Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #318523 > unrolled thread

Better breakdown of OS/browser share

Started byMelzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com>
First post2015-09-02 03:00 +0200
Last post2015-09-01 18:46 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 116 — 16 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  Better breakdown of OS/browser share Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-09-02 03:00 +0200
    Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 01:35 +0000
      Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-02 09:11 -0400
        Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 14:52 +0000
          Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-09-02 16:53 +0200
          Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-02 11:43 -0400
            Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-02 17:53 +0200
              Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 15:59 +0000
                Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-09-02 18:07 +0200
                Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-02 13:10 -0400
                  Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 17:16 +0000
                    Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-02 13:20 -0400
                      Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 17:24 +0000
                  Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-02 19:17 +0200
              Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-02 11:21 -0500
                Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share ronb <ronbNOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 16:36 +0000
            Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 15:56 +0000
              Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-09-02 18:05 +0200
                Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-02 20:46 -0400
                  Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-03 09:08 -0400
                  Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-09-03 15:53 +0200
                    Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-03 09:08 -0500
                      Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-03 10:24 -0400
                      DumFSck's idiocy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-03 09:40 -0500
                        Re: DumFSck's idiocy Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 15:02 +0000
                      Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-03 12:28 -0600
                      Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-09-04 00:24 +0200
              Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-02 13:09 -0400
                Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 17:22 +0000
                  Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-02 17:45 -0400
                    Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-03 10:03 +0000
                      Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-03 09:17 -0400
                        Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-03 13:35 +0000
                          Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-03 10:42 -0400
                            Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-03 15:25 +0000
                              Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-03 12:55 -0400
                          Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-03 09:31 -0700
                            Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 16:42 +0000
              Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-03 09:26 -0400
                Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-03 10:39 -0400
                  Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 15:04 +0000
                    Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-03 12:52 -0400
                      Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 17:02 +0000
                        Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-03 17:00 -0400
                          Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-03 20:56 -0400
                      Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-04 08:53 -0400
                        Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-04 10:20 -0400
                          Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-04 07:39 -0700
                            Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-04 10:49 -0400
                              Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-04 08:55 -0700
                                Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-04 09:19 -0700
                                  Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-04 12:58 -0400
                                    Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-04 10:11 -0700
                                Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-04 12:57 -0400
                                  Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-04 10:03 -0700
                                    Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-04 15:44 -0400
                                      Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 19:50 +0000
                                        Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-04 12:58 -0700
                                          Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 20:11 +0000
                                            Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-04 13:17 -0700
                                              Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 20:27 +0000
                                                Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Hoppy Hopkins <hopster86u4me@surferb.net> - 2015-09-04 18:28 -0400
                                            Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 13:21 -0700
                                              Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 20:33 +0000
                                                Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 13:46 -0700
                                                Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 14:49 -0700
                                                Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 16:34 -0700
                                                Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 16:37 -0700
                                                  Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-04 20:18 -0400
                                                    Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 17:40 -0700
                                                    Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-04 21:18 -0400
                                                      Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-05 09:53 -0400
                                                        Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-05 11:11 -0700
                                                      Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-05 10:21 -0400
                                                        Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 08:09 -0700
                                                          Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-05 11:42 -0400
                                                            Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 08:46 -0700
                                                              Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-05 11:54 -0400
                                                                Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-05 16:05 -0400
                                                              Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share hifye <hifye@humanoid.net> - 2015-09-05 11:58 -0400
                                                            Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-05 11:10 -0700
                                                            Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-05 16:02 -0400
                                                              Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 14:20 -0700
                                                        Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-05 16:00 -0400
                                            Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-05 13:51 -0700
                                              Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 14:12 -0700
                                        Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 13:11 -0700
                                          Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 20:20 +0000
                                            Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-04 13:24 -0700
                                              Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 20:30 +0000
                                                Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 13:36 -0700
                                            Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 13:28 -0700
                                              Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 20:38 +0000
                                                Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 13:49 -0700
                                                Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-04 14:00 -0700
                                      Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-04 12:56 -0700
                                        Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-04 16:29 -0400
                                          Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 20:35 +0000
                                            Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-04 18:24 -0400
                                            Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-04 18:42 -0400
                                            Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-04 18:43 -0400
                                              Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-04 21:17 -0400
                                                Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-04 21:50 -0400
                                                  Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-05 09:51 -0400
                                                    Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-05 10:12 -0700
                                                      Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 11:24 -0700
                                                      Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-05 16:09 -0400
                                                Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-04 21:57 -0400
                                          Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 14:28 -0700
                                  Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-10 05:16 -0700
                                    Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-10 10:26 -0400
                                      Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-09-10 11:38 -0400
                                        Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-10 12:02 -0400
                                      Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-10 09:16 -0700
                                        Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-10 14:53 -0400
    Re: Better breakdown of OS/browser share Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 18:46 -0700

Page 1 of 6  [1] 2 3 4 5 6  Next page →

#318523 — Better breakdown of OS/browser share

FromMelzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com>
Date2015-09-02 03:00 +0200
SubjectBetter breakdown of OS/browser share
Message-ID<20150902030014.0a7a8a7f@maxa-pc>
It happened that I didn't catch all IE signatures so lot of that went
to others. Now corrected.
Better breakdown of OS'es too with introducing BlackBerry and ChromeOS
share.
Eliminated empty useragent strings from calculation.
Also top 20 of "others" displayed.

cumul 95484906 95484906
os------
             Android  16583714 17.37
          BlackBerry    121926 0.13
            ChromeOS    151861 0.16
               Linux    284309 0.30
           Macintosh   3606507 3.78
             Windows  54682179 57.27
                iPad   3675927 3.85
              iPhone  15871445 16.62
               other    507038 0.53
other breakdown (top20):
Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; bingbot/2.0; +http://www.bing.com/bingbot.htm)    245084 0.26
msnbot-media/1.1 (+http://search.msn.com/msnbot.htm)     28468 0.03
Microsoft Office/16.0 (Microsoft Outlook Mail 16.0.6120; Pro)     12594 0.01
Mozilla/5.0 (PlayBook; U; RIM Tablet OS 2.1.0; en-US) AppleWebKit/536.2+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/7.2.1.0 Safari/536.2+     11178 0.01
Microsoft Office/16.0 (Microsoft Outlook Mail 16.0.6106; Pro)      8667 0.01
Mozilla/5.0 (en-us) AppleWebKit/534.14 (KHTML, like Gecko; Google Wireless Transcoder) Chrome/9.0.597 Safari/534.14      8635 0.01
UCWEB/2.0 (Java; U; MIDP-2.0; Nokia203/20.37) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/8.7.0.218 U2/1.0.0 Mobile      5982 0.01
Microsoft Office/16.0 (Microsoft Outlook Mail 16.0.6020; Pro)      5037 0.01
Mozilla/5.0 (PLAYSTATION 3 4.66) AppleWebKit/531.22.8 (KHTML, like Gecko)      4242 0.00
Mozilla/5.0 (PLAYSTATION 3 4.70) AppleWebKit/531.22.8 (KHTML, like Gecko)      3707 0.00
Mozilla/5.0 (PlayStation Vita 3.35) AppleWebKit/537.73 (KHTML, like Gecko)      3388 0.00
Microsoft Office/16.0 (Microsoft Outlook Mail 16.0.6118; Pro)      3271 0.00
Mozilla/5.0 (PlayStation Vita 3.36) AppleWebKit/537.73 (KHTML, like Gecko)      2907 0.00
Mozilla/5.0 (PLAYSTATION 3 4.75) AppleWebKit/531.22.8 (KHTML, like Gecko)      2564 0.00
Mozilla/5.0 (PlayStation Vita 3.52) AppleWebKit/537.73 (KHTML, like Gecko)      2402 0.00
Mozilla/5.0 (Series40; Nokia311/03.81; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) Gecko/20100401 S40OviBrowser/2.2.0.0.31      1950 0.00
Mozilla/5.0 (PlayStation 4 2.51) AppleWebKit/537.73 (KHTML, like Gecko)      1835 0.00
Mozilla/5.0 (PlayStation Vita 3.51) AppleWebKit/537.73 (KHTML, like Gecko)      1830 0.00
Mozilla/5.0 (PlayStation Vita 3.50) AppleWebKit/537.73 (KHTML, like Gecko)      1799 0.00
Mozilla/5.0 (Nintendo WiiU) AppleWebKit/536.28 (KHTML, like Gecko) NX/3.0.3.12.15 NintendoBrowser/4.1.1.9601.US      1325 0.00
browser------
              Chrome  21056677 22.05
             Firefox  34410392 36.04
                  IE  10287010 10.77
              Mobile  14873053 15.58
              Safari  12122522 12.70
               other   2735252 2.86
other breakdown (top 20):
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_9_5) AppleWebKit/537.78.2 (KHTML, like Gecko)    389559 0.41
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_10_2) AppleWebKit/600.3.18 (KHTML, like Gecko)    347706 0.36
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_10_3) AppleWebKit/600.5.17 (KHTML, like Gecko)    295812 0.31
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_10_1) AppleWebKit/600.1.25 (KHTML, like Gecko)    256676 0.27
Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; bingbot/2.0; +http://www.bing.com/bingbot.htm)    245084 0.26
Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; CPU OS 5_1_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko)    125180 0.13
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_10_4) AppleWebKit/600.7.12 (KHTML, like Gecko)     95152 0.10
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_10) AppleWebKit/600.1.25 (KHTML, like Gecko)     82394 0.09
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_8_5) AppleWebKit/536.30.1 (KHTML, like Gecko)     56667 0.06
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_5) AppleWebKit/534.57.7 (KHTML, like Gecko)     52990 0.06
Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_1_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko)     48899 0.05
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_8) AppleWebKit/534.59.10 (KHTML, like Gecko)     35940 0.04
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_9_4) AppleWebKit/537.77.4 (KHTML, like Gecko)     33064 0.03
msnbot-media/1.1 (+http://search.msn.com/msnbot.htm)     28468 0.03
Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.2.1; en-us     22333 0.02
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_10_5) AppleWebKit/600.8.9 (KHTML, like Gecko)     21239 0.02
Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko)     15718 0.02
Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko)     14677 0.02
Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko)     12700 0.01
Microsoft Office/16.0 (Microsoft Outlook Mail 16.0.6120; Pro)     12594 0.01

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#318535

Fromowl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date2015-09-02 01:35 +0000
Message-ID<fi.afe9@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to#318523
Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote:
> It happened that I didn't catch all IE signatures so lot of that went
> to others. Now corrected.
> Better breakdown of OS'es too with introducing BlackBerry and ChromeOS
> share.
> Eliminated empty useragent strings from calculation.
> Also top 20 of "others" displayed.

>                Linux    284309 0.30

Linux at 30 percent!  Oo-rah!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#318589

From"A.M" <.m@nsn.s>
Date2015-09-02 09:11 -0400
Message-ID<ms6seq$s6v$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#318535
On 2015-09-01 9:35 PM, owl wrote:
> Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>> It happened that I didn't catch all IE signatures so lot of that went
>> to others. Now corrected.
>> Better breakdown of OS'es too with introducing BlackBerry and ChromeOS
>> share.
>> Eliminated empty useragent strings from calculation.
>> Also top 20 of "others" displayed.
> 
>>                Linux    284309 0.30
> 
> Linux at 30 percent!  Oo-rah!

Actually, it's less than 1%.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#318605

Fromowl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date2015-09-02 14:52 +0000
Message-ID<fa.kvi93@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to#318589
A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
> On 2015-09-01 9:35 PM, owl wrote:
>> Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>>> It happened that I didn't catch all IE signatures so lot of that went
>>> to others. Now corrected.
>>> Better breakdown of OS'es too with introducing BlackBerry and ChromeOS
>>> share.
>>> Eliminated empty useragent strings from calculation.
>>> Also top 20 of "others" displayed.
>> 
>>>                Linux    284309 0.30
>> 
>> Linux at 30 percent!  Oo-rah!

> Actually, it's less than 1%.

Dude, in American math, 0.30 is 30 percent.  Yes!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#318606

FromMelzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com>
Date2015-09-02 16:53 +0200
Message-ID<20150902165333.3a795381@maxa-pc>
In reply to#318605
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 14:52:53 +0000 (UTC)
owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:

> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
> > On 2015-09-01 9:35 PM, owl wrote:
> >> Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote:
> >>> It happened that I didn't catch all IE signatures so lot of that
> >>> went to others. Now corrected.
> >>> Better breakdown of OS'es too with introducing BlackBerry and
> >>> ChromeOS share.
> >>> Eliminated empty useragent strings from calculation.
> >>> Also top 20 of "others" displayed.
> >> 
> >>>                Linux    284309 0.30
> >> 
> >> Linux at 30 percent!  Oo-rah!
> 
> > Actually, it's less than 1%.
> 
> Dude, in American math, 0.30 is 30 percent.  Yes!
> 

;))))))

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#318622

From"A.M" <.m@nsn.s>
Date2015-09-02 11:43 -0400
Message-ID<ms75cf$21i$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#318605
On 2015-09-02 10:52 AM, owl wrote:
> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>> On 2015-09-01 9:35 PM, owl wrote:
>>> Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>>>> It happened that I didn't catch all IE signatures so lot of that went
>>>> to others. Now corrected.
>>>> Better breakdown of OS'es too with introducing BlackBerry and ChromeOS
>>>> share.
>>>> Eliminated empty useragent strings from calculation.
>>>> Also top 20 of "others" displayed.
>>>
>>>>                Linux    284309 0.30
>>>
>>> Linux at 30 percent!  Oo-rah!
> 
>> Actually, it's less than 1%.
> 
> Dude, in American math, 0.30 is 30 percent.  Yes!

Actually no, it isn't. 0.30 is 30% of 1. The only way it represents 30%
is it we've all come to the agreement that market share in general is
represented by the number 1.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#318628

FromPeter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de>
Date2015-09-02 17:53 +0200
Message-ID<ms75ts$4p9$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#318622
A.M wrote:

> On 2015-09-02 10:52 AM, owl wrote:
>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>>> On 2015-09-01 9:35 PM, owl wrote:
>>>> Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>>>>> It happened that I didn't catch all IE signatures so lot of that went
>>>>> to others. Now corrected.
>>>>> Better breakdown of OS'es too with introducing BlackBerry and ChromeOS
>>>>> share.
>>>>> Eliminated empty useragent strings from calculation.
>>>>> Also top 20 of "others" displayed.
>>>>
>>>>>                Linux    284309 0.30
>>>>
>>>> Linux at 30 percent!  Oo-rah!
>> 
>>> Actually, it's less than 1%.
>> 
>> Dude, in American math, 0.30 is 30 percent.  Yes!
> 
> Actually no, it isn't. 0.30 is 30% of 1. 

Idiot

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#318632

Fromowl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date2015-09-02 15:59 +0000
Message-ID<afmv8.kod@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to#318628
Peter K??hlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
> A.M wrote:

>> On 2015-09-02 10:52 AM, owl wrote:
>>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>>>> On 2015-09-01 9:35 PM, owl wrote:
>>>>> Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>>>>>> It happened that I didn't catch all IE signatures so lot of that went
>>>>>> to others. Now corrected.
>>>>>> Better breakdown of OS'es too with introducing BlackBerry and ChromeOS
>>>>>> share.
>>>>>> Eliminated empty useragent strings from calculation.
>>>>>> Also top 20 of "others" displayed.
>>>>>
>>>>>>                Linux    284309 0.30
>>>>>
>>>>> Linux at 30 percent!  Oo-rah!
>>> 
>>>> Actually, it's less than 1%.
>>> 
>>> Dude, in American math, 0.30 is 30 percent.  Yes!
>> 
>> Actually no, it isn't. 0.30 is 30% of 1. 

> Idiot

He's Canadiun.  Do they have humor in Canadia?  
Either that or Snit's Assburgers is rubbing off on him.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#318636

FromMelzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com>
Date2015-09-02 18:07 +0200
Message-ID<20150902180755.5031f33c@maxa-pc>
In reply to#318632
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 15:59:33 +0000 (UTC)
owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:

> Peter K??hlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
> > A.M wrote:
> 
> >> On 2015-09-02 10:52 AM, owl wrote:
> >>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
> >>>> On 2015-09-01 9:35 PM, owl wrote:
> >>>>> Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> It happened that I didn't catch all IE signatures so lot of
> >>>>>> that went to others. Now corrected.
> >>>>>> Better breakdown of OS'es too with introducing BlackBerry and
> >>>>>> ChromeOS share.
> >>>>>> Eliminated empty useragent strings from calculation.
> >>>>>> Also top 20 of "others" displayed.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>                Linux    284309 0.30
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Linux at 30 percent!  Oo-rah!
> >>> 
> >>>> Actually, it's less than 1%.
> >>> 
> >>> Dude, in American math, 0.30 is 30 percent.  Yes!
> >> 
> >> Actually no, it isn't. 0.30 is 30% of 1. 
> 
> > Idiot
> 
> He's Canadiun.  Do they have humor in Canadia?

Too much Snit influence. Snit does not know humor ;)
HE just knows how to do efficiency & error reduction ... ;)
  
> Either that or Snit's Assburgers is rubbing off on him.

;)))))
> 
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#318647

From"A.M" <.m@nsn.s>
Date2015-09-02 13:10 -0400
Message-ID<ms7afi$oum$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#318632
On 2015-09-02 11:59 AM, owl wrote:
> Peter K??hlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
>> A.M wrote:
> 
>>> On 2015-09-02 10:52 AM, owl wrote:
>>>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>>>>> On 2015-09-01 9:35 PM, owl wrote:
>>>>>> Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> It happened that I didn't catch all IE signatures so lot of that went
>>>>>>> to others. Now corrected.
>>>>>>> Better breakdown of OS'es too with introducing BlackBerry and ChromeOS
>>>>>>> share.
>>>>>>> Eliminated empty useragent strings from calculation.
>>>>>>> Also top 20 of "others" displayed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                Linux    284309 0.30
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Linux at 30 percent!  Oo-rah!
>>>>
>>>>> Actually, it's less than 1%.
>>>>
>>>> Dude, in American math, 0.30 is 30 percent.  Yes!
>>>
>>> Actually no, it isn't. 0.30 is 30% of 1. 
> 
>> Idiot
> 
> He's Canadiun.  Do they have humor in Canadia?  
> Either that or Snit's Assburgers is rubbing off on him.

I understand your sense of humour, except that the joke isn't funny and
gives people the wrong impression. I stand by what I said despite the
fact that Peter the Klöwn doesn't think I'm accurate.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#318649

Fromowl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date2015-09-02 17:16 +0000
Message-ID<dfasnv0afki.uu@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to#318647
A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
> On 2015-09-02 11:59 AM, owl wrote:
>> Peter K??hlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
>>> A.M wrote:
>> 
>>>> On 2015-09-02 10:52 AM, owl wrote:
>>>>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2015-09-01 9:35 PM, owl wrote:
>>>>>>> Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> It happened that I didn't catch all IE signatures so lot of that went
>>>>>>>> to others. Now corrected.
>>>>>>>> Better breakdown of OS'es too with introducing BlackBerry and ChromeOS
>>>>>>>> share.
>>>>>>>> Eliminated empty useragent strings from calculation.
>>>>>>>> Also top 20 of "others" displayed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                Linux    284309 0.30
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Linux at 30 percent!  Oo-rah!
>>>>>
>>>>>> Actually, it's less than 1%.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dude, in American math, 0.30 is 30 percent.  Yes!
>>>>
>>>> Actually no, it isn't. 0.30 is 30% of 1. 
>> 
>>> Idiot
>> 
>> He's Canadiun.  Do they have humor in Canadia?  
>> Either that or Snit's Assburgers is rubbing off on him.

> I understand your sense of humour, except that the joke isn't funny and
> gives people the wrong impression. I stand by what I said despite the
> fact that Peter the Klöwn doesn't think I'm accurate.

Hi Snit!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#318651

From"A.M" <.m@nsn.s>
Date2015-09-02 13:20 -0400
Message-ID<ms7b1e$rue$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#318649
On 2015-09-02 1:16 PM, owl wrote:
> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>> On 2015-09-02 11:59 AM, owl wrote:
>>> Peter K??hlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
>>>> A.M wrote:
>>>
>>>>> On 2015-09-02 10:52 AM, owl wrote:
>>>>>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2015-09-01 9:35 PM, owl wrote:
>>>>>>>> Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> It happened that I didn't catch all IE signatures so lot of that went
>>>>>>>>> to others. Now corrected.
>>>>>>>>> Better breakdown of OS'es too with introducing BlackBerry and ChromeOS
>>>>>>>>> share.
>>>>>>>>> Eliminated empty useragent strings from calculation.
>>>>>>>>> Also top 20 of "others" displayed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                Linux    284309 0.30
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Linux at 30 percent!  Oo-rah!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Actually, it's less than 1%.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dude, in American math, 0.30 is 30 percent.  Yes!
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually no, it isn't. 0.30 is 30% of 1. 
>>>
>>>> Idiot
>>>
>>> He's Canadiun.  Do they have humor in Canadia?  
>>> Either that or Snit's Assburgers is rubbing off on him.
> 
>> I understand your sense of humour, except that the joke isn't funny and
>> gives people the wrong impression. I stand by what I said despite the
>> fact that Peter the Klöwn doesn't think I'm accurate.
> 
> Hi Snit!

Hi Snit!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#318653

Fromowl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date2015-09-02 17:24 +0000
Message-ID<asdfmv83.i@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to#318651
A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
> On 2015-09-02 1:16 PM, owl wrote:
>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>>> On 2015-09-02 11:59 AM, owl wrote:
>>>> Peter K??hlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
>>>>> A.M wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> On 2015-09-02 10:52 AM, owl wrote:
>>>>>>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2015-09-01 9:35 PM, owl wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> It happened that I didn't catch all IE signatures so lot of that went
>>>>>>>>>> to others. Now corrected.
>>>>>>>>>> Better breakdown of OS'es too with introducing BlackBerry and ChromeOS
>>>>>>>>>> share.
>>>>>>>>>> Eliminated empty useragent strings from calculation.
>>>>>>>>>> Also top 20 of "others" displayed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                Linux    284309 0.30
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Linux at 30 percent!  Oo-rah!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Actually, it's less than 1%.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dude, in American math, 0.30 is 30 percent.  Yes!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Actually no, it isn't. 0.30 is 30% of 1. 
>>>>
>>>>> Idiot
>>>>
>>>> He's Canadiun.  Do they have humor in Canadia?  
>>>> Either that or Snit's Assburgers is rubbing off on him.
>> 
>>> I understand your sense of humour, except that the joke isn't funny and
>>> gives people the wrong impression. I stand by what I said despite the
>>> fact that Peter the Klöwn doesn't think I'm accurate.
>> 
>> Hi Snit!

> Hi Snit!

That's exactly how Snit responds.  Imagine that.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#318650

FromPeter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de>
Date2015-09-02 19:17 +0200
Message-ID<ms7arj$poh$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#318647
A.M wrote:

> On 2015-09-02 11:59 AM, owl wrote:
>> Peter K??hlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
>>> A.M wrote:
>> 
>>>> On 2015-09-02 10:52 AM, owl wrote:
>>>>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2015-09-01 9:35 PM, owl wrote:
>>>>>>> Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> It happened that I didn't catch all IE signatures so lot of that
>>>>>>>> went to others. Now corrected.
>>>>>>>> Better breakdown of OS'es too with introducing BlackBerry and
>>>>>>>> ChromeOS share.
>>>>>>>> Eliminated empty useragent strings from calculation.
>>>>>>>> Also top 20 of "others" displayed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                Linux    284309 0.30
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Linux at 30 percent!  Oo-rah!
>>>>>
>>>>>> Actually, it's less than 1%.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dude, in American math, 0.30 is 30 percent.  Yes!
>>>>
>>>> Actually no, it isn't. 0.30 is 30% of 1.
>> 
>>> Idiot
>> 
>> He's Canadiun.  Do they have humor in Canadia?
>> Either that or Snit's Assburgers is rubbing off on him.
> 
> I understand your sense of humour, except that the joke isn't funny and
> gives people the wrong impression. I stand by what I said despite the
> fact that Peter the Klöwn doesn't think I'm accurate.

You would not know "accuracy" if it bit your hairy stinking ass

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#318640

Fromchrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date2015-09-02 11:21 -0500
Message-ID<f68eua9u773gusmrjnc3oc3c57f7o354i4@4ax.com>
In reply to#318628
Peter Köhlmann wrote:

> slime wrote:
>> bowel wrote:
>>> slime wrote:
>>>> bowel wrote:
>>>>> Melzzzzz wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                Linux    284309 0.30
>>>>>
>>>>> Linux at 30 percent!  Oo-rah!
>>> 
>>>> Actually, it's less than 1%.
>>> 
>>> Dude, in American math, 0.30 is 30 percent.  Yes!
>> 
>> Actually no, it isn't. 0.30 is 30% of 1. 

*slaps head*

>Idiot

It's really amazing how often the trolling clowns simply double-down
on their idiocy and lies, after having them pointed-out.

-- 
"RedHat reverted back away from systemd."  -  some piece of shit,
lying shamelessly

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#318641

Fromronb <ronbNOSPAM@gmail.com>
Date2015-09-02 16:36 +0000
Message-ID<ms78it$ghm$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#318640
On Wed, 02 Sep 2015 11:21:09 -0500, chrisv wrote:

> It's really amazing how often the trolling clowns simply double-down on
> their idiocy and lies, after having them pointed-out.

People with serious psychological issues don't understand humor. If they 
could laugh at themselves they could be healed.

-- 
Zero tolerance for LYING WinDrones & iCultists

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#318630

Fromowl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date2015-09-02 15:56 +0000
Message-ID<asdvjg9.kcxvi@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to#318622
A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
> On 2015-09-02 10:52 AM, owl wrote:
>> A.M <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>>> On 2015-09-01 9:35 PM, owl wrote:
>>>> Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>>>>> It happened that I didn't catch all IE signatures so lot of that went
>>>>> to others. Now corrected.
>>>>> Better breakdown of OS'es too with introducing BlackBerry and ChromeOS
>>>>> share.
>>>>> Eliminated empty useragent strings from calculation.
>>>>> Also top 20 of "others" displayed.
>>>>
>>>>>                Linux    284309 0.30
>>>>
>>>> Linux at 30 percent!  Oo-rah!
>> 
>>> Actually, it's less than 1%.
>> 
>> Dude, in American math, 0.30 is 30 percent.  Yes!

> Actually no, it isn't. 0.30 is 30% of 1. The only way it represents 30%
> is it we've all come to the agreement that market share in general is
> represented by the number 1.

Actually it is.  America is number 1.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#318634

FromMelzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com>
Date2015-09-02 18:05 +0200
Message-ID<20150902180519.6ea566fe@maxa-pc>
In reply to#318630
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 15:56:02 +0000 (UTC)
owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:

> 
> America is number 1.
> 

America long live and prosper! ;)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#318728

FromDFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Date2015-09-02 20:46 -0400
Message-ID<ms856q$pq$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#318634
On 9/2/2015 12:05 PM, Melzzzzz wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 15:56:02 +0000 (UTC)
> owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>
>>
>> America is number 1.
>>
>
> America long live and prosper! ;)


"live long and prosper"

Hope you mean that.

We will.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#318773

From"A.M" <.m@nsn.s>
Date2015-09-03 09:08 -0400
Message-ID<ms9gk2$4sj$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#318728
On 2015-09-02 8:46 PM, DFS wrote:
> On 9/2/2015 12:05 PM, Melzzzzz wrote:
>> On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 15:56:02 +0000 (UTC)
>> owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> America is number 1.
>>>
>>
>> America long live and prosper! ;)
> 
> 
> "live long and prosper"
> 
> Hope you mean that.
> 
> We will.

Unfortunately, that's what a lot of the people who read my posts don't
understand. I love America and believe that it was an inspiration for
what every country should be. It provided freedom of expression, the
freedom to bear arms and therefore defend yourself and your family and
generally a free economy. It was an example to follow... and then the
country started to lean toward the left because the media insisted on
it. The citizens used to know that America would afford them every
opportunity imaginable if they were willing to work hard for it and the
culture was set up in such a way that no one got free assistance and
people really DID have to put their best foot forward. Education-wise,
the country used to be number one and the same was true for its freedom.
Because the people allowed for the state to become more of a nanny, the
citizens have become apathetic, unwilling to work hard at school,
unwilling to work hard at their jobs and unwilling to defend the
principles which once made the country so great. I HOPE that it changes,
but it won't if you allow the left to continue being a nanny.


-- 
A.M

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 6  [1] 2 3 4 5 6  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web