Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #331914 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-09 18:27 +0000 |
| Last post | 2015-11-09 17:45 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 178 — 21 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 18:27 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 19:47 +0100
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 18:59 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 16:45 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 20:24 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:54 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 11:50 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 16:42 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 22:26 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 22:32 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 22:43 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 20:45 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-10 22:38 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-11 06:57 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:56 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways awoolmeyer@gmail.com - 2015-11-09 16:46 -0800
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:57 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 15:36 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 22:50 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 16:04 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:59 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 17:41 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 23:04 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 16:19 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 23:25 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 16:42 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 00:17 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 17:25 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-10 00:41 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 17:48 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 03:20 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 21:50 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:09 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-10 09:14 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 14:19 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-09 23:33 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 19:00 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 19:00 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 03:28 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 21:49 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 05:06 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 22:12 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 06:01 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 06:07 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 09:33 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 09:33 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 22:02 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 17:43 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 01:09 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-10 20:14 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 18:14 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-11 09:10 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 10:51 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-12 12:26 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 12:01 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-10 10:42 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 10:33 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 05:16 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:12 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 22:06 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 22:13 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-10 17:31 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 23:28 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-10 19:32 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 23:22 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 15:25 -0800
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 20:21 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-10 18:25 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-11 00:44 +0100
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-10 18:50 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-11 09:04 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-11 15:49 +0100
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-11 10:37 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-11 17:46 +0100
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-11 12:21 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 10:13 -0800
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-11 14:03 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 11:20 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 11:01 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 10:50 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 10:52 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 10:36 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-12 23:06 +0100
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 15:28 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 23:56 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-10 19:02 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 00:59 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-10 21:02 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 02:49 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-10 21:57 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 03:24 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-12 12:28 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-11 07:33 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 23:29 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-10 18:32 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-10 23:27 +0100
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:29 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:27 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:12 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 12:36 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 22:24 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-10 17:36 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:30 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 17:46 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 01:22 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 18:50 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 02:26 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 10:34 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-11 13:52 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 10:26 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 20:03 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-12 11:32 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:29 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 18:10 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 22:07 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-10 17:59 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 23:42 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-10 18:59 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-10 19:47 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-11 00:52 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 20:42 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-10 20:05 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 01:27 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-11-11 02:56 +0100
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-11 13:55 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-11 09:03 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:31 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:11 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 22:26 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:33 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 18:41 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 16:51 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-09 20:52 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-10 08:29 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 14:34 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 14:56 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 15:01 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-10 10:40 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 17:16 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-10 13:00 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 19:05 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-11 06:14 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 12:00 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-11 09:10 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-11 11:34 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-11 12:18 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 10:23 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-12 12:23 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 10:21 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-11 13:57 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-11 12:04 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-11 13:12 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 10:16 -0800
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 20:31 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-11 15:26 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 20:30 +0000
The Jackass, aka Turdv, braying away. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-11 13:59 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-10 10:47 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-09 16:41 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 18:35 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 16:52 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 18:15 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 00:30 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 18:43 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 03:37 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-10 00:46 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 18:07 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 19:03 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:56 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-10 06:03 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 14:59 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-10 13:41 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 23:34 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 18:42 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 16:53 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-09 16:47 -0500
Fabian Russell spews more brain dead nonsense (Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways) "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 16:58 -0500
Re: Fabian Russell spews more brain dead nonsense (Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways) Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-09 17:45 -0500
Page 7 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 Next page →
| From | benj <nobody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 20:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n2x0y.33380$rM.31068@fx16.iad> |
| In reply to | #332473 |
On 11/10/2015 07:52 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> In sci.physics Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:59:20 -0500, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Sure you can concoct a 100 character script to perform the function but
>>> most people can go into foobar2000 and do the same exact thing from a menu.
>>>
>>
>> Need I remind you that the computer always was and always will be a tool
>> that require "tinkering."
>>
>> The very first desktop computers, ca. 1980, would boot up into
>> the BASIC interpreter. Absolutely nothing could be done until the
>> user entered some actual programming lines. The average user had to
>> be a "tinkerer" to be the least bit productive.
>>
>> Things would have stayed this way until Microsoft (and others) decided
>> to "empower" the average idiotic moron with a do-it-all desktop GUI.
>> As a result, even stupid grandma could do some substantial stuff without
>> understanding at all just what was happening.
>>
>> But, ironically, now that an entire generation has grown up digitally
>> illiterate, Microsoft (and others) are beginning to suffer from the
>> lack of talent which they have wrought. They lack programming expertise
>> within their corporate ranks. As a result, Bill Gates, Zuckerberg, and
>> others are now pushing for more basic programming education.
>>
>> Ha, ha! If they had left it with the BASIC interpreter, we'd have
>> a much better world.
>
> Yep, and every car should come with an engine rebuild manual and
> all the tools to do it as well as a manual choke, spark advance,
> and mixture control.
>
> Need I remind you that the automobile always was and always will be a tool
> that requires "tinkering."
Um, actually SOME of them still are!
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\_:/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
\/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 20:05 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n1u43s$lrj$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #332454 |
"Fabian Russell" <root@localhost.localdomain> wrote in message news:pan.2015.11.10.23.42.26@localhost.localdomain... > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:59:20 -0500, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: > > > Things would have stayed this way until Microsoft (and others) decided > to "empower" the average idiotic moron with a do-it-all desktop GUI. > As a result, even stupid grandma could do some substantial stuff without > understanding at all just what was happening. > LOL. How dare companies make computers usable by the masses. I'm sure that at one time there was someone who operated computers by entering octal codes with toggle switches. That ancient dinosaur probably ground his teeth whining that those "new users" are morons because they have a keyboard and a command line. They can only truly understand a computer by entering octal codes with toggle switches. Today you're that moron who's too stupid to realize that time and progress has made you nothing more than a whining dinosaur who still lives in the past. Clearly you're too stupid to learn and understand OO programing languages. -- "Coding in C#, or any other object oriented language, is *not* programming. It is only arranging predetermined classes like a child will arrange toy blocks." Some idiot named Fabian Russell 5 Aug 2015 <pan.2015.08.05.14.06.13@localhost.localdomain>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-11 01:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pan.2015.11.11.01.25.59@localhost.localdomain> |
| In reply to | #332475 |
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 20:05:12 -0500, Ezekiel wrote: > > understand OO programing languages. > OO was designed for thoughtless morons like you. (And my expertise in OO is light years beyond anything you could ever attain.)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-11 02:56 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <20151111025610.66587a49@maxa-pc> |
| In reply to | #332484 |
On 11 Nov 2015 01:27:38 GMT Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> wrote: > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 20:05:12 -0500, Ezekiel wrote: > > > > > understand OO programing languages. > > > > OO was designed for thoughtless morons like you. OO was design after programming techniques that existed already. It just needed to circle what people already done.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-11 13:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4YydnfS02a-mNt7LnZ2dnUU7-WudnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #332484 |
On 11/10/15 18:27, Fabian Russell wrote: > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 20:05:12 -0500, Ezekiel wrote: > >> >> understand OO programing languages. >> > > OO was designed for thoughtless morons like you. > > (And my expertise in OO is light years beyond anything > you could ever attain.) > Guffaw!!! For you it Oozes Out of your brain. -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-11 09:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n1vhns$q8o$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #332454 |
On 2015-11-10 6:42 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:59:20 -0500, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: > >> >> Sure you can concoct a 100 character script to perform the function but >> most people can go into foobar2000 and do the same exact thing from a menu. >> > > Need I remind you that the computer always was and always will be a tool > that require "tinkering." > > The very first desktop computers, ca. 1980, would boot up into > the BASIC interpreter. Absolutely nothing could be done until the > user entered some actual programming lines. The average user had to > be a "tinkerer" to be the least bit productive. Most of those machines allowed a person to insert some sort of cartridge. These cartridges were usually games mind you, but it allowed the computer to be useful without requiring programming. > Things would have stayed this way until Microsoft (and others) decided > to "empower" the average idiotic moron with a do-it-all desktop GUI. > As a result, even stupid grandma could do some substantial stuff without > understanding at all just what was happening. And this is a bad thing? I don't see how not being forced to produce your own spreadsheet program is worse than the way it was before. > But, ironically, now that an entire generation has grown up digitally > illiterate, Microsoft (and others) are beginning to suffer from the > lack of talent which they have wrought. They lack programming expertise > within their corporate ranks. As a result, Bill Gates, Zuckerberg, and > others are now pushing for more basic programming education. As a social service, not because they're lacking talent. The fact that fewer people program, as you suggest, simply means that those who do are more in demand and therefore benefit from higher salaries. It's one of the most basic rules of supply and demand. > Ha, ha! If they had left it with the BASIC interpreter, we'd have > a much better world. Yep, programmers would be a dime a dozen and would compete for a low-paying job rather than the opposite. -- Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 16:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <Feidnaq65-Sq49_LnZ2dnUU7-WWdnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #332413 |
On 11/10/15 15:07, Fabian Russell wrote: > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:12:03 -0700, GreyCloud wrote: > >> >> All geek toys and tinkering. >> > > Just put a million-line GUI over it and you've got Photoshop. > > That's mega-tinkering. > > Guffaw!!! No, using Adobe makes it so much easier and far more intuitive. -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 12:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <IL6dnSBMe4z13N_LnZ2dnUU7-U2dnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #332175 |
On 11/09/15 20:28, Fabian Russell wrote: > On Mon, 09 Nov 2015 19:00:47 -0700, GreyCloud wrote: > >>> >>> I prefer to deal more directly with the machine. >>> >> What are you using? An old Altair? >> > > In Linux, and analogously in other OS's, all that bloated desktop > crap serves only one purpose, and that is to call the little itty > bitty exec() function, which in turn invokes the x86_64 Application > Binary Interface > > The machine is always there in spite of being obscured by millions > of lines of desktop crud. > > A desktop is not necessary. I use a simple window manager and > virtual consoles. I have no bloat and superb control. > A desktop is necessary if you doing graphics... like say engineering work. Like tell it to Ford or the other auto makers. You could also use CP/M if you like. -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 22:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pan.2015.11.10.22.26.48@localhost.localdomain> |
| In reply to | #332346 |
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:11:33 -0700, GreyCloud wrote: >> > A desktop is necessary if you doing graphics... > Not true. Only a window manager is necessary. On Linux, there are dozens available. On MS Windows ... groan ... only one.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 16:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <FeidnaW65-Qt49_LnZ2dnUU7-WWdnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #332422 |
On 11/10/15 15:26, Fabian Russell wrote: > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:11:33 -0700, GreyCloud wrote: > >>> >> A desktop is necessary if you doing graphics... >> > > Not true. Only a window manager is necessary. > > On Linux, there are dozens available. On MS Windows ... groan ... > only one. > Still trolling away, I see. And you only need one window manager on Windows. On Solaris I have two window managers, but both can do graphics. Design programs use nice graphical tools to get the job done. Doing it your way would get you fired from a corporation that wants it done yesterday. -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-09 18:41 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n1raqu$tuq$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #332061 |
On 2015-11-09 6:04 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: > On Mon, 09 Nov 2015 17:41:40 -0500, Slimer wrote: > >> >> >> at >> least it doesn't require configuration once it is. With Linux, this is >> usually necessary for newly-installed programs. >> > > You bet! > > Linux does not try to do everything for the user. Linux does not automatically > assume what is best for the user. Linux does not hold the user's hand or wipe > the user's ass. > > Linux allows the user to run his own game, and that requires CONFIGURATION. The problem is that certain programs are useless unless you know exactly how to configure them. For professionals, this is quite simple but for most users it is cumbersome. Handbrake is actually a perfect example of an excellent program which is completely useless unless you know exactly what you're doing. >> Well, it just makes sense that Microsoft would cater to the companies >> which provide the operating system with software that allows it to stand >> out from something that has no exclusive software like Linux. > > There used to be an honor system, but Microsoft is not an honorable company. It has nothing to do with Microsoft and everything to do with human nature. People, in general, always feel entitled and will pirate things even if they can afford to buy them. They also won't stop at pirating the things that they need and will copy software which is of no use to them and share it. I don't blame Microsoft and third-parties for not trusting the user. >> Good software deserves that the developer get compensated. Since Linux >> developers aren't, we know what kind of quality to expect from free >> software. > > Yes, we know that the quality of open source is always BETTER. Wow, that is incredible delusion. LibreOffice vs. Microsoft Office is a perfect example of how open-source fails. Amarok vs. MediaMonkey is another. > Open source does not need to conform to the pressures exerted by > marketing "experts" that will often dictate software functionality > and direct it to the level of the "lowest common denominator." > > Open source source need not rely on continued profit and so can > dispense with the gimmicks and other deceptions that often infiltrate > commercial software to boost sales. > > Open source CAN be better. Commercial software often CAN NOT. We both know that's not true. Catering to the lowest common denominator as you say ensures that everyone will be able to use the software. It therefore becomes accessible and intuitive but also interesting to the advanced user as the features he is looking for are included as well though inside an "advanced" menu in most cases. This approach sells and allows a programmer or his employer to make money whereas the Linux developer's "everything must be needlessly complicated" approach ensures that free software will continue to be ignored. -- Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-09 16:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D2667FA3.6357D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #332067 |
On 11/9/15, 4:41 PM, in article n1raqu$tuq$1@dont-email.me, "Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: ... >> Linux does not try to do everything for the user. Linux does not >> automatically assume what is best for the user. Linux does not hold the >> user's hand or wipe the user's ass. >> >> Linux allows the user to run his own game, and that requires CONFIGURATION. >> > The problem is that certain programs are useless unless you know exactly how > to configure them. For professionals, this is quite simple but for most users > it is cumbersome. Handbrake is actually a perfect example of an excellent > program which is completely useless unless you know exactly what you're doing. LOL! Great example. I pointed someone to it recently so they could use some footage for a personal video... they gave up and used their phone to record the video playing on their TV. ... >> Yes, we know that the quality of open source is always BETTER. > > Wow, that is incredible delusion. LibreOffice vs. Microsoft Office is a > perfect example of how open-source fails. Amarok vs. MediaMonkey is another. There are some excellent open source programs - but the idea they are "always BETTER" is just absurd. >> Open source does not need to conform to the pressures exerted by >> marketing "experts" that will often dictate software functionality >> and direct it to the level of the "lowest common denominator." >> >> Open source source need not rely on continued profit and so can >> dispense with the gimmicks and other deceptions that often infiltrate >> commercial software to boost sales. >> >> Open source CAN be better. Commercial software often CAN NOT. > > We both know that's not true. Catering to the lowest common denominator > as you say ensures that everyone will be able to use the software. It > therefore becomes accessible and intuitive but also interesting to the > advanced user as the features he is looking for are included as well > though inside an "advanced" menu in most cases. This approach sells and > allows a programmer or his employer to make money whereas the Linux > developer's "everything must be needlessly complicated" approach ensures > that free software will continue to be ignored. Desktop Linux is so great it is easy to get, easy to install, has been marketed by Dell and HP and Walmart and others, and is STILL at less than 2% usage. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-09 20:52 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <slrnn42n03.a86.jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
| In reply to | #332061 |
On 2015-11-09, Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Nov 2015 17:41:40 -0500, Slimer wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> at
>> least it doesn't require configuration once it is. With Linux, this is
>> usually necessary for newly-installed programs.
>>
That's stupid. Any non-trivial application is going to require some
configuration just to allow the end user to set up the options they want.
You are either exposing this to the end user or your program is just
crippled.
Although Unix design principles call for useful defaults.
>
> You bet!
>
> Linux does not try to do everything for the user. Linux does not automatically
> assume what is best for the user. Linux does not hold the user's hand or wipe
> the user's ass.
>
> Linux allows the user to run his own game, and that requires CONFIGURATION.
[deletia]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 08:29 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <38v34bhlohvlr9dmahvoqush58ftis5aoe@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #332171 |
>> slime wrote: >>> >>> at least it doesn't require configuration once it is. With Linux, this >>> is usually necessary for newly-installed programs. Poor "Slimer" seems to want some "committee" to decide on the "best" configuration, for EVERYONE, and then lock it down. We don't need all that choice. It just confuses people! Consistency is more important than flexibility. Forcing people of all skill levels to use a single compromise configuration does _not_ result in loss of productivity! Sheesh. What a dipshit. -- "Attaching the Linux name to a product essentially kills that product. That's why Google refuses to admit Linux is a part of its systems." - "Slimer", lying shamelessly
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 14:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <daedjlFd88pU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #332263 |
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 08:29:02 -0600, chrisv wrote: >>> slime wrote: >>>> >>>> at least it doesn't require configuration once it is. With Linux, >>>> this is usually necessary for newly-installed programs. > > Poor "Slimer" seems to want some "committee" to decide on the "best" > configuration, for EVERYONE, and then lock it down. > > We don't need all that choice. It just confuses people! Consistency is > more important than flexibility. Forcing people of all skill levels to > use a single compromise configuration does _not_ result in loss of > productivity! > > Sheesh. What a dipshit. Every minute spent configuring the OS is a minute of productivity lost unless the configuring of the OS is the only job at hand. -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 14:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pan.2015.11.10.14.56.18@localhost.localdomain> |
| In reply to | #332266 |
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:34:29 +0000, Lloyd Parsons wrote: > > Every minute spent configuring the OS is a minute of productivity lost > unless the configuring of the OS is the only job at hand. > Spoken like a true brain-dead, sub-idiotic MBA. Is it any wonder that the Chinese will soon be eating our lunch? The computer is obviously not the proper choice for a dumb-fuck like you. You need to go back to adding machines and typewriters. Those antiquated machines are still available and they can still do the job. But best of all, such antiquated technology would allow you to better grasp the totality as they would not boggle your pathetic little mind.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 15:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <daef66Fd88pU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #332269 |
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:56:13 +0000, Fabian Russell wrote: > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:34:29 +0000, Lloyd Parsons wrote: > > >> Every minute spent configuring the OS is a minute of productivity lost >> unless the configuring of the OS is the only job at hand. >> >> > Spoken like a true brain-dead, sub-idiotic MBA. Is it any wonder that > the Chinese will soon be eating our lunch? > Right, because the Chinese have found that fucking with the OS is so productive. What a fucking moron you show yourself to be! > The computer is obviously not the proper choice for a dumb-fuck like > you. You need to go back to adding machines and typewriters. Those > antiquated machines are still available and they can still do the job. > But best of all, such antiquated technology would allow you to better > grasp the totality as they would not boggle your pathetic little mind. I have been using computers at many levels for many years. Probably was using and programming them when you weren't even a twinkle in your daddy's eye. -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 10:40 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <slrnn447fb.eh.jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
| In reply to | #332269 |
On 2015-11-10, Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:34:29 +0000, Lloyd Parsons wrote:
>
>>
>> Every minute spent configuring the OS is a minute of productivity lost
>> unless the configuring of the OS is the only job at hand.
>>
So that's what? X minutes for the duration of usage?
That's hardly a great burden to productivity.
Your argument only makes sense to a mathematically illiterate audience.
>
> Spoken like a true brain-dead, sub-idiotic MBA. Is it any wonder
> that the Chinese will soon be eating our lunch?
>
> The computer is obviously not the proper choice for a dumb-fuck
> like you. You need to go back to adding machines and typewriters.
> Those antiquated machines are still available and they can still
> do the job. But best of all, such antiquated technology would allow
> you to better grasp the totality as they would not boggle your pathetic
> little mind.
>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 17:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <daen30Ffu64U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #332314 |
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:40:11 -0600, JEDIDIAH wrote: > On 2015-11-10, Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> wrote: >> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:34:29 +0000, Lloyd Parsons wrote: >> >> >>> Every minute spent configuring the OS is a minute of productivity lost >>> unless the configuring of the OS is the only job at hand. >>> >>> > So that's what? X minutes for the duration of usage? > > That's hardly a great burden to productivity. > > Your argument only makes sense to a mathematically illiterate > audience. > Except I've never seen anyone with Linux on the desktop that isn't fiddling with the OS off and on and accumulating some significant amount of time doing it. -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 13:00 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <kje44bdc2etgrt7h64aet20iiih5mevqgq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #332314 |
JEDIDIAH wrote: >> Lying Lloyd Parsons wrote: >>> >>> Every minute spent configuring the OS is a minute of productivity lost >>> unless the configuring of the OS is the only job at hand. Offset by increased productivity in the future, you fscking moron. Do you consider "training" just "productivity lost", too? Every minute you spend braying like a jackass is a minute of respectability lost, "Lloyd". > So that's what? X minutes for the duration of usage? > > That's hardly a great burden to productivity. > > Your argument only makes sense to a mathematically illiterate audience. I'm reminded of being attacked for my choice of calculator. Its RPN interface was different from the (most popular, therefore "best") interface of most calculators, you see. Some of these imbeciles thought it was just a *terrible* that it might take a couple days to get used-to what I personally considered a *much* more efficient tool, that would be heavily used for *years*. -- "Your claim is disproven by your repeated posts that were highly critical about the lack of USB on the iPad." - lying asshole "-hh"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web