature (like you being a lying imbecile) These are just some of the definitions. There are much more
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 14:36 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <D3467ED0.71235%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #352258 |
On 4/27/16, 2:29 PM, in article nfraop$njk$1@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser snotted: > >> On 4/27/16, 1:34 PM, in article fhgvmncj893a.fki8@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >>>> On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 12:46:40 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>> >>>>> He already said one: >>>>> >>>>> "your constant crap about productivity." >>>> >>>> You know, "Snit" may be using the creationist "argument from >>>> incredulity" >>> >>> Snit is an Atheist who nevertheless believes that Man is not part of >>> Nature. What Man is supposed to be a part of in his diseased mind >>> anybody's guess. >> >> The definition of natural is "not made or caused by humankind." > > Nope. That is just *one* definition Right... but it is the relevant one when I speak of man not being a part of nature. Owl likes to play word games and use other definitions. > existing in nature and not made or caused by people : coming from nature > > not having any extra substances or chemicals added : not containing anything > artificial > > usual or expected > > having a specified character by nature (like you being a lying imbecile) > > > These are just some of the definitions. There are much more Sure. I was talking about the relevant one... and even then being brief. Glad I could help you understand that! -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 23:48 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <nfrbtd$njk$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #352267 |
The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser snotted: > On 4/27/16, 2:29 PM, in article nfraop$njk$1@dont-email.me, "Peter > Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > >> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser snotted: >> >>> On 4/27/16, 1:34 PM, in article fhgvmncj893a.fki8@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 12:46:40 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> He already said one: >>>>>> >>>>>> "your constant crap about productivity." >>>>> >>>>> You know, "Snit" may be using the creationist "argument from >>>>> incredulity" >>>> >>>> Snit is an Atheist who nevertheless believes that Man is not part of >>>> Nature. What Man is supposed to be a part of in his diseased mind >>>> anybody's guess. >>> >>> The definition of natural is "not made or caused by humankind." >> >> Nope. That is just *one* definition > > Right... but it is the relevant one You are in no position to define what is "relevant". And you will never be
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 15:01 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <D34684AF.71248%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #352273 |
On 4/27/16, 2:48 PM, in article nfrbtd$njk$4@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser snotted: > >> On 4/27/16, 2:29 PM, in article nfraop$njk$1@dont-email.me, "Peter >> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >> >>> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser snotted: >>> >>>> On 4/27/16, 1:34 PM, in article fhgvmncj893a.fki8@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 12:46:40 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> He already said one: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "your constant crap about productivity." >>>>>> >>>>>> You know, "Snit" may be using the creationist "argument from >>>>>> incredulity" >>>>> >>>>> Snit is an Atheist who nevertheless believes that Man is not part of >>>>> Nature. What Man is supposed to be a part of in his diseased mind >>>>> anybody's guess. >>>> >>>> The definition of natural is "not made or caused by humankind." >>> >>> Nope. That is just *one* definition >> >> Right... but it is the relevant one > > You are in no position to define what is "relevant". And you will never be LOL! So in your mind is not relevant what *I* mean when people discuss *my* views. Amazing. Really. You never cease to amaze me with how poor you understand basic things. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 15:49 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <849e0389-dcb1-49a9-9579-089d93de5f96@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #352279 |
On Wednesday, April 27, 2016 at 4:02:31 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 4/27/16, 2:48 PM, in article nfrbtd$njk$4@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann" > <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > > > The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser snotted: > > > >> On 4/27/16, 2:29 PM, in article nfraop$njk$1@dont-email.me, "Peter > >> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > >> > >>> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser snotted: > >>> > >>>> On 4/27/16, 1:34 PM, in article fhgvmncj893a.fki8@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: > >>>>>> On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 12:46:40 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> He already said one: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> "your constant crap about productivity." > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You know, "Snit" may be using the creationist "argument from > >>>>>> incredulity" > >>>>> > >>>>> Snit is an Atheist who nevertheless believes that Man is not part of > >>>>> Nature. What Man is supposed to be a part of in his diseased mind > >>>>> anybody's guess. > >>>> > >>>> The definition of natural is "not made or caused by humankind." > >>> > >>> Nope. That is just *one* definition > >> > >> Right... but it is the relevant one > > > > You are in no position to define what is "relevant". And you will never be > > LOL! So in your mind is not relevant what *I* mean when people discuss *my* > views. Being that you were unable to differentiate yourself from your arguments, this statement actually makes sense... and I love it ;) > Amazing. Really. You never cease to amaze me with how poor you understand > basic things. Said the guy who couldn't differentiate himself from his arguments.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 23:12 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <docva7F6n2dU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #352285 |
On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 15:49:19 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Wednesday, April 27, 2016 at 4:02:31 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 4/27/16, 2:48 PM, in article nfrbtd$njk$4@dont-email.me, "Peter >> Köhlmann" >> <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >> >> > The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser snotted: >> > >> >> On 4/27/16, 2:29 PM, in article nfraop$njk$1@dont-email.me, "Peter >> >> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >> >> >> >>> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser snotted: >> >>> >> >>>> On 4/27/16, 1:34 PM, in article fhgvmncj893a.fki8@rooftop.invalid, >> >>>> "owl" >> >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >> >>>>>> On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 12:46:40 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> He already said one: >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> "your constant crap about productivity." >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> You know, "Snit" may be using the creationist "argument from >> >>>>>> incredulity" >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Snit is an Atheist who nevertheless believes that Man is not part >> >>>>> of Nature. What Man is supposed to be a part of in his diseased >> >>>>> mind anybody's guess. >> >>>> >> >>>> The definition of natural is "not made or caused by humankind." >> >>> >> >>> Nope. That is just *one* definition >> >> >> >> Right... but it is the relevant one >> > >> > You are in no position to define what is "relevant". And you will >> > never be >> >> LOL! So in your mind is not relevant what *I* mean when people discuss >> *my* views. > > Being that you were unable to differentiate yourself from your > arguments, this statement actually makes sense... and I love it ;) > > >> Amazing. Really. You never cease to amaze me with how poor you >> understand basic things. > > Said the guy who couldn't differentiate himself from his arguments. I mean, this is basic Debate 101. In fact, it's not even that -- it's Remedial Debate 250. And it is perfectly acceptable to make references to arguments in the general case, since any discussion of specifics will go down the Snit Rabbit Hole of endless bickering and semantics. I actually did bring up a problem with the Mac desktop in another thread, though. That was when I was trying to use my headless Mac Mini to run Pages, and Pages wasn't displaying properly over the built-in vnc remote desktop service. The response (from him) was something along the lines of "I don't see what the problem is." So "denial is not just a river in Egypt". If he's not missing grey matter, there is still some kind of shadow in his thought processes -- right where it should be far more critical of the Mac, and where it should be dawning on him that his specious arguments aren't going to be tolerated. (At least by me.) -- -v "Desktops, workstations and servers are and Microsoft is doing very well. AS well as Linux." -"Slimer"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 17:27 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <D346A713.71275%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #352291 |
On 4/27/16, 4:12 PM, in article docva7F6n2dU5@mid.individual.net, "vallor" <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >>> LOL! So in your mind is not relevant what *I* mean when people discuss >>> *my* views. >> >> Being that you were unable to differentiate yourself from your >> arguments, this statement actually makes sense... and I love it ;) >> >> >>> Amazing. Really. You never cease to amaze me with how poor you >>> understand basic things. >> >> Said the guy who couldn't differentiate himself from his arguments. > > I mean, this is basic Debate 101. > > In fact, it's not even that -- it's Remedial Debate 250. > > And it is perfectly acceptable to make references to arguments in the > general case, since any discussion of specifics will go down the Snit > Rabbit Hole of endless bickering and semantics. > > I actually did bring up a problem with the Mac desktop in another thread, > though. That was when I was trying to use my headless Mac Mini to run > Pages, and Pages wasn't displaying properly over the built-in vnc remote > desktop service. The response (from him) was something along the lines > of "I don't see what the problem is." So "denial is not just a river in > Egypt". When the hell do you think I gave that response? Again: your whole "disagreement" with me is to make things up... which supports the idea you are GROSSLY insecure with your choices. > If he's not missing grey matter, there is still some kind of shadow in > his thought processes -- right where it should be far more critical of > the Mac, and where it should be dawning on him that his specious > arguments aren't going to be tolerated. (At least by me.) Gee: you lie about my views, I call you out on it and ask you to actually talk about technology and not me and even *advocate*, and you decide I am the one with the problem. Well, I suppose it is a problem thinking you will actually rise even part way to my level and stop lying about people. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 23:12 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <fhjgv03.adfji9@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #352267 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/27/16, 2:29 PM, in article nfraop$njk$1@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann" > <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > >> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser snotted: >> >>> On 4/27/16, 1:34 PM, in article fhgvmncj893a.fki8@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 12:46:40 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> He already said one: >>>>>> >>>>>> "your constant crap about productivity." >>>>> >>>>> You know, "Snit" may be using the creationist "argument from >>>>> incredulity" >>>> >>>> Snit is an Atheist who nevertheless believes that Man is not part of >>>> Nature. What Man is supposed to be a part of in his diseased mind >>>> anybody's guess. >>> >>> The definition of natural is "not made or caused by humankind." >> >> Nope. That is just *one* definition > > Right... but it is the relevant one when I speak of man not being a part of > nature. Owl likes to play word games and use other definitions. > "When I speak of man not being a part of nature." What the hell is that supposed to mean, you lunatic? Was man not created of the same supernova debris as everything else you see in the world around you?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 23:18 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <docvlnF6n2dU6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #352292 |
On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 23:12:09 +0000, owl wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 4/27/16, 2:29 PM, in article nfraop$njk$1@dont-email.me, "Peter >> Köhlmann" >> <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >> >>> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser snotted: >>> >>>> On 4/27/16, 1:34 PM, in article fhgvmncj893a.fki8@rooftop.invalid, >>>> "owl" >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 12:46:40 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> He already said one: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "your constant crap about productivity." >>>>>> >>>>>> You know, "Snit" may be using the creationist "argument from >>>>>> incredulity" >>>>> >>>>> Snit is an Atheist who nevertheless believes that Man is not part of >>>>> Nature. What Man is supposed to be a part of in his diseased mind >>>>> anybody's guess. >>>> >>>> The definition of natural is "not made or caused by humankind." >>> >>> Nope. That is just *one* definition >> >> Right... but it is the relevant one when I speak of man not being a >> part of nature. Owl likes to play word games and use other definitions. >> >> > "When I speak of man not being a part of nature." What the hell is that > supposed to mean, you lunatic? > > Was man not created of the same supernova debris as everything else you > see in the world around you? Um, point of order: The "creationist" part of that "argument from incredulity" was as simile, and not intended to start a talk.origins debate. It's the "argument from incredulity" that I'm talking about. Just as some creationists are incredulous about evolution being an actual process, so is Snit incredulous that people are more productive on Linux for some use cases. His frequent refrain is "prove it!". He's not happy unless he's trying to get people to jump through his hoops: apparently, he can't admit that people are more productive on Linux unless he is walked through a video demonstrating the fact. -- -v "Desktops, workstations and servers are and Microsoft is doing very well. AS well as Linux." -"Slimer"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 17:25 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <D346A68E.71273%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #352293 |
On 4/27/16, 4:18 PM, in article docvlnF6n2dU6@mid.individual.net, "vallor" <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >>> Right... but it is the relevant one when I speak of man not being a >>> part of nature. Owl likes to play word games and use other definitions. >>> >>> >> "When I speak of man not being a part of nature." What the hell is that >> supposed to mean, you lunatic? >> >> Was man not created of the same supernova debris as everything else you >> see in the world around you? > > Um, point of order: > > The "creationist" part of that "argument from incredulity" was as simile, > and not intended to start a talk.origins debate. > > It's the "argument from incredulity" that I'm talking about. Just as > some creationists are incredulous about evolution being an actual > process, so is Snit incredulous that people are more productive on Linux > for some use cases. To be clear: this is you making things up about my view. Why? Are you really THAT insecure with your choice of OS? I openly admit my preferred desktop OS has pros and cons. What is it about you and your herd which makes you feel the need to lie to "protect" your choice? > His frequent refrain is "prove it!". He's not happy unless he's trying > to get people to jump through his hoops: apparently, he can't admit that > people are more productive on Linux unless he is walked through a video > demonstrating the fact. Gee, I want you to actually pause your lying about people long enough to, you know, advocate. Show or even explain where you think your choice leads to greater productivity, efficiency, and error-reduction. How evil of me! -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-28 00:53 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <dod58uF6n2dU10@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #352302 |
On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 17:25:34 -0700, Snit wrote: >> Um, point of order: >> >> The "creationist" part of that "argument from incredulity" was as >> simile, >> and not intended to start a talk.origins debate. >> >> It's the "argument from incredulity" that I'm talking about. Just as >> some creationists are incredulous about evolution being an actual >> process, so is Snit incredulous that people are more productive on >> Linux for some use cases. > > To be clear: this is you making things up about my view. Why? Are you > really THAT insecure with your choice of OS? I openly admit my preferred > desktop OS has pros and cons. What is it about you and your herd which > makes you feel the need to lie to "protect" your choice? His own words, folks -- once again, debunking his own manifesto. I want you to note carefully this "you and your herd" language. >> His frequent refrain is "prove it!". He's not happy unless he's trying >> to get people to jump through his hoops: apparently, he can't admit >> that people are more productive on Linux unless he is walked through a >> video demonstrating the fact. > > Gee, I want you to actually pause your lying There he goes again -- he'll _never_ admit it. It's like a shadow in his thought processes, an area of thought-blocking, if you will. This actually happens to people sucked into destructive cults. Have we identified a member of the destructive Cult of Mac? > or even explain No. You aren't happy with explanations, you just repeat your cult mantra, then demand a video. I don't do hoops. -- -v "Desktops, workstations and servers are and Microsoft is doing very well. AS well as Linux." -"Slimer"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 18:06 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <D346B02D.71291%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #352309 |
On 4/27/16, 5:53 PM, in article dod58uF6n2dU10@mid.individual.net, "vallor" <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: > On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 17:25:34 -0700, Snit wrote: > > >>> Um, point of order: >>> >>> The "creationist" part of that "argument from incredulity" was as simile, >>> and not intended to start a talk.origins debate. >>> >>> It's the "argument from incredulity" that I'm talking about. Just as some >>> creationists are incredulous about evolution being an actual process, so is >>> Snit incredulous that people are more productive on Linux for some use >>> cases. >>> >> To be clear: this is you making things up about my view. Why? Are you really >> THAT insecure with your choice of OS? I openly admit my preferred desktop OS >> has pros and cons. What is it about you and your herd which makes you feel >> the need to lie to "protect" your choice? >> > His own words, folks -- once again, debunking his own manifesto. > > I want you to note carefully this "you and your herd" language. > > >>> His frequent refrain is "prove it!". He's not happy unless he's trying >>> to get people to jump through his hoops: apparently, he can't admit >>> that people are more productive on Linux unless he is walked through a >>> video demonstrating the fact. >> >> Gee, I want you to actually pause your lying > > There he goes again -- he'll _never_ admit it. It's like a shadow in his > thought processes, an area of thought-blocking, if you will. > > This actually happens to people sucked into destructive cults. Have we > identified a member of the destructive Cult of Mac? > >> or even explain > > No. You aren't happy with explanations, you just repeat your cult > mantra, then demand a video. > > I don't do hoops. And again you refuse to speak of technology, your lies about my views, and you whine about how you are a part of the "advocates" AKA the COLA herd. Well, if you want to pull yourself out of it and actually talk about technology I would welcome that! -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-28 01:33 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <dod7k1F6n2dU12@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #352313 |
On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 18:06:37 -0700, Snit wrote: > On 4/27/16, 5:53 PM, in article dod58uF6n2dU10@mid.individual.net, > "vallor" > <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: > >> On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 17:25:34 -0700, Snit wrote: >> >> >>>> Um, point of order: >>>> >>>> The "creationist" part of that "argument from incredulity" was as >>>> simile, and not intended to start a talk.origins debate. >>>> >>>> It's the "argument from incredulity" that I'm talking about. Just as >>>> some creationists are incredulous about evolution being an actual >>>> process, so is Snit incredulous that people are more productive on >>>> Linux for some use cases. >>>> >>> To be clear: this is you making things up about my view. Why? Are you >>> really THAT insecure with your choice of OS? I openly admit my >>> preferred desktop OS has pros and cons. What is it about you and your >>> herd which makes you feel the need to lie to "protect" your choice? >>> >> His own words, folks -- once again, debunking his own manifesto. >> >> I want you to note carefully this "you and your herd" language. >> >> >>>> His frequent refrain is "prove it!". He's not happy unless he's >>>> trying to get people to jump through his hoops: apparently, he can't >>>> admit that people are more productive on Linux unless he is walked >>>> through a video demonstrating the fact. >>> >>> Gee, I want you to actually pause your lying >> >> There he goes again -- he'll _never_ admit it. It's like a shadow in >> his thought processes, an area of thought-blocking, if you will. >> >> This actually happens to people sucked into destructive cults. Have we >> identified a member of the destructive Cult of Mac? >> >>> or even explain >> >> No. You aren't happy with explanations, you just repeat your cult >> mantra, then demand a video. >> >> I don't do hoops. > > And again you refuse to speak of technology, your lies about my views, > and you whine about how you are a part of the "advocates" AKA the COLA > herd. Well, if you want to pull yourself out of it and actually talk > about technology I would welcome that! I haven't whined about anything. As I've said before, it wouldn't help to discuss the technology of Linux _with_ _you_, because that way inevitably leads to your own destructive cult thinking, making any rational communication impossible. I discuss technology with people all over, all the time. But I've learned better than to discuss it _with_ _you_, because I've seen what happens. Already, this is apparent -- above, you weren't interested in any meaning in what I had to say, only in how it could be twisted to your cultish ends. The only value in that is for you to feel better about yourself and your cult -- not in furthering any real communication. You project your insecurities onto others, all the while being deathly afraid of not being taken seriously. But you lost that battle long ago. Long, long ago. BTW: If you ever need a deprogramming intervention, I'm sure one can be arranged. -- -v "Desktops, workstations and servers are and Microsoft is doing very well. AS well as Linux." -"Slimer"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 18:50 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <D346BA69.712A4%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #352318 |
On 4/27/16, 6:33 PM, in article dod7k1F6n2dU12@mid.individual.net, "vallor" <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: ... >>> His own words, folks -- once again, debunking his own manifesto. >>> >>> I want you to note carefully this "you and your herd" language. ... >> And again you refuse to speak of technology, your lies about my views, >> and you whine about how you are a part of the "advocates" AKA the COLA >> herd. Well, if you want to pull yourself out of it and actually talk >> about technology I would welcome that! > > I haven't whined about anything. Look above at your whining about my use of the term "herd." Clearly it bothers you. As I have said before, if you do not like it offer an alternate but HONEST term for the false "advocates" of COLA who act in such a cult-like way. > As I've said before, it wouldn't help to discuss the technology of Linux > _with_ _you_, because that way inevitably leads to your own destructive > cult thinking, making any rational communication impossible. > > I discuss technology with people all over, all the time. But I've > learned better than to discuss it _with_ _you_, because I've seen what > happens. > > Already, this is apparent -- above, you weren't interested in any meaning > in what I had to say, only in how it could be twisted to your cultish > ends. The only value in that is for you to feel better about yourself > and your cult -- not in furthering any real communication. > > You project your insecurities onto others, all the while being deathly > afraid of not being taken seriously. But you lost that battle long ago. > > Long, long ago. > > BTW: If you ever need a deprogramming intervention, I'm sure one can be > arranged. Stop whining and babbling about your fantasies of me. Please. Instead grow up a little and talk about technology! You blame ME for your lack of doing so... whining on and on and on. Boring! -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-28 02:03 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <dod9b3F9gllU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #352325 |
On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 18:50:17 -0700, Snit wrote: > On 4/27/16, 6:33 PM, in article dod7k1F6n2dU12@mid.individual.net, > "vallor" <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: > > ... >>>> His own words, folks -- once again, debunking his own manifesto. >>>> >>>> I want you to note carefully this "you and your herd" language. > ... >>> And again you refuse to speak of technology, your lies about my views, >>> and you whine about how you are a part of the "advocates" AKA the COLA >>> herd. Well, if you want to pull yourself out of it and actually talk >>> about technology I would welcome that! >> >> I haven't whined about anything. > > Look above at your whining about my use of the term "herd." Clearly it > bothers you. As I have said before, if you do not like it offer an > alternate but HONEST term for the false "advocates" of COLA who act in > such a cult-like way. Ah, so I've been talking about your cult-of-macintosh thinking, and now you want to try to reverse that. Won't work. > >> As I've said before, it wouldn't help to discuss the technology of >> Linux _with_ _you_, because that way inevitably leads to your own >> destructive cult thinking, making any rational communication >> impossible. <crickets -- but demonstrated above> >> >> I discuss technology with people all over, all the time. But I've >> learned better than to discuss it _with_ _you_, because I've seen what >> happens. <crickets> >> >> Already, this is apparent -- above, you weren't interested in any >> meaning in what I had to say, only in how it could be twisted to your >> cultish ends. The only value in that is for you to feel better about >> yourself and your cult -- not in furthering any real communication. <crickets> >> >> You project your insecurities onto others, all the while being deathly >> afraid of not being taken seriously. But you lost that battle long >> ago. >> >> Long, long ago. <lots and lots of crickets> >> >> BTW: If you ever need a deprogramming intervention, I'm sure one can be >> arranged. > > Stop whining and babbling about your fantasies of me. Please. Instead > grow up a little and talk about technology! You blame ME for your lack > of doing so... whining on and on and on. Boring! That's when you know the guy realizes he's lost the argument -- he freakes out, then declares the conversation "boring". Are we done here? Or do I have to get tough? :P -- -v "Desktops, workstations and servers are and Microsoft is doing very well. AS well as Linux." -"Slimer"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 19:26 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <D346C2EC.712BC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #352326 |
On 4/27/16, 7:03 PM, in article dod9b3F9gllU2@mid.individual.net, "vallor" <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: > On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 18:50:17 -0700, Snit wrote: > >> On 4/27/16, 6:33 PM, in article dod7k1F6n2dU12@mid.individual.net, >> "vallor" <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >> >> ... >>>>> His own words, folks -- once again, debunking his own manifesto. >>>>> >>>>> I want you to note carefully this "you and your herd" language. >> ... >>>> And again you refuse to speak of technology, your lies about my views, >>>> and you whine about how you are a part of the "advocates" AKA the COLA >>>> herd. Well, if you want to pull yourself out of it and actually talk >>>> about technology I would welcome that! >>> >>> I haven't whined about anything. >> >> Look above at your whining about my use of the term "herd." Clearly it >> bothers you. As I have said before, if you do not like it offer an >> alternate but HONEST term for the false "advocates" of COLA who act in >> such a cult-like way. > > Ah, so I've been talking about your cult-of-macintosh thinking, and now > you want to try to reverse that. > > Won't work. OK, you want to talk about it. At least it is tangentially related to technology so I will bite. By all means list the cult-like claims I push or even will not renounce. I am open to it. Certainly better than your boring whining! But let us also look at the cult-like thinking of you and your herd. Here is a list I have shared before. If I remember correctly you denounced a couple but accepted the vast majority of these cult-like views. I assure you I am happy to speak of whatever cult-like views you say I might have... will you do the same here? * MS has secret deals to stop OEMs from selling Linux pre-installed. * Apple claims to have invented the "rounded rectangle". * Desktop Linux serves people in general as well as the competition. * Apple never innovated anything. * Samsung has not been copying Apple's products. * Apple and MS are struggling / dying companies. * MS has a monopoly on the desktop. * Snit is anti-choice (as are others they accuse). * Snit is anti-Linux (as are others they accuse). * Snit uses sock puppets (as do others they accuse). * Stallman's views on kids and sexuality are fine. * Stallman's doubletalk about "Freedom" is coherent and makes sense. * MS is evil to have blocked Linux years ago, but Google is fine to block Aliyun OS *now*. * When an organization moves to a Linux based product it is always a good move. When they move away from one it is always a bad move. * Even though some herd members post membership lists of who is in the herd, all herd members deny the herd even exists. * If you recognize there are downsides to massive amounts of distros, then you must want to be told how to use it and believe everyone feels the same way. * You deny that Android has joined Windows as an OS where user are at a significant risk of getting malware. Often tied to a baseless claim that iOS and OS X users are at equal risk to Android users. That is 17 unsupported / irrational beliefs I have seen which are shared by most of the false "advocates" of COLA. I bet you will accept most... at least 12, without denouncing them. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-28 05:23 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <dodl2iFbe42U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #352333 |
On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 19:26:36 -0700, Snit wrote: > On 4/27/16, 7:03 PM, in article dod9b3F9gllU2@mid.individual.net, > "vallor" <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: > >> On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 18:50:17 -0700, Snit wrote: >> >>> On 4/27/16, 6:33 PM, in article dod7k1F6n2dU12@mid.individual.net, >>> "vallor" <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >>> >>> ... >>>>>> His own words, folks -- once again, debunking his own manifesto. >>>>>> >>>>>> I want you to note carefully this "you and your herd" language. >>> ... >>>>> And again you refuse to speak of technology, your lies about my >>>>> views, >>>>> and you whine about how you are a part of the "advocates" AKA the >>>>> COLA herd. Well, if you want to pull yourself out of it and actually >>>>> talk about technology I would welcome that! >>>> >>>> I haven't whined about anything. >>> >>> Look above at your whining about my use of the term "herd." Clearly it >>> bothers you. As I have said before, if you do not like it offer an >>> alternate but HONEST term for the false "advocates" of COLA who act in >>> such a cult-like way. >> >> Ah, so I've been talking about your cult-of-macintosh thinking, and now >> you want to try to reverse that. >> >> Won't work. > > OK, you want to talk about it. Are you hard of reading? I said it WON'T WORK. > At least it is tangentially related to > technology so I will bite. By all means list the cult-like claims I push > or even will not renounce. I am open to it. Certainly better than your > boring whining! > > But let us also look at the cult-like thinking of you and your herd. http://infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/logic.html#complexq > Here is a list I have shared before. If I remember correctly you > denounced a couple but accepted the vast majority of these cult-like > views. Then I'm sure someone, perhaps you, will post a MID with my previous answers, which I can then revise to match my current thinking, if it has changed. > I assure you I am happy to speak of whatever cult-like views you > say I might have... will you do the same here? > > * MS has secret deals to stop OEMs from selling Linux pre-installed. Please be more specific. http://infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/logic.html#manyq > > * Apple claims to have invented the "rounded rectangle". I've never claimed any knowledge of this. You must have me confused with someone else. > > * Desktop Linux serves people in general as well as the competition. Please be more specific. http://infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/logic.html#manyq > * Apple never innovated anything. Again, you must have me confused with someone else. > * Samsung has not been copying Apple's products. Please be more specific. http://infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/logic.html#manyq > * Apple and MS are struggling / dying companies. This is getting old. Please be more specific. http://infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/logic.html#manyq > * MS has a monopoly on the desktop. For varying values on the meaning of "monopoly", yes. If you mean the colloquial term where someone exercising monopoly power in a market -- yes, Microsoft has done that, and this has even been adjudicated as such. > > * Snit is anti-choice (as are others they accuse). Except your (ambiguious) statement earlier, which you are apparently denying: > * Desktop Linux serves people in general as well as the competition. So you're "pro-choice", as long as it's not Linux? Whatever, guy. > > * Snit is anti-Linux (as are others they accuse). Yes, you are. > > * Snit uses sock puppets (as do others they accuse). You have in the past. I know nothing of the present moment. > > * Stallman's views on kids and sexuality are fine. I have never made any comments about "Stallman's views on kids". This is your attempt at some kind of "guilt by association." ==| A less blatant argumentum ad hominem is to reject a proposition based on the fact that it was also asserted by some other easily criticized person. For example: "Therefore we should close down the church? Hitler and Stalin would have agreed with you." |== http://infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/logic.html#hominem > > * Stallman's doubletalk about "Freedom" is coherent and makes sense. Except, now you're being ambiguous again. http://infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/logic.html#amphiboly http://infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/logic.html#complexq > > * MS is evil to have blocked Linux years ago, but Google is fine to > block Aliyun OS *now*. I've never said anything even remotely like this. > > * When an organization moves to a Linux based product it is always a > good move. When they move away from one it is always a bad move. You're just making these up as you go along. > > * Even though some herd members post membership lists of who is in > the herd, all herd members deny the herd even exists. Your attempted reversal of your status as a member of a destructive cult is noted, but holds no water. > * If you recognize there are downsides to massive amounts of distros, > then you must want to be told how to use it and believe everyone feels > the same way. I have no idea what this is supposed to mean. > > * You deny that Android has joined Windows as an OS where user > are at a significant risk of getting malware. Often tied to a baseless > claim that iOS and OS X users are at equal risk to Android users. And when have I done this? Please be specific. > > That is 17 unsupported / irrational beliefs I have seen which are shared > by most of the false "advocates" of COLA. ...according to a stereotype you hold in your mind. > I bet you will accept most... > at least 12, without denouncing them. You have just threw a pile of crazy spaghetti up against the wall, then demanded I "denounce" it. Most of it is ambiguous stereotypical hogwash. And as I said: I don't do hoops. Do you want to be known as a person who holds stereotypes about geeks? Finally, I'm curious about something: who do you think you're fooling? -- -v "Desktops, workstations and servers are and Microsoft is doing very well. AS well as Linux." -"Slimer"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 23:44 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <D346FF67.71322%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #352361 |
On 4/27/16, 10:23 PM, in article dodl2iFbe42U1@mid.individual.net, "vallor" <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: ... >> I assure you I am happy to speak of whatever cult-like views you >> say I might have... will you do the same here? >> >> * MS has secret deals to stop OEMs from selling Linux pre-installed. > > Please be more specific. Not denounced. ... >> * Apple claims to have invented the "rounded rectangle". > > I've never claimed any knowledge of this. You must have me confused with > someone else. Hmmm, I suppose that is a denouncement. That is one. ... >> * Desktop Linux serves people in general as well as the competition. > > Please be more specific. Not denounced. ... >> * Apple never innovated anything. > > Again, you must have me confused with someone else. Seems a denouncement, though not clear. Still, call it two. >> * Samsung has not been copying Apple's products. > > Please be more specific. Not denounced. ... >> * Apple and MS are struggling / dying companies. > > This is getting old. > > Please be more specific. Not denounced. ... >> * MS has a monopoly on the desktop. > > For varying values on the meaning of "monopoly", yes. > > If you mean the colloquial term where someone exercising monopoly power > in a market -- yes, Microsoft has done that, and this has even been > adjudicated as such. Not denounced. ... >> * Snit is anti-choice (as are others they accuse). > > Except your (ambiguious) statement earlier, which you are apparently > denying: Not denounced. ... >> * Desktop Linux serves people in general as well as the competition. > > So you're "pro-choice", as long as it's not Linux? Whatever, guy. Not denounced. ... >> * Snit is anti-Linux (as are others they accuse). > > Yes, you are. Not denounced. ... >> * Snit uses sock puppets (as do others they accuse). > > You have in the past. I know nothing of the present moment. Not denounced. ... >> * Stallman's views on kids and sexuality are fine. > > I have never made any comments about "Stallman's views on kids". This is > your attempt at some kind of "guilt by association." > > ==| A less blatant argumentum ad hominem is to reject a proposition based > on the fact that it was also asserted by some other easily criticized > person. For example: > > "Therefore we should close down the church? Hitler and Stalin would have > agreed with you." |== Not denounced. ... >> * Stallman's doubletalk about "Freedom" is coherent and makes sense. > > Except, now you're being ambiguous again. Not denounced. ... >> * MS is evil to have blocked Linux years ago, but Google is fine to >> block Aliyun OS *now*. > > I've never said anything even remotely like this. I suppose we can call that a denouncement, though still vague: three. >> * When an organization moves to a Linux based product it is always a >> good move. When they move away from one it is always a bad move. > > You're just making these up as you go along. Not denounced. ... >> * Even though some herd members post membership lists of who is in >> the herd, all herd members deny the herd even exists. > > Your attempted reversal of your status as a member of a destructive cult > is noted, but holds no water. Not denounced. ... >> * If you recognize there are downsides to massive amounts of distros, >> then you must want to be told how to use it and believe everyone feels >> the same way. > > I have no idea what this is supposed to mean. Not denounced. ... >> * You deny that Android has joined Windows as an OS where user >> are at a significant risk of getting malware. Often tied to a baseless >> claim that iOS and OS X users are at equal risk to Android users. > > And when have I done this? Please be specific. Not denounced. ... >> That is 17 unsupported / irrational beliefs I have seen which are shared >> by most of the false "advocates" of COLA. > > ...according to a stereotype you hold in your mind. You had three vague denouncements. That leaves you with refusal to denounce, or even acceptance, of 14 of the 17 irrational / unsupported claims. While the test is far from perfect, yes, you very much show cult-like tendencies and show you are at least likely a part of the herd. And you show NO evidence of my being any part of any cult-like group or herd. NONE. And there we have it. ... -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-28 07:14 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <dodrioFbe42U9@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #352368 |
On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 23:44:39 -0700, Snit wrote: > On 4/27/16, 10:23 PM, in article dodl2iFbe42U1@mid.individual.net, > "vallor" <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: > > ... >>> I assure you I am happy to speak of whatever cult-like views you say I >>> might have... will you do the same here? >>> >>> * MS has secret deals to stop OEMs from selling Linux pre-installed. >> >> Please be more specific. > > Not denounced. > ... Failure to apprehend, and cowardly snipping of, logical fallacies noted. It is your blind spot. > >>> * Apple claims to have invented the "rounded rectangle". >> >> I've never claimed any knowledge of this. You must have me confused >> with someone else. > > Hmmm, I suppose that is a denouncement. That is one. > ... Failure to apprehend, and cowardly snipping of, logical fallacies noted. It is your blind spot. > >>> * Desktop Linux serves people in general as well as the competition. >> >> Please be more specific. > > Not denounced. > ... Failure to apprehend, and cowardly snipping of, logical fallacies noted. It is, yet again, your blind spot. > >>> * Apple never innovated anything. >> >> Again, you must have me confused with someone else. > > Seems a denouncement, though not clear. Still, call it two. Failure to apprehend, and cowardly snipping of, logical fallacies noted. It is still your blind spot. > >>> * Samsung has not been copying Apple's products. >> >> Please be more specific. > > Not denounced. > ... Failure to apprehend, and cowardly snipping of, logical fallacies noted. I think you've about pegged the coward meter at this point. > >>> * Apple and MS are struggling / dying companies. >> >> This is getting old. >> >> Please be more specific. > > Not denounced. > ... Failure to apprehend, and cowardly snipping of, logical fallacies noted. Logic and reason aren't your strong suits, are they? Not to mention honesty. > >>> * MS has a monopoly on the desktop. >> >> For varying values on the meaning of "monopoly", yes. >> >> If you mean the colloquial term where someone exercising monopoly power >> in a market -- yes, Microsoft has done that, and this has even been >> adjudicated as such. > > Not denounced. > ... Applying mechanistic rules to nuanced situations. So not only are you cowardly snecking the logical fallacies you have been accused of, but you are now barely passing a Turing test. > >>> * Snit is anti-choice (as are others they accuse). >> >> Except your (ambiguious) statement earlier, which you are apparently >> denying: > > Not denounced. Applying mechanistic rules to nuanced situations. So not only are you cowardly snecking the logical fallacies you have been accused of, but you are now barely passing a Turing test. > ... > >>> * Desktop Linux serves people in general as well as the competition. >> >> So you're "pro-choice", as long as it's not Linux? Whatever, guy. > > Not denounced. Applying mechanistic rules to nuanced situations. So not only are you cowardly snecking the logical fallacies you have been accused of, but you are now barely passing a Turing test. >>> * Snit is anti-Linux (as are others they accuse). >> >> Yes, you are. > > Not denounced. So? Given the evidence, I would be lying if I "denounced" your stupid missive. > ... > >>> * Snit uses sock puppets (as do others they accuse). >> >> You have in the past. I know nothing of the present moment. > > Not denounced. > ... Failure to apprehend, and cowardly snipping of, logical fallacies noted. Logic and reason aren't your strong suits, are they? Not to mention honesty. > >>> * Stallman's views on kids and sexuality are fine. >> >> I have never made any comments about "Stallman's views on kids". This >> is your attempt at some kind of "guilt by association." >> >> ==| A less blatant argumentum ad hominem is to reject a proposition >> based on the fact that it was also asserted by some other easily >> criticized person. For example: >> >> "Therefore we should close down the church? Hitler and Stalin would >> have agreed with you." |== > > Not denounced. Failure to apprehend, and cowardly snipping of, logical fallacies noted. Logic and reason aren't your strong suits, are they? Not to mention honesty. I think your "coward meter" has just about broken at this point. > ... > >>> * Stallman's doubletalk about "Freedom" is coherent and makes sense. >> >> Except, now you're being ambiguous again. > > Not denounced. Over and over again, "Snit" has made vague statements and demands a yes/ no answer. As can be seen from his cowardly snecking of references to his logical fallacies, he never had any intention to communicate, only to massage his own narcissistic ego. > ... > >>> * MS is evil to have blocked Linux years ago, but Google is fine to >>> block Aliyun OS *now*. >> >> I've never said anything even remotely like this. > > I suppose we can call that a denouncement, though still vague: three. Failure to apprehend, and cowardly snipping of, logical fallacies noted. Logic and reason aren't your strong suits, are they? Not to mention honesty. > >>> * When an organization moves to a Linux based product it is always a >>> good move. When they move away from one it is always a bad move. >> >> You're just making these up as you go along. > > Not denounced. Failure to apprehend, and cowardly snipping of, logical fallacies noted. Logic and reason aren't your strong suits, are they? Not to mention honesty. >>> * Even though some herd members post membership lists of who is in >>> the herd, all herd members deny the herd even exists. >> >> Your attempted reversal of your status as a member of a destructive >> cult is noted, but holds no water. > > Not denounced. There was nothing to "denounce". Failure to apprehend, and cowardly snipping of, logical fallacies noted. Logic and reason aren't your strong suits, are they? Not to mention honesty. >>> * If you recognize there are downsides to massive amounts of distros, >>> then you must want to be told how to use it and believe everyone >>> feels the same way. >> >> I have no idea what this is supposed to mean. > > Not denounced. Additionally, the narcissistic Snit wants people to "denounce" his own unclear language. After all, if one doesn't understand the malformed English of his secret thoughts, that should be license to mark one down in his ludicrous display of condescension. > >>> * You deny that Android has joined Windows as an OS where user >>> are at a significant risk of getting malware. Often tied to a >>> baseless claim that iOS and OS X users are at equal risk to Android >>> users. >> >> And when have I done this? Please be specific. > > Not denounced. Failure to apprehend, and cowardly snipping of, logical fallacies noted. Logic and reason aren't your strong suits, are they? Not to mention honesty. In fact, at this point the "coward meters" circuits have scrammed, and there is no chance of "Snit" ever recovering any semblance of respectability. This has been his Waterloo. > ... > >>> That is 17 unsupported / irrational beliefs I have seen which are >>> shared by most of the false "advocates" of COLA. >> >> ...according to a stereotype you hold in your mind. More cowardly snecking. > And you show NO evidence of my being any part of any cult-like group or > herd. NONE. I didn't have to -- you just did. > And there we have it. Yes, we have established, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that "Snit" is part of a destructive cult that holds to moronic stereotypes of the "other". And in failing to confront the logical fallacies for which he is massively guilty, he has established his cowardice for all to see. The reader should be asking themselves this: who does this "Snit" think he's fooling? -- -v "Desktops, workstations and servers are and Microsoft is doing very well. AS well as Linux." -"Slimer"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 19 of 23 — ← Prev page 1 … 17 18 [19] 20 21 … 23 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web