Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #350884 > unrolled thread
| Started by | 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-19 21:54 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-04-26 19:54 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 443 — 25 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-04-19 21:54 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-19 15:02 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-19 22:13 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye brexit insanity <aslsfijasslkjfhwe22jads@oasdfasfs.org> - 2016-04-19 22:22 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-19 15:44 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-19 17:47 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-04-20 21:51 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-20 15:06 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-20 15:27 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-21 12:13 -0500
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-21 20:13 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-21 12:02 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-21 13:15 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-21 13:52 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-21 15:03 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 00:04 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-22 10:13 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 01:25 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-22 14:22 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-22 07:35 -0500
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 09:27 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-22 23:21 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 14:38 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-23 00:03 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 15:10 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-23 00:23 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 15:33 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-23 01:00 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 16:13 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-23 02:07 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 17:15 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-23 02:34 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 17:37 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-23 02:56 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 18:06 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-23 03:29 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 18:32 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-23 03:46 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 18:49 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-23 03:55 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 19:08 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-23 12:32 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-23 12:34 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-23 08:08 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-23 09:23 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-23 09:22 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-23 09:41 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-23 09:53 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-23 09:33 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-23 10:01 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-23 10:24 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-23 11:13 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-23 11:34 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-23 12:20 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-24 10:52 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye "Popkin" <Popkin@telus.net> - 2016-04-24 16:01 -0400
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-24 13:36 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-24 16:36 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-24 23:28 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 12:05 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-25 12:10 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 12:12 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-25 12:18 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 12:35 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-25 12:58 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 13:10 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-25 13:17 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 13:20 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 14:24 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 14:31 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-24 23:28 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-24 17:37 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-23 20:00 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-23 23:38 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-24 15:58 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-24 10:33 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-24 18:52 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-24 12:00 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-24 19:31 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-24 12:37 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-24 21:12 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 12:48 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-25 22:14 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 15:43 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-25 23:07 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 16:15 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-26 02:13 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 19:38 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-26 02:46 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 19:50 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 19:49 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-26 02:57 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 19:59 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-26 03:35 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 20:46 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-26 03:58 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 21:03 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-26 04:13 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 21:22 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-26 04:41 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 21:50 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-26 05:09 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 22:13 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-26 05:39 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 22:41 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-26 05:58 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 22:59 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-26 06:06 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-26 08:52 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-26 09:35 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-26 09:38 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-26 09:48 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-26 09:54 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-26 09:56 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-26 10:04 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-26 16:57 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-26 10:13 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-27 05:38 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-27 00:37 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-27 05:29 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-27 00:36 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-27 14:18 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-04-27 20:06 -0600
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-28 04:15 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-04-28 15:32 -0600
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-26 06:25 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 21:28 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-26 06:37 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 21:49 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-26 06:58 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 22:12 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-04-24 15:11 -0600
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 12:52 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-25 13:35 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-25 13:43 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-25 18:16 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-04-25 15:20 -0600
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 14:58 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-04-26 15:48 -0600
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 15:45 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-23 00:59 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 16:13 -0700
Plonk Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-22 19:57 -0400
Re: Plonk "Popkin" <Popkin@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 20:15 -0400
Re: Plonk Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-22 21:02 -0400
Keep talking Chris Ahlstrom Richard King <kingsley651@webby.org> - 2016-04-22 21:19 -0400
Re: Plonk "Popkin" <Popkin@telus.net> - 2016-04-24 17:46 -0400
Re: Plonk Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-24 23:30 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye "Popkin" <Popkin@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 19:32 -0400
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 09:26 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye "Popkin" <Popkin@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 19:30 -0400
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 16:32 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-27 04:55 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-27 00:35 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-27 04:01 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 05:24 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-22 06:06 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 07:04 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-22 08:04 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 08:30 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-22 09:56 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 10:28 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-22 12:44 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 13:44 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-22 14:19 -0700
Re: Marek Novotn is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 13:07 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Richard King <kingsley651@webby.org> - 2016-04-22 16:38 -0400
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 14:36 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Richard King <kingsley651@webby.org> - 2016-04-22 18:07 -0400
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 15:20 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-22 19:48 -0400
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Richard King <kingsley651@webby.org> - 2016-04-22 20:44 -0400
"Richand King", yet another nym of a long-time troll Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-22 21:00 -0400
Ask Chris Ahlstrom about.... Richard King <kingsley651@webby.org> - 2016-04-22 21:22 -0400
Re: "Richand King", yet another nym of a long-time troll chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-25 07:48 -0500
Re: "Richand King", yet another nym of a long-time troll William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-25 14:07 +0100
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 19:04 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-22 22:53 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 23:24 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-23 13:35 +0100
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-23 08:04 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-25 07:33 -0500
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-25 10:14 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-25 10:50 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-25 10:53 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-26 12:01 -0400
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-23 08:10 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-23 13:31 +0100
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-25 07:29 -0500
Re: Marek Novotny is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-25 09:28 -0400
Marek Novotny appreciates the beauty of certain 1990's tech Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-22 19:45 -0400
Chris Ahlstrom Makes an ASS of himself again Richard King <kingsley651@webby.org> - 2016-04-22 21:11 -0400
Re: Marek Novotny appreciates the beauty of certain 1990's tech William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-23 13:30 +0100
Re: Marek Novotn is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-22 19:42 -0400
Chris Ahlstrom... Asshole of the year. Just ask Jayne Ahlstrom, his wife. Richard King <kingsley651@webby.org> - 2016-04-22 21:07 -0400
Re: Marek Novotn is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 18:29 -0700
Re: Marek Novotn is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-23 03:32 +0200
Re: Marek Novotn is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 19:40 -0700
Re: Marek Novotn is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-23 05:15 +0200
Re: Marek Novotn is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 20:31 -0700
Re: Marek Novotn is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-23 07:28 -0400
Re: Marek Novotn is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-23 13:43 +0200
Re: Marek Novotn is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-23 06:56 -0700
Re: Marek Novotn is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-23 14:27 -0400
Re: Marek Novotn is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-23 11:46 -0700
Re: Marek Novotn is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-24 17:49 -0700
Re: Marek Novotn is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-24 18:35 -0700
Re: Marek Novotn is stuck in the U.S. tech culture, circa 1990. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-23 14:26 -0400
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 09:42 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 10:26 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 12:45 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 14:08 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 14:24 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 14:54 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 15:10 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 15:16 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 16:01 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 16:18 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye "Popkin" <Popkin@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 19:59 -0400
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 17:04 -0700
A Big Appil beam in his eye Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-22 19:55 -0400
Re: A Big Appil beam in his eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 17:03 -0700
Re: A Big Appil beam in his eye Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-22 21:01 -0400
Re: A Big Appil beam in his eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 18:07 -0700
Chris Ahlstrom's Obsession With People He Claims to Have Filtered. Richard King <kingsley651@webby.org> - 2016-04-22 21:18 -0400
Re: A Big Appil beam in his eye JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-04-22 20:52 -0500
Re: A Big Appil beam in his eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 19:08 -0700
Re: A Big Appil beam in his eye "Popkin" <Popkin@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 20:11 -0400
Re: A Big Appil beam in his eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 17:15 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 12:54 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 14:10 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 14:24 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye "Popkin" <Popkin@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 20:02 -0400
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 17:03 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 13:10 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 14:25 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 14:26 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 14:46 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 15:03 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 15:14 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 15:17 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-21 22:16 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-04-21 20:23 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-21 12:53 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-04-21 23:07 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-21 19:44 -0400
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-21 23:58 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-22 10:10 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 01:24 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-04-22 10:58 +0100
The Appil of my eye Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-22 05:40 -0400
Re: The Appil of my eye Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-04-22 11:02 +0100
Re: The Appil of my eye Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-04-22 11:44 +0100
Re: The Appil of my eye frederick <fakeemail@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 00:31 +0100
Re: The Appil of my eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 09:25 -0700
Re: The Appil of my eye Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-22 15:09 -0400
Re: The Appil of my eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 12:31 -0700
Re: The Appil of my eye Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-22 22:57 +0200
Re: The Appil of my eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 13:58 -0700
Re: The Appil of my eye Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-22 19:53 -0400
Re: The Appil of my eye Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-04-25 11:11 +0100
Re: The Appil of my eye chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-25 07:18 -0500
Re: The Appil of my eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-25 19:40 -0700
Re: The Appil of my eye Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-22 19:52 -0400
Re: The Appil of my eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 17:02 -0700
Re: The Appil of my eye Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-22 21:03 -0400
Chris Ahlstrom a Pansy... Richard King <kingsley651@webby.org> - 2016-04-22 21:15 -0400
Re: The Appil of my eye JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-04-22 20:55 -0500
Re: The Appil of my eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 19:39 -0700
Re: The Appil of my eye "Popkin" <Popkin@telus.net> - 2016-04-22 19:34 -0400
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-22 02:51 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-04-23 10:04 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-23 06:46 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-04-23 09:26 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-23 09:50 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-19 19:40 -0400
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-04-20 21:10 +0000
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-21 12:07 -0400
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-04-20 16:42 +0100
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye "Popkin" <Popkin@telus.net> - 2016-04-21 12:16 -0400
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye frederick <fakeemail@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 21:42 +0100
A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye "Drummer"<drummer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 05:17 +0200
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-26 06:02 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-26 07:01 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-26 07:20 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-26 07:28 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-26 07:56 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-26 08:02 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-26 08:16 -0700
Re: A Big Linux Cock pokes out half of Appils eye Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-26 08:46 -0700
His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-26 20:41 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-26 14:21 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-26 14:24 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-26 18:27 -0400
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-26 15:37 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-26 18:55 -0400
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-26 16:48 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-26 16:55 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-26 17:09 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-26 20:36 -0400
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-27 10:11 +0100
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-27 00:07 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-26 17:11 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-27 00:18 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-26 17:29 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-27 00:38 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-26 17:47 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-27 01:03 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-26 18:10 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-27 01:26 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-26 18:37 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-27 02:48 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-27 06:25 -0400
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-27 07:49 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-27 14:54 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-27 08:11 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 07:59 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-27 16:33 +0100
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-27 08:52 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-27 17:35 +0100
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-27 15:57 -0400
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-27 13:10 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-27 10:07 -0500
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 10:19 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-27 20:59 +0200
Thing Digest chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-27 14:33 -0500
Re: Thing Digest vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-27 20:18 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-28 00:05 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-28 00:14 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-28 00:23 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-28 00:42 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-28 00:51 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-27 20:32 -0400
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-28 00:59 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 02:40 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-27 10:18 +0100
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-27 14:00 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-27 07:57 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-27 16:37 +0100
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-27 09:03 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-27 13:07 -0400
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-27 17:45 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-27 16:23 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 10:24 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 10:30 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-27 11:18 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 12:26 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 12:46 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-27 20:15 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 13:33 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-27 21:31 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 14:35 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 14:54 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 14:42 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-27 23:51 +0200
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 15:00 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-27 21:53 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 14:59 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 15:35 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-27 20:34 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 13:48 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-27 23:29 +0200
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 14:36 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-27 23:48 +0200
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 15:01 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 15:49 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-27 23:12 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 17:27 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-27 23:12 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-27 23:18 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 17:25 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-28 00:53 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 18:06 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-28 01:33 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 18:50 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-28 02:03 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 19:26 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-28 05:23 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 23:44 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-28 07:14 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-28 00:42 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-28 08:26 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-28 10:11 +0100
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-28 06:48 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-28 06:46 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-28 23:48 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-28 17:00 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-28 06:34 -0500
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-28 20:49 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-28 13:51 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 17:29 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-28 00:54 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 18:04 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-28 01:13 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 18:26 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-28 01:32 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 18:45 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-28 02:12 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 19:26 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 18:46 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-28 02:11 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 19:29 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-28 02:58 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 20:03 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-28 03:19 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 20:35 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 10:47 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 18:46 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-28 02:04 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 19:30 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-28 03:00 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 20:08 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-28 03:29 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 20:41 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 09:09 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 19:28 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-27 13:43 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-28 10:12 -0400
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-28 07:24 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 10:31 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 13:54 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-27 14:10 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-27 23:21 +0200
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-27 14:30 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-28 09:54 -0400
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 11:21 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-27 11:48 -0400
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-27 09:10 -0700
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-28 09:53 -0400
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-04-27 20:11 -0600
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-27 02:11 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-27 02:48 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-27 10:17 +0100
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-27 07:21 -0500
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-27 11:48 -0400
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-26 20:37 -0400
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-27 00:45 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-27 10:49 -0400
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-26 20:01 -0400
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-27 02:19 +0000
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-27 07:26 -0500
Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-27 09:48 -0500
A Big anti-Linux K00k Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-26 19:54 -0400
Page 17 of 23 — ← Prev page 1 … 15 16 [17] 18 19 … 23 Next page →
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 15:57 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <nfr5lc$2sf$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #352186 |
Marek Novotny wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> On 2016-04-27, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>> Marek Novotny wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> On 2016-04-27, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>>>> Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 2016-04-27, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>> Anti Linux people are here. And they should not be. I am quite used to
>>>>>>> it. That is not the purpose of an advocacy group. If you like brawling
>>>>>>> with them that's what a war room is for. You should create and migrate
>>>>>>> to Linux vs. {otherOS} if that's how you feel.
>>>>>
>>>>>> These advocacy groups were created specifically to keep OS wars out of
>>>>>> other groups. If you can't tolerate Windoze or Mack tards countering your
>>>>>> advocacy in their own cute, pathetic way, *you* should find another group.
>>>>>
>>>>> That sounds just like this...
>>>>>
>>>>> If you, owl, can't tolerate me countering Windows and mac users in my
>>>>> own way, you should find another group.
>>>>>
>>>> If you want to sow a reputation as a liar by continuing to tell them
>>>> that they don't belong here, so be it.
>>>
>>> Owl, I've considered your reasons and concluded you are correct. I will
>>> not opine that they do not belong here any further.
>>
>> owl is correct that you'll get a reputation as a liar by stating your
>> *opinion*?
>>
>> You roll over too easy.
>
> I simply did a little research on line and found that it is indeed
> recommended that this sort of things stay in advocacy groups. His
> comment that these groups are here to keep the others free of this type
> of activity appears to be accurate. Given that I have to agree with him.
> It's not me rolling over to please him. He just happens to have made an
> argument that by all accounts appears to be correct. If I don't agree in
> the face of being corrected then I am just stubborn and can't admit to
> being wrong.
Being wrong is not "lying". "owl" insinuated you were lying.
--
Q: What do Winnie the Pooh and John the Baptist have in common?
A: The same middle name.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 13:10 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <qeidnX6-dLNcgbzKnZ2dnUU7-TudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #352239 |
On 2016-04-27, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: > Marek Novotny wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> On 2016-04-27, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: // snip >> I simply did a little research on line and found that it is indeed >> recommended that this sort of things stay in advocacy groups. His >> comment that these groups are here to keep the others free of this type >> of activity appears to be accurate. Given that I have to agree with him. >> It's not me rolling over to please him. He just happens to have made an >> argument that by all accounts appears to be correct. If I don't agree in >> the face of being corrected then I am just stubborn and can't admit to >> being wrong. > > Being wrong is not "lying". "owl" insinuated you were lying. And clearly I am not. -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 10:07 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <71l1ib9p1qh1v5b6u3rtookv94fr9no59p@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #352110 |
> bowel wrote: >> >> If you want to sow a reputation as a liar by continuing to tell them >> that they don't belong here, so be it. Telling anti-Linux trolls that they don't belong in a Linux advocacy group can honestly be called a "lie", bowel? Asshole. -- "At least (Snit) has proven to me time and time again where the real lies were perpetrated. How come you can't answer his questions honestly?" - some POS that calls itself "GreyCloud"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 10:19 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <D34642AA.711CF%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #352194 |
On 4/27/16, 8:07 AM, in article 71l1ib9p1qh1v5b6u3rtookv94fr9no59p@4ax.com, "chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> bowel wrote: >>> >>> If you want to sow a reputation as a liar by continuing to tell them >>> that they don't belong here, so be it. > > Telling anti-Linux trolls that they don't belong in a Linux advocacy > group can honestly be called a "lie", bowel? > > Asshole. Your herd are the ones whom push people away from Linux. Real advocacy means being honest about Linux. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 20:59 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <nfr1vi$j8d$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #352219 |
The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: > On 4/27/16, 8:07 AM, in article > 71l1ib9p1qh1v5b6u3rtookv94fr9no59p@4ax.com, "chrisv" > <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>> bowel wrote: >>>> >>>> If you want to sow a reputation as a liar by continuing to tell them >>>> that they don't belong here, so be it. >> >> Telling anti-Linux trolls that they don't belong in a Linux advocacy >> group can honestly be called a "lie", bowel? >> >> Asshole. > > Your herd are the ones whom push people away from Linux. Real advocacy > means being honest about Linux. > > This excludes from from "real advocacy" for the rest of your miserable life. You lie even when the truth would be advantegous for you
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 14:33 -0500 |
| Subject | Thing Digest |
| Message-ID | <6k42ib9vu8aqm5jqanl9l994722f479m25@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #352229 |
> some thing wrote: >> >> Your herd are the ones whom push people away from Linux. [X] Insults (http://tinyurl.com/qzpdzyk) [X] Unsubstantiated accusations (http://tinyurl.com/pojrtxt) -- "The comment is not from anyone in my family." - some thing, shamelessly lying about <http://usenet.sandman.net/files/anne_comment.png> (but no one can quote it lying)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 20:18 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Thing Digest |
| Message-ID | <docl49F3ft2U4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #352233 |
On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 14:33:31 -0500, chrisv wrote: >> some thing wrote: >>> >>> Your herd are the ones whom push people away from Linux. > > [X] Insults (http://tinyurl.com/qzpdzyk) > [X] Unsubstantiated accusations (http://tinyurl.com/pojrtxt) So by extension, I guess Mr. "some thing" is just fine with the trolls and their constant defamation, name calling, and general nastiness. Gah. How can the guy not be self-aware how transparent his machinations are? -- -v "Desktops, workstations and servers are and Microsoft is doing very well. AS well as Linux." -"Slimer"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-28 00:05 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <ghjdiv93a.f@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #352194 |
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> bowel wrote: >>> >>> If you want to sow a reputation as a liar by continuing to tell them >>> that they don't belong here, so be it. > > Telling anti-Linux trolls that they don't belong in a Linux advocacy > group can honestly be called a "lie", bowel? > > Asshole. > Glad to see you're keeping down to one cuss word per post.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-28 00:14 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <dod2unF6n2dU7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #352298 |
On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 00:05:25 +0000, owl wrote: > chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> bowel wrote: >>>> >>>> If you want to sow a reputation as a liar by continuing to tell them >>>> that they don't belong here, so be it. >> >> Telling anti-Linux trolls that they don't belong in a Linux advocacy >> group can honestly be called a "lie", bowel? >> >> Asshole. >> >> > Glad to see you're keeping down to one cuss word per post. While we're being snarky... I've noticed your User-Agent string includes half the output of uname. Why don't you dump the output of inxi in there, too? ;) Seriously though, your faux-threat at Marek just because you don't know of him was kind of a dick move. -- -v "Desktops, workstations and servers are and Microsoft is doing very well. AS well as Linux." -"Slimer"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-28 00:23 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <ghjvkdi03.ar@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #352300 |
vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: > On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 00:05:25 +0000, owl wrote: > >> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> bowel wrote: >>>>> >>>>> If you want to sow a reputation as a liar by continuing to tell them >>>>> that they don't belong here, so be it. >>> >>> Telling anti-Linux trolls that they don't belong in a Linux advocacy >>> group can honestly be called a "lie", bowel? >>> >>> Asshole. >>> >>> >> Glad to see you're keeping down to one cuss word per post. > > While we're being snarky... > > I've noticed your User-Agent string includes half the output of uname. > Why don't you dump the output of inxi in there, too? ;) > I'm not putting that in manually. I can turn it off if it bothers you. anon@lowtide:~$ grep advertising .tin/tinrc # If ON include advertising User-Agent: header advertising=ON anon@lowtide:~$ anon@lowtide:~$ inxi CPU~Quad core Intel Core i7-2760QM (-HT-MCP-) clocked at Min:2508.093Mhz Max:2552.718Mhz Kernel~3.16.0-4-amd64 x86_64 Up~48 days Mem~10160.7/32126.2MB HDD~2320.4GB(62.7% used) Procs~393 Client~Shell inxi~2.1.28 anon@lowtide:~$ > Seriously though, your faux-threat at Marek just because you don't know > of him was kind of a dick move. > OK. Marek seems like a decent guy. I think I sort of made that clear to him already.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-28 00:42 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <dod4itF6n2dU9@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #352301 |
On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 00:23:31 +0000, owl wrote: > vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 00:05:25 +0000, owl wrote: >> >>> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> bowel wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> If you want to sow a reputation as a liar by continuing to tell >>>>>> them that they don't belong here, so be it. >>>> >>>> Telling anti-Linux trolls that they don't belong in a Linux advocacy >>>> group can honestly be called a "lie", bowel? >>>> >>>> Asshole. >>>> >>>> >>> Glad to see you're keeping down to one cuss word per post. >> >> While we're being snarky... >> >> I've noticed your User-Agent string includes half the output of uname. >> Why don't you dump the output of inxi in there, too? ;) >> >> > I'm not putting that in manually. I can turn it off if it bothers you. I was just tweaking your nose. See the smiley? > anon@lowtide:~$ grep advertising .tin/tinrc # If ON include advertising > User-Agent: header advertising=ON anon@lowtide:~$ > > anon@lowtide:~$ inxi CPU~Quad core Intel Core i7-2760QM (-HT-MCP-) > clocked at Min:2508.093Mhz Max:2552.718Mhz Kernel~3.16.0-4-amd64 x86_64 > Up~48 days Mem~10160.7/32126.2MB HDD~2320.4GB(62.7% used) Procs~393 > Client~Shell inxi~2.1.28 anon@lowtide:~$ > >> Seriously though, your faux-threat at Marek just because you don't know >> of him was kind of a dick move. >> >> > OK. Marek seems like a decent guy. I think I sort of made that clear > to him already. Fair enough. -- -v "Desktops, workstations and servers are and Microsoft is doing very well. AS well as Linux." -"Slimer"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-28 00:51 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <fhgjdo03.ar@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #352307 |
vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: > On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 00:23:31 +0000, owl wrote: > >> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >>> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 00:05:25 +0000, owl wrote: >>> >>>> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> bowel wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you want to sow a reputation as a liar by continuing to tell >>>>>>> them that they don't belong here, so be it. >>>>> >>>>> Telling anti-Linux trolls that they don't belong in a Linux advocacy >>>>> group can honestly be called a "lie", bowel? >>>>> >>>>> Asshole. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Glad to see you're keeping down to one cuss word per post. >>> >>> While we're being snarky... >>> >>> I've noticed your User-Agent string includes half the output of uname. >>> Why don't you dump the output of inxi in there, too? ;) >>> >>> >> I'm not putting that in manually. I can turn it off if it bothers you. > > I was just tweaking your nose. See the smiley? > There's an understood smiley in most everything I post. I come here for stress relief, not to gather more. > >> anon@lowtide:~$ grep advertising .tin/tinrc # If ON include advertising >> User-Agent: header advertising=ON anon@lowtide:~$ >> >> anon@lowtide:~$ inxi CPU~Quad core Intel Core i7-2760QM (-HT-MCP-) >> clocked at Min:2508.093Mhz Max:2552.718Mhz Kernel~3.16.0-4-amd64 x86_64 >> Up~48 days Mem~10160.7/32126.2MB HDD~2320.4GB(62.7% used) Procs~393 >> Client~Shell inxi~2.1.28 anon@lowtide:~$ >> >>> Seriously though, your faux-threat at Marek just because you don't know >>> of him was kind of a dick move. >>> >>> >> OK. Marek seems like a decent guy. I think I sort of made that clear >> to him already. > > Fair enough. > I'm going to make Marek great again.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 20:32 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <nfrlpf$r8m$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #352300 |
vallor wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 00:05:25 +0000, owl wrote:
>
>> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>> bowel wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> If you want to sow a reputation as a liar by continuing to tell them
>>>>> that they don't belong here, so be it.
>>>
>>> Telling anti-Linux trolls that they don't belong in a Linux advocacy
>>> group can honestly be called a "lie", bowel?
>>>
>>> Asshole.
>>>
>> Glad to see you're keeping down to one cuss word per post.
>
> While we're being snarky...
And a pansy. (A lot of the trolls seem to get exercised by our using some
mild "naughty" words. They've been harping on "pee-pee" for years.
And the "c" word? Whoa! You'd think they'd never experienced Brit or
Australian vernacular before.)
I realise you're not very good with language, after all you think its
fine to use "cunt" in polite English conversation, but "our screen" is a
take on Northern English as in "our kid" etc.
-- "Hadron"
The levels of mincing faux propriety and patronizing confabulation
are quite chuckle-worthy.
> I've noticed your User-Agent string includes half the output of uname.
> Why don't you dump the output of inxi in there, too? ;)
>
> Seriously though, your faux-threat at Marek just because you don't know
> of him was kind of a dick move.
Big surprise, eh?
--
Go not to the elves for counsel, for they will say both yes and no.
-- J.R.R. Tolkien
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-28 00:59 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <fhgnvmkf.ko@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #352306 |
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: > vallor wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 00:05:25 +0000, owl wrote: >> >>> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> bowel wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> If you want to sow a reputation as a liar by continuing to tell them >>>>>> that they don't belong here, so be it. >>>> >>>> Telling anti-Linux trolls that they don't belong in a Linux advocacy >>>> group can honestly be called a "lie", bowel? >>>> >>>> Asshole. >>>> >>> Glad to see you're keeping down to one cuss word per post. >> >> While we're being snarky... > > And a pansy. What's that, some kind of soccer move? > (A lot of the trolls seem to get exercised by our using some > mild "naughty" words. They've been harping on "pee-pee" for years. > And the "c" word? Whoa! You'd think they'd never experienced Brit or > Australian vernacular before.) > > I realise you're not very good with language, after all you think its > fine to use "cunt" in polite English conversation, but "our screen" is a > take on Northern English as in "our kid" etc. > -- "Hadron" > > The levels of mincing faux The word "faux" has already been used once in this thread. Don't wear it out, Little Beaver. > propriety and patronizing confabulation > are quite chuckle-worthy. > >> I've noticed your User-Agent string includes half the output of uname. >> Why don't you dump the output of inxi in there, too? ;) >> >> Seriously though, your faux-threat at Marek just because you don't know >> of him was kind of a dick move. > > Big surprise, eh? > I'll bet it surprised you that the word "gullible" was not in your precious thesaurus, eh? Linux FAIL!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-28 02:40 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <nfrt6e$4mf$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #352194 |
On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 10:07:11 -0500, chrisv wrote: >> bowel wrote: >>> >>> If you want to sow a reputation as a liar by continuing to tell them >>> that they don't belong here, so be it. > > Telling anti-Linux trolls that they don't belong in a Linux advocacy > group can honestly be called a "lie", bowel? > > Asshole. Exactly. -- Zero tolerance for WinDrones and iCultists
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Poaster <wp@dev.null> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 10:18 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <bnc6vc-754.ln1@user-1842.linux.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #352100 |
Marek Novotny wrote:
> On 2016-04-27, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>> Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
>>> On 2016-04-27, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>>>> Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 2016-04-27, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2016-04-26, DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Why are you even here? Seriously, care to explain why you come in here
>>>>>>>>> in the first place?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For the show, man, for the show.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> See, that basically means you like trolling. Why not just hang in a
>>>>>>> group with like-minded people?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> DFS is a regular here. Who are you again?
>>>>>
>>>>> Marek.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You showed up here a week or so ago, right? You're familiar with
>>>> usenet etiquette, right? Or is this your first trip to usenet
>>>> in general?
>>>
>>> No, I started using Usenet on or around 1992 if I had to guess. Using
>>> Tin actually. I'm just not a regular in this particular news group is
>>> all. I am in a few other Linux groups.
>>>
>>
>> Did your years of usenet experience teach you to pop into a newsgroup
>> out of the blue and tell a poster who's been a regular in that group
>> for more than a decade that he should hang out somewhere else?
>
> If he is in the wrong group, yes. I don't care if invented the group.
> This group is for Linux advocacy. Those that advocate in here are in the
> correct group. End of story.
>
>> Anti-Linux people are here. Get used to it.
<piggybacked as I have "owl" binned>
Those anti-Linux "people" are *trolls*, numbnuts. They are here
deliberately to disrupt this group.
DFS actually admitted that when he first came here. But *you* wouldn't
know as you're a comparative newcomer too.
>>That's the purpose of
>> an advocacy group. The place would be a total drag without them, btw.
>
> Anti Linux people are here. And they should not be. I am quite used to
> it. That is not the purpose of an advocacy group. If you like brawling
> with them that's what a war room is for. You should create and migrate
> to Linux vs. {otherOS} if that's how you feel.
+1
--
openSUSE 13.2 64-bit
KDE 4.14.9
Kernel: 4.5.0-10.1.gb98c3d3-desktop #1 SMP PREEMPT
Mon Apr 11 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
This message is virus free, as absolutely
NO Micro$oft products were used in its preparation.
"If you do want to clean your computer of malware, the first software to
delete is Windows."
http://www.gnu.org/proprietary/malware-microsoft.en.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 14:00 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <ghjdie9t.kig@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #352140 |
William Poaster <wp@dev.null> wrote:
> Marek Novotny wrote:
>
>> On 2016-04-27, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>>> Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2016-04-27, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2016-04-27, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>> Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2016-04-26, DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Why are you even here? Seriously, care to explain why you come in here
>>>>>>>>>> in the first place?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For the show, man, for the show.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> See, that basically means you like trolling. Why not just hang in a
>>>>>>>> group with like-minded people?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> DFS is a regular here. Who are you again?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Marek.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You showed up here a week or so ago, right? You're familiar with
>>>>> usenet etiquette, right? Or is this your first trip to usenet
>>>>> in general?
>>>>
>>>> No, I started using Usenet on or around 1992 if I had to guess. Using
>>>> Tin actually. I'm just not a regular in this particular news group is
>>>> all. I am in a few other Linux groups.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Did your years of usenet experience teach you to pop into a newsgroup
>>> out of the blue and tell a poster who's been a regular in that group
>>> for more than a decade that he should hang out somewhere else?
>>
>> If he is in the wrong group, yes. I don't care if invented the group.
>> This group is for Linux advocacy. Those that advocate in here are in the
>> correct group. End of story.
>>
>>> Anti-Linux people are here. Get used to it.
>
> <piggybacked as I have "owl" binned>
> Those anti-Linux "people" are *trolls*, numbnuts. They are here
> deliberately to disrupt this group.
> DFS actually admitted that when he first came here. But *you* wouldn't
> know as you're a comparative newcomer too.
>
I don't remember when my first post to cola under the owl nym was,
and google completely destroyed deja, so searches are hit and miss,
but here's one from March 6, 2006:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/RqEVMFxwnPE/4iB7tpwCQzMJ
I do remember participating in a crosspost war with cola back around 2000
or 2001. (I was from the other group). I remember there being some awfully
dull people here then. We had much more fun sparring with the wicca tards,
so the great cola war didn't last long. (Y'all got destroyed, BTW). :)
>>>That's the purpose of
>>> an advocacy group. The place would be a total drag without them, btw.
>>
>> Anti Linux people are here. And they should not be. I am quite used to
>> it. That is not the purpose of an advocacy group. If you like brawling
>> with them that's what a war room is for. You should create and migrate
>> to Linux vs. {otherOS} if that's how you feel.
>
> +1
>
Note to Marek: That "+1" is Dumb Willie's trademark. Get used to that too.
You'll be seeing it a lot.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 07:57 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <t5OdnaQXz53cTr3KnZ2dnUU7-VXNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #352175 |
On 2016-04-27, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > I don't remember when my first post to cola under the owl nym was, > and google completely destroyed deja, so searches are hit and miss, > but here's one from March 6, 2006: > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/RqEVMFxwnPE/4iB7tpwCQzMJ > > I do remember participating in a crosspost war with cola back around 2000 > or 2001. (I was from the other group). I remember there being some awfully > dull people here then. We had much more fun sparring with the wicca tards, > so the great cola war didn't last long. (Y'all got destroyed, BTW). :) > > Note to Marek: That "+1" is Dumb Willie's trademark. Get used to that too. > You'll be seeing it a lot. I have no problem with William or anyone else for that matter until they prove themselves to be unwilling to concede when they are clearly wrong. I try hard to be very fair and so you will see me "roll over" from time to time. I am not married to any opinion I post. If you can change my mind the you can. If you can't, you can't. Like Alan Baker in my opinion is unwilling to admit when he's wrong. No matter how correct the argument he will just move the goal post. If I make a point he cannot over come he'll say it doesn't matter anyway. That's an asshole I don't care to have a conversation with at all. I don't care for people like Snit either. Another jackass as far as I am concerned. I have yet to see him ever make a point that wasn't laced with a backdoor. We do +1 where I come from to show agreement. I have no problem with it and do it myself. Maybe it is just not common here, but it is elsewhere. -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Poaster <wp@dev.null> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 16:37 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <vu27vc-0n2.ln1@user-1842.linux.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #352191 |
Marek Novotny wrote: > On 2016-04-27, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> I don't remember when my first post to cola under the owl nym was, >> and google completely destroyed deja, so searches are hit and miss, >> but here's one from March 6, 2006: >> >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/RqEVMFxwnPE/4iB7tpwCQzMJ >> >> I do remember participating in a crosspost war with cola back around 2000 >> or 2001. (I was from the other group). I remember there being some awfully >> dull people here then. We had much more fun sparring with the wicca tards, >> so the great cola war didn't last long. (Y'all got destroyed, BTW). :) >> >> Note to Marek: That "+1" is Dumb Willie's trademark. Get used to that too. >> You'll be seeing it a lot. > > I have no problem with William or anyone else for that matter until they > prove themselves to be unwilling to concede when they are clearly wrong. > I try hard to be very fair and so you will see me "roll over" from time > to time. I am not married to any opinion I post. If you can change my > mind the you can. If you can't, you can't. Like Alan Baker in my opinion > is unwilling to admit when he's wrong. No matter how correct the > argument he will just move the goal post. If I make a point he cannot > over come he'll say it doesn't matter anyway. That's an asshole I don't > care to have a conversation with at all. > > I don't care for people like Snit either. Another jackass as far as I am > concerned. I have yet to see him ever make a point that wasn't laced > with a backdoor. > > We do +1 where I come from to show agreement. I have no problem with it > and do it myself. Maybe it is just not common here, but it is elsewhere. Yes, it's common in lot of groups. You will note that "owl" like a *lot* of the anti-linux & wintrolls, call me Dumb Willie. AFAIC that shows them exactly for what *they *are, trolls. -- openSUSE 13.2 64-bit KDE 4.14.9 Kernel: 4.5.0-10.1.gb98c3d3-desktop #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Apr 11 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux This message is virus free, as absolutely NO Micro$oft products were used in its preparation. "If you do want to clean your computer of malware, the first software to delete is Windows." http://www.gnu.org/proprietary/malware-microsoft.en.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 09:03 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: His Nibs #3's manifesto, debunked |
| Message-ID | <hc2dnYdSFcdDf73KnZ2dnUU7-eXNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #352198 |
On 2016-04-27, William Poaster <wp@dev.null> wrote: > You will note that "owl" like a *lot* of the anti-linux & wintrolls, > call me Dumb Willie. AFAIC that shows them exactly for what *they *are, > trolls. I'll get one too... We all do eventually. I dish them out once in a while as well. I'm not exactly innocent here. Some people deserve it and the feeling is likely mutual. It's not a perfect world... And to some extent I agree that adds some flavor. If everyone hated it so much they'd leave. So something about this formula obviously works else we'd not be here, right? -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 17 of 23 — ← Prev page 1 … 15 16 [17] 18 19 … 23 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web